Comments by "Julia P." (@juliap.5375) on "Без Visa и Mastercard: как иностранцы в России обходят свои же санкции" video.

  1. 42
  2. 28
  3. 26
  4.  @erikstenviken2652  1. Even is someone do something illegal, it not means you also can violate law. Good advice: never try it in court as own defense line :D 2. You are wrong. Everything is legal: — in UA happened coup (funny fact: de jure it means that country gone and non exist anymore, it need to redeclare self, resign all agreements with whole world). — as result, some territories not recognized violation of constitution and proclaimed own independence. Do you know how UA itself arrived 30 years ago? You can read in their declaration of independence (close to original): “due to coup in capital [Moscow, USSR], for our safety, we declare independence…". Funny fact: 30 years ago it was illegal, illegal by internal laws of USSR, according to UN and according to Helsinki act from 1975 where was declared that borders in Europe can’t be changed (yep, reunion of Germany also violate Helsinki act). Okey, it is past.. but nowadays, according to court of UN and new law which West forced whole world to accept 20 years ago, now "any territory have right for self determination and independence without asking permission or opinion of rest parts of own ex-country". So, arrived new countries. They were attacked by UA and this is already illegal and crime. This countries asked Russia for help and it according to 51 paragraph of UN (right for self/collective defense) came on help. So, it is not Russia started anything, but UA. Russia in this situation, de jure, is defender who protected victims. Additionally: — existed so-called "Minsk agreement" which was confirmed by UN as obligatory for UA (issued special resolution). UA publicly rejected agreement. Moreover, Merkel and Hollande also said, that both used this agreement only to trick everyone, gain time and give weapons to UA (so, they prepared UA as future aggressor, it is international crime). This is direction violation and put both countries in state of international criminals (violation of obligatory resolution and giving weapons). While Russia as one of guaranteer of this agreement have right to use force. — when coup only started, de jure president of UA officially asked Russian for military help. De jure, this request still is actual and legal. — UA officially declared WW2 criminals, prohibited organizations, as own state heroes. This is violation of Nurnberg process, put country in illegal criminal status (funny fact: this is correct for several EU countries also, who did the same). And obligatory of anyone to stop such state. So, as you see, there are 4 juridical reason by which Russia did everything right and according to law. While West (majority, not all) — did whole bunch of violations. Actually looks like they fully canceled any laws for self, so lot they violated already. And that’s why Russia declared that will be new Nurnberg process 2.0 (actually process already going for over year, dozens people already got life sentences).
    26
  5. 13
  6. 9
  7. 7
  8. 4
  9. 1
  10. 1