Comments by "Dreamy Cheshire" (@DreamyCheshire-up9rf) on "Binkov's Battlegrounds" channel.

  1. ​ @tacituskilgore80  I disagreed with you. Ukraine had been lied to about membership into EU and NATO with a ton of free money. Not only had NATO/EU failed to destroy Russia economy with their economic sanctions onslaught, their economies been hurted by Russia counter-sanctions backlash. Russia would not remain isolated from the world after the war, since its a member of BRICS, OPEC+, CIS and is friendly with African Union, ASEAN and Latin/South America. Its Ukraine which would lose in the long term.
    6
  2. You heard that Zelensky ? Now get out of Ukraine to beg for more money ! Over.....
    5
  3. How to send Ukraine more anti-air missiles when your taxes are used to repay USA debts ?
    5
  4. I believed its an act of terrorism by USA/Ukraine to blow up the dam from the inside, as it would deprive water to Crimea and to Russian held nuclear power plant. Why not Russia ? You would ask. Because if Russia wanted to flood Kherson region, it just needed to open the dam flood gates, no need to blow it up. Also, long time no news from the wonder weapon of M777 in Ukraine. What happens ? All destroy ?
    5
  5. 10/10/23 ( Tuesday ) 4.36 pm. Given the "friend turned enemy" status of Ukraine and Poland. Perhaps some Polish HIMARS might divert to Ukraine border. Just in case Ukraine S300 missile somehow make another U-turn to bomb Poland like in 2022, Poland might return 10 times the "favour".
    5
  6. I thought Poland had already been steamrolled twice for the past 200 years ?
    5
  7. The expensive fuel would come from the US and Middle East.
    4
  8. To trap the Ukrainians in Kursk while the Russians attack the eastern frontline.
    4
  9. Putin would make sure a clause stating non-NATO membership for Ukraine be included during the peace negotiations.
    3
  10. Zelensky and Putin had peace negotiations with Turkey as mediator in 2022, but was disrupted by USA. Without USA approval, there is no peace, only war. USA would fight Russia till the last abled Ukrainian.
    3
  11. Or perhaps Poland realized that NATO and USA might not send formal, professional soldiers to fight alongside with it when the time comes. As Poland witnessed USA and UK dishonoured their "rock solid" guarantee security agreements signed with Ukraine.
    3
  12. 9/11 conspiracy ? So long ago. After Crimea bridge bombing and Germany gas pipelines bombing, of course its an inside screwjob by USA/Ukraine.
    3
  13.  @prpr8904  He said the "promises" of politicians, not their age.
    3
  14. May not be since Russia only wanted the pro-Russian territories, which it already largely controlled.
    3
  15. Russian military might be a laughing stock of Europe, but no European country dared to officially engaged the Russian military in Ukraine in support of Zelensky. Not even a No Fly Zone over Ukraine. Europe laughed at Russia. Likewise, Russia laughed at Europe. NATO military had been exaggerated.
    3
  16. By your logic, the dam was not destroyed by Russia. Russia just needed to open the dam flood gates to flood Kherson, no need to blow it up.
    3
  17. Just like USA.
    2
  18. You're mistaken. Russia didn't push NATO to its border, NATO make its grand expansion to absorb former Warsaw Pact members during the failed Democratic Russia under Gorbachev and Yeltsin. You did not see great things for Russia in the coming years ? Once the Arctic sea ice dissolve substantially, the long coastal sea line of Russia would be a busy sea lane between Europe and North East Asia.
    2
  19. Same with USA.
    2
  20.  @ZoragRingael  The people died were civilians, not soldiers. Russia could have waited till Ukraine launched their counter offensive from Kherson before opening the flood gates, or blew up the dam. Its illogical to do so prematurely. Thus, a higher probability that its an act of terrorism from USA/Ukraine.
    2
  21.  @newwonderer  Had you ever thought that Russia just needed to open the flood gates, to flood Ukraine soldiers in the midst of attacking from Kherson ? No need to blow the dam to flood civilians.
    2
  22.  @chrissmith7669  This time, USA would have problems running up debts in the name of fighting for freedom, since many rich countries refused to lend money to it and are selling its I.O.U.
    2
  23. Ukrainian woman soldiers have also moved to the frontline from the back.
    2
  24.  @maryanchabursky9148  Not so. Minors and elders have already engaged in the war. Thus the "average" age of 40+.
    2
  25.  @ZoragRingael  Since Russia controlled the dam, why destroyed it ? It just needed to open the dam flood gates to flood Kherson. Thus, most likely its an act of terrorism from USA/Ukraine.
    2
  26. Also remember how stupid they were, for fighting a proxy war on behalf of USA against Russia.
    2
  27.  @TheFrenchBaguettes  For the right of self rule ? You were saying like the whole of Ukraine is under Russia occupation which is not. Your reasoning is not valid.
    2
  28.  @rimanahbvee  When the Ukrainians elected a president that is too pro-USA, listened to its instigation and provoked Russia into invasion. Sure, proxy war.
    2
  29.  @Stiweniasty  I should ask you which parellel universe are you living. It was once over the news last year that the "bombardment" resulted in Polish deaths. Biden had to cut short of his meeting in Indonesia.
    2
  30. 13/2/24 ( Tuesday ) 5.16 pm. Incorrect title. It should be " Could Zelensky launch another grand counter-offensive in 2024 ?"
    2
  31.  @trygveblacktiger597  You're mistaken to think NATO is a defensive alliance after it bombed Serbia intensively for 78 days until it surrendered. A Chinese embassy was also been bombed, killing 2 or 3 staffs. NATO is an offensive organisation after it set up No Fly Zone over Libya and bombed Tripoli. Libya had never attacked NATO to deserve this treatment. If you noticed international news, you would have known that Russia didn't use its full force against Ukraine. During 2022/3, Russia still conduct military exercises with Iran, South Africa, Belarus and China. It even launched a rocket to the moon that ended in failure. With its 1 million regulars still remain intact, NATO victorious conventional war against Russia is not guaranteed. Thus it dared not save the Ukrainians from the Russians.
    2
  32.  @trygveblacktiger597 For your essay, NATO had no courage to save Ukraine from Russia. That said a lot about their own conventional military capabilities.
    2
  33. Perhaps you forgot that Russians had 10 years of horrible experiences with Democracy, during Gorbachev and Yeltsin era which the collective West ignored Russians plight. Democracy failed Russia.
    2
  34. I had different opinion than yours. Though Russia lost a lot more men and military than USA. It had actual control over the 4 regions and Crimea, while USA fled from Vietnam and especially, Afghanistan. So shameful. Economically, the collective West failed to destroy Russia economy. Although I don't believe Russia economy is currently No. 1 in Europe, I still think that its still World's No. 11.
    2
  35.  @lancehamlett3054  You didn't need to whitewash USA military failure in Vietnam and Afghanistan. Fleeing is fleeing. There were many TV shots/news about their defeats to be seen around the world, especially Afghanistan. From US military abandoning its biggest base without its allies knowing about it, to relying on Taliban terrorists to maintain law and order in Kabul ( how ironic ), while US soldiers flew off in their planes with Afghans dropping from the sky. USA invaded Taliban Afghanistan in the name of freedom, democracy, human rights and justice after 911. Its allies trusted USA and also stationed troops for the occupation. In the end, its allies were betrayed by USA. The Afghans were abandoned back to their Taliban overlords. Russia was a free country in the 1990's after Gorbachev abandoned Communism and adopted Democracy. But the collective West ignored the plea for help from the newly democratic Russia. In the end, the rise of Tzar Putin with Russians who experienced the 1990's chaos and hardships, no longer trusted democracy.
    2
  36.  @fakecubed  Regarding about Global Hawks, I was replying to the original comment implying that although USA technology is superior to Russia ( not far superior ), its planes could still be shot down by 3rd world country. Also, Patriot A/A might intercept hypersonic missile but it had been shown that its battery unit been blew up Russia hypersonic missile. USA should not be too over confident in their weapon systems.
    2
  37. As you said, 60 years ago.........
    2
  38. I doubt Ukraine would lose the war if it runs out of AA missiles but USA would not be able to fund Ukraine as it is facing bankruptcy in June or July 2023.
    1
  39.  @enricogattone432  The 31.5 trillion of debts are not GOP generated debts and it must be repaid, at least the interest. Unlike in 2008, China would not lend money to USA since it designated China as its arch-enemy. Also, many countries are selling USA I.O.U. making USA difficult to borrow money from international markets. It makes Yellen very nervous and panicky. Four banks had already collapsed in three months, making USA not 100% solvent, at least to international investors. Aid to Ukraine would be affected as it involved present money for future spending.
    1
  40. For your essay, I still remembered a Ukraine's S300 missile somehow made a U-turn to bomb Poland in 2022.
    1
  41. You are not right. The video assumed rightly that Russia will continue to have an inflow of weapons, domestically or oversea. A working economy, working refineries etc.
    1
  42. You stole the lines from US war merchants.
    1
  43. I agreed with you. If Russia wanted to flood Kherson, just open the dam flood gates.
    1
  44.  @ZoragRingael  To flood the attacking Ukrainian soldiers from Kherson, I don't think most of the rest of the world would blame Russia for that. Russia could accuse Ukraine if it would to attack the dam before or after the offensive. So, no need to blow it up prematurely. Thus, a higher probability is combined USA/Ukraine act of terrorism.
    1
  45. Not so, the credits belonged to Kamala, vice-president of USA for successfully instigated Zelensky to cross Putin's red line. The rest was history.
    1
  46. Don't underestimate Russia and China, especially China. Their Beidou positional system is better than GPS, their Tiangong space station would be the only one in space after 2031, their 5G tech is currently the leader. Like USA, China had also reached the moon and Mars.
    1
  47. USA has also reminded the world, it needs to borrow crap money from China to avoid bankruptcy.
    1
  48. Russia still spending "rainy day" fund.
    1
  49. You're too pessimistic. Though Russia would still be weakened after it won the war, it would not go broke after Biden failed to turn Rubles into waste paper. Nor would it be isolated as Russia is a member of BRICS+, CIS, OPEC+ and are friendly with African Union, ASEAN and Latin/South America.
    1
  50. LOL. I never realised that.
    1
  51. Zelensky had been begging NATO for a No Fly Zone at the start of the war, but NATO was too afraid to implement it in Ukraine.
    1
  52. ​ @B.D.E.  Those Republicans that you knew of failed to stop MAGA Trump from winning.
    1
  53.  @leadleghighkick104  Military, of course. Unless the next Ukraine president still doesn't learn from the mistakes of Zelensky and 2014 annexation of Crimea.
    1
  54.  @leadleghighkick104  You might be right if USA and NATO in Europe have the courage to military oppose Russia, which they still lack. Push come to shove, Russia readily dared to fight with their shovels, while USA and NATO literally watched Ukraine fought till the last abled young man. Shame on them ! Contrary to your assessment, because of Russo-Ukraine war, Russia conventional military production had recovered more to Soviet era. Thanks to the war, Russia had upgraded their conventional weapons.
    1
  55. But the numbers are not enough since Ukraine is the attacking side.
    1
  56.  @fl1mes  Exactly. Ukraine doesn't have the troops for large scale attacks in 2024.
    1
  57. Except that he would be countered by the "East German" party.
    1
  58. No wonder USA sent Patriots to Ukraine. It does not want Ukraine missiles to shoot backward to bomb Poland again.
    1
  59. You meant Ukraine would be a failed state in future after the war ?
    1
  60.  @enricogattone432  The biggest world economy is suffering from financial difficulties and soon to be political turmoils. It might not have the will and money to save war torn Ukraine, from being a possible failed state after the war.
    1
  61.  @enricogattone432  A stable and functional Ukraine is good for Europe, but thanks to USA effort to deindustrialize Germany, sold LNG to France that its people have to pay, four times more expensive than before the Russo-Ukraine war and other economic factors on the continent, Europe might not be in the position to help Ukraine either.
    1
  62. ​ user-ef6mv6ew9b  What ? 10.000.000 ? That meant only 10 troops at the front. You were such a joker.
    1
  63. Russia hypersonic missiles had been used against Ukraine in 2022.
    1
  64. Just like Ukraine is fighting for the world as Zelensky proclaimed.
    1
  65. At least Russia could count on the population from Crimea and the 4 regions to mitigate some loses. Ukraine had it much worse. Not only did it lose the population from Crimea and the 4 regions, 10 millions of its population are scattered across Europe as refugees. The minors and seniors that are stuck in Ukraine are waiting to be canon folders.
    1
  66. A conversation of Ukrainians speaking in Russian blowing up the dam ?
    1
  67.  @alexanderv4609  I think from Criptic211 point of view, is that age 20+ of Ukrainian soldiers have mostly been wiped out from the war. Since the young generation is no longer readily available for the war, the more elderly 40+ have to fill the gap.
    1
  68. Because Belarus got tactical nukes ?
    1
  69. That means Ukraine blew it up.
    1
  70. LOL. "Zero dollar shopping" from Zelensky and friends. LOL.
    1
  71. But where could the smart Russian people go, that would pay a ransom for their talents ? The poor West is currently not friendly to smart Russians.
    1
  72. ​ @lettucesalad3560 Russia learned Soviet Union lesson. Thus, it only holding on to pro-Russian territories. Unless Ukraine military collapse.....
    1
  73. ​ @ComradeHellas  Unfortunately, those young men who fought back in 2022 were died. Minors and elders filled the manpower gap in 2023. Unwilling adults and women would be filling the gap in 2024. If the attrition war drag to 2025, what would Ukraine military be like?
    1
  74. ​ @zaplakailol  Russia annexed Crimea but Zelensky didn't learn the hard lesson that Putin was serious about war, even after multiple threats and warnings from Putin Russia and Biden USA. Zelensky was to blame for putting Ukraine into a war which could be avoided. Now, Ukraine young, old and even women were dying for his stupidity.
    1
  75. LOL. More like USA.
    1
  76. RBS-70 replaced Rapier, so its anti-air but not effective against missiles barrage. Russia could also use cheap explosive drones to expend those missiles before sending in their fighter-bombers, if Russia chose to.
    1
  77.  @DangGoodLuis  They, the Ukrainians elected Zelensky into office whom he represented Ukraine to provoke Russia into war. Russia didn't invade Ukraine because of Zelensky. Russia invaded Ukraine because Zelensky accepted Kamala, vice-president of USA invitation to join NATO and to deploy US nuclear missiles aiming at Moscow, ignoring threats of war from Russia, even warnings from USA officials.
    1
  78.  @rimanahbvee  The Western world already acknowledged that Ukraine is fighting a proxy war against Russia. So yeah, when someone invades you because you're dumb enough to listen to another person instigation and crossed that someone's red line, who already threatened you with invasion, you're fighting on that instigator behalf.
    1
  79.  @DangGoodLuis  As you said, Putin didn't invade Ukraine because of Zelensky. Its Zelensky naivety, ignorance and arrogance actions that led to the tragedy for the Ukrainians.
    1
  80.  @shamargentle5801  If the joining of an alliance would mean War, its best for the independent country to be neutral.
    1
  81.  @shamargentle5801  You forgot that the rule of the jungle apply on the international affairs. Same with USA, same with China and same with Russia.
    1
  82.  @shamargentle5801  It's happening now not only in Europe but also in Middle East as well. Rules of the Jungle prevail.
    1
  83.  @shamargentle5801  Really ? Tell that to Israel and USA.
    1
  84. NATO and the western media had been circulating the world that Russia was running out of weapons, ammo, missiles.....every military things since 2022. In 2023, Russia still bombing Ukraine whenever it feels like it. How to get more of everything, including cash from its main sponsor USA when it is facing bankruptcy in June or July 2023 ?
    1
  85. ​ @ezezcompany  Maybe because USA got a few bases in Philippines ?
    1
  86. We were told that the NATO "wonder" and "game changer" weaponries were far superior than Russia.....
    1
  87. Same with Ukraine.
    1
  88. Have you considered it might be an act of terrorism from USA ?
    1
  89. By now, you should have known that USA forbid Ukraine to attack Russia proper.
    1
  90. EU could accept Ukraine after Ukraine get rid of corruption and dictatorship. NATO could accept Ukraine after Ukraine repay all its debts with interests to NATO.
    1
  91. Didn't Putin refuse peacekeepers from NATO ?
    1
  92. You forgot USA civil war between Democrats and Republicans.
    1
  93.  @macko1416  Have you considered its an act of terrorism from USA/Ukraine that blew up the dam from the inside ?
    1
  94. The meat grinder at Bakhmut is switching off in a few days, so we would see how the next bombings would go.
    1
  95.  @GegeDxD  I don't think @A A was thinking about democracy. Its more about social and economy of Ukraine.
    1
  96. With USA government in danger of shutdown in Nov 2023. I doubted Ukraine would get much economic/military aids in 2024. Freedom fighters ? Taliban was once called that by USA which later renamed them.
    1
  97. Vice-president Kamala of USA had to be blamed for formally welcoming Ukraine to join NATO, and to deploy nuclear missiles which eventually led to war.
    1
  98. Name calling ? No counter arguments ? You're so pathetic.
    1
  99.  @ENGRAINING  You said Ukraine managed to stop 90% of Russian strategic goals ? Yet, Ukraine couldn't join NATO ( Russia main goal ). Ukraine couldn't stop Russia from bombing its electricity power stations, substations etc for the 2023 cold winter. Ukraine couldn't export grains through Black Sea. Ukraine couldn't retake the 4 regions and Crimea after 5 -6 months of Summer counter-offensive. The 10% of Russian strategic goals that matters were achieved by Russia.
    1
  100.  @ENGRAINING  In your last paragraph, you said that Putin had given the Ukrainians 8 years of combat experience against Russian arms, armour and tactics. Even so, the Ukrainians failed in their summer counter-offensive to retake the 4 regions and Crimea. What experience had the Ukrainians gained in Donbass ? Drinking experience ?
    1
  101.  @ENGRAINING  For your last paragraph, you wanted Russia to bombard Kiev like Nazi Israel bombed Gaza Strip ? I doubt Putin is as genocidal as Netanyahu.
    1
  102. ​ @sergarlantyrell7847  You forgot to take into account the leaders and the public supports at that time. Soviet Union vs Afghanistan ( Traitor Gorbachev vs Zealous Taliban commanders ). USA vs Vietnam ( US public scared to death to take part in the fighting against Vietcong ).
    1
  103. You forgot that F117 stealth plane and Global Hawks drone of superior tech USA were once shot down by 3rd world countries.
    1
  104. Yeah. F117 not flying anymore internationally by far superior tech USA. As for Global Hawks drone, not sure.
    1
  105. With 10 million Ukrainian refugees in Europe, 200,000 deserters, over half a million casualties, Zelensky refusal to conscript 18 year old and below.....Ukraine is running out of manpower for war.
    1
  106.  @DmINx9  You mistaken. Poland gained independence after WW1 ended in 1918, which means that it had at least 20 years to build its military.
    1
  107.  @DmINx9  I understood that you meant the Polish economy was really bad due to German and Soviet embargos for a few years prior to invasion by Hitler and Stalin.
    1
  108.  @DmINx9  The purpose is to show I understood your comment but you don't understand mine.
    1
  109. Except its too hyper expensive even for USA.
    1
  110. I agreed with you that its a loss-loss demographic situations for both Russia and Ukraine. But at least, the population from Crimea and the 4 regions could mitigate some Russia losses. As for Ukraine, its much worse since half of its population are either refugees or under Russian controlled territories or waiting to be canon folders.
    1
  111.  @jeffg3221  Thanks for the clarification. Demographically, if Russia had it bad. Ukraine had it worse. All blames to Zelensky.
    1
  112.  @jeffg3221  You're wrong. If Zelensky didn't insist of joining NATO and gave permission for USA to place nuclear missiles pointing at Moscow, Putin would not have attacked Ukraine. So its reasonable to blame Zelensky.
    1
  113. ​ @Harold046 20th century, 1997 was a long time ago. Compared to that time when USA was the most powerful nation on Earth, after the collapse of Soviet Union. The current USA was just a pale shadow of its former glory, reputation, wealth and power. You think they know what they are doing ? Truth is, its gotta out of their control.
    1
  114.  @2goober4u  I'm just replying to Harold comment. Perhaps you could read his comment and my reply ?
    1
  115. Hasn't the Russian military already counter HIMARS with anti-GPS system ?
    1
  116. Poland could send troops into Ukraine to restore the commonwealth.
    1
  117. And it also bombed Poland in 2022.
    1
  118. ​ @ameurus  You're right. Except that those highly moltivated soldiers of 2022 were mostly died, and Ukraine military was forced to fill the manpower gap with minors, elders, unwilling adults and even women. Coupled with internal power struggle in Ukraine, I think Russia now have the motivation edge.
    1
  119. More negative impact for depopulated Ukraine.
    1