Comments by "Rock n Roll" (@rocknroll7400) on "Jordan B Peterson" channel.

  1. 8
  2. 8
  3. 7
  4. 5
  5. 3
  6. 3
  7. 3
  8. 2
  9. 2
  10. 2
  11. 2
  12. 2
  13. 2
  14. 1
  15. 1
  16.  @kellymichelley  love your long resume, oops responce. And I did read 90% of it, but I I was distracted by constantly wanting to see where exactly you would finally just blurt out the part that gave you the resentment. To that end, you could have just simply written the last two sentences and skipped the rest, I know women always like to be the exception and therefore argue the rule. I speak from meeting I would say if I don't count his seminars several times more people than even Jordan Peterson and to some extent in similar interaction, so that I can give you a broad understanding you would get from life experience vs Carl Jung as a short cut.. The only credit I give to Colleges is they cover sometimes precise philosophical subjects that you don't always have the opportunity to specifically delve into until you've been on the road for quite a while. As I hit my 38th year on the road. I feel I've had time to encounter similar amounts of highbrow discussion and everyday bitching. Unlike Peterson for Collegiate types I've dealt with everything from Native American bookkeeping to Cesar Chavez and the farmworkers to every other type group in their Community versus observing it. I consider first-hand interaction quite different than first-hand observation! Add to that my 74,000 posts online on subjects from Men's rights to smart meters on gas meters in people's homes and multiple legal battles to hold the everyday person's rights up from encroaching government municipal or private business, and I think I've pretty much heard it all. Though of course that's technically impossible. But enough for the comment I made here. However if 10 more people write to me an experience similar to yours, I will rethink my concepts statistically and adjust my statements accordingly. However yours is the first, and again the exception does not prove the rule. Do I believe you mentioned several exceptions in your personal life? Yes. I still believe the description that isbased upon your type of judgment - evaluation and frame of reference, versus understanding the gist of how I see bookworms versus wayfarers, road scholars vs Rhoads scholars.
    1
  17. 1
  18. 1
  19. 1
  20. 1
  21. 1
  22. Chris Langans highest IQ in the world. Title called him smartest. 200++IQ.. First time personally ever watching & listening to him being interviewed. Michael Knowles new podcast premiered with him. He was an unabashed thealogian. 1st I've seen a super smart guy not brag that his independent brain is too smart to fall for believing in God. Michael being a Christian conservative, brought little in opposition to that table. He knew almost zilch about historic philosophical topics. And as the pods interviewer it made obvious that other than respecting his guest immensely, he was a yugo to a Maserati. Operator error abounded. Said he avoided so called intellectual types as brainwashed, sold out & college was hell for him. He settled back IN Ohio an is a bc farmer. Michael said he also struggled, barely graduated High School, wanted to not go to college. ------_- I met my doppelganger! I was smartest in my district of 20,000 kids. Top 25 in another testing method. I can dicipher almost every 1st world language. But i failed Spanish class in HS, easiest language. I barely get past 1st semester of geometry. Ughh. Algebra 1 was my max. I couldn't diagram sentences in English though I was high school reading level by my 3rd grade of Elementary School. College was not gonna go well..Called myself a Road scholar all my life, lampooning Rhodes Scholars who learn inside a colleges walls. Since I crave regular everyday basic substantative meaning to arrive upon & be able to institute my lifes philosophies, true grit n bear it substance OVER a perception of status & position, white collar office jobs. 🤮 Point of me giving details on a previous show is that I need you to see the contrasts & the rarity of smart people NOT aspiring to be liberal, WEF globalists or Bill Gates. Or in the power structure of movers n shakers inside the system MAKING BILLIONS. But we exist --Us 2, [ or two of our type example ] should be debating these 2-UN-challenged, or at least automatic givens of intellectual lifers defined & see if our life experience driven knowledge, wisdom derived from hard knocks & blue collar humility & identity plus some booksmarts could not just take these two on, but re-define or RETURN the current line of who gets worshipped for high brow observation & conclusions, to a previous time of Ben Franklin's, citizen soldiers, non-career politicians etc. A rehydration of how we decide what pundit to follow or not follow, & in how we value common sense (not so common) vs feeling like & expressing derogitorily our chagrin for less eloquent speakers delivery & lack of titles.. Ready Mr J P?
    1