Youtube comments of Aristocles Athenaioi (@aristoclesathenaioi4939).

  1. 1100
  2. 782
  3. 282
  4. 234
  5. 218
  6. 125
  7. 119
  8. 111
  9. 103
  10. 102
  11. 97
  12. 97
  13. 79
  14. 66
  15. 60
  16. 59
  17. 52
  18. 49
  19. 49
  20. 41
  21. 35
  22. 34
  23. I apologize in advance for what will be a long reply, but it takes some effortvto explain the situation with rare earth production. Rare earths can be extracted from coal tailings, and one company that manufactures solar panels already extracts cadmium from coal mine tailings. The journal articles linked below describe procedures for extraction of rare Earth's from coal byproducts. These methods likely cost more than rare earths from China do now. However, avoiding the ecological damage by the rare earth mining could prove a marketing advantage to manufacturers outside of China. Market research has indicated that consumers in the US will pay a premium price for products made with green technologies. Companies could present the process of extracting rate earths from toxic coal mine byproduct as a green technology because it helps dispose of coal mine byproducts. If China blocked the sales of rare Earth's to manufacturers outside China that could make it even more attractive to extract rare earths for coal byproducts. When you consider that Germany developed ballistic missiles because the Versailles Treaty forbid Germany from having long range artillery, you realize how inventive people can side-step sanctions by developing substitute technologies. Technology sanctions often have unintended consequences that result in the sanctions back firing. Both the US and China should weigh technology sanctions very carefully. A Review of the Occurrence and Promising Recovery Methods of Rare Earth Elements from Coal and Coal By-Products: International Journal of Coal Preparation and Utilization: Vol 35, No 6 (tandfonline.com) https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/19392699.2015.1033097 Can Harvesting Rare Earth Elements Solve the Coal Ash Crisis? Over 3 billion tons of coal ash occupy more than 1,400 sites across the US https://www.sierraclub.org/sierra/2021-2-march-april/feature/can-harvesting-rare-earth-elements-solve-coal-ash-crisis Citric acid can be used to extract rare earth metals from coal ash - MINING.COM https://www.mining.com/food-grade-solvent-can-be-used-to-extract-rare-earth-metals-from-coal-ash/
    34
  24. Another excellent explanation of the politics in China. This reminds me of the corruption in the British Navy at the time of the American War of Independence, which left the British Navy ineffective against France who allied with the colonialists. If I may be indulged a long description: In 1783, when attention was called to abuses in the public offices, Mr. Pitt stated in the House of Commons that though it bad been officially declared that no fees were received by the navy office, it appeared that very considerable sums were received by the officers under the name of 'gifts'. Exact inquiry disclosed wholesale robbery rather than peculation. The accounts showed a deficit of about three hundred thousand pounds of bread in 1780, besides beef, pork, and other provisions. It was shown that the contract price of bread was more than 4s. per cwt. above the market price, and that the bread actually supplied was 4s. per cwt. inferior to the contract ; that the men in charge of the storehouses kept hogs in them, and fed them on serviceable biscuit ; that stores of different kinds and in large quantities had been taken out of the yards not for the private use of the officers, but for sale, and that everywhere intimidation or guilty complicity had kept the knowledge of these abominations secret (Parliamentary Report, 1783-4). The dockyards had been sinks of iniquity before that time, and were so after it [cf. Jervis, John, Earl of St. Vincent], but at no time were they so utterly bad as during the war of American independence. This state of affairs took place when the First Earl of Sandwich was the Lord of the Admiralty. It was said of the Earl of Sandwich that he was "too infamous to have a friend, too bad for bad men to commend." History does so often repeat itself.
    34
  25. 30
  26. 27
  27. 26
  28. 26
  29. 26
  30. 22
  31. 21
  32. 21
  33. 18
  34. 17
  35. 17
  36. 17
  37. 17
  38. 15
  39. 15
  40. 15
  41. 15
  42. 14
  43. 14
  44. 13
  45. 13
  46. 13
  47. 12
  48. 12
  49. 12
  50. If the CCP wants to take TSMC then they need to do VERY quick strike because it is very easy to destroy a semiconductor fabrication facility. You only need to open the clean rooms and you will have a herculean task of cleaning them out again. Also, the real valuable asset in a semiconductor facility are the human assets. I would be willing to bet that Taiwan with the US has a plan to evacuate all the people critical technical know-how. I am sure that a lot of people working at TSMC would willingly work for the CPP, but it will take years to restart the fab facilities, and during that time TSMC could restart in the new facilities they are building in the US. Also, the ASML systems at TSMC would likely be sabotaged if a take-over of the TSMC looked likely. Although ASML is a Dutch company, it relies on US intellectual property and patents. The US already has an embargo on selling the latest ASML technology to China. Any semiconductor company cut-off from ASML will have an impossible time getting the smallest and highest density chips fabricated. The world-wide manufacturing disruption caused by a disruption in the chips from TSMC would be cause alone for a serious backlash at China. Having said all this, I doubt it would deter China from attempting an invasion of Taiwan because such an attack would be motivated by political issues divorced from the issues of restarting TSMC operations. I seriously doubt that Chinese strategist shown in this video has even the slightest technical knowledge to understand how economicaly disastrous the consequences of disrupting TSMC operations would be or what an immense challenge it would be to restore those operations.
    11
  51. 11
  52. 11
  53. 11
  54. 11
  55. 11
  56. I was fortunate to get a lottery number high enough that I would not have been drafted when my student deferment ended. I have a lot of thought about fleeing to Canada. I never had to make that choice. I fully respect the choice of the people who fled to Canada to avoid the draft, and I also respect the people who without any fault of their own found themselves under fire in Vietnam. The US says it is a representative democracy, and that means it represents the people who voted for it. I find it very hard to argue that I can somehow separate my personal responsibility as a citizen of the US from the responsibility of the US Government which was elected by my fellow US citizens to represent us all. Citizens of the US need to weigh carefully who they support and vote for in elections. I have to accept my responsibility for what my government does. I can't separate "good" US citizens from "bad" US citizens when we all agreed to follow the choices of the majority in US elections. I don't really know what to say to Russians who say they are one of the "good" Russians as opposed to one of the "bad" Russians. If you say you love your country then you must take responsibility for what your country has done. It saddens me that you have never been given a right to choose through elections who will represent you. Nevertheless, if you consider yourself Russian then you must take your share of responsibility for what Russia has done unless you are a child are truly had no choice in the matter. Just a Germany has taken at least one generation to atone for the crimes against humanity that they caused by their war of aggression in the 1940s, now Russia will take at least a generation to atone for the crimes against humanity that Russia has committed. The US has committed the crime of waging wars of aggression even if not on the scale of Germany or with the thorough going destruction that Russia has and is doing. Unless of course the US would correctly be held accountable for the fire-bombing of Japan. I consider the use of nuclear weapons on Japan as different but why that is will have wait for a different posting. The US should take full responsibility for the crimes it has committed, and just because the US has in many cases has unjustly managed to avoid that should never serves as a reason or license for other countries to commit war crimes. I applaud your willingness to accept the responsibility that Russia has for the barbaric way that Russia has treated Ukraine. I have no idea what you as someone who loves your mother country of Russia will do to make up for what your country of birth has done. Interestingly your country of choice, Canada, has a large Ukrainian diaspora community. May I suggest that you contact the Ukrainian Community of Canada, which has its own website, and ask them what you can do to compensate for what your country of birth has done. You speak Russian as many Ukrainians do. Perhaps you could go to Ukraine to help in some humanitarian way. Making videos of what you are doing would help others to learn what they can do. I wish you well in your future endeavors in life. I am sorry you missed out on the life events of your family, just as my friend who fled Crimea with her son missed being with her mother in Crimea when her mom her died of old age this year. I hope you have greater good fortune in your life than many Ukrainians are having in their lives. Who knows maybe you find some way to help.
    10
  57. 10
  58. 9
  59. 9
  60. 9
  61. 9
  62. 9
  63. 9
  64. 9
  65. 8
  66. 8
  67. 8
  68. 8
  69. 8
  70. 8
  71. 8
  72. 7
  73. 7
  74. 7
  75. 7
  76. 7
  77. 7
  78. 7
  79. 7
  80. 6
  81. 6
  82. 6
  83. 6
  84. 6
  85. 6
  86. 6
  87. 6
  88. 6
  89. 6
  90. 6
  91. 6
  92. 5
  93. 5
  94. 5
  95. 5
  96. 5
  97. 5
  98. 5
  99. 5
  100. I have a friend who fled Crimea two years with her 5 yr old son who is now 7 yrs old. She speaks Russian but considers herself Ukrainian. Her mother and sister decided to stay in Crimea, and they had tried to convince her to return. She wants a better life for her son in Ukraine than she feels he would gets in Russia. Although she knew nobody in the city where she moved she did find a man who loves her and who she loves and who loves her son who calls him "Daddy" Her husband fought in the Donbass where he drove an armored vehicle. When the Russians invaded, my friend insisted on staying in Ukraine because she would be near husband eventhough he has gone back into the Army. I tried to persuade her to leave because I felt that her husband would feel better knowing she and her son were safe in Poland. She refused to leave. When the Russians shelled the nuclear power plant then her husband told she had to leave because it was too dangerous. I and some other friends of hers here in the US helped her with money to get to Poland with her son. She is now in Poland but will probably have to move on in about a month. I have told her to go to Berlin because she also has her son's dog with them, and the Germans are very dog friendly. From Berlin she could get a visa to Canada where there is a large Ukrainian immigrant community. I grew up in the US in that same area, but I no longer live there. Once again, she refuses to go to Berlin because it takes her farther from her husband. First she is refugee from Crimea, then a refugee from Western Ukraine moving West to Poland all because Russia has invaded her country. She has had to flee twice, and her husband fought against the Russians first in the Donbass and now back into the Territorial Defense. I can deeply empathize with the Chinese man who has a Ukrainian wife and wanted to keep his family together. Meanwhile the nationalists in China mock him on the Internet. He wants to keep his family together, my friend wants to keep her family together, but what do those supporters of the CCP want? I have no idea.
    5
  101. 5
  102. I agree with your assessment about Finland's position because they need to be part of NATO if they are going to send heavy weapons to Ukraine. If they are a member of NATO then they can rely on other NATO countries coming to their defense if the Russian's attack, but without such an assurance they need to maintain their force strength and will likely need every bullet they have along with the tanks. I find it more puzzling why a country like Spain who was very agreeable to sending their Leopard 2 tanks to Ukraine is now having cold feet. What really worries me is the pivotal role that the autocrat Erdogan in Turkiye is playing. I feel certain that Q'uran burning in Sweden was orchestrated by the FSB precisely because it plays into Erdogan's hand. The Russian oilgarchs have their yacht moored in resorts in Turkiye. Erdogan milked the grain crisis to skim profits from grain sold to Syria. All in all Turkiye has done very well for itself in this war, and has helped Russia a lot. Who knows what deal was cut for Erdogan to block specifically Sweden's entry to NATO. Keep in mind that the Greeks and Turks are at one another's throats once again about some islands in the Aegean, and NATO needs to keep that from blowing up into a war. NATO is indeed a defensive organization because it provides a framework for the European countries to police one another as well as defend against Russia. I think the best hope for Ukraine lies with Poland. I would not be bit surprised if we see a modern Polish Lithuanian Commonwealth reconstitute itself because Western Ukraine was part of that Commonwealth, and a tight political alliance between Lithuania, Poland and Ukraine might serve them better than NATO does. I recommend looking at the Wikipedia article about the Polish Lithuanian Commonwealth because of how much it could apply today if reformed. That would really be Russia's nightmare more than NATO is.
    5
  103. 5
  104. 5
  105. 5
  106. 5
  107. 5
  108. 5
  109. 5
  110. 5
  111. 5
  112. 5
  113. 5
  114. 5
  115. 5
  116. It seems to me that China is basically buying A320 airplanes from itself given that they manufacture A320 themselves. Essentially China is subsidizing their own airline industry. I should also note that the US Government effectively subsidizes Boeing given that Boeing has numerous military contracts with the US Department of Defense. In the 21st century a country needs a robust aircraft industry just as a country needed a blue water Navy in the 19th century. Aside from the obvious military advantages of a robust aircraft industry are the less obvious military logistical values. As General Omar Bradley famously said: “Amateurs talk strategy. Professionals talk logistics.” Looking at the heavy lift capabilities the US has used to supply the weapons to Ukraine demonstrates the importance of air cargo. None of the other NATO countries except Canada have needed to use air transport to deliver weapons to supply Ukraine. Whenever one sees a Boeing passenger plane or cargo plane, one should keep in mind those planes can carry troops and weapons in time of war. The CCP knows this very well and wants to make sure that they have the logistical capabilities needed to sustain an invasion of Taiwan. Looking back at the East Timor Crisis from 1999 to 2000 helps to frame the importance of logistical capabilities. The International Force for East Timor (INTERFET) from the United Nations and led by Australia was refused US ground troops but was able to secure vital support for airlift, logistics, specialised intelligence, over the horizon deterrence, and "diplomatic muscle". This sounds a lot like the situation in Ukraine today where the US refuses to commit troops but provides other capabilities. A war with China would require far more resources on both sides of such a conflict. Reading the Wikipedia article on the International Force East Timor https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Force_East_Timor helps to remind us of earlier conflicts like the current Russo-Ukrainian War when multiple nations needed to cooperate to stop a genocide. This comment has strayed from the initial topic of the CCP buying A320 jets. However, we should never forget conflicts like East Timor and the human pain and suffering inflicted on the Timorese as well as the fierce fighting to end the oppression in East Timor.
    5
  117. 5
  118. 5
  119. 5
  120. 5
  121. 5
  122. 5
  123. 5
  124. 5
  125. 5
  126. 5
  127. 5
  128. 5
  129. 5
  130. 5
  131. 4
  132. 4
  133. 4
  134. 4
  135. 4
  136. Ironically, the Soviet Union had a more stable political structure than both Russia and China have now. The KGB was essential for the political stability of the Soviet Union. People may forget that the KGB was also referred to as "the shield of the Party." If you wonder who the Party needed a shield against, then the answer is the Army. The KGB, unlike the present Russian FSS, actually had armed troops that had a separate chain of command from the Army. I always found it interesting that the Soviet Union had a tripartite system of Government which corresponded to the tripartite form of Government in the US, as follows: Legislative Branch: -- US: Congress. -- Soviet Union: Communist Party. Executive Branch: -- US President, Commander and Chief of the Armed Forces, and effectively the Head of the Police. This is more obvious in the Government of a State within the United States, where the State Police report to the Governor. It is also worth remembering that the US President commands the National Guard in each State. -- Soviet Union: Marshal of the Soviet Union. This was the position held by Gyorgy Zhukov. The last Marshal of the Soviet Union was Dmitry Yazov, appointed in 1990, who was imprisoned after the failed coup against Mikhail Gorbachev in 1991. This is exactly what the KGB was expected to defend against. Judicial Branch: Now here is where it gets really interesting. -- US: Federal and State Courts. -- Soviet Union: KGB. Now at this point, you may be asking "why is the KGB the organization corresponding to the Judiciary?" The answer is that the Judiciary and the Courts are in place to protect against the Executive Branch (the Military and the Police) trying to act in contravention of the Laws passed by Congress. You may also ask yourself, "The KGB had agents through-out the Soviet Union. If the KGB corresponds to the Judicial Branch, then who corresponds to KGB agents in the US?" The answer is simple, "Lawyers." Every lawyer in the United States is an officer of the Court. This is why the first move of an autocrat after becoming the head of the Executive Branch immediately tries to weaken the Courts because that effectively removes the Rule of Law. You only need to look at Hungary and Turkiye to see that at work in contemporary times. There are many more examples, I simply cite those two because they are part of NATO, and in Hungary's case, Part of the EU as well. Putin long ago neutered Russia's Court System which now hands down whatever sentence Putin wants, and under whatever law Putin uses as a pretext. On paper at least, the head of the Dumas is the Prime Minister as opposed to Putin. As President of Russia, Putin is supposed to be Commander in Chief of the Russian Armed Forces. However, the legal head of the Russian Armed Forces is Shoigu, and that is why Putin makes sure that Shoigu, who has served Putin from Putin's time as Mayor of St. Petersburg and Shoigu never served in the military and therefore lacks any power base in the Russian Armed Forces. It also explains why Generals come and go, even Gerasimov, but Shoigu always remains. Although the FSS is technically separate from the Russian Armed Forces, the FSS and the Armed Forces work hand in glove. Gorkin was an FSS Colonel as opposed to an Army Colonel. In truth, the FSS, unlike its predecessor the KGB, lacks its own armed troops comparable to those of the KGB. In place of KGB troops as the Shield of Party against the Armed Forces, Putin needs a "Praetorian Guard" to protect him from the Russian Armed Forces. Does Xi Jinping have a "Praetorian Guard" similar to Putin's? Historically though, a Praetorian Guard has taken control by appointing their own Emperor as happened when the Praetorian Guard declared Claudius following the assassination of the Roman Emperor Caligula by the Praetorian Guard. The Captain of the Praetorian Guard and the other Guard members who assassinated Caligula did commit suicide at the command of the new Emperor Claudius because they had betrayed their oath to protect the Emperor.  They had enough concern for their honor that they did commit suicide to restore their honor and to display remorse for breaking their oath.  Somehow, I doubt that Putin's personal Guards unit or whoever Xi Jinping has as a personal Guards unit would act similarly.
    4
  137. 4
  138. 4
  139. 4
  140. 4
  141. 4
  142. 4
  143. 4
  144. 4
  145. 4
  146. 4
  147. 4
  148. 4
  149. 4
  150. 4
  151. 4
  152. 4
  153. 4
  154. 4
  155. 4
  156. 4
  157. 4
  158. 4
  159. 4
  160. 4
  161. 4
  162. 3
  163. 3
  164. 3
  165. 3
  166. 3
  167. 3
  168. 3
  169. 3
  170. 3
  171. 3
  172. 3
  173. 3
  174. 3
  175. 3
  176. 3
  177. 3
  178. 3
  179. 3
  180. 3
  181. 3
  182. 3
  183. 3
  184. 3
  185. 3
  186. 3
  187. 3
  188. 3
  189. 3
  190. 3
  191. 3
  192. 3
  193. 3
  194. 3
  195. 3
  196. 3
  197. 3
  198. 3
  199. 3
  200. 3
  201. 3
  202. 3
  203. 3
  204. 3
  205. 3
  206. 3
  207. 3
  208. 3
  209. 3
  210. 3
  211. 3
  212. 3
  213. 3
  214. 3
  215. 3
  216. 3
  217. 3
  218. 3
  219. 3
  220. 3
  221. 3
  222. 3
  223. 3
  224. 3
  225. 3
  226. 3
  227. 3
  228. 3
  229. 3
  230. 3
  231. 3
  232. 3
  233. 3
  234. 3
  235. I must agree with the comments that take exception to your view of how benign Putin is for Ukraine. In the July speech from Putin that you quoted, Putin presented the Ukraine Russia shared culture and border as comparable to the relationship of Canada to the US, or Austria to Germany. In fact that is a false equivalence. Despite having history in common, Ukrainian and Russian are different though related languages. I have a friend in Ukraine who who grew up and lived in Crimea, but fled Crimea with her son when the Russians annexed it. She settled in Lviv in Western Ukraine, which about as far West as you can go in Ukraine. She and her son only spoke Russian, and now she is learning to speak Ukrainian. There is less difference between Ukrainian and Russian than there is between Cantonese and Mandarin. However, there is a lot more difference between Ukrainian and Russian than between English as spoken in Canada and English as spoken in the US. The US and Canada really do speak the same language. I should add the my friend in Ukraine views Russia with the same apprehension that my Taiwanese friends view the PRC. The real issue in both Ukraine and Taiwan is whether they can continue to develop as separate and democratic societies, or will they become subject to an autocratic regime even if they share common history, culture and speak closely related languages. Ukraine should be permitted to decide it's destiny, and Taiwan permitted to decide it's destiny. Neither should have that decision made for them.
    3
  236. 3
  237. 3
  238. 3
  239. 2
  240. 2
  241. 2
  242. 2
  243. 2
  244. 2
  245. 2
  246. 2
  247. 2
  248. 2
  249. 2
  250. 2
  251. 2
  252. 2
  253. 2
  254. 2
  255. 2
  256. 2
  257.  @MrAdhiSuryana  Absolutely correct. That is consistent with the point about companies taking on debt. Needing to take on debt to continue or expand operations, some companies must turn to sources of debt that hurt the company. The fact that companies need to take on debt never implied that they made good choices about where they got the money, and who lent the money. Loan sharks exist because companies need loans, but reputable institutions refuse to lend money to the company because the bank judges the company's ability as poor. Enter stock rating systems like Standard & Poors, who provide the ratings on which banks rely to make decisions about whether a company can service the debt and the bank will get a return on their loan. Stock rating companies make mistakes, but their purpose is clear. A common practice these days is for companies to buy back shares to increase the value of the shares in the market, but the real purpose is to assure compensation for executives whose income depends on stock options and therefore depend in the growth of the value of the company stock. Companies who do this really are not buying back shares because the company believes it will earn more by investing in itself. Stock buy-backs should be used to invest in the income generators, such as new manufacturing facilities, rather than to assure to assure that stock options in the company have value. If the company does depend on retaining specific employee expertise, as some service companies such as consulting companies do them stock buy backs to increase employee compensation and thus retain those employees is a case of investing of the company investing in itself to continue company growth. It may also be a way to launder money through the company as you so rightly indicated in your comment.
    2
  258. 2
  259. 2
  260. 2
  261. 2
  262. 2
  263. 2
  264. 2
  265. 2
  266. 2
  267. 2
  268. 2
  269. 2
  270. 2
  271. 2
  272. 2
  273. 2
  274. 2
  275. 2
  276. 2
  277. 2
  278. 2
  279. 2
  280. 2
  281. The view that the Russian invasion of Ukraine is bogged down is seriously mistaken. Here is a link to a video that explains precisely what is happening with Russian invasion, and I will follow the video link with the comments about it made by a friend of mine who is a retired Professor of German History. Russo-Ukraine War: What the West Doesn't Understand EP 3 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K5BAZ2bBUzM Cappy is especially interesting. He quite correctly describes old Red Army techniques that are now being used, beginning with the young, untrained conscripts as cannon fodder. Interestingly, the four (!!) battles for Kharkiv (Kharkov) in WWII, at least two of which pitted Manstein against Konev, are good examples. So too was the Soviet move across Poland and into Germany in 1944-45, culminating with the truly devastating assault on the Seelow Heights east of Berlin. I have been to the Seelow Heights many times. The landscape there is full of hundreds of small Soviet war cemeteries with 50 or 100 bodies in them. Interestingly, current Russian war plans have an even longer ancestry. In the early summer of 1848, Habsburg forces withdrew from Prague, surrounded the city, and bombarded it into submission. This became the standard technique for controlling big cities. They did the same thing to Vienna later that fall (with the Croats acting like the Chechens now). In 1870 the Prussians surrounded and besieged Paris, otherwise controlling all of France north of the Loire. After the provisional government (the "Versaillais") capitulated to the Germans, the Versaillais themselves besieged a Paris that was governed by the Commune, until finally, in May 1871, the Versaillais breached the Communards' defenses and in incredibly brutal street fighting retook Paris block by block, taking advantage of the broad boulevards that Napoleon III had built specifically to thwart urban uprisings. Just as Ike built the interstate highways as defense corridors, the wide boulevards that people love in Paris were built for military reasons.
    2
  282. 2
  283. 2
  284. When the Affordable Care Act was passed, my psychiatrist pointed out to me that the whole ACA could have been done by legislating that one word be added in the corporate charter for all the healthcare companies, and word was "not-for-profit" He was my psychiatrist for fifteen (15) years until he retired at the age of eighty (80) and we had many conversations about the healthcare industry. He had a very low opinion of the Private For-Profit Insurance Companies. He once told me that he preferred to have Medicare patients because eventhough Medicare paid only half of his rate, Medicare paid on time adn without objection for covered treatment. He told me that Medicare had a three (3%) percent administrative overhead while the average overhead for Private For Profit Insurance Companies was fifteen (15%) percent. As he and I both remarked, almost in unison, "but of course the private always provides less expensively and more efficiently as the government." He had held public office in his local town at one point in his career, so he had first hand view of politics, and how political pressure gets used. Before I started seeing my psychiatrist, I had my healthcare insurer call me up and tell me to ask my physician to change one of my drugs to a generic, but failed to tell me that I would have to double the dose as a consequence. My primary care physician who I have seen for thirty (30) years when he started his practice, is not a specialist in psycho pharmacology and when he consulted the desk reference it appeared that the generic could be substituted so we did that. When I started to have reactions my Primary Care Physician said, "Clearly this is outside my area of knowledge, and we need to get you to a psychiatrist", My Primary Care Physician told me that the psychiatrist he wanted me it was very hard to get the psychiatrist he wanted to take new patients, but that he would ask personally. As I sat there, he picked up the phone, called the psychiatrist, and said, "One of my very favorite patients needs to see a psychiatrist, will you take him on as a patient? The psychiatrist agreed immediately, and that was the beginning of a wonderful doctor-patient relationship. When I first visited him because of the change in medication, he instantly knew what was causing the problem, and changed the prescription back to what it should have been. He then pointed out to me that by law a pharmacist must fill a prescription with drug the MD prescribed, and the pharmacist would lose their license as a pharmacist if they changed the medication. He went on to point out that the Drug Management Companies had to have licenses from the State in order to fill prescriptions, and yet the Drug Managment Companies were notorious for changing prescriptions r delay filling the new prescriptions even on post-op drugs that patients needed after hospital discharge. Failing to get those drugs jeopardized the patient's life in some cases. So, my psychiatrist wrote a letter to the licensing board at our State Capitol, which is Albnay and I live and he practiced in New York State, informing the licensing board that the Drug Management Company had violated the terms of their pharmacist license by changing the drug prescription as written by the MD without consulting the MD, and as a consequence, the State should withdraw the pharmacist license from the Drug Management company which would effectively mean that the Drug Management Company would be forbidden from doing business in the entire State of New York. My psychiatrist showed me the letter he sent, and it was very well written. I have read and written many business letters and legal letters in my career; he wrote a good letter. I asked him if he got a reply from the State acknowledging that the pharmacist license of the Drug Management Company was withdrawn. He smiled and said, "Oh I never expected a reply, but I am sure the licensing board put the Drug Management Company on notice even though neither will admit it."
    2
  285. 2
  286. 2
  287. 2
  288. 2
  289. 2
  290. 2
  291. 2
  292. 2
  293. 2
  294. 2
  295. 2
  296. 2
  297. 2
  298. 2
  299. 2
  300. 2
  301. 2
  302. 2
  303. 2
  304. 2
  305. 2
  306. 2
  307. 2
  308. 2
  309. 2
  310. 2
  311. 2
  312. 2
  313. 2
  314. 2
  315. 2
  316. 2
  317. 2
  318. 2
  319. 2
  320. 2
  321. 2
  322. 2
  323. 2
  324. 2
  325. 2
  326. 2
  327. 2
  328. 2
  329. 2
  330. 2
  331. 2
  332. 2
  333. 2
  334. 2
  335. 2
  336. 2
  337. 2
  338. 2
  339. 2
  340. 2
  341. 2
  342. 2
  343. 2
  344. 2
  345. 2
  346. 2
  347. 2
  348. 2
  349. 2
  350. 2
  351. 2
  352. 2
  353. 2
  354. 2
  355. 2
  356. 2
  357. 2
  358. 2
  359. 2
  360. 2
  361. 2
  362. 2
  363. 2
  364. 2
  365. 2
  366. 2
  367. 2
  368. 2
  369. 2
  370. 2
  371. 2
  372. 2
  373. 2
  374. 2
  375. 2
  376. 2
  377. 2
  378. 2
  379. I believe that the US would hesitate to attack Naval vessels who were enforcing a blockade. However, I think that the PLA trying to impose a no-fly would be much harder because the US would without hesitation attempt to land airplanes on Taiwan even if only in the name of humanitarian aid. If the PLA choose to attack a US plane delivering humanitarian aid then that would be the PLA striking the first blow which could serve as a casus belli that the US would use to justify a retaliation on the PLA. I expect the retaliation would be an aerial retaliation, and that the US would avoid a direct naval engagement until the PLA directly attacked a US warship. After an aerial attack the US might then send ships to Taiwan for humanitarian aid, and if those ships were attacked then the US would engage with warships. I doubt if the US would attack the Chinese mainland because that could trigger a nuclear response from China. However, the US would likely invade the islands in the South Chinese Sea especially those near the Philippines because those islands are considered in violation of the International Law of the Sea as well as the Philippines having a justifiable claim to those islands. It would be interesting to see if Vietnam also invaded the islands that they claim are theirs. There is a long standing distrust between Vietnam and China that goes back hundreds of years. The Vietnamese have long been known as an aggressive power in the Southeast Asia. I do believe that the US and China would avoid striking the territory of either country including a direct attack by China on Guam because that kind of attack could provoke a interchange of strategic weapons. If Japan chooses to land troops on disputed islands between Japan and China, and China attacks an acknowledged part of Japan such as Okinawa then that opens the floodgates because the US has very cleat treaty obligations with Japan. In short, a no-fly zone over Taiwan would lead to serious escalations on both sides.
    2
  380. 2
  381. 2
  382. 2
  383. 2
  384. 2
  385. 2
  386. 2
  387. 2
  388. 2
  389. 2
  390. 2
  391. 2
  392. 2
  393. 2
  394. 2
  395. 2
  396. 2
  397. 2
  398. 2
  399. 2
  400. 2
  401. 2
  402. 2
  403. 2
  404. 2
  405. 2
  406. 2
  407. 2
  408. 2
  409. 2
  410. 2
  411. 2
  412. 2
  413. 1
  414. 1
  415. 1
  416. 1
  417. 1
  418. If Putin can declare that he has restored Novorossiya to Russia, then he can claim to have restored an important historical part of the Russian Empire which Catherine the Great added as a new province of Russia (Novorossiya Governorate) in 1764. Novorossiya - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Novorossiya which would include Odessa making Ukraine a landlocked country without any access or influence over the Black Sea. Of even greater value to Russia would be the division of Ukraine into an East Ukraine and a West Ukraine separated by the Dnieper River as a natural boundary. Kyiv sits on the Western bank of the Dnieper Rivier, and thus in easy striking distance of an Eastern Ukraine dominated by Russia. One interesting gambit that Ukraine could use would be to declare both Ukrainian and Russian as official languages in much the same way that Canada has both French and English as official languages. In fact, having Ukrainian and Russian as official languages works more easily than having French and English because Ukrainian and Russian are mutually intelligible languages although in practice it is easier for a Ukrainian speaker to understand Russian than for Russian speaker to understand Ukrainian. Over time it is likely that Ukrainian would come to dominate Russian because the mutual intelligibility is asymmetric in favor of Ukrainian. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CQLM62r5nLI Also of interest is that Polish and Ukrainian are quite close to one another. If there was a Western Ukraine then the language similarities between Polish and Ukrainian would draw those two countries closer to one another politically,
    1
  419. 1
  420. 1
  421. 1
  422. 1
  423. 1
  424. 1
  425. 1
  426. 1
  427. 1
  428. 1
  429. 1
  430. 1
  431. 1
  432. If you edited the existing videos into one week videos then the 539 days is 77 weeks, and at about 5 minutes per video that is about 35 minutes of video per week. It would be very interesting to group your past videos into 1 video per week to see the progress of the war. I know that playlists are an easy way to aggregate the videos, and it might make a useful "perk" to be able to access such playlists. However a playlist on YouTube still forces people to endure YouTube advertisements. You might also offer them as downloads from your online store because the downloaded video would eliminate YouTube advertisement interruptions. It would be wonderful if you could edit the videos to have separate videos for each of the separate fronts, as for example everything about Kharkiv versus a video about Kherson. To mitigate the issue of piracy, I suggest you put watermarks in the four corners of your video. Most all your videos really focus on an area in the center of the screen. In addition, if you introduce a title screen between each day with your channel name on the day title screen and show the date at the top of the screen that will help the viewer and reduce the likelihood of piracy because someone wishes to claim your work as theirs will need to replace the title at the top. Piracy can prove useful if it serves to increase your channel subscriptions. One final editorial thought is to place a time line at the bottom of the screen that simply has a bar with relative position of the day from the starting date of the video to the ending date of that video.
    1
  433. 1
  434. 1
  435. 1
  436. 1
  437. 1
  438. 1
  439. 1
  440. 1
  441. 1
  442. 1
  443. 1
  444. 1
  445. 1
  446. 1
  447. 1
  448. 1
  449. 1
  450. 1
  451. 1
  452. 1
  453. 1
  454. 1
  455. 1
  456. 1
  457. 1
  458. 1
  459. 1
  460. 1
  461. 1
  462. 1
  463. 1
  464. 1
  465. 1
  466. 1
  467. 1
  468. 1
  469. 1
  470. 1
  471. 1
  472. 1
  473. 1
  474.  @2DTL  A person has every reason judge the culture and legal (not moral) standards between cultures. (Morality is universal based on what is rational behavior, and as all humans ae reasoning creature the concept of rationality applies equally. I hope I don't get some moral relativism from you. Before you write such reply, please make sure you can explain even one moral principle: "Avoid killing another person except in self-defense" Now I feel certain that you will say the exceptions to the "do not kill" imperative may vary from culture to culture, but the underlying principle, "Avoid killing people" remains. To test any moral relativism, here are some other top principles: + "Avoid causing pain to another" + "Avoid dismembering another person without that person's consent" + "Avoid depriving freedom of movement by another person" + "Avoid causing loss of pleasure for another person" + "Avoid lying" + "Avoid Stealing" + "Obey the Law" Now even in Western culture we allow exceptions to this, and the exceptions are interesting. A doctor is allowed to cause pain, and to dismember a person if that is with the intent to improve the person's help. Law Enforcement is allowed to cause pain to a specific person and to incarcerate the person to prevent that people from harming society by violating the rules of society's Law. Once again, one society may have a different set of laws than another society. but both societies would agree on the moral requirement to "Obey the Law." A person in a society may object to a Law because due to a belief that the Law violates a higher moral principle. In which case, if the person demonstrates their objection in a non-violent and non-threatening way then their behavior remains within the scope of morality. Every society may have different ideas about how to non-violent, passive resistance, but the possibility of non-violent, passive resistance should be honored. Stalinist Russia violated every canon of morality I have listed here. In fact, at the height of the Nazi domination of Germany, an individual person had more personal freedom such as the freedom to move while Russians under Stalin had fewer personal freedoms. We use Moral Principles to judge the moral character of a society, and we do that when we choose to live in one kind of society than another, and that can be within the same political, economic and cultural group. If people are forbidden from comparing and judge one culture and religion to one another then how do you explain a person chooses to convert from one religion to a different religion? Keeping in mind that the word "culture" derives from the word "cult" and that cultures different from one primarily by how they practice their religion even if they practice the disbelief in organized religion or the presence of one or more dieties. Have people who converted from one religion to another because they judged that one religion or religious practice was better. Did they break a rule that says, "Avoid comparing one culture against another." ?
    1
  475. 1
  476. 1
  477. 1
  478. 1
  479. 1
  480. 1
  481. 1
  482. 1
  483. 1
  484. 1
  485. 1
  486. 1
  487. 1
  488. 1
  489. 1
  490. 1
  491. 1
  492. 1
  493. 1
  494. 1
  495. 1
  496. 1
  497. 1
  498. 1
  499. 1
  500. 1
  501. 1
  502. 1
  503. 1
  504. 1
  505. 1
  506. 1
  507. 1
  508. 1
  509. 1
  510. 1
  511. 1
  512. 1
  513. 1
  514. 1
  515. 1
  516. 1
  517. 1
  518. 1
  519. 1
  520. 1
  521. 1
  522. 1
  523. 1
  524. 1
  525. 1
  526. 1
  527. 1
  528. 1
  529. 1
  530. 1
  531. 1
  532. 1
  533. 1
  534. 1
  535. 1
  536. 1
  537. 1
  538. 1
  539. 1
  540. 1
  541. 1
  542. 1
  543. 1
  544. 1
  545. 1
  546. 1
  547. 1
  548. 1
  549. 1
  550. 1
  551. 1
  552. 1
  553. 1
  554. 1
  555. 1
  556. 1
  557. 1
  558. 1
  559. 1
  560. 1
  561. 1
  562. 1
  563. 1
  564. 1
  565. 1
  566. 1
  567. 1
  568. 1
  569. 1
  570. 1
  571. 1
  572. 1
  573. 1
  574. 1
  575. 1
  576. 1
  577. 1
  578. 1
  579. 1
  580. 1
  581. 1
  582. 1
  583. 1
  584. 1
  585. 1
  586. 1
  587. 1
  588. 1
  589. 1
  590. 1
  591. 1
  592. 1
  593. 1
  594. 1
  595. 1
  596. 1
  597. 1
  598. 1
  599. 1
  600. 1
  601. 1
  602. 1
  603. 1
  604. 1
  605. Academic Grants will become a patronage system. I wonder if there is anyway to get the "Millionaires Who Support Taxes" group or whatever they are called, to join together, participation anonymous to avoid retaliation , to create a funding council for on-going grants canceled by Trump? That is a short term matter, and in the longer get large foundations of charities like Gates Organization to fund work? There would remain a problem that the specific researchers our their academic institutions could face retaliation. That means the researchers must remain anonymous but will be able to publish results but without funding source revealed. The same techniques used by drug cartels and wealthy individuals could used by cresting the fund as an offshore entity. That same entity would help fund existing conferences which would allow these non-Government researchers to attend without making it obvious how they got the funds to attend. As I write this, I realize that some retired counter intelligence officer will need to help manage the fund. There should be enough candidates given how many ex-intelligence officers Trump has stripped of security clearances. Of course those people's involvement in this scheme would need to remain secret as well as any clandestine participation in Five Eyes because surely Canada will pull out of Five Eyes and likely NZ too because of how much of NZ export will be hit by tarrifs. UK and Australia are a question mark. Basically we need to begin to create a government in exile and begin to make sure that these terminated projects are covered by the mainstream media. That may require cresting a new media company that aggregates Internet blogs, similar to Medium, and to promote that media company AND be ready to fight First Amendment attacks in the Courts. This will require a heavy lift and many people will need to help or at least contribute. We can use the Dark Money methods to hide the sources. Powers created to hide activities with malicious objectives and also be used to hide beneficial objectives. The Dark Money methods are, to use a military phrase, dual purpose techniques.
    1
  606. 1
  607. 1
  608. 1
  609. 1
  610. 1
  611. 1
  612. 1
  613. 1
  614. 1
  615. 1
  616. 1
  617. 1
  618. 1
  619. 1
  620. 1
  621. 1
  622. 1
  623. 1
  624. 1
  625. 1
  626. 1
  627. 1
  628. 1
  629. 1
  630. 1
  631. 1
  632. 1
  633. 1
  634. 1
  635. 1
  636. 1
  637. 1
  638. 1
  639. 1
  640. 1
  641. 1
  642. 1
  643. 1
  644. 1
  645. 1
  646. 1
  647. 1
  648. 1
  649. 1
  650. 1
  651. 1
  652. 1
  653. 1
  654. 1
  655. 1
  656. 1
  657. 1
  658. 1
  659. 1
  660. 1
  661. 1
  662. 1
  663. 1
  664. 1
  665. 1
  666. 1
  667. 1
  668. 1
  669. 1
  670. 1
  671. 1
  672. 1
  673. 1
  674. 1
  675. The CCP might benefit from looking at the measures taken by FDR to mitigate the Great Depression. Government injecting cash into the economy as advocated by John Maynard Keynes has helped maintain the consumer spending that drives the US economy. The comments by Prof. Li Dao Qui match those of the US Republican Party. I am most upset by his attack on Carbon reduction. China is crucial to have any significant effect on the climate crisis. The most upsetting aspect of Chinese Economic problems is to remember exactly what it was the ended the Great Depression ... World War II. Having a war helps CCP resolve many internal problems. Wars consume manufactured products at a furious pace, and therefore increase employment and industrial activity. A war will also justify a sacrifice in quality of life, and distract from internal problems. To my mind these economic problems in the PRC increases the likelihood of an invasion of Taiwan in the short term. It just occurred to me that new kind of Olympics might help the entire global economy. People may think I am joking but I am serious. Instead of trying to demilitarize space, I suggest we militarize space and demilitarize Earth by a Space Military Olympics conducted at the Lagrange Points L4 and L5 to avoid increasing the debris in Low Earth Orbit (LEO) which has already become a problem. Perhaps called the Lagrange Olympics, it would avoid human casualties because all the competition will take place between automated weapons. Industrial capacity in LEO can supply the "athletes" in the LaGrange Olympics, and could also supply the industrial needs of the humans on Earth while Earth focuses on producing food for people, and caring for the health of people. Keep in mind that anyone could decide to move the military conflict back to Earth, but every country participates in Mutual Assured Destruction (MAD) strategy such as the US and USSR followed during the Cold War. All anyone needs to do is to drop a big enough rock from space onto Earth. That wiped out the dinosaurs in the past, and could wipe out the human race in the future. Perhaps such an existential threat to all humanity held in the hands of all humanity might cause people to respect one another more given the consequences of treating enough people so badly that a large enough group would chose to drop a rock on all of us, themselves included.
    1
  676. 1
  677. 1
  678. 1
  679. 1
  680. 1
  681. 1
  682. 1
  683. 1
  684. 1
  685. 1
  686. 1
  687. 1
  688. 1
  689. 1
  690. 1
  691. 1
  692. 1
  693. 1
  694. 1
  695. 1
  696. 1
  697. 1
  698. 1
  699. 1
  700. 1
  701. 1
  702. 1
  703. 1
  704. 1
  705. 1
  706. 1
  707. 1
  708. 1
  709. 1
  710. 1
  711. 1
  712. 1
  713. 1
  714. 1
  715. 1
  716. 1
  717. 1
  718. 1
  719. 1
  720. 1
  721. 1
  722. 1
  723. 1
  724. 1
  725. 1
  726. 1
  727. 1
  728. 1
  729. 1
  730. 1
  731. 1
  732. 1
  733. 1
  734. 1
  735. 1
  736. 1
  737. 1
  738. 1
  739. 1
  740. 1
  741. 1
  742. 1
  743. 1
  744. 1
  745. 1
  746. 1
  747. 1
  748. 1
  749. 1
  750. 1
  751. 1
  752. 1
  753. 1
  754. 1
  755. 1
  756. 1
  757. 1
  758. 1
  759. 1
  760. 1
  761. 1
  762. 1
  763. 1
  764. 1
  765. 1
  766. 1
  767. 1
  768. 1
  769. 1
  770. 1
  771. 1
  772. 1
  773. 1
  774. 1
  775. Here is a quote from your "Task & Purpose" web site: How Ukraine is using artillery to stop Russian forces in their tracks Another reason why artillery has proven to be so deadly in this war is the terrain itself. The Donets Basin, known as the Donbas, is defined by rivers that feed into a spiderweb of tributaries and ravines, which are all very difficult for tanks to cross, said retired Army Col. David Glantz, a military historian and an expert on the Red Army during World War II. Not only do tanks have to cross those water obstacles, but the ravines and gullies provide natural cover for anti-tank guns, and because Ukraine is typically very flat, gunners can see enemy tanks from great distances, Glantz told Task & Purpose. This terrain contributed to the horrendous losses the Red Army sustained during their three attempts to recapture the Donbas from the Germans in 1943. Glantz said he recently reviewed a survey of Red Army commanders taken in 1943 as part of his research for a book he is writing about the fighting in the Donbas, during which a Soviet tank corps would generally lose about 120 of its 200 tanks within a week “Universally, the commanders of those tank and mechanized corps tasked with breaking into the Donbas literally curse in their reports the balkas [ravines] and the ovrags [gullies] – basically, the terrain that makes using tanks very difficult in terms of where they can move because crossing the darn things is a task. It requires bridging in many cases.” The Red Army finally took the Donbas in 1943 through attrition. Their tank forces suffered heavy losses but the Germans could not withstand the sheer number of armies that the Soviets threw at them, he said. “I call the Donbas a graveyard for Soviet armor,” Glantz said. Nearly 80 years later, Russian President Vladimir Putin’s forces appear to be faring little better. The combination of difficult terrain and excellent Ukrainian gunners have turned the Donbas region into a killing ground, and the hard-learned lessons from the last time Russian forces fought there, appear to have been forgotten.
    1
  776. 1
  777. 1
  778. 1
  779. 1
  780. 1
  781. 1
  782. 1
  783. 1
  784. 1
  785. 1
  786. 1
  787. 1
  788. For Russian security guarantees, I propose a demilitarized zone (DMZ) from the East Bank of the Dneipr River to the West bank of the Moscow River. In that way both Kyiv and Moscow will sit on the border of the DMZ. UN Peacekeepers would be the only personnel allowed to carry firearms in the DMZ and they would be restricted to side arms and shotguns, and forbidden to carry automatic assault rifles. Also the UN Peacekeepers could have armored vehicle, those vehicles must be unarmed as any heavy weapons are forbidden in the DMZ. The troops in the UN Peacekeeper forces can be drawn only from countries in South America, Africa, Indonesia, Philippines and India. The entire UN Peacekeeper operation would be supervised by Swiss military who would have command over the regiments of the UN Peacekeepers. Only Swiss military can hold the rank of colonel or above as that is the rank required for the head of regiment. The official currency within the DMZ would be Swiss Francs and NATO, Russia and the Swiss would equally fund the operations of the UN Peacekeepers. Let's find out just how committed the Swiss are to peace if it requires that they spend their own money to fund it. One might go a bit further and declare that the only official languages, in which all regulations are published would be French and Russian. The Ukrainians understand Russian although most Russians have trouble understanding Ukrainian therefore allowing Russian is a compromise. Required French as the other language deprives any of the UN Peacekeeper Troops except a few African Nations from having their native language as an official language, but does advantage the Swiss military command because French is one of the three official languages in Switzerland. One final requirement which may seem odd, but I will explain. All UN Peacekeepers must be married, and reside with their families in the DMZ. This should reduce the occurrence of sexual assault on the population of the DMZ as has happened with UN Peacekeepers in Africa. A further requirement would be that the force of UN Peacekeeping soldiers be divided equally between between genders with the number of female Peacekeepers equal to the number of male Peacekeepers. I think the Ukrainians might accept this, but I expect the Russians would only accept this with great difficulty. Nevertheless, these proposals would provide Russia with security guarantees of its border, which is what Russia says it wants. Let's find out just how serious Russia wants border security and what they will concede in order to get it. I doubt they would accept any of this even though these are reasonable proposals. Crimea requires different but similar conditions. Crimea becomes a fully demilitarized UN Protectorate which means that neither Ukraine not Russia have control of Crimea. A perfect compromise. Neither side gets what they want, but both sides get equal treatment. I await the replies to this comment with great anticipation. Thanks for taking the time to read it.
    1
  789. 1
  790. 1
  791. 1
  792. 1
  793. 1
  794. 1
  795. 1
  796. 1
  797. 1
  798. 1
  799. 1
  800. 1
  801. 1
  802. 1
  803. 1
  804. 1
  805. 1
  806. 1
  807. 1
  808. 1
  809. 1
  810. 1
  811. 1
  812. 1
  813. 1
  814. 1
  815. 1
  816. 1
  817. 1
  818. 1
  819. 1
  820. 1
  821. 1
  822. 1
  823. 1
  824. 1
  825. 1
  826. 1
  827. 1
  828. 1
  829. 1
  830. 1
  831. 1
  832. 1
  833. 1
  834. 1
  835. 1
  836. 1
  837. 1
  838. 1
  839. 1
  840. 1
  841. 1
  842. 1
  843. 1
  844. 1
  845. 1
  846. 1
  847. 1
  848. 1
  849. 1
  850. 1
  851. 1
  852. 1
  853. 1
  854. 1
  855. 1
  856. 1
  857. 1
  858. 1
  859. 1
  860. 1
  861. 1
  862. 1
  863. I think the breakthrough is supposed to be the use of a "room temperate" superconductor to fabricate magnets capable of generate the magnetic field density required to contain the plasma. For a number of years before he retried, my father lead the group at Oak Ridge National Labs who designed the superconducting magnets used in the tokamak experimental apparatus at ORNL. My father's specific area of expertise within cryogenic physics was superconductivity. He had low expectations for using the "room temperature" superconductors because their material properties, also described in this video, prevented making wires from the material which crumbles easily. The design of the magnet shown in this video, and how it uses the superconductor in layers is very ingenious, and deserves description as a breakthrough. HOWEVER, nothing else has changed about fusion reactors. As I have mentioned in other replies here, a fusion reactor generates a sleet of high-energy neutrons from which the rest of system is supposed to draw the energy to heat some liquid and drive a turbine etc. The elephant in the room is that all these high neutrons make the ENTIRE play radioactive over time, and compromise the structural integrity of the steel in the building in ways can only be guessed at now. So ... fusion reactors do produce radioactive waste ... the whole reactor ... Now the proponents of fusion reactors have never explained how to dispose of a completely radioactive building. Bulldoze it and bury it, maybe? A modern burial mound to bequeath many generations to come. Worse even than any fission reactor. Better to spend the money on improving fission reactors rather than building fusion reactors.
    1
  864. 1
  865. 1
  866. 1
  867. 1
  868. 1
  869. 1
  870. 1
  871. 1
  872. 1
  873. 1
  874. 1
  875. 1
  876. 1
  877. 1
  878. 1
  879. 1
  880. 1
  881. 1
  882. 1
  883. 1
  884. 1
  885. 1
  886. 1
  887. 1
  888. 1
  889. 1
  890. 1
  891. 1
  892. 1
  893. 1
  894. 1
  895. 1
  896. 1
  897. 1
  898. 1
  899. 1
  900. 1
  901. 1
  902. 1
  903. How interesting that General Shinseki is reviled for an aesthetic decision about headwear instead of being praised for adopting a wheeled vehicle and for the monumental changes he made to the force structure of the Army. The tank commanders are at the top of the prestige hierarchy in the Army just as the Naval Aviators are in the US Navy. Shinseki got savage push back from the advocates of treaded vehicles who with their supporters in Congress compelled Shinseki to do a series of expensive and largely unnecessary head-to-head tests of treaded versus wheeled vehicles. The tank advocates never forgave Shinseki for diminishing the role of tanks, and they focused their anger and revenge on Shinseki on the matter of dress uniform headgear. How sadly predictable that Shinseki is remembered for the trivial matter of headgear in the dress uniform rather than the substantive matter of force structure and the adoption of more practical and logistically supportable wheeled combat vehicles. Add to that the comment also made below that Shinseki told Congress the truth that it would take 300 thousand troops to occupy Iraq about which history showed he was dead-right as opposed to the fantasy that Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld was peddling at the time. The tank clique and the neo-cons got revenge on General Shinseki, and he was forced to retire as Army Chief of Staff. Clinton brought him back as the Secretary of Veterans Affairs where he began but was never able to finish cleaning up the VA mess. It is interesting to note that Clinton's appointment of Admiral Borda to Chief of Naval Operations drew the ire of Naval Aviators because Borda was the first Chief of Naval Operations who rose from the ranks to General Staff. Borda was hounded by the Naval elite about a misunderstanding about battle ribbons that lead to Borda committing suicide in despair over the matter. It is especially interesting to note that Shinseki was the first Asian American member of the General Staff and Admiral Borda was a Jewish-American who was Chief of Naval Operations. I feel certain that animosity against those two ethnic groups had a lot to do with how unjustly Shinseki and Borda were treated by their respective branches of the military. As an historical footnote, Borda was born in Ukraine.
    1
  904. 1
  905. 1
  906. 1
  907. 1
  908. 1
  909. 1
  910. 1
  911. 1
  912. 1
  913. Unfortunately, the land that Russian has occupied is extremely value. It is te source of Ukraine's "blac soil" which makes Ukraine who effective in Agriculture. Nobody understands why that type of black soil except for an inexplicable occurrence in a small area in Australia. The Black Soil in Ukraine is sufficiently valuable that ships will load up and smuggle the soil to other areas. The are the area that Russia occupies is more than just a chunk of land even coastal territory. As far as reparations are concerned if would make more sense to force all Russian grain to Ukraine at a price at some percent below the market price, and then let Ukraine sell the grain on the open market. Sharing revenue from fossil fuels simply puts Ukraine in the position of wanting to increase product much to irritation of the Climate Crisis. Let me give you some insight into Putin's mind and Xi's as well. Putin, Xi and I were all born in in the last quarter of 1952. That makes us all 72 years old. You begin to confront the end of your like when you get beyond seventy, and you begin to wonder what your legacy will be. Notice that both Putin and Xi are Nationalists therefore the natural place to leave your mark is the territorial expansion. Beware of an old man in a hurry. Fun fact: Putin Palace's in Sochi has been razed to the ground and there is much speculation about why. My belief is that some sabotage did visible damage to the building. Putin simply destroyed the entire building rather than try to fix it which would take time and give other Russian resistance that idea that successful attack on the Putin's Palace was possible and effective. https://img.nzz.ch/2024/10/10/f9cc7e9c-e8ed-400c-b132-e0bd33d783e5.png
    1
  914. 1
  915. 1
  916. 1
  917. 1
  918. 1
  919. 1
  920. 1
  921. 1
  922. 1
  923. 1
  924. 1
  925. 1
  926. 1
  927. 1
  928. 1
  929. 1
  930. 1
  931. 1
  932. 1
  933. 1
  934. 1
  935. 1
  936. 1
  937. 1
  938. 1
  939. 1
  940. 1
  941. 1
  942. 1
  943. 1
  944. 1
  945. 1
  946. 1
  947. 1
  948. 1
  949. 1
  950. 1
  951. 1
  952. Although highly speculative, if Belarus attacks Ukraine from the North then Poland might enter the war with troops. Poland can enter a war and remain part of NATO. All the NATO treaty commits its members to do is to defend an attack on one member as an attack on all members. NATO truly is defensive and does nothing to prevent a member from attacking some non-NATO country. That is exactly what the US did in the Iraq Gulf War and in the Afghan war. While it is true that some NATO countries such as Canada and Romania and the Baltic countries sent troops to assist the US, and eventhough people have represented the US wars in the Middle East or even the Yugoslavian War as NATO actions it really was not under the NATO treaty and the NATO countries that allied with the US in the Yugoslavian War and the Middle Eastern Wars was really about the US looking on those NATO with favor. Note that neither France nor Germany although NATO countries never participated in those wars with the US. The point is that Poland could enter the Russo-Ukrainian War on the side of Ukraine without violating the NATO treaty or requiring that other NATO countries from joining. Another consideration in favor of Poland joining Ukraine is historical given that Ukraine, especially Western Ukraine was part of the Polish Lithuanian Commonwealth which lasted from 1563 to 1795 which is comparable to the age of the US now. At the height of the Polish Lithuanian Commonweath it extended from the Baltic Sea to the Black Sea. The Polish Lithuanian Commonwealth was a major counterweight to the expanding Russian Empire, and it was Catherine the Great who dealt the death blow to the Polish Lithunian Commonwealth when Catherine annexed the area of the Black Sea from Russia to Odessa as well as whatwe consider Ukraine today. Sound familiar. Poland wants to avoid that today and would prefer an independent Ukraine to a Ukraine dominated by Russia. It is also worth noting that part of the reason why Ukrainian is a different language from Russia is because of influence and incorporation of parts of Polish into Ukrainian. However that is a story for a different comment.
    1
  953. The desire by France for a Europe without reliance on North American often masks a desire for France to be the arms dealer of choice to a "European Army." However, with Sweden a member of NATO, France may find that Sweden can offer better purchases terms to other NATO countries than France can. I believe the US should support Ukraine; however, we should realize that many of the large military spending is actually the US transferring ownership of F-16 fighters that the US would have to put in storage otherwise. I expect that the willingness of many NATO countries to provide arms to Ukraine comes with steep discounts on US equipment to replace the weapons given to Ukraine. I suspect we will see a number of African countries who had Soviet tanks now have Bradley fighting vehicles and Stryker systems, which are better suited to the environment of their battles. Keep in mind that selling F-16 at a discount means a larger after market in parts, maintenance services and the sale of more advanced missiles that the F-16 can carry. This is the McDonalds pricing strategy: sell the burger at the cost of manufacture, and make up the profit on the fries, milkshakes and other soft drinks. By the way, the most expensive ingredient in your cup of iced soft drink is the ice because the cost of the energy to freeze and frozen water exceeds the cost of any other component in the carbonated water, the plastic cup, the flavoring syrup. The money to be made from F-16 aircraft sales comes for the external parts and replacement costs. France wants to have that business, but the US has it now. I think Sweden produces more effective and better designed weapons for operation in the European terrain and environment.
    1
  954. 1
  955. 1
  956. 1
  957. 1
  958. 1
  959. 1
  960. 1
  961. 1
  962. 1
  963. 1
  964. 1
  965. 1
  966. 1
  967. 1
  968. 1
  969. 1
  970. 1
  971. 1
  972. 1
  973. 1
  974. 1
  975. 1
  976. China makes a serious mistake thinking the Biden Administration is weak. The CCP has little regard for laws and treaties and fails to comprehend anyone respecting limitations imposed by a treaty organization such as NATO. The Biden Administration has shown great restraint by avoiding a direct confrontation with Russia while doing much to provide weapons to Ukraine. If you want to demonstrate that NATO exists purely for defensive purposes then you must avoid using the NATO treaty as a means to attack Russia without Russia having first attacked a NATO. It should make the CCP concerned that the Russian invasion of Ukraine has caused the EU countries to consider having an EU military as well as causing Germany to reverse seventy years of foreign policy and now will expand it's military budget. The Biden Administration accomplished that through diplomatic means. The behavior of the CCP in the Pacific has pushed Japan to reverse the same seventy year policy against using the military in foreign engagements. The Biden Administration encouraged that as well. What the Biden Administration has done in Europe using the NATO treaty to get the European Country to rearm, and using Mutual Defense Agreements in the Pacific to increase weapons sold to Taiwan, to encourage the Japanese to expand their self defense to include any country attacking Taiwan should give the CCP pause. Attacking Taiwan before the end of the Biden Administration would provide a political gift to Biden. The US can cloth itself in self righteous indignation and even make comparisons with the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor. A war with China would close political divisions in the US. There is another aspect to a war with China that as a US citizen it shames me to admit, racism would help fuel a war against China in a way that a war against Russia never would. The white supremacists including those in the Republican Party support Putin eventhough Russia invading Ukraine involves "white" people fighting one another. When it comes to China then all the political parties unite in hostility to China. The white-supremacists would support a war on China for reasons alone. The fact the US would have Japan, Taiwan and Korea as allies works in favor of white-supremacists thinking because it would be the US, a "white" country, leading Asian countries to counter an Asian adversary. A war between China and the US has some many ugly overtones that it makes it disgusting to imagine. However the CCP could deliberately walk into such a war because of the CCP already using Han racism as an excuse for the genocide of the Uyghurs. We could easily end up with a Third World War in which China and Russian are allied against an coalition of US, EU, Japan and ANZ (don't forget Australia, it can function as a huge air base). The CCP could cause all of that to occur if they attacked Taiwan.
    1
  977. 1
  978. 1
  979. 1
  980. 1
  981. 1
  982. 1
  983. 1
  984. 1
  985. 1
  986. 1
  987. 1
  988. 1
  989. 1
  990. 1
  991. 1
  992. 1
  993. 1
  994. 1
  995. 1
  996. 1
  997. 1
  998. 1
  999. 1
  1000. 1
  1001. 1
  1002. 1
  1003. 1
  1004. 1
  1005. 1
  1006. Here’s how you can help Ukraine Across the world, many people are desperate to support Ukraine as its people try to fend off a Russian invasion that has left hundreds dead, thousands homeless and millions fearful of what could become of their country in the weeks ahead. Voices of Children, a charitable foundation based in Ukraine, has been serving the psychological needs of children affected by the war in the country’s east since 2015, according to its website. The group’s psychologists specialize in art therapy and provide general psychosocial support with group classes or individual sessions. Many of its psychologists are based in the regions of Luhansk and Donetsk, areas that have long been controlled by Russian-backed separatists and that are on the front lines of the current, wider conflict. Now, Voices of Children is providing assistance to children and families all over Ukraine, even helping with evacuations. You can donate here. Journalists with the Kyiv Independent have done tremendous work covering the war, offering the world constant updates as they fear for themselves, their families and their homes. The Independent has started a GoFundMe asking for support, but they’ve also promoted a separate GoFundMe — “Keep Ukraine’s media going” — for journalists around the country who have received less international attention. “[Ukraine’s reporters] have shown extraordinary courage, but the reality on the ground is that most operations cannot continue from Ukraine alone,” one organizer wrote. “This fundraiser is aimed at helping media relocate, set-up back offices and continue their operations from neighboring countries.” José Andrés, the beloved D.C. chef famous for feeding people in need around the world, is already in Europe with his World Central Kitchen team helping provide “thousands of meals in Poland, Romania and even inside Ukraine,” he wrote on Twitter. Anyone who wishes to donate to the efforts can go here. Razom for Ukraine was founded in 2014 and has since launched efforts to build a stronger democracy in the country. Now, according to its website, the nonprofit is “focused on purchasing medical supplies for critical situations like blood loss and other tactical medicine items. We have a large procurement team of volunteers that tracks down and purchases supplies and a logistics team that then gets them to Ukraine.” Razom — which means “together” in Ukrainian — posted a list of the lifesaving supplies it has already purchased and is asking for more support here. Click on the website for Care, the international humanitarian juggernaut, and a pop-up window appears. “UKRAINE EMERGENCY,” the alert says, with a photo of a woman holding a child. “Families in Ukraine are fleeing violence and urgently need emergency aid. CARE is providing food, water, and more,” the homepage says. The group has partnered with People in Need and hopes to build a fund that can reach 4 million people, especially women, girls and the elderly. Donations for Care can be made here. Save the Children, founded more than a century ago, is blunt about the grueling nature of its work: “We work in the hardest-to-reach places, where it’s toughest to be a child,” its homepage says. The organization says it is “gravely concerned” for the children of Ukraine and Afghanistan. Its donation page says that $50 can prevent three children from going hungry for a month, $150 can provide warm blankets for 30 children, and $300 can furnish masks to refugee health workers on the front lines. Sunflower of Peace is a small nonprofit with ambitions to help Ukrainian orphans and internally displaced people. A post on its Facebook page in mid-February said it had launched a fundraiser for first-aid medical tactical backpacks. Each backpack, it says, can save up to 10 people. They’re packed with bandages and anti-hemorrhagic medicines, among other critical items. The group has worked mostly off its Facebook page, where it’s accepting donations. Even with Western support, Ukraine’s army and its legions of volunteer fighters are severely outgunned by Russian forces. The National Bank of Ukraine has created an account where people from around the world can donate to the country’s military. You can also donate via this link https://savelife.in.ua/en/donate/ . It’s the biggest fund in Ukraine that supports Ukrainian Army.
    1
  1007. 1
  1008. 1
  1009. 1
  1010. 1
  1011. 1
  1012. 1
  1013. 1
  1014. 1
  1015. 1
  1016. 1
  1017. 1
  1018. 1
  1019. 1
  1020. 1
  1021. 1
  1022. 1
  1023. 1
  1024. 1
  1025. 1
  1026. 1
  1027. 1
  1028. 1
  1029. 1
  1030. 1
  1031. 1
  1032. 1
  1033. 1
  1034.  @jaspertanner3463  My family is from Alabama although I grew up in Western NY, and the comment is dead-on. However, I would add this to the comment, "Folks in the South will not only tell you their life story, but they will also ask you to sit down so they can. However, they will want to know yours. These is a reason for it. People in the South attach get significance to who your ancestors are, what family you come from. Therefore, knowing someone's life story establishes where they are in the social order. In my case, my mother always insisted that we were descended from the indentured servants and petty criminals sent to the Oglethorpe Colony in Georgia. We have family throughout Alabama, Georgia and Tennessee. On one occasion when I visited Australia, I was staying in a hotel on Botany Bay where the first prison ships landed. The monument list everyone one the ships, and the convicts have dot in front of their name. My family appeared as a British sailor, a guard and a convict. So we had all the bases covered. It was reassuring to know that a generation after my ancestors were sent to a penal colony in the American Colonials that when the British could no longer send their convicts to North America, but now had to send them to Australia that my family had continued their thieving ways. I told that story to a fellow in Atlanta who shared my family name, and it visibly disturbed him. I always felt the being descended from the criminal classes put me in the mainstream of culture in the US. Now you see, I have now told you my family history. :)
    1
  1035. 1