Comments by "Sarcasm Unlimited" (@sarcasmunlimited1570) on "MGUY Australia" channel.

  1. In the US, such a bank would be boycotted.
    1
  2. To destroy car racing completely, those EV race cars should all be RC remote controlled. The next progression would be to switch from expensive big cars to small RC scale models, and allow RC hobbyists to participate.
    1
  3. But they are saving the planet.
    1
  4. EVs aren't the only things that are "safe and effective."
    1
  5. One thing the ad got right is linking Wokesim to the Green Agenda, since they both are a manifestation of a shared and insidious ideology - Globalism. If you drew the US VP's Venn diagram of the two, it would be nearly the same single circle. The ad should have concluded with: Keir Starmer approves of this message.
    1
  6. Rolls Royce seems to have adopted the slogan "Powering Sustainable Flight." I'd rather that they didn't strive for sustained flight, and land from time to time in accordance with their schedules.
    1
  7. The Waitrose worker ascertained it was a petrol or a diesel car that was on fire. The Telegraph forgot to mention that it wasn't a DEI vehicle, so now people will assume it must have been, for that very reason. Not everyone will appreciate this humour, especially not woke libtards.
    1
  8. Trudeau is a first class Woke idiot, and he follows WEF instructions to the letter.
    1
  9. If the UK storage sites are now only half full, then they must also be half empty.
    1
  10. Yeah, but Progressives are even more dense, and don't want to accept reality.
    1
  11.  @clintthomas1854  Wouldn't uranium (or other similar material) hold more energy, pound for pound?
    1
  12. If EVs made sense, people would have built and bought them before Climate Hysteria.
    1
  13. "There will be one cap for smaller cars and another for light commercial vehicles...," and a dunce cap for Bowen and Albanese.
    1
  14. Some drivers (owner operators) are paid per mile driven.
    1
  15. No wonder Globalist governments want 15-minute cities. That's about as far as one can hope to safely and reliably operate an EV.
    1
  16. If governments continue their Net-Zero push, eventually people will have no choice but to buy inconvenience on wheels, because there won't be enough cars available for purchase. So what will happen is that those who can afford it will buy electric, and those who can't will use public transport. Both of these options reduce productivity by the value of wasted time workers spend on travel and maintenence of their EVs. It will bury the UK economy, but that's what Starmer has been commissioned to do by the WEF, and all those migrants current and in this century will contribute to UK's demise.
    1
  17. @raypitts4880  If you had the roof attached to a huge helium balloon, it could have been even lighter.
    1
  18. @Colours01-c5r  Bugs will cause bulimia in most of us.
    1
  19. Even though the risk is small, it is totally unnecessary. A rational person will simply avoid it, and stay away from large lithium batteries.
    1
  20. Does burning biomass produce more CO2 than burning natural gas? If so, how was that deemed to be a "Green" alternative?
    1
  21. I would hope it doesn't take till 2025 to charge to 80%, despite what that heading says about the Porsche Taycan.
    1
  22. There must be a silent segment among EV owners who are too vain to confess they have made a terrible mistake, and they will add to the growing numbers of EV deserters.
    1
  23. I just saw an ad for an EV claiming to have a range of 483 km. Of course that's derived from controlled lab tests simulating ideal conditions, using up 100% of a full charge. Of course, if you actually drove like that, you'd end up stopped probably in the middle of nowhere with a dead battery. You can't drive till the battery dies, so the quoted range should be calculated by setting the limit at 20% of battery charge to be left in reserve, or some other reasonable number.
    1
  24. An EV car might get lost in meaningless banter with another EV and forget to watch the road, leading to tragic consequences.
    1
  25. Hollywood should capitalize on this theme and produce a horror movie where a self-driving car stalks a hapless pedestrian chosen by the vehicle's AI. The car would be so cunning that it would follow the pedestrian wherever he went and outsmart him every time. If he walks into a shopping mall and comes out the back, the car is waiting there and turns its lights on as soon as he steps off the sidewalk. Script writers could have a field day with this.
    1
  26.  @robertkubrick3738  Something like that.
    1
  27. One might say "it was hoist with its own petard."
    1
  28. After seeing how Australia's governments totally mis-handled Covid response, it unsurprising to see them act even more disastrously in dealing with Climate non-Emergency by introducing Climate Hysteria.
    1
  29. That solar farm photo is actually quite encouraging. Look at all the greenery suddenly breaking through after the hailstorm.
    1
  30. Saving the planet, but killing the people. The planet doesn't need saving. It will always be here no matter what anyone does, and regardless of whether or not humanity is still around.
    1
  31. Vehicle manufacturers should just keep making 2031 (and call it 2031) models in successive years so they never produce a 2032 or later model, thus beating the EPA dictate. Look ma, there is no 2032 model. They could keep this up until a sane government comes into power.
    1
  32. That is not the entire line. The line extends between Perth and Sydney, with about 2 thousand miles in between without charging stations.
    1
  33. The very fact of being Leftist is a sign of a predisposition to dementia.
    1
  34. If not EVs, we can rely on vaccines to save us from a hurricane, flood, or fire. Biden is on record declaring that the most important thing people should do when a hurricane approaches is get vaccinated or boosted. And I figure if vaccines work on hurricanes, they must also work on floods and fires. After all, they are natural disasters of a sort.
    1
  35. The planet is not in any danger, and it will be here no matter what we do. So there is no such thing as "saving the planet," and everyone should stop saying it's to save the planet. As to saving humans and other living things, there is no scenario or model which actually predicts their demise, and even then no model has yet made a valid (true) prediction in the past, so there is no reason to believe any current prediction will be realized. Even the IPCC study of extreme weather events hasn't found any increase in the frequency or severity of such things.
    1
  36. Dozens of car manufacturers are planning to only produce EVs by 2030. That same number will go bankrupt in a year or two after that, or they will have reverted back to gasoline/diesel and hybrid (not plug in hybrid).
    1
  37. The Globalists have this figured out. If new petrol cars become scarce, forcing citizens to hang onto existing petrol cars, governments will just introduce measures to make used cars unaffordable to operate. The whole thing is heading into economic collapse.
    1
  38.  @speedyserbian  I didn't know Dodge produced any 8s.
    1
  39. The Climate Change propagandists picked the wrong target. Instead of the weather having more frequent and more severe adverse events, it's the Climate Change EVs. Note: Even the IPCC's own study showed that extreme weather events aren't getting more frequent nor more severe.
    1
  40. Social ideology has no place in business decisions.
    1
  41. In that stand-off scenario, the US commanders could ask the Chinese for a reprieve to recharge their batteries using wind and solar. The Chinese would be sympathetic, as long as the US side agreed to purchase Chinese batteries and related products. In the meantime, the two sides could share meals and have barbecues. Unfortunately the food would not include steak, because that wouldn't be environmentally friendly.
    1
  42. A nuclear weapon can also experience a thermal event, and can be seen from miles away.
    1
  43. Maybe those EV buses can be used in warmer parts of the USA only.
    1
  44. Probably the reason Maserati named its EV Folgore is that it is a Folgorne conclusion that it will suck.
    1
  45. Tesla could save the day by altering the technology and renaming it Smart Summons. A printer under the glove compartment will print out a summons every time the self-driving feature detects that the driver has committed a traffic violation.
    1
  46. The solution is simple. Provide live sex shows at each charging farm. And for the fairer sex, get them shopping online.
    1
  47. EVs ought to be equipped with an eject feature, like fighter jets. But instead of a parachute, a ball self inflates around the ejected person before he hits the ground. This might not be optimal in garages that have a ceiling.
    1
  48. Police won't have an advantage after emergency and other public services organizations switch to EVs. Then all a suspect has to do is head out into hilly countryside and after an hour the Police EV will be done. This is because they will be driving at extreme speeds and the EV most likely won't have a full charge to begin with.
    1
  49. Suppose you are renting a car. You show up at the counter and are offered an EV. Your goal is to camp somewhere near Alice Springs. You have no confidence you will actually get there on a battery, so you rent an ICE car instead. Now people in Europe, like those in Liechtenstein, may not have the same problem because they think "how many times do I drive to the Riviera?" The thing is, that the one time you do want to drive to the Riviera will turn out to be a major inconvenience.
    1
  50. To get to Net-Zero, Google should buy carbon credits from Bill Gates. Gates has hoarded huge supplies of carbon credits so he could keep polluting with abandon and without any limits.
    1