Comments by "Harry Stoddard" (@HarryS77) on "Jordan Peterson Almost Says Something Cool, Then Falls Back Into Lameness" video.
-
25
-
15
-
14
-
11
-
10
-
Taylor Phoenix Scientists couldn't actually image an atom until very recently, and because of the nature of how things work on those very small scales, atoms don't really "look" like anything. Some images at the atomic level aren't even processed with optical methods but instead use other means to interpret data as an image.
Before these scanning methods were developed, how did scientists form an understanding of how atoms are structured? Probably because they weren't interested in how they looked, but in how they behave. By performing experiments, they were able to discover an atom's mass, charge, spin, and how it interacts with other atoms.
The discovery of the double helix was the opposite: discovering its structure through imaging elucidated aspects of its function that we previously couldn't have known about. In the case of the Watson and Crick, we have a record to show how they came to discover the double helix. No such record exists in the case of the ancient Chinese or any other peoples.
Instead, JP would have us believe that the knowledge of DNA is somehow inbuilt into the human mind thanks to Jungian archetypes. There's no evidence for that, and quite a lot to the contrary. If early cultures had had an intuitive understanding of DNA all along, it's unlikely that they would have developed medical practices based around the absolute desperation of remedies, herbs, powderized animal parts, blood magic, cannibalism, incantations, and spirits. Most damning of all for JP's hack theory is that the image of two braided strands is NOT a representation of the double helix, which has its strands twisting in parallel, NOT crossing over each other as in the picture of the serpents.
The knowledge that the Earth is a sphere was not "lost" after the Greeks.
https://www.thoughtco.com/did-medieval-people-believe-in-a-flat-earth-1221612
6
-
4
-
2
-
2
-
1