Comments by "Harry Stoddard" (@HarryS77) on "Angela Collier " channel.

  1. 100 tampons? Sure. A suit that fits? Why though?
    50
  2. "You're being sorta glib" then posts a single "study." The irony. Is this your field? Because it also isn't the field of the two authors of that study, both of whom work in psychology. Yikes. Their paper also has no scientific merit. It's not a study, a review, or a meta-analysis. It's them whining about their persecution complex for a few pages. It's not hard to find contrarians in the sciences on any topic. What you can't provide is a substantial body of evidence that shows current levels of fluoride in water present a danger to the population. When people cite falling IQ scores (which have been rising since water fluoridation became common practice), they almost always refer to studies with fluoride levels many times what's recommended. Everything is a poison at the right concentration.
    7
  3.  @Freddisred  Wasn't that Rian Johnson?
    7
  4. @kirkhodges1946  Ok so you don't know what irony is. We can still work with that. Do you have any studies, not articles, actual studies, that show the recommended levels of fluoride cause x problems, be they IQ or whatever?
    4
  5. @kirkhodges1946  You're the one making claim, telling other people they don't know anything, and posting silly articles. You might need to find another explanation for why your IQ is so low.
    4
  6.  @donsample1002  What do you mean they're great for putting stuff in orbit, as if they exist and we know their practicality!?
    4
  7. I've read enough KSR to know it would be an epic disaster.
    3
  8. If you were citing quantum mechanics in eighth grade, you should've gotten bumped up a few grades.
    3
  9. Ugh, all Elizabeth Theranos had to say was, "It's down the stack." Almost the perfect scam.
    2
  10. You didn't fail in your video. Videos like that have to be graded on a curve. And every video has its own unique curve.
    1
  11. Do we need it, do we need it, how much?
    1
  12. Well There's Your Problem Episode 4 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hw2t0MOGnVc It's a podcast with slides.
    1
  13. "things referring to one another in a closed loop holds no ground for anyone but themselves." That's just any system, though. You can't look at a system, notice that it's self-referential, and conclude that it's bs.
    1
  14. I was really hoping this was Angela's Nigel Cheese arc.
    1
  15. 28:17 So, like, did this just happen?
    1
  16. Jebaited
    1
  17. Pretty soon I won't need to exist at all.
    1
  18. Malcolm Gladwell has the distinction of taking tons of money to lie on behalf of Big Tobacco for years and years before spinning that off into writing thinly-disguised self-help for white collar professionals, extant or aspiring, and no one, not even Stinky Pinker, can take that away from him. My Mann-Gell moment(s) is wishing more music critics knew anything about the mechanics of music. It's easy to pick on Pitchfork, which is what I'm going to do. In one review, they write that "most pianos are well-tempered" which is wrong by about 300 years. The fact that Sabine what's her name isn't featured is a minor crime against Michio Kaku.
    1
  19. You left off string theory.
    1
  20. The first place I heard of STEAM was in Finland. In the 70s. It think they called it education. It's this weird idea where you teach children all the subjects and they have better results than if you hyperfocus on what you think is viable in the market.
    1
  21. I'm sorry, but you can't ask for piece of fiction that explores space economics and then bash the Mars Trilogy as "criminally boring."
    1
  22. It's still bad, but shouldn't the line have been, A caterpillar that lives forever never becomes a butterfly? Can I be an underpaid writer now? Is Picard what happens when your showrunner is a Pulitzer Prize winner?
    1