Comments by "Harry Stoddard" (@HarryS77) on "Rebel HQ"
channel.
-
116
-
84
-
35
-
They say she could have come out a long time ago, but what would have happened if she had?
What if she'd come out with her allegations when Kavanaugh was nominated to the D.C. Circuit? Well, why is she coming out now? Why didn't she do it earlier, when he was clerking for Ken Starr? That party was 20 years ago.
Or how about when he was a clerk for Ken Starr? But then the same excuse arises. Why didn't she do it earlier? That party was 10 years ago.
And we'd keep backpedalling like this until we're left with the only possible option: she "should" have come out right after the incident. So why didn't she? There is an abundance of testimonials from victims of sexual assault that explain why they didn't come forward. We know that most rapes and other forms of sexual assault go unreported. Or you could look at what happened with Brock Turner. How did the court perceive the case? Nice college kid, bright future, good at sports, so what if he raped some girl? This happened recently, in this climate of increased scrutiny of sex crimes, and there are plenty of similar examples. Or think of the Cosby trial: it took the word of 50 women or whatever it was to finally convince people to take the charges seriously.
Ford would have been making her allegation in the 90s when women were believed even less than they are now. For Republicans the dynamics of the situation haven't changed in the 30 intervening years, her word against the word of altar boy scholar athlete virgin Brett Kavanaugh.
So when Republicans ask why she didn't come out earlier, flash them a mirror. They're the goblins that keep stuff like this in the dark.
35
-
32
-
28
-
28
-
27
-
26
-
19
-
16
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4