Comments by "Nerdlin Geeksly" (@nerdlingeeksly5192) on "BBC News" channel.

  1. 754
  2. 592
  3. 134
  4. 117
  5. 90
  6. 77
  7. 71
  8. 67
  9. 64
  10. 61
  11. 54
  12. 53
  13. 49
  14. 49
  15. 48
  16. 43
  17. 39
  18. 38
  19. 36
  20. 32
  21. 31
  22. 30
  23. 25
  24. 22
  25. 21
  26. 20
  27. 19
  28. 18
  29. 18
  30. 17
  31. 17
  32. 15
  33. 15
  34. 14
  35. 14
  36. 13
  37. 13
  38. 13
  39. 12
  40. 11
  41. 11
  42. 11
  43. 11
  44. 10
  45. 9
  46. 9
  47. 9
  48. 9
  49. 9
  50. 9
  51. 8
  52. 8
  53. 8
  54. 7
  55. 7
  56. 7
  57. 7
  58. 7
  59. 7
  60. 6
  61. 6
  62. 6
  63. 6
  64. 6
  65. 6
  66. 6
  67. 6
  68. 6
  69. 6
  70. 5
  71. 5
  72. 5
  73. 5
  74. 5
  75. 5
  76. 5
  77. 5
  78. 5
  79. 5
  80. 5
  81. 4
  82. 4
  83. 4
  84. 4
  85. 4
  86. 4
  87. 4
  88. 4
  89. 4
  90. 3
  91. 3
  92. 3
  93. 3
  94. 3
  95. 3
  96. 3
  97. 3
  98. 3
  99. 3
  100. 3
  101. 3
  102. 3
  103. 3
  104. 3
  105. 3
  106. 3
  107. 3
  108. 3
  109. 3
  110. 3
  111. 3
  112. 2
  113. 2
  114. 2
  115. 2
  116. 2
  117. 2
  118. 2
  119. 2
  120. 2
  121. 2
  122. 2
  123. 2
  124. 2
  125. 2
  126. 2
  127. 2
  128. 2
  129. 2
  130. 2
  131. 2
  132. 2
  133. 2
  134. 2
  135. 2
  136. 2
  137. 2
  138. 2
  139. 2
  140. 2
  141. 2
  142. 2
  143. 2
  144. 2
  145. 2
  146. 2
  147. 2
  148. 2
  149. 2
  150. 2
  151. 2
  152. 2
  153. 2
  154. 2
  155. 2
  156. 2
  157. 2
  158. 2
  159. 2
  160. 2
  161. 2
  162. 2
  163. 2
  164. 1
  165. 1
  166. 1
  167. 1
  168. 1
  169. 1
  170. 1
  171. 1
  172. 1
  173. 1
  174. 1
  175. 1
  176. 1
  177. 1
  178. 1
  179. 1
  180. 1
  181. 1
  182. 1
  183. 1
  184. 1
  185. 1
  186. 1
  187. 1
  188. 1
  189. 1
  190. 1
  191. 1
  192. 1
  193. 1
  194. 1
  195. 1
  196. 1
  197. 1
  198. 1
  199. 1
  200. 1
  201. 1
  202. 1
  203. 1
  204. 1
  205. 1
  206. 1
  207. 1
  208. 1
  209. 1
  210. 1
  211. 1
  212. 1
  213. 1
  214. 1
  215. 1
  216. 1
  217. 1
  218. 1
  219. 1
  220. 1
  221. 1
  222. 1
  223. 1
  224. 1
  225. 1
  226. 1
  227. 1
  228. 1
  229. 1
  230. 1
  231. 1
  232. 1
  233. 1
  234. 1
  235. 1
  236. 1
  237. 1
  238. 1
  239. 1
  240. 1
  241. 1
  242. 1
  243. 1
  244. 1
  245. 1
  246. 1
  247. 1
  248. 1
  249. 1
  250. 1
  251. 1
  252. 1
  253. 1
  254. 1
  255. 1
  256. 1
  257. 1
  258. 1
  259. 1
  260. 1
  261. 1
  262. 1
  263. 1
  264. 1
  265. 1
  266. 1
  267. 1
  268. 1
  269. 1
  270. 1
  271. 1
  272. 1
  273. 1
  274. 1
  275. 1
  276. 1
  277. 1
  278. 1
  279. 1
  280. 1
  281. 1
  282. 1
  283. 1
  284. 1
  285. 1
  286. 1
  287. 1
  288. 1
  289. 1
  290. 1
  291. 1
  292. 1
  293.  @trips347  Afganistan was in response to 9/11 where a bunch of terrorists used plains to attack the USA and killed many innocent people, this was con an act of war and the US invoked article 5 calling on all NATO members to come to their aid; Iraq was a continuation of afganistan as 1 group turned into several and many of the terrorist groups moved operations there as well as into Africa these terrorists continued to vocally threaten not only the US but the EU as well, they even bombed a concert killing many innocent people. These barbaric people use there own children as suicide bombers and hold their own women, children, and elderly as hostages/human shields, they hide in civilian crowds and then open fire hoping that any NATO members don't shoot back or do and hit civilians trying to kill the terrorist; you honestly think NATO are the bad guys for declaring war on people who attacked the US first. The reason NATO and the UN got inv in the Serbian/Bosnian war was because there was a literal genocide going on, your gonna try and tell me it was bad that NATO wanted to stop a genocide? I'm sure this exception is perfectly justifiable, hell even you Russians got involved because you wanted to improve relations with the US. As for Syria, Yemen, and Libya, those weren't NATO operations, sure some members of NATO got involved but those operations were completely independent of NATO; Lybia in particular was because the mad sadistic dictator kept threatening the US with missiles so we went in to deal with him, but by the end of it his own people ended up killing him. Saying NATO got involved in these wars is like saying 2 or your friends go and start a fight with someone, other people say you and the rest of your friends got involved as a group because you usually have each others backs. Just because people say everyone got involved doesn't make it true.
    1
  294. 1
  295. 1
  296. 1
  297. 1
  298. 1
  299. 1
  300. 1
  301. 1
  302. 1
  303. 1
  304. 1
  305. 1
  306. 1
  307. 1
  308.  @lemonsarebitter2069  it could be a few people really, Russia and america were in a biological weapon arms race along side the nuclear one and while both agreed to sign the anti bioweapon proliferation treaty made by the U.N. both still have Labs with samples of diseases in them such as Anthrax and smallpox, as does China and a few less notable countries but the United States has been known to test on their own population in the past (I wouldn't doubt russia did too they did have such harsh things as the gulags and state sponsored alcoholism) sometimes entire cities like San Francisco sometimes small black populations although these have stopped as well due to massive backlash once found out and government watch dog groups make sure you keep an eye on in case they try and start again if they did it would guarantee an armed uprising so there's no way in hell the US would do it again on their own population. We can speculate all day but no one has enough answers to make a concrete claim it's all speculation and anecdotal guessing and the only way we would be able to get concrete evidence that this was a bioweapon attack is if someone involved in making it blew the whistle with evidence showing how they made it. All we do know is it is a variation/mutated strain of SARS and it originated in China but that's because it originated there doesn't mean the Chinese put it out it could have been another nation that planted with a spy or it could have just been a lucky mutation in SARS after all it's been a good long time since we last had a natural pandemic we were about due for one.
    1
  309. 1
  310. 1
  311. 1
  312. 1
  313. 1
  314. 1
  315. 1
  316. 1
  317. 1
  318. 1
  319. 1
  320. 1
  321. 1
  322. 1
  323. 1
  324. 1
  325. 1
  326. 1
  327. 1
  328. 1
  329. 1
  330. 1
  331. 1
  332. 1
  333. 1
  334. 1
  335. 1
  336. 1
  337. 1
  338. 1
  339. 1
  340. 1
  341. 1
  342. 1
  343. 1
  344. 1
  345. 1
  346. 1
  347. 1
  348. 1
  349. 1
  350. 1
  351. 1
  352. 1
  353. 1
  354. 1
  355. 1
  356. 1
  357. 1
  358. 1
  359. 1
  360. 1
  361. 1
  362. 1
  363. 1
  364. 1
  365. 1
  366. 1
  367. 1
  368. 1
  369. 1
  370. 1
  371. 1
  372. 1
  373. 1
  374. 1
  375. 1
  376. 1
  377. 1
  378. 1
  379. 1
  380. 1
  381. 1
  382. 1
  383. 1
  384. 1
  385. 1
  386. 1
  387. 1
  388. 1
  389. 1
  390. 1
  391. 1
  392. 1
  393. 1
  394. 1
  395. 1
  396. 1
  397. 1
  398. 1
  399. 1
  400. 1
  401. 1
  402. 1
  403. 1
  404. 1
  405. 1
  406. 1
  407. 1
  408. 1
  409. 1
  410. 1
  411. 1
  412. 1
  413. 1
  414. 1
  415. 1
  416. 1
  417. 1
  418. 1
  419. 1
  420. 1
  421. 1
  422. 1
  423. 1
  424. 1
  425. 1
  426. 1
  427. 1
  428. 1
  429. 1
  430. 1
  431. 1
  432. 1