Comments by "anotheranon" (@anotheranon3118) on "Despite EU sanctions, Serbian president secures gas deal with Putin" video.

@borapetrovic1957 Why did NATO intervene in the region in the 90s? Was it colonial thirst? Any thoughts?
8
@stream2watch It was irony, but I was hoping they'd reply.
2
@dzonikg What prompted NATO's involvement in the region? Again, was it colonial thirst? Was it the rivers of petroleum and gold flowing from Kosovo's mountains?
2
@stormdancer25 What NATO has in Kosovo is the KFOR, which is a peacekeeping operation.
2
Nah, don't. They are free to do these things if so they please and the EU should respect that. Just remind them of the gas deal the next time they are getting pre-accession funds, or that they want to negotiate some agreement, and act accordingly.
1
@cicadraza3671 They had plenty of other countries to build bases in. Any other reasons?
1
@cicadraza3671 The base came afterwards, but first there was another reason why NATO went into Kosovo/Serbia. Any clue what that may have been?
1
@bozakarlin9034 Why are you all not talking about the elephant in the room? Again, what was happening in the region to prompt NATO intervention? Why will none of you discuss it? Is it not talked about in Serbia? What may I be referring to?
1
@bozakarlin9034 No, that's not the answer. Again, and it is the 4th time I ask this, what was happening in the region in the late 90s that eventually led to NATO intervening? Anything unusual?
1
@bozakarlin9034 Ethnic cleansing of Albanians. Not that I am interested in this. What's interesting is that none of you have brought it up.
1
@MP-wi4dx All that I have criticized in my replies is how other users have been ignoring what ethnic Albanians went through in the context of the NATO intervention (who of course were not the only ones who suffered, but were the ones who had to deal with the most suffering). If you think that I deserve no replies, that's OK. You are entitled to your opinion.
1