Comments by "Greg Greg" (@SlowhandGreg) on "Tory conference sees donors calling to defund Sunak!" video.

  1. 2027* 113.01% 2026* 112.69% 2025* 112.79% 2024* 109.71% This is projected Debt to GDP under the current budgetary constraints so there can't be any Tax cuts I have slogan for Labour based on Cameron's renewable statement Get rid of the Trickle Down Cr*p
    3
  2. 7 bins but hey what Car does Rishi Sunak drive A Ford Fiasco Boom Boom
    3
  3. Trickle down supply side was debunked over a decade ago even the bastions of NeoLiberlism the IMF have come out saying it doesn't work. + The basis on which Austerity has been pursued has been debunked as well What the markets told us with Lettuce Liz is no more fantasy economics and I've been reading some interesting stuff on Net Zero recently after the kerfuffle that Sunak brewed up by ar5e kissing Farage and the far right of his party. I read the FT occasionally when I go to the Library and the money men are all in on Net Zero and there was a right storm when the recent wind farm auction collapsed it wasn't said explicitly but implied it was deliberate. Anyway here's a piece of Info which makes Sunak decision look well dodgy I can't see him calling a snap election but looking at the bottom quote "things can only get worse" Quote The OBR concludes: the debt impact of future volatility in gas prices is at 13% of the UK gross domestic product (GDP) to 2050. This dwarfs the debt impact of 6% of GDP for investing in net zero. Second, it investigates the potential of new, growing energy solutions to cushion price volatility. Quote With the energy price cap below £1,300 throughout 2021, UK households spent around £30 billion on energy during the year. In 2023 the projected spend is around £170 billion. This is equivalent to more than doubling the basic rate of income tax from 20% to 45% or almost doubling VAT from 20% to 38%. Just over 6% of GDP.  @KernowDamo 
    1