Comments by "Greg Greg" (@SlowhandGreg) on "James O'Brien analyses the 'absurdity' of House of Commons chaos | LBC" video.

Have you read Labour's amendment? Thought not
17
@bugwandis "collective punishment " is a legal term under the Geneva convention its no wonder it got superseded it needs deliberating via a court.
8
SNP put in a motion to try stir up trouble in the Labour Party The CON's put in an amendment to Block Labour submitting one, they do it all the time so no meaningful amendment goes forward and the whole debate becomes pointless on an opposition day motion. Well done speaker is what I say less of this political shenanigans
8
SNP put in a motion to try stir up trouble in the Labour Party The CON's put in an amendment to Block Labour submitting one, they do it all the time so no meaningful amendment goes forward and the whole debate becomes pointless on an opposition day motion. Well done speaker is what I say less of this political shenanigans
6
SNP put in a motion to try stir up trouble in the Labour Party The CON's put in an amendment to Block Labour submitting one, they've do it all the time so no meaningful amendment goes forward and the whole debate becomes pointless on an opposition day motion. Well done speaker is what I say less of this political shenanigans
2
SNP put in a motion to try stir up trouble in the Labour Party The CON's put in an amendment to Block Labour submitting one, they do it all the time so no meaningful amendment goes forward and the whole debate becomes pointless on an opposition day motion.
1
If they only get 3 why did they waste 1 on politicing to try stir up trouble in the Labour party? Surely Scotland has a cost of everything crisis too?
1
@stefmanbrett91 Did you read the SNP motion? It contained language that neither Labour Nor the Cons could sign up to and was presented at the last possible minute "collective punishment " is a legal term under the Geneva convention its no wonder it got superseded it needs deliberating via a court. Starmer is a Human rights Lawyer You should be happy a call for a ceasefire who's language didn't break international protocol was passed unanimously?
1
The Cons put in an amendment purely to Block the Labour one the SNP new what was going to happen it was just a wasted a day of political sh1tsturing
1
@zeuseditor The language used by the SNP was designed to make sure the motion failed. Playing politics with such a sensitive subject shame on you and your Party
1
@ItsDeffoScott The SNP motion was kept back and presented last minute and has problematic language in it. Labour's motion was legally watertight with international Law "collective punishment " is a legal term under the Geneva convention its no wonder it got superseded it needs deliberating via a court. Aren't you glad a legal call or a ceasefire that also highlighted settler expansion passed?
1