Comments by "Dale Crocker" (@dalecrocker3213) on "Dr. John Campbell" channel.

  1. The pandemic was not a health care issue. It was a business opportunity.
    341
  2. There are very strong reasons for being vaccinated after infection. Those reasons come in $$$ signs to the drug companies, who are milking the pandemic beyond all the bounds of avarice.
    148
  3. They just push an agenda. They are not journalists.
    133
  4. I started a keto diet about a year ago to deal with the onset of type2 diabetes. I also fast about one day every month. It's no hassle. Bacon and eggs, strawberries and cream, whole roast chickens and half legs of pork can fill you up quite a bit! My blood sugar levels are now normal and I'm off the medication. I've also lost around five stone in old money. My BMI is spot-on Agriculture has created a carbohydrate addiction in humanity. While a hunter-gatherer diet (plus cream!) might not be for everybody it certainly works for me. What you eat seems to count for more than how much you eat.
    129
  5. This is no more or less than many people have been saying for months - ever since the pandemic began in fact. Dr Campbell seems too decent a man to consider what is probably the horrible truth - that pharmaceutical companies and politicians with investments in these companies have been deliberately fixing trials. Why? Because hydroxychloroqine, and indeed other treatments, if proved to be effective would reduce the need for the expensive vaccines being worked on and which are set to show huge profits. The wickedly false Lancet paper was just part of this process. And it will continue despite the evidence presented here.
    16
  6. His regard for "science" must be sorely shaken by now.
    14
  7. If anyone wants any further proof of how effective hydroxychloroquine treatments are likely to be you simply have to look at how Google and YouTube censors are weeding out positive information on the subject. Dr Campbell's video of yesterday is still obtainable, thank goodness but plenty of other material has been wiped. Up until now it has mostly been simple stuff, aimed at the layman but I have just discovered that the peer-reviewed John Hopkins study published in late May is now unobtainable. The very fact that the enemies of truth should be acting in this way shows the rightness of the cause. A very great evil is being perpetrated at the cost of thousands of lives.
    10
  8.  @walterego6584  Why? He's already immune in every real sense of the word. Covid becomes a cold as its evolution progresses; natural immunity is part of that process. At this stage the possible dangers of a bad reaction to vaccination are greater than the dangers of covid itself. In neither case is anyone 100% certain of not being to some degree infectious to others.
    9
  9. This video is still up thank goodness, but the John Hopkins peer reviewed study has now been blocked - as have others. This kind of censorship goes a long way to prove the HCQ case.
    9
  10.  @mbd6054  With all due respect there was plenty of evidence, including at least one peer-reviewed paper published as early as April I believe. - buried, of course, like so much other indicative evidence beneath a mountain of Big Pharma diversionary propaganda.
    8
  11. Surely children mix more with adults when out of school than in? And they don't spread the disease as much as adults anyway. And the sunny weather explanation doesn't hold much water either. HIT is the elephant in the room and this really could be it.
    8
  12. It has crossed my mind that the new strain might be the direct result of lockdown and other measures. If the spread is reduced then surely a strain which spreads more quickly and efficiently will survive and prosper? If someone could shoot this disturbing notion down in flames I would be very grateful.
    6
  13. I gather incubation period for Omicron is up to 14 days as opposed to 3 or 4 days for Delta. This is surely of great significance.
    6
  14.  @tonydanis1480  Are those contributing officially to Covid 19 eradication doing such a great job though? It seems to me you only get on board if you follow the official line: enforce restrictions, wait for a vaccine, support expensive medications and dismiss all alternative treatments by using deliberately false data if needs be. Fail to follow these guidelines and you're out.
    5
  15.  @tonydanis1480  Well, you do sound quite extraordinarily elitist if I may say so! "Outsider" indeed! He gains a following, I imagine, for the very reason that he provides a reasonably comprehensible interface with the esoteric realm you seem to inhabit. Lay people such as myself are frequently puzzled by the behaviour and doings of our betters and the arrival of Covid 19 and the way it is being dealt with are especial causes of bafflement. We all have our biases and I must confess I have up until now been somewhat disappointed in Dr Campbell but his reaction to the many mysteries surrounding the use or none use of hydroxychloroquine treatments match mine - so now I thoroughly approve of him. His background is in nurse training I believe, so a very lowly individual indeed. He may even have got his hands dirty from time to time and actually had to deal with real, living patients,; this obviously disqualifies him from pure research. He is however, obviously honest and decent and to quote the eminent and powerful Dr Fauci " has no horse in the race." Whether Dr Fauci himself actually does have a horse in the race or not is of course another matter.
    5
  16. I've noticed a curious lack of serious and fatal incomes in countries where malaria is endemic, notably in Africa and around the Mekong river network in SE Asia Is there any chance that a resistance to malaria could imply a resistance to Covid 19?
    5
  17.  @annoyedaussie3942  It's odd how US statistics differ from statistics available in more civilised parts of the world, where public health is not seen as a glorious opportunity to make money. In England at least half of cases occur among the vaccinated. In the US it is alleged to be between 1% and 5%. The total number of cases of double infections in the UK is around 50, and the second bouts were very mild. The chances of dying or even suffering from long covid in healthy young people is minimal. They then go onto help provide a cordon of immunity around the vulnerable. If this strategy had pursued from the start the pandemic would be over by now.
    4
  18.  @kevinyaucheekin1319  They're brainwashing thousands of kids into setting fire to cities with much the same purpose in mind - so yes. Plus the profit motive of course. And there are very few journalists worthy of respect any longer, nor a lot of scientist either. Money speaks louder than truth.
    4
  19. Dr Campbell - it's all lies. All of it.
    3
  20.  2manynegativewaves  Were you born blind and with only half a brain? Apart from the Orange Man Bad factor the fact that if hydroxychloriquine treatments could massively impact the profitability of pharmaceutical companies is unquestionable. Follow the money.
    3
  21. As I understand it Covid 19 has already been through several variations, most affecting the spike protein and making cell penetration swifter and more efficient. Can anyone tell me why this mutation is so especially alarming?
    3
  22. I do urge caution. The forces which govern us are entirely capable of infiltrating this support and turning it around by various nefarious means. There is a lot at stake here. Mainly money. Lots of money. Watch out for false flags. Be careful of figures suddenly thrust into the limelight which turn out to have feet of clay.
    3
  23.  @ag-bf3ty  I suppose I should apologise for the quotation marks, but I don't feel inclined to do so. It is clear by now that Covid 19 is pretty exclusively fatal to the elderly, those with pre-existing medical conditions or those who have been subjected to repeated re-infections over a short period of time. Much the same can be said of hospitalised severe cases. Even at its peak the death rate per percentage of population was relatively low and now in many countries it is almost negligible. In countries where hydroxychloroquine is widely used as a prophylactic against malaria the death rate has been negligible from the outset. Of course a vaccine will be an ultimate route out of the pandemic, but in the meantime therapeutic and prophylactic treatments which could have vastly decreased the impact of the disease have been DELIBERATELY shoved under the carpet in order to emphasise the need and urgency for a vaccine. This makes me angry. It is my view that at the end of the day it will be realised that the measures we are taking to reduce the effects of this disease will prove to be far more harmful to the health and prosperity of the human race than the disease itself. You can call that a conspiracy theory if you like; but in my experience a fair proportion of conspiracy theories do turn out to have been conspiracies in the end.
    2
  24.  @mastercommander4535  Hydroxychloroquine was available over the counter in France. Following the Lancet piece it was put on the poisons list. It was banned in several countries and studies, including on organised by the WHO, were abandoned. This lasted for at least three weeks, even longer in some cases. There is still a cloud of suspicion hanging over this drug even today. I said thousands of lives, and I stand by it. The Lancet is not alone in suffering a recent and very dramatic drop in standards. Lies are told in many other once-respected journals on a regular basis but such immediate and potent ill-effects are not so readily observable as in this instance.
    2
  25. A factor must surely be that since the pharma companies have apparently managed to legally prevent themselves from being sued for liability, politicians and media who so vehemently championed the vaccines could be in line for private prosecution and claims for damages.
    2
  26.  @sonyb8017  You can buy it in the US at $3,75 a 100.
    2
  27.  @ucouco78  It depends where you live and who your doctor is.
    2
  28.  @ucouco78  Not by population! And by case is impossible to quantify.
    2
  29.  @jayman8464  I must confess that I was on a hydroxychloroquine trail when I hit upon this. Having said that it is perfectly possible that resistance has become inbuilt I suppose. I don't think hiv can be a big factor though. Having said that homeless areas in big cities seem to be remarkably free of infection from what I can gather.
    2
  30.  @FreshGreenMoss  Is fat so hard to come by? Animals are packed with it. Especially if we've stuffed them with carbohydrates! As I said: weight loss has been a secondary benefit for me. Knocking diabetes on the head was the main objective.
    2
  31. Yup.
    2
  32. The study from the University of Edinburgh published in the British Medical Journal this week adds weight to the Great Barrington case. It shows that school closures and lockdowns cause far more deaths than they save. As to the background details of the Great Barrington case, this is easily found by checking out the work published by these hard-working scientists. Professor Gomes' application of heterogenous and homogenous sampling to the pandemic, for example, posits quite convincingly that herd immunity in the UK is imminent, and can be reached with a mere 26% infection rate as opposed to the 80% generally thought. https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m3588
    2
  33. Fake news, now outdated and overthrown. Did you not watch the video?
    2
  34.  @AGDinCA  Don't play silly semantic games. The issue is too important for that. And your image is apt in any case. Studies like this and many others have been churned out to DICTATE policy while hiding behind a cloak of scientific objectivity.
    2
  35. So much of this is puzzling. What about the concerns over false positives and negatives in the tests? And these increased hospital admissions: does anyone know if these patients are in FOR Covid 19 treatment, or are they in for something else and have happened to test positive?
    2
  36. Apparently SARS 1 liked the Spring and Summer - as SARS 2 appears to have done in the Northern Hemisphere. Could the current outbreaks in Australia and New Zealand -small as they are - be related to this phenomenon? "Analysis of the SARS outbreak in Hong Kong, Guangzhou, Beijing, and Taiyuan found the optimum environmental temperature associated with the SARS cases was between 16 to 28 degrees Celsius, which may encourage virus growth. A sharp rise or decrease in the environmental temperature related to the cold spell led to an increase of the SARS cases because of the possible influence of the weather on the human immune system. This study suggested a higher possibility for SARS to reoccur in spring than in autumn or winter." Centre For Evidence Based Medicine - Oxford.
    2
  37. I am sure the pharmaceutical companies are already commissioning peer-reviewed studies proving that this treatment is not only ineffective but is likely to make you want to shoot your grandmother.
    2
  38. The testing system is not fit for purpose. Putting flawed data into flawed computer models is hardly likely to come up with a correct prognosis. And it hasn't.
    2
  39. https://c19study.com/ Any comments on this? I need to check its veracity. By the way just such a study is currently taking place involving 40,000 health care workers from all over the world. It is being done under the auspices of the WHO using money provided by Bill Gates, so I don't hold out much hope for its objectivity. You realise of course that people are dying who needn't do so while "scientists" dither over this drug? Dithering bought and paid for by Big Pharma.
    2
  40. Leave the kids alone. This group is typical of the far-left opportunists who have seized on the pandemic as an opportunity to undermine society through fear. Roberts, despite her fancy title, is an archaeologist who got her TV break as a pink-haired trowel-wielder on Time Team. Like the rest of them she is motivated by ideological considerations - not issues of public health.
    2
  41. Do you have links to other studies using low dosages?
    1
  42. I feel just the same when they blather on about their double blinsided placebos or whatever. People are dying who maybe needn't !
    1
  43.  @ucouco78  I don't understand the point you are making.
    1
  44.  @ag-bf3ty  What world are YOU living in when you don't realise that an incredibly cheap treatment which reduces the death rate from Covid by close on a third is going to reduce the demand for a vaccine? This "pandemic" is already proving to be far less of a big bad beast than first advertised. Expensive drugs you say! You can get 100 hydroxychloroquine tablets for under $40 and you need to take just two A WEEK as an apparently highly effective prophylactic. Those whose eyes lit up with dollar signs when Covid 19 first appeared are going to have to readjust their expectations. And a bloody good job too.
    1
  45.  @mastercommander4535  Once is enough in this instance. How they could have been fooled just beats me. It is a staggering blow to their reputation. That article can be said quite fairly to have cost the lives of thousands. And "not up to scratch" scarcely covers it.
    1
  46. Absolutely correct. Thank you for spreading the word.
    1
  47. And in many other countries also.
    1
  48. Do you have any thoughts on hydroxycloroquine? There seem to have been some developments. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6xqCg12rOPM Just discovered your channel. Excellent.
    1
  49.  Andrew Ongais  But hundredsof lives have been saved, Do watch the video. The doctor explains all sides of the issue in a very fair way and comes to what I think can be the only rational conclusion, namely that if hydroxocloroquine is administered along with an antibiotic and zinc in the very earliest stages of the illness it can prevent virus replication in lung tissue, thus avoiding a fatal outcome. An earlier study coming to this conclusion is cited. That's it. No more than that. The drug is useless once the virus has taken a proper hold. Dr Katz is not pushing it as a wonder treatment. He is not pushing it all. He is totally objective, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6xqCg12rOPM
    1
  50.  Andrew Ongais  An early pre-Trump support study https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Hsu1OU1voQ
    1
  51.  @davidpaz9389  And profits.
    1
  52. The FDA and the CDC - like almost any three-letter acronym in the USA - seem to be notably susceptible to political pressures.
    1
  53. Go online $37.50 a hundred.
    1
  54.  @mbd6054  Here we are. It was in May actually. https://academic.oup.com/aje/article/… Peer reviewed study https://www.newsweek.com/key-defeatin… Newsweek article on above
    1
  55.  @mhskou  The Zoe guys know which side their bread is buttered on.
    1
  56. There is even the horrible possibility that Big Pharma actually commissions poorly conducted studies into cheap alternatives to its products. In this way they can later be exposed to criticism, and thus undermine the credibility of genuine research.
    1
  57. This link is no longer available - a common occurrence when seeking hydroxychloroquine information on the Internet. A peer-reviewed John Hopkins study published in May has also recently been removed. This does tend to add somewhat to the tinfoil hat paranoia I am starting to experience. Odd though that your study is one that found no benefits. As Dr Campbell says: "What's going on here?"
    1
  58. Jimmy Dore, who featured Dr Campbell recently, has just issued a startling video about a paper which seems to have been swept under the carpet. All access seems to be blocked on YouTube but I hope that the points it raises can be addressed very soon.
    1
  59. I've just come across this. Can anyone comment on its veracity? https://c19study.com/
    1
  60. They wiped out the Frontline Doctors in hours, Dr Campbell should be safe though. Youtube will only censor stuff that is understandable to the masses.
    1
  61.  @lizeggar2421  I think so too - but it's hard getting figures on actual use. There's definitely a correlation of SOME sort though.
    1
  62.  marvigli19  It IS a serious problem around the Mekong River though. And although malaria is spread by a parasite the same means of cellular resistance seem to be at work ie strong, healthy cells preventing replication. The case for hydroxychloroquine as a prophylactic and viral replication inhibitor for Covid 19 does seem very strong and even if not in use the low death rates in countries bordering the Mekong need explanation as they do in Nigeria, Uganda etc etc.
    1
  63. @H P Nice one! Except elephants are quite rare in low-lying swampy areas where malaria abounds. On the other hand building resistance to an infection which hydroxychloroquine helps prevent might indicate that when another infection is rare in the same area, there could be a connection, doncha think? In both malaria and Covid death results from the body's violent reaction to the rapid replication of an invader. If that replication is slowed down sufficiently then the body reacts less feverishly with less chance of a fatal result. I still like your elephant dung idea though.
    1
  64.  @mjwilliamsb2676  Thank you. The only reservation I have is that, in terms of competition, any variant which already exists and which already has a more efficient and faster-acting system of transmission might well become more successful in a situation where the number of available hosts is reduced compared to previously. The fact that it actually exists might outweigh the fact that reducing the number of people infected will prevent the arrival of future variants in terms of overall impact. If for example there had been no form of restriction would it not be true that these inevitable variations would either have occurred long ago or would not have occurred at all since earlier forms would have infected all those liable to be infected? I cannot in my own mind determine whether or not this latter course of action would have resulted in more or less fatalities and serious hospitalisations. I suppose it must depend on how many potential subjects of serious outcomes are available. Sorry to burble on. I'm just thinking out loud really!
    1
  65.  @mjwilliamsb2676  Thanks again. I fully realise that the virus has no evil intent and that in fact the less damage it does to hosts the more it can reproduce. I think I'm right in saying that while viruses do generally mutate into less virulent forms there have been some influenzas which have turned out more deadly second or third time around. Fingers crossed!
    1
  66.  @Abracadabra1111  Its also used for arthritis and lupus among other things. It works by immediately turning cells into hostile environments, so that invading organisms cannot reproduce. The only reason a coronavirus gets into your cells is to utilise that cell's resources to reproduce, which it cannot do on its own. Hydroxychloroquine, especially if used in conjunction with a strengthening agent such as zinc, ramps up the cells' defences so the viral RNA cannot reproduce. Hows that for a bit of mansplaining?
    1
  67.  @Abracadabra1111  And yet many people clearly do. People with arthritis or lupus one imagines.
    1
  68.  @Doing_Time  Vote Trump 2020? It's a big step but you should take it.
    1
  69.  @Doing_Time  So pleased to hear it. By any objective standards the Dems' behaviour has been disgraceful beyond measure. Perhaps even evil. Let's hope enough people show your common sense and decency.
    1
  70.  @helpingeachother7007  There are some people who will do anything for money. Absolutely anything.
    1
  71.  @jvlaina  Currently being carried out on 40,000 health care workers worldwide. I don't hold out much hope though. It's being done under WHO auspices with money provided by Bill Gates. Have you seen this, by the way? https://c19study.com/
    1
  72.  @jvlaina  Any ideas about this? I need to make sure it's genuine. https://c19study.com/
    1
  73. It is widely known. Millions of people are on such low doses as a prophylactic against malaria.
    1
  74. Malaria?Hydroxychloroquine? No??
    1
  75.  @FreshGreenMoss  Sugar addiction then?
    1
  76. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gD9YmiGVEkA&t=427s
    1
  77. Food for thought? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=peaRgEOF7zY https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H5ZqTs_YNJk
    1
  78. Any idea how the very elderly will be affected? Not many of those in Africa.
    1
  79. You sound as though you know what you're talking about, so I'd like to ask you a question if I may. I have been much struck by the incredibly low death rates in countries where malaria is endemic. At first I thought this might be entirely due to hydroxychloroquine being widely used as a prophylactic/treatment. Now I'm not so sure. Could it be that populations which have built up a resistance to malaria (especially in its earlier forms) have an inbuilt resistance to the worst effects of Covid 19 do you think?
    1
  80. Does this mean its OK to take Paracetemol six tablets a time, three times a day? You're last sentence lost me too.You can't simply be saying that because the "logical" high dose tests didn't work this calls into question the results of low-dose studies, surely? What am I missing here?
    1
  81.  @gregs3845  Thank you so much for your answer. I have no medical knowledge whatsoever and am finding it hard to understand why there should be such a diversity of opinion on the best way to treat the novel coronavirus. As I understand it so far hydroxychloroquine does in no way stimulate the immune system into increased activity, but merely denies the virus the facilities to utilise cellular material to reproduce (which it cannot do on its own.) To my simple mind this means it has to be there in the cell ready and waiting before the viruses arrive. They get in, but they cannot replicate their RNA or re-assemble their protein shells. This means that it is totally pointless to attempt to defeat the virus with hydroxychloroquine once the virus has gained the upper hand as it were. Once the virus is in tissue in anything like significant numbers you can chuck HCO at it by the bucketful and it will do no good at all. It's not a case of "less is more" but "more is pointless." Thanks again. I am surprised at your news about paracetamol by the way. I once overdosed on paracetamol and brandy following a back injury and it was not a pleasant experience.
    1
  82.  @gregs3845  Thank you once again for your very helpful insights. I have a couple of points to make which you might perhaps disagree with, but here goes anyway: We are in an emergency pandemic situation and, as such, we should could consider laying aside established laboratory protocols for the moment and go for a more direct approach. People rather than petri dishes. Once a treatment can be reasonably proved to be reasonably safe we should just try it out on volunteers. I myself am a vulnerable person, being in my seventies with type two diabetes and one or two other minor age-related ailments and I would be delighted to go on a HCQ prophylactic regime without any form of isolation. Deaths or serious hospitalisations could be monitored and reasonable deductions could be made from whether or not a victim was taking such a treatment. Mind you, with death rates falling as rapidly as they are in many countries we might well be running out of potential subjects before very long. This brings me to my second point, which I admit may be a rather fanciful one. You rightly say that is the over-reaction of immune systems which cause death and damage, rather than the virus itself. Do you not see a parallel in the over-reaction of society to this intrusive illness and which is, in itself, causing more damage than the disease?
    1
  83.  @gregs3845  Fair enough.
    1
  84.  @AGDinCA  You do sound confused. Your image was the one you used implying that data is not dictatorial. It is when used to dictate policy and when proven to be deliberately skewed to reinforce that policy it can and should be overthrown. Studies which test hydroxychloroquine in large doses administered out of context fall into this category. They are then used to convince people that the drug is ineffective and even dangerous. Scientific objectivity is a very good thing. An essential thing; but when its pretend use is cited as a reason for deliberate disinformation, then that is a very bad thing indeed.
    1
  85.  @AGDinCA  I would be enormously surprised since, as I have said, the only studies which indicate such a thing have been undertaken using improbably huge doses administered far too late. The treatment for Covid 19 uses dosages similar to those taken by millions of people over the past sixty or so years as a prophylactic against malaria. It is indicative of the drug's efficacy that in countries where it is used for such a purpose death rates from Covid 19 are insignificant. You might just as well ask me how I would react if a giant clockwork crocodile came down from the sky and bit my arse off.
    1
  86.  @AGDinCA  Off we go then I'm British, not American and I'm quite incredibly old. I'm not a scientist. I was an investigative journalist for many years and I know what a rat smells like. I smelt a rat when the videos put out by the Frontline Doctors were whipped off all social media with such alacrity. The world is full of wicked people who will do absolutely anything for money. It didn't take long for me to find out more or less what Dr Campbell has just revealed here but, being the cynical old bastard that I am I decided to follow the money. It became clear that a campaign of deliberate misinformation has been mounted against hydroxychloroquine treatments and that this has been done because it is an incredibly cheap method of diminishing the effects of Covid 19. This fact immediately reduces the profitability of expensive medications being developed and put on the market by the big pharmaceutical companies' To put it briefly I became convinced that hydroxychloroquine must be good stuff simply because a lot of nasty, greedy selfish people were insisting that it wasn't. My researches have confirmed this. I was utterly convinced after an entirely false and misleading article was planted in the prestigious British medical journal The Lancet which led to the drug being banned in many counties and research programmes being abandoned. The article was exposed as a fraud after a few weeks but the damage had been done. Thousands of lives have been needlessly lost due to these evil actions, and that makes me very angry. My only HCQ beliefs are those which are confirmed by the studies which show that without doubt that if used correctly it can save very many lives. (I am a reluctant atheist and if I was an American I would regard Donald Trump as an unlikely saviour of the values of Western enlightenment democracy and would vote for him without question.) There's a mountain of technical information at the bottom of this video, but I have plenty more should you wish to see it.
    1
  87.  @cvx1632  No . It makes me very sad and angry. Conspiracies occur with quite depressing regularity and all my instincts and experience tell me that this is one of them. The inducement of huge profits combined withe means an opportunity to obtain them is generally sufficient to overcome any moral reservations in a great many people. The conspiracy to dismiss hydroxychloroquine treatments as ineffective and/or dangerous is part of such a strategy. The methods being used remind me somewhat of the way tobacco companies paid willing "scientists" to prove their products cured bronchitis. I regularly collect evidence in the form of properly conducted clinical studies into the issue. Equally regularly these are removed from the Internet. What does this tell you?> That everything is just fine and dandy?
    1
  88.  @chickyrogue8485  Fair enough. But be careful they don't screw us.
    1
  89. I'm surprised anyone is surprised. It is entirely cleat the pandemic response has been stage-managed with the over-riding objective of making obscene profits for drug companies - and with no regard for the consequences.
    1