Comments by "Dale Crocker" (@dalecrocker3213) on "Hydroxychloroquine, evidence of efficacy" video.

This is no more or less than many people have been saying for months - ever since the pandemic began in fact. Dr Campbell seems too decent a man to consider what is probably the horrible truth - that pharmaceutical companies and politicians with investments in these companies have been deliberately fixing trials. Why? Because hydroxychloroqine, and indeed other treatments, if proved to be effective would reduce the need for the expensive vaccines being worked on and which are set to show huge profits. The wickedly false Lancet paper was just part of this process. And it will continue despite the evidence presented here.
16
This video is still up thank goodness, but the John Hopkins peer reviewed study has now been blocked - as have others. This kind of censorship goes a long way to prove the HCQ case.
9
@mbd6054 With all due respect there was plenty of evidence, including at least one peer-reviewed paper published as early as April I believe. - buried, of course, like so much other indicative evidence beneath a mountain of Big Pharma diversionary propaganda.
8
@kevinyaucheekin1319 They're brainwashing thousands of kids into setting fire to cities with much the same purpose in mind - so yes. Plus the profit motive of course. And there are very few journalists worthy of respect any longer, nor a lot of scientist either. Money speaks louder than truth.
4
2manynegativewaves Were you born blind and with only half a brain? Apart from the Orange Man Bad factor the fact that if hydroxychloriquine treatments could massively impact the profitability of pharmaceutical companies is unquestionable. Follow the money.
3
@ag-bf3ty I suppose I should apologise for the quotation marks, but I don't feel inclined to do so. It is clear by now that Covid 19 is pretty exclusively fatal to the elderly, those with pre-existing medical conditions or those who have been subjected to repeated re-infections over a short period of time. Much the same can be said of hospitalised severe cases. Even at its peak the death rate per percentage of population was relatively low and now in many countries it is almost negligible. In countries where hydroxychloroquine is widely used as a prophylactic against malaria the death rate has been negligible from the outset. Of course a vaccine will be an ultimate route out of the pandemic, but in the meantime therapeutic and prophylactic treatments which could have vastly decreased the impact of the disease have been DELIBERATELY shoved under the carpet in order to emphasise the need and urgency for a vaccine. This makes me angry. It is my view that at the end of the day it will be realised that the measures we are taking to reduce the effects of this disease will prove to be far more harmful to the health and prosperity of the human race than the disease itself. You can call that a conspiracy theory if you like; but in my experience a fair proportion of conspiracy theories do turn out to have been conspiracies in the end.
2
@mastercommander4535 Hydroxychloroquine was available over the counter in France. Following the Lancet piece it was put on the poisons list. It was banned in several countries and studies, including on organised by the WHO, were abandoned. This lasted for at least three weeks, even longer in some cases. There is still a cloud of suspicion hanging over this drug even today. I said thousands of lives, and I stand by it. The Lancet is not alone in suffering a recent and very dramatic drop in standards. Lies are told in many other once-respected journals on a regular basis but such immediate and potent ill-effects are not so readily observable as in this instance.
2
@sonyb8017 You can buy it in the US at $3,75 a 100.
2
@ucouco78 It depends where you live and who your doctor is.
2
@ucouco78 Not by population! And by case is impossible to quantify.
2
Yup.
2
Fake news, now outdated and overthrown. Did you not watch the video?
2
@AGDinCA Don't play silly semantic games. The issue is too important for that. And your image is apt in any case. Studies like this and many others have been churned out to DICTATE policy while hiding behind a cloak of scientific objectivity.
2
https://c19study.com/ Any comments on this? I need to check its veracity. By the way just such a study is currently taking place involving 40,000 health care workers from all over the world. It is being done under the auspices of the WHO using money provided by Bill Gates, so I don't hold out much hope for its objectivity. You realise of course that people are dying who needn't do so while "scientists" dither over this drug? Dithering bought and paid for by Big Pharma.
2
Do you have links to other studies using low dosages?
1
I feel just the same when they blather on about their double blinsided placebos or whatever. People are dying who maybe needn't !
1
@ucouco78 I don't understand the point you are making.
1
@ag-bf3ty What world are YOU living in when you don't realise that an incredibly cheap treatment which reduces the death rate from Covid by close on a third is going to reduce the demand for a vaccine? This "pandemic" is already proving to be far less of a big bad beast than first advertised. Expensive drugs you say! You can get 100 hydroxychloroquine tablets for under $40 and you need to take just two A WEEK as an apparently highly effective prophylactic. Those whose eyes lit up with dollar signs when Covid 19 first appeared are going to have to readjust their expectations. And a bloody good job too.
1
@mastercommander4535 Once is enough in this instance. How they could have been fooled just beats me. It is a staggering blow to their reputation. That article can be said quite fairly to have cost the lives of thousands. And "not up to scratch" scarcely covers it.
1
Absolutely correct. Thank you for spreading the word.
1
And in many other countries also.
1
Go online $37.50 a hundred.
1
@mbd6054 Here we are. It was in May actually. https://academic.oup.com/aje/article/… Peer reviewed study https://www.newsweek.com/key-defeatin… Newsweek article on above
1
This link is no longer available - a common occurrence when seeking hydroxychloroquine information on the Internet. A peer-reviewed John Hopkins study published in May has also recently been removed. This does tend to add somewhat to the tinfoil hat paranoia I am starting to experience. Odd though that your study is one that found no benefits. As Dr Campbell says: "What's going on here?"
1
I've just come across this. Can anyone comment on its veracity? https://c19study.com/
1
They wiped out the Frontline Doctors in hours, Dr Campbell should be safe though. Youtube will only censor stuff that is understandable to the masses.
1
@Doing_Time Vote Trump 2020? It's a big step but you should take it.
1
@Doing_Time So pleased to hear it. By any objective standards the Dems' behaviour has been disgraceful beyond measure. Perhaps even evil. Let's hope enough people show your common sense and decency.
1
@helpingeachother7007 There are some people who will do anything for money. Absolutely anything.
1
@jvlaina Currently being carried out on 40,000 health care workers worldwide. I don't hold out much hope though. It's being done under WHO auspices with money provided by Bill Gates. Have you seen this, by the way? https://c19study.com/
1
@jvlaina Any ideas about this? I need to make sure it's genuine. https://c19study.com/
1
It is widely known. Millions of people are on such low doses as a prophylactic against malaria.
1
You sound as though you know what you're talking about, so I'd like to ask you a question if I may. I have been much struck by the incredibly low death rates in countries where malaria is endemic. At first I thought this might be entirely due to hydroxychloroquine being widely used as a prophylactic/treatment. Now I'm not so sure. Could it be that populations which have built up a resistance to malaria (especially in its earlier forms) have an inbuilt resistance to the worst effects of Covid 19 do you think?
1
@AGDinCA You do sound confused. Your image was the one you used implying that data is not dictatorial. It is when used to dictate policy and when proven to be deliberately skewed to reinforce that policy it can and should be overthrown. Studies which test hydroxychloroquine in large doses administered out of context fall into this category. They are then used to convince people that the drug is ineffective and even dangerous. Scientific objectivity is a very good thing. An essential thing; but when its pretend use is cited as a reason for deliberate disinformation, then that is a very bad thing indeed.
1
@AGDinCA I would be enormously surprised since, as I have said, the only studies which indicate such a thing have been undertaken using improbably huge doses administered far too late. The treatment for Covid 19 uses dosages similar to those taken by millions of people over the past sixty or so years as a prophylactic against malaria. It is indicative of the drug's efficacy that in countries where it is used for such a purpose death rates from Covid 19 are insignificant. You might just as well ask me how I would react if a giant clockwork crocodile came down from the sky and bit my arse off.
1
@AGDinCA Off we go then I'm British, not American and I'm quite incredibly old. I'm not a scientist. I was an investigative journalist for many years and I know what a rat smells like. I smelt a rat when the videos put out by the Frontline Doctors were whipped off all social media with such alacrity. The world is full of wicked people who will do absolutely anything for money. It didn't take long for me to find out more or less what Dr Campbell has just revealed here but, being the cynical old bastard that I am I decided to follow the money. It became clear that a campaign of deliberate misinformation has been mounted against hydroxychloroquine treatments and that this has been done because it is an incredibly cheap method of diminishing the effects of Covid 19. This fact immediately reduces the profitability of expensive medications being developed and put on the market by the big pharmaceutical companies' To put it briefly I became convinced that hydroxychloroquine must be good stuff simply because a lot of nasty, greedy selfish people were insisting that it wasn't. My researches have confirmed this. I was utterly convinced after an entirely false and misleading article was planted in the prestigious British medical journal The Lancet which led to the drug being banned in many counties and research programmes being abandoned. The article was exposed as a fraud after a few weeks but the damage had been done. Thousands of lives have been needlessly lost due to these evil actions, and that makes me very angry. My only HCQ beliefs are those which are confirmed by the studies which show that without doubt that if used correctly it can save very many lives. (I am a reluctant atheist and if I was an American I would regard Donald Trump as an unlikely saviour of the values of Western enlightenment democracy and would vote for him without question.) There's a mountain of technical information at the bottom of this video, but I have plenty more should you wish to see it.
1
@cvx1632 No . It makes me very sad and angry. Conspiracies occur with quite depressing regularity and all my instincts and experience tell me that this is one of them. The inducement of huge profits combined withe means an opportunity to obtain them is generally sufficient to overcome any moral reservations in a great many people. The conspiracy to dismiss hydroxychloroquine treatments as ineffective and/or dangerous is part of such a strategy. The methods being used remind me somewhat of the way tobacco companies paid willing "scientists" to prove their products cured bronchitis. I regularly collect evidence in the form of properly conducted clinical studies into the issue. Equally regularly these are removed from the Internet. What does this tell you?> That everything is just fine and dandy?
1