Comments by "Dale Crocker" (@dalecrocker3213) on "How tanks could end the Ukraine Russia war | Major General Chip Chapman" video.

What genocide?
6
Germany hopes Russia will win. Which is really quite sensible. A negotiated peace is entirely possible and ought to be welcomed. Russia's demands are - and always have been -entirely reasonable.
5
Russia was on our side, as I remember. You seem to be mixing your metaphors, as well as your wars. Germany's expansionist ambitions bear no relation whatsoever to Russia's modest requests for its borders to be kept secure, and for its long established commercial interests to be maintained. The aggressor here is America, which has been scheming for decades to syphon off Ukraine's mineral wealth.
2
@lodoova572 It is entirely reasonable to dictate to other countries what they can or cannot do if this involves forming an alliance with a declared enemy, persecuting you nationals who live in that country, and scheme with that foreign power to reap the rewards of your country's hundreds of years of toil and investment. Russia has stolen nothing. It is merely reclaiming what has been stolen from it.
1
@stc3145 I do wish you people would have the sense to examine what is happening instead of swallowing propaganda wholesale.
1
@barryolaith I do, as it happens. It is called Britain. And Britain, like every country in Europe, should be extremely careful about backing America in its latest foreign adventure. No good is going to come of this. Western dominance of world affairs is coming to an end, but this foolish war will very much hasten the process.
1
@flummi6966 Look up Putin's treaty proposals put forward in December 2021, and which still stand as the basis for negotiation.
1
@Robolaralobarar Russia's army is an army of defence, which is why it has to rely on mercenary groups such as Wagner to do its serious fighting. Russia dislikes NATO's presence in these countries, but has grudgingly put up with it. Ukraine was a step too far, however.
1
@dragani2330 Europe will collapse before Russia does - and what treaties has Russia broken that Ukraine, the EU and the USA haven't? Treaties are constantly broken and ignored as their usefulness diminishes. This war is simply the latest American power grab, and once again it is going belly up. Poor bloody Ukraine will be left in the lurch and Russia will keep Crimea and the mineral riches of Donbass, In the meantime it will forge economic alliances with everyone from China and India to Saudi Arabia and Brazil, and the EU's pathetic and ineffective sanctions will achieve nothing other than to bring it economic ruin and probable collapse. The cracks are already showing.
1
@dragani2330 I wouldn't disagree with you, other than that the next pro-Russian dictatorship Russia requires is simply Donbass ,not the whole of Ukraine. And why not? A substantial proportion of he population would be entirely happy with the idea. Russia's downfall is far from guaranteed. NATO and the US seem to be backing off now, and without considerable support Ukraine is likely to lose in the field. As to NATO caring about the potential collapse of the EU, it might well consider that this is likely to presage its own collapse, or at least a very considerable restructuring of its membership.
1
@dragani2330 You have almost everything around the wrong way. Following Minsk, NATO paid for and trained an extremely large Ukrainian army. It was the clear intention of using this army to quash the rebellion in Donbass and to retake Crimea which prompted Russia to take pre-emptive action. This war will merely accelerate a process already begun: the end of Western hegemony and the collapse of the monopolar globalist dream. Russia is riding the sanctions with ease and is forging new relationships with countries which recognise that the world order is changing and that America and the mighty dollar no longer rule. Russia is aligning with Middle Eastern oil producers to set prices with no regard to American-sponsored restrictions. A pipeline to China opens within weeks and a new one is designed and ready for construction which will tap into the fields hitherto used to supply Nordstream. Tankers loaded with crude are landing in India every day. The price is discounted on the surface, but quid pro quo arrangements mean India is supplying Russia with computer chips and other technology formerly obtained from Europe. Russia is winning the war on the ground, and it is winning the economic war too. America, meanwhile is about to default on its debt repayments and inflation in Europe is matching Russia's - which is predicted to drop dramatically within months.
1
@dragonade85 PS. This was just released this morning. It is real history, not sly propaganda. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ep-OJ3L1Phk
1
@CaptainEshara Instead of drawing entirely false historical comparisons, why don't you consider examining the facts of this present situation in something like detail? If you do so you will see that the Russian narrative has a great deal of truth in it.
1
@bryandimery6509 I'm having to read this again. Are you actually agreeing with me? There is hope for the world, even on this ridiculous channel. Thankyou.
1
@CaptainEshara Where lies the fallacy? Do you even KNOW what case Russia makes?
1
@CaptainEshara I might as well cite my laundry list and last weekend's football results. Nothing but facts, and just as relevant as your quotes and figures. Russians represent close on 30% of Ukraine's population. In the east the percentage is even higher and in the industrial cities of Donbass and in Crimea much higher still. Ukraine only became a "country" in 1991. Before that it was part of Russia - and had been for more than three hundred years. This doesn't mean that Russia wants it back. That would be impossible. But it does resent the way in which Russians have been treated in Ukraine since 1991; and even more than that it resents seeing the fruits of its labours and investment being siphoned off to Europe and America, much less Ukraine deciding to join NATO. For more than 20 years Putin and Lavrov have sought peaceful solutions to these difficulties, but have been constantly rebuffed. The last straw though was clown Zelensky allowing NATO to build a huge army with which to further crush Russian dissidence. These, to my mind, are facts far more relevant than a century-old quote from Winston Churchill.
1