Comments by "Dale Crocker" (@dalecrocker3213) on "" video.

As decent and honest as ever. Such a pity some of the commentators on your channel can't seem to grasp the message.
10
@cole0889 I doubt Islamic extremists are much influenced by what they read in the Guardian.
8
I'm not quite sure what "Boris and his cronies" have to do with Islamic extremism.
7
@DJWESG1 This must be one of the most ridiculous theories I've ever heard. Almost 1400 years of religious expansionism and it's all down to the Tories? What planet are you from?
7
@guillaumeshearmur656 This is utter nonsense. Divisions in the 'sixties and 'seventies were far more extreme than they are now. Compared with race riots and the miners' strike Brexit is a gentlemanly disagreement.
6
@DJWESG1 I think you may be misinterpreting the term "excess deaths". This is merely the number of deaths which is over and above those predicted for a particular time period. To ascribe this excess purely to social conditions is entirely misleading. As for Professor Aston, I'm afraid that his inevitable habit of passing statistics through the filter of his political beliefs destroys any pretence of objectivity in his work.
4
@timjackson8516 We'll find out. It seems the guy was probably a lone wolf type. He'd been identified as becoming radicalised while a student, but no further action was taken. He used to live in the area and my guess is that he's two sorts of crazy. His father was once a senior politician in Somalia who came to this country to live some 30 years ago.
2
@timjackson8516 It's a difficult definition, and not all that relevant other than to accept the fact that terrorism is a tactic of radical Islam, and that radical Islam seems quite likely to be part of this guy's motivation. Jo Cox's murderer was basically a nutcase. He was apparently motivated by some confused ideas about British nationalism, but British nationalism does not condone domestic terrorism as a tactic as a general rule. So I think the answer to your question is "No."
2
The killer is apparently a member of a wealthy Somalian family. His father was once an advisor to the country's President. How does that fit in?
1
@kirishima638 Lonely nutters have been trying to assassinate public figures since time immemorial. I don't think it's more frequent now. Attempting to harness the phenomenon to your political prejudices is probably not a good idea.
1
@DJWESG1 Where can I find this report?
1
@DJWESG1 Have you got a hangover? Just asking.
1
@DJWESG1 I was only wondering because you seemed to be so incoherent. It is Sunday morning, after all.
1
@markhackett2302 I'm afraid you are wrong. As an example the projected death rate for 2020 in the UK was 9.4 per 1,000. It turned out to be 10.2 per 1,000. This indicates that covid accounted, mainly, for excess deaths in the region of 0.8 per 1,000. Currently the UK death rate is between 18% and 13% above the five--year average but only about half the excess can be attributed to covid. Around 400 deaths every week can be categorised as "excess deaths" not directly attributable to covid. These are probably the result of failures in hospital treatments, suicides, drink and drugs etc. The fact is that around 10,000 people die every week in the UK - more in winter and less at other times - and that , as with covid, the vast majority of them are old - and very old in many cases.
1
@jaybell1390 Is this some sort of coded message? Your extraordinary use of capital letters seems to suggest as much.
1
@ffotograffydd What sort of extremism exactly?
1
@markhackett2302 I'm not quite sure what point you're trying to make. Anyone who dies within 28 days of a positive test goes on a list. Anyone who dies within 60 days goes on another list. Doctors can seldom know for certain which of several possible causes was primarily involved. Don't forget that the vast majority of those who die "with" covid are suffering from often severe other life-threatening conditions. At the end of the day around 80% of cases are judged to have covid as the main cause. As I said, the only real way of getting close to ascertaining the true impact of covid on the death rate is to compare what OUGHT to have been the figure with what actually was the figure. All we can say with anything like certainty is that last year an extra four people out of 5,000 died, probably as a direct or indirect result of the pandemic - that is to say roughly 51 people instead of 47. This number is obviously much lower than the number of people on the "death toll" . The difference between the two is the number who would likely have died anyway - even if they hadn't caught covid. The majority were over 90, don't forget.
1
Presumably their job is to agree with everything you say.
1
@davidcolin6519 You are assuming a great deal from a ten word comment. (The press is the 4th estate, by the way, not the 3rd.) And yes, the MSM is total crap for the most part. One really has to try to get to sources and view channels such as this one - and those on the opposite end of the political spectrum - to be able to get any idea of what is going on in the world. The legacy media is becoming increasingly irrelevant, which is a very good thing.
1
You just don't get it, do you?
1
@markedwards9247 You are clearly very confused. Collecting the elderly in care homes was a serious error of judgement NOT a deliberate attempt to kill them off. To think otherwise is a paranoid delusion.
1