Comments by "Dale Crocker" (@dalecrocker3213) on "" video.
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@timothyharris4708 Neither uncritically nor foolishly. As for gullible.. well, just look in the mirror.
As far as the "clown-show" is concerned I do not doubt you have seen only the edited highlights selected by the MSM to portray the various cases in the worst possible light. As I say, there are at least forty hours of testimony, much of it tedious and repetitive, but very, very revealing in places.
Edited highlights showing these are of course deleted by YouTube, as are videos showing Republican observers being harassed and shut out of counts. Whoops! Page unavailable. The cover-up is as evil as the crime.
You needn't wade through conspiracy theories to find some interesting items on HITE. The site is quite well curated at the moment, although subject to regular attack from the forces of evil. There are plenty of things to choose from.
I suppose, however, that you will remain locked in your little bubble, believing without question the crap dished out by the MSM. It doesn't matter. As I say, the 2020 election is now history and we can only hope that the forensic audits carried out in some states have, despite continuing obstacles placed in their path, derived sufficient information to enable at least some of the criminal techniques employed to be circumvented this year and in 2024.
1
-
1
-
@timothyharris4708 No links. The YouTube algorithm is a tricky beast and I suspect that even mentioning certain items of hardware used in elections gets your post deleted. It happens in other areas too. Sickening really.
Yup. Diamond and Silk and all the other black American YouTubers who support Trump seem to me to give considerable refutation to the suggestion that Trump is a racist. The Democrats are scared to death of losing the black vote and so this is just one of the many accusations in the relentless campaign of vilification against him - accusations I myself believed for the first two years of his Presidency. My reasoned argument is that because Donald Trump has not risen through the usual messy political channels he owes nothing to anybody, and he has no skeletons in his cupboard, and despite the most absurd efforts to do so, none can be created. I get the impression that American Presidents are usually taken aside shortly after inauguration and told what they must do -or else.
There was no "or else" in Trump's case. As a property developer he was used to giving bribes -not taking them.
He is, of course, a man of many faults but he has one outstanding virtue -he is not a career politician. He is quite an ordinary person really. He has second son syndrome of course - like a number of English monarchs -and is under pressure to fill the shoes his elder brother was destined to wear. He is, in short, not a creature of the swamp as Biden is and Obama was. He is his own man, not a front man. and they don't like that.
One can add to these observations the further perception that the ceaseless and repetitive "Orange Man Bad" propaganda which continues to assail us is of very low quality, as these things go. Nothing stands up. All you get is school yard accusations of this and that. Nothingburgers, as the Americans say. In the end it defeats its own object -at least if you examine it long and carefully enough, as I have done and you obviously haven't.
So this is my serious process of thought - or vapid scribblings if you prefer. Conspiracy theories are rapidly becoming just conspiracies these days, but I don't suppose you've noticed.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@funbarsolaris2822 We are somewhat at cross purposes. Left wing politics, as typified by Sanders and Corbyn, goes on its merry way entirely removed from reality- as it more or less always has been since the end of World War II at least. I am talking about academic neo- Marxism, largely developed in France and Germany in the 50s and 60s. This is of course entirely different to old school socialism, which has become rather stuck in a political backwater after brief earlier successes in the first half of the 20th century, and which has anyway generally backed away from Marxist principles.
By the time Reagan and Thatcher came along this form of socialism had fallen into stagnation - as all economic and political philosophies do. They require constant revision.
Capitalism has revised itself by taking on some Marxist precepts and Marxism has revised itself by accepting capitalism as an inevitable feature of human conduct. The result has been the New World Order and the Great Reset. Marxists can with a clear conscience accept the principle of economic growth through the manipulation of capital, as long as it is accompanied by what they perceive as an equitable distribution of benefits. Capitalists are grateful for the benefits of having a compliant workforce, and modern technology ensures that all proceedings can be closely monitored. Thus the elitist technocrat can enjoy the lifestyle to which he/she feels entitled, secure in the knowledge that the lives of his/her minions are reasonably comfortable and well ordered, and that all dissent can be met with withdrawal of privileges. Capital and labour are at one at last. We are all equal, but some are more equal than others.
Neither the small-time factory owner nor the Labourite shop steward have any place in this new arrangement. Both are defunct. No-one owns anything any more, in fact. Rational decisions as to the distribution of resources and means of production are taken according to principles generally embedded in computer programs and everyone is allocated goods and services appropriate to the contribution they make to the common weal.
You are somewhat nostalgic, I think, and nostalgia has no real place in this brave new world cooked up by the World Economic Forum and which is coming slowly but surely into existence even as we speak - or look with tearful eyes at old films of old struggles, now long past.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1