Comments by "Dale Crocker" (@dalecrocker3213) on "" video.

  1. 9
  2. 5
  3. 4
  4. 3
  5. 3
  6. 2
  7. 2
  8. 2
  9. 2
  10. 2
  11. 1
  12. 1
  13. 1
  14. 1
  15. 1
  16. 1
  17.  @dirkdupont5004  I presume you are aware of the Azov Battalion? In any case I have already agreed that the idea of genocide has simply provided a reasonable excuse for Putin's action which in reality has a much wider political context. The population of Donbass is predominantly Russian and, like Crimea, has voted in a referendum to secede from Ukraine. The response has been invasion with towns and villages being shelled and neo-Nazi death squads murdering anyone who can't speak Ukrainian. Thar's genocidal enough. The history of Russia and the history of Ukraine are inextricably entwined. The very name Russia comes from the Kievian Rus, the Vikings who sailed up the Dnieper in the 8th century or so. Ukraine didn't exist until various fiefdoms were joined together by Peter the Great and then Catherine the Great and only became a country as such because Stalin wanted an extra seat in the UN. Putin doesn't want it in NATO because he knows full well that NATO is just a vehicle for American imperialism and exists mainly to provide markets for the US military/industrial complex which needs to maintain Russia as a permanent enemy in order to justify its existence. Ukraine is flooded with CIA money, much of it channelled through the IMF. Didn't you see the video where vice-president Biden openly boasted that he withheld a billion dollars until the then President of Ukraine sacked the prosecutor who was after his son Hunter? Ukraine is a whore of a country whose leaders will sell her to the highest bidder. Your Scotland analogy makes no sense. Ukraine doesn't want to leave Russia. It is not part of Russia any longer. A more apt analogy would be if Scotland had already left the UK but some of the lowland countries wanted to partially re-join. Scotland then starts shelling these separatist counties and sends in fanatics to kill English-speakers. It also seems ready to enter into an alliance with an international conspiracy of arms dealers who want to use it to set up missile bases targeting English cities. How should England respond to this do you think?
    1
  18. 1
  19. 1
  20.  @dirkdupont5004  I utterly defy you to prove or even indicate the presence of men of similar leanings to the members of the Azov Battalion in the British Army. Our Nazis are bogey men in the brains of brainwashed lefties. The Ukraine's Nazis are real. Even if Putin's invasion is illegal (which is highly disputable) it is entirely justified. More to the point it could be over in a minute if Ukraine simply recognised the independence of the Donbass provinces and promised not to join NATO. Crimea is already a done deal. If it is Putin's ambition to recreate the USSR he's certainly taken a long time to set about it. Russia could have wiped out the other former USSR states after the Soviet collapse if it wished. Instead it kissed them goodbye and tried to recreate itself without the crushing presence of the Party. It also asked to join NATO -four times and was rejected. NATO needs a permanent enemy in order to justify its existence. Russia hasn't been it -until now. All international arms manufacture is interlinked, but the Americans run the business programme and create the markets via countless invasions over the past hundred years, many since the Soviet collapse and many far, far bloodier than this one. The nuclear power plant thing is just another dollop of Western propaganda too. Nuclear power plants are practically impossible to damage from the outside. Even melt-downs generated from within are relatively mild on the scale of disasters. Chernobyl only provably killed 80 or so people and it has proved utterly impossible to attribute subsequent cancer deaths to it.
    1
  21. 1
  22. 1
  23. 1
  24. 1
  25. 1
  26. 1
  27. 1
  28. 1
  29. 1
  30. 1
  31. 1
  32. 1
  33. 1
  34. 1
  35. 1
  36. 1
  37. 1
  38. 1