Comments by "Dale Crocker" (@dalecrocker3213) on "" video.

It was bollocks.
3
@vinylrulesok8470 A totally false parallel between two totally different situations. Germany in the 1930s has nothing in common with the Britain of today. Economic chancers being smuggled across the channel by gangsters to take advantage of the British taxpayer have nothing in common with Jews living in Germany for many years, many of whom were very wealthy. The list goes on, but these childlike comparisons just make me tired and not a little despairing. They are bollocks.
2
@anglonorse2943 It simply wasn't true in any objective sense. Germany in the 1930's was nothing like Britain today. Rounding up Jews because they had taken over large chunks of the economy is very, very different to objecting to people smugglers shipping in all and sundry to sponge off the British taxpayer. Political stance doesn't come into it. I am constantly baffled by these false comparisons. Is it because the history of Nazi Germany is all they teach you in schools these days, and you have nothing else to go on?
1
@DavidMoxham957 I don't read the Daily Mail, so I wouldn't know. In any case the Jews in Germany in the 1930's weren't refugees. Many of them had lived there for generations, and the more recent arrivals had done so to take advantage of Germany's economic collapse by buying up homes and businesses incredibly cheaply. Furthermore I don't see how skin colour comes into it. Armenians aren't particularly brown.
1
@SuperLittleTyke They can thank lefty lawyers who manipulate the system as much as the people-smugglers do.
1
@markhackett2302 What goals? I don't watch football.
1
@markhackett2302 How very confusing. Lineker said that the language being used was the same as the language being used in Germany in the 1930s - and it just isn't. Just read Mein Kampf and take it from there. As for employing illegal immigrants - it goes on all the time. What point are you making? What does it have to do with anything Lineker said? Your last paragraph is utterly unintelligible, so I can't really respond to it.
1
@verystripeyzebra Fascism does not exist in this country, so how can I support it?
1
@SuperLittleTyke Then the law needs to be changed.
1
@jonb4155 I am not "promoting" Mein Kampf, you idiot. I am merely suggesting people might compare its rhetoric with language used by our government, which Lineker claims it resembles. He too is a very silly person.
1
@jonb4155 I said read Mein Kampf and take it from there. It was extensively quoted in the anti-Semitic publications of the 1930s and by Hitler in his speeches. If you're looking for an argument you're not making a very good start, I'm afraid.
1
It wasn't refugees who were put in camps in Nazi Germany though, was it? It was Jews, many of whom were very rich and had been in the country for many years.
1
@SuperLittleTyke That's true enough - but not all that relevant. Gypsies too, of course. And communists - but mostly Jews.
1
@BlyatimirPootin It didn't start with refugees either.
1
@mindaugasstankus5943 True enough, but it was Germany's defeat in the First World War and the subsequent influx of Jews which finally tipped the balance. In any case the anti-Semitism in Germany throughout the 19th and early 20th centuries was far, far more vehement and far, far more widespread than anything which exists today in regard to immigrants into the UK.
1
@markhackett2302 How can you not be "most of the people" when you are the largest single group?
1
@dawnmoriarty9347 But nobody's coming for anybody, are they? We're just trying to keep people out who have no real right to be here.
1
@BewareOfTheKraut We should be in a situation where nobody has the absolute right to enter this country and stay permanently - as was once the case. People arriving other than through ports of entry or airports should be immediately deported. The only reason people choose to come by small boat and land illegally is because they know they would not otherwise gain entry, other than as a visitor, and would thus not be eligible for free accommodation and benefits and the chance to work their way through the system and achieve permanent residency.
1
@BewareOfTheKraut You apply. You will be interviewed and your case considered. If you do not meet criteria you will be returned to your point of embarkation. If you arrive on a small boat, however, you have been rescued from peril at sea and you MUST be taken in and provided for while your case is considered. Other factors enter the situation, not least of which is obtaining visas etc - and the fact that people smugglers obviously keep their clients misinformed as to their rights.
1
@dawnmoriarty9347 They came in on work visas I believe
1
@BewareOfTheKraut He can't unless he's got a passport with the right visa. Otherwise it's just a question of which illegal means he chooses. Crossing the channel in a dinghy is faster and more likely to meet with success than, say, getting a forged visa or forged papers and confessing at the port of entry, or applying to the Red Cross at some point along the route. The laws need changing in order to separate the truly needy to whom we have a duty of care from people who are more cunning and richer.
1
He didn't lie, certainly. He just talked utter bollocks.
1
Spot on. Leftie blabbermouth Lineker has blown the gaff, and played into the hands of all right-minded people who want to see the end of the creaking anachronism which is the BBC.
1
@anglonorse2943 Not for the first time, right is right!
1