General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
Dale Crocker
A Different Bias
comments
Comments by "Dale Crocker" (@dalecrocker3213) on "" video.
They are members.
5
@herrglotzenschnitzengruber1510 Reform UK was initially set up as a private limited company, which meant that its members were essentially shareholders. However, in September 2024, Nigel Farage announced a significant change to the party's structure. Reform UK transitioned from a company limited by shares to a company limited by guarantee, making it member-owned. Under this new structure, members have more control over the party's policies and leadership. They can vote on policy motions, participate in leadership elections, and even trigger a no-confidence vote against the party leader if 50% of all members request it. This change aims to enhance transparency and ensure that the party is accountable to its members rather than a small group of shareholders.
3
@kimwit1307 Yes. It happened automatically in September.
3
There are around 140,000 members. Reform stopped being a company limited by shares four months ago. It is now limited by members.
2
No longer correct. As from September Reform UK is member-owned, not shareholder-owned.
2
The Labour party has 370,500 members.
2
@DavidMoxham957 All of them.
2
@DavidMoxham957 No. Every member. About 150,000 of them.
2
@beecee2205 They can, in theory, vote him out though - perhaps even more easily than Labour could rid itself of Starmer.
2
@ArtsnCrafts-i3v Applying for the free newsletter does NOT make you a member. This is one of the myths currently exercising the minds of the unthinking masses.
2
@ArtsnCrafts-i3v Applying for the free Newsletter does NOT make you a member, contrary to rumour.
2
Reform members have more rights than members of the Labour Party.
1
@clarecrawford9677 I can't find it either! The changes are certainly incorporated in the party's current constitution. My guess would be they are waiting for the AGM in January to formally register the change?
1
Paranoia.
1
@amandag5072 They are members of a political organisation. Reform UK was initially set up as a private limited company, which meant that its members were essentially shareholders. However, in September 2024, Nigel Farage announced a significant change to the party's structure. Reform UK transitioned from a company limited by shares to a company limited by guarantee, making it member-owned. Under this new structure, members have more control over the party's policies and leadership. They can vote on policy motions, participate in leadership elections, and even trigger a no-confidence vote against the party leader if 50% of all members request it. This change aims to enhance transparency and ensure that the party is accountable to its members rather than a small group of shareholders.
1
@beecee2205 Of course he's in charge. Until 50% of the members call for a vote of no confidence. Where does the lying come into it?
1
@peterebel7899 They didn't. There was no other candidate. Farage is leader for five years. If he leaves for any reason and there is more than one proposed candidate there will be an election is which all members have a vote.
1
@kimwit1307 The changes are all incorporated in the Reform manifesto. Companies House has the technical details.
1
@peterebel7899 There was no need, there being no other candidate.
1
No.
1
You are incorrect. Reform UK was initially set up as a private limited company, which meant that its members were essentially shareholders. However, in September 2024, Nigel Farage announced a significant change to the party's structure. Reform UK transitioned from a company limited by shares to a company limited by guarantee, making it member-owned. Under this new structure, members have more control over the party's policies and leadership. They can vote on policy motions, participate in leadership elections, and even trigger a no-confidence vote against the party leader if 50% of all members request it. This change aims to enhance transparency and ensure that the party is accountable to its members rather than a small group of shareholders.
1
Reform members - and that's what they are - actually have probably more rights than members of the Labour Party. Reform UK was initially set up as a private limited company, which meant that its members were essentially shareholders. However, in September 2024, Nigel Farage announced a significant change to the party's structure. Reform UK transitioned from a company limited by shares to a company limited by guarantee, making it member-owned. Under this new structure, members have more control over the party's policies and leadership. They can vote on policy motions, participate in leadership elections, and even trigger a no-confidence vote against the party leader if 50% of all members request it.
1
@trevaudio It happened automatically in September. So you are incorrect.
1
@clarecrawford9677 They are the shareholders, not the members. Reform UK is not a company limited by shareholder, but by membership.
1
Reform UK was initially set up as a private limited company, which meant that its members were essentially shareholders. However, in September 2024, Nigel Farage announced a significant change to the party's structure. Reform UK transitioned from a company limited by shares to a company limited by guarantee, making it member-owned. Under this new structure, members have more control over the party's policies and leadership. They can vote on policy motions, participate in leadership elections, and even trigger a no-confidence vote against the party leader if 50% of all members request it. This change aims to enhance transparency and ensure that the party is accountable to its members rather than a small group of shareholders.
1
@trevaudio I'm afraid it you who has the wrong end of the stick. The transition from being shareholder-owned to member-owned has already happened with the legal position being that as described in my post. The members can vote Farage out and make their views on policy known at meetings.
1
@kimwit1307 I think you are possibly being a little paranoid. The changes are incorporated in the current constitution, which is, I believe, a legal document. Why the alteration in status from company limited by shareholder to one limited by membership does not show up on the Companies House website I cannot say. But I don't think it matters. Reform seems to me to be as democratically constituted as any other political party. (I am not a member, by the way.)
1
@kimwit1307 I think this probably applies to most politicians!
1
@kimwit1307 There's plenty of competition!
1
On the contrary, Reform members can call for a vote of no confidence in their leader, and influence policy decisions far more readily than members of the Labour Party.
1
@peterrear2864 They can make their views known - and reject a leader if 50% of them call for a vote of no confidence.
1