Comments by "Dale Crocker" (@dalecrocker3213) on "" video.

  1. And about how drug companies twist information to increase their profits - and the utter gullibility of those who fall for it.
    13
  2.  @geraldhewing2076  It would be helpful if they put healthcare before profits, that's all. Their business practices are utterly heinous and the way the covid pandemic has been engineered for this purpose clearly illustrates this. It can well be argued that the way they have manipulated the media and the politicians has actually led to an increase in the number of deaths rather than otherwise.
    4
  3. It is a well known fact. One good that could come out of covid is research into why a small percentage of people suffer such debilitating effects from respiratory pathogens.
    3
  4.  @geraldhewing2076  Something I find particularly nauseating is the way people use this pandemic to advance their own particular political prejudices. If you want to follow what I mean by "engineered" I refer you to a response to another contributor in this thread.
    3
  5.  @tomfinney3416  Not at all. If people were afraid to go to work in case they caught of cold from someone civilisation would collapse.
    2
  6. What seems the more likely to you?
    2
  7.  @vforwombat9915  Worse than original Omicron of course.
    2
  8. Computer modelling has a lot to answer for.
    1
  9.  @johnrussell3961  I thought science was supposed to be about separating the spurious from the actual by a process of rigid intellectual examination. Or have I got that wrong?
    1
  10.  @johnrussell3961  And can science destroy all these arguments?
    1
  11. There is no doubt the GBD was a missed golden opportunity -or rather one kicked into the bushes by Big Pharma as a threat to profits.
    1
  12. If you want to do a video about covid why don't you do one about mounting evidence for the total uselessness of lockdowns and the increasing evidence for Ivermectin in reducing covid mortality? The pandemic has been treated as a business opportunity, not a health issue. Wise up.
    1
  13.  @jiversteve  I don't have to. There are plenty of proper experts out there already. You could start with John Campbell.
    1
  14. So what?
    1
  15. That's because it doesn't matter much.
    1
  16. @LuLYaWott Unfortunately my reply to this somewhat naive interpretation of yours has fallen foul of the YouTube Gestapo. It can sometimes be fun to get heresies past the blind computer, so I may try again later.
    1
  17.  @errorswillmultiply1697  How does it feel to be something that slithered out of a chicken's arsehole? Just because you don't have the guts or the brains to defend yourself against logical reasoning and precise information doesn't mean other people shouldn't be given the chance.
    1
  18.  @geraldhewing2076  I'm so very sorry. I do apologise! I thought you were using the pandemic in a pathetic attempt to denigrate Donald Trump.
    1
  19. @LuLYaWott How can you tell what would have happened if no vaccines had been introduced? Where do you get the data for that scenario?
    1
  20. @LuLYaWott How much to drug companies spend on marketing as opposed to research?
    1
  21. @LuLYaWott Why did companies insist that immunity via infection was neither near-inevitable nor long-lasting?
    1
  22. @LuLYaWott Why do you imagine it was that cheap and already available treatments for covid were denigrated in the media? Are you aware of recent studies clearly indicating the effectiveness of these treatments?
    1
  23.  @errorswillmultiply1697  So your "warning" was as pointless and as ineffectual as everything else about you, was it?
    1
  24.  @geraldhewing2076  Orange Man Bad is just SOOOO last year sweetheart!
    1
  25.  @errorswillmultiply1697  Well, it's better to be a whinger than a bully I suppose. Probably not as sexy though.
    1
  26.  @GG-ml3vr  It is rumoured to be so.
    1
  27.  @timothyharris4708  If I try to make the argument in full, YouTube will delete it. And I emphasise that it is "a case that can be made" rather than one which is unanswerable. So, proceeding carefully, I will ask questions rather than make assertions. Does infection provide efficient and long-lasting immunity? Were we not told for many months that it did not do so? Was the main reason the Great Barrington Declaration was dismissed not because of this? Is it not true that the recent Johns Hopkins meta study strongly indicates that lockdowns provided next to no reduction in mortality, while at the same time resulting in immense societal and economic damage leading inevitably to increased mortality from other causes? Is it not true that certain very cheap medications were available which could have reduced mortality, but which were denigrated as dangerous quack remedies? Is it not now true that at least one of these remedies is being proven by scientific study and indicated by real world observation to reduce mortality? Can it not be reasoned that the above artificially extended the pandemic, giving time for the vaccines to be developed? Is it not true that pharmaceutical companies have considerable influence on governments, the WHO and the UN and also are part-owned by the same investment companies which part own a considerable part of the media, especially medical journals? Can you see a pattern here?
    1
  28.  @timothyharris4708  I assure YouTube deletes many arguments. I know this from experience. Getting past its Gestapo often a challenge. These may explain a certain evasiveness in my answer to you, but where is the dishonesty? Answer my questions in the affirmative and they clearly show a pattern whereby the pursuit of profit has far eclipsed the pursuit of an end to the pandemic. Even now it is being artificially extended on order for more vaccines to be sold. For the pharmaceutical companies this has not been a health issue, it has been a business opportunity.
    1
  29.  @timothyharris4708  What political opinions am I advancing? Name one.
    1
  30.  @timothyharris4708  Who's being spineless now?
    1
  31.  @timothyharris4708  I did say "it can be claimed", and I so claim. There is nothing vague or dubious about any of the questions I asked, although obviously the answers may be contested. On the whole though the answer to all of them is "Yes." This constitutes as strong an argument as you can get. Unless you wish to be considered spineless or intellectually incompetent you must provide evidence that "No" is the answer. As for credulity, anyone who believes the patter of snake-oil salesmen must be judged more credulous than those who doubt it. As for being "conspiracy-minded", again healthy cynicism about the messages promulgated by our leaders has been proved to be justified more often than not. The handling of the covid pandemic is a particularly glaring example of multiple deceits being employed to subdue and exploit a weak-minded populace.
    1
  32.  @vforwombat9915  Yes natural immunity is infinitely more efficient. It provides near total, long-lasting immunity and in rare cases of re-infection the second infection is always mild. Vaccines only prevent infection intermittently and are only effective over short periods. "Horse de-wormer" has proved to be enormously effective in reducing mortality is countries where it has been deployed. Furthermore recent studies have clearly shown similar benefits in clinically conducted trials,. One of these used an entire town in Brazil as a test site. The difference in mortality between those who took the "horse de-wormer", even in very small doses, and those who did not is truly staggering. Another study compared the effectiveness of the horse de-wormer, which costs literally almost nothing, with that of a recently developed medication which costs £340 a dose. The horse de-wormer won hands down. A recent meta-study by Johns Hopkins University, citing hundreds of individual studies, has clearly shown that lockdowns have little or no effect on covid mortality, while at the same time creating immense economic and societal damage resulting in a great many deaths from other causes. Herd immunity is a fact of nature. It is the only way any epidemic is conquered. All the above assertions can be backed by attested scientific studies. The only conspiracy is the one which claims these very disturbing findings are the results of conspiracies.
    1
  33.  @timothyharris4708  I think you might be slowly coming round to the cause of of reason, truth and justice. Just a little more effort and you will probably get there.
    1
  34.  @vforwombat9915  Deductive reasoning is not data-based. It is based on assumptions any of which may be false. All the assertions I have made or questioned are backed up by evidence. Deductive reasoning leads to the strong possibility that a sequence of events has been created which has led to an extension of the pandemic with the purpose of increasing drug company profits. Drug companies falsely asserted that natural immunity was ineffective because otherwise fit, healthy people could have willingly caught covid and therefore had no need to be vaccinated. Even now such people are being coerced into having unnecessary vaccinations, as indeed are young children. All trials pretending to show the inefficacy of hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin were undertaken directly or indirectly by drug companies. The results are therefore unsurprising. Recent trials and on-the-ground experience clearly present evidence for Ivermectin to be highly effective in reducing covid mortality.
    1
  35.  @timothyharris4708  The truth is we have been conned something rotten. This conclusion is arrived at by reason, but obtaining justice is a very long way off.
    1
  36.  @timothyharris4708  Once again my original reply has been deleted by YouTube. I will now attempt to conceal my heresies. Who is wearing a mask? Who has been triple-jabbed? Whose fearful and compliant responses have helped create new billionaires while further impoverishing the already poor? What motives lie behind the encouragement of the processes you have willingly undergone? What motives lie behind the questioning of this encouragement? Who's the mug here?
    1
  37. @LuLYaWott I cannot see why you assume C19 is going inevitably to cause serious problems again. Omicron certainly seems to provide a very high level of immunity to other variants, and this very much fits the general pattern of viral epidemics. It is entirely possible that the drop in cases following roll-out was purely co-incidental. Unlikely, but possible. And there is at least one UK statistical study which indicates that all-cause deaths actually increased post roll;-out. The vaccines have certainly performed very badly, and as far as Omicron is concerned there is little evidence that they actually prevent infection, but merely reduce severity. Since Omicron is rarely, if ever, fatal this is scarcely a recommendation.
    1
  38.  @timothyharris4708  You really are Mr Muggins personified. If you don't believe me about YouTube censorship you are a fool. Anything which rationally questions the efficacy of vaccines or the efficacy of pre-existing medications is deleted unless it is phrased very carefully indeed -on the grounds of spreading "medical misinformation." This obviously makes arguing a forceful case very difficult. YouTube controls thoughts. Only certain opinions are allowed. Insult me as much as you like. My sole motivation is to unpick the official line and try to work out true motivation. Gullible idiots like you, who believe everything they are told, are dangerous and must be hunted down and chastised, even if only metaphorically in the comments sections of YouTube channels.
    1
  39. @LuLYaWott Vaccines are not the answer. Natural selection is. C19 has evolved into a more transmissible but less virulent form which bears out Smith's Law and could well have arrived at this stage a great deal earlier if we had not misjudged it and attempted so clumsily and ineffectively to divert it from its natural course.
    1
  40. @LuLYaWott There is no evidence that BA2 is more severe. Indeed there is no evidence that Omicron has directly and solely caused a single death. The Chinese outbreak is tiny and we have no evidence as to the severity of outcomes. Life certainly comes up with nasty surprises, but I really do believe your pessimism is entirely unjustified.
    1
  41. @LuLYaWott What does it matter how many people catch it? The more the merrier. The more who achieve actual real immunity! Omicron affects the bronchial passages and rarely descends to the lungs. Asthmatics and others with bronchial difficulties will have problems- but so they would if they caught a chesty cold. Which is basically all Omicron is at worse.
    1
  42. @LuLYaWott We have achieved herd immunity. Herd immunity means that a pathogen is containable. It does not mean, as many think, that it has been entirely eliminated . C19 will always be with us. It has simply joined that small contingent of pathogens we refer to as the "common cold." Which is exactly what sensible people predicted when it first appeared.
    1
  43.  @errorswillmultiply1697  What you don't understand (among the many things you don't understand) is that my views are in no way controversial when aired on other channels. The inward-looking little tribe you belong to is generally characterised by fear, pessimism, self-righteousness and an overwhelming desire to conform and to obey. You are sheep. You need a good shaking and it is my pleasure to give it to you. Win an argument and I will concede. Point out an inaccuracy and I will gratefully acknowledge my error. Just because you are incapable of achieving these things doesn't mean others can't. You really are a whinging wimp. And so is anyone who heeds your dirge-like warnings.
    1
  44.  @errorswillmultiply1697  Your not proving anything you buffoon! And I am not angry with you, merely slightly irritated.
    1
  45. @LuLYaWott Currently in the UK deaths and hospitalisations from all causes are around 5% lower than the five-year average. BA2 is going to have to behave very strangely indeed if it's going to knock a hole in that reserve. We can go on forever predicting doom and disaster, but as things stand there is no need for it. Very often in life the things we do to prevent disasters turn out to be more damaging than the disasters would have been. We have virtually destroyed ourselves out of fear if what is basically a nasty bug which kills people already on their way to the crematorium. And it isn't even doing that any more. It's time to stop the paranoia.
    1
  46.  @vforwombat9915  My evidence is based on original studies too - hopefully ones not paid for by drug companies which have a vested interest in skewed results. What on earth do you mean: "Natural immunity is zero percent effective at preventing infection. It is highly effective at preventing reinfection."???!!!. You don't get natural immunity unless you you catch covid in the first place - or in some cases have it because of inbuilt immunity due to response to earlier historical infections by a similar pathogen. This is why some Asian countries have been less hard hit. If you are fit and healthy getting covid is practically a bounden duty, as you help build up cordons of immunity around the vulnerable. The way things are looking you stand about as much chance of developing serious issues from covid as you do from the measures taken to prevent it. Have you read the recently released Pfizer data? Trials not undertaken by drug companies, plus statistical evidence from countries where it is widely used, have shown clear correlations between "horse-medicine" and quite dramatic decreases in mortality. Big Pharma has taken the world for a ride -and not for the first time.
    1
  47.  @vforwombat9915  The following is a precis of the data released by Pfizer following a Freedom of Information Court Order. The FADA in America considered that despite the adverse events, including over 1,200 fatalities, the advantages outweighed the risks. Adverse event reports 01 December 2020 through 28 February 2021 Cumulatively, through 28 February 2021, a total of 42,086 case reports (25,379 medically confirmed and 16,707 non-medically confirmed) containing 158,893 events. Most cases (34,762) were received from United States (13,739), United Kingdom (13,404) Italy (2,578), Germany (1,913), France (1,506), Portugal (866) and Spain (756) the remaining 7,324 were distributed among 56 other countries. Fatal, 1,223
    1
  48.  @vforwombat9915  My last three replies to you have been deleted, so briefly: How does your trained scientific mind explain the fact that actual number of injections in this pre-licence roll-out has been redacted? Would it not be useful, in your trained scientific opinion, if the percentage thus obtained could be compared with the equivalent percentage of deaths/serious outcomes resulting from actual infection? As to horse -dewormer you just have to compare death rates in Uttar Pradesh and Goa with Kerala or other Indian states where it has been banned. The argument comparing immunity through infection with immunity via jab is over. You lost.
    1
  49.  @1inchPunchBowl  I said the response to the pandemic has been engineered. Which it has: by the drug companies who have artificially extended it and suppressed information about alternative treatments in order to maximise profits from the sale of vaccines and other medication.
    1
  50.  @1inchPunchBowl  The drug companies have the system tied up. They run rings around NICE and GPs. They cost the NHS millions by persuading GPs to carry on prescribing brand-name drugs even when much, much cheaper versions are available. Tests showing unpleasant side-effects are tucked out of sight and tests exaggerating benefits are widely proclaimed. They are in business for profit and the way in which the pandemic has manipulated to maximise their profits while having little regard for public health is a scandal.
    1
  51.  @MartinJames389  Neither am I either of these things, but I would put money on these figures being entirely due to the increased transmissibility of BA 2. No other explanation is required.
    1
  52.  @MartinJames389  As I said, no other explanation is required. The more it spreads the more people get it, including hospital patients. Why need it be in any way more virulent?
    1
  53.  @MartinJames389  What indications? If it was we would know by now. Look at Delta, we knew then soon enough.
    1
  54.  @vforwombat9915  But where is the evidence that this means effects will be worse in individual cases?
    1
  55.  @timothyharris4708  And there you go again. How about you respond to the points I make instead of trying to deny me the right to make them? You accuse me of "lies and evasion" Name one lie. One evasion. What "conspiracy-mongers" do you mean? What do you mean "able to think"? You show little evidence for it when all you seem to do is swallow official propaganda without question. Look at the mess the mismanagement of the pandemic has got us into. It has only been possible because of the gullibility of unthinking fools who are unable to question objectively what is going on around them
    1
  56.  @timothyharris4708  We are currently having an argument over on Robespierre. An annoying shit called Matt Greek 1066 claims he is blocking my replies to you over there. Is this true? And if it is do you think it fair? Would you be happy to see our argument halted by a third person?
    1
  57. The New World Order is very real. It is the declared strategy of the World Economic Forum which is run by billionaires and whose website quite unashamedly reveals its plans for the future of mankind.
    1