Comments by "Dale Crocker" (@dalecrocker3213) on "Russia's kamikaze drone strikes: A new phase in the war? | Ukraine latest" video.

It seems to be working reasonably well.
35
The civilian deaths are incidental. These drones are a cheap way of destroying infrastructure. The panic they may cause is just a bonus. Russia has tried to keep civilian deaths to a minimum throughout this conflict.
28
Russia will reply with a proper missile attack. What then?
11
The civilian deaths are incidental. These drones are a cheap way of destroying infrastructure. The panic they may cause is just a bonus. Russia has tried to keep civilian deaths to a minimum throughout this conflict.
5
Zelensky must go.
4
This doesn't sound like a definition of losing to me. Quite the reverse.
3
@Quote Ukraine in NATO is not a threat? This war is America's war.
2
@cube6687 Here's hoping.
2
@stasguivan4680 Absolutely.
2
@stasguivan4680 There are memorials to the dead in front line towns and villages in Donbass. At least 14 thousand people have died. People are living in cellars. Industry is crippled. What world are you living in?
2
@linusa2996 The civilian deaths are incidental, as the low numbers show. Different missiles with different targets would be used if the prime objective was killing large numbers of civilians. Shooting the drones down might not be such a good idea either.
2
@quito787 I'm trying to be neutral, but I have to say that Russia has very real reasons for taking the actions it has and, more importantly, a quick Russian victory is the only way this dreadful war can be brought to a rapid conclusion.
1
@rowaystarco Not so. Russia has the capacity to bomb Ukrainian cities into dust, as it did in Syria.
1
@rowaystarco Because they're cheap.
1
@martijnstam6186 No threat to Russia?! What else is NATO for, do you suppose? (Apart from providing a ready market for arms dealers and job opportunities for senior US military of course.)
1
@martijnstam6186 It'll be a bit late then, won't it? Trying to get Ukraine into NATO is what has provoked Russia into taking the action it has. It simply cannot be expected to put up with the idea of having an enemy nuclear missile base seven minutes flying time from Moscow. It is a step too far - and recognised as such even by many Western diplomats and senior military personnel. Do you realise that Russia has tried to join NATO several times? The reason it hasn't been allowed to is because NATO is basically a job creation scheme for the Western military and a goldmine for arms salesmen. The Russian Federation poses no threat to peace in the way the Soviet Union did, but it has to be treated as an enemy because NATO needs an enemy to justify its very profitable existence.
1
@martijnstam6186 Has America given up its nuclear arsenal? I must have missed that.
1
@DrMcMoist You have been misinformed. All the evidence -including on the spot testimony from civilians under attack - points to the Ukrainians carrying out these atrocities. The fact that the Russians HAVE been reluctant to incur civilian casualties has meant that the Ukrainians have been keen to keep civilians in areas under attack to use as human shields. They have even kept civilians bottled up in cellars and bomb shelters, using snipers to shoot anyone who ventures out for food and water. In at least one instance a group of elderly people in Mariupol were actually cemented into a cellar and their cries of distress broadcast on loudspeakers to dissuade Russian-allied troops from advancing. I have archived videos of all the above, but of course Western censorship prevents me from sharing them with you. Some may be found on Patrick Lancaster's channel. or pro-Russian channels tom and anonymous, among others.
1
@Quote Leading to escalation and much, much more death and destruction. Giving in to Russia's entirely reasonable demands would be a preferable solution, don't you think?
1
@matsmith5800 Followed immediately by a nuke on Washington. Their paths might even cross!
1