Comments by "Dale Crocker" (@dalecrocker3213) on "The Damage Report" channel.

  1.  @josephinelane6702  What an evil bitch you are.
    5
  2. Does the US have Christmas and New Year pantomimes as we do in the UK? In case you don't know a pantomime is a charade based on a fairy tale. There are deliberately ridiculous performances, exaggerated posturing and appeals to the audience for support There are usually dirty jokes and songs, but apart from that Don and the Impeachment - currently starting its run in Congress before moving to the Senate - looks likely to provide considerable entertainment over the festive season.
    4
  3. I notice you only mention ice LOSS in Greenland. Perhaps you should take into account the heavy ice GAIN which is now taking place due to particularly heavy snowfalls. The Odin, Sweden's largest and most powerful icebreaker, is currently making just three knots as it encounters exceptionally thick ice in the arctic circle. Plans to actually reach the pole are likely to be abandoned.
    3
  4. All politicians lie. Trump is just pretty good at it.
    3
  5. With dignity.
    3
  6. The climate crisis is a scam. By restricting the amount of carbon industry is allowed to produce, permissions to produce it are of great and varying value. Hedge fund managers are now making vast fortunes by trading in these permissions.The so-called science behind the scam is attractive enough in its way, but exists only in the laboratory and in computer models, Data obtained through measurement is routinely manipulated to fit the theory. There is no empirical evidence that man-made carbon emissions affect the climate in any way. There is, however, considerable empirical evidence that the climate in the quite recent past was warmer than it is today.The Medieval Warm Period is a fact of history and now those scientists who are in on the scam, and are profiting from it, have failed to airbrush it from the records they are attempting to claim that it was small and localised. This report in Nature is, broadly speaking,, a part of this strategy. Evidence of the MWP, or indeed of the earlier Roman Warming Period, is obviously far greater in Europe because this is where we get our history from. New evidence from China and Japan giving details of the crops grown at the time are, however, showing very clearly that it was warm there too. Tree ring evidence from the USA and Canada also supports the case. Obviously evidence that it was warmer for at least two quite lengthy periods of time during the past two thousand years than it is today entirely scuppers the climate crisis theory and the vast profits to be made from demonising carbon and restricting its output through legislation. Although some scientists are in on the scam, very many others are duped into supporting it by the intellectually stimulating nature of the research and further coerced by the fact that unless they follow the party line they will very soon be out of a job. Ignorant journalists and hysterical commentators add greatly to the scam and its grip upon the fearful public. For measured accounts and citations of the facts outlined above I suggest viewers go to the work of Tony Heller and 1000frolly Phd. The skeletons of Vikings who farmed Greenland in places that are now barren snow-covered rock have been found pierced and twisted by the roots of the trees that were planted on their graves. The solar system, bound together by forces of gravity and magnetism beyond our comprehension is speeding and spiraling through space at many millions of miles per hour, passing through clouds of elemental particles the function and purpose of which we are equally ignorant. Do you not think it more likely that the earth's changing climate over the millennia is due to the effects of this awesome and ancient dance than it is to the piffling farts and burps of we tiny, concieted and frequently misguided humans?
    3
  7. Sarah D Too true. Very many other insect species besides.Global warming is, I think, about number 9 on a list of 11 recently put forward as possible causes for this. Far too much of our natural concern and energy is being diverted to the issue of man-made climate change which is, I have now sincerely come to believe, exactly what "deniers" say it is: a clever scam created for sinister political and financial purposes.
    2
  8. Who is this one supporter whose dark secrets are being exposed? I demand you name this person! Otherwise I will have report you to the International Society for the Protection of the Apostrophe!
    2
  9. Is she real or some sort of advanced hologram?
    2
  10.  Julia Sutton  I don't believe you. Statistics from all countries show that over 90% of all Covid 19 deaths occur mainly among the elderly and those with pre-existing medical conditions. Deaths are down in most countries and so are hospitalisations. Many hospital wards set aside for Covid cases are empty. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fGUFfhIkA9E&t=668s
    2
  11. Seigmorag I'm British so I can't vote in your wonderful country. I have to say though that like many over here I wondered what you Yanks were doing electing a semi-illiterate old conman as President. Since then though I have warmed to him bigly. His elegant pisstake of the Ghastly Greta was especially fine, I thought.
    2
  12. It's worth remembering that Trump originally introduced tariffs at the request of US solar panel manufacturers to prevent unfair competition from China. Presumably these 62,000 (?!) jobs are in sales, assembly and distribution. If US manufacture prospers then it will recreate such jobs, as well as adding to the US economy. At the very least the move is a useful part of Trump's continuing trade war strategy against China - one which appears to be paying big dividends so far.
    2
  13. The choice of the word "blows" in the title of this piece was somewhat unfortunate I feel. Just sayin'
    2
  14. The only way to stop South Americans burning down the rainforest to create agricultural land is to pay them not to. If we stopped wasting billions of dollars pursuing the myth of man-made climate change it could be easily afforded.
    2
  15.  @micregil  I hope it didn't take TOO long to think that up. Trump=bashing is just sooooh last year you know!
    2
  16.  @micregil  Do you realise just how severely your brain has been fried? He's not even naughty.
    2
  17. A hologram will be projected to us from the year 2073 telling us that climate change was a hoax. Trump will be re-elected and legal errors in the impeachment proceedings will mean that his first term was cancelled, and thus he will be eligible for a third term. John Iadarola will leave Damage Report and pursue a successful career as a stand-up comedian. Michael Moore will fade slowly into nothingness leaving behind only a baseball cap,an enigmatic smile and a pool of grease on the floor. Joe Biden will be declared insane and try to flee to the Ukraine, but will end up in the Yukon instead. Greta Thunberg will be revealed as a 47 year old man with a rare genetic condition that requires him to be given daily injections extracted from the pituitary glands of puppy dogs. It will snow a lot. The Kentucky Derby will be won by a Ford Mustang which self-identifies as a racehorse. Its pronouns are Brmm Brmm. The year will end on a cheerful note with the announcement that Vladimir Putin and President Trump have formed a trade alliance to allow them to buy Europe off the Germans.
    2
  18. Herd immunity can actually be achieved without a vaccine, or without any strategy at all. A disease will do the job all on its own. When the death rate from Covid 19 was at its height sure, millions would have had to die for herd immunity to be achieved. Now though the death rate in most countries is around.033% . It only has to fall a little more and Covid will become like the common cold:, just a bit of a nuisance. I just thought I'd brighten your day.
    2
  19. purple layne 11.8% poverty rate. Still much too high but the lowest since 2001 121 consecutive months of trade expansion Red tape slashed across the board Corporation tax slashed from 35% to 21% Income tax reduced at almost all levels Black unemployment at 5.5% -the lowest on record (16% under Obama) Hispanic unemployment 3.9% (12.5% under Obama) Overall unemployment 3.5% - the lowest in 50 years GSOH takes the mickey out of people so subtly they don't know he's doing it, Causes feeble-minded Liberals to froth at the mouth in impotent rage. Tremendous entertainment value all round. I'm British, so I have no axe to grind. Like many of us over here I wondered what you Yanks were up to electing this very brash, bizarre old guy and decided to take a look at US politics for the first time. It soon became clear that Trump Derangement Syndrome was (and is) a genuine psychological condition. I said to myself; "If this Russiagate thing turns out to be a pile of crap, and these economic policies seem to work, then I'm going to have to give this guy some respect." It did. They did. And I do.
    2
  20. One Punch I'm sure Mike Bolin can stick up for himself, but in answer to your question Greta didn't just knock on someone's door and say "here I am" did she? Her parents are left-wing, fame-obsessed actors and singers and she is being used as a poster child for climate change hysteria - which is politically-based and uses lies and manipulation of data to push its agenda.
    2
  21. Are you sure it isn't 97%?
    2
  22. "A spontaneous uprising of a justifiably angered populace needs no organisation other than the will of the people to overthrow oppression." Lyan Kuntz 1916
    2
  23. Australican - I quite agree! It's heartbreaking to see so much energy being diverted from the very real problems of tackling environmental pollution and species extinction. The proponents of carbon phobia have much to answer for. I'll stop now before I bloviate!
    2
  24. Mark Ewing - Well I don't expect to overturn thirty years of prejudice and manipulation in a few paragraphs. Do check out Tony Heller and 1000frolly Phd though they'll certaintly give you food for thought. You can try checking the carbon futures market too, to see how the Nature piece has affected prospects.
    2
  25. Australican -As I said Tony Heller and 1000frolly Phd cite numerous sources which you can follow up.
    2
  26. Urrcreavesh -What a cocky fellow you are! I have given you facts -all you have is propaganda.
    2
  27. Urrcreavesh Oh dear! You are showing the usual signs of Carbonophope Derangement Syndrome which occur when your bubble is prodded. You want citations, go to to 1000frolly Phd who will give you,at great length , all the details of the many scientific papers he has read during the course of his research. Google Viking bodies for yourself. Shoestring budgets! Do't make me laugh - an estimated billion dollars a day is being spent on climate crisis garbage. The fossil fuel industry is just shrugging and adapting by making money from such nonsenses as coal-powered (electric) cars and wind turbines, each one of which costs far more in terms of carbon released into the atmosphere by the manufacture of their vast foundations than will be saved by their operation. You can check this out too, but I bet you're too chicken-shit scared to try a bit of research yourself. You'd much rather go through life believing the brainwashed bullshit doled out by you virtue-signalling schoolteachers. Of course the chemistry of tropospheric refraction is sound, and has been understood for many years. What is not clear, however, is to what extent the nature of that refraction is affected by the introduction of increased carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. The results of laboratory experiments vary. Of course ice-core proxy data shows that increased carbon dioxide emissions follow increased temperatures by 5-800 years, which is an experiment hard to replicate. Indications are, incidentally, that carbon only stays in the air from for five years or so anyway. It's not your fault you're the way you are. It's just the way you've been brought up.
    2
  28. Dean Walker - Just go to 1000frolly Phd's latest video. There is a list of citations there nearly as long as the list of peer reviewed bullshit pumped out by the slavish devotees of ACC.
    2
  29. Susi M - I do follow Potholer in an attempt to see other points of view. It's rather like having butter rubbed into your eyeballs while an insurance salesman talks to you in a foreign language. His puerile analogies and convoluted reasoning leave me cold. The fossil fuel industry isn't all that worried by climate hysteria. They can make money by playing the carbon market too and even more by producing coal-powered cars and wind turbines.Tobacco and asbestos aren't exactly the same as carbon emissions are they? People made money from producing them while ignorant of the health hazards and very quickly were persuaded not to produce them when shown the pile of bodies. Where's the pile of bodies resulting from C02 emissions one has to ask? After 30 years of threats and promises things seem to be going on very much as before, despite attempts to prove the contrary with smoke and mirrors and dodgy data fed into computer models and passed on to the gullible masses as facts. You want piles of bodies? Go to the 1930s when tens of thousands died in heatwaves much hotter and longer than those of today and when C02 levels were much, much lower. I agree with you 100 per cent about pollution. That's why it's such a shame to see so much effort being wasted on the carbon myth which could be better used in dealing with real threats to the well-being of the planet.
    2
  30. Andrew Brent Not so much a hoax as an error. Our Serbian's model came up with the idea that carbon molecules vibrate in such a way that the heat of the sun reflected from the earth's surface cannot pass through them. A recent study using literally billions of chunks of data from weather balloons across the world has proved him wrong. This is good news but it has a HUGE mountain of embarrassment and financial commitment to the greenhouse effect myth to overcome before it becomes widely known. You are one of the first to be told, you lucky boy!
    2
  31. Hydroxychloroquine is administered orally. Kids don't need it because their antibodies manage on their own. It helps the old and the sick by stopping the virus reproducing.
    1
  32. commuted There are many people all over the world already doing this. They don't have any money.
    1
  33. My parrot has just died due to Climate Change. When I get a new one I'm going to call it Greta. Even if it's a boy parrot. I don't think these things matter when it comes to parrots Bernie 2020 Yaaay!
    1
  34. Valerie Mc Phail Excellent! Trump would do great Toad and the Democrats are absolutely right for the weasels!
    1
  35. Man-made climate change is a lie. The climate crisis is not a crisis. There is no increase in the number or nature of extreme weather events. Trump is right to ignore the panic and to support the economy. Hell will freeze over before man-made carbon emissions have any significant effect on weather patterns.
    1
  36. So you have to be well known? There are many scientists, well-known and not, who strongly dispute the junk science of climate alarmism, which has a clear political foundation, brazenly alters data to fit its thesis and blackmails scientists into supporting it by threatening to withdraw grants unless they do so I don't know what you mean about Alaska. It was still there and doing fine last time I looked.
    1
  37. Erik Humleker - Please congratulate your brother for me. According to eminent physicist and Nobel prizewinner Ivan Giavier everything in my statement is true.
    1
  38. Erik Humleker - thought it was 97 per cent of the 32 per cent who expressed an opinion? And with all due respect to your brother and his colleagues are they not merely repeating what they have been taught? And if they disagreed with what they had been taught would they not very soon have to stop being climate scientists? When it comes to accusations of cupidity climate scientists are themselves on very shaky ground, I fear - especially when an estimated billion dollars A DAY is being spent on propping up their nonsense.. Your quote from Machiavelli could apply very well to climate scientists - on both counts. They have been deceived and continue to perpetrate the deception. The idea that all scientists who question climate change hysteria are somehow in the pay of evil oil barons and coalmine owners is utterly childish. When NONE of the grim predictions have come true and data is clearly seen to have been manipulated then it is time to start asking serious questions. (Ivan Glavier is not an anecdote by the way - or even an anacdote - he is a real person. Google him if you doubt me.)
    1
  39. Dave abvntr - Turn them into what?
    1
  40. Brian If the atmosphere is warming it is warming very slowly and in apparent accord with previous patterns. There were no reliable thermometers in the Middle Ages and in Roman Times, but anecdotal evidence -Romans growing grapes in Scotland, large rivers running dry in the 12th century - plus tree ring and leaf stomata proxy data -strongly indicate that it was warmer at both these times than at present. On the other hand it was much colder in the Little Ice Age -roughly 1350 to 1850. So the atmosphere warms and cools, and warms and cools. What part industrial emissions play in the current situation, if any, is impossible to calculate. Carbon is held to be the villain of the piece for some reason and while atmospheric carbon seems to play a role in retaining the sun's heat on the surface of the planet how significant that role is a matter of dispute when compared with other factors. What troubles me is that this carbonophobic scaremongering has been going on for over thirty years and so far as I can tell none of the computer-generated predictions of doom have come to pass, suggesting to me that the computer models are wrong but the scientist are so up to their necks in this shit they can't get out. What's more they are fiddling their figures quite brazenly, just to keep their heads above the surface.of the mire. It's all either a scam or a cock-up that's got out of control.Probably a bit of both. -
    1
  41. Andrea Mortimer Alas at 70 I don't have the time and anyway all you scientists seem to disagree with each other so vehemently. All I can do is do as I have done and ask some basic questions and wait for answers.
    1
  42. Brian -I thought I had
    1
  43. Andrea Mortimer -I really am disappointed in you! I thought you were going to be the one to steer me through the minefield - instead you have become hysterical as all you alarmists seem to become when your bubble is given a little prod. Tut! Tut! (I did have a look at the consensus thingy, Couldn't really understand it. It seemed to be saying that there's a consensus that there's a consensus - as for the rest of the stuff it was mostly just journalism, wasn't it? I don't anticipate seeing any major changes in the 7 years you say I have left to me. You I presume can anticipate much longer. Best of luck!)
    1
  44. Brian -Thank you very much for this. I will try to get my head around the science - but will it do more than explain the process whereby CO2 translates solar energy into increased heat, and retains it? I don't understand how the presence of such tiny amounts of carbon in the atmosphere can have such dramatic effects, nor why increased amounts of CO2 apparently follow increases in temperature, rather than precede them, which is what one would expect. Anyway, thanks for your civility. Normally climate change devotees grow quite hysterical when responding to my admittedly provocative comments. This is a fine sport, but not as useful as reasoned discourse.
    1
  45. Frank Speaking - What's up Frank? Are you on medication? Twenty six minutes ago you sent me a post which seemed, although rather chaotic, to contain one or two graspable insights. Then twenty minutes later you send me this hysterical hodgepodge. I'm trying hard to get into this but the way all you carbonophobic climate crisis folk seem to go batshit crazy at odd times is most disconcerting.
    1
  46. Shantanu Shinde Thankyou for this. I've had a go at a couple of these posts but with little progress being made. I find it far easier to understand Tony Heller (cross yourself quickly and throw salt over your shoulder.) His video '100 per cent accurate climate change predictions' seems to fit far more closely with observable facts and my rather cynical view of human nature. I see no warming. I see no rise in sea levels. I see no glaciers melting. All I see is an impressive series of classroom models and terrifying graphs which bear no relation to what is going on on the other side of the window. I must be wrong. I'd very much like to hear your response to the above video, could you bear to watch it though.
    1
  47. Has news of the Connellys reached your shores yet?This father and son team from The University of Dublin have apparently proved beyond doubt that carbon-fuelled global warming is a load of hooey. You will be astonished to learn that all the models predicting global warming are based themselves on a model created in 1942 by an obscure physicist from Serbia. It appears he was dead wrong and that Albert Einstein, who published a paper in 1917 saying that the Earth's atmosphere is thermodynamically stable and self-stabilizing, was entirely correct. Carbon molecules do not retain heat. They absorb it in one third of a second then spit it out again to go on its merry way. This would go a long way towards explaining why none of the climate alarmists' predictions have yet come to pass and also begs the question as to why figures have been fiddled and multiple lies told by the media to pretend that they have. The Connelly paper is based on a five year study of literally billions of readings from weather balloons from all over the world. It is repeatable by anyone who cares to do so and all necessary information to this end is publicly available. If other scientiists come up with the same conclusions then the whole sick, evil terrifying con-trick of man-made global warming will come crashing down like a house of cards - and not before time. Little Miss Thunberg can go back to Sweden and start a family or do something else useful with her life.
    1
  48. Unlikely but possibly true. Predictably steps are being taken to quash and sideline their paper but I gather they can be reached on HTTPS://ronanconnollyscience.com. You might end up merely reaching a blog, but scrolling down, I am told, gets to sources for the original and if contacted they will send you the paper as a pdf. Good luck. I assume you are a scientist, which I am not, but these findings seem to confirm my instinct that nature often gets thing right while mere mortal scientists often get things wrong. Horribly wrong in this instance.
    1
  49. Long duk dong - if the mountains of evidence are based on a falsehood then the mountains will crumble. The man-made climate change models are based on a model created in 1942 by a Serbian physicist whose laboratory experiments incorrectly defined the nature of gases in the atmosphere. Einstein's 1917 paper was based on a theoretical assessment of the nature of these gasses. The empirical evidence gathered from weather balloon data by the Connollys supports Einstein's assessment.
    1
  50. geared4 the truth I expect you'd prefer the kids to be released into a world of sexual exploitation and abuse? That's what would happen to many of them. They are being protected not imprisoned. Border patrol and immigration officials work hard to ensure these poor victims are found a safe environment before they are released.
    1
  51. Octavius Chan What about the very many black people who support Trump, you demented turd? Please, please, please be a troll or there is little hope left for you in the world of the sane.
    1
  52. sue bee And you seem to have pretty sociopathic traits yourself. You certainly have a very loose grip on reality. Illegal immigrants from Mexico arrive EXCLUSIVELY via the offices of cartels for whom people smuggling is just as profitable as drug smuggling. Children are hired out to adults in order to form apparent family groups. A duty of care to children means the US government has to take these "families" in. The children are removed from the adults because in a great many cases they are not their actual offspring. They will be used in child prostitution if returned to the care of the cartels. DNA test have shown that around two-thirds of children crossing the border have no genetic relationship with the adults claiming to be their parents. Why on earth would immigration officials WANT to separate children from adults? Do you imagine them to be evil people, doing it for fun? Every effort is made to re-unite children with their REAL parents once processing has been carried out. Sadly though many of the children are orphans or have already lost touch with their parents. They are transferred to entirely suitable care centres and from there to the normal avenues of care. You may adopt one if you are considered suitable.
    1
  53. Janet Crawford So black people who support Trump hate themselves? That not only sounds like psychological nonsense, it sounds like racism. Current polls indicate that 34% of black voters will support Trump in 2020. That's a lot of greedy scum. Maybe they're intelligent, thinking human beings before anything else and being black is way down on the list of how they feel about themselves. Strikes me you could learn something from that attitude.
    1
  54. nemian618 - and the only country not have suffered the self-inflicted economic wounds of climate hysteria.
    1
  55. Rick White The damage is mostly the result of poor management by Green local authorities who have restricted traditional methods of bushfire control, usually to protect rare plants, insects, birds and animals. Those plants, insects, birds and animals are now mostly burned to a crisp. I can't help thinking there's a lesson here somewhere.
    1
  56. Rick White You are pompous, patronising and misguided as well as being incredibly thick. In what universe would a civilisation build cities inland because they were worried that someone in the future would come up with the crackpot theory that sea levels are going to rise? The climate is changing, as it has always done. There is no crisis. Temperatures will almost certainly increase in coming years but to nothing like the extent predicted in the alarmist computer models which consistently run too hot. This charade has been going on for more than thirty years and not one of the dire predictions has come to pass. Not one.
    1
  57. SpectatorAlius You are delusional. Name one island nation that has been forced to "flee its lands" Give one scrap of real evidence that sea level rises have been any other than minimal. Name a single extinction event that has been caused by increased atmospheric carbon. Name one period in history when carbon increases have preceded increased temperatures rather than the other way around. The whole concept of AGW is based on false premises, exacerbated by misuse of computer programming. No-one disputes that the Earth's climate is warming; what is very much in dispute is how much increased levels of atmospheric carbon contribute to this.
    1
  58. Rick White Just a bit. Were you trying to be ironical at some point? I must have taken it at face value since it was seemingly indistinguishable from your presumably non-ironical nonsense.
    1
  59. Rick White Sorry. Were you being ironical?
    1
  60. Rick White You missed who I was talking to - your buddy Spectator Alius who did indeed make such a a claim (Sigh! Here we go again.) Miami Beach is sinking;the ocean is not rising. London does not flood and nor do Paris and New York as far as I'm aware. I'm really beginning to think you're taking the piss. Nobody could really be as conceited and ill-informed as you seem to be.
    1
  61. Rick White Perhaps you might care to take this on board https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xNRB8SQbVvE
    1
  62. bignardo95 Trump meanwhile is injecting billions into the US economy. His latest trade deal with China will create thousands of new jobs. Catch up with reality why don't you?
    1
  63. Is it not what it is then? If it's not what it is, then what else is it? I know this channel's relationship with the truth is somewhat shaky at the best of times, but to describe a simple five- word statement of fact as a "phrase that will go down in infamy" is taking things somewhat to extremes, doncha think?
    1
  64.  @Swnsasy  Your analogy is absurd. It is what it is because death is what it is.Unlike previous Presidents, Trump is not some ham actor, dripping with false solicitude. Nobody yet knows what is the right thing to do in the face of this epidemic. Those who claim they do are fools or liars. Hysterics and blame-calling are entirely counter-productive. It's time to grim up and get real.
    1
  65.  @seanryan3020  Not at all. There are quite a lot of things he's not much good at. Acting is one of them
    1
  66. Warlord Plisken There's a lot going on in the canyons of your mind, isn't there O mighty chieftain?
    1
  67. Prometheus Go to www.ceres-science.com if you want a slightly more balanced view.
    1
  68. Herd immunity is the only sane option. It's working in Sweden and it could work in the US too. It is clear by now that Covid 19 only kills the elderly, the frail and those subjected to repeated infections. Many of the the former are dead already and those that remain can be protected and given prophylactic drugs. Hanging round watching the economy crumble while waiting for a vaccine is no answer at all. Already it is clear that this disease is not the big, bad wolf we were told to expect. It is what it is - and we should treat it as such and stop pretending it's something it isn't.
    1
  69.  Julia Sutton  The number of re-infections is statistically insignificant. There have only been five recorded cases so far. The statistics from Sweden speak for themselves - death rates very similar to other European countries but with very few restrictions imposed. You say you are a nurse. I'm surprised you should be so hysterical and irrational.
    1
  70.  Paolo G  I don't know what other parts of Europe you can mean. The other matters you bring up are discussed in this presentation. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fGUFfhIkA9E&t=668s
    1
  71.  @jeanniehelliwell1599  There have been no deaths in Sweden for the past five days. Figures have been consistently below twenty and generally far less. The vast majority have been elderly with only a very limited life expectancy.
    1
  72. Rick White And man-made global warming of course.
    1
  73. azarisLP It came from the heart. Once this impeachment debacle is over historians will cite it as a historical document signalling the end of the Democratic Party.
    1
  74. A brainwashed puppet "more smarter" than the billionaire President of the most powerful nation in the world. For the first time I understand this lol thing. I really did' I lolled! Anyway, thank you Damage Report for giving me so much fun and also for allowing a cynical old right-winger to express his views in your comments section. Many of your political persuasion just block us out you know. Shhh!
    1
  75. But these journalists are not journalists. They are Antifa thugs who write "Press" on the bulletproof vests and helmets before shepherding poor fools into the front-line to get teargassed.
    1
  76.  @bryanalexander7571  They are the victims of the trained Marxists using playbook tactics to put them into the position where they are teargassed and the imagery used for propaganda purposes.
    1
  77.  @allhumansarejusthuman.5776  What convoluted nonsense. Just because Antifa meets on encrypted phone apps instead of church halls doesn't stop it being an organisation. Do you suggest that people dressed in the same gear and following the same tactics appear at the same location at the same time due to some sort of spontaneous idea occurring to them simultaneously? And no-one is being arrested for thought crimes. People are being arrested for setting fires and damaging property and assaulting and killing people. Marxism is far more than a means of evaluating the viability of a means of generating income. It is a method by which the processes of generating productivity are controlled by the state. and is based both on a false theory of history and an entirely false assessment of the human character.
    1
  78.  @Ominousheat  And you are as mad as a box of frogs.Communism is the most oppressive culture to have any relevance today. And I said church halls as an example of a meeting place. Your brief tour of European history and its utterly bonkers conclusions are, I assume, the ramblings of a child.
    1
  79.  @azarinevil  Well that doesn't matter when you can shoot them instead.
    1
  80.  @johndigiacomo1674  Portland is ablaze. People dressed in black and carrying Antifa shields are beating up old ladies. America is on the brink of anarchy. It's been happening every day for weeks. What planet are you on? Wake up you smug fool.
    1
  81.  @azarinevil  So what That was then and this is now. Unless we're careful YOU are going to be slaughtered and the forces of evil will climb over your body. Just SEE what is happening in Portland and imagine that coming to your town or city.
    1
  82.  @johndigiacomo1674  You're the one with the false narrative - and I think you know it. You even SOUND like a Stalinist rewriting history. I've watched the videos. I've seen the timeline. I've seen Antifa thugs in shields and helmets terrifying old ladies and deliberately starting fires."Mothers, fathers and veterans trying to protect the protesters" what a load of cock! Other rioters pretending to protect other rioters while claiming moral superiority. You've been let off lightly. It just doesn't wash you know. People are not fools. Old style propaganda like this won't work in the digital age. Your cause is doomed. The truth will out. And thank you, thank you, by the way for helping to ensure Trump's re-election. Decent ordinary people will not put up with this kind of behaviour.We see through you.
    1
  83.  @azarinevil  You fill me with despair.
    1
  84. caniican I have named my new parrot Greta. This is especially poignant since my old one died due to Climate Change.
    1
  85. caniican Thank you for your kind words. I'm sorry you swore though. I don't approve of swearing. My parrot that died swore a lot. I inherited him from a relative who was somewhat foul-mouthed herself which is the explanation for that.
    1
  86. Trump's Brick Layer Greta is not imprisoned. She lives mostly on the perch that used to belong to Captain Henry, my old parrot who died due to Climate Change. She can go into her big cage when she wants to, and sometimes she does. I must admit I do discourage her from flying about indoors, but that is only because she is inclined to poop on the floor, and even sometimes on people's heads. Naughty Greta! I also take her for rides on my bicycle when the weather is fine.She perches on the handlebars, quite the little lady!
    1
  87. Trump's Bricklayer I do not live in Chicago, Whatever gave you that idea? I am not entirely sure of Captain Henry's origins. He belonged to my Auntie Fred who gave him to me when she went to Canada to become a lumberjack. Canadians are fussy about many things, including parrots. And Marmite of course. I am not even sure if poor Captain Henry was hatched in the Amazon basin. He may well have been born here in Godalming and never known the beauty and squalor of the South American jungle. I will try to get in touch with Auntie Fred and ask her if you like.
    1
  88. keir farnum That's the whole point. Everyone knows that politicians lie and until now the game has been to catch them at it. When Trump lies he more or less lets you know he's lying. If you're on his side this is OK because you know he's lying to cheat his opponents - who are your opponents too. If your against him you scream and shout about what a liar he is and he couldn't care less. You're using up all your energy while he just gets on with the next thing he's doing. Trump is a salesman playing chess. His opponents are politicians playing chequers. He's doing deals while they are scrabbling for the moral high ground. That's why they hate him and that's one reasonwhy he's doing so well.
    1
  89. Lefty Me Please refer to my reply to keir farnum just below.
    1
  90. sue bee Morals and integrity are all well and good, but they are generally defeated by cunning and deceit. I make this purely as an observation - it does not mean I approve.
    1
  91. Roger Sprague What lies specifically? Anther of Trump's tricks is telling little lies but not big ones. He lied about the size of the crowd at his inauguration but he didn't lie about Russia. He's not lying about Ukraine either and once again the Dems have fallen into his trap. Impeachment is going to blow up in their faces, just as Russiagate did. Good job too.
    1
  92. https;//www.youtube.com/watch?v=xNRB8SQbVvE
    1
  93. Susi M I must admit my knowledge of the complexities of Australian politics is somewhat limited, but I don't think this excellent guy was necessarily giving the greens a capital letter. What he was saying was that good intentions often go awry. The road to hell is paved with them, as the saying goes. Leaving the whole question of AGW aside it must surely be true, must it not, that if traditional methods of bush clearance had not been apparently abandoned to the degree that they have, then these horrific fires may have been contained a great deal more effectively than has been the case.
    1
  94. RikJ I find it hard to understand how much of a part climate change has played in all this. Hot is hot and a flame is a flame. Once a fire is lit it's lit . A difference of a few degrees in temperature can surely make little difference. What must make a difference is the apparent abandonment of traditional bushfire prevention and control methods as so graphically outlined by the guy in this video. I don't think he was giving the greens a capital letter necessarily. He was probably just referring to the interference in rural affairs by virtue-signalling do-gooders. That's a worldwide problem. Your current tragedy is just a particularly horrific example of good intentions going very much astray.
    1
  95. Susi M I'm afraid I am going to have to disagree with much of what you say. For a start, how can we possibly assert that global temperatures have risen by 1.6c since 1880? There were no weather stations outside of America and Europe, apart from a handful in Australia. These stations all recorded considerably higher temperatures than today on many occasions in the late 19th and early 20th centuries.These records have now been obliterated or adjusted downwards. Even if we accept that they were somehow "unreliable" for one reason or another it still remains a fact that we have no records to compare today's records with. All the climate scientists have done is assume a trend based on what ought to happen and worked backwards from there. There is no evidence of any increase in the frequency or severity of extreme weather events. Once again, this is a made-up story designed to bolster the alarmist claims. Once again, data is being adjusted to fit the narrative, but the old, and true, narrative still exists. One can pick sources almost at random. The investment market and the insurance market have no reason to play down such threats that I can think of and most responsible studies show that, if anything, natural disasters have declined. It is unanswerably true that the loss of human life and reduction in GNP due to such causes is far, far less today than it has ever been. https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/despite-what-you've-heard-global-warming-isn't-making-weather-more-extreme/ This 99% peer- reviewed nonsense is just a cheap trick to fool the unwary. As I say, I don't think this bloke was being political. He was just saying things as he saw them
    1
  96. Susi M Ignore the report and just look at the graphs and figures.You'd better hurry up though, the climate crisis Mafia is busy expunging the truth with all the diligence of a Stalinist correcting grain production figures for 1954. I repeat: there is no evidence for ANY record breaking local weather events. Dramatic occurrences have been filmed more frequently and fed to the gullible masses as representing some vast change in climate but they are just WEATHER! How do you know how many typhoons, hurricanes and droughts there were in the recent past? You don't. And even when alarmists try to pretend that such and such an event is the "worst since records began" you can bet your bottom dollar they've made sure records began AFTER the last time a similar event occurred. You really don't want to believe what the TV tells you. You're the one sitting under a rock watching your screen. I'm out in the real world, desperately trying to find out what's REALLY going on.
    1
  97. Susi M Once again I urge you to just look at the graphs in the article, which are from official government sources, not from journalists. The body of scientific evidence is far from entire. Many hundreds of peer-reviewed scientific papers questioning various aspects of global warming have been published since 2017. Several may found in their entirety at https://climatedepot.com/2019/01/04/consensus Australia's DOM is doing your country a great disservice by expunging the nation's past. Official records begin in 1910, conveniently airbrushing such massive calamities as The Federation Drought and other 19th century tragedies. You will add to your education by looking up the work of Dr Jennifer Marohary.
    1
  98. Susi M "Debunked" is just a buzzword climate scientists use when they mean "disagree with." All these paper are peer-reviewed and stand up to objective scrutiny. As to the "vast amount of evidence" you cite, this amounts to little more than lots of good little boys and girls handing in their homework. Or, to use another analogy, if you gave a lot of chefs the recipe for chocolate cake, the ingredients for chocolate cake, and some nice ovens to bake them in, you'd expect to get chocolate cakes,wouldn't you? As to the motives behind this magnificent scam, they are mostly financial. There are huge amounts of money being made by cashing in on green industries. Trading in carbon bonds allowing industries to exceed carbon footprint allocations is just one aspect of this colossal market. All kinds of people are jostling for their share of those lovely chocolate cakes. For information on Greta's role in all this try: notalotofpeopleknowthat.wordpress.com https://www.pjmedia.com/trending/climate-industrial-complex-financiers-aim-to-cash-in-on-greta-thunberg
    1
  99. Susi M Oh dear, you have swallowed the partly line, haven't you? The scientists producing the papers I mentioned are all highly qualified, to at least Masters and many to Phd level. There is actually no such thing as climate science. It is an amalgamation of other disciplines. You mentioned that Jennifer Marohasy is a biologist. You reaiise, don't you, that much of the "evidence" climate science uses comes from proxy data derived from biological sources: tree rings, mollusc shells and so on? Climate science would do well to recruit more biologists to its ranks to prevent it from misinterpreting this data in such a crude fashion. They could do with a few more statisticians and solar physicists as well. To describe renewable energies as "fledgling" is utterly laughable. Literally billions of dollars are being poured into their development and they are subsidised up to the hilt. The fossil fuel industry isn't at war with green industry, it is largely financing it. A considerable number of delegates to COP25 were from the fossil fuel industry, you know. One of the reasons it broke up was because the oil men and the hedge-fund types couldn't agree on how to dvvi up the chocolate cakes. If the fossil fuel industry is so determined to undermine AGW why does it make such a bad job of it? Who do you think pays for all the expensive videos and scientific studies promoting the AGW creed? Governments and investors will continue to profit from fossil fuels and they will add to their profits and incomes by promoting green industries too. The climate crisis is a racket. Greta Thunberg is a prime example of how that racket operates, Your good nature is being taken advantage of.
    1
  100. Susi M I am sincerely sorry to have upset you as much as it appears I have. I am neither delusional nor evil; I simply have a radically different assessment of the situation to the one you hold. My arguments may be repetitive - you may say circular - but that is because I am trying to make the same point over and over again. I am neither lying nor being dishonest. I sincerely believe that deliberate strategies are in place to manipulate us into accepting an untruth: namely that present upward trend in temperatures is as consistent and as severe as is claimed, and that the way to "cure" this is to restrict energy production. Many entirely reasonable people also hold this view, as I have tried to explain. Best Wishes.
    1
  101. Susi M I know who I am better than you do. There is no action to be taken against climate change. It's just there. If anthropogenic carbon emissions have added to it and continue to add to it adversely then it is far, far too late to do anything about it. I am not twisting information, I am merely offering you information that has been withheld from you until now. You choose to reject it - well that's up to you. I am not a liar. I sincerely believe everything I have told you. By the way, before your somewhat shambolic DOM decided to obliterate all records before 1910, the hottest day in Australia was recorded at Mildura on January 7, 1906. It was 52c. That is not a lie. Check with the DOM yourself - if they'll let you.
    1
  102. R Wags Progress comes in stages. Markets only usually dry up temporarily and as for imports the trade deals Trump seems likely to achieve will, thanks to his threats and bluster, almost certainly see a substantial reduction import duties. The stock market is booming and employment is high. Trump is a businessman and a wheeler- dealer. He understand international trade better than any other President in America's history.
    1
  103. Scott Mac Donald Even if you are right (and I'm not sure that you are) it remains a fact that the US economy remains very stable in the face of Chinese competition. Most farmers support tariffs, despite temporary difficulties. The US has to take action against Chinese competition in order to maintain stability. It is a war and in a war there will be casualties. In the long run a reasonable compromise between the two countries seems the likeliest outcome. There are opposing views of course but I suggest you consult the extensive literature on the subject before jumping to any hasty conclusion.
    1
  104. Doctor Remulak I agree that the distinction between a successful businessman and a superior con-man is often very hard to precisely define. I'm afraid I didn't understand the last part of your little diatribe. What are Focks Alt-Facts?
    1
  105. R Wags I am amused that you claim to speak for most businessmen. I suggest that without the trade wars the US would be drowning under the weight of cheap Chinese imports. It is a necessary war and Trump is fighting it more effectively than most would be capable of. I'm not an American either and I own no stocks and shares. The other items you mention are not relevant to this issue.
    1
  106. Jockum T But what if the experts are wrong? They are in this case because they have been using a flawed model of the atmosphere created back in 1942. Not many people know that.
    1
  107. daedalron There is no consensus - its just that some scientists make more noise and are friendlier with politicians and journalists than others. In any case there is strong likelihood that the whole man-made climate change monster is going to be blown sky-high over the next several months. See my reply to Jockum T above.
    1
  108. Social Purgatory - A brain. See my reply to Jockum T if you want more details of where I'm coming from.
    1
  109. MrDreiAugen Actually it is 97 per cent of the 30 per cent who supplied an opinion. Anyway, you're not going to get very far in the climate change industry by defying orthodoxy ,are you? Please look at my reply to Jockum T on this page. If this study is correct then climate change cannot be man-made.It can only be man-made if the 1942 model is correct and carbon retains heat in the atmosphere. The model says it does. The actual empirical data from weather balloons says it doesn't. It means that science has made one almighty fuckup, but there,s nothing new in that. Look at it this way:imagine the atmosphere to be a HD photograph. By comparison the Serbian professor's model is like something drawn of the side of a cardboard box with crayons. Nature rights itself whenever it can. Mankind screws up whenever possible.
    1
  110. MrDrei Augen The Connolly report . See my reply to Jockum T, as stated.
    1
  111. daedron This 90plus per cent bollocks is just something to beat you over the head with.Look carefully and you will always find out it's 90 per cent of some other per cent of something. It doesn't matter anyway because the climate change mafia have such a hold on things that if you question the orthodoxy you get drummed out of the corps pretty quickly. It matters even less now if it turns out the tools you have been given are broken from the start. 100 per cent of scientists who believe in AGW are wrong if AGW is wrong.We don't need a "consensus" based on interpretations of false data. We need unarguable facts based upon an empirical assessment of reality. And if the Connolly experiment is repeated by other scientists and comes up with the same results that's what we've got.
    1
  112. Ruth Johanne But surely will either be dead or living in a world where voting is a thing of the past?
    1
  113. Withe grace and dignity, tempered by contempt
    1
  114. G Love 64 It isn't real. You've just been brainwashed. Stop believing the lies and realise you are being manipulated. Try doing just a bit of independent research.
    1
  115. G Love 64 You sound like a hysterical Nazi. Corporate greed is nothing compared to the greed of the hedge fund managers and lust for power of their unwitting allies on the left which are behind this giant scam. Science isn't truth when data is manipulated, which it clearly is in this instance. Why don't you check a few facts for yourself instead of foaming at the mouth?
    1
  116. chez moi - No. I listen rather to Friends of Science, Tony Heller and other independent sources who call into question the current ideology. They put out detailed refutations of the man-made climate change scenario which are well worth taking note of. There is something very wrong happening here. We need to find out what it is. The so-called science is not being backed up by on-the-ground experience. We are being lied to. We should find out why.
    1
  117. There really is very little danger to children you know. And you're making a big mistake politically because when October comes to an end and only the occasional fat kid has died , Trump will be able to say: "Told you so."
    1
  118.  @dannya.2616  Not really. Morbid obesity is a major cause of death from Covid 19. It is one of the main reasons why USA death rates are so high. I'm kinda old and I have diabetes, so me and the fat kid are at about the same level of risk, if that's any comfort to you.
    1
  119. jdlock00 Trump lies with grace and dignity and a twinkle in his eye. This confuses conventional politicians who lie like sanctimonious carnival preachers and expect to actually be believed.
    1
  120. Another step towards her immunity with little or no threat to health. Well done Georgia!
    1
  121. If you believe anything that comes out of IPCC propaganda workshop these days then you are believing fairy tales. Enraged scientists are already flooding this corrupt organisation with protests at the way data is being misrepresented. You say "heatwaves in the ocean have just been discovered" -was anyone looking for them before? Temperature graphs like the one you show have been faked ("adjusted" is the euphemism.) Temperatures from the 1930's and 40's have been reduced from those originally filed and more recent ones often supplied from underground unmanned facilities in cities, usually situated next to the boilerhouse.
    1
  122. Peter De Blieck If you believe all those things no wonder you believe the crap pumped out by the climate crisis mafia.
    1
  123. There's a difference between being a racist and being conscious of race. I'm about the same age as Trump and generally we were brought up to be a bit racist (and sexist too!). Most of us got over this to varying degrees and I think Trump has too. Didn't Martin Luther King say something about the color of one's skin and the content of one's character? Orange man seems to apply this principle. He didn't savage the Four Fuckwits because they are various shades of brown, but because they are dangerous lunatics. Seems to me that Dems are far, far more conscious of race than Trump.
    1
  124. Lantern of Diogenes - (Great handle, by the way!) - I did say "to varying degrees!
    1
  125. Jon Nelson - What indeed? I myself suffered from Trump Derangement Syndrome for 18 months or so and the guy sure is a steep hill to climb. When you get there though the view is refreshingly different to that provided by conventional politicians. To understand Trump is to understand oneself a little, I think.
    1
  126. Anita Shine = What can I possibly say against such reasoned arguments?
    1
  127. Linguine Past = I really am not a racist. I happen to think that The Squad probably are though. They are certainly deluded in their opinions, which is why Trump, when he thought the traditional Dems were preparing to sideline them, made the comments he did. As long as the Dems support these four women their chances of winning elections are much reduced. Race doesn't come into any of this. It's just a smokescreen. It disturbs me that so many non-white Americans see their race as the most important thing about them. White people did once, but not so much now, if at all.
    1
  128. Ford Country Do you know, I have no idea what either "brown acid" or "Trumpstock" is or were!!? Enlightenment will be much appreciated.
    1
  129. Kevin Blanchard He isn't. That was a hologram.
    1
  130. SpectatorAlius. No.I am from the year 2173 and I know Climate Change was a hoax. Hologram technology cannot traverse the space-time continuum.
    1
  131. Kevin Blanchard I hate to have to tell you this but you are a thought form lost in the immeasurable emptiness of the cosmos. What you perceive as information is negative feedback from the experiences of corporeal beings. How else could you possibly believe that the earth was destroyed and without life in 2173 when, if you had been there, you would be dead too? As it is the world is prospering and we amuse our children with tales of your foolishness.
    1
  132. Kevin Blanchard No. I am happy here. Go away.
    1
  133.  @stevenlawton6931  A Doctor of Philosophy, but that hardly counts I suppose. You don't have to be a doctor of medicine to follow this argument though. You just have to do some math and use a bit of common sense. I confess to being a bit optimistic however. It's generally reckoned that around 80% of the population has to be resistant for herd immunity to be achieved and we're nowhere near that yet. The point is that if plenty of people get it and don't get very ill it will be a very good thing in the long run.
    1
  134.  @stevenlawton6931  You too.
    1
  135. Matthew Gagnon What mess? Details please.
    1
  136. Laura Hubbard He's just playing to different rules. The distinction you have just made is not as clear-cut as you imagine.
    1
  137. Ben Walker She was selected for the job from among the entrants to an essay competition. An organisation called We Don't Have Time picked her. WDHT is run by Swedish and German financiers with connections to George Soros, the king of hedge-fund managers who has brought several countries near to financial ruin through currency manipulation. If you go to the WDHT website you will see that their ultimate objective is to assign everyone a carbon footprint, to be monitored by a smartphone app. If you need to exceed your allocation - to fly on holiday say -you will have to buy carbon bonds via a market they control. This is an extension of the cap and trade system already in existence which allows manipulators to make vast fortunes supplying industries with permissions to exceed carbon quotas. Greta is there to give a human face to this cynical money-making racket, and she is very good at it. Soros and his cronies have immense power and influence, especially with the United Nations which is, sadly, nothing more than a nest of crooks. Hence her invitation.
    1
  138. TurdFurgeson571 It is a problem. We Don't Have Time will just have to carry the can on their own a bit I suppose. Checked their website yet?
    1
  139. TurdFurgeson571 Checked that website yet Turd?
    1
  140. TurdFurgeson Exactly as you outlined. The very mention of Soros's name puts one into the conspiracy theorist category. The bugger still owes me £15, as he does every man woman and child alive in the UK on September 17, 1992 when he borrowed sterling overnight and then spread a rumour that the pound was in big trouble. His speculations over the ensuing 12 hours almost caused the collapse of the Bank of England and cost the British taxpayer £3billion. It also gave him a personal profit of £1billion. That's not a conspiracy theory, that's historical fact. The AGW scare has created a worldwide currency of its own in the form of carbon bonds, giving companies the go-ahead to exceed set carbon emission limits. Vast fortunes are already being made. We Don't Have Time is very much in on the act and, as I say, the lovely Greta is their poster child.
    1
  141. TurdFurgeson571 You're right, and it's bloody irritating. I'm entirely sure his hand is behind this most glorious and magnificent of scams but one simply mustn't fall into the temptation to say so! Still, he is very old now and can't last much longer. One detects potential heirs jockeying for position. The failure of COP25 might possibly be attributed to that cause, at least in part..
    1
  142. Ben Walker The knowledge is quite widespread, although attempts are made to block the flow of information. Among the articles are one in The Times of London on August 19 last year, The Resurgent on February 22 and notalotofpeopleknowthat.wordpress.com/2019/05/30/ Also try https://pjmedia.com/trending/climate-industrial-complex-financiers-aim-to-cash-in-on-greta-thunberg
    1
  143. Benjamin Pickles Stage-managed by financial predators from start to finish. www.pjmedia.com/trending-climate-industrial-complex-financiers-aim-to-cash-in-on-greta-thunberg notalotofpeopleknowthat.wordpress.com/2019/05/30/
    1
  144. One Punch OK. I'll miss you. It wasn't you, it was me.
    1
  145. Cathy Allen Do you not hate and fear Donald Trump?
    1
  146. macrod38 Always a risk with any leader. Trump is far from stupid, however. He may be no intellectual giant but he is possessed of an animal cunning which stands him in good stead. He is unlikely to overthink his way to a disaster.
    1
  147. macrod What's this big deal about lying anyway? All politicians lie. Trump's technique is just rather different to the usual look-you-in--the-eye, would I lie to you? crap.He's good at keeping you guessing how much he's lying, which is very confusing for many. When his supporters know he's lying they assume he's lying for their benefit. Which usually he is.
    1
  148. macrod He's not my leader, but if he was I would understand the necessity for him to lie in order to counteract the constant stream of lies coming out of the Democrat corner. I think Trump has a profound respect for his voter base; far, far more than the Democrats have for theirs, especially African -Americans, many of whom seem to be wising up to the fact that the Dems need them as vote-fodder, and need to keep them poor and angry for this purpose.
    1
  149. macrod38 I'm SO glad you said that! If I was a black person living in America I would HATE to be called "African-American," I think. It's so hard to keep up with proper nomenclature these days. I was just trying not to tread on any toes. Historically, the evolution of black people in the US is quite fascinating to me. People from all corners of Africa who would never have met or even known of each other's existence were brought together by the horror of slavery, and through tribal interbreeding have produced individuals who are among the most intelligent and indeed good-looking people the human race has probably ever known. And yes indeed, you have evolved a new culture too.
    1
  150. macrod38 All I said was that the Democratc party has a vested interest in keeping black people poor and angry because they can continually promise to improve their condition and thus secure their votes. Once black people stop being poor and angry this tactic falls by the wayside. As to Trump's lying technique it's novelty lies in the fact that he tells such whoppers that NOBODY believes them. Even his ridiculous boasting is quite amusing. "I know more about this than anyone else "...stuff like that. He lies for effect, and not to actually deceive as most politicians do. His lies are quite transparent. He doesn't seem to actually lie about anything crucial though -and this one of the many things that have thrown his opponents into such confusion. Because he lied about the size of the crowd at his inauguration they thought he was lying about Russia. Well, it doesn't seem that he was, does it? And there is much more of the same. Even the fact that we are arguing about how much he tells lies is distracting us from wondering what he's actually up to right now.
    1
  151. Australican - Have you looked at any of the videos though? Obviously anyone who opposes carbonophobe orthodoxy is subject to propaganda attacks by the establishment. He weathers (ha) them very well and is always ready to apologise for any mistakes he makes. In fact it was his and 1000frolly Phd's persecution by the climate crisis mafia that led me to assess their views in the first place. I suggest you at least try to do the same. You must surely not be afraid of listening to them. They are certainly not frauds, whereas a great many climate crisis champions -from Al Gore and Michael Mann onwards - very provably are.
    1
  152. Robert -You are a horrible ignorant shit. Nothing of what you say has anything to do with carbon dioxide.
    1
  153. There have been no attested cases of children passing the illness to an adult. If you find one let me know.
    1
  154. Craig Simpson Hedge funds get a lot out of it by trading in carbon emission permissions. Globalist/ Marxists hope to get a lot out of it because the only way strategies like the Green New Deal can be imposed is through autocratic, undemocratic control from a centralised unelected bureaucracy.
    1
  155. The initial model upon which all man-made climate change models are based was dreamed up in 1942 by a professor from Serbia. He did his best but he got it wrong. Earlier, in 1919, Albert Einstein got it right when he said the atmosphere was stable and self-regulating. Carbon in the atmosphere does not retain heat. Heat passes through carbon molecules in about one third of a second. The greenhouse effect does not exist. All those millions chanting and waving banners might as well be demanding the sun falls out of the sky.
    1
  156. Gustavo Medrano Do you mean Boris Johnson? My parrot died recently due to Climate Change. I think he looked quite a lot like Boris Johnson. Other people couldn't see it though. Bernie 2020 Yaaay!
    1
  157. This letter is genuine historical document. It is honest and true and when in the future historians puzzle over why the Democrat Party chose to commit ritual suicide it will be cited as part of the explanation.
    1
  158. The earth and its atmosphere are pretty much a self-regulating mechanism which can take almost everything thrown at it - including a species which digs up long-buried carbon and sets fire to it. The earth is warming sure - but entirely in accord with millennia-old patterns which mean that sometime soon - by which I mean some time in the next three or four hundred years - a peak will be reached and a new cold period will rapidly ensue. It is only mankind's vanity which assumes our activities to be so important. The carbon we release into the atmosphere does not stay there for more than the twinkling of an eye and nor does it form some sort of blanket holding in heat. Albert Einstein postulated as long ago as 1917 that the atmosphere is and must be self-regulating and this is surely the case. The experiments upon which the current man-made climate hysteria are based were carried out in the early 1940's by a Serbian physicist who could not replicate the atmosphere in the laboratory (who could?) and who concluded from his experiments that the "ideal gasses" which Einstein used in his thesis have no basis in reality. They do, however, and the conclusions reached by this troublesome Serbian are as false as his experiments were tainted. Atmospheric carbon does not retain heat. Heat passes through it in less than one third of a second. Only in laboratory conditions do carbon molecules prevent the escape of solar energy. We are safe from everything but our own high opinion of our significance in the order of the cosmos.
    1