Comments by "Dale Crocker" (@dalecrocker3213) on "Marco Rubio Says Quiet Part Out Loud" video.

Ice core samples from Greenland show it to have been 1.5 degrees warmer 1,000 years ago than today. Man-made global warming is a myth. More money is made by pushing this myth than the fossil fuel industry could hope to gain in a month of Sundays.
1
@HTHAMMACK1 Nope. The first bit is directly from the mouth of Denmark's top glacier expert Jorgen Steffensen. Look him up. The second bit is a lot more complicated, involving gambling on the carbon futures market. You could look that up too, if you like.
1
@Piterdeveirs333 People who play the carbon futures market. Look it up. Restrictions on the amount of carbon emissions means that permissions to exceed limits acquire an instant value. These permissions, in the form of bonds and certificates, are traded every day - for huge sums. They are an international currency which can be traded against other currencies. If some poor country gets a heap of carbon bonds to enable it to build some fictitious road or dam those bonds can be bought cheaply one day, and when a developer in another country needs permissions they are sold to him for many, many times what was paid. To work the Cap and Trade market, as it is called, must ensure that the bonds have scarcity value. And the myth that carbon emissions create global warming does exactly that.
1
@notme2day They are not irresponsible companies! They are behaving in a completely respectable way. Climate change is real - and always has been for millions of years. But in order to control the value of carbon certificates everyone has to believe that carbon emissions cause global warming. That is a different question entirely. The very fact that the carbon futures market depends on everyone believing it makes it suspect in the first place. The "proofs" are becoming increasingly hysterical and removed from reality, however. Not one of the gloomy predictions has come true in the real world, but as long as people continue to believe they one day will carbon bonds remain a stable currency.
1
Interesting. Time for The Great Reset then?
1
@kimwelch4652 But the Great Reset is a thing. A plan. It is underway. It is designed to counteract the very problems you mention. This threat of a mass-extinction event is an integral part of that very strategy. It is the general theory of reflexivity in action.
1
@kimwelch4652 And Soros and his disciples know that- which is why they are aiming to escape from a free-market economy to a regulated economy. To do this a new world currency is needed, and this is the role carbon certificates are designed to fill. To function as a currency their supply has to be regulated, and to achieve this the fictitious notion that global warming is caused by excessive carbon emissions must be maintained.
1
@kimwelch4652 We seem to have been waiting for a considerable time for reality to overrun perception though, don't we?
1
@kimwelch4652 I agree with you last statement entirely - almost as much as I profoundly disagree with your first. Cosmology and proxy data point conclusively to the fact that the earth's climate follows patterns dictated by its position in relation to the sun and the strength and regularity of various waves of energy, most of which are not understood. There is no correlation between temperature and atmospheric carbon levels other than the possibility that atmospheric carbon may induce a process whereby heat reflected back from the earth's surface is disseminated according to some formula related to atmospheric pressure. In other words it is not a "greenhouse". It acts as a thermostat. As to the possible collapse of the world economy I have a feeling this will be a structured procedure. The WEF has been gradually exercising control for many years and, as I said originally, it seems to be doing so in response to the very threats you mention. I think one can be reasonably sure of the ultimate objective and also detect the various methods by which it is being achieved - all of which I personally find very disturbing.
1
@kimwelch4652 I have read several books and do not regard climate science as a science at all. It was made up in the 1980's with the express aim of promoting the AGW myth. Climate scientists know nothing about cosmology or even cloud formation. They think the sun is a light bulb. At least three generations have been turned out, given the same datasets and algorithms and told to come up with the right answers. It's a travesty.
1
@kimwelch4652 The WEF has some extraordinarily intelligent people in its ranks. By setting up carbon bonds as a central currency to replace gold and the dollar they can both manipulate exchange markets for personal profit and dictate the shape of the world economy to the long-term advantage of their successors. The idea you seem to have that the world is heading for an apocalyptic bust-up, and that therefore industrial output must be restrained, fits this strategy very neatly. It isn't true of course, but as long as you and others like you believe it to be true it enables the WEF and hedge fund managers "in the know" to tune markets to their requirements much more readily.
1
@kimwelch4652 Cosmology a philosophy! What are you talking about? It is the scientific study of the universe, utilising the most advanced forms of mathematics and physics toward this end. Climatology is a cookery class which completely ignores the magnificence of the universe and the breathtaking almost organic structure of the solar system. The gravitational field of Jupiter has more influence on the climate of the Earth than any number of farting cows and belching factory chimneys. Oh well, crawl back into bed and pull the covers over your head if that's what you want.
1
@kimwelch4652 What profound philosophical knowledge you possess. Are you going to tell me a dog isn't a man's best friend after all?
1
@kimwelch4652 You've lost me on this one I'm afraid. I can't put this string of words into any meaningful context. My fault I suppose?
1