Comments by "Dale Crocker" (@dalecrocker3213) on "Kyle Rittenhouse LASHES OUT, Suing The President?!" video.
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Sean Embry I think I broadly understand the rules of procedure in civil as opposed to criminal courts, but I still maintain that even with a far lesser burden of proof Rittenhouse has every chance of winning substantial damages from news outlets - if not from Joe Biden. The Nick Sandmann case is indicative of this. The real world is not the world CNN, MSNBC et al apparently believe it to be. Wearing a MAGA hat does not make you a fascist. Staring down an irritating native American does not make you a racist,
Equally well, shooting people who intend to do you harm is not murder. Talking to the Proud Boys, attending Trump rallies or making the OK sign don't make you a white supremacist either.
As for the drone footage, apparently no version, zoomed or not, in focus or not, does not suggest to the eyes of any reasonable person that Rittenhouse was to any degree provoking or challenging his assailants.
Even if this was the case it would not affect the fact that he is not guilty of murder. There is a remote possibility, I suppose, that a civil court might allow it to suggest this and so award damages to the families of the men he shot, but this seems unlikely.
It would be paradoxical if Rittenhouse gained compensation from those who have defamed him, and was then ordered to pay some of it to the families of the men he killed, but stranger things have happened!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1