Comments by "Master Blaster" (@MasterBlaster3545) on "Undecided with Matt Ferrell" channel.

  1. Ah just good enough computing. When you put in a calculator what is 4.23 x 16.45 and it gives you the answer 72.8956 Sorry but that just isn’t going to work, but it would fit into the lefts narrative that 2+2=5
    1
  2. Without a counterweight in the lifts the going up is going to draw more power than if you had a counterweight. This means the gains on the braking would be used up making the lift ascend. If the lift has counterweights then it is the motor that slows the lift to a stop so I do not see how power can be saved in such a system.
    1
  3. Wow get a life
    1
  4. They scream about climate change and then start moaning about the so called solutions. You can’t please leftists one bit. Strange crowd.
    1
  5. It is a grift. We already have nuclear that can be used safely now.
    1
  6. Look the people are just going to have to pay for stuff. The west has so much disposable income with other parts of the world also getting richer. Desalination plants cost money but also give fresh water which means countries can grow food. If we have to pay for this which means £500 per household per year then so be it. I bet if it came down to it people would rather pay that than have a 500lb ordinance crashing through their roof. Maybe that is what needs to happen to wake the greedy up in the world.
    1
  7. There won’t be many who find that funny on this channel. Leftists don’t have sense of humours.
    1
  8. That carbon dioxide looks the best way for storage. It is only about 10% behind lithium which is about 90% efficient and carbon dioxide is 80% efficient.
    1
  9. Shows how many blockheads are out there. How can people be that dense? Imagine thinking the sun will stop producing light if you use solar panels. Plants do the same thing with photosynthesis. Mind you I saw a video the other day of 3 American high school leavers who were asked to name 3 other countries in the world other than the USA. The answers were Canada, New Mexico and they couldn’t think of anything else. 1 out of 3. Now that is not a good look for the American youth of today.
    1
  10.  @piotrmorag2597  pointless points
    1
  11. So how much carbon does all this newly changed infrastructure put into the atmosphere as it is produced? With the bad efficiency in colder climates where you still have to help if you want hot water is it worth it? New homes yes but already installed gas or electric appliances has to be better in colder climates rather than installing a whole new ground installation heat pump. Seems like another green con that is going to go tits up.
    1
  12. That is the left yet again that caused the nuclear energy shut down. 3 mile Island was nothing. Chernobyl was caused by lazyness human error and Fukushima was silly to be built on a coast that has tsunamis. Today the nuclear plants are so much more advanced that it will be near impossible for another Chernobyl to happen. Man learns by his mistakes. Mass air transport is so much safer than when it first began because faults that man could not see happened and now only we are seeing faults appear again because of employment laws allowing not the best to work in industries because it is about diversity and not merit. The President is sorting that out thankfully.
    1
  13. I don’t care what a battery is called but instead is the next thing groundbreaking or not and are we going to see it?
    1
  14.  @stbuchok  what are you talking about you donut? Go back to sleep.
    1
  15. Oil is the culprit. That is all I have to say.
    1
  16. What gets me is Hemp can make multitudes of stuff but we still see it as a drug plant when it has virtually no THC content. I heard it was the big companies that lobbied for its ban as it encroached on their business. Why is it not now being discussed as the saviour to our ills?
    1
  17. Most people in cities or towns do not travel far from day to day. Sodium batteries are perfect for that. When the time arises that they do venture out farther, then a charge or two along the way surely isn’t that bad a thing seeings as it does not take that long to charge. Sadly people have been hoodwinked by being told they need range when most of the time they don’t.
    1
  18.  @johnathangeorge1109  Yea and they are the loudest to shout that we need clean energy. You also get the ones that go on about birds getting killed by the blades. My argument to one was that what is the point of saving a few birds if there ends up no life at all because we did nothing. The answer I got back was they should be stopped because they are killing some birds. This went around and around as they had no answer. All they cared about was some birds but did not address the logical point that in 200 years there will be no birds or life to save because we did nothing at all. There is always a cost and 1/2 million birds worldwide a year is a lot but it does not compare to billions lost if we do nothing.
    1
  19.  @loghorizon45  exactly
    1
  20. Amazing that they want everything green, but to keep shareholders happy they cut benefits from selling excess to the grid which in turn virtually stops people going green. Typical government. They will always put money before everything else. What happens anyway sooner or later when the grid does not have to produce much energy? Surely that time will come regardless, so why hang it out and p off the people in the process? Shows the hypocrisy and contradictions that fester in bureaucrats.
    1
  21.  @slyseal2091  Two different things. There is never going to be a H bomb reactor nor are there kinetic bullets or a tokamak in a H bomb. Stop using that reference because it is the idiots way of thinking or lack of.
    1
  22.  @ekothesilent9456  You obviously are one
    1
  23.  @iller3  It still is never going to happen regardless of whether I know enough or not about it. Fusion is a grift and we will never be able to shoot bullets at or create the pressure needed to fuse such atoms expending less energy than what we get back. It is like religion, people believe and there is no proof to ever get them to think otherwise. A bit like the krap we just went through over the last few years. They get told this thing is in the air and they all believe it like religion. They still do even though the evidence is to the contrary. Fusion is a cult.
    1
  24. Make the end user pay the extra $20 per panel. Not hard really is it? It is just 5% extra cost if the panel costs $400. It isn’t going to make that much difference. It gets me how everything is about how much the end user saves. Well it is about time people pay that little extra and it is enforced. Not the end of the world is it? Or is it?
    1
  25. When it snows why not just keep on top of it by using your scraping device? You need to keep on it so when the snow clears you can get straight back down to producing energy. Seems silly that you would leave it to the point where it falls on somebody.
    1
  26. Tard
    1
  27. This is where you are taken in by it all. If it takes a 20lb sledgehammer to crack a nut, a 100g pin hammer will never be able to break the same nut. This is what scientists are trying to do with fusion. They know exactly the force they need to fuse two atoms together and there is nothing on this Earth that will do it at a lower force. There is probably only one solution and that is to put something into space that could magnify the suns energy back to Earth to create that force needed. The extra energy released from fusing said atoms is never going to be enough to reproduce said force again. Just a constant flow of free energy magnified somehow will be able to create fusion constantly. If you could magnify said free energy you probably wouldn’t need fusion in the first place. It is a money roundabout keeping a bunch of scientists in well paid jobs. A bit like Astronomers are funded, but fusion scientists are being paid on the illusion that the physical impossible might one day happen.
    1
  28. If it meant no cat videos to save the world later on I would choose the cat videos. Sorry 🌎
    1
  29. No you could drill virtually anywhere on the planet so whatever you have been reading is well out. The Mponeng gold mine in S.Africa is 4km deep and is in a cold spot and is still 66 degrees centigrade even there at that depth so with this tech you could basically drill anywhere on the planet to get to the heat you need. That means there is enough heat to fuel us thousands if not millions of times over depending on how many bore holes you drill. Obviously we do not need millions of times the power we use, but theoretically if we bored enough holes then we could.
    1
  30. America and Britain is full of bureaucracy which wastes money. Just look at the Californian high speed rail or HS2 in Britain that has cost £100bn already. A lot of people and companies make a lot of money whilst nothing happens. Hopefully the new President will stop all of this.
    1
  31.  @williamlancto3655 It will be paid off when one of his Grandchildren get the house.
    1
  32. Such a shame that we have unlimited energy all around us and we can’t break the bonds without putting massive amounts of energy in.
    1
  33.  @fredbloggs5902  shut up you donut. Go back to sleep.
    1
  34. Isn’t Energy Dome the best bet? 90% efficient. Just CO2 and mainly steel to build the infrastructure. Job done isn’t it? Who really cares about the 10% loss in efficiency when everything else about it ticks all the boxes?
    1
  35. Fusion is just a big money generation operation. It will never happen and anybody who thinks it will is demented.
    1
  36.  @Neon-ws8er  pretty is no good when there is nobody around to see it. Are you one of these types that would rather humans were not on the planet? If so then why are you here adding to the problem? I would rather have all of America’s power produced by the pretty park and life survives than life gone. Anyway this tech is going to solve that, but if we had to use Yellowstone I would be there to counter protest you into submission if it meant doing so to save the planet.
    1
  37.  @stbuchok  https://youtu.be/yMrVKpjjQQE
    1
  38. In 6 years these will be 7% more than your pet sunpower’s efficiency. Take that 👊
    1
  39. It is okay having a heat pump but that frequency going through your head constantly can’t be good. I am talking the crammed housing where everybody has to have one will be a nightmare for all. If you have the luxury like you Matt then alls well and good. Terraced housing is going to be a nightmare in Britain when every home has to have one. Some start rattling and a whole row of them is going to be detrimental to peoples health. Skill builder just did an interview with a fella and it is a must see to show how bad these things can be.
    1
  40. Are people that stupid? Solar panels are not “renewable” the light they absorb is lost forever or the sun will go out 😂 are they for real? So what happens when plants absorb light for photosynthesis? Same thing.
    1
  41. Funny how the dustbowls in the 30’s are not down to climate change but mega droughts and if they ever happened like that time again you just know what they are going to blame it on. Funny that.
    1
  42. So basically the structure has to be made with thick beams, struts and columns. It is no good having one of those things that burns easily because you will get a collapse.
    1
  43. Energy Dome is the only solution for that.
    1
  44. So how does solar panels and a couple of motors and batteries cost £800,000 more on a boat than a regular one? So if you buy a tesla wall for your £250,000 home is that going to cost £800,000? I don’t think a couple of motors are going to cost near on a million do you? It is just companies hiking prices because of greed as usual.
    1
  45. What so with our knowledge of physics today we still cant work out stresses and how strong to make stuff so that it does not fail? What BS. They cant blame it on a race to the top which makes them cut corners. Sounds like the companies are employing sub standard designers with no experience.
    1
  46.  @tomgunton His channel is called Undecided. Use your brain.
    1
  47. When they look like cool glasses rather than making you look like something from the Peter Cushing film Shockwaves, then maybe they will be cool in some environments. If they totally disconnect people like phones do, then they are not good for humanity.
    1
  48. Yes but doesn’t this explain how they get around that problem with just a 20% loss in energy density.
    1