Comments by "Karen Phinney" (@karphin1) on "RobWords"
channel.
-
243
-
50
-
43
-
38
-
31
-
15
-
12
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
7
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Thank you, “tak”, Rob! I have always been fascinated by the roots of language and have some books on the subject. Also had a friend who was a retired linguistics professor, we had great discussions on it all. He spoke several Languages, like you, I only speak French and studied Latin in high school (Canada). Was always intrigued by the parallels in those two languages, and later with others. I recall one book I read suggested words like “water” could have a long ago common ancestor, even the Hittite word for water is similar, like “watar “ or something. Amazing. And aqua in Latin, eau in French, and other languages such as an African one, okka. So interesting! I often thought I should have been a linguist! Love your videos, always interesting.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
You’ve touched on a few of my “bugbears”, I hear people on the radio, our CBC here in Canada, which should know better, saying criteria when they mean criterion. I also, bc I studied science and Latin, used to get upset about data being used as a singular. I would think, as a collective word it should have a plural verb. Like, “the people are “, not the “people is”, or “many are”, not “many is”. Same for phenomena, often used as a singular. There are other things which I find grating, but heaven knows, I’m not perfect! As to data, I realize the ship has sailed on that. It is now the data is, the data has, but I still am not comfortable with that!
1