General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
Due Dissidence
comments
Comments by "" (@gezenews) on "" video.
@Rob-lw8to Do you or do you not support this onesie
23
@MimCotton Yes individual workers with stock, and enough money to spend $200+ on politics. HOW IS THAT BETTER. Because they are not "executives"??? You are delusional and naive.
5
@MimCotton The fact you misrepresented that as $200k shows you are a bad actor. Edit: Russell and (more likely Keaton) are deleting my comments for some reason. I never said "200k". You added the k.
3
@ I did not put a K there. I wrote $200+. You still have to explain how receiving $200+ donations from rich employees with plenty of stock options is any less corrupt just because its not coming from "executives". What magic does not technically being an "executive" matter? They still own stock, and are employed based on the company's continued performance.
3
@acetate909 you mispelled semitic
3
$200+ contribution from people who work at pharma companies and undoubtedly have stock does not make it better. Organized upper-middle class support (more like low-upper class) is still gross and not defendable. She still went to RFK jr and begged him to not sue the pharma companies. That serves no one.
3
@djangokill65 Yes he does, all the time.
2
@ Address the substance of what I said instead of getting hysterical.
2
@Rob-lw8to and its main customer is intelligence agents using it to spy on us. We are paying the government's cutout to provide services to the government that noboy wants or asked for except for evil people in the government... Make me care. Try to make me care.
1
@MimCotton $200+. Ordinary people do not give $200 to progressive sellouts.
1
"not from executives" Oh ok so just people on the company's email list with a lot of money and a lot of stock. I'm supposed to care it's a chemical/biological super rich engineer instead of just the CEO and "executives". Cool, let's say I believe you. Why is Elizabeth warren advocating for RFK jr to not be rewarded for suing pharma companies? Who does that serve besides pharma companies? Its more BULLSH
1