Comments by "Shorewall" (@shorewall) on "Why We're Facing another 30 Years War" video.
-
The major difference is that Spain relied on Resource Extraction Operations, whereas modern US is cutting edge in every tech field, and tech sharing in those it isn't. Spain was great because they got the gold and plantations of the New World. US is great because they used their head start to make friends with every major power it could, and subordinate them willingly into a cool kids club.
Spain had to fight the other major powers in Europe. USA doesn't really have to fight anyone. Hell, they don't even have to fight China or Russia at all. Ukraine is fighting Russia pretty well right now, and a Naval blockade on China would be devastating.
I always say, as an American, the US is a blessed country, we have crazy advantages, and we need to make sure we do the right thing. God blesses the righteous, but if we turn from Him, and our leaders and the Elites definitely have, but if the people turn from Him, then we will be blessed no more and suffer even more than others.
77
-
@clamum9648 People need something to believe in, that is for sure.
When I studied Sociology in college, they said one of the 5 features of any civilization we have ever discovered, was Religion. Because people need to explain the unexplainable.
Science is great, but it cannot explain everything. There are things we do not know, or don't even know we don't know. And there are other things that are moral judgements, like what is happiness, what is the good life?
Science cannot answer that, because Science is a tool, a method. We need to decide what we want, and what we want to be. Equality, justice, these things are not scientific. They are moral, ethical, religious in nature.
34
-
27
-
24
-
24
-
On the comparison to WW1, I think back then the populations and patriotism were so healthy and strong that people wanted war. That is different from today. Nowadays most people would probably rather overthrow their own government than go invade or defend some other country. Which is why I like the 30 Years War analogy of this video so much.
I agree on nukes, the Major powers have too much to lose, and have thought about it so much, that I don't see them ever using nukes. Even the hardest red line I can imagine, if China invaded Siberia, I question if Russia would use nukes even then. But the smaller, less stable countries, who knows what could happen?
As populations decline, I think the US will form a new Global race. Specifically with Hispanic and East Asians being merged into the White Identity. And depending on how bad it gets, like with the colonization of the New World, Americans might go to Japan, Germany, other places, to bolster and repopulate these areas. Especially if those countries don't want just "any" type of immigrants.
Aside from that, migrations are something to watch. I have my eye out for the famines and destabilization in Africa and the Middle East to lead to another, much greater migrant and refugee crisis. If Europe does not control it, Europe will be overwhelmed and become New Africa. I think they will choose to work with Turkey, and the Maghrebi Nations in North Africa, to control the situation, but it will turn bloody, and millions will die either way. It will be ugly.
7
-
7
-
6
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
Who is strong enough to project so much power to destroy another? We thought Russia could, but it turns out they can't. We suspect China can, but that is a dicey situation going up against the US, with a naval blockade really hurting them.
Even the US, which has the most proven power projection of all, and many allies, has things that are just off the table in terms of ability to execute. Imagine the US wanting to invade Russia or China? Not gonna happen. The US might be able to do it, but it would devastate the US and guarantee a Civil War or Uprising, especially since they would probably need a draft to do it.
The Big players aren't afraid of being invaded. They are afraid of collapsing internally. And this goes for Europe, Africa, South America, all of the Globe. And one failure will pile up into the next, since we are all so intertwined. Poland is buying and developing tanks with South Korea right now, to give you an idea of the complex supply chains that are normal right now.
The world will know war, but it won't be one side against another, until Unconditional Surrender. It will be like the wars in Africa and the Middle East from the last few decades. Instability leads to chaos, leads to conflict and war to establish some kind of favorable order.
1
-
Zeihan talks about the US using special forces and drones to engage in limited wars without involving the US population. Especially now that Americans are worn out from Iraq and Afghanistan, and don't want to die for any war the US might get involved in. Heck, maybe even mercenary units, as this video mentioned.
The American People want to isolate, but the government, and especially other governments, want the US to stick around. So that is a central issue they'll have to address. Just look at our involvement in Ukraine. I think most Americans support Ukraine, but don't want us to get directly involved in the war. But we are sharing intel, weapons, training, and strategy with the Ukrainians.
Same with a potential war against China. US Navy would be involved, but it would probably involve a lot of Korean, Japanese, and potentially Indian soldiers as well, in order to fight that conflict. (I'd say a naval blockade, with maybe China trying to invade into the Middle East directly, opening up a front with India.)
1
-
1
-
1