Comments by "Clint Holmes" (@clintholmes2061) on "The Majority Report w/ Sam Seder" channel.

  1.  greatest dad  "I love having science debates with Home Depot cashiers" Aren't you the same guy who was criticizing people for mislabeling you? Do you not mind being a hypocrite like this?
    22
  2.  greatest dad  "it surely is a living human being" When do you celebrate your babies birthdays "greatest dad?"
    19
  3.  greatest dad  ".that's why it's called a "birth day". You mean, because that's the day they are BORN.
    18
  4. What does black lives matter want? 1 End broken windows policing 2 Community oversight 3 Limit use of force 4 Police independently investigated and prosecuted 5 Community representation 6 Universal body cams 7 Additional training 8 End for-profit policing 9 Demilitarization 10 Fair police union contracts All are common sense much needed changes.
    16
  5.  greatest dad  "organism is considered living" And yet it was never a baby until it was actually born. Human life starts the day you are born... that's why you celebrate that day.
    13
  6.  greatest dad  "Miss labeling?" Yeah. Remember all that libertarian talk? But now you are calling me home depot or some BS because you clearly don't mind being a hypocrite. And just loling doesn't make it go away.
    13
  7.  greatest dad  It was a fetus. "You probably should have known that before you started a debate within the topic" Derp
    12
  8.  @kfox420  It's kind of odd that sam seder is telling his audience that they need to vote for dems to stop republicans from rolling back a women's right to choose. Yet here we are with a democratic president, democratic senate, and democratic house and it's happening anyway.
    11
  9. Your are joking right? Did you listen to the story? Trespassing is when you are not welcomed by the owner. If you are a guest you are not trespassing. Wow you are stupid.
    8
  10. If the Supreme Court was actually as important as you pretend then you should remember that democrats have the ability to do the exact same thing republicans are doing this very second. I suspect it really isn't as important to you as you say and instead you are content to use the issue to fear monger and scare people into voting for a candidate that absolutely is completely unacceptable buy any standard of measure other than maybe being compared to the orange clown.
    8
  11.  greatest dad  You were right to take exception to them not saying you were not a libertarian. Because you are. Because mislabeling are wrong. But only when it happens to you you think because of hypocrisy.
    7
  12.  greatest dad  "I'm going to go watch movies" Why do I think you are going to go watch CNN?
    7
  13. The Green Party is the only party who isn't bought by big money and corporations. This allows them to actually represent the people. Jill Stein for President!
    6
  14. There are a lot of people I have lost lots of respect for during the current campaign. None more than Warren perhaps. I very much expected her to support Sanders considering the views she claims to value. Now with her supporting Clinton I feel she has really sold out. Never Clinton.
    6
  15.  @kfox420  "a nice strawman argument" You can claim I'm deflecting if you want. Ultimately I'm making a point and you are just nonsensically handwaving it away. You are going to have to try better.
    6
  16.  greatest dad  "ounce of ability in human cellular makeup" LMFAO Really. "you surely are not working within the science Industry," Do you? Or is this just more hypocrisy on your part?
    6
  17.  greatest dad  "CNN.... that's been the talking point for the last 2 days" Then again I have no idea what they are talking about. I'm not the one who watches CNN but apparently you do and are again just a huge hypocrite about it.
    6
  18. "We need to keep voting blue no matter who." sam seder
    5
  19. That's the only way you get the "democratic" nomination.
    5
  20. Nice news network fraud.
    5
  21. "Revolutionary blackout" is giving actual good political commentary if anyone is tired of sam and his crews BS.
    5
  22. "aggressively ignorant." I think I'll start using that for sam. It fits.
    4
  23. Sam sedar is controlled opposition.
    4
  24. Why anyone would take a shitlib like sedar seriously is beyond me.
    4
  25.  @danbridges4755  "what truth are they withholding?" That dems are corrupt and they are selling you out. "Are you ok?" Are you? Do you think people in china are the only ones being bombarded by propaganda? They aren't.
    4
  26. Elizabeth Warren in her own words about who she now supports... "In the spring of 2001, the bankruptcy bill was reintroduced in the Senate, essentially unchanged from the version President Clinton had vetoed the previous year. This time, freshman Sen. Hillary Clinton voted in favor of the bill. Had the bill been transformed to get rid of all those awful provisions that had so concerned First Lady Hillary Clinton? No. The bill was essentially the same, but Hillary Rodham Clinton was not. As first lady, Mrs. Clinton had been persuaded that the bill was bad for families, and she was willing to fight for her beliefs. Her husband was a lame duck at the time he vetoed the bill; he could afford to forgo future campaign contributions. As New York's newest senator, however, it seems that Hillary Clinton could not afford such a principled position. ... Big banks were now part of Sen. Clinton's constituency. She wanted their support, and they wanted hers — including a vote in favor of "that awful bill.""
    3
  27. Knight, she certainly talked the talk but I agree that walking the walk is what's really important. She is currently supporting the corrupt, corporate shill named Hillary. Everything else just seems like details at the moment.
    3
  28. "I think Clinton prob feels like she has to pick a man to satisfy the balance needed to get elected."  I agree.  Unlike a good candidate who feels that the most important thing when choosing a running mate is finding the best person to be next in line for the most important job in the world... Hillary certainly is more concerned with things like... not picking another women because that would take some "shine" off her "historic" coronation.  Further more she is more interested in winning first and foremost and not what is good for the country. "Many of the Bernie bros are being turds"  No hypocrisy coming from you here is there?  We are turds and you are righteous.  Got it. "Bernie doesn't have many friends in the Senate."  You say this like it is a bad thing.  It is more of a badge of honor in my opinion.  It means he is more interested in doing the right thing rather than making friends. "Bernie's not a Democrat"  Who does Bernie caucus with?  Who does Bernie vote with?  How do democrats feel about the issues he champions? "He has refused to acknowledge Clinton's win"  She hasn't won anything yet... or did the convention happen and I didn't hear about it? "her historic accomplishment"  What did she do that was so historic?  A women ran for president in the 19th century.  Try not to diminish her accomplishment propping up your POS candidate. "or endorsed her."  Good for him.  It only makes me like him more.  And don't think for a second that I would care if he did.  I am a free thinker.  I am not going to support Hillary even if Sanders supports her. "When someone welcomes you into their home in this case party and you piss on them the way Sanders has done..."  Is that what they did?  They cheated and rigged the playing field from day one.  Is it so much to ask for free and fair elections from the "democratic" party?  Clearly it was. "I don't think they are going to give him anything"  Every now and then you say something I can agree with.  But don't kid yourself that he would have gotten anything had he just gone away quietly like the DNC and you hillbots wanted. "And after all the heavy handed hate and hostility from Sanders and progressives directed at Clinton"  She is a liar and corrupt.  Our elections were a sham and travesty.  If that isn't something that requires anger then what does? "Sanders would be undercutting her every chance he gets"  What has he done... other than dropping out and kissing the crown that makes you say this? Don't bother answering. It's rhetorical. I don't really care what you think.
    3
  29. "This is why  you losers Lost . This never ending  toxic hatred." Are you at least smart enough to see the hypocrisy of your statements?
    3
  30. "Nobody likes you Bernie freaks you're rabid haters" Love the hypocrisy. Are you not smart enough to realize you are doing it or do you just not mind being a complete hypocrite? "Sanders is a selfish old man feeding his ego" You support Hillary Clinton. The irony is as obvious as your hypocrisy... too bad you are not smart enough to realize your stupidity. "Bernie and his followers showed who they really are Chronic Independent party crybabies who hate liberals" I am proud to call myself an independent. There are too many people who are loyal to their party first and their country.... somewhere down on the list. I am crying. Either Hillary or Trump is likely to be the next President. This makes me sad. It should also make you sad as well but you are not smart enough to be. Hate liberals? I've proudly called myself a liberal since I became interested in politics. "the DNC" The DNC is corrupt as fk. They biased the entire election process from day one. They allowed DWS be head of the DNC despite a clear conflict of interest... she was Hillary's campaign co-chair in 2008 afterall. They love money in politics because it allows them to hold onto their power. They disenfranchise voters. They allowed their superdelegates to call an election before major elections (voter suppression) the day before elections... as opposed to letting voters vote without them putting their thumb on the scale. They have pushed a corrupt, hated, corporate shill like HRC from day one, only bothering hold sham elections. "overthrow the the will of the voters" It's tough to know the will of the voters when the game has been rigged from day one and it's tough to know the will of the voters when you don't allow people to vote. If we had free and fair elections, which we don't, you would really have a good point. "$220 million down the drain, and in Sanders's pockets.Has there been a more ungracious candidate in recent political history?..." You must be one of Hillary's and David Brock's paid shill right? Part of the her super pac money that is being spent spreading lies, misinformation, hate, false support and BS talking points for the queen? Your attacks are everything that I would expect from a Trump supporter. It really is impossible to tell the difference between talking to them and talking to you. You have nothing to offer in support of your candidate but try your hardest to put others down. You ignore the hypocrisy of your attacks because you live in glass house. "Clinton Won and by the Popular VOTE " Superdelegates tilted the field from day one. 3 million independents in NY alone were not allowed to vote. Exit polls are too far outside the margin of error (when they weren't being canceled). So yeah, if you ignore the cheating, disenfranchisement, and shenanigans you have a great point. Too bad we don't have free and fair elections coming from the "democratic" party or you really would have a great point here. "People didn't want hateful Sanders and his hateful followers" Not like you right? You've called me a twat, loser, turd, and more while living in your glass house. I understand why you support Hillary... she speaks to your values and ethics... none. "us Democrats" Your a democrat huh? You make me embarrassed to think that I used to be proud to call myself one. I won't be making that mistake again anytime soon. I do not support corruption and cronyism so I will not be supporting HRC or the DNC again anytime soon.
    3
  31. Cezariusz regarding, "you do know that Republicans are able to do what they do because they actually have a majority in the Senate?" It doesn't take a majority it takes 41 and there is zero percent chance of them having less than that. Regarding, "And because there is a presidential election?" Bullshit. That has absolutely nothing to do with it. Republicans could have just as well done the same thing on Obama's first day in office. Please stop lying. Regarding, "If you think Dems will be capable of filibustering Trump's pick after the election with a minority for 2 or probably 4 years, you are crazy." You are probably right about this but not because they can't but because democrats are pussies who cave and support garbage like HRC. I wouldn't even advise democrats to refuse to confirm anyone and everyone the same way republicans currently are but rather that they would insist that a judge be a centrist LIKE MERRICK GARLAND only be confirmed. Merrick Garland was fucking praised by Republicans right up until Obama put his stink on him after all. What really would be the difference between Obama getting him on the court or Trump anyway? And if Trump insists on nominating Scalia types democrats absolutely would have the power to tell Trump to fuck off and try again. Please don't continue to pretend this isn't a possibility. This very fucking moment in time proves they can.
    3
  32. It really is amazing to me how many people have dumb ideas as to what a VP is suppose to be. Regarding, "Your VP candidate is suppose to shore up a portion of the electorate that you aren't certain that the presidential candidate can secure on their own." No they are not. Nobody but the dumbest of folks vote based on the bottom of the ticket. The VP first, foremost, and solely should be based on who would be the best person to run the country in the event of a catastrophe befalls the President. Yes there are other reasons that politicians use in their determination. But those are all terrible no good reasons that reflect terrible no good candidates.
    3
  33. It's not that people like myself are "giving up on her." We just feel that actions speak louder than words. If I thought someone's words were what is important I wouldn't think Hillary is the POS I think she is. For example I think Hillary is a POS because of what she does. I still respect Warren much more than the average politician.... but that really isn't saying much. And I respect her far less since she is willing to help support corrupt, corporate Hillary. She of all people should know better. She either doesn't know, doesn't care, or has sold out. Ultimately it doesn't really matter much which reason she is willing to help Hillary... none speak well on her behalf. Never Hillary.
    3
  34. Daffy Duck regarding, "Your sense of entitlement to hate and smear Clinton relentlessly is bullshit It has everything to do with your candidate losing.You need to give it a rest it's just classless trolling at this point and makes you look like the twat" You gather all this just because I called Hillary a POS? You might want to consider that I call her that because of her actions. Because she seems to think she is entitled to be President. You might want to consider that I resent the fact that she has zero principles and that she would say or do ANYTHING if it meant that she would be president. If you think that I am a "twat" because I do not like the facts that she is liar and corrupt so be it. If you think that the only reason I feel the way I do is because my candidate lost... well... I can't stop you from being stupid. Don't think your insults hurt me. Remember that you said all this BS the next time you hate on smear Trump... no doubt you will. But that is probably different in your mind because he deserves to be insulted and smeared... not like your queen. Good luck with her anointing. I will not be a part of it. Never Hillary.
    3
  35. Only here to downvote.
    3
  36. The media is forcing Warren to lie about sanders? Nice headline you hack. Makes me glad I avoid your crap like the plague.
    3
  37. Sam Seder is controlled opposition.
    3
  38. The FBI won't even say if they had people in it... because they certainly did. And not because they weren't worried but because they actively wanted it to happen. Fun fact: AOC voted to give them all a big raise when the real left wants police defunded.
    3
  39. "He's OBVIOUSLY just grifting" How many billionaires are paying sedar these days? Last time I checked it was 3.
    3
  40.  @Dos_Caffeine  "do you know what a grift is?" Yes. It's that thing shit libs like sedar do. "It means holding no real positions" I've watched jimmy for a long time. He has consistently been for things like: universal health care, giving peace a chance, getting money out of politics, and more. Just like me. His positions have been clear and consistent even if we haven't agreed on everything over the years.
    3
  41. Jackson cares about all the things that sam "I don't care" sedar should.
    3
  42.  @scruffopone3989  You know who doesn't question things? Cults.
    3
  43. You sound like you are talking about sam and his cult. Sam would tell you to vote for donald trump he were representing his team.
    3
  44.  @Thezuule1  "2 independents" LMFAO Wow. Your intellectual dishonesty is boundless. "You're not entitled to your own facts." At least you seem to have conceded the fact that they only need 50 and are done with the other lie.
    3
  45. They are smart enough to know that you need to sprinkle in some truth or you will never buy their BS. Controlled opposition has to pretend to be on your side at least some of the time.
    3
  46.  @falloutboy691  They are sheepherders leading you to slaughter. Those people you listed, that you KNOW are corrupt. They are people sam will tell you to vote for in general elections. But I'm the one that should be quiet? I'm the one who doesn't know what they do?
    3
  47.  @danbridges4755  " I never said China was the only country being bombarded by propoganda." Thanks fuckface. I never said you did. "There's plenty of propoganda in the US, obviously." Yeah. You are soaking it up here. "MR is very critical of Democrats too" Controlled opposition has to at least pretend to be on your side or you wouldn't buy their BS. MR is never critical of dems when it matters most... your votes. At the end of the day they will tell you to vote blue no matter who because that's their job... to sheepherd you into a corrupt party. MR will virtue signal and tell you how mad joe manchin makes them but the only thing they really care about is he's representing their team or not. They will tell you to vote for manchin EVERY time he represents the blue cult in a general. The day they stop doing that is the day he switches to the red team and not one day sooner.
    3
  48. "Both are losing followers." I can only think you are intentionally lying which makes sense for people watching sedar.
    3
  49. This is the internet version of mainstream corporate media.
    3
  50. "You aren't being shadow-banned or censored by big tech" This is funny because my first attempt to reply to this was literally shadow banned and censored.
    3
  51.  TJ B  "shadow bans and censorship" You don't need to separate them as if they are different. Shadow banning is an example of censorship.
    3
  52. "a powerless useless position like VP" I know right. Is that even a real job? If I had the misfortune of such a position I don't think I would even bother to put it on a resume. What does a real man such as yourself do for a living?
    2
  53. Darryl Perry has won my vote. (sarcasm)
    2
  54. This is sarcasm right?
    2
  55. What a compelling argument Michael. That's sarcasm in case you are not smart enough to know without me telling you.
    2
  56. I am going to judge you clowns and I'd never go to this place to be informed.
    2
  57. Sam is controlled opposition. He is sus.
    2
  58. Sam Seder is controlled opposition for a corrupt party. He is not your friend.
    2
  59. I'm confident he has done enough to maintain his access to AOC and I'm confident AOC will never talk to jackson because jackson will hold to her account and sam won't.
    2
  60. Sam and his crew might criticize biden but they will tell you all to get in line and vote for joe when it matters most. They are sheepherders leading you to slaughter.
    2
  61.  @50jakecs  "I think you are ignorant about what the word "ignorant" means." This is what's known as projection in psychology.
    2
  62.  @robingourde9366  "the Corporate Democrats who did that. Closet conservatives." The entire party who russiagated. Thanks for agreeing with my comment. Not that it should be necessary.
    2
  63. Sam and his right wingers may as well just advocate for censorship.
    2
  64.  @j0j0dartiste21  A sheepherder for the "democratic" party. And if you are getting at the fact that a made a typo an edited comment probably isn't the best way to do it unless you don't mind being a hypocrite.
    2
  65.  @oxman5571  "cries a lot" This is funny considering you are crying about my comment. I shouldn't be surprised that sam cultivates an audience of hypocrites.
    2
  66. If hillary clinton and sam seder are smearing you then you are doing something right.
    2
  67. Sam seder is controlled opposition meant to sheep herd you into a corrupt "democratic" party.
    2
  68. Sam seder is controlled opposition meant to sheep herd you into a corrupt, warmongering, "democratic" party.
    2
  69. Holding people to account means being willing to call them out when they are selling you out. It's what sam doesn't do for the squad and his cult.
    2
  70. I'm only here to downvote.
    2
  71.  @scruffopone3989  It's what science does.
    2
  72.  @scruffopone3989  "No, Science asks questions" LMFAO You are literally proving my point. Yes. Science asks questions.
    2
  73. Sam Sedar SAD Joe Rogan has freedom of speech. Accuses him of "misinformation." Does it on the propaganda network MSNBC.
    2
  74. Speaking of spreading lies how about the time sam said that mccarthey would be speaker if they forced a vote on M4A?
    2
  75. @Vesta_the_Lesser Actually that isn't something we get to have an opinion about. Do you really not understand the difference between fact and opinion? The bottom line is that if sam wasn't lying then h jeffries would have been speaker instead of the republicans just voting over and over like they did.
    2
  76.  @YourLocalZombie  "Not only was that an opinion" Nope. It was a lie. "McCarthy is the speaker and was at the time you posted that comment." I'm talking about 2020 when sam was lying that if dems didn't unite behind pelosi and if dems trying to "force the vote" the same way the republicans just did then mccarthy would be speaker. Try to keep up.
    2
  77.  @YourLocalZombie  "it was an intentional lie and not his opinion?" It's possible he was only grossly incompetent but I think more of sam's intellect than that.
    2
  78.  @TheMinneapolisKid  Youtube video titled, "DEBATE: Briahna Joy Gray vs. Sam Seder" at bad faith.
    2
  79.  @danielcrafter9349  "can you explain" Yeah but if you don't already get it and some of you clearly don't you likely never will.
    2
  80.  @danielcrafter9349  "lie, opinion and assertion" Sam asserted that mccarthey could have been speaker while dems had a majority. It was just a lie. And it's my opinion that it was deliberate.
    2
  81.  @YourLocalZombie  "intentional lie" While it is only my opinion that it was it was intentional that is really irrelevant... it was a lie even if sam didn't realize it at the time.
    2
  82.  @taearum5134  "It really sounds like you are ASSERTING that Sam was intentionally lying. This really doesn't sound like your opinion." I've repeatedly said that part is opinion. Sams sycophants are impossible to take seriously.
    2
  83.  @YourLocalZombie  "You haven't explained how it's a lie." Just admit you are unserious and don't actually care about what I'm saying. "was he worried about losing control of the house?" He was pretending that a republican speaker while dems had a majority was a real possibility. It wasn't. He was just lying. This isn't as hard as you are making it. I can only think you are not a serious person.
    2
  84.  @YourLocalZombie  At least you live up to your name of "local zombie."
    2
  85.  @YourLocalZombie  "Why do you keep making multiple replies to the same post?" Sometimes I think to add something so I do. Sometimes I break them up because of censorship and I don't want an entire novel shadowbanned. You should be embarrassed you don't know the answers to your own obvious questions. "I am serious when I say you know the difference between fact and opinion and are choosing to conflate the two." I'm serious when I say you are projecting and don't know the difference between fact and opinion. That or you are just being intentionally obtuse because you lack intellectual honesty.
    2
  86.  @YourLocalZombie  "I am serious when I say you know the difference between fact and opinion and are choosing to conflate the two." We don't get to have an opinion if a republican might be speaker while dems have a majority or if a dem could be speaker if republicans had a majority. Sam was just lying and you are not a serious person.
    2
  87. Sam seder is controlled opposition to make sure you keep voting for evil oligarchs.
    2
  88. The deep state is a way to describe unelected officials in government who persist over decades in government. It's hardly a conspiracy to talk about them. Only a person brainwashed by watching too much sam sedar would attempt to deny that they exist like this.
    2
  89. Thanks for leaving this video up even while it shows what clowns you guys are.
    2
  90.  @thermodynamics458  They are calling out a POS like biden and his shills like sam. Admitting your problems is halfway towards defeating them.
    2
  91.  @thermodynamics458  But I get the gist of what you are trying to imply... you are trying to say that it's ICIP's fault that we can't have nice things and not the fault of a corrupt POS like Biden.
    2
  92.  @thermodynamics458  "that makes zero contribution." You are projecting. That's what you are doing. But it's actually worse than that. Not only are not contributing anything with your BS but you are bootlicking for corrupt POS like biden. Don't you have something better to do with your time? "What actual work do you do to strengthen the left in America day to day?" I hold politicians accountable for their BS. I don't make excuses for their failures and act like the peasants are the problem. I know it's the fault of the rich and the powerful unlike some.
    2
  93.  @thermodynamics458  "you do fork all" Do you tell Majority report that? That's literally all they do is talk. "We know Biden sucks." Do you? Isn't he the same POS that sam and his cult told you and everyone to vote for? "Tell us something we don’t know." Don't vote for POS like Biden. Your cult clearly hasn't figured that out yet.
    2
  94. Maybe she heard about ana's history of flashing in the work place and attempted blackmail.
    2
  95.  @Junebug89  "Jimmy Dore's sexual harassment" Jimmy isn't the one who flashes people at work or blackmails. I'm blaming the right person and I suspect you know it or you would make an argument instead of what you are actually doing. Very classy. /s
    2
  96.  @russellward4624  "maybe learn the definition" LMFAO You are projecting. "I've been holding back, letting you run your mouth as if your some kinda warrior for what's good in this world. That's about to change." Words a villain in a movie might say to blackmail the movies protagonist and words ana said in real life to try and blackmail jimmy. Facts.
    2
  97.  @it-s-a-mystery  "explain what blackmail is" Explain it? How about I just read the definition: "the action, treated as a criminal offense, of demanding payment or another benefit from someone in return for not revealing compromising or damaging information about them" Let's break it down: "demanding payment or another benefit from someone in return" She wanted jimmy to "stop running his mouth." "revealing compromising or damaging information about them" And she was threatening to try and metoo him if he didn't stop. You don't even attempt an argument but it can't be anymore clear from someone who isn't being intellectually dishonest.
    2
  98.  @it-s-a-mystery  "She threatened to release information about his behaviour if he didn't stop what?" Keep going? I already answered this? She threatened to try to metoo him if he didn't stop calling out TYT. I could only take you less seriously if you gave your own comments a thumbs up. Oh wait... you are doing that already.
    2
  99.  @davidgoldstein1526  "Ana is flat out beautiful." Not on the inside. And that is what's important.
    2
  100.  @thedissidentleftist6997  "you blindly supports Fascism" No doubt it's easier for you to invent a strawman to argue against instead of trying to intelligently address the things I'm actually saying.
    2
  101. It doesn't matter how good he is for sam. Sam will vote for anyone regardless of who his blue team rolls out.
    2
  102. I've said it before and I'll say it again, sam "I don't care" seder is the Mancow of YouTube "political punditry," in that he has a massive audience yet he is TERRIBLE at it. The fact that he has gotten so big despite having no insights or intelligence for politics is an indictment of YouTube as a platform. That said I will never be sympathetic to the idea of banning. I'm not sam seder afterall.
    2
  103. Sam's job is to sheepherd you into a corrupt democratic party. He's leading you to slaughter.
    2
  104.  @peterbondy  He's a partisan hack and let me prove it with a thought experiment... Hypothetically let's say Donald trump wins the "democratic" nomination. What does sam do? Spoiler alert: he would tell you to vote for the orange clown because that's what a partisan hack would do.
    2
  105.  @bearislandthuglife3463  "never talked about Israel Palestine"... "Fuck AOC" I can remember them talking about how AOC voted to fund the iron dome. But I guess that doesn't count to you because it's about your cult. That's not how it works for intellectually honest people. When you aren't a hack like sam you are willing to call out all sides.
    2
  106.  @bearislandthuglife3463  "The Channel your mentioned never talked about Israel Palestine" Meanwhile, in reality, they literally did a stream 6 hours ago titled, "International Leftist Coalition - Israel is an Apartheid State." Your BS is as transparent as sam's. You two deserve each other.
    2
  107.  @peterbondy  So what do you think of bearisland here? He leads off with "never talked about Israel Palestine" which is an easily provable lie. And continues with "it looks like another Make Money by Saying Fuck AOC type channels, even Jimmy Dore Milked the Fuck AOC Cow got rich, and moved on to Anti Vaxx Grifting where the real "Capital Gains" for Grifters is today." Is this type of BS common for sedar's audience? You sure he isn't the one grifting? And pointing the finger at pundits when you should be pointing it at politicians with real power instead? FYI dems have literally all the power right now if you are looking for someone to blame for how things are. Joe rogan isn't the one fucking you over no matter how much sam wants to spend his time talking about him instead of... I don't know... how california dems with a supermajority aren't even voting on m4a.
    2
  108. Sam seder is controlled opposition meant to sheep herd you into a corrupt "democratic" party.
    2
  109.  @kfox420  It's fact that dems have all the power they need to codify roe into law. Sorry not sorry if that fact triggers you.
    2
  110.  @j0j0dartiste21  "at this point that is irrelevant." LMFAO Of course it's not because the dems have all that power this very second but they would rather run on the topic than use the power they have.
    2
  111. Sheepherders are going to sheepherd. If you listen to sam and his crew he's leading you to slaughter.
    2
  112. Fun fact: california dems aren't even voting on universal health care despite having supermajorities. Dems have literally ALL the power while sam and his crew pretend that republicans are the only problem. They are controlled opposition and they are leading you to slaughter.
    2
  113.  @alabamaman8885  "hurt the Democrats" I don't care. I'm not talking about the party. I'm talking about the goal of getting universal health care. That's what I care about. That's where my allegiance is. Not to some corrupt party. "As a progressive, I highly doubt you do." It sure AF aren't corrupt POS like pelosi or bootlickers for the party like sedar that's for damn sure.
    2
  114.  @falloutboy691  Have they ever told you not to vote for a dem in general election? This is rhetorical. We all know they haven't.
    2
  115.  @falloutboy691  "corrupt dems like pelosi, sinema, manchin, clyburn," Sam will tell you to vote for all of these POS if they are in a general election versus the red team.
    2
  116. Because he interviewed someone? You act like he joined them FFS. Clowns like you are impossible to take seriously.
    2
  117. Just here to downvote this fraud hack sam.
    2
  118.  @monotech20.14  "didn't much matter" Momentum is important in politics. It took what was suppose to be a time to talk about bernie and made it about pete. It literally tainted every single state after it... which was literally ALL of them.
    2
  119.  @monotech20.14  "didn't much matter" You straight up know they are cheaters. Long story short you just don't care about it.
    2
  120. The guy who destroyed sam in a debate.
    2
  121.  @eddymac5767  Better question: why are you licking the boots of corporate propagandist?
    2
  122.  @furiousapplesack  "I said who should we watch," You are desperate to deflect and talk about anything other than your POS. It's funny.
    2
  123. Sam and his crew will always cover for their team.
    2
  124. Sam and his crew don't have much to say about the people who are actually in power. It's their job to deflect from them.
    2
  125. Sam seder is controlled opposition.
    2
  126. Sam's job is to sheepherd you into a corrupt party that doesn't give a f about you.
    2
  127. Sam and his crew are doing ok so they don't seem to care much about the dems who are actually in power.
    2
  128. Sam sedar is controlled opposition who would rather go after the people holding politicians to account than go after corrupt politicians.
    2
  129. So if Trump were the democratic nominee (not that hard to imagine, he was a self described democrat not that long ago) and David Duke were the republican nominee you would vote for one of the two? Do you not realize that there are more than 2 candidates running? You are an idiot, that's all there is to it.
    1
  130. Duck there is so much wrong with everything you say its tough to know where to begin but I guess I'll try... "Sanders lost fair and square"  Do you really believe this?  Are you really so blind?  Ug.  I'm one sentence in and I'm already questioning why I'm bothering.  If you don't already realize the system is rigged and not fair I have to wonder why I'm bothering. Superdelegates biased the game before it began.  I could be willing to accept superdelegates and their role in the process if, and only if, they would keep their fking mouths shut during the election process.  To have nearly 500 superdelegates pledge their support to Hillary before any of us mere peasants were allowed to vote is completely unacceptable.  It biases everything going forward and corrupts the entire election process tipping the scales of all elections to follow.  It allows corrupt and lazy newsmedia to report Hillary as having an insurmountable lead, creating a sense of inevitability and suppressing voter turnout... AS INTENDENDED AND COMPLETELY UNFAIR to anyone but the willfully stupid such as yourself.  There are more reasons why the system is unfair but why am I even bothering with you really.  I'd rather save the wasted effort. "by which she lost to Barack Obama in 2008."  Arguments such as this have always been the idiots way of justifying injustice throughout all of history.  Just because something has been does nothing to justify its existence or fairness.  You may as well be a confederate arguing slavery is fine because, "that's just the way it has always been." "Why must he incite volatile people and provoke useless rage?"  The only person inciting rage is you.  Stupidity, lies, and muddying the waters by people like you piss me off.  Unless you would like to be more specific about why you claim he incites volatile people when he time and again denounces violence.  Don't bother it's rhetorical.  We both know you are liar like your queen who has absolutely nothing to back up your BS claim. "he still can’t manage to disagree with people without being disagreeable."  You need to look at yourself in the mirror and think about what you see before you say things like this.  I admit that I can be quite disagreeable because morons like you piss me off and I have no problem telling you that you are a fking idiot.  But I also don't go around and tell others how they are being disagreeable because I am not a complete fking hypocrite like you. "The parties are private organizations. They get to set the rules, "  Every now and then you say something that isn't complete BS.  The problem with this statement is that you say it as an effort to justify injustice.  Just because they get to set the rules does not mean that the rules are inherently fair.  They have nothing to do with one another.  For example let's talk basketball since it was just in the news.  Let's say the NBA decided to change the rules and that from now on Cleveland gets to start each game with 10 points (the NBA dubs them superdelegate points).  That is within their power.  They too are a private organization.  Some teams would even be able to win some games against them.  Would it be fair though?  Obviously not... unless you are dumb as duck. "lies about her."  Have I lied about her at all?  You might want to consider that she is called a liar because she is a fking liar.  It isn't just a right wing conspiracy.  And her being corrupt is also not a right wing conspiracy... she just is corrupt as fk.  She has no principles.  There is nothing she wouldn't say or do to be President.  She just says what she thinks people want to hear. "You, however, want the rules changed because your guy isn't winning."  No.  I want the rules changed because the rules are unfair.  I, unlike your queen, have principles that I hold regardless of how they might affect me or my candidate.  I am willing to accept losing but I am unwilling to accept cheating and unfairness. "Maybe you should stop blaming the DNC," and "It's not the DNC's job to help Bernie win." The DNC on May 26, 2015... "Our goals in the coming months will be to frame the Republican field and the eventual nominee early and to provide a contrast between the GOP field and HRC."  THAT'S ON MAY 26 2015!  They go on to say, "Use specific hits to muddy the waters around ethics, transparency and campaign finance attacks on HRC."  Yup, it wasn't the DNC's job to help Bernie win... it was the DNC's job to help Hillary win. And that wasn't according to me... that was according to THEM you ducking idiot. I suspect you might be one of their paid operatives. This also isn't just some conspiracy theory.  POS David Brock thinks that this is good politics and has spent over a million dollars paying trolls like you because he, like the POS he works for HRC, have no ethics.  For your sake I hope that you are being paid for your willful ignorance and are not really so ducking stupid. "Sanders supporters suggesting that polls point to him as the best nominee - is ridiculous."  The only thing that is ridiculous is you.  We are talking about EXIT POLLS.  Do you know what those are?  Are you smart enough to know the difference?  They aren't polls conducted a week before an election or something.  They are polls taken where people are voting the day of an election.  They absolutely should be in line with election results and when they are not something is terribly wrong.  Go to trustvotedotorg to learn more.  From them, " when exit poll data varies more than 2% from electronic vote totals, the electronic vote totals are questionnable. If fact, 2% is used as the boundary by the US government when determining that the election in another country other than the US has possibly been stolen."  Discrepancy in favor of Clinton from exit polls on March 1, 2016; Georgia 11.9%, Virginia 4.3%, Vermont 1.1%, Mass 8%, Alabama 13.9%, Tenn 8.3%, Oklahoma -6.1%, Ark 5.2%, Tex 6.4%.  That is what we are talking about.  Something is clearly wrong with this picture unless you are a blind moron who either actually thinks we are talking about polls conducted before an election, or more likely the more I think about it, just a POS muddying the water so that hopefully others won't be able to see the truth. Duck you.  You suck at life.  I've wasted so much more time on you than you deserve.  I'm done caring what you think or have to say.  You are a lost cause and not worth any more of my time. Good luck with your POS candidate. You deserve each other.
    1
  131. Only because the dems wouldn't have the balls to do what the republicans are doing right now. Just out of curiosity why do you think the dems should not block conservative nominations considering republicans block a centrist?
    1
  132. I'm not a fan of religion. Stuff like this is why.
    1
  133.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  Every comment of yours makes me laugh so freaking hard when I think about how sam supports censorship and you support sam with that name.
    1
  134.  @10tothebigguy25  When your praying doesn't do anything, and it doesn't, will you care? Of course not.
    1
  135.  @10tothebigguy25  "Jesus loves you." Your cu lt teaches that I'm going to burn for all eternity because of the "crime" of disbelief." Actions speak louder than meaningless words, even when it comes to your fake deity.
    1
  136.  @10tothebigguy25  Doesn't your book of BS say that those thoughts and prayers will work? While they won't? But don't let the fact that you are wasting your time stop you.
    1
  137. So you agree with AOC that people only criticize her because they want to bang her? What is wrong with you people?
    1
  138. This channel isn't "left." This channel's job is to smear people on the actual left.
    1
  139. You busy voting for joe? Whose brain is melting? Whose corrupt?
    1
  140. Yeah... for example even when a right wing grifter like sam knows he's wrong he will go to, "i don't care" instead of admitting being wrong.
    1
  141.  @seanpatrick1243  That is exactly the type of worthless "argument" I expect from anyone who listens to sam. And it's telling.
    1
  142.  @briancardio6567  I'm calling him out. Do I really need to to tell you why that's different than being a fan?
    1
  143.  @seanpatrick1243  "To everyone else you're just sounding a bit foolish" Team sam has nothing more than ad hominem. It's clear who the fools are.
    1
  144.  @seanpatrick1243  bUt HaVe At It
    1
  145.  @seanpatrick1243  "It's just sad, Jimmy. Just sad." That's how I feel about you. At least try to make an argument one time FFS. Or do you really not care that that's all you have?
    1
  146.  @seanpatrick1243  "I challenge you to go back through your comments and point out one argument" You mean like the argument I was just making about how you don't even attempt any arguments? That you are literally trying to address? But hey... well done. You have attempted an argument. But it was awful. And it's telling that you don't even know why it's so bad. I can point out more argument I've made in this thread. Would you like me to?
    1
  147.  @seanpatrick1243  "I challenge you" Took me two seconds to show an argument. Time for you to, "Never admit you were wrong." and " Never apologize."
    1
  148.  @seanpatrick1243  "Your feelings" It's fact you weren't making an argument. And yours and my feelings are irrelevant to that point.
    1
  149.  @seanpatrick1243  "that was a complete waste of time." Not for me. Thanks for proving my point that you wouldn't admit you were wrong and wouldn't apologize. I guess that this means, according to you, you are a right wing grifter.
    1
  150.  @seanpatrick1243  "I'll leave you" You are best off not attempting any arguments. If you do I suspect they will be as easy to poke holes in as your only real try.
    1
  151.  @seanpatrick1243  "I freely apologize." LMFAO You should be sorry that you can't accept facts when they are presented to you. "I will admit that it has been very interesting watching someone say absolutely nothing and claim a "victory." " It shouldn't be too interesting for you. It's in the mirror everyday looking back at you. "you're only competing with yourself." This is funny because you are trying to compete in this very thread. And doing it poorly. "muting notifications of further comments written by you" When you silence someone you don't prove them wrong. You only prove you are scared of what they have to say.
    1
  152.  @seanpatrick1243  "your authoritarian nature than anything else. I as an individual should not be forced to read your nonsense, which seems to be your goal." Not once did I say you should be forced to read... "Anything less will just prove what a hypocrite you are." LMFAO You are impossible to take seriously. Please mute me or go back to not even attempting arguments again. It would be better than what you are doing. You are wasting my time.
    1
  153.  @seanpatrick1243  I legit pity you.
    1
  154. Real liberals support censorship like sam am I right?
    1
  155. Sam and his crew really are.
    1
  156.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  "who hurt you kid?" No one. Am I hurting you? Does the truth hurt?
    1
  157.  @MichaelAronson  Vote blue no matter who just like sam tells you. Also... be embarrassed you don't know the answer to your own question.
    1
  158.  @MichaelAronson  Me: controlled opposition for a CORRUPT party. And that is your response? If you were trying to prove you are unserious it worked.
    1
  159.  @MichaelAronson  "And the person or persons doing the controlling would be . . .?" Please be embarrassed you don't understand what the words "corrupt party" means.
    1
  160.  @MichaelAronson  " Is "Corrupt Party" the name of a person?" I can only think you are being willfully obtuse at this point. Even you must be able to understand my obvious point and who I'm talking about. Or maybe worse... you really don't. Either way it's clear you are not serious person, much like sam.
    1
  161.  @willscanlon9843  I'm sure if you had something intelligent to say you would have gone with that instead of what you did do.
    1
  162.  @MichaelAronson  I've never seen anyone so willing to act like they don't understand simple and obvious points like this? Are you trying to prove you are not serious? It's working.
    1
  163.  @MichaelAronson  "vague and nonspecific" Imagine acting like "corrupt party" is "vague and nonspecific." Are you worried I'm talking about the republicans? I'm not.
    1
  164.  @MichaelAronson  "You still haven't made a point." Just because you pretend you don't understand what my point is doesn't mean I haven't made one. Talking to you is like talking to a malfunctioning bot.
    1
  165.  @MichaelAronson  "Correct." At least you admitted I made a point. That's better than just pretending and lying that I hadn't like you were doing.
    1
  166.  @willscanlon9843  "I want you to control my opposition" Those are words.
    1
  167.  @MichaelAronson  "Your point is you haven't made a point?" Are you going to pretend this now? That makes sense... for you. Not for anyone serious.
    1
  168.  @MichaelAronson  Me: "you don't understand what my point is" You admitting I did make a point, that you were lying when you said I didn't, and admitting you just don't understand what my point is, "Correct." At least all that makes, "Your point is you haven't made a point? Derpity derp derp to you too." funny because you are projecting.
    1
  169.  @MichaelAronson  You are paid for this right? Please tell me you just don't have your head that far up sams arce like this.
    1
  170.  @willscanlon9843  "I'm hyper-gay as well" You aren't my type. Sorry.
    1
  171. "We don't need anymore Republicans pretending to be a democrat." You voted for Biden right? That's why this is funny.
    1
  172.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  "all you;re doing is showing everyone you're an emotional bad faith actor as you lash out like this." LMFAO Look at your comment. Your projection is funny.
    1
  173.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  "showing everyone you're an emotional bad faith actor" You don't even attempt to address my point that biden is terrible.
    1
  174. They can't all be bastions of truth like MSNBC. That's why sam goes there... to tell everyone how joe rogan is the one misinforming people, on the propaganda network MSNBC. If you listen to sam you are a sheep being led to slaughter. He is controlled opposition.
    1
  175. She has real power in the form of her votes... like the one she used to make pelosi speaker and she got jack shit from it. AOC and sam are controlled opposition and they are leading you to slaughter.
    1
  176.  @TheJumpsuitJack  More like true or you would have some sorta intelligent argument to try and combat it.
    1
  177.  @TheJumpsuitJack  Or maybe you are like sam "I don't care" sedar.
    1
  178.  @TheJumpsuitJack  "around personal feelings" Is that what me talking about AOC's unforgivable voting record sounded like to you? Is this really how you want to mindless ignore her record? Is this how you want to ignore the fact that sam doesn't care about things a real progressive should care about? "What's there to debate?" Just admit you don't care like sam already has.
    1
  179.  @TheJumpsuitJack  "AOC's one vote" That's not her only inexcusible vote but it perfectly shows how she squanders the power she does have and acts in complete opposite to the values she claims to hold. These are AOCs own words that she has on twitter this very moment... " Sometimes it’s to get members on the record, so ppl can’t make excuses later. Sometimes these votes create real political pressure that forces developments. Sometimes we vote for the historical record - to let future generations know we did everything we could." She's also the same person who said that she wouldn't vote for nancy for speaker before she got in office. If you want to defend her how about you at least start with this one vote and then we can move on to her other inexcusable votes. "Sam is personal" LMFAO No. It's not. It's again another example of someone whose actions betray the values they claim to hold. It's evidence that he's a fraud in the same way aocs actions betray her. "It's opinion" Yes. It is. It's the opinion you come to when the values you actually hold and care about are protecting your cult. At best it's a biased opinion to try and maintain his access to AOC. At worst he is straight up controlled opposition whose job it is to sheepherd people into a corrupt party. He might pretend to care about their wrongdoing from time to time but that's only to get the sheep to trust him when he tells them all to vote for them when it matters most. "He's a commentator, not someone with similar power to goverent officials." Thanks captain obvious. Those are words even if they offer nothing of value to the conversation at hand. "knows exactly who Sam is" He's a sheepherder who will tell you to vote blue no matter who. He doesn't care about these people at all. At the end of the day he only cares what color jersey they are wearing. He's a hack. "Your personal beef is irrelevant." So according your "logic" that would mean you have "beef" with me? Then it too is irrelevant. "You probably aren't a "real progressive" in my eyes." I want universal health care, money out of politics, to give peace a chance, to break up the banks, reparations, free college, freedom of speech, freedom to decide what goes into my body and more. I also don't really care if you think I'm not a progressive or not. It's more important to me that you realize that people like sam and AOC are frauds, because they are.
    1
  180.  @schmoborama  "“what goes into my body” LOLOL there it is." To be clear you think that the government should get to tell people things they have to put into their body? You probably think trump is an authoritarian but it really doesn't get anymore authoritarian than that. "freedumb to give covid19 to as many ppl as he possibly can," The jab doesn't stop people from getting or transmitting covid dipshit. "thinks you’re not a real leftwinger unless you also want our hospital system to collapse under the weight of an unvaxxed public." Seems like the problem is that there aren't enough beds. But those extra beds aren't very profitable. "Do you also claim the right to shit while you’re in line at the dmv?" Sam really cultivates some of the most intellectually dishonest MFers I've met. It's very cultlike.
    1
  181.  @miac.4806  "They know she is a threat." A threat to vote in lock step with all the other corporate dems. She's a fraud.
    1
  182.  @nothingtoitbuttodoit  "it's Jackson Hinkles burner account" Is that what you want to go with? Sam cultivates probably the most intellectually dishonest community I've ever come across, and I've talked to flat earthers.
    1
  183.  @nothingtoitbuttodoit  Am I talking to sams burner account? You still mad hinkle got you to say the quiet part out loud? That you don't care about their shit record?
    1
  184.  @TheJumpsuitJack  "Get a grip." Sam cultivates probably the most intellectually dishonest crowd I've ever come across. That, and comments of yours such as this, make it hard for me to take you seriously. That said you managed to sprinkle in some things that I don't think were downright terrible so I'm going to do my best to address them and ignore all the dumb BS like this. "Your problem seems to be you put too much faith in the political mechanisms of America and the political mainstream." I've made this mistake many times in the past but I don't think I don't this much anymore. I've been fooled to many times and I'm on to their game. "plan on peacefully prying power and wealth away from the capitalist class in the dramatic fashion" The truckers show a perfect way we should be doing this. "overthrow capitalism" I'm not sure this is a reasonable goal but I'm still happy to try to do this. People have to be mad. Sam puts people to sleep. "the planet on a more equitable, sustainable path" This problem is too big for me. I don't have "faith" in science but I am hopeful that people smarter than me can figure this out. "social collapse" I am absolutely not saying this is my goal but I also don't see this as something I absolutely need to avoid. Sometimes something needs to burn down so that something better can takes it's place. I'm not saying I think it would be better if "society" collapsed but I am pretty much over capitalism. And there would be no easy way to transition off it. "ideas" Make sure everyone is as mad as they should be... and use that anger to pressure the oligarchy. Make them fear our pitchforks (in a symbolic way, I'm a pacifist). "anticapitalist" This was mostly why I'm answering. I do consider myself this. "logic behind the speaker vote" It's really not complicated. Nancy needed their votes to be speaker. Use that leverage to get something of value for progressives. Asking for a vote on m4a makes sense. It was during a pandemic. Let people voting against health care pay the price after the fact. And they would. It didn't need to be that. But it absolutely should have been something. "alternative" If dems don't cave then noone is allowed to be speaker and the country debates the topic. Let them explain why they aren't even willing to even VOTE on m4a during a pandemic much less give you m4a. That it's that important to them. Let them pay the price after the fact. My allegiance is to m4a and getting it.... not to politicians or a party.
    1
  185.  @TheJumpsuitJack  "I can tell you're from one of those pseudo-left communities like Dore." I can't tell if you are paid to make smears like this or just a useful idiot. " Because you've clearly never read any theory" Does it matter that I have? This seems like lazy stupid ways to avoid all points I made. Me: ""anticapitalist" This was mostly why I'm answering. I do consider myself this." Your response to that: "you seem averse to any serious anti-capitalist rhetoric." You don't seem very serious to me. "So anti-dem yet never once do I hear any coherent ideology based in Marxism, much less a stated adherence to Marxism." I'm sorry I'm not using all the labels you think I should. I personally find all the labels distracting and try to focus on the ideas behind them. Me: "The truckers show a perfect way we should be doing this." You: "We're gonna pressure the oligarchy with our mean words" I was wrong to take you seriously, even if only for a moment. "not sure you're able to grasp this: global capitalism is diametrically opposed to anything that means losing their grip on power. " I'm not sure you are able to grasp this: I've never said this isn't the case. You are arguing against a strawman and wasting my time. "Neoliberalism will break fascist and America will be ruled by fascists before you will "pressure" congress to get M4A" If you say so. "Revolution" I'm a pacifist or this is probably what I'd be advocating for. But I am a pacifist so... do the math. "protests like in Canada?" If you think actions like this don't help then you are DEFINATELY part of the problem and not someone I take very seriously. "Did you ever leave your house in 2020 and attend the myriad of large protests?" Let's say I didn't but only spent my time "protesting" as a "keyboard warrior." Who let my voice be heard in only that way would that really be the devil? Or does it only count if you are on a street corner using your freedom of speech? "the US is a police state on the verge of fascism!" LMFAO Are you really trying to blame this shit on me? As if it's my fault we can't have nice things? Meh. Somehow, someway I still think I will find the strength to sleep like a baby tonight. I know that I'm the victim and not the problem even if you do not or are pretending that's the case for bad reasons. "Pelosi won by like 10-15 votes" Meanwhile, in reality, the vote was 216-209. Are you lying to people? Politically illiterate? Or lazy and stupid? "McCarthy would be speaker" To be speaker of the house you need a MAJORITY of the votes in the house. Mccarthy can't get that unless dems vote for him. If no one gets a majority of votes no one is speaker and they do it all over again until someone is. Let's say that happens.... a debate starts about m4a during a pandemic and it's merits as people are made to answer for the side they are picking. Sam lies about mccarthey being a possibility. It's not. I mean... hypothetically dems could be out sick one day and only republicans show up for work. They have a majority and vote him in. So what. Dems still have a majority and can kick his ass out immediately for someone else when they actually choose to show up for work. You are wasting my time. I'm done with you.
    1
  186.  @TheJumpsuitJack  So when I'm commenting here it's dumb. When you do it it's fine because of hypocritical reasons. And when I tell the truth I'm being stupid but when you are straight up lying to people "Pelosi won by like 10-15 votes. And if she lost, McCarthy would be speaker. Not "nobody," it's fine. All righty then. "How old are you? And how long have you been politically engaged? Really weird lack of basic knowledge." You are suffering from dunning-kruger. Do everyone a favor and STFU.
    1
  187. I often wonder why sam has a platform or audience.
    1
  188. You: "her hateful stupidity" You not realizing your blatant hypocrisy, "She is utterly despicable."
    1
  189. "Why I left the left...because I found a profitable grift." That does sound like something seder would say behind closed doors but it's still not correct because seder was never on the "left." Sam represents the elite and always has.
    1
  190. I wish morons like you would call her out for how she uses the power she has... aka her votes. Go back to sleep. Let sam convince you that republicans are the problem when dems have literally all the power.
    1
  191. ​ @anibalhyrulesantihero7021  Yeah. That doesn't mean that so called "progressives" don't have deciding votes in must pass bills. That means they have leverage. Leverage they have squandered to get jack shit for the people that are suppose to be on their side. They were suppose to be different than the corporate dems but instead they are voting in lock step with them. They are just as full of it as the corporate dems. They played you.
    1
  192.  @anibalhyrulesantihero7021  "They don't have leverage at all." Meanwhile, in reality nancy pelosi needed their votes to be speaker. Stop listening to sam's BS. He's lying to you.
    1
  193.  @anibalhyrulesantihero7021  "corporate Democrats wouldn't be getting away with everything" Actually they are getting away with everything because the so called progressives are sellouts and frauds.
    1
  194.  @anibalhyrulesantihero7021  Sorry not sorry if the truth hurts.
    1
  195.  @anibalhyrulesantihero7021  I see you got a "fuck joe manchin" playlist. Sam might virtue signal and tell you how mad joe manchin makes him but at the end of the day when it matters most sam will tell you you should be voting for joe as long as he is the one representing your cult in a general.
    1
  196.  @anibalhyrulesantihero7021  "Progressives don't have control at all." They have control of their votes. And they use their votes to act just like the corporate dems. Actions speak louder than meaningless words. If it votes like a corporate dem it's a corporate dem.
    1
  197.  @anibalhyrulesantihero7021  "You're being truthful" You got one thing right at least.
    1
  198.  @anibalhyrulesantihero7021  "Manchin... is too powerful" So you are able to understand that a single senator has power and leverage because of his deciding vote but fail to understand that the squad has any power or leverage when pooling their deciding votes? Are you being intentionally obtuse?
    1
  199.  @anibalhyrulesantihero7021  "Progressives were against..." So how did it pass?
    1
  200.  @anibalhyrulesantihero7021  "The rest of the Democrats voted for the gutted" Fair enough. I concede they did not have deciding votes in this specific instance. Why did AOC vote for pelosi? Because that example is different.
    1
  201.  @anibalhyrulesantihero7021  So why did AOC and the squad vote for her?
    1
  202.  @anibalhyrulesantihero7021  You just showed how joe manchin had power and leverage because of his deciding votes. AOC and the sqaud had it here. What did they get for it? Manchin got the world.
    1
  203.  @anibalhyrulesantihero7021  "kevin mccarthy" He couldn't be speaker unless dems voted for him. Sam is just lying by suggesting he might have been speaker.
    1
  204.  @anibalhyrulesantihero7021  "There weren't other other Democrats to challenge Pelosi" They could have wrote my name if they needed to. Stop with the excuses. " is a coal baron millionaire," LMFAO Is that why he's powerful? And not because of his deciding votes? What is this? How about an answer to my simple and direct question... what did AOC and the squad get for their votes for nancy as speaker?
    1
  205.  @anibalhyrulesantihero7021  So what did AOC and the squad get for their deciding votes? Oh right... nothing. They sold you out.
    1
  206.  @scruffopone3989  I thought the story you sedar clowns went with is that he talks about force the vote too much? Try to keep your BS stories straight at least.
    1
  207.  @scruffopone3989  "they're not the same" LMFAO Force the vote is literally about universal healthcare. You can't be anymore intellectually dishonest if you tried.
    1
  208.  @scruffopone3989  "anti-vaxx and anti-mandate are effectively the exact same thing" I don't understand how anyone can buy your BS. It's remarkably transparent.
    1
  209. Isn't this channel here to manufacture consent for a corrupt "democratic" party? They must not be very good at their job.
    1
  210. Yeah he's the grifter... not the controlled opposition making excuses for corrupt politicians.
    1
  211.  @GR-wf2ig  "what does that have to do with him being an obvious grifter?" I'm saying you are projecting and that the only grifter is sam. Maybe you watch too much of sam and his grift. But at least I think he has done enough to keep access to AOC whereas I doubt she will be talking to jackson anytime soon. "You realize logically that they can be both be grifters, right?" Yup. But only one is and the other actually cares about the things sam should care about but doesn't,
    1
  212. "he would probably support a US coupe." LMFAO When you have to make up your smears you don't have a legit gripes.
    1
  213.  @davidowens2067  I get it. You have no intelligent argument to make whatsoever. You have ad hominem, nothing else, and talking to you is an epic waste of time.
    1
  214.  @davidowens2067  Dore has always been against war and you are just a tool spouting BS.
    1
  215. "he would probably support a US coupe." FYI that is you making shit up even if you aren't smart enough to realize it or intellectually honest enough to admit it.
    1
  216. Sam Sedar, "I'm tired." You are. You also suck.
    1
  217. Tell me again how you don't care that sam want's joe ro gan censored with your handle. It's forever funny.
    1
  218.  Culture Warrior Alert System  "BEEP BEEP BEEP" What is that even suppose to mean? Is that all you have to say about sam's support of censorship?
    1
  219.  Culture Warrior Alert System  Are you ok? Fun fact: typing in all caps is a sign of mental illness.
    1
  220.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  " we're heading to the shelter" Is that what you call your safe space where you can ignore the substantive point I'm making?
    1
  221.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  "the shelter" Hopefully they censor joe rogan there. Because I know you don't actually care about free speech.
    1
  222.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  "you think if you're not a free speech absolutist" LMFAO Is that how you want to rationalize your hypocrisy on the topic of censorship? "you've said absolutely nothing of substance" LMFAO I'm fine with you thinking this. It's funny. "bad faith" I don't rule out the possibility that this describes your hypocrisy on the topic as well. Either way it doesn't speak well of you.
    1
  223.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  "it makes you "pro censorship"" If you think that joe rogan should be censored, like sam does, then yes of course that makes you pro censorship. And nothing you can say changes that fact.
    1
  224.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  "shadow banned" Nothing you can say can defend the type of censorship sam advocates for when it comes to rogan. You are lucky if your words aren't being shown. They are doing you a favor. That said I support your right to say it. Because I, unlike you, actually support free speech.
    1
  225.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  "spotify is responsible for that" Sam thinks that spotify should censor joe. That's the fact whether you realize it or admit it.
    1
  226.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  "spotify is responsible for that" No doubt that's what youtube says to rationalize their censorship.
    1
  227.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  "spotify is responsible for that" But youtube isn't responsible for bad info? But that censorship is bad and spotify censorship is good, or at least that what's you think if you are a hypocrite.
    1
  228.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  "culture warrior alert was correct" Maybe you think youtube is correct? Maybe they should be censoring me huh?
    1
  229.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  Because you don't actually care about censorship. You clearly think that spotify should be censoring joe. That is so funny. Thank you.
    1
  230.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  "Sam is not a free speech absolutist." Sam supports censorship. And so do you.
    1
  231.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  "1 instance" That's all it takes to support censorship. You either support free speech or you don't. Sam doesn't. And clearly neither do you. Which is why your handle is so funny.
    1
  232.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  "1 instance" "So what if OJ killed people that one time. It doesn't make him a murderer." -f youtubecensorship, probably
    1
  233.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  "repeated patterns of behaviors prove larger conclusions, cherry picking data like you proves exactly the opposite of what you claim" Do you use this to try and argue that OJ isn't a mur derer? Because it's just as meaningless here.
    1
  234.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  Me: "Oj is a mur derer." ilovecensorship: "1 iNsTaNcE proves nothing!" CWAS: "BEEP DERP BEEP"
    1
  235. "They live in a bubble" LMFAO Look in the mirror. And tell me again how you don't care that sam wants to censor joe rogan with your name.
    1
  236.  @Damacles9  Dems are corrupt warmongers who would veto m4a if it made it's way to the presidents desk. If you think they are the "left" you are a dupe.
    1
  237.  Nicholas Time  "he doesn't want Rogan arrested he wants his platform taken away" Yup. He wants joe censored. He wants his corporate overlords to censor him. "wanting the market to decide" LMFAO he wants the market to censor. "I personally want Rogan lined up against a wall, denied a cigarette, and then ****" LMFAO Seek help.
    1
  238. "Once you have dehumanized a group of people, you can justify all sorts of atrocities committed against them." You mean the way sam and company dehumanize conservatives? And republicans? Even while he votes for people that belong in that party?
    1
  239. "Once you have dehumanized a group of people, you can justify all sorts of atrocities committed against them." Like one of the top comments right here, "I literally can’t wish enough bad things on Candace Owens." It proves your point. It also proves this is a place of hypocrisy.
    1
  240.  @christopherweise438  "I literally can’t wish enough bad things on Candace Owens." That's what's getting upvoted right here by sam's sycophants.
    1
  241.  @christopherweise438  I thought you should know because you claim to care about that sort of thing.
    1
  242.  @angie99656  You are missing my point and making the point of the OP but not about "christians." It describes sam and his audience, like you.
    1
  243.  @angie99656  "I genuinely hope Karma comes back to her in a huge and very unpleasant way." Very "sam" of you.
    1
  244.  @paffles6696  "doesn't make OP's comment wrong" I agree with the OP's statement. It's spot on. And I'm pointing out how sam's audience is filled with hypocrites. "pretend that both sides are the same" Both sides can be hypocrites without both sides being equal. But you will pretend that it is. "Candace Owens" I'm not a fan of owens. This isn't about her. It's about sam and his crowd who all prove with their actions that they are hypocrites. And you prove you don't care about it. You will always find a way to dismiss it no matter how silly.
    1
  245.  @CerebralPugilist  English and simple concepts aren't for everyone.
    1
  246.  @CerebralPugilist  "a question triggered you so bad" I concede that people like you, who make me feel like I'm living in the movie Idiocracy, frustrating. "I will attribute that to your acknowledgement/admission that English and simple concepts aren't for you." LMFAO Of course you would. "when asked for clarity." Forgive me for not take you seriously. Or don't. I don't care.
    1
  247.  @CerebralPugilist  Tell you what I'll take you more seriously than I should and try to explain this to you like you are a child...
    1
  248.  @CerebralPugilist  I agree with the OP. My point is that the audience here, who gives the OP a thumbs up, are the same fanboys who gave the comment, "I literally can’t wish enough bad things on Candace Owens" a thumbs up as it's also one of the top comments here. And it shows that the fanboys here are nothing but hypocrites.
    1
  249.  @CerebralPugilist  Although I'm not sure why you would understand that when it was all perfectly clear the first time I explained it.
    1
  250. ​ @CerebralPugilist  Sam has dehumanized people. That's why, "I literally can’t wish enough bad things on Candace Owens" gets all the love that it does here.
    1
  251.  @Philbert-s2c  Putin isn't the one keeping americans from having health care. He's not the one keeping american wages down. Dems have the presidency, house and senate but yeah... it's putins fault we can't have nice things claim completely disingenuous twats.
    1
  252.  @woobiefuntime  "hes the best thing" You are proving my point for me. Only a brainwashed sheep says something like this.
    1
  253.  @woobiefuntime  "What is the alternative" Don't support and enable evil like him and his ilk. They are the problem, not the solution. But that's who sam told you to vote for and the type of person he will tell you to vote for again. Have some freaking standards to get your vote FFS.
    1
  254.  @woobiefuntime  "hes not on the same level of evil as trump." 1) are you sure? More covid deaths under biden, more military spending under biden, more deportations under biden. 2) so freaking what if he is? The bottom line is that morons like you would vote for trump as long as you thought their opponent was "more evil." You are still enabling and supporting evil when you should be supporting good and willing to lose.
    1
  255.  @bomblade15  1) because candace is irrelevant to me. and 2) I haven't even watched the video. I don't really care what the latest propaganda from sam is. And I don't need to to be able to call him out.
    1
  256.  @50jakecs  "Seder uses facts when he forms an opinion" Sam would tell you to vote for donald trump if trump were representing his team in a general election. It's fact that sam has never told anyone not to vote for his team when it was time to vote.
    1
  257.  @50jakecs  In other words sam doesn't care about the facts. He has his cu lt and he sticks to it regardless of any facts.
    1
  258.  @50jakecs  Sam's is akin to candace. They both have their corrupt teams and that is all that's all that's really important to either.
    1
  259.  @thedissidentleftist6997  "watch at you repeating yourself nowaday. It's sad watching you spirals into madness." Well written. /s LMFAO
    1
  260.  @ToxicAudri  Sam's audience is clearly not too bright.
    1
  261.  @wilcee238  "You do realize that since you’re here, you’re part of the audience right?" Do you really not realize the difference between sams fans and people who are criticizing him? Of course you do. But grasp at semantics and pretend like you have a point. It's funny.
    1
  262.  @Kloutkulture  Ignorance is bliss so I understand why you think everything is so funny. I almost envy you.
    1
  263. Sam can always have the people he doesn't like censored... because he's cool with that and not really on the left.
    1
  264. "Blaming others for her failures." Not like the entire "democratic" party who blames russia for hillary clinton's loss am I right?
    1
  265.  @robingourde9366  "Blaming others for her failures" Remember when the "democratic" party blamed russia for hillary's loss? Peppridge farm remembers.
    1
  266.  @robingourde9366  The entire "democratic" party has earned the conservative card. Who blames others for it's failures. Who projects. Who are hypocrites. Who are conservatives. And sam will tell you to vote for them when it comes time. Because that's what sheep herders do.
    1
  267. "Nothing will change." That's what people like sam want... who tell you to vote blue no matter who. Who will shame you if you don't vote for the guy who promises to his big money donors that "nothing will fundamentally change." Sam is a sheep herder.
    1
  268.  @glen7228  " If I remember right, Sam Seder and TMR were not exactly rah rah Biden supporters" LMFAO Sam and his clowns absolutely told everyone to vote blue no matter who. It's what they ALWAYS do when it matters and people are voting. Sam tells you how mad trump makes him but if trump were representing the dems in a general sam would not only tell you to vote for him but he would shame you if you didn't because he'd call trump the lesser evil. It's what he ALWAYS does in general elections. "Biden over Trump was pretty much a no brainer, don't you think?" Nope. I think trump is the lesser evil... not that it matters. I don't vote for evil. Period. And neither should you.
    1
  269.  @glen7228  Not a single reply can be seen by anyone other than us. "Land of the free" am I right? Speaking of censorship sam thinks joe ro gan should be censored.
    1
  270.  @glen7228  "So you're saying it's better to not participate at all" Nope. There are always more options than two corrupt parties to pick from. I say vote for good. "How does that accomplish anything?" It more constructive than voting for people that I know are terrible. There are millions of people who voted for trump knowing he's a POS. Don't be the other side of that idiot coin. "Trump would be better for the country" There were less covid deaths under trump. There was less military spending under trump. Trump would be better when it comes to dealing with russia. Imagine that... I'd trust trump more than biden and his dementia. "Your whole argument about Sam Seder telling people to vote Blue no matter what is just BS." It's fact. If it's not you can you please point to a single election where sam didn't tell people to vote for a dem in a general... I'll wait forever because you can't. "He saying vote Blue, because it's the better choice" He will straight up tell you you are voting for corrupt POS. Does it really matter if that's "less evil." Because that's the argument he makes. He tells you that you need to vote for the lesser evil. Sorry not sorry if the truth hurts.
    1
  271.  @glen7228  "WTF are you talking about, you're all over the place." LMFAO I'm doing my absolute best to address all of your terrible points as you are making them. "Stay on point, finish one debate before starting a new one." LMFAO Is that what you think you are doing? "Do you want to discuss censorship?" I can. My point at large is that sam is terrible and that is an example of him proving it. "Tell me your feelings on Florida's "Don't say gay" laws" Are you the same guy who was saying stay on point in this very post? And now you are doing this? Is the hypocrisy intentional?
    1
  272.  @glen7228  "Stay on point." My point is that sam sucks and I've been laser focused on that. Your comprehension problems are not my fault.
    1
  273.  @stdesy  "I see your reply" Some of them... starting with the one where I called out the censorship. But that wasn't my first comment. Count how many you can see and compare that to the number that youtube tells you is there and note the difference. It's censorship.
    1
  274.  @glen7228  "I'm starting to think you're having two conversations." You are clearly continuing to think silly things. "What point of mine" What? I'm suppose to be making your points? That's not how it works. I'm making my point and telling you exactly what it is. "Nothing about that has anything to do with what we were talking about" Again... I'm talking about sam and why he's terrible. Censorship is another way to do it. Real leftists believe in free speech. Sam isn't a real leftist. He's controlled opposition meant to sheep herd you into a corrupt, warmongering, right wing, "democratic" party. "So there it is, you don't like Sam Seder." Go on you. You figured this out even after I made it perfectly clear. Bravo. "You haven't addressed a single one of my points" Your OP starts with, "Nothing will change..." as if you want things to change right? Well I'm trying to tell you why you are listening to the wrong person. Sam is doing great. He has lots of money. He doesn't care if things change. He'd prefer it if things stay the way they are because as it is he'd doing fine. "you've made some senseless statements" LMFAO I can't make you smarter than you are. They all make perfect sense and I'm even telling you why. If you can't understand that's on you. "haven't backed any of them up with any kind of explanations" LMFAO Me doing this despite your BS, "can you please point to a single election where sam didn't tell people to vote for a dem in a general... I'll wait forever because you can't." Not only have I explained myself but I've given you a way to intelligently address what I'm saying. Instead you are doing this and ignoring my point and rhetorical question. "how about we start with why you don't like Sam Seder," LMFAO I'm doing my best to tell you. How about you try to address my points the way I'm doing for yours instead? "other than you don't like him telling people to vote Blue, or is that it?" Let's say that was my only reason. Would that not be enough? FYI dems have the presidency, house and senate and things aren't changing. Don't you want things to change or not?
    1
  275. "Our law makers are all comfortable wealthy people, living comfortable wealthy lives." You are also describing sam. Who tells you to vote for his POS comfortable, wealthy lawmakers of the blue team. Good luck with sam. Good luck getting any change. You are a sheep and sam is leading you to slaughter.
    1
  276.  @glen7228  "I was asking you to make your own points," I already had. And instead of addressing them you are claiming I'm not making any. It's wasting my time. "putting things in quotation marks" I do this to tell you exactly what I'm addressing. "cryptic statement and expecting me to read your mind" LMFAO I'm being as clear as I can. Again, I can't fix your comprehension problems. "You're making a lot of assumptions about who I am and who I listen to." LMFAO You don't think it's fair of me to assume you listen to sam? While you are commenting on sams message board? I'm having a tough time taking you seriously. I legit hope you are just trolling. "My original comment had absolutely nothing to do with Sam Seder did it?" LMFAO I don't really care either way. "I don't know why you decided to jump in and act like I'm some idiot" You do keep acting like an idiot. You do have seem to have an impossible time understanding even the simplest of points. "doing as I'm told" LMFAO Actions speak louder than words. Look at your OP, "comfortable wealthy people, living comfortable wealthy lives." Do you only care about this when talking about politicians? Or maybe you should also care about this when talking about sam? Like I'm pointing out. Like I'm arguing. And just putting your fingers in your ears doesn't make that point go away. Address it or don't. But don't pretend like I'm not making an argument. "I can't see how my comment implied that," You comment implies you should care about all the things I'm pointing out about sam. I'll just figure you are a hypocrite who doesn't care about any of it. You are just virtue signaling. My mistake. I thought you cared if things changed. I thought you cared if someone was rich and it was changing their perspective. It's clear to me now you really don't. "I don't think he's a shill for the corporate Democrats" Which is why I'm trying to wake you the f up. Every election he tells you to vote for those corporate dems. Because they are less evil. Nevermind that they are evil... sam will tell you to vote for them. And you will won't you? "Just because a person is wealthy, doesn't mean they're corrupt or disingenuous." Have you talked to the person who wrote your OP? The one who said, "Our law makers are all comfortable wealthy people, living comfortable wealthy lives. Even the progressives lose touch..." What happened to that guy who seemed to care about that sort of thing? "I'm not even sure he's a Democrat." LMFAO He's been a pundit for a really long time. Whose advocated for lots of politicians. If he's not a dem then you should be able to cite at least one general election where he didn't advocate for the dem. Of course he's a dem. What is wrong with you? "vote for the person who you think will do the best job" LMFAO You both voted for joe biden right? I know sam did but so did you right? You think he's the best person for the job? The corrupt guy? Who proudly wrote the crime bill? Who voted for the Iraq war? Who would veto m4a if it made it's way to his desk? Who wants a ministry of truth? That's the guy you think would do the best job? LMFAO You CLEARLY listen to too much sam. "real leftist" Real leftist care about corruption and money in politics. We care about the enviornment and don't want fracking. We want peace and to stop giving money to the MIC. We want to defund the police so that money can be used for other priorities. I want criminal justice reform and more. The dems are obstacles to ALL of that. But if you listen to too much sam you will think you need to vote for them anyway.
    1
  277.  @glen7228  "I am interested in what you think a real leftist is." One last thing to add but it's not about being a leftist... it's about being a person. I believe in paragraphs. Learn about them and use them.
    1
  278.  @glen7228  I wrote you a novel but youtube is censoring it for others. If you can't see it so be. I'm not wasting more time of mine trying to repeat it for you. I'll just have to let the censors win that one.
    1
  279.  @glen7228  "That's a cop out. Simply answer the questions I asked without writing a novel" LMFAO Sorry not sorry a novel isn't good enough for you. "Which party has consistently voted against change and protecting big money's influence on policy makers?" LMFAO Both major parties. Obviously. "How would Trump have been a better choice than Biden?" Most importantly we wouldn't be fighting the same proxy war with russia and wouldn't be implementing sanctions that are raising the cost of fuel and crushing americans. If trump were president you would care about all the people the US is deporting. While biden does it you don't care. "Are you saying it's better to not participate rather than pick a side?" Not once. I say pick the side of good. And neither major party represents it. I say lots and lots and lots of things. Too much maybe. Address the things I actually say instead of doing this. "What do you think it is to be a real leftist?" They believe in money out of politics, giving peace a chance, protecting the environment, universal health care, and more. They support all the things that dems are obstacles to achieving much like republicans. "Those are simple questions, no need to write a book" You can't even comprehend simple answers. I'm going to say what I want to say. You are going to be triggered and confused regardless. "you have a point about posts not showing up." Just like I have a point that sam supports censorship. "Are you saying those posts are being censored?" I am. Or would you like to propose an alternative theory? I could use a good laugh.
    1
  280.  @glen7228  "Simply answer the questions" I even wasted more time on you answering your terrible questions. If you can't see them it's not my fault. But you will call it a "cop out" because you are stupid. I'm done caring and done wasting my time trying.
    1
  281.  @glen7228  "That's a cop out." I answered your questions again. It's not my fault if you can't see it. How much time do you think I should waste on you?
    1
  282.  @glen7228  "Why so hostile" Among other things I'm literally being censored. "maybe that's what's getting your posts deleted." Among the posts that can't be seen by others is yours... the one where you start off writing, "Biden has always been a moderate corporate owned Democrat..." Is that why you think this comment of yours is being censored? Or is it because they have some trigger words that's setting off the bot doing the censoring?
    1
  283.  @glen7228  "I promise you fuel prices would be right where they are now even if Trump was president, probably higher. And if you're so smart, tell me why I'm wrong." LMFAO FYI trump was already president for 4 years and we know what the fuel prices were before him. We should also know why the prices are going up. And there is good reason to think that trump wouldn't have made the same mistakes. I mean he might have. But I KNOW what biden IS doing and it's terrible.
    1
  284.  @glen7228  You: "Why so hostile" " From this little exchange of ours, I can tell you are very hard to get along with. One of those people who thinks they're the smartest person in the room." Also you: "I think you're a poser." I admit I'm condescending and mean but I'm not a hypocrite about it like you are.
    1
  285.  @glen7228  "you are obviously the only person you listen to" LMFAO I'm literally addressing YOUR words. I can only do that after I listen. But tell yourself whatever you need to tell yourself.
    1
  286.  @glen7228  "You tell yourself whatever you need to tell yourself, because you are obviously the only person you listen to." This is funny because those are the words you were using to not answer my questions and to run away.
    1
  287.  @glen7228  I went out of my to answer your question even when they were terrible. You don't even attempt to answer mine. You are a coward.
    1
  288.  @glen7228  I noticed that there is suppose to be a new reply but I can't see it and assume it was yours. Don't cop out. Type it again.
    1
  289.  @glen7228  I can't see number 33 either. It's your fault. Don't cop out.
    1
  290.  @glen7228  35 is another no show. Don't cop out.
    1
  291.  @glen7228  Have you calmed down yet? Just remember that if your message isn't showing it's your fault, according to you. Don't cop out now.
    1
  292.  @glen7228  "It took you 4 hours to come up with that?" It took you 6 hours to come up with this? LMFAO "surely you can do better." Clearly you can't do better. Clearly you are just avoiding answering simple and direct questions. It's funny. Thanks for the laugh.
    1
  293.  @glen7228  "Where'd you go?" LMFAO I've been here all alone. Are you ok? "Here I am ready to answer simple and direct questions" LMFAO What are you waiting for? This is funny because you are literally not answering any of my questions. Really, are you ok?
    1
  294.  @glen7228  "I'm not avoiding or copping out" In reality you are not answering simple and direct questions. According to you that is "copping out." "or being censored," LMFAO You absolutely are. If you want to know what comments can or cannot be seen take a look at the thread while you are signed out. You can't even figure this out. If you can't get your facts straight your opinions are rightfully ignored. "when you come up with your simple and direct questions let me know" LMFAO They were the words followed by question marks that you already have not answered.
    1
  295.  @glen7228  "or being censored" You are. If you want to know which comments of yours can be read and which are being censored you can check by looking at the thread while not signed in. If you can't get your facts straight your opinions are rightfully ignored.
    1
  296.  @glen7228  "when you come up with your simple and direct questions let me know" LMFAO Look for question marks... as if you care. I won't hold my breathe waiting for you to answer any of the questions you dodged.
    1
  297.  @glen7228  "Oh I did go look, way back when you first accused me of not answering." Did you? And you still don't know what a question is? And you still didn't answer any? Is this like you looking to see if you were being censored and getting it wrong? Like I said people who can't get the facts straight have opinions that are rightfully ignored so that's what I'm doing. I've wasted FAR too much time on you. I'm done making that mistake. You want some questions to answer try these.... were you being censored? You were. So were you demonstrating that you don't understand the world in which you exist when you said you weren't? Again... you were. So I'm going to treat you like it. Goodbye.
    1
  298.  @glen7228  "YouTube has rules" The country has rules about free speech. Youtube has censorship. Of course a fan of sam can't tell the difference. You can't get your facts straight.
    1
  299.  @glen7228  " Imagine what it would be like if they didn't moderate their content." It would be a free speech platform that would still be subject to laws such as defamation. FYI I'm not really talking to you anymore. I'm only talking at you from this point.
    1
  300. Imagine calling censorship, "moderate their content." What a boot licker you are.
    1
  301.  @glen7228  "I still think it is odd that you seemed to know what I said in my posts that you claimed you weren't seeing." Sometimes youtube sends a notification but not always. I still think it's odd how little you understand the world in which you exist, unless you are being intentionally obtuse.
    1
  302.  @glen7228  "never my job to figure out that posts were missing" Is that how you rationalize your LIE? It's your job to not lie if you want to be taken seriously.
    1
  303. Speaking of crap team and out of a job.... joe biden.
    1
  304. Sam seder is controlled opposition.
    1
  305.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  "says the guy who can;t logic his way out of a paper bag" I can't tell you how funny this is coming from you. Thanks.
    1
  306.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  Pretty please tell me again how you don't care about sam calling for censorship with your handle.
    1
  307.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  "outliers being irrelevant to valid conclusions" I've asked you this before but you ignored the point. Would this be a way to not call OJ a murderer? Because it's just as meaningless when you do it here.
    1
  308.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  "spreading covid misinformation" So do you think corporate media should be censored for their covid misinformation? Or just joe rogan? FYI your argument is the same nonsense youtube uses to try and rationalize their censorship. You are impossible to take seriously.
    1
  309.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  "Killing people" LMFAO You are misinforming people and accusing joe rogan of "killing people." If what you say is true, and it's clearly not, then charge him with murder or manslaughter. As it stands it's just misinformation being spread by you.
    1
  310.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  "Killing people" This is funny because you misinforming people and claiming that joe has killed people. If what you were saying is true, and it's obviously not, then he should be charged with a crime, not censored. And you could arguably be charged with slander. Imagine accusing joe of killing people like you are.
    1
  311.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  "the line is causing harm to people" Causing harm to people is already illegal. You only censor because you want to. "you refuse to understand that because this is a religion to you at this point" LMFAO Projection much?
    1
  312.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  "causing harm to people isn;t remotely illegal" It is. That's why when you slandered joe and said he killed people it's illegal.
    1
  313.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  "causing harm to people isn;t remotely illegal" It's why rape and murder is illegal. Or do you live in an alternate universe?
    1
  314.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  "you have a real problem with understanding scale." LMFAO What a silly "argument." "Can you provide a single compelling reason why anyone should ignore the 20 years of Sam clearly not being "pro censorship" to replace all of that information because during a pandemic he advocated that Rogan be held responsible for using his platform to cause harm?" Let's try this "argument" but change a couple words and see how it does... "Can you provide a single compelling reason why anyone should ignore the 20+ years of OJ clearly not murdering people to replace all of that information because one time he went out and killed some folk?" Do you really not understand why your argument is terrible? "Stop with the emotional lashing out and explain why 1 time trumps 20 years of evidence of the contrary." LMFAO Stop with the emotional lashing out and explain why a person advocating for censorship means they don't advocate for censorship again? It's funny. "If Lebron James has a bad game and only scores 2 points and fouls out then by your logic Lebron James is a terrible basketball player, which is absurd." LMFAO A better analogy would be to say that if lebron threw a single basketball game that would always make them guilty of it. And not amount of games where he didn't throw a game would change it.
    1
  315.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  "if your argument is covid misinformation doesn;t cause harm, that 2 is ridiculous" LMFAO Never do I say, "covid misinformation doesn't cause harm." You are a very tedious person to talk to. You would rather strawman than address the things I'm actually saying.
    1
  316.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  My comments are being censored. The irony.
    1
  317.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  "if your argument is covid misinformation doesn;t cause harm, that 2 is ridiculous" Not once do I say that. Maybe address the things I actually say.
    1
  318.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  "you're a very tedious person to talk to" This is funny when combined with a strawman argument from you.
    1
  319.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  "If Lebron James has a bad game and only scores 2 points and fouls out then by your logic Lebron James is a terrible basketball player, which is absurd." That's not my logic. I understand that people have off days. They can't control that. But they can control their actions. A more apt analogy would be to say that the black sox will forever be guilty of throwing games for one series. And deflecting to talk about all the games they didn't throw doesn't change that fact.
    1
  320.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  "by your logic" By your logic OJ isn't a murderer because it's only once. And people who bring up that one time are "cherry picking." Even you should realize on some level how silly that is.
    1
  321.  @Bickle121  I'm going to address your BS as if I take you seriously. I do not. "when asked about specific people they say “I can’t answer that” because it may involve an ongoing trial but when asked generally they say no." You are full of it. You are claiming that they can make a general statement like "no" to everyone but they can't do it for individuals? And that is suppose to make sense? "may involve an ongoing trial" What BS. If anyone knows if there were feds there it should be the freaking fed right? And despite you BS claims they absolutely HAVE NOT denied having anyone there. "increased funds," I wish I were able to fail my way into more money like this. Is there even a situation that you think calls for less cops? Because I suspect it doesn't work like that for you. But there's always a reason for more cops am I right? Maybe if they get more money then they will be able to afford more of their own to send in there. And then it can be an actual coup instead of the glorified riot/protest. As a US citizen I'm well aware of what an actual coup looks like. We do it all the time all over the place to other countries afterall. This wasn't one.
    1
  322.  @MichaelAronson  Did he? Sounds dumb. Shouldn't you be defending sam instead of deflecting to talk about jimmy?
    1
  323.  @MichaelAronson  "Why do I need to defend anyone?" Because you are only here because I'm talking about your man crush sam.
    1
  324.  @MichaelAronson  "Oh I just told you why I'm here." Actions speak louder than your meaningless words. You are only addressing me because I'm telling truths about sam you don't like. Try not to lie to yourself about it.
    1
  325. Meanwhile, in reality, dems have the presidency, house and senate but yeah... mitch is the one with all the power. /s
    1
  326. Sam seder is controlled opposition and sheep herder for the "democratic" party.
    1
  327.  @ThePanMan11  They pretend to care about things like corruption and war it's all an act meant to get you to vote for POS like Biden.
    1
  328.  @ThePanMan11  Sam will act like joe manchin and people like him make him mad but he will tell you to vote blue no matter who when it really matters.
    1
  329.  @ThePanMan11  Can you explain in your own words why you listen to controlled opposition like sam?
    1
  330.  @ThePanMan11  Can you explain in your own words what controlled opposition is? Or do you listen to too much sam and have no idea?
    1
  331.  @j0j0dartiste21  "why you should abstain from voting" I don't say this. Can you explain why you aren't addressing what I actually say?
    1
  332.  @j0j0dartiste21  "voting for the Republican" I don't say this either. Not even close.
    1
  333.  @j0j0dartiste21  "a dead end third party?" Why should you vote for good people? Who actually deserve the job? Who aren't corrupt? Who aren't terrible? Who actually represent people like me? And not the elite? Do you really not know why you should vote for good people and not for corrupt POS?
    1
  334.  @j0j0dartiste21  You listen to too much sam if you don't know the answer to your own question. It's obvious.
    1
  335.  @j0j0dartiste21  Do you really need me to explain to you why you shouldn't vote for evil?
    1
  336.  @j0j0dartiste21  Even what you think is a "lesser evil?"
    1
  337.  @j0j0dartiste21  Do I really need to explain how a "lesser" evil is still evil?
    1
  338.  @j0j0dartiste21  Do I really need to explain to you why you should vote for good?
    1
  339.  @j0j0dartiste21  You don't even attempt to deny that the dems are corrupt and warmongering.
    1
  340.  @j0j0dartiste21  If I need to explain obvious things like that it's only because you are being brain washed by too much sam.
    1
  341.  @ThePanMan11  "I don't think you know what controled opposition is..." I know that this is ad hominem and not an argument. You don't even attempt an argument while answer your terrible questions that you should already know the answer to. Go back to sleep. Go back to voting for evil. I know you will.
    1
  342.  @ThePanMan11  "I suspect this won't be a fruitful conversation" I answered your question knowing that you are insincere. You walk away because you know you got nothing.
    1
  343.  @ThePanMan11  You: "your hostile tone" Also you in the same paragraph: "incel on tinder"
    1
  344.  @ThePanMan11  Thanks for saving me from more hypocrisy from you.
    1
  345.  @MichaelAronson  "he's against the existing third parties. They're awful." This is funny because sam tells you to vote blue no matter who. Because they aren't awful am I right? Are people still buy your guys bullshit? It's remarkably transparent.
    1
  346. Sam sedar is controlled opposition.
    1
  347.  @ZERO_O7X  Is he one of the several billionaires sam gets a check from?
    1
  348.  @ZERO_O7X  Do you think that controlled opposition is just some crazy conspiracy theory that doesn't actually exist or do you merely think that your favorite clown isn't one?
    1
  349.  @Regenmacher175  "when he feels the need to criticise them." He doesn't care about them giving the state department a raise because he's a hack. He doesn't care that they waste the leverage they have because he's a hack. And you don't care that sam isn't holding them to account because you are a hack in a cult. Sam is sheepherder leading you to slaughter but you are too stupid to see or too intellectually honest enough to admit it. But at least he has maintained his access to AOC. She will keep talking to sam while she will NEVER talk to a person like jackson because jackson is willing to call her out while sam makes excuses and rationalizations for her failures. "fixation on the Squad, and AOC" Is clearly born out of the fact they are suppose to be different than the average corrupt dem. Pelosi didn't say she would be different but they did. I hold them to a different standard than people who don't pretend to be on my side yes. Of course that's how it works. If you can't understand that or comprehend that it's only because you don't care about things you should be caring about... just like sam.
    1
  350.  @Regenmacher175  "I might disagree with their votes but I know their overall intention is to fight for left-wing ideas" Their votes are inexcusable. It's easy to see if you aren't watching propaganda like this. Action speak louder than words. Even trump has said things akin to "everyone should have health care." Action speak louder than meaningless words. You are being pandered to and lied to and their ACTIONS make it clear while you and sam focus on rhetoric instead of action. George carlin knew it in a time when it was far harder to see it. "They don't give a fuck about you." It's not apathy or self defeatist to recognize the reality in which you live. It's empowering. But you would rather be deluded into thinking that people making inexcusable votes are actually on your side because you don't like what it means to admit the fact that they aren't. You are a deluded cultist as much as trump supporters are.
    1
  351.  @Regenmacher175  "defeat left-wing ideas" LMFAO You are talking about people fighting for the IDEAS of universal health care, giving peace a chance, breaking up the banks, criminal justice reform, protecting the enviornment, getting money out of politics and more. You are conflating that with POS politicians who virtue signal about those ideas before selling you out. Those PEOPLE do need to be defeated because they aren't actually fighting for the ideas they claim to support in words but demonstrate they do not in their actions.
    1
  352.  @Regenmacher175  You and your ilk would rather be mad at peasants for having the audacity to be mad about corrupt politicians' inexcusable votes instead of rightfully being mad at the politicians for their votes.
    1
  353.  @Regenmacher175  "If you're actually a left-winger" I definitely am. "think Hinkle is left-wing" He clearly is. You know how I can tell? He actually cares about it when the state department is getting a raise and so called "lefties" go along with it and get nothing for it. And so do I. Sam doesn't because he hack who cares about his cult. "your point of view does not really interest me." You are not intellectually curious about things you should... just like sam. You virtue signal to lefties like me while demonstrating you don't actually care about me or my interests. Just like sam I don't care sedar. I'm a person who used to support the dems. I gave money to AOC but now I call her a fraud and you don't care why. It's telling. "You're mad at 6 people" They are the few who actually pretended to care about the things I do before selling me out. Nancy used to pretend to care about universal health care a long time ago but she doesn't anymore. I can only get mad at people I had expectations for or mad at them for breaking their promises. AOC and the squad promised to fight for universal health care so of course they are the ones I care about when they don't. "all the other politicians" Who never pretended to be on my side. Who I've never supported. Who were never suppose to be on my team in the first place. I actually have more respect than them because they don't even pretend to be on my side while so called lefties stab me in back and their shills like sam don't care about it. "Hinkle does not make videos about right-wing corporatists or Republicans" You can go everywhere for this. You act like he thinks they are good. You act like you need to be told that they are terrible when you clearly do not but you ABSOLUTELY need to be told how AOC sucks because you don't realize it even when it's clear as day. No one here is saying republicans are good. You are just deflecting to point at them because you can't intelligently defend the people in your cult. When I talk to right wingers I don't spend my time telling them how AOC is terrible. They already know. But I will tell them trump sucks and you know what they do? They do the same stupid BS you do. They deflect to talk about the other team and how they suck as if it has jack shit to do with the flaws in their own cult. "easy scapegoat" LMFAO It's like even you understand they can't be defended on some level. Sorry not sorry if the truth hurts and you can't handle it. The facts simply are not on your side no matter how much you put your fingers in your ears to ignore it. "magically make the policies happen" LMFAO They are deciding votes in must pass bills while you pretend they have no power or leverage. Their is nothing magic about what I'm talking about. If you think it is it's only because you have been brainwashed by too much propaganda. "Getting them elected is great because their ideas become part of the mainstream discourse as opposed to fringe ideas but there's not much else you can expect" Wait... we can't expect them to live up to the ideas they claim to hold while running? We need to just take in the ass when they bend us over. Sam doesn't care. Neither do you. You are part of the problem. You and your ilk are straight up stopping me from getting things I care about. You and sam are the white moderate MLK warned everyone of.
    1
  354.  @Regenmacher175  "you CLAIM to be left-wing." Yup. I should know. Sam claims to be left wing but doesn't care when the state department gets a raise and so called progressives vote for it and get nothing for it. "You SAY he cares" Yup. I even concede I could be wrong about it. I even concede I don't care if he doesn't if his actions help me. And it works the other way too. For all I know for certain sam's heart is actually in the right place and I'm unable to figure that out because he acts like a useful idiot. At the end of the day all that matters is a persons actions and not why they do what they are. If your actions are hurting my cause I will treat you like my enemy and if you actions are helping me I'll treat you like my friend. "he came across as an insufferable wokescolder and as a performative virtue signaler" Nonsense attacks that have nothing to do with substance. Its just a string of smear words as if it's his fault he might be mad about things. Look in the mirror. How insufferable are you? You keep blaming peasants for being mad, you signal virtue but do it to protect terrible politicians. You want so scold jackson because reasons that have nothing to do with his arguments. It's pathetic and transparent. "right-wing" You are talking about the guy who cares about cops getting a raise. The left is suppose to be ones who want to defund the police. I'm pretty sure the right winger is the guy who doesn't care that they are getting extra money even after knowing what they are doing with that money and it's abhorrent. "Part of defending left-wing ideas is calling out right-winger" LMFAO We are. Right wingers want more money for the state department. Right wingers vote for nancy pelosi and get nothing for it. Nancy pelosi and the dems are right wing party. "Curious why you lot don't do that" LMFAO Curious why you don't call out people acting like right wingers. But it's fine as long as they are in your cult. Look.. you wrote a lot more but I honestly don't take you seriously enough to want to address it all intelligently. Much like sam I find you impossible to take seriously and I'm not really talking to you... I'm only really talking at you.
    1
  355.  @Regenmacher175  " Note how you didn't address Dimmy kissing Tucker's boots all day" I don't care. And not for terrible reasons like sam has but for good reasons. I want people who watch fox news to be able to hear the message that jimmy preaches of: giving peace a chance, universal health care, getting money out of politics, freeing assange, and more. This is just a mindless smear to act like he goes on to tucker to talk about right wing issues or come at anything from a right wing perspective. He talkes to people that are cultists and gives him tools to possible break free. You act as if jimmy is giving tucker a platform. It's the opposite. Tucker is giving jimmy a platform to preach the things you should care about but don't because tucker. I don't like tucker. I don't watch tucker. But if I did I would definitely need to be exposed to the ideas that jimmy brings and it's good that he brings them to them. They need to be broken out of their cultlike mindset as much as you do. Shutting people up doesn't prove them wrong. It only proves you are scared of what they have to say. Even if tucker was a tool who was wrong about literally everything so freaking what. Go there and tell them all why they are wrong. "Tucker... the Squad" Look at you. You are making excuses for me wanting to hold POLITICIANS accountable. But think I should care very deeply about holding a single pundit accountable? Like I said... I don't watch tucker. I can't defend him and don't want to defend him. I want his audience to be broken out of their cult as much as I do you. I might not take you very seriously. Or fox viewers very seriously. Or tucker very seriously. But I have no problem with anyone talking to anyone. Debate is healthy. Fun fact: nancy pelosi literally refuses to debate anyone and has for a long fucking time. If I were a partisan hack for the dems I might not care about this. But I'm not a hack. I'm a person with principles so I do. "your hero is not even willing to use that tool at his disposal or to support voting third party" I'm not sure what you are talking. I'm pretty sure it's BS. "I didn't even mention examples like Greenwald's" LMFAO What? Greenwald? When did this start having something to do with him exactly? "Maybe this is language you understand:" I think that at best you are useful idiot. At worst I think you are paid to mindlessly smear people the way you are. "those guys are right-wing sellouts" You bootlick for corrupt dems. The establishment projects it's faults 100 percent of the time and this is just another example of it. "the Office of Foreign Disaster Relief" Yeah. I've noticed this is the BS being used to act like giving a raise the to state department was like the only way to get this passed. The BS is so remarkably transparent I am left baffled how anyone takes it seriously. I mean... really. Do you want to act like if they didn't get that raise this would never have happened? You clowns are professional turd polishers. Sorry I'm not buying your BS. It's still a turd. OBVIOUSLY. "Hinkle just seems to have conflated the state department with the Pentagon" LMFAO No dude. You are making excuses for what the state department is doing with that money. Even that intellectually dishonest sam conceded that what the state department is doing is wrong. But that was after he conceded that he didn't speak out against it.
    1
  356.  @Regenmacher175  "Tucker only has Dore on..." I don't care what tuckers motives are. His audience desperately needs to hear the message dore preaches and I'm happy he's bringing it to them. "Jimmy is at best a useful idiot to the right-wing" LMFAO By talking about the issues the left is suppose to care about? By addressing things from a purely leftist persepective? And that makes sense to you? At best you are a useful idiot who only serves to divide people that should be united. "Dore does not call out Tucker on ANY of his BS." I don't watch tucker but I watch jimmy. I can remember tucker straight saying that he changed his mind and started supporting the free assange movement because of jimmy. So dore went on his show to preach a left wing message that changed tuckers mind and likely much of his audience on an INCREDIBLY important issue to people on the left and on an INCREDIBLY important issue to me. Long story short you are full of shit. "That single pundit has a lot of influence over what right-wingers in the US in general think" And jimmy got tucker to go from wanting to persecute assange to wanting him free. That's what you are crying about as if it's a bad thing. "validating him" You think tucker needs jimmy's validation? It's tucker's own audience dipshit. They need a left wing perspective... like free assange and give peace a chance and that's what jimmy brings to the program. You are painfully stupid.
    1
  357.  @Regenmacher175  "Primarying the politicians you disagree with is the only way to do that" I'm not in AOCs district. That means I'm literally incapable of holding her to account according to you. Great plan dipshit.
    1
  358.  @Regenmacher175  But maybe, just maybe she will lose her next primary if people such as myself call her out as the fraud she is.
    1
  359.  @Regenmacher175  "you're full of shit because you claim you want to hold people accountable while not using the tools necessary to hold them accountable." LMFAO You say this to me but not to sam as he makes excuses and rationalizations for her failures. "while not using the tools necessary to hold them accountable." AOC isn't in my district dipshit. I have my wallet and I have my voice and little else to hold her to account. "You want to posture" Nope. I want her to actually fight for the principles she ran on. "Sometimes it’s to get members on the record, so ppl can’t make excuses later. Sometimes these votes create real political pressure that forces developments. Sometimes we vote for the historical record - to let future generations know we did everything we could." I want the AOC who wrote that... not the sellout who betrays those words. "posture and have people tell you how virtuous and principled you are without ever doing anything" I'm going to copy and paste this again. This is AOC posturing and pretending to have virute without ever doing anything she says in her own tweet.... "Sometimes it’s to get members on the record, so ppl can’t make excuses later. Sometimes these votes create real political pressure that forces developments. Sometimes we vote for the historical record - to let future generations know we did everything we could." Those are AOCs words. But I'm the one posturing? I'm the one virtue signaling. But not her? Yeah right. You are completely full of shit.
    1
  360.  @Regenmacher175  "You want to posture and have people tell you how virtuous and principled you are without ever doing anything more than going on twitter or youtube. Sorry, that ain't going to get your preferred policies passed." Be sure to tell AOC that. As if you would. "Sometimes it’s to get members on the record, so ppl can’t make excuses later. Sometimes these votes create real political pressure that forces developments. Sometimes we vote for the historical record - to let future generations know we did everything we could." -aoc's twitter
    1
  361.  @Regenmacher175  "you're full of shit because..." You really made my case for me that AOC is full of shit.
    1
  362.  @maytalcliff9497  "Tucker had already said that Trump should pardon Assange" Did he really? I don't watch his show but is that really what happened? Because I saw the show with jimmy where he told his people that jimmy changed his mind. Why would he do that if his audience should have known that was BS even I couldn't? Why would he have to gain to lie to people about that when his fans are the ones who could know that he lying? And if tucker was lying about this then that should only hurt his credibility while you act that jimmy gives him credibility. Furthermore I thought that tucker is a pure right winger. You mean to tell me that he's further to the left than the democrats on an issue that is INCREDIBLY important to me? If that's the case are you sure tucker is the right winger (I mean he is) and not the dems (but so are they)? "outright and easily disprovable lie" LMFAO Like I said. Then disprove him. Which you aren't actually doing. You are merely claiming that he was lying. He might have been. Like I said I don't watch him. But I've also made it perfectly clear why I don't care about it and you have given nonsensical BS to try justify your hate. (well, not you but the other guy mostly). " He goes on Tucker’s show and says that having progressives in the democratic party is actually worse than not having any." So what? That's his opinion and there is nothing wrong with it. You are only triggered because you think it hurts your cult when you should be caring that cult sucks. "His anti-intervention talk" Thanks for at least admitting this... that jimmy goes there to talk anti-intervention. Jimmy rightfully trashes CNN and MSNBC but he would certainly go to those propaganda outlets too to talk if it means he can spread an anti-interventionist message. But CNN and MSNBC aren't going to have him on for that and beggars can't be choosers. I'd prefer to be on major networks even if they are garbage to tell everyone that sam, the squad, the democrats, the republicans, and the corporate media all suck. That isn't an option for me. I have to settle for what I can get so I'm telling you here instead. Now while you are here stop being an idiot.
    1
  363.  @maytalcliff9497  "Assange helped out daddy Trump" You only care about your cult. You don't care that cult is terrible. I protect journalists. I don't want them persecuted. Wow do people like you suck. "Sam happened to be a guest on Chris Hayes’ show" Yeah. Sam gets access to MSNBC because he's a fucking tool of the establishment. Jimmy would go there to even though they are POS. They aren't about to invite him because they are scared of what he has to say. "Sam was the only one pushing back against that cable news narrative" Jimmy has absolutely pushed back on that exact same narrative... "While Jimmy was..." But don't let that stop you from lying about it. This isn't like talking about tucker. I'm familiar with jimmy's work and you are full of it. "relentlessly trashing Bernie" Again... you are just straight up lying. I was a bernie supporter. I was furious that jimmy endorsed tulsi over bernie. But jimmy absolutely was not "trashing" bernie even if he had criticisms of him at the time. Your lies are straight up transparent. I watched jimmy that whole time, had my own criticisms of him, but you just lying. "Sam used his Hayes..." Hayes is a propagandist... as is tucker (note: I'm not saying they are "equally" guilty of this before you go there because you clowns always do) But I don't care if sam goes there. I'm not a hypocrite like you are. "he hasn’t been invited on cable news for ages" He instead gets access to AOC because that's who he's covering for and making excuses for these days. Do you think AOC would talk to jackson? Of course not. Jackson would hold her to account for her indefensible voting record and sam doesn't care about it. "I certainly don’t mind one bit being called an idiot" I know. That would take self awareness you do not have. "I’ll wear it as a badge of honor." The feeling is mutual when I get insulted by people in your cult.
    1
  364.  @maytalcliff9497  When all the shitlib controlled opposition is attacking you... like sam is. You know you are doing something right.
    1
  365.  @maytalcliff9497  "Sam used his Hayes" Sam just went on MSNBC to scold joe rogan... as if joe rogan is the one misinforming people and not MSNBC. What clowns you all are. Good luck with your cult.
    1
  366.  @scruffopone3989  "What Jimmy does is ask questions with prepared answers that support his worldview." Newton had the audacity to ask questions about gravity because of his "worldview." Einstein asked if space and time are linked because of his "worldview." What's the alternative? Should we be spending our time entertaining all the ideas that don't make sense to us? Is that what you do? Is that how you get to making so little sense with literally everything you say?
    1
  367.  @scruffopone3989  You are impossible to take seriously.
    1
  368. Sam Seder is controlled opposition.
    1
  369.  @MichaelAronson  Do you really not know what controlled opposition is? Or are you just being intellectually dishonest?
    1
  370.  @MichaelAronson  Sam's audience is so uninformed I wouldn't doubt you don't even know what it is.
    1
  371.  @MichaelAronson  How aren't you embarrassed by your ignorance?
    1
  372.  @MichaelAronson  I'll ask again... do you really not know what controlled opposition is?
    1
  373.  @MichaelAronson  Or maybe you are paid to play dumb just like sam is.
    1
  374.  @MichaelAronson  "Opposition to . . . what?" The "democratic" establishment. Obviously.
    1
  375.  @MichaelAronson  "Sam is the opposition to the "Democratic establishment"?" What? Sam's job is to get you to vote blue no matter who. "So he's a Republican?" LMFAO No where do I say anything even remotely close to this.
    1
  376.  @MichaelAronson  Do you really not know what controlled opposition is? Maybe learn.
    1
  377.  @MichaelAronson  "Do you not know either?" I'm sorry for not answering your question originally. I really thought you were trolling. I really didn't think you wouldn't know how something so basic and important in politics works.
    1
  378.  @MichaelAronson  "Then what is he opposition to?" He pretends he is opposed to dems when they are doing wrong. He will tell you how mad joe manchin makes him. He will pretend that he cares when joe biden does something wrong. But he doesn't. It's all pretend opposition. It's all pretend caring. At the end of the day when it really matters his job is to get you to vote blue no matter who and that's what he does.... always.
    1
  379.  @MichaelAronson  "Then what is he opposition to?" Let's say he were real opposition... he would inform his audience about topics such as controlled opposition. But you seem completely oblivious and politically illiterate. It's telling.
    1
  380.  @MichaelAronson  "one question that I keep asking you is getting you very upset" Your ignorance that almost seems willful is frustrating. I question if you are sincere and suspect you are not. Either way I like it more when the people I talk to don't make me feel like I'm living in the movie Idiocracy.
    1
  381.  @MichaelAronson  "Then what is he opposition to?" I'll repeat myself because of shadow banning...
    1
  382.  @MichaelAronson  Sam pretends that he is opposed to dems when they do wrong but it's all an act. At the end of the day when it really matters he will forever tell you to vote blue no matter who.
    1
  383.  @MichaelAronson  Third time trying to post coming up... Real leftist want free speech. Controlled opposition like sam likes censorship.
    1
  384.  @MichaelAronson  I'm not even being controversial in what I'm saying but being censored.
    1
  385.  @MichaelAronson  The real left wants free speech. Sam is cool with censorship.
    1
  386.  @MichaelAronson  The real left want free speech. Sam does not.
    1
  387.  @MichaelAronson  Sam doesn't support free speech. The real left does.
    1
  388.  @MichaelAronson  I'm done wasting my time. Good work censors.
    1
  389.  @MichaelAronson  The real left supports the first amendment. Sam does not.
    1
  390.  @MichaelAronson  "you wrote 10 more comments" I know I'm being shadow banned. If I'm going to take the time to write something I want it to be read.
    1
  391.  @MichaelAronson  "Can you answer the question yet?" LMFAO I've was trying but letting the censors win this one. You are hopeless anyway.
    1
  392.  @MichaelAronson  "he opposition to" Sam pretends to care that joe manchin and joe biden make him mad. At the end of the day he will tell you to vote for anyone representing the blue team.
    1
  393.  @MichaelAronson  "what is he opposition to" Sam pre tends that joe man chin and joe biden make him mad. But he will always tell you to vote for them because he doesn't actually oppose any of them. He supports them.
    1
  394.  @MichaelAronson  "You're not even being coherent." Your comprehension issues are not my fault.
    1
  395.  @MichaelAronson  My message finally showed. I support the first amendment and free speech. Sam does not much like youtube.
    1
  396.  @MichaelAronson  "what is he the opposition to? Where is the opposition part?" Answer: "pre tends that joe man chin and joe biden make him mad" Aka opposition
    1
  397.  @MichaelAronson  Or let me try to explain it to you another way... "opposition" sam is "opposed" to donald trump. You can tell because he spends time talking about how he's bad. "controlled" But sam would tell you to vote for donald if he were representing the dems in a general election. He will always tell you to vote for the blue team.
    1
  398.  @MichaelAronson  I can't do anymore than that to break it down to you like you are a 5 year old child. Good luck.
    1
  399.  @MichaelAronson  Sam doesn't have princ iples, it's more like a religion that he represent.
    1
  400.  @MichaelAronson  "He's never said this" He doesn't need to. Actions speak louder than his meaningless words. "Sam opposes Republicans and supports dems." Regardless of who is representing his team or how terrible they are. "You just described every single dem voter." Nope.
    1
  401.  @MichaelAronson  "You just described every single dem voter." Not all are cultists like sam is.
    1
  402.  @MichaelAronson  "you just said he doesn't oppose them" I can't make you smarter than you are. I quit.
    1
  403.  @MichaelAronson  "his actions have never supported Trump or told anyone to vote for him. You're not being coherent again." Sam has been a pundit for a long time. In all that time he's never told anyone not to vote for the dem in a general election. Stop wasting my time.
    1
  404.  @MichaelAronson  "Yes" In other words he absolutely would tell you to vote for a POS like donald trump if he was representing the blue team. Thanks for proving my point for me, not that it is necessary.
    1
  405.  @MichaelAronson  "Yes," Thanks for making my argument for me.
    1
  406.  @MichaelAronson  "You made my argument for me." LMFAO If you say so.
    1
  407.  @MichaelAronson  I've said what I wanted to say and can't make you smarter than you are. I'm not going to try. Good luck.
    1
  408. Sam and his crew are controlled opposition meant to sheep herd you into a corrupt, warmongering, "democratic," party.
    1
  409. Your comment is funny because sam clearly is as well.
    1
  410.  @rve420  Sam's fan's don't even attempt arguments.
    1
  411.  @MephilestehDarkness  "lying" LMFAO
    1
  412.  @DRChupacabrah  "One is independent" LMFAO He's blue no matter who every general election. "organically funded" He gets checks from multiple billionaires. "go look up "grifter"" They should have a picture of sam next to it.
    1
  413.  @DRChupacabrah  ""independent media"" LMFAO He's blue no matter who PROPAGANDA. "B) name one They bring him on MSNBC for a reason.
    1
  414.  @DRChupacabrah  "ok, bozo." We have all been fooled before. Don't blame the messenger.
    1
  415.  @DRChupacabrah  "ok, bozo" Rubin fans say the same thing when he's called out.
    1
  416.  @rve420  "You listen to an old man yell at clouds" LMFAO You are proving my point for me not that it's necessary. "there is no argument to be made." This is as close as you get to telling something that's true. Yes... you have no arguments to be made. If you did you would give them instead of what you are doing.
    1
  417. That's hilarious from anyone watching sam seder unironically.
    1
  418.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  You ascribes censorship as a foundation of only 1. You are not equally against them all, you thinks youtube is particularly bad and plays up outliers as the norm. You don't care about sam supporting censorship. You are a hypocrite.
    1
  419. Sam seder is controlled opposition meant to sheep herd you into a corrupt "democratic" party.
    1
  420. I guess there aren't enough billionaires giving sedar a check to make you wise up.
    1
  421.  @stevencoardvenice  I'm "anti-death penalty." You know how you can tell? I'm against the death penalty. ALWAYS. That's what being "anti" something actually means. You accusing jimmy being "anti-vax" is nonsensical. It would be just as nonsensical if you accused someone of not supporting the death penalty if they merely thought a single person should not be put to death but still wasn't against the practice in all cases... you know... like I am. I'm actually anti-death penalty. I'm the type of person you could describe that way. Not someone who merely has a critique of the death penalty but still thinks people can be put to death by the state.
    1
  422.  @stevencoardvenice  "Your attempt to defend him is nonsensical." This isn't an argument. It's ad hominem and nothing else. Ironically giving ad hominem and nothing else is nonsensical. If you actually had an argument that made sense I suspect you would give it. I think it's telling that you don't even attempt to offer one. "Are you vac cinated?" This doesn't affect you so it's none of your business.
    1
  423.  @YourLocalZombie  "McCarthey is speaker" And you know who isn't speaker... h jeffries. But that was the same type of lie sam was telling in 2020. McCarthey was never going to be speaker then and when sam told everyone he might be he was just lying.
    1
  424.  @YourLocalZombie  "My psychic powers" Most people know what I'm talking about when I refer to "force the vote." And it happened in 2020.
    1
  425.  @YourLocalZombie  "I don't understand" Sam is a liar. And he told a big lie in 2020 about force the vote because he is controlled opposition.
    1
  426.  @automanvw  No I'm saying he made a really important lie back in the day because he's controlled opposition for a corrupt party and he will always tell you to vote for the blue team no matter what because he's a partisan hack.
    1
  427.  @YourLocalZombie  "opinion" We don't get to have an opinion about how the democratic process works. Sam was just lying about it and it was to give AOC and the squad cover for failing to get anything of value for the left.
    1
  428.  @russellward4624  "Being wrong doesn't make something a lie." If you are wrong about a fact that is exactly what a lie is. Sam was lying about a fact. It's known as a lie. Just call it fake news. That's what a trump supporter would do in your position.
    1
  429.  @j0j0dartiste21  "if enough Democrats abstained from voting" But why would they do this? Oh right... they wouldn't. And even in a hypothetical where enough dems didn't show up for work one day then they could IMMEDIATELY vote on speaker when they do all show up for work and vote. "there was the chance for McCarthy to win. And for what?" McCarthy is actually speaker right now and we don't have that. "A floor vote that was bound to fail?" Real advocates for M4A want this fight even if it will fail. Controlled opposition like sam and the squad will lie about it and squander their power like they did.
    1
  430.  @j0j0dartiste21  "A floor vote that was bound to fail?" Just admit you don't want to pressure politicians. Just admit you are a clown who listens to too much sam propaganda.
    1
  431.  @YourLocalZombie  "It really seems like you have some personal dislike of Seder and co and you've decided to redefine words like lie and opinion to make them out to be liars for expressing opinions" It really seems like you are just an unserious clown with their head too far up your favorite pundits bottom if you are going to not understand the difference between fact and opinion like this. It's pretty pathetic.
    1
  432.  @YourLocalZombie  Anyone who says that a republican might be the speaker while dems have a majority is just lying. And that's what sam said. Sorry not sorry if the truth hurts.
    1
  433. That "grifter" isn't the one you will ever find on MSNBC manufactuing consent for the elite. But sam will.
    1
  434. I'm only here to downvote.
    1
  435. Sam Sedar is the type of POS that MSNBC feels comfortable putting on air. He is controlled opposition.
    1
  436. MSNBC would never allow Dore on air. He actually challenges the oligarchy's BS.
    1
  437.  @scruffopone3989  "he spends the vast majority of his time being mad about AOC or Ilhan Omar" FYI dems have all the power at the moment. That's why you should be focused on them dipshit. "whining about vaccines giving him an upset tummy." Just like a sedar sycophant to nonsensically frame authoritarian mandates in such a way.
    1
  438.  @scruffopone3989  "going after the Senate Dems that are holding everything back. I wonder. Why he doesn't do that." He literally is. AOC had real power with her vote for speaker and used it get literally NOTHING of value for progressives. "I love how Jimmy's fans are basically just small boys who can't accept any public health policy" I love how you just mindlessly handwave away what is clearly authoritarian policy. You think you can tell other people what they have to put in their bodies. You don't. But you would have made a good nazi.
    1
  439. Sam seder is controlled opposition meant to sheep herd you into a corrupt, warmongering, "democratic" party. Sam might pretend to care about the dems are bad but when it really matters he will always tell you to fall in line and vote for them regardless of how abhorrent their candidate is.
    1
  440. Sam and his crew are out trying to smear real journalists, as always.
    1
  441.  @pathofzeros  "the deep state made me do it!" That's not what I'm saying. I suspect that even you get that but are disingenuous. I'm saying that you can stop putting "deep state" in quotes like that. It's a real thing that exists. "thank you for guiding me to clarity" I'm not hopeful that you have the self awareness needed for such a thing.
    1
  442.  @pathofzeros  "this conspiracy" The deep state is not a conspiracy dipshit. It's something that actually exists.
    1
  443.  @Dos_Caffeine  "it's a conspiracy" Nope. It's a thing that actually exists. It's just a way to describe unelected people that spend decades in government shaping our lives. They are completely unaffected by whether or not democrats or republicans have power. Their jobs are unaffected by such things.
    1
  444.  @Dos_Caffeine  If you deny their existence you are just denying reality and are demonstrating you are not to be taken seriously. We can disagree about some things. Whether or not a deep state exists or doesn't is not one of those things. It clearly does.
    1
  445.  @pathofzeros  "when you're back to reality, maybe you can have actual conversation" This is funny coming from someone who wants to deny the existence of nonelected government officials who spend decades in government regardless of what party is in power. "I'm not into conspiracy" Don't kid yourself. You aren't into reality.
    1
  446. Dems have the presidency, house and senate if anyone is looking for who to blame for things.
    1
  447. "I don't know and I don't care." -sam seder
    1
  448.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  "you're the insufferable one" But sam isn't? While he's pro censorship? And you aren't? With your name? As you defend sam?
    1
  449.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  "He's not pro censorship" He literally called for joe rogan to be censored. "you're spewing talking points" I'm not giving "talking points," I'm telling the truth. Why aren't you? "spreading lies only proves you folks are doing the wrong things" LMFAO I agree that you spreading lies does not speak well of you.
    1
  450.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  Maybe check out the video titled, "sam seder calls for joe rogan to be censored on msnbc." I won't tell you what it's about. I don't want to spoil the ending.
    1
  451.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  "1 video" That's how it works. It only takes on video of sam advocating for censorship for sam to be pro censorship. "Here's how data works" Heres how data actually works... let's say you murdered someone... all the time you spent not murdering people doesn't really matter in deciding if you are a murder or not. "You folks have no critical thinking skills at all." I can't tell you how funny this is. Thanks from the bottom of my heart.
    1
  452.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  "1 video" Thanks for conceding that in that video sam was advocating for censorship.
    1
  453.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  "oe Rogan Doesn’t Realize How In Over His Head He Really Is" So people that are "in over their head" get to be censored? Just admit you are pro censorship and maybe change your name.
    1
  454.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  "he called for Rogan to be held responsible" He called for rogan to be CENSORED. LMFAO Just admit you are for censorship.
    1
  455.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  "held responsible" How did he think joe should be "held responsible?" This is rhetorical. We all know he was calling for censorship.
    1
  456.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  "no point in this since you're reporting my posts like every other bad faither" There is no point in talking to you but I'm going to expose you and sam anyway for people that aren't bad faith actors such as yourself.
    1
  457.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  Sam called for joe rogan to be censored. Don't take my word for it people... look into it yourself.
    1
  458.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  "since you're reporting my posts" What an insane thing for you to lie about.
    1
  459.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  You: "telling someone to search a video title from your pet cat show as proof of something is genuinely pathetic stuff" You two seconds without the self awareness to really your hypocrisy: ""Joe Rogan Doesn’t Realize How In Over His Head He Really Is" Watch that and stop cherry picking."
    1
  460.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  But I'm the one acting in bad faith? LMFAO Projection much?
    1
  461.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  Your handle is "f youtubecensorship" but you don't care when sam wants joe rogan censored but I'm the bad faith actor? Your BS is transparent.
    1
  462.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  You don't care about sam wanting joe rogan censored with that handle and I'm the one acting in bad faith?
    1
  463.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  Doesn't your BS need to be at least a little bit believable?
    1
  464. Sam is worse because sam is a POS that fools you.
    1
  465. It doesn't matter who represents the blue team. It could be donald trump and sam would tell you you need to vote for them. He's a cheerleader, not a journalist.
    1
  466. HRC smeared her as a russian much like sams crowd is smearing her as republican. They don't have argument.
    1
  467.  @Buckleup-x9r  That sounds like the type of gibberish you say when you don't actually have a point.
    1
  468.  @Buckleup-x9r  Are you trying to prove my point for me? It's not really necessary. But thanks anyway I guess.
    1
  469.  @Buckleup-x9r  "you obviously got and continue to be triggered." This is funny because you sound triggered. "I didn't come to your post and rant" LMFAO Are you unaware that you keep responding to me with nothing more than ad hominem? Wouldn't you like to at least attempt an argument?
    1
  470.  @Buckleup-x9r  I'm just kidding. I know you only want to rant and that you have nothing of value to say. But good luck with your mindless smears. It's clearly all you have.
    1
  471.  @Buckleup-x9r  I'll take that as a no to my invite of something other than ad hominem. You continue to prove my point that that's all you have.
    1
  472.  @Buckleup-x9r  " justifiable?" No. But I do think it was understandable considering the fact that thousands of people, many who were native russians, were being slaughtered in the donbas. It's also understandable considering NATO keeps breaking it's promises and putting countries on it's border. Lastly it's understandable because I know how much they hate nazis and ukraine had azov. I'd bet that if canada or mexico was joining a military allience hositile to the US you would think they would be "justified." Remember the cuban missle crisis?
    1
  473.  @Buckleup-x9r  A bear isn't justified to maul a human being but if a human being is poking it with a stick I'm going to understand it.
    1
  474.  @Buckleup-x9r  "articles in Reuters and NPR both interviewing Russians living in the Ukraine" And I've seen patrick lancaster interview some who thought it was. "Putin is insinuating that Zylensky is a Nazi" Nope. He is saying that zylensky is a puppet for nazis because that's a fact whether it triggers you or not. "who wants a to rebuild the old Soviet empire." Of course you do. You only listen to western propaganda. "His ambitions have seemed to backfired" LMFAO You are impossible to take seriously. "poised to gain 2 more countries" NATO was also going to provoke him because they don't want peace. They want war.
    1
  475.  @Buckleup-x9r  "Al Jazeera? They are all saying the same thing." Yeah. You are impossible to take seriously.
    1
  476. There are always other ways to cover for and make excuses for the squad think sams sycophants.
    1
  477. Not like sam. Give him all your money.
    1
  478.  @MichaelAronson  You still making excuses for sam? I hope you are paid well for it.
    1
  479.  @MichaelAronson  "confused" What about my comment has you so confused? You are impossible to take seriously.
    1
  480.  @za.307  Yeah, you're totally not an idiot. /s
    1
  481.  @it-s-a-mystery  "are you ok?" I legit have no idea what point you are trying to make. And I'm fine with it.
    1
  482.  @it-s-a-mystery  "people who don't see dore for what he is usual need help, that's all." LMFAO He's not the blackmailer. That's the person you don't seem to see for what they are. It's funny. "claim someone flashed all their co workers on one mans word" LMFAO Ana literally left a blackmail note. I don't need anyone's word when I have ana's own words and they betray her. "it's a mystery" why you don't care about it. Just kidding. I know you aren't a serious person.
    1
  483.  @it-s-a-mystery  "you're opting" You are opting ignore a literal blackmail note. I can only think it's intentional.
    1
  484.  @it-s-a-mystery  "explain" Your turn. Explain how it isn't blackmail. How that isn't something a movie villain might say to try and blackmail. Because it clearly is.
    1
  485.  @it-s-a-mystery  "Don't stop short." LMFAO I took you all the way there. Just ignoring my comment doesn't make it go away.
    1
  486.  @davidgoldstein1526  The blackmail note among other things.
    1
  487.  @za.307  "I got a problem with a middle aged man being lewd about a colleague." But absolutely no problem with a blackmailer. It's just weird.
    1
  488.  @mckenzie.latham91  "No one does that at TYT" Except ana. "it’s never been proven" She literally left a note. Just ignoring it doesn't make it go away. "blackmail is an actual crime" It is. "if Jimmy had any evidence of it he would have gone to the police" LMFAO This is funny because if ana actually had evidence that jimmy harrassed her she would have gone to the cops a long time ago. Instead she tried to blackmail him with an apology note. "he didn’t because" The hassle likely isn't worth it and he has better things to do with his time. That said he was wise to get ahead of it by releasing her blackmail note when she wrote it.
    1
  489.  @mckenzie.latham91  "blackmail is an actual crime and if Jimmy had any evidence of it he would have gone to the police" Sexual harrassment is an actual crime and if ana had any evidence of it she would have gone to the police.
    1
  490.  @mckenzie.latham91  " it’s never been proven" She literally left a note. Just ignoring it doesn't make it go away.
    1
  491. At least most of sam's audience stops short of calling her a russian asset like hillary. They "only" call her a republican. People who don't have arguments will just smear.
    1
  492. I'd rather watch corporate media propaganda than watch sams propaganda.
    1
  493.  @thedissidentleftist6997  "you blindly supports Fascism." It's so transparent and lazy. I'm dumbfounded how this type of thing works on people.
    1
  494.  @muskyoxes  " If you've attached your virtue to hating everybody, then you are a political nonentity" It makes me a realist. George carlin knew that neither party gave a fuck about the peasants. And he was able to see it in a time when it was far, far, far harder to see it. If you think one of the major parties care about you then you are in denial.
    1
  495.  @thunderpooch  "false equivalency is a right wing tactic." So george carlin was a right winger because he called out dems for being the POS that they are? That's not how it works. FYI if you are voting for the "lesser evil" you are still voting for and enabling evil.
    1
  496.  @Opheliakami  If voting really mattered they wouldn't let you do it.
    1
  497.  @Opheliakami  You go ahead and vote all you want. I don't have a problem with you doing that. I do have a problem if you want to act like it's going to change anything. It's not. It's a big club and you ain't in it. The elites don't give a fuck about you.
    1
  498.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  "you think you're above it all and it makes you better than everyone else" You think that voting for a POS like joe biden makes you better than everyone else. In actuality it only makes you a bootlicker.
    1
  499. Wait, you want to outlaw political parties? What is wrong with you?
    1
  500. Sam Seder is controlled opposition for a corrupt warmongering party.
    1
  501. If youtube did an audit how many subscribers to sam do think would be fake? It's waaaaaaayyyyy more than half. Joe biden support is more real than sams and joe bidens support is manufactured too.
    1
  502. Rogan is a pundit who has no real power. Long story short you are using the word "bootlicker" wrong.
    1
  503. An example of a correct way to use the word would be: sam sedar is a bootlicker for the democratic party.
    1
  504. Sam seder is controlled opposition meant to manufacture consent for the "democratic" party.
    1
  505.  @jmc4975  "Sam will vote for the lesser of 2 evils." Not only will sam vote for evil but he will tell everyone else they need to vote for evil also. "It's not like people think" Not only would sam vote for donald trump if he represented his team but he would tell everyone else they needed to vote for him too. He's not a journalist. He's a cheerleeder. "You can say the same thing about both sides" I do. "get a clue" This is funny coming from people enabling and supporting evil.
    1
  506. "Candice is profiting off the stupid republicans. Thats all." This is funny because sam makes all his money manufacturing consent for corrupt dems.
    1
  507.  @wvu05  Anyone who told you to vote for demented joe isn't just annoying, they aren't all there.
    1
  508.  @wvu05  "there was literally zero chance that anyone other than Biden or Trump would get elected" Because of people like you who insist on enabling and voting for evil. "If you want to live in a fantasy world where there are no consequences to your inaction" I want to live in a reality where people like you don't rationalize voting for terrible people. Millions of people voted for trump knowing he's a complete POS and voted for him anyway. You are the other side of that coin and together you all ensure the country circles the drain forever. Keep voting for evil and shaming people who don't. I know you will.
    1
  509.  @TheBayFoto  And you got someone who is arguably worse. Maybe vote for someone who doesn't suck next time and be willing to lose.
    1
  510.  @TheBayFoto  You can vote for literally anyone. And you voted for a POS.
    1
  511.  @TheBayFoto  You: "folks that want to talk" Also you: "block them by all means." It's clear you only want to talk and have no intention of listening.
    1
  512.  @imnotmike  "if you think that Biden is "arguably worse" than Trump, you have brain damage." You think? I think that if you voted for either of them then you have brain damage.
    1
  513. I'm only here to dislike and say that sam sucks.
    1
  514. If you voted for joe biden then no, you do not have standards.
    1
  515.  @YaGotdamBoi  "yikes 🤦" You are proving my point for me. FYI biden sucks not that cultists realize it.
    1
  516.  @oxman5571  That is exactly the type of substance free "argument" I'd expect from one of sam's fans.
    1
  517.  @MichaelAronson  "What does this mean in English?" This is funny because you aren't making fun of me... you are making fun of the OP.
    1
  518.  @MichaelAronson  No doubt the people who are giving your comment a thumbs up are the same people who gave the OP a thumbs up. It would prove my point even further, not that it's necessary.
    1
  519.  @MichaelAronson  "I'm very much mocking what you said, actually." You are mocking the person who actually wrote it, the OP whom I copy and pasted it from. But you aren't smart enough to realize that despite how obvious it is.
    1
  520.  @MichaelAronson  "I'm very much mocking what you said" LMFAO They weren't my words. They were copy and pasted from the OP. How can't you realize that? LMFAO
    1
  521.  @MichaelAronson  "you're upset that one of my comments got a thumbs up?" LMFAO Hardly. I love it. I'll even add one for you.
    1
  522.  @MichaelAronson  "So you admit you copied and pasted words even you don't understand?" No. But I apparently copied and pasted words that you do not understand. "What does that say about you?" LMFAO What does that say about you?
    1
  523.  @MichaelAronson  Were you always like this or is it a side-effect of watching too much sam?
    1
  524.  @MJH-kr4zg  I'm not joking about sam. But relax. It's not like I'm lying.
    1
  525.  @MJH-kr4zg  And I wasn't the one making fun of you. That was "michael."
    1
  526.  @MJH-kr4zg  Correction: I was making fun of you too.
    1
  527. I've never respected sedar. Or his sycophants.
    1
  528.  @alanparedes2034  They aren't controlled opposition hacks like sam is. They are willing to call out dems bullshit for what it is.
    1
  529.  @peterbondy  "we can simply go and find an outlet that agrees with our opinions" It really is a good thing otherwise I'd be forced to listen to the propaganda you think I should. And it's too bad I can't go out and find politicians who agree with my opinions the way I can still find pundits who legit agree with me. "Don’t even watch anything that challenges your point of view, right?" If I wanted to listen to corporatist hacks like sam I can go to all of corporate media. Do you listen to your own advice? So you advocate going to revolutionary blackout to hear what they have to say right? Or do you stay in your bubble here?
    1
  530.  @peterbondy  Sam and his crew are hacks who would tell you to vote for donald trump if he represented their cult. They are sheepherders for the "democratic" party and they are leading you to slaughter.
    1
  531.  @peterbondy  "not corporate hacks" Sam IS a corporate hack who goes on to MSNBC to act like joe rogan is the one misinforming people and not the corporate media. He does this, again, on msnbc.
    1
  532.  @bearislandthuglife3463  Are you paid for your bullshit the same way sam is paid for his?
    1
  533.  @peterbondy  "a thought experiment that proves your point" If you are intellectually honest it certainly does. If you would vote for an orange clown and call it "harm reduction" it does. " use your guess as proof?" Prove me wrong if you can (spoiler alert: you can't). Has sam every told anyone not to vote for a democrat in a general election? He hasn't because he's a hack and that's proof of it not that I suspect you would ever admit it. "You’ve lost all credibility with that silly so called thought experiment..." Let's not pretend that you were interested in anything I had to say. You are here to defend your cult and can't do it honestly. Sam cultivates some of the most intellectually dishonest people I've ever come across and I've talked to flat earthers.
    1
  534.  @peterbondy  "Discussion over for me." Just ignore the intellectual dishonesty of your fellow cultist and pretend I'm the one with no credibility. Figures.
    1
  535.  @peterbondy  "got to do with me?" It's a reflection of the intellectual dishonesty of the people in your cult. You want to criticize me but have nothing for the guy with laughable lies and wrapping it with smears? " one person’s comment?" I promise you they are not alone. I've been dealing with your cult on the regular as of late. Sams crowd are seriously some of the most intellectually dishonest people I've come across. "your credibility is nose diving by making silly comments." You listen to sam tell you to vote blue no matter who. He only pretends to care about how terrible joe manchin is. When the chips on the table and when it would matter most he would tell you to vote for that clown because he doesn't care how terrible he is he only cares about his cult. "Should I judge the quality of Revolutionary Blackout from your comments here like you are suggesting I should do with Sam’s channel?" Yup. For example I don't spread blatant lies like your fellow cultist for sam here.
    1
  536.  @peterbondy  "you limp me in with others" You are criticizing me like sams sycophants. You are not going after the blatant lies of sams fans like sams fans. You are defending sam and not in any sort of good way like sams fans. You were trying to use a thought experiment as a way to ignore what I'm saying as if you are not capable of thinking. You have yet to acknowledge the fact that sam has never told anyone not to vote for a democrat in a general election. So yeah. I'm going to lump you in with all the others with you act like all the others. And the same thing can be said of AOC while she votes in pretty much lock step with all the corporate dems and while she squanders the leverage she has to get jack shit for progressives. That's how it works for me. I'm going to judge you by your actions. "That’s not fair to me or you if I did it to you." I call out everyone. You were trying to call out me right? But not the guy with blatant lies wrapped in smears? I want to you to say why because I think it's telling and hypocritical of you to pick and choose who you call out like this. You continue to address your problems with me and have yet to say their behavior was wrong a single time even when pressed. Repeatedly. "Because some other commentor didn’t look and see the channel you recommended did cover the Israeli issue isn’t anything to do with me or Sam or anyone else." So instead of calling it a lie which it obviously was you are going to polish that turd instead? "I’m not responsible for other viewers commitment to accuracy." I asked you what you thought of it. And instead of just calling it out like you seem so wanting to do for me you polished it. That's what I'd expect someone in sams cult to do. "They all have their dodgy moments." Do you have any breaking points? Where you decide that maybe it would better to not be exposing you to blatant propaganda? If you willingly listen to partisan hacks like sam not caring that he's a hack then you probably get what you deserve. Pundits are like politicians... have some standards. Don't listen to people that prove themselves frauds. Fool me once, well the point is that you can't get fooled again. "appreciate every single journalist" What about the ones that actively work with the CIA to propagandize the people? Don't get me wrong real journalists are heros. But fake journalists who are actually controlled opposition are the worst of the worst. "bottom line is I don’t need to agree with every segment I watch" Of course. But if you listen to people that completely disingenuous you are listen to propaganda out of some sense of duty to listen to all sides or some shit then you are being a dupe.
    1
  537. Make sure to vote blue no matter who like sam tells you to.
    1
  538.  @MichaelAronson  "It worked" Do we have universal health care, a living wage, peace, money out of politics? Oh right... you are a unserious person.
    1
  539.  @MichaelAronson  "Is that what you think elections do?" If the "democratic" party actually cared about it's people it would.
    1
  540.  @ethanvilla4418  "this time in English." Maybe consider the possibility your comprehension skills are terrible.
    1
  541.  @MichaelAronson  "Is that what you think elections do?" How do you think I'm supposed to get it if not elections?
    1
  542.  @MichaelAronson  "I really have no idea." You just know that it's definitely not elections. Which is funny because that's literally the only way it's going to happen despite your asinine words.
    1
  543.  @MichaelAronson  me: "universal health care" you: "nOnSpEcIfIc." I think I've let you waste more than enough of my time already.
    1
  544.  @ethanvilla4418  "Or maybe even consider that rereading the drivel you typed might be promising because it made no sense?" LMFAO
    1
  545.  @ethanvilla4418  "MY comprehension skills, right?" Yup. Vote blue no matter who like sam tells you to. Makes perfect sense even if it includes a typo.
    1
  546.  @ethanvilla4418  "MY comprehension skills, right?" I'll explain my point to you like you are a child... it's that sam will forever tell you to vote for the blue team in a general election. He would tell you to vote for donald trump if he were representing the blue team in a general election. He is a sheepherder for a corrupt party. Good luck with that.
    1
  547.  @ethanvilla4418  "my critique of Rogan violated that nerve of yours so strongly that you start malfunctioning?" I haven't even mentioned rogan. You must be projecting and malfunctioning.
    1
  548.  @ethanvilla4418  "Nice rebuttal there, sparky? LOL. Just like I thought." They hypocritically rebutted without a shred of self awareness.
    1
  549.  @ethanvilla4418  "I CAN'T WAIT to hear exactly how the GQP was going to offer anyone universal healthcare?" I don't support republicans and never have but don't let that stop you from your nonsense.
    1
  550.  @ethanvilla4418  "I CAN'T WAIT to hear exactly how the GQP was going to offer anyone universal healthcare?" At least the GOP is honest when they tell you they don't support it.
    1
  551.  @ethanvilla4418  "FINALLY, you get it." I'm pretty sure me saying "to" instead of "too" shouldn't have stopped you from understanding my simple and obvious point that sam that, like I said, "Make sure to vote blue no matter who like sam tells you TOO*."
    1
  552.  @ethanvilla4418  "Not sure if you're saying, "people like Sam" OR "people who like Sam."" It must be unclear if you don't look at the words I used. But I specifically stated "people like sam." Stop trying to justify your idiocy.
    1
  553.  @ethanvilla4418  "typo" Actually you know what.... I got it correct the first time. LOL You just can't read.
    1
  554.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  You keep defending sam and his clowns while they support censorship. Maybe change your handle at least if you are going to boot lick for people who support censorship. Or don't. It makes me laugh really hard.
    1
  555. How does sam think joe rogan should be punished? Spoiler alert!.... Sam wants joe censored.
    1
  556.  @uncomfortabletruth5915  Have you not seen a chick with a dick? What sex are they?
    1
  557.  @jocksharerock7318  "meaningless now" The US imprisons more of it's population than the rest of the world and it's not even close. Not only that but they are predominately minorities thanks to the racist policies biden has authored. Wow. Just. Wow. People are literally in jail thanks to the POS you are defending.
    1
  558.  greatest dad  "codify Roe into law?" Yeah. "Somebody's been watching CNN" LMFAO Nope. And it's not something that CNN would talk about because it puts the blame at the dems. You are wasting my time. "Putin?" Are you ok? How desperate must you be to be talking about putin right now. You must have nothing intelligent to say. "🤣🤣" Ignorance is bliss.
    1
  559.  @jeffreywillstewart  "you can't site Sam for us having a president, Congress, etc that are also about self interest. Although democrats." What? Your message is so incoherent I'm not sure what your point is but mine is that sam will tell you to vote blue no matter who regardless of how unworthy they are. Sam would tell you to vote for donald trump if trump were representing his blue team in a general. And he'd tell you you need to also because the red team is worse.
    1
  560.  greatest dad  "you watch it." LMFAO Maybe just be quiet. You clearly have nothing intelligent to say. "That's why your saying the same thing they say on their broadcast word for word" I watch richard medhurst, revolutionary blackout, jimmy dore and others who point out how dems are failing and not codifying it into law. You are the one who watches CNN and you are an epic hypocrite about it.
    1
  561.  @kfox420  "You made no point." I did. Your lack of understanding isn't on me. "The undemocratic activist Supreme Court" Did you describe them this way when they originally enacted roe? I'm just kidding. I know it's just hypocrisy. "to change the law" No. They would be changing their ruling. The people who have the power to change law are the president, house and senate and dems have it all. "But I get it" No you don't. "you think this is a team sport or something," I know it is. And I know that that dems are counting on you to play the game and go out and vote for them while they aren't doing anything for you. They are willing to let roe get rolled back because the only thing they care about is your vote. I don't play for either team. I call out both sides. Why don't you? "you wanna talk smack about the team you don't like" LMFAO What team do you think I play for? I've been talking smack to "greatest dad" this whole time. Are you sure you don't just have your team that you are mindlessly boot licking for? "They are both shit as far as I'm concerned." They why are you going after me for calling out one of the teams for their abhorrent behavior?
    1
  562.  @kfox420  "They are both shit as far as I'm concerned." What do you think of sam seder? Who will forever tell you to vote blue no matter who?
    1
  563.  @keirfarnum6811  "They need 60 votes in the Senate" No they don't. They choose to leave the filibuster in place so that they can have excuses for their failures so that people like you can pretend it's not their fault. This is type of idiocy you get when you listen to too much sam seder.
    1
  564.  @keirfarnum6811  "We need MORE Democrats" No you don't. Dems have all the power they need to do anything they want and republicans can't stop them if they wanted. "Republicans will block everything we try to do." They can't do a damn thing if the dems didn't let them.
    1
  565.  @Thezuule1  " it isn't a fact Dems have all the power they need to codify Roe since they just tried and the Senate couldn't get 60 votes" It's a fact that dems can get rid of the filibuster. So... you are just lying.
    1
  566.  @thedissidentleftist6997  "Its because democrat party is many sects under one umbrella." LMFAO It's not because they are corrupt and would rather try and use the issue to run on? Oh wait... it is that. It is that they are bought and owned just like republicans are bought and owned. You fools are what happens when you listen to a propagandist like sam too much.
    1
  567.  @Thezuule1  "they don't have the votes to do that either!" It takes 50 votes to get rid of the filibuster. "What reality are you living in?" What reality are you living in?
    1
  568.  @Thezuule1  "they don't have the votes to do that either! What reality are you living in?" Maybe turn off propaganda like this and you won't be so terribly misinformed about the reality in which you exist.
    1
  569.  @Thezuule1  "there are only 48 Democrats" If you can't get your facts straight then your opinions are rightfully ignored. This isn't true in my reality. Good luck with yours.
    1
  570.  @thedissidentleftist6997  "you Republicans." LMFAO This is funny seeing as how I've never voted for a republican in my life and I'm old as dirt. Do you ever say anything that isn't laughably terrible?
    1
  571.  @thedissidentleftist6997  You ever think about changing your name to "bootlicker" rather than "the disident leftist?" I think you should. It would be far more apt.
    1
  572.  @thedissidentleftist6997  "It's a lame excuse as old as time" LMFAO What an apt way to describe your voting for the "lesser evil." Nevermind that it's still evil. Nevermind that you enable evil and excuse it when it's your team doing it. "Simple logic works." LMFAO How has voting for evil worked for you in the past? Is it getting it done? Or do you have a corrupt party with a demented leader? "makes republican party stronger." F the republicans. I call them out just like I call out your team. Maybe if you weren't so willing to put up with corrupt dems you might make them stronger... but you would rather spend ALL your time tearing down republicans to try and make your clowns look better by comparison. "After all I have seen republican party try literally every tactics into existence to get me to leave Democrat Party." I've had plenty of conversations like this where I call out republicans. I could imagine them saying, After all I have seen DEMOCRATS try literally every tactics into existence to get me to leave REPUBLICANS. I accept it from you as much as I do them.... I don't.
    1
  573.  @thedissidentleftist6997  "After all you have 555 comments on this channel" Do I? How many do you have? "a serious attempt to get Democrats to switch to republican party" LMFAO Nevermind the fact that if I'm talking about republicans I only call them out for being terrible. Nevermind the fact that I'm here to try and get sam's sheep to wake up before he leads them to slaughter. Nevermind that the democratic party is terrible, and corrupt, and has all the power and isn't doing a damn thing for you.
    1
  574.  @thedissidentleftist6997  What really makes you think you are a "dissident leftist?" Really? Bootlicking for corrupt dems? Go watch revolutionary blackout and you maybe learn what actual "dissident leftist" sound like.
    1
  575.  @thedissidentleftist6997  "serious attempt to get Democrats to switch to republican party" I'm trying to get people like you to switch from blue no matter know propaganda like this to people who actually want to pressure the dems do good things because we know they aren't going to do it without it. Switch to richard medhurst, jimmy dore, useful idiots, glenn greenwald, the greyzone and others. But leave sam and his blue no matter who BS behind. He'd tell you to vote for trump if trump was representing team blue.
    1
  576.  @thedissidentleftist6997  "a serious attempt to get Democrats to switch to republican party" Never do I ever say a single positive thing about republicans or their party.
    1
  577.  @thedissidentleftist6997  "to switch to republican party" I never say a single good thing about republicans or their party. So...
    1
  578.  @thedissidentleftist6997  If it seems like I'm promoting republicans to you it's only because you are boot licking for dems. I haven't said a single good thing about republicans but I have trashed them.
    1
  579.  @thedissidentleftist6997  "why are you here" Because the world would be a far better place if it had less sycophants for corrupt parties like you in the world. It's likely hopeless with people like you but others can be saved.
    1
  580.  @thedissidentleftist6997  "why are you here" Because someone needs to try and talk some sense you to and try to burst you from you bubble that is filled with nothing but establishment propaganda.
    1
  581.  @thedissidentleftist6997  And if you wonder why I often have to repeat my messages it's because of shadowbanning and censorship, the types of things that sam is all for if it helps his team.
    1
  582.  @moonlightfishin4113  "I guess evil really never prevails.🙂" Whatever point you are trying to make is completely lost on me.
    1
  583.  @moonlightfishin4113  "who would have guessed? 🙄" Who would have guessed that instead of taking this opportunity to explain whatever point you were trying to make you would do this instead? I would.
    1
  584.  @moonlightfishin4113  "who would have guessed?" What was your point? That evil prevails? That can't really be it can it? Were you wasting my time with things that literally everyone knows? Or what is your point? I'm genuinely curious how terrible it is.
    1
  585.  @thedissidentleftist6997  "obsessed with a youtuber" LMFAO Because I use a small amount of my time calling them out? Because I think they are controlled opposition? This is the type of lazy "argument" you give when you have nothing of value to say. "Jommy Dore is a true Republican" LMFAO Shouldn't your BS be at least the slightest bit believable? Then again I'm just impressed you stopped short of calling me or jimmy a russian agent.
    1
  586.  @scruffopone3989  "Do you have Attention Deficit Disorder?" Do you? I ask because you seem incredibly distracted from what I'm saying. I'm just kidding. We both know you are just deflecting.
    1
  587.  @scruffopone3989  "have to do with the Jan 6 riot?" Jack shit. What does your comment have to do with mine?
    1
  588.  @scruffopone3989  "California being far more right-wing than its reputation proceeds it" You watch all of sams bullshit. Has he bothered to call out the dems in that state? Or is he too busy being mad about joe rogans free speech on MSNBC? Who lies to everyone on the regular?
    1
  589.  @scruffopone3989  But you gotta simp for sam. Good luck with that. Hopefully he will make out with you.
    1
  590.  @scruffopone3989  "fan of Sam" Let's not act like you aren't a huge fan of sam. Both of you share the same sort of intellectual dishonesty.
    1
  591. Maybe if russell would visit him the way AOC does he would take it easy on him too.
    1
  592. Sam seder is controlled opposition and sheep herder for the "democratic" party.
    1
  593. LMFAO Last time I checked sedar was getting checks from 3 different billionaires.
    1
  594.  @Dos_Caffeine  "used to work with TYT." Sedar didn't just "used" to work with TYT. He does right now. I'm sure this bothers you very much right? I'd hate to think you are a hypocrite.
    1
  595. Has sam covered the fact that dems have killed universal health care in California? Or is he too busy smearing people using free speech?
    1
  596.  @alabamaman8885  "Forcing the vote is almost always political suicide" If forcing a vote would bad for the cause pelosi and company wouldn't be willing to fight tooth and nail to stop it. Hell, if it would actually hurt the cause they would bring it up for a vote themself. They do everything they can to not vote on it because everyone knows it obviously would be good for the cause. "It's a Republicans wet dream." So republicans are trying to bring it up for a vote because it would be bad for the cause? Oh right... they aren't.
    1
  597.  @alabamaman8885  "attack their own allies" I'm confident I have a much better idea who is actually on my side than you do.
    1
  598.  @alabamaman8885  If the party burnt to the ground so that something better might replace them that would be a bonus. But getting universal health care is really what I'm fighting for and what I really want as an actual progressive.
    1
  599.  @alabamaman8885  "Forcing the vote is bad for Democrats." If the party actually cared about winning elections it would give people health care. But their job is to maintain the status quo, not win elections. "which is your party dude" Since when? George Carlin said it best back when it far harder to see it... they don't give a f about you. At all. "take over the Democrats" I thought that was a good idea back when justice dems were being created. That was BS. I'm more in line with the thoughts of people like chris hedges and richard wolfe who see the party as dead and as only an obstacle for change. The oligarchy will only give the peasants just enough crumbs to keep them from picking up their pitchforks. And the peasants are too busy wasting their lives on their cell phones to even think about picking up a pitchfork.
    1
  600.  @alabamaman8885  "Herbert Marcuse" I've honestly never heard of him. He sounds smart thou. Maybe I should. "completely reject progressive ideology" As a progressive I want things like: universal health care, giving peace a chance, breaking up the banks, protecting the environment, criminal justice reform, money out of politics, freedom of speech, freedom to decide what goes into my body, and more. This are all widely popular ideas with the peasants. The war that matters is between the top and the bottom... not the left and the right. The elite divide us into a left and a right to get us to fight amongst ourselves. That way we don't blame the powers that be, like we should.
    1
  601.  @alabamaman8885  "get rid of the all the idpol nonsense" Are you talking about identity politics? I'm not bringing that to the table. That's just another tool the elite use to try and divide the peasants. It can't possibly be gotten rid of because there will always be disingenuous people using it to divide. I can only call them out and I already do that.
    1
  602.  @alabamaman8885  "Until progressives let it go y'all be on your own." That sounds like today. Literally none of the people I follow and listen to treat this as important. They all recognize it's just another tool the elite are using to divide the peasants into camps so that they are easier to conquer. "calling more than half the country 'racist fascists'" You are talking about corporate media pundits. They are not progressives. They are elites. Brian williams essentially did this in his going away speech recently. Jimmy dore called him out for it.
    1
  603.  @alabamaman8885  "Most progressives..." Don't paint with huge brushes like this. "I'm not disagreeing with your assessment on why this happens" Then it should be easy to know who to blame.... and it's not the peasant being propagandized and pit against you. I get that it's not easy. I get called a "commie" and crap like that. But I know that the peasants are not really my enemy even if lots of them are useful idiots for my real enemies.
    1
  604.  @falloutboy691  I can only take you less seriously if you gave your own bullshit comment a thumbs up... oh wait... you did that already. I guess I can't take you any less seriously than you are. Not only will they tell you to vote for all those POS if they are running against someone on the red team but they display the type of intellectual dishonest you do while doing it. They need to tell you the truth on occasion or you wouldn't buy their bullshit. But when it really matters they will tell you to vote for every name you listed because they are partisan hacks.
    1
  605.  @palestalemale1779  "when you say you’re pro vaccine but just don’t want to take THIS vaccine, you’re being anti vax." So you need to be willing to take all vaxs to not be anti-vax? What a joke. Fun fact: the word vaccine was recently redefined so that this "vaccine" could be called one.
    1
  606.  @ndb9248  "I would still call Jimmy Dore an "anti-vax-mandater" as opposed to an "anti-vaxxer". Would you be able to explain where I'm wrong?" Don't sweat it or expect an intelligent answer from pale. You are clearly correct.
    1
  607.  @robsreality  Understanding the world in which you exist is the first step in changing it.
    1
  608. If you have faith in a corrupt party who rigs it's primaries you might. But why would you?
    1
  609.  @monotech20.14  You don't actually think pete buttigieg won iowa do you?
    1
  610.  @aw2031zap  "Too bad Sam Seder gets paid 0.0001% as much." He gets a paycheck from 3 billionaires last time I checked. Does he give you a cut to lick his boots?
    1
  611.  @furiousapplesack  They aren't the only ones giving you corporate propaganda. "MSNBC" Sam literally works for them as a contributor. You are making my point for me.
    1
  612.  @eddymac5767  I cannot take you seriously enough to respond to any of your drivel intelligently. Why do you continue to lick the boots of a corporate propagandist?
    1
  613.  @eddymac5767  "Clit" You are the millionth person to try that joke. You must be remarkably unoriginal.
    1
  614.  @eddymac5767  "You make me laugh." You do to. Like when you, "You might want read simple words better. I asked why are you so angry at him?" pretend you are unable to understand why I wouldn't like someone I'm calling a corporate propagandist. You are stupid but even get what I'm saying. You pretend otherwise because you are not a serious person.
    1
  615.  @eddymac5767  "I fully understand what you're doing." Same. FYI calling people names isn't the same as making an argument.
    1
  616. @UCsscAKYq8q2jrl-3ABXpiNw "He's not a contributor anymore." So to be clear this was a problem when it was happening? So when did he all of a sudden stop being a sellout? Allegedly? "Clit" Why do I get the feeling that this is just another account by a person with another name in this thread? Or were you really just awed by his childish, predictable joke?
    1
  617.  @eddymac5767  "Clit" So you just want to act like you are in a sedar cult then? You do you.
    1
  618.  @furiousapplesack  "not a problem at the time" LMFAO Is that how you describe sams nuts? "furious apple sacks?" "he wasn't going on to tow a corporate line. Nor does he now" He's a party hack and always has been.
    1
  619.  @eddymac5767  "You have nothing more of substance to say so I'm in a cult." You haven't even attempted substance. Calling me clit repeatedly doesn't count.
    1
  620.  @eddymac5767  "reason he's a corporate hack" He will always tell you to vote for the blue team in a match against someone from the red team. It doesn't matter how vile the person on the blue team is. He will NEVER care. He'd tell you to vote for donald trump if trump were representing the blue team.
    1
  621.  @eddymac5767  You don't even attempt to say why what I'm saying is wrong. It's very telling.
    1
  622.  @eddymac5767  "I'm trying." No you aren't. It's more apt to say you were agreeing with me with, "I fully agree that the majority of Democrats this day on age are corporate shills."
    1
  623.  @eddymac5767  "So why will I correct you. I'm curious on who you prefer I listen to to get political information from Clit." You aren't willing to say why you think what I'm saying is wrong but you have all the time in the world to call me clit. You are not a serious person. May as well just admit that you don't care that sam is a partisan hack. It's clear you don't.
    1
  624.  @oxman5571  Sedar sycophants are remarkably similar.
    1
  625.  @oxman5571  That is funny to me because you are clearly triggered that I insulted your favorite POS propagandist.
    1
  626. @UCOz0HyLJDDLVy-iOlxmptUg "Why does one have to be "triggered" Clit for just observing something in someone else that could possibly be true?" This is funny because you think I'm triggered for calling out sam. Are you upset? Do you need a hug?
    1
  627.  @furiousapplesack  "who we should be listening to." I recommend you start with the basics and don't watch anyone with TYT in their channels.
    1
  628.  @eddymac5767  I can't make you smarter than you are. I'm sorry.
    1
  629.  @oxman5571  "loses again. I can't call him "Clit" because a clitoris gives a woman pleasure." Your stupidity is almost remarkable somehow.
    1
  630.  @furiousapplesack  "I said who should we watch," You want to act like I should have a different deity for you to worship instead of sam. That's not how it works. You need to be taught how to think. Not what to think. If someone is a partisan hack, and sam clearly is, then you should probably be getting your "news" elsewhere. This isn't "news." It's actually partisan propaganda. And that should bother you. It clearly doesn't. Start with that as if you can.
    1
  631.  @oxman5571  "Clint Holmes" I'm just impressed you didn't make a childish clit joke. You might want to edit it in.
    1
  632.  @andrewbrady6154  "Clit" I'm just looking out for the cult of sedar. You are clearly a member.
    1
  633.  @andrewbrady6154  If you take partisan hack sam sedar seriously then the feeling is mutual.
    1
  634.  @mattrogers6107  "it’s not clear, and reasserting it doesn’t make it any more clear or true." It's clear as day but if you want to claim otherwise you can do it with an example. When has sam ever told anyone to vote for someone that isn't playing for his blue team. Good luck with that. Because it's never happened because he's a partisan hack no matter how much you want to pretend otherwise.
    1
  635.  @mattrogers6107  "Maybe because when asked for ACTUAL reasoning you claim to have given some but that it must have gone over our heads?" You aren't interested in the world in which you exist. You only care about defending your clown no matter how nonsensical the things you say are. I admit this is hypothetical because trump isn't actually running in an election as a democrat but if he was I can promise you that he would be telling you to vote for him. He cares first and foremost what team a person plays for and nothing else.
    1
  636.  @mattrogers6107  " working for MSNBC doesn’t automatically make someone a propagandist" LMFAO Meanwhile, in reality, literally every person working there is one. You must agree with their propaganda to claim nonsense such as this.
    1
  637.  @TheHuxleyAgnostic  "So what if he..." Long story short you have zero examples of sam not being a partisan hack and you don't care that he is one. You are also one as well. Not that you care.
    1
  638.  @oxman5571  "hasn't even bothered to mention the subject of the video" I haven't even watched the video. I don't care what this propagandist has to say anymore than I care what FOX news is talking about. But I will call out both for being propagandists from time to time. "which suggests he just likes to make the "partisan hack" statement wherever he may roam." I don't call everyone partisan hacks. I only do it for partisan hacks like sam.
    1
  639.  @TheHuxleyAgnostic  "he's not a moron, like your grifter cult leader." LMFAO Sorry not sorry if the truth hurts and you have nothing of value or substance to intelligently claim your clown isn't a partisan hack.
    1
  640.  @TheHuxleyAgnostic  " he's not a moron" We are going to have to agree to disagree about this.
    1
  641.  @furiousapplesack  "who should we not watch." FYI some of the best political commentary I've ever heard was from george carlin. He was smart enough to realize that neither team gives a fuck about peasants in a time when it was far, far, far harder to have seen it or realized it.
    1
  642.  @oxman5571  "whine about Sam Seder rather than to make any point" LMFAO My point is that sam is a partisan hack and that you should care about it. You aren't even trying to say he isn't a hack because he is and you aren't even trying to say that being a hack is should bother people because it should. You have no points to counter my points so you spout nonsense such as, "It makes it much easier to laugh at his intellectual impotence." Ignorance is bliss. I suspect you are very happy.
    1
  643.  @TheHuxleyAgnostic  "Not partisan and not a hack, are two different things," LMFAO FYI you aren't actually making an argument of any kind. You are just asserting things and doing it nonsensically. "are two different things" Are you really claiming that someone can't be a "partisan hack" or some shit because that's two different things? Were you always this dense or is it a byproduct of watching too much sam? "it doesn't make him a hack" Sam is a hack because if a devastating scandal came out tomorrow involving trump and involving biden (or involving trumps kids versus biden's kids) he can only be trusted to tell you about one of them. And if it's about his team he can be trusted to cover for his team because that's what he cares about... his team... not truth. That's the truth whether or not you will admit it or acknowledge it. And that's why he's a hack. Sam would tell you to vote for donald trump if trump is the one representing his cult in an election. "Dore" I love how you want to deflect to make this about dore. Anything to distract and deflect from your cult leader.
    1
  644.  @TheHuxleyAgnostic  " are two different things" LMFAO You will do anything to try and deny the fact that your clown is a partisan hack. But this is boring. Forgive me for not addressing you BS in more detail... or don't. "Sam criticizes Biden, and other corporate Dems, all the time," LMFAO I'm talking about meaningful criticism, and this isn't that. He might "criticize" his team but only as he tells you to vote for them. If he won't tell you not to vote for any of these people then his "criticism" is meaningless and not what I'm looking for. Would you like to try again? He tells you to vote for biden. He will tell you to vote for manchin if manchin is on the blue team versus the red team. He's hack and no amount of your nonsense changes that fact.
    1
  645.  @TheHuxleyAgnostic  The day that manchin switches to the red team sam will stop telling you to vote for him. But until then he will forever tell you to vote for him in a matchup against the red team. He's a partisan hack.
    1
  646.  @TheHuxleyAgnostic  "Every single Republican..." We aren't talking about Republicans no matter how much you want to deflect and distract to talk about them. This is about sam and him being a partisan hack. You are just deflecting. "Sam would support someone primarying Manchin." This is irrelevant to the point I'm making and I suspect that even you know it. Sam will FOREVER tell you to vote for manchin in a general against the red team. It literally does not matter who manchin is or what he's done. Sam ONLY cares about the color of the person's jersey and that's why he's a partisan hack.
    1
  647.  @TheHuxleyAgnostic  "Do you have severe brain damage?" Just admit you don't care that he's a hack FFS. Your denial is just pathetic.
    1
  648.  @TheHuxleyAgnostic  You are in a cult. And sam is your cult leader.
    1
  649.  @TheHuxleyAgnostic  "harm reduction" I honestly don't care very much how you rationalize and excuse your supporting evil. Ultimately the "lesser evil" is still evil and you support it because you are a tool listening to a partisan hack spouting propaganda.
    1
  650.  @oxman5571  "offing himself." It's like you are trying to prove my point that you are a triggered cultist.
    1
  651.  @oxman5571  Talking to you is indistinguishable from talking to a triggered trump cultist at this point.
    1
  652.  @TheHuxleyAgnostic  "Trump cultists..." Nonsense a triggered trump cultist might say, " doesn't know what "proving a point," "triggered," or "cultist" means. He loses again, the way his father lost when he took a load of semen, feces, and blood and turned it into "Not Sherlock" Holmes." Indistinguishable.
    1
  653.  @TheHuxleyAgnostic  "Fitting, since you don't seem to know what any of those things mean." You continue to say things that are indistinguishable from trump cultists. Neither of you say anything of value.
    1
  654.  @oxman5571  "takes his losses very poorly" I'm not going to lie this is funny coming from the same person who was so triggered they were calling for me to off myself earlier.
    1
  655.  @TheHuxleyAgnostic  "Sam: Clinton sucks, but is still the better option than Trump." Yup. Sam will happily tell you to vote for a POS. He'd tell you to vote for donald trump using the same "logic" you are giving here. He'd say trump is "better" and that you should vote for him if were representing his blue team as long as there is someone on the red team to be scared of. He's a hack who would tell you to vote for trump if they were the one his team. You are a clown just like your conman.
    1
  656.  @TheHuxleyAgnostic  Never has dore EVER said that people should vote for donald trump. Telling people to vote for complete pieces of shit is what your conman does.
    1
  657.  @TheHuxleyAgnostic  I'm not sure if you are aware but dems have the presidency, senate, and house and rainbows and sunshine aren't breaking out. I think you might want to consider the possibility that they are partly to blame for why things suck and that they are not proving to be the answer. There are worse people than trump out there and we are likely to get one next election thanks in part to dipshits like you.
    1
  658.  @TheHuxleyAgnostic  ""Biden has a worse record than Donald Trump." More covid deaths under biden. More military spending under biden. More deportations under biden.
    1
  659.  @thedissidentleftist6997  Does sam pay you by your post? By the hour? Or are you a burner account for sam? I know you aren't actually a dissident leftist so what are you?
    1
  660.  @thedissidentleftist6997  "Sam never paid me." You mean you do this for free? I pity you.
    1
  661.  @thedissidentleftist6997  "After all Republican party does the same thing so why not?" I'm sure your corrupt dems think the same thing when they take their corrupt money.
    1
  662.  @thedissidentleftist6997  "After all Republican party does the same thing so why not?" This must be what your dems say when they sell out.
    1
  663.  @thedissidentleftist6997  "I don't care." Are you sure you aren't sam "i don't care" seder?
    1
  664.  @thedissidentleftist6997  But maybe change your name to something more apt like "placated leftist" or "useful idiot." I'm what an actual dissident leftist looks like.
    1
  665.  @thedissidentleftist6997  "most of us don't like Pelosi and to a lesser degree bidens" And sam will tell you to vote for them in every general election because that's what controlled opposition does.
    1
  666.  @thedissidentleftist6997  Pelosi and biden don't care if you don't like them. They have yours and sams vote. That's the only thing that's important to them and sam makes sure they get it.
    1
  667.  @thedissidentleftist6997  "don't like Pelosi and to a lesser degree bidens" Sams job it to get you to vote for people you don't even like.
    1
  668.  @thedissidentleftist6997  Sams job is to get you to vote for people you don't like joe and nancy.
    1
  669.  @thedissidentleftist6997  "we all knows what will happens when republican party gets absolute majority." Nevermind the dems who currently have it all and are using it to wage war and not helps it's people. Good luck. You need it.
    1
  670.  @thedissidentleftist6997  "you wish you can make a leftist trump worshipping party" Never said anything close to this. I'd NEVER vote for him. You and sam would.
    1
  671.  @thedissidentleftist6997  "muted" When you silence someone you don't prove them wrong, you only prove you are scared of what they have to say. You and sam deserve each other since sam is for censorship.
    1
  672.  @j0j0dartiste21  "i have never seen Sam advocate to vote for Pelosi." Sam has NEVER not told people not to vote for a dem in a general election. He's vote blue no matter who. Does sam people not even watch him?
    1
  673.  @j0j0dartiste21  "Biden was one of two choices" this is what sam's teaches but it's blatantly false. Your choice were literally INFINATE. You could write someone in. "Don't see how telling people not to vote for him will get us anywhere to close to what we want." LMFAO He's in office right now. Do you see how voting him isn't getting you what you want? Or do you just not care? And want to vote for someone you know isn't going to do good?
    1
  674.  @j0j0dartiste21  "i have never seen Sam advocate to vote for Pelosi" Sam has been a pundit for a long, long, long time. When has sam ever told anyone not to vote for a dem in a general? Oh right... NEVER. So yeah... sam is vote blue no matter who and that includes pelosi.
    1
  675.  @j0j0dartiste21  "You are complaining that people are advocating to vote for Biden to prevent Trump." And I tell people voting for trump to stop biden that they are being dumb for EXACTLY the same reasons.
    1
  676.  @j0j0dartiste21  Millions of people voted for trump knowing he sucked and was terrible and should never be POTUS. But they voted for him anyway because of biden. You are the other side of that idiot coin.
    1
  677.  @j0j0dartiste21  Biden being a POS isn't reason to vote for trump and trump being a POS doesn't mean you should vote biden. This isn't rocket science.
    1
  678.  @nickthompson1812  "Is it because it’s not right now or something? 18 months too late for you?" Yes. I'm busy caring about the people who are actually in power right now because I'm not a tool of the democrats.
    1
  679.  @nickthompson1812  "Is it because it’s not right now or something?" Is it because you don't care that dems suck? Is that why you only want to deflect and point at republicans? That's what I'm forced to think.
    1
  680.  @nickthompson1812  "I don’t know why holding them accountable is a bad thing to you." I know exactly why you and sam don't care about the people who are actually in power right now. It's pathetic.
    1
  681. I'm not going to lie sam sedar sycophants making fun of people's masculinity is hilarious. Sam is so insecure his team is likely to delete this comment.
    1
  682.  @MichaelAronson  "He hasn't pushed back on Tucker once." You must live in an alternate universe. I live in this one. The one where tucker carlson said: "I didn't use to think that and now I do because you convinced me through the force of your argument." He said that while talking about pardoning assange.
    1
  683.  @MichaelAronson  "provided an example of them agreeing," It's like you are going out of your way to intentionally miss the point that they didn't always agree. That dore used tuckers platform to move him to the correct position. You clearly don't care about the world in which you exist. You have an agenda.
    1
  684.  @MichaelAronson  "They do now" Yup. Because when you were saying, "He agrees with Tucker on everything. He hasn't pushed back on Tucker once." You were full of it and lying. "rightwing" I'm talking about freeing assange and you are acting like that's "right wing." You sedar sycophants can't be anymore intellectually dishonest if you tried. Were you always like this or did you only learn it from sam?
    1
  685.  @MichaelAronson  "Jimmy Dore is now a rightwing" I want things like: universal health care, giving peace a chance, money out of politics, criminal justice reform, to protect the enviornment, to break up the banks, freedom of speech, the right to decide what goes into my body, and more, just like jimmy. I guess I must be rIgHtWiNg tOo.
    1
  686.  @MichaelAronson  "you were saying," I told you exactly what I was talking about it wasn't that. Me telling you what I'm addressing, " "He hasn't pushed back on Tucker once." That's me telling you what I'm talking about. I can only think you are pretending to not get it. "This is still true." Your lies are transparent. They didn't always agree on if assange should be free or prosecuted. Then dore made his case on his show and tucker changed his position. Those are the facts and you lie about them because you are not an honest person. "politicians does Jimmy Dore support" I don't care what conmen jimmy chooses to support. I'm not talking about them. I'm talking about policy. I can tell you one thing thou... if someone can actually be found supporting and fighting for universal health care, (pandering does not count. Trump after all could be heard saying things like "everyone needs health care.") Jimmy would support them. If AOC actually withheld her vote for pelosi and used it to demand that m4a be brought to a vote you can damn well be sure jimmy would support them. Instead we dems have control of everything and it won't even be voted on.
    1
  687.  @MichaelAronson  "this is still correct" It's forever a lie. If jimmy never actually pushed back on tucker then tucker would still advocate that assange be persecuted. Instead he advocates that assange should be pardoned. Because of jimmy. You are a disingenuous liar and this is a waste of my time.
    1
  688.  @MichaelAronson  "This means Jimmy Dore could claim something" Jimmy claimed assange should be pardoned. "Tucker disagrees" Tucker didn't. "Jimmy doesn't push back. He has literally never pushed back." Jimmy pushed back. Tucker changed his position. And you lie about it. It's not even a good lie. It's transparent.
    1
  689.  @MichaelAronson  "Correct. You finally got it." You must be trolling me right? "so they agree on everything, like I said" All you need to do to claim this is ignore the reality in which you exist and ignore the time when they didn't agree on assange. It was before jimmy pushed back and changed tucker's mind. What a POS you must be to lie about this.
    1
  690.  @MichaelAronson  Me: this is the exact time and place when and where they didn't agree. You: "so they agree on everything, like I said." You are a joke.
    1
  691.  @MichaelAronson  You lying: "You only quoted Tucker saying they presently agree" Me actually quoting tucker: "I didn't use to think that and now I do." To be fair I'm taking tuckers word for this. I don't actually watch his show. But according to tucker jimmy has changed his mind and he would know better than you. Tucker is a liar but he is still more credible than you. "My point is that Dore never pushes back, because he doesn't." My point is that you are liar because according to tucker dore changed his mind about assange. "that would not be an example of Dore pushing back" Dore literally changed his mind about assange according to tucker. You are a joke of a person with an agenda.
    1
  692.  @MichaelAronson  "That's not an example of pushing back." I can't take you seriously enough to keep responding to your BS. You are a joke.
    1
  693.  @MichaelAronson  If you want to know what jimmy dore going on tucker actually looks like instead of lying about it I recommend the youtube video titled: "Jimmy Dore Brings Anti-War Message To Fox News!" It really shows how rightwing jimmy is as he spreads his message of giving a peace a chance on tucker.
    1
  694. ​ @MichaelAronson  "You have to actually attempt to show why your opponent is wrong." Tucker literally conceded that dore was successful in accomplishing this. And that dore's arguments won him over. You are a joke. Or let me put ask you a rhetorical question... why does tucker now think that assange should be pardoned? Because of jimmy and his arguments according to tucker. That's the fact. Another fact: you are a joke.
    1
  695.  @MichaelAronson  "It looks like two rightwingers" Rightwingers talking about peace? I guess I'm a right winger too then. You are a joke with an agenda.
    1
  696.  @MichaelAronson  "agreeing with each other." Agreeing that jounalists should be protected and not persecuted. I guess I'm a right winger too in your world where facts don't matter.
    1
  697.  @MichaelAronson  "Show me an example of Dore pushing back against Tucker." I don't watch tucker and I sure AF am not going to watch it for you. Even if I did you would find ways to ignore a smoking gun. I'm already admit I'm talking tuckers word for it and according to tucker jimmy changed his mind. "Of course you are." LFMAO Of course you say this. Only shitlibs like sam and you are on the left am I right?
    1
  698.  @MichaelAronson  "without a shred of evidence" This is true if you ignore the fact that tucker said jimmy changed his mind. But he did so there is that and it's evidence. Obviously.
    1
  699. Has sam called out any of MSNBC's many lies about covid? Nah. But he goes there to blame russel brand for misinformation instead like the puppet he is.
    1
  700. Are you uninformed? Are you angry? You should probably unsubscribe. You are worth it.
    1
  701. Sam probably thinks it's not a mistake to call for joe rogan to be censored. It's probably just "strategic hypocrisy" to him. I'm sure he never really believed in free speech.
    1
  702. Intellectual dishonest such as this seems a staple of sam's audience. I wonder if they were always like that or if they learned it from him.
    1
  703. "You aren't being shadow-banned or censored by big tech" It takes a real lack of self awareness to say this on youtubes website whose bots consistently shadow ban and censor. Sam's crowd isn't too smart.
    1
  704.  TJ B  "those of us who have functioning brains have learned how to use the copy and paste to get around "shadow bans and censorship" LMFAO This comment that you just made is being shadow banned. You and I are the only ones who can see it.
    1
  705. Seder is controlled opposition for a corrupt "democratic" party.
    1
  706. This is what sam sedar propaganda is designed to get you to think... that joe rogan is the problem and not democrats even though they have the presidency, the house and the senate.
    1
  707.  @scruffopone3989  Thanks for proving my point... not that it was necessary.
    1
  708. You mean kinda how dems acted like trump was satan and trying to mount a coup?
    1
  709. Sam seder is distracting you from the people who are actually in power. Sam is controlled opposition.
    1
  710. Sam really proves it.
    1
  711.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  Why? I already know it's true. That's why I try to waste as little time on you as possible. But I will have some fun with you.
    1
  712. Sam and his crew are controlled opposition and they are leading you to slaughter. They would tell you to vote for donald trump if he represented their cult and say it's for "harm reduction" or because he's "less evil."
    1
  713.  @scruffopone3989  Ad hominem and nothing else, how predictable from sam's sycophants. Were you always intellectually dishonest like this or did you learn the behavior from sam?
    1
  714. To think harris lost despite having the darth cheney vote. Go figure.
    1