General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
Clint Holmes
The Majority Report w/ Sam Seder
comments
Comments by "Clint Holmes" (@clintholmes2061) on "Jackson Hinckle Predicts AOC Will Bring Fascism To America" video.
Jackson cares about all the things that sam "I don't care" sedar should.
3
I'm confident he has done enough to maintain his access to AOC and I'm confident AOC will never talk to jackson because jackson will hold to her account and sam won't.
2
Holding people to account means being willing to call them out when they are selling you out. It's what sam doesn't do for the squad and his cult.
2
@monotech20.14 "didn't much matter" Momentum is important in politics. It took what was suppose to be a time to talk about bernie and made it about pete. It literally tainted every single state after it... which was literally ALL of them.
2
@monotech20.14 "didn't much matter" You straight up know they are cheaters. Long story short you just don't care about it.
2
The guy who destroyed sam in a debate.
2
Sam sedar is controlled opposition who would rather go after the people holding politicians to account than go after corrupt politicians.
2
Yeah he's the grifter... not the controlled opposition making excuses for corrupt politicians.
1
@GR-wf2ig "what does that have to do with him being an obvious grifter?" I'm saying you are projecting and that the only grifter is sam. Maybe you watch too much of sam and his grift. But at least I think he has done enough to keep access to AOC whereas I doubt she will be talking to jackson anytime soon. "You realize logically that they can be both be grifters, right?" Yup. But only one is and the other actually cares about the things sam should care about but doesn't,
1
@Regenmacher175 "when he feels the need to criticise them." He doesn't care about them giving the state department a raise because he's a hack. He doesn't care that they waste the leverage they have because he's a hack. And you don't care that sam isn't holding them to account because you are a hack in a cult. Sam is sheepherder leading you to slaughter but you are too stupid to see or too intellectually honest enough to admit it. But at least he has maintained his access to AOC. She will keep talking to sam while she will NEVER talk to a person like jackson because jackson is willing to call her out while sam makes excuses and rationalizations for her failures. "fixation on the Squad, and AOC" Is clearly born out of the fact they are suppose to be different than the average corrupt dem. Pelosi didn't say she would be different but they did. I hold them to a different standard than people who don't pretend to be on my side yes. Of course that's how it works. If you can't understand that or comprehend that it's only because you don't care about things you should be caring about... just like sam.
1
@Regenmacher175 "I might disagree with their votes but I know their overall intention is to fight for left-wing ideas" Their votes are inexcusable. It's easy to see if you aren't watching propaganda like this. Action speak louder than words. Even trump has said things akin to "everyone should have health care." Action speak louder than meaningless words. You are being pandered to and lied to and their ACTIONS make it clear while you and sam focus on rhetoric instead of action. George carlin knew it in a time when it was far harder to see it. "They don't give a fuck about you." It's not apathy or self defeatist to recognize the reality in which you live. It's empowering. But you would rather be deluded into thinking that people making inexcusable votes are actually on your side because you don't like what it means to admit the fact that they aren't. You are a deluded cultist as much as trump supporters are.
1
@Regenmacher175 "defeat left-wing ideas" LMFAO You are talking about people fighting for the IDEAS of universal health care, giving peace a chance, breaking up the banks, criminal justice reform, protecting the enviornment, getting money out of politics and more. You are conflating that with POS politicians who virtue signal about those ideas before selling you out. Those PEOPLE do need to be defeated because they aren't actually fighting for the ideas they claim to support in words but demonstrate they do not in their actions.
1
@Regenmacher175 You and your ilk would rather be mad at peasants for having the audacity to be mad about corrupt politicians' inexcusable votes instead of rightfully being mad at the politicians for their votes.
1
@Regenmacher175 "If you're actually a left-winger" I definitely am. "think Hinkle is left-wing" He clearly is. You know how I can tell? He actually cares about it when the state department is getting a raise and so called "lefties" go along with it and get nothing for it. And so do I. Sam doesn't because he hack who cares about his cult. "your point of view does not really interest me." You are not intellectually curious about things you should... just like sam. You virtue signal to lefties like me while demonstrating you don't actually care about me or my interests. Just like sam I don't care sedar. I'm a person who used to support the dems. I gave money to AOC but now I call her a fraud and you don't care why. It's telling. "You're mad at 6 people" They are the few who actually pretended to care about the things I do before selling me out. Nancy used to pretend to care about universal health care a long time ago but she doesn't anymore. I can only get mad at people I had expectations for or mad at them for breaking their promises. AOC and the squad promised to fight for universal health care so of course they are the ones I care about when they don't. "all the other politicians" Who never pretended to be on my side. Who I've never supported. Who were never suppose to be on my team in the first place. I actually have more respect than them because they don't even pretend to be on my side while so called lefties stab me in back and their shills like sam don't care about it. "Hinkle does not make videos about right-wing corporatists or Republicans" You can go everywhere for this. You act like he thinks they are good. You act like you need to be told that they are terrible when you clearly do not but you ABSOLUTELY need to be told how AOC sucks because you don't realize it even when it's clear as day. No one here is saying republicans are good. You are just deflecting to point at them because you can't intelligently defend the people in your cult. When I talk to right wingers I don't spend my time telling them how AOC is terrible. They already know. But I will tell them trump sucks and you know what they do? They do the same stupid BS you do. They deflect to talk about the other team and how they suck as if it has jack shit to do with the flaws in their own cult. "easy scapegoat" LMFAO It's like even you understand they can't be defended on some level. Sorry not sorry if the truth hurts and you can't handle it. The facts simply are not on your side no matter how much you put your fingers in your ears to ignore it. "magically make the policies happen" LMFAO They are deciding votes in must pass bills while you pretend they have no power or leverage. Their is nothing magic about what I'm talking about. If you think it is it's only because you have been brainwashed by too much propaganda. "Getting them elected is great because their ideas become part of the mainstream discourse as opposed to fringe ideas but there's not much else you can expect" Wait... we can't expect them to live up to the ideas they claim to hold while running? We need to just take in the ass when they bend us over. Sam doesn't care. Neither do you. You are part of the problem. You and your ilk are straight up stopping me from getting things I care about. You and sam are the white moderate MLK warned everyone of.
1
@Regenmacher175 "you CLAIM to be left-wing." Yup. I should know. Sam claims to be left wing but doesn't care when the state department gets a raise and so called progressives vote for it and get nothing for it. "You SAY he cares" Yup. I even concede I could be wrong about it. I even concede I don't care if he doesn't if his actions help me. And it works the other way too. For all I know for certain sam's heart is actually in the right place and I'm unable to figure that out because he acts like a useful idiot. At the end of the day all that matters is a persons actions and not why they do what they are. If your actions are hurting my cause I will treat you like my enemy and if you actions are helping me I'll treat you like my friend. "he came across as an insufferable wokescolder and as a performative virtue signaler" Nonsense attacks that have nothing to do with substance. Its just a string of smear words as if it's his fault he might be mad about things. Look in the mirror. How insufferable are you? You keep blaming peasants for being mad, you signal virtue but do it to protect terrible politicians. You want so scold jackson because reasons that have nothing to do with his arguments. It's pathetic and transparent. "right-wing" You are talking about the guy who cares about cops getting a raise. The left is suppose to be ones who want to defund the police. I'm pretty sure the right winger is the guy who doesn't care that they are getting extra money even after knowing what they are doing with that money and it's abhorrent. "Part of defending left-wing ideas is calling out right-winger" LMFAO We are. Right wingers want more money for the state department. Right wingers vote for nancy pelosi and get nothing for it. Nancy pelosi and the dems are right wing party. "Curious why you lot don't do that" LMFAO Curious why you don't call out people acting like right wingers. But it's fine as long as they are in your cult. Look.. you wrote a lot more but I honestly don't take you seriously enough to want to address it all intelligently. Much like sam I find you impossible to take seriously and I'm not really talking to you... I'm only really talking at you.
1
@Regenmacher175 " Note how you didn't address Dimmy kissing Tucker's boots all day" I don't care. And not for terrible reasons like sam has but for good reasons. I want people who watch fox news to be able to hear the message that jimmy preaches of: giving peace a chance, universal health care, getting money out of politics, freeing assange, and more. This is just a mindless smear to act like he goes on to tucker to talk about right wing issues or come at anything from a right wing perspective. He talkes to people that are cultists and gives him tools to possible break free. You act as if jimmy is giving tucker a platform. It's the opposite. Tucker is giving jimmy a platform to preach the things you should care about but don't because tucker. I don't like tucker. I don't watch tucker. But if I did I would definitely need to be exposed to the ideas that jimmy brings and it's good that he brings them to them. They need to be broken out of their cultlike mindset as much as you do. Shutting people up doesn't prove them wrong. It only proves you are scared of what they have to say. Even if tucker was a tool who was wrong about literally everything so freaking what. Go there and tell them all why they are wrong. "Tucker... the Squad" Look at you. You are making excuses for me wanting to hold POLITICIANS accountable. But think I should care very deeply about holding a single pundit accountable? Like I said... I don't watch tucker. I can't defend him and don't want to defend him. I want his audience to be broken out of their cult as much as I do you. I might not take you very seriously. Or fox viewers very seriously. Or tucker very seriously. But I have no problem with anyone talking to anyone. Debate is healthy. Fun fact: nancy pelosi literally refuses to debate anyone and has for a long fucking time. If I were a partisan hack for the dems I might not care about this. But I'm not a hack. I'm a person with principles so I do. "your hero is not even willing to use that tool at his disposal or to support voting third party" I'm not sure what you are talking. I'm pretty sure it's BS. "I didn't even mention examples like Greenwald's" LMFAO What? Greenwald? When did this start having something to do with him exactly? "Maybe this is language you understand:" I think that at best you are useful idiot. At worst I think you are paid to mindlessly smear people the way you are. "those guys are right-wing sellouts" You bootlick for corrupt dems. The establishment projects it's faults 100 percent of the time and this is just another example of it. "the Office of Foreign Disaster Relief" Yeah. I've noticed this is the BS being used to act like giving a raise the to state department was like the only way to get this passed. The BS is so remarkably transparent I am left baffled how anyone takes it seriously. I mean... really. Do you want to act like if they didn't get that raise this would never have happened? You clowns are professional turd polishers. Sorry I'm not buying your BS. It's still a turd. OBVIOUSLY. "Hinkle just seems to have conflated the state department with the Pentagon" LMFAO No dude. You are making excuses for what the state department is doing with that money. Even that intellectually dishonest sam conceded that what the state department is doing is wrong. But that was after he conceded that he didn't speak out against it.
1
@Regenmacher175 "Tucker only has Dore on..." I don't care what tuckers motives are. His audience desperately needs to hear the message dore preaches and I'm happy he's bringing it to them. "Jimmy is at best a useful idiot to the right-wing" LMFAO By talking about the issues the left is suppose to care about? By addressing things from a purely leftist persepective? And that makes sense to you? At best you are a useful idiot who only serves to divide people that should be united. "Dore does not call out Tucker on ANY of his BS." I don't watch tucker but I watch jimmy. I can remember tucker straight saying that he changed his mind and started supporting the free assange movement because of jimmy. So dore went on his show to preach a left wing message that changed tuckers mind and likely much of his audience on an INCREDIBLY important issue to people on the left and on an INCREDIBLY important issue to me. Long story short you are full of shit. "That single pundit has a lot of influence over what right-wingers in the US in general think" And jimmy got tucker to go from wanting to persecute assange to wanting him free. That's what you are crying about as if it's a bad thing. "validating him" You think tucker needs jimmy's validation? It's tucker's own audience dipshit. They need a left wing perspective... like free assange and give peace a chance and that's what jimmy brings to the program. You are painfully stupid.
1
@Regenmacher175 "Primarying the politicians you disagree with is the only way to do that" I'm not in AOCs district. That means I'm literally incapable of holding her to account according to you. Great plan dipshit.
1
@Regenmacher175 But maybe, just maybe she will lose her next primary if people such as myself call her out as the fraud she is.
1
@Regenmacher175 "you're full of shit because you claim you want to hold people accountable while not using the tools necessary to hold them accountable." LMFAO You say this to me but not to sam as he makes excuses and rationalizations for her failures. "while not using the tools necessary to hold them accountable." AOC isn't in my district dipshit. I have my wallet and I have my voice and little else to hold her to account. "You want to posture" Nope. I want her to actually fight for the principles she ran on. "Sometimes it’s to get members on the record, so ppl can’t make excuses later. Sometimes these votes create real political pressure that forces developments. Sometimes we vote for the historical record - to let future generations know we did everything we could." I want the AOC who wrote that... not the sellout who betrays those words. "posture and have people tell you how virtuous and principled you are without ever doing anything" I'm going to copy and paste this again. This is AOC posturing and pretending to have virute without ever doing anything she says in her own tweet.... "Sometimes it’s to get members on the record, so ppl can’t make excuses later. Sometimes these votes create real political pressure that forces developments. Sometimes we vote for the historical record - to let future generations know we did everything we could." Those are AOCs words. But I'm the one posturing? I'm the one virtue signaling. But not her? Yeah right. You are completely full of shit.
1
@Regenmacher175 "You want to posture and have people tell you how virtuous and principled you are without ever doing anything more than going on twitter or youtube. Sorry, that ain't going to get your preferred policies passed." Be sure to tell AOC that. As if you would. "Sometimes it’s to get members on the record, so ppl can’t make excuses later. Sometimes these votes create real political pressure that forces developments. Sometimes we vote for the historical record - to let future generations know we did everything we could." -aoc's twitter
1
@Regenmacher175 "you're full of shit because..." You really made my case for me that AOC is full of shit.
1
@maytalcliff9497 "Tucker had already said that Trump should pardon Assange" Did he really? I don't watch his show but is that really what happened? Because I saw the show with jimmy where he told his people that jimmy changed his mind. Why would he do that if his audience should have known that was BS even I couldn't? Why would he have to gain to lie to people about that when his fans are the ones who could know that he lying? And if tucker was lying about this then that should only hurt his credibility while you act that jimmy gives him credibility. Furthermore I thought that tucker is a pure right winger. You mean to tell me that he's further to the left than the democrats on an issue that is INCREDIBLY important to me? If that's the case are you sure tucker is the right winger (I mean he is) and not the dems (but so are they)? "outright and easily disprovable lie" LMFAO Like I said. Then disprove him. Which you aren't actually doing. You are merely claiming that he was lying. He might have been. Like I said I don't watch him. But I've also made it perfectly clear why I don't care about it and you have given nonsensical BS to try justify your hate. (well, not you but the other guy mostly). " He goes on Tucker’s show and says that having progressives in the democratic party is actually worse than not having any." So what? That's his opinion and there is nothing wrong with it. You are only triggered because you think it hurts your cult when you should be caring that cult sucks. "His anti-intervention talk" Thanks for at least admitting this... that jimmy goes there to talk anti-intervention. Jimmy rightfully trashes CNN and MSNBC but he would certainly go to those propaganda outlets too to talk if it means he can spread an anti-interventionist message. But CNN and MSNBC aren't going to have him on for that and beggars can't be choosers. I'd prefer to be on major networks even if they are garbage to tell everyone that sam, the squad, the democrats, the republicans, and the corporate media all suck. That isn't an option for me. I have to settle for what I can get so I'm telling you here instead. Now while you are here stop being an idiot.
1
@maytalcliff9497 "Assange helped out daddy Trump" You only care about your cult. You don't care that cult is terrible. I protect journalists. I don't want them persecuted. Wow do people like you suck. "Sam happened to be a guest on Chris Hayes’ show" Yeah. Sam gets access to MSNBC because he's a fucking tool of the establishment. Jimmy would go there to even though they are POS. They aren't about to invite him because they are scared of what he has to say. "Sam was the only one pushing back against that cable news narrative" Jimmy has absolutely pushed back on that exact same narrative... "While Jimmy was..." But don't let that stop you from lying about it. This isn't like talking about tucker. I'm familiar with jimmy's work and you are full of it. "relentlessly trashing Bernie" Again... you are just straight up lying. I was a bernie supporter. I was furious that jimmy endorsed tulsi over bernie. But jimmy absolutely was not "trashing" bernie even if he had criticisms of him at the time. Your lies are straight up transparent. I watched jimmy that whole time, had my own criticisms of him, but you just lying. "Sam used his Hayes..." Hayes is a propagandist... as is tucker (note: I'm not saying they are "equally" guilty of this before you go there because you clowns always do) But I don't care if sam goes there. I'm not a hypocrite like you are. "he hasn’t been invited on cable news for ages" He instead gets access to AOC because that's who he's covering for and making excuses for these days. Do you think AOC would talk to jackson? Of course not. Jackson would hold her to account for her indefensible voting record and sam doesn't care about it. "I certainly don’t mind one bit being called an idiot" I know. That would take self awareness you do not have. "I’ll wear it as a badge of honor." The feeling is mutual when I get insulted by people in your cult.
1
@maytalcliff9497 When all the shitlib controlled opposition is attacking you... like sam is. You know you are doing something right.
1
@maytalcliff9497 "Sam used his Hayes" Sam just went on MSNBC to scold joe rogan... as if joe rogan is the one misinforming people and not MSNBC. What clowns you all are. Good luck with your cult.
1
That "grifter" isn't the one you will ever find on MSNBC manufactuing consent for the elite. But sam will.
1
There are always other ways to cover for and make excuses for the squad think sams sycophants.
1
If you have faith in a corrupt party who rigs it's primaries you might. But why would you?
1
@monotech20.14 You don't actually think pete buttigieg won iowa do you?
1
Intellectual dishonest such as this seems a staple of sam's audience. I wonder if they were always like that or if they learned it from him.
1