Comments by "Clint Holmes" (@clintholmes2061) on "Don't Be Shamed Into Voting For Hillary" video.

  1. Clinton supporters should be careful what the ask for. If I voted for the lesser of two evils I think I might be voting for Trump. That said I will not be supporting evil anytime soon. I'd rather vote for Jill Stein and lose than vote for either Trump or Hillary and win.
    11
  2. I'm with her. Jill Stein that is!
    5
  3. Number one Nader is not responsible for Gore losing. Stop believing all the BS you hear. http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/12/6/1260721/-The-Nader-Myth Number two you are an idiot to suggest that progressives don't care about harming others. Number three there are so many other issues that make Hillary completely unacceptable other than just fracking. Number four I can make an excellent case as to why Hillary is in fact worse than Trump. I am not going to because number one I don't like defending Trump and number two I don't really care who is worse... both are completely unacceptable and neither is worthy of votes. Number five the only vote that is a wasted vote is a vote for a candidate that does not represent you, your policy positions, your priorities, and your ethics. Number six why did you stop counting at three when you tried to make more than 3 points? Is that only as high as you could count? Number seven despite your BS claim I do not only have two possible choices for president. Number eight I will not be responsible if Trump wins. If Trump wins it will be because of 1 Trump voters, 2 Hillary for sucking so bad she couldn't beat Trump, 3 the DNC for rigging the primary. Number nine nevermind, I've already wasted enough time on you already. You are lost cause who is completely brainwashed. Good luck with Hillary. If you are lucky she and DWS can rig the general for you like they rigged the primary.
    4
  4. Bernie didn't lose, he was cheated. There is a big difference.
    2
  5. First there is nothing to blame Nader about. The BS that Nader cost Gore the election is just that... BS. http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/12/6/1260721/-The-Nader-Myth Second you are an idiot to not realize Hillary would be an epic terrible candidate. I arguably think Trump would be less dangerous mostly because he would be less effective. He is all talk and wouldn't be able to get much of anything done. That said Hillary would be able to get things done and almost none of it would be any good.
    2
  6. Actions speak louder than words. I don't really care what she says because I do not trust her words at all. She would say literally ANYTHING to win. She can pander all she wants but, for example, when she says she is against the TPP I realize she is full of crap. It would be nice if she were more like Bernie but she isn't and she never is going to be.
    1
  7. Decent like Merrick Garland? He was praised by republicans right up until Obama nominated him. If dems care about SCOTUS as much as they claim they can demand Garland types and say no to Scalia types just the same way republicans are saying no right now.
    1
  8. Thanks Sarah Silverman. Sorry but you are ridiculous to think that people should just fall in line and ignore rigged elections. You are ridiculous to think I should support a candidate that does not, in any way, represent me. I'm sorry you have a problem with free speech and the right to protest. I'm sorry you think we should ignore our own feelings and vote based on someone else's endorsement. I'm a moron because I'm not voting based on another person's endorsement? Seriously thou... you are being ridiculous.
    1
  9. Sweet fear mongering. Ironic that democrats like to call republicans fear mongers. What if, hypothetically and understandably, I don't want either Trump nor Hillary to be President? What if I think there is something very wrong with the 2 party system? What if I am tired of people like you saying things like, "the race will be decided between only 2 opponents" especially when the 2 opponents you are talking about are 2 of the most despised politicians in the country? You say, "My candidate of choice would be Jill." But you don't plan to vote for her. You are the reason why "It's a sad truth..." I remember "But she does not have a real chance." being said about Sanders when he entered the race (except... ya know... they said he). And that type of self defeatist attitude didn't help him in the long run. Regarding, "A vote for Jill or any other third party candidate will be a vote Trump" Are you really so sure? If I were going to pick the lesser of two evils I think I would rather have Trump win. That said I am not about to support evil anytime soon and will be voting for Jill Stein. Regarding, "Supreme Justices." This is the democrats favorite fear mongering tool these days it seems. Other than maybe the ironic claims about war (hillary is a warmonger). But I was just wondering that, if this issue were as important as the dems claim it is... have you ever considered not confirming conservative justices? I mean, look at what the republicans are doing right now? I would think that if the issue were really so important then you would just obstruct unless republicans offered the type of terribly centrist justice republicans won't confirm. Meh. Let's be real, supreme court justices are of concern because democrats are pussies who cave on their morals... just like when they vote for such a terrible no good candidate like Hillary Clinton. Good luck with your continued efforts to fear monger thou. I'm going to go ahead an vote for the candidate I think would be the best President. If only you would do the same thing as well maybe people wouldn't get to say we only have two choices. Cheers!
    1
  10. It was Gore's fault. If Hillary loses it will be Hillary's fault. http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/12/6/1260721/-The-Nader-Myth
    1