Comments by "Clint Holmes" (@clintholmes2061) on "THIS Scares The Sh*t Out Of The Establishment (Video)" video.

It's not left versus the right... it's the elite versus the peasants. And I'm on team peasant.
214
@UniqueBreakfastTaco If it was about health they would have given them to people in africa. It's clear it was about money.
3
@kski5432 "the 1st can also be infringed" Sure enough, my original response to you is being shadowbanned. The first is already being infringed. You should focus on that.
2
@reasonwarrior "Group think is the problem" Is that why the MIC does what it does? Group think? Or are you unserious? "We are all individuals" Never do I ever say we aren't. "not peasants and elites" Yes. You are. Whether you like it or not. But that isn't even what matters. What matters is who you identify with. Who you support. You can also be a traitor to the class you are actually in.
2
@rugdnit911 "The 2a is non negotiable" It's already literally an "amendment." Do you care about the constitution or not? Because the best thing about it is that it allows itself to be changed and you fail to understand that.
1
@kski5432 "the 1st can also be infringed" It already is being infringed. There is probably only about a 90 percent chance that this comment that I'm writing won't be shadowbanned. "Would that be you thinking?" No. I wouldn't support any sort of new laws restricting the first amendment. But I understand that it is an amendment and that the consititution was not some perfect document that can't be changed. I understand that it already has been changed.... many times. Do you?
1
@psychonautpupildiallater7734 ""God given right"" You can't even prove your god exist much prove they have "rights" they have given you.
1
@psychonautpupildiallater7734 ""God given right",.. how is that negotiable?" And I honesty have no clue what you are talking about. I must have missed the commendment where "god" says thou shalt not limit your ability to own guns! Was that number 11?
1
@psychonautpupildiallater7734 "You obviously haven't read the Constitution then." You don't even attempt to say what I'm getting wrong. Maybe just be quiet.
1
@kski5432 "we go based off wording" Not about which one they put first? Even when I'm sure they put that one first and this one second for a reason? Well I'm sure you care very deeply about the part of the 2nd where it says "well regulated" at least then right? I'm just kidding. We both know you don't.
1
@kski5432 "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." You must be devastated that you are not allowed to have nukes huh? Is it unconstitutional you can't?
1
@kski5432 "The First Amendment..." Do you have a point? Or are you just wasting my time?
1
@angelald8172 " protects the first and all the rest for that matter." I'm not sure what you are waiting for. All your guns aren't doing anything to stop them from infringing on the 1 amendment and all your rights already. Seriously... what are you gun nuts waiting for?
1
@spunkinater ".the government is not your friend." Thanks captain obvious. If it makes you feel any better I want the government and the militarize police disarmed first. "Protect yourself" No amount of guns is going to do that. But good luck with that.
1
@UniqueBreakfastTaco "maybe dont act like the smart guy when you dont qualify." Sorry not sorry if facts trigger you. The constitution allows itself to be changed and I've made zero statements about how likely that is at the moment.
1
@UniqueBreakfastTaco "maybe dont act like the smart guy when you dont qualify." People like you inspired dunning and kruger to form their original hypothesis. You legit concede the only point I'm making and somehow that makes me the dumb guy?
1
@Kiyoone " it does not represent the COMMON PEOPLE INTERESTS anymore." When did that document allowing slavery represent the peasants?
1
@Damn3dYank33 "Do you realize there are more than one Constitution?" Yes. For the purpose of this conversation I'm talking about the United states constitution.
1
@UniqueBreakfastTaco "i see i was correct with my first assessment" Your deflection that was completely irrelevant to anything I was saying? Have it for all I care. I see I was correct in everything I was saying.
1
@davyboy9397 "can we agree that only allowing the police state to have weapons isn't a good idea ?" I'm the same guy who in this thread said that I want the militarized police disarmed first, assuming it's not being shadowbanned. My comments very often are. I say defund the police. I think that should answer all your questions.
1
@davyboy9397 "You really want to allow the Fed" I say abolish the FBI and abolish the CIA.
1
@reasonwarrior "people don't wakeup and unite because they assume they know what everyone is about based on their group" They unite based on vested interest. It's not in the interest of the people if the elite own everything. "All black people aren't a certain way, all white republicans aren't either." Thanks. Have I said they are? Maybe address the things I actually say. "This is what marxist want you to think" So according to you all marxist are a certain way? You are wasting my time. "Do you have any idea how much turnover there is in those categories," Very little these days, especially compared to the past where people were more easily able to move between groups. And this isn't important to me. I don't care what class you are in. I care whose interests you represent.
1
@reasonwarrior "peasants could become millionaires all the time" The founded a system where it was easy to become a millionaire as long as you exploited some slaves or someone else. Because that's what capitalism does.
1
@reasonwarrior "I think it's much more meaningful to just categories people by good and evil" Good people don't become billionaires. "For every great fortune there is a great crime." -some smart guy stating the obvious
1
@reasonwarrior "Appears useless to argue" It's not my fault everything you say is terrible for one reason or another. "a simplistic view of a complex problem." Just calling income inequality a "complex problem" doesn't make it true. In a complex world some things are "simple." For example if the exxon CEO loves the "inflation" bill that really is all you need to know about it... it's terrible. "Keep talking about those darn elites though, as if you know what that means." I'm confident I know what simple words mean even if you don't.
1
@Sunflower-ug3eh I wish that were true but as malcomn X has said, "If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing," and some people are "not careful."
1
@squanchy7643 "Upward mobility is important." Sure. "Don’t hate people just because they’ve worked hard to make their lives better." I don't. I hate you if you side with the elite. You don't have side with the class you are in. You can choose to be class traitor. "Are we enemies because I made choices in life that ultimately lead to increased prosperity?" Nope. But we are enemies if you got to where you are by stepping on other people. Was your prosperity created by someone whose live isn't better? That's when we have a problem. "I think we all can agree that dark money and corporate backing of politicians is problematic." So are you using your new wealth to buy the system? Because if you are calling this out and trying to stop it we can always be friends on this topic if not anything else.
1
@squanchy7643 "I don’t think you should hate someone because you’re envious of them." I'm an "anti-capitalist" and you conflating that with "hating capitalists.
1
@squanchy7643 I don't care how much money you have. I care which team you are on.
1
@Woeisme2 "Your fellow republicans" I'm an not a republican and never have been. Which makes "Actually talk to each other before assuming," really funny in a you are an idiot kinda way.
1
@Woeisme2 "democrat bad" Also, democrats are bad, just like republicans. Clown.
1