Comments by "Clint Holmes" (@clintholmes2061) on "The Hill" channel.

  1.  @Trambo1997  I could only take you less seriously if you gave your own idiotic comment a thumbs up. Oh wait. You did that already. I guess I can't take you any less seriously than I do.
    1
  2.  @YourMom-cu8yt  I could only take you less seriously if you also gave your own comments a thumbs up and your name is "your mom." Oh wait...
    1
  3.  @samhhaincat2703  Not all mistakes are created equal. In other words it depends.
    1
  4. LMFAO
    1
  5.  @whipstitchwebwork1383  Spoiler alert! No. He shouldn't. Obviously.
    1
  6. Regarding, "I disagree Biden lost miserably." You should check yourself for cognitive decline and political hackery immediately, as should biden.
    1
  7. "She's nothing but a keyboard twitter warrior" LMFAO. Look in the mirror hypocrite.
    1
  8. This didn't mean trump was a good person anymore than it means yang is.
    1
  9.  @shakacien  Regarding, "Who said "tHe oNlY OneS"" I didn't say you said the only ones like it's worth putting in quotes. You just make it seem like only one team is doing it because you are also advocating for voting for people who are also clearly cheating. As for the rest of your nonsense I'm forgive me for not addressing it intelligently or don't. I don't' care.
    1
  10. I vote for people... not parties. But yeah... if I vote for a person and they do terrible things I would share some responsibility for that.
    1
  11.  @LARPANON  To be fair biden not make it 4 years.
    1
  12. Please sign the petition. Force the vote!
    1
  13.  @storage-space4927  "we live in the United States" You have offered literally nothing of value to the conversation. But thanks captain obvious.
    1
  14.  @storage-space4927  "focus more on..." Maybe just admit you don't care about RFK's abhorrent position. That would be far more honest than what you are doing.
    1
  15.  @storage-space4927  You are making excuses for the inexcusable. Do you always do that? Or just for RFK?
    1
  16.  @storage-space4927  Are you for real? Instead of caring about RFK's inexcusable position when it comes to israel/palestine you want people for "focus more on..." because you know his position is terrible. And if he wasn't terrible on that position I doubt you would have any problem "focusing on it." But instead you are here... making excuses for inexcusable and wasting my time.
    1
  17.  @storage-space4927  If RFK is willing to sell out the palestinians why don't you think he'd do it to you?
    1
  18.  @storage-space4927  You never bothered to answer my simple and direct question... if RFK will sell out the palestinians what makes you think he won't do it to you?
    1
  19.  @storage-space4927  "Not our problem" Does RFK think that? Or does he want to continue to give US wealth to israel? I'm just kidding... you don't care or at least pretend to not care because RFK is on the wrong side of history.
    1
  20.  @storage-space4927  Cool nonanswer. Thanks for wasting my time.
    1
  21.  @storage-space4927  Is that what you tell yourself instead of answering a simple and direct question? Maybe just be quiet instead.
    1
  22.  @storage-space4927  "I answered..." No. You didn't. And now you are lying about. I'll repeat it a third time... if RFK will sell out the palestinians why don't you think he would do it to you? It's rhetorical at this point. I'm done addressing you and done caring what you have to say. If you were trying to prove you were wasting my time you have succeeded. Goodbye.
    1
  23. Yang worked for CNN. And corporate media hated trump. Does that mean you should support the orange clown? Your thinking is flawed and yang is terrible.
    1
  24. I don't care about term limits. Imagine what would happen if we had money out of politics. That would actually change things for the better.
    1
  25.  @finn8248  Rice is just another warmonger. Has she never found a war she didn't want to fight.
    1
  26.  @finn8248  She may as well be condelleza rice when it comes to war.
    1
  27.  @finn8248  Regarding, "What makes her a warmonger?" LMFAO. The fact that when giving the option between war and peace she goes with war 100 percent of the time.
    1
  28.  @finn8248  And we actually don't get to have on opinion if she is a warmonger or not anymore than we get to have an opinion if GWB is a warmonger or not. She either is one or she isn't. And she is. Because facts.
    1
  29.  @finn8248  I don't think youtube is going to let you see my recent post. In short I'm telling you what I think of you. And it isn't nice.
    1
  30. He never promised universal health care. He promised a public option. But the public option was scrubbed from his website so you can safely call that a broken promise.
    1
  31.  @OutSideTheBoxFormat  That's not an argument.
    1
  32.  @tankie9997  "For instance the USSR banned religion publicly" An action like this is, by it's nature, right wing authoritarianism. "does that make the USSR right wing?" When it comes to that specific issue. Yes. It clearly does make them right wing. "All these issues..." I'm not talking about all issues. I'm talking about one specific issue. And if you take a certain position on that specific topic then you are taking the right wing position and are only wrongfully called left wing when it comes to that. Hypothetically they could be "left wing" on everything else but more likely they are right wing when it comes to all the other stuff as well. But again, we aren't talking about all that other stuff. We are talking about one specific topic.
    1
  33.  @tankie9997  Regarding, "you've redefined left wing to mean non authoritarian" More like I'm pointing out that authoritarian is right wing by definition. The problem with your framing is that you want to act like the "left/right" labels are given before committing actions. For example I consider myself a "progressive" and "leftist." But those labels become meaningless if my actions are that of a "conservative" and "righty." Joe Biden has said BS in the past like he is the "most progressive." That doesn't mean he's actually on the left. Being on the left is determined by your actions regardless of how you want to label yourself. My point being that no matter how much you want to act like a "leftist" can be "pro-censorship" they cannot. At least not in the context of which you are speaking. Being pro censorship and being authoritarian are innately right wing. Those are the types of things that actually determine if you are on the left or the right. Actions speak louder than words.
    1
  34.  @OutSideTheBoxFormat  To be clear there are plenty of people who PRETEND to be on the left who support censorship. But actions speak louder than words.
    1
  35.  @OutSideTheBoxFormat  At least you are trying to make an argument even if it's terrible. Good for you.
    1
  36.  @OutSideTheBoxFormat  "Waiting for those examples for your claim." All of them is an answer to your question.
    1
  37.  @mathurex211  "what do you call censorship of right-wing voices? Right-wing?" Yes. It's right wing. "You have to admit you're being hyperbolic and flagrantly biased with your definitions." I'm not. "left" and "right" are not how you feel about yourself. It's where you fall on the spectrum. Censorship is on the right and freedom of speech is on the left. It's not arbitrary.
    1
  38.  @mathurex211  Are you worried that you are a "leftist" on some things? Don't be.
    1
  39.  @mathurex211  Regarding, "Clarify your definitions of left-wing and right-wing." It depends on the topic. If the topic is war and peace then peace is the left and war is the right. "Are you trying to pose that left-wing governments that engage in censorship are engaging in right-wing ideology?" Pretty much. I'm saying that governments who engage in censorship are clearly engaging in right-wing ideology on that topic. And that you are wrongfully calling them "left-wing." " left-wing governments." A truly left wing government would support peace, protecting the environment, universal health care, a living wage, and the like. Those are "left wing" positions.
    1
  40.  @mathurex211  "Also define authoritarianism. And define objectivism while you're at it." Open a dictionary. Authoritarianism, "the enforcement or advocacy of strict obedience to authority at the expense of personal freedom" That's right wing.
    1
  41.  @mathurex211  "Do you believe left-wing governments can promote capitalism?" No. Capitalism is the right. Socialism is the left. At least when this is the topic economic theory. If you are capitalist you are not "left-wing." You are right wing.
    1
  42.  @mathurex211  "Do you believe the Soviet Union was headed by a right-wing government?" Yes.
    1
  43.  @mathurex211  Regarding, "the soviet Uniom was a socialist state." It's really not. Don't be fooled by a label and name. "You just said socialism was the left." The soviet union did not have anything that resembles true socialism. It was a bastardized version at best.
    1
  44.  @mathurex211  "thus leftwing, but socially conservative?" Of course people can be different things on different topics. Of course I could be "left wing" because I'm a socialist when the topic is economic theory. And I could be "right wing" on a completely different topic. Nobody is just one thing or the other. But they are just one thing or the other on INDIVIDUAL topics. Which is again what I'm addressing. If the topic is say, freedom of speech versus censorship well there is a clear side that is the left side and the other side is the right side. And I do concede there is a "spectrum" on the topic. But not a very important one. For example when the topic is yelling "fire" in a crowded theater I'm against it. Still I think I can only be said to be on the "left" for the topic. I'm kinda mad I got into this conversation. "left versus right" is not the important conversation. The important conversation is where do you stand on individual topics. EVERYONE should be for free speech. NOONE should be for censorship. The rest is really just unimportant details and I'm honestly bored of this conversation.
    1
  45.  @mathurex211  "Don't you see you're running away." If that's what you choose to think I don't care. In reality I don't have unlimited time and energy that I feel like using to address your wall of text or anything else at this point. I've said what I want to say. Get it or don't. I don't care anymore.
    1
  46.  @tankie9997  "I'll leave it there." I should have done that a long time ago myself.
    1
  47. I guess they don't want to hear public opinion when trump speaks as well because they do the same thing there.
    1
  48. My thumbs down on this video is for ryan grimm and andrew yang.
    1
  49.  @elingrome5853  No lie. A sane person would think it a warning sign and red flag. A cultist would think it's a good thing like the OP does.
    1
  50. They are controlled opposition.
    1