Comments by "Clint Holmes" (@clintholmes2061) on "RFK JR On Rising: FULL INTERVIEW" video.

  1. RFKs position on israel is abhorrent. West is a superior candidate with a superior strategy (3rd party).
    6
  2. Do you want a leader or a follower? A leader is suppose to have answers on the important topics.
    2
  3.  @totemr4039  Not when it comes to palestine. He sounds like a sellout to israel. Literally everyone is better than biden or trump. You have do far better than that.
    1
  4.  @NeaEmrys  "What's with this illusion that everyone that pretends to have all the answers actually do?" If you want to call someone a leader they should have answers. Otherwise call them a follower cause that's what they are doing. "They don't" I'm looking for someone who does have answers... and correct ones at that. If RFK doesn't have them it's fine. I'll vote for someone who does.
    1
  5.  @deannaartzbennett244  He went out of his way to throw roger waters under the bus. Good luck with that... or at least good luck trying to convince suckers of that.
    1
  6.  @deannaartzbennett244  "Glenn Greenwald interview?" Yes. I did. He failed.
    1
  7.  @deannaartzbennett244  "he has More to offer" He is an inferior candidate compared to cornell west with an inferior strategy (running 3rd party).
    1
  8.  @deannaartzbennett244  "Qualified to Both Challenge and CHANGE Entrenched POLICY," He sold out rodger waters and backed apartheid.
    1
  9.  @storage-space4927  "we live in the United States" You have offered literally nothing of value to the conversation. But thanks captain obvious.
    1
  10.  @storage-space4927  "focus more on..." Maybe just admit you don't care about RFK's abhorrent position. That would be far more honest than what you are doing.
    1
  11.  @storage-space4927  You are making excuses for the inexcusable. Do you always do that? Or just for RFK?
    1
  12.  @storage-space4927  Are you for real? Instead of caring about RFK's inexcusable position when it comes to israel/palestine you want people for "focus more on..." because you know his position is terrible. And if he wasn't terrible on that position I doubt you would have any problem "focusing on it." But instead you are here... making excuses for inexcusable and wasting my time.
    1
  13.  @storage-space4927  If RFK is willing to sell out the palestinians why don't you think he'd do it to you?
    1
  14.  @storage-space4927  You never bothered to answer my simple and direct question... if RFK will sell out the palestinians what makes you think he won't do it to you?
    1
  15.  @storage-space4927  "Not our problem" Does RFK think that? Or does he want to continue to give US wealth to israel? I'm just kidding... you don't care or at least pretend to not care because RFK is on the wrong side of history.
    1
  16.  @storage-space4927  Cool nonanswer. Thanks for wasting my time.
    1
  17.  @storage-space4927  Is that what you tell yourself instead of answering a simple and direct question? Maybe just be quiet instead.
    1
  18.  @storage-space4927  "I answered..." No. You didn't. And now you are lying about. I'll repeat it a third time... if RFK will sell out the palestinians why don't you think he would do it to you? It's rhetorical at this point. I'm done addressing you and done caring what you have to say. If you were trying to prove you were wasting my time you have succeeded. Goodbye.
    1