Comments by "Clint Holmes" (@clintholmes2061) on "Panel: Floated Biden Cabinet Like West Wing Episode From Hell" video.

@heykresl Yang is an establishment conman. He is just better than most at it.
4
@heykresl Yeah... running on actual ideas is better than the norm. Being willing to actually change the system when in office is something very different.
4
@borp6912 Do you think that establishment conmen only hold political office? You can't for example be an establishment hack working for CNN?
3
@carjaune6793 Regarding, "Yang ripped democrats a new one on CNN twice just this past month." Is this really all it takes to impress you? Do you get this wet when trump rips dems?
3
I'm surprised that clown isn't in the cabinet considering how terrible it is.
2
@jordanintheknow Regarding, "we get it you hate yang. Move on from the comment section now because many don’t." Maybe take this opportunity to tell people why you love yang so much instead of just telling me I should STFU.
2
@carjaune6793 Regarding, "Yang is not controllable" His entire presidential campaign was an establishment wet dream specifically designed with the soul purpose to siphon votes from the progressive candidate they actually feared might win. He's their puppet whether you realize it or not.
2
@carjaune6793 Yang is "not controllable" the same way Liz Warren is "not controllable." They are both establishment puppets.
2
@carjaune6793 Regarding, "That's just you talking, buddy." Nah. That's what you are doing. I'm making logical arguments based in reality. Regarding, "Here let me do it too: "Bernie is an establishment puppet." Ok let me do it again: "AOC is an establishment puppet." " People do this all the time. I've defended both Bernie and AOC. And I do it with intelligent argument... not with deflection like you are attempting. This is not an intelligent argument. Do you really not realize that? Or do you just not care that you that's not what you are doing? Regarding, "Thxs for the productive conversation" It hasn't been productive because your comments are worthless.
2
@carjaune6793 When people like myself call warren an establishment puppet do you just try to mindless deflect from that fact using these types of silly "arguments?"
1
@carjaune6793 Do you respond to "warren is an establishment puppet" with mindless drivel like, ":) That's just you talking, buddy. Here let me do it too: "Bernie is an establishment puppet." Ok let me do it again: "AOC is an establishment puppet." Again: "Nina Turner is an establishment puppet." Thxs for the productive conversation :)" It would be just as worthless there as it is here.
1
@carjaune6793 Regarding, "You might say that about Warren maybe" Wait... do you mean to tell me the verdict is still out whether or not warren is a snake? That's only a maybe? You need to wake up.
1
@carjaune6793 Regarding, "You might say that about Warren" I say that about warren and I say it about yang. Do you have anything of substance to defend either well? Regarding, "Yang was just this random nobody" He had loose ties to the Obama administration. But yeah... he essentially was a nobody who had zero logical reason to think ANYONE would support him for president. He had no name recognition, held zero public office, and had zero reason to logically think he should be qualified to be commander in chief. But his campaign would serve a purpose... it would siphon a handful of votes from Sanders. It's not like he was taking votes from biden and his ilk. Regarding, "give Yang another listen," I've listened more than I care. For example I know that he wants UBI to be paid for as regressively as possible when it should always have been paid for as progressively as possible. His pandering has evolved to pay for it more progressively in theory... but so what about his pet pandering project. It was as meaningless as trump saying he was going to give everyone health care. He's a conman. And a far better one than Trump is and he became president. Do everyone a favor and wake up to this fact.
1
@carjaune6793 Regarding, "Warren ran for her own reasons" To split the progressive vote and cock block "sexist" Bernie Sanders. Regarding, "she thought she could win the primary" She took third in home state. Regarding, "Remember she was the frontrunner at one point?" I don't remember this. But only because she never was. Regarding, "she wasn't just sent there by the establishment to take votes away from Bernie." Of course she was. Long after Pete dropped out to help his team (and he "won" the Iowa Caucus according to the corrupt DNC) Warren was staying in to help her team as well. And by her team I'm referring to team establishment which she is clearly part of. Regarding, "To believe some kind of conspiracy like that is to dissociate yourself from reality." Wait? The DNC establishment wasn't conspiring to stop sanders at all cost? I'm the one dissociating myself from reality? LOL Projection much? Pete had good reason to stay in... but he dropped out... for a reason. Warren had every reason to drop out... she stayed in... for a reason. It really shouldn't be so hard to connect the dots. Regarding, "But that came late in the day" LOL. So what that it happened "late in the day." It shows what she was all about all along. She was in it to help team establishment, split the progressive vote, and stop sanders from getting the nomination. I'm sure you have rationalizations and excuses for her calling sanders a sexist as well, not that I really care to hear them. Regarding, "Yang ran because no one else was running on UBI" Did yang think this was the only way to talk about UBI? Did he think a guy with zero experience in politics was a good messenger? Did he just not care how his entering the race would affect everyone else? Regarding, "Why the hate?" He is an establishment tool that was one part of many that help orchestrate biden and stop sanders. I've made my feelings perfectly clear. I can only think you are not engaging me in good faith to so willfully ignore the things I'm saying in a way such as this. Regarding, "If that was really his machiavellic scheme, he would have kept on running past New Hampshire." It doesn't work this way according to you otherwise you wouldn't try to make excuses and rationalizations for warren saying BS like, "that came late in the day." You just move the goalposts whereever you want to fit the point you are trying to make no matter how silly what you are saying is. Regarding, "Bernie only ran into trouble 3 weeks later" Bernie lost the Iowa caucus by a razor thin margin according to the corrupt media and corrupt DNC. Regarding, "Bernie only ran into trouble 3 weeks later, in South Carolina? Your theory makes no sense." Bernie should have entered SC having won all the previous contests by clear margins making him the clear frontrunner. Because of the actions of people like warren and yang who were actively working to split the progressive hope while having zero legitimate path to the nomination the media was effectively able to portray the contest as open going into SC. They also didn't hammer biden for his lies about working in civil rights, about being arrested with mandela, about lies about his record, and more. You make no sense. Your excuses and rationalizations are sad. Regarding, "Let that sink in." Just putting UBI on top of a system like ours that doesn't change any else just creates wealth that will all flow to the top of the pyramid just like it does now. Let that sink in. And your conman doesn't really want to change much of anything. He is just getting you to trade in any hope of real hope and change you have for the system for UBI pandering. And even if Yang were president UBI wouldn't have a chance in hell of happening. Regarding, "(Are we good?)" I'm good. You are a sheep.
1