Comments by "Clint Holmes" (@clintholmes2061) on "Where Does God Fit in an Infinite Universe Brian Cox and Joe Rogan" video.

  1.  @carlosatreides5653  I have a brain that enables me to be conscience. You should get one if you can.
    2
  2. For your sake I hope you are intentionally trying to miss the point.
    1
  3.  @carlosatreides5653  I guess not. Too bad for you. Good luck with your cult going forward.
    1
  4.  @carlosatreides5653  ​ Carlos Atreides Ug. I guess I will try but in all honesty if you don't already "get it" I suspect you never will. I suspect that if you were truly curious about the answer to your "gotcha" question you would have already looked at the comments and would have seen that your question has been asked and answered multiple times in this very comments section. Regarding, "In the beginning there was a big bang." The overwhelming scientific consensus is that there was a big bang in the "creation" of the universe. I put creation in quotes because it means something very specific in this context. It is talking about the known universe. It's talking about the universe in the wake of the big bang because this is the only "universe" we have any reasonable ways to measure. Scientists concede that they currently have no good ideas about how to examine what may have been before the big bang and that they may never be able to measure it. That doesn't mean the universe was "created" by the big bang and the universe very well might have been here before the big bang. You shouldn't have a problem with this concept seeing as how you likely think these things about your fake deity.... that they were here all along and don't require a creator. Maybe I'm wrong about that and feel free to correct me about that but it seems like a safe assumption. So he thinks it's possible to think the same things about the universe that you think about your god... it was always here aka eternal and there was no creator for it... it just is and has always been even if it very well may have been in a very, very different form before the big bang. Regarding, "there was no big bang" Nowhere does he even hint that he thinks there may have not been a big bang. He merely accurately says he has no idea what was BEFORE the big bang. Maybe it was a "creation event." (and even if it was that doesn't mean that god did it) Or maybe the universe was eternal. But the rather specific length of time he gives is for when the BIG BANG happened.
    1
  5.  @carlosatreides5653  Regarding, "My "gotcha" question will never be answered on Youtube." I literally just answered your question but don't let that stop you from taking the concepts out of context. Regarding, "Let's not be arrogant." Why? I am arrogant. But at least I'm not going to tell you that you are going to burn for eternity in hellfire if you don't buy my book of bullshit. Regarding, "I'm assuming by your comments of my "fake" deity and my " cult" that you are probably a liberal." I self describe myself as a progressive. Regarding, "Most of whom have no understanding of politics, economic or religion and is a real cult." Is this your idea of not being arrogant? But I love a good... "I know you are but what am I," I just haven't heard one since grade school. Regarding, "if he believes that the universe is eternal like our creator then he is trying to disprove it. That's quite clear." You are a moron. He isn't trying to disprove god anymore then he is trying to "disprove leprechauns." If your fragile worldview can't handle the possibility that maybe, just maybe, you believe a book of bullshit written thousands of years ago when people thought sickness were actually demons that's your problem. Regarding, "It is an attempt to push the idea morality is subjective so reason your way to pedophilia as the greeks and romans and "know" there is no God just like the communists." This is seriously some of the dumbest shit I have ever read. You are exactly the type of moron that religion needs. Forgive me for not addressing this bullshit more intelligently... or don't. I honestly don't give a fuck what you think at this point. Regarding, "Well done for doing no outside research." Jesus christ are you stupid. Seriously. I am so fucking tired of you cultists.
    1
  6.  @carlosatreides5653  Regarding, "I never said anyone would burn in hellfire." No shit sherlock. But are you really not a bible thumper? Because that is that particular book of bullshit's position. Regarding, "You are definitely a narrow sighted person." Aren't the same fucking moron who just got done saying, "Most of whom have no understanding of politics, economic or religion and is a real cult." Regarding, "Which explains your progressive leanings." Um.. yup... obviously. How can you really not realize what a hypocrite you are? Regarding, "You are the one throwing around ad hominems." But you haven't? You have zero self awareness don't you? Regarding, "You use foul language which displays your ignorance of vocabulary." Words are merely a tool we use to express an idea there simply is no better way for me to express my frustration you fucking dipshits in your cult then by using the words I do. Regarding, "Obviously you do care what I think or you wouldn't have left a 2nd comment." LMFAO. I guess maybe I should have used the word respect. I do care what you fucking dipshits think because you fucking morons are busy keeping the world from progress because of a book of fairy tale from thousands of years ago and your cult has you brainwashed. Regarding, "Finally, using the name of the deity you don't like, for whatever reason, in order to cast derision on someone." Jesus Christ. I would need to think they exist for me "not like them." I "don't like" Jesus the same way I "don't like" Zeus. Regarding, "You haven't explained the problem of consciousness by the way," The "problem of consciousness?" There is no "problem of consciousness" unless you are referring to the fact that you arguably are not conscience. And yeah... that really is a problem. The world would be better if you were.
    1
  7. "when we look far out into the universe we look far back in Time" is referring to that fact that when, for example, you look up at the night sky you are not seeing events taking place this very second. You are seeing events that took place in the past but you are only now being able to see it after the time it has taken for light to have traveled to you. Hopefully that helps.
    1
  8. Except modern science does not take faith. Science takes evidence.
    1
  9.  @radcabbage  Regarding, "we have no evidence." LMFAO. Actually there is lots of evidence for transition species. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o92x6AvxCFg That said theories can and will be changed when new evidence is learned and presented. That is what is great about science and it has NOTHING to do with faith.
    1
  10.  @radcabbage  I believe in evolution because it's the best explanation given with the known evidence. If you want to change my mind you can... with evidence. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OuqFUdqNYhg
    1