Comments by "Clint Holmes" (@clintholmes2061) on "Amy McGrath Defeats Charles Booker In Kentucky" video.

Keep in mind that according to the DNC Pete Buttigieg won Iowa.
3
@sunseeker9581 Regarding, "claiming everything is a conspiracy makes us sound as bad as republicans" I honestly don't care about your opinion on this or anything. I asked you a very simple question and instead of answering it you offer this stupid shit. I'll tell you what I will give you another chance to answer my very simple question and not deflect like you did before... how do you verify the results being given from mail in ballots? What do you have that is akin to exit polls from us to know if results are legit or bullshit? It's ok to admit you have nothing but faith in the system and trust that votes are being counted correctly like you do. A system that again tells you that Pete Buttigieg "won" in Iowa despite all the evidence that he wasn't even close to first. How do you verify mail in ballot results?
3
@sunseeker9581 Regarding, "exit polls are not always accurate" This is particularly funny because in the same post you want to hypocritically criticize me for "conspiracy shit." Exit polls are not always accurate? From the same person who doesn't seem to think it's important to be able to verify that our votes are being counted accurately? Vote counts are always accurate? But not exit polls? Really? Exit polls, while imperfect, are simply the best and ONLY way to tell if votes at the polls are being counted correctly. That's simply fact. Not "conspiracy shit." Regarding, "Mailed votes are counted the same as any other votes." Yeah. They are counted by machines that are owned and operated by big corporations. Those machines are considered "proprietary" which means those corporations don't even need to tell you or me how they work. That's what you are taking for granted. At least when those votes are cast at the polls we, again, have exit polls to try and verify that votes are not being flipped. Regarding, "Enough of this conspiracy shit." So no answer to my very simple question right? You are conceding that there is no way to verify the results right? But just pretend that isn't a problem to sane people.
3
@sunseeker9581 Regarding, "Voting by mail." How do you verify the results of voting my mail? You can't. When people go to the polls we have exit polls. When people vote by mail we have nothing. And asking for an election that you can't check is just asking to have your elections stolen. Did Booker lose cause he was outspent? Or does the DNC, who thinks Pete Buttigieg "won" the Iowa primary just full of shit again.
2
@sunseeker9581 Regarding, "I admit Iowa was a mess" It was a straight up conspiracy with flipped votes. Don't worry. Conspiracies actually happen. No shame in admitting it. This isn't like saying the earth is flat. Regarding, "voting in person makes no difference to voting by mail." The difference is that we, the peasants, have a way of verifying one but not the other. That's the fact whether or not you realize it or admit it.
2
When people go to the polls we can at least try to check the results with exit polls. When people vote by mail we have nothing like that. We are just suppose to accept the results. I am not ok with that.
1
@jamesfiegel9675 Why not both?
1
I care. Does it really matter if he is replaced by another person who corrupt and terrible?
1