Comments by "Clint Holmes" (@clintholmes2061) on "Data-Guy Nate Silver Smears Bernie Sanders Without Data" video.

  1. You know what happens when you start caring about trying to get someone young? You open yourself up to being duped by someone like Obama. Sanders is great in part because there is no doubt about what we would be getting with him.
    2
  2. So would you be here saying the same stupid shit if he gave Hillary a 99.99 percent chance of winning? Nate was not wrong!!! you would say. He gave a CHANCE of 99.99% Dear god people. Or maybe, just maybe would you realize then how silly you sound. He was wrong. You know what her chances ended up being? 0 percent.
    2
  3. Do you really not realize that we don't use the popular vote to elect presidents?
    1
  4. She worked for her father's PAC which advocated for gay conversion therapy while Sanders has been fighting for gay rights for a long, long, long, long time.
    1
  5. Gay rights. Makes me think you have not followed her very closely.
    1
  6. Gay rights.
    1
  7. Tulsi has a very short record and even thou it's very short she has still "evolved" on some very important issues. Bernie on the other hand has a long, consistent record. There is no question about what we are getting when it comes to him. Tulsi would be a great running mate for Sanders but the reasons to support Sanders over Gabbard are many and the reasons to support Gabbard over Sanders are nonexistent.
    1
  8. He didn't try to discredit her at all. He merely pointed out factual reasons why Sanders is the better candidate.
    1