Comments by "Clint Holmes" (@clintholmes2061) on "DAPL Worker With Assault Rifle Infiltrates Standing Rock" video.

  1. Bob Marley regarding, "Maybe the protectors should protect their land with weapons instead of prayers" That is only an option for white people. As soon as these protectors pick up weapons they would be slaughtered.
    6
  2. NYC regarding, "it's likely." You cannot possibly be this delusional without being paid to say such stupid things. I refuse to believe you are actually this dumb. You must just be a person with no ethics or morals being paid to say dumb things. I was also wondering what happened to your post yesterday where you were saying dumb things even by your standard? I was enjoying the laugh at your expense.
    4
  3. nyc regarding, "Yes, they are trespassing." nyc is impervious to facts. Again, he is either the dumbest "human" (I have my doubts about this) on the planet or he is being paid to lie for a living. It doesn't really matter at this point. Everyone would be wise to ignore everything he says. Or if you listen to him you are safe to assume that the truth is the exact opposite of his words.
    3
  4. NYC regarding, "How ironic, to say the least" You only think this because you are dumb as fuck. What happened to your post yesterday? You never bothered to answer my question about this.
    3
  5. NYC do you know what I'm talking about or is it difficult for you to keep all your lies straight? It was the post that you started with, "FACT: DAPL is not on a single inch of Native owned land" It just disappeared. Were even you embarrassed to try and spread that lie when the entire video proved you were lying?
    2
  6. Like I pointed out when NYC says, "Yes, they're trespassing on DAPL owned land" You can be sure the truth is; no, they are not trespassing on DAPL owned land. NYC is reliably unreliable. NYC humor me. What happened to your BS statement yesterday? I'm genuinely curious. Am I correct that even you decided that was the wrong place to spread that lie?
    2
  7. NYC clearly whatever soulless company pays you for the lies you say pays you by quantity and not quality. If you were paid by quality you would have to pay them.
    2
  8. NYC did you really just cite blogs as evidence? That is why I come to you... for the laughs at your expense. I noticed you haven't bothered to answer my simple question. Your silence speaks volumes. I get it thou. Deleting that post is arguably the smartest thing you have done your life.
    1
  9. NYC regarding, "The link" If you say so. I don't trust you enough to click on anything you would ever post. And even if what you say is true (I'll give you credit for telling the truth even thou I assume you are lying, but for arguments sake...) that is, according to you, "an example." An example of something does not demonstrate a complete picture. You love to use examples while ignoring the complete picture. That is NYC 101. NYC 102 would be ignoring questions you don't want to address. So what happened to that post you put up yesterday?
    1