Youtube comments of Clint Holmes (@clintholmes2061).

  1. This shows why Dr. Phil should never be called a "Dr." What joke. He should be ashamed.
    1000
  2. Ad him to Bernie's anti-endorsement list.
    870
  3. Vote Sanders. That's how we remove Trump from office.
    851
  4. Just another reason Bernie Sanders is the clear choice.
    766
  5. Everything he said about atheism was actually accurate about religion. It is destructive and terrible.
    737
  6. Imagine being paid to spout nonsense on TV.
    681
  7. Don't let this get to a second ballot. Go out and vote Sanders and bring friends when you do.
    670
  8. I don't care about Seinfeld.
    601
  9. Please get out and vote for Bernie Sanders in the "democratic" primary.
    599
  10. Warren is controlled opposition to real change. Accept no imitations. Bernie Sanders 2020.
    575
  11. If Iran assassinated a US official it would be called terrorism and a war crime. I feel like it should be called the same when the US does it.
    543
  12. I am all for hostile takeover of the "democratic" party.
    534
  13. Bernie Sanders 2020. The candidate who can't be bought.
    526
  14. It can get worse than Trump. Just imagine if he were competent.
    495
  15. Policy, integrity, and trust first. Bernie Sanders 2020!
    482
  16. This is what trying to lose looks like.
    478
  17. We voted in a guy who voted for the Iraq war.
    448
  18. Sam and Max spoke for so many of us. We can't thank them enough.
    434
  19. Karen Finney is as terrible as Kystal is amazing.
    433
  20. Biden: the war machine needs to eat. You don't.
    431
  21. Bernie 2020 is alive and well to me. CNN on the other hand has been dead to me for a very long time.
    431
  22. Accept no imitations. Bernie Sanders 2020!
    422
  23. Please do whatever you need to do to vote for Bernie Sanders in the "democratic" primary. Thanks in advance for that.
    412
  24. The biggest commodity in politics is trust. Bernie Sanders has it. He has earned it by saying and doing the same correct things for decades. Bernie Sanders 2020!
    398
  25. Don't mess this up America. Do what you need to do to vote for Bernie in the primary.
    390
  26. Please vote Bernie Sanders.
    361
  27. Vote Jill Stein if you want to give peace a chance.
    360
  28. Bernie needs to be our next president. Accept no imitations.
    357
  29. There was a reason Biden's team had him hiding instead of campaigning. Unsurprisingly the more people hear him the less they like him.
    347
  30. Billionaires are not your friend.
    334
  31. "If he dies, he dies." -Ivan Drago
    332
  32. My take from all this: horses get better health care than humans.
    328
  33. Sanders in 2020 to take over the party.
    327
  34. I think money in politics is our biggest problem. It's the problem that makes all other problems all but impossible to solve. Fix that and all the others fall like dominoes.
    325
  35. Sounds like something Bloomberg would be for.
    308
  36. I had to see if that show was real... under the preview for it everyone was like... best show ever. Are they blind?
    305
  37. Everybody should have one vote and that vote should count the same.
    304
  38. This guy is evidence that corporate media propaganda is effective.
    302
  39. If the Koch brothers like you then I don't like you.
    282
  40. Actually her campaign died when she shived Bernie as being a sexist.
    279
  41. How I love stories like this in sad times. It gives me some faith in humanity.
    270
  42. Kyle: this is time for a bold agenda. Biden: I will not make that happen.
    267
  43. Ominous sign for his campaign but a great sign for the country.
    265
  44. Idiot trolls hate Corbyn. He must be doing something right.
    253
  45. Come on South Carolina. Vote Sanders today and end this.
    250
  46. Bernie would crush Trump. Biden would lose to Trump.
    248
  47. Thank you Bernie Sanders for helping us identify some well disguised sell outs. I used to really like Bill Maher but he can go fuck himself.
    247
  48. I wish Americans would hold America to the same standard they expect from the rest of the world.
    243
  49. I care about policy. That's part of the reason why I won't support Biden and corporate dems.
    238
  50. Shame on this show and shame on the people making it.
    237
  51. Nina Turner would be amazing as America's first women president... unlike Hillary.
    234
  52. How about a thumbs up if you, like me, voted for Obama and regret it.
    228
  53. Can you imagine how much better informed this country would be if all corporate news coverage were this good?
    226
  54. Claims to care about war while supporting a candidate who voted for extra bombs for trump.
    225
  55. Tulsi really killed it on this. I only wish she would have added Steve Munchin to her list of grievances.
    224
  56. I used to like Bill Maher and now I can't stand him. I'm not sure if if he changed or I did. Probably both I guess.
    220
  57. Many thanks to all of you forcing Jake to admit the truth by supporting Sanders with your actions and money. Bernie Sanders 2020! Better late then never.
    219
  58. It's not left versus the right... it's the elite versus the peasants. And I'm on team peasant.
    214
  59. Thank you to those of you forcing the corporate media to acknowledge Bernie but don't be complacent. It's going to be a long war.
    213
  60. CNN is blaming Jill Stein and Gary Johnson. You know who is more to blame than them? CNN.
    211
  61. It has been said before but it is worth repeating. The democratic establishment would rather lose to republicans then lose to progressives.
    209
  62. One of many reasons why blue no matter who is stupid: neera tanden.
    209
  63. If the "democratic" party is going to come out against democracy maybe they should change their name. I believe the Undemocratic Party is still available as a name.
    205
  64. On the bright side they are outing themselves as frauds really quickly.
    205
  65. Sanders offers real hope and change. Obama offered fake hope and change.
    204
  66. Bernie Sanders is the real deal and Americans know it. Now they just need to make sure he is our next president.
    203
  67. Bernie represents the 99% and is right 99% of the time.
    193
  68. Jon got out before he became the villian.
    192
  69. Nice of the "democratic" party to admit it doesn't care for democracy.
    188
  70. That phone call is infuriating. Mark sounds like a person who knows they are full of it.
    179
  71. Obama fooled me. I can't believe I voted for him twice.
    178
  72. Sanders needs to be our next president!
    178
  73. Can another country please bring us democracy? Sincerely, an American.
    177
  74. Policy, integrity, and trust first. Bernie Sanders 2020
    175
  75. Bernie or bust. Accept no imitations.
    167
  76. The fact that the corporate media was even able to make Pete a thing in the first place doesn't speak well of the entire system.
    162
  77. Free assange and fraud squad, never forget.
    158
  78. Every accusation is a confession.
    156
  79. Warren can't sacrifice things like integrity if she never had any to begin with.
    155
  80. Meh. The dems lost to an orange clown and learned nothing. The major parties don't care if they win or lose so long as nothing fundamentally changes.
    155
  81. To all those people doing the establishment's bidding by smearing Sanders try and keep in mind that Bernie was the only reason the 2016 "democratic" primary even needed to be rigged in the first place. No one has done more to wake the public than Sanders. No one.
    153
  82. Bernie Sanders 2020! Better late than never.
    152
  83. "Edited for time." What a terrible lie.
    149
  84. Fraud squad. Never forget.
    148
  85. How I envy the people who didn't watch it. Just imagine being able to pay thousands of dollars to be there. Must be nice to be able to set that kind of money on fire.
    147
  86. Claims to care about special interest groups controlling Washington while supporting a candidate who admits she will take legalized bribes should she make the general.
    143
  87. "nothing will fundamentally change." -the one time he told the truth
    141
  88. Bernie Sanders 2020
    141
  89. Medical bankruptcy is not a thing in Canada. It must be nice.
    141
  90. Fellow pissed off progressives please still vote in the "democratic" primary. Find the most progressive candidate you can find there and vote for them. That doesn't mean you owe the "democratic" party jack shit during the general if you don't want.
    138
  91. JFK, MLK and FDR all touched Warren... or at least she says so now.
    137
  92. He can't get off unless it's on a zoom call now.
    135
  93. Both parties are bought.
    131
  94. Kyle, unlike Sam Seder, is actually a progressive.
    130
  95. The business model for taylor and the military industrial complex is very similar. Both like it and profit off of things being broken.
    129
  96. I'd pay to watch that old guy long before I'd ever pay to watch CNN. You would need to pay me to watch CNN.
    128
  97. The United States imprisons more of it's citizens than any other country on Earth by percentage of population and by overall number and it isn't even close. They are only the "land of the free" ironically.
    128
  98. It was very dumb of Mayim Bialik to say that. All talk of assault should be centered around the perpetrators. It is their fault and no one else's. Period.
    126
  99. We try to spread democracy around the globe when we need to spread democracy at home.
    125
  100. She was incredibly impressive. Thoughtful, articulate, and intelligent.
    124
  101. Jill Stein for President. Because she is the only candidate running that actually deserves your vote.
    123
  102. The "land of the free." But only ironically.
    123
  103. Fraud squad. Never forget.
    121
  104. I'm only surprised when Trump says something that is true.
    120
  105. Americans are not the brightest bulbs.
    119
  106. I'd be too busy blaming the corporate media for helping create a nuclear war too much to really want to watch them.
    118
  107. Jill Stein for President if you care about the quality of the air you breathe.
    115
  108. You shouldn't be voting for any bill that doesn't include a 15 dollar minimum wage or 2K checks. Both were promised by biden.
    109
  109. I hate wearing a mask. But calling it tyranny is absurd.
    106
  110. Gore won florida in 2000 and bernie won the iowa caucus and not mayor pete. This is the second time I'm trying to post this cause the first try was immediately taken down in the "land of the free."
    106
  111. Ro is just another corrupt politician.
    105
  112. She has "The Highest Ethical Standards"? I'm more likely to believe Trump has the best words.
    102
  113.  @shinobi3620  He turns green to show support for the green new deal. Duh.
    102
  114. I like that progressives (as in us peasants) are willing to call out our "team" like this. Our representatives have let us down but at least we are honest enough to realize it and admit it.
    99
  115. Nobody does paper towels like Trump. Trump has the best paper towels. Bigly. Top notch.
    98
  116. I've had been an advocate of them in the past but everyday they keep proving they are frauds and controlled opposition. F them at this point.
    97
  117. If Jimmy Dore were a stock I'd buy.
    97
  118. She is far more impressive than the average politician. I'd vote for her if I could.
    96
  119. Accept no imitations. Bernie Sanders 2020!
    96
  120. Bernie Sanders 2020!
    96
  121. Yup. Don't hate the player.... hate the game.
    96
  122. Sanders doesn't just point out what is wrong with the world today. He offers solutions.
    94
  123. We live in sad times.
    93
  124. And the tax cuts will only make the problem worse.
    93
  125. She was introduced to jayz while she was a minor. You might want to consider the possibility that she is both a victim AND a victimizer.
    93
  126. You shouldn't be surprised by any of this if you were paying attention.
    90
  127. Now if only she were put in a cage.
    89
  128. Louie is a character straight out of the movie Idiocracy.
    89
  129. In any sort of sane world hunter would be in prison with his dad.
    88
  130. Are you sure Pete has a soul to sacrifice?
    88
  131. This is what real leadership looks like. Bernie Sanders 2020!
    88
  132. I'll never vote for Biden.
    87
  133. I'm done with corporate dems. I support justice dems and the green party.
    87
  134. Dump the "democratic" party. They represent their big money donors and not the people. Go Green and don't look back. They actually represent the public.
    86
  135. The fact that nobody in the comments section buys ryan grim's BS really restores some faith in humanity for me.
    86
  136. Just tell Trump supporters Mexico is going to pay for it.
    85
  137. They all have their favorites. I prefer they be honest about it.
    85
  138. I hope to see more of him. That really was a great and selfless move. He deserves lots of credit and lots of props. Thanks for reminding me about that. It needs to be noted.
    85
  139. She proves that evil hides in plain sight by existing.
    84
  140. The whole Mate family is great.
    83
  141. Remember when she voted for the 700 billion dollar per year budget for the department of offense? I do.
    82
  142. The establishment loves Feinstein but thinks Sanders is too old.
    81
  143. Nomiki you are the best. Joy Reid is the worst.
    80
  144. And Isnotreal.
    79
  145. Let's also bring back Glass-Steagal while we are at it.
    79
  146. Bernie would have won in 2016 and he would win by the largest margin in 2020.
    78
  147. Vote Jill Stein if you want some much needed real change... like we were promised 8 years ago but never received.
    75
  148. I hope everyone had a nice turkey day. Obama demonstrated he cared about turkeys with a pardon as he continues to shit on the natives of the land.
    75
  149.  @annaclarafenyo8185  Then again Cenk fits right in with fraud squad.
    75
  150.  @lewiswatt2597  No one is perfect. Voting against trump isn't a terrible idea. It's just that voting for biden is doing it wrong.
    74
  151. This guy was awesome. Please bring him back for more.
    73
  152. Actions speak louder than words. Accept no imitations. Bernie Sanders 2020.
    72
  153. I feel like there should have been a protestor at least. Then again he is irrelevant.
    72
  154. Why would anyone do that? This show is obviously exploitative garbage.
    71
  155. Grimm's job is to manufacture consent for corrupt politicians.
    70
  156. Bernie Sanders 2020!
    70
  157. They really have to dig deep to smear him.
    69
  158. Do what you need to do to vote for Bernie Sanders in the "democratic" primary for real change like this that the country desperately needs. Thank you for that.
    69
  159. Protect real journalists like pat. Free assange!
    69
  160. You are using quotation marks wrong. You are a liar.
    68
  161. MAGA: Miriam Adelson's Goals Advanced
    68
  162. The United States is an oligarchy. Bravo to her for trying to shine a light on it.
    67
  163. They just want one half of the country to fight with the other half instead of fighting the people that are actually to blame.
    67
  164. Playstation arabia not turning pride colors had me rolling.
    67
  165. For what it is worth I'm begging Bernie Sanders to run in 2020.
    66
  166. If Hillary Clinton, Obama, and the "democratic" party gave a shit about these people they would have won.
    65
  167. I wish someone like chris would run for president so that I could have someone to feel good about voting for.
    65
  168. Bernie or bust til one of us dies... or longer.
    65
  169. Bloomberg is why "blue no matter who" is idiotic.
    65
  170. Don't waste your vote by casting it for a terrible candidate. Vote for Jill Stein because she is the only candidate deserves it and the rest is just details and distractions meant to get you to vote against your own interests. Vote your values not your fears.
    63
  171. These people are Republicans in everything but name. The two major parties may as well merge and call themselves the corporate party.
    63
  172. Bernie Sanders for President! Chuck Todd for garbageman.
    63
  173. Don't waste your vote. Cast it for the only candidate who actually deserves it. Jill Stein for President. Ignore the inevitable "Correct the Record" trolls comments. They think not wasting your vote is casting it for terrible candidates. As always they are wrong.
    62
  174.  @FireOccator  No. Mustache man was riii... wait... what am I doing?
    62
  175. That would take empathy and compassion that the pig didn't have.
    62
  176.  @libelldrian173  2 minutes. Then I'm thinking about sex again and all clarity is gone.
    61
  177. Yang supporters don't care that their candidate has zero experience and zero record to look at to know what they are getting like they should so I won't be surprised if this doesn't bother them either.
    61
  178.  @houseofaction  Are you intentionally missing my point? I don't care what piece of paper he has. He is a disgrace to people who should actually be able to call themselves doctors.
    60
  179. Reign in the military industrial complex NOW!
    60
  180. Which is better than knowing who he is.
    60
  181. Warren is only progressive when it is politically convenient.
    59
  182. Please follow up on this story.
    59
  183. Legalize it. Tax it. And regulate it. This is suppose to be a free country.
    59
  184. It's making the corporate shills look bad. By the way, this isn't my problem, that's theirs.
    59
  185.  @nuancedmilitarism8402  I can only think you are paid to make everyone dumber. I hope your soul was worth the price paid for it.
    58
  186. I did not see that coming.
    58
  187. Jill Stein only got 1 percent? Are we really buying that?
    55
  188. I can imagine how sane Canadians feel about Ford... it's how I feel about Trump as an American.
    55
  189. He fooled me as well. The lesson I learned is follow the money. My trust is directly correlated to how a politician raises their money.
    55
  190. For the same reasons the US and every country shouldn't have nukes.
    55
  191.  @chrisg4908  Forgive me for not taking your comment seriously enough to respond to it intelligently. Or don't paid shill.
    55
  192. Meh. Will is responsible for his actions. He doesn't get a pass because his wife sucks.
    55
  193. Assange knows.
    54
  194. Those are CGI legs.
    54
  195. He says 9-11 when he cums. Your welcome in advance for that thought.
    54
  196. Bernie Sanders 2020. Better late than never.
    54
  197. Michael you do understand that more population also means more people to pay for said system right? That what is actually important is how much it costs per person right?
    54
  198. He thinks it's easy because his plan is to declare bankruptcy, as usual.
    54
  199. I doubt even John Delaney's family supports him for president.
    54
  200. Don't forget an incompetent public, corporate media, and big money legalized bribes.
    54
  201. Trump is wrong about almost everything but there is truth in calling the corporate media "fake news" even if he says it for the wrong reasons.
    54
  202. Money in politics is worse than cancer.
    53
  203. Can you imagine how corporate media would cover this if it were russia doing it?
    53
  204.  @YvaJStoryTime  Maybe. Or maybe they were never that good as demonstrated by the fact that cenk was also a founder and he has always sucked.
    53
  205.  @genehendrix1847  It's a more apt for shareholders really (they don't work and get all the money) as you make excuses and rationalization for CEOs who make hundreds of times what peons do.
    53
  206. "We've been to the border." "You've never been to the border." "I don't understand your point." My point is that you are a liar who was lying.
    53
  207. They believe in winning but that is not as important to them as to who wins. Their first priority is supporting a big money, corporation approved candidate.
    52
  208. Bernie Sanders 2020. Better late than never.
    52
  209. "His youtube channel, secular talk, an AFFILIATE of the young turks network" -wikipedia
    52
  210. It's cheaper, covers everyone, and produces better results.
    52
  211.  @jayjohndafalcondawg4918  Herman WAS NOT the victim. He was one of the people stepping on others.
    51
  212. We need money out of politics. I like that Justice Democrats seem to understand this and I'm far more likely to trust politicians who are not taking legalized bribes.
    51
  213. Actions speak louder than words and the justice dems are acting like frauds.
    51
  214. Jill Stein only got 1 percent? Are we really buying that?
    50
  215. Jimmy is the only reason I think I'd ever get a twitter account.
    50
  216. Ryan Grim's job is to manufacture consent for corrupt politicians.
    50
  217. I'm a pacifist but I would really love to punch Ted Cruz.
    50
  218. I will never vote for Biden. Bernie Sanders 2020
    50
  219.  @JD-jz5rr  Whatever the for profit health insurance company is paying for your soul to spout propaganda is not enough. I'd like to think that even you are better than what you are doing.
    49
  220.  @joejose8433  "he needs to start taking care of himself" He looks great and he got out of the game for the most part. I think he's got this.
    49
  221.  @Ray-cn1yn  I can only think you are being willfully obtuse.
    48
  222.  @nuancedmilitarism8402  Did you ever think that voting for the lesser evil is still supporting evil? Do you not understand why supporting evil is dumb? Or are you paid to spout the nonsense you have?
    48
  223. Private, for-profit prisons have no place in a civilized society.
    47
  224. Sounded like she was blaming the victim to me. The fact that she was talking about her own life was a way of patting herself on the back for not getting assaulted and telling others why they did. The victims shouldn't be the topic of discussion at all. We only should be talking about the perpetrators of the crimes. It is their fault. No one elses.
    47
  225. To "defend" Pete I will say that there isn't a good answer Pete could have given about that stat. There just isn't a way to spin that. Ultimately it's his fault that the tiny bit of record he has is atrocious. Bernie or bust.
    46
  226. Winston Shih, please hold our beer, sincerely the corporate media.
    46
  227.  @shushuyu  Regarding, "It's all about discipline." That had NOTHING to do with discipline. That had EVERYTHING to do with being an immoral piece of shit.
    46
  228. Thanksgiving. What a joke of a holiday.
    45
  229. And Warren is probably willing to give him more then he wants for bombs... again.
    45
  230. Sam Seder is not progressive.
    44
  231. Jill Stein is the only presidential candidate that can be trusted to do the right thing here.
    44
  232.  @j_ll7  How well do the Koch brothers pay for you making the world dumber with every idiotic thing you say?
    44
  233.  LA Lakers  Wasn't Fauci the same guy who lied to the public and said masks don't work? Probably not the best example.
    44
  234. With the electoral college a candidate could win the election by only winning 11 states and a candidate could lose the election after winning 39 states. Therefor your argument is complete bullshit.
    43
  235. Bring some friends!
    43
  236.  @joe.oneill  She's an embarrassment to all humanity. Shit, she is an embarrassment to the universe.
    43
  237.  @ericgrigorof1509  I think he is. I just wanted to give the anti-endorsement list props really. I love it so much... just like Bernie.
    43
  238. Never Biden. Never Trump. Vote for someone decent 2020!
    43
  239. Lots of trolls out to smear AOC. It means she is doing something right.
    42
  240.  @kylem2560  Politicians aren't terrible because of a lack of sex. It's because they are selling out, corrupt, and are generally immoral. Don't blame blue balls for their terrible ilk.
    42
  241. I'd just like to take this moment to applaud you for just pulling over rather than driving while angry.
    42
  242. Vote progressives in the midterm and Bernie Sanders for President in 2020.
    42
  243. Kyle, please do not compare us to Chuck Todd. Thank you in advance for this. Sincerely, oatmeal.
    42
  244. This is not true. Some of his career was spent stealing. Have you forgot his plagiarism? Checkmate joe biden hater. I think?
    41
  245. @Milo Kaye You can rationalize supporting literally the second worse person in the world with your lesser evils philosophy. In other words your philosophy is breathtakingly dumb.
    41
  246. Hopefully he decides on Bernie Sanders.
    41
  247.  @RetiredMillennial  People who pretend to be on your side are far worse than republicans who don't promise you shit and never get anything from you.
    41
  248. I really wonder what an alternate universe where he wasn't murdered looks like.
    41
  249.  @Gnolomweb  Don't you guys get better talking points than this to use? It's like you aren't even trying.
    41
  250. I was never going to vote for Joe Biden before he started losing what little bit of a mind he had.
    41
  251. Joy Reid and the people working to smear medicare for all are NOT centrists.
    40
  252.  @trosway  9-11 on his watch, torture, lies into war, economic collapse and bank bailouts, tax cuts and exploded deficit and more not that that shouldn't already be more then enough for you to realize the obvious truth that he sucked balls beyond belief.
    40
  253. "as an actual american I have a camp for you to live in whether you like it or not." some shitlib, probably.
    40
  254. "poor maintenance, incompetence or terrorism" It's poor maintenance due to capitalism. As long as someone at the top is getting rich things like this WILL happen.
    39
  255. "Fake democrats" is an apt way to describe pretty much the entire party.
    39
  256. Leave the whole "chance of winning" narrative behind. That's better left for the corporate media. Focus on who SHOULD be winning. And the answer to that is Bernie Sanders.
    39
  257. Never Pete.
    39
  258. I want whatever happy drug this guy is on. Unless liking Warren was one of the side effects.
    39
  259. Pete Buttigieg "won" Iowa according to the DNC.
    39
  260. Does anyone not anticipate a time when williamson tells everyone they should vote for biden?
    38
  261. Well he is making israel great again.
    38
  262.  VunderGuy  "those savages" We were the ones dropping nukes on peasants. Who were the savages?
    38
  263. Bernie Sanders 2020 to reform the democratic party from the inside!
    38
  264. Thank you for "bothering him."
    38
  265.  @shushuyu  No amount of "proper training" gives a person a soul.
    38
  266. I think that is dumbest thing I've read today camillo and that is really saying something. Bravo. You are king dipshit.
    37
  267.  @imnotmike  regarding, "She has never flip flopped on anything." This is simply not true. Regarding, "All she ever did wrong was to not endorse Bernie." Is that all? Because to me things like turning her back on the DAPL protestors and her voting for the 700 billion dollar per year budget for the department of offense (MORE money for bombs then even Trump wanted) are also litmus tests that she failed miserably on. Regarding, "This kind of attitude is what will keep progressives from succeeding." Nope. Turning a blind eye to how the establishment keeps progressives from succeeding and acting like there aren't dealbreakers, which there should be for good reason... is what actually keeps progressives from succeeding.
    37
  268.  @MisterCharlton  Thanks for proving my point for me. Not that it was necessary.
    37
  269. The green party is left. But the system is rigged top to bottom in favor of the two major corporate parties.
    37
  270. This lifelong democrat will never support corrupt Hillary and a corrupt DNC that rigged the election. Goodbye DNC. Hello Green Party. Jill Stein for President!
    36
  271. Kallister regarding, "Jill would be a nice change" If you believe this then work to make it happen. Regarding, "our real choice is either Hi$$ary or Trump" Those are not real choices and are not very different in any sort of meaningful way. Regarding, "Make your vote count for something." I am when I vote for Jill Stein. I tell the establishment that I am not going to waste my vote by using it for a garbage candidate. The only wasted votes are votes for terrible people you don't want to win. My vote gets the Green Party closer to the very important 5 percent mark so that the party can receive matching funds in the future and grow and this is very important to a party that doesn't fund their elections through legalized bribes the way the other parties do. Regarding, "Vote Trump which is our vote Against the Hill." Trump is garbage and you are no better than a Hillary supporter when you support him. He would have been considered by Hillary for VP had he not run on the Republican side. Trump is shit. Don't be a fool buying into his BS. "we have to take out their families" is something ISIS should be saying, not a Presidential candidate. That is hardly "giving peace a chance."
    36
  272. It's not even so much the fact that Bernie's plan is far better than Warren's (and it is), it's far more that I trust Bernie to fight for his plan while Warren would just roll over and forget about hers.
    36
  273.  Qimodis  What a remarkably uncompelling argument.
    36
  274. The corporate media does the bidding of the establishment. They are not news. They are propaganda.
    36
  275. Marcos proves there is still lots of work to be done making robot smiles authentic.
    36
  276. I'd like to buy the book and use it for toilet paper. I won't thou because I don't want Hillary to make money off me.
    36
  277.  @chrisbeeken  Because only one major party needs to change? Oh wait. Is the fact that the "democratic" party needs to change a legit reason to vote for the orange clown?
    36
  278. I reached out to Nancy and Chuck as well but they don't take my calls.
    35
  279. I used to be proud to be an American. Now I relate to what good people in Nazi Germany must have felt like.
    35
  280. I know why Warren is in... to try and take votes from Sanders. But I don't know why amy is sticking around. I wouldn't be surprised if she is gone soon.
    35
  281. Wouldn't it be nice if politicians cared about what was good for the people rather than worrying about what is good for their party and own skin?
    35
  282. Am I the only progressive that is furious that Warren voted for the 700 billion dollar per year budget for the department of offense? Because I can't believe how many people seem to be ok with her while she does that. Or that she didn't support the DAPL protestors, and didn't endorse Sanders, or hasn't done essentially anything that is progressive to me.
    35
  283. I can... the election is over.
    35
  284. Hopefully the water protectors stay safe. Sadly the police, whose job it is "to serve and protect," do the exact opposite and pose the biggest threat to them and their safety.
    34
  285. Clearly Jordan has sold out to Mike's Hard Lemonade. :)
    34
  286. Meh... feels like you are hustling for 200 bucks.
    34
  287. Warren went to add, "Cut. It. Out."
    34
  288. We need criminal justice reform NOW!
    34
  289. Maybe Joe Biden can let him talk at the "democratic" convention.
    34
  290.  @GregoryWonderwheel  Regarding, "That's the plural "we" as a nation, not as individuals." Clearly. I didn't vote for POS biden.
    34
  291. Please do anything and everything in your power to help Bernie Sanders become our next president.
    34
  292. You should have spent more time listening to Sanders. He said over and over that he didn't want Trump to be President. He said over and over that he would do everything in his power to try to prevent Trump from winning. You can disagree with his decision but you should be able to understand it because, as Sanders does, he tells you what he is going to do and does what he says.
    33
  293. It's not like 20 million from hillary's friend was going to last forever. Burgers and nosejobs aren't cheap.
    33
  294.  @dwrash21  No. I don't. But I'm not voting for Biden. Now that you know what are you going to do with that? Because if you push Biden knowing he can't win then it's you who wants 4 more years of Trump. Biden can't win and won't win. Maybe act accordingly and make sure the candidate who can win gets the nomination.
    33
  295. The military industrialized complex needs to be stopped.
    33
  296. Soulless corporations and rich elites.
    33
  297. This should be taught in schools under "Pandering 101."
    33
  298. Was only here for hedges. Later frauds
    33
  299.  @DJTreviCSRecordings  I feel bad for you if you think Trump is a representation of "real people" to you. To the sane real people are not narcissistic, pathological liars like Trump is.
    33
  300. In a sane world Charles Booker would win and it wouldn't be even close. Please let him win in this mess up world.
    32
  301.  @shinigamiryan5837  Creating a new party takes time. Time we don't have. That and the entire system is rigged against 3rd parties. The 2 major parties made sure of that.
    32
  302.  @tedmarley4341  For some reason if I try to type that all at once it gets shadowbanned. I had to work really hard to inform you. I hope you appreciate it.
    32
  303. Accept no imitations. Bernie Sanders 2020!
    32
  304. You should be sorry if you are actually suggesting that you vote based on a person's appearance.
    31
  305. Bernie Sanders 2020. Better late then never.
    31
  306.  @markgorenshtein1946  Even a moron like John Kasich knows that what your wrote is idiotic or he'd be doing it. Fucking dumbass.
    31
  307. Our real life ministry of truth in action.
    31
  308. Love, love, love you. And thank you. This country needs Sanders.
    31
  309. I reject the implied premise that FOX has an "A team."
    31
  310. Pretty much every policy Bernie is advocating for would disproportionately help blacks. Universal health care, providing college education, raising the minimum wage, criminal justice reform and legalizing weed, restoring voter rights to all, and more are all issues that disproportionately affect blacks and would disproportionately help blacks if implemented.
    31
  311. I saw a bumper sticker that had me cracking up. This is not a direct quote but it was something to the effect of, "I love Jesus, I just can't stand his followers."
    31
  312. "Neil" Think of all the lives we could save if we harvested his body for parts.
    31
  313. Bernie Sanders in 2020!
    31
  314. All you people bashing Hillary are sexist and it is your fault Hillary Clinton lost the election. She is a saint and the victim of only Republican smears. I'm just kidding. Seriously thou fuck her. As much as I hate Trump being President I am able to take some comfort in the fact that she is not President. It sucks that she is lingering like a smelly fart but we should be grateful that she won't go away as she is only doing a service to progressives by continuing to show why corporate dems are akin to cancer.
    30
  315. If she were smart she could have subcontracted out some farts in jars to you and no one would be the wiser.
    30
  316.  @BonnieG101  He committed an extreme act of protest whose side effect is likely death. It was not suicide. A suicide when your intended purpose is death. His purpose was to bring awareness.
    30
  317. I have no tolerance with anyone dodging questions even people I like like Tulsi. If she thought it was BS question then she should have spent time saying why it was a BS question rather than just avoiding it entirely.
    30
  318. Uncle Tom in 2020.
    30
  319. Donna Brazile is sexist. Sincerely Hillary Clinton and the DNC.
    30
  320. Nah. She hasn't changed. She was always terrible. The only difference is that now more people realize it.
    30
  321. Republicans are welcome in the "democratic" party. Progressives are not.
    30
  322. Jill Stein for President! The Green Party is the only party not representing big money and corporations. They represent the people but they need your support.
    29
  323. Manufacturing consent was designed for terrible people like him.
    29
  324. That's not even good trolling Ricky.
    29
  325. Whataboutism in full effect here.
    29
  326. Just another useful idiot for the establishment.
    29
  327. Polls have a margin of error. I suspect he actually is below 0% somehow.
    29
  328. Which isn't exactly true. They do have superdelegates but they are fewer and used differently.
    29
  329.  @fsdafdsafdas  their youtube channel is called "breaking points"
    29
  330. Youtube tells me there are 32 replies but only let's me read 13 of them. Thanks for saving me from wrongthink youtube. /s
    29
  331. That is probably because most people are smart enough to not drive drunk mountaingoat.
    29
  332. Bernie Sanders 2020! Better late than never.
    29
  333.  @j_ll7  Regarding, " I'm not a troll." So, in other words they do exist and aren't just a "conspiracy theory." Thanks for conceding that obvious truth. Regarding, "Just a hard working guy" You spend more time comment on the same cites I do and I'm retired. You spend all this time on cites that you totally disagree with. It would be like if I spent all my time on Alex Jones and Breitbart. Only two logical conclusions can be drawn from your behavior, 1) you are fucking insane or 2) you are being paid. Oh wait, it might be 3) you are fucking insane and you are being paid to spout nonsense 24/7.
    29
  334. We don't.
    29
  335.  @neutralmilkbaby  Regarding, "Some people prefer a stable life free of drama." We are talking about sex. Not "life."
    29
  336. The Trump administration has instead offered free courses in flag worship in lieu of the debt forgiveness.
    29
  337. This guy gives me hope for the future.
    28
  338. It's time we look into all the people who went missing after diddy's vote or die campaign.
    28
  339. I'd vote for jimmy dore. Just saying.
    28
  340.  @borninthewronggenerationno3873  You suck at trolling and life.
    28
  341. Jean well done on being able to jam pack so much stupid into so few words. Bravo for that.
    28
  342.  @m00nBB  Just when I thought I couldn't underestimate her idiocy...
    28
  343. If he does this I will refrain from calling him an orange clown for at least a year.
    28
  344. I'd like to remind everyone that the primary was fair and if you think otherwise you are sexist (yes this is sarcasm).
    28
  345. I think he is pretty happy not being effectively blamed for Trump winning. I know I wouldn't want to be successfully blamed for that orange clown.
    28
  346. I'd like to thank Hillary for reminding me why I never voted for her.
    28
  347. Protect journalists like Pat! Free Assange!
    28
  348. But has she thought about it as a corrupt politician?
    28
  349. Bernie or Bust... til one of us dies. Maybe longer.
    28
  350. Vote your values. Don't worry so much about labels.
    28
  351. Regarding, "People need to stop blaming the training or lack of." Yup. It's McDonald's fault. Officer Karen didn't get her happy meal and someone had to pay. I use jokes to deal with my anger.
    28
  352.  @Alkhemy84  If I were David I'd give your comment a heart. We still have a lot of room for good progressive voices like both Bowman and Andom.
    28
  353. Regarding, "His core are die hards" It's not about his core. He was going to get the votes he was going to get for the most part. It was about the democratic base who weren't going to show up for a corrupt POS like Hillary. They would have shown up to support Bernie in droves thou. It wouldn't have been close.
    27
  354.  @nebo1186  If trump were really cool he would dismantle them.
    27
  355. Accept no imitations. Bernie Sanders 2020
    27
  356. Or let me try to put it another way... it's not kyles job to support Sanders. But he does support him. And he should be being honest about it. You would rather they lie to you and pretend they don't have candidates they support when this is one the only things they do right.
    27
  357. I can't think of anything that has a better return on investment than bribing government officials.
    27
  358. ​ @elynum  Jimmy apologized for a joke, not for harassment. You should apologize for lying.
    27
  359.  @j_ll7  Oh so it's a conspiracy theory that there are paid trolls working the internet? There is no reality behind such a claim? So, for example, Hillary's "Correct the Record" was a "conspiracy theory" as opposed to reality? Or maybe does the truth hurt?
    27
  360.  @aaronwilkinson8963  "bombed a country they were at war with" So you would support russia using nukes in ukraine then right?
    27
  361. I can't think of a better explanation why they would commit a federal crime to destroy the ballots then she stole the election.
    27
  362.  @tedmarley4341  research
    27
  363. Christopher regarding, "so everything said by a liberal is a "fact" now?....how supremely arrogant of you to state this "fact"" Well it is a fact that Christians are more likely to be in favor of the death penalty. It is a fact that Christians are more likely to be in favor of torture. So I am confident that what paleghost says is a fact.
    27
  364.  @Kinshasa9200  Bernie is smeared as a socialist and communist already and has been for a long time. Labels are for the lazy. Policy is what is important and people want, for example, universal health care.
    27
  365.    You are still doing a horrible job of smearing Sanders and you continue to show your inner shill.
    27
  366. "They don’t give a fuck about you, they don’t GIVE A FUCK ABOUT YOU. THEY DON’T CARE ABOUT YOU — AT ALL. AT ALL. AT ALL" Fuck I wish he were still alive today.
    27
  367. Nah. He knows what is up but it is his job to pretend he is clueless.
    26
  368.  @ahwasright1364  Regarding, "get a job," Says a paid troll who is here 24/7.
    26
  369. This would save lives.
    26
  370. They have already been doing that because they have always feared him.
    26
  371. "Why are these people being allowed to be in charge of anything" Because nancy was an important part of the ben franklin presidency.
    26
  372. Seltzer is God.
    26
  373.  Harry James Pleat  "I've been holding back, letting you run your mouth like your some kinda warrior for what's good in the world. That's about to change." That's something an evil villain in a movie might say to blackmail someone while holding a knife to the someone's throat and it's exactly what ana said to try and blackmail jimmy.
    26
  374.  @LIV2500  "where the military industrial complex campaign donations are going" Both sides are bought and they have been for a long time.
    26
  375.  @AndrewYPTang  that was for the original theft. Those didn't include such information as he was able to get after his creation... like people's addresses.
    26
  376.  @RR9ISTHEBESTGUARD  Regarding, "It’s the height of privilege." The irony. So the blue team is just entitled to my vote? They aren't. I vote my values and corporate dems do not represent me. Sorry not sorry for having standards.
    26
  377.  @tedmarley4341  of function
    26
  378.  @nuancedmilitarism8402  Are you trying to make me throw up in my mouth? It's working.
    26
  379. I gave you a thumbs up even thou I question her being human.
    26
  380. Glass-Steagal now please..
    26
  381.  @streetteamtony2672  Regarding, "no need to be smart." I'll assume this is your mantra for everything. God damn you are dumb.
    26
  382.  @cosmicgiraffe4071  He's a fraud for things like: not mentioning the blackmail, not mentioning he's affiliated with TYT, for pretending 20 million dollars doesn't mean TYT are corrupt, and for acting like he's not taking sides when he clearly is. I've been a huge huge huge fan of kyle for a long, long long time. If I were a cultist I'd put up with his BS. You are projecting cultist for kyle.
    25
  383. What a shitshow our government is. They make me embarrassed to be American.
    25
  384.  @ConstantChaos1  Is happy to take corporate money in the general. Loves the MIC. Didn't run against Hillary in 2016 but runs against Sanders in 2020. Was and always is a 90s republican. Pretty much a wolf in sheeps clothing meant to stop Bernie.
    25
  385. Bernie Sanders 2020
    25
  386. When did the meaning of the word sellout get changed to "does something I disagree with?" Because clearly lots of people these days think that is what it means.
    25
  387.  @Jbo2000  How much are you paid for what you do? Is it by the hour or by the asinine post?
    25
  388. Fox is fucking garbage just like CNN or MSNBC unless you like and want to be brainwashed and bombarded with propaganda.
    25
  389. "hold my.... what's it called again?" -joe biden
    25
  390. Yup. But you keep voting blue no matter who like bernie tells you to. I'm sure that will help.
    25
  391. "severe stroke" I'd rather vote for it than I would for fetterman.
    25
  392. I hate the US corporate media almost as much as our corporate run government. Please let Sanders be healthy in 2020. We really need him in power.
    25
  393. Yang is like, "Who can beat Donald Trump? That's the right question." I'm like, no it's not. The right question is who SHOULD beat Trump. And the answer to that is Bernie Sanders.
    25
  394.  Trump Lost  How can you simultaneously think the trump years where so bad and not blame biden who is largely responsible for his rise and after his failure will likely lead to trump 2.0 after he is gone? In short I guess you haven't been paying attention.
    25
  395. Triple regarding, "a lot of women use their looks to land jobs." This is totally irrelevant, has nothing to do with sexual assault, and has no place in this discussion.
    25
  396. Accept no imitations (which is what Warren is). Bernie Sanders 2020!
    25
  397. They are busy covering the Kardashians.
    24
  398. I'm done calling them MSM. I simply call them corporate media now. It seems more appropriate.
    24
  399. Agreed. Their arguments are very insulting to everyone's intelligence.
    24
  400. The Green Party is the only party not bought by big money and corporate interests. They actually represent the people but they need your support. Jill Stein for President!
    24
  401. Let's not forget a pushup competition. And I personally would like to know who can win a hot dog eating competition.
    24
  402. I'd say it's more money in politics. It helps make the public dumb with constant propaganda. And to people that do understand what's going on apathy can be a natural result as well.
    24
  403. We need to create the next generation of terrorists for the military industrial complex to fight.
    24
  404. Do words really deserve huge credit when all your actions say it's just pandering?
    24
  405. And the same to ryan grimm, but sarcastically.
    24
  406. They also thought about bringing Epstein and Weinstein aboard but both were unavailable.
    24
  407.  @tedmarley4341  gain
    24
  408.  @tedmarley4341  and lied
    24
  409. I love this comment.
    24
  410. According to him and the DNC, pete "won" Iowa. I trust that they are all full of shit.
    24
  411.  @samscheller2331  Do you copy and paste the fact that you are not comfortable with sexuality everywhere?
    24
  412. I'm thinking he should look for someone who charges by the minute.
    24
  413. Biden already gave his plan for everything: Nothing Will Fundamentally Change -Biden 2020
    24
  414. I really wish Jill would have come back with, "MSNBC are you responsible for Trump winning after giving him multi-million dollars in free media exposure? Shouldn't you maybe had been covering Bernie Sanders speaking in front of record crowds instead of covering Trump's empty podium?"
    24
  415.  @Peopleofthesun386  if you don't understand why campaigning with despised people like Hillary and DWS is bad strategy then you are too far gone. That being said I find it funny that you are calling people "babies" while crying like a bitch about people who voted for Stein. Good luck with your continued efforts to shame voters. I'm not sure what it is going to take to convince you that you are being a fucking idiot. I doubt anything ever will.
    23
  416. He answered your question with his cowardly actions.
    23
  417.  @danbrown5736  You have it backwards. It's her crazy that makes her bitter... among lots of other terrible things.
    23
  418. They don't care about that and prefer high IQs in all honesty. What they do require is that their employees not have souls. Lou isn't dumb... he is just a terrible, terrible, terrible person. Wait a minute... yeah he is at least a little dumb.
    23
  419. Can you believe some countries have the audacity to call themselves free and don't have our gun violence? I mean, how can you be free without an arsenal? Am I right?
    23
  420. Trump supporters are fucking morons just like Hillary supporters. Just because Hillary is a piece of shit doesn't mean Trump isn't a piece of shit. He obviously is to anyone with a brain.
    23
  421. Support progressives. Support justice democrats.
    23
  422. Braindead regarding, "How about cut down on military costs instead?" How about both. I'm tired of subsidizing your cult.
    23
  423. I'm not a fan. And that is putting it nicely.
    23
  424. I support free speech, ALWAYS. Edit: as long as you aren't hurting someone else with your speech. So no defamation, no threats, no yelling fire in a theater and the like.
    23
  425. It's not about that. It's about corporate dems and their ilk doing what they are paid to do, represent big money and special interests and not the people.
    23
  426. I think it is more likely that you are controlled opposition to tear down about the only politician who is worth a shit.
    23
  427. Jill Stein Time!
    22
  428. Brent regarding, "but we can't always go back to that" It isn't about ALWAYS anything. It is about telling it like it is. It is about doing onto others as we want them to do to us. It is about not sweeping our wrongdoing under the rug because it is us. America is not defined by their name. There actions are not implicitly good. They are only good when they act good. And when we overthrow governments around the world, imprison people, torture people, and when we lock people up and throw away the key without giving them a trial we are not better than anyone. Those are actions that we should be feeling guilty about and I assure you that is what is really going on.
    22
  429. Hillary Clinton was terrible. I'm glad she isn't going to be President. That is very different than saying I'm glad Trump is going to be President. I'm not. But in the long run I think it will be a good thing. We need a major party that actually represents the people and we haven't had that for some time. Hopefully this is the first step towards getting that. The "democratic" party needs to learn from this and change or die. Love you Emma. Don't be sad. We need people like you going forward. Thank you for your work.
    22
  430. We essentially are in the Matrix but instead of serving the robots we serve the oligarchy.
    22
  431. 9:38 regarding Goldwater. Hillary Clinton was, is, and forever will be a "Goldwater Girl."
    22
  432. They could but they don't really want to win any of them... they are meant to be perpetual.
    22
  433. I voted Jill Stein in a swing state and have no regrets. At least there is hope for a progressive president in 2020.
    22
  434. Boycott Amazon if you haven't already.
    22
  435. Very true ben... except for the word almost.
    22
  436.  @heinzguderian9980  Don't be silly. If trump had a witchdoctor who could cure bone spur he certainly would have served in the military. /s
    22
  437. Jimmy wanted Jill Stein and so did everyone else that is sane.
    22
  438. Biden is dumber. Obviously. It's a pretty silly question really.
    22
  439.  @grsshppr7659  Troll says what?
    22
  440. Elizabeth Warren can go to hell and take her votes to perpetuate the military industrialized complex with her.
    22
  441. Don't forget about the jobs that will be lost making mansions, yachts, and jets for the private health insurance industry CEOs.
    22
  442. "Comedy" pays well in ukraine I guess. Check out his net worth.
    22
  443. I still haven't forgiven Wisconsin for choosing Ron Johnson instead of Russ Feingold.
    22
  444. Trump is a racist and you are a moron.
    22
  445. There are people that care about you even if the corporate media doesn't.
    22
  446. He wrongly described bushnells death as "suicide." But that is all I got. He is a legend.
    22
  447.  @BonnieG101  It was an extreme act of protest. That's not how you commit suicide.
    22
  448. Fun fact: I'd write in Bigfoot for president before I'd vote for Biden.
    22
  449.  @tedmarley4341  at wuhan
    22
  450.  @tedmarley4341  about it under oath
    22
  451.  @tedmarley4341  to rand paul
    22
  452. Can we get the CBO to also tell us how many lives it will save compared to the current system?
    22
  453.  greatest dad  "I love having science debates with Home Depot cashiers" Aren't you the same guy who was criticizing people for mislabeling you? Do you not mind being a hypocrite like this?
    22
  454. Just when you think you can't be more cynical...
    22
  455. Literally everything Bernie advocates for would disproportionately help black americans.
    22
  456. We need criminal justice reform NOW!
    22
  457. It's going to be tough to top the fact that AOC saved NY BILLIONS and set a precedent that we won't pay for corporations employees while they keep all their windfalls.
    22
  458. Thanks for covering their responses David... while the corporate media avoids talking about this like it's the plague.
    22
  459. I'm only shocked to learn that people would be shocked by this.
    22
  460.  @whyamimrpink78  Everyone's least favorite troll. I'll assume you are here to try to make tony look smart.
    22
  461.  @streetteamtony2672  Regarding, "They seem to forget what economics are." Canada pays half as much per person compared to the US. For a system that doesn't leave millions without insurance. Who produces better results (better infant mortality rate and better life expectancy). You are just a moron.
    22
  462. Bernie Sanders 2020. The candidate who can't be bought in the general.
    21
  463. Non-answers are answers even if they are not good answers or acceptable answers. In all honesty I prefer she not get a mulligan to say what she should have been saying the first time around. She is telling you what you already need to know... don't support her.
    21
  464.  @mikehauncho4874  The United States executed Japanese for the exact same war crimes Bush and his cronies did. Dipshits like you are what inspired Dunning and Kruger to form their original hypothesis.
    21
  465. 16:25 "Movie depictions are often confused..." This is funny because the movie "Total Recall" depicted a world with a thin atmosphere. You are showing the part AFTER the alien atmosphere machine was started. Before they got that thing going if they went outside their eyes would bulge outside their head. It's a hyper realistic movie is what I'm trying to say. /s
    21
  466. Of course one of grimm's sycophants would use the word "butthurt" unironically like that. Thanks for the laugh.
    21
  467. Don't give the neoliberals ideas.
    21
  468. I don't watch corporate media but I'm guessing they are not covering this.
    21
  469.  @JayBee-cr8jm  You stand with apartheid and jennyside.
    21
  470. @TurtleOnaMountiantop They don't have time for it? What world do you live in? I live in this one... the one where there are more United States citizens in prison then any other country by percentage of population and it isn't even close. Seems to me they have plenty of time to be locking people up... but those people's crimes are more likely to be victimless... like nonviolent drug offenses.
    21
  471.  @Sheepy-hp9je  PragerU lmfao. I guess I'll be impressed they aren't citing Trump U.
    21
  472.  @Che-e  While I appreciate and admire your efforts with "mr mountain" you would have a better chance using logic, reason, and intelligent arguments on an actual mountain.
    21
  473. No worries. She is the real deal... just like Sanders.
    21
  474.  @tedmarley4341  funded
    21
  475. It's remarkable how cheap US officials are bought.
    21
  476. Mind of the North Star while I agree that the people should have done more you have to understand that the average joe is busy just trying to stay afloat and pay their bills. They were also being mislead by the corporate media who, when they bothered to talk about him, were smearing him. And then there is the fact that so many states have closed primaries where, even if they wanted to vote for him, often couldn't because the system is rigged from top to bottom. The DNC rigged the primary... not your average joe.
    21
  477.  @CommanderWar64  Regarding, "Trump's worst case scenario is post apocalyptic." If you really think this what is so good about electing biden? Do you not understand that voting for nothing to fundamentally change in a world that desperately needs change is a recipe for disaster? That trump got into office because of what you are insisting we elect? Biden leads to trump to 2.0. If trump is relected he can be blamed. The DNC and the corporate media who told us biden was the electable one and forced him upon us might have some sort of small reckoning. We might be able to break the cycle of circling down the drain supporting greater and greater lesser evils. We might elect a progressive. And we might get the hope and change that was promised long ago but was never delivered to actually happen. I think the world would be better off in the long run (worse in the short run) if trump wins. But I'm not going to vote for him because you don't vote for terrible. And that's what you are doing when you vote for biden.
    21
  478.  @angelahall4402  Do you really? You like the billionaire who couldn't even be honest about whether or not he would run? You know who really would be great in a debate with Trump? Bernie. Even Trump knows Bernie would make him look bad. That's why he chickened out of debating him last time.
    21
  479. If they sold punches to Ted Cruz's face they could pay for it.
    21
  480.  @whyamimrpink78  You saying bad things about fauci makes me like him. That's how much you suck and how little I think of what you have to say.
    21
  481.  Ms Taylor  I mean... you are giving your own idiotic comments a thumbs up so you must really be on to something. /s
    21
  482.  Sir Panda  Yes, Sanders is anti war, along with Gabbard and a couple others in government. Still the fact remains that neither major party can be said to be a party of peace.
    21
  483.  @JamNMama1  Most of his personal wealth came from his best selling book. And I'm not talking about himself personally even thou he has been on the very bottom for personal wealth compared to his peers, I'm talking about his campaign. And his campaign is being paid for by the little guy and not big money, corporations, and the elite. I hope you are being paid to say the stupid shit you are and aren't really as dense as your comment makes you seem. Either way you suck at life.
    21
  484. He'd rather be proven wrong.
    21
  485. Your comment is funny because they are literally ALL warmongers.
    21
  486.  @glennwilcock4593  "not at War" Gaslight much?
    21
  487. Meh. Biden is corrupt. I'd rather Bernie just said it. Nobody is perfect. If the worst thing I can think about Bernie is that he is too nice I can still live with him. Bernie needs to be our next president because Biden and people like them are corrupt.
    21
  488. How am I expected to be scared of Trump when this is already going on with a "democratic" President? Jill Stein for President because she is the only candidate running who actually deserves your vote!
    20
  489. Trump loves the uneducated.
    20
  490. Yeah, it is pretty tough to deal with unconditional love and adorability on a regular basis.
    20
  491. If it were it wouldn't be very intellectually honest of kyle to not mention that in this video. So it would be par for the course.
    20
  492. I really like this guy... except for his praise of Warren.
    20
  493. Loppo regarding, "Jill is paid opposition" No she is not but you might be. And if you are not then you are just dumb as fuck.
    20
  494. True progressives don't enable the military industrial complex. Warren is not a progressive.
    20
  495.  @lexluthore6065  Some of us are good people.
    20
  496.  @danielpincus221  I'm surprised you believe obvious propaganda lies.
    20
  497. Boss regarding, "he sold out to the DNC" Stop being silly. The DNC has essentially declared war on him and the people who support him.
    20
  498. But we were just about to win the war on drugs! (sarcasm obviously)
    20
  499.  @jordanhenderson9213  She made it perfectly clear what she wanted and it had nothing to do with predatory behavior and everything to do with jimmy 'running his mouth.' That's what she was asking for... him to stop exposing TYT.
    20
  500. MrB most things in the world are very complicated but this one is quite simple actually. I would like to add that I think it is funny to be called a simpleton by someone who only felt the need to use one word.
    20
  501.  M G  Both Biden and Trump are racists. Don't be absurd.
    20
  502.  @tedmarley4341  Shouldn't you be getting boosted right now?
    20
  503. Republicans and democrats have essentially been part of the same corporate party for some time. Nice that they act like and stop pretending otherwise.
    20
  504. If  @whyamimrpink78  ever said something that wasn't stupid as fuck I might die of shock.
    20
  505. Getting caught watching porn is the only evidence I've ever found that Ted Cruz is human.
    20
  506. Why do you say so? That is something they believe right? So it isn't like he is saying something that isn't true. Everyone should be able to defend their beliefs or not believe them.
    19
  507. "supposed free speech" Why is it only supposed? Was somebody put in jail for speech? Or maybe free speech extends to everyone? You aren't any less free to say stupid things when I use my freedom of speech to call you an idiot.
    19
  508.  @JonSmith-cx7gr  "Poor people are not your friend." Yes. They are. It's the elite versus the peasants.
    19
  509. There will always be reasons why some let corruption slide like this. I don't give a fuck that Pence may very well be worse. We have to start somewhere in a war against corruption.
    19
  510. Why get the TVs if you never use them?
    19
  511. The incredibly articulate, thoughtful women was dumb? If you actually think that it is only because you are the one that is dumb.
    19
  512.  @whyamimrpink78  Seriously dipshit. Do you get paid by the hour or by the stupid comment?
    19
  513. Trump supporters were calling people who tried to reserve tickets to his rally with no intention of going "election tampering." I suspect they will be silent on this.
    19
  514.  @kylewatson5133  Some are more complicit than others. Stop pretending we are all equal.
    19
  515. Wylliam If you have trouble understanding why so many have trust issues look no further then Obama. Hope and change was same ole same old. And the lesson we learned is that first and foremost if you want know how credible a politician's rhetoric is follow the money. Politicians represent who got them there (as in who pays for their campaigns). She still loves takes dirty money so, while the rhetoric is nice and a small win, it does not mean that we are going to blindly trust her because she talks a good game. Obama talked a great game. Then he gave us republican health care, and more war, and persecuted journalists, and made the bush tax cuts permentant, and...
    19
  516. Medicare for all isn't a litmus test? It is for me. If you want my vote you are going to need to support it.
    19
  517. I guess paying as much as then next 10 countries combined (including china) on the military doesn't get you what it used to.
    19
  518.  @girletherial  I hope you are being paid for that drivel and aren't actually as dense as your comment.
    19
  519. Do you think Brian practices looking confused and lost when being given logical and sound reasoning the way he does at 10:59 with his furled eyebrows?
    19
  520.  @armgemboiii  I donate but you don't want me to phone bank. I'm a dick.
    19
  521.  @DLTD  Regarding, "you’re vote... it don’t mean shit" It obviously does. That's why the establishment disenfranchises voters and purges voter rolls... among other things.
    19
  522. That is murder.
    19
  523. Nah. But you would be crazy to think he will be locked up for this.
    19
  524.  @davidlazarus67  You sound like someone who would have the audacity to drink a big gulp. Or worse, give bagels to the homeless. /s
    19
  525.  @tedmarley4341  Faucci
    19
  526.  @LD-tn6ff  She has been consistently supporting the MIC just like the 90s republican she still is. You seem desperate to find ways to excuse the fact that she told us who she was long ago and we aren't interested despite her efforts are rebranding and pandering. Bernie is the hands down better candidate and one of the ways I know it is because he wasn't a Republican when he was in his 40s. Shit he was fight the good fight long before that like for example when he was marching with MLK. Consistency matters. Principles matter. You are clearly desperate to find ways of excusing substantive problems with Warren.
    19
  527.  greatest dad  "it surely is a living human being" When do you celebrate your babies birthdays "greatest dad?"
    19
  528. Canada can afford it but the richest country in the history of the world can't. Got it.
    19
  529. It's not a new story (and Jimmy has covered it in the past) but it does contain new information.
    19
  530. You need to be able to have some nuance in your thinking. Yes the party in general sucks balls but that doesn't mean I'm not going to vote for a guy like Tilleman even if he has the audacity to run as a democrat. You don't vote for parties. You vote for people.
    19
  531. I am with her... Jill Stein!
    18
  532. kandy regarding, "jill stein would have shit the bed if she won" What a vague meaningless insult. Regarding, "talk about not enough experiance" As opposed to all the experience Donald Trump is bringing? Or the experience Hillary Clinton has of demonstrating nothing but terrible flawed judgement? Dick Cheney has experience but he too would suck. Judgement is always going to be far more important than experience and Jill Stein had the best judgement. In part because in her judgement the military industrialized complex is out of control and needs to be reigned in. Regarding, "she's a far left FEMALE activist" I am to the left. I do not care about gender and think you are suspect for thinking that was important enough to be put in all caps. And I think being an activist is good. It is far superior to being establishment. Regarding, "Yeah. that would help." Yes. It would of. Sadly we will never know and instead we get another corporate stooge sucking goldman sachs dick and making an oil baron SOS.
    18
  533. Agreed. I live in a swing state for once and I will be voting for Jill Stein. Republicans message of fear of immigrants and muslims does nothing for me. Democrats message of fear of Trump also does nothing for me.
    18
  534. Because she is a sweet angel who is only being demonized by the right. (heavy sarcasm)
    18
  535. Not voting is practically the equivalent of voting no. That said I would have preferred he actually voted no but don't act as if he voted yes.... he didn't.
    18
  536. Regarding, "a compromise that everyone will be happy with for Health Care" Do you know anything about our politicians?
    18
  537. Regarding, "Stop acting like a brainless tribal partisan" You lack self awareness.
    18
  538. Nope. For Xenu to not approve they would have to actually exist first.
    18
  539. Panic regarding, "If they did we might not have Trump right now." There is no difference between your average Republican and Trump when it comes to policy so let's not pretend there is shall we? Just adding some racism and offensiveness isn't substantive when it comes to what is ultimately important... policy. And again... they do have their own superdelgates.
    18
  540. It's nice of him to admit neglecting an entire city.
    18
  541. He's the same age as Biden. He can run laps around bigmac Trump. There is no reason to think he can't do the job. And there is a reason we have vice presidents should the unthinkable happen. Stop it with the too old bs.
    18
  542.  @TheAdamisgay  I'm not sure it's possible to be worse than neera but I agree that both biden and cuomo are superb examples of why blue no matter who is nonsense.
    18
  543. Good luck with being dumb as fuck going forward.
    18
  544.  @xyz7975  He and Obama did set record deportations with their time in office. Biden did destroy countless lives with his racist crime bill that exacerbated mass incarceration. But now I have this propaganda that is designed to make me feel happy good thoughts about a specific politician and POTUS elect. I just don't know what to think now.
    18
  545. Because that is how we pay for important things like roads in society.
    18
  546. You should be scared about the corrupt Superdelegate party stealing this.
    18
  547. There are zero good arguments against not forcing the vote. And anyone telling you it's a bad idea is suspect AF.
    18
  548. I trust she is just waiting to pick the best moment to officially endorse for maximum impact. If I'm wrong and she doesn't I will be crazy disappointed.
    18
  549.  greatest dad  ".that's why it's called a "birth day". You mean, because that's the day they are BORN.
    18
  550. Not for me. I want Bloomberg to waste his money on me and would prefer Bernie used his elsewhere as he already has my vote. But for everyone else... yes.
    18
  551. This channel loses credibility when it has ryan grim on and doesn't challenge him for his BS.
    18
  552. When you think about who she represents she is essentially a Republican.
    18
  553. The first point worth noting is that the legal immigration system is completely broken and people who want to come to the country in search of a better way of life and the opportunity to provide for themselves and their families should be allowed to do so. It isn't "okay" for people to immigrate illegally. It is just understandable. That type of "crime" is akin to speeding. It is hardly nefarious in and of itself even if it is against the law.
    17
  554. He doesn't really need to push the TPP through. Both parties are for it because it is what the corporations want. The public option not so much.
    17
  555. I haven't seen his standup. I only know him for his political commentary here and at the YT. I'm sure his standup is great considering his ability to make me laugh while talking about things that should make me cry.
    17
  556. It means you are doing something right if you are a politician.
    17
  557.  @archibaldhaddock5277  You weren't there. Neither was I but Warren told me it happened and she would never tell a lie. If you think she would lie then you are sexist. /s
    17
  558. Protect journalism!
    17
  559.  @Blackmallowtube  "on the right side of hundreds of issues" That was when he was talking. Action speak louder than words. It's no different than a politician who said the right thing but now they are in office and showing you who they really are. He's a fraud. You'd be wise to accept it. I don't need perfection. I require integrity and kyle is showing us he has none.
    17
  560.  @christiansutton4369  "nobody will want to hire lazy or stupid people" Were people eager to do this before or are you just being one of the stupid people you are talking about?
    17
  561.  @christiansutton4369  Regarding, "The US dollar is going to tank in value soon" I guess we shouldn't try to raise the minimum wage then. Do you ever say anything that isn't idiotic for one reason or another?
    17
  562.  @Y0utubeIsFuckingHomo  "Nothing will fundamentally change." Joe biden telling the truth. Checkmate again!
    17
  563. There are bootlickers for biden just like there were bootlickers for trump. They really aren't that different.
    17
  564. Regarding, "WTF is wrong for them" They aren't bad people but they are brainwashed by too much corporate media. Propaganda works, sadly.
    17
  565. Dead Sirius that applies to some of them but there are definitely many that are just so brainwashed and indoctrinated that they genuinely believe what that guy was saying.
    17
  566.  @borninthewronggenerationno3873  Not wearing a mask =/= essential liberty. Obviously.
    17
  567. edy you mean because Sanders is willing to accept reality and the fact that russia did fuck with us even if their influence was wildly overblown by corporate media? I've lost more then a little respect for you over that.
    17
  568. Regarding, "he endorsed Hillary" Yup. He endorsed Hillary like he said he would when entering the dem race and agreed to support the winner of the primary. Sanders is like that. He does what he says he will. He didn't want to be blamed for Trump winning. Can you really blame him for that? And remember what it was and what it wasn't. It was a fucking endorsement not his soul. I fucking love Sanders but I happily voted for Jill Stein because only sheep vote for someone because of another person's endorsement. The establishment appreciate you doing their dirty work for them and trying to smear about the only decent politician in the country.
    17
  569.  @patrickpinch2929  You fuckers and your whataboutism arguments are pathetic as fuck... almost as pathetic as you are predictable with your rationalizations, excuses, and deflections.
    17
  570. Regarding, "we can all agree that this was a wonderful thing for him to do." Can we? Not all of us are impressed by meaningless political theater.
    17
  571. Regarding, "There's more to the budget than defense spending." So what. That is a fucking pathetic excuse to rationalize supporting a bloated military budget that is even more than the orange clown in chief wanted. Regarding, "DAPL was not that huge of an issue" It was to me. Regarding, "just because someone doesn't mention it much doesn't mean they don't have opinions on it or would have opinions on it." I don't give a flying fuck about her private opinion. I want leaders. She clearly isn't. Regarding, "So what if she didn't endorse Bernie?" You must be fucking with me. She had the opportunity to support a progressive and didn't because..... I don't really care why. The why isn't important to me like the action is important to me. Regarding, "Is she supposed to tow the progressive line 100%." Pretty much. At least if you want me to consider you a progressive. You don't have to do this, but when you don't I'm not going to think you are a progressive and I'm only looking to support progressives. Regarding, "Relationships matter in politics." Sure they do. But principles are far more important to me. Compare what Warren did to what Tulsi did during the primary. One demonstrated progressive principles by endorsing Sanders and one did not. Regarding, "If Hilary won, Warren would of been on her good side." I guess if I were a fucking moron I'd care more about being on Hillary's "good side" than I'd care about getting an actual progressive in office. Look at what Warren has already fucking said about Hillary in her own fucking book. "As first lady, Mrs. Clinton had been persuaded that the bill was bad for families, and she was willing to fight for her beliefs. As New York’s newest senator, however, it seems that Hillary Clinton could not afford such a principled position . . . The bill was essentially the same, but Hillary Rodham Clinton was not." That is Warren acting on principle. That is back when I liked her. That was a long, long, long time ago. That was back when Warren actually fought for her beliefs. Because you know fighting for those beliefs is what is really important... not just claiming to have them.
    17
  572. We need to reign in the military industrial complex now and people need to refuse to support any politician that won't do so.
    17
  573. Listening to a politician talk is about the worst way to think you know anything about them. You would be better off looking at who is funding their campaign and looking at their record in office. If you did that for Pete you would realize his is an establishment shill who represents corporate america. That is why he is being sold to you as the best thing since sliced bread when in reality he is dogshit.
    17
  574.  @Nackdad  Regarding, "Please feel free to blow your brains out when Bernie becomes president." I only wonder why you would ask them to wait. There's no time like the present.
    17
  575. You are in luck and have found a gem.
    17
  576. Good for you. Now just don't go supporting the other side of the uniparty like far too many people here.
    17
  577. Sounds good to me. Signed sexist Bernie Bro.
    17
  578. I'm sure you don't care about the trump family as well. I'm just kidding. You are clearly a hack.
    17
  579.  @KiTheMC  No. Not fine. Stop it.
    17
  580.  @snapgrouch702  LMFAO. Do the Koch brothers pay you for your stupid shit?
    17
  581.  @tedmarley4341  If you are trying to prove you don't care about faucci's lies you are succeeding.
    17
  582.  @cane509  This is only the beginning. Chris knows what's in store for him at Central Park when Sanders wins. /s
    17
  583. Elshad, as already mentioned exit polls clearly show massive election fraud. What I don't see mentioned are how about 500 superdelegates biased the entire election process before any of the peasants were allowed to vote. It allowed biased and corrupt media to cite superdelegates in the vote counts (even thou the corrupt DNC themselves say they shouldn't have been counted til the convention) which served to present Hillary as being inevitable. It served to suppress Sanders support as intended. Superdelegates also biased the voting process by "calling" the election on a day when nobody voted, the day before the largest state in the union was voting. There is also DNC internal memos of May 2015 that showed they had picked their candidate and were anything but neutral. There is the NV democratic convention. There were massive voter rolls purged. There was massive intentionally disenfranchisement. There was biased media coverage where the MSM gave Trump billions of dollars in value of free coverage while Sanders was essentially ignored and dismissed. The MSM would cover Trumps empty podium while Sanders would be speaking in front of record crowds. You are a dickhead if you think this election was free and fair. All the evidence and facts suggest otherwise.
    16
  584. I'd love a woman President... just not Hillary Clinton.
    16
  585. Kallister regarding, "I agree with you" It does not seem that you do. I refuse to give my vote to a terrible person unworthy of my vote and Trump is all that kind of terrible and more. Regarding, "there is only a choice between two less than stellar candidates." No. There isn't. And "less than stellar" is an understatement of epic proportion. Regarding, "Draining the swamp is a start." People call me naive for supporting Stein but I am confident that your belief that he would do this is far more naive. I have zero credible reason to believe Trump would do this. The swamp is his natural habitat.
    16
  586. Yup. His signature piece of legislation was a Republican policy rather than a progressive policy. He brought war, war, war, war, war, war, and war. He did nothing substantial to regulate wall street. He did nothing to address income inequality. He let Hillary do whatever she wanted. His failed presidency and inability to actually bring hope and change directly led to Trump. People still want and need change and would go to extreme measures to try and get it. The only reason history will remember him fondly is because he is likely to be sandwiched between two of the worst President's in history and American's are all about comparing things rather than judging them by their own merits.
    16
  587. user regarding, "he had the whole Republican-dominated Congress against him" Not the entire time. He used a democrat controlled house and senate to pass Romneycare nationwide. He could stop DAPL this very moment and it has nothing to do with congress. He represents corporations and his donors. Stop defending him.
    16
  588. What does black lives matter want? 1 End broken windows policing 2 Community oversight 3 Limit use of force 4 Police independently investigated and prosecuted 5 Community representation 6 Universal body cams 7 Additional training 8 End for-profit policing 9 Demilitarization 10 Fair police union contracts All are common sense much needed changes.
    16
  589.  @user-kcrpine  I don't need him to be poor. I need him to keep calling out the people in power.
    16
  590. You gotta give the Trump sheep some credit... even a broken clock is correct twice a day. CNN does suck.
    16
  591. Even the trump supporters there seemed to understand that was an "ew" moment.
    16
  592.  @LD-tn6ff  Warren is a 90s republican, who said she will sell out if she makes it to the general, who voted for more bombs for trump, who didn't run in 2016 against a corporate shill like Hillary but wants to run in 2020 against a progressive like Sanders, who didn't support her fellow "natives" during the DAPL protests. Just stop it. Everything you have said trying to talk her is just bullshit. She is terrible. There is a reason the corporate media is warming to her while true progressives are smeared the way Sanders is.
    16
  593. I find that offensive.
    16
  594.  @dragonwhimsy6696  Except they are both possibly going to lose their home states. I get warren sticking around cause the majority of her supporters would go to Bernie if she dropped out. But that isn't the case for amy as far as I know. Then again maybe you are correct because of Minnesota. Even if sanders wins the state he would win it by SIGNIFCANTLY more if she dropped out. But everywhere else in the country I think she takes more votes from biden.
    16
  595.  @PEZ1514  Yes. Sorry not sorry if the truth hurts.
    16
  596.  @MCWaffles2003-1  Corry has it right... the establishment's plan is about keeping Sanders from winning on the first ballot. Bloomberg for example doesn't take lots of votes and delegates from Sanders, but he will take some especially in a huge state like NY. It's our job to go out and support Sanders overwhelmingly so that he wins on the first ballot.
    16
  597. *And all the other wars as well.
    16
  598. Garrett that is only the tip of the iceberg. They also should be paying the bottom more... as in... we need to raise the minimum wage.
    16
  599. Yes David I do.
    16
  600. They aren't just baddies... they are the WORST.
    16
  601. Yeah, eliminating the profit, the marketing, the paperwork is magic to a fucking moron. You probably lose your shit when someone has a lighter and think it is the devil.
    16
  602. Wanna hear a joke? Land of the free
    16
  603. So you don't like Jeff Weaver because he accepts the reality that Trump will never support this? It isn't going to happen right now. I'm sorry. I want it to but the fact of the matter is that the people need to put better people in positions of power before it can become a reality. That is why Sanders pushes for a political revolution.
    16
  604. I'm not sure what's dumber, being a register dem or voting straight republican. Either way you have voting against your interests down pat instead of voting 3rd party.
    16
  605.  @claymusicoff5663  "imma start doing what I wanna do”" She wanted to do blackmail. And she did even if incompetently so.
    16
  606.  @Sheepy-hp9je  You are going to be waiting for a long time because I'm not going to give PragerU a view anymore then I'm going to give Alex Jones one. Just think that means you win for all I care. I know you will. But I'd rather try to talk intelligently about this with my dog more then you. They are smarter then you and I actually care about what my dog thinks.
    16
  607. Libertarian ideology sucks.
    16
  608.  @OblivionEight  Regarding, "absolutely horrible take." Pretty funny coming from a guy bootlicking for liars.
    16
  609.  @Jbo2000  How much are you paid to say the things you do? Is your "soul" worth it?
    16
  610. Isn't chompsky that guy who thought people who don't get jabbed should starve?
    16
  611. Private prisons should be against the law.
    16
  612. Don't worry folks. It seems there is a bipartisan agreement to give them more money so they should be ok.
    16
  613. I'm going to go out on a limb and think that everything you just wrote was dumb without reading it.
    16
  614. Bernie Sander 2020. Better late than never.
    16
  615. "Every human being should work within the laws of the land" Meh. I'm going to smoke my weed anyway.
    16
  616.  @Darke_Exelbirth  Nope. Epstein and others beat him to it.
    16
  617. Kvlt she is exceptionally well spoken even if this was not a great example of it. It is very human for people who are very well spoken to have some trouble when impassioned and it is very understandable that she feel passionate about what she was speaking about here. This is hardly an accurate portrayal of her ability as a public speaker and even if it is not one of her best examples of it it is also very clear the message she was trying to convey about a topic she clearly had lots of emotion about.
    16
  618.  Major Thought Ahead  Regarding, "we had a severe shortage at the time would you rather have hoarders buy them all up" Stop making excuses for a public official lying to the public. If the public are sheep who do what the government tells them (that's why they needed to be lied to right?) then tell them the truth. Use government channels to make sure people couldn't buy them all up. And don't willfully erode trust in a government that already has no real trust behind it. Why should ANYONE trust a person who willingly lies like that? You can't.
    16
  619.  Ms Taylor  Walmart is there... like they always wanted to be. You don't need to give (correction) walmart billions to do something they already want to do. You would realize this if you weren't a stupid and a paid troll. Good luck being the disgrace to the human race that you are. Try to be at least a little bit ashamed of what you see in the mirror.
    16
  620.  @borninthewronggenerationno3873  You are forever stupid beyond words, not afraid to say it.
    16
  621.  Jack Strawb  I want to love nina but that was embarrassing.
    16
  622.  @VileVengeance  Kyle supports force the vote as do all true progressives. Are you sure you are in the right place?
    16
  623. "0 nuance" This is funny coming from a comment that offers 0 nuance or argument of any kind. Your comment is 100 percent ad hominem.
    16
  624. Appointing Brazile is clearly the action of a party that cares more about party loyalty and scratching each others backs than they care about the people they represent and about winning elections.
    16
  625.  @streetteamtony2672  Regarding, "That maybe so" It's a fact. Sadly you are trying to make everyone as fucking moronic as you. Too bad you don't do the world a favor and keep your trap shut. Regarding, "You don't see Me asking for health care now do You?" Weren't the same dipshit who said, "How about looking into an employer who can provide private insurance." Two fucking seconds ago? Regarding, "I get mine private like most other middle class Americans" I find myself hoping you lose your job and have no health insurance one day. You are seriously that much of a waste of oxygen.
    16
  626. Eric regarding, "why would alllivesmatter bother you so much" Of course all lives matter. The problem with it though is it isn't used to promote the idea that all lives matter. It was created as an effort to dismiss, deflect, and marginalize the black lives matter movement. And in doing so it is essentially saying the black lives matter doesn't have a point. I assure they do. Blacks face a unique set of obstacles whites do not face and their movement was created to address their unique situation and draw attention to it.
    15
  627. With the electoral college a candidate could win the election by winning only 11 states and a candidate could lose the election after winning 39 states. Therefor your entire argument is complete bullshit.
    15
  628. We need a Jordan Chariton clone army.
    15
  629. She is like Bernie Sanders in that the more people get to know her the more they like her.
    15
  630. You believe Trump when he speaks? How cute.
    15
  631. The American way of letting corporations run amok is getting old. America needs to change.
    15
  632. Kallister regarding, "Then vote for Jill." Thank you. I will. Regarding, "I voted for Ron Paul and got Bush and Obama." You didn't get Bush and Obama because you voted for Ron Paul. You got Bush and Obama because others voted for them. Nobody thinks change is going to be easy. The establishment is going to do everything they possibly can to hold onto their power. I honestly don't think my vote is going to change anything but I KNOW that if I don't vote for real change I won't get it. Take care.
    15
  633. His signature piece of legislation was a Republican policy position instead of a progressive policy like single payer or a public option. Fuck I'm embarrassed I voted for him.
    15
  634. Go subscribe to TYT politics if you haven't already. Your welcome in advance.
    15
  635. How do you know he didn't lie to get 200 bucks?
    15
  636.  @mmolchin  When someone shows you who they are believe them the first time. maya angelou. kyle showed everyone he's a fraud. Believe him. Don't "get over it."
    15
  637. Not everyone. Bernie Sanders 2020!
    15
  638. They can but they choose not to.
    15
  639. And he can just have Mexico reimburse him.
    15
  640. I'll believe it when I see it. "Nothing will fundamentally change." Joe Biden
    15
  641. Your ability to jam pack so much wrong in so few words is really something.
    15
  642. People need to be in prison and held accountable for Flint.
    15
  643.  @JoeG2324  Thanks. Good luck with your condescending worthless comments.
    15
  644. I don't know that they all will. I do know they all should.
    15
  645. Force the vote. Please sign the petition if you haven't already! Force The Vote on Medicare for All Now!
    15
  646. And subscribe to Bernie's youtube channel if you haven't already. But most importantly do what you need to do to VOTE for Bernie in the "democratic" primary. Thanks in advance for that.
    15
  647. Never Biden. Never Trump. Vote for someone decent 2020! Probably the green party.
    15
  648. @FUCK GOOGLE Regarding, " That would entail me destroying the DNC. That's the only way we will be able to vote for him." Huh? I understand your rage at the party. But if you don't vote for Bernie in primary you are only hurting yourself. The establishment doesn't want you to vote. Don't give them what they want.
    15
  649. @IosebDzhugashvili Yes. He did. On judge napalenato's show. Why would I lie about someone I also call a legend? Nobody is perfect. Stop acting like a cultist.
    15
  650.  @chrispoole8630  What types of businesses need to pay people to keep quiet? That's right... shaddy ones.
    15
  651. John Kearns huh? Do you care to elaborate why you are so mad or is stomping your feet all you wanted to do?
    15
  652. JMV regarding, "i'm keeping my black ass home" Don't be a fool. Don't let them win without a fight. That is exactly what they want.
    15
  653. We only have one vote to cast in a primary that is crazy important. Let's not pretend we are friends right now. Progressives should be supporting Sanders because we know the establishment isn't going to be fighting fair, not splitting the progressive vote and making it more likely someone like Biden gets the nomination.
    15
  654. This is your brain on religion.
    15
  655.  @thecryinglennyface166  regarding, "why the hostility" Because "people" like whyamiretarded are actively working to make the world dumber with every stupid thing they say. They are being paid to spread disinformation (I assume, there is a tiny, tiny, tiny chance they are just really stupid but I am all but certain in their specific case they are a paid shill.), lie to people, and manufacture consent. They have no principles. They are paid liars. Regarding, "Let the guy have there own opinion." We don't get to have our own opinion if it was originally a republican plan. It is a fact that it was. It's origins and the origins of the individual mandate were from the Heritage foundation. We can have opinions about some things... this isn't one of them.
    15
  656. Mudder Man blanket statement? It seemed pretty specific to me.
    15
  657.  @nitrologly  Great point. All replies are being shadowbanned. It's like they are trying to prove my point for me.
    15
  658. Thanks. Please stay away. You are not welcome here. Sincerely, martians.
    15
  659. Hayes should share a cell with biden. He is complicit.
    15
  660. @ The entire corporate media has manufactured consent for what is happening. That's why they are complicit... obviously.
    15
  661. "If you are not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing." -malcomn X
    15
  662. One reason why I am so proud to not call myself a democrat: corrupt nancy pelosi.
    15
  663.  @whyamimrpink78  I've told you a million a times that I couldn't care less what you "think." Even that doesn't get through to you. Which proves my point that you are a waste of time addressing in the first place.
    15
  664.  @7k769  Regarding, "pegging is sexually adventurous" Why do I think you have something up your ass this very second?
    15
  665.  @Xpistos510  Regarding, "the protesters" I don't give a shit about your whataboutism bullshit. I'm busy worrying about what are suppose to be paid "PUBLIC SERVANTS" committing crime and not so much a rightfully pissed off public who isn't being paid with my tax dollars to commit crime up to and including clear murder. Furthermore, as already addressed, the problem is that cops defend their tribe and their team regardless of right or wrong. But just say idiotic shit like, "Spoken like someone who's never served in public service of any kind" because I have a problem with cops committing crime and murder. I know you will... twat.
    15
  666.  Progressives Against the Regressive Left  Paid troll be paid trolling I see.
    15
  667. Slamz regarding, "success(is this the right word?)" It is not the right word but there really isn't a good word for this. The problem is that it implies that women are in control of their own destiny. That "success" is determined by them. It isn't. It is determined by the perpetrators. And when she tells her story of what worked "FOR HER" it implies that victims did something wrong, "FOR THEM."
    15
  668.  @etchalaco9971  No. But you probably shouldn't shut down society and mandate people put things into their body.
    15
  669.  @fathialjack2009  ok... fine.. he gets in the debates. That does nothing to address the Electoral College which makes it all but impossible for a 3rd party candidate to win the general election. To win the general you need a MAJORITY of EC votes.... just getting the most isn't good enough. I'm so fucking tired of answering this question. You know how rigged the game is at some level but you want to act like the game is fair for 3rd party candidates. It isn't. It's not even close. You have to pick your poison. Sadly there is no way the game magically becomes fair.
    15
  670. Keep up the good work Nomiki.
    15
  671. Not really. But mostly because I know the US bombs go pretty much everywhere.
    15
  672. This is some much needed good news in a sad world. We desperately need change. This gives hope it's possible.
    15
  673. ahab regarding, "you should" I don't. You should regret voting for whatever POS you voted for. I'm happy to have voted for the only candidate running who actually deserved my vote. There is no shame in that.
    14
  674. Aman, slow your roll. We haven't even had the DNC convention for THIS election. 4 years is long time off. I assure you nobody knows what his plans are then... even Bernie. DC. I'm pretty over Warren these days. I feel quite betrayed by the fact that she didn't endorse Bernie considering the issues she claims to champion. Actions speak louder than words and her actions this cycle were unacceptable to me. Now she endorses Hillary? She should really listen to what she had to say herself about Hillary back in the day. I'd rather support Tulsi Gabbard down the road. But again... that is way, way too far off in the future to really be thinking about. Isn't our election season too long already? At least give everyone a week off after this cycle to rest before the we talk about the next one.
    14
  675. equals regarding, "He just doesn't bash Hillary" First and foremost to be a progressive you need to be telling the truth. Instead Sam doesn't do that because of how it will affect his "team." There is nothing progressive about that. There is also nothing progressive about saying I'm "crying" because I said something you don't like. It is being a hypocrite. You don't like crying but you are, in fact, crying.
    14
  676. You are correct but you are also wrong. Wrong to not include Republicans in your list.
    14
  677. Matt regarding, "Thats pretty fucking disingenuous." I think you are using the term disingenuous wrong. Regarding, "No country lives up to the standard it demands of other countries" Really? Anyways I'm not sure if you noticed but I'm not talking about other countries. I'm talking about America. America and Americans specifically like to think of itself as being better than the rest of the world but the fact of the matter is that there is no other country that currently threatens the stability of the world like we do. Regarding, "nearly every american hates the Mil Ind complex more than you." More than me? I doubt it. I cite the fact that most of America voted for Hillary or Trump. I on the other hand voted for Jill Stein, in part, because she could be trusted to reign in the military industrialized complex like we so desperately need.
    14
  678. Nick regarding, "he's right 100%" Nope. He should have given Hillary and the DNC the finger before running with Jill Stein. Nobody is perfect thou.
    14
  679. Do you realize that argument goes both ways? Do you want Iran to have nukes? Well, when Iranians ask why they should or shouldn't have nukes they give the same argument you just gave... the US has them right?... is what they say.
    14
  680.  @carlechevarria2226  I hope for your sake you are being paid for your stupid ass comments.
    14
  681.  @user-ei9ns9hq6b  Shouldn't it be on you to prove election fraud before you advocate a military coup?
    14
  682.  @imthebestamanda  regarding, "at least they're not out there kidnapping people or kids" You think these people are disgusting these people are honestly not that bad sure they kidnap but at least they're not out there murdering and torturing. Just using your own "logic."
    14
  683.  @xaviercortinaz8008  regarding, "imagine being the person who actually wrote this nonsense." Ok I will. It sounds like the person is educated to Warren's positions on issues such as single payer, student loans, Ben Carson, and more. Can you imagine what type of dipshit doesn't think she has flip flopped on anything despite her positions on issues such as these?
    14
  684. I'm confident it doesn't.
    14
  685. Yes Ricky, whataboutism arguments used to distract and deflect from toxic water is trolling from you. It is possible that maybe you would just be a fucking moron to say something like that but, because it's you, and you have a history of trolling, it clearly is... and terrible trolling at that. You can do better.
    14
  686. If I had 150 billion dollars? I tell you what I'd do man... two chicks at the same time man.
    14
  687.  @Argacyan  Is it really? Because the establishment has been in control of the game for as long as I can remember and "comprehensive immigration reform" never happens and is nonexistent. I've personally been calling for "fixing our broken immigration system" for a really, really time. Is that better? Because of my terminology? Or have I just been establishment all this time when I thought I was a progressive and pragmatic?
    14
  688. Fluffy regarding, "my dream ticket is Sanders/Turner 2020" I tend to think Gabbard is the more logical VP pick but Turner is the only other person I mention on the short list for that spot (although there are others to consider). Ultimately that is a long, long ways away and highly overemphasized in my opinion. First and foremost we need to support Sanders and get him the nomination. This is going to be all out war with the establishment and it has already started. They will do anything and everything they possibly can to stop him. And after he (hopefully) wins I trust him to pick an excellent running mate... or Warren. That said thinking about a person like Turner as president down the road is an excellent way to motivate us for the fight.
    14
  689. You think Sanders is a phony and you voted for Trump. I can't say I think much of you.
    14
  690. Maybe so... but this is not a good reason to support a terrible person who has no business with the job. It's only a good reason to not support biden.
    14
  691. Better late then never to see the truth.
    14
  692. Look on the bright-side friends... hopefully we learned from our mistakes.
    14
  693. Vic as much as I think their beliefs are batshit crazy I do understand it to a certain degree. People want to be able to explain things. They want to think their life has meaning. They want to know what happens when they die. They want to think they don't die. They want to think their family and friends don't die. And they are willing to play mental gymnastics and believe otherwise insane things to explain those things and get the answers they want. There are also lots of societal pressures. People want to be a part of a community and sadly more people are religious than not. Times are slowly changing thou. The more we are able to understand the world we live in the more it contradicts religious doctrine. But sadly I do not ever think humanity will rid itself of religion completely. There will always be some believers among us. And as much as I think religion blows I will let them practice their insane beliefs as long as they are not hurting others because I also believe strongly in freedom. Even freedom to be dumb.
    14
  694.  @kylewatson5133  No. It's not. Protestors of what is happening in gaza who pay taxes are nothing like supporters of israel. Stop being silly.
    14
  695.  @1Mhoram9  He's on the left, unlike any major party.
    14
  696. Probably because Americans hate people that are perceived to be whining, even when their whining is justified. Do you need Bernie to tell you he was robbed? Because I don't. And the people that don't realize it already aren't all of a sudden going to wake up from their slumber and be like... "you know what, I think Bernie Sanders is on to something. I think he was actually robbed." So he would be giving ammo to be used against him and be would stand to gain nothing other than to stop people like you from making stupid comments.
    14
  697. Why don't you try claiming ignorance of the law the next time you are accused of a crime and see how that works for you. Good luck with that.
    14
  698.  Dondi Allen  Are you trying to make everyone dumber and destroy my faith in humanity? If so it's working.
    14
  699.  @funnybunny1759  Thank you for not even attempting to make an intelligent argument. If you had it certainly would have been a disaster.
    14
  700. odblog regarding, "Feelings mean more than facts." That is pretty fucking funny coming from you. Thank you for laugh dipshit.
    14
  701. Jason you really went above and beyond what was required to prove the original posters point.
    14
  702.  @randomlime3477  Bernie is the real deal. Even if you don't agree with him about everything I would think that should be good enough. I'd vote for someone on the right that was the real deal. Not that I have to worry about it at the moment seeing as how they don't exist.
    14
  703. Justice dems are the future. Corporate dems are the past.
    14
  704. Fair enough, except I didn't think Booker did that bad. There were others that did far worse IMO That said don't think I'm a fan of his. I'm not.
    14
  705. Can you lose something you didn't have?
    14
  706. His signature policy proposal was racist as fuck. He only cared about a wall on the southern border and doesn't give a fuck about a northern border wall because he is a racist fuck. You don't understand this or are going to try and excuse this obviously racist shit because you are a mental midget.
    14
  707. @Proud violent Libtard Regarding, "We must support any nominee" No we don't. Speak for yourself. I'm not voting for the Joe Biden's of this world.
    14
  708. That was exactly my first thought.
    14
  709.  @pkia898  There are still people alive in gaza... til then it can get worse. Not that it really matters... don't support evil. Period.
    14
  710.  @samscheller2331  It's probably because you are a bot.
    14
  711. Hurricanes are more popular than her.
    14
  712. It is much easier and makes more sense to run and win as dem. Then he can reform the party and give us a major party worthy of support.
    14
  713.  @warsamemohamed7244  Regarding, "Bernie (if he was president) he would be overthrown by the CIA in a coup" Self defeating attitudes are self defeating. Let's say I agreed with this... and I don't. It's not a logical reason to not support Sanders. It's actually a logical reason that his is the right man for the job.
    14
  714.  @jeffmorency3224  So the ends justifies the means? It doesn't. Especially when you realize biden isn't fighting to get stuff done for regular people.
    14
  715.  @oscarosei1985  "show two people with differing opinions can have a good faith debate" Graham took jabs about max not being funny. Graham failed at this.
    14
  716. It's not shameless. It's true. My dick is even bigger than it was. Which actually sucks. It's probably too big now.
    14
  717.  @antediluvianatheist5262  I don't expect him to win. It's just too bad that stories like this weren't given the coverage they deserved. If it had my expectations would be very different. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AKCJ45QMyLU One more reason I worry about SC... I don't trust them to count the votes accurately. I want to know how different exit polls are from whatever ends up getting reported. If it's more than 3 points then votes are being flipped.
    14
  718.  @thedan7  26 states haven't voted yet. Yang is full of shit and so are you.
    14
  719.  @noly310  Does Bernie marching with MLK count as doing? Does Bernie singlehandedly winning the war of ideas and swaying public opinion when it comes to universal health care count as doing even if it isn't the law of the land? Does Bernie forcing Amazon raise their minimum wage count as doing? Ultimately he can't do it all by himself. There is a reason he calls for a "political revolution."
    14
  720.  Ms Taylor  I'm not going to lie, calling me a moron is pretty fucking funny.
    14
  721. He's orange. And a clown. Good luck with that.
    14
  722. Mostly just others. They defend one another to the end.
    14
  723. GoodDog regarding, "it isn't" What a compelling argument. I've never thought of it that way. I guess I'll just take facts and flush them down the toilet then. Thank you for enlightening me. I was blind but now I see.
    14
  724. Yeah, vote for the clown who lies about being arrested with mandela, about working in civil rights, about being endorsed by the NAACP, about his record, and would say literally anything to win because he's also a liar. But at least he won't be a pathological liar on twitter. Way better. But not really.
    14
  725. I don't care about making Trump a one term president. I care about doing good things for the country and opposing bad things. This would be a good thing. Try not to overthink it.
    13
  726. You shouldn't support Hillary or Trump.
    13
  727. Jay Diggy. A vote for Jill is a vote for Jill. A vote for Trump is a vote for Trump. Its easy to understand if you aren't an idiot. You are an idiot. Just sayin.
    13
  728. Raf hardly. She is essentially Bernie Sanders but she isn't tired of hearing about Hillary's damn emails. She is exceptionally strong especially in her commitment to her values. She is exactly what the country needs right now. She is the only Presidential candidate running worthy of support.
    13
  729. You think Hillary is that answer after her lifetime of fucking people over then you couldn't be more wrong.
    13
  730. Trump's America? He isn't in power yet. This is Obama's America.
    13
  731. They are misusing rule of law. They would be better off using anarchy.
    13
  732. Glass regarding, "Her raising the minimum wage is one of her policies." You are fool to believe anything she says. She worked against raising the minimum wage in Haiti.
    13
  733. Happy ironic Thanksgiving everyone.
    13
  734. You know Hillary loves fracking right? Don't kid yourself to thinking she is any better. Jill Stein is the only candidate who can be trusted to do the right thing on issues like this.
    13
  735. The Green Party is the only party not corrupted by big money and corporate money. Jill Stein for President!
    13
  736. If we had free and fair elections you would have a point. We don't thou therefor you are a fucking moron.
    13
  737. 1.9 trillion is enough to give everyone almost 7K each. But dems can't even give the 2K they promised.
    13
  738. Sorry not sorry that we just realize that grim is controlled opposition and we are calling him out for it.
    13
  739.  @HRae87  Joe biden is Obama memberberries. That is where his support comes from. But it will predictably go away when he opens his mouth.
    13
  740. Someone else beat me to it but I'm going to reiterate... WHY ISN'T THIS ON THE MAIN SHOW? Put it there otherwise it is blatantly obvious you are part of the problem TYT. Edit. Thank you for putting it on the main channel.
    13
  741. Politicore regarding, "Nina Turner is a fraud." Thank you for that. I've never thought of it that way. You have really enlightened the world with your brilliant insight. I once was blind but now I see. Bravo. Pure genius. Seriously thou... piss off. You are making people dumber.
    13
  742. That is not cool to actual walruses.
    13
  743. If you tell people to vote for either major party then you are not "independent" in my opinion.
    13
  744. The best jokes, like this, are rooted in truth.
    13
  745.  @JackFury  Ana, the blackmailer, is the one who is coming across as a demon.
    13
  746. @H MAX He's not a communist. You are just stupid.
    13
  747. Did she really say that? LMFAO
    13
  748.  @GeraltofRivia22  I doubt the idiot you responded to does either.
    13
  749. Nobody gives a shit what a moron like you thinks Steven.
    13
  750. He's a better conman than most of them. He's a smooth talker.
    13
  751. Thank you for continuing to talk about stories that need to be talked about but seem to be forgotten everywhere else.
    13
  752.  @Thepopcornator  As an Ontarian you guys need to get your shit together. Diet shit is still shit and Canada is my escape plan if the United States crumbles. Or do I need to make Mars my escape plan? Or maybe just the sweet release of death? Just kidding... mostly.
    13
  753.  @lexluthore6065  That's better. Don't go making Trump build a wall on the northern border because he will make you Canadians pay for it. He doesn't have a problem with you guys at the moment cause most of you are white but don't push your luck.
    13
  754.  @nuancedmilitarism8402  He's a warmonger who is largely responsible for mass incarceration because of his racist crime bill. Your ability to lick boots is remarkable.
    13
  755. knowledge regarding, "GREEN PARTY are NOT environmentalists" This has to be one of the dumbest things I've ever read on the internet and I've talked to flat earthers. Regarding, "Jill Stein raised millions of dollars they have never installed a single solar panel on a poor person's home with that cash." Which would be a federal crime. Don't be afraid to do some research into campaign finance laws before spouting nonsense in the future.
    13
  756. Yeah. Pretty much.
    13
  757. Too soon. Oh wait. It's not really.
    13
  758. Trump is fucking terrible but still your comment is absurd Alexander.
    13
  759. I don't care about age. I care about policy and so should you.
    13
  760.  @Sheepy-hp9je  Thanks for proving my point about you being like flat earthers. They think and say the same shit when I don't waste my time watching their stupid videos and telling them everything that is wrong with it as well. I wish I had unlimited time and energy to waste on your bullshit. Then I could watch your stupid fucking video and would be happy to write the short novel it would take to debunk any entire video. I don't thou. My time is valuable to me and I'm not going to waste it telling you why you are stupid when you obviously can't comprehend it if I did. There is nothing I can say or do that will change the fact that you are one of the dumbest motherfuckers alive so I'm not going to try. I'm sorry. I'm only human. I'm not a miracle worker.
    13
  761. Canada can afford it but the richest nation in the history of the world can't? God damn you are an idiot working with misleading numbers. Good luck spreading your bullshit misinformation. Stop making everyone dumber with your garbage.
    13
  762. He didn't sell out and to suggest he did suggests a complete lack of understanding what those words mean. He made a decision you disagree with. It happens. The only way you are going to get someone you agree with 100 percent of the time is if you do it so why don't you do the work instead instead of bitching about one of the only politicians actually working for you.
    13
  763. I'm happily done with all corporate media.
    13
  764. You can safely assume the answer is oil and natural resources. You can also safely assume the answer is not humanitarian.
    13
  765. Too bad running for president doesn't make people like biden better like this.
    13
  766. Shouldn't ryan grimm by manufacturing consent for the "democratic" party somewhere else?
    13
  767. "You gotta vote biden." -david sirota in 2024
    13
  768. The problem starts with the letter z and it's not a religion.
    13
  769. And the average IQ of JD viewers will go up by a remarkable 2 points after you are gone.
    13
  770.  @tedmarley4341  I don't watch fox news. Shouldn't you be watching CNN or MSNBC?
    13
  771. Are tears suppose to be a consolation prize for not getting real change in this country? It's not.
    13
  772.  @worldforalll  We didn't start the fire. And if I didn't hold graham accountable for his actions I'd be a hypocrite.
    13
  773. Shmilbert needs someone to describe mur der as "unfair stuff." Because that's their idea of being fair.
    13
  774.  greatest dad  "organism is considered living" And yet it was never a baby until it was actually born. Human life starts the day you are born... that's why you celebrate that day.
    13
  775.  greatest dad  "Miss labeling?" Yeah. Remember all that libertarian talk? But now you are calling me home depot or some BS because you clearly don't mind being a hypocrite. And just loling doesn't make it go away.
    13
  776. So much speculation and talk about who his running mate should be. Let's focus on getting him the nomination and trust he will pick a good running mate. I also don't think Cortez is old enough to hold the office of President.
    13
  777. Great wall did you know that Canadians are far happier with their health care system than Americans are with theirs while you regurgitate your idiotic talking points?
    13
  778. He's real good at being fake.
    13
  779. Does this not count as a black agenda? https://berniesanders.com/issues/racial-justice/ Because I'm pretty sure it does even if you want to argue that it should do more and include reparations.
    13
  780. Nope. I don't care about age and neither should you. There is no reason to think he can't do the job.
    13
  781. So what if he actually did die in office. I wouldn't be surprised if Big Mac Trump were to die any day but that is literally the worst reason to not want him to be President. There is a reason we have vice presidents and Bernie can be trusted to pick a good running mate.
    13
  782.  @technosaurus3805  I don't care who you are. If you are working 40 hours a week (which teenagers don't do) you should be making enough money to live on.
    13
  783. Jill Stein is the only Presidential candidate that can be trusted to be against the TPP in more than just meaningless rhetoric. Jill Stein 2016!
    12
  784. AlexWu. So you are going to ignore exit polls suggesting election fraud. You are going to ignore the fact that 3 million NY independents were not allowed to vote. You are going to ignore the fact that independents in over 20 other states were not allowed to vote. You are going to ignore biased media coverage. You are going to ignore the DNC bias. You are going to ignore superdelegates biasing the game. You are going to ignore cheating in NV and elsewhere. You are going to ignore voter rolls being purged. You are going to skip past all this and suggest that Hillary won even thou she cheated, and that the game was rigged. You are pathetic. You are like a card cheat claiming that you didn't cheat (even thou you had an ace up your sleeve) because you won money playing. I understand why you and Hillary supporters like Hillary. She represents your values and ethics... excuse me... she represents your lack of values and ethics.
    12
  785. Tanner regarding, "some americans do" Of course but not nearly enough and almost none of our politicians sadly.
    12
  786. Obama is "letting it play out." Fuck him. If the "democratic" party actually cared about the people like they care about their corporate sponsors they wouldn't have lost the presidential election to an orange clown.
    12
  787. And everywhere else for that matter. We need to worry about what is going on in our country, spend our money nation building here, and let the world take care of themselves.
    12
  788. I listen to Jill Stein but I've never heard her make promises. Donald Trump for example and contrast did say that he WOULD build a wall and that Mexico WOULD pay for it. Those are examples of promises that are never going to happen. Jill Stein on the other hand presents a vision for America of how she sees it. She gives you an idea of what she wants, what she considers to be priorities, but that isn't to be mistaken with promises or the idea that just because these are things she wants she promises to get them done. I love Jill Stein and will be voting for her but I have no illusions about what she would be able to get done with the Congress we have. I do not think this is an argument for not voting for Jill Stein but rather for voting against the current congress who are not willing to work for Jill's vision and priorities of: universal health care, accessible education, criminal justice reform, protecting the planet, addressing poverty, a just economy, freedom and equality and more. Lets contrast that to the little bit the current congress and president get done when they actually work together... the TPP. I'd take gridlock and nothing getting done as opposed to the country taking steps backward like this, and that is what will happen with either Hillary or Trump as president. Lastly the biggest power a President has for unilateral reform is as commander in chief. Unlike the 2 major candidates she could be trusted to reign in the military industrialized complex in that is completely out of control. She can be trusted to not get us into new wars and congress has little to do with it.
    12
  789. Salty regarding, "money out of politics" Damn right. That is the overarching problem with everything. That is why BS like this is allowed to happen.
    12
  790. F the cheating DNC.
    12
  791. What could Hillary do to get my vote? Nothing.
    12
  792. You might want to consider that people have different opinion's than your own and that not everyone with an opinion different than yours is a shill.
    12
  793. Vote in the primaries for the most progressive candidates you can find. That doesn't mean you owe the party anything in general elections if you don't want. But use the opportunity you have to make them better and pull them to the left.
    12
  794. It's not even low key. Max is a genius... big time.
    12
  795.  @mohegansun2439  Nobody is claiming anyone is perfect. That sounds like the type of strawman argument graham would come up with when he is rattled.
    12
  796. Fraud squad will still vote for her. Never forget.
    12
  797. Don't support evil. Period.
    12
  798.  @doctorlemon243  Bernie is going to fight to make available the education you desperately need.
    12
  799. Sorry but few things are as predictive of future behavior then authenticity and for that reason we will continue to use it. We also criticize her specifically because of her behavior and who she supports. Regarding, "But that is a chance we will have to take." No. It absolutely isn't. Especially when this is an effort to try and give a presidential run a try.
    12
  800. La Wanda regarding, "us conservatives don't won't that around children" So if I were to use your "logic" I can safely assume that you want guns around children then.
    12
  801.  @seanhammer6296  I actually have to return that video tape.
    12
  802. The war on drugs is just another perpetual war that was never meant to be won.
    12
  803. Youtube says there are 15 replies but I can only see 6. Some land of the free.
    12
  804.  @JayBee-cr8jm  All of them... including yours.
    12
  805.  @ocumstweezers  Sanders has been in the public eye for DECADES saying and doing the same thing. Yang is a guy you had never even heard of a year ago to take votes away from the actual real deal.
    12
  806. @Avery Benson I'll bet you didn't do so for political PR. That is why your story might be amazing and biden's political ploy is not.
    12
  807. Droid regarding, "Trump is not a dictator" Did the original poster say he was? Nope. So how about you stop trying to deflect from the facts brought up like a typical trumptard.
    12
  808.  @kyled1673  But didn't you hear the sheep tell you that the new deal prolonged the great depression with no evidence what-so-ever? How could you not be compelled by that? Seriously thou... don't bother wasting logical arguments on them. Save them for people with the intelligence to understand them.
    12
  809.  @Sheepy-hp9je  You are the comic relief in sad times. You in the same category as flat earthers. I'm here to laugh at you... not to try and engage you intelligently.
    12
  810.  @donHooligan  I'm probably better known for being a huge dick. I share your frustration but ultimately I don't blame this guy as much as I blame the sources of "news" that this guy uses to get all his information.
    12
  811.  @rockstriker1622  They aren't idiots, they are corrupt. Well, some are corrupt idiots.
    12
  812.  @MultiPolarWorldCo-op  The US is the "land of the free" the way the IDF is the "most moral army."
    12
  813.  @LadieKadie  Everything you said is completely wrong.
    12
  814.  @LadieKadie  He will forever be remembered as the anti-genocide legend and hero that he is.
    12
  815.  @therealchristfollower  "you'll all understand that maybe my comment is just a little bit more important than yours" Are you intentionally missing the point that perspective matters? It's pretty obvious for you to say this nonsense.
    12
  816.  @cockoffgewgle4993  "What does race have to do with anything?" The crime bill that joe wrote that we are talking about predominately affected minorities. It affects them more than it affects people like hunter.
    12
  817.  @unreasonable-man.bsky.social  We got bombs and prisons too!
    12
  818. Bernie isn't perfect but it often seems like he is when compared to the establishment. Sanders 2020!
    12
  819.  @twoshedsjohnson8540  "None of these help workers" Raising wages don't help workers? Please STFU. Employers ALREADY don't keep people on the books they don't need. They ALREADY do anything and everything they possibly can to cut hours. Raising wages doesn't change that.
    12
  820.  greatest dad  It was a fetus. "You probably should have known that before you started a debate within the topic" Derp
    12
  821. If you are still saying the "democratic" primary was fair I would like you to know that I hate you.
    12
  822.  @appetiteee5605  Vote for someone good. I won't even tell you who that is but I can tell you that people like trump and biden are not eligible.
    12
  823. Sanders is my first choice, Bernie is my second, and Bernard is my third.
    12
  824.  @davidiihouston6883  "In what way?" He manufactured consent for biden and harris and told you to vote for them. "Don't be performative." I shouldn't have to explain this. It's sad I do.
    12
  825.  @borninthewronggenerationno3873  You were wrongfully born and the world would be better had you not been born. I'm not afraid to say it.
    12
  826. I'd rather drink that sweat then that brown sludge coming out of the tap Canadian Crusader. Don't go nowhere. I'll be right back with my gun.
    12
  827. "free speech" Youtube says there are 11 replies (before me writing this) but I can only see 9.
    12
  828.  @prmr619  Because they are being paid to think the guy who marched with MLK, has fought for civil rights his entire life, and has incredibly diverse campaign co-chairs including Nina Turner is, not because of any sort of intelligent reason.
    12
  829.  @ricardobarahona3939  Disingenuous criticism is rightfully referred to as "cancel" culture.
    12
  830. We really dodged a bullet. Thank goodness for people like like summers who saved us from an "overheated" economy. /s
    12
  831. I guess that is why Canada pays significantly less for their health care (per person) than the US (while getting better results and covering everyone) and it isn't even fucking close.
    12
  832. @Bradley Harrison How dare you insult honey badgers like that. You should be ashamed.
    12
  833. People working full time should be making enough to live on. We need a higher minimum wage now.
    12
  834. Alice we are talking about someone under oath at a job interview and not the drunk guy at the bar you are asking about whether you are fat or not. That said well done on the mental gymnastics.
    12
  835. You would be better off having on ANY random peasant than this tool of the oligarchy on.
    12
  836.  @marctouss1862  I'm a progressive. It doesn't take rocket science to understand why I won't support someone you consider is a republican. The fact that orange man is bad doesn't make biden good.
    12
  837. cezariusz regarding, "So it's about you feeling good about yourself" It is about being able to feel good about your vote. It is about knowing you voted for a candidate who actually deserved your support unlike some people. Regarding, "Thanks very much, special snowflake, I hope it was worth the next four years" Don't let the fact that had every Jill Stein voter voted for Hillary Clinton she still would have lost. Don't be afraid to save some blame for Hillary Clinton for sucking her entire life, some blame for Trump voters for Trump, some blame for the DNC for rigging the primary for their preferred inferior candidate, some blame for the corporate media for giving Trump billions in free media, some blame for the 40 plus percent of eligible voters who didn't vote, some blame for the 9 percent of "democratic" voters who voted for Trump. You won't thou. Brainwashed sheep like you will blame Jill Stein voters for voting for a candidate who isn't complete garbage like your queen. Regarding, "since the election day. That wouldn't bother you, right?" Since election day it seems donations to the Clinton foundation have disappeared. That wouldn't bother you, right?
    11
  838. I do not believe Assange said anything so definitive did he? I thought he merely implied.
    11
  839. Baraka's words, "However, let me be clear, my critique of the moral hypocrisy of the West should not be read as a rationalization for the horrific crimes committed in Paris a few days ago." NYC's words, "He rationalized the attacking of France..." Who do I believe? Hmm? Tough one. (That's sarcasm in case you aren't smart enough to realize it without me telling you.)
    11
  840. Too late. I couldn't wait that long.
    11
  841. Have you ever used aspirin, tobacco, alcohol, or caffeine? If so do the right thing.
    11
  842. Who is going to do something about it when it's the cops breaking laws?
    11
  843. He has done more to expose corruption in the system than you could ever hope to do. You are right to want more but it is hardly nothing even if you dismiss it.
    11
  844. Clinton supporters should be careful what the ask for. If I voted for the lesser of two evils I think I might be voting for Trump. That said I will not be supporting evil anytime soon. I'd rather vote for Jill Stein and lose than vote for either Trump or Hillary and win.
    11
  845. Regarding, "All those people who paid the Clinton's for influence if that's true, just lost multiple 100's of millions of dollars" Meh. Most of them hedged their bets and also bet on Trump as well.
    11
  846. Wikileaks is a hero for giving the exposing public corruption and enlightening the public about things they should already have access to. I'm sorry if the truth hurts but that's all they are doing... exposing the truth.
    11
  847. Everybody for Jill Stein!
    11
  848. Bobby regarding, "when there is actually proof that I was wrong." This isn't actual proof that you were wrong? Denial is a powerful thing.
    11
  849. I didn't vote for Wall Street. I voted for Jill Stein.
    11
  850. You could have trusted Bernie.
    11
  851. How about a thumbs up if you, like me, voted for Obama and regret it.
    11
  852. Aurel regarding, "bad people that want to resort to drugs." The difference between a good person and a bad person is not whether or not they do drugs and your insinuation that it is is not smart. I would like to add that aspirin and caffeine are examples of drugs.
    11
  853. I have a couple questions for you, the Rachel Maddow fan, that I don't know although I have my suspicions as to what the answers are... How has Rachel Maddow's coverage of the extra 80 billion to the department of defense been? How has Rachel Maddow's coverage of net neutrality been? These are not rhetorical. I am actually curious.
    11
  854. Everyone has an interest in a sane US rather than what we currently have.
    11
  855. Sorry but our job actual includes manufacturing consent for terrible people like Bush. Sincerely, Corporate Propaganda. Otherwise known as media.
    11
  856. Fluffy regarding, "whom ever Bernie chooses will be ok with me." I'd vote for Sanders/Satan before I'd vote for a corporate dem. Fortunately I won't have to because Sanders can be trusted to pick someone good. I can't wait for the day he gets to. 2020 can't come soon enough.
    11
  857. Regarding, "Because the corporate Dems are shit." So you support diarrhea instead? I guess that makes sense to idiots.
    11
  858. That cornpop going after Rosa Parks.
    11
  859. Careful, Trump has made frivolous lawsuits based on far less then your comment.
    11
  860. I love Jimmy but the one place I disagree with him is on him not seeing the strategy of taking over the "democratic" party. We need change now. We need to win now. This is the quickest and easiest way to get what we want. The establishment is going to try to stop it from happening. The fight is not going to be fair but it can be done and Sanders is in a unique position to do so in 2020. The winner of the nomination holds crazy power. Part of the reason why the "democratic" party currently sucks so bad is because Hillary "won" the nomination and they are going to continue to suck balls until Sanders or a progressive wins the nomination. There is reason to think this will happen in 2020 and after it happens there will be the first hope in a long time that we can get a party that will start caring about the people and not their big money donors.
    11
  861. Those are just her words. Her heart belongs to mama bear.
    11
  862.  Trump 2020  Your name says it all. You are a moron. Good luck with that.
    11
  863. Actually it was put in place so that slave states and their 3/5ths people would get more representation then they deserved. As for what it does now it let's swing states dictate to the rest of the country and makes votes in the largest states in the union fucking meaningless. The only thing it does is take a system that is as good as it gets where everyone's vote counts equally and perverts it so that votes are not counted equally.
    11
  864. Let's hope Trump doesn't have an empty podium somewhere.
    11
  865. Let's not give Trump any ideas shall we?
    11
  866.  @jakes658  Pete Buttigieg "won" the iowa caucus. Just ask the DNC.
    11
  867. There is a reason the phrase "even a broken clock is correct twice a day" is a thing. It's a thing because if you think AJ is wrong about everything just because he is wrong about almost everything then you are being silly.
    11
  868.  Revision TV  Regarding, "Sanders offers nothing" Sanders offers M4A, ending perpetual war, raising the minimum wage, breaking up the banks and bringing back glass steagal, education, raising the minimum wage, protecting the environment, criminal justice reform, and so much more. You are ridiculous. Regarding, "Andrew Yang is the ONE!!!" He has no experience in politics and no record to look at to know if he is legit or full of shit. Stop being an idiot... for the country. Thanks.
    11
  869. I feel like he practices in the mirror looking confused and lost with his furled eyebrows like he does at 10:59 as an act to make it seem like the perfectly logical points being given to him somehow don't make sense when they obviously do.
    11
  870. "he’s an honest actor" LMFAO He's not. And that's why everyone questions why he's here.
    11
  871. Which is something else considering she, unlike the officer, had reason to fear for her safety. He's literally telling her to get out of the car so he can fuck her up. She's damned if she does and damned if she doesn't comply.
    11
  872.  @Bike_Lion  Body cam footage always matters. The fact that stupid people exist doesn't change that.
    11
  873. Haven't you gotten the memo from the establishment? Harris and Booker are the next big thing now get in line or it is your fault Republicans win.
    11
  874. jeffrey regarding, "and you think that the democrap party would give ole bernie the power to do what he wants?" What? Is this how you would justify not supporting him? The bottom line is that even if Sanders were president and was able to get literally nothing accomplished while in office policywise it would give him the opportunity to win the war of ideas like he is currently doing when it comes to medicare for all. He could be trusted to not make shit worse like the orange clown. And he would be in a position to shape and reform the "democratic" party from the inside. Stop being obtuse.
    11
  875. America regarding, "You deserve an award" Can I pick my award? I'd like a single payer health care system like the rest of the civilized world.
    11
  876. Nobody is perfect and I'm referring to the guy in the video. Fuck warren.
    11
  877.  @poker4400  Yang has zero experience and zero record to look at. Those are both incredibly important litmus tests of mine that he fails. How anyone can consider someone like that for the highest political office in the land is beyond me. Why isn't experience important to you? Wouldn't you prefer that of a doctor if you were getting surgery? So why would that be ok for our president? And how can you feel comfortable voting for someone who has no record to look at? A record is one the ways you know if someone is telling the truth or completely full of shit. And politicians are well known for being full of shit and still you are cool just taking one's word. You have no way of knowing if he is sincere or just pandering. Do the world a favor and stop thinking a business man with no experience is a good idea for the highest political office in the land. Go with the guy with tons of experience and a long consistent record of getting shit right.
    11
  878. Twirlip regarding, "I'm willing to let him follow but he hasn't shown willingness to lead." Doesn't lead? Really? The guy who calls for a political revolution? The guy who is dragging lying corporate dems kicking and screaming into supporting medicare for all? The guy who talks tirelessly about issues? The guy who goes out of his way to win his senate seat as an independent? Let's agree to disagree about him not being a leader shall we.
    11
  879. Money in politics is fucking our country over. If you don't realize this you are hopeless.
    11
  880. More additions to the fraud squad. Never forget.
    11
  881. Yup. It does more to destroy their credibility than it does to stop Sanders. Correction... they didn't have credibility to destroy. It makes them look bad is what I meant to say.
    11
  882. Fun fact: the US government has even more money and promises even less as a minimum wage.
    11
  883. 0 percent seems high.
    11
  884. I miss the days when I was a young and proud of my country. I'm not sure I ever should have been proud of it. But it was nice when I was. I miss that feeling.
    11
  885. I like to think you are really high up on musk's shit list. That's a badge of honor.
    11
  886. @IosebDzhugashvili He praised bushnell in the same interview but in doing so he used the wrong word to describe his act. It's nothing to act like a cultist about. That's the type of thing blue no matter who does.
    11
  887. Charles regarding, "I’m supposed to take him serious when he wants me to pay 80% of my income into a corrupt government." Seeing as how he has never said anything even remotely close to what you are suggesting I find it impossible to take you seriously. Even still that doesn't make you "like a stand up comic." That just makes you a moron at best or an outright liar at worst.
    11
  888. I consider myself a progressive and I like Wikileaks because I like transparency in government. As long as they keep releasing information that is true, and I have no reason to think they have lied about anything, I will support them.
    11
  889.  @emileeout1964  N o l e g i t i m a t e pro fessional doc tor would suggest people go on TV to tell their d e e p e s t d a r k e s t pro blems for mi lli ons to wa tch and jud ge. He is e x p l o i t i n g si ck peo ple for p r o f i t.
    11
  890. It can't be easy. He had a lot invested in them.
    11
  891. I'm pretty sure our bombs are nicknamed "democracy."
    11
  892. In other words we do not have universal background checks. Thanks for confirming my point.
    11
  893. I don't care that pete is gay but he sure isn't a good representative for that group of people. The same can be said about Trump and orange people. I'm pretty much a racist against orange people because of Trump.
    11
  894.  @samscheller2331  If only you were as comfortable with women's sexuality as you are with copy and pasting.
    11
  895. And for watching that intolerable crap so I don't have to.
    11
  896. "It's easy if you try." John Lennon putting down Joe Biden from the grave.
    11
  897. Regarding, "threaten it with the rise of a genuine, progressive third party" I think you are being foolish if you think this will change them. The only thing that is going to change the "democratic" party is if a progressive like Sanders wins the nomination and changes it from the inside. Regarding, "With his unwillingness to abandon them" It isn't about saving them. It is about the fact that they are not going anywhere anytime soon and it is about the fact that a hostile takeover of the party is best way to get what we want.
    11
  898. We take issue with the lies of omission. Why are you so butthurt about that?
    11
  899.  @kfox420  It's kind of odd that sam seder is telling his audience that they need to vote for dems to stop republicans from rolling back a women's right to choose. Yet here we are with a democratic president, democratic senate, and democratic house and it's happening anyway.
    11
  900. Sounds like something cornpop would say. /s
    11
  901. @EZLN Yeah... to try and get ahead of the blackmail. I hope you are paid for your gaslighting BS.
    11
  902. Regarding, "Russian troll." What you say when you have nothing intelligent to offer for 2000?
    11
  903. For your sake I hope that you are being paid to say stupid things and are not really as dumb as you seem.
    11
  904. I don't care about "disses." I care about lies. That's why grimm has it coming.
    11
  905. I live in a swing state and I'm not voting for Biden or Trump.
    11
  906. Policy, integrity, and trust first. Bernie Sanders 2020
    11
  907.  @PapaBushka  What is your point exactly? When Obama belongs in the republican party?
    11
  908. @Derya Alkan Regarding, "corporations to start using automation as quickly as possible." As if they aren't already doing that. Oh wait... they are.
    11
  909. 1.9 trillion is enough that they could give everyone almost 7K each. But dems can't even give the 2K they promised.
    11
  910.  Trump Lost  Or another way to put it is... if Obama/biden didn't expand war and suck in office a clown candidate like trump shouldn't and can't win. This isn't rocket science.
    11
  911.  @liberalsocialist9723  "They just know how to play politics." I can tell because they sold out the people and got nothing for their vote for POS pelosi. Yup. They are just your typical POS politicians who know how to play politics.
    11
  912.  @JamNMama1  I'm sorry I can't fix your stupidity for you. I wish I could but I can't.
    11
  913.  @JamNMama1  Tell you what thou... How about a source for your smears? I dare you to try to prove your bullshit.
    11
  914. The party establishment is corrupt but they aren't stupid. They won't. And if they do so be it... it would likely lead to the collapse of the party and that would be just fine with me.
    11
  915.  @greatcesari  He's a guy being tortured for exposing wrongdoing by the american government. That's why he isn't a POS.
    11
  916. saint regarding, "Do you pay..." No, I expect everything to be free or I'm guessing that's what you think. You want me to bitch about the government? There is plenty to bitch about. I want good government and to me a good government is one that makes sure all of it's citizens have health care. Now shouldn't you be digging a bunker and stockpiling guns somewhere?
    11
  917. CIA too.
    11
  918. I'm in a swing state and I will happily be voting for Jill Stein. The only wasted vote is a vote for a candidate that sucks.
    10
  919. I think we all agree on... Bernie is a hero. Hillary is a Republican. Trump is pure evil.
    10
  920. Not anymore. Now I know to blame God. And I was thinking it was because of Hillary Clinton.
    10
  921. If you support fracking then, by all means, vote for Hillary. If you don't vote for Jill Stein.
    10
  922. Garrett, no he meant protestors. The only people being violent are the police and DAPL thugs.
    10
  923. I don't really care what the DNC does at this point. They are quickly becoming as irrelevant to me as the RNC. They are too corrupt to be reformed. You would be wise to forget they exist and join the Green party instead.
    10
  924. I suggest that instead of voting against somebody you find the candidate you think would be the best President and vote FOR them. The only wasted vote is a vote for a candidate who doesn't represent you. Jill Stein is the only candidate worthy of support.
    10
  925. LiltheGreat is right. It was more like 2 billion. They would give coverage to Trump's empty podium while Sanders would be speaking in front of record crowds.
    10
  926. Joe just because you keep repeating something stupid and obviously not true does not make it anymore accurate.
    10
  927. Jill Stein for sanity's sake.
    10
  928. Tennis regarding, "you prove this how" Prove what? That illegals aren't voting in droves? The burden of proof isn't on me. It is on the people that want to claim it is actually happening and their "evidence" is nothing but bullshit. Regarding, "to funny" Simple pleasures and terrible spelling for simple people.
    10
  929. Mark B regarding, "Does Russian hackers make any of the revealed corruption less credible?" It is obviously just an effort at spin and distraction. If they can get the attention on attacking the messenger then they are not talking about the message.
    10
  930. You do at least realize you lost the civil war right dipshit?
    10
  931. There is nothing wrong with regulated capitalism when it comes to most things (war and health care being important exceptions). The problem is that we have capitalism run amok.
    10
  932. Aurel regarding, "Im not talking about taking it for medical reasons. I hope this is clear." I honestly don't care what reasons you are talking about. I care about the fact that you idiotically seem to think that using drugs has something to do with whether or not they are a good or bad person. It doesn't and to suggest otherwise is stupid beyond words. I hope this is clear.
    10
  933. Aurel regarding, "its about treating yourself with respect" No. It doesn't. And even if I agreed with this, which I don't, I think the claim that taking drugs recreationally is not showing yourself respect to be fucking absurd along with all your other "thoughts." Regarding, "Drugs do that." I'm sure the expert on drugs and what they do is the guy who has ZERO experience with them. That would make sense to me if I couldn't logic. Regarding, "Anybody that takes them then has nothing in his life he could want to experience to the fullest." That is well said for being completely devoid of logic and reason. Regarding, "That means he is a non functional person or a bad person." No. It doesn't. You are absurd. You are making claims about things you have no real knowledge of. You are working backwards to try and support your idiotic conclusions. Regarding, "You should watch my video about Ayn Rand" Ayn Rand? Isn't she the idiot hypocrite who railed against government all her life until the very end of her life when she needed it? No thanks. Ayn Rand was not a good person. Period. And it has nothing to with whether or not she took drugs because being a good or bad person has nothing to do with whether or not you take drugs. You are absurd. Good luck with that.
    10
  934.  @mtothealcolm  Regarding, "I always hated the rapist go to." And I always hate how some can ignore this. To each their own I guess. Regarding, "It simplifies the election to a morality argument rather than a policy argument." Like these two can be separated and like the immoral person can be trusted on anything policy related is absurd. Policy comes from morality. Regarding, "its actually the least important in terms of how it shapes the country." Maybe so. But being a sexual predator should be a deal breaker. Especially coming from the metoo crowd. Regarding, "all of Kyles arguments revolve around policy" Sadly policy is less effective in shaping the peasants opinions than dirt about rape. And I, unlike Kyle, want to do some shaming. And people should be ashamed of supporting a sexual predator.
    10
  935. Pandora regarding, "Better him than HRC" I disagree. There is no significant difference between the two. And even if I agreed with that statement, which I don't, isn't it pathetic that that would be the best thing you can say about him? Better than HRC. Wow. Aren't you easily impressed.
    10
  936. How many billionaires are paying sedar these days? Last I checked it was 3.
    10
  937.  @michaelrichardson989  "Capitalism doesn’t cause this." Yes. It does. Capitalism doesn't care if a train derails as long as there is profit to be made. "There’s absolutely no reason why you can’t maintain things properly in a capitalist economy." Meanwhile, in reality, the capitalist can and will buy your government and this is what happens when it does. "corruption and exploitation. Those are different things to capitalism." Nope. They are the logical result of a capitalist system that is fine with corruption and exploitation as long as their is profit to be made from it. "your involved in a major war and your southern border is wide open" There is lots of money to be made from war and cheap labor. And you wonder why these things are the way they are?
    10
  938.  @maximus012  Shame! Shame! Shame! (ding ding, ding ding)
    10
  939.  @hithere8753  So I can either send a message or betray all my principles and values? I'm going to keep my principles and values. I'm going to support good. And if I lose so be it. But if I vote for someone I don't want to win I've already lost and doomed myself to defeat.
    10
  940. 8 replies and I can't see one in the "land of the free"
    10
  941. Those infomercials are bad but they still don't deserve that.
    10
  942.  @DiscipleOfHeavyMeta1  Sometimes he's just creeping out at young girls. Biden haters get nothing right.
    10
  943.  @leovolont  I'm not going to lie... listening to you makes me like Warren even less.
    10
  944.  @alanparedes2034  She is not "an idiot." She is just very, very, very wrong about politics likely due to too much corporate media propaganda.
    10
  945. Kek, you obviously do not understand what communist means and that primary was rigged as fuck.
    10
  946. I like the term. There simply isn't a better way to describe some people.
    10
  947.  @peterhardie4151  There are 4 replies in this thread and I can only see yours (in addition to my own that I think is being shadowbanned) yay censorship! /s
    10
  948.  @peterhardie4151  "Obama had quite a sensible policy towards Ukraine at the time. He didn't want to arm them." Dude was a warmonger but he was more reasonable that his friends on this one issue at least. He was terrible but this and the nuclear deal were alright with me.
    10
  949. I love the Green party but please still vote in "democratic" primaries for the most progressive candidates you can find. Then if you want to vote green in generals by all means do so.
    10
  950.  @IamRandomAF  We don't buy elon's snake oil or yours because we are not idiots.
    10
  951. Speaking of sad, what a sad attempt at wit Alice.
    10
  952. Naz regarding, "I wish he get impeached" Meh. I have no real good reason to believe Pence would be any better but I understand why you think what you do.
    10
  953.  @davidhoran7116  Fun fact: the "land of the free" imprisons more of it's citizens by total and by percentage of population and it isn't even close. By that metric we are, by far, the least free nation on the planet, by a mile.
    10
  954. Jarhead regarding, "who needs your vote" Well the democrats sure could have used it if they cared about winning the last presidential election. They sure do love to blame me for Hillary losing but if the election were today I'd vote for Jill Stein again.
    10
  955. jeff regarding, "i have NEVER voted for a democrap,,,EVER." I'm not exactly sure what your point is or if you are hoping for a cookie for this. Who do you vote for? And I'm not saying that you should be voting for corporate dems. I'm not. You should be voting for progressives. And although they are few and far between in the "democratic" party they do exist and they deserve your support. They are the ones not selling out to big money to win their elections... like justice democrats.
    10
  956.  @johnsmith1474  I was going to agree with you and then I thought about what it costs for political campaigns... Everyone can bought... especially in a capitalist nation that has warped it's people.
    10
  957.  @JayBee-cr8jm  Do you always defend jennyside? Or just when israel does it?
    10
  958. Lori regarding, "YOU voted in a monster" He voted for Jill Stein... a good person. YOU VOTED FOR A MONSTER!
    10
  959. Anytime someone brings up the fire I'm pointing this out.
    10
  960. I wish I could give your comment a dislike for not bothering to elaborate what disagreement you actually have... that seems pretty important to me if you are going to make your comment. And if you want to be consistent you can just tell me you disagree with my comment as well without bothering to elaborate about it as well.
    10
  961. Am I right to assume that you are being paid to regurgitate that stupid fucking talking point about Trumps "Afro-American support" Ara?
    10
  962. Global Warming Skeptic how can you be so dumb?
    10
  963. Regarding, "FUCK BERNIE PIECE OF SHIT WHO WANTS WAR WITH RUSSIA." Provide one example of Bernie Sanders calling for war with russia. I'll wait... forever... because it doesn't exist.
    10
  964. Never Biden. Good luck getting your fellow republicans to defect to you Joe.
    10
  965. From Memes regarding, "imagine Marshawn Lynch being in control of the nuclear codes" I'd trust him with them more than I trust Trump.
    10
  966. I'd ask why you care about age so much but, in all honesty, I don't care. I suspect that you are really just using a stupid area that you think would be effective at attacking him. Maybe you should get some new talking points.
    10
  967. Well I guess we just need to disagree on whether or not he is going to die before the election. While he is alive I guess I'm going to treat him like he is alive because I'm not a moron. And when he is dead I will, only then, treat him like he is dead, because doing otherwise would be fucking moronic.
    10
  968. We try by using facts, knowledge, and persuasion. He has been programmed so he can be unprogrammed, not that it is an easy task.
    10
  969.  @saltornabene8612  Youtube deleted my comment but still let me know you commented in this thread as if they didn't.
    10
  970. Y Lin regarding, "where was Hillary?" She was busy being a "Goldwater Girl."
    10
  971. wiz 9496 that is some top notch trolling.
    10
  972. This is a good thing because it hopefully gets money in politics talked about more. This is good because hopefully it makes others look worse who don't do this. That said I still do not, in any way, shape, or form trust her all of a sudden. I will not support her and will never vote for her for anything. Ever. People do not change overnight. She has already made it clear who she is. She is a pig... the lipstick doesn't change that.
    10
  973.  @uptoolate2793  "brick he threw" Did he though? The only thing they didn't like about him was the fact that he put an ugly face on the ugly empire.
    10
  974.  Max Von Lowe  Regarding, "What does that even mean." Seems pretty self explanatory. Regarding, "Better than what?" Better than perpetual war, better than legalized corruption, better than millions without health insurance, better than mass incarceration, better than militarized police, better than having wages people can't live on, better than...
    10
  975. It looks like Planet Killing Meteor is winning the 2020 election.
    10
  976. @FUCK GOOGLE Regarding, "brainwashed morons" Even smart people can be brainwashed. Propaganda is used because it works.
    10
  977.  @scotty6124  Please stop being so sexist and racist. /s
    10
  978.  @Gnolomweb  Speak for yourself.
    10
  979. Charles it is good to laugh but I think that if what Bernie says has you cracking up then you might want to seek psychiatric help.
    10
  980.  @ericthomas917  Anyone with the name "facts first" is clearly a propagandist.
    10
  981.  @thesinaclwon  "show" I wasn't talking about the show. I was talking about the person.
    10
  982. To all the people whining about Sanders not voting calm the fuck down. The only thing that decides if something like this passes is the number of YES votes. The number of no votes if MEANINGLESS. Sanders has spoken out passionately and repeatedly in favor of net neutrality. His position on this is clear. You can tell because if he wanted to he could have voted yes and didn't. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dBHjfTKfdQs
    10
  983. I fucking hate Warren but her getting hate from whyamiretarded makes me like her a little more then I did.
    10
  984. Acting like this has anything to with skin color is silly beyond words. Obamas kids have the same privilege.
    10
  985. Regarding, "Why leftists act stupid when encounter a basic logic?" That's your edited comment? I can only wonder how fucking retarded it was before.
    10
  986. "His youtube channel, secular talk, an AFFILIATE of the young turks network." -wikipedia But at least the millions TYT gets doesn't make TYT corrupt right kyle? You are a fraud.
    10
  987.  @tedmarley4341  "bubble" This is funny because like I said you should go back to your CNN/MSNBC bubble.
    10
  988.  @justanotherguitarplayer9767  Regarding, "Trump is still better than any other candidate" You are an idiot.
    10
  989. Trolls be trolling in force.
    10
  990. I'm sorry the problems this country is facing hasn't changed enough to keep up with your attention span. Some things are worth repeating and emphasizing. I would also like to add that some of us love that his rhetoric doesn't change. We already have plenty of fuckers who are happy to say different shit depending on their audience.
    10
  991.  @calboy2  Kyle clearly does. He's affiliated with them.
    10
  992.  @craigsips8677  You make me feel like I'm living in the movie Idiocracy, except President Camacho was a better president and person then the president I have.
    10
  993. w regarding, "they're having massive financial problems too" Huh. I didn't know that. Any chance you provide a link that Canada is about to collapse?
    10
  994. Great wall regarding, " is that why hundreds of thousands of Canadians come to the US for care?" They don't. You are just making shit up.
    10
  995. Bernie Sanders 2020, the guy the paid trolls fear.
    10
  996.  @snapgrouch702  Your right. The dems as a whole are the one with all the power. But that won't stop you from defending them while they do nothing for the people because you are bootlicker.
    10
  997. @Derya Alkan Remember when you said "What a joke" and "these people are a lost cause" and "their heads are already too far up Bernie's asshole." And then said, "Anytime you use an insult to throw shade, it just confirms your insecurity and lack of argument." Weird right. It's almost like you are a hypocritical dipshit without the self awareness to realize how ridiculously hypocritical they are being.
    10
  998. Just when I think things can't get any dumber stuff like this happens.
    10
  999.  @SouthEastSD619  For the most part I agree with Tulsi but I was furious at her for not raising her hand during the first debate about getting rid or private health insurance. Yeah, if anything I'm harder and more critical of the ones I like because I actually expect something from them as opposed to the average politician who I only expect to work against my interests and fuck me over. Bernie 2020
    10
  1000. Let's not rule out them saying a mask gave trump the virus.
    10
  1001.  Trump Lost  And When trump 2.0 follows biden of course it will be largely his fault.
    10
  1002. Trump rubs his cheeto dick with his tiny hands to this.
    10
  1003. "unconscious." Nah. He is dumb on purpose.
    10
  1004.  @steveno2760  Dems have no excuses anymore and nothing is going to fundamentally change unless I'm very wrong. And I'd happily be very wrong.
    10
  1005. It doesn't help that we have big pharma here who are more concerned with making money than with the well being of the citizens of the country.
    9
  1006. Just call it taking a Trump instead. Or taking a Hillary.
    9
  1007. Here. TYT politics archives. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z149Y0aPxCk&list=PLqSpk99bLYIRhTrDy1WU4xR5xqTDT4KCP
    9
  1008. Only a fucking moron thinks Kyle was the victim. Lyle I am calling you a moron in case you are not smart enough to realize it.
    9
  1009. Regarding, "In the '92 election, George H.W. Bush won the popular vote" Except that he didn't. He lost by over 5 million votes. Stop being a moron and delete your lie. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election,_1992
    9
  1010. Tanner regarding, "but isis" I am confident you are joking but I am going to point out that ISIS would never have been a thing had we not invaded a Iraq under false pretense, overthrew their government, and disbanded their army.
    9
  1011. Tronerman isn't smart enough to realize they are only hurting their garbage candidate. If they were any smarter thou they wouldn't support Hillary Clinton in the first place.
    9
  1012. How doesn't that get old for you?
    9
  1013. Stop being so sexist and racist. (sarcasm obv)
    9
  1014. Kyle regarding, "Obama has nothing to lose." Sure he does. He has yet to cash in on the speaking tour after this. He is likely to lose lots of money if he did the right thing here.
    9
  1015. I want to be able to support one of the major parties. Sadly it doesn't seem like that is going to be happening anytime soon. Green Party you will have my support unless something changes.
    9
  1016. Mimi regarding, "DJT just picked someone who has experience and knowledge! He is no longer working at Wall Street! Stop being picky!" Stop being an idiot. He is still working for Wall Street. He will just being doing so in a different role.
    9
  1017. Fusion regarding, "You may this it's a sad argument but it's reality." No. It's just a sad argument. Regarding, "A massive amount of liberals defecting to Jill Stein will result in a Trump presidency" I am a liberal/progressive/lefty type. Do you really want to convince me to vote for the lesser of two evils even though there are more than 2 candidates running? Because if I did vote for the lesser of two evils I'd vote for Donald Fucking Trump. Not because of this election but as enru points out because of the next election. Seeing as how I rightfully think we are going to be fucked under Trump and Hillary I'd rather have the country blame the right for the ensuing disaster so that next time around we can get a real progressive in office as opposed to a fake progressive like Hillary or Obama. And I fear the type of candidate the right will put up next time to run after what will be a failed Hillary presidency. Regarding, "That is just fact, even if you don't like that fact." Just because you say shit like this doesn't make it true. We honestly have zero way of knowing for sure how Trump would govern. You do realize he is a liar right? So why are you so quick to believe anything he says when it conveniently fits your narrative. If you actually cared about the environment you wouldn't be willing to support the spokeswoman for fracking.
    9
  1018. Actually if ED is not being used for the public good it is the equivalent of stealing land. You are a joke.
    9
  1019. But he can't be bothered to offer an opinion of what is going on in ND. Then again his silence speaks volumes.
    9
  1020. Huh? McDonalds profits billions of dollars every year. The only reason they are able to do so is by paying their employees less than what they are worth. They would happily pay people less than the current minimum wage if they were allowed to. They would happily cut their employees hours more than they do so now if they were able to. The government currently subsidizes their paying their employees dirt wages when workers are forced to go to the government despite working. It is corporate welfare. The bottom line is that anyone who is working 40 hours a week is doing the right thing by me and by society's standards. They should be able to pay their bills without going to government for help. All of your notions that workers will be laid off have been dis-proven. Regarding, "You think a fast food place is going to give people full time employment of 40 hours if they have to pay people $15?" What difference does it make to the fast food place if the person getting paid 15 bucks an hour is full time or part time? Regarding, "Companies will cut hours and fire people, how don't you get this?" What do you not understand that these companies would already cut hours and fire people already if they could? Do you think they are currently giving hours and employing people because they are benevolent?
    9
  1021. I encourage you to vote for a third party candidate instead. If we are ever going to do better than a broken two party system we need people to vote for third party candidates. I specifically encourage you to look at Jill Stein. Her policy positions are very close to that of Sanders.
    9
  1022. We are one day out. Let's not speculate about the next election for at least a week please.
    9
  1023. Regarding, "So why did he give way to Hillary?" Because the democratic elites had made their choice. He feared running as an independent, splitting the vote and being blamed for Trump winning.
    9
  1024. The facts you seem to be ignoring is that about half the country is near poverty levels, the middle class is disappearing, all the money is going to the top because our government has essentially legalized bribery, neither major party is interested in peace, our students are swimming in debt, our infrastructure is crumbling, climate change threatens everyone on Earth, the "land of the free" locks up more of it's citizens by percentage of population than anywhere else on Earth (and it isn't even close) and more. And nothing you can say makes any of these facts go away. Good luck with your spin. Everyone but the super rich and super stupid realize the status quo is completely unacceptable.
    9
  1025. Zach can stay. Fire everyone else.
    9
  1026. The DNC would promote her but she is already at the top.
    9
  1027. He might actually make things worse and that is really saying something. We should be afraid. We should have been afraid of the direction of the country long before Trump.
    9
  1028. Huh? The guy is fighting for the well being of the nation.
    9
  1029. Bernie Sanders is the fucking man. He has done more to expose the system for being systemically corrupt than you ever could. I think he made a mistake endorsing Hillary but it was an endorsement and not his soul. I loved Bernie Sanders and still do but I don't care about anyone's endorsement because I'm not a sheep. I voted for Jill Stein.
    9
  1030.  @yugiohpokemon5285  Canada pays half as much for their health care system, they don't leave millions of people uninsured, their infant mortality rate is superior to that of the US and their life expectancy rate is superior to the US. In short you are a complete moron. Good luck with that.
    9
  1031. These corporations really get an amazing return on their bribes, excuse me, donations to our politicians.
    9
  1032. Aurel regarding, "It does." No. It doesn't. You think that because you are stupid. The difference between a good person and a bad person is determined by their actions and not what is in their blood stream. A good person could, for example, take drugs while doing good things and a bad person could, for example, not take drugs and do terrible things. That is because the difference between being a good person and being a bad person has NOTHING to do with whether or not they do drugs and EVERYTHING to do with their actions.
    9
  1033. I don't think her covering Flint is worthy of praise. I do think the rest of the corporate media ignoring it does deserve scorn. They are suppose to be the news. That is suppose to be the type of thing they cover. I also don't get too excited over the pizza delivery guy (or gal) when they show up after I order pizza. That is simply what they are suppose to do. I will get mad if they don't show up thou. I don't watch her anymore so I honestly don't know the answer to this but how long has it been since she talked about Flint? This is Jordan Chariton talking about it TODAY. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ShaJOEbIcms&t=0s
    9
  1034. There is so much wrong with everything you say. Regarding, "It was obvious who was worse" No. It really wasn't. Regarding, "ALWAYS choose the lesser of two evils. PERIOD!" No. I won't. Because I refuse to support evil. Is it really so difficult to understand why supporting evil is wrong? Because to me that concept is pretty self-evident. Regarding, "At least with HC some progressive agena would have succeeded." There is NOTHING progressive about Hillary and her agenda and for you to suggest there this is absurd. One of the reasons I'm actually happy with Trump being president is because sheep you will cry, whine and bitch about Trump being president but, if Hillary were president you would go to sleep and justify all the terrible shit she would be doing in office the same way Trump supporters are justifying the terrible shit he is doing. Regarding, "With Trump, America has slid backward" America has been sliding backward for quite a long time. You know who shares a lot of the blame for that? Bill Clinton. Repeal of glass steagal, outsourcing jobs, mass incarceration with the omnibus crime bill, in general neoliberal policies. If you think America wouldn't have slid backward with a different disgrace like Hillary then you are an idiot. Regarding, "it will take many years to see any progess now" You know another reason why I'm happy Trump is president? Because with him in office there is hope for an actual progressive president in 2020. With Hillary Clinton that would not be possible. But you go ahead and continue to support shit as long as you think it smells better than different shit. You give them no reason to offer you anything other than shit. You fail to realize that the election of the moment isn't the only thing to think about. You need to think about every other election yet to come. And in every other election yet to come you give them no reason to try and earn your vote. They know you are going to give it to them regardless.
    9
  1035. Top regarding, "There's no such thing as a lie detector." Not according to Kavanaugh who has said, "The Government has satisfactorily explained how polygraph examinations serve law enforcement purposes."
    9
  1036.  @whyamimrpink78  What makes it challenging are trolls like you who go out and make everyone dumber with everything you write.
    9
  1037. Paul regarding, "privatize prisons" They are part of the groups lobbying to keep weed illegal but first and foremost big pharma stands the most to lose if it is legal. Then there is also the alcohol industry and lots of other smaller industries that want it to stay illegal.
    9
  1038.  @shootingbricks8554  He still has time to gaslight and lie to people online in his free time so that's really what's important. /s
    9
  1039. Didn't dave vote for Trump? How is that libertarian?
    9
  1040. Matthew regarding, "trump continued this which is bad." Yup. You should have stopped here. Sadly you go on. Regarding, "this started under obama" It is far more accurate to say it started under Bush with the patriot act. That said this isn't as relevant to the conversation as the conversation about what we need to do now is. Regarding, "you bet your ass hillary wouldve continued it too" This is just a lame and pathetic way to excuse what Trump is doing. Regarding, "dont blame the voters" Why not exactly? There is plenty of blame to go around and I'm going to save at least some of it for a public that voted overwhelming for 2 pieces of shit named Trump and Clinton. And that ignores the fact that half the eligible voters didn't even bother to vote. Clearly a stupid public shares the blame even if they are being fucked over, brainwashed, and busy just trying to stay afloat that makes it difficult for them to figure out accurately why they are getting fucked over. Regarding, "blame the system for giving us two garbage candidates" Yes the system is fucking garbage but they also rely on people like you pushing the narrative that there were only 2 candidates to chose from. Again, there is lots of blame to go around to lots of different things. Just because I blame Trump supporters for supporting Trump and Hillary supporters for supporting Hillary doesn't mean I don't also blame "the system."
    9
  1041. Trump fans consider this winning. There is a reason Trump loves the uneducated.
    9
  1042. rising regarding, "Trump is an asshole and doesn't hide it" I'm an asshole. Trump being an asshole is not why I can't stand him. Regarding, "I voted for Trump to help collapse the GOP." That is a better reason than most still I think it is fucking stupid. You should be voting for your values not for blowing shit up. Regarding, "Bernie was used to coral the youth vote" I'd ask why you think this if I cared more and/or thought there would be some kind of logic that would justify thinking this but there isn't. Bernie Sanders entered the race to get his message out and to be able to talk about the issues he cares about... PROGRESSIVE ISSUES. He knew the game was rigged. I didn't think he thought he had a chance when entering (why should he have, he was down 60 points), but after realizing how much his message was resonating and seeing his support grow it seemed clear that he had a shot and he was as sad about not winning as anyone (see his body language at the convention). Regarding, "only to switch it up at the last minute to give you the shit burger that was Hillary" Again this makes no fucking sense. Sanders exposed Hillary, the DNC, and the establishment for what they were and you think it was all just a ploy to get people to support Hillary? That makes no fucking sense to people paying attention. Hillary would have won had Sanders not run. But because of Sanders people decided they were not willing to support such a corrupt candidate and corrupt party even when the alternative was Cheeto dick. Regarding, "endorses Hillary and tells his base to get behind her." When entering the primary candidates pledge to support the winner of the primary. Sanders did what he said he would and endorsed Hillary. Not even for that reason so much but because he didn't want Trump to be President and he didn't want to be blamed for Trump being president. Can you really blame him? I don't. And remember what this was and what it wasn't. It was a fucking endorsement not his soul. I fucking love Sanders but I happily voted for Jill Stein because only sheep vote based on another person's endorsement. Regarding, "Bernie is a con artist , owns multiple huge homes" Do you get your stupid ass talking points from Hillary Inc? Regarding, "WE VOTED HIM" You voted for Hillary Clinton with an orange dick. That is really something to be proud of if you are fucking stupid. Regarding, "Bernie though is a fake progressive , he is owned by the Dem Establishment." Yeah, the guy who has done more to expose the DNC and the establishment for their corruption and rot is working for them. That would make sense if I were a fucking moron.
    9
  1043. Even if he does will it be counted that way? Check exit polls. That's how you know if votes are being flipped.
    9
  1044. I love Jon but I'm tired of celebrity politicians.
    9
  1045. "the same thing to Tucker that the state tried to do to Chappelle and Joe Rogan." No. They are not the same. Not even close. What the state is trying to do to chappelle and rogan is nefarious and evil. Wolff is just being wrong about tucker. He's dismissive of tucker because he's terrible on some issues and because he's on fox. Ultimately I'm trying to get away from pretending I know someone's motives. At the moment I'm going to treat tucker like my friend when he's acting like my friend and I'm going to treat him like my enemy on issues where he's my enemy. I'm not sure motives really matter even.
    9
  1046. Anybody who voted for either Trump or Hillary is an idiot in my opinion and I'm tired of so many people thinking you had to vote for one or the other. You know there were other candidates right? When the only defense you have for your piece of shit is by deflecting and talking about someone else's piece of shit you have lost and are lost. Stop voting for shit all of you. When you do you are as big of a problem as the shit candidates you vote for.
    9
  1047. I do and so does anyone who cares about the revolving door where politicians profit off of their political influence when leaving office.
    9
  1048. I feel nothing but shame when thinking of how I voted for Obama.
    9
  1049.  @NGHealthCoach  Regarding, " where is the lie?" Well, regarding, "ADOS is not voting for Bernie." You do not speak for everyone so this cannot be true. Regarding, "said he did not think a black person could be on his ticket" He absolutely has not said this, aka a lie. Regarding, "no black agenda" https://berniesanders.com/issues/racial-justice/ Is clearly a black agenda. I hope you are at least getting paid well to smear Sanders.
    9
  1050. flyin regarding, "Did you just insult my garbage" My apologies... and my apologies to all garbagemen.
    9
  1051. Great guests.
    9
  1052. How exactly was he being racist? I could use a good laugh.
    9
  1053. How does anyone get convicted of corruption these days? It really takes a special kind of stupid, arrogance, and corruption combined.
    9
  1054. Except it is a plant and very easy to grow yourself. It isn't like building a car ya know.
    9
  1055. It's tough to find the time in a 24 hour news cycle to cover anything other than Trump's tweets
    9
  1056.  @Attmay  I've known I'm racist against orange people for some time now.
    9
  1057. Her cult is her crack.
    9
  1058. Yes the DNC will do anything and everything they can to prevent Sanders from winning but there are not enough tricks in their playbook to keep him from winning. Regarding, "Didn't the DNC just purge all progressives from the organization?" Yes but not all that important to his campaign in all honesty. And if Sanders wins corporate dems can be purged just the same way. Regarding, "Don't they still have super Delegates?" Yes but I am confident they will fall in line and support the winner of the most pledged delegates. The establishment is corrupt but they are not stupid. If they are used to usurp the will of the voters, like they have never done, they will very possible lead to the destruction of the party. I would be ok with that. Regarding, "Closed primaries?" Yup. It is bullshit but their message is clear... they don't want you to vote in their primaries. Which means we need to make sure anyone and everyone does. Regarding, "what will be different from 2016" When he entered the race in 2016 he was virtually unknown and down 60 points and still he barely lost. In 2020 he will enter with the name recognition of a rockstar and is rightfully the most popular politician in the country. Hillary was portrayed as inevitable as an effort to try and suppress Sanders support. In 2020 Sanders will be the one that is inevitable. He is going to crush anyone and everyone that tries to stop him. The game has clearly changed.
    9
  1059.  @tonyclifton2230  "What's your point." Even you must realize their point right? "He explains" Actions speak louder than meaningless words. He's part of that problem who shields politicians from criticism. For example when jimmy was talking about forcing the vote grimm was giving BS about how it might lead to mccarthey being speaker.
    9
  1060. If that were actually true, which it isn't, they wouldn't be working overtime to try and fuck him over.
    9
  1061. Regarding, "Bernie should adopt how trump campaigned." Keep in mind that Trump demonized immigrants and ran on committing war crimes (we have to take out their families). My point is that this notion or being like Trump is fucking terrible. I get that it really isn't the point you are trying to make, but the point you are actually trying to make needs to be done much, much better. We both agree about Bernie 2020. But please don't think emulating the orange clown sounds like a good idea. It isn't.
    9
  1062. I'm not voting for either Biden.
    9
  1063. I'm still pretty pissed at Cenk for lying on warren's behalf of what she said to him on his own show.
    9
  1064.  @rideordietheyretring2tranx382  You can't judge a person's intelligence by a single action. Maybe stop doing it. Obama sucks. There a million legit ways to criticize him. Do that instead of this stupid shit. Obama's suckatude has nothing to do with his intelligence. The guy is smart. And you look like a moron when you suggest otherwise.
    9
  1065. It's all corporate media... stop acting like it's not.
    9
  1066. When it comes to knowing if you can trust these politicians follow the money. My trust is directly correlated to how they finance their campaigns.
    9
  1067. The war for 2020 is on and you can tell they are scared.
    9
  1068.  @oceania2385  "produces beggars" Isn't substance abuse... it's capitalism.
    9
  1069. Bernie votes in lockstep with those "heartless bastards." Actions speak louder than words.
    9
  1070. They will do anything to win... other than offer an inspiring message.
    9
  1071.  @JoeG2324  I didn't actually mean "good luck with your condescending worthless comments," it was more meant to say... shut the fuck and begone with you troll.
    9
  1072. Why Bernie? It would be easier if I told you why not Bernie. So easy my list is complete... and empty.
    9
  1073. By following the Biden signs and MAGA hats.
    9
  1074. It only they would agree to not support clowns like biden or trump.
    9
  1075. I agree Bernie should be there but Jordan is right to call out MSNBC for their bullshit.
    9
  1076.  @thebigpicture2032  Regarding, "A vote for M4CA is useless right now." It's never useless to get the people stopping the public from getting good things to go on the record for it so that they can pay a price for sucking. Regarding, "If anyone has issue with AOC, ask her to step down so Crowley can have his seat back." There's no middle ground? I can't maybe just criticize things she does that I disagree with without having to think that crowley should come back? Long story short your comment is shit.
    9
  1077.  @LadieKadie  Correction: you got one thing right... he did set himself on fire.
    9
  1078.  @LadieKadie  If you don't appreciate him for what he was I feel sad for you.
    9
  1079.  @GregoryDM  Let's all actually get this right. The US government has NEVER accurately represented it's people.
    9
  1080.  Craig Bowers  Yes. It is. We shouldn't play the establishment's game of framing it as if there are only 2 people running.
    9
  1081. Because she would be better than Trump by quite a bit. That shouldn't be hard to understand even I personally don't know if I would vote for her.
    9
  1082.  @makeamericagreatagain3401  No one cares what you think obvious troll.
    9
  1083.  @josephcioe4697  Regarding, "And to be fair I think trump wants to legalize it." To be fair you have no good reason to think this. Trump is a guy who will literally say anything about anything and he has never said anything of the sort. This is merely wishful thinking on your part based on literally nothing intelligent. Meanwhile he thought Jeff Sessions was a good idea for his job which can be a clear message to the contrary. Regarding, "I don't really think he can resist lobbying" And ultimately it doesn't really matter what the orange clown "thinks" because he is a clown whose soul is bought.
    9
  1084.  @imonghosh912  I'm not a country but I promise you I've been apologizing for and been embarrassed by our presidents for quite some time.
    9
  1085. Narmy regarding, "I'm not joining the Democratic party to vote in their rigged primaries." So your pride is more important to you than do what is best for the country? Suck it the fuck up. You are only doing yourself a disservice if you don't.
    9
  1086. sq regarding, "it's a failed dying party" It isn't dead and as much as it should be it isn't going to die anytime soon. You don't want to vote for a dem in the general? Fine. Don't. I sure as fuck won't try to convince you to. But vote for the most progressive candidate in the primary you can. It is in your interests to do so. And if you want a good reason why how about because it is what Perez won't want you to do.
    9
  1087. Qasim regarding, "If Bernie Sanders isn't leaving the democratic party, then f* him too!" Way to go, you already have something in common with democrats and republicans. You all care more about party labels than you do about the person.
    9
  1088. Regarding, "to be fair the only other option was" There were more than 2 people running. Stop being such a brainwashed sheep.
    9
  1089. You are why Hillary supporters are considered to be just as dumb as Trump supporters. Literally everything you just said is stupid other than "Bernie Sanders has had good policies."
    9
  1090. @Omar Bandino Don't be an idiot. If you don't like the major party candidates find someone else.
    9
  1091. Thumbs down for Ryan Grimm the propagandist.
    9
  1092.  @penpenultra  Regarding, "For the Bernie or Bust peeps in here: what exactly is your strategy?" Vote for good. It's not exactly "strategy" it's more of a principle. And it's a principle that literally everyone should have. But if you need a strategic reason it makes sense... if the "democratic" party actually cares about winning maybe they will offer a reasonable candidates in the future. If I voted blue no matter who they have zero reason to give a shit about me.
    9
  1093. John regarding, "My sources told me Bernie took a buyout package to stop campaigning amd support Hillary" Your "source" is the establishment trying desperately to smear the only politician working for the people. I wanted Bernie to tell Hillary and the DNC to go fuck themselves but I understand why he did what he did even if I disagreed with him on it. Sadly he isn't perfect but he will have my support in 2020. Better late than never.
    9
  1094. "Left eating the left." As if CNN or Cuomo are "the left." The war isn't between the left and the right. It's between the elite and the peasants.
    9
  1095. Regarding, "there’s no evidence that votes were altered." There absolutely is. Exit polls indicated election fraud. So much so that if those types of results happened in other countries the US wouldn't consider their election legitimate.
    9
  1096. Kylo, the best way to know if votes are being flipped are by comparing exit polling data to election results. A discrepancy of more than 2 percent is considered to be suspect and an indication of election fraud. Hillary outperformed exit polling by 11.9 percent in Georgia, 13.9 percent in Alabama, 8.3 percent in Tennessee, 8 percent in Massachusetts, 6.4 percent in Texas, 4.3 percent in Virginia, and 5.2 percent in Arkansas. This is clear evidence of election fraud and vote flipping. I should probably talk about what exit polling is if you are not aware. It isn't polling done a day or week before an election. It doesn't try to predict who may or may not show up to vote. It is polling done of voters at voting sites during the election. There simply is no good reason for exit polling data to be so far off from election results like this unless there is foul play.
    9
  1097. This type of mentality has you not caring that you are talking about YOUR tax dollars being moved into private hands.
    9
  1098. Sorry you have been indoctrinated to think sex is dirty and wrong even thou you wouldn't be here without it.
    9
  1099. Few have done as much to expose the rot in the part as Sanders. He is the only reason the primaries even needed to be rigged. He all but singlehandedly was winning the debate about M4A. Don't be absurd.
    9
  1100. I'm only here to give a thumbs up.
    9
  1101. They are a bit busy here. Jeremy would probably say the same thing if someone said he should come endorse Sanders right now.
    9
  1102. I used to be proud to be American but that was a long time ago.
    9
  1103. He's going to find those WMD any day now.
    9
  1104. He's apt at getting money from the government. I'd be a billionaire too if I were getting billions of dollars from the government.
    9
  1105. Captain Harry is why Trump loves the uneducated.
    9
  1106. It's worse than being a nazi? Or maybe your comment is silly.
    9
  1107.  @williamryan7403  Regarding, "I think a Sanders/Tulsi ticket has the best chance to beat him" Sounds good to me but far too much is made of the bottom half of the ticket. People don't really vote based on the bottom half. Far too much is made of it and I think people should focus on making Sanders the nominee. Period. Regarding, "I believe Trump is going to win because..." I don't. Trump fucking sucks. He got millions less votes than someone who was rightfully perceived by the public to have cheated to have gotten there. Even she, a complete piece of shit, would have beaten trump in the general had she have been believed to have won her primary legitimately. Ultimately... I really barely care about the general. A good candidate will have no trouble crushing him. The election that really matter is the "democratic" primary. Regarding, "pandering to illegal immigrants offering them free healthcare etc." You do realize that we already provide them with healthcare right? That we don't just let them die when they get sick because we aren't monsters. (well most of us at least) The question is just manipulated right wing talking points to try and scare people away from a universal system.
    9
  1108. Just imagine how they would be reacting if Sanders were doing this... but it's Biden. So crickets before SC. Biden wants "normalcy." Normalcy meant he should drop out. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AKCJ45QMyLU
    9
  1109. @M R They make no claims about about it being "equal." That is only you. The original poster merely says they both smear him. Which is absolutely true. The only person bringing nonsense is you.
    9
  1110.  @wahm7872  There is no way that Thomas John is actually on the left while they are mindlessly shittalking the only reason either of the last two "democratic" primaries even needed to be rigged.
    9
  1111.  @liberalsocialist9723  "Everyone is a sell out." Just people that say the right things like... https://twitter.com/AOC/status/1349186664502087680 But don't force the vote. That's why she is a sellout.
    9
  1112. Triple regarding, "That she never used her looks and thus never was molested." But that isn't why she was never assaulted.
    9
  1113.  @JamNMama1  So evidence huh? Here... this is what it might look like. This video talks about his tax returns that have gone back 10 years. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S8VMfbARSwA&t=516s
    9
  1114. Following the money tells you more about a candidate than the words they use. Don't support candidates selling out to big money and corporate interests. Bernie Sanders 2020
    9
  1115.  @mattstorm360  By demanding pelosi bring it to a vote to get their vote for her for speaker. Nancy needs their votes to be speaker.
    9
  1116. M4A NOW!
    9
  1117. Sane people want justice. Insane people want bombs.
    9
  1118. Jill Stein was not perfect but the only reason she wasn't considered "viable" was because of the corporate media only talked about her to smear her.
    9
  1119.  @dreb222  Are you and glenn competing to try and tell the most transparent lie?
    9
  1120.  @IshtarNike  Yup. This is what not me, us, looks like in practice.
    9
  1121. Nope. He needs to be exposed to make sure.
    9
  1122. Andrew Yang has no political experience and no political record for me to look at. Those are both deal breakers for me when considering my vote for the highest political office in the country.
    9
  1123.  @pegeta  That seems racist to me. That wasn't what MLK dreamed about.
    9
  1124. Things state media would do... censor.
    9
  1125. NYC regarding, "Most people know that knowing and accepting reality" Thanks for the laugh considering you have no idea what reality looks like. Regarding, "The office of Presidency is not intended for a person that has no knowledge at all pertaining to the inner workings of legislating." Jill Stein is incredibly intelligent. I am confident she can figure it out. What will be forever more important than experience is judgement. Jill Stein has good judgement. Hillary has demonstrated nothing but terrible judgement. Dick Cheney has knowledge pertaining to the inner workings of legislature so to you I guess you think he too is what we need for President. You can't be this dumb can you? Seriously you must be being paid to lie to the public right? Get a real job. What you are doing is making the world a worse place. Change. Immediately. Please.
    8
  1126. I'd rather vote for Nixon than Hillary. Especially now that he is dead, but I'd still rather vote for him if he were alive.
    8
  1127. Tyler do you think the cause of police reform is helped when police are murdered? I assure you it only hurts their cause. The DNC is a joke at the moment. I kinda hope they burn to the ground so that something better (the green party for example) replaces them. Violence isn't going to help. Not voting for democrats is the answer. I have been a lifelong democrat. I am exactly the type of person they could count on to support and vote for them but no more. When enough people like myself stop supporting them they will either change or become extinct. The answer is not violence.
    8
  1128. It was a catalyst like Citizens United was another catalyst. But Jordan is right that it really began with Reagan and trickle down economics.
    8
  1129. You forget Jimmy Dore.
    8
  1130. LMFAO. This was either excellent sarcasm or you are dumb as fuck.
    8
  1131. And you have to criticize her when criticism is due. Not backing Bernie or the water protectors for examples.
    8
  1132. Your are joking right? Did you listen to the story? Trespassing is when you are not welcomed by the owner. If you are a guest you are not trespassing. Wow you are stupid.
    8
  1133. Never Hillary. Never Trump. Jill Stein for President!
    8
  1134. Jurassic regarding, "You don't see the sarcasm." It is great sarcasm. It is just very difficult to identify because Trumpeteers actually think that BS.
    8
  1135. Bobby regarding, "I dont judge someone based on what they have not yet done" And you don't seem to be willing to judge someone on what they have done yet if it doesn't fit what you want to believe. That is not being rational or fair. That is being biased. DraintheSwamp is at least being intellectually honest and admitting what is obviously going on. I can at least respect a Trump supporter who supported them hoping for the best and going with the unknown instead of the known POS. I lose respect when they bury their head in the sand to the constant evidence and facts that Trump is nothing more than a conman.
    8
  1136. Eirikr Sanford, I know you are there. Kallister responded to you. I got an email saying you responded. It says there are far more replies than I can see, but I can't see any of your comments here. It is very weird. I apologize if you have said something I should respond to. (or anyone else for that matter) I would if only I could see it. In the meantime I'm blaming Russia... like Hillary and company would.
    8
  1137. If the Supreme Court was actually as important as you pretend then you should remember that democrats have the ability to do the exact same thing republicans are doing this very second. I suspect it really isn't as important to you as you say and instead you are content to use the issue to fear monger and scare people into voting for a candidate that absolutely is completely unacceptable buy any standard of measure other than maybe being compared to the orange clown.
    8
  1138. This is as close as I get to disagreeing with Jimmy. I don't think the fact that Trump won the election is a good reason to not bring up illegal immigrants voting if it were actually true. The reason it shouldn't be brought up is because it doesn't exist like Trump claims.
    8
  1139. Cody regarding, "isn't on the ballot in NC." Then write her in. She is registered as a write in candidate so your vote will be counted. http://www.jill2016.com/ballot_access
    8
  1140. Islam thank you for ignoring everything I bothered to say. You go ahead and choose between a douche and turd... that isn't wasting your vote. SMH
    8
  1141. Bob regarding, "Don't you know that this might NEVER have happened if people hadn't voted for a spoiler" You think people are entitled to votes. They aren't. You think that people who voted for Nader would have naturally gone to Gore. They don't. I'm voting for Jill Stein this election but you are going to think that vote belongs to Hillary even thou she has done nothing in her entire life to deserve it. She has actually worked against my interests and beliefs her entire life. If I voted for who I think the lesser of two evils is I'd vote for Donald POS Trump. But you don't care about this inconvenient fact. You will just say my vote belonged to Hillary or some other BS talking point. Don't blame Trump voters for Trump, the DNC for rigging the primary, or Hillary for sucking her entire life, point the finger at me even though if anyone has a gripe with my vote it should be Trump and company. http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/12/6/1260721/-The-Nader-Myth
    8
  1142. Erik regarding, "Nobody said Hillary is entitled to your vote." It certainly is implied when Bob says, "Don't you know that this might NEVER have happened if people hadn't voted for a spoiler" I'm not voting for a "spoiler" when I vote for Jill Stein. I'm voting for the only candidate that represents me, my priorities, and my ethics. I'm voting for the only candidate running who actually deserves my vote. But to sheep that means spoiler. Regarding, "We're saying voting for Hillary is probably in your best interest" Well, you are very, very, very wrong. Hillary is everything I despise about our political system, politicians, and state of politics. And it isn't up to you. It isn't your vote so it isn't your call. Regarding, "you're most likely throwing your vote towards nothing" I'm getting the Green party closer to the very important 5 percent mark even if she doesn't win and I'm letting the establishment know I'm not going to choose between a douche and a turd. Regarding, "actually impacting who the next President is." You seem to think I consider Hillary and Trump to be very different. They aren't, at least not in any sort of meaningful way. (being a better liar is not a meaningful difference) Regarding, "Nobody is denying you the right to do that. We're just point out what it means." You are blaming Green party voters already if Hillary loses. Stop denying that. Regarding, "There are only two outcomes this election" No there aren't. Regarding, "Good luck to you if you think doing something else has a bigger impact on your future." I will. My vote isn't just about this election but about all the elections yet to come.
    8
  1143. There have been no claims that any of the evidence is not true or falsified. Where or not it was the Russians is merely a distraction from the DNC being corrupt.
    8
  1144. Jesus regarding, "This time I voted Trump." I don't think you are racist for that but I do think you are being a fool for supporting that conman and clown.
    8
  1145. The Green Party is the only party who hasn't sold their soul to big money and corporate interests. That is why they can actually represent the people. Jill Stein for President!
    8
  1146. "sick of being lectured to." Are we suppose to care? That lecture was about peace and about hypocrisy. That lecture is actually the same lecture that jimmy gives. It's only funny because he got the names mixed up.
    8
  1147. John-Paul regarding, "We're already bankrupt since the 1980s you dumbass!" Do you really not understand the difference between the meaning of words such as bankrupt, debt, and deficit?
    8
  1148. This is tough to watch but it has to be done.
    8
  1149. Regarding, "because that is too hard." I don't think they say that. I think they say it is harder. Regarding, "Isn't hard easier than impossible?" Well they obviously disagree with you about it being impossible. Regarding, "as the dnc rigged primary lawsuit proved, the establishment dumocrats have every right to pick their candidate in smoke filled rooms and ignore primary and caucus results." You are mischaracterizing the case. The fact of the matter (as much as it is wrong) the party does absolutely have the ability to pick a candidate if they want. That said they do choose to have primaries and they argue they do not really need to be fair. It is fucked up. It is wrong. But still they can't just ignore the results of elections as soon as they have them. You go ahead and try to build a 3rd party if you want. Some are going to try to take over the "democratic" party hostile takeover style. And some are somewhere imbetween like myself. We can disagree on the tactics and still be friends I hope. I would like to add that you should be supporting good people who share your values, concerns and ethics and support them regardless of a party label.
    8
  1150. Stephen regarding, "I believe you meant to say, "Concerted effort"." Of course that is what I meant to say but I'm American. At least I proved my own point.
    8
  1151.  @SharisVoice  Regarding, "you think 7 people can instantly fix a corrupt government?" Cool strawman argument. I do think they could have forced the vote on m4a. That's why they are frauds. Stop bootlicking.
    8
  1152. If I believed in a god I'd pray Bernie crushes it tonight.
    8
  1153.  @cosmicgiraffe4071  "a FRAUD for disagreeing with your daddy" You feel like a fraud to me because instead of addressing the things I'm saying you strawman with nonsense like this. "Dore..." LMFAO This isn't about dore. It's not dores fault that kyle is wrong about a bunch of important shit. That's kyles fault. If i were a cultist I'd excuse it and overlook it. I won't. " Cult leaders ALWAYS do that shit." LMFAO I wouldn't accept this behavior from kyle if jimmy were doing it either. You should consider the possibility that you are projecting and making excuses for your cult leader.
    8
  1154.  @mmolchin  "he says that about politicians specifically." That doesn't apply to cenk? Who just got done running for office long ago? Because reasons? I don't care about yours or kyles bullshit. Everyone knows the millions make them corrupt by kyle whose affiliated with TYT but doesn't mention it ever. "not accurately representing any of his actual arguments" I'm not even really bothering with his BS terrible arguments. I'm more pointing out the asinine conclusions of a person demonstrating they are a fraud.
    8
  1155.  @Stonefallow  "a proclamation that she was going to go public about her grievances toward him" It was a threat to metoo him if he didn't stop telling everyone how TYT are frauds. We have a word for the behavior. It's called BLACKMAIL.
    8
  1156. He is suppose to not be triggered by a joke.
    8
  1157.  @jasonwalker6285  Some points are worth repeating.
    8
  1158. The party will do everything they can to fuck him over but you overestimate the number of tricks in their bag. They used them all last time and he still almost won even though when he entered the race he was virtually unknown. The game has changed because he is not unknown anymore. He has the name recognition of a rock star and is the most popular politician in the country. There are not enough dirty tricks to stop him in 2020.
    8
  1159. Shame
    8
  1160. Shaun regarding, "Wouldn’t have mattered if Clinton won." I guess that is why I didn't vote for either Trump or Clinton.
    8
  1161. David regarding, "You mean like trump is doing?" No. I mean the economic elite like Trump put in his cabinet.
    8
  1162. Accept no imitations. Bernie Sanders 2020. Go subscribe to his youtube channel if you haven't already and get out and vote for him. Thank you in advance for that.
    8
  1163. Trump is a conman and you are a moron for supporting him.
    8
  1164. Regarding, "Everything trump said was right." I have bridge to sell you. It's tremendous. Bigly. Top notch.
    8
  1165. Promoting Shit Pai is how Trump, "drained the swamp."
    8
  1166. Dore is a truth teller. Why wouldn't you like that?
    8
  1167. Everyone who gave this a thumbs up is a sexist. (I am kidding.)
    8
  1168. If you think Russia didn't fuck with us then you are willingly being blind to the obvious truth even if the importance of that truth is being wildly overblown by the corporate media. He absolutely has spoken out about the DNC rigging the game although there is a case to be made that he could have said more. But try to lie to yourself. There is nothing Sanders could say or do that is going to convince the idiots that still think the primary was fair to think otherwise. Bernie has not sold out his principles at all and you are being foolish if you think he has. I continue to support him because, not only am I able to look at a lifetime of working for progressive policies to know exactly what I'm getting with him, but because he is the most popular politician in the country with the name recognition of a rock star. All important advantages if we are to have hope of overcoming a rigged system. The establishment appreciates you doing their work for them with your efforts to smear him. They thank you for being a useful idiot.
    8
  1169. Regarding, "who do you think is the establishment person. Me, who is against Hillary and Trump and Bernie when he pushes for war with Russia" Yes. You are acting like an establishment dipshit. Because you lie. Bernie Sanders has never pushed for war with Russia. Never. Ever. But that doesn't stop you from pushing that bullshit and misrepresenting reality the exact same way the establishment does. Regarding, "Bernie pushing the establishment line that Trump won because he colluded with Russia" Again I am pretty sure that you are lying. Not quite as sure as the claim that Sanders is calling for war. You are taking the fact that Sanders has questioned Russian involvement in the election and are twisting it to suit your BS narrative. Maybe I'm wrong. I dare you to prove your claim. When has Sanders ever said that Trump won because he colluded with Russia. I'm sure you can do that if what you said is true. Regarding, "you still think I am a Hillary or Trump supporter" No. I think you are stupid, just like Hillary and Trump supporters because you say stupid things including working to smear darn near the only politicians working for the people. Regarding, "If you can't see that I am against war" You say this like Sanders has pushed for war with Russia. But he hasn't. That is why you are an idiot. Nothing changes the fact that you, Hillary supporters, and Trump supporters have found common ground in working to unfairly smear Sanders. Good luck with that going forward.
    8
  1170. Time will tell. All the Biden propaganda makes me think he might be the candidate of choice. I also don't rule out Booker and a couple other establishment tools. We will know for sure who their pick is when the superdelegates tell the peasants who to vote for.
    8
  1171. If you have a problem with a person because they are an "old, white man" then you are sexist. And ageist. And dumb.
    8
  1172. I'm sorry if the truth triggers you. Bernie doesn't smell women's hair and kiss them without consent. That's actually the problem people have with Biden... not that he touched someones shoulder.
    8
  1173. While it is fun to fantasize about let's not get ahead of ourselves. Our focus needs to be on making Sanders the nominee in 2020.
    8
  1174. Ricky Spanish is not representative of all Trump supporters. There were many Trump supporters who were swayed by his populist message. Sure it was all bullshit but those were still ideas.
    8
  1175. Idiocracy looks more and more like a utopia. I'd kill to have a president as qualified and well intentioned as president camacho.
    8
  1176. Steven reminds me of the moron in Idiocracy who gets paid to say, "brought to you by carl's jr." but instead he says, "snowflake" and is significantly dumber.
    8
  1177. Regarding, "The whole reason I posted that was to effect some sort of debate but as usual nobody is actually interested in discussing anything" The only thing I find myself genuinely interested about you is whether or not you believe the stupid as fuck things you say. I want to think that you can't possibly think the best way to get a genuine debate going is by acting like a fucking moron and starting by calling people snowflakes and giving zero substance whatsoever. I want to think that even you can't be so fucking dense. That said I'm not sure and I never will be. Asking you is pointless because you rightfully have zero credibility to the sane. I suspect you are a paid shill. But who knows. Maybe you are actually as dumb as you seem.
    8
  1178. In your comment you are at least talking about quantum string theory. Greta wasn't even doing that. Advantage you.
    8
  1179.  @avpthegreat  "Why not?" The democratic party isn't a left party so they don't represent them. Obviously.
    8
  1180. KAWAII don't be so sure. For example Sanders and AOC are covered presently because they simply have become too big for them to ignore. Instead they will likely cover it to a small degree because they feel they have no choice and use it to try and smear Sanders, AOC, and Welder.
    8
  1181.  @mrashad219  "put Hillary Clinton in the state department" Fair point. And I'm not looking for ways to try and defend obama. Ultimately he was terrible. "Ghadaffi" Another fair point. Peace.
    8
  1182.  @MuantanamoMobile  *dangerously stupid
    8
  1183. I would because I know who is asking it and what they want. They want to get her. No question about it to me.
    8
  1184.  @eFPronouns  I'm thinking it's one of grim's burner accounts.
    8
  1185.  AntiSocial Atheist  Regarding, "You have never even looked at her record." Of course we have. We are actually the people most likely to study and scrutinize it. Regarding, "I love Bernie but people like you make me want him to lose." So you know there are people like us that are possibly not going to go out and vote for a person like warren because she, for example, is happy to take legalized bribes if she makes the general, and that makes you want Bernie to lose? That only makes sense if you want Trump to win because people like us are the difference between winning and losing the general. Regarding, "You believe only one man matters in American politics" Not true. Do you always strawman the opposing side like this?
    8
  1186.  @brothermine2292  In reality the EC is a garbage system with no redeeming value. It takes a system that is as good as it is going to get, most votes wins, and makes some votes more meaningful than others.
    8
  1187.  @tonyclifton2230  "Ryan gives good analysis." You don't even attempt to address my point about his lies about mccarthey become speaker. You are as disingenuous as him.
    8
  1188.  @tonyclifton2230  " I don't need to address your point." This sounds like something ryan grimm would say. Is this a burner account of his? Just ignoring my point doesn't make it go away ya know.
    8
  1189.  Christian Soldier  Not bad. I rate your trolling 7/10.
    8
  1190.  @ozmond  "he's just a grifter." The guy who was trying to force the vote on m4a? I suspect you are paid for you BS.
    8
  1191. This is funny because you are watching corporate hack ryan grimm. I'm turning off the hill today except for a little taking it to ryan grimm time.
    8
  1192. Global Warming Skeptic, dumbest, fucker, ever.
    8
  1193. Imagine being so dense you call blackmail trivial.
    8
  1194. Then talking heads say, "not trump," just like they do now while acting like joe isn't losing his marbles.
    8
  1195. If you actually think that Armando then you have comprehension skills that are far worse then my dog.
    8
  1196. Don't forget their locking up non violent drug users.
    8
  1197. Youtube says there are 48 replies but only let's me see 26. I'd be curious to see what a "youtube files" would reveal.
    8
  1198. Random that wasn't truth, that was bullshit. You probably just don't realize it because you are being brainwashed by fox news.
    8
  1199. We need to make Bernie our next president.
    8
  1200. Hi there!
    8
  1201. Never Biden.
    8
  1202. Andrea regarding, "except no one who doesn't already follow this sort of stuff will hear about it" Not if I have anything to say about it. You wouldn't believe how often I still hear BS about the primary being fair and it is nice to have shit like this to throw in their face.
    8
  1203.  @shakacien  "cheat us into a place" As if trump and republicans are the only ones cheating. Fun fact: Pete Buttigieg "won" the Iowa Caucus according to the "democratic" party.
    8
  1204. Jo regarding, "don;t talk to people like shit and expect it to go well" If you have a problem with me treating you like shit you need to not throw out obvious lies and stupid arguments. I'm not going to have anymore patience for that shit just because you are on my "side" than I would if they were not on my "side." Regarding, "you lot spend more than the next 12 countries combined" I don't think it is quite 12 but you definitely have a point here and concede that you may, in fact, be correct about this. That is the type of thing you should say in the first place and not stupid ass shit like, "most of your tax is spent on war," that can quickly be dismissed as being stupid as fuck and is an obvious misrepresentation of reality. I'm antiwar and you aren't helping when you are lying to try and make the case. You don't need to lie to make a case and are only hurting the cause when you do. You lying about shit only gives people the opportunity and excuse they need to dismiss everything you and all others fighting against war say.
    8
  1205.  @LightTackleEthusiast  Does deflecting from wrong and stupid by saying the other side does it ever get old for you? I suspect not.
    8
  1206.  @LightTackleEthusiast  Regarding, "I'm not deflecting." Um.. Yes. That is EXACTLY what you are doing. I guess you don't realize it because you aren't smart. Regarding, "just stating..." Just bring up shit that has nothing to do with the topic at hand to try and change the conversation from what is being talked about to what you want to make it about and to try to make it seem like the shit being talked about is "normal," "status quo" or "same-ole same old." You are why Trump loves the uneducated.
    8
  1207.  @miriammaldonado604  "It's a big club and you ain't in it." "They don't give a f about you. AT ALL!" -g carlin
    8
  1208. MRost regarding, "you could have done things differently and maybe avoided it. That's not victimblaming." It is, by very definition, victim blaming. You are blaming the victim for not doing things differently. You are implying it was their fault they didn't avoid it. Just because you wrote "it's not your fault and you didn't deserve it" before it doesn't mean you then get to go and say why you think it was their fault and why they did deserve it.
    8
  1209. Just another reason why we need universal health care.
    8
  1210.  @Nackdad  Fair enough. Maybe it wouldn't even take a bullet if Sanders were president. Their head might just explode on it's own.
    8
  1211. Don't have children.
    8
  1212. At least one that is... they have usually visited both but got rejected by one.
    8
  1213. wiz regarding, "I'm serious." For your sake I hope you are not.
    8
  1214. Zionism is akin to notseaism (sic).
    8
  1215. I am with Jimmy dore who says that the dems are as well. Republicans don't have a monopoly on evil.
    8
  1216.  @RonnyDoplo  Well that is certainly as dumb a comment as someone with your name can be expected to make.
    8
  1217.  @keitth6935  Regarding, "He never went to bamckrukcy dummi look it up facts are fun" You are why Trump loves the uneducated. https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2015/sep/21/carly-fiorina/trumps-four-bankruptcies/
    8
  1218.  @LadieKadie  Nobody "wants" to go like that. You are deeply unserious.
    8
  1219. Money in politics should be the number one issue. People on both sides of the spectrum (at least when it comes to the peasants) think money in politics needs to go and understand that our politicians are corrupt because of it. Then we should be focusing on things like universal health care and universal background checks. But we need to get the money out of politics first so that we can address all the other issues like those.
    8
  1220. Charles do the world a favor and stop saying stupid things. Literally everything you say is moronic. But don't let the fact that Sanders has said exactly how he would pay for things he proposes stop you from continuing to make an ass of yourself if insist on proving how uninformed you are unless you are just outright lying. Do you not realize that other countries who are not as wealthy as the US are able to pay for things like universal health care and college education? I suspect you do understand why the points you are making are fucking absurd and that is why you feel the need to lie and say things like "80%." You suck at life and you are a disgrace to the human race.
    8
  1221.  @LP-mz7hd  It's sarcasm.
    8
  1222. Sanders is not pandering. He has been preaching this all his life. Thanks to him the others are forced to pander.
    8
  1223. To be fair her principles involve making money for herself and she is living up to it.
    8
  1224.  @annaclarafenyo8185  Cenk sucks. He smeared jimmy while back tracking on his own words during force the vote. He lied on behalf of warren while she was running for pres about stuff she said to him to his face. He is terrible.
    8
  1225.  @sniperjared  "only sets up a 3 strike policy for felons" We live in a world where whites and blacks use weed at the same rate (white are arguably just a touch more actually) but blacks are imprisoned for it at about 4 times the rate. Even if it "only sets the rules..." we know exactly how those rules are enforced unless you are being willingly obtuse.
    8
  1226. Bernie or bust!
    8
  1227. Matthew regarding, "warren" I can't stand her. I don't trust her. I don't think I'd vote for her in the general. But if she is the best candidate in the primary when it comes around I will support her because it only makes sense to try and get the most progressive candidate to win the primary.
    8
  1228. Zox regarding, "NO." Very short-sighted and very foolish. I'm starting to understand how progressives get portrayed as children.
    8
  1229. Bryan regarding, "they are beyond reform." They are a dumpster fire but that is, in part, because Hillary "won" the nomination. If Sanders wins in 2020 the corporate dems can be purged the same way progressives were recently purged. There are also many reforms the leader of the party can unilaterally make. They will try to screw him over again but ultimately they will fail this time. The game has changed.
    8
  1230. The most popular politician in the country is "unelectable" think mental midgets.
    8
  1231. You are a moron.
    8
  1232. Ted Cruz will never let that happen.
    8
  1233. Classy. /s
    8
  1234. It's cold in Canada.
    8
  1235.  @tomuchbs1987  It takes a real special kind of stupid to have a misspelling in your name.
    8
  1236. Cross really won me over in the long interview.
    8
  1237.  Celena Newell  A russian stooge? You are an idiot and if anyone is a russian stooge it's you.
    8
  1238.  @markmachale1169  I can't tell you how hard it is for me to be able to get my response to ted to show in the "land of the free."
    8
  1239.  @tedmarley4341  I care about faucci's lies. And you?
    8
  1240. Youtube says there are 12 replies but I can only see 8. Isn't that the type of thing that is suppose to make china the bad guy?
    8
  1241.  @mattw9764  Commander in chief comes with crazy power. It wouldn't take "work" it would take WILL. And he has it.
    8
  1242.  @voccsaycee30  "absolutely clueless" This is what's known as "projection" in psychology.
    8
  1243.  @voccsaycee30  "you know a label." And most importantly I use them correctly. I don't use them to mindlessly to smear the way you do.
    8
  1244. I guess Hillary should have considered that before she elevated Trump using the "Pied Piper" strategy to try and make her corrupt ass look better.
    8
  1245. Shark propaganda is strong. There is an entire week dedicated to demonizing sharks every year.
    8
  1246. I'm only here to call kyle a fraud and downvote.
    8
  1247. Inti regarding, "we're fine" Good to hear. I thought maybe something was going on that I didn't know about.
    8
  1248.  @davidiihouston6883  Chris manufactured consent for what happened in gaza and no amount of gaslighting can ever change that fact.
    8
  1249.  @E-damnn  Meh. You don't need to convince Trump is terrible. That is captain obvious territory. Need to convince me biden is decent. And good luck with that. He clearly isn't. But whatever you got to tell yourself to rationalize voting for a piece of shit that has dementia. I don't really care how you do it.
    8
  1250. Na Na regarding, "the last 3 job interviews i went to i was told "We are not hiring white men for this position"" You are full of shit.
    8
  1251. Good for the bike.
    8
  1252. Market Liberal regarding, "It would cost 40% of our GDP." Please tell me that is sarcasm and you are not actually that stupid.
    8
  1253. Look don't get me wrong joe biden is beyond terrible but please don't make the false equivalency that he is as big a liar as trump. Trump is a straight up pathological liar while joe biden is a calculating liar. There is a difference.
    8
  1254. Please do what you have to do to make sure you can vote for Bernie in the "democratic" primary.
    8
  1255. Norway they purge voters and rig the game because they know it does matter. But you go ahead and give up without fighting. That is exactly what they want.
    8
  1256. She would only do it in a coordinated effort with biden while he dropped out IMO.
    8
  1257. Dan represents what the republican party really is... not you. You are the "RINO."
    8
  1258. This is clearly western propaganda.
    8
  1259.  Trump Lost  Regarding, "it will?" LMFAO. It would wouldn't it? Let's say a trump 2.0 rises after biden the same way trump 1.0 rose after obama/biden. Do you really want to claim that the previous administrations are blame free for what follows them? I find it impossible to tell the difference between you and trump supporters other than your team. Bootlickers for terrible politicians, all of you.
    8
  1260. "nothing will fundamentally change." joe biden in a private meeting to his owners
    8
  1261. Alice you remind me of the moron in Idiocracy who kept repeating, "brought to you by carl's jr," but instead you say "go take your meds," only you are SIGNIFICANTLY dumber.
    8
  1262.  @brendanryan8439  Regarding, "the moment someone doesn't do or say exactly what you want them to they instantly become a sellout corporate wallstreet loving hack." AOC was the one who said she was going to fight for m4a. It's not our fault she is a liar.
    8
  1263.  @JamNMama1  Please direct me to the part that supports your claim of, "most of his wealth came from... (being) a JUNIOR senator in Vermont."
    8
  1264.  @JamNMama1  Because if you look at the link I've given you and if you pause it at 3:30 you can clearly see from his tax returns when his wealth was gotten. And that timing coincides with his book. Because that's the reality. And I see nothing in your terrible sources to support your claims. They just look like your average run of the mill shit hit pieces.
    8
  1265. She is not the real deal. These are votes for 700 billion for the military. https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=115&session=1&vote=00199#position
    8
  1266. If you were still taking her seriously before this it's not likely to affect you.
    8
  1267. I would prefer it if we, the taxpayer, would pay them well for the rest of their life and they not be allowed to make any money that they could keep in other ways. They can make their speeches still if they want but all the money they would get paid must go to charity. I think that tax money would be well spent to prevent us from getting fucked over in other ways.
    8
  1268. Regarding, "Not at all" You should be embarrassed and ashamed.
    8
  1269. And not just other elections but our own, like Correct the Record does.
    8
  1270. gross
    8
  1271. Fun fact: this means that kyle never disclosed the conflict of interest while covering TYT. This only proves what fraud he has been. Make sure to include that part when spreading the news about the fraud.
    8
  1272. Please clap.
    7
  1273. Meh. He didn't really have much of legacy to kill.
    7
  1274. Son of Hightower regarding, "where's Jordan and at worst Emma" I'm not sure. We certainly have been spoiled when Emma can be referred to as "worst." She is far better than anyone on all of MSM. They are progressives in part because they are first and foremost truth tellers. Sam Seder is a turd polisher.
    7
  1275. The rich love war because there is money to made there. They get their way because America is actually an oligarchy these days.
    7
  1276. Eobard regarding, "We need to beat trump." Had Trump not run he would have been considered by Hillary for VP. She went to his wedding. Trump talked to Bill immediately before announcing he was running. They are not different in any sort of meaningful way. Regarding, "I don't want us to go to war" Do you not realize that Hillary has a 100 percent record of choosing war over peace? Hillary has said, "As President, I will make it clear that the United States will treat cyberattacks just like any other attack. We will be ready with serious political, economic, and military responses." MILITARY RESPONSES. No big deal thou. It isn't as if she wasn't currently accusing Russia of cybercrimes to distract and deflect from the fact she was caught being corrupt as fuck. Hillary wants a no fly zone in Syria. ISIS doesn't have planes. Russia does. What is the worst thing that could happen? Other than WW3? Regarding, "With Hillary atleast we have 8 years of peace." What are you smoking? Regarding, "no illegal wars" Like the illegal Iraq war she voted for, with "conviction"? Regarding, "Her foreign policy is actually one of her better areas" Not if you actually want to give peace a chance like myself. Go "Correct the Record" elsewhere.
    7
  1277. We have a government and economic system that cares about money and not people. It is really messed up.
    7
  1278. Pr C Jill Stein would.
    7
  1279. Garrett regarding, "fires were started long before they brought the hoses out" Except that is complete bullshit. Please stop lying. Regarding, "lets also add to the list shooting arrows at helicopters," Why stop there while you are just making shit up. You may as well accuse them of trying to detonate a nuclear weapon since you are just making stuff up. Regarding, "being dick bags" But you don't think the police are being dick bags because you are a moron. I don't have time for your BS. You are either being paid to say lies or you are just a moron. Either way I don't care what you think.
    7
  1280. Amy regarding, "who cares who is in charge" The only thing that I think would be nice about Donna being replaced is that I could immediately know another person's name that is corrupt to their core.
    7
  1281. Never Hillary. Never Trump. Jill Stein 2016!
    7
  1282. Please do not support a candidate and a party willing to rig elections. Never Hillary. Jill Stein for President!
    7
  1283. Forget the celebrities. It isn't there job. Where is the President?
    7
  1284. Joshua regarding, "she will never win" Sadly you are probably correct but voting shouldn't be about trying to vote for the winner. And it is also sad that you want to imply that it is.
    7
  1285. Miguel regarding, "You're fucking stupid voting for this fucking idiot." I disagree. She was the only option if you refused to vote for garbage. The election was lost when the DNC fucked over Bernie.
    7
  1286. Nice guy regarding, "proud to say I am no longer" Me too. I can't tell you how betrayed I feel after supporting that party all my life. This must be kind of how it feels to be in an abusive relationship. I'm not going back anytime soon.
    7
  1287. Speaking of irony how ironic is liberty's picture reading, "Don't tread on me," while they are happy to let big oil and gas tread on everyone.
    7
  1288. Kyle regarding, "she isn't going to win." If you say so. I don't care. She is getting my vote because she is the only person who actually deserves it. You can't make a claim that any other candidate would do something about this so you have to go to, "she can't win." That is hardly a decent reason to not be supporting good. I'd rather vote for Jill and lose than vote for Hillary or Trump and win in part because of issues like this. But you go ahead and vote for dogshit and try to vote for the "winner" even if you are supporting a loser. Regarding, "strategically" Voting is not meant to be strategic. It is meant to be an expression of a person's values. When you are voting for dogshit you are essentially saying those are your values and what you support. I don't.
    7
  1289. Why not? She's not running. If she were she has zero political experience of her own. Even if she did I have a problem with President's sharing the same last name. If I wanted them to all have the same name I'd suggest we had a monarchy.
    7
  1290. Wooksley regarding, "but he's a regressive" Small mind love to put labels on things. Stop it with the meaningless labels. Regarding, "he is a feminist" Again. Stupid labels. Talk about policy instead please. Policy actually means something unlike labels. Regarding, "he supports BLM" Black lives matter has a problem with innocent black people being killed by public servants. So do I. Regarding, "and all that stuff" Could you be any more vague with your insults. Regarding, "Electing a genuine regressive" As opposed to faux regressives I guess. Whatever this means. Your entire statement is void of anything substantive.
    7
  1291. Kuroi regarding, "He is almost always wrong on race and gender." What is this suppose to mean? He called you a girl when you are a boy? Again, I care about policy, priorities, and ethics. Laws generally don't target races and genders as you seem to think and imply. The smears against him like this are really pathetic.
    7
  1292. Trump loves the uneducated.
    7
  1293. Regarding, "didnt sanders lose" There is a big difference between losing and being cheated. Regarding, "he screwed the american people when he backed clinton" It was a fucking endorsement. Stop pretending it was more than it was. Regarding, "you have no power" He is a beloved senator. You must be thinking of yourself.
    7
  1294. You are an embarrassment to the human race.
    7
  1295. Keety regarding, "So when Trump wins and picks numerous supreme court judges that will impact America for decades" Stop with the fear mongering. If the "democratic" party cares about the SC as much as they pretend they can block Scalia type justices the same way Republicans are blocking Obama this very second. They could demand Trump nominate "centrists" like M Garland or the Texas Republican Hillary would put on the court and block everyone else. You guys don't actually care about the SC as much as you care about scaring people to vote against their own interests and support a complete POS like Hillary Clinton. Regarding, "you're going to be content with that" Are you going to be content with Hillary nominating corporate judges to the court? Are you going to be content with Hillary signing the TPP? Are you going to be content with the wars Hillary supports? Are you going to be content with Hillary privatizing social security to "save it?" Good luck with queen. Jill Stein for President because she is the only candidate who actually deserves my vote.
    7
  1296. Gisli regarding, "But boy did he make it look good, though." Yup. He was a great public speaker. Too bad he sucked as a leader.
    7
  1297. Elizabeth regarding, "just voted Jill Stein" That is definitely being part of the solution rather than being part of the problem. Even if Jill doesn't win that gets them one step closer to the very important 5 percent threshold so that the Green party can get federal funding. It isn't as if they rely on the legalized bribes of big money and corporations the way the 2 major parties do to fund their campaigns after all and they need that money to grow.
    7
  1298. Hillary Clinton, "As President, I will make it clear that the United States will treat cyberattacks just like any other attack. We will be ready with serious political, economic, and military responses." No big deal thou. It wasn't as if Hillary Clinton was currently accusing Russia of cybercrimes to distract and deflect from the fact she was caught being corrupt as fuck. And here is a another example of "she's more of the same..." http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/patrick-goodenough/clinton-no-fly-zone-2013-youre-going-kill-lot-syrians-2016-could Trump said "pussy" thou so I should vote for Hillary even though she has spent her entire life working against what I believe in and support. That makes sense in a retarded kind of way.
    7
  1299. I hope that is sarcasm. It is tough to tell because morons actually say that shit but not sarcastically.
    7
  1300. Fuze regarding, "bill maher" That shit was unreal. I don't like Hillary because I don't know anything? No. I don't like Hillary because I do know about her. He accused others of not knowing what was going on while he clearly had his head up Hillary's ass and apparently it smells like roses in there.
    7
  1301. I agree that Bernie was wrong but he is hardly a terrible person for it. He succumb to the lesser of two evils BS. He doesn't want to be blamed for Trump and can you really blame him for that? Ultimately it was an endorsement and not his soul. I loved Bernie and still do but nobody is going to decide my vote for me. Jill Stein for President.
    7
  1302. I give a shit. Therefor you are a liar.
    7
  1303. "We're"? Why are you still a democrat? Time to leave the party and join the Green party.
    7
  1304. You need to stop defending him if you haven't already. He doesn't represent you. He represents the corporations. He knows what is going on, can stop it, and doesn't because ultimately he supports DAPL. He sucks. I too voted for him. I was very wrong.
    7
  1305. Keep up the good work Emma and I'm not just saying that because you look good doing it.
    7
  1306. Sandy regarding, "he's con-artist making money in a presidency for profit," while all of this is true he is still also an idiot.
    7
  1307. I actually thought it was an onion headline when I first saw it.
    7
  1308. Herb regarding, "How could Pence be worse?" You literally answer your own question in the very next sentence... "He would be bad in different ways." Yes. Yes, he would be bad in different ways. And assuming there aren't different ways that he would be good then that would make him worse overall in the grand scheme of things. Ultimately this point is irrelevant and not important to those of us that want corruption punished regardless of whether on not Pence would be better or worse. I don't care if Pence would be worse even thou I think he would be because I think he would be more effective at being a terrible president. I want Trump punished for being corrupt. Period. The rest are just details.
    7
  1309. Herb regarding, "It really is just another choice between a shit sandwich and a turd burger." Yes it is. And it is going to be nothing but shit and turds for the foreseeable future until we begin to punish people for being pieces of shit.
    7
  1310. I'm going to continue to assume then that Maddow has been as silent as you have been on those stories. So much for progressive issues when they conflict with corporate interests.
    7
  1311.  @mmolchin  "how does any of that make him a fraud?" Because all the words he has said in the past lead me to believe he would act differently than he has. If you say money corrupts people all the time and then you don't call tyt corrupt when taking millions from katzenburg or mention you are affiliated with TYT you are a fraud. "he doesn't feel the money influenced Cenk." Yeah. It was BS and it flies in the face of all the other things he says. That's why he's a fraud. It's like he's telling me 2 + 2 = 5. It doesn't add up. That's why he's a fraud.
    7
  1312.  @justinbailey6515  I can only see your reply but there are apparently 2 more. Land of the free am I right? /s
    7
  1313.  @smolderingtitan  Let's say we were talking to harvey weinstein and he was making "good points," would you care about those points? Or would you care who is saying it?
    7
  1314. A coordinated effort to stop him by the establishment and a corporate media that is best described as propaganda.
    7
  1315. There is one guy. He has been healthy his entire life and never tried to use it.
    7
  1316. Lucky for us our chances of him dying are higher. Obviously.
    7
  1317. I gave this a thumbs up but to be clear I'm not from Boise.
    7
  1318. Why exactly? I'm genuinely curious and don't understand the distinction.
    7
  1319. branden Obama fucking sucked but he was black. You don't need to grow up poor or have ancestors that were slaves to be black and even blacks can sellout. There are lots and lots of legit ways to criticize him. I suggest you stick to those.
    7
  1320. Says a mental midget and pathological liar likely being paid to regurgitate moronic talking points.
    7
  1321.  @jolee3389  "don't blame capitalism" I can and I will. This is my 3rd try to my reply to post. Capitalism doesn't care about free speech or anything other than one single thing... It only cares about profit.
    7
  1322. Albin I find your comment funny because if anyone has no fucking idea what reality looks like it is you.
    7
  1323. Canadians can do it but the richest nation in the history of the world can't afford it?
    7
  1324. She's just another fraud who talks the talk but doesn't walk the walk.
    7
  1325.  @d.rabbitwhite  She just voted for POS pelosi for speaker and got nothing for her vote despite it giving her and other progressives great leverage.
    7
  1326. rising regarding, "can't actually give a counter point to anything I've said" Just because he chooses not to respond to you doesn't mean they can't and you are a fucking moron for conflating the two as if they are the same. They very likely just think you are lost cause and not worthy of an intelligent response. Regarding, "HE IS TOO BUSY EATING SHIT COVERED COCK to intelligently respond." Are you at least intelligent enough to realize why this statement makes you a hypocrite?
    7
  1327. rising regarding, "My thoughts about Bernie are just an opinion and a theory" Yup. A really dumb opinion and a really dumb theory that makes no motherfucking sense. Regarding, "he knew it was rigged" Anybody with a fucking brain knew it was rigged at least as early as when 400 superdelegates came out and supported Clinton before a single peasant was allowed to vote. Regarding, "I think he played his part." He is either fucking terrible at his role or you are just dumb as fuck. I'm thinking dumb as fuck. Regarding, "Bernie is a rich bitch, with multiple McMansions." Holy shit are your Clinton talking points stupid. Compare him to the actual oligarchy. And the most recent house the Sanders bought was paid for by inheritance from his wife's side. You either are not doing your research, are fucking stupid, are being paid to smear, or a combination of those. Regarding, "the Establishment doesn't want real change." No shit. You figure that all by yourself? Regarding, "part practical joke" Good one. Don't quit your day job and try comedy. Regarding, "I'm not going to pretend I'm on your side." Clearly you are not. You voted for Trump for fucks sake. Regarding, "we can both agree that something is extremely fucked up in this nation." Yes. And you are not helping. Regarding, "some men just want to watch the world burn." Yeah. They are called douchebags. You are a douchebag. Good luck with that. I'm done with this.
    7
  1328. Not always. Trump didn't do it right.
    7
  1329.  @exiledhebrew1994  He didn't say that to you. That was to his big money overlords. We found that out in spite of him trying to keep it from us.
    7
  1330.  @alienzenx  Regarding, "I love it when 2020 Bernie supporters sound exactly like 2016 Hillary supporters" Telling you to vote for Bernie is not like telling you to vote for Hillary. Obviously. There is nothing wrong with being strategic in your voting. What Hillary and co do that we don't ask you to do is support evil. It's a pretty important difference you are ignoring. And when you ignore it YOU sound like Hillary and company.
    7
  1331. Meh. We need to be better than people like Tom Watson, not emulate him.
    7
  1332. I think that "palestine" is still a name given by imperialist. It should probably be something different. Then again I don't care if it's called "israel" as long as it's a free state and not an apartheid.
    7
  1333.  C W  Anytime you want to bet that whyamimrpink isn't going to say something stupid I will ALWAYS take that bet and give you really good odds.
    7
  1334. He knows they will try but the game has changed and they will fail.
    7
  1335. Not really. We have different laws for different people.
    7
  1336. You're trolling right. Somebody please tell me you're trolling. I'm going to choose to believe you're trolling. Nobody can possibly be this stupid.
    7
  1337. Bernie or bust til one of us dies. (and probably longer)
    7
  1338. obermiss regarding, "dont associate Christianity with the horrible things going on in the Middle-East." Why not? I'm pretty sure a Christian nation is waging war there and killing hundreds of thousands of people. Regarding, "Western culture is way more succesful and Christian values are one of the reasons why." Nope. Western culture is successful in spite of religious doctrine.
    7
  1339. S G regarding, "Islam is actually beautiful." There is an element of beauty in all religions, that is part of their appeal. But that has nothing to do with whether or not your book of fairy tales is true. And the problem with your religion and every other religion is that people use them to justify doing terrible things. There is nothing worse than a crazy person who gets to think their imaginary deity wants them to do crazy things.
    7
  1340. When it comes to his voting record I can't tell the difference between bernie and any corporate dem. He is voting in lockstep with his good friend joe.
    7
  1341.  @epyonsystem1869  Do you generally break things while simultaneously claiming to have "fixed" them.
    7
  1342.  @extremelycareless2541  Your feelings shouldn't be mistaken for facts.
    7
  1343.  @somkeshav4143  Regarding, "Amy Klobuchar also put an innocent black man behind bars so she definitely doesn’t have a shot at all." If putting away innocent black men were a deal breaker Joe Biden would have no shot thanks to his crime bill. But he just won SC but a ton. People are dumb. Don't underestimate their stupidity.
    7
  1344. Sorry not sorry for having standards.
    7
  1345. He's reckless enough to start WW3... and they are happy to give him 80 billion more for the military.
    7
  1346. Sofa I agree with everything you said but I must point out that Republicans aren't the only people trying to make it harder for some people to vote. For example dems are happy to purge voter roles when it serves their interests.
    7
  1347.  Trump 2020  I mean you did you give your own stupid comment a thumbs up afterall.
    7
  1348. Yes I think you are a paid shill. You know they actually exist right? While you act like I just said I thought you were a leprechaun. And that is me giving you the benefit of the doubt. The alternative, you whole hardheartedly believing all the stupid as fuck things you say would say far less of you and your intelligence. And that is really saying something. I, for example, am not going to spend all my time at Alex Jones. And if I did people would be correct to question my motives. That isn't normal... unless you are getting paid, or insane.
    7
  1349. Fuck Sam Sedar.
    7
  1350.  @whyamimrpink78  Regarding, "It is a slippery slope." If you ever said something that wasn't absurd I would die of shock. It's not a slippery slope. And if it were a slippery slope we would have already been on that "slippery slope" a long time ago. Did you know that we don't let people walk around naked in public?
    7
  1351. Except when he doesn't know the facts even though those facts were words being said to him on his own show. And he uses that lack of knowledge to gaslight progressives. This is Tim Black breaking it down as it was happening. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=itiacoqgdQI&t=205s
    7
  1352.  @Thepopcornator  I'll take your word about Scheer. I told you I was from the US right? We really don't know shit about anything outside our borders. It's practically a miracle I know who Ford is and to me he is pretty much just known as the crack mayor's brother.
    7
  1353. Nah. It's not that she is taking his plans. I'm fine with that. We want our plans adopted by her and everyone. It's about how much can she be trusted to fight for those plans while she openly admits that she is willing to sell out if she makes it to the general. That is where his focus needs to be, not about trying to take credit for progressive plans.
    7
  1354.  @dashx1103  "because of a grudge with a certain podcaster" No doubt it's easier for you to strawman the argument instead of addressing our actual problem with him... that he's a liar who manufactures consent for corrupt politicians.
    7
  1355.  mister.T Jr  I thought I was pretty clear about Trump making Canadians paying for the wall. Trump knows the art of the deal and has the best words. If he lived in Westeros he would have made the Wildlings pay for the ice wall. That's how great he is. (hopefully obvious sarcasm is obvious)
    7
  1356. Trump is going to build a lid for the US and make the extra terrestrial aliens pay for it. MAGA
    7
  1357.  @bullsonparade687  It's like they aren't even trying anymore.
    7
  1358. I once fell out of a plane. Only now am I pro-parachute.
    7
  1359. Panic regarding, "You wouldn’t have the fascists and white supremacists this energized and emboldened by a Jeb! or a Marco Rubio the way they are with Trump" Maybe but is that really so important? Is this less important then having the left, center, and even some of the right energized against a terrible president? I actually prefer Trump over Pence for example. Not because the orange clown is good but because we need a populace that is pissed off. Obama managed to more then double the number of wars we were in and the public mostly just slept through it. We need people woke.
    7
  1360. Regarding, "He deserves this from us, guys." He deserves jack shit. Trust is earned, not given, and he hasn't earned it. Maybe he should go out and be a politician somewhere not at the fucking top. Then he might deserve things like trust, but he hasn't. Regarding, "He is running for a job only a lunatic would seek after for our sake" He's running for a job that literally everyone wants. Good people would want it to do good and bad people would want it because it comes with money in power. Literally everyone wants it. That's why so many are willing to lie to try and get it. He has literally ZERO experience in politics. Experience is that thing that you would prefer for literally anything. If you go get fast food you would prefer the person flipping your burgers and taking your order have experience. But you really want it for important jobs. If you ever need major surgery I'm sure you understand why it's important and something you would want but you are somehow able to turn off the common sense part of your brain to justify it for literally the most powerful person in the world. It's fucking crazy. And I don't value experience for experience's sake. But all experience in politics comes with a record. It's how you know if a politician is legit or full of shit. Your guy doesn't have it when you should be requiring it.
    7
  1361. This old guy thanks you for the Gomer Pyle reference.
    7
  1362. I'd take President Camacho over President Trump any day.
    7
  1363. Don't get me wrong I love Ventura too. That doesn't mean I need to agree with him about everything.
    7
  1364.  Scott  Regarding, "They're lack of political strategy is comical" They are the people that hold power at all sorts of important parts of society and have for a long time despite not deserving them. Maybe don't underestimate them. This is a fucking war and we squeaked out a battle.
    7
  1365. Iranian Liberal regarding, "I give less than two fucks about Ghouliani's love life." I desperately need some comic relief in sad times.
    7
  1366.  @zubedahaider3266  I can't speak for Django but Americans as a whole have insurance that costs TWICE as much as everyone else, leaves MILLIONS uninsured, give us an INFERIOR infant mortality rate to our Canadian neighbors, and a SHORTER lifespan then Canadians. That's the type of insurance we (as a country) have.
    7
  1367. You are forgetting their campaign strategy of not having biden talk. That was obviously a good idea considering his foot in mouth syndrome.
    7
  1368. Going to?
    7
  1369.  @SteveM-gj2vy  Seek psychiatric help.
    7
  1370. Da shit regarding, "The US hasn't won a war since 1945" Only because none of their wars are meant to won. Rather they are only meant to exist perpetually. If we won any of these wars there would no longer be a need to fund them and the establishment doesn't want that.
    7
  1371. Or to give people health care.
    7
  1372. I'd dislike any video that included any politician because I don't want politics in my puppy videos.
    7
  1373. Market Liberal regarding, "socialization= higher costs and shittier quality" Except Canada's socialized medicine costs less, provides better care, and covers everyone. You are a fucking moron and you make everyone you talk to dumber.
    7
  1374.  @sowinglight1960  If it comes to that find a third party candidate to support and vote for them. At least you can make a statement that the 2 party system is broken with that vote.
    7
  1375. Except it was not unethical in any way shape or form. The person being recorded is a PUBLIC official talking about things directly related to the government that should already be on the record and public knowledge. I don't think what Tilleman did was illegal (although I can't say for certain), but even if it was it absolutely was not unethical to me.
    7
  1376. Lots of the troops are poor people who do it to pay for education. They are also brainwashed into thinking they are "protecting the country" when they are in fact invading other countries.
    7
  1377. Swnsasy I'll give a couple examples of why CNN sucks even thou I really shouldn't need to. The free coverage they gave to Trump while doing their best to ignore Sanders. Their misrepresentation of facts surrounding the issue of universal health care. Their non coverage of Israel murdering peaceful protestors. The support of the war machine and their never questioning it. For example they will tell you how "unaffordable" paying for college is but the increase in military spending approved by the US government that would have been more then enough to pay for college wasn't even talked about by CNN. In short they represent corporate interests and can lick my balls. Do the world a favor and open your fucking eyes. Thanks for that in advance.
    7
  1378.  @sohaibshehzad2314  Regarding, "Bernie & Yang" Bernie has proven who he is over decades. The other guy is someone nobody had even heard of a year ago to try and take votes away from the guy who should actually win. Maybe don't mention them in the same breathe.
    7
  1379. Please subscribe to Bernie Sanders youtube page if you haven't already and please vote for him in the "democratic" primary. Thank you for that in advance.
    7
  1380. Boss regarding, "Alaska isn't another country" Fine. Puerto Rico then.
    7
  1381. Fine. The Virgin Islands then.
    7
  1382. Jo regarding, "lol" Translation, "duh." Regarding, "most of your tax is spent on war" No. Most of my tax is not spent on war. Do yourself a favor and learn what percentage of tax goes where so that, in the future, you can not say stupid things that are empirically false. That said there is a debate to be had about where tax dollars go and I have it all the time. I argue for reigning in the military industrialized complex constantly and would like the department of offense budget slashed but I don't go around lying to try and make my case. Regarding, "dont pretend like that money would go on infrastructure" Don't be afraid to educate yourself to the facts before you say shit. It would prevent you from looking a complete dipshit. https://www.entrepreneur.com/article/289613 Regarding, "im not that dumb" Let's just agree to disagree about your intelligence shall we.
    7
  1383. I would also like to add that if you think your response to me was done with any respect you are lying to yourself so I'm not sure why you think I owed you jack fucking shit at that point in terms of respect.
    7
  1384. Literally everything.
    7
  1385. MRost regarding, "They shouldn't have the right to beat my ass." No. They absolutely should not. Regarding, "That's basically your argument." Not exactly.
    7
  1386. Check exit polls for primaries!
    7
  1387. Nomiki I'd be interested to hear the long story of your running for office if you would be willing to tell it.
    7
  1388.  @kyled1673  Good luck to you then but I think you are wrong to think they are capable of being "destroyed." For that to happen they would need to have the intelligence required to realize they are wrong and stupid. I just don't think that's possible and don't see it happening. That said if you succeed I would be forever grateful and wish you luck.
    7
  1389. I disagree. He will take some votes and delegates from Bernie in the yuuge state of NY where Bernie should do very well. It's about keeping Bernie from winning on the first ballot.
    7
  1390. Regarding, "there is no problem with northern illegal immigration" There is no problem with southern immigration which is currently at a net zero according to the best data.
    7
  1391. m. rude you are embarrassing us. Sincerely, the human race.
    7
  1392. Regarding, "not to tell Bernie he shouldn't have anything to do with them." I think Bernie is too busy to watch this and think he was more just ranting than anything. That said you make a valid point and again I agree Sanders should be there and continue to do everything he can to sell this to the public... including going into the liars den.
    7
  1393.  @SwitchingRooskies  Just insufferable to me to me with no love.
    7
  1394.  @MFFLRicky  I'm talking about the daughter that orange hands has openly admitted to wanting to bang, that isn't tiffany.
    7
  1395. wiz regarding, "I'm not here to entertain." You shouldn't be here at all. You need to get your lazy ass out of your mom's basement and get yourself a job.
    7
  1396. wiz regarding, "I'm at my job" It is nice to know that "Correct the Record" hasn't laid everyone off.
    7
  1397. I'm glad I'm not Dave Rubin.
    7
  1398.  @keitth6935  But you aren't all bad. Sure you use a symbol of hate, sure you wouldn't be able to recognize a fact if "Fact" was the name of a stripper rubbing her tits in your face, sure "bamckrukcy" has to be one of the dumbest attempts at spelling I've ever seen, but calling me "dummi" while not being able to spell dummy is funny beyond words. Thanks for the laugh dipshit.
    7
  1399.  @keitth6935  So your argument is that his corporate bankruptcies don't count as bankruptcies? You can't really be that fucking stupid can you? Don't bother answering, it's rhetorical. I know you are.
    7
  1400.  @johnwhitlow8220  I'm glad you enjoyed it. We all need a good laugh in sad times.
    7
  1401. That's the "real scandal?" You can't be serious can you?
    7
  1402. No Charles I mean because what he talks about are serious issues. He is not "like a stand up comic" and only someone who is utterly ridiculous and/or detached from reality would think saying that makes any sense.
    7
  1403. Smart and moral too. The whole package.
    7
  1404. While you have a point he was addressing this guy specifically and not someone who is disadvantaged by the system. This is a cop and the system is designed to protect him so he has no reason to take the deal if he did something wrong. Shit he barely has reason to take the deal KNOWING he did something wrong.
    7
  1405.  @MikmaqWarrior  "He's a real legitimate professional doctor" He's a fraud and a disgrace to "legitimate professional doctors."
    7
  1406.  @dougcasey6117  Regarding, " I don't care to hear" You don't care about the blacks who don't have health care but could. You don't care about the blacks who can't afford to go to college but could. You don't care about the blacks making the minimum wage but could make more. You don't care about the blacks in jail for weed. You don't care about the blacks who can't vote. I question if you actually care at all.
    7
  1407.  @sargemarine3709  "wait" For what? Look at his cabinet. Denial much?
    7
  1408.  @Garionica  Regarding, "she got rid of the paygo rule" Which can't be more meanless to me if you aren't voting on m4a. Stop making excuses and rationalizations for politicians selling you out.
    7
  1409. op kingdom regarding, "All JD/WNC Candidates need to run as Greens in each GENERAL and bypass the Dems altogether." I understand why you would say this but I disagree. Regarding, "The Greens have a national presence/infrastructure and are 100% willing to embrace the Progressive candidates." I love the Green Party. I identify with them far more than I do any other party. That said winning, although not the only thing, is very important to me. I admit to being demoralized after Jill Stein's showing last election. She wasn't running against 2 of the most despised politicians in the country, she was running against 2 of the most despised HUMANS in the country. Still she only got about 1 percent of the vote (I'm told. I have my doubts in all honesty.) And so they are plan B for me. Plan A is to get a true progressive to win the "democratic" nomination like Sanders, Gabbard, or Turner. If a progressive can win the primary they will not run the risk of splitting left leaning thinkers during the general. And remember that winning the most electoral votes isn't enough to win the general. An independent would need a majority of electoral votes. Let's say a 3rd party candidate wins the presidency. They are immediately opposed by both major parties and they will likely be able to get nothing done. Then after they are gone everything goes back to normal and it is business as usual. If Sanders or a true progressive wins as a dem they would be able to reform the party from the inside. They would be able to enact certain reforms unilaterally like, for example, banning them from accepting their legalized bribes among others. Then we might have a party that cares about the people rather than just caring about their big money sugar daddies. Not only that but then democrats would be more willing to work with them instead of unilaterally opposing them on everything. Please work to build the green party. I will certainly be voting for them if the dems nominate a corporate stooge. But please vote in the "democratic" primary. That is very different and has nothing to do with your vote in the general. Regarding, "It is LITERALLY the only hope for getting Progressives into Office." Maybe you are right and I'm just being naive. Maybe there is no hope a progressive can win the "democratic" nomination. If and when that happens I will happily join with you to vote for the Green candidate. But until then I'm going to try and get a true progressive to win the dem nomination. But that is a bridge I will only cross when I get there.
    7
  1410. AJ regarding, "I'd be curious as to where you found the statistics that claim Bernie is the most popular politician." Literally every poll since the last presidential election that has tried to gauge it. Regarding, "doesn't really matter" You go ahead and tell yourself that all you want. The sane understand that your claim is asinine.
    7
  1411.  @mountaindweller777  True. Until they hold a primary where they claim it means something. And if that primary didn't mean anything that's fraud, illegal, and they should not be able to do that even under our lax laws.
    7
  1412. They will try but the game has changed.
    7
  1413.  @twandendulk5723  "The Russian ruble keeps rising, hitting a seven-year high." -the new york times
    7
  1414.  Working Prole  1/10 trolling
    7
  1415. Everyone has bias.
    7
  1416.  @twoshedsjohnson8540  Regarding, "if a business is already cutting labor costs to the bone, what do you think will happen when costs rise?" Their need of labor is not related to the cost of labor therefor nothing changes. Don't be afraid to think hard about this. I know logic isn't easy for you.
    7
  1417.  @robertanderson6929  You are impossible to take seriously.
    7
  1418.  @davidcunningham9282  Regarding, "are you upset at the notion that ben shapiro might be bad in bed?" Don't ruin their fantasy for them.
    7
  1419.  @tedmarley4341  "don't quite your day job" You should quit yours. Peddling the blue team is no way to make a living.
    7
  1420. I'd like to think you would feel silly about calling this propaganda when she directly addressed what you talked about. You won't thou because that would take more intellectual honesty than you posses.
    7
  1421. Prove it
    7
  1422. Jimmy has covered this. But don't let that stop you from saying stupid shit.
    7
  1423. Meanwhile MSNBC is giving in depth coverage of Trump's empty podium and latest tweet.
    7
  1424. I love Tulsi but hopefully you are wrong and she doesn't make a big jump. We know the game is rigged. We know it's going to be a war for the WH. We know the corporate dems are going to be doing anything and everything they can to stop a progressive from being president. For those reasons progressives should be presenting a unified front and supporting the clear leader of the progressive movement, Bernie Sanders. There is only a limited number of progressives to spread their support around and their support should be going toward him. He deserves to be higher than he is right now and Tulsi should be backing him... not opposing him.
    7
  1425. In large part because Project Veritas loves to edit and distort context. Also in large part because Project Veritas try to entrap as a tactic.
    7
  1426.  greatest dad  You were right to take exception to them not saying you were not a libertarian. Because you are. Because mislabeling are wrong. But only when it happens to you you think because of hypocrisy.
    7
  1427.  greatest dad  "I'm going to go watch movies" Why do I think you are going to go watch CNN?
    7
  1428. @EZLN It makes perfect sense to anyone with a brain. And just typing stupid shit in all caps doesn't make it smarter than it is.
    7
  1429. That is only what it sounds like to an epic fucking moron whose brain doesn't work correctly.
    7
  1430.  @appetiteee5605  "I agree with what he says" So do I. That's not the problem. The problem are his actions. "He has always been consistent and determined in terms of his views" He's voted in lockstep with corporate dems. Since biden took office he hasn't opposed him once. When it comes to his actions he may as well be one of them.
    7
  1431. She sucks and should go away but she really helps progressives by sticking around and reminding people what is wrong with the "democratic" party. I hope she runs in 2020. I think it would only help make sure an actual progressive wins because she would squeeze out the other corporate smucks that the public is not quite as sure are sellouts. The public is slow but they do realize how terrible she is and she would stand no chance of winning in 2020.
    7
  1432. Unfortunately for David he hasn't seen the movie Reefer Madness. It debunks this study. (obvious sarcasm is obvious)
    7
  1433.  @TheGodsrighthandman  I can only think you are being intentionally dishonest. For example biden would veto M4A if he gets the chance. He is not the left. Sincerely, an actual leftist.
    7
  1434. If you think your religion is much more intelligent than Scientology you are wrong. You just have a different kind of crazy.
    7
  1435. Tom's not being subtle.
    7
  1436.  @dominicanfrankster  Comments sections are hardly a good representation of the public. The establishment has long been able to control the narrative (using corporate media). With the emergence of independent media such as this paid trolls are a common practice to try and continue for them to shape the narrative in areas where they have less control. Most of the people smearing Sanders in areas like this where he is loved are dishonest actors and only a handful are truly crazy, braindead parrots who genuinely believe the things they are saying.
    7
  1437. whyamimrpink regarding, "Saving money by lowering quality is not good. Friedman never mentions quality, only money." Canadians have better quality of care than Americans. They have a longer life expectancy and a lower infant mortality rate. Medicare and the VA are more popular with their users than private health insurance industry users. And it really isn't surprising. A market that is incentivized to not take care of you if they can make more money for their CEOs is not going to be good at providing care.
    7
  1438.  @ArtScienceWonder  The irony of you telling us to be logical is something else. Regarding, "he's just been consistent in what he's said from the beginning" Not even fucking close. Revisionist history 101. I can only think you are intentionally full of it.
    7
  1439. Trump is garbage and so is Fox.
    7
  1440. ​ @wasteddude  Look at the thousands of subscriptions kyle is losing. But if you want to care so much about semantics I guess it's more correct to say they WERE kyle fans before he exposed what a fraud he is.
    7
  1441. @FC6-3.7 Silverman lost me with her voter shaming. To put it another way she was being ridiculous.
    7
  1442. "And some bad banking too which I know a lot about." 5:17 Trump pretty much just admitted he is a criminal and engages in "bad banking."
    7
  1443. 1) Yes we realize this isn't an easy fix... but we don't care and neither should you. 2) They literally said there was nothing wrong with the water til it goes through the shit pipes. This isn't an example of a contaminated source.
    7
  1444. No. He didn't. He voted against it. It really isn't that hard to educate yourself and not spread bullshit. I can only think that you are intentionally lying to people. You suck at life. Don't be afraid to do the right thing and change your lies. https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=115&session=1&vote=00199
    7
  1445. To be fair he has lots of terrible takes.
    7
  1446. Ted Cruz is a fucking clown. That said he isn't a bad debater especially considering all the facts are against him. He doesn't believe the BS he says. It is just that he is being paid to argue the wrong side.
    7
  1447. Biden can also give the 2k he promised. It would be nice if you would call him out for it and not cover for him for lying.
    7
  1448.  @13lochie  You are asking for the things that we have lots of. That works. Let's do this.
    7
  1449. You make good points but I can't help but think that what she said was in TERRIBLE taste. To me she is very much implying that if you don't want to be assaulted you need to, not be a 10, don't diet, don't have plastic surgery, don't exercise, wear sweatpants, don't flirt and if you do then you share some of the blame.
    7
  1450. It is about creating equal opportunity for everyone. Blacks have gotten the short end of the stick for a long fucking time... long after slavery even. This is one way of evening the playing field.
    7
  1451. It's worse. I wish we had Camacho as President.
    7
  1452. We don't really even have news. (This being the exception.) It's really just corporate propaganda.
    7
  1453. "The war in Ukraine has nothing to do with rail workers or labor rights in the US." Maybe if the US wasn't spending all it's money on war it might be more willing to use it's money on it's own people... OBVIOUSLY
    7
  1454. Because the party is hooked on their corporate cash and big money donations. They are all about the status quo.
    7
  1455. Regarding, "Words aren't black and white" No shit sherlock. If you think that was my point it's only because you are an idiot. We are talking about a person who used "naughty language" because she was stoked and excited about her job and you are comparing it to shit like, "Shut the fuck up mom you skank. No officer I will not stop murdering people," as if those are in the same ballpark. Context matters. There is nothing innately wrong with any word or words. It's about how they are used.
    7
  1456. There is nothing innately wrong with political parties. They suck because they are shills for big money. Money in politics is the problem. That is what we need to abolish.
    7
  1457. She's a big girl who could have just done the right thing and denounced the smears and blackmail. Instead she trivialized the situation to talk about pocket pussies with cenks nephew under the BS premise of "staying neutral." She's earned her fall just like kyle has.
    7
  1458. Even Biden's camp realizes that people hate him the more they get to know him.
    7
  1459. Let her run. She is a less scary establishment candidate then Booker, Biden or Harris and she would suck up all the establishment support and money before getting crushed.
    7
  1460. Bob Marley regarding, "Maybe the protectors should protect their land with weapons instead of prayers" That is only an option for white people. As soon as these protectors pick up weapons they would be slaughtered.
    6
  1461. I'll give him credit for stopping the TPP assuming he continues on that course. It is everything else he is going to do I'm scared of.
    6
  1462. LLC please vote. 3rd party candidates need our support if we are going to do better than our broken 2 party system.
    6
  1463. I honestly don't care if she doesn't have a chance. Voting isn't about trying to pick the winner. I'd rather vote for her and lose than vote for either Trump or Hillary and win.
    6
  1464. I didn't think so from the other things you said. I just get so tired of everyone playing "which turd smell better."
    6
  1465. Trump is complete POS and you are no better than a Hillary supporter if you vote for him. Realize there are more than those 2 shit options and support someone else.
    6
  1466. Auceza please pull your head out of your ass. Regarding, "The MSM" That MSM that you despise gave him BILLIONS in free media. Regarding, "the Crooked MSM wouldn't support Sanders that much." Yeah. No shit. The MSM would rather an establishment tool like Trump win that a real threat to the establishment like Sanders. You do know that the media doesn't do the voting thou and the people do right? The people love Sanders and that was what was important. Run along and believe whatever you want to believe. I know you will.
    6
  1467. Auceza regarding, "I liked Trump since the beginning." Then you are a moron. You were going to vote for Trump regardless. People like myself who were not going to vote for a POS weren't going to vote or, like myself, voted for Jill Stein. Had I had the chance to vote for Bernie I would have jumped on it. Regarding, "i watched his whole interviews and his whole speeches" Me too unfortunately. The MSM would run his shit constantly and unedited. They would cover Trump's empty podium while Sanders would be speaking in front of record crowds. If you believed his BS then you are a fucking sheep. Good luck with your clown.
    6
  1468. Warrior regarding, "Personnel IS policy." And it is going to be even more so with Trump. Keep in mind that he asked Kasich to run with him and if he did Kasich could be in charge of foreign and domestic policy while Trump "makes America great again." Trump has no desire to actually govern. He is going to delegate the entire job out to other people.
    6
  1469. Then you are a fool. Can you point to another SOS that had their own foundation they used to essentially sell arms to Saudi Arabia, a uranium mine to Russia, and a seat on a nuclear commission to a big donor among other completely corrupt as fuck things? Stop making excuses for this sorry excuse of a human being and pull your head out of you ass.
    6
  1470. Lark, let your voice be heard but keep it peaceful please. You lose the moral high ground and the battle if you get violent. Make sure the message sent is about the message and not the methods. Thank you in advance. Take care.
    6
  1471. You sold me at "Bill O'Reilly is a fucking idiot."
    6
  1472. The Green Party is the only party who isn't bought by big money and corporations. This allows them to actually represent the people. Jill Stein for President!
    6
  1473. If you say so Ashton. Personally I prefer not to be lied and pandered to. I'd rather someone be honest and disagree with me than lie to me and pretend to be on my side.
    6
  1474. Tronerman, my mistake. I personally never get tired of hearing Bernie or Bust other than the fact that I prefer Never Hillary or Bernie or Jill myself but the sentiment is essentially the same. I on the other hand get tired of Hillary and Trump supporters arguing whose candidate is less terrible but i guess that is me. If you are tired of hearing Bernie or Bust you are in the wrong place.
    6
  1475. And he should only get to drink Flint water while there.
    6
  1476. That is sarcasm right? I hope. It's tough to tell on the internet sometimes.
    6
  1477. Never fear the certain hillary troll like rollin loud who is simply too stupid to realize that voting for Jill Stein is a vote for Jill Stein, voting for Trump are votes for Trump, and votes for Hillary are votes for that POS. Hillary has done nothing to deserve anyones vote (unless you are super rich, then, by all means, she actually represents you). Rollin Loud is obviously a complete moron otherwise they wouldn't be willing support such a corrupt POS but failure to understand simple concepts like votes for a go to a and votes for b go to b is just another example of why they are obviously a complete fucking tool.
    6
  1478. There are a lot of people I have lost lots of respect for during the current campaign. None more than Warren perhaps. I very much expected her to support Sanders considering the views she claims to value. Now with her supporting Clinton I feel she has really sold out. Never Clinton.
    6
  1479. I know right. Phones cost more than a place to live and they are even better. Who needs a place to live when you have a phone?
    6
  1480. If not Bernie I'd settle for Gabbard, Turner or another true progressive. I agree about Warren. She is on my shit list right now.
    6
  1481. That is funny considering the sources you just cited on other posts. I guess that is your idea of "real news." You are an idiot.
    6
  1482. Trump's signature piece of proposed legislation, the border wall is racist as fuck. If he cares about border security like he claims he wouldn't ignore the northern border. He does thou because it isn't about security.... it is about security from a specific type of person. Trump is racist. Period.
    6
  1483. Look for the small battles. Hopefully Jill gets at least 5 percent. Hopefully Maine passed ranked choice voting. Hopefully weed get passed where it is a referendum. I understand your point thou. It is destined to be a depressing day.
    6
  1484. Regarding, "The natives were compensated with a fair market price by the Supreme Court in 1980" The natives did not agree to this. That is like saying I can just give you money for your house and you have no reason but to accept it because.... reasons. Even if these people were trespassing on private property (it is in fact native land) you saying, "I hope they start using real bullets next ;)" is fucking disgusting. Again, you are a disgusting and a disgrace to the human race. You should be ashamed of yourself. Sadly you are not.
    6
  1485. It was 40 some percent but your points are all accurate.
    6
  1486. And as H4mmer points out there we need to get Jill to 5 percent even if she doesn't win. The Green party needs that money because they do not fund their elections with legalized bribes the way the 2 major parties do. It is also a way of sending a message to the establishment that our votes are not going to be taken for granted and that if they are going to get them going forward they need to do better than nominate a douche and a turd. It isn't just about this election which is already lost essentially. It is about all the elections yet to come.
    6
  1487. You have to be more specific. Both Nomiki and Emma are awesome.
    6
  1488. Nik is right Secular Talk is good. There is also the Humanist Report and Redacted Tonight.
    6
  1489. YuRM regarding, "how do you people continue to be this naive" Great irony. Thanks for the laugh. Regarding, "Where have you been over the past year?" Not on Breitbart and watching Alex Jones like some.
    6
  1490. I could make a case for either of them being the greater evil. Ultimately I don't care thou. They are both evil and neither is worthy of support. Jill Stein for President.
    6
  1491. Auceza. Bernie Sanders had done more to expose the establishment and call them out that pretty much anyone on the planet. Is he perfect? Hardly. But he seems perfect compared to the others names you mentioned. Regarding, "But progressives like that." You are an idiot. Only a moron would think this makes sense.
    6
  1492. Mega regarding, "the only positive thing I could think of during Obama's presidency" I tend to think of getting Bin Laden and doing so in a way that gained us the maximum amount of intelligence (as opposed to just droning him). That said for the most part he was nothing more than a total disappointment. I guess he helped starve off a depression but at the same time he did nothing to prevent the same types of problems in the future. The banks are bigger than ever. I don't think he even considered bringing back glass-steagal. Main street was never bailed out. Even as I type this I can't help but feel regret for voting for him. Hope and Change? Nope. Same old, same old.
    6
  1493. All you Stein supporters give me some much needed faith in humanity during very depressing times. Thank you. Take care all.
    6
  1494. Erik you go ahead and think I'm wasting my vote when I cast it for Jill Stein. In my opinion the only way I could waste my vote is if I cast it for a terrible candidate like Hillary or Trump. I want neither of them to win.
    6
  1495. Same here. The only way I might vote for Hillary is if Bernie was her running mate. Then I might vote for her with the idea that I might do something against everything I value as a pacifist. Otherwise... she is dead to me. I don't know who I am going to vote for for certain, but I know 2 names I will not be voting for... Hillary or Trump.
    6
  1496. The DNC picked a side in May of 2015. Superdelegates biased the entire election process before anyone was allowed to vote. 3 million independents in NY state alone were not allowed to vote along with independents in over 20 other states. Exit polls suggest election fraud. Biased media coverage. I can go on but if you don't already see that we do not have free and fair elections already then my words are certainly going to fall on def ears.
    6
  1497. Regarding, "that its ok for illegals to vote" I dare you to try to provide evidence of your lie because you can't.
    6
  1498. Sam regarding, "They spent literally NO time campaigning in states like California" THAT'S THE PROBLEM. California is large enough that it could be it's own country and the EC puts in place a system where they are completely ignored along with most of the country. Politicians have limited time and resources and with the EC they wise to only use them in swing states. A system where everyone gets a vote and all votes count the same creates a system where ALL votes must be fought over, contested, and courted. Regarding, "opens up the possibility of voter fraud EXPONENTIALLY!" Um. No. The EC does nothing to address this an your suggestion that it does is fucking absurd.
    6
  1499.  @Name-jw4sj  1) She's not. 2) Warren sucks. 3) It's irrelevant.
    6
  1500.  @Name-jw4sj  Regarding, "If you promote progressive legislation" What about if you vote to give Trump, a guy you call unhinged, even more money for bombs than they wanted? What do you call someone who lies about supporting M4A? What do you call someone who loves dirty money until they calculate taking it isn't in their best interests? What about if you are smearing the only actual progressive running and are enabling establishment fucks like bidens chances? Regarding, "And it's very relevant." It's not. I only get one vote to cast and it's bound for Sanders. Regarding, "Bernie isn't able to do this alone you idiots." That's actually the only way he can do it. At least when it comes to establishment politicians like Warren who are only running to smear him and to try and cock block him from the nomination. Regarding, "Stop with this cult like mentality that isn't going to help our movement." I get to pick who is on my team and former republicans smearing actual progressives don't make the cut. Stop defending the indefensible. Stop acting like she isn't a fucking liar. Pieces of shit like her and you don't help.
    6
  1501. http://www.jimkeady.com/welcome?splash=1
    6
  1502. Pundits should own their on bias. Absolutely. I can't agree more.
    6
  1503. I love Gabbard and think she should be on the short list of running mates for Sanders. But I think Sanders is the logical choice in 2020 because of name recognition and popularity for the top of the ticket.
    6
  1504. Regarding, "Clinton 2016 ....because the name recognition and popularity for the top of the ticket...sounds familiar ?" Um.. not exactly because you are comparing Hillary Clinton to Bernie Sanders. And Hillary Clinton was never popular even if she had name recognition. The bottom line is that you want to take the advantages Sanders has and toss them in the garbage so that you can get a candidate who has the same disadvantages Sanders had in 2016 which were likely the difference between him winning and losing. And for what? Do you think Gabbard would be so significantly better as President that you are willing to risk losing for it? I sure as fuck don't. The establishment still has their dirty tricks and partly the reason I do not expect they will work in 2020 is because Sanders can level the playing field with his name recognition and popularity.
    6
  1505. Actually how rich the owner of the company is is very relevant. They wouldn't be as rich as they are if, like you said, that box folder wasn't bringing value. They clearly are. For example McDonalds profiting billions every year proves burger flippers are worth more than what they are getting paid.
    6
  1506.  @CarloBiondi  They are not. They are everywhere spouting propagandist BS. Check any thread and you will see more bootlicking nonsense.
    6
  1507. I don't know. I feel like we were already at peak dystopia when chompsky was saying that people who didn't get vaxxed should starve.
    6
  1508.  @sharonsmith1360  Because I don't trust that twat to even attempt to educate themselves. https://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/news/a35397/bush-cheney-war-crimes/ https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2012/05/12/bush-convicted-of-war-crimes-in-absentia/ https://www.commondreams.org/news/2012/05/13/war-tribunal-finds-bush-cheney-guilty-war-crimes
    6
  1509. I'd vote for west but I'd really prefer it if he'd drop the "putin is a gangster" rhetoric.
    6
  1510. @ "isn't honorable" Yup. Shame on everyone who serves the US empire.
    6
  1511. Seems he was smart to be recording.
    6
  1512. Brandon regarding, "normal stupid Democratic response when they got no answers" Look at your original post and try to understand why you are a hypocrite. I know it's going to be hard to understand because you are a mental midget but I assure you you are.
    6
  1513. Danny Knapp there is nothing progressive to me about voting for the 700 billion dollar budget for the department of offense to me. That was more than even Trump wanted for fucks sake. But what could go wrong about giving Trump more money for bombs.
    6
  1514. Is that your idea of wit Albin? Congrats on telling that joke for 1 trillionth time. You must be very unoriginal.
    6
  1515. I'm sure lots of donald trump supporters used this same idiotic "logic."
    6
  1516. I absolutely have heard Bernie talk about the need for criminal justice reform even if there is a case to made that could talk about it. But that could be said of literally any issue. Furthermore those issues are not independent of one another. For example people who are educated are less likely to go to jail regardless of race. That is a way to keep people out of jail even if it isn't the only way.
    6
  1517. Accept no imitations. Bernie Sanders 2020. The OG progressive.
    6
  1518.  @hithere8753  Regarding, "I don't know what your principles are." You do. Don't support evil is a principle. And it's a good one. It's something everyone should easily be able to get behind. But our world is pretty messed up and people find lots of terrible reasons to rationalize supporting evil.
    6
  1519. Kyle has a new video out titled: ZERO Mainstream Media Outlets Covered the BOMBSHELL Assange Story. Why is this funny? Because ZERO Kyle Kullinski's Covered the BOMBSHELL Ana K Blackmail Story. Your silence about topics says something about you like their silence says something about them Kyle.
    6
  1520. Regarding, "they do propaganda in favor of maintaining the status quo" Yup. But there is clearly a distinction to be made between the tool being used (the establishment), and the people using that tool (the oligarchy).
    6
  1521. When I think of "human weasel" I think of Chris Cillizza.
    6
  1522. Zuca regarding, "it is all perfectly, 'technically' legal" No. It isn't. They don't get away with the shit they do because the things they do are legal. They get away with it because the enforcement of what is legal or illegal is applied differently to the rich and powerful than it is for the peasants.
    6
  1523. Kestrevon regarding, "Libtards rather pay tax for illegal immigrants welfare." If someone said something that wasn't idiotic after saying "libtards" I'd probably die of shock. We will never know thou because it will never happen.
    6
  1524. proud regarding, "YOUR SIDE." I'm not sure who you are talking about? The "democratic" party are a bunch of sellout who serve their big money donors like those that get rich off of sick people. In short they are "right wing."
    6
  1525. It's not exactly a debate format... more question and answer. Kyle asked his question and Christie predictably lied. People need to realize for themselves that he was full of shit.
    6
  1526. Trump has the best words. (obvious sarcasm is obvious)
    6
  1527. Regarding, "DNC rigs the primary against Bernie again" At least try to be consistent about the stupid things you say. You go from saying that Bernie has sold out his principles but now you say the DNC is going to rig it against him. Why would they rig it against him if what you originally said was true? Well, obviously what you originally said was not true and even you at some level realize it is bullshit. You are right. The DNC is going to do everything to rig the primary. The game has already started. They will do anything and everything to smear him (note, THIS IS IDENTICAL TO WHAT YOU ARE DOING). But Sanders has weapons he didn't have in 2016. In 2016 he was down 50 points to Hillary. The establishment was effective at portraying Hillary as inevitable. In 2020 Sanders will be the frontrunner. The game has changed even if it still isn't fair. Regarding, "I don't see you to be any different to the Hilbots and Trumptards." That is pretty funny coming from the guy who tries to smear Sanders in the exact same way hillshills and trumptards do. Regarding, "And based on your reasoning, because Bernie is the most popular candidate with the best chance of winning because of name recognition, we should should just bend over and accept whatever he does, regardless of our own values or principles." No dipshit. I'm saying that because I'm a progressive, as is Sanders, I'm going to support him, in part because of the advantages he holds over any other progressives. Try not to overthink it and make it into something it isn't. Regarding, "winning is more important than doing what is right." Holy shit are you stupid. Seriously you are exactly like Trump and Hillary supporters. Winning isn't everything but it is important despite your effort to pretend it isn't. Again good luck with your efforts to smear Sanders. You share that trait with Hillary and Trump supporters. The establishment loves you for it.
    6
  1528. J Abrams regarding Warren admitting primary was rigged. She changed her mind. Can't stand her. This is only the latest reason. Regarding, "Sanders/ Warren 2020" Fuck Warren. Gabbard or Nina Turner should be on the short list of VP picks.
    6
  1529. The "democratic" party isn't going anywhere. The system is rigged from top to bottom and that includes it being rigged in favor of the 2 major parties. Even if it wasn't Trump existence would be plenty to sustain the opposition party for some time. They are not going anywhere anytime soon so I suggest you accept it and plan accordingly. To me this means that the party needs to be taken over and to do that we need a true progressive like Sanders to win the nomination in 2020.
    6
  1530.  @bobbucks  "Bernie bros really believe that." Nope. But strawmanning the other side is easier than addressing the legit concerns with your conman who for example lied about supporting m4a while running for potus.
    6
  1531. "Free speech" is not protection from "other people." Other people can't take away your freedom the way government can.
    6
  1532.  @namakudamono  I know you want to just forget and deflect from the fact that she betrayed everyone but she did. You would be wise to remember the knife in your back.
    6
  1533. It's almost like they have conclusions they want to come to and are trying to reverse engineer things to say to get to them but aren't very good at being the shills they are.
    6
  1534.  @levanmikadze4748  "Jimmy is a progressive Dem" You must be new here.
    6
  1535.  @levanmikadze4748  He used to be a dem. And I used to be a dem. Those days are LONG gone.
    6
  1536.  @Jannakennels  "anti-imperialism" Trump isn't that. He stopped 0 wars and had LOTS to choose from. You can't drop as many bombs as he did and call yourself "anti-imperialist."
    6
  1537.  @scottwaters998  "why do you lie then hide like a coward when confronted?" I didn't lie. I gave the guy an article as evidence and he calls it "no evidence." I just have better things to do with my time. Why do you lie about me lying? Shouldn't you at least say what you are think I'm lying about?
    6
  1538. I don't care about easy/hard, I care about accurate. And people who, for example, vote against their interests are accurately called useful idiots. I'm not even sure Kanye is being a "useful idiot" for supporting Trump. Trump represents him and his interests because he is rich. The real useful idiots when it comes to Trump are the peasants who support him.
    6
  1539. Do yourself a favor Damian and save your breathe for someone more worthy of your time. Consider yourself warned.
    6
  1540. I see now FrozenWolf totally beat me to the point. Well said frozen. I totally agree.
    6
  1541. Yang embracing PAC money obviously is policy. Bernie doesn't do that even if there is a PAC out there that he can't control.
    6
  1542.  @avpthegreat  Universal health care, give peace a chance, a living wage, criminal justice reform, money out of politics, and more. The "democratic" party is an obstacle to literally all of those things and all the real solutions this society desperately needs. If only they weren't busy selling out to corporate interests and big money they might be worth voting for but as it stands they are not the left nor even close.
    6
  1543. I have no idea why someone would want a fake when they can have the real deal. Accept no imitations. Bernie Sanders 2020!
    6
  1544.    Regarding, "was looking to get superdelegates to support him. Or did you conveniently forget that?" He has consistently said that superdelegates are undemocratic and have no place in the system. Have you forgot that? If a football team doesn't think kickoffs should be part of the game that doesn't meant they don't play when the other team is kicking off. You are just being absurd.
    6
  1545. david regarding, "Bernie is starting to see what its like to be a conservative or a Republican to have the Media against you" I think he had a pretty good idea about it when the corporate media would cover Trumps empty podium while Sanders would be speaking in front of record crowds. But you go ahead and think you are the victim of the media when Trump got BILLIONS in free media coverage. Trump supporters are not too smart. You go ahead and enjoy these good times. So much winning I can't think of a single example of it.
    6
  1546. Giving handjobs to their big donors.
    6
  1547.  @sonjakozman1699  "it's a bug" It's not a bug. It's a feature. It's by design.
    6
  1548. Whoever contributed to grim's rug get's third, ryan is fourth.
    6
  1549. If only there was a way to turn shares into cash.... oh wait...
    6
  1550. FYI the friends in krystal, kyle and friends is TYT.
    6
  1551. The media should be asking everyone hard questions but they should not be actively trying to mislead people and/or frame questions in a disingenuous manner. I feel bad for you if you really can't tell the difference.
    6
  1552. F andrew yang!
    6
  1553. He was rich enough to give Obama a million dollars.
    6
  1554. I find it IMPOSSIBLE to take you even the least bit seriously.
    6
  1555. This comment is dumb... even by internet standards.
    6
  1556. While I agree that this is a good thing and should be praised it is not nearly as meaningful as it would have been had her vote been meaningful... which it wasn't. I suspect that had she had the deciding vote and not a meaningless one it would have been different. Sadly we can't know for sure and I concede this is merely speculation.
    6
  1557. Feels like both to me.
    6
  1558.  Christian Soldier  Now you are trying too hard. 1/10
    6
  1559.  @parallel9201  You fail because Bernie is already running on populism. He is already doing lots of rallies (especially when compared to biden). He is already doing everything in his power to get media attention (it isn't his fault they are ignoring him). And "go out more," he was just fighting for workers rights at Walmart and protesting with them. So really, what the fuck are you talking about. Bernie has been killing it, doing everything right (his debate performance was a bit underwhelming, but still), and running a fucking great campaign. And you start your original comment with, "Bernie should adopt how trump campaigned" when Trump's campaign was a fucking disgrace based on fear and lies. And then you tell Bernie to do all the shit he's already doing. Clearly we are on the same team. We both want Bernie. I just think your original comment is fucking terrible. Peace.
    6
  1560.    And Sanders is better on economic policies and Sanders has the best chance of winning.
    6
  1561. Do what you have to do to vote in the "democratic" primary going forward. Make them cheat if they are going to win. That doesn't mean you owe them jack shit in the general election if you don't want.
    6
  1562. "all Wallace's lies" Glenn is amazing but it would take a legit superhero to make a comprehensive compilation. This is a nice small sample thou.
    6
  1563. Lack of evidence mostly.
    6
  1564. Don't get me wrong I wouldn't be surprised if we found some evidence. But as of now it's lacking.
    6
  1565. TC regarding, "I also dont have that big a prob with bad question framing." You should if you care about a media that is doing it's job correctly... which you should. Not that I'm saying Sanders shouldn't be there.
    6
  1566.  @sowianskiwojownik5973  Don't give big gym any ideas. I'm still paying for a gym membership I tried to cancel years ago.
    6
  1567. They probably did you a favor then if you thought ryan and emily might be watchable.
    6
  1568.  @joeblast8004  We absolutely need joe "nothing will fundementally change" biden in a world that DESPERATELY needs change? What could possibly go wrong? Except Trump 2.0 after him. Let's hope trump 2.0 is at least as incompetent as the first one is.
    6
  1569.  @hplogsdon293  If you say so. How about we legalize, tax and regulate drugs then? That would seem to solve your problem and our police can have their time freed up to pursue thieves like turtle seems to think they don't have time for.
    6
  1570.  @anderseckstrand7033  "Both parties are captured by big industry and NWO capitalists." I agree with this. My point is that only one party really pretends to be on my side and support the things I care about. That is arguably worse than telling me the truth that they don't care about me.
    6
  1571. Check exit polls. If they can rig a caucus they can rig a primary. Don't just assume you are getting correct results.
    6
  1572.  @imjustboredleavemealone9055  I have no clue. People are discouragingly dumb I guess.
    6
  1573. @Darryl Walker "or a politician" Imagine saying this about a guy who was literally president. Wow.
    6
  1574.  @leonardlithen6787  I know about that one. But just in case you aren't aware of the quote I'm referencing it's what biden said when asked if he would give 50 student debt loan forgiveness his answer was, "I will not make that happen." And you know what... I think I almost prefer it when biden is being honest like this. It's actually better than his usual lying and pandering.
    6
  1575. America regarding, "why not" Because our politicians don't give a shit about us. Sadly they serve their big money interests and not the people.
    6
  1576.  @alphamikeomega5728  Long story short he sucks then. Thanks.
    6
  1577. So you are fine with this? Really?
    6
  1578.  @peterstafford4426  "They make their living demonizing people who are trying to do something good." What an apt description of yourself.
    6
  1579. Please subscribe to Bernie Sanders channel if you haven't already and do what you need to do to vote for him in the "democratic" primary. Thank you for that.
    6
  1580. Chris regarding, "That is your mistake for thinking that people needed Bernie to 'wake up'" Meanwhile, in reality, millions and millions of people are fast asleep. Meanwhile, in reality, that number is less then it was in large part to Sanders. Regarding, "only YOU can wake yourself up." Is this suppose to be deep or something? Have you never been influenced by anyone? A teacher, parent, or friend has never enlightened you about anything? I guess not but you are alone in that regard on the planet.
    6
  1581. You know there are other options right?
    6
  1582. How does this prove "throwing money at a problem does not fix it" seeing as how there is no money being used for this specific problem?
    6
  1583.  @teej783  Regarding, "couldn't even beat Hillary" He had no name recognition when he entered the race and a corporate media didn't help with that like they should have. Still he closed a 60 point gap and only "lost" because of shenanigans. Yeah... corporate dems are going to try and rig it against him again. He is still going to overcome it this time because of us. Well... maybe not you but you should.
    6
  1584. "Purity tests" is just the rhetoric used to demonize people with the audacity to have standards.
    6
  1585. M4A doesn't mandate you even go to a doctor much less put things into your body. What an asinine apples to oranges comparison.
    6
  1586. What about faucci?
    6
  1587.  @donHooligan  Regarding, '"why have i never heard of this guy before?"' I'd like to say to America... you haven't heard of him, in part, because MSNBC is corporate propaganda who wouldn't even let Ed Shultz tell you he was running.
    6
  1588.  @ConstantChaos1  If that is all you gathered from my list of grievances about her that is far from a comprehensive list nor meant to be taken as such then you need to have comprehension skills checked.
    6
  1589.  @buecherdrache1  Regarding, "But there was no large gathering of cameras, when he adopted him." And still we somehow have managed to received this propaganda. It's like you are describing a time when I adopted a dog, didn't try to use it to make everyone like me, and it was never on the dodo. Regarding, "There were no pictures of him picking up the puppy for fostering, no pictures of him specifically showing of the dog to the public. So why is this political theater" I'm not going to lie I have trouble taking your questions very seriously. Regarding, "the most important part (the press) is not there?" "most important part" I honestly have no clue as to what point you are trying to allude to. I suspect it's not good even if I understand exactly what you are trying to say. Regarding, "Could it maybe just be, that he needed an outlet to his political life and chose a dog for this?" What? I do my best to try and address every point that people are trying to make to me. But sometimes I just have to admit that I have no clue what you are trying to say. Feel free to try and rephrase and try again. Regarding, "So what makes you think this is?" In short I know this is political PR because of common sense. Would you have as much trouble recognizing it as that if it were trump doing this?
    6
  1590. Defund the police. As in slash their budget, not abolish.
    6
  1591.  @t500010000  The only thing Bernie has in common with Trump is that both are old.
    6
  1592. Donald Trump actually: "I'm going to make israel great again."
    6
  1593. There is a 3rd option... he needs to take different drugs. Checkmate atheists, I just proved God. (totally kidding)
    6
  1594.  @williamcole1069  "feel asleep" You are lucky then. I've heard of far worse things happening.
    6
  1595. RFKs position on israel is abhorrent. West is a superior candidate with a superior strategy (3rd party).
    6
  1596.  @Crimsonfangg  We all have bias and a lens that we are looking at the world through. I'm a diehard Bernie sanders supporter peace loving hippy. That's where I'm coming from. The world is a better place when we are just honest about it... not lie about it or ask to be lied to about it like the OP seems to think would be a good idea. It's not.
    6
  1597. You are an idiot.
    6
  1598. She's terrible and liar. "I’ve pledged not to take money from federal lobbyists or PACs of any kind." That is on her campaign website this very second. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/elizabeth-warren-flip-flops-on-taking-pac-money/vi-BB10xNpM
    6
  1599. Wear it like a badge of honor. It just means you are doing something right. Fuck the corporate media.
    6
  1600. Regarding, "The wall is immigration reform" If that were actually true then he would want a wall on the northern border. Nice try thou dipshit.
    6
  1601. Abolish the death penalty. Not only is it the moral thing to do but it would save the government money.
    6
  1602. So am I. They are atypically late in their pathetic apologist arguments. They must still be working on their retarded talking points.
    6
  1603.  @odintheterridorable8097  They would already say running against him is anti-semitic. He may as well do the voice.
    6
  1604.  @MultiPolarWorldCo-op  To see your comment I had to hit the "see more replies" which is suppose to happen after the 10th reply. I guess I'm not the only one they are censoring here.
    6
  1605. wiz you are really disappointing me. You went from a really great troll to really pathetic trolls very quickly.
    6
  1606. As a Sanders supporter I have no illusions that the country is going to be transformed overnight. I know what the rest of our government looks like. But you have to start somewhere. Even if he got nothing passes in congress he would still be the commander in chief, would be leader of the party to do housecleaning, and would be able to use the bully pulpit like no one else because he talks about the issues people actually care about. That said he will get some things done even if it will be a fraction of what this country needs. Furthermore he is a firewall from the continued backtracking and destruction that we are currently on. Sanders 2020!
    6
  1607. I can't imagine what kind of pathetic life you must have that you spend all your time trolling.
    6
  1608. Dems just got done lying to you about 2K checks but you want to be a partisan hack? Ok then.
    6
  1609.  @dannymeyer3256  "he knew many in politics before joining the game" He had a chat with bill clinton before announcing his candidacy. He also hung with eps tein.
    6
  1610.  @adambriceland6588  Let's just savor this victory as they are few and far between before planning out that far ahead.
    6
  1611. I'm so tired of the label wars. I don't care about labels. I care about policy. All the talk of labels is just a distraction... by design.
    6
  1612. That's just the microchip planted by ronald mcdonald talking. /s
    6
  1613. What Mckenzie said. If you want to vote for him in the general, and you should, help him get there.
    6
  1614.  @savstradamus3996  Regarding, "trumps family is literally working in his administration" So working for foreign governments like ukraine is way better? And I care about trumps corruption. Why don't you care about bidens? Regarding, "you are clearly an idiot to make this equivalency." I never say they are equivalent. I don't need evil to be equal for me to care about it. I'm not a hack. If that's what you heard it's only because the idiot is you.
    6
  1615.  @susanw2869  Regarding, "one of two will be the next president." While this may be so this isn't a logical reason to support either of those terrible people.
    6
  1616. I've never clicked so fast before at a headline.
    6
  1617. They are in office right? We are stupid.
    6
  1618.  @y3ee3e  So biden should get credit for the 600 trump is responsible for and we are the the one's being disingenuous? LMFAO
    6
  1619.  @cockoffgewgle4993  "people who committed crimes and did drugs" Meanwhile hunter biden is out and about.
    6
  1620. Kinky I hate Trump as much as most but stop with the Trump derangement syndrome. He isn't a dictator for fucks sake and when you make that comment you only make people who oppose Trump look like the kid who cried wolf and idiots. That's not helping. There's a million ways to legitimately attack Trump. Stick to those.
    6
  1621. So they have jobs but they aren't full time now? Why am I not surprised how easily the stupid shit you says changes. As for why so many minimum wage jobs are part time you would be wise to examine the incentive corporations have for keeping their labor force working part time rather than full time that has nothing to do with the BS narrative you want to portray of a lazy public. Are you ever embarrassed at what you see when you look in the mirror? You should be.
    6
  1622.  @TheZombie567  "behavior is ridiculous in the video" And we all know the best art is really boring right? And "ridiculous" isn't also really interesting right? /s
    6
  1623.  @kennethgilman3215  "nothing wrong with standing up for Israel" Yes. Yes there is. Shame on all their supporters.
    6
  1624. While I wish Sanders would endorse Canova the fact of the matter is that endorsements are wildly overblown by the public. Sanders and everyone shouldn't need to be telling you or anyone who to vote for. jewelry is absolutely correct... stories like this are far more important then what they usually cover and it isn't even close. I am genuinely shocked CNN aired this story.
    6
  1625. The "moderator" is terrible. I am only here for norman.
    6
  1626. So give up, throw up the white flag, and don't even make them rig it? No thanks.
    6
  1627. op kingdom regarding, "I'm voting Green only." If you want to vote for the Green party candidate in the general go right ahead. I happily voted for Jill Stein last general. But there is no green party candidate during the "democratic" primary and that election gives you the opportunity to shape their candidate or, at the very least, send them a message that you want progressive values. Regarding, "Dems will just use super delegates to screw over Progressives" They will absolutely do everything they can to fuck with things including using the superdelegates. That said there are less of them thanks to Sanders. I fucking hate the party. I really do. But use the opportunity you have to try and shape them with the little power you have. Don't let them win without a fight. And again if you want a good reason why, how about because it is what Perez and all the other corporate dems DON'T want you to do.
    6
  1628.  @celestemi4341  We are more than just pieces of meat for you to objectify. I'm just kidding. I just don't understand the people who would make a comment like this in response to yours. Your is clearly a compliment. And that's fine.
    6
  1629. Only one supports the pride flag. But yeah, I obviously agree with your sentiment.
    6
  1630. "A former bush employee" More like she's state media.
    6
  1631. Don't pick evil. Pick good and be ok losing while not supporting evil.
    6
  1632.  @wuhaninstituteofvirology  "which contradicts his entire life's work" Yup. Let's not act like he didn't do that then shall we?
    6
  1633. It's not for us.
    6
  1634. Max regarding, "The DNC admittedly rig their primaries" Yes they did. Because they don't want Bernie to win. It really speaks well of his character. Regarding, "Bernie has clearly been coopted" You are being silly. You are mad he endorsed Hillary? Fine. I get that. It was a fucking endorsement. Stop acting like it was his soul. I fucking love Bernie Sanders and I voted for Jill Stein during the general because only sheep vote based on someone else's endorsement and I'm not a sheep. Regarding, "It's pointless." That is what the establishment wants you to think. They want you to quit fighting. Don't.
    6
  1635. I don't have the time or ambition to tell you why. I could write a novel of brilliant insights and it wouldn't work on you because clearly you are hopeless and it would go in one ear and out the other. That said I thought it appropriate to call you what you are... stupid.
    6
  1636. I very much disagree with people that don't vote but I do understand it. We live in a country where the two top options for president in 2016 were two of the most despised people in the country. I understand why that would cause apathy. While I happily voted for Jill Stein that is far from getting a president I respect and wanted. All that said people still need to vote.
    6
  1637. "He’s a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side." Donald Trump about Epstein.
    6
  1638.  @debbieallen1815  Regarding, "Trumpers don't math." Pretty funny coming from you. 1400 is not 2K. Stop bootlicking. It's exactly what trump supporters did for their clown. Regarding, "please be intellectually honest." Wow. Just. Wow. Do better. YOU please be intellectually honest.
    6
  1639.  fa q  I don't know who she is but I'm inclined to agree.
    6
  1640. Val regarding, "Lets then tune to Fox News for some real news! lol." The only difference between Fox news and MSNBC is that MSNBC is better at hiding their agenda and lying to people.
    6
  1641. @ Way too late. Hayes and MSNBC are complicit.
    6
  1642. I thought I was voting for change when I voted for Obama. Turns out I was voting for same ole same old.
    6
  1643.  @snapgrouch702  "I don’t get paid for anything." But you do give all your bullshit a thumbs up right? Regarding, "When the hill brought up conspiracies, lies, and assumptions about Trump, the comment section was mad. However when they do it to Biden everyone is acting like the country is burning in flames. " Fun fact you still have yet to offer a single example of the hill lying which should be a prerequisite of anyone claiming they lie. You suck at life. Please be quiet. You make everyone dumber.
    6
  1644.  @zevkurtzman8108  Regarding, "what if we like tulsi or yangs ideas more?" 1) then you are wrong and 2) you are not being strategic about voting. Every person should have a principle that reads, "a politician needs to be at least a certain amount of decent to get my vote." Bernie should have no trouble making that mark. That and he is the only one of the three that actually has a legit chance at getting the nomination. Oh... and he has the best policy proposals in addition to being the person best trusted in a world where trust isn't easy to get. Regarding, "This is the same lazy thinking the establishment uses in order to get people scared out of voting third party." No. It's not. Because strategic voting is perfectly logical. It's stops being logical when it's used to try and support evil. Do you think that's what Sanders is? Because he's not. And if you actually do think he is evil, when he's not, then yeah... you shouldn't support him for that very misguided, very wrong reason. Regarding, " i like yang more and want his ideas" Ideas are neat but they are worthless when they are coming from a politician who hasn't done what they need to to have earned trust. And yang hasn't. He has zero experience in politics and has zero record to know if he believes what he says or is just trying to tell people what he thinks they want to hear.
    6
  1645. "I would have to be higher than a kite" If that's all it took I'd be watching it right now.
    6
  1646. Corporate media is propaganda.
    6
  1647. Flags are people too. /s
    6
  1648. This must be the war on Christmas I've heard about because I haven't seen it elsewhere.
    6
  1649.  @zarrex6808  Only listen to western propaganda like this am I right?
    6
  1650.  @zleeven  Regarding, "no voting for anyone othe than Biden is counter productive" Voting for a POS like biden who is everything that is wrong with our government other than mean tweets, is counterproductive and will inevitably lead to Trump 2.0 in 2024. Regarding, "specifically in a swing state." I live in a swing state and I'm happily not using it for either trump or biden. I don't care if this triggers you. Regarding, "Biden fucking suck" I have more respect for trump supporters who think their clown is the second coming. At least they are not willingly supporting what they know is a POS like you are. You know you are voting for a clown. You are a useful idiot for evil and are why hillary tried to prop up trump with the pied piper strategy in 2016.
    6
  1651.  @penpenultra  Regarding, "I could do without the condescension" I'm a cranky old man who is tired of having a shit government and it shows. Don't take it personally. Regarding, "It's a fantasy to assume that voting for anyone outside the two parties at the moment would yield any results." Still thinking that winning is the only thing that matters? And is the only "result" of an election? If you holding your vote from the "democratic" party in 2016 helping them lose to an orange clown didn't change anything that says more about the corrupt party than it does about the "results" of your vote. Regarding, "It makes you feel much better to vote for someone you genuinely think is a good person; I get that." Not only does it make me feel better but it's the only way things are going to change in any sort of meaningful way. Regarding, "But to reiterate my point: The republican party is objectively worse than the democratic party." Not that it matters who is better between a giant douche and turd sandwich but are they really? Is pretending to be on your side only to do anything and everything to stop your life from being better and ultimately serving corporate interests 100 percent really better? Regarding, "They are both obviously terrible" Which is what should be important but sadly isn't for you. Regarding, "there is clear distinction" Not really. The only clear distinction I find is that one is better at pretending they are on your side while selling you out. One is a terrible that you will support and the other is not. Regarding, "Third parties aren't even on the map right now like they have (sort of) been in previous elections." I don't care. I have no illusions that I'm going to be voting for the winner. But I'd rather do that than vote for someone I don't even want to win in the first place. And they will never be viable if people like you continue to brainwash people into thinking there are only 2 options and that's just the way it is so bend over and take it instead of fighting it like you should. Regarding, "It would make the most sense to vote for a lesser of two evils now." Voting for evil never makes sense. Because it's fucking evil. Maybe fight instead of enabling it. I can't really blame hillary and company for helping give us trump and propping him up. Their strategy is clearly effective on people like you.
    6
  1652.  @oscarosei1985  It's not our fault that graham failed at what you claim they were there to do.
    6
  1653.  @voccsaycee30  I noticed you deleted your other terrible thread where you were rationalizing mur der. Good for you. It shows self awareness I didn't think you had.
    6
  1654.  @kfox420  "a nice strawman argument" You can claim I'm deflecting if you want. Ultimately I'm making a point and you are just nonsensically handwaving it away. You are going to have to try better.
    6
  1655.  greatest dad  "ounce of ability in human cellular makeup" LMFAO Really. "you surely are not working within the science Industry," Do you? Or is this just more hypocrisy on your part?
    6
  1656.  greatest dad  "CNN.... that's been the talking point for the last 2 days" Then again I have no idea what they are talking about. I'm not the one who watches CNN but apparently you do and are again just a huge hypocrite about it.
    6
  1657. Yup. What a low bar we set.
    6
  1658.  @amrs6713  Let's say ana had a real ace in her pocket. Let's say they had an affair and she had pictures to try and use as blackmail instead of an apology. And jimmy doesn't want to mess up his marriage. That clearly would have been much more effective blackmail material for ana. Ultimately she tried to use what she had, which was just more lies. She tells so many lies she thought that maybe this lie would work. I mean who wants to get metooed right?
    6
  1659.  @synchronium24  "him sexually harassing her." Let's say for a second this obvious BS were true for a moment. That would mean... Ana, the person who hired jimmy to be on the show, covered up for a person she thought was a sexual predator and had him on the show for a really long time without saying anything. But now she's decided to come out about him being a sexual predator because he's exposing them as the frauds they are. And that makes sense to you and that's ok in your alternate reality?
    6
  1660. Regarding, "Clinton supporter," You are as much on my side as Trump supporters are on my side. Maybe less so even because the "democratic" party is suppose to be my party. Regarding, "DNC owes Bernie Sanders supporters an apology" Oooo. An apology. They can take an apology and shove up their ass. They owe THE PEOPLE free and fair elections. Seeing as how they are not going to be given the people that any time soon they can go fuck themselves. Regarding, "they need to refund the Bernie Sanders supporters who gave money to the DNC" What about all the 27 dollar donations that went directly to Sanders? That said I really don't give a fuck about money. That is the corporate democrats thing. I CARE ABOUT FREE AND FAIR ELECTIONS and there was nothing fair about the "democratic" primary. Regarding, "I will never hate you" I don't care. I care about you perpetuating the myth that the rigged primary was fair. The world would be a better place without people spreading these lies and I have no patience or tolerance for them.
    6
  1661. Alienated while not waiting til getting the nomination to announce a running mate is an interesting idea I think it would be a terrible one in this specific case. Let's say Sanders chose Turner, who I love and consider to be second on my own personal list of choices behind Gabbard, that mostly serves to give the establishment a new avenue to attack and smear Sanders campaign and you know damn well they would. The biggest obstacle to a Sanders presidency is the "democratic" primary and we would be wise to give them as little ammo as possible to prevent him from winning it.
    6
  1662. Meh... I love Jimmy and understand why he was mad but while this guy was wrong for what he did it's much more fun when jimmy is taking someone else down more deserving than this guy whose work is so important.
    6
  1663. You are wrong to think she doesn't know that what she is saying is wrong. She does. She is paid to mislead.
    6
  1664.  @appetiteee5605  "He has always been consistent and determined in terms of his views" Has he? How about his recent vote for 50 billion for ukraine?
    6
  1665.  @brawldevil1585  It's too early. She's going to pick a better time for maximum impact imo.
    6
  1666. This has to be the smartest, most accurate thing he has ever said.
    6
  1667.  @karmafride1237  My fourth choice is America's Dad.
    6
  1668. You are an idiot.
    6
  1669.  @davidiihouston6883  You are complicit in what happened in gaza. You voted for the people who did it.
    6
  1670.  @pipertipurts5211  Bernie would be the first person to tell you not to give money to him that you can't afford. Your vote for him and a better tomorrow is greatly appreciated by him and by people like myself. Thank you for that.
    6
  1671.  proud American  Regarding, " Yeah vote for the rich guy, mr. man of the working class, who got mad at his poor workers for asking for a raise. Trump 2020." Your paid shill comments are always remarkably bad but I'm not going to lie I do find this pretty funny. Maybe not include the "Trump 2020" part to avoid coming across like the hypocrite you are. As it stands I can't take you seriously enough to address this intelligently other than to point out the "got mad" part must be one of the talking points you shills were given to recite.
    6
  1672. She is always good at talking the talk. Walking the walk is something completely different entirely.
    6
  1673. Nice news network fraud.
    6
  1674. @My 2 Cents If it makes you feel any better I'm not new to shitting on yang. He was always terrible. This is but the latest reason why. Regarding, "Granted, there are still a majority of states that haven't voted" You would think a person who claims to care about math so much might wait for someone to be the nominee... MATHEMATICALLY. And that's not the case. But good luck with your terrible rationalizations for terrible people. So many sheep in this country.
    6
  1675. Kyle got one thing right. We can and will fuck off. I almost hope kyle gets blackmailed one day.
    6
  1676.  @Unclejamsarmy  Really well said.
    6
  1677.  @darkempath7436  Regarding, " we're looking for tangibles" I'm confident that this stuff is "tangible" to blacks without health insurance, or access to education, or making the minimum wage, or in jail for weed, or unable to vote. You are not woke, at best you are a useful idiot for the establishment and at worst you are a disingenuous paid shill.
    6
  1678.  @darkempath7436  I don't give a fuck about the party. The "democratic" party is a dumpster fire. But you should be ashamed of voting against your self interests for terrible reasons.
    6
  1679. Not only does kyle not think ana's attempted blackmail is worth glasses but he doesn't think it's worth talking about at all. The TYT family protects it's own.
    6
  1680. Jace regarding, "Please use your brain" In samir's defense he did use his brain. It is just that samir is stupid.
    6
  1681. Market Liberal doesn't realize the VA, despite it's problems, provides better healthcare than the for profit private health care industry. He is dumb as fuck. http://news.gallup.com/poll/186527/americans-government-health-plans-satisfied.aspx
    6
  1682.  Ms Taylor  LMFAO. Amazon was a typo. Was meant to read Walmart. Now all we need is for you to stop sucking at life.
    6
  1683. @Derya Alkan And I find your stupidity pretty hilarious. I'm not reinforcing your point. I'm telling you why your point is wrong. The fact of the matter is that corporations are already doing anything and everything they possibly can to automate. To think otherwise is a denial of what reality looks like. Their is no more "acceleration" to be added to a process where your foot is already on the floor. What a joke.
    6
  1684. @Derya Alkan Regarding, "Even if what you said is even remotely true" Which it absolutely is and I'll prove it with a question you can't answer. Please give me a single example of automation that isn't being used and/or would be used once the technology is available that isn't used currently but would be if we raised the minimum wage. I'll wait... forever. Because it doesn't exist.
    6
  1685. @Derya Alkan Automation that isn't happening but would be. One example.
    6
  1686. @Derya Alkan Regarding, "small businesses that won't be able to handle the higher labor costs" Small business will fucking love a world where people have extra money in their in pocket to spend at their small business. Not only will people have more money but they will be more willing to use it at mom and pop stores because they aren't trying to scrimp and save every dollar they can like they are now which almost necessitates them going to walmart to save a buck. And if they can't pay their employees enough to live on. Fuck em. I'm sure these were the same types of idiotic arguments used to try and keep slavery around back in the day but they wouldn't have been compelling to me then and they aren't compelling to me now. You can't pay your employees enough to live. Then they can fail. That said, most all will love it for the reasons I've already given. Regarding, "Also then how is Bernie gonna combat the automation wave that will put 75 million jobs at risk?" Nothing can slow automation. It's not like Yang has got anything for that either. As for the people and jobs... well we make sure that they are educated, have health care, and when working have enough to live on. Some jobs will be replaced but ultimately I think society is going to have to adapt. 4 day work weeks or even 3 should be the norm with higher pay for those hours in the future. Americas shouldn't be killing themselves at work and working 40+ hour work weeks. Less hours per person means more jobs available overall. I'm open to UBI in the future. But Yang.... I'm not. I require political experience to vote for someone for the highest political office in the land. Not only because I value experience, and I do, but because I require a record to look at and know exactly what I'm getting. With Yang I only have his rhetoric to go on. That's not good enough and a deal breaker for me.
    6
  1687.  @do_care919  Arguably democratic neolibs are worse because they pretend to be on your side while doing more to crush you and your priorities (assuming you are a progressive) than the republicans can even dream of doing while they aren't pretending to be on your side.
    6
  1688.  @jivet3919  Everyone other than ana and TYT who are his partner affiliates really.
    6
  1689.  Sir Panda  Yes it is. It is incredibly sad. It also helps to explain why so many people are apathetic when it comes to elections. How do you vote for peace in a country that gives "options" like Hillary and Trump? It's lose/lose if you care about peace.
    6
  1690. Very well said digital.
    6
  1691.  @etchalaco9971  "we should do nothing about it" Nope. Never said or implied this. "crossing out fingers and hope for the best" That's not what I advocate for. Do you always strawman like this? Do you have anything to offer about the things I actually said?
    6
  1692.  @coletrickle1775  I like Tulsi but I wish she were supporting Sanders like she did in 2016 and wasn't running against him and splitting the progressive vote.
    6
  1693.  @jameshumphrey9939  Regarding, "why not gove hs profits on his book to charity?" Let's say you weren't illiterate and wrote a best selling book, would you give all the money to charity? Why do you think this is a reasonable expectation of Bernie?
    6
  1694.  @stoontechguy  Regarding, "discipline" Just stop with this. The problem is that the person is immoral and terrible. That's the problem. Period. And I'm tired of people acting like it's something other than that obvious truth.
    6
  1695.  @stoontechguy  Would you say something like, "discipline prevents an immoral someone from acting like it" when talking about Jeffrey Dahmer? Would you really want to describe his problem as a lack of discipline? Or would it better be described that his problem was that he was a psycho? A murderer? Or a cannable (sic)?
    6
  1696. The greatest threat to the stability of the world is clearly America in part because of people like Lindsey Graham.
    6
  1697. Calls tulsi a sellout and then proceeds to propup Elizabeth "looking forward to corporate money in the general" Warren. Very funny.
    6
  1698. You shouldn't have been acknowledging wrongdoing. You should have been thanking them for keeping you off twitter.
    6
  1699. Yes I read your response. I very much agreed with it. Unfortunately it is buried under your original comment where you question his age. The war for 2020 has already begun. The establishment is already doing anything and everything they can to stop Sanders in 2020. One of the ways they will try to attack him is because of his age because they do not have more substantive avenues of attack such as policy. I just don't like you doing them a favor by bringing it up. I am not trying to pick a fight with you but I do concede that I tend to focus on areas of disagreement rather than telling you how much I too would be ok with Weekend at Bernie's WH Edition should something unfortunate happen. Peace.
    6
  1700. "Why does every Republican hate regular Americans?" Follow the money and stop acting like only one party sucks. Both are corrupt to their core.
    6
  1701. Seth, Sanders has been fighting the good fight his entire life, including, as William points out, against the military industrial complex. It is hardly his fault the rest of the government is garbage.
    6
  1702.  @Scepticalasfuk  Speaking of experimental how about that wuhan lab. Does anyone know what the difference is between "gain of function research" and chemical weapons development? Or bio weapons development? I legit can't tell the difference. It feels like another turd being polished to me. Like calling weapons "lethal aid."
    6
  1703. No shit right. Actual Orangutans are cool.
    6
  1704.  @TheKnowspicker  Has nothing to do with my comment. Is there a point you are trying to make?
    6
  1705.  @claymusicoff5663  Is that what you heard? If so get some new comprehension skills.
    6
  1706.  @claymusicoff5663  I'm sorry. I can't fix stupid and your comprehension issues for you so I'm not going to try. Good luck with them going forward.
    6
  1707.  @OvertDummy  I find it difficult to imagine that you aren't being paid to be so dense.
    6
  1708. I don't care if you are or were a Bernie supporter. I care about her biased coverage. Like, for example, when she perpetuated the bullshit myth of Sanders supporter chair throwers during the NV convention long after she should have realized she going on air and lying to her audience.
    6
  1709. Your English needs work comrade.
    6
  1710. FoxTopia The only vote that is thrown away is a vote for a candidate that does not represent a person's values, priorities, policies, and ethics. Jill Stein is the only candidate running that represents me so I will be happy to be voting for her. Good luck with your conman.
    5
  1711. cez regarding, "Jill Stein's insignificant 1% result was not enough to swing the election." That isn't going to stop fools like you from blaming Jill Stein voters. Regarding, "'Hillary will bring WW3' bs" Don't be afraid to blame Hillary from giving them something to fear. She did say, "As President, I will make it clear that the United States will treat cyberattacks just like any other attack. We will be ready with serious political, economic, and military responses" At the same time that she was accusing Russia of cybercrimes to distract and deflect from the fact that she was caught being corrupt as fuck. Regarding, "and now they're like 'don't blame me'" You can go ahead and blame me if you want. You will anyway. Sadly there weren't enough Jill Stein voters for you to do so without lying. Hillary Clinton supporters, like their candidate, are cool with lying to serve their purposes. Regarding, "And don't worry, Hillary deserves 80% of blame for all of this." Isn't that nice and surprising of you to say. Too bad the other Hillary sheep are too busy making excuses for the fallen queen that have nothing to do with the fact that Hillary lost because of Hillary. Regarding, "But if we want to clean up this mess, the left must get to work and leave special snowflakes behind, cause they are useless." Seems you have learned nothing. Keep on courting Republican voters instead of the left then. That makes sense to sheep. Regarding, "They are already spinning Trump as a more progressive than Dems." It does seem that he is killing the TPP. He isn't progressive but there is a case to be made that he is more progressive than Hillary was, not that that is saying much. Regarding, "I'm guessing they won't be working against him." Bernie Sanders said it best when he said we are willing to work with him where there is common ground and we will oppose him when works against what we believe in. Regarding, "If your fixation on Clinton foundation is more important to you than hate crimes" Only a sheep would suggest that my bringing it up means it is "more important" than your BS talking point. Here are some points for you to ignore. Hillary Clinton has a direct impact on the foundation and their immoral activity. Donald Trump is not encouraging people to commit hate crimes. You talk as if it was the Donald himself committing hate crimes. Speaking of hate crimes and racism how many people were imprisoned due to the "superpredator" problem Hillary and Bill addressed with the omnibus crime bill back in the day? Speaking of hate crimes the current "democratic" President is letting ND "play out." You see I care about hate crimes when both parties do it. You ignore it when it is your "team." Racist as fuck policies were actually a great reason to not support the corporate democrats. But you keep on trying to scare me with your cup of water while I'm already standing out in the rain thanks to your POS that I'm suppose to feel bad she lost. I don't.
    5
  1712. It is related because it is about the need for the people to have access to clean water.
    5
  1713. Kwisatz regarding, "sense of humour fail" I get that you were trying to make a joke. I was trying to make a valid point. There is room in the world for both.
    5
  1714. Obama had democratic super-majorities at the start and he used it to pass Republican legislation. Maybe if he used it to pass progressive policies he wouldn't have been obstructed the rest of his time.
    5
  1715. NYCpeopleareidiots is a Hillary shill who loves to smear candidates other than their own and excuses everything wrong with Hillary. Ignore them. I suspect they work for "Correct the Record."
    5
  1716. NYCpeopleareidiots regarding, "No actually I despise Hillary." If that is actually the case my apologies. It is possible I have you mistaken with hillary shill idiots because I've simply lumped you into the category of complete fucking moron with them. Should you actually believe that good for you... it is the only intelligent thing I suspect you are capable of saying. Strange you would choose to respond to my comment and not one of the other comments that correctly point out that you are completely full of shit distorting facts to serve your agenda.
    5
  1717. I'm with her. Jill Stein that is!
    5
  1718. Please stop playing the establishment game of trying to figure out who is worse. It really doesn't matter who is the greater evil when both are evil. Evil is evil is evil and the rest is just details, distractions, and noise. They both suck. Neither Trump nor Hillary are worthy of your vote.
    5
  1719. Regarding, "The United States has NEVER been a pure Democracy" The favorite argument of people on the wrong side of the issue. That's how it's always been. You would have fight right in with people justifying slavery. Regarding, "each State must be given some consideration regardless of its population." and every state would be given some consideration depending on their population. Only a state with zero people would get no consideration. You want to justify injustice. You want the person who gets the least amount of votes to win. You want peoples votes to count differently. You are wrong.
    5
  1720. Yup. The GOP really did themselves a disservice with the Benghazi witch hunt. They are like the kid who cried wolf too many times now that there is real scandal going on.
    5
  1721. Robert regarding, "How is that objectively true" To me to be a progressive a person needs to first and foremost be a truthteller. Kyle tells the truth about the "left" even when inconvenient. Sam Seder, along with fake progressives like Bill Maher, John Oliver, and most the left pundits are turd polishers who tried to pretend Hillary wasn't the POS she was. They all may as well have be the FOX news of the left. Partisan hacks supporting their team and ignoring reality. There is nothing progressive about that to me.
    5
  1722. Auceza regarding, "Trump wasn't disliked." That's why he got less votes than another POS hated person like Hillary Clinton.
    5
  1723. Warrior regarding, "your sense of betrayal as Trump fucks over the working class yet again" Auceza will have plenty of excuses and rationalizations to excuse the clowns actions. They are likely blissfully unaware that he is filling positions with nothing but lobbyists.
    5
  1724. Warrior regarding, "so can I just say that you're rad" I'm ok with that. Thank you. My biggest weakness is that I can be quite abrasive at times. I don't tolerate ignorance very well. Regarding, "Ever thought about running for office" Never seriously. The closest I've ever considered about really being political is heading to ND to protest. That I did consider seriously doing. In hindsight I wish I were there at the moment.
    5
  1725. There is a lot more evidence of Hillary being corrupt if you are really interested, all you have to do is ask. I apologize for being so abrasive. I resent people spreading misinformation and that is what I thought of, "I literally don't find her anymore corrupt than any other secretary of state."
    5
  1726. slippy regarding, "it concerns me that they are looking for a reason." I fear they will be able to make up a reason. I also fear another false flag event like the failed DAPL security guard. Regarding, "I just don't know what else the Native/protestors can do about it." Not much. I agree with their strategy and admire their resolve. If I were there I would have a very difficult time not resorting to violence. I also fear a protestor losing their cool and giving the police the excuse they are looking for. I don't believe in God but I pray they stay safe just in case.
    5
  1727. Never Hillary. Never Trump. Jill Stein for President. She isn't popular with war mongers but she should be popular with you.
    5
  1728. Trump is pro war crimes. That is a special kind of evil.
    5
  1729. Zach if you think I made soda's point and not my own it only seems that way to you because you are an idiot. Is it ok for me to say that? I think so BECAUSE I HAVE FREEDOM OF SPEECH. You can't claim to be for freedom of speech and think that I need to mind my own fucking business at the same time. Freedom of speech means I do not have to mind my own fucking business. You don't understand because you are stupid. If you have a problem with me calling you stupid the answer is to stop acting stupid and saying stupid things rather than trying to tread on my freedom of speech.
    5
  1730. Mike regarding, "Without something like the electoral college system, people in less populated States will never have their interests represented at the Federal level." Except the electoral college does not make the system better, only less fair. With the electoral college someone could win the Presidency by winning only 11 states and someone could lose the Presidency after winning 39 states. Therefor you don't have a point. The electoral college does not solve the problem. It only creates inequality. Regarding, "while the majority of people in the center of the country, might as well stay home." Currently if you live in California, Texas or NY you may was well stay home on election day. Their votes are essentially meaningless. If everyone's vote counts the same everyone would have the same reason to go out and vote.
    5
  1731. Mclauritsen regarding, "Ummm then what about people that have more money" What about them? They get one to cast just like everyone else. You are joking right?
    5
  1732. At the end of the day the arguments in favor of keeping the electoral college are arguments to justify inequality. Fans like to say that it makes sure small states get their say but that's not true. Again, with the electoral college a candidate could win the Presidency by winning only 11 states and a candidate could lose the presidency after winning 39 states. Therefor that argument is BS even by their own "logic." You want to fight to make sure people are not equal... you go ahead. Just don't have an illusions about what you are fight for. You are fighting so that some people are more important than others. I am saying we are all equal when it comes to voting for President and I don't care what you live. If you are an American you should have one vote. Period.
    5
  1733. There certainly was but it was probably about 100 people across the country and to suggest it was millions if fucking absurd. If somebody wants to know the truth about voter fraud they should want recounts. Instead Trump cries like a bitch about them happening.
    5
  1734. This isn't about how it will affect or hurt a politician or party. This is about fairness. One person one vote for everyone is fair regardless of the state you live in.
    5
  1735. She wouldn't lie. (sarcasm obv)
    5
  1736. Regarding, "but Trump could have beaten Bernie too." No. He couldn't. It wouldn't have been even close. Regarding, "You probably won't believe that, but it's true." No. It is not. No matter how many times you say so. Regarding, "but don't act so sure." But I am as sure of this as I am sure the sun is going to rise tomorrow.
    5
  1737. Single payer is a radical idea? Not according to the rest of the world.
    5
  1738. I'm not a big fan of chanting generally but... CNN SUCKS! CNN SUCKS! CNN SUCKS!
    5
  1739. Top regarding, "There's no real need to label them," That's not your call. People want to know what they are eating and they have a right to that information. Regarding, "as they have no effect on health." That is what they said about lead until it was proven that it did have an effect on health. Regarding, "GMOs have been singled out because they sound scary to uninformed people." Logical minds understand, when told what GMOs are, that it is very conceivable that they might have adverse health affects. Regarding, "Without them, I don't think we'd be able to meet society's growing needs." Fine. JUST PUT IT ON THE LABEL. That really isn't too much to ask that people be allowed to be informed as to what they put in their bodies.
    5
  1740. If you live in a swing state you should be supporting Jill Stein. Trump, Hillary, and their parties have proven they are not worthy of support regardless of who you think is the lesser of those two evils.
    5
  1741. Regarding, "And what would we do if they invaded our country" The same people that freak out over illegal immigrants here in search of a better way of life never seem to understand that dropping bombs in foreign countries creates as many enemies as it destroys. Also thank you for your service.
    5
  1742. charley regarding, "Okay then who do you want?" James nailed it with Bernie Sanders. If it isn't him I am going to have a litmus test for who I'd supporting including: I need a candidate who supported the water protectors, and I need a candidate who supported Bernie Sanders in the primary of the last election. Warren fails both and she will not get my support for President.
    5
  1743. I agree that The Progressive Party would be an accurate name for them but ultimately I suggest you not get too wrapped up in labels. Leave that to weasels like Frank Luntz.
    5
  1744. You sound just smart enough to be voting for either Hillary or Trump. Which is to say, not smart.
    5
  1745. We will go ahead and get trillions of dollars ready to bail out the elite then.
    5
  1746. Carol regarding, "MSM is on its deathbed" I wish. Sadly I think this is hyperbole.
    5
  1747. Bobby regarding, "No, there isnt." Um. Yes. There is. I don't need to wait for a bomb to go off before I can call out the person placing the bomb. That is how proof works.
    5
  1748. Jill Stein is way better. But I agree that voting for third party candidate is better strategy than writing in Bernie who I hope tells the "democratic" party to fk off and runs as an independent.
    5
  1749. If you consider yourself on the left please do not support Hillary. Please realize Jill Stein is the only candidate that represents you and your values. Jill Stein for President!
    5
  1750. Yup. Stunt Wax beat me to the obvious response.
    5
  1751. Warrior regarding, "I voted for Jill and Ajamu earlier this week" One step closer to 5 percent if not the win. Regarding, "3 other Green candidates on my ballot for statewide offices." Too bad all the other elections don't get the attention the Presidential election does. Regarding, "ranked choice voting" I'd love ranked choice voting. Hopefully it passes in Maine where they have a referendum on it and it becomes a model for the rest of the country to follow. We need it. Overnight the BS argument of voting for the lesser of two evils could be done away with. I'm so tired of getting told by democrats and republicans I'm wasting my vote while they vote for dogshit. But not only that but ranked choice voting would lead to significantly more civil dialog. Our country is terribly polarized at the moment in part because of the system. Politicians currently have incentive to lash out and attack anyone and everyone that doesn't support them. If we have RCV our dialog as a country would be more civil because there would be incentive for politicians to reach out to people of differing ideologies. They might not be your first choice but they will not want to alienate people in hopes of being their second choice. Of course the major parties don't want it thou. They are all too happy to use the "vote for the lesser of two evils" BS or "wasted vote" argument to try and scare people into voting for their inferior candidates.
    5
  1752. Regarding, "It is also an accurate statement that once Trump gets in the white house he will be 10x (at least) worse than Hillary on the environment." Since you can accurately predict the future I was wondering if you could give me some powerball numbers.
    5
  1753. Jill Stein is very much worthy of your vote. She is essentially Bernie Sanders on policy but with better hair. If we are ever going to do better than a broken 2 party system 3rd party candidates need support.
    5
  1754. More government? It's just government. We are always going to have it so let's try to improve it.
    5
  1755. No thank you. He is a racist. He policies are all wrong. He called for the killing of the families of terrorists. (aka a war-crime) There are more reasons but any one of these are disqualifying in my opinion.
    5
  1756. We want peace and the military industrialized complex reigned in, money out of politics, transparency in government, health care for all, education for all who want it, no fracking and to protect the environment, financial reform and glass-steagal back, criminal justice reform and an end to the war on drugs, jobs and no TPP, a living wage, freedom and equality, and free and fair elections. Is that what you mean by purist? If so I guess I'm guilty.
    5
  1757. Global Warming Skepitc regarding, "0 Republicans voted for Obamacare." No shit. Stop pretending it was all about policy and had nothing to do with "making sure Obama is a one-term president." It was fucking Romneycare nationwide. It was born out of a Republican think tank the Heritage foundation. If Obama had found the cure to cancer Republicans at the time would have said Obama was trying to put doctors out of work. Regarding, "No, Republicans as a whole do not support Obamacare." Republicans, much like Democrats are sheep supporting their team. It has nothing to do with policy and it has to do with identity politics. To learn more watch South Park. The establishment has pit half the country against the other half so that they don't actually blame who is rightfully blamed... the establishment and the oligarchy.
    5
  1758. Stop playing the establishment game of who is worse, neither is worthy of support. Vote third party. They need our support if we are ever going to do better than a broken 2 party system.
    5
  1759. You must be being paid to be here and lie. I think Breitbart is garbage. You know what I don't do? Spend all my time there telling them they are garbage. Only a moron or paid shill would do something like that. I'm betting the house on paid shill. Wait, correction, you are likely a moron AND a paid shill. Regarding, "cry me a river," "You're a complete hack," and "There's not a single scrap of integrity within you." You are moronic and ironic as always.
    5
  1760. NYC regarding, "what a wonderful response of emotional charged personal attacks, and not one single substantive point of factual information" LMAO. Please go back and read your original post you hypocritical piece of garbage.
    5
  1761. LOL. My NYC translator tells me that, "Yes, this is treaty land," must be true seeing as how you only lie.
    5
  1762. Moh Mooney I saw that as well and was left shaking my head. How can he ignore the fact that around 30K emails were deleted and we have no way of knowing what was in them? Would it be so hard to believe that classified information was conveniently deleted? Then again Hillary assures us that those emails were just about yoga and personal information not related to work. Even her explanation is garbage. If we are to believe her story then she spent half her time at work doing anything other than work and this is suppose to be ok? I don't get it. I do not understand what is wrong with the country that so many people are willing to vote for either Hillary or Trump.
    5
  1763. I hope Bust is slang for Jill Stein.
    5
  1764. Concerned Citizen, TYT politics is separate from TYT with very different coverage. You would love it. They take Hillary apart constantly. Regarding "VOTE TRUMP" You are supporting a POS candidate just the same as Hillary supporters. You are part of the problem. Support a person who isn't human waste and be part of the solution instead.
    5
  1765. CC regarding, "not true man" No. It is absolutely true. The man is garbage for so many reasons. Do I really need to tell you why? Regarding, "we need to end the corruption first" By electing a man who is corrupt by his own admissions? That doesn't make sense to the sane. Regarding, "check out his Gettysburg rally today" No thanks. I care about what he has to say about as much as Hillary. They are both liars and at this point neither has any credibility with me and they shouldn't with you either. Regarding, "He is rough on the edges" I'll remember you when I have a turd I need polished. Regarding, "and not a racist" No. He is a racist. Take for example his signature piece of legislation the wall. It isn't about security or he wouldn't be ignoring the northern border. It is about security from a specific type of person... brown people. Regarding, "but he is not inherently evil like Hillary" You know what evil people say, like people in ISIS? They say things like, "we have to take out their families." But that isn't a quote from ISIS. That was Donald Trump saying that. And that is not the only time he has called for the United States to be committing war crimes. WAR CRIMES. Nothing evil about that to you? Pull your head out of your fucking ass and again, stop being part of the problem.
    5
  1766. Tyler regarding, "and not voting for hillary isn't a vote for trump. a vote for trump is a vote for trump. she isn't entitled to my vote because her opponent is an even bigger fuckhead than she is" This makes a lot of sense to people smarter than Wilson. Wilson should really be careful what he asks for. If I was going to vote for the lesser evil I very might be voting for Trump. Trump is a complete idiot who is all talk (very Wilson like). At the end of the day I do not think he would be able to accomplish much of anything. It's not like the man has ever passed a law. Furthermore I really have no idea how he might govern because I've never actually seen him in action in office. Hillary on the other would be much more effective in getting things done and that is not a good thing for the country. She has already demonstrated that she might get us into war with Russia. She has already shown that she will give away everything she possibly can to her big money donors. Gun to my head I think he might be the lesser of two evils. That said I'm not voting for evil anytime soon. I'll leave that to morons like Wilson. Lastly a Bush election did lead to great backlash. It gave us Obama with a promise of hope and change. Sadly he fell very short of delivering what he promised. Sanders was an opportunity at real hope and change but the corporate party (known as the "democratic" party) made sure that didn't happen. I know it is crazy to think this way but considering there are no good options coming from the two major parties I think that after 4 years of Trump the country would be ready to make sure real hope and change happen or revolt. And this would be a good thing. The status quo is acceptable only to the super rich and super stupid.
    5
  1767. EOM regarding, "You're always attack Hillary, but not Trump" Um. Nope. Regarding, "Paid [Orange Hitler] Trump troll" Trump is racist, corrupt, a liar, a POS, and a disgrace to the human race. But Trump trolls say that all the time. Hillary's "Correct the Record" POS trolls accuse everyone not bowing to the queen of being Trump trolls. Just saying.
    5
  1768. Have we learned nothing from NAFTA? NO TPP!
    5
  1769. True. But make politicians take a side so that we can hold them accountable for the vote.
    5
  1770. Auceza regarding, "Bernie is a sellout." You are using the term sellout wrong. A sellout gets something of value like money. There is no reason to believe this was the case with Bernie. When Bernie was running he said over and over that he didn't want Trump to win and considered him a threat. He said over and over and over that he would do whatever he could to prevent Trump from winning. I wanted him to tell the DNC to fuck off and run with Jill Stein. He didn't and although I disagree with him I get it because Bernie Sanders said over and over what he was going to do and he has a way of doing what he says he will. Regarding, "The Green Party will shit on you, too." The Green Party is different in that they do not accept legalized bribes from big money and corporations. That means the are free to represent the people and not the people paying to fund their elections. There is a direct correlation between money and corruption. That is, in part, what makes the Green Party superior at the moment.
    5
  1771. Yup. It also paved the way for a real progressive in 4 years as well.
    5
  1772. That's absurd. I'm not a fan of Obama but he is by far more popular with the country than Hillary or Trump.
    5
  1773. Because of Russia. Can you believe what Russia did? How dare they. Fucking Russia. Putin and Russia. Anything but the content of the emails. You can't talk about them or Russia wins.
    5
  1774. Alan actions speak louder than words. Warren talks the talk but she is not walking the walk.
    5
  1775. I have had enough of you. Does that mean I should be able to kill you?
    5
  1776. This should be titled, "Denial."
    5
  1777. I'll have to remember Paul Krugman the next time I need a piece of shit polished.
    5
  1778. That said, fuck them all and stick to independent media. I actually recommend Secular Talk, the Humanist Report, Redacted Tonight, TYT politics. Forget what I said about the MSM. Too much BS.
    5
  1779. I don't care if she would be better than Trump. What kind of a standard is that anyway? EVERYONE IS BETTER THAN TRUMP! Please realize you can vote for whoever you want. Hillary and Trump are not your only choices. Wake up. Support someone like Jill Stein or someone you can be proud to vote for. Better than Trump... sheesh. Is that suppose to be impressive or important to me? It isn't.
    5
  1780. "We need to keep voting blue no matter who." sam seder
    5
  1781. Literally everything you say is wrong for one reason or another. It's like you are trying to disprove the saying that even a broken clock is correct twice a day... because you are ALWAYS wrong about everything. Your ability to suck is epic.
    5
  1782. Kara regarding, "Keith Ellison got pushed out of dnc chair, no matter how much power the JD thought they had." I don't think they are pretending or claiming to have the upper hand. I think they are fighting for it thou and I support them. Regarding, "Kimberly Ellis" The reason you have stories about a person like Ellis is because there are still good people fighting in the party who deserve our support. That doesn't mean we aren't fighting against the establishment, we are. That doesn't mean we think the game is fair, we know it isn't. But we think it is still a fight worth having. Regarding, "tom perez goes and cleans out progressive opposition" Yup. It is fucked up. It is wrong. But the bottom line is that he has to do shit like that because, again, there are still good people working in the party who deserve your support. They are fighting for you. The least you can do is not turn your back on them. Regarding, "have the word democrat or republican next to your name is nothing more than a disgusting corporatist badge of dishonor" Then you really shouldn't give a shit about Ellis or what Perez did because it was only affecting disgusting people. You care way too much about a party labe when you should care first and foremost about the person. For example I love Bernie Sanders and support him. I'd do so if he called himself a democrat, republican, green, independent, or martian. The party label is not nearly as important as the person. Try to realize that.
    5
  1783. McConnell makes me not like turtles.
    5
  1784.  @janetfromanotherplanet1301  Regarding, "he sounded decent for a man running for president during his campaign" Did he thou? "We have to take out their families." He ran on committing war crimes.
    5
  1785.  @janetfromanotherplanet1301  Regarding, "for a man running for president" Um... what? Am I misunderstanding you or are you really trying to rationalize a presidential candidate campaigning on war crimes? Are you really trying to say it's no big deal because he was running for president? That can't really be your point can it? I must be misunderstanding you. If not what world do you live on? How can you really call that "decent?" How wasn't that a red flag for you? Because it should have been and there was nothing decent about him and his campaign. Good for you if you see the light now. But wake the fuck up and analyze the past or you are going to continue to make the same moronic mistakes going forward. Long story short don't support candidates who want to commit war crimes. Because duh. Lucky for you most don't campaign on it. They might do it but most are at least smart enough to understand that isn't the type of shit you campaign on. And if you do don't call their campaigns decent and/or act like you had no reason to see what a piece of shit he was after they do it. Accept some fucking responsibility at least for being a dumbass for supporting someone you had every reason to know was a piece of shit.
    5
  1786.  @nitrologly  "generally no "winning" when you're dealing with multiple nuclear powers." Luckily this hasn't ever actually happened (in a direct hot war) and let's hope it never does.
    5
  1787. @Ashli Babbit was murderedbythestate Regarding, "the left won’t fight that." Correct. They are masks. Stop being a pussy. It won't kill you to wear one in public until a vaccine is distributed.
    5
  1788. Never Trump. Never Biden. Someone sane 2020!
    5
  1789.  @Blackmallowtube  "I disagree that he has no integrity." A person with integrity would have done almost everything differently for quite some time now. " I am happy that people like you are calling him out on his lack of integrity on this issue." I'm pissed. It brings me no joy to do this but I feel betrayed. " not 100% legit" I'm about as far left as you can go. I'd rather listen to someone on the right who I think is sincere and wrong than someone on my "side" and a liar. Kyle's told too many lies and tried to tell me that 2+2=5 too many times now. "No one is perfect." He's got a huge ego. I don't care because he's genuine and not a liar for blackmailers.
    5
  1790.  @mmolchin  I really don't care about kyle's "logic" to come to the conclusion that 2+2=5 cause I'm so focused on the idiotic answer he's giving.
    5
  1791.  @meanwhileinsooke  Why are kyle's supporters using transparent smears like this?
    5
  1792.  @justinbailey6515  "my bank account" He wasn't talking about that nor does he care about it.
    5
  1793. I'm just impressed he didn't mention where he puts his junk at night because his bar is so low.
    5
  1794. Diamond regarding, "words mean so much more than actions" LMFAO... again you are acting as if he voted yes. That would have been an important action. Regarding, "progressive hiveminds" You strike me as the type that is looking to smear Sanders no matter how unjustified it is.
    5
  1795. Wilson regarding, "We can call it when he fucks up" You really think this is one of those times? Again you are acting as if he voted yes. Him voting no is really that fucking important to you? Are you fucking kidding? Do you not realize how fucking unimportant that is? Him voting no is akin to me going to McDonalds to tell them I don't want a BigMac.... it is fucking meaningless. It is only important I go to McDonalds when I actually want to eat there (which is never, but that is unimportant... like voting no is unimportant).
    5
  1796. And if Bernie single-handedly invented that pill he would be smeared for, "putting cancer doctor's out of work."
    5
  1797.  @joshuaherpolsheimer4699  Regarding, "she isn't doing that ok." She is literally collecting a check from the MIC this very moment. When Bernie was saying give peace a chance and AFTER Tulsi had already held public office she said... get me a uniform. That's the fact of the matter and it's hardly the type of thing MLK would have been happy about it. Try not to let the truth trigger you too much. Regarding, "Bernie is a chickenhawk. Never been in war" Some people don't need to fall out of planes to figure out that having a parachute is a good idea. That's what superior judgement looks like while Tulsi demonstrates the type of "judgement" John McCain shows on torture and Dick Cheney shows when it comes to gay rights.
    5
  1798. In an election between Hitler and Pol Pot bob would happily be either a Hitler or Pol Pot supporter. He would even try to shame people who didn't support one or the other because he is a good sheep happy to do the establishment's bidding.
    5
  1799. The first thing yang wanted to do to pay for UBI is by dismantling the social safety net. That's regressive as hell when it should be paid for by the super rich.
    5
  1800.  @alphach1mp  "You be wrong." Wow. Saying all you need to know about yang is that he got an endorsement is as shallow as saying all you need to know about yang is the color of his skin. Stop being an idiot. MLK would be appalled by this type of stupidity.
    5
  1801.  @Randomas23  Regarding, "Trump will pass" LOL. Nah. Regarding, "thats why he's aking for one" OJ had had lie detector test conducted on himself just after he murdered someone. Your "logic" is flawed. I suspect it's because you are stupid. Regarding, "You shouldnt comment if your that uneducated." Maybe don't say "your" instead of "you're" while calling others uneducated. Then again maybe you don't mind being a hypocrite Regarding, "Help me lord!" God doesn't exist. You are on your own and pretty fucked.
    5
  1802.  Progressives Against the Regressive Left  Obvious copy and paste troll is obvious.
    5
  1803.  @batboy3746  Regarding, "The echo chamber is strong on this channel." What a remarkably uncompelling "argument."
    5
  1804.  @ArchlordZer0  Just ignore the fact that trump 2.0 is going to follow the inevitable failure that will be a biden presidency. Biden is a clown without orangeface.
    5
  1805. Yup. He is "staying out of it" the same Obama was "staying out of it" when DAPL protestors were having their heads bashed in and constitutional rights trampled.
    5
  1806. Being right is more important than being first.
    5
  1807. Why do you think I care about the perspective of a moron and pathological liar? You might understand this if you bothered to answer my questions about your other absurd lie. Nobody gives a shit what you think because you suck at life. We only like to laugh at you and make fun of you.
    5
  1808.  @darineller6768  "Profits are for losers." There is more to life than just money. But you will just strawman the things I'm actually saying.
    5
  1809. If Obama did even a half decent job there is no way the country would have been willing to give the keys to an orange clown.
    5
  1810. Talon regarding, "either a moron or a troll" All trolls are morons therefor the only question is whether or not they are a troll. Either way they are definitely a moron.
    5
  1811. Albin thanks for proving my points about you having no idea what reality looks like and that you are not witty. It's 2018... nobody jerks to playboy anymore and your attempts at wit pathetic. That said please try again. You are funny... just not in the way you intend.
    5
  1812.  1800s kindaguy  7 replies but I can only see 5
    5
  1813.  @ryananderson6321  I know the media is hot garbage. But so are trump and yang.
    5
  1814. Says a sexist, racist, Russian operative. Just kidding of course.
    5
  1815. It really shouldn't take it happening to you to understand. Still better late than never I guess.
    5
  1816. Bart regarding, "63 million people who thought that racism is either great, or at least no big deal" It must be nice to be able to see everything in black in white when it actually is grey. Do you happen to remember when Hillary Clinton worked to imprison a huge percentage of the population that was disproportionately minority to address the "superpredator" problem?
    5
  1817. You single-handedly bring down the average intelligence of the world by over a point.
    5
  1818.  @Salsuero  Regarding, "she was dead going in." She really was. I'm not sure why anyone would support her. The people that support her claim it's because she's the one to stick it the MIC. She works for the MIC. That war that Biden voted for... she went to go serve in it. If only she listened to Sanders then she might have avoided serving the MIC personally. Don't get me wrong, I actually like Tulsi. But she is no Bernie. Obviously.
    5
  1819. Please tell me that is a joke. Whatever. Either way it is actually funny just for different reasons.
    5
  1820. Zuca don't get me wrong, there are lots and lots of things that should be illegal but are, in fact, legal. But that is not what I'm talking about even though those examples do very much exist. I am talking about the times when the rich and powerful are breaking laws.... not just laws that should exist but don't but laws that actually exist on the books. There are still plenty of examples of those. There is a line (even if that line isn't where it should be) and that line is crossed. Repeatedly. And repeatedly the rich and powerful are able to get away with it because of a corrupt system that allows them to break the law and not be punished for it. For example citizens united makes it very, very difficult to break campaign finance laws but it is still not impossible. Politicians still can and do all the time despite very lax regulations. But they are all but never punished for it. That's what I'm talking about. We have the same laws for everyone in the country but those laws are enforced differently depending on who you are.
    5
  1821. whyamimrpink regarding, " I don't agree with your ideas, however I will never say that you want people to die. I just think your ideas are not good. I don't want people to die and neither do conservatives." Well, the facts are not on your side. If your "idea" is that the ACA needs to be repealed you have to take responsibility for what that would mean. It would mean less people with health insurance and it would mean people would lose their lives because of it. Sorry but those are the facts. You can't claim to care about people's lives when you are trying to take away their health insurance. And people are correct to say you don't care about people's lives when you demonstrate that you don't care about people's lives. https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2017/01/23/repealing-the-affordable-care-act-will-kill-more-than-43000-people-annually/?utm_term=.91a58133c8dc
    5
  1822. Fortunately for the country it isn't exclusively up to the DNC and primary voters have a say in the matter.
    5
  1823. Who fucking cares? I do and so should you. You are either dumb as fuck or a paid troll.
    5
  1824.  @bimgraves4551  That is insulting to snow piss.
    5
  1825.  @tonyclifton2230  "He just told you how the system works." I'm already well aware of how the system works. That's how I'm able to call out frauds like grimm. "You don't get that kind of insight out of jimmy dore." Jimmy dore not only knows how the system works but he's proposed ways of changing it.... like force the vote, which grimm was spitting on.
    5
  1826. He said he doesn't care.
    5
  1827. Paddle Duck regarding, "I don’t feel like Warren walked back her comments (sic)" Really? "I agree with what Donna Brazile has said over the last few days; that while there was some bias at the DNC, the overall 2016 primary process was fair and Hillary made history." Elizabeth Warren
    5
  1828. obermiss regarding, "Hitler and Stalin were atheists" There is quite a bit of debate about Hitler's beliefs but if all you want is for me to admit that there are crazy atheists then yes. There absolutely are. They just happen to be significantly less frequent than religious fanatics. Regarding, "its only religious people who have caused major conflicts" Not only. But the fact of the matter is that there is a large religious component of almost all war. It isn't a coincidence that of all the wars the US is currently fighting none of them are against a Christian nation.
    5
  1829.  @dennisfischer7676  FYI I'd be calling for revolution if I weren't a pacifist.
    5
  1830. Niding I very much agree with that. I consider taking over the party plan A and I want strong alternatives as a plan B. Even if we are able to takeover the "democratic" party I want strong 3rd parties to keep the major parties "honest," and pull them to the left. Getting progressives in office is the priority and I will do so regardless of their party label.
    5
  1831. Niding regarding, "I do share Jimmys worry about Bernie sheep herding people into Democratic party." I don't. I think that nobody has done more to expose the rot in the party than Sanders. Sanders is why so many people have left the party. But he needs to keep them just close enough so that he can run as a democrat in 2020 to be able to takeover the party. Regarding, "the real progressives in Democratic party" Sadly the real progressives are almost non existent. That said I think justice democrats have a pretty good plan to try and start changing that. Regarding, "the overwhelming corruption in the democratic party" Sadly as far as I can tell they are going to continue to be corrupt AF until a progressive can take over the party. Regarding, "we are trying to eject them" Agreed. I'm not trying to "save" the party or live side by side with corporate dems. I'm looking to take shit over and kick their asses out. They can go join the Republican party for all I care since it is where they belong.
    5
  1832. Spencer regarding, "I can't wait for it to get stolen from him again, and for him to just sit back and do nothing about it." No doubt the establishment will try to rig it again but the game has changed. Sanders isn't an unknown like last time... instead he is rightfully the most popular politician in the country.
    5
  1833.  @namakudamono  Everyone, especially people like me who supported her because she said she would fight for m4a. All the people who thought she would be different than your average corporate dem (because that's how she marketed herself) who wouldn't be expected to fall in line behind pelosi but she did. She betrayed the principles she claimed to have.
    5
  1834.  @georgeshibley9529  How dare you!
    5
  1835. You should stop giving biden a pass. it makes you look like a tool of the empire.
    5
  1836. @Paul Wolf I used to always think of myself as a little more david gilmore than roger waters.... not so much right now.
    5
  1837.  @levanmikadze4748  Why not a dem? Because he doesn't support the democratic party. That's what being a dem means.
    5
  1838.  @warfossil  "Under Trump, the United States has dropped about 20,650 bombs through July 31, or 80 percent the number dropped under Obama for the entirety of 2016." More than obama. Is that enough?
    5
  1839. "land of the free" am I right?
    5
  1840. He is a corrupt corporatist.
    5
  1841. op regarding, "I want Bernie to care that Americans' ability to vote was impaired" Even thou we were all fucked over nobody was fucked over more than him. I think the notion that he doesn't care to be absurd. Regarding, "I want him to speak out about it." I understand the point but trying to put this in context. After getting fucked over he had an impossible choice to make. Get behind the person and party that fucked him over and support them because he thought they were better than Trump or spend all the remaining political capital he had to do what you want and sacrifice literally everything else for it. I think he made the right call. And specifically in hindsight it is really nice that intelligent people are forced to blame Hillary for his lose instead of letting Sanders be effectively scapegoated for her loss. Regarding, "I want him to care more about that than about protecting his chance of being president." I don't think he cares about being president as much as he cares about helping the country. And, go figure, being president is a way of being able to do that like no other. Regarding, "Bernie could do more for America and our government by starting or endorsing a third party than he could EVER do as a President." Some of us don't care about stupid fucking party labels. I'm pretty sure we all want at least one major party that doesn't suck but I personally don't care what their name is. You do. You want to make sure the "democratic" party pays for betraying you. You are right to be mad at them. But you are wrong to cut off your nose to spite your face.
    5
  1842. mark regarding, "Bernie did not give his campaign 100%" They guy who entered the race down 50 points, who faced media blackout, who was attacked and smear by the entire establishment and only "lost" because he was fucked over didn't give 100 percent? I think that is insane. Regarding, "Look at Trump" I think you have lost your way when you want to look at Trump for how to do anything unless that thing you want to do is suck or be orange.
    5
  1843. Carlos regarding, "perhaps he's just a establishment's tool" I guess that is why the establishment works to smear him 24/7. I can't say for sure if you work for the establishment but I can say for sure that you are a tool.
    5
  1844. I'd be more worried if Biden brought it up himself, like he did his "hairy" legs. I think so little of Biden's word I'd bet he shaves his legs at this point.
    5
  1845.  @samg.5165  Regarding, "To be fair, Warren did extremely well." To be fair she came out against democracy. Hard to do "extremely well" while doing that IMO.
    5
  1846. That's better. Now everything is right in the world. I was starting to worry that you might put a shirt on or say something that wasn't dumb as fuck next. Now my mind is at ease.
    5
  1847. There is a reason right wing idiots aren't known for their sense of humor. Or accuracy. Who is really the snowflake when you come here to cry that someone said something factual about your mancrush Hannity?
    5
  1848. By the way, that is rhetorical. Like I've already said I don't actually give a fuck about the stupid things you think Steven. That said I do enjoy laughing at you.
    5
  1849. Thanks for showing exactly why I don't give a fuck about the stupid shit you think and say. You never bother to address how I pointed out that you were the original snowflake in this thread (because you really can't) and I would need to write a short story to do justice as to why everything you just said is stupid as fuck and misguided.
    5
  1850. Regarding, "are you comparing kyle kulinski to Alex Jones?" If you think that's what I'm doing it is only because you are stupid as fuck. Then again you are stupid as fuck.
    5
  1851.  @jameshumphrey9939  With anything... health care, money in politics, war...
    5
  1852. Regarding, "Chris Matthews is losing his mind..." You can't lose something you never had.
    5
  1853.  @StormCrownSr  clearly they do not. But I understand your confusion. Secular talk viewers are not usually so dumb. But it was at least funny how they are trying to insult others intelligence when demonstrating how ignorant they are.
    5
  1854. I want to give each and every one of you thrashing kyle a thumbs up but I should probably go to bed. When someone shows you who they are believe them the first time. That's good advice from maya angelou.
    5
  1855. ​ @borninthewronggenerationno3873  Regarding, "can't even answer my question" You never asked a question. Your stupidity is almost impressive somehow.
    5
  1856.  @TheGrinningViking  They really could if they wanted. But they choose this. They choose to deflect, distract, and look back. Anything other than addressing the current state of affairs.
    5
  1857.  @Thepopcornator  I actually do know more about him than just for being the crack mayor's brother (thanks mostly to this channel but not exclusively). I really just wanted to poke fun at ignorant Americans. I use jokes and humor as a coping mechanism. Without it thinking of Trump and Ford in their positions might make me clinically depressed if not insane. On a serious note good luck getting rid of Ford. It's like having cancer run government.
    5
  1858. Libertarian ideology is at least correct when it comes to the military industrial complex and the war on drugs, even if their domestic economic policy is absurd.
    5
  1859.  @darkempath7436  By us do you mean the paid shills lying about Sanders?
    5
  1860.  @darkempath7436  Because the guy in video is genuine. Which is far more than can be said about you.
    5
  1861.  @meltedsnowman9637  "disrespectful and sexually derogatory to the accuser." What the AF are you talking about? 1) Even you concede she was blackmailing him. The notion that this should have been given respect as if it's anything other than a blatant and obvious smear is asinine. 2) "sexually derogatory?" What nonsense. Your framing is loaded, terrible and wrong. She was the boss and she exposed herself in the workplace. If anyone is guilty of predatory or bad behavior it's clearly her. Jimmy called out her terrible behavior. It's not his fault there isn't a nice way to do it.
    5
  1862.  @larchlarch9851  If you can't understand that grim is a tool of the oligarchy used to manufacture consent for them then I pity you.
    5
  1863.  @larchlarch9851  "Ryan Grim is all about integrity and good journalism." Meanwhile, in reality, ryan writes propaganda like, "CHUCK SCHUMER EYES A SECOND SHOT AT RAISING THE MINIMUM WAGE THROUGH RECONCILIATION" so that people will chuck credit for "something" while he actually does NOTHING about raising the minimum wage.
    5
  1864. The VA is far more popular than the private for profit health care industry despite being far from perfect but don't let that fact get in the way of your stupid talking point. http://news.gallup.com/poll/186527/americans-government-health-plans-satisfied.aspx
    5
  1865.  @Sixstringman  Sad but true. Warmongers are going to warmonger.
    5
  1866.  @peterhardie4151  Not to blame but his actions are still far from perfect. I might be wrong about the timetables but I think that the US was sending money to ukraine during his time and nato was expanded during his time. Still... if anything it seems that he was holding them back while this was going on.
    5
  1867.  @elgatofelix8917  UBI is fine when done right. Yang's UBI sucks. As does him.
    5
  1868. I'm ok with that.
    5
  1869. Sorry Steven but I'm not interested in your anecdotal evidence. He is the most popular politician in the country with the name recognition of a rock star. The policy positions he advocates are wildly popular with the public. If anything is going to stop him from being our next president it will be the "democratic" party establishment and their shenanigans, not his age. I question your authenticity. Your bringing up his age and bullshit about him not having a spine are all favorite talking points of the trolls being paid to smear him.
    5
  1870. Regarding, "its not anecdotal," Remember when you said, "i was speaking on behalf of many women who have told me personally that..." That is anecdotal. Regarding, "he endorsed what he said he was fighting against" Yeah... you obviously have all the favorite establishment smears for Bernie down pat. I guess you are going to pretend that Bernie didn't agree to support the democratic candidate when he entered the primary. I guess you are going to act shocked that Bernie followed through and did what he said he would... like always. I guess you didn't hear Bernie say over, and over, and over, and over that Trump absolutely should not be president and that he would do anything and everything to try and stop him. Like I said I find you to be completely disingenuous so please stop it with the act and screw off.
    5
  1871. How much does it cost to rent your soul steven? I find myself wondering how people like you can sleep at night. I have more respect for the trolls who at least don't pretend to be on our side.
    5
  1872. He says it better than I can.
    5
  1873. That's the only way you get the "democratic" nomination.
    5
  1874. trump has the swampiest swamp
    5
  1875.  @GeorgeCarlinWasAGod  "a right wing plant." The guy trying for force the vote on m4a? The guy who is to far left of the "democratic" party? You people must be paid for this shit. No one can really be this dense can they?
    5
  1876.  @Definitelynotjewish  "Im surprised she didnt claim to know him personally" Too bad they didn't. She might have ended up with all the other bodies found buried on his property.
    5
  1877.  @consciousobserver629  Great comment. That's why it's being shadowbanned in the "land of the free."
    5
  1878. Just accept that the party and the people in it LIKE MARIANNE don't care about you.
    5
  1879. Global dipshit regarding, "Because the government sucks at providing people with healthcare. That much has been demonstrated." Please look at the following and try to understand it. I know it is going to be hard because you are obviously dumb as fuck but try anyway. It proves that what you are saying is complete and utter bullshit. http://news.gallup.com/poll/186527/americans-government-health-plans-satisfied.aspx
    5
  1880.  @emhu2594  "her mean tweets" I used to say the only thing that changed with biden is that he didn't come with mean tweets. As it turned out neera brought them for him. Not only did nothing fundamental change but nothing superficial even changed with biden.
    5
  1881.  @matthewschwartz6607  He writes propaganda and manufactures consent for the establishment. Take his recent article, "CHUCK SCHUMER EYES A SECOND SHOT AT RAISING THE MINIMUM WAGE THROUGH RECONCILIATION." It's something that should be written and distributed by chuck shumer's pr team. That's why he is a hack.
    5
  1882.  @geddydesmond451  Regarding, "TDS seems to dictate that the DNC only cheats against its own party." Actually it's the lack of evidence. But don't let that stop you from strawmanning stupid shit like this.
    5
  1883. So you care more about party labels than about the people those labels are attached to. I will never understand such a position.
    5
  1884.  @luv2fly745  We can't forget the trillions they just lose and nobody seems to care. Sht happens am I right?
    5
  1885. I will never vote for Biden. The establishment knows this but pretends he's the most "electable" because they would rather lose to Trump than let a true progressive win. Bernie 2020!
    5
  1886. You'd think he would avoid wind with that rug on his head.
    5
  1887. Kyle SNAPS at questions over his dishonesty.
    5
  1888. Regarding, "That was actually pretty good." Epic understatement.
    5
  1889. Legalization of weed alleviates problems and creates zero problems. Problems like mass incarceration and a weed black market go away when it's legal. It creates tax revenue and so much more. What problem do you think legalization would create? Because I honestly have no idea what you are talking about.
    5
  1890. Dems are proposing a 1.9 trillion dollar bill with 1400 checks. If all 1.9 trillion went in the form of checks we could all get 6K each. But they won't even give the 2K they promised.
    5
  1891.  jack  It was a fucking joke you twat.
    5
  1892. The primary process should be overhauled from top to bottom and shit like this should be outlawed.
    5
  1893. 1:05 Does the guy on the left have a permanent frown? Edited because I can't tell left from right. Then again they both look like they could have permanent frowns.
    5
  1894. It's not called a "self defense rifle." They are called "assault" rifles.
    5
  1895.  @ASTROPLANET13  I'm actually quite certain they are not a bot from other experiences I've had with them in the past. I also don't think bots edit their comments. All my money is on C.
    5
  1896. Why do you assume him comparing the jew to a deadly disease isn't because of antisemitism?
    5
  1897. 69th like. Nice.
    5
  1898. It reminds me of Hillary's "I'm winning" last time around.
    5
  1899. Justin regarding, "Not good enough! As Bernie Sanders would have said at some point in the past...ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!" Stomping your feet and being pissed at what is isn't the same as offering viable solutions.
    5
  1900. Barney called himself a "perfect candidate." Sounds like something Trump would say.
    5
  1901. Dan makes a great point... there are plenty of retarded dipshits willing to support a complete piece of shit and disgrace to the human race without Russian interference.
    5
  1902. I said the same thing about CNN but I didn't do so while completely missing the point. The topic of this video was about the chanting. Not the content of the chants.
    5
  1903. Even GWB thinks GWB should be in jail. What is the public waiting for?
    5
  1904. It's funny but I don't watch the office.
    5
  1905.  @rm19660  You are living in a crumbling empire regardless of anything trump does.
    5
  1906. They are trying. They just have nothing of substance.
    5
  1907.  @RandomYouTubeNameAgain  Has no experience, no record to look at to know if he is sincere or just pandering, and no shot to win. There are zero logical reasons to support him over Bernie.
    5
  1908. I assure you they get it. They just don't care.
    5
  1909. @Ben the brummie Regarding, "please take your opinions some where else" Must be nice that you get to share you opinion on this public platform while others can't. What a hypocrite you are.
    5
  1910.  @singerrb4984  Regarding, "It proves once again that Joe Biden has a heart of gold." Is that what you think? The only that is actually proven is the gullibility of the public and their ability to be taken with obvious propaganda and pandering.
    5
  1911. I very much agree that shame is ineffectual at getting people to vote for something but think that shame can prevent people from voting for something. For example I think that shaming a Trump supporter isn't likely to make them vote FOR someone else but it does, I think, have an effect to prevent them from supporting him or someone like them going forward when done correctly. That said this is not a great method and is hardly the only way to sway opinion but humans are a social species who are very capable of feel shame.... especially when that shame is justified. I voted for Obama. I feel shame for it and I'm going to try and never do something like that again.
    5
  1912. "Bernie or busters" are giving logical arguments and substantive problems with terrible candidates. What you are doing is smearing.... the irony.
    5
  1913. That or they are the type who could afford to pay thousands of dollars to be there... and then decided to boo sanders because they are rich and he would make their taxes go up.
    5
  1914. Boss regarding, "are you intentionally naming US territories." Yes. Do you really not realize I am? I've been saying for a long time that we need a sarcastic font.
    5
  1915. You had me at, " Don't watch this video." I'm not sure what that says about me.
    5
  1916. What progressive values? She was a 90s republican and still is.
    5
  1917. This is all meaningless talk before he tells you to vote for an anti-worker party.
    5
  1918.  @PixelGunZodiac  "I wouldn't call it an oligarchy" You clearly should.
    5
  1919. Nice news network fraud.
    5
  1920.  @elendil6144  Regarding, "You clearly have never read foreign news paper or watched a foreign news outlet." Idiots love making assumptions. Regarding, "In Europe..." I guess you think that they don't have an ideology or some shit. You are an idiot. I assure you they do.
    5
  1921. It's too bad bernie isn't the person FOX claims he is. He is just another sheepherder for a corrupt party.
    5
  1922. I find it very difficult to find common ground with the right and anyone who would call themselves a republican. That said I do find their is common ground in wanting to get money out of politics. We disagree on almost everything other than the fact that we both agree our politicians are corrupt and bought.
    5
  1923. I love Gabbard but let's not get ahead of ourselves and let's focus on getting Sanders the nomination.
    5
  1924. Not even good trolling.
    5
  1925. Marlon did answer your question in a way... It's because people like Marlon are stupid beyond words.
    5
  1926. Marlon are you really citing Ben Carson as evidence? Wow. Just wow.
    5
  1927. Regarding, "A successful black surgeon" He is a moron who thinks the pyramids were granaries. He is evidence of nothing but thanks for the laugh... kinda. I just wish you could make me laugh without also destroying my faith in humanity.
    5
  1928.  @beautifulworld9829  "Snake AOC" Save titles like that for actual snakes like warren. We can have disagreements about strategy without being considered snakes.
    5
  1929. Thank you for breaking free.
    5
  1930. Get out and vote in the primaries please for people like Amy and if you don't want to support dems during generals you don't have to.
    5
  1931.  @icomment2533  There is a legit debate to be had about when life begins even if I personally contend it begins when someone is born. My biggest problem with "pro-lifers" isn't that they think life begins at conception, it's that very often those "pro-lifers" support the death penalty, and/or don't support universal health care, and/or love war.
    5
  1932. Analyzing the past is never irrelevant unless you are stupid.
    5
  1933.  @alveolate  "israel has" nukes
    5
  1934. Biden said he would veto M4A if it got to his desk. No task force changes that. Never Biden.
    5
  1935. Chris isn't honest. He buried this info for months. He is complicit.
    5
  1936.  @Peopleofthesun386  Regarding, "Come back when Hunter Biden becomes UN ambassador or something like that." Is that what it takes for you to care about corruption?
    5
  1937. Joe McCarthy, is that you?
    5
  1938.  @nathanfielure4305  Regarding, " How much time did they give her?" Huh? To answer the question she directly asked? Plenty. Stop making excuses and rationalizations for her failure. In general during the entire debate, not enough in my opinion. But so fucking what. The person that I thought had the best night was Bill Fucking De Blasio, the same person who had the LEAST amount of talk time on the stage. It's not just about the time you have... it's how you used it. Tulsi shit the bed until the very end when she crushed that guy whose name I don't care about. Because reality.
    5
  1939.  @Prodigi50  Regarding, " Nobody has time to explain all these BS questions." If you think, "this is a BS question" then it takes you two fucking seconds to say, "this a BS question." Then you can offer a reason or two why you think it's a BS question with the rest of your time. The corporate media is shit and their questions are fucking terrible. But if you think just dodging their bullshit and going off on a tangent is the way to go instead of taking their shit and throwing it back in their faces is the answer just because the person dodging is on your "team" then you are part of the problem and sound way too similar to trumptards when they polish turds for their clown. I fucking love Tulsi. But show some intellectual honesty for fucks sake.
    5
  1940.  @nathanfielure4305  Regarding, " As if you cared about equal pay." If I made a list about problems I think need addressing the gender pay gap probably wouldn't make my top 100. You know what I do care about? Politicians answering the fucking questions they are given and not dodging them. That is something I care about. I suspect you do as well if you were being intellectually honest. But not right now. Right now you are defending it. Look inside yourself and try to figure out why, then make some changes.
    5
  1941.  @mrankitanks  Yang is going to be president someday. Down the future when the establishment concedes that something needs to change or their entire system and gravy train will crumble they will give us andrew yang and a regressive UBI to prop up the current system. We won't get real change, like universal health care or an increase in wages but we will all get a small bribe to keep us from picking up our pitchforks. Nevermind that yang is going to gut the current social safetey net to help pay for his UBI. Nevermind that all that UBI money will funnel to the top just like it does now make the rich even richer. The peasants will all get just enough crumbs to keep them placated. A small bribe in lieu of real change. A small bribe that will all end up in the hands of the rich anyway.
    5
  1942. Nobody cares that it works a little bit of the time except elon sycophants.
    5
  1943. "The corporate "news" media in the United States is just propaganda." I know right. And conman yang went to go work for CNN. Not that it will stop you from trusting that conman.
    5
  1944. Maybe just tattoo I'm an idiot on your forehead instead.
    5
  1945.  @missinglew  Regarding, "I'm sure she will at the exact Right time" Are you anticipating a better opportunity than the one that just passed where AOC had real power and leverage? Regarding, "She has earned it." She just voted for pelosi, betrayed you, and sold you out for NOTHING.
    5
  1946.  @bigdogonporchrun6959  You can't even spell base for fucks sake. Maybe consider the possibly you are dumb as fuck.
    5
  1947. @Jack R Regarding, "Democracy is for general elections." Is it? I thought we had the EC instead. Regarding, "This is a primary run by a private organization." A private organization that calls themselves the "democratic" party. They could use democracy. Instead they use superdelegates. You are talking about what is while I'm talking about what should be.
    5
  1948. Yup. Immigrants are just being scapegoated for being a major problem with the country so that the people who are not very smart blame them for the problems of the country rather than the real causes.
    5
  1949.  @minniemins2837  "burning down the movement" If your "movement" doesn't want to vote on m4a your "movement" is worthless and can burn for all I care. "I want M4A just as much as anyone else" I find this impossible to believe coming from anyone who simultaneously doesn't want it voted on. If you actually want m4a then you want it voted on or are too stupid to be taken seriously.
    5
  1950. @ I think you are missing my point.
    5
  1951.  @Disciple-ofChrist  Regarding, "So Trump was bluffing!" The only person we know for sure was bluffing was pelosi. She never sent a bill. Stop making excuses for her and HER inaction.
    5
  1952.  @joe.oneill  No worries. It's not like you said something that was wrong.
    5
  1953.  @dashx1103  You listen to too much propaganda from sirota rationalizing your support of evil. I legit think trump is the lesser evil. But I don't vote for evil. Period. And neither should you or anyone.
    5
  1954. Those millions are for your soul, not for failing.
    5
  1955.  @Michael_Paul585  Nope. If I were I'd vote for him. Are you materially ok with a candidate with dementia, who is a corporate tool, is racist, and is credibly accused of rape?
    5
  1956.  @theonetruelenny9883 So nothing of substance to refute the points I made? Just another biden cultist being toxic because I'm calling out their clown? Keep it up. It's like you are trying to lose.
    5
  1957. "It's more important to fund a proxy war with russia than it's important to protect babies." -bernie sanders actions
    5
  1958. I'm as far left as you can get but I liked him. He actually has principles unlike the rest of the Republican party even if I very much disagree with him on much policy.
    5
  1959. What a remarkably uncompelling "argument."
    5
  1960. JMV I'm not going to try and engage you in an intelligent conversation. I don't see the point. My dog is more likely to say something smart. Take care.
    5
  1961. Bryan regarding, "the nomination" Ultimately primary voters are going to have a say in the matter. Regarding, "the super delegates will steal it from him" The establishment is corrupt but they are not stupid. If they use superdelegates to usurp the will of the voters (like they have never done) they will ensure the downfall of the party. That isn't the purpose of superdelegates. They are there to shape the narrative of the election. They were there so that the corrupt corporate media could put up all the delegates up on the same graphics when Sanders is up pledged delegates to make it look like Hillary is crushing him and inevitable. Regarding, "I don’t see how it’s changed" Sanders was down 60 points when he entered in 2016. Now he has the name recognition of a rock star and is rightfully the most popular politician in the country. These are very important facts in a world with the corporate media is reluctant to give any one who isn't establishment the time of day but Sanders current popularity makes him impossible to ignore. Regarding, "Tom Perez..." The DNC is a dumpster fire and is going to continue to be until a progressive takes over the party. Sanders is in an ideal position to do so.
    5
  1962.  @austinhernandez2716  I was clearly not suggesting it is an important distinction.
    5
  1963. Why should you have to change? He's the one that sucks.
    5
  1964. I guess I'll take your word for it. I'm happily done with corporate media. There are much better ways to be informed that don't come with heavy doses of propaganda while "sometimes" being honest.
    5
  1965.  @wuhaninstituteofvirology  "the greatest american dissent" Isn't he that guy who thought people who don't get vaxxed should starve? I'm pretty sure he is and I'm pretty sure that makes your comment nonsensical.
    5
  1966.  @tonyclifton2230  "He co wrote manufacturing consent." Which makes him manufacturing consent for the elite all the more despicable. "Vote blue no matter who" -noam chompsky
    5
  1967. joeb regarding, "Bernie Sanders never wanted to be president...." Dude, we get it... you are dumb as fuck. There is no need to continue saying idiotic things. Seriously you are just dumb as Trump supporters.
    5
  1968.  @codyw518  While you are correct if you think I, or anyone, really cares about that you would be wrong.
    5
  1969. Give people like him more time to talk and political hacks less time to talk. Thanks.
    5
  1970.  @RyanWow65  Regarding, "Harris is progressive" LFMAO. She just voted down Bernie's proposal to cut the military by less than the raise they recently got right? Real progressive. /s
    5
  1971.  @RyanWow65  Regarding, "she’s pretty progressive bud. Quit crying." Quit being willfully stupid.
    5
  1972. @Jacket off Gym Jordan "Hitler got the most votes. How can he be terrible?" Jacket off Gym Jordan
    5
  1973. "They don't give a f about you. AT ALL!" -George carlin
    5
  1974. So now, in the face of overwhelming evidence, she comes out and says it was rigged when she should have been able to say that long ago. I'm not impressed. I think she is only progressive when it is politically convenient. She is not a leader. I do not trust her and I will not support her. Being better than a bunch of shitbags just isn't good enough for me. That said I'm glad she did admit the obvious.
    5
  1975. Bernie Sanders > all other candidates Bernie Sanders supporters > all other candidates supporters
    5
  1976. I am ashamed and embarrassed to have been a fan of hers back in the day.
    5
  1977. I gotta give this douche some credit... he is better at trolling then most.
    5
  1978.  @sirens4562  Regarding, "Why am I even wasting my time responding to these crappy bots and people anyways" I make the same mistake. I have trouble letting stupid shit go unanswered.
    5
  1979.  @twoshedsjohnson8540  Regarding, "It's survival." LMFAO. I'm the one advocating for people making enough to live on. You are impossible to take seriously. Regarding, "about the only way I survive is to raise prices to offset those costs." So raise them. I'm not going to let you have slaves to sell stuff for cheap anymore than I'm going to let you pay dirt wages that people can't live on that my tax dollars often has to end up supporting because those people don't have enough to live on. Regarding, "Do you not grasp the most basic concepts of economics?" I get it. I also get that you are a POS. Why I ever address people like you is beyond me.
    5
  1980. In Puerto Rico.
    5
  1981.  @alanbrad4564  there's more. That wasn't mayo, it was miracle whip.
    5
  1982. If only you had the internet to do some research Mark.
    5
  1983. "Revolutionary blackout" is giving actual good political commentary if anyone is tired of sam and his crews BS.
    5
  1984.  @opulentsardonicist8240  Regarding, "Allright calm down" I prefer to not try and hide my condescension. But you do you. Regarding, "yes Biden is bad," Let me guess. You are not going to advocate voting for someone you know is bad? Regarding, "it's either don't vote (keep trump) of vote for biden" There are literally infinite more options than this while you pretend otherwise. It's pretty annoying and stupid tbh. Regarding, "Sorry but I want climate change to be helped" As you advocate voting for a guy who loves fracking and will continue to advocate for it til they die? Regarding, "even 1 percent more" I'm sure you would be telling me to vote for trump saying the same stupid shit if you thought his opponent were 1 percent better. Ultimately you are clown advocating voting for terrible and using terrible reasons to do it.
    5
  1985.  @penpenultra  Regarding, "In what way do you think your advocacy for abstaining from the current system would help?" In not advocating abstaining from the system. I haven't even used the word abstain. Do you always strawman like this? Regarding, "You already stated that a Biden presidency would be better" I've said more than once that I think a trump presidency is better long term. I've also said repeatedly that this is inconsequential. Regarding, "In what way do you believe that another Trump term would be better than a Biden one?" The next 4 years are going to suck. We are going to live through a depression. At best it will be a recession. There is going to be housing crisis among lots of other big problems. It's going to suck. It's a world that requires drastic change. Joe wasn't lying when he said nothing would fundamentally change under him. And that is a recipe for disaster. It's the same formula that lead to trump. The country wanted hope and change and got nothing. They felt desperate. How desperate do you think they will be in 2024? And they will blame the "side" that controls the WH. If trump is president the country blames the "right" and we get a chance at a progressive and real change again in 2024. If biden is president the country blames the "left" and look to elect trump 2.0 in 2024. Sure things will be marginally better for 4 years. But long term I honestly prefer trump win. But this doesn't matter because I don't support evil. So don't worry, I'm not going to vote for trump for the same reasons you shouldn't vote for biden.
    5
  1986. Ryan grimm again? yuck
    5
  1987.  @bryanjs4785  Regarding, "the whole Russia-gate conspiracy" This has nothing to do with the original comment or yours. That conversation was about the last election and you are talking about the aftermath of the election. Also I'm pretty sure that fox can be said have done something very similar to this with bullshit about millions of illegals and dead people voting for hillary.
    5
  1988.  @schloops8473  What a remarkably idiotic comment. Yang and Williamson have never voted for anything because they have never held political office... that thing that anyone running for the highest political office in the land absolutely should have because experience and a record to look at to know what you are getting is important to the sane. As for Bernie's voting record it unsurprisingly isn't perfect for a person who, unlike the people you are bringing up, does have an incredibly long voting record and is human, therefor, imperfect. But if you bothered to study his entire record on the whole it paints a clear picture of a guy who has consistently been on the correct side of history and war even if not perfectly so. Your comment would have been asinine if you made it about Trump before he got into office (because he too, like the people you are propping up had no experience and no record before getting into office) and it's still asinine for the people you mention for all the same reasons. I suspect your agenda is all about trashing Sanders for the establishment using dumbass shit like this (because it's all that you have) because he clearly is a threat to the MIC specifically and the establishment generally and the people you are mentioning are not.
    5
  1989. Mark regarding, "certain defeat" I'm going to let you address your own point... "would rather lose to Republicans than see that happen." They don't care about winning. They care about maintaining the status quo and keeping the money flowing. They do not fear 3rd parties. They know they have the entire system rigged top to bottom just like the party is rigged internally. Regarding, " Dems will not allow a progressive to win" Fortunately for us it isn't only up the the establishment and primary voters have a say in the matter and there is no reason to think he won't clean house there in 2020. That is the key to getting a party worth a damn... win the nomination.
    5
  1990.  Rob Genson  We shouldn't need to explain things that are common sense. And if you don't already understand how she is raising money by fear mongering about trump I suspect you never will.
    5
  1991. glenn don't think her being his daughter is stopping him. He would still bang her if she would let him.
    5
  1992.  @Nerwesta  "we should work further to prevent them from biting humans." We don't work to educate people much less sharks in the US. But good luck with that.
    5
  1993.  @amrs6713  "I said IF it were blackmail, it was a lousy one." It was blackmail and it was a lousy one. Stay with this. It's where you make the most sense. "person knows about it?" Yes. Obviously. That's why ana wrote what she did to jimmy. To tell him she's trying to blackmail him. "nothing really happened." The attempted blackmail happened. And the reason it didn't work is because ana didn't have anything good to try and blackmail jimmy with. I've already made this point but I'll try to repeat it another way... let's say ana tried to blackmail jimmy with one of his kids at knifepoint... her attempt at blackmail might have worked. But she had lousy blackmail. It's still blackmail. Try not to lose sight of that.
    5
  1994.  @amrs6713  Ana blackmailing in quotes... "I've been holding back... that's going to change." Why is it going to change? "you run your mouth nonstop" not because you are actually a predator. That's like me saying to you... I've been holding back Amr. That is going to change. Not because of what I claim but because you are running your mouth. Both are textbook examples of blackmail. Obviously.
    5
  1995. Regarding, "nothing to do with primaries" You can't actually believe the bullshit you are saying here do you? I mean, it's not like that money may have been used in the primaries right? And this is hardly the only reason why the primary was rigged. And no I'm not going to tell you why. If you don't already know then you are too far gone. Also, I hate you.
    5
  1996. Jesus fucking Christ with you stupid ass talking points. I fucking hate you. Take your bullshit elsewhere. You make everyone dumber when you say stupid things like that.
    5
  1997. The fact that you think you have a good point is only proving that you are dumb as fuck. I hate you.
    5
  1998. Regarding, "If he runs as a democrat in 2020, wins the nomination, he will have my vote." I suspect he will and I suspect he will win but not because we will have free and fair elections but because he will be able to overcome a rigged process and tipped scales.
    5
  1999. chris regarding, "My wife keeps telling me hate is a strong word and it's not very nice." Your wife is right. It is a strong word, I do not use it often, I am not trying to be nice, but I think it is appropriate here. I can't respect and tolerate people perpetuating the myth that it was fair.
    5
  2000. Regarding, "there can never be unity without trust" Agreed. I am not interested in unity anymore than they are but at least I'm honest about it. I'm interested in taking over the party and kicking the corporate dems out on their ass. Then they can go join the Republican party for all I care. It is where they belong.
    5
  2001.  @volourn9764  "no proof otherwise" "Bush wins, Gore wins -- depending on how ballots are added up" In the age of information ignorance like yours is a choice.
    5
  2002. I think you are missing the point.
    5
  2003. Downtown if you actually believe that bullshit then you are stupid.
    5
  2004. @ Did you vote for biden and harris like chris and MSNBC told you to?
    5
  2005.  @davidiihouston6883  You support a political party that armed and supported jennnnyyside (sic).
    5
  2006.  @davidiihouston6883  You are complicit too for who you supported and what they did with that power... just not nearly as much as chris hayes is.
    5
  2007.  @davidiihouston6883  Gaza looks like LA because of the people you voted for.
    5
  2008. @ LA looks like LA because of the people you voted for.
    5
  2009.  @strongfoot2009  Reefer madness here I come!
    5
  2010. As much as the "democratic" party should die I just don't see it happening anytime soon. I think our best hope is that we elect a progressive like Sanders as a dem so that he can reform the party from the inside.
    5
  2011.  C W  Regarding, "enjoy 4 more years of Trump" Are you under the impress I enjoy Trump or some shit? But feel free to ignore the reasoning I offered and do this stupid shit. Thanks for moving on after taking a big shit and leaving it on the floor.
    5
  2012.  @journeyon1983  and D Wonders. We should be focusing on the top of the ticket to make Sanders the nominee which is exactly what neither Gabbard nor Warren are doing at the moment. They are both doing the opposite, putting themselves ahead of the good of the country, and actively working to make it less likely Sanders wins the nomination. Which is why, if I were going to talk about the bottom of the ticket (even thou, according to me this is a bad idea, but hypothetically speaking), Nina Turner, a person not opposing him would be a far superior choice to either Gabbard or Warren as of right now. But again, and please take this to heart... focus on making Sanders the nominee and forget about who should be his running mate. He can be trusted to pick someone good and he will... assuming we can overcome the rigged "democratic" primary and avoid splitting the progressive vote to the benefit of the establishment.
    5
  2013.    Regarding, " Have I attempted to smear him?" Your agenda is all about getting people away from Bernie and by using terrible and illogical ways of doing it. I'd go back and give you some of the idiotic things you've said in that really long thread but you I do not think you are an honest enough actor for me to bother. Regarding, "You're losing it kid, see " Or don't paid shill." Who gets paid for posting in the YouTube comments?" Hillary Clinton's "correct the record" was but one group of many whose purpose is just that. Bots and paid shills are common practice nowadays sadly.
    5
  2014.  proud American  You are impossible to take seriously.
    5
  2015.    Regarding, " I thought Sanders supporters where about the truth not conspiracy theories." Correct the record and others like them aren't a "conspiracy theory" it's fact. Regarding, "You seem paranoid like a trump supporter." You like to say I'm just like a trump supporter. Which is pretty funny coming from someone as dumb as trump supporters.
    5
  2016.    Because I waste too much of my time addressing you. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Correct_the_Record
    5
  2017.  @aaronlampkin284  I'm not a "commie" and neither is Sanders Joe McCarthy.
    5
  2018.  @Gnolomweb  Regarding, " I take it you're a Trump supporter." I take you are being paid to say such nonsense.
    5
  2019.    Regarding, " You shouldn't believe everything you see or hear on the internet." You really prove your point by existing and saying bullshit on the internet constantly.
    5
  2020.    Again, doing a shitty job of smearing Sanders. All you do is lie and cry like the pathetic troll you are.
    5
  2021. Nik M for the record I thought it was easy to identify as sarcasm. I've been saying this for a long time now. WE NEED A SARCASTIC FONT!
    5
  2022. Market Liberal regarding, "meduicare costs 1.1 Trillion a year and covers 44 million people, for it to cover 325 million people would coat 8.1 Trillion" Wow are you a simpleton. It must be nice to think it is that simple. Canada spends about 10% of their GDP for their health care system but it will cost the US 40% because of idiotic math. Do you really need me to tell you why your math is stupid? I would just do it but considering the fact I don't think you will be swayed by intelligent arguments I'm not really looking to invest the time.
    5
  2023. Kurt regarding, "If you need factual numbers for arguments sake" I don't think Market Liberal is the type to be swayed by facts, reason, or numbers but thank you for the link.
    5
  2024. TheZodiacz regarding, "great display of state approved divisiveness there Clint. You should be paid as a social media agent." Sorry if the truth hurts. Would it have been better had I added that all corporate media, Hillary Clinton, and both major parties are all garbage? Would that not have offended your delicate sensibilities?
    5
  2025.  @RobertHo987  Fair enough.
    5
  2026. Hillary Clinton in blackface would have been the worst. But Harris isn't far behind.
    5
  2027. A day late as always when it comes to Warren. Fuck her and her support for the 700 billion dollar per year budget for the department of offense.
    5
  2028. I agree with this but think it should be expanded to include all public servants like police officers. They work for us. Or at least they should be.
    5
  2029. Harry Mann is absolutely a troll... and a particularly terrible one at that.
    5
  2030. 1:05 "Being the party hack that I am I'm willing to give the president more of the benefit of the doubt than he deserves." Or at least that is what it sounded like to me.
    5
  2031.  @T.H.E.O.2024  You destroy my faith in humanity.
    5
  2032. Ana: trying to commit blackmail. Kyle: nothing to see here or comment on.
    5
  2033. @Dileon Regarding, "you realize any arbitrary grouping of people is gonna have bad apples" No. Had no clue. Thanks captain obvious. Regarding, "If you cared about the facts of this issue, you could make a case for institutions hurting communities, but not individuals." As if I don't care about the facts or some shit? Facts like, the US, aka the "land of the free" imprisons more of it's citizens by total and by percentage of population and it isn't even close. Also, the notion that "individuals" committing murder and the institutions that protect them are independent of one another is beyond absurd.
    5
  2034. @Derya Alkan Actually you are missing my point. You can't ACCELERATE something that is going as fast as it already can.
    5
  2035. @Derya Alkan Regarding, "There's absolutely nothing out there to suggest that automation is accelerating as "fast as it already can", considering that's a completely subjective point." Sure there is. It's called reality. And in it the walmarts of the world are already trying to make people check their own shit out, and truck drivers jobs are already looking to be replaced. These major corporations aren't holding back to automate and to suggest otherwise makes me think you have your head up yangs ass.
    5
  2036. The video wasn't the problem, it was kyle's bullshit. The mask is off.
    5
  2037. No. It really isn't difficult to recognize bullshit. It was a fucking vote. It isn't hard to learn the truth about it if you actually care about the truth. And if I get pissed it is because there is a concerted effort to mislead people about facts in our society and I have no tolerance for it. We get to have our own opinions. We don't get to have our own facts.
    5
  2038. Regarding, "He still supported Hillary." When entering the "democratic" primary he agreed to endorse the winner of the primary. He fulfilled his promise in a straight up no win situation. He endorsed her and still team Hillary tries to blame him for her losing. The only reason those attacks are ineffective is because he bit the bullet and endorsed her. Had he not done so he would have been effectively blamed from Trump winning. Not only would I not want to be blamed for president Trump but it would have crushed his ability to push policy going forward. The movement he started would have suffered a devastating blow. But if you really want to piss and moan about a fucking endorsement you go ahead. I fucking love Sanders but I voted for Jill Stein because only sheep vote based on someone else's endorsement.
    5
  2039.  @soulofhawk1742  If they aren't going to answer a real question does it really matter? As jimmy points out it really says something about AOC and the squad that they won't answer questions. That's about all we can hope for... exposing frauds like this.
    5
  2040.  Sir Panda  Bernie is our best hope in my opinion and I am a diehard supporter of his but it is again worth mentioning Tulsi. She is excellent on this specific issue and arguably better than Sanders on the topic of war. I try to avoid talking about the bottom of the ticket and first and foremost want to make Sanders the nominee but between you and me, specifically because of the topic of war/peace, I dream about Sanders/Tulsi winning in 2020. Let's give peace a chance.
    5
  2041.  @k.doolittle2473  "Grog" is complicit in war crimes too... just not as much as blinken.
    5
  2042. "Why would they want to get more done for the people, than the Republicans?" Dems job is to give the peasants just enough crumbs to stop them from picking up their pitchforks. They are still evil.
    5
  2043. Why do TYT fans have nothing other than smears and are unable to address anything of substance? Maybe too dumb? Ignorant? Intellectually dishonest? All of the above?
    5
  2044. Of course he did. This is the same election where he was getting away with lies that helped cause him to drop out in 1988. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AKCJ45QMyLU
    5
  2045.  @fwdcnorac8574  I avoid them like plague personally. I don't get why your response is here. It's not like I'm telling people to watch them.
    5
  2046. You make flat earthers look smart.
    5
  2047. Degrees from Trump university don't count.
    5
  2048.  @fathialjack2009  oh... and there are lots of other good reasons... for example running as a 3rd party candidate eliminates any ability of Sanders to reform the "democratic" party from the inside which is desperately needed. Winning as a dem is hitting 2 birds with one stone. You get Sanders in office and you get to reform the party from the inside. And then there is the fact that winning as a 3rd party candidate ensures both major parties oppose everything he does. Don't get me wrong corporate dems will oppose him as a dem but they would be forced to work with him in ways they absolutely wouldn't do as an independent. Do you need more reasons? Because those should already be waaaaaaaaaaaaay more then enough to retire this stupid talking point.
    5
  2049.  @contraband100  regarding, "ranked choice voting" Yup. I fucking love it. There is a reason both major political parties oppose it. Dems love to sit there and whine and bitch about spoilers when they lose. They still piss on Nader as if he was the reason Gore lost. But they don't really give a fuck about the spoiler effect or they would support ranked choice voting. But they don't... for rather obvious reasons. And the EC needs to go as well. It takes a system that is good as it gets where everyones vote is equal and fucks it up by making some votes incredibly meaningful and other votes totally fucking meaningless. And before some dipshit comes in to cry about how without the EC only a small group of people would be controlling elections (which absolutely isn't true), I'll point out that that shit happens with the EC. With the EC we are controlled by the handful of people living in swing states while the rest of the country may as well stay home.
    5
  2050. First to call fetterman hman garbage!
    5
  2051. Bullshit. Superdelegates were used to change the narrative of the election. That is why over 400 delegates came out to support Hillary before the election even started. They wanted to make her winning seem inevitable. Even after Sanders was up in pledged delegates early, when the corporate media put the delegate totals up they would use all delegates to leave the impression that she was fucking crushing him. Fuck you for pushing your bullshit. I'm sure you know better and are just full of shit.
    5
  2052. I will never forgive her for role in rigging the primary even if I am happy she is coming out with the information she has as of late.
    5
  2053.  @sirfortesque8757  Regarding, "do u really think the average non political junkie is going to hold the Dems accountable" I don't let people who don't really know what's going on dictate my actions. I'm going to hold them accountable. Period.
    5
  2054.  @ish7957  Regarding, "Homeboy has a point" He has defeatism, nothing more. Regarding, "Well those average non political junkie people out number us." Even non political junkies should have a certain amount of understanding that, for example, our health care system is broken. Trump was our last president. Biden is going to be our next one. I understand our government sucks and the people voting are idiots. But stop acting like that is a logical reason to not fight the good fight because it's not.
    5
  2055.  @rockn997  Her lawyers would tell you it's not a news program. They get that one thing right at least.
    5
  2056. Free Palestine
    5
  2057. How could you? None of this was tested.
    5
  2058. Thanks for that. I was worried some have just been corrupt or bad people.
    5
  2059. This started in 1948. Or before then with z'ism.
    5
  2060. This is just a reminder that dave was a sheepherder for trump.
    5
  2061. I would like to say fuck you to anyone this doesn't bother.
    5
  2062. Aaaand it's gone. Or was this sarcasm?
    5
  2063.  @kylezheng8807  "Its actually potentially fraud" Only when the peasants do it. When the rich did it it was fine.
    5
  2064.  @kylezheng8807  Stop bootlicking for billionaires who had a bad day for once in their lives.
    5
  2065. People need to realize that words are merely a tool we use to convey information.
    5
  2066. Regarding, "no its sound like your" Well done on jam packing so much stupid in so few words. Regarding, "liking his own comments" I don't normally do that but I did give my reply a thumbs up after your newest idiotic response. I figure since you think I'm already guilty of it I may as well do it. Good luck with the whole dumb as fuck thing you got going on.
    5
  2067. You sound like a troll who is trying too hard Mario. For that reason I'm done addressing you further after this. And that is me giving you the benefit of the doubt. If you really don't understand that I have made an argument and you are just an idiot doubling down on stupid that says even less of you and your intelligence. Ultimately it doesn't matter. Either way you are an idiot unworthy of intelligent response.
    5
  2068.  @dukekenny9340  Huh? Maybe add some punctuation and be coherent if you want to be understood. If you have a point it's lost on me.
    5
  2069. Because clearly you are opposed to generalizations am I right? Do you at least realize you are a hypocrite? I'm betting the house you don't.
    5
  2070.  @65minimom  regarding, "I am frustrated with those of you who are looking for a Savior" I am frustrated with those of you who use strawman arguments as an excuse to say silly things. Have I said anything even remotely resembling something akin to I am looking for a savior? So how exactly do you justify your comment? FYI this is rhetorical as I really don't care how you want to try and rationalize what you are doing. Regarding, "WTF have you done? Have you knocked on doors? made calls? joined a local group?" You can't seriously be asking for personal information in this forum can you? I can say literally anything to you but I'm not going to because 1) I value my privacy 2) I have nothing to prove to an anonymous youtube user 3) You have no way of knowing if what I'm saying is true which makes your question and my answer pointless. Stick to the things that can be independently proven and stop trying to make it about me. Regarding, "All you want is for him to do more!" I don't think I'm alone in this. I am confident Sanders wants to do more and will be running for President. If and when he does he deserves our support. If he decides not to run, and I see no good reason to think he won't, then I will find someone else who shares my values to support. Regarding, "It is time for young people to take a turn!" Nobody who is sane cares about age. There is no reason to think he can't do the job. If anything I actually like that he has a long record because that long record is a way of knowing exactly what we would be getting with Sanders as President. Do the young people who support Sanders count? Because they tend to love him, support him, and want him as their next President.
    5
  2071. Rachel Maddow happily lied about Sanders, his supporters, and his campaign during the election. She does the establishment bidding. She is a sell out and I have no interest in listening to her.
    5
  2072. What do I know. I'm part of the problem. I voted for Jill Stein during the election and Maddow rightfully blames me for Trump. Not Trump supporters. Not the DNC for rigging the primary. Not Hillary Clinton for sucking. Not the millions who didn't vote. It was my fault. I'm stupid so please forgive me.
    5
  2073.  @randomdude2832  You have advanced my sarcastic font research considerably. Thank you.
    5
  2074.  @lynnrussell467  And I'm of the opinion that corporate dems have no place in the party. That's why they will never get my vote, including biden.
    5
  2075. Let them run him. Nobody will vote for him.
    4
  2076. Meh. I'll support the DNC in 4 years if it is Bernie or another true progressive at the helm. If they install Tim Kaine I will vote Green again.
    4
  2077. Regarding, "he seems super cool" Spoiler alert. He's not. Even if he was right on this.
    4
  2078. I'm with her. Jill Stein that is! A woman who would actually make a good President.
    4
  2079. How about you get a longer attention span?
    4
  2080. Any chance you could care about people dying from drugs and not want to lock them up?
    4
  2081. NYC regarding, "it's likely." You cannot possibly be this delusional without being paid to say such stupid things. I refuse to believe you are actually this dumb. You must just be a person with no ethics or morals being paid to say dumb things. I was also wondering what happened to your post yesterday where you were saying dumb things even by your standard? I was enjoying the laugh at your expense.
    4
  2082. Joshua regarding, "i think it was a joke" So do I but honestly how am I suppose to know? I have been called a sexist bernie bro many, many times when I know for sure they were not joking. Either way I like giving Hillary supporters shit and calling them anti-semites for a little payback for their baseless smears.
    4
  2083. Same. I can't tell you how betrayed I feel by the "democratic" party for the support I have given them in the past. I guess the silver lining is that a few people like us won't be making that mistake again anytime soon.
    4
  2084. NYC regarding, "Every single person that resorts to such foolish "paid troll" claims is a mindless zombie incapable of coming up with their own substantive points." The paid troll comment is in fact a substantive point in an and of itself. The point of the comment is that Hillary, David Brock, and "Correct the Record" are spending millions of dollars paying people to troll the internet because the queen doesn't have enough actual support without paying for it. It also points out that Hillary has zero ethics or she would avoid the practice. If you missed those points it was only because you are an idiot. Regarding, "Oh, and I more than rebutted the mental gymnastics played by the others by using the facts." Lol. If you say so. I give you credit for responding even after choosing to respond to me first, but the fact of the matter is that Midnight hit the nail on the head with his comment. You are talking words completely out of context and twisting their meaning so much only you think you have a point.
    4
  2085. NYC regarding, "He rationalized the attacking of France as justified..." In the same article by Baraka, "However, let me be clear, my critique of the moral hypocrisy of the West should not be read as a rationalization for the horrific crimes committed in Paris a few days ago." I guess that wasn't clear enough for you though. Maybe he should have used smaller words to say this so you might have been able to understand.
    4
  2086. NYC regarding, "Baraka speaks out of both sides of his mouth." You clearly know what you are talking about regarding people who speak out of both sides of their mouth. Still you manage to be wrong. Regarding, "you're more than free to buy into that bullshit if you wish." I sure as hell am not buying your bullshit. Regarding, "I don't expect much more from someone that's also trying to play mental games for the justification of blindly labeling people as paid trolls without a hint of substantive evidence." It wasn't exactly a blind label. I was using your stupid words as evidence. I gave you credit for not actually being so dumb and suspected you might only being saying completely misleading statements because you being paid to do so. I didn't even say with any sort of definiteness that you were a troll. I only said I suspected it was possible. If you aren't actually a paid troll I kind of pity you for simply being an idiot.
    4
  2087. Regarding, "is there any leaders from those countries listed that you might not trust with a nuclear weapon?" All of them.
    4
  2088. Cosmo Kramer
    4
  2089. Ps regarding, "only polling at 2%" Jill is lucky if she is even offered as an option. There is also a big difference between asking the question, "who do you want to win the Presidency?" and "who do you plan to vote for?" Pollsters know this and use this to get the answers they want. That said I don't even care what polls say, at least not in this election. I would consider being strategic with my vote if there were actually more than one candidate I thought was good enough to be voted for. Considering Jill Stein is the only candidate running I actually want to win there really is no choice for me this election.
    4
  2090. Thank you for taking a stand against this BS and trying to do something about it.
    4
  2091. Number one Nader is not responsible for Gore losing. Stop believing all the BS you hear. http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/12/6/1260721/-The-Nader-Myth Number two you are an idiot to suggest that progressives don't care about harming others. Number three there are so many other issues that make Hillary completely unacceptable other than just fracking. Number four I can make an excellent case as to why Hillary is in fact worse than Trump. I am not going to because number one I don't like defending Trump and number two I don't really care who is worse... both are completely unacceptable and neither is worthy of votes. Number five the only vote that is a wasted vote is a vote for a candidate that does not represent you, your policy positions, your priorities, and your ethics. Number six why did you stop counting at three when you tried to make more than 3 points? Is that only as high as you could count? Number seven despite your BS claim I do not only have two possible choices for president. Number eight I will not be responsible if Trump wins. If Trump wins it will be because of 1 Trump voters, 2 Hillary for sucking so bad she couldn't beat Trump, 3 the DNC for rigging the primary. Number nine nevermind, I've already wasted enough time on you already. You are lost cause who is completely brainwashed. Good luck with Hillary. If you are lucky she and DWS can rig the general for you like they rigged the primary.
    4
  2092. Good luck with the red pill. It isn't easy to swallow but it is the truth.
    4
  2093. Homo regarding, "you are pretty stpuid." Thanks for the laugh. Regarding, "you respond as if I told you to fuck off." I was rude as fuck in my original response. I am understandably frustrated with the state of politics. There is a lot of BS floating around and I'm tired of it. For example, Hillary Clinton's superpac "Correct the Record" is using millions of dollars from her corporate sponsors to lie on behalf the queen. It is tiresome and frustrating. My response after that was not, in any way, meant to be rude or to tell you to fuck off. I was trying to enlighten you to the truth and I used a quote from the Matrix that I think is far too appropriate for the situation. I encourage you to ignore the fact that I am rude and kind of a dick, look at the material and address it. Don't blame the messenger the way Hillary is doing to Russia and look at the facts.
    4
  2094. I thought the "democratic" party's losing to Trump would have done more to help them wake the fuck up and do more to bring about much needed change in the party. I might have underestimated their ability to make excuses for their mistakes.
    4
  2095. Ras144. No. The story needs to be how the DNC doesn't listen to the people. Not that the people are violent and not worth listening to.
    4
  2096. I guarantee that if these people had assault weapons they would be slaughtered. That is only an option for white people.
    4
  2097. slippy regarding, "do you believe that cops would open fire on them?" I think the cops are just looking for an excuse to escalate the situation and that they would not hesitate to open fire if they feel they have an excuse to. I think the DAPL security guard that came out with a gun was an effort to give the cops an excuse to do just that and I wouldn't put it past some of the police to have known about him and what he was doing as he was doing it. Again, that white guy with a gun got off without charges because there are different rules for different people. Regarding, "I don't believe the protectors would fire unless fired upon." I would trust the protectors with guns more than I trust the police with them but as soon as the cops see anyone with a gun things would get out of hand quicker than is already happening.
    4
  2098. Intelligent minds think otherwise.
    4
  2099. Bushdoctor. I think of it as an oligarchy personally when I bother to label it. That said I generally don't care about labels but whatever label you want to call it I think we can all agree it is fucked up.
    4
  2100. Fuck that. I won't go down without a fight like you. I will be voting 3rd party and voting for Jill Stein. If we are ever going to do better than a broken two party system 3rd party candidates need support.
    4
  2101. Except he didn't. We get to have our own opinions. We don't get to have our own facts.
    4
  2102. Lori regarding, "I'm shocked more Americans aren't trying to hold the DNC accountable for that." Think Americans were. That is how a complete POS like Trump was allowed to win the general. Regarding, "Instead of blaming him for HRC's loss." I think you are talking more about corporate media talking heads than the public.
    4
  2103. Do you know what it says about you that you think their coverage is garbage but you still spend all your time here? It says you are either being paid to be here or you are completely insane. I think you must be being paid to be here.
    4
  2104. Being a soldier, like being a cop, is suppose to be dangerous. You don't get to just kill people indiscriminately or else you are no better than the people you are trying to "kill them all."
    4
  2105. Regarding, "the way the cop is acting that he did not want to shoot the guy." The fact that he shot him multiple times seems to suggest otherwise.
    4
  2106. She is on my shit list at the moment. Had she endorsed Sanders early this election cycle things might have gone much differently.
    4
  2107. Pat regarding, "we would have been in world war III with Hillary" I do not agree with this. I think that under Hillary the military industrialized complex would march on but, for example, I do not think she would have started WW3 with Russia in the end. That simply would not serve the interests of the elites in the long run. That said I was never going to vote for Hillary in part because of her stance on war and peace. Regarding, "We are better off" We shall see. Time will tell. I think these next 4 years are really going to suck but I think they are necessary so that we can get some real change for the better afterward. I never thought we would have a black President in my lifetime. Especially not one named Barack Hussein Obama but he won because of his promise of hope and change that the country desperately crazed. Unfortunately the military industrialized complex continued, money in politics stayed, his signature piece of legislation was a Republican policy, BS in ND was turned a blind eye to, the most corrupt option available was named to succeed him, and instead, not surprisingly people voted for change again. Even terrifying change. Trump is going to suck but he too will lead to backlash and change after him. Hopefully the democratic party offer a real option and not just lip service to the issues of the people.
    4
  2108. Pat regarding, "She turned me off" I agree. Warren is on my shit list as well. Had she endorsed Bernie this election cycle might have gone very differently. Regarding, "Lets build the Green Party" I am still going to hope and try to reform the "democratic" party. If they don't change I will continue to vote for the Green Party going forward.
    4
  2109. NYC why am I not surprised to find you saying stupid things? I guess it is because you only say stupid things. Regarding, "Point being, the "protesters" have shot themselves in their foots thanks to the acts of a few, and have nobody to cry to about it but themselves." Imagine if you held the police to the same type of scrutiny that you held the protesters to. If you did you and were intellectually honest you would have to also say, "The police have shot themselves in their foots thanks to the acts of a few, and have nobody to cry to about it but themselves." You of course would never say such a thing because to you the truth doesn't matter. You just want to paint the picture you saw months ago when nycnostradomis saw the future. You talk about these people as if you haven't watched the video and or are just seeing what you want to see. It doesn't matter how many times they talk about peaceful protest you will call them violent protestors. It doesn't matter if none of the people have not done anything of what you accuse them of... others did so fuck these people right?
    4
  2110. pidgeon regarding, "Hillary should have actually paid attention to those other States." This isn't about Hillary. This isn't about trying to help one side. I don't care how it affects your "team." I'm glad Hillary isn't going to be President but that doesn't mean I think we should have an unjust system in place. Regarding, "The electoral college is not the problem." Actually it is the problem when it allows someone who gets less votes to win.
    4
  2111. Mimi regarding, "Electoral College has a good side too" Your idea of a good side is simply to have people's votes not count equally and you are going to use terrible arguments to justify this terrible position. Regarding, "if we decide winner based on who got the most votes then that means every time populous area like LA/NYC get to pick the next POTUS." No. They don't. Unless they have more people in those 2 cities than the rest of the country combined. Regarding, "The issues that farmers in Iowa etc. have wont be reflected at all." Sure they will. But the farmer won't have more say than any other American like they do now. You also ignore the fact that currently the largest states in the union have essentially meaningless votes. But you are cool with that. Regarding, "and it's a bit unfair." No. What's unfair is you thinking their votes shouldn't count as much as yours. Regarding, "open primary, campaign finance system, automatic registration, rank choice system" I agree with all this but try to stay on topic.
    4
  2112. Britney regarding, "Gore asked for a recount inmediately." And still he didn't exactly get it. The election is not ancient history but you are talking about it as if it is. There is a process that needs to be gone through to request recounts. There are rules in place. They are being followed. I'm not sure what your problem is. I can't seem to reply so let's hope I can edit. Britney regarding, "It doesn't take 3 weeks to ask for a recount..." They literally are just getting done counting all the votes in some places. Michigan only certified their results a few days ago. The popular vote margin of difference was changing for a reason. Some of the rules requiring a recount say the person requesting it needs to be able to pay for the recount to be done. That means raising millions of dollars. They are essentially doing it as soon as possible. Again, there are rules and they are being followed. That should be enough for you and I fail to understand why it isn't. I just saw an article saying Hillary's lead in the popular vote has reached 2.3 million because they are only getting done counting votes the first time. You are being silly to think that people should have figured out the morning after that recounts were necessary.
    4
  2113. I think history will be kind to him. Not because he did a good job but because he has the luxury of being sandwiched between arguably the two worst presidents in the history of our nation.
    4
  2114. "How are you going to convince the existing resistance of your views?" By talking about the real problems facing Americans. By talking about the issues the 2 major parties refuse to talk about. By educating the public. Admittedly this is an uphill battle when our major media is pure garbage. You won't see them giving her this type of forum to address the issues. You will see them smearing her for complete BS thou.
    4
  2115. He used the floor to ask questions. So you have a problem with Cenk answering his questions?
    4
  2116. Stack regarding, "I wonder what their pay is though." I too wonder what it exactly like. Are they all sitting in cubicles in an office building? Are they outsourced to other countries? Are they Hillary superfans sitting at home on their computers? Regardless they are despicable human beings who really should be doing something better with their life rather than lying to people for a living.
    4
  2117. BBluewood. She is a liar. She is corrupt. She is not genuine. She is everything I hate about government, our politicians, and our political system. Why do you like her?
    4
  2118. Technocrat regarding, "lost the primary"? You mean, along with the DNC, stole the primary. There is a pretty big difference between the two. I can handle losing. I have a hard time being cheated. http://alexanderhiggins.com/stanford-berkley-study-1-77-billion-chance-hillary-won-primary-without-widespread-election-fraud/
    4
  2119. What does that say about you if you think that AND you are here?
    4
  2120. You don't seem to be showing them any respect. That is still probably too much. That was how much respect they deserved before hiring Lewandowski. Now they are worthy of contempt, hate, and despise.
    4
  2121. Estivel regarding, "I think she's still honest and a progressive" I don't. There is no way honest, true progressives didn't support Bernie and don't support the water protectors. Regarding, "I'm just concern about Bernie's age at 2020" I don't care about age. I care about policy. Regarding, "I don't know if he's gonna have the strength to run again." Bernie doesn't even know this at the moment. Time will tell. I suspect he will. If he does I will support him. If he doesn't I will not support Warren. Regarding, "Warren has been a warrior against those people at wall street." Not much to show for it even if I agree. I want a jack of all trades. I want someone who is right about everything not someone who only operates in a niche.
    4
  2122. Mareepu regarding, "I'm not personally bothered by labels, but unfortunately, others are," I understand your point and arguably you are very correct. One of the problems I thought Bernie Sanders faced during the primary was the fact that he has labeled himself an independent all his life. If he had just called himself a democrat all these years I think there is a decent number of people who would supported him but considered themselves democrats, are swayed by labels, and would only vote for another "pure" democrat. I like the Green label in that it does emphasize a couple important issues that are considered a high priority by the party. 1) Climate change. Anyone who doesn't believe climate change is real and influenced by man isn't going to be looking to join the party anyway so I think this is a legit description. Furthermore it differentiates them from Republicans who are pure anti-science and corporate Democrats who support fracking. 2) End the war on drugs. People are waking up to the fact that America is not really the "land of the free" when MJ is illegal and we imprison so much of our population. Again there is great difference with the fake left when Hillary loves collecting her donations from for profit prisons. I can see your point that maybe re-branding might do the party good but ultimately I think the problem is the fact that Americans are not very educated when it comes to politics and political parties. But in their defense our terrible media does little to really educate the public.
    4
  2123. I guess they don't want my vote.
    4
  2124. Ell regarding, "Hillary needs to step down." Don't hold your breathe. I believe the chances of Mexico paying for Trump's wall has better chance of happening than this.
    4
  2125. Fusion regarding, "You, like Jimmy, have a complete irrational hatred of Clinton." Rationale I have for hating Clinton... She voted for the Iraq war. As a result approximately a million people have lost their lives. She supported mass incarceration ("superpredetor" problem). As a result America imprisons more of it's people by percentage of population than countries you consider to not be free. She worked to gut welfare. As a result children would go to bed starving because of her. I can go on. Would you like me to? There are lots more facts you seem to not know. I assure you the only one being irrational is you.
    4
  2126. Yup. Sad but true.
    4
  2127. Or Trump.
    4
  2128. Zeroman you are disgusting and a disgrace to the human race.
    4
  2129. The constitution says otherwise.
    4
  2130. Raul regarding, "and privatizing all education" Again, he would be President, not dictator. He couldn't do that on his own even if he is very wrong on the issue.
    4
  2131. Fuck the military industrialized complex and the DNC that supports them. Join the Green party and vote for real change.
    4
  2132. ernsala regarding, "trump is not that bad" Remember when ISIS said, "you have to take out their families" Wait, that wasn't ISIS. It just sounds like something ISIS would say. That was actually Trump saying the United States should commit war crimes. He is also in favor of waterboarding so at least he is consistently in favor of the US committing war crimes. I guess what I am saying is pull your head out of your arce.... Trump is that bad.
    4
  2133. Stelio nailed it. Obama was the best Republican president. He passed the best idea Republicans have ever come up with Romneycare nationwide. Of course a progressive policy like single payer or a public option would have been far, far superior but as far as Republican ideas go that was as good as it gets.
    4
  2134. Matt Santos regarding, "Why do you libs assume Hillary is Republican" We know "Goldwater Girl" Hillary is a Republican because of her policy positions, and I'm not talking and don't care about distractions such as who can use what bathroom.
    4
  2135. I'm Hers regarding, "the drone program" There is a compelling case to be made about using drones rather than putting soldiers lives at risk. I feel conflicted about the topic. The country in general needs to have a debate and discussion about drones and how they should be used. This is a discussion we have never bothered to talk about or write laws about because the public and corporate media prefer not to talk about hard issues like this. Ideally this is the type of thing we would discuss before using them. Sadly we don't.
    4
  2136. Williams regarding, "The sellout commie who endorsed the establishment candidate after stealing 200M dollars from his supporters. What a crook." So much jam packed stupid. Terms you are using wrong include, "sellout," "commie," "stealing," and "crook." Damn you are not smart. My dog has more understanding of the English language than you. The only thing you got correct was that he endorsed the establishment candidate. Your comment could only be dumber if you repeated it and wrote it in all caps. At least it isn't in all caps I guess.
    4
  2137. YuRM regarding, "just because u keep saying so, doesn't make it true." Again, sweet irony. Put up your bullshit "evidence." I could use a good laugh.
    4
  2138. noly there is plenty of blame to go around including lots of blame for Obama and it has nothing to do with him being black. You are a joke.
    4
  2139. DWS is as ugly on the outside as she is on the inside and that is really saying something.
    4
  2140. "Double fisted jerk off." I'm going to have to start using that.
    4
  2141. Marc Jones please don't. Write in ballots are essentially discarded. Even if they weren't, actually running for President should be a prerequisite for getting your vote. Jill Stein is essentially Bernie Sanders when it comes to policy and priorities and that is what is really important. 3rd party candidates need our support if we are ever going to do better than a broken 2 party system.
    4
  2142. I've consider that to be a possibility as well. Here's the thing, even if they try to push the pipeline through later they will need to have done the environmental impact study that they should have done before laying any pipe. That is part of the deal and that is part of what the Army Corps says it needs. That can't be done overnight and it can't look good when completed.
    4
  2143. Bob regarding, "I think you and the rest of the keyboard clown jockeys in here" Hypocrite much? Regarding, "Is that crickets I hear?" No. Don't be afraid to give an opportunity to respond before jumping to your preconceived notions. The first step in solving any problem is admitting there is a problem. Social media is one way of talking about and addressing problems. No problem is ever solved without awareness. Regarding, "keyboard jockey" What are you exactly? Other than a hypocrite? Regarding, "clown," and "bag of hot air," Again I find this funny coming from you. Thank you for the laugh. They are needed in sad times. Regarding, "conspiracy theories" I was called a conspiracy theorist for saying the DNC was rigging the game. Wikileaks proved me right because some conspiracy theories are true. What you are doing is being disparaging to suggest that the idea of a conspiracy theory is to be dismissed off hand. That is at least as dumb and inaccurate as thinking all conspiracy theories are true. Regarding, "Breitbart" Just insults with nothing of substance to back it up. I think Breitbart sucks. You know what I don't do? Go there and talk shit. If you believe the BS you are saying what does that say about you that you are here?
    4
  2144. Regarding, "you kept calling Hillary corrupt" Um. She is corrupt. I'm sorry if the truth was inconvenient to you.
    4
  2145. Bob regarding, "The reality is that one of those two IS going to win." Because of morons and sheep like you supporting complete pieces of shit. No because of me. Regarding, "I know what my priority is." Certainly not supporting an ethical candidate or someone who actually deserves your vote. We can agree to disagree.
    4
  2146. Bob Regarding, "you can feel good about voting for an ethical candidate" I do. I wonder how you can sleep at night knowing you are supporting a corrupt POS. Regarding, "US Supreme Court full of right wing judges who'll ensure that money talks." If the SC is as important to the "democratic" party as you claim then democrats should block Scalia type justices the way republicans are doing this very second. The democrats can demand centrists like Garland and block everyone else. The candidate you support has floated the idea of putting a Texas Republican on the court. Nevermind all that though. Just give your BS talking points and supporting dogshit.
    4
  2147. Erik regarding, "You have just as much chance of being a paid troll as I do." No. I don't. Jill Stein doesn't have a superpac spreading lies. Regarding, "As far as I know, you're a paid Trump plant who is pushing for Stein to keep people from voting against Hillary." Trump shills don't talk shit about Trump like I do. Pull you head out of Hillary's ass. Regarding, "In the end, look at what I've said." I have unfortunately. I think I'm dumber because of it. Regarding, "Good luck with that." Thanks. Go fuck off and let me be irrelevant then.
    4
  2148. What Trump said was not true.
    4
  2149. The source matters and they are proven frauds.
    4
  2150. No they want to win more than anything. Hillary would sell her soul to win. The problem, as you point out, is that they are incompetent, in addition to being corrupt.
    4
  2151. There is also the media blackout of Jill Stein coverage... other than the occasional smear job.
    4
  2152. Ward regarding, "Hillary" Hillary only fooled the blindest of the blind. Or some supported her because they feared Trump. The people are learning otherwise she would have won. The politicians and elites of the "democratic" party, not so much.
    4
  2153. Ozy regarding, "Obama has been a crook his entire political career," Obama was one of the few to vote against the moronic war in Iraq. He spoke out against torturing people. He talked about closing Gitmo. He stressed the need to talk to our enemies and not just bomb them. I admit being duped but if you can't understand why he was able to fool some people you are an idiot or just being a dick gloating while saying I told you so.
    4
  2154. Jesus regarding, "better than Hill3ary." No. They are essentially the same. Birds of a feather flock together. Hillary went to Trump's wedding. Trump called Bill Clinton for a little chat immediately before announcing he was running. Had Trump not ran Hillary would have considered him for her VP. They are not different in any sort of meaningful way even if there are differences. Regarding, "I don't watch CNN and think their lies and manipulations is news or journalism." I too think CNN sucks balls but you might want to note that CNN and MSM that you rightfully hate gave Trump BILLIONS in free media. Regarding, "nonsensensical fear mongering" Remember when ISIS said, "we have to take out their families" wait, that wasn't ISIS. That only sounds exactly like something ISIS would say. That was actually Donald Trump calling for the US to be committing war crimes. And that wasn't the only time. There are legit reasons to fear Trump (as there were for fearing Hillary). It isn't all just fear mongering. Try to be honest about your candidate when he doesn't do anything he said he would. Try to be honest when he gives blowjobs to the corporations and the oligarchy. Try to be honest when he does nothing that helps the common person. I admit I was wrong for voting for Obama. When Trump fucks you over try to be honest about it as well.
    4
  2155. Jesus regarding, "Trump ended the TPP." I'll be happy if this ends up being the case but I'm not cracking the champagne just yet. Regarding, "Made peace with Russia" Huh, I didn't know we were at war with Russia. And he accomplished this before even taking office. Trump is pretty amazing or you are insane. Regarding, "is scaring Ford and Apple to keeping jobs in the USA" I'd ask you to elaborate on this if I were actually interested in what you had to say. Regarding, "has China and SaudiArabia calling him out of respect" Because leaders calling the winners of elections is not normal I guess. Regarding, "Japanese Prime minister saying he is happy and gas full confidence in President Trump after 90 minute meeting" I expected him to break down crying and claim the apocalypse was about to begin (that is sarcasm in case you can't tell). Regarding, "has Canada and Mexico begging that they are willing to renogotiate Nafta," Ok. This I am actually curious to know what you are talking about. It smells like BS. Regarding, "StockMarket" Of course wall street is thrilled. They know he is going to deregulate them and let them run wild as they fuck over the public. Regarding, "He us already a better president than Obama, and he has not even taken iffice." LOL. Yes, the guy who isn't president is already a great president. If logic were a person they would kick your ass. Regarding, "CNN" I don't watch CNN and try to avoid thinking about them as much as possible. That said I'm betting Corey Lewdowski is sucking your clowns dick. Regarding, "They know Trump has potential to Make America Great Again." Do you have any idea how empty that sounds to the sane. Regarding, "Even if he has to bring brainwashed peeps" This is funny coming from someone who is clearly brainwashed. Regarding, "But ibwill be first to call him out in 2 years uf he has failed some." Consider me a skeptic of this statement. Regarding, "Do u even doubtbthat?" Yes. I think you are being absurd. Regarding, "A reasonable person would give him a chance at least for a year with an open mind." I have no choice but to give him a chance. But considering his words, his actions, his lack of character, and everything about him only a fool thinks he is going to be a good president. Regarding, "he is as bad a Prez as BushJr was" Yes. You are utterly ridiculous. I'm not a fan of Obama but W... president during 9-11, the stock market, skyrocketing deficit, katrina, didn't get bin laden, the patriot act, torture, gitmo, lied us into the Iraq war, bailouts and more. You, as usual, are being absurd even if Obama has sucked as well.
    4
  2156. Valken regarding, "Bernie, same thing" Don't be absurd. The idea that Bernie is the same thing is beyond stupid.
    4
  2157. Rebuilt, the general election is not like primaries, you can vote for whoever you want. Write her in if you want to vote for a candidate worthy of support.
    4
  2158. I hope it is. They have brought it upon themself. Info like this is just an example of why the DNC needs to burn so that it can be replaced with something better.
    4
  2159.  @chokinonashes61  I'm not saying I'd want to talk to her or that she is a good person but she is objectively hot as hell.
    4
  2160. Yes... endorsing a terrible corrupt POS is wrong.
    4
  2161.  @d.owenpowell9023  How can you defend billionaires? In a world with so many homeless. Shame on you and the billionaires you support.
    4
  2162.  @d.owenpowell9023  "thousandair" You are never going to be a billionaire. Stop betraying your class.
    4
  2163.  @d.owenpowell9023  "It's a big club, and you ain't in it." g. carlin
    4
  2164.  @d.owenpowell9023  If you weren't betraying your class I would wish you success. Instead I wish the same that I wish for your billionaire overlords that you serve. You are benedict arnold to your class.
    4
  2165. @UCTYpXP5KEhNtV3jdNaAUBdw Regarding, "thank you for proving my point dude." It's not my fault that she is a liar and you are defending her for it. That's on you and her. I'm not the liar. She is and you are the one defending her while she does it. Thank you for proving my point that you are an idiot and are not helping. Maybe call me sexist for no good reason right away. It's what warren likes to do.
    4
  2166.  @JL-gt1kc  "rational" If you think it's rational for you to drag him over this instead of focusing on the work he is doing we are going to have agree to disagree.
    4
  2167. Remember when you lied and said that less then 5 percent of minimum workers were full time? I do. You probably don't because you lie so often.
    4
  2168. cptmiller, "hundreds of trillions of dollars." That's a lot. Maybe we should just declare bankruptcy as a country then.
    4
  2169. Yup. I just wrote the same thing essentially but you beat me to it.
    4
  2170. Kara regarding, "the dumocratic party has become the party of" Do you think I'm defending the party? I'm not. It is a dumpster fire. Regarding, "LEAVE that label" Still you demonstrate that you care waaaaaaayy too much about that label. Regarding, "build something better that they can be proud of" If that is what you want to do go right ahead. I encourage it. I want strong 3rd parties even if the "democratic" party is overtaken and reformed. But some people are still working to reform the party and change the party I'm ok with that and will support them if I think they are good people supporting the things I want done. Regarding, "many Germans who at first thought the nazi party was a good idea GOT OUT OF IT," Sigh. Wouldn't it have been nice had the nazi party been reformed? Regarding, "LEAVE THE DISGUSTING DUMOCRATIC PARTY BEHIND" You do what you think is right but I think you are fucking fool if you are going to not support good people just because they dare to call themselves a dem. You certainly have the party first attitude in common with dems and republican sheep.
    4
  2171. I'm reminded of George Carlin... "Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that."
    4
  2172.  @MoCa5545  Regarding, "tyrannical orders like being forced to wear a mask" LMFAO. There is real tyranny in society like the fact that the US imprisons more of it's citizens than any country on earth. But you care about masks?
    4
  2173. Over 4 percent today but don't let that stop you from saying stupid things.
    4
  2174.  @SaulKopfenjager  Bernie said no to the Iraq war while Tulsi said get me a uniform. Bernie is the most overtly anti-war candidate because reality.
    4
  2175.  @MegaZdizzle  Wait do people actually watch that show for him? I was only there for krystal anyway and because of how she ghosted jimmy to have cenks nephew on I'm about to unsubscribe from breaking points this second.
    4
  2176. The guy getting blackmailed was a dick about it. Do you always victim blame like this?
    4
  2177. Meh... sadly they will get away with it. I only wish they would suffer consequences.
    4
  2178. Not biden. He forgot.
    4
  2179. Hassan regarding, "surprised when the house burns down." We are talking about a house of cards built on corruption, cronyism, and fraud. We want that house burnt to the fucking ground so that something better can be built in it's place. But you go ahead and think we are not thinking ahead if you want and it makes you feel good for all I care.
    4
  2180. No thanks mowgli. Religion is for weak minds who can't think intelligently for themselves. I'll leave that shit to you.
    4
  2181. Regarding, "Can we get some regular people to run our nation" No you can not. Sincerely, the establishment and oligarchy.
    4
  2182. We are the ones who want to slash the military's budget and end subsidies to corporations.
    4
  2183. He was never a good person but yeah, he clearly has cognitive decline.
    4
  2184. Steve please stop playing the establishment game of who is better the douche or turd sandwhich. My point was not to compare the two. Even if you think one is better than the other that doesn't change the fact that the other is fucking terrible and the game is only played by people trying to rationalize supporting terrible. That game was tired and stupid when they were actually running against each other and that was quite a while ago already. The point I was trying to make was that saying "better than Hillary" does nothing to dissuade from the facts that Trump is a complete piece of shit, terrible fucking president, and disgrace to the human race, just like guy he elevated to FCC chair Shit Pai (minus the being president part).
    4
  2185.  @meanwhileinsooke  Cool smear. Unsubstantiated BS like that means they are fighting the good fight.
    4
  2186.  Traci Dave  Some of us come to our conclusions without letting the "intelligence" community do it for us despite your idiotic strawman argument.
    4
  2187. beh regarding, "Honestly I think an abstain is basically a vote to confirm..." Huh? Why would this make it more likely they be confirmed? The only thing that is relevant in determining whether or not someone is confirmed is the number of yes votes they get. The number of no votes is not relevant what-so-ever.
    4
  2188. @Christopher They spent their lives fighting for the same people in the same types of ways. Totally different think epic dipshits.
    4
  2189.  @abe8435  "you can agree with that" I could but I legit have no interest in what he has to say. I have better things to do than listen to controlled opposition... like calling them out. That's a far, far, far better use of my time. Don't you think? "Since you don’t do that" I'm making substantive points about him being controlled opposition. I'm making points why that's important. If that's not enough for you that's on you... not me.
    4
  2190.  @abe8435  "you aren’t actually making any substantive points about why Grim is controlled opposition at all." Sad you need them. Grim told you not to force the vote on m4a. Grim writes articles like, "CHUCK SCHUMER EYES A SECOND SHOT AT RAISING THE MINIMUM WAGE THROUGH RECONCILIATION" which is meant to manufacture consent for chuck as if he's doing something about minimum wage while he actually does nothing at all about it.
    4
  2191.  @schloops8473  Regarding, "that's a lie" Nope. You are lying. Right here on youtube, "Andrew Yang: Paying for a Universal Basic Income" When asked how are you going to pay for UBI the first thing yang says is that he would gut the current social safety net to pay for it.
    4
  2192.  @schloops8473  "that's a lie. A complete fabrication." This is what you are doing. Sorry not sorry if the truth hurts.
    4
  2193.  @JulieAnn02261990  Not an important one to a layman.
    4
  2194. Regarding, "U can only vote for one person" Not exactly. I could for example vote in the democratic primary for the most progressive person I can find to help shape the party and make them better and I could vote for someone else in the general if I want. Regarding, "you need to concentrate your energy on one." You care too much about parties. Vote for good people. People who share your values and concerns regardless of the party they are in or you are doing the exact same thing as republicans and democrats who blindly support their party.
    4
  2195. If the truth triggers you then you are the problem and you need to get a fucking grip.
    4
  2196.  @heykresl  Yang is an establishment conman. He is just better than most at it.
    4
  2197.  @heykresl  Yeah... running on actual ideas is better than the norm. Being willing to actually change the system when in office is something very different.
    4
  2198. Better yet he should have addressed it and not left out the blackmail part.
    4
  2199. Accuracy is far more important than timeliness.
    4
  2200. "two medical centers" Do even doctors need 2 jobs these days?
    4
  2201. "new dirty tricks"? I assure you they were already doing everything they could in 2016 and still almost lost to a guy who was down 60 points when he started. And yes they will dump lots and lots of cash into the election but fortunately for us cash doesn't vote.
    4
  2202.  @batboy3746  Regarding, "Do you really think this bashing on Biden will help Bernie?" Um... yes. First off when biden loses support that support needs a place to go. And lots of bidens support comes from people that piss themselves over trump, only care about beating him, and buy the corporate media bullshit that he is the best hope to beat trump. If they lose faith in biden sanders is a likely place for their support to go based on those priorities. Second, biden bashing is done about substantive issues. Issues where biden is wrong and Bernie is correct. And people love comparisons. Sometimes it's almost as if they are incapable of having independent ideas about things and are only able to think about things by comparison.
    4
  2203.  @pauljansen1137  I listened. He can't be more wrong on the topic of force the vote. It's his right to speak but what he is saying is making everyone dumber.
    4
  2204. Not even close.
    4
  2205.  @glenglen6386  I hope you are at least being paid for your disgraceful posts. Good luck with your continued efforts to excuse putting civilians in the line of fire.
    4
  2206. Sat with Putin? Only Satin would do such a thing. https://images.search.yahoo.com/search/images?p=hillary+clinton+sitting+with+putin&fr=yfp-t&imgurl=http%3A%2F%2Fs20.postimg.org%2Fw40kazhfh%2Fhillary_putin.jpg#id=-1&iurl=http%3A%2F%2Fs20.postimg.org%2Fw40kazhfh%2Fhillary_putin.jpg&action=click I would also like to add... fuck you. You are a clown but not funny.
    4
  2207. Yang's UBI is paid for regressively, he lied about supporting m4a, and more. There is plenty to argue about yang policywise for people who aren't corporate media.
    4
  2208.  @wxmanwes  Let's hope not. Terrible thought.
    4
  2209.  @blazebaby89  The DNC told us Buttigieg "won" Iowa. Is questioning the results really so delusional? When exit polls don't match election results?
    4
  2210.  @BonerMaroner  I don't give a fuck about your excuses and rationalizations for Warren. Her record on the military is atrocious, she voted to give Trump more money for bombs than even the orange clown wanted. She didn't want to run against a corporate shill like Hillary in 2016 but wants to run against the clear leader of the progressive movement in 2020 to split the progressive vote and make it more like a corporate shill wins. She openly admits that if she makes the general she will take all the legalized bribes she can. She is controlled opposition to the real change this country needs. She is terrible and you are embarrassing yourself by defending her.
    4
  2211.  @tciesla  Regarding, "I never said I would vote for Biden!?" Well if you wouldn't vote for him and you don't want trump to be president then you probably should want bidens balls in a vice. Because logic.
    4
  2212.  @lucienberl  Your English needs work comrade.
    4
  2213.  @michaelbooher339  "poorly educated" This is what you go with when you don't have intelligent arguments to make.
    4
  2214.  @tierneylogan5943  "disasters don’t ever happen in non-capitalist counties" It's a like a bot army with the same terrible talking point. Disasters like this will always happen in a capitalistic society if there is profit to be made from it. Let's say the railroads were nationalized there wouldn't be 0 disasters but there would be significantly less in a system that doesn't prioritize profit. But don't let that stop you from your terrible talking point.
    4
  2215.  @texjohnson9208  If you mean empty platitudes and empty promises in referring to Obama's message then yeah that isn't going anywhere as their will always be politicians looking to lie to you and Obama was a great liar. The question you should be asking yourself is if you are going to believe politicians when they sell you bullshit or are you going to require they actually mean what they say?
    4
  2216.  @daryno9073  FYI the dems control everything. When transformative legislation doesn't pass because they are being bribed by big money know who to blame.
    4
  2217. Nina is just another dem. PINO
    4
  2218. You probably want to add a period while telling others they are uneducated and dumb.
    4
  2219. That's funny coming from someone offering only poor insults and no substance. Do you ever say anything that isn't unintentionally ironic?
    4
  2220.  @Bike_Lion  "That's because..." I'm well aware of why it happens but it's still important to call it out.
    4
  2221.  @darrenbutler9819  Regarding, "corporate media and MOC would say MM4A doesn't work and it would be a loss." If I waited for corporate media and the MIC to play nice I'd never get the chance to fight for nice things. But since we are bringing up the corporate media one of their favorite talking points is m4a is "pie in the sky" "unattainable" "fantasy." Well it would be a lot harder for them to continue with that BS if m4a was something people in our government were actually voting on. It you seriously want m4a you want this fight. You know you have the best of it. If you are just pretending that you support m4a you make excuse for not fighting. But they are all pathetic and terrible and wreck of being reverse engineered to come to the conclusion they want of not fighting for m4a. Stop it.
    4
  2222. Is it really hard to believe the pathological liar is lying?
    4
  2223. He's still affiliated with TYT but fails to mention the conflict of interest.
    4
  2224. I'm smart and I wanna help with the prep. - fredo cuomo had me rollin
    4
  2225. Point out the innate bias of large corporations and their profit motive when presenting the news. It isn't a left/right thing. It's a corporate thing. There is a reason why I call them the corporate media.
    4
  2226. "Bernie on point, as usual. Nothing changes, as usual." Bernie sanders tells you to vote for biden and the status quo and you are baffled why things don't change.
    4
  2227.  @PetBunnyDebbie  "Biden was our only hope of preventing Trump from taking office." I have no clue why you even think biden is better. "A centrist is better than a far right politician." They are both on the far right.
    4
  2228. David regarding, "He has to appease them somewhat" If only mental gymnastics were an Olympic event you could win the gold. Trump and Hillary are not different in any sort of meaningful way and you are delusional if you think so.
    4
  2229.  @deirre  Regarding, "You mean worthless nuclear deal" Worthless? Really? In reality they weren't producing nuclear weapons and the deal was working. This is literally the best thing about Obamas failure as president. And now the world knows it's the US who doesn't honor it's deals. Now... after the deal... there is nothing stopping them from enriching uranium. Wow. Just. Wow. So dumb.
    4
  2230.  @jthom0027  I bet they don't do it for richard medhurst or jimmy dore.
    4
  2231. It's hard to believe next time won't be different. When he entered the race in 2016 he was unknown and down 60 points. Still he only lost because of shenanigans. In 2020 he will have the name recognition of rock star, will rightfully be the most popular politician in the country, and will be the clear favorite. There are not enough dirty tricks in their playbook to stop him.
    4
  2232.  @whyamimrpink78  Regarding, "He left a lot of things out..." You mean that wasn't a comprehensive history in a couple minutes? You don't say. This is arguably the least dumb thing you have said because you suck so much.
    4
  2233.  @BCNeil  It's not sexual. It is bending the knee.
    4
  2234. Herb regarding, "There's just not enough "there" there." She is corrupt as fuck. Try not to lie to yourself about it but this isn't about her. Or at least it shouldn't be.
    4
  2235. Herb regarding, "They're very clever about bending the law as far as possible, (they're both lawyers), and covering their tracks." We are going to have to agree to disagree about this point. They are more clever than Trump when it comes to such things but that really isn't saying much. The problem isn't that they are master criminals. The problem is a corrupt system.
    4
  2236. stephen regarding, "The voting machines..." I honestly don't trust the voting machines but that doesn't mean I'm not going to vote and give up without a fight. Sanders is going to be such a clear favorite in 2020 that if the voting machines say he loses the country will be forced to take notice.
    4
  2237. Nobody else wants to admit it huh? I understand.
    4
  2238. There are already way too many people pretending to be progressive for me to trust a guy with no experience and no record to back up their words. Bernie Sanders 2020 because trust is vitally important.
    4
  2239.  @MoonlightXYZ  Thank you for making perfectly clear what an idiot you are so that we don't have to bother taking you seriously.
    4
  2240. She has always been a liar. I think the other day she only now came out and admitted that her native American ancestry was all bullshit. The only difference is that now you are more aware of what a liar she has ALWAYS been. Don't feel bad. She fooled lots of people. It happens. My point is just that she has always been terrible and has always been a liar. Maybe go back and try to figure out what you were missing to avoid making the same mistake going forward. Peace.
    4
  2241. She talks the talk but she doesn't walk the walk. Fraud squad. Never forget.
    4
  2242.  @garyevans718  "hunderf00t stepped in it on this video." What are you babbling about? He called out a conman using billions in tax subsidies to make himself rich.
    4
  2243. Regarding, "You are assuming the Democrats are acting in good faith." Nobody is assuming they are acting in good faith. We know they are not. Regarding, "The truth is that no single candidate at any national level has been elected to office thru Our Revolution or Justice Democrats and they won’t." Wow are you quick to throw in the towel. Both of those organizations are exceptionally new. Regarding, "None of that will change by giving the process a “chance.”" You must realize the game, although still completely unfair, has changed. Wikileaks has exposed them so they can not be quite as blatant about their corruption going forward. Sanders entered the race as a virtual unknown last time. This time he will be the most popular politician in the country with the name recognition of a rock star. Of course they will try to fuck him over again but the bottom line is that they won't be able to in 2020. And if we don't get Sanders or another progressive then that doesn't prevent us from going and supporting another candidate. I am going to give it a "chance." That seems more logical than just quitting without trying. Regarding, "support a people’s party" Why can't you do this and support progressives who are still trying to work in the "democratic" party? Does it really need to be one or the other? Can't we do both?
    4
  2244. Not when the money comes with strings. But you want to pretend those strings aren't there. Gotcha….
    4
  2245.  Sheeshkebabz  You are embarrassing us. Sincerely, the human race.
    4
  2246.  Sheeshkebabz  "Cry harder, neck." LMFAO. Am I suppose to be insulted by that?
    4
  2247.  Sheeshkebabz  1/10 trolling
    4
  2248. Americans are not very smart. Them just knowing someone's name is half the battle for that person to be able to win an election. Sadly celebrity is more important than policy.
    4
  2249. J Abrams regarding, "If they interfere again they'll suffer defeat again" They know they are going to be in trouble in 2016. That is why they are trying to get a headstart framing the election already with bullshit like the rational national talks about here. Regarding, "the more establishment candidates the better." Agreed. I was fucking furious that Biden didn't run in 2016. He would have taken enough support from Hillary that Bernie would have ended with the most pledged delegates. The establishment is corrupt but they are not stupid. They know this. Whoever the establishment candidate is in 2020 they will have a clear path and will be opposed only by a progressive like Sanders. I actually fear there being more competition on the progressive side. I could see Warren running for the establishment in the hopes that she would siphon off support from Sanders.
    4
  2250. If anyone is guilty of sexual harassment it's the person exposing themselves in the work place.
    4
  2251. chokinonashes I agree with everything you said.
    4
  2252. I very much agree with that Damp although maybe not "most." There are certainly many politicians who are religious. For example I do not question whether Michelle Bachman is religious. I am confident she is genuine. Sarah Palin I'm not so sure. Ultimately it is impossible to know for sure who is religious and who is pretending but among all professions few are incentivized to lie about their religious beliefs or non-belief like politicians. So who knows. It may very well be most.
    4
  2253. obemiss regarding, "if I was an atheist I would rather have "crazy" Christians who have a baseline of good values opposed to atheists whos only morals are not pissing people off." I don't even know what to say about this. So you want to have people with "good values" living near you as opposed to atheists whose "only morals" are not pissing people off, whatever the fuck that means. Um... ok. I lived a short drive away from Colorado Springs when a Christian religious fanatic shot up an abortion clinic. So....
    4
  2254. S G regarding, "Islam is the only truth." You clearly misunderstand the meaning of the word truth.
    4
  2255. X-Files regarding, "Believe in Jesus Christ and you shall have everlasting life!" Why does your god care so much about me believing in them? That doesn't seem very becoming of an all powerful deity. That seems more like something written by man to make me believe in bullshit. I mean... who doesn't want to live forever right? If your god was benevolent I would think they should care more about whether or not I am a good person and lead a good life and less about whether or not I believe in them. And if they really want me to believe in them they know what it would take because they created me to require evidence for my beliefs. Your all powerful god can show themself to me right? Then they should do it and I will believe in them. This isn't rocket science. Regarding, "Jesus loves you!" Really? He has a funny way of showing it. He is going to let me burn in a lake of fire for the rest of eternity for not believing in him. We have different notions of the concept of love. Regarding, "Get a king james bible and believe." I'm more likely to read Harry Potter and believe he is real. Harry Potter after all is less petty and sadistic than your god. For example Harry Potter was never ok with slavery like your god was.
    4
  2256.  @douggoldwater1734  Regarding, "he's neither a liar or a conman." He's both despite all your bs. "that doesn't mean that he's some sort of massive fraud, not everyone that disagrees with you is" He ran ads for president saying he supported m4a. Then he proposed a health care plan. It wasn't m4a or even close. He was just lying. That's why he is a massive fraud among other reasons.
    4
  2257.  @bobbucks  Regarding, "M4A became a synonym for universal Health care." Yes. It did. And it was popular. Yang decided to capitalize on it's popularity and say he supported it. Then he showed you what he actually supports. HE WAS A LIAR. No matter how much you want to spin it.
    4
  2258.  Clifford M  Tell you what I'll try and keep this simple for you; Republican party= Doesn't pretend to be on your side while they support corporations and big money. "Democratic" party= Pretend to be on your side and gives you just enough crumbs to keep you from picking up a pitchfork all while selling out the common person and supporting corporations and big money. I don't really care what POS are in charge. I know they don't give a fuck about me either way.
    4
  2259. redd regarding, "Berners have been purged." Yup. It was fucked up but I think you are overestimating the effect it will have on the primary. It also demonstrates that corporate dems can be purged the exact same way as long as we win the nomination. Regarding, "The rules committee is entirely establishment. They will rig again." Yup. It is fucked up. It is not fair and it is not going to be until we win. Fortunately for us they do not have enough dirty tricks in their playbook to stop Sanders in 2020.
    4
  2260. danny regarding, "I am certain there is NO WAY to win within that corrupt, corporatist war party." I am not as certain. Sanders, a true progressive, barely "lost" in 2016 after entering the race down 60 points. In 2020 he will enter with the name recognition of a rock star and as rightfully the most popular politician in the country. Even the corrupt party will not be able to stop him. Regarding, "I originally registered with them in order to vote in their closed primaries," Good. Thank you. You should be voting in their primaries. It is fucked up you need to register with them. It is undemocratic. It is wrong. But it is necessary and important. And if you decide you don't want to vote for them in the general then you don't have to. But you should be using the opportunity you have to shape their party. The close primaries because they know how important it is and don't want you to vote in it. Fuck them. What better reason do you need to make sure you do other than the fact that the establishment doesn't want you to? Regarding, "the party has shifted more and more to "the right" and become ever more beholden to big money." Yup but the war isn't over. Thanks, in large part to Sanders, more of the country is woke to the rot in the party than ever. Regarding, "Since they conned me" They have successfully conned lots of people. Obama was suppose to be hope and change but he was same old same old. Regarding, "they will coopt/adopt some of our polices" They are never going to change unless they are forced to change. And the only way they are going to be forced to change is by electing a progressive as head of the party. Regarding, "But as long as we play in their sandbox, all we'll get is sand in our eyes." The sad fact of the matter is that if you want to elect a progressive president anytime soon the only way that is going to happen is by going through the "democratic" party. Sanders give us the best chance of that happening in 2020 for the first time in essentially forever. Don't take the opportunity to try and help him or another progressive because you are rightfully pissed at the party. You don't vote for a party. You vote for a person.
    4
  2261. proud american regarding, "is on video admitting he idolized castro" Why am I not surprised that you would be looking to take Sanders words completely out of context. Regarding, "Bernie gave speeches to the communist party USA." Damn you really have to work hard to smear him don't you. Bernie Sanders has given speeches to millions and millions of Americans. I guess all those people were communist because communism is passed along like a virus based on your idiotic way of thinking. Regarding, "who also endorsed him in the election." I endorsed him. I guess that means I am a communist. I had no idea. I also had no idea a person's political affiliation is determined by someone else. Seems weird. Regarding, "his platform puts USA far closer to communism." You obviously have no idea what communism is and/or what Bernie Sanders stands for and/or are just lying. Regarding, "Bernie is Jewish, jews are the fathers of communsim." No comment. This speaks for itself. Regarding, "To say someone is crazy for assuming bernie is a communist, after all that, just means you know nothing about Bernie." Damn you are dumb as fuck but I could use a good laugh. I challenge you to tell me of a single policy position Bernie holds that is communist. Good luck dipshit. I'm betting that if you try you say something idiotic about health care.
    4
  2262. will I "don't have the free speech to stop someone else's protest." Clearly you have no fucking idea what "free speech" is. But I could use a good laugh... How exactly can I use my "free speech" to stop other's protests?
    4
  2263.  @tpad6  I'm not ok with that.
    4
  2264.  @tynao2029  "Jimmy is a right winger" He believes in giving peace a chance, universal health care, money out of politics, providing education and more. I guess that means I'm a right winger too according to your nonsense.
    4
  2265.  @MikeYurbasovich  "How many bombs?" I don't know off hand. But I can add that his administration also stopped publishing drone war casualties of civilians.
    4
  2266.  @warfossil  "You've provided nothing." Just mindlessly call it fake news for all I care. You are impossible to take seriously.
    4
  2267. Nationalist I have 2 questions for you... Are you a Trump supporter? Do you realize you are a racist?
    4
  2268. I'd pay money to be able to unsubscribe again.
    4
  2269.  @donHooligan  regarding, "some young people give me hope for the future..." I couldn't agree more. That was funny, in large part because of how true it was.
    4
  2270.  @vcsund1911  I gotta think that is what happened but this wendys video is really old. Is there any chance that pink floyd sampled a wendys training video?
    4
  2271.  @bobbygautam3950  Let's not forget all the rich oligarchs who are old.
    4
  2272.  @weedidi7144  Until people start refusing to support evil like you are advocating for then evil is all we are going to get. Find a candidate that is good and support them.
    4
  2273. You forgot to call him a snowflake Steven. I don't even know you anymore.
    4
  2274. Regarding, "And do you not think that you are doing a disservice to yourself if you only watch videos which align with your political views?" Go back and read what I wrote you fucking moron instead of trying to strawman me like the mental midget you are. There's an important concept you are leaving out like "all my time."
    4
  2275. And thank you for the laughs at your expense.
    4
  2276. That's one of the least crazy things about all this.
    4
  2277.  @avpthegreat  "They are the left." No. They are not. I just told you what the actual left is for and that's not what the party of sellouts is about. "Not sure where you’re from, but in America, liberalism" You are moving the goalpost around. I'm not talking about "liberalism." "Democrats represent all of that." If dem the democratic party were actually in favor of that they have all the power needed to make it happen. But instead of, "anti-war" biden illegally dropped bombs on syria. Instead of, "socialized/regulated health care" biden won't even keep his promise of public option. You must exist in an alternate reality. "some dems like Pelosi do sell out to corporate interests, not all of them. " Pelosi was only allowed to be speaker because the entire party is full of sellouts. It only took a handful of people with principles in the party to stop her from being speaker or at the very least getting something of value for her speakership but we live in the world where we do whether you see it or are willing to admit it or not.
    4
  2278.  @borninthewronggenerationno3873  LOL I never expected you to make a valid point or to bother to try and prove your stupid point after the fact with an argument as to why not wearing a mask in a world where we already aren't allowed to walk around naked is "essential liberty." Just go away. You make everyone dumber.
    4
  2279.  @klenmcrock5265  Regarding, "That's the reason they want you to wear the mask in public. I can't believe I have to even state it." The AI wants masks huh? You are an idiot. I can't believe I have to even state it.
    4
  2280. The parties haven't been any different in any kind of meaningful way for some time now. It's nothing new.
    4
  2281. He's a fraud.
    4
  2282. It's not a tough spot for a person with integrity.
    4
  2283. Biden decided you can't be. He has that power.
    4
  2284.  @sonjakozman1699  5 replies but I can only see 4. Just once you'd think you would be able read all of them in the "land of the free."
    4
  2285. Youtube says there are 10 replies and I can actually see all of them. That is UNBELIEVABLY rare when that should be the norm in an actual land of the free.
    4
  2286.  @brandonburns5365  "I know i spelled it wrong" It's a good idea. I'll start doing the same. I've noticed they don't like it being used.
    4
  2287.  @darkempath7436  Regarding, " nobody's lying about Sanders" Then I'm sure you can cite a source where Sanders said, "he did not think a black person could be on his ticket." Oh wait... he didn't. Regarding, "we're not voting for his old wrinkled stinking ass." That's right. You are voting for Trump's old, orange wrinkled stinking ass. I hope you are paid well for this shit but that you at least have a little trouble sleeping at night.
    4
  2288.  @larchlarch9851  "that's just right wing propaganda." This isn't an argument. It's just ad hominem. "Don't be a shill for them." And you are using it to shill for ryan grim. Which is really funny.
    4
  2289. I am truly baffled at her decision to out this. I still can't stand Brazile but I am very happy she did what she did here.
    4
  2290. Jeff regarding, "the problem is that I think it's Bernie that's being disingenuous. He himself has said that this bill has absolutely no hope of passing." Do you know what disingenuous means? Lets say Bernie were saying that the bill is going to pass and that was his current goal THAT would be disingenuous. The fact that he is up front that this isn't about passing the bill now but rather trying to gain support for it in the future is genuine. Regarding, "This is about Bernie putting his mark on the Democratic party," This is about Bernie fighting for the same things he always fights for. You act as if he doesn't care about this and it is merely a political stunt. If you have been paying attention this is something he talks about constantly and has fought for for a very long time. Stop pretending to be surprised he is doing it now. Regarding, "a party that he constantly trashes" That party is doing plenty on its own to trash themselves that has nothing to do with Bernie. He absolutely could be trashing them 24/7 and be justified about it because he wouldn't be saying anything untrue but that isn't his style despite your bullshit. He endorsed Hillary Clinton after the DNC rigged the game and campaigned for her. I think the only reason he talks about the party at all is because the corrupt corporate media love to ask stupid questions to try and stir the pot. Sanders would prefer to talk about the issues he cares about like... ya know... medicare for all. Regarding, "refuses to join" He has caucused with the "democratic" party his entire life. The issues he champions are overwhelming popular with the peasants that identify themselves as democrats. They refuse to join him and fight for the issues their own fucking people care about. Regarding, "rather than about policy" You can't really be so detached from reality can you? Seriously... that is all he would talk about if it were possible. You must realize this. Do you at least say the same shit about Hillary and her book at the moment? I'm betting no. Regarding, "If you can't see that then I feel sorry for you." I don't but there is no need for you to feel sorry for me. I'm just busy living in reality. You should join me.
    4
  2291. Jama regarding, "they will just screw them over 10x harder." What? Do you think they have a bunch of secret weapons they have that they are going to use? They don't. They have the same playbook as last time. Fortunately Sanders has name recognition and popularity he didn't have in 2016. In 2020 he is the inevitable one... not the corporate shill.
    4
  2292. They already keep as little labor as possible. Taxes don't affect it.
    4
  2293. I'm glad Warren is showing her true colors. I won't forget it when the establishment tries to pretend she is a true progressive.
    4
  2294. For once there would be a legit birth certificate scandal.
    4
  2295. Regarding, "hes canadian" Yes. But then again he is white so it probably wouldn't be a big deal.
    4
  2296. You are correct of course and I very much agree with the premise of your original post. I just wanted to take the opportunity to piss on the current system which is designed to not give us choice and representation.
    4
  2297. This point would be valid and applicable only if they cared about intellectual consistency. They obviously don't.
    4
  2298. "aggressively ignorant." I think I'll start using that for sam. It fits.
    4
  2299.  @davidhoran7116  I thought freedom to conservatives meant being able to own an arsenal.
    4
  2300. I beat most of you to his youtube channel. Just saying. For your fantasy youtube football team.
    4
  2301. There is nothing wrong with the data. But with the election results...?
    4
  2302. Nancy regarding, "give up." He gave up the same way the Patriots gave up in the super bowl. They fucking lost. But the establishment appreciates you dipshits smearing the person who is more of a threat to them than anyone on Earth.
    4
  2303. dob regarding, "Bernie is spreading Russiagate lies." What lie exactly are you referring to? That Russia fucked with the election? THEY ABSOLUTELY DID FUCK WITH THE ELECTION. I didn't even need hard evidence to think this. I just assume they fuck with us the same way I assume we fuck with everyone else in the world based on an understand of the world.
    4
  2304. Meanwhile they keep superdelgates. Talk about messed up priorities.
    4
  2305.  @naglar7610  "TYT have ignored" And all you need to do to utter such nonsense is ignore the blackmail. Please be quiet.
    4
  2306.  @tonyclifton2230  "all you can think of is. Ryan bad." Yup. The source matters. Would you use this kind of "defense" if we were talking about jeffrey epstein? 'here jeffrey is making a good point and all you can think of is how it's jeffrey.' -you, probably
    4
  2307. But you are already paying for their EMERGENCY care which is far more expensive because we don't just let people die. You are selfish and stupid.
    4
  2308.  @maxsmart9116  The content of Bernie's answer was fine. His delivery was bad. It would have been better IMO if he just said, "money in politics" or if he wanted to elaborate "money in politics because it's creating all our other problems." That would have been much better. Regarding, "I thought the question was stupid." The whole format was stupid. The questions in general were stupid. The moderators were stupid. Most the candidates were stupid. But if there was really one piece of diarrhea shit on display that wasn't Biden it had to be Chuck Todd. It was like he was trying to do a "proud American" impression.
    4
  2309.  @Catloves997  I'm fine with regulated capitalism for most things but we don't have that. Instead we have crony capitalism or capitalism run amok where lobbyist write our laws because of money in politics. That said there are things like health care, war, prisons, and others where people should not be able to be making profit and where we should have socialism. But say, for an industry like cars, I'm just fine with regulated capitalism. And those regulations are to make sure we don't have monopolies and workers have a safe working environment, a living wage, there's no corporate socialism and more. Sadly that's not what we have. But I think those should be our goals.
    4
  2310. Thulyblu would you just like to admit that you are in love with your cousin?
    4
  2311. Speaking of doublespeak, Biden is currently "deescalating" the situation in the middle east by dropping bombs in syria.
    4
  2312. Yes but it is still worth saying and studying.
    4
  2313. He shits on Trump all the time. Stupid people are going to say stupid things... your comment proves this.
    4
  2314.  @PittsburghSonido  I go out of my way to state that I get the point they are trying to make. My issue is with how they are making that point. Or do you really think pro Bernie comments should start with, "Bernie should adopt how trump campaigned." Because they shouldn't. Period.
    4
  2315.  @zackdurant1584  regarding, "I’m not shifting the burden of proof." Let's agree to disagree about this. It seems clear that you are with your lack of understanding how atheism is the default position. Regarding, "I just have a problem when atheists say “there is no god”" Try to understand that, "I am unconvinced of any god claims" just don't roll of the tongue the same way. Do you get mad when people say, "there is no flying spaghetti monster in the sky?" or "Zeus is mythological bullshit." I suspect not even thou, for all I can say with absolute certainty, there is a flying spaghetti monster in the sky and Zeus is real. Regarding, "I think atheism being the default position is a joke" But it is... or it should be because you should need good evidence to believe things and disbelief in literally everything is the default to the sane. Do you have any other examples of where you think people should believe in things by default without evidence? I suspect not. Then again who knows. Backward religious type thinking has a way of bleeding into other ways of using logic, reason, and evidence incorrectly. Regarding, "it’s not like they say “we don’t know” Do you go around saying you don't know if unicorns exist? Because for all you can say with any certainy you don't right? Or do you say you don't think unicorns exist like sane people do for the exact same reasons I say god doesn't exist.
    4
  2316.    She's not better on foreign policy. She served the MIC personally while Sanders was saying no war.
    4
  2317.    You are a joke for thinking a guy with zero political experience and zero record to look to know what you are getting is a good idea for the highest political office in the country.
    4
  2318.  @edwuncleriii1922  He's not a communist Joe McCarthy.
    4
  2319.   Regarding, " Who would receive more republican and independent votes?" 1) Sanders has appeal to everyone because of his decades of consistency and reluctance to take dirty money. 2) Sanders crushes Trump and has ever since he would have won in 2016. 3) I don't care about appealing to republican. 4) Any dem nominee will be called a commie by the right, even a centrist like Biden.
    4
  2320. Sam sedar is controlled opposition.
    4
  2321.  @EastSide-qc5oy  "Who owns the MSM" The rich. "what is their agenda?" Making money. Obviously. You should be embarrassed that you don't know the answers to your own questions.
    4
  2322. Regarding, "gigantic Russian-Controlled Anti-Trump mobs" Holy shit is that funny.
    4
  2323. Regarding, "Nobody likes an extremist." Wow. Just. Wow. No hypocrisy in that.... like at all.
    4
  2324.  @geddydesmond451  Regarding, "evidence?" Yeah. Evidence dipshit. Regarding, "Pretty sure there is evidence they cheat." Then it shouldn't be hard for you to provide evidence of cheating in the general election if you want to believe it happened. But here you are. Not providing it.
    4
  2325. that's funny coming from the side trying to steal gaza.
    4
  2326.  @tenzinnordron9836  Lucky for us that aaron didn't want to disappoint his dad and went into the youtube video business.
    4
  2327. I think of him as a lying piece of shit.
    4
  2328. You say that like you didn't just watch it.
    4
  2329. I understand that lots of people want Bernie to do more tearing down specific terrible people. I get it. But that's not what Bernie Sanders is about and never has been. That's what everyone else tends to be about. Bernie Sanders is all about presenting his vision for the future and always has been. That's part of his appeal to lots of people. That's just another way Bernie is different than the average politician.
    4
  2330. I am mad about it but it is taking me time to craft a novel about it.
    4
  2331. knavish and herb you guys are forgetting that only the 2nd amendment matters to the right.
    4
  2332. This comment makes me think you are CIA.
    4
  2333. Why anyone would take a shitlib like sedar seriously is beyond me.
    4
  2334. "King Bone spurs" That was funny. Thanks for the laugh. Forgive me but I'm stealing and using that.
    4
  2335. ak regarding, "they fucked him during elections, and super delegate will do the same again." They will do everything they can to fuck him over again but the game has changed. There are not enough superdelegates to overcome what I expect to be an ass kicking in the primary. Last time he was unknown. Now he is known by everyone and loved by everyone (with a brain).
    4
  2336.  @kimcornelissen1529  Do you think they would allow Trump to use them for a photo op and publicity when he were in office? And should they? Because they shouldn't for anyone who is political.
    4
  2337. Regarding, "I guess that's why you think this woman DESTROYED this guy." I don't remember saying that. You don't realize it because you are a mental midget but what you are doing is called strawmanning me.
    4
  2338. You know the only thing I am genuinely interested in when it comes to someone like you is if you actually believe all the stupid shit you say or if you are a paid troll. Sadly asking you is pointless because I don't believe anything you say.
    4
  2339. Steve regarding, "okay so when he come in and raise taxes on all the rich how many business or going to stay in America" I think we will be ok. http://money.cnn.com/2016/02/08/news/economy/sanders-income-jobs/index.html Regarding, "how many rich people are going to stay in America." I guess if I were a clown I'd be scared the rich are going to leave the country that helped make them rich. I'm not a clown thou so... Regarding, "jobs are leaving all over California because democratic policies of high taxes." How are low taxes treating Kansas and Oklahoma? Regarding, "Its okay though act like nothing bad will happen." LMAO. Nah.. I'm sure you are correct. The sky will fall in if we make corporations pay their fair share and reinvest it in the community. Regarding, "the democrats already have there pick" You know they have a primary right? It is a place where the peasants go to have their say. It isn't fair and there are lots of problems with it but it does actually exist you know? For your sake I hope that you are being paid to say the ridiculous things you say and don't actually believe the BS you spew.
    4
  2340. When this is the sentiment from the side that is suppose to have empathy we are truly fucked as a society.
    4
  2341. "what action or payment Ana was demanding" She wanted him to stop "running his mouth." "in exchange for what exactly" She was threatening to metoohim. You probably shouldn't call other people morons.
    4
  2342. Those countries can buy their own bombs to drop on their country.
    4
  2343.  @JP-jd8wr  I gave money and support to justice dems in the past. I actually expected something from them. I can't say any of that of republicans. There is dirt that is younger than me and I have never voted for a republican so it's not like they can betray me the way JDs have.
    4
  2344. He wasn't before?
    4
  2345.  babajohn100  Let's say she told people to vote for Biden, that has nothing to do with honesty. That's the type of thing people get to have an opinion about.
    4
  2346.  @BIGTOUHY  regarding, " so it only matter when certain people do it ?" If that's what you think I'm saying it's only because you are stupid. Then again you are stupid.
    4
  2347. Never Biden. Never Trump.
    4
  2348. Aren't you suppose to be everywhere already? Shouldn't you already know?
    4
  2349.  Johnny G  I can't take you seriously enough to respond to you intelligently.
    4
  2350. Your name is funny. Your comment, not so much.
    4
  2351.  @Salina-qd6es  Chomsky is highly overrated. I think he spent too much time with epstein and it showed in his analysis later in life.
    4
  2352. Conservatives shouldn't be. At least not if they actually held the principles they claim to espouse.
    4
  2353. Regarding, "who is the worst person running for the Democratic nomination?" I'm going to pull a 'new York times.' Everyone but Bernie.
    4
  2354. Nice news network. Fraud.
    4
  2355. Do you argue that the government is infringing on your rights because they won't let you have a tank?
    4
  2356. Imagine thinking any of the oligarchy is "decent."
    4
  2357. "Twitler." That made me chuckle. Thanks.
    4
  2358. She was wrong and we absolutely have no use for private health insurance companies if we have a robust universal system. Stop making excuses and rationalizations for keeping those fuckers around just like Tulsi has.
    4
  2359. Is that how it works? If I like someone I have to think exactly how they do about literally everything?
    4
  2360. gIvE eVeRyOnE wEaPoNs smh
    4
  2361. Meh. Most humans are quite capable of feeling empathy for people and things they have never experienced. I've never been raped but that doesn't mean I can't feel something for someone who has.
    4
  2362. Jason regarding, "Agreed but now what stick around I figure they have all the super delegates they need so why run under an empty banner?" I am honestly not sure what you are trying to say but when it comes to superdelegates let's not misunderstand their purpose shall we? They are not there to overthrow the will of the people. They are there to shape the election. They are there so that the corporate media can put up all delegate numbers alongside one another to try and sell their establishment candidate. I fucking hate the "democratic" party. I would be happy if they just died and went away so that something better could take their place. But that isn't going to be happening anytime soon. That said if they used superdelegates to get a candidate that didn't get the most pledged delegates, like they will never do because they are not stupid, then that party very well might collapse. That would be a win in and of itself even if it wouldn't be as good as Sanders as president.
    4
  2363. David regarding, "he’s now rocking everyone back to sleep by singing the same old “Democratic” lullaby." Meanwhile, in reality, he has been championing medicare for all and winning the war of ideas. That is hardly the same old "democratic lullaby." Regarding, "we need someone like Bernie to lead something new" Here's the plan in case you haven't heard. Hostile takeover of the "democratic" party. One of the reasons why the party is a dumpster fire and will continue to be until at least 2020 is because Hillary "won" the primary. That is why we have perez who picked all the people under him and so on. That is why progressives were purged. But corporate dems can be purged exactly the same way. The nominee of the party is able to pretty much unilaterally shape and reform the party. They get to decide what it means to be a democrat going forward. They can enact reforms such as banning corporate pac money. Then all of a sudden we might start getting a party that cares about the people rather then their big money donors. That is new and that is the plan. But to do it we need to win. The game isn't fair but we have a not so secret weapon in Sanders. But he needs our help. Regarding, "I wish he’d stop marketing for them." If he is selling them then he is doing a terrible no good job. There is reason demexit was a thing. There is a reason people are leaving the party in droves. And he is a big big part of that reason.
    4
  2364. Nate regarding, "all that talk he does is great," Um... yeah... it is. He can't do everything by himself. And getting shit done starts with winning the war of ideas. Regarding, "but when push came to shove Bernie backed down from the DNC." It is worth noting that when entering the primary he agreed to support the nominee. It is worth noting that Sanders pretty much always does what he says he will. It is worth noting that he talked over, and over, and over, and over about how much he didn't think Trump should be president and that he would do everything in his power to try and stop him. Let's not pretend those aren't the facts. Regarding, "They cheated him by rigging the primary against him." Yup. Regarding, "That was his chance to be a real revolutionary by exposing the corruption on both sides." It was already exposed for fucks sake. Do you really think the people that still want to claim the primary was fair were all of a sudden going to wake the fuck up if Sanders cried about getting fucked over? The bottom line is that Americans fucking hate whiners, even if their whining is justified. Even Hillary supporters had an impossible time defending their fallen queen on her blame everybody other than herself book tour. I don't need Sanders to tell me he got fucked over and neither should you or anyone. Regarding, "That would have allowed him to really start a third party." All of this obsession over starting a new party even thou we live in a world where the game is completely rigged against 3rd parties. The bottom line is that you gotta pick your poison and the best way to go is to try and takeover the corrupt "democratic" party. That would kill 2 birds with one stone. Even if you successfully created a new party you would still have 2 corrupt major parties to deal with. Regarding, "Instead he has gone along with the Russia ruse" Ruse? Do you really want to claim they didn't fuck with us at all? Because they did even if the corporate media wildly overblows their influence. Ultimately Sanders is wise to admit they fucked with us because... ya know... they did. Regarding, "and loss of Hillary" The corporate media wildly overblows their influence because it creates an excuse for hillary's loss. And that is important because they need to justify the status quo. It wasn't hillary's fault it was russias. That is bullshit. But ultimately russia did fuck with us so let's not pretend they didn't. And it isn't surprising. The USA fucks with everyone and I don't need a smoking gun to know it. Regarding, "Now the DNC made sure he will never get the nomination." Did they? How so? Because there is this still a thing called the "democratic" primary. It isn't fair but it does give the peasants an opportunity to have their say. And if they are willing to fight him doesn't that tell you he isn't their shill? You can't have it both ways. He can't have sold out and them be fighting him and it make sense. Regarding, "But will he actually run as a 3rd party?" You know something that would have forever damaged a 3rd party movement? Sanders running as a 3rd party candidate and Trump winning. The only reason Sanders isn't effectively blamed for Trump is because he did what he did. Now yes they do try to blame him. But the sane are easily able to see through this and it only makes them look worse. Regarding, "He’s been bought and paid for." I guess that is why they are working overtime to do anything and everything to stop him. I guess that is why they will again do everything they can to fuck him over in 2020. Regarding, "If he was smart he would have called for an investigation into the DNC, completely rejected the Russia narrative" Worst advice ever. There is a reason he is the most popular politician in the country, winning the war of ideas, and in a position to bring change going forward... because he didn't think this was a "smart." Regarding, "vote 3rd party." Here is the reality... Jill Stein got 1 percent of the vote against 2 of, not only the most despised politicians, but most despised HUMANS in the country. Think about that for a minute before you conclude 3rd parties are the answer in this country currently.
    4
  2365. Steven regarding, "California it’s a progressive shit hole." People who have been to California disagree. And if it is a "shit hole" then what does that say about states like Alabama and Tennessee?
    4
  2366. mikey regarding, "Sounds like your argument essentially boils down to..." Well it absolutely is not. Regarding, "Lastly, who here has "smeared" Bernie exactly?" Really? Do I really need to go through the comments and pick out some gems for you? Regarding, "Jimmy" I wasn't talking about Jimmy. I was talking about people in the comments section. I thought that was pretty clear, like my point. I guess it isn't to some.
    4
  2367. Daily Dope regarding, "2020 will be a repeat of Hillary V. Bernie 2016, only, this time, Bernie will be playing the role of the Corporate Warmonger." I am so tired of feeling like I'm living in the movie Idiocracy because of shit like this. The fact that you not only think this was smart but felt so strongly about it to write it is really something else.
    4
  2368. Chaud regarding, "Screw you Clint Holmes. Bernie is a traitor. Get over it. Time to move on. He won't win as a Democrat. Nor would I vote for him as a Democrat. Go Away Bernie." This is what you say when you have nothing of substance to offer.
    4
  2369. anthony regarding, "better options? Really?" Yes. Literally anyone and everyone is better. Regarding, "There's going to be two parties in 2020" What a good brainwashed sheep you are to accept their bullshit that you must vote for a giant douche or a turd sandwhich. Regarding, "I'm voting for Trump" Sadly you are part of the problem rather than being part of the solution.
    4
  2370. A visit to epstein island maybe.
    4
  2371. Are there innocents working at the capital? Or just warmongers?
    4
  2372. To be "fair" to kyle he defended the hell out of blackmailer ana and at a huge cost to himself. It cost him all his credibility.
    4
  2373. If I ever find myself agreeing with Chris Matthews I rethink things and figure out what I'm doing wrong.
    4
  2374. She is why there is still hope for the dumpster fire party.
    4
  2375. Spencer regarding, "That’s why you be as over the top as possible." I think your original comments sarcasm was clear but, because you live in a world with people like whyamipink and global warming skeptic to name a couple, people can never, ever, know for sure it is sarcasm unless you say so specifically. Even the most over the top comment is no different than some of the things the dumbest of dumb say without sarcasm. I would have treated your comment as sarcasm from the start (my original reply was not to you but to a guy who deleted their comment), but I don't think anyone can get mad at someone for not knowing for a certain a sarcastic comment is sarcastic unless explicitly stated. #sarcasticfont LET'S MAKE THIS HAPPEN!
    4
  2376.  @AshGreen359  They do more pretending to support the people, less overt racism, more virtue signaling.
    4
  2377. And if you want to know how the disingenuous corporate media has covered this study check out The Rational National's video on this. It was spot on. Sanders 2020
    4
  2378. Regarding, "No such thing as a good supporter, says a bunch of..." Are you smart enough to see the irony?
    4
  2379. That's funny coming from a guy who smears Bernie Sanders just as often as the establishment.
    4
  2380.  Barney  I don't claim to have compassion for evil. I have contempt for it.
    4
  2381.  Barney  Regarding, "It shows the nature of progressives." Nah. You are showing the intellectually bankruptcy of maga morons as you lie. Regarding, "You claim..." I told you exactly what I claim. I claim to have contempt for evil. But don't let that stop you from ignoring what I actually claim to continue to strawman. Regarding, "When that judge died no one said a bad word about her" BS. In the age of information ignorance like yours is a choice. Regarding, "here you are hoping Trump dies." Yup. He's evil. The world would be a better place without him. Sorry not sorry if the truth hurts. I feel the same way about Biden if it makes you feel any better.
    4
  2382.  Barney  Regarding, "You sounded like a moron." Try to realize that you think and say the things you do because you are a dipshit. Regarding, "Keep in touch with me dude." I'd rather not. Ideally you would just shut up and stop making the world dumber with your drivel. Regarding, "When Trump wins I wanna laugh at you as you cry like a big baby" Even after I straight up tell you I hate biden this is your idiotic response? Your stupidity is almost remarkable somehow.
    4
  2383. Regarding, "Tulsi is still in the race to talk about regime change wars." She doesn't need to be in the race to talk about this. She could still do this as a Bernie surrogate... just like in 2016.
    4
  2384. Thank you for this. So many people going out of their way to trash her personally. Her heart is in the right place even if she is way, way, way wrong.
    4
  2385.  @ikexbankai  Regarding, "yet more people decided not to vote for him when they were all by themselves in the voting booth" Why should I trust the election results when they are being brought to me by the DNC who said Pete Buttigieg "won" Iowa? Regarding, "you know the DNC don’t run the state elections right? They are ran by the Secretary of State of that given state and parties in the state" Are you really implying the DNC has no influence? There is lots of blame and corruption to go around in the party.
    4
  2386.  @klip8726  Regarding, "I doubt he would have picked up the votes of disgruntled boomers who don't like trump..." Really? Well nevermind them. Sanders brings people out to vote that wouldn't otherwise. There are lots of people who don't think either party represents them. Sanders does. He is simply the most popular politician in the country.
    4
  2387. Believing there are no conspiracies is just as dumb as thinking everything is a conspiracy.
    4
  2388.  @Glumclam  Did he? Or did he just talk?
    4
  2389.  @user-wl2xl5hm7k  Regarding, "Are there any other policies that are a better progressive litmus test?" Personally I have three issues that are most important to me. 1) money out of politics 2) universal health care 3) give peace a chance.
    4
  2390. I'm ready to say 90 percent. I'm tired of this.
    4
  2391. Thanks for the comic relief carrot. You are dumb even for a carrot.
    4
  2392. We need to invent new words in the English language to describe you Tamila. Psycho doesn't even begin to describe the kind of crazy you are.
    4
  2393. tech regarding, "Lost about what?" Whatever point you were previously trying to make. Regarding, "What people immediately think of as "hot" or attractive whether it's for men or women is mostly consumer bullshit." Kinda but I don't actually agree with this. Although culture influences us, what we perceive of as hot is something we are born with in my opinion much like our sexual preference is something we are born with. Regarding, "Women aren't admired for their innate talents and intelligence" Sure they are although maybe not to the degree they should be. For example I absolutely find intelligent women more attractive and less intelligent women less attractive. Regarding, "men are mostly judged by the size of their bank accounts." Again although what you are saying is kindof true it is hardly everything. I'm pretty sure Brad Pitt could get laid all he wanted if he were dirt poor. Regarding, "It's cultural garbage like this that leads to destructive behavior by both genders." Humans are innately flawed. Nothing in life is perfect. People are responsible for their actions even if their environment plays a role. Regarding, "Culture influences women look at men as their sugar daddies, so they become permanent infantile children and culture influences men to look at women as something that has no other value than some dolled up sex toy." Still I am unclear as to what the point you are trying to get at is. Does culture influence people? Sure. Do I think people should be able to use culture to excuse behavior? Absolutely not. Is that what you are trying to do?
    4
  2394. myname regarding, "your such a soy boy" I have no idea what that means and being the simpleton I am I'm ok not knowing.
    4
  2395. BULLSHIT!. They also want war, less regulations, corporate welfare, money in politics...
    4
  2396. "suggestions" end apartheid. freedom for everyone
    4
  2397.  @christopherlee9026  Yup. And just in case you don't already know about Portugal I suggest you look into what they have done regarding drugs. It helps prove your point for you. https://www.theguardian.com/news/2017/dec/05/portugals-radical-drugs-policy-is-working-why-hasnt-the-world-copied-it
    4
  2398. You remind me of ana who went to smearing when unable to debate the merits.
    4
  2399.  @jesusf.2600  Sanders should pick Nina Turner... someone who doing the right thing by supporting him for president and isn't splitting the progressive vote.
    4
  2400. Progressives really should be holding out for both 2K checks and a 15 dollar minimum wage. Both were promised by biden.
    4
  2401.  @f58534  LMFAO. Not only is he not but he's not in wikipedia.
    4
  2402.  @robertsvorinich890  Regarding, "don't superdelegates pick the nominee on the second ballot if there is no first ballot winner?" If it goes to a second ballot it becomes a free-for-all that favors the establishment. Superdelegates can do whatever they want. Pledged delegates can do whatever they want. Horsetrading and inside deals ultimately lead to some corporate tool in that scenario. It wouldn't be inconceivable if they didn't pick someone who didn't even run at that point like (no joke I could see them doing this) Michelle Obama.
    4
  2403. Bernie lost because the game was rigged from day one. You should realize why the worst candidates have a way of "winning," rather than saying stupid things.
    4
  2404. Yang is a conman and terrible. I'm shocked the DNC isn't having him speak.
    4
  2405. The peasants are the victims.
    4
  2406. To expose him.
    4
  2407. Yeah John weed is more dangerous than people think because literally nobody has ever overdosed on it. That is what makes it so dangerous... the fact that it doesn't kill anyone.
    4
  2408.  @Fokadas  I didn't vote for any of them. Speak for yourself.
    4
  2409. Having troops literally everywhere is imperialist. But I'll give you an a for effort in polishing that turd. "Supporting our allies." LMFAO. Maybe we should have our allies in the US right? Supporting us?
    4
  2410. If you identify with either major party then you are part of a cult.
    4
  2411. I love you guys. Thank you so much for what you are doing. Someone needs to do it.
    4
  2412. South Park was, as usual, ahead of it's time on the topic of queefing.
    4
  2413. It should be. Sadly it is quite predictable.
    4
  2414.  Bruce Boring  Yup. Good catch. I should have included that. Ultimately their position isn't generally born of principle... generally it's born of religious indoctrination.
    4
  2415.  @Tiredofthecensorship189  Regarding, "How has Biden lied about 2k checks" It's 1400 now. In the age of information ignorance like yours is a choice.
    4
  2416. Nobody is watching. No one cares.
    4
  2417. This is it bobby. This is her "broken clock" moment. Meghan is correct that Warren should be willing to go on fox. It's literally everything else that she says that is wrong.
    4
  2418. TYT isn't the left or even close. just sayn
    4
  2419. Register as a dem long enough to vote in their primaries. It is fucked up and wrong that you need to do so but it is important that you do. And don't think that because you would be a "registered dem" you would owe them anything in general. You wouldn't.
    4
  2420. They are extremely dangerous to our democracy.
    4
  2421.  @clearshade3560  They aren't blind. They just don't want to take it seriously and are trying to mindlessly dismiss it.
    4
  2422. @WeAreIt So when exactly did it? Was their some kind of goldilocks zone between women getting the right to vote and 60 years ago where you think the government accurately represented the people? Yeah... they didn't. They never did.
    4
  2423. @WeAreIt While JFK was better than most as a POTUS I think that suggesting that what is essentially an american royal family leading government isn't the same as a government truly being "representative" of it's peasants.
    4
  2424. Aaron Mate is my headliner.
    4
  2425. It's the money that corrupts and he hasn't taken the big money.
    4
  2426. Your comment is either great sarcasm or you are epic stupid. It is tough to tell sometimes.
    4
  2427. If anyone is a fraud it's you.
    4
  2428. Sanders has been in politics for a long, long time. Yes there are some votes that he has made over that very long time that can be considered questionable but, on the whole his record is exceptional, especially when compared to others. He voted against the war in Iraq and argued about it impassionedly. After that vote was made and he lost he voted to fund the troops which is often portrayed as voted for the war. It wasn't. They were already going to war and seeing how there was nothing he could do about that fact at that point he wanted to make sure that US troops going to war would have what they needed. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_om-x323Em0&t=20s Keep in mind that he said these things in the immediate wake of 9-11.
    4
  2429. Does this mean that you sadly didn't lose a hand to fireworks yesterday? Bummer.
    4
  2430.  @andrewdwyer2456  "Yang definitely has a special appeal for sure" There is no mystery that bribing people with money makes you like them and that the effect works on both "sides."
    4
  2431.  @mrankitanks  "At a time when Bernie was the frontrunner." Immediately after yang dropped out he endorsed noone saying that he wanted someone to support UBI. Tulsi supported ubi and still he didn't endorse her or try to push sanders over the top. Yang ultimately endorsed biden after sanders was out and despite him not offering UBI like yang said he needed. He was bad and lying but not exactly in the way you say.
    4
  2432.  @bluesrockfan36  "OPT into UBI," Why should people have to opt into what is suppose to be a UNIVERSAL program? Why should people have to choose between food stamps and UBI?
    4
  2433. You are impossible to take seriously.
    4
  2434.  @dassnek4728  You too are impossible to take seriously. And it's telling to find trump supporters and warren supporters finding common ground and talking points.
    4
  2435. Just more evidence that they are propaganda with an agenda.
    4
  2436. What a waste of money.
    4
  2437.  @toropodcast1195  I hope you are being paid well to spread crap like that. Forgive me for not taking you and that bullshit article seriously enough to respond to it intelligently. Or don't. Whatever.
    4
  2438. I blame the corporate media for their propaganda as much as I blame the DNC.
    4
  2439.  M G  Regarding, "Ok then tell me what Trump did to become a racist and I’ll believe it?" Good one. As if you are going to be swayed by anything I have to say. You are clearly a trump cultist. But why is trump a racist? Take his racist wall policy. Why does Trump only care about a wall on the southern border? Why does the guy who loves walls not think we need a wall on that wide open norther border? Because he is a racist. He only cares about building a wall between us and the country that isn't predominately white. Regarding, "BET YOU NEVER REPLY BACK TO ME!" What did I win? Regarding, "Your the racist Clint!" Based on what? You being stupid doesn't make me a racist. Regarding, "I love it when a white man tells me who is racist because most of the time they’re are the real racist." I love it when people, without cause, interject my race (or at least what they think my race to be) into the conversation as if it's important in the exact same breathe where they call me racist. And by love it I mean you are destroying my faith in humanity and can't really think less of you for reasons that have nothing to do with whatever your skin color may be.
    4
  2440. You are forgetting an orange clown.
    4
  2441.  @dennisbarzanoff9025  Regarding, "I am really sorry for you spending your limited time here hating on people for no reason" Pretty funny considering you here hating for no reason. I'm here hating because dr phil is a POS. Would you like me to break down in great detail why he is a POS?
    4
  2442.  @emileeout1964  I responded to you and it was immediately taken down. Wow. Just. Wow. I feel strongly enough about this that I'm going to try and get by it...
    4
  2443. This nerd is for Sanders!
    4
  2444.  @darkempath7436  Regarding, "fuck other people" and "they think we're fools" You are a fool and fuck you. You are impossible to take seriously. I really hope you are just paid to be an idiot and aren't actually as dense as you seem. Either way you really do suck. Good luck with that.
    4
  2445.  @sniperjared  "your opinions are facts and my facts are opinions got it" It doesn't matter what either of our opinions is... it's fact that the crime bill only exaserbated the racial disparity of people being persecuted by the US "justice" system. "got it." You clearly do not. I hope it's because you are bought, for your sake.
    4
  2446. Regarding, "What is this guy’s target audience?" Weasels? And/or weasel/human hybrids?
    4
  2447. Tell you what Taskmaster I'll rephrase since you are going to try to dodge the point. How exactly could Trump plausibly make a better deal with Iran than the one Obama made? Note, just proclaiming faith in a guy who thought selling steaks at the sharper image was a good idea does not constitute an answer to the sane. Even the guy who actually wrote "the art of the deal" thinks the orange clown in chief is an idiot. Oh and pointing out how he used bullshit about bonespurs to get out of serving this country isn't derangement unless you are deranged. That is absolutely legitimate.
    4
  2448. I guess that is why raising the minimum wage is so important to them... because they don't have jobs... thinks a mental midget.
    4
  2449.  @UsenameTakenWasTaken  One way or the other they are internet cancer.
    4
  2450.  @TheZombie567  Sorry not sorry but I don't take you seriously enough to respond to your latest shit intelligently.
    4
  2451.  @TheZombie567  Regarding, "grammar." I don't care about grammar. I care about hypocrisy. And you are a hypocrite while spelling like a dipshit and calling others dumb at the same time. Whatever. Talking to you is a waste of time. I'm done with this.
    4
  2452.  @Freakarmy  Regarding, "democracy dollars in his portfolio is Yang. If he passes that, there won't be a need for Super-Pacs. Is that clear to you?" Yangtards are a special breed. Why stop there? May as well claim that democracy dollars are going to get me laid and cure cancer since you are just making shit up.
    4
  2453.  @jackripper5240  Regarding, "this is how the country fails" The country fails because it's filled with morons. Regarding, "stay divided" The country is divided. Closing my eyes and wishing for the best isn't an answer. We need people like you to pull your head from you ass. Regarding, "Reality is no one is suitable for that seat." Says a person trying to justify the absolute least qualitied person. You want experience if you go to mcdonalds for fucks sake but are willing to forgo it for literally the most powerful position in the world as if that makes any fucking sense whatsoever. Regarding, "And calling Trump supporters morons will bury you even deeper." They are morons... because reality. As are Hillary supporters. Regarding, "May the Father of Understanding enlighten you." Don't kid yourself... the only difference between what I do and what you do is that I don't try to veil my insults.
    4
  2454. things a clown would say
    4
  2455. TYT is not corrupt despite the 20 million. Kyle said so.
    4
  2456. You know Americans support social security right? Spoiler alert that is socialism you fucking moron. Even a dipshit like you should be able to figure that out considering the name.
    4
  2457. Holy shit are you fucking stupid. Your original comment states, "Most Americans do not accept socialism." I then demonstrate how they do in fact not only accept socialism but love it because they love the socialist program social security. You can't just be a man and admit that what you said was fucking stupid so instead you move the goalpost to something completely fucking different, ie a 100 percent "socialist government" that nobody, Sanders included advocates for. People like you destroy my faith in humanity.
    4
  2458. Diana regarding, "that candidate won't be Democrat" I can confidently say that the best candidate in the "democratic" primary is going to be a democrat. Vote for them in the primary and if you want to vote for someone else during the general then absolutely. Go right ahead. I will be encouraging you to do so then if Harris or Booker are the democratic nominee.
    4
  2459. op kingdom regarding, "Care more about party lables?" What I was saying was that some people care about party labels more than they care about politicians. I for one love Bernie Sanders. I'd vote for him if he called himself a democrat, green, independent, republican, martian or other. I think that people who say they will only support a candidate if they put their preferred party label after their name are demonstrating they care more about a party label than they care about the candidate. Which is fucking stupid to me. Regarding, "you just told us to vote Dems no matter what because we can't let the Repubs win" No. I definitely did not say such a thing. Regarding, ""No they cheat us" and you say we're "letting them win"" Um. Nope. They are cheating us but I'm going to make them cheat to win. I'm not going to not vote. Not voting is just letting them win. Regarding, "are you with correct the record" Um. Nope. I think you are misunderstanding what I've said. Let me try to be clear again.... vote for whoever you want during the general. But vote during the "democratic" primary to try and get the most progressive candidate they have at the moment. I assure you it makes lots of sense.
    4
  2460. ameigh there are very legit grievances to be had about the voting machines. That said... Regarding, "I realize that my vote won't necessarily be counted." By not voting you go from not necessarily being counted to ABSOLUTELY 100 PERCENT not being counted. At least force them to rig it. What you are doing, like I've already pointed out, is letting them win without a fight. At least fight (aka vote).
    4
  2461. op kingdom regarding, "if Bernie got in as President, he, too would be "opposed at every turn" from Reps & Dems." You have a point but I think you must realize that Bernie gets pushed much harder by dems if he is an 3rd party than if he is a dem. That said you are correct to think they will be reluctant to do anything good on their own but it will be much harder for them to justify if they are in the same party at the time. Regarding, "Progressive President" I promise you I want a progressive president as much as you. But the fact remains that the easist way to get one is to go through the "democratic" party. And if I am wrong it doesn't stop any of us for voting 3rd party afterward. Regarding, "Because EVERYONE would be happier paying less for their better insurance." Have you met the American public? There are lots of idiots out there who vote against their own interests. Regarding, "We need Progressives in Congress" We definitely agree on this. Regarding, "and the Democrats will NOT allow that" Voters do have a say in the matter. Regarding, "The party has now rigged their power structure against Progressives." It has always been rigged... they are just making it worse. But they have to rig the game because there is still a game to be played. Of course it is fucked up that they get to start a touchdown up and it is wrong we have play that way but it is still a fight worth having. Especially when voting in the primary doesn't cost you anything. It isn't like you have to then vote them in the general. Regarding, "They have closed ranks and we KNOW they believe that can just select their candidates in a smoky back room." They do all their shady shit because they KNOW there are still elections to be had. Regarding, "They are not seeking UNITY with Progressives" No they are not and I am not seeking unity with them. I'm looking to take over the party hostile takeover style. And if it doesn't work the green party is plan B. Regarding, "the ONLY power Progressives held" We still have our votes. I like to think they have realized they can't win without them. I'm not sure they have but clearly they are power. Regarding, "Progressives have been purged." How about we purge them? To do that we need to win their primary. And it absolutely is possible. And again, if it isn't there is a plan B. Regarding, "Time to re-strategize because the Dem Party is closed to Progressives now." I'm not as sure. I'm going to make them prove it. I will reevaluate after the primary. Til then I'm still going to try to go through them.
    4
  2462.  @juniorgod321  So is Alex Jones the seniorgod321?
    4
  2463. He wasn't comparing them. He was pointing out that this is a slippery slope and dangerous precedent for them.
    4
  2464.  @thepatternologist  "kamikaze much?" Much? Isn't that kinda a one and done sorta thing?
    4
  2465. AJ forgive me for not being your bitch and doing your homework for you. It's not like you are actually interested in the answer anyway since you think polls are fake news or some other retarded ass shit.
    4
  2466.  @joela6895  I get that. I'm a human being and I'm ashamed that pete is part of my species.
    4
  2467.  @tonyplow9882  "Not sure if he would say the same thing at this point" I've got a dollar that says he tells you to vote for the blue team in 2024 assuming he makes it long enough.
    4
  2468.  @tonyplow9882  "it likely won’t come up if nobody asks him." Let's say I used to think people should starve and die but now I've changed my mind about it... I wouldn't wait for people to ask to let them know I've come to my senses.
    4
  2469.  @dashx1103  "please point to Chomsky's quote of "vote blue no matter who."" I'm pointing at his actions. He tells you to vote for the dem nominee every election no matter how terrible their candidate. "It's a reasonable take" 1) It's not reasonable 2) He is manufacturing consent for corrupt politicians by doing it. "It's a reasonable take" It's just as unreasonable as people who voted for trump knowing he was terrible but did so anyway because of biden. Together they all ensure the country circles the drain forever.
    4
  2470. joeb regarding, "You are one of those Bernie bros who don't want to face reality. Bottom line. More people wanted Hillary Clinton than Bernie Sanders to be president." See what I'm talking about. Everything you say is dumb as fuck. You say I don't want to face reality then you make an idiotic, detached from reality point that more people wanted Clinton to be president than Sanders despite reality. No doubt you think are justified for saying such a stupid thing because Clinton got more votes in the Primary than Sanders but you ignore obvious facts such as DNC meddling in the election, corporate media bias, voter disenfranchisement, and voter suppression. 4 million independents in NY state alone were not allowed to vote but that doesn't happen in your fantasy world. And I'm the one who doesn't want to face reality? Right.
    4
  2471. This is all meaningless talk before he tells you to vote blue no matter who.
    4
  2472. water regarding, "Fuk the DNC" The DNC is a joke but they are not going anywhere. The best plan is to take over the party and change it. Regarding, "If he doesn't run as an independent I won't vote for him." You care way too much about a letter after a person's name and too little about the person.
    4
  2473. @Derya Alkan Regarding, " You still haven't addressed to me the issue of increased labor costs that a $15 minimum wage has to the millions of small businesses that'll bankrupt them" Here's the answer that I did address. Straight up copy and pasted... "Regarding, "small businesses that won't be able to handle the higher labor costs" Small business will fucking love a world where people have extra money in their in pocket to spend at their small business. Not only will people have more money but they will be more willing to use it at mom and pop stores because they aren't trying to scrimp and save every dollar they can like they are now which almost necessitates them going to walmart to save a buck. And if they can't pay their employees enough to live on. Fuck em. I'm sure these were the same types of idiotic arguments used to try and keep slavery around back in the day but they wouldn't have been compelling to me then and they aren't compelling to me now. You can't pay your employees enough to live. Then they can fail. That said, most all will love it for the reasons I've already given." You make me embarrassed to be a human.
    4
  2474. I am not an expert on her nor do I pretend to be but when I listen to her I have little trouble understanding where she stands on the topics she talks about. As for your obsession with her being either a social democrat or a democratic socialist you need to understand that the people who even understand the difference between the 2 is practically nonexistent in this uninformed country and, again, should be focusing on individual policy positions rather than trying to put a person in a box with a label on it. As for my "sensitivity" that is born of my belief that you are disingenuous and insincere.
    4
  2475. Regarding, "how is this attacking her????" If you wonder why I might have trouble taking you seriously take this question.... do you really not know the answer to this with me answering it for you? Are you really so baffled that not only do you ask it but you think it requires extra question marks? I guess I'll try to explain the obvious to you but I have to question myself as to why I would. Well... most people understand that politicians who flip flop and hold conflicting positions are less trustworthy and less electable like the picture of her you are trying to paint. Regarding, "Its not my fault..." Maybe so but this is not relevant to my point. Regarding, "Kulinski... do(es)." Although he uses labels I am confident that he would agree with me far more then you in that what is important are policy positions and not labels. Regarding, "I'm not the one going in full on attack mode" I'm sure that when you call me a sensitive snowflake that is waaaay different right? Regarding, "for a critique of someone" Don't let the actual why of my lack of tolerance for you, which I've already said, get in the way of what you want to think. Clearly it doesn't. Regarding, "someone whom you've obviously placed on a pedestal and can do no wrong" Don't let the fact that I, for example, just got done telling you that I am no expert on her get in the way of the fantasies you want to paint. I'm sure it is easier for you to think this rather then just accept the fact that maybe, just maybe, it has more to do with me thinking you are disingenuous and insincere. You know... like I've already said.
    4
  2476. Jill wasn't perfect but she was the only person running that I actually wanted to win. I can't tell you how sad and frustrated I was that she only got about 1 percent of the vote. (So I'm told. There is a part of me that has trouble accepting that as fact.) I'm not familiar with Vermin Supreme but let's hope it doesn't come to that in 2020.
    4
  2477. @Jacket off Gym Jordan Regarding, "How can a person be terrible and get the most votes?" LMFAO. So if trump gets the most votes this election it means he can't be terrible? That's not how it works. Obviously.
    4
  2478. @Jacket off Gym Jordan How are you not a trump supporter with your intellect?
    4
  2479. She would be a great running mate and great president... in 2028 after Bernie.
    4
  2480. Don't get your hopes up. 2021 is going to suck terribly. But at least it will suck less now.
    4
  2481. Jeremy regarding, "third party surge." I support your desire to improve 3rd parties. If the "democratic" party nominee in 2020 is a corporate stooge like Biden, Booker, or Harris I will be looking for a 3rd party candidate to vote for. But I think that is rightfully plan B and I am pushing for a progressive to win the dem nomination in 2020 in part because of the legit point sbears made about the general election. Things are not going to get any better without winning elections and there is no bigger election than the presidency. We have the best opportunity we have had in some time to actually get a progressive in the WH. I'm not going to sacrifice it just because people are rightfully pissed at the "democratic" party.
    4
  2482.  @plotlinevideo3719  Regarding, "citation needed," He ran for potus saying he supported m4a. Then he proposed a health care plan. It wasn't m4a or even close. He was just lying. He says he supports a "universal" basic income. But he also says people need to opt in. As if you should need to opt into a universal program. "I’m betting you got nothing but opinions." I'm betting his lies won't affect you the same way trump supporters don't care about his lies.
    4
  2483.  @sirens4562  I actually think they are a bot the more I look at it. So many of the same comment in such a small timeframe.
    4
  2484.  @holdenbrooksweaver  Regarding, "delusional people trying to find some rationale of saying it supports women" So is this what you think you are doing? While telling a women that what she is doing wrong? Is that supporting women in your opinion? The way I see it... she is a women performing art that isn't hurting anyone. So I find your problems with it pretty silly. You don't need to enjoy it. But to have a problem with it is questionable at best.
    4
  2485. David regarding, "is that her reporting style i.e. the story telling narrative in which she approches news stories is what she's good at" Yup. She is good at telling stories. Forgive me but I personally am reluctant to give her credit for it because she is a corporate stooge and sellout. Regarding, "it is my understanding that he wasn't a good painter" I was just trying to give him credit for what I think he was good at. I thought that was what you wanted. Regarding, "Maddow and Hitler are like the same person." Nowhere did I say or mean to imply anything of the sort. The point I was trying to make is that it is perfectly natural to not want to give a person you despise credit for anything, even if it is something they do well. Let me be clear... Maddow is not like Hitler. But I do not like Maddow and I'm not looking to give her credit for jack fucking shit. She is a sellout serving her corporate masters. And the fact that she actually is good at telling stories only makes her worse and more dangerous because of what she does and is. Now I'm going to continue to try to only give credit and praise to people I like and respect... like normal people do.
    4
  2486. "He did the first time..." Citation needed.
    4
  2487. I wish there were a hell for people like him. Sadly there isn't.
    4
  2488. Notice how you offer nothing of substance and just smears? Did you learn that by watching TYT?
    4
  2489.  @snapgrouch702  "Don’t get mad because I’m speaking facts." LMFAO You have no facts. That's actually what I was asking you for. And you offer more BS like this rather than the lies you were accusing the hill of saying. I attack you because YOU are the one lying. I attack you because YOU have no facts.
    4
  2490. Regarding, "desire to have Hitlery run in 2020." Meh, I wanted her to run. She would get crushed and box out all the other corporate democrats like Harris and Booker who I actually fear can win.
    4
  2491. Cenk
    4
  2492. You are an idiot who isn't using the word hypocrisy correctly. Biden is creepy as fuck and it has nothing to with Trump but cool deflection.
    4
  2493. Remember he was promoted by Trump. That was his idea of "draining the swamp."
    4
  2494. BrackShiip did you bother to watch the video before commenting?
    4
  2495.  @missinglew  Regarding, "Stop with this "bust" bullshit." No thanks. I'm going to continue to remind people that I'm not in the vote blue no matter who crowd. How about you stop with the "time to grow up" bullshit?
    4
  2496. I trust Bernie but I do not follow him blindly. I respect Sanders supporters, in part, because they are not just sheep.
    4
  2497.  @TheRatsintheWalls  Not all UBIs are created equal. If you asked me how I'd pay for UBI as a progressive I'd answer, "rich people." But not yang. Right here on youtube, "Andrew Yang: Paying for a Universal Basic Income" when asked how are you going to pay for UBI yangs answer is very different than mine. Yangs first thought to pay for his UBI? He wants to gut "500 billion dollars per year on income support" (it's at about 1:24 in the video) to pay for his UBI. 25 percent of his UBI is paid for by the poorest of the poor and by taking their food stamps. That's regressive. Progressive UBI is paid for by the rich.
    4
  2498. Regarding, "Obamacare is not good." No. It is not. I do not think that is his position. I believe that his position is that the ACA was an improvement upon what we had, which is it was. And that Trump is going the wrong direction and making things worse, which he is. That said you can also make an accurate case that it was a net loss because it slowed the progress to an actual good system like single payer for all but that is a different discussion. Again, the ACA sucks... but still that isn't a good reason to go the wrong way... like Trump is trying to do.
    4
  2499.  @RKZX2  I suspect that grim is being funded by some billionaire who is invested in that type of surgery.
    4
  2500. Actually it is but let's stop fighting wars all over the world anyway.
    4
  2501. As if he didn't already enter as a swamp creature.
    4
  2502.  @zarrex6808  As if azov isn't a thing. You don't have anything to contradict their statement. Your only hope is that people put their fingers in their ears like you.
    4
  2503.  @penpenultra  Regarding, "I understand that mentality, but it will get us nowhere." But voting for Biden who is terrible and the antithesis of everything I believe in will get us somewhere? Regarding, "I voted green in 2016" Good for you. And the world, and the country. If only more people were sane by doing this. Regarding, "it was a vote of principle" All your votes should be votes of principle. If you aren't representing your principles with your vote you certainly won't get representatives who share your principles. Regarding, "which garnered absolutely no utility, no value." I guess by your "logic" the only votes of any value were votes for trump then right? Because it only matters if you win? Regarding, "Voting for the Democratic party is not easy for me, but I see it as a necessary means to subverting our delve into fascism. At least this year." Whatever you got to tell yourself as to rationalize supporting a POS. You aren't the only one. There are plenty of republicans who know trump is evil and terrible and will vote for him anyway using their version of your "logic." Sure trump is terrible, but they need to vote for him because of biden, or pelosi, or hillary. Ultimately you are sheep supporting terrible for terrible reasons.
    4
  2504.  @penpenultra  Regarding, "delve into fascism" Do you vote for a fascist next election if you think their opponent is a nazi? May as well. That's what is wrong with a lesser of evils philosophy. No standards. If you had some you wouldn't support evil at all.
    4
  2505.  @oscarosei1985  "nothing to do with Graham and Jimmy's debate" That's literally why he's being criticized. That's why he failed at "show two people with differing opinions can have a good faith debate." Instead of doing that he was taking idiotic pot shots at max.
    4
  2506.  @oscarosei1985  It was a debate. And now that it's done he doesn't get some magic shield to protect himself from the dumb shit he did in it.
    4
  2507.  @oscarosei1985  "Are you dense?" Are you? "He never had any kind of debate with Max." No shit sherlock and no one is claiming he did. What he did do was take pot shots at max during a debate with jimmy where they were suppose to be being all civil and shit. Why are you defending him for this? Really? "Max misrepresented..." Even if I absolutely conceded all of this so what. Jimmy and graham were suppose to be having their debate and it had NOTHING to do with that. "Why are we having this inane back and forth on this?" Great question. Why are you defending grahams actions when they were indefensible here?
    4
  2508. Legislative sessions are where they make law. Stop being willfully stupid and a lying hypocrite.
    4
  2509. It's not everybody though... even if it should be.
    4
  2510. There is so much stupid I can't correct all your bullshit but regarding, "Their quality of care is also straight up dookie compared to ours." Bullshit. Canada has a single payer system. It costs far less than ours, covers everyone, AND PROVIDES BETTER CARE. The average life expectancy of Canadians is longer than Americans. Their infant mortality rate is better than Americans. So stop lying to people and get a fucking clue. All of your bullshit are just idiotic talking points that have no basis in reality. I have to wonder if you are really so stupid or if you are just being paid to say stupid things.
    4
  2511.  @paulxbsog1972  Regarding, "backpeddling means nothing." What? You just said that jimmy wouldn't cover this in your OP. In reality he already has. You are a liar. I hope it's just stupid but I have to wonder at this point if it's more nefarious and you willfully spreading BS.
    4
  2512. Too corrupt, too racist, too rapey...
    4
  2513. Great point.
    4
  2514. http://www.jimkeady.com/welcome?splash=1
    4
  2515. "MLK" MLK knew you needed justice. And you can only have justice when perpetrators have been punished.... aka brought to justice.
    4
  2516. I know right. Ana exposing herself in public. That type of behavior is clearly sexual harassment and it's not talked about enough. Good on you for shining a light on her deplorable behavior.
    4
  2517. So you think I'm not smart because I have a problem with people like you making the world dumber when you open your mouth. That makes sense to you because you are a moron. In short it is forever you that is not smart.
    4
  2518. CNN is garbage propaganda and their employees should mostly be in jail.
    4
  2519.  @synchronium24  "admitted what he said" Yes. He admitted to a joke. He was wrong to apologize for it. "actually wearing inappropriate clothes" Let's say what she were wearing was appropriate, then why would anyone find it funny or ana have reason to be embarrassed? "a second chance" LMFAO. In your alternate reality she would have been covering up and enabling a sexual predator only to change her mind because he's "running his mouth" about how TYT are frauds. "later on makes him the victim" She straight up tells you in the note why she wants to metoo him and it's not because she thinks he's a sexual predator but again because he's "running his mouth."
    4
  2520.  @amrs6713  "where is the conditional?" It's clearly implied. I honestly have a tough time taking you seriously at this point. "she's not conditioning the threat" The implication is that if he stop running his mouth she won't try to metoo him. "she seems to have decided to tell the story" What are you talking about? She didn't. But she was threatening to do so. She's bad at blackmail but even she wasn't going to give away the leverage she thought she had without trying to get something for it first. I'm bored of addressing your crap. If you don't get it by now you never will. Forgive me for being done addressing you or don't. Whatever.
    4
  2521.  @amrs6713  "I try to address people respectfully" As do I. But I concede I often fail especially when I think someone is being disingenuous. And I wonder that about you even if I'm wrong about it. "future indicative" What a strange way to describe what is clearly a threat. "There's no conditionality implied." LOL. The only person who controls if ana tries to metoo jimmy is ana. She is the person who has the control of which you speak unless jimmy gets a head of it and exposes her efforts to blackmail. I mean think about those words if the context were different... if the blackmail material ana had were different... let's say she said that will she held a knife at one of jimmys kids (if he has kids or had kids). It's a threat and it's not even veiled. It's all out in the open. "you know what I can do" LMFAO. This is literally just a different way of saying, "I've been holding back." I quit this. Take care.
    4
  2522. Gross
    4
  2523. Regarding, "the primary process was fair" No it wasn't and I hate you.
    4
  2524. Mary regarding, "Sanders." I think it is funny how they smear him for being an independent and not a democrat. He is what they should be. He shouldn't be joining them... they need to join him. Regarding, "Hillary's been a destructive presence..." If you want to want to stump Hillary supporters ask them what she has done for the country that has been good. Sometimes they are able to come up with tiny, tiny things if they dig deep enough. Then I point out a couple of the ways she has helped destroy the country to put it in context. How anyone could support her is beyond me. I fucking hate that Trump is president but the fact that she will never be president is a consolation prize. Regarding, "She should quietly slither away" What I'm about to say isn't very popular for good reason but I actually hope she runs in 2020 (not that I think, in any way, shape, or form that she will). She would suck up all the corporate support and corporate money before getting crushed in the primary. She would clear the way for a true progressive. She won't thou and the establishment will go with Booker or Harris who I fear much more than her.
    4
  2525. Sanders lost the south in 2016 in large part because they were put early on the schedule before Sanders had more name recognition and while Hillary was effectively portrayed as inevitable by the corporate media. I agree that they are predictable and will attack non stop. That is why I think it is important to give them as few things as possible for them to try and use including a running mate which is a yuuuuge avenue for attack. As for who the establishment's chosen one is it seems the early favorites are Biden, Booker, and Harris. We will know for sure who it is when the superdelegates line up early to support someone and all the phonys of all races will get behind them. Maybe there will come a point where it would be wise for Sanders to announce his running mate early and I consider this conversation far more interesting and constructive at this point then who it should be but think that point is still a long way off. I would like to add that I hope Sanders uses a single question to determine who to pick as his running mate... Who is the person best suited to take over as president should the unthinkable happen?... and that he doesn't use something like what is between a person's legs or what color their skin is to make that decision for political reasons.
    4
  2526. It certainly wasn't a loss even if it wasn't everything we want.
    4
  2527.  @TheGodsrighthandman  I'm the left. That means I'm for giving peace a chance, universal health care, criminal justice reform, protecting the enviornment, providing education, and more. BIden is a warmonger, who would veto M4A if given the chance, who authored the racist crime bill, who would protect fracking, and more. He isn't the left whether you are smart enough to realize it or intellectually honest enough to admit it.
    4
  2528.  @TheGodsrighthandman  Regarding, "He has stated - ON RECORD - that he will bring those policies I mentioned into Law if he becomes POTUS." You are full of it. He has stated that he would veto M4A, that he would protect fracking, that he is not for open borders and more. I can only think you are being paid to willfully spread lies.
    4
  2529. Regarding, "you never addressed what I said" No. I didn't. If you don't understand why what you are saying, as always, is dumb as fuck you never will. I choose to not waste the time and effort on an obviously hopeless cause such as yourself. I do want to call you stupid thou. People like you need to be shamed if nothing else.
    4
  2530. So he sucks and is a liar then for votes? That makes perfect sense.
    4
  2531. Meanwhile, in reality, the policy proposals Bernie has disproportionately help minorities.
    4
  2532. Illiterate morons calling others stupid is forever funny.
    4
  2533. The US government always gets just enough votes to pass bad legislation and a few votes to little to pass anything good. "the don't give a f about you. AT ALL!" -george carlin
    4
  2534. Fate has nothing to do with it. Reality does. Who do you think exists and can be passed that is worse than neera?
    4
  2535.  @karmafride1237  My fifth choice is the Amendment King.
    4
  2536. I'm sure Bill Maher called her out for her bullshit then? No. Then it is Bill Maher.
    4
  2537. I agree that big pharma has the most to lose but let's not forget the for profit private prison industry, our law enforcement agencies, the alcohol industry, and others. They all stand to lose if MJ were legal.
    4
  2538. Meh. Trump is an exception.
    4
  2539. You want my hard earned money to go for your lid Paul? Fuck you. Trumps going to make the extraterrestrial aliens pay for it.
    4
  2540. Giant Planet Killing Meteor 2020!
    4
  2541. Please do try to build other parties but don't dismiss good people like Sanders just because they run as a democrat.
    4
  2542. LOL. Yeah, I have a problem with this because he is black. I'm so racist I voted for him. I'd be just fine with a corrupt government as long as it is white. That is why I bitch about Trump, because I'm racist. Orange people are simply no good and it time we all talk about it.
    4
  2543. You are stronger than I then. I'm done with the corporate media. I can't take it without wanting to rip my hair out.
    4
  2544. It's still GWB.
    4
  2545. I'm thinking they all happily voted for Trump. (other than the one guy who praised MLK)
    4
  2546. @Clyde illusion Bravo on being totally unphased about being called out for your hypocrisy. Why am I not surprised? I couldn't take you less seriously if you gave your own retarded comments a thumbs up. Oh wait... you do that already.
    4
  2547.  @TheZodiacWoman  Jane and killah are your typical yang supporters who start with copy and pasted talking point crap.
    4
  2548.  @ExpatZ266  I'd rather vote for planet killing meteor than them.
    4
  2549. Missteps? You mean like her current pattern of supporting corporatists? You mean like her continuing to take dirty money? Look, it is a win. But a small one. And I'm not going to pretend it is more then that.
    4
  2550. Are you fucking kidding me? Do you not have the internet to do your own fucking homework? In the age of information ignorance is a choice.
    4
  2551.  @williammason3229  There are edibles ya know.
    4
  2552.  @Gnolomweb  Meanwhile, in reality, the policies that Bernie supports like universal health care, raising the minimum wage, providing college education, and criminal justice reform including legalizing weed are all problems that disproportionately affect blacks and would all disproportionately help blacks if implemented.
    4
  2553. Now you know why I smoke weed.
    4
  2554. Then it is up to Bernie alone then because the corporate dems are really only paying this lip service.
    4
  2555.  @pansepot1490  It's big money and corporate interests that win either way when it comes to those two.
    4
  2556.  Major Thought Ahead  Regarding, "you want to trust the Trump Administration to do anything?" I haven't said a word about the trump administration. I'm talking about fauci. whataboutism 101
    4
  2557.  Progressives Against the Regressive Left  Regarding, "Walk Softly" LFMAO. If Iran assassinated a US foreign official we would call it terrorism and a warcrime. I bring this up because that's what "walking softly" trump did to them.
    4
  2558.  @darkempath7436  Regarding, " that shit is not working" Maybe because those are solutions to problems that currently exist. You make no sense and if all you hear when others speak is blah blah blah that says more about you than it does me.
    4
  2559. Shadow regarding, "Trump was on the right track before the election." When exactly was that? Was it when he was saying things ISIS would say like, "we have to take out their families," or when he was calling Mexicans rapists and murderers (some I assume are good people)?
    4
  2560. KOS = kill off sanders maybe?
    4
  2561. He does even though you can argue he should do it more. Ultimately I get why he does what he does. Whining about your coverage isn't a good look for presidential candidates even when it's true.
    4
  2562. There is a reason Trump loves the uneducated and a reason they love him.
    4
  2563.  @danbridges4755  "what truth are they withholding?" That dems are corrupt and they are selling you out. "Are you ok?" Are you? Do you think people in china are the only ones being bombarded by propaganda? They aren't.
    4
  2564. No it isn't. But it should be in a country that is the richest in the history of the world and thinks that being able to carry a gun is a right.
    4
  2565. Adkins regarding, "How is private healthcare a failure?" Look at the number of uninsured. Look at the cost. Look at the outcomes. That is how it is a failure. Regarding, "How is capitalism a failure?" Capitalism is fine for most things but there are a few things, like sick people, that others should not be able to get rich off of.
    4
  2566. Adkins regarding, "What do you mean look at the number of uninsured?" Wow are you dense. I'll try to explain it so that you might be able to understand the obvious. In a country where millions and millions of people do not have insurance it is a problem especially if that country is going to treat people when they get sick. As much as you might want those people to just die the fact of the matter is that, in this country, because it is the moral thing to do, we don't just let sick people die (mostly). That cost is already spread out among everyone paying into the system. And since everyone benefits from a system where if they get sick they get treated it is common sense to make everyone help pay for that system especially when it is far cheaper to pay for preventative medicine as opposed to emergency medicine. Regarding, "They just didn't purchase insurance." In case you haven't realized the cost of private health care is out of control. Just because it is available does not mean that everyone can afford it... especially in a country that likes to pay its workers as little as possible. Regarding, "So you want Govt to forcefully tax everyone and insure everyone?. Is that what you call as everyone insured?" Yes dipshit. Despite your whine the fact of the matter is that the government is already taxing me and spending my money and I would prefer that if they are going to do so they spend my tax dollars on something I actually want and need like healthcare instead of just bombs. EVERYONE NEEDS HEALTH INSURANCE. Nobody can safely go without it. Since we all need it I want the government to makes sure everyone has it. That, to me, is good government. No doubt to you this is tyranny or some other bullshit.
    4
  2567. Adkins regarding, "helping hold the country back from progress" Yes. Absomotherfucking lootely. Because you are blinded by your nationalism. You seem to think that America is the only country that has anything to offer in any aspect of society. Because you are blind to the simple, obvious truth that started this conversation that private healthcare is a failure. We only need to look at the United States health care system and compare it to other countries but you are incapable of doing that because to you nobody has anything to offer other than America. That apparently America is great because of something intrinsic rather than how it conducts it's business. In the United States we leave millions of people uninsured even thou we pay far, far, far more for health insurance per person than other countries that don't leave millions of people behind AND they get better health care results. At least the for profit health insurance industry is able to make their billions every year even though they offer NOTHING of substance to the health care industry. I'm sorry I don't have the time or ambition to tell you what the rest of the world has to offer. I really don't have any time or ambition to keep talking to you. Like I said before you are clearly hopeless and I am being a fool for continuing to waste my time on you. (That said I quit you.) At least you are an American right. Dumb as fuck but you can think you are better than everyone else in the world because of the country your parents fucked in.
    4
  2568. Sorry to disappoint you Harry but you aren't my type. And if you aren't a troll then I feel sorry for you. That was me giving you the benefit of the doubt. If you actually believe the stupid shit you say that says even less of you and your intelligence.
    4
  2569.  @CyberClu  That was all of 6 months ago. There are lots of new important reasons to add since then.
    4
  2570. Why is it so important to you that the issue be defined as being either "left" or "right?" Is it because you are incapable of simply addressing the issue at hand based on it's merits?
    4
  2571. Just when I thought this world couldn't be any dumber you introduce me to this guy.
    4
  2572. Those small business would benefit because people would have more money to spend at their business. Not only would they have more money to spend but they would be more inclined to use it at small businesses. A public that doesn't have to do anything and everything to cut corners and save a buck is less likely to use their money at the Walmarts of the world and more likely to use it at the mom and pops of the world. Ultimately any business that can't afford to pay it's employees enough to live on is a business that shouldn't exist.
    4
  2573. Good list. He also should be mentioning his relationship to TYT which is clearly a conflict of interest.
    4
  2574. Why? notice how he never mentioned the conflict of interest even while omitting the blackmail in this video? "when someone shows you who they are believe them the first time." good advice from maya angelou
    4
  2575. Warren is staying on my shit list but she did good here.
    4
  2576.  @stickemuppunkitsthefunlovi4733  Not harris... he was sent in by aipac.
    4
  2577. Tom Perez, "we know the power of momentum in democratic primaries." The DNC, "Pete Buttigieg won the Iowa Caucus."
    4
  2578.  @snapgrouch702  Regarding, "Democrats had to use budget reconciliation for stimulus because republicans wouldn’t vote for it." You say this based on absolutely nothing. Dems didn't even attempt to pass a clean bill with 2K checks.
    4
  2579. How can you tell if a guy with no experience in politics is just a snake oil salesman? Oh right... you can't.
    4
  2580. Because he wouldn't do this or something? Because he would.
    4
  2581. Well it is a joke but I don't find it very funny.
    4
  2582. Is everyone enjoying the censorship and shadowbanning?
    4
  2583. Because people are waking up to the fact that he is controlled opposition.
    4
  2584. I need to go change my pants now.
    4
  2585. Thank you for you time. For some reason that seems funny to me. But seriously.... that was all well said.
    4
  2586.  @TheBigGSN5  I hope you are paid for stupid shit such as that.
    4
  2587. If I wanted to watch party propagandists like ryan grimm I'd watch corporate media.
    4
  2588. @Bradley Harrison "There is obviously no creature nastier or more rabid than Tanden in this solar system." While this is what I've tended to agree with I concede that Danny's answer of Hillary is arguably worse than neera and is easliy the best answer i've gotten (then again I've only gotten about 2 other names) to my question. I also concede that if dems tried to do it might be arguably easier for them to pass hillary than it was for neera. That is likely the best answer to the question. And still I am not afraid in the least that dems are going to nominate hillary for that spot. Hillary would think it beneath her.
    4
  2589. Let's agree to disagree about pretty much all of that N B. I'd elaborate but to really address everything you said well would take a lot... more then I'm willing to do at the moment. That said I do agree that capitalism has no place when it comes to something like health care. But when it comes to selling cars and computers I agree with Kyle that regulated capitalism, not capitalism run amok like we currently have, is just fine.
    4
  2590. Charles beat me to it. There is a world of difference between being lazy and being corrupt.
    4
  2591.  @etchalaco9971  "public health policy regarding mutations be?" What a strange question. I have no idea how to answer it. It's not like we can get rid of them or something. They are just there and we have to deal with them. Finding vaccines and using them is an option. But mandating them is not unless you have a really good vaccine and case to make. This leaky ass vaccine is not even close to being effective enough to consider warranting a mandate. Not even f'ing close.
    4
  2592. Every group you mention has someone who has gone batshit crazy but you would think from your statement that isn't the case. The bottom line is that this problem is uniquely American in it's scope. All countries have military, hunters, police... but they don't have the problem we do with gun violence. It's almost like there is a correlation between guns and gun violence. Who would have thunk it? Except everyone who isn't dumb as fuck.
    4
  2593.  @TheHesseJames  Regarding, "at this stage it is more important to get exposure." Let's agree to disagree. Should Nina Turner have her own campaign to increase her exposure? Or should she be helping Bernie do anything and everything to help Sanders win like she is doing? Because I think she is doing the right thing of helping Bernie and all the same concepts apply to tulsi. I love tulsi but I'm of the firm belief that she is fucking up big time. Regarding, "They can join forces at a later stage." When do you think this will be? Because Tulsi fans seem to be under the impression that they can just share delegates or some shit. It doesn't work that way. Every delegate and vote she gets that would have been Bernie's hurts Bernie. In an election and campaign where every vote matters and we know the game isn't fair she should be helping him... not running against him. And like I've already said even if she dropped out today she arguably hurt Bernie. Every day she stays in hurts him more. Because the war has already begun and all progressives, peasants and politicians alike, should be doing everything in their power to help Sanders become our next president. Regarding, "Once he takes her on his ticket she will draw more people." Almost nobody gives a shit about the bottom half of the ticket. Far, far, far too much is made of it. And if we ever get to the point where Bernie is picking a running mate, which generally only happens after getting the nomination, then war is ALREADY won. The hard part is getting Bernie to be the nominee of the "democratic" party. The rest is just details. He can be trusted to pick a good running mate and can be trusted to crush the orange clown. The hard part is overcoming the rigged primary and tulsi is only making it harder.
    4
  2594.  @JAMuUP  regarding, "Get a real progressive in as a dem and change the rules from within." Damn right. That's the plan. Hostile takeover of the party. Remember when the dems were purging progressives from the party? Well the same shit can be done with corporate dems. But to do it we need a progressive to win the nomination. It isn't going to be easy as the game is rigged from top to bottom but fortunately for us we have a not so secret weapon by the name of Bernie Sanders.
    4
  2595.  @tonyclifton2230  "there is no pressure for politicians" He will likely note how grimm has consistently shielded those politicians from the same pressure ryan thinks will do anything. He will point out ryans lies on behalf of those same politicians.
    4
  2596. @Diane Schubach Also... Trumps donations to Harris were in 2011-2014... when trump was NOT a democrat.
    4
  2597.  @peterstafford4426  I thought about asking why you are triggered but then I realized I don't care.
    4
  2598. Go take your meds.
    4
  2599. "it's hate for their oppressive government." Maybe spend more time worrying about your own oppressive government.
    4
  2600.  @peterhardie4151  I like katie but she really is "boutique left" and lacks real revolutionary spirit. "Chris Hedges" She is no chris hedges even if she interviewed him.
    4
  2601. All in regarding, "did they come from China" They come from China but Mexico is paying for it.
    4
  2602. @Liverpool 11 I like how you don't even try to deny that Biden has dementia and is a corporate piece of shit.
    4
  2603.  @TykoBrian7  Makes it official. Ends speculation as to who they are officially supporting as opposed to Warren for example. And if you care what AOC thinks this might affect you. That said endorsements are overrated and ultimately people should be making up their own damn mind. Sanders 2020! My official endorsement... if you care.
    4
  2604.  @twatts1523  Dave is 'part of the problem.' That's my point. Obviously.
    4
  2605.  @michaelhomes8049  Kyle does. He's affiliated with them and they are all frauds.
    4
  2606. Poker regarding, "She was sitting at the same table as flynn AND PUTIN!!!! LET THAT SINK IN." Did it look something like this? https://images.search.yahoo.com/search/images?p=hillary+clinton+sitting+with+putin&fr=yfp-t&imgurl=http%3A%2F%2Fs20.postimg.org%2Fw40kazhfh%2Fhillary_putin.jpg#id=-1&iurl=http%3A%2F%2Fs20.postimg.org%2Fw40kazhfh%2Fhillary_putin.jpg&action=click Regarding, "She is a fucking lunatic" The only lunatic here is you. Regarding, "I am left/progressive" I like how you say this as if because you said it I should give your bullshit a pass. Get a clue clown.
    4
  2607.  @benwalters6084  Are you trying to get me to root for ww3 with your comment?
    4
  2608. I still haven't forgiven Warren for her support of the last increase in war spending. And I don't think I ever will.
    4
  2609. Regarding, "HAS NO CLUE WHAT A BUMP STOCK IS OR DOES" And why exactly do you say this?
    4
  2610. The top half is at least.
    4
  2611.  @crickey__in__durham  So I went to look for someone saying that about Biden. I found one where linday graham says biden would be "hard to beat." The search also brought up an article where Hillary says trump would be "very hard to beat." Both are coming from people who want the person to be beaten so maybe you have a better point than I'm seeing.
    4
  2612. I wish I thought you were right Dr but I don't. I expect the democratic establishment will coalesce earlier around a single establishment candidate among your group and will make sure the path is cleared early for them. I also think Warren or another pseudo progressive will run to try and siphon progressive votes away from Bernie. That said I hope you are right and hope there is more competition for center (which is actually more like the right) then there is for the left.
    4
  2613. An actual brick wall is smarter than you.
    4
  2614. Just when I think yanggang comments can't get any dumber you do this.
    4
  2615. Stash regarding, "I would be interested in how a meeting would cause things to escalate" One or both of them say something stupid and those stupid things are used to justify full scale war. Regarding, "Obama taking a radacle departure from 50 years of failed policies with Cuba was likely a great move." Yes I agree but I think those situations to be completely different. Cuba, even thou it is strategically much more scary than NK is not considered to be nearly the threat NK is specifically because of nuclear weapons. And as much as I can't stand Obama and could talk plenty of shit about him the fact of the matter is that I do not consider him to have been unstable the way I consider Trump to be. Regarding, "MSM position that both DT and Kim are mentally unstable" Look... the corporate media is a fucking joke but I share the opinion that both of those clowns are mentally unstable. They both have insulated themselves with sycophants. Both are used to be the biggest swinging dick in the room and I fear a meeting of those 2 ending badly. I'll happily be wrong if they meet but I think you are overestimating both of those fucks if you think either of them are anything other than crazy. Regarding, "NK is not a direct threat" They DEFINITELY are not. Regarding, "far larger geopolitical and economic strategy." Maybe so but that is not a good enough reason for full scale war with a country. I'm fucking tired of imperialism and the MIC running things. Regarding, "parrot the MSM talking points, failing to develop indenpend thinking." Dude... fuck the MSM. They suck balls. But should anything go wrong with this meeting... and I think there is good reason to think something will, then you know the MSM will be be all over war and pushing for it. If Un says anything that can be used to justify war THEY WILL USE IT. You lose me with the last points you are trying to make. I'll be happy to eat crow if these meeting happens and goes well. It's just that I think the MIC is looking for a new war to justify the new money they are getting. I see us export bombs labeled freedom to NK. And I see this meeting giving them an excuse to do so. Again... I really hope to be wrong. I am so fucking sick of war.
    4
  2616.  @dpeagles  Are really sure it's only because of his women? And it has nothing to do with being rich and privileged his entire life? Jada didn't give him the god complex that he displayed even if she might help exacerbate his bad tendencies.
    4
  2617. The same idiot who takes fox news seriously.
    4
  2618. Do you think doctors wear them into surgery just because?
    4
  2619.  @Nonpeon  You might want to consider the possibility that you are stupid beyond words.
    4
  2620. I'm old as dirt and I don't think I do remember a time when they did respect free speech.
    4
  2621. Harry Mann Jr's comment is brought to you by the Koch brothers.
    4
  2622. How about her coverage of net neutrality? I'm sure its award winning am I right?
    4
  2623. We all get to have opinions. We do not get to all have our own facts. The example I gave of chair throwers in NV is just one example of her going on air and and straight up LYING to people. And when she does shit like that I'm sorry but I can't respect your opinion to call her a great journalist.
    4
  2624. Val regarding, "I honestly don't know what you are talking about in NV" Sanders supporters were fucked over during the NV convention. During the convention a frustrated Sanders supporter lifted a chair over their head for about 2 seconds before gently setting it down. Maddow's reporting on the issue was all about Sanders supporter chair throwing even thou no chair was thrown. She also completely ignored the fact that Sanders supporters were taken over a barrel during the NV convention and talked about the bullshit narrative the DNC wanted them cover... about non existent chair throwers. For a little more context... my favorite part is at about 1:15 when DWS makes sure to point out that they are impartial and don't take sides. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R8w5wY_wT9M Regarding, "I am not presenting my own facts." I'm not saying you are. I'm saying Maddow does... incorrectly (aka lies). Regarding, "I just said she is an Emmy Award winner which is a fact and a small part of what I base my opinion on." Ok. I personally don't care about it. I personally care about credibility and to me Maddow has none. Regarding, "I also became interested in what is going on in the country and politics because of her show." Good for you. Everyone should be interested in politics but I encourage you to get more information from sources outside the corporate media. They have an agenda and are not going to inform you properly.. Regarding, "What other "fact" did I present" Again, I'm not calling you a liar. I'm calling Maddow a liar. Regarding, "if you read my post you will see my main concern is that fact that sexual harassment is prevalent in our society and I applaud anyone who can bring it to light, corporate media, progressive media or any other." Fine. I personally find that she is tainted and just because she does something good doesn't excuse her bad. I honestly happily don't watch her anymore. I honestly wonder what her coverage about the extra 80 billion for the military has been. Clearly you watch her. Has she even talked about it? Corporate media acted like Sanders wanting to spend 53 billion per year for college education was fucking crazy so I would think that an extra 80 billion per year for bombs was at least talked about. But it wasn't was it? Hopefully I'm wrong. I just don't think so.
    4
  2625. This is the "chair thrower." This is the violence they talk about. This is what they talk about other than Sanders getting fucked during the convention. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rFCKiZdfTpU This is what actually happened. My favorite part is at 3:00 when Lange looks around with an expression that reads "oh fuck! Now what?" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=435x0dQ5Lzg The point of all this is that Maddow has an agenda. Maddow is terribly biased. This is just one example of her coverage being terrible and there are lots more. She serves the interests of the establishment and the corporations.
    4
  2626. Regarding, "MSM made out Bernie supporters look unhinged and unwilling to accept a loss." I can accept losing. I can't accept being cheated. And clearly the game was rigged up to and including the coverage by Maddow that was intentionally (at least in my opinion) biased... which doesn't make it coverage anymore but rather it is propaganda. Regarding, "I was not bitter or vengeful the way I see some Clinton followers be." I am pissed in all honesty. I want free and fair elections and don't think we get them. Then when Maddow blames me for voting for Jill Stein... well... it really rubs me the wrong way and I was already pissed. Regarding, "We just didn't have a strong candidate who people trusted with way too much baggage." By we you can't include me. I used to be a lifelong democrat but no more and consider them to be sellouts (like Maddow). I now identify with the Green party far more. That said I want Sanders to run and win as a democrat. Regarding, "I watch news outside the MSM like this channel and a few others." Good. At least you get other sources to try and put the corporate medias BS in perspective. At least you get to learn somewhere about the 80 billion extra for the military somewhere. I actually think it was covered here and it's not like he has 24 hours a day to fill. Regarding, "I used to watch the Young Turks until I noticed some discrepancies and exaggerations in their reporting and stopped watching like you did with Maddow." They are far from perfect. I actually prefer secular talk, the humanist report, and jimmy dore. I also watch TYT and a few others but not always. Forgive me for jumping on you about Maddow. I feel betrayed by her. I used to really like her. Her coverage during the election was the end of her and all corporate media for me. I really saw their coverage to be no better than FOX news but for the (corporate) left and although I think they are better about lying I see them as more sinister because everyone knows Fox is bullshit. Maddow had credibility and she used it to try and force Hillary down everyone's throat.... like the rest of the corporate media.
    4
  2627. I thought the ending was terrible. To try and make it better for myself I've added some of my own context and story in the background to try and make it better and more complete for myself. I like to think that bran... er, the 3 eyed raven, is legit awful. They are the architect for all the terrible shit going on just so that they could be king.
    4
  2628. @Bernard The problem is that there is certainly someone who has said what you have but does so unsarcastically. I've been an advocate of a sarcastic font for a long time.
    4
  2629.  @queenrayne1338  I think you are missing my point. I'm not saying he isn't bad. He's obviously terrible. I'm pointing out that it can get worse than him. A lot worse really.
    4
  2630.  @andrewhunsaker4831  Regarding, "You're the reason we got Trump." Not Trump supporters? Or hillary's for sucking? Or hillary for propping up trump with the pied piper campaign? Or the DNC for rigging their primary? Or the people who didn't vote? Or the corporate media who gave trump billions in free media? Who would cover trumps empty podium while Sanders would speak in front of record crowds? Or obama for being such a failure the country was willing to give the keys to an orange clown after him? It's my fault. LFMAO. You are as impossible to take seriously as are trump supporters.
    4
  2631.  @atom_gray  You beat me to it. Bob Ross does not deserve to be compared to W.
    4
  2632. Do you think Pence would be any better when it comes to policy? Because he wouldn't. That said I'd advise you to use your energy on more constructive things. If we are going to have a shit government we really should have an ugly face to it like the orange clown.
    4
  2633.  @MagiciteHeart  regarding, "LESS-scary establishment candidate?" Yes absolutely. But I guess I should clarify as you are misinterpreting my meaning. I mean that she is a less scary establishment candidate in that she has no fucking chance of winning the primary. Booker, Biden, and Harris are establishment candidates who would all have a better chance of winning the primary. That is what I meant as someone who cares very deeply about preventing an establishment candidate from winning the primary. Nothing more. Hopefully you can agree with this because it is absolutely true. She is about as well liked as cancer and has the charisma of dog shit. Let the establishment pick her as their candidate of choice. Like I said she would suck up all the establishment money and support before inevitably getting crushed. They won't thou. The establishment is corrupt but they aren't stupid and sadly their candidate of choice will not be her.
    4
  2634. Regarding, "Trump is objectively worse" So never mind that there is a huge list of legit grievances and reasons to not support her, you just point at Trump and think people should be scared enough of him that people should go running into the arms or your time tested proven complete piece of shit candidate. Rather than give people something they can support you expect them to run away from Trump in fear. That doesn't work for me. I can't get scared of Trump while I'm already scared of Hillary. I'm not interested in voting against something. I will only vote for something. And I wasn't about to vote for Hillary or Trump. And time will tell if he is actually worse. Nobody can say for sure exactly how Trump will govern because he has never actually governed. I knew how Hillary would govern because I've actually seen her in action and she has sucked her entire life and worked against everything that I believe in and stand for her entire life. I think Trump is going to suck but if you say you know for sure how he will govern you are lying. For all anyone knows for certain he might govern like the self described democrat he was not long ago and he was just pandering to the right's base during the election to get votes. He has already backtracked on terrible positions he held during the campaign like the wall and torture. Lastly it isn't about just this 4 years and this election. It is about all the elections yet to come. What type of message would does it send to the "democratic" party that you are willing to support them even when they rigged the primary? Even when their candidate is a complete POS? What reason would they ever give you to provide a decent candidate when being better than Trump seems to be good enough for you? I am not going to support a party rigging primaries. Being arguably better than Trump isn't good enough for me. I am not going to vote for garbage and neither should anyone else. Sadly people like you continue to. You are part of the problem. Stop supporting dogshit and be part of the solution instead. Correction, you, Billsama do not seem to be a Hillary supporter so that isn't exactly the best statement for you. Still I'm going to leave up my words as I think the point is still very valid for actually Hillary bots.
    3
  2635. I support Jill Stein not because I think she would be able to get much of anything that she wants and that should happen done. I understand that the house and senate are essentially broken. They literally are only willing to get things done when they are the wrong things. Jill Stein would be the best President because 1) she would continue to give exposure the real important issues facing this country... issues the 2 major parties refuse to talk about and 2) because she is the only candidate running who can be trusted to not make things worse by working with congress. For example the TPP is an example of an area where Republicans and Democrats agree and it would be terrible for Americans (but great for corporations and big money donors). Jill is the only candidate running who could be trusted to do the right thing on this issue. 3) the biggest power of the President is as commander in chief. That is an area that has much less to do with congress and again Jill is the only candidate to do the right thing when it comes to foreign policy. The fact that she wouldn't be able to find much common ground with congress doesn't suggest to me that Jill shouldn't be President. It suggests to me that we need a new congress. One that actually represents the people.
    3
  2636. nyc regarding, "Yes, they are trespassing." nyc is impervious to facts. Again, he is either the dumbest "human" (I have my doubts about this) on the planet or he is being paid to lie for a living. It doesn't really matter at this point. Everyone would be wise to ignore everything he says. Or if you listen to him you are safe to assume that the truth is the exact opposite of his words.
    3
  2637. NYC regarding, "How ironic, to say the least" You only think this because you are dumb as fuck. What happened to your post yesterday? You never bothered to answer my question about this.
    3
  2638. You are wrong. Hillary would do anything and everything to win including sell her soul to win. But she is a terrible politician in addition to being corrupt.
    3
  2639. If you support DWS then my opinion of you could not go any lower.
    3
  2640. Lilith regarding, "So Obama's SHAME is public." What shame? If he doesn't already feel shame he never will. In an unrelated thought it is going to be sickening to watch his personal wealth grow after he leaves office.
    3
  2641. Agent Orange regarding, "I don't support either of them" That is so fucking sane and rational. Too bad there isn't more of that in this country. Jill Stein for President. The only wasted vote is a vote for a candidate you don't want to win.
    3
  2642. Moh Moony regarding, "he's starting to sway me over" Don't. He is a POS just like Hillary. They are two peas in a pod. Birds of a feather flock together. She went to his wedding. He talked to Bill Clinton immediately before announcing he was running. They are not really very different in any way. If Trump didn't run and win the Republican nomination he would have been considered by Hillary for VP.
    3
  2643. Hillary wants to win more than anything in this world. She would sell her soul to win. If you think she doesn't want to win it is only because she is a terrible politician in addition to being corrupt.
    3
  2644. 2014 Regarding, "Democratic socialism is the same as communism." We use different words for different things for a reason. Please stop being such an idiot.
    3
  2645. "Seinfeld" was one of the funniest shows of all time. I am old.
    3
  2646. They still drag their feet in Flint. I'm sure hope and change is just around the corner thou.
    3
  2647. Bernie Sanders is forever the man. He has done more to help expose the corrupt system than you or Trump ever could.
    3
  2648. Those are your options and you would choose to spend one night with Trump's daughter and a lifetime with Cruz? I question your judgement.
    3
  2649. Clifton regarding, "US Bank also but are they financing this" You are safe to assume that all banks suck these days. Credit unions are the way to go. 0:17 in top left. Fuck you US Bank.
    3
  2650. If there actually were good cops then all the bad cops wouldn't be able to get away this crap 100% of the time unless there is video evidence they can't lie away. Even the cops who don't pull the trigger will lie in their police reports to protect their own.
    3
  2651. Work to get her on the ballot in your state then. There are petitions on her website for you to sign.
    3
  2652. Bernie Sanders has done more to awake the public to corruption than you could in 10 lifetimes.
    3
  2653. It can't be that great of a piece if it only directs questions toward Trump.
    3
  2654. Virgin regarding, "Sigh everything is race with you guys" Not everything but some things clearly are no matter how much you want to bury your head in the sand.
    3
  2655. slippy regarding, "Do you think they would be willing to risk that kind of publicity" The corporate media essentially works for them. As long as they think they can spin their actions and present a case that it was justified (even if their case is terrible) I think they would. They don't care about publicity. They care about finishing the pipeline at essentially any cost. Look at the actions the police have already taken. They are thugs. They enjoy what they do. They would happily take it to the next level if given a reason and that reason doesn't need to be very good. Regarding, "I am also of the type that would be willing to die before killing" While protesting peacefully the water protectors maintain the moral high ground. As soon as they lose that they would be wiped out and the corporate media would run BS story after story about how an officer feared for his life. They already do this. They already wrongfully say they are violent. Fortunately there are few actual journalists like Jordan who are giving the truth and not just regurgitating BS from the police and DAPL.
    3
  2656. slippy if the corporate media actually cared what was going on there they would have reporters there. The fact that they don't tells you what you need to know. They are content to say whatever the police want them to say. Regarding, "It just makes me sad and angry that people would have to go through this in order to try to get their point across." It is a disgrace. I've always been told the right to peacefully protest is as American as apple pie. Clearly it is not.
    3
  2657. Joe Smoe regarding, "Don't try and say where one party now" Ok man. The establishment appreciates your ignorance on the matter. If you really want to know what is going on I suggest you watch South Park. There is more political truth coming from a 30 minute cartoon once a week than from all the 24/7 MSM propaganda networks combined. As long as we fight among ourselves we don't fight the people to blame, the establishment. Regarding, "Whatever she does is on you." Is it really? I'm not voting for her. Regarding, "We want no part or association with that disaster." Don't be naive. The right has lots and lots of blame to be shared. What about Donald Trump? The only reason many Hillary supporters are able to continue justify supporting her is because they can rightfully point and Trump and say he too is a complete POS. And is it really so surprising, they are two peas in pod. Birds of a feather flock together. Hillary went to his wedding. Trump talked to Bill Clinton immediately before announcing he was running. Had he not run he would have been considered as Hillary's VP. They are not different in any sort of meaningful way. But you go ahead and think they are different somehow. The establishment needs sheep.
    3
  2658. Please let Bernie still be in great health in 4 years.
    3
  2659. Don't play the establishment game of choosing between a douche and a turd sandwich. Be willing to vote for your values and lose. It isn't just about this election but about all the elections to come. Jill Stein for President!
    3
  2660. Regarding, "lol" You must be high if you think that was funny.
    3
  2661. Regarding, "If she supported Bernie, she would lose power in the senate no?" No. That's not how the senate works. Regarding, "And Bernie lost. so it would have been for nothing." Bernie lost without her support. Sadly we have no way of knowing what difference she would have made at the time. She did have a lot of respect with the left before her silence. Regarding, "In politics, you choose your battles." Is that how you describe having a complete lack of principles? Regarding, "Sometimes you gotta do the smart thing" How was this the smart thing exactly? Nevermind... it's rhetorical. I don't really care what you think.
    3
  2662. Vote your values and not your fears. Don't let polls and strategy dictate your vote but rather your positions and ethics. Then let the chips fall where they may.
    3
  2663. We have a system of checks and balances. The SC is has the final say whether or not something is unconstitutional.
    3
  2664. Gary Johnson supports the TPP. Your thoughts on this?
    3
  2665. Regarding, "But as we've seen, Trump won." Only because of an archaic system that allows the person who received less votes to "win."
    3
  2666. This would be hilarious if this country didn't have so much of this stupidity floating about.
    3
  2667. enchanted regarding, "all I got from your emotional rant is that everyone other than you is stupid or an idiot." Everyone is not stupid or an idiot... just people who do no seem to understand what freedom of speech means. Soda for example thinks that there is only "supposed free speech" even thou there are no examples of anyone losing their freedom for speech. He apparently thinks that freedom of speech does not extend to the rights of people to use labels and that when people do that somehow diminishes freedom of speech rather than expressing it. Therefor he is an idiot. Regarding, "You sound like a bitch. That's me using my freedom of speech." Why the labels man? Soda and Zach would not approve even thou you are actually being correct about freedom of speech and your right to use it. Regarding, "Continue to rant while I ignore you..." You are an idiot. Just because you say you are ignoring me doesn't make it true. You are actually acknowledging me by replying to me and addressing me directly. It isn't hard to understand unless you are a moron.
    3
  2668. Mike Viet regarding, "but we must also remember if he turns his back on everything he said" Bernie has said over and over and over and over and over how important he thinks it is that Trump not be President. He has said over and over and over that he will work to prevent him from being President. So you need to remember what he has said. I very much disagree with Sanders giving her an endorsement should he but I get it because it is consistent with his rhetoric in many ways. Regarding, "he is viamently against the tpp" He is against our terrible trade deals only when he isn't using them to make himself richer. He is pathological liar. Clinton also says she is against the TPP these days but the bottom line is that neither of these two crap candidates word means jack. Regarding, "Bernie should support Jill stein or even better run as her president or vp. . ya know" I agree with you on this but do not see it happening. I believe that at the end of the day Sanders fears doing anything that might help Trump win and thinks both these ideas would only serve to help Trump.
    3
  2669. James Varner regarding, "I'm staying home." Don't give up without a fight please. Support a third party candidate. They need our support if we are ever going to do better than a broken two party system.
    3
  2670. raf regarding, "where are the angry mobs with torches" There is a reason we have storm-troopers for police these days.
    3
  2671. NYC regarding, "Please explain how any of these actions are putting water in danger?" You are dumb as fuck but I think my favorite thing about you is that you have no self awareness at all. You have no problem exposing time and again that you are dumb as fuck. Here is some reading for you to do in case you want to actually educate yourself. I suspect not. I suspect you would rather keep saying dumb things that feel right to you. https://www.americanrivers.org/threats-solutions/energy-development/pipeline-failures/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/keystone-xl-pipeline-may-threaten-aquifer-that-irrigates-much-of-the-central-us/2012/08/06/7bf0215c-d4db-11e1-a9e3-c5249ea531ca_story.html There are lots more. Let me know if those don't do it for you and/or you are not smart enough to figure out the answers to your own dumb ass questions.
    3
  2672. Jill not Hill!
    3
  2673. Zach. Paragraphs. Learn about them and use them. Regarding, "I'm going to make the case that people are to stupid to pick a candidate that is truly great because they lack the mental tools to understand any policy to begin with." I guess we shouldn't let people vote then. SMH Regarding, "I don't want people with less intelligence making decisions for the nation based on things beyond their understanding regardless of their intentions." I don't care how you want to rationalize telling people who can or can't vote. I don't care if you think you are really smart (even though you aren't smart enough to use paragraphs) your vote gets to count no more or less than anyone else. We are all equal on election day. Stop thinking you are so special and deserve special treatment. You don't. Regarding, "Congrats on your unfair and crap system to replace an unfair and crap system." Why exactly is one person one vote unfair exactly again? Because people less smart than you get to vote? We are going to have to agree to disagree. Regarding, "the founding fathers looked at the history of their time and found that direct democracies are crap." The founding fathers legalized slavery and didn't allow women to vote. I have no problem telling them they are wrong when they are wrong. Regarding, "The United States are a Republic." The very standard, very cliche argument of that is how it has always been. You have fit right in with people trying to keep slavery around because that is how it has always been. Regarding, "The popular vote didn't win but,..." Excuses. Excuses. Excuses. Try to stay on topic. Regarding, "Democrats laziness and snubbing their base" This isn't about a certain side. This isn't about democrats sucking. I hate Hillary. I'm happy she isn't going to be President but I'm here saying it should be popular vote because that is what I always think. It isn't about helping a team or caring who changing the system would benefit. It is about doing the right thing for the sake of doing the right thing. Regarding, "People not participating is the problem." No. That's a completely different, completely unrelated problem. Regarding, "Your concern should be that of your state. Your state is suppose to represent you." You sound like you are talking about state elections. You are not. We are talking about a federal election. A person that is suppose to represent everyone regardless of the state you live in. Regarding, "I'd like to hear your thoughts?" Any ideas other than everyone getting one vote and everyone's vote counting the same and most votes wins is absurd. The only other thing you might be able to add to this is ranked choice voting to get to a majority. But in the end the bottom line is that everyone's vote should count the same. Period. Seriously. Paragraphs. It is worth repeating. Not using them makes it difficult to take you seriously.
    3
  2674. Vote your values please. For me that means I will be voting for Jill Stein. I suggest you do the same.
    3
  2675. Regarding, "He wants recount in California." Then he should go ahead and file for a recount. I wouldn't mind. I'd be all for it. Why the fuck do you think Jill Stein needs to be doing what Trump wants for him? Is there something stopping him from doing it because of his tiny hands or something? Regarding, "Where is the contradiction?" Your "logic."
    3
  2676. Even a broken clock is correct twice a day. This has to be the smartest thing you have ever said in your life even if it is ironic that it is coming from an uneducated voter.
    3
  2677. NYC regarding, "Oh, have I been triggering you with logic and reason?" Yeah, that's what's going on. (That's sarcasm. I figure I better tell you because I do not expect you to be smart enough to realize it without me telling you.)
    3
  2678. AB. You continue to ignore the other commentators points but I'll try to point out the obvious to you again. Christianity is all over America. Fox news for example freaks out about a "War on X-Mas." If there is actually such a thing then I assure you X-mas is winning here. You continue to say that Islam is the only real threat. I disagree. I barely know any muslims in real life and the muslims I know are no bigger threat than the Christians I know. But I know lots and lots and lots and lots of Christians. I live about a little more than an hour away from Colorado Springs when a Christian terrorist attacked a planned parenthood. That is near me. That is close to home. Islam is not. Again as others have pointed out as soon as it is closer to home I will call them stupid in the same ways I call Christianity stupid because all religion is stupid in the hands of stupid people. Dangerous people are empowered to do dangerous things when they think they have the blessing of whatever God they worship. The world would be a better place without any religion. No if ands or buts about it. That said I respect the fact that America believe in freedom of religion. To me that means you can keep your religion as long as you aren't breaking other laws. But then the bottom line is that at the end of the day I am not going to persecute religions and their beliefs other than using my freedom of speech to call them idiots; I insist on people being persecuted for committing crimes. Extremism is the enemy. Not islam like you suggest. And you and your point of view do nothing to help the problem. It is just fear mongering.
    3
  2679. Britney regarding, "I think it's kind of silly to have them this late in the game." It is never too late to find out the truth. Regarding, "they really should've asked for recounts a few days after or the night of the election." It is not that easy. A lot more goes into requesting a recount and considering their need than you suggest. The recounts being done have a lot more to do with making sure there isn't election fraud rather than voter fraud. Trump is the candidate who thinks voter fraud is happening by the millions at the same time he is saying recounts are terrible because he lacks principles. He just wants to claim he won the popular vote without evidence even thou he lost it by millions.
    3
  2680. What a joke. Even the author off the article had the sense to put the word victim in quotations. You forgot to put the word explain in quotations for your "statement."
    3
  2681. They let Kyle go because they are corrupt as fuck. It is obvious unless you are fucking stupid.
    3
  2682. He was rammed in his truck because he was about to run down a person. Did you bother to watch the video? Are you really this dumb or are you being paid to say stupid things?
    3
  2683. Our political system and economic system are all about money sadly.
    3
  2684. So we are suppose to vote Hillary who helped Bush invade Iraq? We are just suppose to ignore the fact that the DNC rigged the game? Funny that the DNC accuses Republicans of fear mongering but all Hillary supports have for supporting their corrupt, corporate, lying candidate is fear of Trump. No thanks. Jill Stein for President!
    3
  2685. It's pretty telling that David Brock has to spend millions of dollars on internet trolls to "Correct the Record." It's one of those ironic names. They should be named "Liars for Hillary."
    3
  2686. No. It ensures that farmers votes are more important than office workers votes.
    3
  2687. Elizabeth Warren in her own words about who she now supports... "In the spring of 2001, the bankruptcy bill was reintroduced in the Senate, essentially unchanged from the version President Clinton had vetoed the previous year. This time, freshman Sen. Hillary Clinton voted in favor of the bill. Had the bill been transformed to get rid of all those awful provisions that had so concerned First Lady Hillary Clinton? No. The bill was essentially the same, but Hillary Rodham Clinton was not. As first lady, Mrs. Clinton had been persuaded that the bill was bad for families, and she was willing to fight for her beliefs. Her husband was a lame duck at the time he vetoed the bill; he could afford to forgo future campaign contributions. As New York's newest senator, however, it seems that Hillary Clinton could not afford such a principled position. ... Big banks were now part of Sen. Clinton's constituency. She wanted their support, and they wanted hers — including a vote in favor of "that awful bill.""
    3
  2688. Knight, she certainly talked the talk but I agree that walking the walk is what's really important. She is currently supporting the corrupt, corporate shill named Hillary. Everything else just seems like details at the moment.
    3
  2689. So what do you propose to do about it? I'll start. Slash military spending. Make corporations and the super rich pay their fair share. End subsidies to big oil and gas.
    3
  2690. Face regarding, "Why did you ignore my first sentence." Why did you ignore everything I wrote? You don't need to convince me that Hillary Clinton sucks. She does. And when I would try to make that point to others I would bring up the Clinton Foundation and Haiti among other things. That is why when I've been talking about her I refer to her as evil. But we were talking about who is more evil and specifically who will be evil for the country. If you think that Trump is going to operate much differently than Hillary you are wrong and as much as Hillary Clinton sucks she wouldn't, for example, put a person who doesn't believe in climate change in charge of the EPA, nominate an oil baron for SOS, and her SC nominations would certainly be better even if she does suck. I am very happy that it seems Trump has killed the TPP and I think that had Hillary won it would have gone through. Still Trump is certainly going to be worse for the country over the next 4 years in my opinion but only time will tell. And I hope that you realize that despite me disagree with you that has nothing to do with honesty.
    3
  2691. Jill Stein for President. We were promised change 8 years ago. It's time we got it.
    3
  2692. You know he is pro TPP right? How do you rationalize him having that position considering what libertarians claim to believe?
    3
  2693. "I think Clinton prob feels like she has to pick a man to satisfy the balance needed to get elected."  I agree.  Unlike a good candidate who feels that the most important thing when choosing a running mate is finding the best person to be next in line for the most important job in the world... Hillary certainly is more concerned with things like... not picking another women because that would take some "shine" off her "historic" coronation.  Further more she is more interested in winning first and foremost and not what is good for the country. "Many of the Bernie bros are being turds"  No hypocrisy coming from you here is there?  We are turds and you are righteous.  Got it. "Bernie doesn't have many friends in the Senate."  You say this like it is a bad thing.  It is more of a badge of honor in my opinion.  It means he is more interested in doing the right thing rather than making friends. "Bernie's not a Democrat"  Who does Bernie caucus with?  Who does Bernie vote with?  How do democrats feel about the issues he champions? "He has refused to acknowledge Clinton's win"  She hasn't won anything yet... or did the convention happen and I didn't hear about it? "her historic accomplishment"  What did she do that was so historic?  A women ran for president in the 19th century.  Try not to diminish her accomplishment propping up your POS candidate. "or endorsed her."  Good for him.  It only makes me like him more.  And don't think for a second that I would care if he did.  I am a free thinker.  I am not going to support Hillary even if Sanders supports her. "When someone welcomes you into their home in this case party and you piss on them the way Sanders has done..."  Is that what they did?  They cheated and rigged the playing field from day one.  Is it so much to ask for free and fair elections from the "democratic" party?  Clearly it was. "I don't think they are going to give him anything"  Every now and then you say something I can agree with.  But don't kid yourself that he would have gotten anything had he just gone away quietly like the DNC and you hillbots wanted. "And after all the heavy handed hate and hostility from Sanders and progressives directed at Clinton"  She is a liar and corrupt.  Our elections were a sham and travesty.  If that isn't something that requires anger then what does? "Sanders would be undercutting her every chance he gets"  What has he done... other than dropping out and kissing the crown that makes you say this? Don't bother answering. It's rhetorical. I don't really care what you think.
    3
  2694. "This is why  you losers Lost . This never ending  toxic hatred." Are you at least smart enough to see the hypocrisy of your statements?
    3
  2695. "Nobody likes you Bernie freaks you're rabid haters" Love the hypocrisy. Are you not smart enough to realize you are doing it or do you just not mind being a complete hypocrite? "Sanders is a selfish old man feeding his ego" You support Hillary Clinton. The irony is as obvious as your hypocrisy... too bad you are not smart enough to realize your stupidity. "Bernie and his followers showed who they really are Chronic Independent party crybabies who hate liberals" I am proud to call myself an independent. There are too many people who are loyal to their party first and their country.... somewhere down on the list. I am crying. Either Hillary or Trump is likely to be the next President. This makes me sad. It should also make you sad as well but you are not smart enough to be. Hate liberals? I've proudly called myself a liberal since I became interested in politics. "the DNC" The DNC is corrupt as fk. They biased the entire election process from day one. They allowed DWS be head of the DNC despite a clear conflict of interest... she was Hillary's campaign co-chair in 2008 afterall. They love money in politics because it allows them to hold onto their power. They disenfranchise voters. They allowed their superdelegates to call an election before major elections (voter suppression) the day before elections... as opposed to letting voters vote without them putting their thumb on the scale. They have pushed a corrupt, hated, corporate shill like HRC from day one, only bothering hold sham elections. "overthrow the the will of the voters" It's tough to know the will of the voters when the game has been rigged from day one and it's tough to know the will of the voters when you don't allow people to vote. If we had free and fair elections, which we don't, you would really have a good point. "$220 million down the drain, and in Sanders's pockets.Has there been a more ungracious candidate in recent political history?..." You must be one of Hillary's and David Brock's paid shill right? Part of the her super pac money that is being spent spreading lies, misinformation, hate, false support and BS talking points for the queen? Your attacks are everything that I would expect from a Trump supporter. It really is impossible to tell the difference between talking to them and talking to you. You have nothing to offer in support of your candidate but try your hardest to put others down. You ignore the hypocrisy of your attacks because you live in glass house. "Clinton Won and by the Popular VOTE " Superdelegates tilted the field from day one. 3 million independents in NY alone were not allowed to vote. Exit polls are too far outside the margin of error (when they weren't being canceled). So yeah, if you ignore the cheating, disenfranchisement, and shenanigans you have a great point. Too bad we don't have free and fair elections coming from the "democratic" party or you really would have a great point here. "People didn't want hateful Sanders and his hateful followers" Not like you right? You've called me a twat, loser, turd, and more while living in your glass house. I understand why you support Hillary... she speaks to your values and ethics... none. "us Democrats" Your a democrat huh? You make me embarrassed to think that I used to be proud to call myself one. I won't be making that mistake again anytime soon. I do not support corruption and cronyism so I will not be supporting HRC or the DNC again anytime soon.
    3
  2696. 50 whole dollars! I don't care if it was as little as 15 dollars. He sounds rich to me and rich in spirit. Isn't that what is really what's important? Not that you are living on the fking street? (I am being sarcastic, sadly I do not think alexis is as well).
    3
  2697. Estivel regarding, "No candidate will be right about everything." Of course. But some issues are more important than others and some issues are deal breakers. I could agree with someone on literally everything but if they advocate for torture I will never support them. You can disagree if you want but to me if a politician is currently silent or on the wrong side of what is going on in ND that is a deal breaker for me. That is completely unacceptable. I will not accept any excuses or rationalizations for it. I will not support her for President. I am not alone. Be warned before you think she should be the nominee next go around. Regarding, "I just don't see another progressive candidate that could be somewhat compared to Bernie Sanders." I do. And the election is still a long way off. I can't say for sure who I would support. I can say for sure who I wouldn't support. I will not support Warren. Regarding, "but way better than those establishment politicians." What a high bar you set. I hope you realize how similar you sound to Hillary supporters arguing she is better than Trump. As if that is suppose to impress me. It doesn't.
    3
  2698. There is so much wrong with the Flint story. Right now I am appalled that, even after attention has been brought to the problem, so little is being done to solve the problem. So sad. So sickening. I don't know what else to say other than... please do more government. Not tomorrow. Now.
    3
  2699. You write like a certifiable moron.
    3
  2700. Ka regarding, "He's not what we thought he was when we elected him. Massive disappointment." Yup. I voted for him twice. I concede I was duped.
    3
  2701. liz regarding, "it's not going to come from 2 outsiders in positions without power." Whoever wins the democratic nomination in 2020 will have great power. If they are a good person like Bernie I would support them. If they are a corporate stooge like Tim Kaine I will vote Green. Regarding, "If you think Bernie has leverage through the people you're wrong" The people have great power if only they used it better. Sadly the people are very good at voting against their own interests. Regarding, "leverage Hillary had on him" The leverage Hillary had on him was Donald Trump's existence. Bernie didn't want Trump to win. He feared splitting the left, allowing Trump to win, and being blamed for it. I disagree with his decision but I get it. I wouldn't want to be blamed for Trump winning either. He fucking endorsed her and campaigned for her and still the corrupt MSM is blaming him.
    3
  2702. celvester regarding, "but I think you misread that comment." I don't think I did. Regarding, "try to chill on the name calling," Fair point. I concede I can be a real dick. I have little tolerance for stupid and there is a lot of it in comments sections. But I am a bit of a dick. I'm not going to pretend otherwise, unlike Trump supporters who like to pretend their orange clown and his cronies are something they are not. Regarding, "and that doesn't help anyone" It helps me blow off steam. Regarding, "it just riles everyone up and makes it harder for voices to be heard." Stupid should be silent. You make fair points although I disagree with what you think Mimi was trying to say, but like I said, I'm a bit of dick. You may as well be asking Trump to not be such a POS. People are who they are.
    3
  2703. Lunch Box regarding, "Yeah and elect Donald Trump" Don't be afraid to save some blame for Hillary for sucking her entire life, some blame for Trump voters for Trump, some blame for the DNC for rigging the primary for their inferior candidate, some blame for the MSM for giving biased terrible "news" including BILLIONS of free media for Trump, some blame for the over 40 percent of eligible voters who didn't vote, and some blame for the 9 percent of democratic voters who voted for Trump. You won't though. Morons like you will blame Jill Stein voters even though if ever one of them voted for your disgrace of a candidate she still would have lost. That makes sense to brainwashed sheep. Regarding, "You dont trow temper tantrum if you do not get ALL you want" This is fucking hilarious as you stomp your feet and whine like a petulant child because people didn't vote as you wanted them to. Hopefully the DNC gets the message that they can't take voters for granted and need to give better options going forward if they want to get support and win elections in the future. Regarding, "Jill Stein elected donald trump" No she didn't dipshit. Had every Jill Stein voter voted for Hillary she still would have lost moron. I wish she could have gotten more votes so you could claim otherwise and still your BS claim wouldn't be true. The fact of the matter is that HILLARY CLINTON, because she fucking sucks, elected Donald Trump. Regarding, "do not forget to tell everyone around you that will suffer under him that you stood your ground and made a protest vote that elected him" Don't forget to tell everyone around you that you are a liar and moron. That would actually be something you would say that is true for a change.
    3
  2704. Lunch box regarding, "Do not lie to yourself atleast" Very funny coming from you. Had EVERY JILL STEIN VOTER VOTED FOR HILLARY SHE STILL WOULD HAVE LOST. That is the fact. Try not to lie to yourself at least. Even is those votes would have swung the election that would not be Jill Stein's fault. It would have been the fault of Hillary Clinton for not doing more to get people to vote for her. She is the main reason for her losing. She sucks. I'm glad she lost. That is not to say I'm happy Trump won. If I actually wanted one of them to win I would have voted for one of them. Regarding, "doing the morally bankrupt thing" Again this is hilarious coming from a person supporting a morally bankrupt candidate. It seems donations to the Clinton foundation have fallen off a cliff since she lost the election. I can't imagine why. What a strange coincidence. Regarding, "I was thinking you dicks learned from Neider and 2000" Except the Nader argument is complete fucking bullshit. I'd think you would have learned that already but Hillary supporters are not the brightest bulbs. http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/12/6/1260721/-The-Nader-Myth I don't owe anyone my vote. I am going to continue to vote for who represents me, my priorities, and my ethics. Hillary Clinton did not in any way shape or form. She is everything I despise about politicians. Regarding, "You gave us 8 years of hell with Bush" You would think you would blame Bush voters. You don't because you are an epic fucking moron. Regarding, "I blame you cos" Because you are fucking stupid and lack critical thinking skills. Regarding, "Small minded petulant children crying" Again this is so funny coming from you. What a moronic hypocrite you are. Shame on you. Shame on the "democratic" party. Shame on Hillary. Again I hate that Trump is going to be President but I am happy as fuck you and your queen lost.
    3
  2705. I guess I'm saying there are lots of superficial Americans.
    3
  2706. I thought of another reason to be happy. This bullshit election cycle is almost over.
    3
  2707. Regarding, "If the House and Senate are controlled by Republicans, eliminating the minimum wage isn't a far-fetched scenario." Republicans would need 60 votes in the senate. That isn't happening anytime soon.
    3
  2708. Raul regarding, "Like Bernie can't make education tuition free or universal healthcare." As a Sanders supporter I never had any illusions about what Bernie would be able to accomplish. That said one of the powers a President has is the ability to gain the ear of the nation to champion important causes to gain public support for things like those that should have public support. Regarding, "I wouldn't want a libertarian as president just my opinion." Fair enough. He isn't my pick either. Like I said I support Jill Stein. But again I personally would much rather have Johnson than Trump or Hillary. Trump and Hillary are both completely unacceptable candidates. Both would be terrible Presidents.
    3
  2709. Regarding, "sovereign States" States are not sovereign. Regarding, "different realities." There is only one reality. Regarding, ""One person one vote" cannot work in a republic as large as a continent." Of course it can.
    3
  2710. D Logan. Whites smoke weed at the same rate as blacks (if anything anything a slightly higher rate) but blacks are 4 times more likely to be arrested for weed. This does not reflect a society with equal rights.
    3
  2711. Regarding, "The US already engages in the killing of the families of suspected terrorists." The US is currently targeting terrorists. Unfortunately there are too many (I assume, we have no real accurate number to look at for bad reasons) civilian casualties. But those are not intentional. Trump suggests targeting the families of terrorists, not because of something they have done (or he would just be saying 'you have to take out terrorists'), but because of who they share blood with. Regarding, "tell us how Drumpf's words are so appalling?" I really should not have to explain this. This should be self evident. Are you serious that you needed an explanation? Regarding, "Torture?" From wiki, "Waterboarding is considered to be torture by a wide range of authorities, including legal experts, politicians, war veterans, intelligence officials, military judges, and human rights organizations." The US tried Japanese for war crimes for waterboarding during WW2. Regarding, "Gitmo, still alive and active." Yes. This is utterly atrocious. What is your point exactly? I have trouble following you because you seem pretty dense.
    3
  2712. With friends like you who needs enemies.
    3
  2713. C Mac very honest, understandable mistake and no big deal. Not like voting for Hillary or Trump. :)
    3
  2714. Matt Santos regarding, "No Republican likes her policies." Anybody who identifies themselves as a Republican is clueless as to what reality looks like. As for her policies what does that even mean? Her public policies or her private policies? Regarding, "In fact the one that scares most of us is the no fly zone in Syria." Yeah. I don't like that either. Let's go further thou. As a progressive I want the military industrialized complex completely reigned in and I want the military's budget slashed. As a Republican how do you feel about that? Hillary is clearly closer to Republican ideology than "democrats" ideology when it comes to this even if you are going to cherry pick a single military issue you disagree with. Regarding, "If she starts an unnecessary war it ain't Bush's fault." Please try to be honest when you answer this... How did you respond to Bush invading Iraq at the time? Because I was saying WTF don't do that at the time and it had nothing to do with political parties or identity politics.
    3
  2715. Matt Santos regarding, "Too much is spent on the military and more than half of the budget can be cut." What a sane, logical position. I agree with all of that. I don't find that to be the position of the Republican party. The Libertarian party sure, but never the Republican party even if that is your position.
    3
  2716. The "democratic" party is too corrupt to save. I voted for them because I mistakenly believed they supported my values, positions, and priorities. I was wrong. The party is dead to me. I still would be willing to support the occasional candidate who identifies themselves as a democrat because a person is more important than their party, but ultimately I'm done with them and am not looking to change them. Regarding, "we MUST win on getting money PERMANENTLY out of the American political system," I can't agree with this more but you are wrong to think the "democratic" party shares your interest here. They love the money and love their superpacs. Do yourself a favor and quit that party. They do not share your values and are only lying to you to get your vote. Join the green party. They actually want you want. They have not sold their soul to big money. The DNC is not the solution... they are the problem.
    3
  2717. Cezariusz regarding, "you do know that Republicans are able to do what they do because they actually have a majority in the Senate?" It doesn't take a majority it takes 41 and there is zero percent chance of them having less than that. Regarding, "And because there is a presidential election?" Bullshit. That has absolutely nothing to do with it. Republicans could have just as well done the same thing on Obama's first day in office. Please stop lying. Regarding, "If you think Dems will be capable of filibustering Trump's pick after the election with a minority for 2 or probably 4 years, you are crazy." You are probably right about this but not because they can't but because democrats are pussies who cave and support garbage like HRC. I wouldn't even advise democrats to refuse to confirm anyone and everyone the same way republicans currently are but rather that they would insist that a judge be a centrist LIKE MERRICK GARLAND only be confirmed. Merrick Garland was fucking praised by Republicans right up until Obama put his stink on him after all. What really would be the difference between Obama getting him on the court or Trump anyway? And if Trump insists on nominating Scalia types democrats absolutely would have the power to tell Trump to fuck off and try again. Please don't continue to pretend this isn't a possibility. This very fucking moment in time proves they can.
    3
  2718. Guccifer is a true patriot. The MSM are traitors.
    3
  2719. Regarding, "but it's not as simple as "Bernie would have won!"" It really is. It wouldn't have been close.
    3
  2720. Regarding, "So what, let's disarm?" Yup. Wouldn't it be nice to have the moral high ground when talking to countries like Iran when telling them they shouldn't have nukes by us not having them as well. Regarding, "Having Nukes is the best and only deterrent to not attack a nuclear power." Or we could work toward world without them. Then there would be no need for such a deterrent. Regarding, "They are here on this earth, no going back on it." Nice can't do spirit. Why even bother try to make the world a better place. Got it.
    3
  2721. Robots don't cry.
    3
  2722. CC regarding, "He is not, please tell me why" Holy fuck man. I just did that but apparently you were not smart enough to understand. I'm sorry I can't draw you a picture. It is actually your turn to make an argument or address mine. But please don't actually. I honestly don't give a fuck what you think at this point. Regarding, "I have not been brainwashed by the MSM" Maybe not but you are obviously brainwashed. Regarding, "Me and millions others" are like I said... the problem. (along with Hillary supporters) Regarding, "You're Welcome" Fuck you. You want me to be grateful? Stop being a fucking moron to start.
    3
  2723. Elana regarding, "Out of curiosity, why is he a racist for being conservative about illegal immigration?" Because he is not consistent with his argument. If you actually care about illegal immigration you can't only care about brown people's illegal immigration. Regarding, "When discussing illegal immigration, haven't we typically looked south in our references." Yes. For very racist reasons. Regarding, "but it seems disingenuous to suggest other politicians haven't done the same." Is seems very disingenuous to put words into my mouth. When have I ever said anything even remotely close to what you suggest? Regarding, "I think mostly everyone should follow the rules we put in place to attain citizenship, barring extreme circumstances - that just seems fair" Everyone essentially thinks that. But, if you are going to be honest, you must admit that our legal immigration system is completely broken. And people who want to come to America in search of a better way of life, who want to provide for their families and contribute to society should be allowed to do so legally. And the fact that our legal immigration policies are completely broken is a huge part of the problem. Regarding, "Why is this a racist notion?" The notion is not racist as long as you are willing to be consistent with your beliefs and apply them uniformly. When you only want to address brown people's illegal immigration while ignoring white peoples illegal immigration that is, by very definition, racist as fuck.
    3
  2724. The DNC can change assuming they get a true progressive leader. Obama was not that. If Bernie is back in 4 years or another true progressive there will be hope for them still.
    3
  2725. Regarding, "if you're so sure I'm not aware of the facts, help push Jordan to a real debate with me." Because I'm certain you do not have the facts I'd rather not give you and your lies a voice. It bothers me that you get this platform to spout your bullshit already. Regarding, "some vapid childish rant" Yes you are a hypocrite as always. When your original post says childish things like, "mindless followers. Be a man" it is way different right?
    3
  2726. Mike regarding, "Bernie sanders is a puppet" Bernie Sanders has a long record that suggests otherwise. Regarding, "I know its a tough pill to swallow" Did you bother to read what I've written? I've been trashing Obama. But Obama and Sanders are different people that you are conflating based on nothing of substance to me.
    3
  2727. Mike regarding, "go back and look at Bernie's record." Bernie has a very long record. Anyone who has been in office that long will always have done something I disagree with. But when I look at the big picture of Bernie's record he has consistently been on the right side of issues even when they were unpopular. He opposed the Iraq war and the Patriot act when it was the popular position. He supported gay rights when it was the unpopular position. Nobody is perfect but in comparison to his colleagues Bernie is. Regarding, "Look Bernie was put out there as like a release valve and to lead the dissent" And they would have been more dangerous had they not had someone leading the cause? They would have been better off had their not been someone speaking out against the machine and the oligarchy? They would have been better off had Sanders not been talking about the real problems? We are going to have to disagree. Regarding, "before this year people were waking up" And now they are not despite wikileaks, Sanders, and Trump winning? Again we are going to have to disagree. Regarding, "If we all wake up and unite against the real enemy of humanity which is Zionism" Again we have to disagree. Money is the root of all evil in my opinion and Jews do not have a monopoly on it.
    3
  2728. mars regarding, "by far the worst ever" Are you kidding me? Look at DootDoot's list. There is almost nothing of policy mentioned. The only exception is the disgrace going on in ND. And I agree that that belongs on a list of fuckups. Compare that to Ws time in office. There is no comparison. The idea that Obama was the worst even even thou he sucked suggests you must have been born in the last 8 years.
    3
  2729. The Corporate States of America
    3
  2730. Jill Stein's policy positions, priorities, and ethics are exactly what this country needs. Jill Stein for President. The only sane choice.
    3
  2731. Jacob pretty much nailed it. it is more expensive for edibles. I know how to grow my own but don't know how to make weed gummies, and you can't put a gummy in a bong. Oh... and I also, as many other people do, have a oral fixation and smoking is fun
    3
  2732. I can't stand that Trump is going to be President but I am very happy she is never going to be President.
    3
  2733. Bob regarding, "it really doesn't work" It certainly doesn't with that type of can't do spirit. Regarding, "Nobody wants Trump or Clinton" You know this and because I refuse to vote for either of them I'm a CTR troll insulting CTR trolls? Why am even bothering to respond to you? Regarding, "but the reality is only one of them can win." Because people like support dogshit rather than supporting good and being willing to lose. Regarding, "You either do the responsible thing" Your idea of the responsible thing is supporting dogshit. We have very different ideas of what the responsible thing is. Regarding, "you've shirked your responsibility" It's my fault that dogshit wins because I don't support dogshit. That makes sense to the sheep. To me it seems that you are responsible for not supporting a candidate worthy of your vote. Clearly we have very different world-views. Regarding, "potentially enabling the eorst politician ever." Both Trump and Hillary are very possibly going to be the worst politician ever. So I don't vote for them. That makes sense to me. You compare and contrast two piles of shit trying to figure out which smells worse. That isn't for me. That is what the establishment wants. I'm not playing their game. You go ahead thou and be part of the problem rather than part of the solution. Regarding, "3rd party candidates mean nothing until they have a chance of winning a significant number of states." If not now when? The two major parties are running the two worst politicians in the country. Nobody trusts either of them or likes either of them. Still you support them because you are a sheep.
    3
  2734. Blue regarding, "cannot beat Trump, Hillary can" If I voted for the lesser of two evils I'd vote for Trump. Consider that before you try to convince me to vote for evil like your dumb ass. Fortunately for you I don't vote for evil and have standards for who I'm willing to support. You are part of the problem when you vote for garbage. Vote for good and be part of the solution instead. Support good and be willing to lose. You won't because you are sheep. Good luck with the queen.
    3
  2735. Remember when ISIS said, "you have to take out their families" Wait, my mistake. That wasn't ISIS. It only sounds exactly like something ISIS would say. That was actually Donald Trump saying the United States should be committing war crimes. How sad is it that both Hillary supporters and Trump supporters such as yourself have nothing positive to say about your candidate? It is pathetic that the best argument both of you have is, 'look at at how terrible the other candidate is.'
    3
  2736. I do not care about polls. I do not care about endorsements. I care about policies. I care about priorities. I care about ethics. I vote for the candidate I think would be the best President and in this election that is Jill Stein and it isn't even close. I suggest you do the same.
    3
  2737. Erik regarding, "It doesn't matter how much she represents you." Actually it does and only a sheep would suggest otherwise. Regarding, "But you aren't participating in who the next President is with a vote for Stein." Sure I am. I am getting the Green party closer to 5 percent. I am also sending a message to the establishment that I'm not going to choose between a douche and a turd and if they get that message they might just offer more than a douche and a turd next time if they actually care about getting my vote. Regarding, "Trump" You don't really listen do you? You have your talking points and stick to them. If I were going to vote for the lesser of two evils I'd vote for Trump. Consider that while you try and convince me to vote for a shit candidate. The problem with all your BS and talking points is that you never bother to have any standards what-so-ever for who you will vote for. I do and so should you and everybody. You know the "you need to be at least so tall to ride" signs at rollercoaster parks? Well everyone should have a "you need to be at least so decent" to get my vote signs. You obviously don't. Had Trump been the "democratic" nominee (it isn't that hard to imagine, he was a self described democrat not long ago) and David Duke were the Republican nominee you would be here with the same absurd talking points telling everyone they need to vote for Trump. Pull you head out of your ass and vote for a candidate that actually represents you and be willing to let the chips fall where they may. I'm willing to support good and lose. You support evil. Stop being part of the problem and be part of the solution instead. Good luck with the queen.
    3
  2738. Erik regarding, "I'm sorry you don't want either to win" Of course I want to win. Everyone wants to win. But voting my values if far more important than that. I assume you would be voting Trump if new leaks tank Hillary and she is down 25 points on election day. You would vote for Trump then right? Winning is important and if you didn't vote for Trump you would be wasting your vote right?
    3
  2739. Erik regarding, "You aren't refuting me" I'm not refuting the fact that Trump or Hillary is going to be the next President. I'm refuting your bullshit "logic" that that is a good reason to support dogshit. Regarding, "you're dodging reality." You are dodging reality if you think either Hillary or Trump deserves anyone's vote. But you go ahead and support shit and wonder why things don't actually change when you vote for same old, same old. Regarding, "Good luck." Good luck with your queen. I'm not sure why you still think people's votes actually matter anymore anyway. http://alexanderhiggins.com/stanford-berkley-study-1-77-billion-chance-hillary-won-primary-without-widespread-election-fraud/
    3
  2740. Erik regarding, "I voted for Bernie and he lost" I'm sure Hillary's "Correct the Record" trolls would never lie about something like that considering they lie about anything and everything because that is their job... to lie and lie and lie and lie and lie, just like their queen. Regarding, "Digging up an irrelevant" If she is so irrelevant than what are you doing here fear mongering to get people to vote against their own interests? If she is actually irrelevant shouldn't you just fuck off? Regarding, "no experience" Judgement is always more important than experience. Sure Hillary has experience. So does Dick Cheney. But when all that experience demonstrates consistent terrible judgement and lack of ethics I'll take no experience over that any day. Regarding, "polling at 2%" Polls can be fucked with. Jill is lucky to be offered as an option in polls. Pollster know that asking the question, "who do you want to win" and "who do you plan to vote for" gets very different answers. Pollster know this and use this to get the answers they want. They also pick and choose who they bother to ask like for example excluding polling young voters. Regarding, "naive" You are naive when you vote for dogshit for president. Correction, I would rather have dogshit be president than Hillary or Trump. I apologize to dogshit.
    3
  2741. Erik regarding, "Do you want to borrow my phone to call someone that cares?" You get service in hell?
    3
  2742. Erik regarding, "I haven't anything credible about that report about the statistics of election fraud" Really? How do you explain the fact that exit polls indicate massive election fraud? http://trustvote.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/trust-vote.png Look at the last column of "discrepancy in favor of Clinton." How do you explain it? Regarding, "polling" At the end of the day I don't give a fuck about polling. At least not in this election. If there were more than one candidate that I thought was decent enough to get my vote I would consider being strategic with my vote. Considering there is only one candidate I want to win there really is no choice for me.
    3
  2743. Erik regarding, "I said "sorry you don't want either to win"." My mistake. I did misread that. You still don't have a valid point so far as I'm concerned.
    3
  2744. Eric regarding, "she's more of the same" Hardly. Although superpacs are the new norm having your own foundation that takes in millions from Saudi Arabia while you sell the Saudi's arms is very new, very different, and hardly business as usual. (Side note, recently released pages from the 9-11 report indicate that the Saudi's are likely directly implicated in 9-11) She also used the foundation to essentially sell a uranium mine to Russia, and sell a seat on an important nuclear commission to a contributor. This is not business as usual no matter how much you want to pretend it is.
    3
  2745. Erik regarding, "Selling arms to Saudi Arabia isn't new" Selling arms to foreign countries only because they are donating millions to your foundation absolutely is new. You are either being foolish, naive, or intentionally misleading. (My money is on intentionally misleading.) Regarding, "Pointing out that we arent going to roll over on cyber attacks...sounds more than appropriate" You realize we do this to other countries right? Good thing the rest of the world isn't has hypocritical as the US. Regarding, "Get some better talking points." That's funny coming from "Correct the Record." Thanks for the laugh in these sad times.
    3
  2746. Oculos regarding, "I've talked to him outside of YouTube." It was all part of my plot to try and get you to vote for Trump while disguising myself as a Jill Stein supporter. Seriously thou I'll look you up later. I've got a bunch of stuff I need to be doing like an hour ago. Bob and Erik are lost causes. I feel they must be working for CTR. I'm done with them. My time is better spent doing anything other than talking to them further. Have a nice day.
    3
  2747. Hopefully he is still in good health in 4 years. We could really use him after 4 years of Trump.
    3
  2748. SD regarding, "not possible" Of course it is. Social Security could be privatized among about another million ways things could be worse. Don't tempt fate. Just because the country is fucked up don't pretend it can't get worse. I assure you it can.
    3
  2749. I disagree but fine, recount them all then. I'd prefer it if all votes were counted twice from the start and we still could have recounts done when filed through the proper channels.
    3
  2750. The Green Party is the only party not bought by big money and corporations. That is why they are able to represent the people of this country. That said the person is more important than the party. There are a few democrats like Alan Grayson worthy of support. But there is only one Presidential candidate worthy of support. Jill Stein for President!
    3
  2751. It really is amazing to me how many people have dumb ideas as to what a VP is suppose to be. Regarding, "Your VP candidate is suppose to shore up a portion of the electorate that you aren't certain that the presidential candidate can secure on their own." No they are not. Nobody but the dumbest of folks vote based on the bottom of the ticket. The VP first, foremost, and solely should be based on who would be the best person to run the country in the event of a catastrophe befalls the President. Yes there are other reasons that politicians use in their determination. But those are all terrible no good reasons that reflect terrible no good candidates.
    3
  2752. This had nothing to do with sexism. This had to do with Hillary being a corrupt POS and terrible candidate.
    3
  2753. Don't be so sure. The base of the tree is reinforced with gold and cash.
    3
  2754. MSM makes large donations to Hillary's campaign... not that that creates a conflict of interest.
    3
  2755. That's a lot of Courics.
    3
  2756. It's not that people like myself are "giving up on her." We just feel that actions speak louder than words. If I thought someone's words were what is important I wouldn't think Hillary is the POS I think she is. For example I think Hillary is a POS because of what she does. I still respect Warren much more than the average politician.... but that really isn't saying much. And I respect her far less since she is willing to help support corrupt, corporate Hillary. She of all people should know better. She either doesn't know, doesn't care, or has sold out. Ultimately it doesn't really matter much which reason she is willing to help Hillary... none speak well on her behalf. Never Hillary.
    3
  2757. Daffy Duck regarding, "Your sense of entitlement to hate and smear Clinton relentlessly is bullshit It has everything to do with your candidate losing.You need to give it a rest it's just classless trolling at this point and makes you look like the twat" You gather all this just because I called Hillary a POS? You might want to consider that I call her that because of her actions. Because she seems to think she is entitled to be President. You might want to consider that I resent the fact that she has zero principles and that she would say or do ANYTHING if it meant that she would be president. If you think that I am a "twat" because I do not like the facts that she is liar and corrupt so be it. If you think that the only reason I feel the way I do is because my candidate lost... well... I can't stop you from being stupid. Don't think your insults hurt me. Remember that you said all this BS the next time you hate on smear Trump... no doubt you will. But that is probably different in your mind because he deserves to be insulted and smeared... not like your queen. Good luck with her anointing. I will not be a part of it. Never Hillary.
    3
  2758. "it often will drive addicts to steal" Then lock them up for stealing. I'm pretty sure that is against the law as it should be. The war on drugs is a joke PERIOD
    3
  2759. John when you dig a little deeper into the reason for the factors you talk about it (like our political system is completely rigged) it is all the more reason to vote for the real change we so desperately need these days.
    3
  2760. 143 regarding, "they promise things" Everyone promises things. That is how the game is played. I like to think I have good BS detection but I was fooled with Obama. The problem with him wasn't that he promised things. The problem with Obama is that he didn't deliver.
    3
  2761. FSnow regarding, "Obama was a victim of reality" Is that suppose to mean something? Because to me that seems like word vomit.
    3
  2762. steve regarding, "bush was a Democrat" Run along and let the sane talk please.
    3
  2763. jwren regarding, "I now don't believe a damn thing politicians say." The biggest lesson and takeaway I've learned from this is the importance of following the money. The biggest tell that Obama was going to sell out the people was how much and where he got his money from. There is a direct correlation between how corrupt a politician is and where they do and do not get their money. Regarding, "George Carlin" Fuck I miss him. I'd love to hear his take on the current state of things. Not only would it be accurate but it would have been hilarious and we need good laughs in sad times when we can get them.
    3
  2764. He does so on piles of money. I agree he is a disgusting, lying POS.
    3
  2765. Lee regarding, "Dude it's on youtube." I know what you are talking about. Justin is taking words completely out of context. Obama does not advocate for illegals voting. He talks about the sanctity of the vote. He is talking about citizens voting who might have illegal immigrants in their family, not themselves. He talks about how your vote is confidential. To vote people need to REGISTER TO VOTE. And we do not let illegal immigrants register to vote. Try to remember that the next time you peddle the illegal immigrants are voting bullshit.
    3
  2766. Mike, the overarching problem with this country is money in politics fucking everything up. That is why we have a for profit health care system that will deny coverage if it means more money. That is why the military industrial complex runs wild. That is why we have corporate welfare. That is why we have for profit private prison industries. Money in politics is the problem that makes solving all other problems all but impossible. My point is that ultimately there is nothing innately wrong with capitalism. It is actually the best system when it comes to something like selling cars or computers and shit like that as long as the game is regulated, as long as the government makes sure the game is fair. But they don't because they are bought. The problems with capitalism in the country are not the disease. They are a symptom.
    3
  2767.  @d.owenpowell9023  You probably heard the phrase, "behind every great fortune is a great crime" and thought the same nonsense you are typing now.
    3
  2768.  @d.owenpowell9023  "immature and shallow" That is your retort to me talking about a homeless epidemic. You really are betraying and turning your back on your class. It's gross.
    3
  2769.  @d.owenpowell9023  Shouldn't you be off helping a billionaire get richer? Oh wait.... I guess you are in a way.
    3
  2770.  @d.owenpowell9023  "All of us are supporting billionaires" Some more than others. Not all of us enjoy the boot the way you do.
    3
  2771.  @d.owenpowell9023  "All of us are supporting..." Your argument is akin to the... you can't possibly be a socialist because you engage in capitalism "argument." And then you go off to talk about "off-grid" like I've mentioned that and like that is the only way to show class solidarity while you are the benedict arnold of your class. You are tough to take seriously.
    3
  2772.    Regarding, "Tulsi supports him , too bad Clint Holmes doesn't see that." If tulsi supports sanders then maybe you should too. Oh wait... she supports herself for president and you are just being you. Regarding, "His hatred for the troops has really done a number on him." I don't "hate the troops." I question their judgement for good reason. You would too if you weren't being biased beyond belief. If I actually hated the troops I'd have them fight stupid wars. But I "hate" them so much I want to keep them safe. I suck, I know.
    3
  2773.    Regarding, "Tulsi supports Tulsi first" Yup. Bernie first ran in 2016 because he wanted progressive principles represented and is the clear leader of the progressive movement in a world where we know the establishment is going to do anything and everything to stop him. Tulsi could support him but instead opposes him for herself and her brand. Regarding, "You come off as hating Tulsi because she enlisted." It's almost like I have a problem with blatant conflict of interests. I'd also have a problem with Sanders if he were cashing checks from Aetna or some other big insurance industry but that isn't actually happening. I appreciate what service members do but their decision to work for and enable the MIC is a problem. It would be tough to go to war everywhere if people stopped working for them...don't you think? Regarding, "Tulsi's #1 reason for running for president is ending regime change wars." Sanders was already doing that. He was the guy telling tulsi and people like her Iraq was dumb. She ran for herself. Regarding, "The truth triggers you, ,that is for sure." Stupid shit triggers me. That's why I have an impossible time not responding to morons like you. Regarding, "are you sure you don't support Trump and his authoritarianism" I'm pretty sure. But think and say whatever stupid shit you want. I know you will.
    3
  2774. Keep in mind that according to the DNC Pete Buttigieg won Iowa.
    3
  2775.  @JL-gt1kc  "discredited" His work speaks for itself but I'm not going to him for political commentary.
    3
  2776.  @RoddyFuhr  "wish it hadn't happened" I feel the same way.
    3
  2777. @Badatallthis Stuff BTW I don't care if you want to "lecture me." I care about your hypocrisy and your lack of quality arguments.
    3
  2778. Notice how many replies youtube tells you are there and compare it to how many you can actually see. Land of the free am I right? /s
    3
  2779. Kara regarding, "made a chump out of me twice," I admit to being duped by Obama as well. The biggest lesson I like to think I learned is follow the money and my trust in a candidate is going to be directly correlated to how a candidate raises the money for their campaign. I am going to be much more willing to trust Justice Dems in large part to how they finance their campaigns. Regarding, "I voted Green Party" Vote for good candidates and good people regardless of their party label or you are doing the same thing that dems and republicans do when they blindly follow their party. Regarding, "Green is where I will stay registered so they can have a chance of getting matching federal funding." I do not believe that federal funding is in any way attached to registration. That I am far from sure about this and would be interested if you have any proof of this claim.
    3
  2780. Leland regarding, "That's a nice blanket generalization of a population of 323.1 million people." You must be one of the dim bulbs. I was obviously referring to the 42 percent of the population that thinks something utterly absurd like you need to believe in God to be moral. Next time I'll draw you a picture with crayons to make my point easier for you to understand. That said I actually think you understood my point but are religious, felt offended, and decided to say something silly. Then again I might be wrong about that.
    3
  2781.  Janet Baker  You are conflating very different concepts. I do not think Meghan Kelly is a good person... but that has nothing to do with my opinion of her appearance.
    3
  2782. So why does Trump only care about a wall on the southern border and not about the northern border? Oh yeah... racism.
    3
  2783. lucky you should care more about supporting good people and care less about a party label.
    3
  2784. I am shocked how you lie about rape and beheaded babies to manufacture consent for genocide.
    3
  2785. Accept no imitations. Bernie Sanders 2020
    3
  2786. Wait... we are the one's unnecessarily interjecting politics?
    3
  2787.  @thenamelessguy7357  Regarding, "infinite lockdowns and infinite Covid strains." Infinite? So you just pull shit from your ass? Regarding, "It will never end." So a vaccine is just for show? Regarding, "Let me give you some political advice, once someone has power, it’s very hard to let it go" Let me give you some advice... don't just mindless go between talking about covid to talking about "political" power and act like they are the same thing or some shit.
    3
  2788. Kamala waffling on bodycams. https://www.sacbee.com/news/politics-government/capitol-alert/article22451643.html https://www.latimes.com/local/political/la-me-pc-harris-body-cameras-20150527-story.html
    3
  2789.  @TPJSM794  Regarding, "that's not the same as being against them." It's also not the same as being for them. This is a textbook have your cake and eat it too play from the politicians handbook. Those are her ACTIONS on the topic. They speak louder than her meaningless words.
    3
  2790.  @TPJSM794  Regarding, "only necessary because of how horrible the police are" This isn't a new problem. This was a problem when Kamala was waffling.
    3
  2791. I don't think they care in all honesty but please do in open primary states. In closed primary states make sure you are registered with them at least long enough to vote in their primaries.
    3
  2792.  @czos9239  I hope you are correct. I'm worried about the whole stage trying to tag team Bernie.
    3
  2793. Aurel regarding, "explain to me how you are treating yourself with respect if you want to numb yourself to not experience reality." There is so much wrong with this sentence it is really tough to know where to begin to explain what is wrong with it. First off the characterization that all drugs "numb" is wrong. There are lots and lots of drugs with lots and lots of different effects. And the exact same drug can have a different effect depending on the person using it. Bottom line is that to suggest that all drugs numb is terribly misguided. The drug category know as stimulants do essentially the exact opposite of "numb." Then there is your suggestion that, because you have taken a drug, you are "not experiencing reality." Again this is utterly insane and demonstrates a complete lack of understand of what drugs do and what we, as society define reality to mean. If you were talking specifically about hallucinogenics, again a specific category of drugs, you could say such a thing and not come across as ignorant beyond words (even if I would still tell you why you were wrong) but your characterization that someone who has taken drugs suddenly isn't "experiencing reality" requires you completely redefine what society has determined reality to mean. Then there is the notion that, if you are taking some kind of drug you are not, "treating yourself with respect." Again there is so much crazy in that sentence I can't believe I'm addressing it but there is nothing innately disrespectful about taking drugs. If you were talking specifically about people who ABUSE drugs, which you are not, then again you wouldn't be coming across as blatantly absurd as you are. Do you know why people take drugs? Because they work. Because they are fun. Because they can make you feel good. There is nothing wrong or abnormal about people wanting to have fun and feel good. The thing is is that, like all things that can make people feel good and have fun they can overdo it. And when they do that the negative consequences begin to out-weight the positives and they become a problem in their lives. And even still, to people to whom drugs have become a problem in their lives they do not bad people because of it. They might have more trouble being a good person but that is not the same. There is more I could say about why that entire sentence is absurd but hopefully you get the point (I doubt it thou). Regarding, "I would not have the need to escape reality by taking drugs." Nobody NEEDS to take recreational drugs. That is what makes them RECREATIONAL. Some people choose to because that is the nature of recreation. Maybe I CHOOSE to go to a baseball game for recreation because it is something I enjoy doing and you would sound just as absurd and insane if you said that if I did I "wouldn't need to escape reality by going to a baseball game, if reality was something I enjoyed." Or what if I enjoy reading fiction. I'm sure you say the same insane things like, "wouldn't need to escape reality by reading fiction, if reality was something I enjoyed." The things you don't realize about that example is that, 1) even if it is "fiction," it becomes real to me when I'm experiencing it therefor it is reality and 2) just because I enjoy experiencing it doesn't mean I don't also enjoy experiencing other things. Regarding, "If my reality is not enjoyable enough to be experienced, then I have not worked at creating the reality I want, which means Im a “bad“ (unfunctional) person." This "logic" is insane. Again it is truly remarkable how you could jam pack so much wrong into such a small space. Forgive me but I'm not going to break this down. Even if I did I am convinced it isn't going to get through to you. Regarding, "She didnt “rail against the government“. Yes she made arguments as to why government is evil." Go back and reread this as many times as it takes for you to realize why writing this is idiotic. Hint, making arguments as to why government is evil is railing against the government to the sane. Regarding, "Yes she was a hypocrite." Yes she was. And if you actually want to know the difference between whether or not someone is good and bad this, unlike whether or not they take drugs, determines good and bad. Regarding, "Yes she was an idiot for thinking that smoking is not unhealthy. This doesnt have anything to do with her arguments though." Actually it kind of does. After someone demonstrates that they are a moron, like you concede she did in the first sentence, then I can rightfully be less inclined to take anything else they have to say seriously. That said she may very well make a good argument about something somewhere... I'm sure Hitler did someonewhere at sometime too... I just don't care to hear it and am not interested in it because I have no respect for the person. (I would like to add that if I did actually listen to whatever "thought" of hers you are trying to get at I'm certain I would conclude it is insane and misguided, like all your "thoughts.") Regarding, "I never claimed she was a good person. I said that she provided a good case for there being more important things than treating others fairly in order to be a good person." So you don't understand the importance of whether or not a person is good or bad has relevance to their arguments about what makes a person good or bad? Sorry but if I'm going to listen to arguments about why someone is good versus bad I'm going to want to be listening to good people making that argument and I'm not going to want to be listening to bad people making that argument. Do I need to elaborate as to why? Because I think it is self-evident. All the things you say seem to come from the position that because someone takes drugs they are a bad person and you work backward from that conclusion and make other claims that are utterly absurd to try and make your point. You redefine words and make logical fallacies just to back up something that, in all honesty, in insane beyond words. But at least you get to think that you are fucking amazing, super special, and better than everyone else because of your idiotic beliefs.
    3
  2794. This is how you justify making California's votes utterly meaningless... you think they are less then you. Bottom line is that they are Americans and their votes should count exactly as much as everyone else when it comes to voting for president.
    3
  2795.  Gabe.  I said someone sane. I'm not sure he was sane before his brain started melting.
    3
  2796.  Gabe.  It's trump or america? Is this really the nonsense you want to go with when people are accurately telling you your clowns brain is rotting?
    3
  2797. Then she votes for that shit power and gets nothing for it.
    3
  2798.  @benjaminhenderson7059  I forsee nuclear war with humans after the dogs learn that we have been taking their balls.
    3
  2799. Hassan I have never watched house of cards and there I was not referencing it. If you missed something it isn't because you didn't watch that show. Regarding, " But now saint Donald of Triumph is burning down the white house of corruption" With so much stupid on the internet it is difficult to say something so dumb that it really stands out. You did thou. Bravo for that. Forgive me for not addressing this level of stupid intelligently. I see no point.
    3
  2800. It's not jimmy's fault that her actions don't match her words.
    3
  2801. ZERO Kyle Kullinski's covered BOMBSHELL Ana K blackmail story.
    3
  2802. Project Veritas? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Deep breathe. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
    3
  2803. Are you at least smart enough to realize you are an anti-semite? I'm betting no. That would take more intelligence than I suspect you have.
    3
  2804. Comments like yours only make me like kyle less and that's not easy to do.
    3
  2805. This comment is dumb even by your standards.
    3
  2806. You are an idiot.
    3
  2807.  demigodzilla  Has nothing to do with where pete puts his junk at night. I'm sure you realize this but have an idiotic agenda.
    3
  2808.  @AMildCaseOfCovid  Is that what you are suffering from? Is that what prevents you from just intelligently trying to address the points the original poster is making and instead has you making such an idiotic response? Do you live in an alternate universe where some people don't value 1) being warm or 2) being incognito? Do you live in an alternate universe where masks don't give people those things? Or do you have some sorta idiotic stockholm syndrome that prevents you from acknowledging the reality in which you exist?
    3
  2809.  @victorybeginsinthegarden  If all you require is "better than Trump" then that is all you will ever get. Or what if the republicans have a candidate worse than Trump. Would you think support trump because he would be better than the alternative? You have to draw a line in the sand somewhere. And that line should be... does this person deserve my vote or not. The Trumps and Bidens of the world don't deserve my vote so neither of them are going to get it. Ever.
    3
  2810. Pandora regarding, "Voted Trump." So you consider yourself a progressive? Way to go. You prove that the left can be just as fucking retarded as the right.
    3
  2811. They have musk on the hook for 1 billion. I think they can live with the "embarrassment."
    3
  2812. And the spinkles are also made of turds.
    3
  2813. Well I guess he did abstain... which, again, is not actually any different than a no for all intensive purposes. https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=115&session=1&vote=00209
    3
  2814. @Christopher Nobody cares about your "thoughts." Go back to alex jones or breitbart or wherever stupid place you came from. But you are paid to troll here aren't you? You stupid twat making everyone dumber with everything you say. Maybe shut the fuck up... forever.
    3
  2815.  @solgato5186  "Calling someone "controlled opposition" is not making a point," LMFAO Of course it is. Just handwaving it away like you can accurately be called, "not making a point."
    3
  2816.  @abe8435  "calling him a tool of the oligarchy" He gets a check from MULTIPLE billionaires.
    3
  2817. Steve regarding, "Hillary Clinton was president Bernie’s chances of being president would have been less" It would have been essentially nil. It is not uncommon for incumbents to essentially run unopposed in their primary. Regarding, "I would much have preferred if Bernie spoke out about the rigging of the democratic primary or bias of the dnc whatever the term of cheating is." He has. That said there is a legit case to make that he should have done more. But let's be real... the people that still think the primary was fair aren't all of sudden going to be swayed by anything Sanders says on the topic. Regarding, "him supporting Hillary didn’t really do anything except turn people off." Sanders is all about trying to get the policies he wants implemented. Endorsing Hillary was an indirect way of doing this. He is currently the most popular politician in the country and much of his power is because he bit the bullet and did what he did. Even after endorsing her team Hillary tried to blame him for her losing. The reason those attacks are ineffective is because he didn't give them ammo to use. Had he not endorsed her and Trump won all the attacks and efforts to try and blame him would have been successful. He, his policies, and the movement he started would have all suffered a terrible blow. Because he did what he did Hillary is rightfully blamed for her loss (despite the idiotic original posters attempt to shift blame). Regarding, "I’ll be ready for him come 2020 though." 2020 can't come soon enough for me. He is the best hope the country has to get the progressive policies we desperately need. But it isn't going to be easy. There is going to be a war fought. The establishment will do anything and everything to try and stop him (as they did in 2016) but I am hopeful that 2020 will be different because of his current popularity and name recognition. Two assets he didn't have in 2016.
    3
  2818. Does someone need a new diaper?
    3
  2819. Policy wise he is right in line with republicans and corporate dems.
    3
  2820.  @dashx1103  "Abstaining wasn't gaslighting." It is. And you are. "threatening to abstain was the ultimate cutthroat move." Abstaining is taking the power you have and throwing in the trash. Abstaining makes them as powerful as I am on the issue and I don't have any power. "abstain would have gotten a floor vote" There is no reason to think this. "Too extreme?" The strategy of voting for a person who would bring m4a to the floor every single time would already have been extreme enough. I don't care if they had to vote on speaker one billion times. I already hold the "extreme" position as you advocate for giving away all the power they had.
    3
  2821.  @christianpervert525  "Pointing to other mandates is not a good defense of more mandates." It would have been a fair point if M4A was actually a mandate. It doesn't mandate jack shit. You don't even have to go to a doctor FFS. To conflate that with mandating putting things into your body was asinine.
    3
  2822.  @npalmi88  Regarding, "people want to fuck them." I'm confident Amy doesn't have this problem.
    3
  2823. I care about the guy exposing a coverup at the OPCW.
    3
  2824. LOL The irony of you accusing jimmy of gaslighting while spreading BS is funny. Cenk is against forcing the vote on m4a.
    3
  2825. " they'll argue in court they're not news." It would be the most true thing they would have ever said.
    3
  2826. And for that hot dog eating competition let's agree that they can't coat them in water so they go down easy. Maybe we can get lucky and at least one of them can choke and die.
    3
  2827.  @inktoxicant  Regarding, "Give them this win," They might win... but not with my help. I'm not enabling their corruption and actually think the world would be better long term if trump wins. Not because of 2020-2024 which is going to suck regardless of who is president, but because of 2024. The country is going to blame the next 4 years on whoever is in office. I'd prefer they blame trump and the "right" and not biden and the "left." Trump was a response to failed corrupt dems. Joe "nothing will fundamentally change" in a world that desperately needs change is a recipe for disaster and trump 2.0 in 2024. But whatever. I don't vote for evil so don't worry, I won't vote for trump even if I think he might be the lesser evil long term.
    3
  2828. Only here to downvote.
    3
  2829.  @borp6912  Do you think that establishment conmen only hold political office? You can't for example be an establishment hack working for CNN?
    3
  2830.  @carjaune6793  Regarding, "Yang ripped democrats a new one on CNN twice just this past month." Is this really all it takes to impress you? Do you get this wet when trump rips dems?
    3
  2831.  @CC-vq1yg  Don't take my comments wrong. I support a single payer system and M4A.
    3
  2832. This is the type of stupid shit you say when you have nothing of substance to offer.
    3
  2833. Give them all your money and they will make it happen.
    3
  2834. Maybe, but why take the harder road during the general election? And why sacrifice the ability to reform the "democratic" party from the inside?
    3
  2835.  @batboy3746  Regarding, "I thought you would say that." You didn't give me much to choose from considering how vapid your response to me was. Regarding, "Good luck with Bernie." Thanks!
    3
  2836.  @batboy3746  Polls when done correctly is straight up science. But it is science that is easily manipulated by using terrible methodology.
    3
  2837. Musk's companies have gotten literally billions of dollars from the government. How could you not be a billionaire when that's happening. When organized crime is organized enough it isn't even illegal.
    3
  2838. I don't care if the "democratic" party never wins another election as long as they don't represent me. And they don't represent me. I'd also like to add... nice "sentence."
    3
  2839. We gotta expose the people who lie to us like grimm because he won't be the last one to try it.
    3
  2840.  dandagod official  Actual cave men are smarter than you and less likely to paint with the huge brush you are using.
    3
  2841.  @girletherial  How about you stop being an idiot?
    3
  2842.  @sunseeker9581  Regarding, "claiming everything is a conspiracy makes us sound as bad as republicans" I honestly don't care about your opinion on this or anything. I asked you a very simple question and instead of answering it you offer this stupid shit. I'll tell you what I will give you another chance to answer my very simple question and not deflect like you did before... how do you verify the results being given from mail in ballots? What do you have that is akin to exit polls from us to know if results are legit or bullshit? It's ok to admit you have nothing but faith in the system and trust that votes are being counted correctly like you do. A system that again tells you that Pete Buttigieg "won" in Iowa despite all the evidence that he wasn't even close to first. How do you verify mail in ballot results?
    3
  2843.  @sunseeker9581  Regarding, "exit polls are not always accurate" This is particularly funny because in the same post you want to hypocritically criticize me for "conspiracy shit." Exit polls are not always accurate? From the same person who doesn't seem to think it's important to be able to verify that our votes are being counted accurately? Vote counts are always accurate? But not exit polls? Really? Exit polls, while imperfect, are simply the best and ONLY way to tell if votes at the polls are being counted correctly. That's simply fact. Not "conspiracy shit." Regarding, "Mailed votes are counted the same as any other votes." Yeah. They are counted by machines that are owned and operated by big corporations. Those machines are considered "proprietary" which means those corporations don't even need to tell you or me how they work. That's what you are taking for granted. At least when those votes are cast at the polls we, again, have exit polls to try and verify that votes are not being flipped. Regarding, "Enough of this conspiracy shit." So no answer to my very simple question right? You are conceding that there is no way to verify the results right? But just pretend that isn't a problem to sane people.
    3
  2844. LA looks like gaza now. And I'm going to make sure everyone knows it who talks about the fire.
    3
  2845. To change them hostile takeover style.
    3
  2846. Regarding, "I will become a Bernie Sanders supporter." You care more about party labels than people. You are exactly the type of sheep the "democratic" party and republican party rely on.
    3
  2847. Regarding, "but I’m probably the most rational person you’ll ever meet and probably the kindest." You sound like Trump when he says "believe me" before spouting BS. Regarding, "I need the Democratic party to be a viable party" I kinda agree with this. I desperately want the democratic party to be viable... but not when they suck like they currently do. If they suck then they may as well die for all I care. They are part of the problem, not part of the solution. And when they are part of the problem I am going to fight against them. When they are part of the problem and you support them then you are also part of the problem. Regarding, "because who else is going to look out for minorities if not them?" Anyone else. They don't care about minorities and you are foolish for thinking they do. For example the US imprisons more of their citizens than any other country in the world by percentage of population and it isn't even close. Much of the blame for this, which disproportionately affects minorities, falls squarely on the shoulders of the democrats. And there are lots and lots of other examples, this is just one.
    3
  2848.  @ArchlordZer0  Regarding, "A defeatist mentalityity like that will surely lead to it" I'm confident that pretending fakes are on your side isn't going to lead to a win. I'm not a defeatist. I'm a realist.
    3
  2849.  @ArchlordZer0  Regarding, "I never said they were on our aside." So you think they aren't on your side but their feet can be held to the fire? Do I really need to intelligently address my many problems with your "logic." Regarding, "If you can't understand how Democrats are in the spotlight now" I never said they weren't in the spotlight. /s But seriously. I know they control all of government. They have zero excuses but NOTHING is going to fundamentally change. That is the one thing biden said that I actually believe. Regarding, "Progressives are in a much better position to push their agenda" I know right... like how they could have forced a vote on m4a but instead voted for pelosi and got nothing of value for it. They are ALREADY failing at this. Regarding, "you're missing the big picture." No. You are missing the big picture. The dems have everything and they won't even vote on m4a. We are fucked.
    3
  2850. They vote for Trump for the same reasons they vote for Biden... brainwashing and propaganda.
    3
  2851. Who would that even be? There are plenty of people claiming it can be worse than Neera but I have yet to get a single example of who the fuck that could even be.
    3
  2852.  @SamJohn52  Biden clearly has cognitive decline. Get over it.
    3
  2853.  @vegastjg  Their business model involves selling your info and if you are doing well they might try to manipulate the market by only allowing you to take one side of a stock.
    3
  2854. Speaking of cowards... kyle kullinski.
    3
  2855. branden the conversation you are insisting on trying to engage in is pretty idiotic in my opinion. How about we just agree to disagree about it and focus on our common ground of agreeing that Nina Turner would be an excellent president. And she wouldn't be a great president because she is a women or because she is black but because of the person she is and the policies she fights for. That is really what is important afterall. Not what is between her legs or what the color of her skin is. She's no politicore of course but who is?
    3
  2856.  @smittys3069  Even you must realize you don't have any thing intelligent to say or I'm sure you would have gone with that instead.
    3
  2857.  @texjohnson9208  Your question is absurd. As has already been pointed out to you Obama isn't running. As for who America decides to vote for in 2020 for president, I don't know, that is a long way off and it has a lot more to do with who can make the best empty platitudes of "making America great again" which is all you a message of "love, peace, and unity" is. People like me care about policy, priorities, and trust and you should to. You also shouldn't be over romanticizing the Obama presidency because, like I said, if was actually about "love, peace, and unity" the country wouldn't have elected an orange clown after him. That man of "peace" more than doubled the number of wars we were in and failed to get us out of the wars he said he would.
    3
  2858.  @texjohnson9208  Regarding, "President Obama's GREAT achievements for the American people speak for themselves" They really don't. He was a warmonger who more than double the number of wars we were in. Who made droning people in foreign lands the new norm. Who set records when it came to deporting people. Whose signature piece of legislation was Republican health care. Who lost over 1000 democratic seats in government during his time. Who sucked so bad the country was willing to give an orange clown the keys to the car after him because he failed to give the people the hope and change that he promised and instead gave them same old same old. The people were left so starved for change they gave a clown the chance because even thou he was a clown he was, at the very least, different. Regarding, "You will quickly find out between Obama and Trump which one is considered "A GREAT. LIAR!"" Obama was a great liar because you bought his bullshit. Trump is a pathological liar but he really isn't good at it or you would believe him as well the same as you did with Obama. Ultimately they are both establishment tools who serve big money and corporate masters.
    3
  2859. Rice regarding, "Obama did this Trump is just doing the same thing" Whataboutism in full effect being used to justify the unjustifiable. Shit like this really makes me hate humanity.
    3
  2860. If anyone is guilty of sexual harassment it's person exposing themselves in public.
    3
  2861. I can't agree more with the fact that biden is "out of touch" but want to add that it's so much more than that. It's a complete lack of principles. He wants to say whatever is politically best for himself because he doesn't give a shit about this issue or anything else (as demonstrated by his flip flopping over the course of a day), and he is out of touch because he demonstrates he doesn't have a clue what the people want and that's why he's swaying in the wind. Bernie on the other hand is a demonstration of what a person who has principles looks like. That's why his opinions on things like this and everything else for that matter doesn't change with the times. He isn't pandering and trying to tell people what they want to hear... he's telling them what he thinks and not pretending to be something he's not. The US needs Bernie in the worst way. Let us all please make that happen.
    3
  2862.  @darrenbutler9819  Regarding, "So what? just reject them" Or you could just ignore poor behavior the way trump fans do. Regarding, "lose all ground we gained with these progressives?" What are you talking about? I'm saying actions speak louder than words. I'm saying if someone doesn't act like a progressive we treat them like they aren't a progressive. Regarding, " It's not like we can just draw up another leftist to run and they win just like that" I'm hardly talking about the next election. We just had elections for fucks sake. I'm saying that I'm going to call them frauds when the act like frauds. I do the same for EVERYONE. Regarding, "for all we know they foresaw something bad coming from rejecting Pelosi and forcing the vote." LMFAO. It's like you want to be lied to. I use occam's razor. It leads me to the conclusion that they suck. Actions speak louder than words. ESPECIALLY when it comes to politicians. Regarding, "But sure let's destroy the left." If you are standing in the way of m4a you aren't the "left." And if you are standing in the way of m4a you are part of the problem. In a world where practically nothing is simple this kinda is.
    3
  2863. Trump is a symptom of the problem... not the cause.
    3
  2864. Nope. There are also big macs and, from what I assume, lots and lots of cheetos. Something has to be making him orange.
    3
  2865. Jon Smith regarding, "at this point if it doest effect laws" Whose to say this type of shit didn't affect laws in the past?
    3
  2866.  @RobertDavis-qt2ve  Meanwhile, in reality, Bernie is beating trump by double digits, just like when Hillary lost to the orange clown you epic dipshit determined to learn nothing from your previous stupidity.
    3
  2867.  @anderander5662  "how so?" Goldman sachs cabinet, cares act, covid response, stopped 0 wars, kids in cages, war crimes, and more. Like every way possible. I shouldn't have to explain this.
    3
  2868. The media is forcing Warren to lie about sanders? Nice headline you hack. Makes me glad I avoid your crap like the plague.
    3
  2869.  Tyg  "the land of the oppressed." Count how many replies youtube tells you are there and check how many you can see. It's the land of the free, but only ironically.
    3
  2870.  @TheShawny122  It's almost like you know Biden is corrupt and you are going to support him anyway. I have more respect for trump supporters who think their clown is the second coming. They may be morons but they aren't willingly supporting a POS the way you are.
    3
  2871.  @timn5008  Which one? Can anyone see my second reply? The one that reads, "Don't support evil. Period." How does that not get any thumbs up? How isn't that something everyone can get behind? Do people look at that and think I'm dumb for writing it or something?
    3
  2872.  @DarkerPhoenix1  You really should. Biden and Trump are not the only candidates and it is not the only vote happening. The establishment loves it when you stay home. Don't give them what they want.
    3
  2873.  @htown148  Regarding, "the vaccine production" You needed biden to tell you to produce vaccine or some shit? How stupid are you? Regarding, "an entire covid plan with fema lmao" If this is how it works then I get to blame him for literally every single COVID death since he took office. And I don't give him praise for that... I'll give him contempt for that. Keep licking that boot.
    3
  2874.  @lauriefrancisco1084  Regarding, "I'd be interested to know your definition of morality." Biden is a warmonger and proud author of the racist crime bill. He's immoral. Sorry not sorry if this triggers you.
    3
  2875.  @matthewschwartz6607  Regarding, "Biden is a warmonger?" Yup. Regarding, "He just ENDED a war!" LMFAO No. He didn't. But he did just in fact take steps to stay in Iraq forever and looks to be taking steps to break our current agreement with Iraq to get the hell out of their country.
    3
  2876.  @presidentresident  Regarding, "As far as her past service you dont want to play this game homie. She admits that those wars were a mistake." I don't want to play this game and you come admitting your candidate got one the biggest mistakes in foreign policy wrong. What? Because she admits her mistake it goes away? She gets a mulligan or something? Regarding, "voted for Afghanistan" The nation that we had reason to believe was hiding the person who actually attacked us on 9-11? Apples to oranges comparison. I suspect you understand that. Regarding, "Tulsi signed up to serve when she was in her young dumb 20s." LMFAO. This wasn't ancient history. It was AFTER she held public office. Maybe she should go get some more life experience so that she come to more obvious conclusions like the MIC is bad. Regarding, "I wouldnt fucking bring up MIC shit if I were you." Tulsi literally collects a check from them this very moment. It would be like if Bernie were collecting a check from Aetna while running for M4A. It's a MAJOR conflict of interest.
    3
  2877. Meh. I consider the corporate media part of the establishment but not necessarily part of the oligarchy.
    3
  2878. I'm not on the same "side" as the reporter (as in I'm a far lefty), but ALL his questions were legit enough to get answers.
    3
  2879.  @dk-bw4gk  "thin atmosphere" It was always my understanding that it was that. Don't get me wrong the special effects to show it were silly but it was silly in a COMPLETELY AWESOME kinda way. Or at least it was IMO.
    3
  2880.  @follow_me_please  We need to laugh in sad times or we will all go crazy. Take care!
    3
  2881.  @GamerFrom1982  Just when I start thinking I can't be awed by an internet comment I read a comment like yours and I am truly awed... for all the wrong reasons.
    3
  2882.  @leovolont  There is so much wrong with everything you say. I guess I'm just grateful that Correct the Record isn't stepping up their game this election cycle.
    3
  2883.  @leovolont  Hi Leo, please learn how paragraphs and capitalization work.
    3
  2884.  @leovolont  Regarding, "condescending, patronizing" You probably are not the right messenger for civility in politics. Read the stuff you have written and try to understand why you are a hypocrite.
    3
  2885.  @sanketthakuriya5669  How'd that "logic" work for you in 2016?
    3
  2886. I can't stand Warren at this point but I'll give her props for this.
    3
  2887. Regarding, "not addressing the problems at hand." People dying in ice custody is a problem at hand. Obviously.
    3
  2888.  @misstrunchbull3953  You guys remind me of trump fans shouting MAGA.
    3
  2889. Free Palestine
    3
  2890. Jimmy's focus and this channels focus is politics. There is nothing political about Louis CK and there really isn't much Jimmy can add about it that isn't already being talked about. Jimmy needs to continue to focus on the things the corporate media ignores.
    3
  2891. Regarding, "You're reaching." Really? http://www.businessinsider.com/how-much-harvey-weinstein-donated-to-clinton-obama-2017-10 It includes a picture of Weinstein with Clinton and as you pointed out he isn't with her because of his fame.
    3
  2892. they are all warmongering z's
    3
  2893.  @brentpham1155  To be "fair" you are rationalizing and bootlicking for a person writing and lying, "I'm going to go off script," into a script.
    3
  2894.  @TwilightSentinel  Nobody is comparing the "seriousness" of the two.
    3
  2895. Should they steal the nomination from Bernie when he has the most pledged delegates he absolutely should run 3rd party.
    3
  2896.  @2very  "If he runs and wins he’ll be a tool just like the rest" I legit have zero reason to think this would happen.
    3
  2897.  @camelopardalis84  Regarding, "Can you explain to me what the WARren thing is about? It started before she voted for the military budget" She has always been a friend of the MIC like the 90s republicans she has always been. While you are right this started before she voted for Trumps budget for the department of offense, it proved all the people calling her WARren for a reason correct.
    3
  2898. Except he's still a sycophant to power.
    3
  2899.  @jc.1191  What sort of nonsense is that to justify the fact that the dems haven't passed a stimulus despite biden promising 2k checks immediately?
    3
  2900. You forgot about protecting their consultant class money.
    3
  2901. How ironic.
    3
  2902. All anti-zs are tied for first on my list.
    3
  2903. Paddle regarding, "I doubt both Bernie and Warren would run." I doubt that Bernie and Tulsi would run but I don't trust or like Warren at all. I think she is only progressive when convenient and is otherwise a sellout who very well might run in 2020 SPECIFICALLY to fuck over Sanders and endear herself to the corporate wing of the party.
    3
  2904. Karen regarding, "I will gladly vote for a woman. But it has to be the RIGHT kind of woman." Essentially everyone thinks this. The only reason this BS is talked about is to serve the establishment narrative.
    3
  2905. Paddle regarding, "She was too timid to stand up for the absolute onslaught of hate she got from the Clinton supporters." I think weak is a more apt word to use rather than timid. And my problem isn't exactly with what she says AFTER the proof comes out proving rigging, but rather how she never would have said anything about the obvious fact that they rigged it before concrete evidence was put forth. But let's go back just a little bit further. Warren voted for the 700 billion dollars per year budget for the department of offense. This is pretty unforgivable to me and demonstrates to me that she does not represent me. I can't believe she didn't even pretend to be opposed to it as her vote was inconsequential.
    3
  2906. J Abrams regarding, "she's an islamaphobe." That is the type of smear that deserves something more of substance to back it up. Regarding, "she got elected because of her tough stance on wall street and I feel she's genuine on that important issue" The only thing of note that Warren has ever done is the consumer protection bureau. It is a good thing but I am not, at all, impressed by it because of what it was not. This was created in the wake of Wall Street almost collapsing the economy. This was created at a moment when dems should have been breaking up the big banks, bringing back glass-steagal, and jailing criminal bankers. They didn't do anything of these things but instead they gave us just enough (the consumer protection bureau) to keep us from burning them all at the stake. In short I am not nearly as convinced that she is genuine on the issue. As much as I like bankers being sternly talked to I would prefer they be put in jail for their criminal activity. Regarding, "She gets too much hate for some Bernie folk that I think is uncalled for" I guess Bernie fans are rightfully pissed she didn't endorse him during the primary... you know... like a true progressive and true leader should have.
    3
  2907. J Abrams regarding, "Obama deserves the sort of blame you're laying on Warren." There is plenty of blame to go around but it isn't even so much that I'm looking to blame her as much as I'm not interested in giving her credit for putting a band-aide on the banking problem at the time while you want to give her props for it. Regarding, "meeting with genocidal dictators." Meeting with people makes her an islamaphobe? Are you fucking kidding me? We need to meet with leaders everywhere including the bad ones otherwise there would be essentially no one to meet with. That is strategy that makes more sense to me than just bombing everyone and leaving troops everywhere around the globe.
    3
  2908. J Abrams regarding, "Neutrality is fine in my book." We see things very differently. I want people that stand for what I stand for and are willing to lead. You are clearly content with bystanders who are only progressive when politically convenient. I assume you were just fine with her being neutral when DAPL protestors were getting the shit kicked out of them as well. I wasn't.
    3
  2909. Eric regarding, "he rolled over." He did what he said he would do when entering the primary and endorsed the "winner." He didn't want to be blamed for Trump winning and, considering what that orange disgrace to orangutans is doing while in office can you really blame him for that? All of your idiotic fake outrage about this is just because you are a fucking moron who refers to him as "Bolshevik Bernie Sanders." Regarding, "disgraceful pig!" You are the disgrace but I'm not even going to call you a pig because that would be insulting to swine.
    3
  2910.  @SickRedApple  I can only think that you are intentionally trying to lie to everyone by copy and pasting your bullshit. You are a disgrace.
    3
  2911.  @ThunderfallFilms  "dressing provocatively doesn’t excuse sexual harassment" Commenting about how someone is exposing themselves isn't sexual harrassment. "Period. No excuse. What the hell is wrong with you?" What the hell is wrong with you that you don't understand and admit that a person exposing themselves in public is the person committing sexual harassment. I suspect you wouldn't have trouble figuring it out if it was a guys junk in the open and not ana's ass in the open.
    3
  2912.  @TMAC803210  "The race was OVER at that point" Yang was only in the race at the very start when it was hardly over. Holy shit is this comment stupid AF. Yanggang stupidity has no limits.
    3
  2913.  @calebtorres7111  "All Yang did was endorse the CLEAR winner." Which is the problem. He had a chance to pick a side between biden and sanders when he dropped out and he didn't. "Bernie sabotaged himself." This isn't about bernie. If it were I'd have all sorts of criticisms of him. But it's not. It's about yang. And in a world where everyone in the establishment was conspiring to stop sanders yang was actively helping them and hurting sanders. At best he is a useful idiot. At worst he is a plant which would make him the worst of the worst.
    3
  2914. LOL Tell yourself whatever you want.
    3
  2915.  @chadsimmons4496  There is plenty of room to care about both.
    3
  2916.  @chadsimmons4496  Regarding, "one has no political effect" Sure it does. It brings into question his morality, ethics, judgement and more. All are important indicators of how someone is going to act politically.
    3
  2917.  @chadsimmons4496  For example his behavior towards Anita Hill (political decisions) are better understood because of his behavior.
    3
  2918.  @jaimep39238  Regarding, " we are conscious enough of what going on" I want to think I am. But I've also had my share of being programmed back in the day. I used to consume lots of corporate media. I used to think Bill Clinton was a good president. I was duped into voting for Obama... which ultimately helped wake me from my sleep. After looking at what he was doing I began to really wonder how the fuck it was happening? How was he able to sell me "hope and change" and gave me republican health care, double the wars, and pretty much nothing of real value. Don't get me wrong I very often say I think Americans are morons and that I feel like I'm living in the movie Idiocracy, but lot's of that is by design. Corporate media is making them dumber. Our education system is not what it should be. Religions pitting people against one another. People are busy killing themselves working multiple jobs just to put food on the table so it's hard for them to take the time to really understand what's going on in the world. Ultimately there are lots of factors that go into creating the mess we are in other than just people being stupid and not caring even if those are no doubt big parts of the problem.
    3
  2919. Michael Gardner, don't forget Jeremiah 19:9, "And I will cause them to eat the flesh of their sons and the flesh of their daughters, and they shall eat every one the flesh of his friend in the siege and straitness, wherewith their enemies, and they that seek their lives, shall straiten them." and Peter 2:18, "Servants, be subject to your masters with all fear; not only to the good and gentle, but also to the froward." and Matt 23: 33, "You serpents, you brood of vipers, how shall you escape the sentence of hell?" But all of this is irrelevant since there is no more proof of the god you worship than any other religions god.
    3
  2920.  @PoochuTheHunter  It's my experience that yanggang likes to pretend there aren't substantive problems with their conman. Instead they want to pretend they all, "I’m not sure" and that it must only because of smears. He's a liar and conman. That's actually why people don't like him.
    3
  2921. Thanks Canada. It is nice to know that other countries are fucking up as well. Sincerely, the United States.
    3
  2922.  Clifford M  Regarding, "I'll make this simple for you..." Is that the BS you tell yourself to rationalize supporting corrupt POS? I don't really care. Regarding, "At least the Dems have some truly uncorrupted progressives in power" We are going to have to agree to disagree about this. Regarding, "If much rather have Democrats in charge." Well they have it all right now and the country is likely to give trump 2.0 the keys after this administration for the same reasons we got trump 1.0. Don't be afraid to blame them for sucking so much the country is willing to give the keys to clowns rather than elect your teams corrupt oligarchs.
    3
  2923. I agree with what you are saying. I can be very critical of the public but I also agree with noting how many Americans are too busy just trying to make it and stay afloat in everyday life to realize how badly they are getting shafted. There are also lots of people who still get their "news" from corporate media. Ultimately I think Bernie is doing the best he can in a bad situation. He isn't even a dem. People should think this done for a reason. He points out the income inequality. He points out how our politicians represent their donors (and he does so while saying politicians as opposed to saying republicans). He calls for a "political revolution." And does lots of other things I can't think of because it is late to distance himself from the corporate dems. 2020 can't come soon enough.
    3
  2924. W Meito regarding, "the duopoly must end" The only way that is going to happen is by winning. The major parties have rigged the entire game to their benefit. They have insulated themselves from their terrible politics. Let's say the Green party supplanted the dems with the current system.... with the current system we wouldn't have a 3 party system but rather the dems would suffocate and die (which would be ok) but we would still be left with a 2 party system. To really end the stranglehold of a 2 party system the system needs to be reformed. We would need ranked choice voting and other things. It is not going to happen overnight. You have the entire system fighting against it. Both major parties like it just the way it is.
    3
  2925. op regarding, "force the Dems to either support Progressive platform points in order to form a coalition government to get ANYTHING done OR they will further reveal their colors" They would only reveal their colors. They clearly are more ok with losing than with changing. The only way they are going to change is if they are forced to change from the inside. Regarding, "taking them over from the inside is NOT the quickest way to have an impact on policy" Taking them over from the inside is the quickest way to get everything. To start getting the policy we want. To get a major party that represents the people and not the big money donors. To kill the corporate dems and send them to the Republican party where they belong. It all starts by getting a progressive as the nominee. Then we purge the corporate dems and reform the shit out of the party. Ban them from taking their legalized bribes and all of a sudden we start having a party that is incentivized to care about the people rather than being incentivized to care about their big money donors. It won't be easy. It isn't a fair fight. But it is possible. Regarding, "We could get this done by 2018." And people like to call me naive about the "democratic" party. Regarding, "We need change NOW." Yes we do. Regarding, "And the quickest way to do that is to push hard on the Dems with a thrid party that has ballot access." They don't give a fuck about your 3rd party. They are not threatened by it. They would rather lose to the republicans than change. And they know they have rigged the entire system against 3rd parties. Regarding, "MAYBE we'll have enough Progressives to finally influence Dem policy." We NEED one progressive to influence dem policy. The nominee. The party leader. They get the chair of their choice. The chair picks the people under them and so on. Regarding, "if Bernie threatened to go third party it would INSTANTLY create this third party and we would be where we need to be to be getting policy changes." First off I don't see why everyone thinks creating a new party is such a great idea and so necessary. I personally think that the Green party's policy positions are right where the dems and the left should be. There is essentially nothing I disagree with them on in general. If people want to get a new player in the game I think they should be working to build and support the Green party who have the benefit of already existing and having some infrastructure. Secondly, like I've already pointed out, this is going to get you ZERO policy. If Sanders runs as an independent or Green and wins you very well might get ZERO policy. Both major parties would just oppose everything he does (and if you disagree with this I suggest you are not paying attention to the major parties) and they would just try to run out the clock on his presidency until they can just go back to the status quo. If Sanders wins as a dem democrats would be incentivized to work with him. And yes they would fight him often but they would not fight him always like they would if he were of another party. But most importantly he needs to win as a dem so that he can reform the party from the inside and from the top down. That is the quickest way to get a progressive major party.
    3
  2926. Being popular =/= being right. Obviously.
    3
  2927. proud regarding, "Bernie also admitted he organized for a communist front in his youth." I honestly have no fucking idea what you are talking about. I'm betting this is just more bullshit taken completely out of context considering your track record of representing reality. His youth? When was that 100 years ago? Do you have anything a little closer to the present day to prove your idiotic point? Regarding, "say Trump was a racist because..." I definitely called him a racist but not because of this. I like to focus on policy unlike you. Trumps signature policy was racist as fuck because he was only calling for a wall next to the predominately brown country. If Trump wasn't a racist who loves walls he would have been calling for a wall with Canada as well. He is racist therefor he doesn't care about making sure the whites don't come in this country to get a taste of our sweet, sweet health care (that is sarcasm in case you are too stupid to realize it). I noticed you didn't bother to answer my question about what communist policies you think Sanders is advocating for. This is arguably the smartest thing you have done but it is still very telling that you can't. You keep up with your dipshit talking points thou. You smear him because you fear him. You shouldn't thou. You need to see a doctor and Sanders will work to make sure you can. Your name is kinda funny. You make me embarrassed to be an American.
    3
  2928. proud regarding, "of course you don't.. you don't know shit." I know right. Clearly I don't spend enough time watching Alex Jones and reading Breitbart. Still no answer to my simple question. Go figure. You would think that if Sanders were actually a communist you would be able to tell through policy.
    3
  2929. proud regarding, "Bernie's message of income inequality" His "message of income inequality?" Are you fucking mental? Just because Sanders lives in reality and acknowledges the fundamental truth that income inequality is out of control and unsustainable doesn't make him a communist. It just means he is looking around and seeing what is going on. You should get out of your bunker and try it.
    3
  2930. proud regarding, "tell me how Bernie's policies are not closer to communsim than trumps." So you can't answer my simple question then. Fine. I'm not going to answer your very complex idiotic question used to distract from the fact that you have no fucking answer to mine. I could write a novel of brilliant insights afterall in it would be wasted on your dumbass. Bernie is a democratic socialist moron... you want to know how I can tell? His policy positions.
    3
  2931. proud regarding, "his policies are SOCIALIST" Shouldn't that make him a socialist then? Of course not if you are dumb as fuck. Regarding, "socialism is the road to communsim" Well then this country is already fucked. We have social security, we have k-12 education and spoiler alert... they are socialism. Yup. That's right. You live in a country with socialism. Maybe you should change your name now... I assume you are no longer a proud american.
    3
  2932. Spencer regarding, "I don't think popularity has anything to do with him not having the balls to say something when an election is clearly being rigged against him." Huh? Did I imply these two were linked? The point I was making is that the establishment's ability rig the game was only successful last time because, when he entered the race, he was virtually unknown. When he announced he was running Hillary had about 60 points on him. This time when entering he will be entering as the most popular politician in the country... that is a game changer and something the establishment is going to find impossible to overcome. Now as for his "balls to say something," he did what he did. The man is all about policy and doesn't really give a fuck about what you think of his balls. He decided that the best way to gain support for the policies he cares about was to do what he did and it is paying off. Because he chose the path he did he has been very effective at gaining support for medicare for all. Had he gone Hillary (aka crying like a little bitch and pointing fingers) his influence may have been very diminished. Look at how hard it is for Hillary supporters to defend the queen at the moment on her book tour. Even if Sanders had much to cry about the public hates anyone who is seen like a whiner. Regarding, "He was far more popular than Hillary last time" At the end. Again... 60 points behind to begin. Regarding, "he endorsed the person who cheated him" I wish people would stop acting like it was his soul. It was a fucking endorsement. Only sheep vote based on someone else's endorsement. I fucking love Sanders but I voted for Jill Stein because it was my fucking vote, not someone elses. Sanders decided to support the lesser of two evils as he saw it. He didn't want to be blamed for a Trump presidency and can you really blame him for that? I'd hate to be blamed for that clown even more than I'd hate to be blamed for Hillary. But more than that it was about policy. That was the path that he thought would help the policies he care about most going forward.
    3
  2933. proud american I, again, fucking dare you to tell me one policy position Bernie has that is communist. Otherwise you go ahead and keep spouting your bullshit if you want but I don't have time for it. I feel like I am getting dumber just talking to you.
    3
  2934. Spencer regarding, "Have you SEEN our public school system?" Yes. I have. I went through it. It is hardly perfect but what is your alternative? Do you honestly think it would be better off if we didn't have it? Would you rather have an educated public or would rather have an uneducated public? Trump loves the uneducated. Me, not so much.
    3
  2935. JR regarding, "What she said was not aggressive" So fucking what. Rosanne is free. You say this shit like she is in jail or something. She is just as free today as she was yesterday and the day before to say all the stupid shit she wants. Freedom of speech doesn't entitle her to TV show. And if ABC is being "idiotic" so fucking what as well. But I'm betting they have good reasons for doing what they did even you disagree with them.
    3
  2936. JR regarding, "zilch that is racist" Never have I said or implied that you have but it must be nice to cry about me doing something that I'm not doing. Regarding, "immediately dismissing it." I don't immediately dismiss the stupid shit you say. I read them. Realize that what you say is devoid of logic, reason, and intelligence and then I dismiss them after giving it far more consideration that it deserves. Regarding, "civil discussion." I assure you I am capable of civil discussion but concede that I can also be a super huge dick. I have little to no tolerance for people that are not only stupid but are making sure to try and make the world as dumb as themselves. Regarding, "I love people like you" I can't stand people like you. You literally make the world dumber when you open your mouth. Regarding, "You're honestly intolerable." You mean you weren't being honest when you said you loved me? I'm crushed. Seriously thou, and you may or not have already realized this but I find you intolerable for all the reasons I've already given. Regarding, "sociopathic baby killer." Do you not realize what strawmanning is? I've never suggested anything of the kind. You are likely a much nicer person than I am. That isn't my problem with you. My problem is that you are making the world stupider when you say the shit you do. Regarding, "look in the mirror." I get this bullshit argument a lot. Yup. I'm a dick. At least you get to have that to fall back on because if you had to talk solely about the topic at hand you might realize how dumb everything you say is.
    3
  2937.  @espenha  "SpaceX doesn't get much subsidies." How much are you paid to gaslight and bullshit everyone? It takes 2 seconds to find the article titled "SpaceX Seeks $16 Billion in Government Subsidies for Satellite Internet Project" in addition to many others. In the age of information ignorance like yours is a choice.
    3
  2938. Does he really thou? Think about the things about the party he was willing to put up with. He would have stuck with the party if Pence were president and the only way Pence is better is because he isn't overly dickish the way trump is. Policy-wise Trump isn't really different and is a terrible "straw to break the camels back."
    3
  2939. And any people who would be willing to support her are almost certainly already backing Sanders. You know, like she should be doing.
    3
  2940.  @Tholen3  Regarding, "and now his ideas are outdated and harmful." How absurd. Universal health care, giving peace a chance, raising the minimum wage, protecting the environment, criminal justice reform, breaking up the banks and bringing back glass-steagal and so much more are not outdated solutions for a world that went away. They are solutions to problems that have persisted and grown over time. These all things that we need now more than ever.
    3
  2941.  @joshuafallet5690  Regarding, "no we are trailing in every metric internationally except for military spending" Let's not forget that the US imprisons more of it's citizens than any country on Earth by total and by percentage of population and it's not even close. It's only the "land of the free" ironically.
    3
  2942. ginsengaddict regarding, "I did check." Look more closely. 68 percent of her money comes from big money so unsurprisingly that is who she represents regardless of some meaningless pandering. https://www.opensecrets.org/members-of-congress/summary?cid=N00027658
    3
  2943.  Kylem  Why not? Everyone else has. But yeah... she should drop out.
    3
  2944.  @bcon2608  Is that what you tell yourself to rationalize paying twice as much for health care? For a system that leaves millions uninsured? And others in medical bankruptcy?
    3
  2945.  @bcon2608  "I look at lobbying contributions by industry and have a functioning brain." Do you think the countries that have universal health care don't also have those problems? And still their system costs HALF as much as the US system. "You should try to think sometime." This is funny from a guy that wants to pay twice as much for our current terrible system.
    3
  2946.  @Wolfe-xz6tr  "when did he call himself anti-imperialist?" You guys are calling him that. Or at least some are.
    3
  2947.  @reinsmano  "better stat to use" Why aren't you looking up the info yourself? Why would you be asking me for it? Instead of just doing your own research? Why should I need to prove that trump dropped lots of bombs? How unserious are you people?
    3
  2948.  @brucecampbell6578  "zero US casualties in Afghanistan" Nevermind trying to prove this. I know it's not true. "8/2/2017 Hunter, Jonathon Michael Sergeant United States U.S. Army 23 Afghanistan" That is but one name among many. Why would you lie about something like that?
    3
  2949.  @paddyo3841  "Trump HAD TO GO because he said the quiet part out loud" Yeah. Trump was a bad spokesmen for the establishment but he was always one of them.
    3
  2950.  @paddyo3841  "Trump was... opposition" Meanwhile, in reality, trump would invite the clintons to his wedding. Before trump first announced his candidacy he called up bill clinton to have a talk. Trump passed the cares act, the largest upward transfer of wealth in history. Trump was not opposition, he was merely a bad look for the empire. They would much rather have someone like obama putting people to sleep but at the end of the day the policies were all the same.
    3
  2951. Regarding, "it’s in the USA Constitution." So fucking what. My favorite part of the constitution is the part saying that it can be changed. The 2nd amendment is AN AMENDMENT as in it was changed to get it in... therefor you should easily understand that it can also come out or be changed. The notion that it's in there so nothing can be done about it is asinine and wrong.... much like your statement of "It's not the guns." Don't get me wrong, it's not only about the guns... but the guns absolutely have something to do with it.
    3
  2952. I'm looking forward to seeing the new polling that shows Biden plummeting, and I'm curious to see how the corporate media tries to polish that turd for him.
    3
  2953. I think they are both pretty open about it.
    3
  2954. Bernie gave specific ways to pay for the programs he proposed. Stop being an idiot.
    3
  2955.  @donHooligan  regarding, "i feel awful, for being so blunt and rude...but sometimes...i'm all out of fucks to give." I can't agree more. I want to be polite. I want to be civil. But some people make it really hard to do either. That said it isn't just caused by some "people." It's in large part a byproduct of the countless disingenuous paid trolls that exist. And because there is so much disingenuousness out there anger and frustration are a natural result.
    3
  2956.  @Jessica_Roth  I know what you are talking about. But try to understand what we are talking about. We are talking about the President of the United States. She has zero experience in elected office and you want her to go straight to the top. There are more qualified, more deserving people who can do what you are praising her for and much more.
    3
  2957.  @Jessica_Roth  look, don't get me wrong. I admire that she is willing to take a political position when she knows damn well that it is likely to alienate half the people she is trying to sell her music to. I also think that first and foremost a good politician needs to be a good person and that is more important then experience. But again... we are talking about the POTUS. The most powerful job in the world. Certainly we can find someone who has all the qualities Swift has AND has experience in politics right? When you bring her up it just sounds lazy, like there aren't actual politicians with experience in office who have the same positions she does. I give her props. I hope she continues to advocate for progressive causes. I admire her to be willing to pick a side that is the right side. But a pop star POTUS with no political experience and just barely old enough to even qualify for the job is asinine. Look for people who are going out and earning the right to be considered for the job. Look for people who have experience running a campaign. Lastly I'd like to add that I'm tired as fuck of celebrities in politics and I'm not the only one.
    3
  2958.  @angelicentity1401  It was 75 I think. The better question is when was the wendy's training video made?
    3
  2959. Not B.A. He doesn't like flying.
    3
  2960. Anyone doing the right thing will be smeared like this... always.
    3
  2961. The establishment appreciates your stupid comment.
    3
  2962. Steven regarding, "Healthcare quality will drop if you universalize it and make it free- this is inarguable." You are baffled why people don't take you seriously but let's look at this stupid as fuck shit. Not only do you want to present your stupid as fuck opinion but you go the extra mile to prove what a fucking moron you are by trying to present your dumb as fuck opinion as fact. Well... let me prove that you are at least wrong about it being "inarguable." No doubt you are going to ignore the evidence I present and stick to your stupid as fuck opinion because ultimately these facts won't matter to you but, at the very least, even you should be able to admit it isn't "inarguable" like you so absurdly say. If universal health care would inarguable drop in quality then Canada wouldn't have longer health expectancy. No doubt you will try to excuse this with americans eating too many big macs. But that doesn't explain why Canada's infant mortality rate is also superior to the US. That is Canada, with SUPERIOR health care to the US in those very important metrics. And the mechanic as to why such a thing might be isn't hard to understand unless, like you, you are willfully ignorant of the obvious problem with health insurance providers being so greatly incentivized to provide lesser care if it means their CEO can make an extra buck and buy a bigger yacht. They are not in the business to provide care. They are in the business to MAKE MONEY. So if they can cut corners to make more money the will and do. Now I don't give a fuck about the stupid fucking rationalizations and excuses you make for these facts because I know you don't give a fuck about them. I want to show why, at the very fucking least, it is arguable. People get to have their own opinions. They don't get to have their own facts. And people like you, who think they get to have their own facts, and who demonstrate they don't actually know what reality looks like, have opinions that are not be taken seriously. You are a fucking joke. Society hates you. And you make the world a worse place by breathing.
    3
  2963. Regarding, "that was very painful to read" The irony of you saying this is remarkable. You are stupid as fuck but you are not all bad. You are funny, but only when you aren't trying to be. Regarding, "Imagine you are me reading that." I try but it is tough to put myself in the shoes of someone who is so stupid, such a douche, and so disingenuous. Oh... and I wear shirts. Regarding, "It’s filled with more insults than actual content." So there is content right? I did tell you why I was insulting you right? Regarding, "you didn’t address any of the points I made" This is funny coming from the fucking moron who isn't bothering to address the one thing I wanted to emphasize... you presenting the stupid as fuck thing you said as fact. Regarding, "I asked you to point to one example of a country becoming better after socialism or healthcare quality increasing after it became free. If you show me something like that then you win. It’s that simple. Ill wait" http://www.yesmagazine.org/issues/health-care-for-all/has-canada-got-the-cure Do the world a favor and shut the fuck up forever. I'll wait.
    3
  2964. Regarding, "wtf is yes magazine?" Who gives a shit you mental midget. Don't be afraid to address what they say instead of just mindless trying to dismiss the facts presented like the fucking moron you are. I'm done with you. I need to take my own advice and ignore you. It is just that I have a hard time letting stupid shit go unanswered and with you there is so much stupid. Take care fuckface. Good luck with the whole dumb as fuck thing you have going on.
    3
  2965. So in other words 1) you want me to do your homework for you 2) you are moving the goalpost 3) you are ignoring the sources listed in the article and 4) you are a moron unworthy of talking to.
    3
  2966. Sam Seder is controlled opposition.
    3
  2967. Your comment is funny because it lacks nuance.
    3
  2968. Bernie is controlled opposition meant to manufacture consent for a corrupt party.
    3
  2969.  sonder sonder  LOL
    3
  2970.  Vante  Regarding, "you should see his other comment dude" Both born in the wrong and whyamimrpink are trolls. Not sure why I bothered to respond to either.
    3
  2971.  @GeorgeCarlinWasAGod  I hate wearing both. Both are uncomfortable. That said... I do wear both.
    3
  2972.  @klenmcrock5265  Chains =/= masks. Obviously. Stop being ridiculous.
    3
  2973.  @Bluebelle51  Don't get me wrong, I wear one as well even if I don't like it. The data is pretty clear. They help.
    3
  2974. Keep censoring. It's all you have because no one is buying your BS anymore.
    3
  2975. LMAO. Don't blame the millions of eligible voters that didn't vote. Don't blame the DNC for rigging the primary for their corrupt POS. Don't blame the corporate media who gave Trump billions in free media. Don't blame Hillary Clinton for being such a corrupt POS she couldn't beat another corrupt POS. Blame the .01 percent of the population that watches Alex Jones because afterall if those dipshits weren't watching Alex Jones they would have been smart enough to vote differently.
    3
  2976. What else are they doing? That's my way of saying they can't. Or at least that they choose not to.
    3
  2977. Biden doesn't somehow magically become better because trump is terrible.
    3
  2978.  @georgehenderson7783  "there is no way you are not praying to a higher power that you live." Doesn't the bible say that their prayers should be answered? Does it work? Or right... it doesn't.
    3
  2979. Nicholas A. regarding, "if that were true, Prohibition would still be a thing." Um... what? I suppose prohibition was repealed because we won the war on drugs then. Not so much. But prohibition perfectly demonstrates how making something illegal that should be legal only serves to create a black market and does far more harm then good. But let's keep at it. I'm sure we are going to win the war on drugs any day now.
    3
  2980. ghenulo regarding, "Colbert, funny? When did that happen?" The correspondents dinner when he roasted GWB. But that was a long time ago.
    3
  2981.  @ryanlott1108  " I'm wondering is why they had him on." I like to think it's to have him get roasted in the comments like he is but I don't know. And I really don't care. As much as I despise him I'm ok with him having the ability to express himself.
    3
  2982. @Mind of the North Star regarding, "If someone didn't vote for Gillum because of Hillary" Is there ever a point where you hold the politician responsible for their boneheaded decisions or do you just blame the people for not supporting politicians while they make boneheaded decisions. Don't get me wrong... I would have voted for Gillium if I lived in Florida. But if you can't acknowledge and hold him responsible for doing dumb things when they do it then, as you would say, then you are part of the problem and you need to fuck off somewhere. If you think people need to be held responsible for doing dumb things don't stop when it comes to politicians. The fact that fuckers like you don't understand why getting Hillary Clinton and DWS stink on you is dumb is fucking remarkable. You can't really be so fucking dense to understand why this is dumb can you? Meh... I guess you can. Do you want to actually win? Or do you just want to just piss on people for not doing what you want when they don't? Stop being fucking retarded and making excuses for this shit and maybe we can win next time.
    3
  2983.  @sonjakozman1699  "Spam that gets reported or comments that get deleted, continue to display the same number" Nope. When a comment is deleted by youtube or when you delete it yourself the count goes down.
    3
  2984.  @sonjakozman1699  If you want to know if you comment is actually showing or if it's being shadowbanned you can check by looking at the thread while you are signed out.
    3
  2985.  @sonjakozman1699  After I wrote the comment beginning, "Tell you what..." I wrote 3 different replies to you. All are being shadowbanned. I'm not a bot, I'm not spam, they weren't reported, they are just wrong think and being censored.
    3
  2986. People are idiots but they can go a long way towards proving me wrong by not supporting Biden.
    3
  2987. We are too far out for them to be very meaningful. They are used by the corporate media to shape the narrative more than anything else at this point.
    3
  2988. It's not true and it isn't on us to prove he doesn't. It's on your mom to prove he does, and she can't (that's our evidence), because he doesn't.
    3
  2989. Really guys? So all she needs to do is say she supports it? Require more than obvious pandering please. Shit, Trump has gone on record to say he wants health care for all.
    3
  2990. Someone is worse so if you don't vote for her you aren't black. Joe biden, probably.
    3
  2991.  @darkempath7436  Regarding, " you keep showering me with all these compliments, stop it" For once you are right. I'm being an idiot for addressing you and feeding the troll. Consider this my farewell.
    3
  2992.  @NGHealthCoach  You are clearly a liar and disingenuous. Your original claim was that, "said he did not think a black person could be on his ticket" that is a straight up lie and you know it. Nowhere does he say anything of the sort. Him not making promises about a running mate is totally fucking different. The fact of the matter is, whether or not you want to be intellectually honest about it or not, is that he can't promise anything specific about who his running mate should be because we simply are not at that part of the game and he isn't at a point where he is picking a running mate. I personally think the best choice for his running mate, when the time comes and that is way off in the future, should be Nina Turner. And he has said NOTHING to suggest that she couldn't be on his ticket. You are just a fucking liar and smear merchant. I judge people by the content of their character and you seem to have none.
    3
  2993.  @meltedsnowman9637  " If Jimmy addressed the accusations in a more respectful way while still boldly refuting Ana's claims, Kyle wouldn't have had a problem with it." Wait... this is your defense of kyle? Let's say this were true it would only be evidence that kyle's priorities are terrible. If only jimmy were nicer when talking about how ana was trying to blackmail him. Then it would have been worth addressing and talking about? But he wasn't so he buried the lead and covered for ana because he's nicer to him or some shit? You aren't a good advocate of kyle. Even if I accepted the BS premise you offer it still paints kyle in a terrible light with terrible priorities.
    3
  2994.  @slammajamma5435  I'm going to assume that it was just EXCELLENT sarcasm.
    3
  2995.  @larchlarch9851  "ditto" LMFAO Wait... that wasn't sarcasm. LMFAO
    3
  2996.  @dashx1103  "He's a good journalist" He's not. And you don't even attempt to address my points. " haven't known him to "lie."" So you believe that chuck shumer is working to raise the minimum wage? That he was legit trying to use reconciliation a second time to raise the minimum wage. "point out the examples if you wish." Maybe address what I've already given and you can get more if you want.
    3
  2997.  @Cindy99765  Tulsi is great but she is very wrong to be running and people supporting her rather than Bernie are making a mistake. She shouldn't just be supporting Bernie's policies. She should be supporting Bernie Sanders for president just like we all should.
    3
  2998.  @susanmercurio1060  I think it's best to just walk away.
    3
  2999.  Tariq St Patrick  In the same way the dems made a deal to give everyone 2k checks immediately.... they lied.
    3
  3000. I just remembered rebel HQ is from TYT. The same frauds who were pissing on force the vote. Consider myself happily unsubscribed.
    3
  3001. Jeff regarding, "Bernie Sanders is nothing but talk...." Forgive me but I'm not going to respond intelligently to this crap. I only have so much time and energy and I'm not going to waste it telling you the obvious reasons why that is entirely just a pile of shit word vomit.
    3
  3002. Again, so much bullshit. Correcting you would be a full time job and I'm not interested. I would like to say that you should learn about paragraphs and use them though. Peace.
    3
  3003. Jeff regarding, "I know you think you're a genius" So. Much. Stupid. Please stop. I know I'm not a genius because I was dumb enough to ever talk to you in the first place. I can't keep responding. You are welcome to think it is because I can't.
    3
  3004.  @captserenity8154  "why change the script?" It seems really transparent at this point. "Americans haven't called them out for any of their other lies" I mean, we all know that WMD in iraq was BS don't we? Even corporate media has conceded that.
    3
  3005. Nah. I'd put my fingers in a bowling ball.
    3
  3006. Regarding, "Amazing how many people in this comment section pretend to know Cavuto's positions and opinions simply because he works at Fox." Is it really? Because whether or not you like it or are willing to admit it working at Fox is very telling. I'm not going to pretend to claim that it says everything about someone but it definitely says something and that something isn't good. Oh and fyi for example the same shit can be said about someone who works at MSNBC.
    3
  3007. Nobody says everyone HAS to go to college but cool strawman argument. That said there are lots of people that want anyone who wants to go to college and has the grades to be able to do so without going into debt.
    3
  3008. We are closer to a one party system then we are a 2 party system.
    3
  3009. If you don't talk about something light hearted on occasion you will lose your mind.
    3
  3010.  MrZapparin  There's no law against that so it's fine. /s
    3
  3011. Obama was selling out from day one. Politicians represent who gets them there (and by get them there I mean who pays for their campaign)... and people like me are funding Bernie's campaign, not the people who bought Obama.
    3
  3012.  @Goldun-nah  "why would they" Youtube wants it's stuff watched. Less downvotes gives their material the look that it's better than it is. "We don’t live in a time where we can risk being fooled by blatant intentional bad actors. This is a mask off moment" Don't get me wrong I'm done with kyle and pissed at him for lots of things... just not for the dislikes going away.
    3
  3013. You don't actually believe this right? Even you know it's BS?
    3
  3014.  @Lurch685  If it's fact maybe provide evidence instead of being a twat.
    3
  3015.  @Dontwanthe24  People didn't vote for biden, they voted against trump. Provide evidence or STFU.
    3
  3016.  @almichaels6443  I care about smears and blackmail of journalists. You should get your priorities straight.
    3
  3017. I sure as fuck don't care about Meghan McCain's opinion but strangely enough she is correct about this. Warren is very, very, very wrong to not be willing to even attempt to reach fox viewers.
    3
  3018. cock, could you be a little more specific about your statement as opposed to making vague assertions? Are you talking about capitalism amok? Does that include for profit health care? Because I'm betting the house you are not referring to regulated capitalism not including health care and war (you know... what I was talking about) seeing as how that doesn't actually exist anywhere so it is fucking impossible for it to be killing millions. You just regurgitating stupid talking points without bothering to think is exactly what paleghost does and it is just as worthless.
    3
  3019. thelinedrive regarding, "So your excuse is to say they did rig the election because..." It really isn't that hard to understand. They rigged the election BECAUSE THEY RIGGED THE ELECTION. You sound like a person saying you didn't cheat at cards because you won money playing. Regarding, "as an independent who has done nothing for the party whose nomination he was running for" Sweet revisionist history just like the queen. Sanders has caucused all his life with the "democratic" party. The issues Sanders champions are supported by people who call themselves democrats (and I'm not talking about "democratic" politicians.) Regarding, "The super delegates weren't some new construct just for this primary." Do you not understand how pathetic and weak your responses are? So what that superdelegates are not new. That has nothing to do with whether or not they are fair to the process. If the NFL decided to give the Patriots 14 points to start every game and had been doing so for some time that wouldn't do anything to justify the question of whether or not it would be fair. Regarding, "but to expect to get a nomination of a party you've put zero work into is BS." Beside the fact that this statement is complete bullshit this is just a weaksauce argument to justify a rigged election. Keep up with this thinking. The only people who get to vote are those that will pledge themselves to a party that rigs its elections while ironically calling themselves the democratic party. Who cares what independents in the country think even though there are more of them than democrats. Regarding, "You are just an idealistic fool" It is sad that I am idealistic for wanting fair elections. What a fool I am. But you are right that I am certainly going to get nothing I want.... because of people like you.
    3
  3020. Respect is earned... not given. People like you are actively trying to make the world a worse place. Sorry not sorry for being intolerant of that. And tell yourself that your 😅 emoji was "respectful" when you are just being a hypocrite.
    3
  3021. As far as I can tell Warren campaign is designed to cock block Sanders. She is controlled opposition to real change.
    3
  3022. "our victory" LMFAO. Stop caring about credit. Care that a good thing happened and feel free to enjoy it for fucks sake.
    3
  3023. @Odin's Oracle Hopefully the dems come through with another 2k so that I can give it directly to cenk.
    3
  3024.  @willbeard4835  I've already maxed out my credit card giving it all to TYT. I know that as soon as they have all the money the revolution can start.
    3
  3025. Ted Cruz clearly has the most punchable face in the world. Personally I think Shit Pai is 2. I'm not even sure Walker has the most punchable face from Wisconsin. I think that might be Reince Priebus. Don't get me wrong thou. I would pay good money to punch Walker even if I disagree with your rankings.
    3
  3026. Was he right to vote for the cares act?
    3
  3027. Hayes too for burying this info for months.
    3
  3028.  @dashx1103  "Jimmy" This isn't about jimmy no matter how much you want to try and make it about him. "Grim" He lied about mccarthey could be speaker. He fear mongered that it was possible and it wasn't to try and cast shade on force the vote. He's a liar. Period. And nothing you say changes it.
    3
  3029.  @dashx1103  "You are confusing Grim with someone else." Nope. I'm spitting nothing but facts.
    3
  3030.  proud American Regarding, " different forms of compensation" It's called votes. The shit they are suppose to be fighting for instead of legalized bribes. Your stupidity is almost impressive somehow. I find myself wondering if you ever say anything that isn't completely moronic. You are like a broken clock that somehow never tells the correct time.
    3
  3031.  proud American  I'm not going to lie being called a dumbass by you is fucking hilarious. So thanks for the laugh dipshit.
    3
  3032.  @jayzenitram9621  Regarding, " The question isn't as stupid as you think." It's not a good question. There is something to be said about wanting to know a politician's priorities, but the question if framed to make it seem like a president can't walk and chew gum at the same time. And take one of our largest problems, war, that isn't something that requires congressional approval or some shit. The commander in chief can pretty much just unilaterally address this problem, assuming they think perpetual war is a problem. Furthermore look at our country. It has lots and lots and lots and lots of problems. All of these people should be trying to address them all. And then, if they are only able to get part of their agenda passed, which is very possible considering our government and the people in it. So be it. But the notion that we should only be planning to address a single thing or one thing at a time is really dumb.
    3
  3033.  @smileyface702  I think it's pretty well implied when he talks about taking on big money and special interests. His campaign is being financed by the little guy after all. That said... yeah. I'd agree he should be making a specific point about getting money out of politics more.
    3
  3034. As if warmonger propagandists paid for by katzenburg money who smear assange and attempt blackmail is the left.
    3
  3035. The biggest commodity in politics is trust. I trust Bernie Sanders. He has earned it by saying and doing the same thing for decades.
    3
  3036. Your comment is funny because I don't doubt you are paid to say it.
    3
  3037. Ah yes... the whataboutism defense. Very predictable. And very pathetic.
    3
  3038. He looked presidential.
    3
  3039. No lie. She is more likely to praise the job he is doing as commander in chief than criticize him for it.
    3
  3040. It never went away for me.
    3
  3041. And their quality of content.
    3
  3042. language
    3
  3043.  @cleencarma  "he's a person first and a politician second" What an empty platitude. You may as well say he is going to make america great again. "I'm half Asian." Nobody cares. Why would you bring this up like it's important or relevant?
    3
  3044.  @zackdurant1584  Atheism is the "default position" for the same reason not believing in a pink spaghetti monster in the sky is the "default position." If people are going to believe in either the pink spaghetti monster or your god the burden of proof is on you to prove it. It's not on us to prove their isn't a pink spaghetti monster anymore then it is on us to prove a god. That's how it works for the sane despite religious apologists efforts to shift the burden of proof like you are trying to do.
    3
  3045.    Regarding, " They have the same economic plan." Did Tulsi just come out with a plan to cancel student debt? Nope. That was Bernie.
    3
  3046.    Regarding, " Same same little fella." Um.. What? I just looked at her website. There is almost nothing about the domestic policy. And if your argument is, she is copying everything Bernie does doesn't that mean Bernie is the leader? And the logical choice for president?
    3
  3047.    Tulsi is great. If the unthinkable happened and Bernie died today I'd support her. But there simply aren't any logical reasons to be picking her over the OG progressive and you are just trying to reverse engineer arguments that all fail when you spend time thinking about them. Stop splitting the progressive vote with terrible arguments.
    3
  3048. Too tough a question. There are so many that deserve it. It would be far easier for me to tell you who I don't want primaried and even that isn't an easy question.
    3
  3049. I love it and would be all for it but I think we need Sanders in 2020 and boils down to this... I don't trust the public. Turner is relatively unknown and inexperienced. The corporate media would be very effective in smearing her the same way they smeared Sanders last go round (the DNC as well of course). Sanders has name recognition now. Sanders is the most popular politician in the country. If Turner wins I would love it and think Sanders should consider her for VP (should he run) but I consider her plan C (Tulsi is plan B).
    3
  3050. Antonio regarding, "I think the American people want a new face." I think they want change and don't care the face that brings it to them. Obama ran on it but because he didn't bring it they tried a person who wasn't a politician previously. Regarding, "The American people are now more distrusting of the media than we have been in a very long time." I agree but still you need to be wary of the corporate media... they still hold great power. And the same can be said of the DNC. Regarding, "Nian Turner has a much more assertive personality than Sanders." Agreed. I think she would have handle Bernies situation in the last election very differently. That said I'm not sure it is a political asset. You know they will try to smear her as an angry black women no matter how unjustified it is. Regarding, "But America is ready for our first woman president," Of course they are. That said I don't think Turner being a women is an asset. The fact that she is brilliant is an asset. Regarding, "I truly believes that she captures the spirit of this rising America." She very well might the same way Bernie did and if it happens I would be happy to support her. I just worry about her being an unknown hurting her the same way it hurt Sanders last go round. Regarding, "I think she would be a fantastic leader of the United States." Absolutely. I can't agree more with this.
    3
  3051. idea regarding, "Democrats do not deserve even that." Deserve has nothing to do with it. It has everything to do with being wise. And if it helps, keep in mind that the democratic establishment don't want you to vote in their primary. That is why they have so many closed primary states. If you have a problem with the party, as you should, then do what little you can to make them better. And supporting progressives in their primary is a way of doing that. That isn't a vote to put someone in office. That is a vote tell the party what they are suppose to be.
    3
  3052. Yes I am. I find it funny as fuck that those are the best smears you have of her. Let's compare that to the piece of shit candidate you supported who was corrupt as fuck and a warmonger. Have no record of public service seems better than a record of fucking the people over but I guess that is just me. If you really want to blame someone for Trump how about you look at your fallen queen who happily elevated the orange clown in an effort to make her corrupt ass seem better by comparison?
    3
  3053. You think that's going to stop cancel culture? And in a world with a million problems you really think cancel culture is the number one priority? You are an idiot.
    3
  3054. If you don't think any conspiracies are true you are an idiot, let's be honest.
    3
  3055. "blackmail asks for something in return" She wanted him to stop "running his mouth." That's what the blackmailer cared about.
    3
  3056. To those of you trying to reason with GWS, do yourself a favor and stop. I assure you that it is pointless. If you are just talking to them to hear what stupid thing they say next then by all means carry on.
    3
  3057.  @geddydesmond451  Regarding, "you parrot the msm argument that was used against bernie in 2016" What the actual fuck are you babbling about? I have evidence of cheating against bernie in 2016. I ask again if you have any evidence but I assume that if you say more it will continue to be nonsensical bullshit.
    3
  3058. You would think she would have backed her fellow native americans. Seriously thou this isn't mentioned enough and it's unforgivable as a progressive who cared very much about DAPL.
    3
  3059. Trump has been right about pretty much everything at one point or another... but that's only because the compulsive liar has taken both sides of every issue. Shit he has even said he wanted to give healthcare to everyone at one time.
    3
  3060. That's pretty much the only thing he says that isn't idiotic, even if he says it for idiotic reasons.
    3
  3061. Too bad they don't actually know about and follow their bible... "Behold, I have given you every plant yielding seed that is on the face of all the earth, and every tree with seed in its fruit. You shall have them for food." "Every moving thing that lives shall be food for you. And as I gave you the green plants, I give you everything."
    3
  3062.  @elynum  "Sorry someone committing sexual harassment is far worse than different political opinions." Blackmailing someone for a joke is far worse than making a joke and apologizing for it. Obviously. Your efforts to smear dore as a harasser is pathetic. And you are only talking about this and know of this story because ana was trying to blackmail jimmy with it.
    3
  3063.  @luv2fly745  "Amirite?" This comment of yours is being shadowbanned. I can't possibly figure out why. /s
    3
  3064. You are one of the dumbest people on the planet. That said thank you for being you. You make me laugh in sad times.
    3
  3065. It is not like he voted for it. A no show is just a lazy no.
    3
  3066. We need to laugh in dark times or we would go insane. Peace.
    3
  3067. TC regarding, "in this particular interview especially - that the framing was an issue." Really? Let me try to help you realize why this interview was biased as fuck. Let's look at the first "question." "Why was this the right time to...?" Ok. Legit question if he stops there. But it isn't about asking a question. Todd doesn't give a flying fuck what Bernie has to say. It is about Todd getting to say what HE wants to say so he goes ahead and frames the previous question disingenuously when he adds, "Republicans are still trying to repeal and replace Obamacare..." It simply isn't about asking asking tough questions... it is about trying to portray Sanders as helping Republicans and ultimately trying to smear Sanders. The other favorite way to try and smear Sanders these days is by taking a quote completely out of context from 30 years ago. Anybody who is at least a little bit of honest can look at the entire interview and understand that the quote being used is utter BS being used to completely misrepresent Sanders position. That was the clip Todd used. He offered ZERO context and just played the clip out of context again to try and mislead people who were watching. Asking Sanders to say how it is going to be paid for is legit. Using a completely out of context quote that isn't trying to make the public smarter but is actually designed to make everyone who watches it dumber is the opposite of what good media does. Again, it simply isn't about Todd giving Sanders a chance to say what he stands for... it is about Todd intentionally trying to portray Sanders views for him. It is about Chuck Todd getting HIS message out. He doesn't give a flying fuck what Sanders has to say and actively works to derail what Sanders has to say.
    3
  3068. TC regarding, "What matters to the audience is how well Bernie rises above Todd's incorrect "message"." Of course what matters most is Bernie. Of course what matters most is how Bernie rises about the disingenuous bullshit. But that simply is not the only thing that matters. Regarding, "It doesn't matter what Todd's message is." Yes it does. And it matters to people who want news that doesn't come with an agenda and blatant bias. Some of us want news sources that make the public more informed rather than dumber and people like Chuck Todd make people dumber... that is a problem that Sanders should not have to fight through. Regarding, "The only problem I think you might actually have is that maybe you think Bernie didn't do a good job in the interview dispelling any of the incorrect messages." I thought Bernie did great but comments are not about him, again, it is about biased, misleading "journalism." (aka propoganda) Regarding, "And that then is just a shame cause you're projecting/misdirecting your anger to Todd instead of Bernie." Clearly you are missing my point or just fine with the shit journalism we have in this country.
    3
  3069. You just keep regurgitating the same stupid shit. I wish I thought hell was real for people like you.
    3
  3070. Being able to rig your own election is not the same as rigging a general election. Provide proof or STFU.
    3
  3071.  @rideordietheyretring2tranx382  Regarding, "Michael Jordan picked Beetlejuice to be team captain" Obama picked Biden to be his VP... and he won. Obama can said to be many things. Dumb isn't one of them.
    3
  3072.  @rideordietheyretring2tranx382  Regarding, "a fascist bootlicker" Just when I thought I couldn't think you any dumber you edit this in and prove me wrong. Touché.
    3
  3073. The FBI won't even say if they had people in it... because they certainly did. And not because they weren't worried but because they actively wanted it to happen. Fun fact: AOC voted to give them all a big raise when the real left wants police defunded.
    3
  3074. Your comment (the jock) is funny because you don't bother to back up anything you say with anything of substance.
    3
  3075. jas regarding, "SaneProgressive" Her heart is in the right place I think but I also think she is a more than a bit batshit crazy. You want to be disappointed in Bernie for endorsing Hillary? Ok. Fine. So was I at the time. I wanted him to go to the convention and tell them "fuck you, fuck you, fuck you, you're cool, fuck you, I'm out" Half Baked style. But that doesn't mean he is a sellout. It means he chose to use different tactics than you would have preferred at the time. He shouldn't need to tell everyone how fucked over he was. Do you need to be told it to realize it? I sure as fuck don't. And the country hates anyone that is being perceived as whining, even if their whining is justified. Even Hillary supporters are having an impossible time justifying their fallen queens crying on her blame everyone else book tour.
    3
  3076. Okami regarding, "feel free to move to Venezuela." I'll keep that in mind. Feel free to say something that isn't retarded next time.
    3
  3077. I don't believe her in the slightest. Still I am glad she is lying because it makes it more difficult for the corporate media to smear the policy when one of their future stars support it.
    3
  3078. meeg regarding, "hadn't thought of it that way" If it was only Sanders pushing this the corporate media could just push their BS narrative of Crazy Bernie is just trying to give out free ponies but when the corporate dems support it (even if only for political reasons) their bullshit talking points are much more difficult to make. Regarding, "still gotta primary these crooks though" Agreed. Medicare for all is a litmus test for me. I am only going to support a candidate that supports it. That said I'm not going to support everyone that claims to be in favor of it and will continue to try and out people I view as corporatists. But the corporate dems are not the only ones we need ousted and it is good that republicans are gotten on the record opposing policy like this that is supported by so much of the public.
    3
  3079.  @chemache8571  You can't wake someone whose opinion is bought.
    3
  3080. Regarding, "conflict of interest how?" Sorry but I'm not going to explain this shit to you like you are fucking 5 year old. Especially when I think an actual 5 year old would have a better chance at comprehending it. I don't try to talk intelligently to flat earthers either and for all the same reasons I'm not interested in trying to talk intelligently to you.
    3
  3081. That said I will happily continue to laugh at you if you want to keep making an ass of yourself.
    3
  3082. Even flat earthers get to look at you and accurately think, "what a fucking moron."
    3
  3083. Oh, ok. You just were not intelligent enough to comprehend what she was saying. That might be the first thing you've said that isn't idiotic.
    3
  3084. If you say so. That's fine. You were getting boring anyway.
    3
  3085. If superdelegates were used only to prevent a contested convention they would be acceptable. To do this they would be required to only vote for the candidate who gets the most pledged delegates. That way they would not be tipping the scale but rather making sure that there isn't a contested convention which can get very messy. Regarding, "Progressives need to band together and REFUSE to vote for a democratic candidate" If you don't want to vote for a democrat in general elections you go ahead. I'm not going to try to convince you otherwise. I happily voted for Jill Stein last general. That said please vote in "democratic" primaries for the most progressive candidates you can find. I understand why you are pissed at the party. You should be. But take that opportunity to try and make them better than they currently are.
    3
  3086.  @marccreation1052  Who is laughing?
    3
  3087. Stop trying to make williamson a thing before she inevitably tells you to vote for biden.
    3
  3088. Steve regarding, "better never." I wholeheartedly disagree and think you are absurd. Sorry to disappoint you in 2020. Regarding, "would be worse then Obama." Don't be afraid to try and back your claims up with things. Or don't. I do get tired of fools who use words like socialism and communism incorrectly.
    3
  3089. rude regarding, "he's 90 years old." Don't let facts get in the way of you saying stupid things. Regarding, "He'll be dead by 2020." There is a better chance that Big Mac Trump is dead in 2020. I'd also be willing to vote for Bernie Sanders corpse before I'd vote for corporate shill. Regarding, "He may already be dead from the looks of him." I suppose you think this is witty because you are not very smart. At least you are rather aptly named rude. Get a life.
    3
  3090. m rude regarding, "woopty doo." What a diverse vocabulary you have. You remind me of a character in the movie Idiocracy, but dumber. Regarding, "clit" Congratulations on being the 3 millionth person to tell that joke. You must be very, very, very unoriginal. You bring down the average IQ of the world by over a point.
    3
  3091. When did I say I took it seriously? I guess you misunderstood me because of the whole you being stupid thing.
    3
  3092. Yes I did reference it but that is a very different than taking it seriously. It really is not hard to understand the difference. I'm going to have to stop responding to you at this point. It is starting to feel like I'm picking on a child. But before I go I encourage you to look in the mirror and make some changes in your life. It is never too late to stop being a sad excuse of a human being. Being a pathetic troll is not a constructive use of your time. Go outside or something. Doing literally anything other than what you are doing is a good idea and you might even gain some respect from your family. I suspect even they can't stand you at the moment.
    3
  3093. Regarding, "intoxicated driving" There is no evidence that supports this being a problem. Fatal car accidents have actually gone down in Colorado since it became legal. Regarding, "non-consensual sexual behavior" What? You think people are more likely to rape on weed? You can't be serious. Regarding, "addiction" It's not that kind of a drug. There is no evidence that it creates any sort of physical addiction. Psychological addiction but that just isn't what people think of when they mean addiction when it comes to other drugs like tobacco, alcohol, and opioids. Regarding, "if it means not contributing to more of those issues." There is zero evidence that any of any of your fears are caused with legalization and plenty of evidence to the contrary. If any of that stuff were actually going to happen it already would be happening in places like Colorado. But it isn't and if you want to make your claims you need to provide some kind of evidence. It doesn't exist thou. At least not in any sort of credible way. Regarding, "I’ve had 2 people in my high-school class effectively have their lives ruined because they couldn’t get though school, because they were constantly high on weed." Here's fact... feel free to look it up. High school students are less likely to use weed when it's legal and regulated. I also don't care for anecdotal evidence. If what you say is actually true you might want to consider that the kids you are talking about had problems that had nothing to do with weed... like shitty parents for example. Regarding, "very small risk of overdose" More like non existent. Aspirin has a "very small risk of overdose," and it is far, far, far more likely to kill someone. It's not even close. We have enough labs to have tested what happens when weed is legal. Check them out. Study what is actually happening in Colorado. It should alleviate your concerns if you are intellectually honest about the facts.
    3
  3094.  @meafrenchie7143  Regarding, "Why can you not just accept the fact that Donald's voters like Donald" I guess I'm just tired of having presidents who are POS.
    3
  3095.  @meafrenchie7143  Regarding, "I think that is why I keep trying to get people to realize that we need a real People's Party." I'm more of a hostile takeover of the "democratic" party kinda person myself. But I wish you well in this. I'd be more supportive of the idea if 1) I thought it wouldn't take too long and 2) I didn't realize the entire game is rigged AF against 3rd parties. Regarding, "I think one of the first steps in doing that is for us to realize that there are Democrats and there are Republicans and then there are those that are of neither." I identify as an independent but the most meaningful vote I cast is the one I make in the "democratic" primary for president. I think that is our best hope for real hope and change.... getting a progressive nominee of the party. Then purge and house cleaning. Regarding, "This Progressive Democrat thinking is bull shit." You mean like the justice dems? I'm a fan. And it's proven far more successful than working outside the party. Regarding, "want someone in office that is not bought and paid for by anyone other than the working people." I wholeheartedly agree with this. Regarding, "I feel we are in for a large battle these next four years." It's like US war... sadly it's perpetual. And the next 4 years are going to suck. Biden doesn't have a cure for coronavirus or a plan to give people money or jobs. It's going to suck. There is going to be a housing crisis and nothing is going to fundamentally change. That is a recipe for disaster and trump 2.0 happening next. I hope I'm wrong.
    3
  3096. I guess I'm just saying that, "Tulsi is the only one to take on the military establishment, which the others, including Sanders, have refused to do." makes zero fucking sense.
    3
  3097. I'm going to continue to protest her being on the rules committee and am not going to forgive her unethical behavior during the campaign. Still you must realize how good it is that she came forward with the information she did. This is not the time to criticize her. She deserves praise for what she did here (I just threw up a little in my mouth).
    3
  3098.  @custodiancolorzoo870  Exactly right.
    3
  3099.  @johnnytsunami3695  No.
    3
  3100. He is better off winning as a dem so he can reform the party from the inside.
    3
  3101. He has the facts. He lacks integrity.
    3
  3102.  @drBaja14  regarding, "that doesn't make NPC's statement false." That doesn't make anything I've said false. Two can play your stupid game. Regarding, "Obama and Bernie did the same." Only if you are stupid as fuck and have ZERO ability to use nuance in your thinking.
    3
  3103. Miriam Adelson is the real POTUS anyway.
    3
  3104.  @eduardotejerasosa8476  When wasn't he a degenerate?
    3
  3105. They are just the other side of the coin even if that side of the coin is a little bit better at lying and doing the establishment bidding.
    3
  3106. The scientific community thinks you are dumb.
    3
  3107.  @jeaninekorotki1835  Would you say the same stuff if they were giving the orange clown a photo op while he were in office?
    3
  3108.  @ohtee2965  Regarding, "a famous person using their elevated public status to endorse adopting rescue animals" Is that how you see it? Let me describe what is actually going on... this is a channel using their platform to give positive PR (aka propaganda) for a POS politician with the soul purpose of making people like him more than they should. And yeah... that's a bad thing. I'm going to ask you the same thing I asked Jeanine. Would you have a problem with this if the dodo used their platform to give the orange clown positive PR while he was in office?
    3
  3109. Reality is a "Bernie bro's channel."
    3
  3110. Hayes buried this info for months and would have continued to bury it if harris won. He is complicit.
    3
  3111. Which is trillions less then we are going to spend.
    3
  3112. Although your statement is true it is not exclusively a problem with republicans like it implies.
    3
  3113.  @girletherial  Regarding, "Nope." Too bad for you then. Good luck being an idiot. Regarding, "I just get sick of all the naive Warren bashers" So it's naïve to point out the many, many problems with her? For example that she will happily take legalized bribes in the general, that her record on the military is attroutious, that she didn't support a progressive like Sanders in 2016, that she didn't want to run in 2016 against Hillary but wants to run in 2020 against Sanders, that she was Republican in the 90s when she was in her 40s but now wants to claim she is a progressive which are completely opposite political ideologies, that she didn't support her fellow "natives" at the DAPL protests. And more. Is that me being naïve to you? Because if it is it's only because you are the idiot that you are. Regarding, "and Bernie supporters. Bernie is actually my second choice" So you don't like his supporters? But you would be one if not for Warren? And that's what you have a problem with? That's what you care about? And not all the real word problems that Bernie is fighting? God damn... this is why I never wanted to address your shit intelligently. It's remarkable just how terrible the things you say are. It's tough to really do just to all the ways everything you say is terrible. Regarding, "Warren is just smarter and more strategic" Citation need for dumb claims. Actually please don't try to justify the things you say and instead change the things you say. Sanders is the amendment king, who just helped force Amazon singlehandedly to raise their minimum wage. Who is pretty much single handedly winning the debate on health care in a world where even a majority of REPUBLICANS (you know, like WARren) support medicare for all while that topic doesn't even manage to make WARren's webpage. Regarding, "Bernie is still the leader of the Progressive movement" So you aren't a progressive or you would be supporting him. Are you too a 90s republican? If so then yeah... warren is for you. If you are a progressive like me then Bernie is the clear choice and it isn't even close. Regarding, "But the best movement leaders don't make the best country leaders" You really like saying things but back up absolutely nothing that you say. Regarding, "Bernie makes people angry." Good. If you don't look at what the US is doing around the globe and you don't get pissed... well... you should be. It should piss Warren off. Instead she happily votes to give Trump extra money for bombs. How that fact doesn't piss you off makes me question your morality and your humanity. Regarding, "We see with Trump how that works out." Your comments are just remarkably dumb. Really. No joke. As if the problem with Trump and his supporters are their anger with the status quo. It's not the corruption or the policy, it's that think total idiots. Why the fuck did I even attempt to respond this intelligently. What a fucking waste of my time. Regarding, "Warren gives people hope!" No me. You know who does? Bernie. Because he can actually be trusted to fight the good fight while Warren can be trusted to roll over and cave to the establishment. But good luck with all the stupid shit you have been saying. Please go work for warren if you are going to continue to be an idiot. At least get paid for being dumb if you can.
    3
  3114.  @girletherial  Like I said... you are a complete moron who seems to only be capable of saying things that are remarkably stupid. I'll leave you too it. I wish I could fix stupid for you but sadly I can't.
    3
  3115.  @nothanks3236  Your thinking is akin to think some dems are good because they voted for roe. It's wrong. "They don't give a f about you." 'george carlin
    3
  3116.  @nothanks3236  Apparently there are 2 replies in this thread that exist that I can't see. Yay censorship! /s
    3
  3117. Mushrooms helped me with my depression.
    3
  3118. "He's OBVIOUSLY just grifting" How many billionaires are paying sedar these days? Last time I checked it was 3.
    3
  3119.  @Dos_Caffeine  "do you know what a grift is?" Yes. It's that thing shit libs like sedar do. "It means holding no real positions" I've watched jimmy for a long time. He has consistently been for things like: universal health care, giving peace a chance, getting money out of politics, and more. Just like me. His positions have been clear and consistent even if we haven't agreed on everything over the years.
    3
  3120. We'll stop vilifying them when they stop giving us reasons. And if you think calling out people who deserved to be called out doesn't help then you are an idiot. Your comment, like the CIA, are hurting the country far more for pointing out the ways the CIA sucks. Stop defending the indefensible.
    3
  3121. If only he would have mentioned the blackmail that everyone does care about.
    3
  3122. Regarding, "Atheism is just as much of a belief as Christianity, or any other religion" Not so much. Atheism is the rejection of the claim that there is evidence of god. Religions believe things using faith. Atheists require evidence to believe anything, as they should. To compare and conflate them is incorrect. Regarding, "I'm just having a laugh, Clint" Ok, if you say so. I guess I didn't like what I thought was the idea that deluded thinking is ok as long as it isn't too much deluded thinking.
    3
  3123.  @mattmiller9809  You don't feel a little hypocritical making that comment at all?
    3
  3124. I can only assume you a paid shill at this point. I hope you realize what a piece of shit you are and have at least a tiny bit of trouble sleeping at night.
    3
  3125. Yang was always on team stop Bernie Sanders. Hopefully now at least more people will realize it.
    3
  3126.  @ECisvotersuppression  Regarding, " trump has no experience at all and somehow he's in there but it is what it is." I'm not asking myself who can be in there. I'm asking myself who SHOULD be in there. Trump actually is evidence for the point I am trying to make. He is an example of why you and everyone should want a person with experience before they get a job as important as president of the united states.
    3
  3127.  @The_Opinion_of_Matt  "dividing the left" The left isn't divided. The left support things like m4a. You are talking about people who pretend to be on the left. It's also know as controlled opposition. And it exists no matter how much you want to pretend it doesn't. That's not jimmy's fault.
    3
  3128.  @h_3_x_  "Sometimes it’s to get members on the record, so ppl can’t make excuses later. Sometimes these votes create real political pressure that forces developments. Sometimes we vote for the historical record - to let future generations know we did everything we could." This the same person who a day or two earlier didn't force the vote.
    3
  3129. Thank you David Doel for watching the corporate media so that I don't have to.
    3
  3130. This clearly looks like a smear campaign. It makes me like Alex Morse.
    3
  3131. Jackson cares about all the things that sam "I don't care" sedar should.
    3
  3132.  @lolfemfaillol3933  "Sorry he lied to you Syria." Did he? The MIC getting everything they want is how it's been for a while. Nothing has fundamentally changed from the US perspective (the only perspective that matters to biden his ilk). We have been an empire for a long time. That's just the US being the US.
    3
  3133. You know there are more than 2 parties right? Because voting for Trump is no better than voting for a corporate dem. Do yourself and everyone a favor and only be willing to vote for people that actually deserve your vote. Thanks for that in advance.
    3
  3134. We are going to have to agree to disagree about that Bootsy.
    3
  3135. Corporate medias "coverage" of assange says something about them the same way kyle's "coverage" of ana's blackmail says something about him. It says neither can be trusted.
    3
  3136. I kinda agree. I personally have reservations about Nixon but this makes me like her more.
    3
  3137.  @AtheistsClaw  How can you be sure it's sarcasm? In a world where there is certainly an idiot who would say that without being sarcastic?
    3
  3138. Chris regarding, "then show me evidence" The demexit movement and the popularity of medicare for all are both examples among many. Regarding, "all I see is..." Then you aren't looking hard enough. Do I count? Have I praised McCain? Tell you what... I will. Even thou he sucked he was at least a voice of reason when it came to torture.
    3
  3139. David regarding, "its hardly a Sander’s thing." No it's not. But he is clearly leading the fight for it now right? Do you think so many dems would be willing to lie about their stance on it if it weren't for him? Regarding, "I’d wager that the majority of people who wanted to Dem-exit, but didn’t, did it because they believe Bernie still has a chance with the Dems." So people being registered in undemocratic closed primary states is a bad thing? Those are people who want to try and use what little power they have to try and shape that shit party and make it better. Ultimately crying isn't as effective so I don't blame them. I fortunately live in an open primary state and don't need to play that game. But those people leaving the party in droves, who absolutely do exist, are doing so in large part to Sanders. Sorry if the truth hurts.
    3
  3140. vlada regarding, "No one?" Yup. No one. Regarding, "They might not have the same politics but Ron Paul has done an equally fine job opening the eyes if people." Um... no. Regarding, "Paul is vastly superior to Bernie on foreign affairs these past few decades" He is better but not vastly so. And he is shit when it comes to domestic economic policy and that is an epic understatement. Sanders record on foreign policy, while admittedly not perfect, is constantly smeared, mischaracterized, and lied about by the establishment. Regarding, "Ross Perot election run was huge" Let's agree to disagree about this shall we?
    3
  3141.  @anewfuture  There's a way around the electoral college. Getting enough states to agree to the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact is how to do it. Stop telling people to just deal with it.
    3
  3142.  @Daniea3  "punishes rural people, like in VERMONT" Nope. People in vermont get a vote just like I get a vote. And there is no reason to make their vote more valuable than mine. Furthermore there's the senate where they have 2 of them just like a state like california that could be it's own country.
    3
  3143. Let's never hang out.
    3
  3144. I think TP should come before sliced bread. I use TP every day. I agree with everything else thou.
    3
  3145. You are why Trump loves the uneducated.
    3
  3146. You appreciate freedom but support Trump while he erodes your freedom. I guess that makes sense to dipshits. I appreciate freedom but that isn't the only thing I appreciate. I also appreciate paragraphs. I guess they didn't talk about those at your school.
    3
  3147. Chomsky can't be more wrong on the topic of force the vote. It was embarrassing.
    3
  3148. He's a MF hero.
    3
  3149.  michael piro  There really is someone for everyone huh? Even a dipshit shill like you.
    3
  3150. You are why religion sucks balls.
    3
  3151. Regarding, "doesn't Canada have more guns per capita" No. And it's not even close. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Estimated_number_of_guns_per_capita_by_country
    3
  3152. Jeff regarding, "they have less of an ability to resist a tyranny." I don't care how many guns you have in your trailer. If the government comes to kick in your door you aren't going to be able to stop them.
    3
  3153. Tak regarding, "it's hard to tell the difference between those being sarcastic and those actually serious about what they've said" I could not agree more. I've been saying for a long... long time that we need a sarcastic font.
    3
  3154.  @scruffopone3989  You know who doesn't question things? Cults.
    3
  3155.  @daggerdan12  "irrelevant shit" Like the OPCW coverup? Like anas blackmail? Like the corporate cash TYT takes? "purity testing" M4A and giving peace a chance are litmus tests to be on the left. "He's a cult leader." What meaningless nonsense. This is type of worthless crap you say when you have nothing of actually substance to offer. It's just ad hominem BS.
    3
  3156.  @Bluebelle51  I kinda want a citation for that but I also am not sure if I can take much more outrage at the moment assuming you are telling the truth. Even the US can't be that fucked up can it?
    3
  3157. She's still earned my wrath by being part of the team that ghosted jimmy to have cenks nephew on krystal kyle and friends under BS premises. I'm done with her too.
    3
  3158. There is zero reason to think Trump would have been Sanders including the notion that blacks wouldn't have voted for Sanders over Trump.
    3
  3159. If all you want is to bitch about Trump there is the corporate media for that. I'm sure CNN is currently talking about his latest tweet right now. Just because there are other bad things going on is fucking pathetic excuse to bury this type of corruption. Maybe if we did something to stop this type of bullshit we would actually have a decent President at the moment.
    3
  3160.  @beeyaybaracas3240  I'm not sure they are a troll although I haven't ruled out the possibility. I think they might just be misguided as fuck and have made it their personal mission to shit on Sanders every chance they get. Regardless it really does suck there are so many disingenuous trolls poisoning the discourse and making the sincerity of commenters a question that needs to be asked constantly.
    3
  3161.  Barney  Regarding, "you hate trump more" It must be far easier for you to make assumptions about my beliefs rather than just address the things I say. That said it still just proves that you are an intellectually dishonest dipshit who isn't to be taken seriously. Regarding, "as you want trump dead" And I feel the same way about Biden. Because I prefer evil not be around. Not that you actually care what I think. Just go back to your idiotic talking points and ignoring the things I actually say. Regarding, "Also have you thought that if Trump wins, it would give way to a real possibility of a progressive being the next democrat candidate for 2024?" Not only have I thought about this but I talk about it all the time. Have you thought that maybe you are an idiot? Because you clearly are.
    3
  3162.  Barney  Regarding, "So you should be on the Trump Train." It doesn't matter who I think is better between a giant douche and turd sandwich because I have standards and principles. I don't support evil. I leave that to epic dipshits such as yourself.
    3
  3163.  Barney  Regarding, "Treating people you disagree with as evil" Evil is evil. I can disagree with people plenty and they aren't evil. Not that you care you intellectually dishonest hack.
    3
  3164. This video is terrible. You've earned a rare thumbs down from me.
    3
  3165. AOC went on to add that she supports Nancy Pelosi and got nothing for it. Fraud squad. Never forget.
    3
  3166.  @JoshuaTerence38  Regarding, "as dnc is done screwing yang and he's out," You don't need to "screw someone" who has no experience, no record, and lies about supporting M4A. When yang loses it will be because he has no right to the job.
    3
  3167. The only people being forced to stay in show symptoms.
    3
  3168. We are already there.
    3
  3169. "It's still a better country from where any of these immigrants came from." Is it? The "land of the free" imprisons more of it's citizens by total and by percentage of population and it isn't even close. The US is the greatest threat to world peace. It might be better for you but as a whole as a country it's literally the shittiest country on earth at the moment.
    3
  3170.  @ScoopMeisterGeneral  Regarding, "Nobody's won yet." Nope. You were getting it right when you were pointing out that someone has already won... us not knowing officially that it was Bernie doesn't mean he hasn't already won... because he has.
    3
  3171. @Avery Benson Regarding, "I don’t think he did it just for recognition, he probably sincerely just wants a dog" The makers of this propaganda will be happy to hear that. That is exactly what they want you, a dog lover, to think. And if they thought you loved hot sauce you would instead be getting, "I got hot sauce in my bag." Hillary Clinton.
    3
  3172.  @singerrb4984  If trump did this would it prove the orange clown has a heart of gold? Or would it merely prove that you are a dupe?
    3
  3173. Shouldn't you have known that without clicking Jesus?
    3
  3174.  @fishingsouthwestflorida1586  I don't worry about money and I'm not nearly so happy.
    3
  3175. Bernie will
    3
  3176. take that love
    3
  3177. and use it to
    3
  3178. Keep licking that boot that had the chance to fight for m4a but instead voted for pelosi.
    3
  3179. Both have written books.
    3
  3180.  Michael Timely  I'm voting against Trump and Biden both. Both are liars and both are evil. Try not to lie to yourself about the POS you support.
    3
  3181. Regarding, "if Bernie runs as a Democrat he can forget my vote" Cares more about a party label than the person. So fucking stupid.
    3
  3182. Regarding, "No actually I don't care about labels at all. I will vote for Bernie Sanders if he runs as anything but a Democrat" I'm sorry but I'm not a fucking moron so this makes no fucking sense to me. Regarding, "this shit was rigged." No shit sherlock. Regarding, "Tom Perez just purged anyone and everyone that supported Bernie Sanders or Keith Ellison you fucking idiot." No shit sherlock. Regarding, "You think he has a fair shot" Do I think the process is fair? It obviously isn't. But all their dirty tricks won't be enough to stop Sanders in 2020 unless enough morons think your dumb ass.
    3
  3183. CNN is pure propaganda garbage.
    3
  3184. I can only think of one politician who talks about this. Not surprisingly he is the most popular politician in the country. Sanders 2020.
    3
  3185. Those are all pretty good replies but none of them are all in bold. Checkmate HowSci.
    3
  3186. Tub regarding, "Although whatever strength Trump is gaining, is being wiped out by Trump himself." You are kinda right but still missing the point I think. Trumps popularity should be practically nil. But it isn't. It is exceptionally high considering the way he has governed and isn't going down the way it should be.
    3
  3187. Nobody cares what you "think" carrot.
    3
  3188. Thanks for proving my point that there are still plenty of idiots who think Trump isn't establishment Sean. That said I'd prefer it if you weren't an idiot instead.
    3
  3189. It's not really a "downgrade." It's more like a complete independent unrelated topic.
    3
  3190. nature giver I'm not sure Biden will have the time considering he has a lot of creepy groping to do.
    3
  3191. I honestly don't care if Brazile is correct on the point. The notion that you or anyone should be listening her is really fucked up. She should be in jail for what she has done.
    3
  3192. Regarding, "stabilishment " That's your edited comment? You aren't worth what the koch brothers pay you.
    3
  3193. Adan regarding, "She believes in regulating the economy." She says she is for regulating the economy but I haven't seen anything of substance to substantiate this. I am not appeased by grandstanding and words. The biggest accomplishment Warren can take credit for is the creation of the consumer protection bureau. Don't get me wrong, in a world where all things are equal this is clearly a good thing. But we don't live in a world where all things are equal. At the time we were living in a world where wall street nearly collapsed the economy. We needed the banks broken up. We needed Glass-Steagal brought back. We needed criminal bankers thrown in jail. Instead we got the consumer protection bureau. Just enough to appease the peasants into thinking their government was doing something so they wouldn't demand more. So forgive me for not giving her lots of credit for it. Regarding, "fight for workers rights, fight for universal healthcare" She is for these things the same way Obama was for those things... only talk. I have no evidence to believe she will actually fight for these things. Donald Trump has said he supports health care for all for fucks sake but ultimately actions speak louder than words when it comes to all politicians. Regarding, "help the most needy in society." I've already brought up DAPL. They needed help when they were getting the shit kicked out of them for expressing their 1st amendment rights. She was silent. She couldn't even bother to help her fellow native americans. Regarding, "However she is also interventionist and believes in a strong military, and government intelligence agencies. Warren is certainly a progressive." I'm not sure how you could write these 2 sentences back to back. Clearly we have a very different idea of what makes someone a progressive.
    3
  3194. Sorry for not being as impressed with her grandstanding as you.
    3
  3195.  @younggotti8195  the only person looking braindead is you.
    3
  3196. Bernie is a career politician.
    3
  3197. I guess in this moment I can relate to the people who want to send "thoughts and prayers" even thou I am not, at all, religious. It would be nice to think I could do something significant to really help when I can't. I wish you the best and I'm sorry I can't do more.
    3
  3198. I'm glad to hear you are alright. :)
    3
  3199.  @christopherlee9026  No prob. It's something that I think isn't talked about enough.
    3
  3200. Meh. It does more to make them look bad then it does to stop Bernie.
    3
  3201. There is a reason I refer to them as the corporate media.
    3
  3202. You don't even attempt to back your BS up. I'll just figure you are projecting.
    3
  3203. The guy who is ripping the party a new asshole is a shill for them? Holy shit are you stupid.
    3
  3204.  @blackgold754  Her previous answers about force the vote were weak as hell. She pretty much just refused to answer what side she would be on if she had power at the time. It was NOT inspiring but it also was not the same as voting for pelosi.
    3
  3205. Why are you relevant? That's right. You are not.
    3
  3206.  @verygoodfreelancer  "faint praise" Hardly. He sets a high bar and still someone exceeded it.
    3
  3207. They have all the money and they like to use it trying to brainwash people.
    3
  3208. What political career? Talking head on corporate media and book seller is all he is now.
    3
  3209. I'm more likely to believe Tulsi "evolved" at young age like she did on gay rights. I'm less likely to believe Warren "evolved" at an old age like she did when becoming a "progressive" after being a 90s republican.
    3
  3210.  @peterkrug2327  Does anyone actually forget that?
    3
  3211.  A Vote for Trump Is a Vote for Treason  "forcethevote taught us you're reactionary fools too lazy to learn how any of this works, you just throw your poop and demand we respect you for it." We know how it works. So does AOC. Here is AOC telling you why force the vote was a worthwhile fight. "A few reasons: Sometimes it’s to get members on the record, so ppl can’t make excuses later. Sometimes these votes create real political pressure that forces developments. Sometimes we vote for the historical record - to let future generations know we did everything we could." It's not our fault that her actions don't match her words. It's not our fault she is being exposed as a fraud. But you keep licking that boot and making excuses and rationalizations for politicians lying to you. It's EXACTLY what trump supporters do for their clown.
    3
  3212. If you think that you are an idiot.
    3
  3213.  @f58534  "He hosts The Jimmy Dore Show." -wikipedia nothing about it being affiliated with tyt.
    3
  3214.  @binodshrestha1553  Nah. I'm pretty sure they are going to help me burn the party to the ground if the nomination is stolen for Bernie.
    3
  3215.  @The_General_Zubas  Regarding, "there is nothing to fear but fear itself." That and the fear of known cheaters cheating.
    3
  3216. He is wrong on this. He is not "on the take." Don't be silly. Maddow is good at what she does. She had me fooled for quite a long time. She is on the take. She is getting filthy rich doing what she does, and for what she doesn't do. Harris too. He is just being naive.
    3
  3217. Charles regarding, "Which religion do you subscribe to?" Does it really matter? There is equal evidence for all of them... none.
    3
  3218.  @whensomethingcriesagain  He doesn't need to be popular with everyone... he only needs to take a handful of delegates away from Sanders to possibly make a very, very big difference at the end. Sanders NEEDS to win on the first ballot. Even if he has the most delegates he will lose if he doesn't have a majority because the establishment would rather lose to trump than let him win.
    3
  3219.  @whensomethingcriesagain  He won elections as mayor of NY. Someone has to like him and he has great name recognition which is often half the battle with know-nothings.
    3
  3220. He's a democratic socialist but don't let that fact get in the way of you saying something stupid.
    3
  3221. Regarding, "People are not illegally sneaking to Canada." I'll give your dumbass credit for just misspeaking. I'll assume you meant to say that people are not illegally sneaking into the US from Canada which isn't true. Regarding, "People are sneaking across the border from Mexico." Yes they are. Just like they do from Canada. But again, they are LEAVING the US at the exact same rate. Would you like to continue to try and claim there isn't a racial component? Of course you would because you are dumb as fuck and intellectually dishonest.
    3
  3222. Shaun regarding, "the border of a poor country?" Some I assume are good people. You keep telling yourself it is because they are "poor" and has nothing to do with the color of their skin. Intelligent and intellectually honest people understand what is really going on.
    3
  3223. Shaun regarding, "We don't have an immigration problem up North" Holy shit. I guess I'll repeat myself again. NET ZERO immigration rate down south therefor not a problem there either.
    3
  3224. Shaun regarding, "no one has anything" Thanks for the laugh.
    3
  3225. "blackmailed" Jimmy dore." "I've been holding back. Letting you run your mouth as if your some kinda warrior for what's good in the world. That's about to change." Things a blackmailer might say to you while holding a knife your loved one's throat and something that ana actually said to try and blackmail jimmy.
    3
  3226. If he were being "objective" he would mention the conflict of interest as he's affiliated with TYT too.
    3
  3227.  @KG9551  regarding, "that was an incredibly unnecessary correction" What an understatement. But I can't complain... it did make me laugh my ass off. And that is why I'm about to give theirs a thumbs up in addition to your comments.
    3
  3228.  @benfrank8649  Regarding, "Which of the two parties is for clean renewable energy, single payer health care and a legal and moral foreign policy?" That sounds like the green party. It is obviously neither major party.
    3
  3229. The dems are right to want to keep US troops in Germany? That is remarkably dumb.
    3
  3230. Ant Man ALL of those have majority support.
    3
  3231. Sorry not sorry for not being a cultist for kyle like you sheep. I'm too busy calling out his BS because that's what not being a sycophant looks like.
    3
  3232.  @SkillsofAWESOMENESS  I don't care about "love." I care about votes. And they are saving their votes for a guy who has done NOTHING to deserve trust.
    3
  3233.  @dgc4059  You know what you are right... we should rely on allies not just our allies rely on us. We should dismantle our military and let germany protect us. They can station troops in the US. That type of shit is totally normal and cool right?
    3
  3234. Except better.
    3
  3235.  @YersiniaPestisNPO  I'd love to answer your question but I really need to be going... I've got a big day tomorrow. Or at least that's what Ivonka would hear and she would be tired and fine with it.
    3
  3236. love I'm talking about all elections and I guess I'm specifically referring to the elections you, "just don't vote" in. The point I'm making is that you should be voting. Period. And you should be voting for people that represent you, even if they don't win. Even all those times that you voted for someone and they did win, spoiler alert, it wasn't because of your vote. It wasn't your vote that put them over the top to win.... but you still should be voting because. Because that is how you let the powers that be know what you want. Because that is how you say what you want.... even if what you want doesn't win. At least then you have, at the very least told them what you want and what you are for. What you are doing is a self fullfilling, self defeating prophecy. Why don't you vote for 3rd party candidates? Because they don't win. Why don't they win? Because people don't vote for them. Why don't people vote for them? Because they don't win. Why don't they win again? And around and around it goes. Lastly I would like to point out that Bernie Sanders an independent Senator. And I'm pretty sure that that qualifies as an important election.
    3
  3237. Regarding, "she knew it was a silly trap question" Stop making excuses for her. It makes you sound like Trump fans. She didn't have a good answer. So she dodged. Show some intellectual honesty and just admit it.
    3
  3238.  @edwardcote2440 I just got done making the same sentiment. My apologies Edward. I should have known someone would have beaten me to it.
    3
  3239. You had me until, "Vote Blue No Matter Who." Realize that there is no substantive difference between corporate dems and republicans at least not on economic issues. They are just republicans who are cool with abortion and gays. Worst "solution" ever.
    3
  3240. You lost me at "bolton was right."
    3
  3241. I am going to start by saying that I am not personally very knowledgeable about Ro's voting record and am not claiming anything about his voting record. That said the point I would like to make is that a person's voting record and where they get the money for their campaigns says far more about whether someone is a "wolf" then who they endorse. I would actually like it if we as a society got away from endorsements even being a thing and think their importance is wildly overblown. (not that I have any illusions of them actually going away)
    3
  3242. Pappy so you expect a human being to be perfect and if they are not you are going to call them a sellout? It was an endorsement and you are acting like it was his soul. I'm not suggesting that it is nothing. It is something. But you are proving my point that some wildly overblow the importance of an endorsement. You want to question his decision? Fine that is perfectly reasonable. You want to use this as motive to go over his voting record with a certain amount of skepticism? That too would be reasonable to me. But to say you literally don't give a flying fuck about anything else about him and think that that is literally all you need to know about him anymore is fucking absurd.
    3
  3243. As if republican hands are clean or some shit.
    3
  3244.  @lordnemesisthesperg  Regarding, "republicans aren't out there trying to burn down the country" You are an idiot. Good luck with that.
    3
  3245. Regarding, "voting for a Biden/Harris ticket... should be one of the easiest things you’ve ever done in your life." It should be easy to support a corrupt, lying, warmonger with dementia and his favorite cop? LFMAO. Yeah no.
    3
  3246.  @RyanWow65  Regarding, " looks like you need to do some research." This is what you say when you have nothing of substance to offer. I have done research. That's actually how I know Biden is a corrupt lying warmonger whose brain is melting inside his head. Regarding, "saying Biden has “dementia”" Watch video of Biden from just 10 years ago and compare it to now with just a little bit of intellectual honesty if you can. Reality is here if you want. Biden's brain is clearly melting. And if you can't see it yours might be as well.
    3
  3247.  @RyanWow65  Also regarding, "are you on the right channel bud?" Are you under the impression kyle and company think fondly of biden? Are you new here? Are you on the right channel? Shouldn't you be watching CNN or MSNBC propaganda?
    3
  3248.  @marcus.guitarist  Regarding, "What's wrong with the death penalty?" It's tough to even know where to begin with this. First and foremost it is blatant hypocrisy from a society trying to say killing people is wrong. A single innocent person being executed makes the system a murderer. It costs more then just locking people up and throwing away the key. And there is ZERO evidence to suggest that it is any sort of deterrent for crime. Nobody was going to rape or murder but then didn't because of the a death penalty... that simply isn't how the human mind works. Regarding, "Not sure about universal health care, don't know too much about it." Long story short... it would save lives by providing health care for millions without it which is the type of thing people who claim to be "pro-life" should care about.
    3
  3249.  @murk4552  Regarding, "What?" Dems control everything but hacks want to focus on the republican party wrongdoing. Biden just got done lying about 2k checks. I'd like to think David would cover it but he hasn't to the best of my knowledge. That's what a hack would do. Regarding, "If you chose either party blindly, you're a partisan hack." Yeah. That's kinda my point.
    3
  3250.  @dvdv8197  Dave seems to find value in it. Although I'm not sure why.
    3
  3251.  @signsofbias  You: "getting warmer for over 8 thousand years?" Also you: "the medieval warm period it was actually 5 degrees hotter than it is now?" You can't seem to keep your BS straight.
    3
  3252. You lost me at "Her reluctant support for Bernie" That's not what happened.
    3
  3253.  @misstrunchbull3953  " draw your shallow conclusions as you see fit." You are calling other people's conclusions "shallow" while making excuses and rationalizations for yang betraying the principles he claims to hold.
    3
  3254.  @misstrunchbull3953  "tell me how he's betraying the principles he claims" He criticizes corporate media all the freaking time. A few headlines, "Andrew Yang Trashes Media Focus On Donald Trump: 'This Is The Reality TV Show'" or "Yang calls out CNN, MSNBC for leaving him off of fundraising graphics" YANG CALLS OUT CNN. Well he is a part of CNN. Do I really need to explain in great detail how that makes him a fraud?
    3
  3255. Meanwhile, in reality, all the money and legalized bribes flooding the system inside the US does so much more to interfere with the system by magnitudes that make Russia seem meaningless by comparison.
    3
  3256. Lean forward... and fart.
    3
  3257. I think he was just tired of it. I can't really blame him for that.
    3
  3258. Regarding, "You sound like a bitch kyle" Pretty funny coming from you..
    3
  3259.  @Joseph-ro6wq  And I'm not saying that she is a trump supporter. She might not be. But the fact remains that if you are a racist you are likely a trump supporter. Note: biden and trump are racist.
    3
  3260. He was busy.... being a fraud.
    3
  3261. "comparing the COVID vaccine to a seatbelt" What is wrong with the analogy? The vax and a seat belt are to protect YOU if you choose to use them. If someone chooses not to use them it doesn't affect you. You just like to pretend that it does.
    3
  3262. You clearly do not get it.
    3
  3263. dpeace regarding, "Russ Feingold" I understand why Trump won Wisconsin. I was shocked, appalled, and pissed Feingold didn't get his senate seat back.
    3
  3264. I like to think Feingold would have won had Sanders been the nominee. Sadly we will never know. Hopefully Feingold gets a position of power sometime in the future. There are very few politicians I trust and actually root for so I was very sad to see him lose... especially to such a complete douche like Johnson.
    3
  3265.  @marcus.guitarist  Regarding, "our moral compasses are our own." Yes. They are. Regarding, "Mine isn't meant to guide you, and yours isn't meant to guide me." You can think murder is just fine all you want. Even if you did that doesn't mean that I, or David, shouldn't be able to say things like, "should be" because of our own. You want to disagree with what "should be?" Fine. You can do that. But don't act like you are oblivious to where a person's ideas of what should be are coming from. Regarding, "The government should not be able to force anybody to do anything" Um what? You aren't talking about government then. What you are describing is anarchy. We have a government. And the government does get to tell you what you can and can't do. Or at least they are capable of imposing penalties when people do things the government deems they shouldn't. Again... we can debate about those things should be. But stop pretending the don't or shouldn't have any power.
    3
  3266. Sign the petition if you haven't already please.
    3
  3267. "vote for biden." -bernie sanders
    3
  3268. Gerthax I'm a peace loving hippy who is exhausted by war and desperately wants to reign in the military industrial complex. While I agree that Sanders record has some flaws, especially (well, only really) when it comes to foreign policy but still I think you can be confident that he could be trusted as commander in chief especially when compared to what will be the alternatives. Rand Paul would be the ideal when it comes to foreign policy but his domestic economic policy is atrocious and a deal breaker. Sanders isn't perfect but he is as good as it gets when it comes to presidential hopefuls. And sorry for being rude originally. There are lots of trolls and idiots working overtime to disingenuously smear Sanders and it gets tiresome.
    3
  3269. I still can't stand elon but he did one good thing at least.
    3
  3270.  @Peopleofthesun386  Regarding, "I will worry more about that side." Don't kid yourself. You ONLY care about one side. That's what makes you a hack.
    3
  3271.  Robot Man  Regarding, "Where is the rigging going on" According the DNC Pete Buttigieg "won" the Iowa Caucus. This is but one example of many.
    3
  3272. I'm way to the left and I can't stand him. He's the liar and conman who said he supported m4a while running for potus right? Not sure what you think is decent about that.
    3
  3273. Only the "democratic" party is.
    3
  3274.  @x00p3  "Calling someone a conman doesn't make them a conman. Explain." Lying about supporting m4a while running for potus and then presenting a health care plan that isn't m4a or even close to it is the act of a conman.
    3
  3275. Nori regarding, "POC are not voting for your cult leader Bernie." Bernie Sanders is the most popular politican in the country and that includes people of color who demonstrate they do like him. It probably has something to do with where he stands on the issues including supporting criminal justice reform that disproportionately affects minorities, supporting raising the minimum wage, supporting universal health care, making college accessible to all, giving peace a chance and others that are popular with pretty much everyone. Then again I haven't really factored in your silly smear of calling him a "cult leader" but I think that won't have much effect because of how absurd it is.
    3
  3276. I want universal health care, college accessible and good education, to reign in the military industrial complex, peace, a living wage, the environment protected, criminal justice reform, the banks broken up, glass-steagal brought back, net neutrality, immigration reform and accessible, money out of politics, equal opportunity for all among other things just like Hitler would. I'm just your typical zionist demon, white supremacist I guess. I'd like to think you people are being sarcastic but you aren't are you.
    3
  3277. @idefix Regarding, "He has no chance of winning the primaries." You are arguably correct about this and I hardly give a shit about who wins the republican primary. Whoever it is will suck. Romney or otherwise.
    3
  3278. I'm pretty sure it has something to do with that.
    3
  3279. I agree that he will face an uphill battle to pass legislation. Even if he passes nothing he would be a yuuuge step in the right direction because 1) he can be trusted to not make things worse and 2) he could frame the debate and force the corporate media to talk about things they would rather not. He could win the war of ideas the way he has with single payer... even if we don't have single payer.
    3
  3280.  @TheAlibabatree  You are correct. They meant "the sane." That might not apply to you.
    3
  3281.  @tungbi11  Praise be the orange clown says the cult.
    3
  3282. I suspect he will stop calling out elon the day elon stops getting rich from his cons.
    3
  3283.  @HSstriker  regarding, "in some countries it's illegal to film other people..." Um... ok. If you say so. In the US we can have security cameras on our properties and there is nothing illegal about it. Thankfully.
    3
  3284.  @BastardlyAlive  Is it? Is that why I had to awake from my dentist's chair without my pants and with things in my body I didn't ask for? I'm sorry but being a dentist does not impress me. Seriously thou I just like being different. There's too many yes men in this world. Trust me I like nice things.
    3
  3285. "butt ass naked if she chooses" She absolutely can't. That's actually considered sexual harassment and would get me thrown in jail if I tried it.
    3
  3286.  @sniperjared  Don't get me wrong I'm happy that I don't get persecuted for it. But it's laughable for you to use the word "mythical" when I'm doing nothing but spitting facts. Responses like yours are what you say when you have nothing of substance to refute those facts.
    3
  3287. Taskmaster and how exactly is President Bone Spurs going to do better with Iran than the deal Obama made?
    3
  3288. Taskmaster I guess that is better if you ignore the fact that none of that stops them from working on a nuclear bomb this moment which, correct me if I'm wrong, is suppose to be the ultimate goal that was already achieved. Sanctions in the past were suppose to force them to the table to give up nukes and it had already worked. So better to you is going backwards. Why am I not surprised?
    3
  3289. Taskmaster regarding, "How do you know he doesn't have bone spurs?" He was asked by a reporter what leg his bonespurs were in and he couldn't give them an answer. Instead he referred them to check his medical report because he had no fucking idea. If he actually had bone spurs he would have known. Let me guess, you graduated from Trump U?
    3
  3290. Regarding, "You asked me to give you an idea of how he'd go about a better deal. That's how I'd start." Holy shit. I'll just ignore the fact that you totally missed the point of the question and address that there is nothing better about doing the exact same shit we did before. There's better, same, and worse. They mean totally different things. Regarding, "they'd have to give up a vast majority of their uranium." You mean like they did in the deal with Obama? Regarding, "That doesn't stop them from researching" Nope. Do you think Trump has a plausible way of preventing them from doing research? Do you think he can take away all their computers? Regarding, "What's your point?" My point is that the deal the US had with Iran was vastly superior then the deal Trump made with NK. How do you not understand that without me spelling it out?
    3
  3291. Taskmaster regarding, "So what?" Try to be intellectually honest when answering this question... would you be saying that if it was a politician you didn't like that used them to dodge the military? Regarding, "it's a shit move" Yes. It is. That's the point. Try not to overthink it and excuse it because you are a fanboy of the guy who did it. Regarding, "it doesn't define him." No it doesn't and that is probably why I don't assert it does. Literally nobody is defined by a single thing which is obvious and makes your point irrelevant. Regarding, "Your childish slights continue." Like I said we have to agree to disagree about what makes something childish. Addressing draftdodging for example is anything but "childish." Regarding, "Can we keep it civil?" No promises. I concede I can be a real dick at times.
    3
  3292. Taskmaster regarding, "All deals aren't the same." Yeah. I know. That is kinda the point. For example the non deal we have a the moment is huge step backwards. It was literally the only thing about the Obama administration I was happy about. "I've answered your question." No. You didn't. I asked for better. You gave the same from 10 years ago. Regarding, "Trumps going at it a different way." How so? Sanctions? Like I said that is not different. That was already done and had worked. And what is the goal? What more do you think Trump could have achieved seeing as how the US got everything they could possibly get. There's no better deal to be made. Unless all you care about is getting rid of Obama stink. Regarding, "Not like you or I are altering the course of political history, am I right?" Certainly not individually but, for example, Trump supporters overall do and we, as a society, need you to wake up, understand that Trump sucks, and stop supporting him.
    3
  3293. Regarding, "I'm not covering for him." Forgive me but I'm having a hard time believing you. Regarding, "If someone doesn't want to go into the military that badly" It isn't just about how badly someone doesn't want to go. It is about what they are willing to do to get out of it. And don't be afraid to put it in a little context. Trump is the same guy who smeared John McCain for "being caught." Regarding, "You don't want wishy washy soldiers." What are your thoughts about your desire for lying immoral presidents?
    3
  3294. He's talking about family and loved ones and you are labeling it "material things" like he's talking about a car. It's dumb AF.
    3
  3295.  @TheZombie567  Regarding, "dumb milinials" That's your edited comment? LMFAO
    3
  3296.  @TheZombie567  Regarding, " if your a dumb milinial I guess it's an insult" It's a insult if I am a millennial or not. You would realize that if you weren't an idiot who can't spell for shit.
    3
  3297.  @jackripper5240  Regarding, "coz bernie has experienced?" Um. Yes. Obviously. If you wonder why Yang supporters are tough to take seriously it might be because they have trouble with incredibly simple concepts such as this. Regarding, "do you really think that bernie will push through with his own policies?" Even Bernie knows he can't do it alone. There is a reason he calls for a political revolution. Regarding, "Dont criticize supporters." Then don't be an idiot. Respect is earned, not given. Regarding, "You might end up calling them "deplorables"." Hillary is a cunt but even she gets the occasional thing correct. Trump supporters are morons whose stupidity is currently costing this country dearly.
    3
  3298.  @dontwan4266  I hope you are trolling. You are impossible to take seriously.
    3
  3299. Regarding, "How do you feel about Tulsi not raising her hand on the Medicare for All question?" I felt how I imagine the hulk feels before turning green.
    3
  3300. @Terrapin243 Calling LiftedBuddha "a bit confused" is being kind.
    3
  3301.  @LiftedBuddha  Regarding, "Dont need the tattoo" You already have a swastika? That makes sense. Regarding, "why would they care?" Because being a racist is morally reprehensible. You would realize this if you weren't also dumb. Regarding, "I only talk to white people" Everyone appreciates this, other than white people. They would prefer you just STFU.
    3
  3302. Ok dipshit. You go ahead and continue to think that "Most Americans do not accept socialism," even after I accurately point out that most Americans accept social security and K-12 education... aka socialism. Fuck you are stupid. Actually me calling you stupid is insulting to stupid people. But you are correct that me addressing you is a waste of time. Even a broken clock is correct twice a day.
    3
  3303. This is exactly what the country needs. SMH
    3
  3304. crist regarding, "Sorry! you made no! logical sense at all." You should really consider that your failure to understand has more to do with you than it does Rob.
    3
  3305. Andrew huh? I like Redacted Tonight but I don't understand what your point is unless you are just trying to plug them. Would you care to elaborate?
    3
  3306. B4 regarding, "It's just a shame that the Duopoly of the two major parties has so corrupted American politics." Money in politics is fucking everything up. It is the virus that infects everything it touches. Regarding, "hoping for a change that never seems forthcoming" Former democrats are rightfully pissed at Obama for never producing the hope and change he promised. Regarding, "Bernie is the best choice by far but that won't happen." I'm not sure how they can stop him. He is by far the most popular politician in the country. He has by far the best policy positions. His positions are overwhelmingly popular. He generates more enthusiasm than anyone else by far. Even with the wheels of the establishment working overtime against him I'm not sure they can stop him. Regarding, "very little chance of four more years of Trump." Just so long as it isn't the someone who is as bad on policy but less offensive. If they are just as bad on policy then I actually prefer it is someone that makes everyone sick to their stomach. Hopefully we actually get someone decent... like Sanders.
    3
  3307. I have to go live my life. Have a nice day everyone. Good luck fighting the good fight. Peace.
    3
  3308.  @TinaSindichakis  Did you vote for trump like dave told you to?
    3
  3309. Well if Trump said he didn't use campaign money then I guess I should just believe the word of a pathological liar.
    3
  3310. The real issue is money in politics... not term limits.
    3
  3311.  @bidoof4938  "willing to compromise and incorporate non-progressive ideas" Sorry not sorry for having standards and principles that yang doesn't even come close to reaching. You want to blame us for not liking the things your clown is doing? I don't care.
    3
  3312. "embraced fucking Boogaloo Boys" What nonsensical, biased, loaded framing. He brought on a guy to talk to him the way larry king used to.
    3
  3313.  @misterf7299  "who would you suggest Bernie supports in 2024?" An actual revolutionary would run as an independent. The sheep herder will tell you to vote for corrupt corporate dems. "The republican candidate?" I've never voted for a republican in my life and likely never will. What a silly thing to think.
    3
  3314. Maybe because you aren't even attempting to make an argument.
    3
  3315. "They should be represented." They are. They get to go out and vote for whoever they want. But the notion that they should be voting based on what's between someones legs is not relevant, and not a concept that is ok. It is as equally not ok as think that I should want men based only on what's between their legs.
    3
  3316. It's not over yet. And it's the first time we have superpowers on opposing sides even if the US is mostly just using ukranians to do it's fighting for them.
    3
  3317.  @ampamp999  Yeah that's not how it works for the peasants. Stop being silly.
    3
  3318.  @wuhaninstituteofvirology  " who is the greatest american dissent vs. american imperialism in history" Isn't he that guy who is blue no matter who? Didn't he tell everyone to vote for biden? And american imperialism?
    3
  3319.  @tonyclifton2230  "at least pay some heed on both them issues" The exxon CEO is happy with biden's "climate" bill. Is that what you are referring to?
    3
  3320.  @InfoForYou8  "it doesn’t decrease his other contributions." I'm pretty sure that when the author of manufacturing consent manufactures consent for the elite that DOES diminish that book and that person.
    3
  3321.  @dashx1103  "you are just wrong on that" Just one example in his 500 years on the planet when he told people not to vote blue in a general election... prove me wrong if you can.
    3
  3322.  @dashx1103  "Fans concede what?" That noam thinks the unclean, aka the unjabbed, should be ostracized from society.
    3
  3323.  @BadMayonnaise  Propaganda works... even on smart people.
    3
  3324. Regarding, "There is no bigger insult than lumping me with Donald Trump supporters." Too bad it didn't get you to reflect on how dumb your statement are and get you to stop staying stupid things. You are as dumb as Trump supporters and you continue to prove it. Regarding, "They cling to their own ignorance like a baby with a rattle and they live to be manipulated." Wow does this perfectly describe you. Ok I'm done with this. This has been a complete waste of time because people like you are hopeless. Good luck with being dumb as fuck going forward.
    3
  3325. Just keep telling yourself trickle down economics rule for all I care. I really don't give a fuck what you think. I just wanted to call you stupid. You are an epic fucking moron spouting bullshit and making everyone that you talk to dumber. I am embarrassed to be the same species as you. Good luck getting the tax cuts you want.
    3
  3326.  @everyvillainislemons2521  Regarding, " he wants to give illegals health insurance" Do you not realize that we already do that? That when illegal immigrants get sick we don't just let them die, because we aren't monsters? Or at least most of us aren't? Seriously, what do you think we do right now when they get sick? And who do you think pays for it?
    3
  3327.  @everyvillainislemons2521  So to summarize, you know what you are talking about, I don't, and you aren't willing to answer my very simple questions. Ok bud. Go fuck yourself.
    3
  3328. This is sarcasm right?
    3
  3329. If you want to know where she stands I suggest you focus on individual policy positions rather than a label.
    3
  3330. So it isn't that you "don't know where she stands" but that you think you know where she stands and are going to pretend you don't to try to manufacture ways of attacking her. Thanks for clearing that up.
    3
  3331.  Bruce Lee  "the Turks are loved" Is that why team clinton gave them 20 million?
    3
  3332.  Fire Boy  Hawkins is a flawed candidate but I'll likely be voting for him to try and build support for the green party.
    3
  3333. @Jacket off Gym Jordan Regarding, "Biden could have picked Jimmy Dore as V.P. and you people would STILL have been unhappy." I get it... the we require perfection BS. We don't. I'm going to vote. I even said I am likely to vote for a candidate I think is flawed in this very thread. My inability to support trash humans like biden, harris, and trump isn't born out of a need for perfection. I don't need perfect. But I do need to think that what I'm voting for is good. Biden and harris are not. But good luck with your gaslighting and strawman arguments going forward.
    3
  3334. @Jacket off Gym Jordan Regarding, "Biden already said he was "a bridge" not the future." So does biden want to be president in the past or some shit? That's dementia. Regarding, "Trump is willing to destroy everything in sight if he gets another 4 years" Yeah. Everyone knows he is waiting for his second term to end the country. /s Regarding, "Hitler was a dictator" Hitler was elected right? He got the most votes in an election right? But keep deflecting. Regarding, "The guy that you want to win again" Compared to biden I arguably do. Not that I'm voting for him. I don't vote for evil and terrible. That's what you do.
    3
  3335. It's not about getting the nomination... it's about trying to siphon some votes and delegates away from Sanders in NY state.
    3
  3336.  @redphilips9180  If that were true I don't think he would have been killed.
    3
  3337. Jimmy I only ask that if you do sell out you are obvious about it. Maybe come out with a video about why Hillary is fucking amazing the day you cash the check. Thanks in advance.
    3
  3338. Or maybe you can make a satirical video doing the same but don't actually sell out.
    3
  3339. etikk regarding, "I truly think they are too old." The only evidence you cite for thinking this is a number... not any sort of reasoning that they can't do the job. Regarding, "it wears people out" Yes. It is a tough job. It does wear people out. These facts are still true for the young. Regarding, "two terms is eight years" You are getting ahead of yourself. We elect presidents in 4 year terms. Regarding, "I thought it was madness last year when Drumpf and Killary were in the general election" So did I but not because of anything to do with their age. Regarding, "What about finding a younger progressive candidate? Tulsi f ex" I love Tulsi and think she should be on the short list of people Sanders should consider for running mate. But if she were running for the top of the ticket in 2020 she would be plagued by the same problems Sanders had in 2016. Name recognition is supremely important in this country, especially when the corporate media is not going to give non establishment candidates the exposure they deserve. In 2020 it would be less important if the corrupt corporate media is covering Trumps empty podium while Sanders speaks in front of record crowds but it would be much, much more important if they are covering Trump's empty podium while Gabbard is speaking in front of record crowds because our uninformed public doesn't know who she is for the most part. She would be perfect for the bottom of the ticket and if Sanders can't do the job then she can step in. That is why we have a VP.
    3
  3340. I don't think you understand the power the nominee of the party has. He would be able to practically reinvent the party as he sees fit as long as he wins. Not only that but if he becomes something other than a dem while in office then the dems that are also in office (and not going away) all of a sudden lose all incentive to wok with him and he kills his ability to pass legislation. That said he should make good appointments to the FEC and change the rules to level the playing field in elections as much as possible.
    3
  3341. Brian regarding, "I think you're overestimating the power of a party nominne." I think you are underestimating it. The party nominee gets to essentially pick the party leader who picks the people under them and so on. I'm betting you are aware of progressives currently being purged from the party but the fact of the matter is that the corporate dems can be purged just the same way. The party leader also has the ability to essentially unilaterally make decisions for the party as demonstrated by... https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=91226631 That is the type of shit the party leader can virtually single handedly. To be fair the DNC went back on this solely for the purpose of benefiting Hillary Clinton but it demonstrates the type of thing the party leader can do. Regarding, "Drmocratic Party would never let one guy take away their piggy bank without a fight" Nobody is saying they are not going to fight. They are going to do everything they can to stop Sanders and company but ultimately they are going to lose. It isn't about working side by side with them. It is about taking over the party hostile takeover style.
    3
  3342.  @twandendulk5723  How is buying power with the dollar going? I have to pay about twice what I did for everything this time 2 years ago.
    3
  3343.  @scottwaggoner223  No I haven't read RT this morning. You could always cite what you are talking about like have or rightfully be ignored.
    3
  3344.  @52flyingbicycles  That's not how it works.
    3
  3345. Let's say that he is a loser (even thou he isn't). What does that make you?
    3
  3346. I'm only here to call kyle a fraud and give him a thumbs down.
    3
  3347.  @Ocasio-CortezPrez  "Trump was trying to de-escalate and eventually get out of the middle East all together" LMFAO. He was trying to this the same way dems were trying to do this... he wasn't. He was commander in chief. Stop making excuses for his failures.
    3
  3348. Yang is a conman and liar.
    3
  3349.  @plotlinevideo3719  Any sort of progressive when asked how would you pay for UBI would give you some kind of answer akin to "rich people will pay for it." Not yang. When asked how are you going to pay for UBI the first thing yang thinks of is "500 billion dollars per year on income support" that he is going to gut. "Andrew Yang: Paying for a Universal Basic Income" at about 1:25.
    3
  3350.  @signalfire6  "And you're a troll, right? Since you seem the feel its necessary to constantly comment on these sites." I'm just a person that can't stand your conman. Are you paid to be here? Talking to yanggang reminds me of talking to hillarys correct the record trolls back in the day. You are all just as empty.
    3
  3351.  @signalfire6  You are also busy spreading lies just like hillary CTR would. Like how yang didn't lie about m4a while running for potus. Sorry but he did. The truth is what it is no matter how much you lie about it.
    3
  3352.  @gerardvriend729  LMFAO. I'll assume you are being paid for this shit. Not that it really matters.
    3
  3353.  @holdenbrooksweaver  Why do I feel like you are paid to be here?
    3
  3354. I can't. I had no blackness to lose.
    3
  3355.  @1stb1  I have the internet ya know if I cared. It sounded like ignorance was bliss. Sounds like I was right about that.
    3
  3356.  @nnenne4  "much nicer than neera" That's like being much nicer than cancer.
    3
  3357. I'm going to use my parachute pants.
    3
  3358. "This is just God's way of telling us to vote orange." Some republican, probably.
    3
  3359.  @twoshedsjohnson8540  Regarding, "You missed my last point...raising prices." Nice of you to admit that all you care about is your self interest and greed. You may as well advocate for slave labor so you can get all your crap as cheap as possible.
    3
  3360. Kinda feels like are we not going to vote on neera and I suspect it has to do with bernie not voting for her. In other words are you sure he doesn't affect the outcome ever?
    3
  3361. Technically you are correct. I also don't "know" if unicorns and leprechauns exist either. That said there is no good reason to believe any of those things exist.
    3
  3362. LMFAO. The only thing unacceptable is ana's attempt to blackmail jimmy but kyle doesn't talk about it like he should.
    3
  3363.  @robertanderson6929  Just typing "TRUTH" in all cap doesn't change the fact that all you have is gaslighting with terrible talking points straight from the aipac script.
    3
  3364.  @robertanderson6929  Israel is committing jenny side. And you are complicit.
    3
  3365.  @robertanderson6929  "truth of what I wrote" You don't have "truth." You have gaslighting with aipac talking points. We are too familiar with the script to take is seriously. We see you for what you are.
    3
  3366.  @robertanderson6929  Israel just bombed another child. And you are complicit.
    3
  3367.  @robertanderson6929  History will remember you the way it remembers those who supported the notseas (sic).
    3
  3368.  @pimaldaumen7209  "Are you going to post that under every video?" You can expect it for at least a little bit. It's my "the more you know" message. "Didn't you post something like "I am leaving this Channel" last time?" I was talking about watching their BS. I am going to call them out for being the frauds they are for a little while.
    3
  3369. Vote Sanders and save yourself from the political theater.
    3
  3370.  @snapgrouch702  In your very first comment you accuse the hill of lying. You still have to offer a single lie even while being pressed. Not that I care about whatever you might source. Literally everything you spew is terrible.
    3
  3371. I am pretty sure he realizes the establishment isn't going to be persuaded. He isn't doing it to convince them. He is doing it because then they look bad when they don't do it and people need to realize that they are bad.
    3
  3372. Satwa regarding, "and racist." Obviously. I just thought that it was too obvious to mention along with the fact that Brazile is a Russian operative.
    3
  3373. I can't tell the difference between him and corporate dems when it comes to voting.
    3
  3374. Eco regarding, "let Hillary run against Trump" Despite all their shenanigans she would never win the primary.
    3
  3375. Regarding, "This year I'm plugging my nose and voting Joe. I'm done with the Dem party tho." And this gets some instant thumbs up as if it's not stupid beyond words? Idiocracy is real.
    3
  3376. The rich have gotten richer.... so not everyone's plans have been ruined.
    3
  3377. "Why exactly should Ukraine cede any of it's territory to Russia in exchange for them to stop their aggression against them?" You answered you own asinine question... to stop their aggression against them.
    3
  3378.  @nickolassmith473  I don't think Warren and Trump are the same but I'm not voting for anyone taking dirty money in the general and I don't give a shit about your voting shaming bullshit. Go fuck yourself.
    3
  3379.  @nickolassmith473  I think people should vote for Bernie BECAUSE OF POLICY... not because of a D next to his name. In short you are using the word hypocrite wrong and are a complete idiot.
    3
  3380.  @chadsimmons4496  while you have a point the problem has been getting far, far worse as of late with the consolidation of the media in the hands of only a very few.
    3
  3381. @Russo2 You sound fun at parties.
    3
  3382.  @TheRatsintheWalls  I can't stand him. He lied about m4a while running for potus. His UBI plan is as regressive as he can make it and more.
    3
  3383.  Cliff M  That's blasphemy. It's fettuccini and garlic toast. This means war.
    3
  3384. He has some charisma but he is nothing compared to Obama when it comes to that. The fact of the matter is that Sanders is loved not because he is a greater speaker but because he has a winning message and we know he means what he says because he has been saying it his entire life.
    3
  3385.  @galactick3816  You must be sexist if you are supporting gay jew bernie or you would be supportering a woman. /s
    3
  3386. Meanwhile, in reality, I will never vote for Biden.
    3
  3387. Because all the true progressives are busy fighting for Bernie like they should be.
    3
  3388. Khashon, I just think the appropriate place for Hillary Clinton's words are between my buttcheeks soaking up poo.
    3
  3389.  @penpenultra  Regarding, "Excuse me for assuming you want people to abstain from the system by voting third party." Your assumption isn't the problem. It's your regurgitation of propaganda that makes it seems as if you only have two options of a giant douche or turd sandwich and that's it. Regarding, "The reality of the situation is that voting third party will help nobody but you, and not in any meaningful way." There you go again being a tool. Regarding, "You'll feel better, sure. But you will accomplish nothing; not in this election cycle anyway." Not in this election cycle anyway. Wait... do you mean to tell me that you understand that this might have influence beyond this election while you pretend it can't possibly be of any value at the same time? Sounds about right. You do not seem intellectually honest at all and find myself doubting that you voted 3rd party in 2016. I hope I'm wrong about that. Regarding, "You make the argument that a Trump presidency would in some way drive the people to move left." And not in some sort of nonsensical way. Regarding, "I would argue the opposite." In a nonsensical way. Regarding, "The overton window was very clearly shifted right since his arrival in office." Meanwhile, in reality, progressive issues such as M4A, criminal justice reform, and more are growing in popularity DURING trumps presidency. Regarding, "he ultimately gave way for people like Bernie" Obama's failure gave us Trump. You don't elect an orange clown if you are happy with things. Bernie was always there. Giving Obama credit for him is asinine. I'm having an impossible time taking you seriously.
    3
  3390.  @FazeParticles  Imagine thinking the good thing is people suffering. GFY
    3
  3391. Do yourself a favor and read this so that you might avoid making an ass of yourself in the future when you open your mouth. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legislative_session
    3
  3392.  Paco Rodriguez  I honestly don't give a flying fuck what a fucking moron like you thinks and I have better things to do with my time then to tell you all the ways you are stupid as fuck. Even if I did I have no good reason I think you can understand intelligent argument.
    3
  3393.  @melaniel.s8990  He's already told you he's backing joe. And no doubt you will.
    3
  3394.  Ahmad Hijaz  I'm not going to lie being called a "bot" by a "person" who only says one word at a time is pretty funny.
    3
  3395. You sound like you are talking about sam and his cult. Sam would tell you to vote for donald trump he were representing his team.
    3
  3396.  @ssllsg9439  TYT has smeared assange repeatedly and justified his imprisonment. Are you being intentionally obtuse?
    3
  3397. The same way all the other countries do it. Or are you just dumbfounded how Canada does it while they do it?
    3
  3398.  @bryanjs4785  Regarding, "got anything to back up your claim?" You mean like you didn't do?
    3
  3399. And what exactly isn't "fake news" to you? Fox news? Alex Jones?
    3
  3400. If you had actual examples of strawmanning I suspect you would have been more specific instead of incredibly vague.
    3
  3401.  @LBizKid04  regarding, "fabrics" I concede this might be a strawman argument. I've already said I am no expect on the topic and that I really don't care about fabrics. Regarding, "Jesus's story being copied from the past." Let's say I concede Kyle was wrong about this. It still wouldn't be a strawman argument. Regarding, "It's extremely funny that you are deciding to pick and choose which parts of the Bible you get to decide are "important" or not" Only a cultist would think this is "extremely funny." We are talking about your holy book. The divine word of god according to you cultists. It's not my book. I do get to pick and choose what is important to me. You don't get to just dismiss blatant immorality when it comes to this anymore then you get to pick and chose things about Hitler to discuss. Can you imagine if this were about him and you wanted to talk about how he tried to give people health care and was a painter? And I'm like hey... remember the genocide. And then you are like... It's extremely funny that you are deciding to pick and choose which parts of Hitler's life you get to decide are "important" or not." Yeah motherfucker.... GENOCIDE = IMPORTANT. FABRICS = TRIVIAL. Do the world a favor and stop being willfully retarded. Regarding, "Slavery...let's be specific here, what's your (specific) contention with slavery being mentioned in the Bible?" I can't imagine how anyone would be able ask this question and be ashamed of themselves. A holy book worthy of respect would say in no uncertain terms that slavery is abhorrent, wrong, and immoral. The bible on the other hand is fine with it... as long as you do it right by them. But I'm done with this after this. I just don't care about the stupid rationalizations you have for your book of bullshit and have zero hope that anything I'm going to say will help you open your eyes. Your cult has them sealed shut.
    3
  3402. I gave you a thumbs up because he should. That said you probably don't deserve it because he certainly won't.
    3
  3403. HAHAHA. No.
    3
  3404. Because people like you don't hold him to account when his actions don't match those words. So he's able to get away with it when all those words turn out to be empty.
    3
  3405.  @thecryinglennyface166  regarding, "I actually agree" Then you probably shouldn't be questioning me like you don't. Regarding, "was just saying your attitude isn’t helping anything" No you weren't. That wasn't what you said at all. Regarding, "I see someone as your self so close minded." And you are basing this off of one comment? That seems close minded of you in my opinion. Regarding, "Open minded individuals don’t need rhetoric to proven there point bc they have such a solid argument." I'm not trying to debate the paid troll. My time is valuable to me and I only reserve honest debate (like I think I'm doing with you) for people that I consider to be honest actors and genuine. I don't waste in on disingenuous pieces of shit. But the fact of the matter is that sometimes I want to tell pieces of shit what I think of them. And I want to put up a warning label around them so that people don't bother wasting their precious time wasting intelligent arguments on people who are being paid to ignore intelligent arguments. Because ultimately what anyone says to the paid troll has no effect. You can't convince someone of something when they are being paid to think otherwise. You would be correct to think that what I was doing is terrible "debating." But that wasn't what I was trying to do.
    3
  3406. IDF = terrorists
    3
  3407.  @Nerwesta  To be clear my previous responses to you were not serious. Don't get me wrong I'm not for killing sharks... it's just that I feel like there are far bigger problems and I'm not going to single out sharks for saving in a world where some species are going extinct.
    3
  3408. Hopefully your newer fans will start giving this video the views it deserves. Great work.
    3
  3409.  @Thezuule1  "2 independents" LMFAO Wow. Your intellectual dishonesty is boundless. "You're not entitled to your own facts." At least you seem to have conceded the fact that they only need 50 and are done with the other lie.
    3
  3410. We already know he wants to gut it to pay for UBI.
    3
  3411. If he does that and Trump wins then he is effectively blamed for Trump. It is better that Hillary be blamed for her loss (despite all her efforts to place the blame elsewhere).
    3
  3412. It only sounds like that to you because you are not smart.
    3
  3413. While imaginepeace is telling us to be scared of Bernie Sanders and he is using establishment talking points to make him look bad. He is the establishment sheep herder.
    3
  3414. I'll bet his legs aren't even that hairy.
    3
  3415. I can't say for sure because I'm happily done with the corporate media but I think I can safely assume this will NEVER be covered by them. And if they do cover it they will try to polish this turd and act as if this is ok.
    3
  3416. I am about 99 percent sure she loves things in her ass.
    3
  3417.  @amrs6713  "How does that work?" Do you really not understand how blackmail works? It's really not that complicated. "I know someone is going to blackmail me, so I go public with the subject of my blackmail and expose it with half a grin on my face?" The blackmailer isn't very smart. Because they literally gave you evidence that they are trying to blackmail you it makes perfect sense to try and bring their wrongdoing to light. "My audience seems to believe it's fine" I appreciate and enjoy a blackmailer being exposed for their wrongdoing. You seem to think blackmail is fine. It's weird. "the person trying to blackmail me has no real power over me" Only because they are bad at blackmail. But they are still a person trying to blackmail even if incompetently so. "if it's a blackmail, it's a pretty lousy one." You got one thing right.
    3
  3418.  @amrs6713  "Jimmy's the one who came out with the story" Would it make more sense if ana came out about her own blackmail? Or that the person being blackmailed would more likely bring it up assuming the blackmailer doesn't have something good on them. "it's drama" LMFAO It's not drama. It was attempted blackmail. "more effective?" If someone is trying to blackmail you you pretty much have two reasonable options. Cave to the blackmailer or expose the blackmailer. "he likes what he did" He should. He exposed a person trying to commit blackmail. "he didn't really feel that threatened." I again agree with you. It was lousy blackmail. We have gone over this. That doesn't mean ana's behavior should have just been ignore or some BS like you would lead everyone to believe. "two opposing sides" In on the side of blackmail is wrong. What side are you on?
    3
  3419.  @amrs6713  "we agree on that" Do we? Let's see. What EXACTLY is the threat? I ask because I can't even imagine how you can you explain her actions as a threat and not as blackmail... like how would that even add up in your mind? "I don't understand what bothers you here." It seems like you are deflecting from the fact that it's blackmail to make it seem like it's something else. "a threat is one thing, blackmail is another." I feel like the only distinction between a threat and blackmail is if you are giving the other person an "out" to your threat. Threat: I'm going to kick your ass. Blackmail: I'm going to kick your ass unless you do what I want. Well not only does ana threaten jimmy like you concede but she also tells jimmy exactly what she wants and what would stop her threat from seeing the light of day. "now I'm going to tell on you." She been covering for an alleged sexual predator for years. It only makes logical sense that she would give him a heads up before finally turning him in. Oh wait... it doesn't make sense. What does make sense? Blackmail.
    3
  3420.  @amrs6713  "Where?" In her blackmail letter with the words, "run your mouth" "How?" Words. "no conditionality to it." Of course there is. She tells you that is why literally the only reason she is doing this and that's it's not because of being a predator. If she were about being a predator she would have outed him long ago. It's not like there is new info about being a predator. The condition that's changing is dore calling out TYT and she wants it to stop. "Dore... a sexual predator" Of course he's not. Neither does ana or even if she wouldn't have outed jimmy she sure AF wouldn't enable him and have him back on the show. "the focus of the debate would be something else entirely" I mean it's rightfully focused on ana's blackmail when people like you aren't trying to make it into something else.
    3
  3421.  @roguetwo5903  regarding, "vault of lines" Otherwise known as "the best words." Regarding, "his tiny brain." It's perfectly proportionate to his tiny hands.
    3
  3422. Fun fact: this channel is affiliated with TYT not that kyle will ever mention it.
    3
  3423. And their credibility.
    3
  3424. Regarding, "you have to consider these identity groups because it matters to a considerable number of voters." Let's agree to disagree about this because I don't and won't. If I did I very well might not support Sanders because he is an old white guy. I do because first and foremost I care about policy and ethics and refuse to pander to illogical thinking.
    3
  3425.  @CheekyClapper  This guy is not the enemy. He was just wrong. We need to remember that. Back to jimmy live right now...
    3
  3426. Shawn regarding, "Wasn't it California that decided to stop doing exit polls" All of the states I listed were early in the primary. The reason later states are not mentioned are because they stopped taking exit polling data when it was showing a clear and consistent pattern of foul play. That only makes logical sense if you are trying to bury the crime.
    3
  3427.  @appetiteee5605  "Im unaware of when, where, and how he voted in lockstep with corporate dems." Not once has bernie voted against the corporate dems agenda and opposed biden since he became president. Not once.
    3
  3428.  @cesargomez8887  "a republican" Huh? Why are republicans stopping you from doing anything? "I might take you up on that Clint" What exactly are you referring to? Voting for good? So you are going to keep finding excuses and rationalizations to vote for evil? Of course you will. And with bernie's help.
    3
  3429. Warren is going to run against Sanders just to try and siphon votes away from him during the primary. Or at least that is what I think. Hopefully I'm wrong. Either way her voting for the 700 billion dollar per year budget for the department of offense is something I'll never forgive or forget.
    3
  3430.  @thudthud5423  what a waste of a perfectly good explanation. I am awed at your patience trying to educate the neanderthal.
    3
  3431. How does Maddow come to work anymore?
    3
  3432.  @Solmangrundy  Do you always bootlick for billionaires using your tax dollars to make themselves rich like this? You are not a serious person.
    3
  3433.  @pcprincipal9517  "That is one of the saddest things I have ever heard." Did you hear the one about how 20 million dollars to TYT doesn't corrupt them as told by kyle?
    3
  3434. I'd vote for your grandma before I'd vote for biden.
    3
  3435. Regarding, "you just did waste your time." Yes I did... for saying anything other than calling you names. Regarding, "address what I say or I will just pass you off as another ignorant ultra leftist that has no clue what they are talking about." Ok. I'm fine with that. I could not give less shits what you think about me or anything at all. If you are sincere about the things you say you are one of the dumbest human beings on the planet and you make me ashamed to be of the same species as you.
    3
  3436.  @wavegodrobsanders539  Huh? So it's not enough that his policies like criminal justice reform and legalizing weed, capping loan sharks interest rates, providing health care, providing education and more disproportionately helping minorities isn't enough? You require policies that ONLY help minorities? That seems remarkably shortsighted and idiotic.
    3
  3437. 0. His racist policies are more than enough already.
    3
  3438. She tells you exactly what she wants. She wants him to stop 'running his mouth' and makes it perfectly clear it has nothing to do with him being a predator. It's obviously a terrible blackmail attempt.
    3
  3439. She saved NY billions of dollars earmarked directly to Jeff Bezos.
    3
  3440. Um... nope. He is currently the most popular politician in the country for good reason.
    3
  3441. Biden has always been evil but at least back then he was coherent.
    3
  3442. So this is what you are doing instead of fighting for m4a? You suck.
    3
  3443. Andre regarding, "i wish this would happen, but it will never happen" I think you are very wrong. I think Sanders winning in 2020 is inevitable as long as he is healthy. Of course the DNC and the establishment are going to do everything they can to stop him but the game has changed and their efforts are going to fail imo. In 2016 Sanders entered the race completely unknown and only "lost" to Hillary because of their shenanigans. Now he has name recognition like no other (which is waaaayyyy more important in our society than it should be) and he is the most popular politician in the country. Please let him stay healthy and he will win.
    3
  3444.  @williamkelly5689  How many wars has the US started?
    3
  3445. Blair regarding, "it's just like those who've experienced PRIVILEGE to try and put down those who haven't as soon as they even appear to be given any." What a pathetic deflection from the issue at hand. Regarding, "Like I said how about focusing on all the GOOD he's done" Why don't you go make that video because I honestly have no fucking idea what you are talking about. Even if I did good things do not make the bad things go away. Regarding, "crying about speeches he's ENTITLED to make as a former president." I wish you could understand how fucking similar you are to Trump supporters. You are all fucking clowns who can excuse anything when your team does it. Regarding, "who only want to hear about how terrible everyone else is." I assure I don't want to hear about this. I would much prefer it if Obama wasn't proving how much of an empty suit he was and wasn't doing this.... but he is so I'm going to call him out for his bullshit because it is fucking bullshit. But if you want to dismiss it by saying it has to do with his skin color you go ahead and act a fool. Regarding, "You know what if YOU have such a problem with it then YOU get off YOUR butt and make the change you want to criticize someone else for not doing while they were busy doing a million other things." Your arguments are so fucking lazy and pathetic. I am wasting my time with you. My dog has a better chance of understanding this.
    3
  3446. Regarding, "people like YOU love to deflect whenever sexism or racism is brought up because..." There is plenty of sexism and racism in this country but it has nothing to do with this and it is fucking pathetic that you say it does. You do the fight against actual sexism and racism in the world a disservice when you do this bullshit and come across as dumb as fuck.
    3
  3447. You know there were other candidates right?
    3
  3448. By making idiotic smears of him you are doing the work of the establishment. They appreciate your stupid shit.
    3
  3449. Regarding, "My kids hate Joe Scarborough" Sounds like you are doing a good job raising them. They sound like smart kids. :)
    3
  3450. Bernie has sold you out. Just accept it.
    3
  3451. Jimmy has products for sale? I had no idea. :) Maybe if they did some advertising or something.
    3
  3452.  @E-damnn  Regarding, "They’ll just blame it on Russia or something." While this is true more people will wake to their rot despite their best efforts to deflect blame. There is a reason I spoke of it as, "some sort of small reckoning." I know they aren't going to go down without a fight. Regarding, "If Biden wins, we can say that “it only took a pandemic, economic depression, and mass unrest and growing racial tensions to get Biden elected” " You can say that all you want but I'm not sure how the country would care. Biden would be in office, things are going to be shit and the left will blamed for the shitshow. Rhetoric doesn't mean much compared to that. Regarding, "promote racial tensions" Few people, if any, are more responsible FOR RACIAL TENSION in america because of his racist crime bill that led to mass incarceration. Regarding, "atleast we’ll get social issues" Let's say I agreed with this, and I don't, at what cost? Trump 2.0 remember? How about you try to convince me biden won't led to trump 2.0. And good luck with that. I have every reason to think that is where this goes.
    3
  3453.  @E-damnn  Regarding, "like trump is going to solve economic issues... lmao" Like anyone here supports trump or is saying anything good about him. LMAO. If you wonder why I find people like you tough to take seriously it's reasons like that.
    3
  3454.  @E-damnn  Regarding, "What? That’s not my point. I was responding to bluebelle51 with that last part." You were strawmanning. No one loves trump. No one is acting like trump is good. But you acting like it which is strawmanning and crazy disingenuous. Regarding, "Their point was that Biden would be apocalyptic" Yeah.. that biden is bad. Regarding, "I responded by saying that trump was MORE apocalyptic" Oh... more apocalyptic? Like degrees matter when that is the topic. It's deflection from the topic at hand and the topic was biden no matter how much you want to make it about trump. Regarding, "their point was invalid." You made Biden being terrible invalid? Really? Well done on magically making biden being terrible unimportant. /s Regarding, "Biden administration would be much better at handling COVID" Meh. If you expect anything other than incompetence from biden you are kidding yourself even if he would likely be better in the more unimportant superficial ways. Regarding, "wouldn’t force the country to re-open while cases are rising" Really? Nothing will fundamentally change biden wouldn't do this? Even if his big money donors that he answers to told him to? Regarding, "You people always assume that I assume that you like trump" You are deflecting by bringing up trump when the topic biden. Just because trump is terrible, which he is, does not make biden better or have anything to do with him really. You need to be able to talk about biden without having to even mention trumps name. It's just like the trump fans who have to mention biden, or hillary, or pelosi to deflect from their clown. In that case it's about trump... not democrats.
    3
  3455. Not even. They could still supplement public health care and get superior "cadillac" type plans if they wanted.
    3
  3456. Calling him a tool is too kind. Tools have legit uses.
    3
  3457. Michelle regarding, "NaNa is full of complete shit" Yup. It doesn't say much for their argument that they need to lie to try to make their case.
    3
  3458. Regarding, "provide me with a link that shows she's taking dirty money." I've been saying this a lot lately. If you want to know who a politician represents follow the money. Politicians represent the people that get them into office and it isn't hard to understand why. Kirsten has gotten 68 percent of her money from big money. https://www.opensecrets.org/members-of-congress/summary?cid=N00027658 Regarding, "You voting for her or supporting her is irrelevant when talking about her potential support if she became President." You think I'm alone in my beliefs? Regarding, "I was stating the obvious, if she had more dems in, it would be easier for her to pass a progressive platform." Only if they are democrats who are interested in passing progressive policies and you are being naive if you think corporate dems are interested in that. Regarding, "when you have more than a hunch about the pandering, let me know." The one thing I learned from being fooled by Obama was follow the money to know who someone actually represents and to know if they are pandering or sincere. Regarding, "walking the walk." I guess we have to agree to disagree about her actually doing this.
    3
  3459. Wow. Just. Wow.
    3
  3460. Luis, he absolutely was a self identified democrat during the time of GWB.
    3
  3461. TYT is corrupt. Because 20 million from team clinton.
    3
  3462. Liz Cheney is Abraham Lincoln in her own mind.
    3
  3463.  @williammason3229  Regarding, "I don't bake" Neither do I. But if you ever find yourself in a place where it's legal and you have access to a dispensary edibles are an option you might want to try. They certainly aren't going to cause your chest to burn the way smoking may. Gummies are a personal favorite of mine. Brownies are often other peoples favorite. Regarding, "doesn't have a strip club anymore" I live in the middle of NOWHERE. Still even I have access to strippers if I wanted. LOL
    3
  3464. She's just another fraud and is arguably worse than the rest of the swamp. At least you understand the others are swamp creatures but you have your pom poms out for her.
    3
  3465.  @willg3717  Please *vote for Bernie.
    3
  3466.  BartJ583  Regarding, "Why does it upset you that Warren voted yes on the military budget?" What an asinine question. The US was already spending as much as the next 9 countries combined. I guess I didn't think spending as much as the next 11 was really necessary. That raise for the department of offense that she voted for was more than enough to pay for Sanders proposal to pay for college for americans. But that plan was deemed "unaffordable" and "pie in the sky" by the corporate media. Why doesn't it upset you that she voted for it is a far better question. Regarding, "Do you understand what a "no" vote would have meant? It would have meant that in the debates, Trump could call her "unpatriotic; not willing to give our soldiers the best equipment they can get."" It was for literally more money than even he wanted. And if you think enabling the MIC because of trump is a good reason to enable the MIC you are lost. Those simply are not progressive values. Regarding, "Remember, most Americans are militaristic." Meanwhile, in reality, we live in a nation with severe war fatigue and a population that is in favor of spending our wealth here as opposed to in foreign nations. Regarding, "This would cost her a lot of votes." Sanders voted against it and he continues to crush trump in every poll. Furthermore I care first and foremost about doing the right thing and so should you. Building bombs to get votes is pretty piss poor "morality." Regarding, "As for taking bribes - i don't give a fuck as long as she doesn't do her donor's bidding." LMFAO. Why would you think she wouldn't do their bidding after taking their money? Do you think the rich and powerful tend to give bribes if they didn't think they were buying something? She is hypocrite. She is campaigning on not taking that money during the primary but she admits that "principle" is only for the primary. Which doesn't really make it a principle now does it. Regarding, "It seems that this does not occur to people like you, that a candidate can accept campaign donations without actually selling out." It seems that this does not occur to people like you, that you have no logical reason to think they aren't selling out when accepting those legalized bribes because ultimately they are legalized bribes. Who you accept this type of "rational" from a trump supporter? Regarding, "As for running against Bernie - she is not." Um... of course she is. She is running against literally everyone. And the same can be said of Bernie. For you to suggest otherwise is crazy. Regarding, "You still haven't tried to find out about these two prior to 2015, have you." Clearly I haven't even thou I cite her being a republican. Do you generally think of progressives as people who were republicans, who enable the MIC and who love legalized bribes? I don't. Regarding, "She was Bernie's workwife in 2013/14." What a meaningless statement and pathetic way to deflect from my substantive objections. Regarding, "Don't get me wrong - I am really glad that so many people who paid zero attention to politics before 2015 are now supporting progressives. But know your place." LMFAO. Your comments are remarkably stupid. It's like you have never paid attention to politics and the only info you get is from the corporate media.
    3
  3467.  BartJ583  https://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-warren-wall-street-respect-20190705-story.html Compared to... https://berniesanders.com/anti-endorsements/ Totally the same am I right? And why is this important? https://dailycaller.com/2019/02/25/elizabeth-warren-no-pac-money-escape/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5tu32CCA_Ig
    3
  3468.  BartJ583  Because being to the right of Trump is real "progressive." https://www.leftvoice.org/Elizabeth-Warren-Votes-for-Massive-Increase-of-War-Budget
    3
  3469.  BartJ583  Regarding, "I don't understand why you are so upset about what I wrote." Because everything you are saying is wrong for one reason or another and like a flat earther you seem to want to make the world as dumb as you are. Regarding, "If you are correct, then it's over. Harris will be #46." Your slide into the absurd continues. Nothing about this statement makes any sense. If I'm correct it's far from over as not a single person has voted and a long war has yet to be fought where progressives would be wise to coalesce around the clear leader of the progressive movement, Bernie Sanders. We live in a world where splitting the vote is a real concern and candidates don't get to pool their voters. We live in a world where if Joe Biden would have run in 2016 it would have been a game changer to the detriment of the establishment but he didn't because although the establishment is corrupt, they aren't stupid. We live in a world where Warren is splitting the progressive vote to the detriment of progressives while you claim she is just as good as Bernie whom she is intentionally fucking over and making it far more likely an establishment clown wins. But that's only if I'm right. And I am while you spout nonsense.
    3
  3470.  @zephyr2278  Yeah. But there are important differences between the two you are ignoring and Trump only proves my point that a businessman with no political experience is a really dumb idea.
    3
  3471.  BartJ583  Regarding, "Those are your words. And if you are right about this, then Bernie cannot win anymore. Your entire last post makes no sense." Tell you what, just focus on that on part where I use the word detriment and not destruction, ignore the part where I point out that no one has voted yet, attribute a conclusion that I don't agree with in the least, and illogically conclude for terrible reasons that my post makes no sense for all I care at this point. I can't make you smarter than you are.
    3
  3472.  BartJ583  I'm not going to lie hearing you say "welcome to reality" to me is quite funny really so thank you for that. But I'm way done addressing you at this point. Just the time spent to scroll down over a 100 comments to hear what you have to say is not worth it. I'll just assume that anything you have to say will be just as idiotic as everything you have said up until now.
    3
  3473. Man does your comment really suck.
    3
  3474. Calls Tulsi a centrist and fake progressive then props up Warren. Too fucking funny.
    3
  3475. @ Now you know that I smoke weed because someone else's grandma had syphilis. Hopefully everyone can stop asking now.
    3
  3476. I feel that way about your take... it was disgusting to listen to. Fuck you for the time I wasted reading it. Feel free to fuck off.
    3
  3477.  @sebozon1769  While there is an argument to made that this would be a good thing ultimately it isn't practical in this world. A world where anything can be weaponized and used against a candidate. Especially in a world where US (I'm speaking of this from a US perspective) citizens are not well known for their worldwide knowledge and such an endorsement could easily be used to manipulate low information voters. Think for a second why candidates only announce a running mate until AFTER getting the nomination. They do it that way because they know that no matter who they pick that pick will be tried to be used against them so why bother with a headache you don't need and give the other side ammo you don't have to give them? This type of endorsement would seem very similar to me. A headache you don't want or need for rather limited gains IMO.
    3
  3478.  El Draco  Regarding, "the good doctor was trying to make sure the few available masks were not taken by non medical people." The "good" doctor was a liar who has done nothing but erode public trust. Why should we believe anything the "good" doctor has to say after he proves he is a liar? Regarding, "If the Orange Traitor..." Trump is a clown but this isn't about him no matter how much you would like to make it about him. It's about fauci. It's about his lies. When we are talking about trump and his lies do you start talking about fauci? As if that makes any sense? Because that's what you are doing here.
    3
  3479. Medhurst, greenwald, bad faith, the takeover with justin jackson (probably won't have much during football), robert inlakesh, the vanguard, the greyzone and rachel maddow (JK).
    3
  3480. Shadow regarding, "I like the part where..." Of course there is something that you can point to that Trump said about something and agree with because Trump would say anything and everything that he thought people would want to hear. He could say something and then contradict himself in the same fucking sentence. That isn't good campaigning, that this mindless, meaningless pandering. Regarding, "I'll take an anti-war." Yeah. I love and want candidates who are anti-war too but, again, we are talking about the guy who said and campaigned on, "WE HAVE TO TAKE OUT THEIR FAMILIES." That is a fucking war crime. So I'm not sure exactly why you or anyone could think the guy saying this was "anti-war."
    3
  3481. Shadow regarding, "You hate the consequence, when you should be hating the 'FACTORS'" I hate both and that is what everyone should be doing. Just because Trump is a result of a corrupt system and corrupt parties doesn't mean he should be given a pass for sucking and when you say something like this it only serves to excuse him and his behavior. Regarding, "Voting for third party doesn't sound like a sound strategy as that would only have added chance for victory for the "you know who witch". " I happily voted for Jill Stein in a swing state because she was the only candidate running that I actually wanted to win. But way to go with your bullshit "logic." That is the same bullshit Hillary supporters used to support that piece of shit. Regarding, "that was what was available for the people to deal a blow against the permanent state." I really wish you were able to see how obviously flawed this "logic" is. Voting for Trump wasn't a "blow against the permanent state." That was vote for it... just like voting for Hillary.
    3
  3482. Meh, he's not immoral, he's brainwashed by corporate media.
    3
  3483.  @ninjanik3  Bernie Sanders 2020 for real change... not bandaids. Peace.
    3
  3484.  @Forthepeoplepodcast305  Regarding, " I said that she’s the only one other than Bernie that’s supported it her entire career." Meanwhile, in reality, the first thing you wrote was, "Tulsi is the only one in the race who has unequivocally supported M4All her entire career." Bernie is absent from this statement. Because reality.
    3
  3485. Are we suppose to care about who putin "respects." If anything something like that would make me like someone less.
    3
  3486. Kyle is a fraud and free assange.
    3
  3487.  @pranoychow3808  He already told everyone they could fuck off in the video.
    3
  3488.  @chrisbeeken  Both parties are dumpster fires, neither are worthy of support, and I don't really care which one you think is worse. Those are unimportant details.
    3
  3489. This is Trumps idea of MAGA. And the trumptards are fine with it cause it triggers the sane.
    3
  3490. You are placated by crumbs.
    3
  3491. Meh. While that would have been better than this shit take he absolutely should talk about, for example, the blackmail.
    3
  3492. They are smart enough to know that you need to sprinkle in some truth or you will never buy their BS. Controlled opposition has to pretend to be on your side at least some of the time.
    3
  3493.  @falloutboy691  They are sheepherders leading you to slaughter. Those people you listed, that you KNOW are corrupt. They are people sam will tell you to vote for in general elections. But I'm the one that should be quiet? I'm the one who doesn't know what they do?
    3
  3494.  @danbridges4755  " I never said China was the only country being bombarded by propoganda." Thanks fuckface. I never said you did. "There's plenty of propoganda in the US, obviously." Yeah. You are soaking it up here. "MR is very critical of Democrats too" Controlled opposition has to at least pretend to be on your side or you wouldn't buy their BS. MR is never critical of dems when it matters most... your votes. At the end of the day they will tell you to vote blue no matter who because that's their job... to sheepherd you into a corrupt party. MR will virtue signal and tell you how mad joe manchin makes them but the only thing they really care about is he's representing their team or not. They will tell you to vote for manchin EVERY time he represents the blue cult in a general. The day they stop doing that is the day he switches to the red team and not one day sooner.
    3
  3495. Regarding, "America has more than 320 million people. No country with more than 300 million people has universal healthcare. None." The number of people in a country is irrelevant. The fact that America has 320 million people means that there are 320 million people to help pay for it. Regarding, "When it comes to medical innovation, the United States is the world leader." There is nothing about health care being privatized that has anything to do with this. American can still innovate medicine and provide it to everyone at the same time. Regarding, "with 57 percent of that coming from private industry." That private industry is profiting BILLIONS, every year, off of sick people. So what that they paid for some of this. People are still going to try and take care of the sick, as they should even without a for profit health industry that gouges us and whose sole purpose is to make money, not care for the sick. Regarding, " I do believe we have to find a way to get affordable healthcare to every single American." I don't even know what to say about this. I find this hard to believe since you seem to think, at the same time, that doing so is the devil.
    3
  3496. Adkins regarding, "You didn't explain anything new." No. I didn't. I never said I did. That is why I think you are fucking moron working against progress and I have little tolerance for you. Regarding, "To cure homelessness... (stupid point)... Do you think this is a good idea?" No. How about you try to stay on point instead of trying to change the conversation. Regarding, "the government would seek to limit spending by forcing down payments to doctors and pharmaceutical companies" You are quick to point out your hypothetical point seem oblivious to the actual fact that private health care industries sole purpose is to make money. That isn't hypothetical like your BS talking point. A good government... like the type I want and would work for would be willing to pay health care industry providers what they are worth. They just wouldn't be willing to gouge the public the way the Martin Shreli's of the world are currently allowed to. Regarding, "while scrutinizing treatments for cost-effectiveness." Yeah... like that isn't currently happening with the for profit private health industry. So your argument to not progress is because of something that ALREADY FUCKING HAPPENS might happen. Regarding, "profit motives always lead to bigger cost effectiveness and control." Except this is complete bullshit because of facts. Americans pay far more for health care than anyone else in the world and it isn't even fucking close. Are you intentionally lying or just stupid? Regarding, "There will be no patient flexibility" Patient flexibility? Are you kidding? I talk about millions uninsured. I talk about the fact that costs are out of control. I talk about results that are not as good as the rest of the world and you are talking about flexibility whatever the fuck that is suppose to mean. What? The flexibility to die if I get sick? The flexibility to go bankrupt if I get sick? Sane people don't give a fuck about this. If you are worried the government is going to be picking your doctor for you or some bullshit then I don't really know what to say other than the fact of the I currently can only go to a certain number of doctors. I can't, under my current insurance plan, go out of network. So, again, you are scared of shit that is already going on. Regarding, "We have to fix the healthcare system but the evidence is clear govt run healthcare is not the perfect answer." There is no perfect answer and I'm not interested in waiting for one because it will never happen. The fact of the matter is that single payer is better than what we have because of the easily provable facts I've already mentioned (number insured, cost, outcomes). Regarding, "You guys are hell bent on turning this country into a socialist paradise." Just generalized bullshit smear. I am talking about one specific issue.... health care. I even said that capitalism is just fine for most everything. But there are exceptions and, again, sick people is one of them. Only soulless fucks and brainwashed morons think getting rich off of sick people is moral and acceptable. But I guess I just think it would be a "socialist paradise" if we made a commitment to treat the sick without bankrupting millions, ignoring millions, and letting some get rich off of a BS provably shit system that is failing despite your obliviousness to it. Regarding all of your bullshit misplaced nationalism. Just because the USA does it doesn't mean it is good. "What have they achieved?.Have these countries contributed anything to mankind?" No. Nothing. The rest of the world is worthless and only the USA has done anything even though the USA is only about 400 years old. Regarding, "A space research?" Do you really think only the USA researches space? Regarding, "world's best schools." As is the case with us you get the best of the best when you are rich. But I dare you to do a quick google search of something like how does the us education compare with the rest of the world. You might be surprised at what you learn. Regarding, "I am trying to find if anything good about these nations.I couldn't." How about I give you one thing that is specific to what we are talking about.... THEY PROVIDE HEALTH INSURANCE TO THEIR PEOPLE WHILE WE LET MILLIONS GO WITHOUT INSURANCE.
    3
  3497. Adkins you are fucking hopeless. It only sucks that you are helping hold the country back from progress.
    3
  3498. Well said as always.
    3
  3499. Oliver sucks but it would have made more sense than endorsing trump.
    3
  3500.  @wasteddude  "If people unsubscribe for being snowflakes that's on them." Good thing I'm unsubscribing because kyle demonstrated he has no integrity. "stupid drama." I can't imagine being so dense I'd call blackmail and smears "stupid drama."
    3
  3501. "Both are losing followers." I can only think you are intentionally lying which makes sense for people watching sedar.
    3
  3502. This is the internet version of mainstream corporate media.
    3
  3503. Why would anyone still be subscribed to this channel? I almost wish I was subscribed just so that I could unsub.
    3
  3504. She was just explaining to him that she was going to call him a sexual predator even though she admits it has nothing to do with predatory behavior and actually has everything to do with running his mouth. "explaining what she is going to do." Except she never did what she was threatening. She was giving him a chance to be blackmailed. And instead he outed her. "no negotiating you morons" No shit sherlock. She just made her demand that he be quiet or she would make good on her threat.
    3
  3505. Regarding, "a job in congress is nothing compared to the private sector?" Clearly you feel very strongly about this. I can tell because it is in bold. But the fact of the matter is that it isn't about their job in congress. It is about the revolving door. You seem to kind of understand this when you say, "any Dem, in any seat, could quit and become a lobbyist." as if they don't when they leave their job. As if they are not a bunch of fucking sellouts. As if they are doing it out of the goodness of their heart. As if congresspeople are struggling are not rich as fuck. As if the Clinton's didn't leave office dirt poor after paying for Bill's lawyers and proceed to get rich as fuck doing what exactly? Regarding, "The kids..." Sweet condescension. Regarding, "There's a reason holding office is referred to as "public service."" There is a reason our "public servants" are all rich as fuck.
    3
  3506. Regarding, "You don't seem to have grasped anything I said." What a lazy and pathetic way to not address my points. Regarding, "Bye now." That works for me. I wasn't under the impression this was going to be a good place for intelligent conversation but I thought it important to state the obvious reasons why your words were just a bunch of polished bullshit.
    3
  3507.  @xSayPleasex  Regarding, "stacking courts... by Republicans?" Refusing to vote on an obama nominee using the same "logic" they ignore for a trump nominee is accurately called court stacking.
    3
  3508. They also have a serious lack of empathy for any suffering that does not affect them. You shouldn't need to, for example, be tortured like John McCain to understand that torture is bad. Sadly it seems that is what it takes for these people. And yes them selling their souls doesn't help as well.
    3
  3509.  @eleksitia  regarding, "It will be harmed." If that is the case, and there will be examples of this even if there will be far, far, far more examples of small businesses benefiting from an increased minimum wage for the reasons I've given, then so be it. This was the same argument used to justify keeping slavery around back in the day. I wouldn't have found this argument compelling back then and I don't find it compelling now coming from you. Like I've already said, any business that can't afford to pay it's employees enough to live on is a business that shouldn't exist. Period. I don't care how big your business is. I don't care if you are just opening the doors. You either have a business and a plan that involves paying your employees enough to live on or you don't. And if you don't then you shouldn't be in business. I'm not going to let you use employees getting paid dirt wages to prop up your business anymore then I'm going to let you use slaves to do it.
    3
  3510. And his failure to cover the OPCW whistle blowers.
    3
  3511.  @stickemuppunkitsthefunlovi4733  Yeah... I don't know about them... that's why I'm bringing them up... and that makes sense to you? You must be on their payroll just like fetterman here.
    3
  3512. You can't see how long the videos are before clicking on them? That's what I do.
    3
  3513.  @havable  More importantly they were successful in cockblocking Sanders from getting the momentum he deserved.
    3
  3514. I remember the good old days when people used the word sellout correctly. It doesn't mean "they did something I disagree agree with" like some seem to think.
    3
  3515.  @snapgrouch702  And there were plenty of republicans who were on the record saying they would support it. Dems didn't even try. Not that you care. You are just like trump supporters. It doesn't matter what your team and cult is doing. You will make excuses and rationalizations for them regardless of how terrible they are and how indefensible their actions are.
    3
  3516. It isn't about passing policy right now. It is about forcing politicians to take a position on the record. Just because many of them are signing on doesn't mean I believe them. Still we can all know for sure who doesn't and target most of the mud on them. I get it that you don't believe many of them actually support it. I agree. But this isn't the time to target them. Do that when they are on the wrong side of an issue. It happens plenty enough.
    3
  3517. @Dileon Regarding, "What evidence do you have that Cops themselves act as individuals in a way that targets marginalized communities?" Despite using at a slightly lower rate blacks are about 4 times more likely to be charged with MJ. Or maybe check out who stop and frisk was used on in NY. Then again... yeah, no evidence cops target minorities and marginalized communities. /s Regarding, "Lol, if you can’t see how decent individuals can’t contribute to institutions than you really don’t care about getting policy correct." LOL. If you don't understand that I never said anything close to, "decent individuals can’t contribute to institutions" then you don't really seem like a person to be taken seriously. Cool strawman though.
    3
  3518. @Dileon In the age of information ignorance is a choice. https://www.nydailynews.com/news/crime/nypd-targets-minorities-stop-frisk-report-article-1.1075037
    3
  3519. It's still on her website that she won't take pac money. You would think she would at least have the decency to take down the lie.
    3
  3520. I wouldn't put it past her to put them on and have them conclude that Biden is telling the truth for convoluted terrible reasons.
    3
  3521. @Derya Alkan Cool story bitch. How about an answer to my question.
    3
  3522. @Derya Alkan Nah. Tell you what. You can go fuck yourself. My time is better spent not talking to moronic hypocrites anyways. You fucking off is doing me a favor so thanks for that.
    3
  3523. That's ok John. Some things are worth repeating.
    3
  3524. Even if they did you would still find stupid things to bitch about.
    3
  3525. @M R I don't care if you insist. You are just making shit up. If the OP wanted to claim it was "equal" they could do that easily enough. But they didn't. And if anyone is implying shit it's you. You are implying that what the corporate media on the left does is fine because it isn't as bad as what the right does. You are making excuses for the inexcusable... cause it's not as bad.
    3
  3526. Wisdom
    3
  3527. Regarding, "hasn't deserted the totally corrupt Democratic Party." Nobody on the planet has done more to expose the rot in the party than Sanders. Nobody offers the opportunity to reform the party and make them not suck going forward like Sanders. But you keep smearing the best hope we have for progressive policy going forward. The establishment appreciates you doing their work for them.
    3
  3528. Still leaving your bullshit up. Why am I suppose to be ok with that? Why shouldn't I take offense to that? You are actively and, I can only assume, intentionally trying to lie to people.
    3
  3529. People who can't spell tend to have the dumbest opinions.
    3
  3530. A crumbling empire.
    3
  3531. No it isn't. It is the exact same as voting no.
    3
  3532. I'd be quick to try and point out that what kind of network would have someone saying that on. Not that I think it would help... but I'd try.
    3
  3533.  @goldbrick2563  A real revolutionary would run 3rd party.
    3
  3534.  @tommyob4762  Regarding, "It will only split the votes." We are suppose to have a split vote. Instead we have 2 parties that both represent things like war and corporate interests. We need to have at least one party that represents the people and clearly we do not. "Focus on getting rid of the Republican party first" LMFAO. I've never been a republican or voted for a republican in my entire life. Why should I care so much about what is going on over there? Like that is suppose to be my area? It's not. I'm not going to pretend like I should have any say in what the right does. I'm on the left. So rightfully that is where my focus is. " then the Dems..." I'd ask how you plan to get rid of the republican party but in all honesty I can't take your BS seriously enough to do that.
    3
  3535.  @tommyob4762  Good luck with your smears calling jimmy "fascist." I hope for your sake you are paid for it. I hope you aren't actually that dense all on your own.
    3
  3536.  @Aj-zr8dz  Speaking of syria and syrians I recommend richard medhurst if you aren't already aware of him. His reporting is spectacular.
    3
  3537. If you ever say something that isn't idiotic I might die of shock.
    3
  3538. If that makes me a chud to you I don't care.
    3
  3539. She is not second best and we are calling her out this very moment.
    3
  3540. Whose to blame for that? In a world where the dems have the presidency, house and senate?
    3
  3541.  @JS-ro2if  I challenge you, and everyone to give me a name of someone who is worse than neera that they might pick and pass.
    3
  3542. Man do I wish youtube would let me give you a thumbs down.
    3
  3543. None. Fortunately it isn't about trust. It is about creating consequences for those opposed enough so that we force them to pass it. It is a litmus test. I'm not going to automatically support someone who says they are for it but I am NOT going to support anyone who openly opposes it. And anyone who flip flops and fucks us over down the road... well that is a quick way to lose your job. Let's just hope that we can get to the point where the K Harris and C Bookers of the world are forced to decide if they want to flip flop or lose their jobs.
    3
  3544.  @eleksitia  regarding, "I will admit that I might have been wrong." This the difference between an honest actor and someone who is disingenuous. Even honest actors can have too hard a time admitting they might be wrong. Being willing to admit being wrong, or even admitting possibly being wrong, takes far more intellectually honesty then just entrenching oneself and doubling down. I appreciate the debate, your respectfulness, and openness to my points. I apologize for being blunt to the point of being rude. I concede I can be a dick.
    3
  3545.  @eleksitia  regarding, "You are a lot nicer than many on the Internet," I can be a real dick, especially with people that I think are being disingenuous and there are lots and lots of paid trolls about that I will straight up go off on. It is frustrating giving someone a perfectly logical argument that is just dismissed because the one hearing it isn't an honest actor. You on the other hand were clearly interested in an honest debate, were open to ideas, and were willing to listen. It is refreshing after dealing with the Marlon White, whyamipink, preposterous, Joe Noyes, and Harry Manns of the world. If you don't know any of those names I envy you and suggest you just ignore them. It's like trying to talk to a wall. Take care.
    3
  3546.  @eleksitia  yeah, he is no communist. He isn't even a socialist in it's truest sense even if he does advocate for certain socialist programs. Like I said I'd be curious to know what you would disagree with him on if you do think of something. It's my experience that pretty much everything he advocates for (policy-wise) are wildly popular with the public in general. And if you don't no big deal.
    3
  3547. Maybe walking and chewing gum at the same time would be better than sacrificing principles like this. In other words what happens on the relief bill is irrelevant to whether or not we should allow illegal war money. Bombs are not a bargaining tool.
    3
  3548. So happy David mentions this at about the 6 minute mark. Imagine if Bernie did this.
    3
  3549.  @anahata3478  Regarding, "Call every leftists who doesn't agree with your strategy a sellout," You are either fighting for m4a or you are sellout. It really is that simple. You can either defend pos politicians or you can fight them. It's also that simple. You choose poorly.
    3
  3550.  @thatindiandude4602  Regarding, "Jimmy Dore will ruin the progressive movement" If you "movement" won't vote on m4a your "movement" is worthless. Regarding, "I mean the conservatives are destroyed" WTF are you talking about? Conservatives are everywhere in positions of power. They are the ones who won't vote for m4a.
    3
  3551. I'd be curious to hear why Trump fans think this deal is significantly better than the deal we had with Iran. (Note, Obama stink is not a legitimate answer.)
    3
  3552. LMFAO. I too should edit my comments. You don't make flat earthers look smart, you make bugs look downright brilliant.
    3
  3553. Regarding, "Knife homicide and knife violence sky rocketed!" Sane people will happily trade gun violence for knife violence. Total fucking morons say what you just did... as always.
    3
  3554. "You aren't being shadow-banned or censored by big tech" This is funny because my first attempt to reply to this was literally shadow banned and censored.
    3
  3555.  TJ B  "shadow bans and censorship" You don't need to separate them as if they are different. Shadow banning is an example of censorship.
    3
  3556. I don't think the politicians would take away what you would want them to... they would think of it as a "how to (be a conman)."
    3
  3557.  @josephheston9238  regarding, "I still get blamed for Gore's loss for voting for Nader." Yeah. So do I. Nevermind the fact that I was living in a state that was decided long before I voted. My vote was totally fucking meaningless that election because I was living in deep blue state that had zero chance of going for Bush. If I lived in a swing state at the time I would have voted for Gore despite whatever you are talking about regarding his wife's war on Rock-N-Roll.
    3
  3558.  @JAMuUP  I agree with everything you said except that I think corporate dems are worse then republicans. They are taking seats that should be ours. They are in a better position to cock-block progressives because they are working in what should be our party. And they happily do it.
    3
  3559. Trey regarding, "We already have gun control laws in the US" Which aren't even remotely close to what the rest of the world has. We don't even have universal background checks for fucks sake. Are you intentionally missing the point or are you really as dense as you seem?
    3
  3560. Trey you lost me at, "I'm not intentionally missing anything nor am I dense." Because it's definitely one or the other. Regarding, "the problem is that it requires a universal gun registry for it to work;" Complete and utter nonsense. I'd elaborate but feel no need. Regarding, "My point is I've bought firearms before and I'm telling you that it's quite a process to do it" Oh... well if you are telling me it is hard I guess I'll just ignore the fact that there are plenty of gun shows in this country where buying a gun is as painless as buying a computer. Regarding, "to hear an uneducated Canadian lecturing me on this is quite grating on my ears." Sorry if you have trouble with facts... facts like the US has a problem with guns to a degree that other countries simply don't have. Here's the fact you fucking moron. There is no comparison between the gun laws in the US and gun laws found in other countries and only a dipshit of epic proportions would try to compare the two.
    3
  3561. Trey regarding, "It's neither of the two" We are just going to have to agree to disagree about this. Regarding, "universal background checks do require a gun registry for it to work." Um... nope. Total bullshit that demonstrates an inability to understand reality. Still so obvious that I feel no need to even bother to offer a logical argument. I'll just let your stupid words speak for themselves. Regarding, "It's worth noting that every single gun show requires background checks from FFL dealers." Which is meaningless if a person is able to go home with their gun before the process is completed. Then again I'm sure someone looking to attain a gun illegally will never do something like lie on a background check right? Foolproof system. Regarding, "It's also worth pointing out that mass shootings are rare events even by US standards." The fact that you think this is "worth pointing out" says something about you and that something isn't good. Because it certainly isn't "rare" when comparing the numbers to the rest of the world. Regarding, "I'd rather live with dangerous freedom than be in peaceful slavery." Yeah... because having universal background checks is akin to slavery think mental midgets. 22 percent of guns purchased in the United States are bought without a background check. To change that would be "slavery."
    3
  3562. Trey regarding, "Because it's neither of the two." All evidence suggests otherwise. Regarding, "Universal background checks do require a universal gun registry," You just repeating stupid shit over and over doesn't make it anymore true. And even if this were true, which it absolutely 100 percent isn't, why would this be so fucking important? Does the existence of the DMV also make you a slave or some other stupid shit because cars are registered? Regarding, "Lying on a background check carries harsh penalties, and there are thousands of people who get denied a gun because of their background checks." You say this shit like it is relevant to the facts I've brought up. This does nothing to address the fact that background checks are fucking worthless when someone is able to go home with a gun before the process is completed. Regarding, "This gamer..." Spoiler alert... the system is never going to be perfect. We will never be able to eliminate gun violence and gun crime. But those facts are pathetic excuses to maintain the status quo where mass murder is far more common then elsewhere in the "civilized" world. And I put civilized in quotes not because I question their civility, but ours. Regarding, "Per capita the U.S. has less mass shootings than a lot of other industrialized nations leading that chart is not the U.S. but Norway, hell the U.S. isn't even in the top 10." This sounds like total and utter bullshit pulled from your ass. Even if it is true it does nothing to mitigate facts such as, the US has 5 percent of the world's population but over 30 percent of the global mass shooters. And gun homicide rates are 25 times higher in the US than other high income countries... countries that are just as free as the US to people who aren't morons.
    3
  3563.  @PixelGunZodiac  Regarding, "The stimulus will be signed on march 13" Does it have the 2k checks like biden promised? Regarding, "read my other comment." Maybe read the OP you are responding to before you get to the bootlicking.
    3
  3564.  @PixelGunZodiac  I may as well add is march 13 your idea of "immediately" like biden promised? But I get it he got sidetracked illegally bombing a country we don't have a declaration of war with.
    3
  3565. I agree. Sincerely, guy on the way left.
    3
  3566. Trump had 4 years and only took away people insurance.
    3
  3567. I appreciate kyle showing us he's a fraud so we can go elsewhere. To think I had been a fan of his for a while. Then again I was a fan of maddow way back when too. Maybe you can replace her at MSNBC.
    3
  3568. @Diane Schubach Is that suppose to be an excuse for Trump's hypocrisy? It's not. Would you like to try again? I could use a good laugh.
    3
  3569. Zem regarding, "All that matters is that she’s doing it." Nope, more than that matters. Motive does matter. Her words would be more meaningful if people couldn't rightfully criticize her and suggest she is only doing this to sell books and for other selfish reasons. It also matters how she does it. I would give her more credit if she didn't do this while at the same time saying the process wasn't rigged. Regarding, "Getting hung up on the past rather than focusing on what people are doing in the present isn’t very productive" Like I said I am happy she is doing what she is doing but that simply doesn't excuse what she has done in the past. I can walk and chew gum at the same time and I can like what Brazile is currently doing while hating what she did during the election.
    3
  3570. Sounds like something Cornpop would say. Which biden? Will the malarkey meter do anything about my hairy legs?
    3
  3571.  @sirfortesque8757  Regarding, "we're looking to build the party right" Speak for yourself. I give two shits about the "party." They are a dumpster fire and are in need of house cleaning. Regarding, "not just circle jerk each other" I find this really funny all things considered. Regarding, "this movement" Movement and party. I want change. Real change. Substantive change. That's what I'm fighting for. Regarding, "draw other in....yes?" Of course I want more people on the right side but eventually we need to able to stop having to debate the merits of M4A. It's a no brainer everyone should be able to agree on. At some point we need to put our foot down and fight for this. And if you aren't with us then you are standing in the way of change and are going to be dealt with accordingly. This IS a litmus test.
    3
  3572.  @ish7957  Regarding, "Calm down. You're too emotional like Dimmy Dore." Bite me. We are talking about politics. If you aren't fired up it's only because you don't fully understand the topic of which you speak or you have lost your humanity. Regarding, "The progressives in congress have only been in power for two years." I don't care. Do you have a point. Regarding, "You can't change washington in two years." Why am I even bothering to address you. You offer literally nothing of real value in anything you say.
    3
  3573.  @briancardio6567  Ok Mitt Romney. Take your "corporations are people my friend" line and shove it.
    3
  3574.    Regarding, "This shit would stop if people voted for Bernie Sanders." Are you sure they didn't? When exit polls don't match election results?
    3
  3575.  @bigcauc7530  "Forget about Russia, the real threat to America is Israel and the Israel Lobby " - Julian Assange
    3
  3576. Yup. I am a big fan of Tulsi but I'm seriously pissed about this and angry at progressives for not talking more about the real problem of splitting the vote. I even sent her an email (I'm on her mailing list as if she ever saw it... I know she didn't) to say don't run months ago. And said she should be doing anything and everything to help Sanders win.
    3
  3577.  @Cruizinelli12  Not cool, we do not deserve that. Sincerely, The Addams family.
    3
  3578. As soon as you hold a position of power you are no longer an "average" man or woman.
    3
  3579. Thanks for the hearty laugh in sad times thescopedogable.
    3
  3580.  @AmbyJeans  Terrible people are capable of being intelligent. Now what exactly is Pete going to do to help people specifically? Or is ignoring Trump on twitter and being able to articulate in multiple languages meaningless pandering pretty much it? Because that doesn't actually help people.
    3
  3581. Are you serious? I suppose you are baffled why the government builds roads as well.
    3
  3582.  @cryptocrazy9599  I have better things to do with my time than unpack why literally everything you say is wrong for one reason or another. It's easy for you to take a shit. It's harder for me to clean it up effectively. Sorry not sorry for wasting my time addressing you intelligently. You aren't entitled to my time.
    3
  3583. You can't really be this stupid can you?
    3
  3584.  @pauliepaparazzo4484  Regarding, "Have a little depth in your comment Clint" My time is valuable to me and I don't tend to waste in on people I think are flat earth level stupid. Literally everything you say is wrong for one reason or another. Hopefully that can be deep enough for you. If it's not I don't care.
    3
  3585. "Dems in congress gave Dick Cheney a standing ovation." 'You still need to vote for dems because they are less cucked than the guy cheney shot in the face.' -some shitlib, probably
    3
  3586. Whose fault is that? When dems have the presidency, house, and senate?
    3
  3587.  @peterhardie4151  "It's just the most unkind reading of who she is." It's fact. Not everyone can be like chris hedges. And when you pretend that people like katie are like him not only are you lying but you are doing a disservice to the actual chris hedges of the world.
    3
  3588.  @peterhardie4151  "It's just the most unkind reading of who she is." It doesn't mean she is a bad person or her heart is in the wrong place. It's just where you tend to end up when you don't have to worry about food on the table or about being able to go to a doctor.
    3
  3589. Fixel regarding, "tremendous" How did I forget to include that Trumpism? Shame on me.
    3
  3590. Yeah, because they are the only one holding off attacks... and it isn't as if Israel isn't offensive like their ally the USA.
    3
  3591.  @frankporter6169  I think you are overthinking the OP. It's compliment of glenn and nothing more. And we are lucky to have him.
    3
  3592. He's affiliated with TYT not that he has the intellectual honesty to mention it.
    3
  3593.  @SupremeInvigilator  Yeah. He's gay. Everyone but nancy seems to know it.
    3
  3594. Endorsement: to officially support them for the position they are running for.
    3
  3595.  @bobsmith5109  "They arr all dnc hacks" Yup. Yang worked for CNN. He's a hack.
    3
  3596. Regarding, "If you're against single-payer M4A in 2020, you're just not a good human being." Meh. Some are good people who are brainwashed. Useful idiots are a thing.
    3
  3597. Not like you right?
    3
  3598.  @crickey__in__durham  Look, don't get me wrong... I agree they are not impartial. And I want to make that case. It's just that I didn't find the argument compelling. And bad arguments can really hurt the cause. That's what I thought you were doing. That said my first impression of your argument may have been wrong. Whatever. Ultimately I am confident we are on the same side. Take care. Peace.
    3
  3599. You are a moron.
    3
  3600. If it comes to that you would be better off voting for a third party to try and build their support in a world where the 2 party system is clearly broken.
    3
  3601.  @Scroteydada  Regarding, "the lesser of two evils" Is still evil. Don't support evil. Period.
    3
  3602.  @blueballedtech  Regarding, "let them know you don't care about their rights" I don't huh? It's pretty tough to take you seriously.
    3
  3603.  @Scroteydada  Regarding, "how" Did you even bother to read what I wrote? Maybe address what I said intelligently if you can. Regarding, "Do you know what fascism is?" Do you? But good luck with your silly fearmongering.
    3
  3604. Regarding, "She never said that he stole her ideas." Actually she did dipshit. It was the whole reason she talked about the movie "There's Something About Mary."
    3
  3605. Oh and everything else you said is complete bullshit as well.
    3
  3606.  @monsterram6617  I had no idea. I just looked into it. Thanks for bringing this to my attention. Words cannot express my gratitude.
    3
  3607. It's not about the question as much as it's about what the person asking the question wants. That person wanted to trip up nina as much as I would want to try and trip up biden if I ever got the chance to ask him questions. Kyle is just being honest about the person asking the questions motives. And kyle is spot on.
    3
  3608. Chris regarding, "his war record" You mean like when he took a stand against invading Iraq in the immediate wake of 9-11? Regarding, "carrys water for dem party" You mean like how more people are woke to the rot in the party than ever before because of Bernie Sanders? Regarding, "Ill never understand u dummys" You don't understand because you are dumb as fuck.
    3
  3609. This is what evil looks like
    3
  3610. Great back and forth. It's convinced me to unsubscribe from TYT. Cenk has either sold out or is an idiot.
    3
  3611. I hope Kim will negotiate. The problem is that, if he doesn't, I could see this meeting causing the situation to escalate. I believe in diplomacy. This is the type of thing that I would normally be wholeheartedly in favor of. That said I do not trust Un or Trump to act logically. Both of them are all about trying to prove how big their dicks are and think this can easily get out of hand. As much as the situation is shitty at the moment at least we are not currently at war and I am tired as fuck with war. Those two are so mentally unstable I wouldn't be surprised if Trump not being able to shake hands like a normal person leads to war. I hope it goes well assuming it actually happens. To me there is no reason to be starting another war. As much as Un is unstable I just don't consider them a legitimate risk to the US, see no need to start to go to war, and fear this situation may give Trump and company an excuse to start another war.
    3
  3612.  @UniqueBreakfastTaco  If it was about health they would have given them to people in africa. It's clear it was about money.
    3
  3613. Sexist ageist says what?
    3
  3614. Regarding, "Don't you have a Tide pod to chew or a condom to snort?" Being stupid beyond words is your thing, not mine.
    3
  3615. Regarding, "Of course it is not!" Ok. I guess I was mislead when the first thing you said was, "this is not corruption."
    3
  3616. I have been saying for a long, long time that we need a sarcastic font to help convey meaning. It isn't exactly your fault. It is just that internet comment sections are filled with some of the dumbest comments ever that are not meant to be sarcastic when they should only be said in such a way.
    3
  3617. He's the fucking president. What he says matters... unlike you.
    3
  3618. This. But it still needs to be called out when it happens.
    3
  3619. I'll take the stupid shit you said to mean that you don't realize you are a hypocrite.
    3
  3620. FYI if you are trying to dispel an image of being a mouth breather saying "brah" doesn't help.
    3
  3621.  Harry Mann Jr  Your English needs work. I'd engage you and the silly things you say intelligently if I took you seriously. I don't thou as you are clearly a disingenuous paid troll. I can't convince someone who is being paid to think what they do so I'm not going to try with you. Good luck with your misinformation campaign in the future.
    3
  3622.  @MarionetteMuse  You are too easily appeased and pandered to.
    3
  3623.  @MarionetteMuse  "I think it show integrity that Kyle left TYT" If he actually had integrity he would have at the very least disclosed the blatant and obvious conflict of interest of his affiliation with TYT while covering TYT. Instead he didn't and he covered up blackmail while telling everyone he was "not leaving anything out" while leaving out the most important part. "Perhaps it is you that is too cynical." I've followed lots of terrible people in the past. Pundits like olberman, maddow (and everyone at MSNBC really), tyt, kyle and others. Politicians like obama and aoc. At one point all of them were unmasked. It's like you finally see them for who they are and you are only left wondering why you ever liked them in the first place. Kyle's mask is off and you would be wise to accept what he's showing you. It's ugly and he's a fraud.
    3
  3624. I don't watch Maddow so maybe you can answer a question for me since you are a fan. How has her coverage been of the extra 80 billion given to department of offense, excuse me, department of defense been?
    3
  3625. Regarding, "I agree that Bernie needs to run as a Democrat in order to win." I don't think he needs them. I just think it would be the best thing for the country. If he won as an independent I think both parties oppose him, nothing changes, and then everything goes to back to the status quo after he is gone. If he wins as a democrat he could, if nothing else, implement party reforms from the inside that would leave lasting change. We desperately need at least one major party that represents the people and currently we don't. Regarding, "At this point I am not really even sure he will run again," If I were a gambling man, and I am a gambling man, I bet the house he runs as long as he is healthy. Regarding, "It is the only hope we have against this President." There are plan Bs but none are as good as him in my opinion. I do not, in any way, fear Trump in 2020. Literally anyone other than Hillary can beat him. The most important election in 2020 is going to be the primary. We need a true progressive to win and not a corporate stooge like Harris or Booker. I get the feeling Maddow is going to love Harris.
    3
  3626. "Anything less than complete devotion is unacceptable." He hypocritically said while giving complete devotion to kyle.
    3
  3627. "The democrats can always count on you bernie." Yes they can. Bernie will always tell everyone get in line and vote blue no matter who, regardless of how terrible or unworthy.
    3
  3628. I agree with everything you say but please make sure to vote in their primaries still to try to make them better and pull them to the left. And if you don't want to vote for them in general elections you owe them nothing if you don't want.
    3
  3629. Nothing calling out andrew yang today? That's very suspect.
    3
  3630.  @berdyderg900  "all these people with advanced stockholm syndrome just want to think it's different this time" Meh. In their defense so did I. I thought we actually had some progressives who were going to fight and stand up for the people but instead they voted for pelosi and got NOTHING for it. We are fucked and dems are worthless. But by all means prove me wrong about this "democratic" party.
    3
  3631. If you were ana you would be a blackmailer, propagandist, and generally terrible person.
    3
  3632. @Kevin Tewey While it's true that Bernie would crush Trump and Biden would lose to him it isn't even nearly as important than the fact that Bernie should be the nominee not because he would win... but because he superior to Biden in every way when it comes to policy.
    3
  3633.  @subversivelysurreal3645  And let's not forget Biden's pushup challenge to Trump.
    3
  3634.  ss  Regarding, "can anyone seriously risk having another four years of Trump." Stop acting like trump is some sort of unique evil who is waiting for his second term to end the country. I'm actually of the belief that it would be best if trump wins. Not because of 2020-2024 which is going to suck regardless of who is president but because of 2024. If trump wins he and the "right" is blamed and the country looks to the "left" in 2024. If Biden wins the "left" is blamed in 2024 and the country looks to elect trump 2.0. I think the country is best if trump wins in the long run. But I don't vote for evil and terrible and neither should you, even if you think it's the "lesser" evil. It's still evil.
    3
  3635. Paganbeer I wish I were a youtube superdelegate so that I could give your comment a few thousand thumbs up. I can't agree with a statement more than yours.
    3
  3636. I'd vote for Bernie/Satan before I'd vote for corporate dems.
    3
  3637. Bernie didn't lose, he was cheated. There is a big difference.
    2
  3638. Chelsea is officially my favorite Clinton. That said I would never vote for her for President.
    2
  3639. "a powerless useless position like VP" I know right. Is that even a real job? If I had the misfortune of such a position I don't think I would even bother to put it on a resume. What does a real man such as yourself do for a living?
    2
  3640. jaime regarding, "I never said anything about social security," You didn't? I could have swore you said, "socialists confiscatory taxes are just a new tipe of communism" Social security is socialism. You can tell, in part because of the name. Regarding, "are you ok with government taking your wealth through taxation" Um. Yeah. That is how government works. That is how we pay for roads, schools, public officials, the military and much much more. Regarding, "even when you know all the waste and fraud going on in the government" That is why I want someone leading government who is going to actually do something about this. That is why I want a President who will reign in the military industrialied complex. We spend as much as about the next 8 countries combined on "defense," (and most all are allies). Imagine how much we could save if we spent "only" as much as the next 4. Regarding, "just so they take all that money into their pockets like whats happening in latin american socialist countries which you "forgot" to mention." I didn't forget to mention it. I just chose not to engage your BS arguments. This isn't latin america. You misunderstand government and what Bernie's democratic socialism is. I don't have the time or energy to educate you. I do not think nuance is your thing. Regarding, "Trump did the right thing not debating Sanders, that would have been free publicity for sanders" Even you don't believe your own BS. Why should Trump have cared about giving Sanders free publicity if he would have crushed him in the debate? Shouldn't he have wanted to get that free publicity himself since he would have won? Even you don't believe your own BS do you? Regarding, "If people would love Bernie, he would have got the popular vote in the primaries... he didn't." You ignore the media bias. You ignore the DNC rigging the game. You ignore the "democratic" party not allowing independents to vote. You ignore exit polls that indicate massive election fraud. You are an idiot. Regarding, "You just don't want to accept reality," That is funny coming from you. Thank you. I need a good laugh in these sad times.
    2
  3641. Liberaled I hadn't heard that. Do you have a link perchance?
    2
  3642. NYC do you know what I'm talking about or is it difficult for you to keep all your lies straight? It was the post that you started with, "FACT: DAPL is not on a single inch of Native owned land" It just disappeared. Were even you embarrassed to try and spread that lie when the entire video proved you were lying?
    2
  3643. Like I pointed out when NYC says, "Yes, they're trespassing on DAPL owned land" You can be sure the truth is; no, they are not trespassing on DAPL owned land. NYC is reliably unreliable. NYC humor me. What happened to your BS statement yesterday? I'm genuinely curious. Am I correct that even you decided that was the wrong place to spread that lie?
    2
  3644. NYC clearly whatever soulless company pays you for the lies you say pays you by quantity and not quality. If you were paid by quality you would have to pay them.
    2
  3645. destiny regarding, "what do you know about his policies" He takes both sides of essentially every issue because he has no principles.
    2
  3646. Your comments are always great. Have you ever thought about running for office? We need people like you in government.
    2
  3647. Shasta regarding, "It's more like a hit and run. Leaving others to deal with everything left behind." What do you imagine these people are leaving behind that left such destruction? Never mind. I don't really care what you think.
    2
  3648. Shasta regarding, "I don't see how what your saying makes it alright" I'm not saying it "alright." I'm just saying that in a world with lots of real problems and real important problems illegal immigration is not high on my priorities list especially when, as I've already pointed out, the legal immigration system is broken. We are a nation of immigrants afterall. In a country with lots and lots of problems they are not one of them. Rather they are used to be demonized and scapegoated for problems that have absolutely nothing to do with them. Regarding, "I have no problem with people coming" Do you speak out about the broken legal immigration system or do you just spend your time speaking out about illegal immigrants? Regarding, "Im sure everyone has their excuses but it's a law." If you were living in another country, wanted to live here, knew the legal immigration system was broken, and thought your only way to live here would be to do so illegally are you sure you wouldn't break that law? Yes it's not right but it also just isn't a big deal. I get it. I guess you don't. Regarding, "A lot of other countries including the ones we border with have stricter laws than us." I don't let the rest of the world be my moral compass for me and neither should you. Regarding, "I don't find it to be okay because it's "understandable"" Fine. Don't. But at least understand why some do it and at least understand that they are not a major problem in a country with lots of major problems. In an ideal world they would exist, neither would speeders. Ultimately neither is a big deal thou when you look at the big picture. Regarding, "not going to pretend I'm holier than thou like you seem to be." I'm not trying to pretend I am. I'm not native to this land. My ancestors came here from elsewhere in search of a better way of life. I'm not going to close the door behind me just because I got in.
    2
  3649. AG regarding, "illegal immigration is a problem." The military industrialized complex is a problem. Student debt is a problem. Money in politics is a problem. Income inequality is a problem. Health insurance costs are a problem. Climate change is a problem. ND, "free speech zones" (when the entire country is suppose to be a free speech zone), and human rights violations in the US is a problem. Illegal immigration is not a problem anymore than speeding is a problem even if both are illegal. Regarding, "What's the point of having a nation with borders and laws" Again, we are a nation of immigrants. Again, our immigration laws are broken. Some laws are more important than others. Regarding, "Plenty of immigrants do the right thing and come here legally." And plenty more want to do the right thing and should be able to but are not given the option.
    2
  3650. I'm with her. Jill Stein that is!
    2
  3651. Agent Orange should I believe you? Believe you? Believe you? Because I don't believe Trump or Hillary. Ever.
    2
  3652. Jay regarding, "I want to learn how to lie with a straight face like that." No you don't. Just be a decent human being who tells the truth unlike these people.
    2
  3653. Max regarding, "SEXIST. BERNIE BRO." Yup. That's why I support a woman for President Jill Stein. Actually I think Hillary supporters are anti-semites otherwise they would support Jill Stein.
    2
  3654. John Miller of course.
    2
  3655. Not only would Bernie have crushed Donald but the "democratic" party would have won the senate.
    2
  3656. Regarding, "But flag burning rights" I thought you had a hard on for the constitution. It is freedom of speech. People burning the flag are doing so as a statement. A statement that is protect under the first amendment. Could a state make burning the flag illegal even thou the SC has determined it is unconstitutional to outlaw it? No. You know why? They are not sovereign.
    2
  3657. Lucky Bastard regarding, "Anti-Science as that woman is" Dr. Jill Stein who graduated from Harvard Medical School and practiced internal medicine for 25 years is anti-science? Nice try "Correcting the Record." That BS only works on the weak minded.
    2
  3658. Lucky Bastard, I've heard all of your "Correct the Record" talking points that completely misrepresent her positions and beliefs. You are straight up misrepresenting the truth because you clearly have no interest in the truth. Go support a douche or a turd. They represent your lack of ethics and values.
    2
  3659. The US imprisons more of it's citizens by percentage of population than any country on Earth and it isn't even close. "Land of the free"? Only ironically.
    2
  3660. AndThe regarding, "There is NOT only one combination to reach 270." Thanks for clearing that up. I'm not sure why you are under the impression that I implied anything of the sort. Regarding, "There are multiple strategies, and that ensures that many States get consideration." And one of those strategies is to target only swing states and ignore deep blue and deep red states. Therefor your argument that the EC ensures everyone needs to be courted is again, complete BS. Regarding, "In this cycle New Hampshire actually became a pivotal State. That would never be the case in a purely popular vote election." Of course NH would have been important. Look at how close the popular vote was. In an election that was so close no votes could be taken for granted the way they are under the current system. Again you suggest the EC somehow prevents the exact problem it creates. It solves nothing. It only creates inequality and the possibility that the person who gets the most votes can lose. That isn't right to the sane and unbiased.
    2
  3661. Turbo regarding, "Which ideals founded this country" This country was founded on slave labor. We didn't let women vote. Things have changed I'm sorry you have trouble accepting the fact that we now don't just say "all men are created equal," we actually try to live up that ideal with more than just words.
    2
  3662. 712 regarding, "Correct the Record hacks" Defending Hillary is not an easy job. They do a much better job just attacking the competition but, "Trump is 100x worse than Hitler." Sheesh. I fucking hate Trump but it is as if they aren't even trying.
    2
  3663. Regarding, "If Obama put in place all your crazy ideas you would block it." Obamacare was Romneycare on a national level. It was based on the individual mandate, a Republican idea first proposed by the Heritage foundation, a right-wing think tank. Obamacare got zero Republican support, was blocked in every way imaginable, and has had about 60ish symbolic votes to repeal the law by Republicans. In short your statement, in addition to being obvious, is provably true.
    2
  3664. You are not different than Hillary supporters who are voting for her just because of Trump. Wouldn't you rather find a candidate to vote for? And not just things to vote against?
    2
  3665. R Lee. I'm confident that was excellent sarcasm. I'm sorry you don't get it.
    2
  3666. You go ahead and keep playing their game and spend your time figure out who is worse. Or here is a better idea for you to consider. Tell them both to fuck off and vote for real change and a third party.
    2
  3667. This kid sounds like the real life of the party.
    2
  3668. He sounds like a smart kid. I wish him well and hope he wins.
    2
  3669. You are wrong to think this is only a problem with the republican party.
    2
  3670. No thanks. I'm in a swing state and i will happily be voting for Jill Stein. She is the only candidate worth voting for. She is the only candidate I want to see win. The country loses if Hillary or Trump win and I will not help either of them.
    2
  3671. Whatever you got to tell yourself to vote for a terrible candidate like Hillary or Trump.
    2
  3672. Not Obama. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_order
    2
  3673. TinTin what is the distinction you are trying to make exactly? Are there Republicans who are not establishment republicans I don't know about? Ultimately these people actually are "democrats" these days. It's just that "democratic party" is not very democratic. Whatever. I really hate labels. I think my point is clear and that is that these people suck and do not represent the public.
    2
  3674. Yes he should. Well, not as an independent, Jill Stein has already offered him the top of the Green ticket. Sadly I do not think he will.
    2
  3675. Trump is a bigot. No need to put quotes around it. His signature piece of proposed legislation, the border wall, was racist as fuck. If he cared about security he wouldn't only be proposing a wall on the southern border. He only cared about one border and not the other because of racism.
    2
  3676. Regarding, "Every day my man." So why the stupid comment? Just trolling? Just because you have freedom of speech doesn't mean you should use it to act like an idiot.
    2
  3677. Dawn regarding, "The whole country can & should do something about it. That's who." I agree of course. The point I was trying to make is that generally it is the responsibility and job of the police to do something about laws being broken. But sadly cops don't do anything about dirty cops.
    2
  3678. Sainter regarding, "The American standard" Raymond beat me to the obvious answer that many Americans like you are completely dense to.
    2
  3679. Sainter regarding, "You and "Raymond" will wake up one day." What a stupid insult. Sadly you will never wake up will you?
    2
  3680. Bernie or busters. Please do not let bust mean you do not vote. Please vote for Jill Stein. Her policy positions are very close to that of Bernie. 3rd party candidates need our support if we are ever going to do better than a broken 2 party system. Jill Stein for President! The only candidate worth voting for.
    2
  3681. Andre regarding, "I just don't like people being rude how is that over sensitive?" DWS is a complete POS who deserves all the shit we can throw at her and more. Do you defend Hitler (my mistake on the previous spelling) when people choose to make fun of him?
    2
  3682. Attila regarding, "If only the US supreme court was non partisan." Do you have a better idea or do you just want to bitch?
    2
  3683. Attila regarding, "a non partisan supreme court that is seraprate from the legislative and executive branches." Well. Doesn't that sound nice if not exceptionally vague. How do you propose we determine who is on the supreme court without partisan politics at all? That is kind of an important detail you don't bother with but is the actual underlying problem that you are ignoring. Regarding, "separation of powers and everything." You don't seem to understand what separation of powers means. The SC is independent of the legislative and executive branches as soon as they are on the court. They, at that point, answer to no one and their powers are completely separate from the legislative and executive branches.
    2
  3684. Ashley regarding, "Even if the majority voted for a candidate that wanted to take away your right to vote?" You know these people were running for President and not dictator right?
    2
  3685. Attila regarding, "Except the fact that they all answer to the same political party" No. They don't. When SC justices are on the court they answer to no one really.
    2
  3686. Ashley regarding, "if their candidate wanted to remove freedom of speech." If you want to run on a campaign to try and remove freedom of speech you can. I don't think you will get far but that is your right. And even if you are elected keep in mind that we elect a President and not a dictator. Just because Trump said he was going to build a wall and have Mexico pay for it doesn't mean he can actually do that while in office.
    2
  3687. Attila regarding, "A good example of that would be Islamist parties running for office" We do not have a religious litmus test to run for political office. You can run on a platform of implementing one if you want but currently there is no such thing and actually quite the opposite.
    2
  3688. We live in depressing times.
    2
  3689. "Hillary made mistakes," epic understatement.
    2
  3690. Even the people claiming she didn't break the law don't have the balls and stupidity of you to claim that she didn't do anything wrong.
    2
  3691. HEN regarding, "So I'm guessing Hillary Clinton won't be your pick for Nov. 8." I'd rather pick my ass and wipe it on the ballot than vote for either Hillary or Trump. I guess maybe I should have elaborated with my original statement and included Hillary as well but this story wasn't exactly about her. Jill Stein for President. The one person running I actually want to win.
    2
  3692. TLL regarding, "announce he's back in the mix." No he can't. There are rules to get on the ballot in states and rules to register as a write in candidate. He can't win at this point. Ballots have already been made and people are already voting at this point.
    2
  3693. Logan regarding, "Every time someone posts a political lie, they were successful if they convinced at least a few people of the lie, or caused some level of confusion about what is true." The only plus is that some people will read his blatant lie, realize it is a lie, and be able to gain some insight to the opposition. This fucking douche-bag liars name ironically starts with "truth." Hopefully for every person that was fooled into believing their BS at least 2 others will wake up to the fact that there are liars like him all over the place and they figure out which side they are on. It really says something about the people on the side of keeping the EC that they are happy to lie their fucking asses off to justify keeping this archaic practice that makes sure all votes are not equal.
    2
  3694. Logan regarding, "I sure hope you're right." No promises. I guess I'm just a glass is half full kind of guy.
    2
  3695. Truth, I would just like to add that you are a disgrace and should be ashamed of yourself for blatantly lying like that. And again it is quite ironic that your name begins with "truth." You are a joke.
    2
  3696. Hillary is not, in any way, worthy of the job. She will never have my vote. Jill not Hill!
    2
  3697. If the house and senate are forced to vote on it it would force them and Trump to take a position on the topic. I don't think it would pass but that isn't the point. The point is to show the public who their public servants work for.
    2
  3698. True antitheist regarding, "Didn't read my whole post did you" Sure I did. And just because you added, "It needs to be reformed" doesn't make, "is a necessary evil, without it you'd have the most populated states decideding everything for the entire country" Anymore true. That is bullshit. We absolutely do not need the EC. And with it you have exactly what you claim the EC is suppose to prevent. Now you can go fuck yourself. I'm sorry if saying things that are not all complete BS triggered you.
    2
  3699. Marduk an Anarchist Party would not support the TPP. Beidoll is correct they are very republican in nature because they ignore their own values when it suits them.
    2
  3700. Tronerman I do not understand or follow you at all but I am ok with that. If you don't want to hear anything about Bernie or Bust just go watch the MSM and you will never hear it talked about and you can be happy. Or don't. Whatever.
    2
  3701. Haha. Seriously thou don't be surprised if Chelsea doesn't try down the road. I've also heard people throwing Michelle Obama's name because dynasties are the way to go. (obvious sarcasm is obvious)
    2
  3702. Orion's Ghost. Do yourself a favor and save the effort on NYC, he is a lost cause. I know from way too much experience. That said if you want to have some fun trolling him and pointing out why literally everything he says is stupid he is good for that if nothing else.
    2
  3703. NYC regarding, "This isn't happening on Native land." Nevermind that it absolutely affects the water on native land. That is totally different. I'm sure you would realize that things that don't happen on your land can affect you quite quickly if an amusement park opened up next door to your home or a pig farmer moved in. But I'm sure you would be fine with any of those... it isn't happening on your land after all therefor you should have zero say even though it directly affects you.
    2
  3704. NYC regarding, "You know you're on the winning side when you have to play mental gymnastics with the facts to fit your narrative." This is why I talk to you. It isn't because you are smart. It is because you make me laugh.
    2
  3705. Rachael regarding, "your water source is next." I think it might be too late. I suspect NYC is already drinking contaminated water. It would explain their "intelligence."
    2
  3706. NYC regarding, "The land being worked on is NOT Native land." Way to go, you go something correct even if you got wrong that I have ever said anything to the contrary. Orion's Ghost is correct that these there are lands sacred to the native American's being destroyed even if he is incorrect that there is construction on native lands. From this article http://thefreethoughtproject.com/mercenaries-attack-protesters-dogs/ " “This demolition is devastating,” Archambault said, as quoted by the WSJ. “These grounds are the resting places of our ancestors. The ancient cairns and stone prayer rings there cannot be replaced. In one day, our sacred land has been turned into hollow ground.” There is also a lot of other information in this article you are either ignorant of or, more likely, are willfully ignoring because it doesn't suit the BS narrative you were foretold months ago.
    2
  3707. NYC were you one of the two pieces of shit to give this video a thumbs down?
    2
  3708. NYC I'm going to put this up as if you give a shit about the truth. Obviously you do not. http://inhabitat.com/oil-company-sics-attack-dogs-on-native-american-protestors-in-north-dakota/oil-company-sics-attack-dog-on-oil-protestors/ https://amp.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/oct/18/amy-goodman-perils-standing-up-fossil-fuel-industry http://lacrossetribune.com/vernonbroadcaster/news/opinion/north-dakota-authorities-wrong-in-charging-journalist/article_7c94d1f2-6ff3-566c-865f-152da7ae588e.html http://inhabitat.com/oil-company-sics-attack-dogs-on-native-american-protestors-in-north-dakota/ http://www.democracynow.org/2016/9/4/dakota_access_pipeline_company_attacks_native http://indiancountrytodaymedianetwork.com/2016/09/04/cheyenne-river-sioux-tribe-demands-answers-north-dakota-state-leadership-after-attack http://www.cbsnews.com/news/dakota-access-pipeline-protest-turns-violent-in-north-dakota/ http://grist.org/briefly/dakota-access-pipelines-private-security-unleashed-attack-dogs-and-sprayed-mace-on-protesters-this-weekend/
    2
  3709. jusanothercooldude regarding, "Every state, regardless of population, should have a say in who wins an election." Are you actually implying that everybody having one vote and them all counting the same would prevent this somehow? But it would only prevent what you imply if there is a state where no one lives.
    2
  3710. Keep in mind that if you want to argue against what I propose as fair you are arguing for an innately unjust system where some votes are more important than others. On election day, when voting for the President, we should should not be defined by the state we live in but we should all be Americans with an equal say in who becomes President.
    2
  3711. bandholm regarding, "But dont they have people in the Senat and Congress?" Try to stay on topic. We aren't talking about the Senate and House here.
    2
  3712. bandholm regarding, "True, but aren't the Senat and House part of government?" Um. yes the Senate and House are part of the government. You people are really losing me with the points you are trying to make. Have I done something to suggest I didn't think they were part of the government? Regarding, "Aren't they the ones to make the laws and such?" Yes. But again, that isn't the point. The point is to have a discussion as to what kind of a government we should have. Should we have a process, like we do now, where people voting in huge states like NY, Cali, and Texas have meaningless votes. Should we have a process where the person who gets less votes is allowed to win? Or should we have a system where everyone gets one vote and they all count the same. That is the discussion we are having. Not how the system would be gone about being changed. Regarding, "And if they are, why should stats then have special privilege over/instead of the people?" Huh?
    2
  3713. Puff regarding, "If it was majority vote, the results would be completely different," I am not interested in trying to change the election results from the previous election. I am trying to start a conversation so that we can change the rules going forward. If we don't talk about this now and try to address this now we never will. I expect to be back here in 4 years saying it should be one person one vote and the EC is a joke. Still I'm going to try because that is how it should be.
    2
  3714. SourPatch regarding, "well educated" Of course I want a well educated electorate. I resent 3rd party candidates not being allowed to be on the debate stage because our media is more interested in brainwashing people rather than educate them. But everyone has the right to partake in the political system. Even the uneducated should have the right to vote and their vote should count as much as everyone else. Maybe they want to have some say in making sure that they and their next generation is educated and has access to good, affordable education. Regarding, "unfortunaly everyone is different" Everyone is different but everyone should not be different in how meaningful their votes are. Regarding, "the reality of vote rigging" I consider election fraud to be a major problem and ridiculously under covered by the media. That said a one person one vote system is no more susceptible to vote rigging than the EC.
    2
  3715. Zach regarding, "you clearly are unwilling to even consider other peoples points since, you're still being insulting and dismissive." Me being insulting as dismissive has nothing to do with me considering other people's points of view. You might want to consider that I have considered other points of view and I'm insulting and dismissive of them because I've concluded they are dumb, irrational, illogical points and that is why I'm insulting and dismissive of them. Regarding, "As a matter of fact I'm going to keep this super short" If you wanted to make it short maybe you should have avoided saying repeatedly how short you were going to make it. Regarding, "dealing with people like you is cancerous." I concede I am very often a dick but that has nothing to do with my points. Regarding, "yep the EC doesn't represent the majority of the population even though over 40% didn't fucking vote" We can't really talk or address the people who didn't vote. That is on them. I am only interested in talking about the people who voted. They are the ones that have expressed their voices. And they should be heard, equally, fairly, and none should count more than others. Regarding, "My entire point of the 57% was to point out that you left out a decent point of information" It is not a decent point of information, as I've already pointed out, because you talk about those 57 percent of people as if they think the same. They don't. Those populations don't vote as a block, like the EC represents them. That 57 percent is nuanced. Regarding, "Instead you used it to insult me repeatedly. Also, I don't expect every voter to have voted the same." You don't expect every voter to have voted the same but you talk about the 57 percent as if they do. Regarding, "I called for changes to the EC in a previous post but, you seemed to have forgotten that." This thread is crazy long. And it isn't the only one that I've talked about the EC. Forgive me for not remember every nuanced detail you have made in the past. I don't even read entire posts before I start commenting on them. I start with the first point you make, I address it, then I move onto the next. It is hardly perfect but it is how I do things. Regarding, "I never claimed to be brilliant just above average" The problem I have with this is the fact that you bother to bring it up. It doesn't seem, at all, relevant to the conversation unless you think people should get more or less say depending on their intelligence. I don't. The dumbest person in the country's vote should count as much as Stephen Hawkings. Regarding, "I fall short of the genius level. I'm sorry you find that offensive somehow?" It's not offensive. Just totally irrelevant. The offensive part is that I'm having to address this topic again. Again, it has nothing to do with the conversation. Regarding, "I never said I wanted their opinions heard less," It certainly seemed implied. Regarding, "just that I didn't want the average of the public representing me. The average of the public is what gets voted in under your system. Please acknowledge this." I am barely able to make sense of this. "The average of the public"? I've made my position clear. I think everyone should get a vote, all votes should count the same, and the most votes should win. If this means the average of the public to you then yes, that's what I want. Regarding, "my entire point is it's an idea worth saving." I disagree. I think it is garbage. It is overly convoluted for a reason and none of those reasons are good. Simple is good when it comes to elections. Most votes wins seems like common sense to me and I see no reason to make it hard. Again the only reason you would mess with that simple concept is if you think and want some votes to be more important than others. Regarding, "You would just take us back to a different system with it's own flaws" I'm pretty sure I've said this before... there is no perfect system. There is no system where politicians are going to Alaska and Wyoming to have rallies. There is only perfect fairness. That is a system where everyone, including people in Alaska, Wyoming or where ever get the same say, an equal voice. That is a system where politicians have a reason to try and get every vote because ever vote matters. Currently every vote does not matter. Regarding, "accepting the lesser of two evils is still fucking evil" Sorry but a system where everyone gets to vote and the most votes wins is hardly evil. An evil system to me is a system where the least votes wins. Regarding, "If you recall I wanted to have a system where a president got at minimum 55% of the EC after it's proportionally delegated. Again you seem to have forgotten that." You got me. I didn't recall that. In my defense it was quite forgettable. You are just proposing a different system where votes are not counted the same therefore it is inherently wrong.
    2
  3716. Mopar regarding, "Are you from there then shut the fuck up" Hypocrite much?
    2
  3717. Mario regarding, "at least Oliver admitted that Clinton is a bad candidate" while leaving out problems with her record like, for example, authorizing selling arms to Saudi Arabia while they donated to the Clinton Foundation and then excusing the fact she is a bad candidate with, "BUT TRUMP!"
    2
  3718. Torch regarding, "Hasn't every administration in like, forever, sold arms to Saudi Arabia?" No. They haven't. And even if they had there is a special evil in doing so only after they give you money. And there is a special evil in doing it after 9-11 when according to recently released pages from the 9-11 report, they likely are directly connected to the greatest terrorist attack against this country. And even if they did that is not an excuse.
    2
  3719. Regarding, "He should have run as an independent and would have been president." Maybe. I certainly wish he would have tried. I desperately wanted him to at the time of the convention, but I understand his decision. He talked over and over how much he didn't want Trump to be President. He said over and over that he would do whatever he could to keep Trump from winning. He feared splitting the left, letting Trump, and being blamed for it. I don't blame him for that. I wouldn't want to be blamed for President Trump either. Bernie is the man even if he made a mistake here. He has a lifetime of doing the right thing and being on the correct side of every issue. I'm not going to ignore that because he is human.
    2
  3720. The Green Party is the only not corrupted by big money and corporate money. Jill Stein for President. In part because she is in favor of criminal justice reform.
    2
  3721. Prow. Fuck you for not voting for a decent candidate like Jill. Instead you wasted your vote on a complete POS.
    2
  3722. Prow regarding, "It's me who wasted his vote." Admitting your problems is half way towards defeating them. Neither of us voted for the President-elect but only one of us voted for complete dogshit.
    2
  3723. Goodbye "democratic" party. Hello Green Party! Jill Stein for President!
    2
  3724. Spenser sorry for not taking your comment more seriously. Clearly you were trying to conflate the two issues and use Russia to dismiss from the content of the emails. And you do so while calling college kids gullible... but apparently insulting you was wrong to you because you are a hypocrite.
    2
  3725. Super regarding, "seeing what Trump's cabinet is going to look like, he was right." Meh. Yes they suck but so would have Hillary's cabinet. It seems as though Trump being elected is going to ultimately kill the TPP and that goes far. It also isn't about just these next 4 years. It is about after that. Trump being elected paves the way for a true progressive in 4 years and that never could have happened if Hillary were elected. It is also about sending a message to the corrupt DNC that they need to change. Clearly they are having trouble getting the message and the establishment isn't going to go down without a fight but I am happy they were not rewarded after cheating in the primary. That would have been a terrible precedent. I think Trump is going to suck for the next 4 years and I think it will suck more than Hillary for the time being but hopefully it will be worth it in the long run.
    2
  3726. Face regarding, "There was no lesser of two evils" Yes there was. The only way you can say there isn't a lesser of two evils would be to believe that both are IDENTICALLY evil and as similar as I think they are they are not the same. Again I think Hillary Clinton would have been better for the country over the next 4 years. That said I was preferring Trump win because I think the country will go on for longer than 4 years. Who ultimately is more evil is up for interpretation and we will never get to know for sure who would have been more evil because only one of them gets the job. Regarding, "When Hillary became the nominee Cenk put the important videos exposing her on this smaller channel" There are different reporters with different takes, different opinions and different coverage. I believe that they have different channels because that is how people like it. People like to get the news they want and like having their opinions reinforced because humans are not even close to perfect. Regarding, "the main channel went into full attack Trump mode showing their clear bias." There was good reason to attack Trump. He is a fucking clown. The only reason he was able to win was because Hillary sucks. Everyone has bias but the real problem is when people are not up front with their bias and/or lie to support their bias. Even Jordan and Jimmy have bias. The key to good journalism is honesty thou. Cenk has different opinions and I agree with Jimmy and Jordan far more than him but I think you would be wrong to say Cenk isn't honest as well. I think he is even if he is ultimately wrong more often than Jordan and Jimmy.
    2
  3727. I would be proud to call her our first female President... unlike Hillary.
    2
  3728. To me it doesn't sound like you are trying to be fair but rather you are trying to make excuses... piss poor excuses at that.
    2
  3729. This is what real reporting and journalism looks like. Too bad there isn't more of it. Thank you Jordan.
    2
  3730. Great reporting and much needed. It is too sad this is so under-reported by the MSM, but hardly surprising.
    2
  3731. America imprisons more of our citizens by percentage of population than any other country in the world and it isn't even close. "Land of the Free?" Only ironically.
    2
  3732. I could only have been less surprised if the headline were, "Cops commit heinous crime, other cops gladly cover it up."
    2
  3733. Estivel regarding, "If it isn't Bernie, what other candidate would you support?" I have a litmus test that includes two things. One they need to have supported Bernie during the last primary and two they need to be standing with the water protectors. (Elizabeth Warren fails both.) Tusli Gabbard is plan B, Nina Turner is plan C and there are certainly more names worth mentioning that elude me at the moment. The election is a long time off and things can change between now and then but those are names I could see supporting. If there is a third issue I will be considering closely it is where a candidate does and does not raise their money for their campaign. There is a direct correlation between how corrupt a candidate is and where they get their money.
    2
  3734. charley regarding, "You sure got some high ass standards dude" Yes. I do. We are talking about the most powerful position in the world. It seems to me we should have very high standards for it. Regarding, "which is why we have Trump in the first place" We have Trump because the DNC rigged the primary, because Hillary Clinton sucks balls and worked her entire life against the interests of the people, because the people realize they are getting fucked over, want change, are willing to go to extraordinary lengths to get it, because of Trump voters, because the corporate media gave him BILLIONS in free media, and because over 40 percent of eligible voters didn't vote. You know what absolutely didn't create Trump? High standards. Regarding, "you have the right to vote whichever way you want" Thank you. Your approval means everything to me, even when stating the obvious. Regarding, "But politics has always been this way." Not exactly. It is getting worse. We used to have candidates that represented the people. Today we only have candidates that represent corporations and big money and when a decent candidate like Bernie comes along the entire establishment, including the "democratic" party does everything in their power to smear and crush them. Regarding, "You're never gonna have the perfect candidate." Again, no shit. It isn't about perfection but it is about having standards. You know carney workers and their signs that say "you need to be so tall to ride"? Well I think of myself as having a sign as a voter that says, "you need to be at least so decent to get my vote." We should all have one. Sadly many don't. Many are content to pick between a douche and a turd. They are part of the problem rather than being part of the solution. Regarding, "People like Bernie are extremely rare" No. They really aren't. They are just rare for politicians and even more rare as members of the major parties.
    2
  3735. charley regarding, "Everyone's litmus test is different." Of course. I was giving you mine but I assure you my thoughts are not just my own. They are the thoughts of many progressives. Regarding, "Not everyone can risk their current economic situations on whether or not the candidate supported Bernie or on water protectors lol." For the great majority of people these issues do speak to whether or not a candidate actually represents their economic interests or if they are just paying lip service to the people while representing the interests of big money and corporations. Regarding, "Everyone prioritizes differently." Yup. I was trying to give you insight to my priorities. Again, even thou they are my own, I think I'm in touch with the progressive base who isn't willing to settle for corporate pieces of shit like the "democratic" party tries to shove down our throats while slitting the throats of actual champions of the people. If winning is on your list of priorities I think you would be wise to consider my thoughts and priorities. I'm not willing to "settle" with my vote. I am only going to give it to someone who actually deserves it. To me Warren will not deserve it. Maybe things will change between now and then but don't bet on it. How about we all just agree to get a real progressive in office. Someone who represents the people and then there is nothing to worry about.
    2
  3736. Trump won because of Hillary. Don't overthink it.
    2
  3737. Regarding, "Is man made global warming bad?" Yes. It is. And the better term for what is going on is climate change because that also includes the increase in natural disasters.
    2
  3738. Mareepu regarding, "Life Skills course..." Great idea. I can't agree more and have thought the same for some time. Personal finance specifically should be taught in school and it is criminal to think it isn't. Talk about an important life skill everyone needs but it isn't taught in school in any kind of meaningful way. I also like the other ideas you have about education.
    2
  3739. You're an idiot.
    2
  3740. jokum regarding, "now who will you trust now" For me first and foremost I will follow the money when deciding who to trust.
    2
  3741. Warrior regarding, "The Democratic Party is a graveyard for progressive ideals." I certainly tend to agree, especially with the party as it is right now. That said I think the party is capable of reform should they get a transcendent leader going forward. I expect Sanders will run again in 4 years if he is healthy enough and if he does he is the type of person I would support. I am a big believer that a person is always going to be far more important than their party label. The democratic establishment will do everything they can to prevent anyone who threatens the establishment but should a person who I perceive to be a true outsider emerge I will support them. I expect them to try and force another corporate stooge down our throats again. Should they succeed I will vote for the Green Party again but I'm not willing to rule out supporting them in the future if they do realize they need to change if they want to ever win again.
    2
  3742. Warrior regarding, "build a 3rd party," I think that we need to support 3rd parties for 2 reasons. 1 it is the escape plan should the "democratic" party have learned nothing from what is an embarrassing defeat and we do need to jump ship for good. 2 it is our leverage to help force them to change. I'm not interested in building a party but rather supporting and growing the Green Party which I see as supporting progressive values without the corporate poison and greed infecting the "democratic" party. Regarding, "I'm not so sure that this is the answer just yet. Time will tell, and I'm certainly torn on that" I very much agree. Regarding, "building a 3rd party movement seems like a much steeper uphill battle than the already-uphill battle of taking the Democratic Party back from corporatist neoliberals" Again I agree. I was very dismayed that Jill only got the vote she did. I really wanted and expected her to get to 5 percent. Maybe I was overestimating the public's competence. Regarding, "It must be done carefully and deliberately," There is going to be plenty of push back. You can see it already with how the establishment is unwilling to accept any blame and instead make excuses for losing. Regarding, "it's a bit alarming to me to see the degree of purification I'm seeing on the left in this moment." I wonder if I might be guilty of this. There are so many people that I used to like that I can't stand now. Bill Maher, John Oliver, Rachel Maddow and all of MSNBC, even Elizabeth Warren. Regarding, "Warren and Sanders are beautifully positioned to fight effectively for us" Warren could still win my trust back but she has a lot of work to do to get it. Had she endorsed Sanders early this past election may have gone down quite different. I prefer Tulsi Gabbard because of her willingness to lead on the issue and support Sanders at great cost to herself and her position in the party. That demonstrated great leadership to me while Warren demonstrated cowardice to me. Again, she could win me back over but she has her work cut out for her to do it. Regarding, "I think it's in our best interest to work with that." I hope that Sanders is healthy in 4 years. I do not see how the party could stop him the way they did this go around. The party can change but it will talk someone like him to do it.
    2
  3743. US Army core of engineers Phone number is Chief of public affairs 202 761 0010 main number 202 761 0011 White house press office Main white house switch board 202 456 1414 Department of Justice: main switch board 202 514 2000
    2
  3744. The real Steven Hawking would know better and not care.
    2
  3745. Walter regarding, "Are there massive numbers of illegal immigrants crossing the Canadian border?" Are there massive numbers of illegal immigrants crossing the Mexican border? No. There isn't. Illegal immigration is currently about a net zero. Therefor you "point" is complete fucking bullshit. The wall isn't only suppose to be about preventing illegal immigration. It is suppose to be about security. Try not to forget that when you make excuse for racist policies that only target specific people. Regarding, "At least use arguments that make some sense." The only reason you think it doesn't make sense is because you are dumb as fuck. http://www.politifact.com/florida/statements/2012/aug/28/jeb-bush/jeb-bush-says-illegal-immigration-net-zero/ http://www.pewresearch.org/daily-number/net-migration-from-mexico-falls-to-zero-and-perhaps-less/
    2
  3746. Regarding, "Trump is a conman and megalomaniac!" Yes. He is. But I hope you are not pretending that that fact makes another POS like Hillary Clinton seem any better by comparison. It just doesn't work that way for people who have not been brainwashed. I won't be staying home. I will be voting for Jill Stein.
    2
  3747. purplefishies, regarding, "Jill Stein isn't even at half the %...." Voting shouldn't have to do with the polls. It isn't about picking the winner. It is about voting for your values.
    2
  3748. Purple regarding, "her 20% lie rate ain't nothing compared to Trumps 71% on every thing he says." Wow. What stupid misleading, far from true numbers. Even if they were true, which they are not, the fact that Trump loves the sound of his own voice and can't shut up versus Hillary who lies less because she isn't willing to do a press conference for example might help explain this. "We can get her elected and still primary her in less than 4 years." And people call me unrealistic.
    2
  3749. Do Tim Canova and Alan Grayson have a shot today? For the sake of the country let's hope so.
    2
  3750. Michael regarding, "Give the conspiracy theories a break for one god damn second." I was called a conspiracy theorist for saying the DNC was rigging the game. As it turns out some conspiracy theories are true and to dismiss any conspiracy theory as fiction because it is a conspiracy theory is dumb as fuck. I assure you some "conspiracy theories" are true. I'm not saying I'm sure what percentage of votes Jill got. I would be very curious to see exit polling data though.
    2
  3751. Darryl Perry has won my vote. (sarcasm)
    2
  3752. He is by far better than either major party VP running mate.
    2
  3753. "He sometimes sound like an advocate of conspiracy theories." Anybody who thinks that there are not conspiracies is at least as wrong as someone who thinks everything is a conspiracy. The bottom line is that some things are a conspiracy. I was called a conspiracy theorist for saying the DNC was colluding against Sanders despite it obviously being true. Then wikileaks proved it was actually a conspiracy. The point I am making is that just because something is a conspiracy theory does not mean it is crazy or not true. At the end of the day this is the bottom of the ticket we are talking about. I don't know of anyone who votes based on the bottom of the ticket but it seems like a petty way of attacking her these days. Can you imagine if the only thing that sucked about Hillary or Trump were their running mates? And again both of their running mates suck far more than Jill's. I'd prefer we talked about the issues. That is what's really important. Unless you are just working to smear her... and there are more and more people working to smear her these days because she threatens the status quo. Or does that sound too conspiratorial for you?
    2
  3754. She isn't supporting the water protectors. Actions speak louder than words. I want leaders. Not followers. Warren is fine where she is but don't think I, or progressives like myself, will support her for President. If you care about winning you would wise to take this warning.
    2
  3755. I'm convinced Hillary work for her corporate donors. I'm convinced Hillary will always choose war instead of peace. I'm convinced Hillary will support the TPP despite her words. I'm convinced fracking is bad. I'm convinced we need to bring back Glass-Steagal. I'm convinced Hillary is a liar who would say literally anything to get elected. I can go on but I think you get the point.
    2
  3756. nez regarding, "its not freedom of speach its burning a flag" Um, yes. It is. Why do you think the do it then if not for a political statement? Regarding, "saying n!@# is also then freedom of speach" Um, yes. It is. Holy shit you are not very smart are you?
    2
  3757. The only people creating bullshit going on are DAPL and the police.
    2
  3758. Elexie, regarding, "it wasn't that high" It was about 45 percent I think. It was definitely over 40 percent. That is not much different and does not effect the point they were making.
    2
  3759. First there is nothing to blame Nader about. The BS that Nader cost Gore the election is just that... BS. http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/12/6/1260721/-The-Nader-Myth Second you are an idiot to not realize Hillary would be an epic terrible candidate. I arguably think Trump would be less dangerous mostly because he would be less effective. He is all talk and wouldn't be able to get much of anything done. That said Hillary would be able to get things done and almost none of it would be any good.
    2
  3760. Agreed. Sad but true.
    2
  3761. I hate to break it to you but if you think America having a 1 party system would be the worst case scenario.... we already essentially have a 1 party system that represents Wall Street and big money.
    2
  3762. CalM regarding, "If Clinton gets in this 5%..." With all due respect the idea that anyone should support the Green party by not voting for them is absurd. Just as absurd as the idea that Trump is any better than Hillary. The same candidate you support is essentially the exact same as the candidate you despise. Dadtka regarding, "You can still vote for Bernie" Please don't. Jill Stein is essentially Bernie Sanders when it comes to policy, priorities, and ethics and that is what is really important. Bernie is not running and write in votes for candidates who have not registered as write in candidates are tossed in the trash. Actually running for President should be a prerequisite of getting your vote. You also are ignoring the very good reasons to support the Green party and get them to 5 percent to help them grow.
    2
  3763. CaLMCee regarding, "foreign policy. Trump wants" Trump wants to "take out their families." Trump wants to bring back waterboarding and worse (whatever that is) and he doesn't care if it works. The man is evil and a POS. He sounds like he wants to lead ISIS because ultimately he is the same type of person that is found in ISIS. I agree that Hillary is dangerous. But to use that as an excuse to support another POS who also is obviously dangerous is absurd and terrible logic. Trump would start a war because someone said something that hurt his feelings on Twitter for fucks sake. You are voting for essentially the same type of terrible you claim to want to avoid. Good luck with your conman. I will never support him or Hillary.
    2
  3764. Most regarding, "Vote for Jill Stein IF you don't live in a swing state." I don't care what state you live in. Jill Stein is the only candidate worthy of your vote.
    2
  3765. CaLM regarding, "Getting bored of this ridiculous argument that Trump will just be able to start a war with anybody he wants easily." I don't if easily is the best term but we are talking about the who is going to be the next commander in chief. Whoever that is will be the biggest determining factor in any upcoming wars we decide to go to. Regarding, "no war gets started on the whim of a president." Traditionally we don't start wars on a whim but I wouldn't put it past Trump should someone get under his very thin skin. Regarding, "You dont seem to be understanding that im making my argument based on what is best to do given the current situation." You don't seem to understand that there is barely a best when it comes to Hillary and Trump. Regarding, "Either Clinton or Trump will get in so 3rd party is wasted this time around." Do I really need to answer this absurd argument again? If you aren't bothering to listen to what I have to say I feel less need to respond to you but I will say this again... The only wasted votes are votes for terrible people I you don't want to win. I'd rather vote for Jill Stein and lose than vote for either Hillary or Trump and win. Oh and there are the reasons of supporting the Green party because of making sure they get to 5 percent sending the establishment a message that I'm not willing to accept inferior candidates. It is never a wasted vote when it is being cast for the only candidate I actually want to win. Regarding, "Changes in torture approaches etc doesnt come near" Even good people can excuse and rationalize terrible things so I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt, but if you continue to make excuses for torture you are not going to be good for very long. No doubt ISIS says the same thing you do here. Support good and be willing to lose. It is a fight worth having.
    2
  3766. Global Warming Skeptic regarding, "I am giving you the facts. You are merely trying to insert motive." I'm sorry that you do not like the fact that the motive of the Republican party was obviously in complete obstruct mode. Regarding, "It was not popular when Nixon proposed it." Huh? The origins of Obamacare are that it came from an the Heritage Foundation, a Republican think tank in 1989. That is when the "individual mandate" idea was really born. I'm sorry you do not like the this fact but it is true none-the-less. Regarding, "And it's interesting that you bring up Republicans being team players when you just claimed that Obamacare is something Republicans as a whole support. That is factually incorrect. Cherrypicking..." Sweet irony. I never claimed Obamacare is something Republicans as a whole support. I actually claimed the exact opposite. But their support had nothing to do with policy. It had to do with politics even if you want to bury your head in the sand to motive. Funny you call me factually incorrect and accuse me of cherrypicking. Merrick Garland was given high praise by Republicans. Then Obama got his stink on him and things changed. Merrick Garland didn't change... other than the Obama stink. Do you understand the point? Regarding, "Republicans have always been about a free market approach." Except when they are not. Like when they fight and defend tooth and nail to protect subsidies to big oil and gas. Regarding, "I'll be polite and not respond to your South Park reference, because it would be incredibly condescending to you for me to comment on it." LOL. Good thing you weren't being condescending while being condescending. http://americablog.com/2013/10/original-1989-document-heritage-foundation-created-obamacares-individual-mandate.html
    2
  3767. So many people here think others are not entitled to a different opinion than their own. Or do you have proof? No. Just speculation. You are the embarrassment.
    2
  3768. This is sarcasm right?
    2
  3769. Andrea regarding, "IT'S NOT TRUE" I don't doubt there were a handful of people who committed voter fraud but the idea that it was millions if fucking absurd. That said I would like the votes recounted for other reasons. I fear election fraud but that is very different than what Trump talks about.
    2
  3770. Michael regarding, "we can't go back because the technology exist now." Thanks for clearing that up. I was obviously suggesting the world be placed into a time machine and we all go back in time in a delorean. Now I understand. Regarding, "that's why there's sooo many and not just 10 nukes per capable country. Its either a lot of nukes or no nukes" Um. Just out of curiosity do you at least think there would be a point where there were too many nukes? The US and russia each have about 7500 nukes. That doesn't seem a little excessive to you? Would these countries be any less of a power or deterrent if the "only" had 1000 nukes? Or do you think if that was all the US had Russia would be like, "fuck yeah... look at those pussies... may as well start ww3. It's like they aren't even trying." Israel has about 100. Are they still considered a nuclear power to you? Or are they barely worth mentioning or don't even count at all because they don't have lots and lots and lots of nukes. I mean. 100 nukes? Just imagine how "little" damage they could do with them. You know these weapons of mass destruction (the term we used to wrongfully justify invading another country) cost lots of money to make right? And to protect right? And in all honesty I feel that of those 7500 nukes the US THEY ARE MORE LIKELY TO BE STOLEN AND USED AGAINST US THAN US USING THEM. Regarding, "A lot of nukes gives reason not to launch because it'd be the end of everyone." Take a moment to please think about these words. IT'D BE THE END OF EVERYONE. I actually agree with those words but I guess I think differently about them than you do. What is the purpose of having the ability to destroy the world? Who wins if something like that happens? Are you really willing to do this? Or is this just a big bluff that you would be using with a losing poker hand? Regarding, "Having no nukes puts everyone at risk at every moment because we're capable of making one at the snap of a finger." Again do you not realize how silly this statement might seem? A world with no nukes is the dangerous world to you because they COULD be made... and the safe world is the world with 20K nukes in the world?!? I guess we are going to have to agree to disagree. And it also is not as easy to make nukes as you suggest or Iran would already have them. That said I concede that if the US wants to makes nukes they can do so rather quickly, but I feel the world with less nukes is actually the safer place.
    2
  3771. 3:08 Hillary shill nods her head in agreement. 3:20 Hillary shill sighs knowing she is beat and has nothing to say as a response. The truth hurts sometimes.
    2
  3772. Puffn, save your breathe. NYC is a lost cause. I'm not sure if they are being paid to say stupid things, they are the dumbest human on the planet, or they are just a simple minded troll, your efforts to try and enlighten them are a lost cause. Time and again I've proven them to be a liar but the truth and him go together like water and oil. He is only worth talking to if you, like me, need to let out a little rage after watching the video. As if the video doesn't piss me off enough I have to read his idiotic comments.
    2
  3773. Regarding, "that's the stance that intelligent people take." Yes. Intelligent people pick their battles. I don't have the time, energy, or desire to continue fact checking all your bullshit. Especially because even when I do prove you wrong it never does any good. Regarding, "Run from the facts" And you say shit like this. You are a real mixed bag. I want to be angry with you but when it isn't infuriating it is funny. Regarding, "Here's a fact for you to ponder upon." You are a completely discredit source. When you say this I can assume the truth is, "Here's a lie for you to ponder upon." You don't have facts. You have bullshit, propaganda, and distortions. Time and again I've told you how you are lying. You are the kid that cried wolf at this point. Even if (likely by accident) you said something that was true I'm right to just think you are lying at this point seeing as how that is all you do. When I said that I wasn't sure if you are paid, stupid, or a troll I have an opinion. I'd be willing to bet the house you are being paid to say stupid things and mislead people. That said get a real job. Something that doesn't involve lying to people.
    2
  3774. Regarding, "you prove my point that no mater what you run from the facts." LMAO. You say that like this is our first rodeo. I regret not saving past conversations of ours. The first run-in with you that I remember was when your original post made a claim about something Ajamu Baraka said, then I brought out the transcript and he literally said the exact opposite of what you claimed. It was as if he was talking to you and calling you a liar before you said your lies. It was truly amazing. Still you brushed it off and continued to claim you had a point even after being proven to be lying. Another favorite of mine was when you were claiming the oil companies were not on native land even though the title of the video said something to the effect of the fact the oil companies were on native land. Do you remember that one? It didn't stay up for long. You immediately deleted it because, I think, for once you were actually ashamed at so blatantly trying to lie. There have been others but those are my 2 favorites. But I run from facts because I'm done fact checking your bullshit? Of course you would say that. Of course you will say I don't care about facts when time and again I've given you facts, facts that contradict your lies, and it was ultimately a waste of time because you don't let facts sink in. Good luck spreading your bullshit. Forgive me to not want to spend all my time telling you why you are full of it. I, unlike you, actually have a life and correcting your lies is more than a full time job. It is easy to pull stuff from your ass. It is much more difficult to show why what came from ass is just shit.
    2
  3775. CNN and MSNBCs parent companies are some of Hillary's largest donators. Not that such a thing would create a conflict of interest. if you look to them for unbiased news you are going to be let down.
    2
  3776. Jill Stein advocates for education as a right. http://www.jill2016.com/plan
    2
  3777. That is either epic sarcasm or you are epic stupid. It is tough to tell online sometimes.
    2
  3778. Jesus is sexist. I never knew that.
    2
  3779. Please vote for Jill and do not write in Bernie. If we are ever going to do better than a broken 2 party system 3rd party candidates need support. Jill Stein is essentially Bernie Sanders policy-wise but she has much better hair.
    2
  3780. Bob regarding, "This clearly comes from a CTR shill" You think that I am a CTR shill even thou in my original post I call out CTR? Trump loves the uneducated for a reason. You might want to consider the possibility that many people have a problem with both major parties and refuse to support terrible candidates. That actually makes sense to the sane.
    2
  3781. Jill Stein is essentially Bernie Sanders but with better hair. Jill Stein for President!
    2
  3782. Because drugs work. Warning: drugs come with side effects.
    2
  3783. The only wasted vote is a vote for a candidate that does not represent you, your policy positions, your priorities, and your ethics. Please vote for the candidate you think would be the best President and let the chips fall where they may. Do not under any circumstances vote for evil. Based on that criterion there is only one candidate worth voting for to me. Jill Stein 2016!
    2
  3784. Regarding, "I've heard Trump had more popular votes with the final count." That's BS. http://www.cnn.com/election/results/president http://www.foxnews.com/politics/elections/2016/presidential-election-headquarters CNN and fox agree Hillary is winning the popular vote.
    2
  3785. saturated fat, thanks for the laughs at your expense. Seriously thou seek help.
    2
  3786. Erik regarding, "None of that changes the fact that Nader voters could have changed the outcome of the election." So could have Bush voters. Or Gore could have been a better candidate. Or the SC could have not stopped a recount. You choose to focus on Nader voters even thou for all you know they would have preferred Bush win at the time of their vote or, more likely, they would have just stayed home and said they were not going to vote for a terrible candidates.
    2
  3787. Erik regarding, "You can make personal attacks, but nothing I've said is untrue." If you say so. If you have a problem with me accusing you of being a "Correct the Record" troll you should blame Hillary Clinton for engaging in that type of despicable campaign tactic that make such an accusation valid. You won't thou. You will blame me... as always. Regarding, "I donated $100 to Bernie as well." Thanks for that. I'm the type to believe people when they say shit that can't be proven or dis-proven in the comments section. Again, I'm sure Hillary's "Correct the Record" trolls would never lie like that.
    2
  3788. Bob regarding, "SC" Yeah, Bob let's vote Hillary so we can get a Texas Republican on the court. http://snapzu.com/AdelleChattre/wikileaks-reveals-clinton-considered-a-texas-republican-for-the-supreme-court http://www.breakingnews.com/item/2016/10/24/wikileaks-email-reveals-hillary-clinton-campaign/
    2
  3789. Erik regarding, "That was people within her campaign discussing it" That's way different than the queen. Birds of a feather flock together. If you think Hillary has any intention of putting people on the court who are not corporate friendly I assure you you are being naive and duped. Good luck with the queen. I envy you in a way. It must be nice to think your candidate still has a chance to win (even though nobody should want her to win). I've already lost because of morons and sheep like you who are ok supporting dogshit that don't give a flying fuck about the people. Jimmy brought a good Malcolm X quote up before. He says, "If Johnson had been running all by himself, he would not have been acceptable to anyone. The only thing that made him acceptable to the world was that the shrewd capitalists, the shrewd imperialists, knew that the only way people would run toward the fox would be if you showed them a wolf. So they created a ghastly alternative. And it had the whole world, including people who call themselves Marxists, hoping that Johnson would beat Goldwater." Ironically Hillary Clinton was a "Goldwater Girl" at the time. Malcolm X goes on to say, "I have to say this, those that claim to be enemies of the system were on their hands and knees waiting for Johnson to get elected because he is suppose to be a man of peace. And at that very moment Johnson had troops invading the Congo and south Vietnam. He even has troops in areas where other imperialists have withdrawn. Peace corps to Nigeria, mercenaries to the Congo." Good luck with the fox. At least you aren't voting for the wolf huh? Fucking sheep.
    2
  3790. Regarding, "while Donald Trump is stuffing the US Supreme Court full of right wing judges who'll ensure that money talks." You want to make sure it was included here you go. The point is that you are worried about Trump stuffing the court with judges who'll "ensure that money talks" while supporting Hillary Clinton. You are dumb as fuck. I have to go live my life. You can't change the opinions of people like Hillary's "Correct the Record" trolls when they are already being paid to think something. That premise applies to the queen herself as well.
    2
  3791. Eric I really have to go. You feel free to keep saying stupid shit if you want and I'll tell you why you are a moron later.
    2
  3792. Tiny Hands Donald must be a Trump shill. (Obvious sarcasm is obvious.) Seriously thou I admire Tiny Hands Donald's ability to give you far more attention, detail, and nuance than I think you deserve Erik. Hearing stuff like, "Selling arms to Saudi Arabia isn't new or anything Hillary is pushing." makes me angry enough I could shake a baby. (Don't worry I don't have a baby.) You make anyone who hears you talk dumber when you say BS like that. I just want to tune out your noise but THD just dropped the mic on you. Does that affect your CTR pay?
    2
  3793. Erik regarding, "but to suggest they have anything to do with the Clinton Foundation is a bit naive" LMFAO. I'm sure the Saudi Arabian government was giving those millions to the Clinton foundation at the time of the weapons deals because they were interested in humanitarian efforts. The Saudi's are known for their big hearts. Seriously you should go fuck off and Correct the Record elsewhere. Only one of her paid shills is capable of saying crap like that and doing so while calling me "naive." It is a bit funny when I don't think about how you are helping destroy the world. Get a real job.
    2
  3794. Bob's messages have been brought to you and paid for by Goldman Sachs. Get the fuck out of here and get a real job you piece of shit. Hearing your bullshit really makes me want to vote for Donald Trump and I don't want to do that. You, like Eric, are making the world a worse place with what you are doing. Wouldn't you rather be doing something decent with your life? Look in the mirror, change, and change professions. Humanity would appreciate it.
    2
  3795. Oculos regarding, "I miss Erik" I don't. Bob and Erik seriously make me want to vote for Trump. I live in a swing state for the first time in my life during a Presidential election. I like the idea of my vote possibly swinging the election. And gun to my head I would prefer Trump. That is so messed up. I was a lifelong democrat before this election. Fuck that thou, I snapped out of it. Jill Stein will get my vote.
    2
  3796. Oculos regarding, "Make sense" I guess. This election is just depressing as fuck. Trump or Hillary? We have already lost as a country and election day isn't even here yet. How does anyone vote for either of those two? They are both. So. Awful. The FBI has different rules for the rich and powerful. Corporations have free rein in ND while my former "team" turns a cheek and doesn't give a shit. The war machine rolls on. I think it all might be a conspiracy to sell anti-depressants. I'm not going to let big pharma win though. I think I might go track down a bag of green and smoke it til election day has passed in solidarity with the Green party (and for sanity sake). Regarding, "Jill gets mine too." Keep up the good fight. I'd rather vote for her and lose than vote for Hillary or Trump and win. The only silver lining I'm hoping for is that this election has started to wake the country to how corrupt our political system is. (Thank you Bernie Sanders, wikileaks, snowden, and manning.) And hopefully after the ensuing, inevitable disaster we can get someone decent in office next time. GWB led to Obama. I never thought I'd see a black President in my lifetime. Too bad he didn't come through with his promise of hope and change. Maybe next time we can actually get the hope and change we are long overdue for. Peace.
    2
  3797. Music regarding, "no the DNC had policy" Is that what you call fear mongering about a Trump Presidency, acting tough on foreign policy, ignoring fracking, ignoring the TPP, distorting the queen's record, and pretending there is unity?
    2
  3798. I will have a litmus test for candidates I will be willing to support for President in 2020. 1 they need to be supporting the water protectors. 2 they will need to have supported Bernie Sanders during the primary. Warren fails both. I will never support her for President.
    2
  3799. Smaak we get your meaning but you are wrong.
    2
  3800. Smaak. I'm not going to claim that weed cures everything but I know for a fact that it has medical uses. The first day I got home after having back surgery I was fking miserable (was in the hospital for almost a week before then). I couldn't eat. I was in extreme pain everywhere. I was legally given Vicodin and was popping a pill at least every 2 hours to help with the pain but still I was absolutely hating life. A couple days later I was able to get some weed illegally. It's difficult for me to describe how big of a difference it made. I was able to eat and my pain went from intolerable to manageable. I was able to take significantly less Vicodin which I very much feared becoming addicted to. Does that mean I think that we only should have access to weed for medical purposes? No. Why should we? As an adult I also enjoy weed for recreational uses and because I'm living in Colorado I am able to do so without being a criminal at the same time. The government here taxes it and regulates it as they should, people are able to partake in smoking without being persecuted but other than that life here is the same in whatever backwards state I'm assuming you live in where people have idiotic ideas about weed such as yourself. I'm not telling you you should be smoking it but I am telling you it is absolutely none of your business if I want to smoke. I don't drink or do any other drugs of any kind but I enjoy MJ because despite your dumb ideas it works. I don't care if it doesn't cure all.... it makes me happy. Do you have a problem with me doing something that makes me happy? I've never actually had snake oil but I'm betting it doesn't make me happy the way MJ does. And unlike you (I assume, but it seems safe to assume considering your clueless thoughts on the issue) I am not talking about something I have no experience with. I have decades of experience so I know what I'm talking about.
    2
  3801. Nobel peace prize winner. What a joke.
    2
  3802. jxsilicon regarding, "you need to put reelection pressure on her" Is "reelection pressure" some kind of code for millions and millions of dollars? Because that is the only thing that affects the queen. Regarding, "Well Trump is completely insane. So what do you want to do?" I want to not use the fact that Trump is a POS to excuse the fact Hillary is a POS and support neither.
    2
  3803. Trump loves the uneducated.
    2
  3804. People don't give a shit about voting against something. You need to give people something to vote FOR. Hillary Clinton lost because nobody paying attention wanted to vote for her.
    2
  3805. Regarding, "the electoral college for a reason, so the big high population states won't decide every election." With the electoral college a candidate could win the election by winning only 11 states and a candidate could lose the election after winning 39 states therefor you argument is complete BS. Regarding, "civil war" Yeah. The idea of one person one vote would be fucking terrible. So terrible we would need a civil war. You make me want one so that you might be the first causality.
    2
  3806. YuRM regarding, "it's clear video" It is clearly edited. Even if there is wrongdoing here, and I think their is, I wasn't talking about the video. Regarding, "don't be ridiculous" I was talking about the source and the only one being ridiculous is you if you do not accept the fact that they are proven frauds. Again, the source matters and that source if proven to be dogshit.
    2
  3807. Beau regarding, "The report that they are frauds is fraud." LOL. From wiki, "The California Attorney General's Office granted O'Keefe and Giles limited immunity from prosecution in exchange for providing the full, unedited videotapes related to ACORN offices in California.[17] The AG's Report was released on April 1, 2010, concluding that the videos from ACORN offices in Los Angeles, San Diego, and San Bernardino had been "severely edited."[17] The report found there was no evidence of criminal conduct on the part of ACORN employees nor any evidence that any employee intended to aid or abet criminal conduct. It found that three employees had tried to deflect the couple's plans, told them ACORN could not offer them help on the grounds they wanted, and otherwise dealt with them appropriately. Such context was not reflected in O'Keefe's edited tapes. The AG's Report noted that "O'Keefe stated that he was out to make a point and to damage ACORN and therefore did not act as a journalist objectively reporting a story"." AKA he is a fraud.
    2
  3808. YuRM regarding, "the wikileaks" You want to talk about wikileaks go ahead and use them. They are not discredited proven liars. They are source that has earned trust. O'Keefe is the boy that cried wolf. Regarding, "I'm not saying the source doesn't warrant some skepticism but it's ridiculous to dismiss everything because "source"" Trust is earned, not given.
    2
  3809. Daniel regarding, "you're probably still mad at Russia for hacking the DNC instead of DNC corruption" Assumption is the mother of all fuck ups. There is no conclusive evidence that it was even Russia that did the hack. Again, I vet my sources and the DNC is not a reliable source either. The DNC is corrupt as fuck but that doesn't mean that anyone should be trusting O'Keefe and only morons make that type of leap in "logic."
    2
  3810. The DNC can boo Sanders all they want. It only makes me like him more.
    2
  3811. gray troll regarding, "I can't believe you did either" Yes. You are a troll. Get a life.
    2
  3812. Coley regarding, "u shouldnt vote again honestly" Sorry. I will. Regarding, "he fooled u cause hes black" What kind of ridiculous statement is this? Do you understand how absurd it is? What do you base this on? Please don't answer. That is rhetorical. I don't actually care what you think. Regarding, "i told you so" I don't think so. I don't recall ever talking to you before this.
    2
  3813. Coley regarding, "fine get fooled again" No like you. You are amazing, have never made a mistake and have never been fooled even if you are a fool. Regarding, "they never call out BLM for shit." If I actually cared what you think I'd ask what your problem with BLM is. I don't care what you think so please don't offer your thoughts. Regarding, "they think black people cant be racist." Of course they can. Regarding, "they think black people can define what is racist" I let the dictionary define things. That said I think you are ignoring the fact that blacks have a very unique perspective on racism that I think you lack. Regarding, "so i will say i told u so. i will gladly tell you." I can't say for sure that you are a racist although I do think you are suspect. I can say for certain that you obviously a douche-bag.
    2
  3814. What a compelling argument Michael. That's sarcasm in case you are not smart enough to know without me telling you.
    2
  3815. The only wasted vote is a vote for POS candidate who I don't want to win. If I were going to vote for the lesser of two evils I'd vote for Donald Fucking POS Trump so you remember that before you actually convince me to vote for a garbage candidate like your queen. It is a good thing for you I don't vote for lesser of two evils. I leave that to idiots like you.
    2
  3816. Michael Duncecap regarding, "but you will waste a vote on some one who is polling at 1-2% and you think she has a chance to win." No. I don't think she has a chance to win. Voting isn't about trying to pick the winner and, again, only a mental midget would think it is. Voting is about expressing my values, priorities, and ethics. Jill Stein represents me and my interests. That is why I vote for her. I don't vote for either Trump or Hillary because neither of them represent me. I don't want either of them to be president. It really is not hard to understand unless you are a fucking moron. But everyone who isn't dumb as fuck already realizes you are a fucking moron when you say you are voting for a corrupt POS like Hillary Clinton. I'm going to leave with a quote you will certainly ignore, "If Johnson had been running all by himself, he would not have been acceptable to anyone. The only thing that made him acceptable to the world was that the shrewd capitalists, the shrewd imperialists, knew that the only way people would run toward the fox would be if you showed them a wolf. So they created a ghastly alternative. And it had the whole world, including people who call themselves Marxists, hoping that Johnson would beat Goldwater." Malcolm X (Side note, ironically Hillary Clinton was a "Goldwater Girl.") Malcolm X goes on to say, "I have to say this, those that claim to be enemies of the system were on their hands and knees waiting for Johnson to get elected because he is suppose to be a man of peace. And at that very moment Johnson had troops invading the Congo and south Vietnam. He even has troops in areas where other imperialists have withdrawn. Peace corps to Nigeria, mercenaries to the Congo." Good luck voting for the fox. At least you aren't voting for the wolf.
    2
  3817. Irrational atheist, quotes are suppose to used when you say exactly what someone says. You are using them incorrectly. I will also add that your misquote is taken completely out of context. Jimmy says at 8:20, "So you are hearing a lot of people saying this is all about racism, Trumps about racism, Brexit is about racism. That is a very... overly simplistic view of what's happening..." I guess what I'm trying to say to you is pull your head out of your ass if you can. I doubt it thou. You sound like an idiot.
    2
  3818. She will just block you because she can't handle the truth.
    2
  3819. Trump's motto is "Make America Great Again." Maybe you should leave Donald if you think America isn't great.
    2
  3820. I am going to judge you clowns and I'd never go to this place to be informed.
    2
  3821. @Eric W Regarding, "Practically nobody lives in Canada." This is totally irrelevant. What is relevant is the price of health care PER PERSON. And they pay HALF as much PER PERSON. But good luck with your idiotic fear mongering about waiting lines. What a bunch of bullshit.
    2
  3822. Bernie wants to bring them home.
    2
  3823. I dislike the dodo letting any politician use their platform for a photo op. You should too. Sad you don't.
    2
  3824. L98 I think we essentially agree about everything. I just thought it was worth noting that we already have a mixed system but we are still very, very broken.
    2
  3825. If you are trying to destroy my faith in humanity it's working.
    2
  3826. Just what the dems needed, another out of touch billionaire. /s
    2
  3827.  @hamsterlife6509  Speak for yourself.
    2
  3828.  @d.owenpowell9023  "juvenile thinking" The irony. Thanks for the laugh.
    2
  3829. It's good that this channel is losing subscribers... if everyone subscribed to this channel is having a mental breakdown it should be held responsible.
    2
  3830. @UCTYpXP5KEhNtV3jdNaAUBdw It's also noteworthy that you don't even ATTEMPT to address the many and very substantive problems I have with her. I suspect you know you can't.
    2
  3831. Bernie just voted to give billions of american wealth to fund war.
    2
  3832.  @c.f.okonta8815  This isn't about trump. He isn't president. Stop deflecting.
    2
  3833.  @JL-gt1kc  "rational" He is a victim of propaganda. "weird" I feel like he was trying to win back someone important to him in his family. And I think he needs people right now.
    2
  3834.  @JL-gt1kc  "victims" Not like him and jimmy. When you do the type of important work that they both do they are targets in a way I can't imagine. "rational" Jimmy handles being called a "trumper" better than epstein does but he is still a rational person doing important work. His job isn't to be a pundit... that's jimmys job for a reason. And Jimmy would probably struggle doing epsteins work. Let's not throw the baby out with the bath water.
    2
  3835. @Badatallthis Stuff "Typically speaking I would say, nobody likes being lectured to randomly by people they don't know." Yup. Obviously. But that isn't going to stop me from preaching a message of peace to people who need to hear it even if they don't want to hear it. "It's a way of speaking down to someone" I'm very often condescending. The way to stop this is by not being stupid... like, for example, advocating for increased hostility with russia when this world NEEDS detante. " just like this brief one I have given you for example." LMFAO I was going to bring up your hypocrisy for you. The fact that you know you are being a hypocrite and doing it anyways really speaks for how intellectually bankrupt your "argument" is.
    2
  3836. "Bernie always works for the American people." As if. He works for the "democratic" party and will always tell you to vote for them.
    2
  3837. Not really the elderly but he has made me racist against orange people.
    2
  3838. What does that say about you if you actually believe that and are here commenting?
    2
  3839.  @thepolishlatinofromphilly9709  I thought Paul Ryan died at the end of the last GOT.
    2
  3840.  Daniel Appleton  That I haven't seen. And based on your opinion I'm not about to anytime soon.
    2
  3841.  @janetfromanotherplanet1301  Regarding, "you’re not going to get a good president that isn’t controlled in the US ever again." This just sounds like defeatist attitude to me and terrible rationale to not vote. Regarding, "Anyone campaigning can say anything" Yeah. But most don't campaign on committing war crimes. And if they do don't call their campaign decent. It really bothers me. Regarding, "you best believe someone’s holding a gun to their head" Let's say I agree with this, and I don't, some would do the right thing and risk the bullet. Find those people and support them. They aren't the ones campaigning on committing war crimes.
    2
  3842.  @janetfromanotherplanet1301  Regarding JFK. Meh. Don't get me wrong he very well might have been worthy of that label had he lived longer. Sadly he didn't. Regarding Bobby. I think he was probably better. Regarding, "the US should ditch the two party system because Trump VS Hillary" There were plenty of good reasons that it should go long before this. That said Trump v Hillary was great further evidence of this. That said I think Jimmy is very, very, very wrong in his belief that Sanders should be forming his own party. I think Sanders plan for hostile takeover is the correct plan. The 2 major parties have done an excellent job at insulating themselves from their suck. The game is rigged from top to bottom. It's not like 3rd party candidates get a fair shake. It's not like the electoral college isn't a thing. If the party successfully fucks him over in the primary again I might change my mind. But as of now Sanders is doing the right thing.
    2
  3843. Even terrible human beings are like, "do I really deserve that comparison?"
    2
  3844. lucky regarding, "totally against both parties." You want to be against both major parties? Fine. They both suck. Neither represent the people. I wasn't talking about supporting parties. I was talking about supporting people. You should be supporting good people regardless of a party label. There are good people who think the best way of getting the change the country deserves is by working to overtake the party. You are doing yourself and the causes you claim to care about a disservice by refusing to support people who want to use different tactics than you would prefer even if their goals are the same. Regarding, "You didn't see them objecting to upping our defense by over $700 billion no problem for you, right?" You talk about parties like they are people. They are not. There were some people, like Sanders, who voted against that bill. That is what is important to me. Not the party label he affiliates himself with. Regarding, "You're a fool how many times are you going to get played?" You mistakenly think I am looking to work the oligarchy. I'm not. I'm trying to take over their party. Regarding, "if you put your hand on a flame and it burned your hand how many times are you going to put your hand back on that flame?" You seem to think it is more important to try to punish the flame than think it is important to do what is best to get what you want. Regarding, "it has nothing to do with party." Clearly it has everything to do with party when you care more about a person's party label than about the person. What you advocate is no different than what partisan dems and partisan republicans do. They care about party labels and ignore all the important things that they should care about. Regarding, "you're falling for the party shit not me." Clearly you were not listening to me. I don't care about parties. That is your thing. I care about people. Regarding, "It doesn't matter how good the person might be who is running if they run in the Democratic Party." How can you not realize how stupid this sounds? Seriously. Please take some time and reflect on this statement. Regarding, "I adore both of them but they will be chewed up and spit out if they stay in the party" You adore them both but you are kicking them to the curb because you have bitten before. You sound like a person who says they will never fall in love again because they were hurt by someone in the past. Regarding, "nothing will ever change in our favor if someone goes into that party." So, if only, those couple people would call themselves some other meaningless label that would change something? It wouldn't. What is important, which you clearly are blind to, is that the objective is to get as many good people in government as possible and their party labels are not at all what is important. Currently there are only a handful. We need more and I don't care what party label they wear. Regarding, "Do you seriously think our politicians make our laws here?" Not really. How far off topic do you need to go? Regarding, "The Dems..." You talk about them as if they are a monolith. You talk about them as if they all think the same. You talk about them as if they are all the same. They clearly are not and you sound silly and being lazy when you think you can know everything about someone because of a stupid party label. Regarding, "Wake the fuck up its because of people like you who keep voting for the same damn party and thinking something wonderful is going to happen." Wake the fuck up, its because of people like you who keep thinking in terms of only party labels that we got into this mess in the first place. Stop thinking something wonderful is going to happen when you have no plan for winning. Winning elections isn't everything but I assure you it is pretty fucking important. Regarding, "It took both parties to get us where we are today I guess you're happy being governed by oligarchs." Yes it did take both parties and I'm not happy being governed by oligarchs. It's just that I am willing to support the people fighting against the oligarchs even if they have the audacity to call themselves a democrat. It really is not that hard to understand. Regarding, "So you keep voting for the Dems you keep voting for the Republican you keep taking it up the ass not me!" So what is your idea of not taking it in the ass? The ability to feel good about not voting for either major party while they still fuck you just like they fuck everyone else? You care more about punishing the parties than you care about people. Wake the fuck up and stop being such a bitch. Act like you care about the things you care about instead of what you actually do which is caring about punishing the parties. I'm going to put this all in caps because it is important and you really need to understand it. PEOPLE ARE WHAT IS IMPORTANT! Stop focusing on parties.
    2
  3845. lucky I think we agree on pretty much everything other than the tactics we think are best to get what we want. I think you are being silly to not support good people because of the label, so much so that I was willing to write so much. Focus on people not their party label. For example I support Sanders because I think HE represents me. He doesn't represent me more or less depending on the party label he wears. And as soon as I think HE doesn't represent me anymore I will stop supporting him.
    2
  3846. Jerry regarding, "look up hillary's speaking fees" He asked for a popular senator. But it has nothing to do with popularity.... they get paid based on their amount of influence in government (or possible future influence) and how much of their soul they are willing to sell.
    2
  3847. This show is still affiliated with TYT. But kyle would tell you that doesn't affect him like the 20 million katzenburg gave tyt didn't affect them. Time to leave this sinking ship.
    2
  3848.  @nanoaged1  My first instinct was to give him a second chance but the more I've thought about it the more I'm done with him. I was a huge fan of his for a long time. I'll spend a little time trashing him because I feel betrayed by him. And then I'm just done with him. I've unsubscribed to both his channel and krystal kyle and friends.
    2
  3849. If he actually had priniciples he would have at the very least mentioned the conflict of interest as he was covering for TYT's blackmail. "when someone shows you who they are believe them the first time" good advice from maya angelou
    2
  3850. She is a fake who just sold out m4a to vote for pelosi.
    2
  3851. With all due respect (you deserve none) you are a moron and twat. For example I will never vote for Biden. He doesn't represent me. Not even close. Now if you want to throw a tantrum about you go ahead and fucking cry about it like the crying little baby bitch that you are.
    2
  3852.  @sandyunderpants4376  "this is his topic of expertise, and I knew more than he did?" He is an expert because he studies history and books while you study twitter.
    2
  3853. I'm going to go rogue. Great work. I said it. Now hate me if you must.
    2
  3854.  @hizzlemobizzle  Pretty sure he didn't even though it is also true that he is the only one with a chance of winning among the two.
    2
  3855. Biden is the proud author of the racist crime bill for which he has never apologized for.
    2
  3856.  @AtacamaHumanoid  I've got a theory that the conflict of interest of him being affiliated with TYT has something to do with it. Then again TYT isn't corrupt despite the millions they've gotten so nevermind. It can't be that.
    2
  3857. Deciding to vote is an easy decision. Do it. That doesn't mean you have to vote for either trump or biden. I'm not.
    2
  3858.  @leavesarerandom  Both Trump and Biden are corrupt liars who represent corporations and big money. One might be better, but only in the way a shit is better than diarrhea shit. It doesn't really matter who is better. Neither are worthy of support and it isn't even close for either of them.
    2
  3859. Michael do you want to flip burgers? I sure as fuck don't. You know why? Because that job fucking sucks. They are worth every penny they get paid and significantly more because, like I pointed out, McDonalds makes billions from their labor.
    2
  3860. You should have already done that a long time ago if you live in an open primary state. That said do what you need to do to vote in the "democratic" primary in closed primary states.
    2
  3861. A sperm bank? Maybe.
    2
  3862. Odin regarding, "i want justice also." You say this the same way Trump says he wants health care for all... these are clearly just meaningless words. Regarding, " i will make sure trump stays in office over pence." Because you are demonstrating that you do, in fact, not care about justice... at least not as much as you care about making sure Trump stays in office. You don't care about justice, you care about keeping Trump in office. And I'm not interested in the rationalizations and mental gymnastics you want to play to justify your position. You think the ends justify the means. They don't. At least not to people with principles. Principles such as a desire for justice. That is more important to me than party politics and it should be to you. Sadly it isn't.
    2
  3863. jb regarding, "I mean regular honest people" Don't get me wrong, I wish we could as well obviously. It's just that I'm a cynic.
    2
  3864.  @Peasham  "Never once did he defend TYT" Remember the time when he said the millions they got from kazenburg doesn't make them corrupt? Pepperidge farm remembers.
    2
  3865. I guess I now know the origins of my being an atheist... I played Dungeons and Dragons back in the day.
    2
  3866.  @henrygustav7948  I want american wealth spent in america. There is plenty of money that could be spent, for example, rebuilding our crumbling infrastructure. Not that I think added spending need be done when cutting the military. Everything would be just fine if we cut their budget in half. Regarding, "we use neoliberal framing without even knowing it." Huh?
    2
  3867. "Thank you for caring about the people of our nation" Bernie sanders actually.... "vote for biden, my good friend."
    2
  3868. Let's go out and vote for Bernie en masse anyway shall we?
    2
  3869.  @urrywest  "No respect." -rodney dangerfield
    2
  3870.  @victorybeginsinthegarden  Regarding, "we only get 2 choices" No. We don't. Obviously. People like you, who keep supporting the lesser of two evils, are why we are where we are. Vote for who you want but take your idiotic blue no matter who message and shove it up your ass. Voting for the lesser evil is VOTING FOR EVIL. Maybe stop doing that for reasons that should be obvious but escape you.
    2
  3871. Sam is controlled opposition. He is sus.
    2
  3872. Steve regarding, ""better him than Hillary" might have some merit (because)..." My favorite part about Trump being president versus Hillary is that, because of it, there is hope for an actual progressive like Sanders becoming President in 2020. That said, all talk of who is better is ultimately irrelevant, mute, and pointless at this point because it no longer matters who would "have been better." Trump IS president. Period. Who would be better Trump or used toilet paper is now just as relevant a question... aka utterly meaningless. (that said I prefer the used TP) That said it does have a tiny, tiny bit of validity as a mental exercise but that is NEVER how it is brought up. The people who bring it up EXCLUSIVELY bring it up to try and justify and excuse Trump doing fucking terrible shit. To them it literally doesn't fucking matter what Trump does while in office. What do Trump supporters think about tax break blowjobs to the rich? He's better than Hillary. What do Trump supporters think of a Goldman Sachs cabinet? He's better than Hillary. Shit Pai as FCC chair? He's better than Hillary. He could whip his tiny orange dick out and rub it across their face and their response? He's better than Hillary. That is how it is brought up. ALWAYS. It is fucking infuriating, it is fucking sad, and I have no patience for it. So sorry for jumping over you for elaborating about it. You seem cool. Unlike Pandora Rice who, in all honesty, can lick my taint. It's better than Hillary afterall so it should be fine.
    2
  3873. Town Drunk regarding, "Who got millions more votes?" If we had free and fair elections you would have a really good point. Seeing as how the primary was rigged as fuck you are dumb as fuck. Regarding, "Bernie lost fair and square" It takes a special kind of stupid to say something like that. You are dumb even by town drunk standards. There is no substantial difference between Hillary and Trump. There is also no substantial difference between Hillary supporters and Trump supporters... you are all fucking morons.
    2
  3874. TYT groomed kyle and he rewarded them by covering for the blackmail while never mentioning the conflict of interest at the time.
    2
  3875.  @SpeakerWiggin49  "drama between talk show hosts." Then this is just "drama" between west and a university. Or maybe, just maybe these are important substantive topics. I write "covering for the blackmail" and your response is "big fucking deal." How tone def and stupid can you possibly be to write that response to my comment?
    2
  3876.  @Blackmallowtube  "principled pundits" Medhurst, the greyzone, greenwald, jimmy, the vanguard, franc analysis, robert inlakesh, chris hedges, and my apologies to good ones I've missed.
    2
  3877.  @potatopoweredhamster9897  "the one and the only time." Just looking at him I'd think he has hairy legs. But he lies so much that when he says he does I start to think he doesn't.
    2
  3878.  @potatopoweredhamster9897  I'm also willing to bet that cornpop isn't a bad dude.
    2
  3879. Nah. I like the onion.
    2
  3880. Your smears against him are so weak.
    2
  3881. This should be obvious but thanks for saying it drinker. Next round is on me.
    2
  3882. Smears like this are remarkably transparent at this point.
    2
  3883. Jimmy Dore didn't deserve to be treated like he was by kyle. No one does. Kyle's a fraud who never bothered to mention his relationship with TYT even while covering up their blackmail.
    2
  3884. He's barely older than her and he doesn't suck like WARren who voted to give Trump even more money for bombs than the orange clown wanted, is a waffle on M4A, and loves dirty money until she calculates it's not in her best interest to take it.
    2
  3885. Is partisan politics how kyle got brainworms? What a fraud.
    2
  3886. He lied through his teeth and recited easily debunked bullshit talking points. The only conviction he has is a love of special interest money.
    2
  3887. cc: "a place where large numbers of people, especially political prisoners or members of persecuted minorities, are deliberately imprisoned in a relatively small area with inadequate facilities, sometimes to provide forced labor or to await mass execution." Yes. It clearly is.
    2
  3888. "ex-Democrat supporters that have become so disgruntled with the party" That describes me.
    2
  3889.  @abe8435  "Someone watching this video who isn’t as invested in social media drama as you would have no idea what you are on about." You can always ask instead of what you are doing.
    2
  3890.  @dashx1103  "Democrats capitulated" No they didn't. They did exactly what they and their donors wanted to do. This is just more BS from grim.
    2
  3891.  @dashx1103  "Democrats capitulated." If you were trying to prove my point that grim manufactures consent for dems you have succeeded. The parliamentarian works for the dems, not the other way around.
    2
  3892.  @abe8435  And when I say grim is controlled opposition meant to manufacture consent for corrupt politicians I can cite articles like the one I already have.
    2
  3893. celtic while I agree with what you said I can only wonder why you are talking about fox news here. This thread isn't about them. Try to stay on topic in the future.
    2
  3894.  @peasant7214  "so jimmy dore is also confused about it?" Nope. He gets it. That's why he understands yang isn't good. Regarding, "I still dont see anyone who mentioned how Yang plans to pay for it though." Maybe go listen to yang himself. I recommend a video right here on youtube titled, "Andrew Yang: Paying for a Universal Basic Income" When asked how he would pay for it the first thing he offers is by gutting the current social safety net. That's how he wants to pay for UBI when any actual progressive would insist it only be put on top of the current system and paid for by the super rich and not by people on food stamps.
    2
  3895.  @imnotmike  regarding, "Do us a favor and change parties, ok?" I happily demexited long ago. Only because I'm fortunate enough to be living in a state with an open primary. If I were living in a state with a closed primary I'd still identify with your dumpster fire of party because that is the only way I'd be allowed to vote... in America. Real legit. Regarding, "Go 'help' the republicans please." Nah. I'm good. I'm tempted to just say fuck, join the green party, call that my team, and work my entire life to see dems never win another election ever again but I guess I'm just masochistic enough to try and reform your dumpster fire of a party that can't win a general election against Donald fucking Trump. Regarding, "Your toxic nonsense is only going to flatline our movement." What does that make the nonsense you spew? Radioactive toxic waste? Your comment is what someone who has nothing of substance or value says. If that is your "movement" there is no wonder why you fuckers can't win elections. You don't even attempt how to reconcile your stupid rhetoric of "She has never flip flopped on anything. All she ever did wrong was to not endorse Bernie," with the facts I've brought up. You should be ashamed of yourself... just like your party.
    2
  3896.  @imnotmike  regarding, "because you ain't helping." And you lying about shit is? Sorry if the truth hurts. Regarding, "But Bernie may or may not run." There is ZERO good reason to think he won't be. Regarding, "And even if he does run - what then?" Then we support him. Duh. This isn't rocket science. Regarding, "What about after Bernie? Who is next?" Holy fuck. This is your concern of yours? What to do about 2024? I don't know. Tulsi Gabbard, Nina Turner and all the people that have the intelligence and willingness to do the right thing and NOT run against Sanders in 2020 because they care more about what is right for the country then what might bring them their own personal glory. Regarding, "Elizabeth Warren shouldn't have endorsed Bernie in the 2016 election." Um... Yes. She absolutely should have. That is what a person with actual progressive principles was doing in 2016. Regarding, "She should have run herself." Maybe. But she didn't. And since then she has made choice after choice after choice that spits in the face of progressives and our values. Regarding, "and then we wouldn't have Trump in the White House. That was her real mistake." Let's agree to disagree about the details but agree to agree that Elizabeth Warren and her actions helped put Trump in office. There is lots, and lots and lots of blame to go around and I don't put her name anywhere near the top of the list but she has some of it and people are right to hold her responsible for it. Regarding, "She would have mopped the floor with Hillary and Trump." Whatever. This isn't relevant to anything and I don't give a fuck about hypotheticals that have nothing to do with the specific conversation at hand. Regarding, "The way toxic progressives like yourself go around shitting on progressives" I'm sure you are going to finish this with something reasonable like, by bringing up the facts, fact are our friend right? Regarding, "you make it pretty much impossible to live up to your standards." Nope. You don't. Why am I not surprised. If you think standards that include things like supporting progressives in their elections, supporting peaceful protestors, and not supporting a budget to give Trump more bombs is "impossible to live up to" then that is only because you fucking suck and the standards that you bother to hold people up to are probably fucking worthless. No doubt you would say the same stupid shit if I had the audacity to mention an inconvenient fact such as Obama more then double the number of wars we are in. And me having a problem with this is having standards that are impossible to live up to. Regarding, "You sow discord" Oh. Do I? Good. I want people pissed. They should be. But they need to blame the right people and the right people includes people like Warren whether you like it or not. Whether you are willing to admit it or not. I want discord. But put it where it belongs... with the oligarchy. With the establishment. With the corporate media. Regarding, "you hurt progressives worse than you hurt corporate dems." As someone who seems keen on propping up corporate dems let's agree to disagree about this. Regarding, "Corporate democratic voters aren't going to be convinced by your arguments against Cory Booker. They don't care." Holy shit is the random. Cory Booker. Like what the fuck? When did any of this become about Cory Booker. What arguments have I made against Cory Booker? I have no fucking idea what retarded point you are trying to make (that said I still confidently conclude whatever you were trying to say was stupid... but whatever) so I really can't respond intelligently to it. Regarding, "Is Elizabeth Warren perfect?" Ah yes... this stupid fucking talking point. Because that is what me and my mentioning of specific things where she failed me means... that I require perfection. Meanwhile, in reality I don't require perfection. Meanwhile, in reality I've never used the word for really good reason. Meanwhile, the person that I will be supporting for President, Bernie Sanders, isn't perfect and I can tell you exactly in the ways I have problems with him. Regarding, "I am not perfect." Thanks for clearing that up not that we needed it. This is an understatement of epic proportions. Can you imagine if we were talking about Hitler and I was talking about specific things I have a problems with and responded to that with this nonsense... the nobody is perfect defense. Do you think that would be a logical argument there? Well it isn't anymore insightful here. It's more like word vomit that makes everyone dumber when they read it. Regarding, "Elizabeth Warren did not ever support the creation of the Dakota Access Pipeline." No shit. That's probably why I never said anything of the sort. I'm not sure if you are stupid as fuck or are intentionally trying to misrepresent what I'm saying but either way it doesn't speak well of you. The actual words I used were, "turning her back on the DAPL protestors." I shouldn't have to explain to you what this means like you are child but it doesn't mean what you are saying. At best your being an idiot. At worst you are a blatant liar with a warped moral compass. Regarding, "Just because Elizabeth Warren didn't personally show up in North Dakota to protest" Again you are putting words in my mouth. I could have appeased by something so simple as a statement of support for them when they were having their constitutional rights trampled on. Regarding, "These are republican talking points. Smear jobs. Fox News 101 bullshit." This is an accurate indication of what you are doing. You have by lying from the first stupid thing you have said and you continue to lie. You suck at life just like all the people you mention. Regarding, "You're sick, and if you're going to be spreading Fox News propaganda, at least have the decency to go do it as a republican." There is a job for you working at "correct the record" if you don't already work there already with all the stupid shit you have said. In short good luck being retarded.
    2
  3897.  @imnotmike  regarding, "And did Tulsi Gabbard personally show up to back the protesters for the Dakota Access Pipeline?" You are like a walking talking strawman argument. Never do they say anything about "personally showing up" but you just hear whatever you want don't you. I can't tell you how frustrating talking to someone like you is.
    2
  3898.  @imnotmike  regarding, "Progressives care about policy." Yeah... that's why I bring up DAPL protestors and her support of the budget for the department of offense while you lie about my claims for one and completely ignore the other. Holy shit do you suck at life.
    2
  3899. Regarding, "She will be a good foot soldier in Bernie’s army" If you say so... while she fights a war against him.
    2
  3900. "His youtube channel, secular talk, an AFFILIATE of the young turks network" -wikipedia
    2
  3901.  @Robert-og3xx  Um? What? Actually nevermind, I'm quickly not caring what you "think."
    2
  3902. He still hasn't apologized for his racist crime bill. I'm not sure why you think trump is so much worse.
    2
  3903. Their human rights abuses for starters.
    2
  3904. When did being classy mean pretending that a person isn't what they are? And are terrible people really entitled to "class." Don't some earn stones? And that isn't our fault?
    2
  3905.  @Madeviets  It's too bad we can't see how many thumbs downs your stupid comment would get if youtube allowed it.
    2
  3906. While they aren't the "same," hoping someone dies" is an example of "wishing harm."
    2
  3907.  @sirtheodorefranciswindsor  Regarding, "you would get down with Ivanka" Yup. I've never tried hate sex. She would be perfect for that and then she can get lost. I'm not looking to talk.
    2
  3908.  @sirtheodorefranciswindsor  Regarding, "owl guy." I'm not trying to take sides but it might be TDS there is a lot of that going around. And don't get me wrong trump is terrible but he also has a way of making some people's brains melt.
    2
  3909. I could see him taking lawrence's spot at msnbc
    2
  3910.  @joelindblad8001  Maybe that's what the corporate media was telling itself when it was burying tara reades allegations until after joe was the presumptive nominee. If you care about party politics more than the truth then you are a hack.
    2
  3911. I'm surprised that clown isn't in the cabinet considering how terrible it is.
    2
  3912.  @jordanintheknow  Regarding, "we get it you hate yang. Move on from the comment section now because many don’t." Maybe take this opportunity to tell people why you love yang so much instead of just telling me I should STFU.
    2
  3913.  @carjaune6793  Regarding, "Yang is not controllable" His entire presidential campaign was an establishment wet dream specifically designed with the soul purpose to siphon votes from the progressive candidate they actually feared might win. He's their puppet whether you realize it or not.
    2
  3914.  @carjaune6793  Yang is "not controllable" the same way Liz Warren is "not controllable." They are both establishment puppets.
    2
  3915.  @carjaune6793  Regarding, "That's just you talking, buddy." Nah. That's what you are doing. I'm making logical arguments based in reality. Regarding, "Here let me do it too: "Bernie is an establishment puppet." Ok let me do it again: "AOC is an establishment puppet." " People do this all the time. I've defended both Bernie and AOC. And I do it with intelligent argument... not with deflection like you are attempting. This is not an intelligent argument. Do you really not realize that? Or do you just not care that you that's not what you are doing? Regarding, "Thxs for the productive conversation" It hasn't been productive because your comments are worthless.
    2
  3916.  @CC-vq1yg  He gets it through work (who give it to him only to try and keep him in his terrible job that doesn't pay him nearly what he's worth). And because he has never been sick he has never paid anything out of pocket himself.
    2
  3917. Sabotaging Bernie was always her plan. She has always been terrible. I'm so happy more people are realizing it.
    2
  3918. Sam Seder is controlled opposition for a corrupt party. He is not your friend.
    2
  3919. Hitler was a "time person of the year" and some still think musk is their worst person ever.
    2
  3920.  @themidnightpoetryclub7663  Nah. If we turn enough millionaires into billionaires then some might trickle back on us peasants. /s
    2
  3921. Brilliant. I guess there is no reason to try and figure out why it goes up and down then.
    2
  3922.  jerry flounders  Regarding, "it's a Sad thing." You know what's really sad? Your inability to master something as simple as capitalization much less master more complicated ideas.
    2
  3923.  @TomDLuv777  Regarding, "Really can't count anyone out this early in the race." While I agree with your sentiment, ultimately your statement is wrong. As evidence I cite John Hickenlooper. Or me. Even thou I like my chances more then John despite my not running. :)
    2
  3924.  @TomDLuv777  Again... I agree with the point you were trying to make... just not how you did it. You can't over extrapolate polls results this far out. This is really your point right? And it would be very correct. That said the fact of matter is that there is, at best, a handful of people who might win the general in 2020. The rest really can be counted out when thinking they have a chance. They don't. I'd even include a person I very well might end up voting for like Jill Stein. Let's hope I don't have to vote for her. Because if I do I will know I've already lost. That said I'd have no trouble doing it if I conclude that she is the only candidate running that I think is worthy of winning.
    2
  3925.  @tobysmith2081  Regarding, "we don't have the numbers" Actually we have everything we needed to force a vote. We just don't have actual progressives willingly to stand up for progressive priorities. "because what chomsky said makes you feel bad doesn't mean he's wrong" It only feels bad because he is terribly wrong. Just because it's chomsky doesn't make his BS on this topic right.
    2
  3926. Bloomberg needs to be on the debate stage to talk about and address the pressing issues of our day... like homeless people being given free bagels. /s
    2
  3927. He's going to call out your guy while they are in power. I hope you stick around for it.
    2
  3928.  Geist Maschine  Probably, but I'm not ruling out the possibility that they are just really, really, really, really, really stupid.
    2
  3929.  @girletherial  Your comments are remarkably terrible. It's almost impressive just how fucking awful they are. Fuck you for writing it so that I spent time reading it and fuck youtube for not just enabling the thumbs down feature for comments so ridiculously terrible as yours. But good luck with your efforts to make everyone dumber with every stupid thing you write.
    2
  3930. That says far more about you than it does them.
    2
  3931.  @sunseeker9581  Regarding, "Voting by mail." How do you verify the results of voting my mail? You can't. When people go to the polls we have exit polls. When people vote by mail we have nothing. And asking for an election that you can't check is just asking to have your elections stolen. Did Booker lose cause he was outspent? Or does the DNC, who thinks Pete Buttigieg "won" the Iowa primary just full of shit again.
    2
  3932.  @sunseeker9581  Regarding, "I admit Iowa was a mess" It was a straight up conspiracy with flipped votes. Don't worry. Conspiracies actually happen. No shame in admitting it. This isn't like saying the earth is flat. Regarding, "voting in person makes no difference to voting by mail." The difference is that we, the peasants, have a way of verifying one but not the other. That's the fact whether or not you realize it or admit it.
    2
  3933. Scholar regarding, "When wasn't it?" When did I say or imply it wasn't always? Just because it has always been one does not make it ok today.
    2
  3934.  @nhlpa17  "the US doesn't give a sh*t about the environment." I'm all for shitting on the US and their environmental policy but you did it wrong with your original reply. It only made it seem like the you care about the environment less than the US government. But good for you about getting some US money.
    2
  3935.  @nhlpa17  Regarding, "I'm sure that thought made sense as it bounced around in your empty head." I'm sure you thought the same about your original idiotic reply. Regarding, "To cancel it under the banner of it is because they care about the environment is laughable" If only you said something like this in your OP. Instead you only tossed shade at it's cancelation and rejoiced at getting US dollars. But don't let that stop you from pretending that this sort of message was in your original reply when it was clearly not.
    2
  3936. The articles of impeachment have nothing to do with murder. Therefore you are being absurd.
    2
  3937. I'd vote for jimmy dore!
    2
  3938. Galaxy regarding, "Yes, they are" You are in denial and hopeless. Regarding, "Bernie is working with us for a reason." Bernie is working around them and against them. He is only successful in forcing the democrats to do the right thing on occasion. They sure as fuck aren't interested in doing the right thing, EVER, unless they are forced.
    2
  3939. Regarding, "but a corrupt democracy is certainly better than a corrupt dictatorship." Whatever you have to tell yourself to justify supporting a corrupt democracy. I'm sure you will be happy to support a corrupt dictatorship when something worse comes along.
    2
  3940.  @ArchlordZer0  Regarding, "Wow dude. You might as well roll over, because you are a defeatist." I find you impossible to take seriously. I hope you are paid for your shit. I hope you don't bootlick like this for free. I would love it if your POS dems change something. I'd happily be wrong about them. But they suck whether you see it or not and my actions aren't going to affect them because I'm not super rich. Me and my "defeatist" attitude won't be why they suck. But you will likely blame me and not them when nothing changes won't you? You are already practically blaming me and my "defeatist" attitude. I can't blame you. That strategy must be easier for you than defending those clowns.
    2
  3941.  @ArchlordZer0  Regarding, "Politicians can always be pressured to listen." So hitler was the fault of the German people. If only they pressured him to do the right thing he would have. Politicians can always be pressured to listen. LMFAO
    2
  3942.  @ArchlordZer0  Regarding, "You're not a serious person." I'm not going to lie I find this really fucking funny coming from you. Thanks for the laugh dipshit.
    2
  3943.  @maximilian3394  Regarding, "yes I'm for that" That is what defund the police is about, slashing their budget. If it were about abolishing the police it would called abolishing the police. Ultimately "slashing the budget of the police" doesn't have the same ring and also leaves out the other part where you better spend that money elsewhere. Regarding, "Hopefully they makes sense." I think we see eye to eye on pretty much everything.
    2
  3944.  @maximilian3394  Regarding, "I don't know to much about the military industrial complex I should do some more research" Ignorance is bliss. Ultimately it doesn't take too much to know that making money off of war is a pretty sick business. I believe the term MIC was first coined by D Eisenhauer, a republican.
    2
  3945.  @maximilian3394  Regarding, "source of info but Kyle's" Make sure to check out the podcast he is doing with krysal these days. She is also a great source of info and kyle is there. Regarding, "I'm a registered democrat" If you are in a state with closed primaries I get this. If you are in a state with open primaries I'd demexit. That party should be yours but they clearly represent big money and corporations. Ultimately this isn't that important really. At least not compared to who you are voting for. Regarding, "I'm s proud progressive democratic socialist and I don't feel I could truly say I'm fighting for the cause that I feel myself and any and all progressive democratic socialists are fighting for if I registered differently" I think you are wrong to think that those ideas are represented in the party. If you really want to represent progressive democratic socialist ideals the green party or the peoples party would far better represent those ideas and those values. Regarding, "being an independent then I'm comfortable with sticking where I am" Again your political affiliation is hardly what is important. I support Bernie Sanders and would regardless of the party he chose to identify with. It does say something who you are hanging out with and who you choose to identify with, but what you stand up for is far more important. Regarding, "like nancy" I've been a big supporter of AOC in the past because she says all the right things and runs her campaign the way I want it run (doesn't take big money), but her actions in office are ultimately what is important. Like when she just voted for nancy for speaker and got nothing for it instead of trying to force the vote on m4a. So as of now she is dead to me. I care about good policy like m4a. I don't care about parties and a team. And if you aren't fighting for m4a and the other policy I want I'm going to treat you like the enemy. And best I can tell both major parties are my enemy. Dems have everything and can prove me wrong. I'd love to be wrong about them but I won't be. They are already betraying the people. 2k checks are now 1400 dollar checks. But I hope you and your family are doing as best they can in really sad times. Peace.
    2
  3946.  @maximilian3394  Regarding, "what do we do from here?" I wish I knew. I'm honestly for anything and everything to a degree. I'm an advocate for hostile takeover of the democratic party. I thought it was working to a certain degree but like I've said I'm less sure these days. I'm also for building 3rd and alternate parties whereever and whenever possible. I'm for acts of civil disobedience and protest. I'd probably be for revolution if it weren't for the fact that I also consider myself a pacifist. Regarding, "AOCs words" She talks the talk. But so did obama. After obama the lesson I took from it and how I explained his ability to fool me was follow the money. AOC didn't even really do that but who knows... if she ever did live up to her words she would be something pretty great. Time will tell I guess but she really dropped the ball with force the vote. Regarding, "Bernies mindset was going along to get along with Biden was better than 4 more years of trump" I'm pretty sure that hedges addressed this in one his speeches. He said that bernie "didn't want to be nadared." I kinda get it. Full disclosure I really want to believe in bernie. The party and the machine would have destroyed him if he ever ran 3rd party. In hindsight I wish he would have tried anyway. Regarding, "Biden needed to be voted for simply to stop trump" I understand why people play the lesser evil game. I did it in the past. I'm done with it personally. I'm super old but 2016 was the first time I actually had a meaningful vote for president because I was living in a swing state for the first time in my life. I voted for jill stein. I don't regret it. I'm not voting for people I think are the problem and that's what I think of both biden and hillary. In a way I think they are worse than trump because trump doesn't pretend to be on my side the way dems do. I like to think of myself as a good judge of character who has a good BS detector (everyone thinks this) and still I find myself being duped too often. It shouldn't be impossible to support a candidate who believes in peace. I voted for obama because he voted against the iraq war and then he expanded war. I wish I had better solutions for you but you clearly have a grasp of the game going on. Hopefully it can keep you ahead of the game better than I have been able to over my years. Thanks again for the conversation. Forgive me for typos and rambling, it's late and I'm too tired to proofread. Sorry. Peace.
    2
  3947. supporters of israel are complicit in jennyside (sic)
    2
  3948. Capitalism corrupts everything, especially war.
    2
  3949.  @Zeit_waise  Meh. Good citation for a terrible dem but I'm still not sure she is "worse" or can be passed any easier than tanden.
    2
  3950.  @Meine.Postma  If taking down one of the richest conmen on the planet is a "waste of his talents" then what exactly do you think he should be doing instead?
    2
  3951.  @Meine.Postma  I think the more people that understand he is a conman and why he is a conman is only a good thing. If you don't think it is then you are not thinking straight. You also never bothered to answer my simple and direct question. I think that's telling.
    2
  3952.  @Meine.Postma  "other conmen or groups of people" You mean like in his recent video titled, "Source: BUSTED!" "do something like the Apollo 13 videos" You mean like the video titled, "Apollo 13: Was it really accurate?" like he has also done recently? "His point about Musk has been made." And still he finds new ways to show he is terrible. And still he has bootlickers. And still he is rich AF. "But whatever you want to believe man, I do not really care" If you actually didn't care you wouldn't be here making up idiotic reasons to whine about TF. But think whatever BS you want. I know you will.
    2
  3953. The notion that wanting diversity is being "anti-white" is absurd. The bottom line is that we are a diverse nation... and our representatives should reflect that. If our representatives where disproportionately minorities he would still call for diversity. And that wouldn't be "anti-minority" either. I agree that first and foremost policy is what is important. I'm not about to vote for Palin because she's a women or Ben Carson because he's black. But our representatives should represent the people, and not only in policy but in backgrounds. It makes them better able to understand us in a way a non diversified group can't.
    2
  3954.  @Wildgrovehomestead  "I am interested in who is at risk at this point from an Omicron infection" No one had died from it unless they already had terminal cancer or something like that.
    2
  3955. I'm confident he has done enough to maintain his access to AOC and I'm confident AOC will never talk to jackson because jackson will hold to her account and sam won't.
    2
  3956. Fatlittle kid... I was quoting the movie "Office Space." It's a great movie if you haven't seen it.
    2
  3957. Kyle is actually pretty cool purple. Seriously thou... yeah, Christie sucks.
    2
  3958.  @tciesla  Some of us are pretty fucking tired of "lesser of two evils" bullshit and that's what your comment feels like. That and there is a war going on for the soul of the party. Are they going to be a party for the people or continue to be a party for big money and corporations. I'm not looking to play nice with corporate dems. Fuck em. They should be republicans. There isn't cohesion and I'm not good at pretending. The fight wasn't fair in 2016 and it isn't going to be in 2020 either so why should I act like there is a cohesive front?
    2
  3959. I unsubscribed from secular talk, breaking points, and krystal, kyle and friends. If it was planned it wasn't a good plan.
    2
  3960. It's about money. Politicians are bought by industries and people who don't want weed legal... like big pharma, and alchohol, and the private for profit prison industrial complex. They all bribe our politicians. That's why legal weed isn't passed.
    2
  3961.  @dagooch2394  It's a joke. Please don't take it seriously.
    2
  3962.  @richardbritton4675  meh. He isn't as rich as he says but he sure as fuck isn't broke. It is far more likely he doesn't release his tax returns for other reasons. Like he wants to hide his conflicts of interest and wants to avoid addressing the pittance he pays in taxes compared to the wealth he claims to have.
    2
  3963. As if the actual left like biden. Stop being a moron blaming peasants. Blame the powers that be.
    2
  3964. Everyone can go see whatever the fuck doctor they want under a universal system.
    2
  3965. I used to be a big fan of his. Now when I think of that I feel nothing but shame and embarrassment. Fuck Maher and his neoliberal bullshit.
    2
  3966.  @ilikeme1234  In hindsight I suspect he always was but was being better at hiding it. He probably still would if Bernie Sanders weren't around exposing him and his beliefs.
    2
  3967.  @rohitguptac  Ah ok. That makes perfect sense. My response was born out of misunderstanding. Feel free to disregard it. Peace.
    2
  3968. branden look, it is idiotic to me in not only that I think it is absurd to suggest Obama isn't black but it is also idiotic to me in that it is completely irrelevant to the conversation at hand. Regarding, "the reason we NEED Turner or someone like her..." has NOTHING to do with whether or not Obama was or wasn't black. And if you feel the need to hammer home the point that Obama sucked I'm not sure why. I've already agreed that he was terrible. Lastly this thread isn't about Obama, it is about Nina Turner. Try to stay on topic.
    2
  3969. How dare you! /s
    2
  3970. I wholeheartedly agree with everything you say but I'm going to nitpick a fact. The US was spending as much as the next 11 countries combined BEFORE they just increased spending for "defense" by about 80 billion per year. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_military_expenditures
    2
  3971. Al gore won florida since you mentioned him.
    2
  3972.  @babyt556  "country without capitalism" Any country like that the US tries to destroy.
    2
  3973.  @stealingclay  "How would you incentive better maintenance?" Prioritize safety over profit. "My guess is you haven't put enough thought into this" My guess is that you lack imagination.
    2
  3974.  @ninjaface2342  "the difference between capitalism and crony capitalism" There isn't one. That is just a meaningless distinction capitalists try to use to justify their failed economic philosophy.
    2
  3975.  @texjohnson9208  Oh... and Obama was a great liar because I too bought his bullshit and voted for him. I learned something from it though after all the war and broken promises. I learned to follow the money better and not trust people selling their soul the way he did. You on the other hand still use the word "peace" with him and think he did a good job even though his suck was largely responsible for giving us Trump. How I have no fucking clue. Please wake up.
    2
  3976. @J Stone Yeah, cuba wasn't bad although there wasn't really any good reason for us to keep shitting on them. But speaking of cuba, guantanemo bay is still open.
    2
  3977. Let the retarded smears of Sanders in the comment section commence.
    2
  3978. Except they aren't. Did they lie about something? Oh wait they didn't.
    2
  3979. Is that suppose to be rational for making poor decisions?
    2
  3980. The key to being able to reform them is by electing Sanders in 2020 (or a similar progressive). The reason they are able to block all reforms right now is because Hillary won the nomination.
    2
  3981. Regarding, "a deep State script." So you just change the topic of your stupid smears. Regarding, "He straight folded." Yeah. The same way the Patriots folded in the SB. They fucking lost.
    2
  3982. Why stop at 30 million since you are just making shit up? May as well claim more. Make it a cool billion why don't you.
    2
  3983. I've come across some great trolls in my time. You are not one of them.
    2
  3984.  @aikenodubitan5256  Regarding, "take responsibility for the stats" How? You can only do this by explaining it. Firing my black police chief for people who are racist was a bad idea, my bad, is essentially saying you've dropped out. I guess my point is that it was a piledriver of a question. No idea how that happened on corporate media.
    2
  3985. Regarding, "in a sense it does help to solve the problem by dishing out the blame" Yup. Don't get me wrong this is far from the only thing that should be done to solve problems but we are a social species who, like it or not, care what others think. I want people who voted for Trump to feel shame for supporting that piece of shit so that hopefully they don't do it in the future.
    2
  3986.  B. Greene  While you have a point about the polls don't underestimate 1) biden (and the corporate wing of the "democratic" party) 2) how effective corporate media and their propaganda is, and 3) the stupidity of lots of americans. Treat it like Biden is crushing it in that it makes you fight all the more harder. It's going to be a war. Treat it as such.
    2
  3987. as he voted to give them 40 billion dollars
    2
  3988. instead of voting to give that money to the american public
    2
  3989.  @frankd.506  Calling people trolls isn't an argument.
    2
  3990.  @frankd.506  Trolls deflect to talk about trump instead of talking about the people who are actually in office.
    2
  3991.  @Bike_Lion  "that didn't go through" And they do their best to make sure you don't know it didn't go through. They don't want debate, especially when it comes to certain topics.
    2
  3992. Hostile takeover is the easiest and quickest way to get change. Not that it is easy, quick or fair.
    2
  3993. Are you trying to suck up to billionaires or some shit?
    2
  3994. It was one of the rare times when Kyle was wrong.
    2
  3995.  @manniking233  Regarding, "It's a fake virus." Please never reproduce. Thanks for that in advance.
    2
  3996. He wasn't even running things when he was president.
    2
  3997. I would be surprised even thou he should. 2020 is a war an it's only starting. Don't underestimate the establishment. They are not going to go down without an epic fight and lots of shady shit.
    2
  3998. Imagine trying to weaponize an apology for blackmail that you long since accepted while pretending to be a progressive. Wait... I don't need to imagine, I only need to look at ana.
    2
  3999.  @atrociousconsequences4432  I'm sure you were saying the same stupid shit in 2016 about Hillary. Fuckers like you why we got Trump.
    2
  4000. More bitching by a clown who does nothing but smear Sanders. I hope the establishment pays you well for your bullshit.
    2
  4001. Only terrible people are allowed to rule the US empire.
    2
  4002. rising regarding, "The Barack Obama's and Bernie Sanders of the world are there to misdirect the real progressive movement" Morons like you conflate 2 very different people and act as if they are the same despite clear evidence you are comparing apples and oranges. Regarding, "And emotionally unstable people like you" You want to dismiss facts and attack me for being emotional you go ahead and do so like a moron. The fact of the matter is that I am pretty much permanently pissed when talking about American politics. It is a side effect of understanding. Regarding, "low on real intellect" That is coming from a dipshit who voted for Trump. This would be insulting if I gave a flying fuck what you think. Good luck with being a dipshit going forward.
    2
  4003. Dems don't need to be better on literally everything environment related to be better on the environment. Let's say both dems and republicans are equally bad on fracking. But at the same time the one or the other is superior on another environmental topic. It would make perfect sense to say one is better than the other even if they are exactly the same when it comes to fracking. Note: fuck both major parties. I'm just trying to address why your "logic" is flawed and why what you are saying makes no sense.
    2
  4004.  ezsticker6370  "yes, he did" Spoken like a true cultist.
    2
  4005.  @mohegansun2439  Because I'm here talking about it like you are? I think you are a hypocrite.
    2
  4006. @Melvin Deeply The member of the elite comedy community. Don't try comedy if you aren't a member too. /s
    2
  4007. @Glen Q I couldn't look away. It was like watching a train wreck in real time.
    2
  4008.  @PetBunnyDebbie  "Biden was our only hope of preventing Trump from taking office" Biden depo rts more.
    2
  4009.  @PetBunnyDebbie  "Biden was our only hope of preventing Trump from taking office" Why should I care about this again? Less mean tweets?
    2
  4010.  @PetBunnyDebbie  "Biden was our only hope of preventing Trump from taking office." Biden increases the budget for the military industrial complex.
    2
  4011.  @PetBunnyDebbie  More people di ed of co vid during biden compared to trump.
    2
  4012.  Tyg  "republicans to vote with the Majority of People which they never do." Dems have all the power. Maybe worry about them instead of the guys in the minority everywhere.
    2
  4013.  Tyg  "He just wants republicans to vote with the Majority of People which they never do." And even if republicans were the ones with all the power, which they aren't, you STILL should be focusing more on YOUR HOUSE. Maybe do some housecleaning for YOUR TEAM. Otherwise you are just a being a hyp oc rite.
    2
  4014. Bart regarding, "Americans had better pull their heads out of the sand and understand that your racism problem is a lot more severe than you like to admit." It isn't that racism isn't a problem it is that it is more of a symptom than the cause. Americans are being fucked over. At the same time they are being brainwashed by the corporate media who likes to blame minorities, and immigrants, and anyone other than the real causes of their problems. As long as we fight each other we aren't fighting our corporate overlords.
    2
  4015. David regarding, "Am I still evil for wanting better prospects for my community" No. Absolutely not. You are just foolish for supporting a complete POS like Trump just like Hillary supporters were foolish for supporting a complete POS. Regarding, "I knew Clinton wouldn't do anything." You really should have known that Trump wasn't going to do anything as well.
    2
  4016. Barik regarding, "That's probably because they're being paid by the people who are the real problem." I'm still waiting for an offer to sellout myself.
    2
  4017. Jenk regarding, "Which are?" The economic elite like the Koch brothers and the Martin Shrelis (sic) of the world who care only about making money and are happy to step on anyone and everyone to get it. And the corporate media who does their work for them.
    2
  4018. I'd take a rotten potato over biden. But good luck with your corrupt POS.
    2
  4019.  @TheShawny122  Regarding, "The fact that you think Trump has something over Biden in the corruption category amazes me" I never said, "Trump has something over Biden in the corruption category." I don't care who is worse. Why do you? Both Biden and Trump are corrupt. The rest is just meaningless details to people who are sane and don't support anyone who is corrupt.
    2
  4020. I was always more of a fan david gilmore than waters but the gap is closing because of politics.
    2
  4021.  @borninthewronggenerationno3873  I don't care what you think and never will. You are comic relief in sad times... nothing more. Now dance for me some more clown.
    2
  4022.  @borninthewronggenerationno3873  What's really sad is that a mental midget like you can't come up with something better than that.
    2
  4023. So true. I was surprised to hear of Cosby. Biden... not so much.
    2
  4024. You know what happens when you start caring about trying to get someone young? You open yourself up to being duped by someone like Obama. Sanders is great in part because there is no doubt about what we would be getting with him.
    2
  4025.  @DBJ345  We are about to enter a depression regardless of who is in the WH. What happens after biden? What happens after nothing fundamentally changes in a world that DESPERATELY needs change? How isn't that a recipe for disaster? How isn't that going to lead to trump 2.0 after the inevitable failure that is going to be a biden presidency? What's next?
    2
  4026.  tw_bass  The only wasted votes are votes for terrible people who don't deserve to win.
    2
  4027.  tw_bass  Regarding, "If Trump doesn't get the swamp drained the evil will always be in Gov. forever and ever." So I guess the evil is going to be there forever and ever. Trump filled his cabinet with goldman sachs swamp creatures. Please shut up. You are making everyone dumber.
    2
  4028.  @alexandernerep152  Regarding, "why is trump evil?" He's corrupt, a liar, racist, sexist, stupid, a narcissist, entitled, ... literally everything everything about him is terrible. He's a war criminal. If Iran assassinated a US official it would rightly be called a war crime and terrorism. I mention this for a reason. That said it's not surprising. He literally ran on committing war crimes. "we have to take out their families." -orange clown
    2
  4029.  @cctv5348  Regarding, "well your replies dont seem to be very principled." This should be fun... Regarding, "Failing to pick between the lesser of two evils could easily be viewed as supporting evil." So supporting the lesser EVIL is actually supporting good? Are we in the book 1984? Regarding, "The lack of an ideal philosopher king might not be a valid reason to not make a hard but obvious choice." The worst thing about people advocating for the lesser evils argument is that all their arguments can be used to justify supporting literally the second worst person in the world as long as their only perceived opponent is the worst person in the world. If all the stuff you are saying could be used to try and rationalize supporting hitler, and it can, then you should really rethink the things you are saying. Hitler is the lesser evil compared to the devil. So vote hitler. The lesser evil. And if you don't vote hitler then "Failing to pick between the lesser of two evils could easily be viewed as supporting evil." Nope. Supporting evil is supporting evil. Supporting good is supporting good. Supporting the "lesser" evil is still supporting evil. That's why evil is in the name.
    2
  4030.  @alexandernerep152  Regarding, "he killed a terrorist leader" Let's say I agreed with this. So fucking what. GWB was a terrorist and war criminal in my opinion. That doesn't mean I can just assassinate him. And if Iran did it IS STILL terrorism and a war crime. Regarding, "strange how you care so much all of a sudden?" All of a sudden? You just spout nonsense. Regarding, "did you get that upset when previous president killed terrorists leaders?" There are rules. Was I mad when Bin laden was killed? No. I wasn't. But he also wasn't an official in a foreign government that we don't have a declaration of war with.
    2
  4031.  @cctv5348  Regarding, "So far 0 new wars." Only because Iran showed more self restraint and sanity than Trump did. And you do realize we are running out of countries to invade right? Trump is a war criminal. Even if I thought he was better than biden that is a deal breaker.
    2
  4032.  @thealmanac_4935  If people didn't shop there how exactly wouldn't that work? Also... Sherri's response is spot on.
    2
  4033. Warren is a just an establishment tool to help try to stop Bernie. Fuck her.
    2
  4034. He's terrible. Find a new gang.
    2
  4035.  @ScholarVisual  Fair enough. But be wary of how people propose UBI be implemented. Yang for example was going to gut all of the social safety net to help pay for it. That and we need to fix the system first. If we don't all that UBI money will just get funneled to the top.... just like all money does now.
    2
  4036.  @lauriefrancisco1084  Regarding, "my sense is you're a typical highly hypocritical right-winger" I'm left wing and happily use it. Deflecting to point at republicans is stupid. This isn't about them.
    2
  4037.  @matthewschwartz6607  Fun fact: Biden just bombed Syria and we don't have a declaration of war with them. That probably has something to do with why I call him a warmonger.
    2
  4038.  @presidentresident  Regarding, "YOU "work for the MIC" as well since you pay taxes. LMFAO. That's totally like Tulsi going to serve in Iraq. You can't be serious can you? You must understand how different things are right?
    2
  4039. Except everything you just said is complete bullshit due to facts. I know you think it is logical to say what you did so you don't bother with them but the fact of the matter is that killing people is actually more expensive because paying for the appeals they are entitled to is incredibly expensive. It is actually MORE EXPENSIVE to keep the death penalty around. So if you actually care about cost, which I doubt, but maybe, just maybe you do, then support abolishing the death penalty. As an added bonus you will be supporting a society that demonstrates the value of human life and sets an example that killing people is wrong... as they should. http://www.nbcnews.com/id/29552692/ns/us_news-crime_and_courts/t/execute-or-not-question-cost/
    2
  4040. He's just showing you why he's affiliated with TYT.
    2
  4041.  @dk-bw4gk  "thin atmosphere" To further support this the eye effects went away after the newly created oxygen got to them. They just needed air. And I'm confident that is EXACTLY how it would happen or they wouldn't have put it in the movie. /s
    2
  4042. Why not? Life is short and that mustache is awesome.
    2
  4043. Well that was how I took it and that is how I think about things. I voted for Jill Stein. But to me that was me supporting Jill Stein... not supporting the Green Party.
    2
  4044. I have allegiance to progressives (as in people)... not parties.
    2
  4045.  @teddiskim  I'd rather people get paid what they are worth from their employers so that my tax dollars don't have to subsidize wages that don't pay the bills.
    2
  4046. She doesn't touch her nose that much.
    2
  4047.  @follow_me_please  Regarding, "the amount of head bobbling she does, almost looks li,e it’s going to fall off" Are you sure you aren't thinking of Amy? I've already called her a bobblehead once today.
    2
  4048.  @follow_me_please  Regarding, "I don’t even pay attention to that one!" You aren't missing anything... except that she shakes like a chihuahua. I think she is hopped up on some kind of stimulant pretty much always. Regarding, "Watch Warren in all her interviews" All of them? What are you trying to do? Kill me? Regarding, "You’d think her neck was made of spring." Makes sense. I'm not even sure she is human.
    2
  4049.  @follow_me_please  Seeing as how I'm going to be watching video of Warren you should watch one of Amy. I've got one ready for you... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1oZD001vowY
    2
  4050. Good for him. Our average politician is garbage.
    2
  4051. He bashes republicans. You are an idiot.
    2
  4052.  @TooMuchDramaInTheMilkyWay  Nope. Cornpop was a bad dude but biden and his hairy legs got em.
    2
  4053. LMFAO. You chose to be here.
    2
  4054.  @nickmolonlabe5780  I'm willing to bet Steves family members aren't POS while trump is.
    2
  4055. Michael regarding, "nobody cares what you think" You don't understand why your comment is moronic beyond words do you? Let me try to explain it to you so that even a dipshit like yourself can understand... If you actually didn't care what I think then you wouldn't have bothered to respond. You say you don't care but you demonstrate that you actually do and are a liar... just like Trump.
    2
  4056. Pisstrooper regarding, "All your evidence provided is overwhelming" I'm sorry I am not willing to provide you with an education. Even if I did I am confident it wouldn't do any good. Providing evidence to you is akin to providing evidence to my dog. That is to say it is a complete waste of time. If you don't already realize he is conman then there isn't something I'm going to be able to say to get through to you. You are just too fucking stupid.
    2
  4057. Free Assange!
    2
  4058.  @bgbthabun627  Bernie used to be a progressive. Or at least he acted like one back in the day. That bernie is long gone. I recommend the youtube video titled, "Young Bernie Would Hate the Current Bernie Sanders."
    2
  4059.  @whukriede  "management has disallowed him to say anything" Then why was he talking on the phone? This isn't on his management. It's on him.
    2
  4060.  @SiC_DoUrden  "Elon is actually doing something" Yeah... taking in billions of dollars in taxpayer money to make himself rich. Do you always bootlick for billionaire bullshitters like this?
    2
  4061. I saw you play football at polk high.
    2
  4062. You are why Trump loves the uneducated.
    2
  4063. She obviously can't stand biden. I'm pretty sure it's you trumptards that are desperate.
    2
  4064. He's still a POS and doesn't magically become better because of other terrible people.
    2
  4065. You are right. It is that it should be.
    2
  4066. @Jacob Tacker You have the patience of a saint. I applaud you for it.
    2
  4067.  @sanketthakuriya5669  I'm sure that's why his team has him hiding instead of campaigning then.
    2
  4068. I say Nina Turner in 2028 and AOC 2036.
    2
  4069. Is that why we are in so many wars? Because our military commanders believe in peace?
    2
  4070. Joe Biden: I have no empathy for millennials and I like Dick Cheney. Me: I have no empathy for Dick Cheney and I like millennials.
    2
  4071. Even that isn't being talked about like it should. We should have results where he didn't even make the 15 percent threshold to get any delegates.
    2
  4072. Nobody says that. We can walk and chew gum at the same time. You would realize that if you weren't evidence of the dunning-kruger effect.
    2
  4073. "Awakened citizen" I find your name to be quite funny considering your theories are batshit crazy and totally misguided. I'd elaborate but in all honesty I don't see the need and trust that people will realize what you say is cray cray.
    2
  4074. logtype regarding, "Bernie did nothing about the election fraud" That simply isn't Sanders job. There are lawyers for that type of shit.
    2
  4075. "Awakened citizen" regarding, "I'd elaborate but......" BUT YOU CAN'T" See, you think things like this because you are stupid. I was choosing not to respond you to your idiotic bullshit but since you insist I will. Regarding, "#MAGA" This shit speaks for itself. You are a fucking Trump supporter. Only an epic fucking moron would support that clown. Regarding, "Bernie knew the whole time and never expected to get the nomination." This is about as intelligent as your statements get. I agree that Bernie didn't expect to get the nomination, at the start, and why should he have. He was down 60 points when he entered the race. But after campaigning, traveling the country, and seeing his support grow I think it because clear that he thought he had a good chance and it energized him. I also think there was no one who was more crushed than him after "losing," but ultimately he took it with class because that is who he is and it was never about him but about his ideas. Regarding, "It was Hillary's turn and Bernie knew that." Everybody fucking knew that dipshit. The DNC made it clear when over 400 superdelegates came out to support her before any of the peasants were allowed to vote. Still he campaigned, fought hard, and fought for ideas he cares about DESPITE knowing the establishment thought it was Hillary's turn. He didn't pull a Biden like you seem to imply. Regarding, "Seems like it only serves to support MY position that Bernie knew all along." Anyone with a brain realized the DNC was fucking him over. What is your problem exactly? That he didn't cry about it while they were doing it? That isn't his style nor would it have helped him in any way shape or form. Americans fucking hate anyone who is perceived as whining, even when their whining is justified. Shit even Hillary Clinton faithful had an impossible time supporting their fallen queen on her blame everyone but herself book tour. Regarding, "he wasn't a whistleblower on this issue" Why do you think Sanders was the first to know on any of the details of the DNCs skullduggery? The DNC is going to go out of their way to try and make sure he is the LAST person to know. And it isn't Sanders job to tell him how bad he is getting fucked over. I sure as fuck don't need him to tell me how much of the shaft he got because I'm not a fucking moron. And the people that still choose to believe the primary was fair aren't all of a sudden going to see the light because Sanders says he got fucked. Regarding, "because he was in on it the whole time" It takes a real epic moron with no logic to think that the DNC fucked him over and he was in on it the whole time. Why would they need to fuck him over if he was just one of them? God damn you are stupid. Regarding, "Bernie was meant to be seen as a defeated adversary for Hillary." The establishment is not nearly as fucking stupid as you. Only you would think this was a good plan because you are a fucking moron. Regarding, "They wanted to boost her political cred by taking down Bernie in the primaries." The fact that you think this would be a good plan proves how fucking dumb you are. The reason I didn't feel the need to try to address this shit intelligently is because of how fucking retarded it all is. If Bernie Sanders didn't run Hillary Clinton would have won the general. The primary did nothing but expose how corrupt and weak Clinton was. It exposed how corrupt and dirty the DNC was and so people didn't want to support them when the general rolled around. The fact that I need to point out this obvious shit is really something else. Regarding, "groundswell of Trump support" Trump is fucking hated by anyone with a brain. Most votes "for" Trump were actually votes against Clinton and most votes "for" Clinton were actually votes against Trump. They are rightfully 2 of the most despised people in the country. They are two peas in a fucking pod. Regarding, "they also didn't see the Sanders supporters coming" If there are no Sanders supporters then why the fuck would they think beating him in the primary was so fucking important? Please don't answer. It is rhetorical. I don't care what you think. Regarding, "same libtard moron that called me every derogatory political catch phrase in the book" Are you at least smart enough to realize why this sentence is so fucking funny to intelligent people? Regarding, "saying that the DNC was rigged" No shit it was rigged. I guess this is as smart of a thing as you can say. It is just that everything else you say is painfully stupid. Regarding, "logic and facts" You wouldn't know logic and facts if they were the names of strippers throwing their tits in your face. You are a mental midget and that is why you are a Trump supporter. He loves the uneducated, like you, for a reason. Now I don't have time for your stupid shit. No doubt this is going in one ear and out the other for you because you are dumb as fuck. That is partly why I didn't want to bother elaborating on why what everything you said was so fucking stupid. Now go back to loving that orange dick in your ass.
    2
  4076.  @Yesica1993  What a childlike way to say you support apartheid israel while it commits genocide.
    2
  4077. Do not vote for Neera Tanden!
    2
  4078. Decent troll. You still suck at life thou... obviously.
    2
  4079. Harvey Weinstein, although not primarily a political figure, is a political figure who is directly linked to many powerful politicians. The same cannot be said of Louis CK. Weinstein was also the beginning of the flood gates opening. CK is not and is instead fallout from Weinstein.
    2
  4080. Regarding, "Kim Kardashian and Lady Gaga" They are famous and you are comparing them to a guy nobody had heard of until it came out that he was sick. Apples and oranges. Regarding, "Millions of people donate to political campaigns." Yes. Do you really not understand the difference between those people and the people who raise millions of dollars... enough to get their picture taken with Hillary and others? I've donated to political campaigns. I've never had my picture taken with a politician much less a politician as powerful as Clinton. Regarding, "All rich people do" Not all of them but many of them. We are an oligarchy afterall. Regarding, "That's not why Jimmy is avoiding discussing CK." You go ahead and think whatever you want then. I'm done caring about this conversation and not sure why I ever did. Peace.
    2
  4081. What have you done?
    2
  4082.  @garyevans718  I just wanted to know what the OP has done in their life. I suspect it isn't much.
    2
  4083.  @garyevans718  "wtf are you talking about" I'm talking about the billions of dollars musk's companies have gotten from the government. This isn't some secret while you slob his knob. "Tesla" Tesla got 1.3 billion from Nevada. "I want you to explain your reasoning ?" I want you to STFU. You are making everyone dumber.
    2
  4084.  @garyevans718  "a real conman like Donald Trump" LMFAO You are no different than trump sycophants. You all worship conmen.
    2
  4085.  @garyevans718  "what do you think a major employer does when they go shopping for a new state to locate a massive manufacturing plant in ?" Let me tell you what I think... I think that if organized crime is organized enough it isn't even illegal and that you are a useful idiot for a rich conman. Please be quiet. You, much like trump supporters talking about trump, are only making the world dumber with your drivel.
    2
  4086. You really don't get why your statement is moronic do you?
    2
  4087. It's also infuriating how kyle ignores ana's attempted blackmail. But the TYT family watches each others backs.
    2
  4088. Don't be silly. Kamala will also be there making me glad I'm not voting for biden.
    2
  4089. Pandering 101
    2
  4090. "merit." That is not possible for that position. Lying is the job description.
    2
  4091. You are aptly named. Good luck with your brain herpes.
    2
  4092. Go read the definition of "concentration camp." It has nothing to do with it's birth rate.
    2
  4093.  @flyrodmike  I agree he would never be allowed to win, but I think the value added by having someone like him in a position to elevate important issues would be incredibly valuable. For example just once there would be antiwar advocate running.
    2
  4094. If you ever find yourself hurting for money let me know. I would pay top dollar to punch you in the face without fear of going to prison for assault.
    2
  4095.  @camelopardalis84  Regarding, "Just to be clear, I don't like her and..." I get it. I didn't have any trouble understanding your reply and your meaning unlike some. Regarding, "I've just been under the impression that she must have made one - or a couple of - specific things that made people award her with that nickname for a while now." She has always been a hawk when it comes to foreign policy. Never has she ever said anything like Bernie or Tulsi does when it comes to foreign policy. Her apologists in the past who tried to excuse this and claim that she was still a progressive while doing it is because her home state builds lots of weapons. Her detractors would, in part, call her WARren for things like this. Regarding, "I know until when she was a Republican and what the Republican party was like up until that point and you've nudged me into the direction of considering that her nicknam could easily have to do with her being a member of that pro-war party for so long." Progressives are understandably cynical when it comes to politicians. We are used to having people pretend to care about our issues before leaving us high and dry (Obama). Lots have always thought warren was a pretender but only now has she really been exposed for what she is. Yeah she has been called WARren for a while. But only now is most everyone really realizing it.
    2
  4096.  @stevekake3359  Nevermind. I found this. "The $600 checks make up about $166 billion of the total $900 billion package" So if anything I think everyone getting 6K might be a small underestimate. Time to start screaming this to everyone so everyone knows.
    2
  4097.  @cloudyskiesnow  Damn right. Neither are even close to being decent enough to be considered for my vote.
    2
  4098.  @colonelangus8247  I hope for your sake you are being paid to act so dumb.
    2
  4099. Jimmy never said that. Which means you are just lying and smearing. But at least I don't think it's McCarthyite.
    2
  4100. J Abrams regarding, "You seem to ignore the fact Warren has very little power as a junior senator" I'm not arguing that Warren had great power. You seem to be arguing that I should feel sorry for poor Warren. I don't. Regarding, "has overachieved given her stature with hearings, policy, and legislation." What evidence to have to back up your claim? A bunch of grandstanding and a bill that was NOTHING but a bandaide on a problem that required so much more to appease people like you. I personally am not impressed by anything she has done. If you want to claim otherwise you go ahead and try. Literally the only thing of substance that she has ever done was already pointed out and I have already given you legit reasons why deserves ZERO credit for it. Regarding, "Who would you say compares to her record on the subject?" Well if you standard of comparison is comparing her to a bunch of other shitbags in the Senate she does look decent. The problem there is that I do not compare her to a bunch of shit but rather have an independent idea of what I want from a politician. Regarding, "Tulsi promoting a war criminal?" Cool smear. Again, like I've already said, this is the type of smear that REQUIRES you to back up your claim. But if all you actually care about (and I'm sure you do not) is whether or not a person has "promoted a war criminal," then you need only look at Elizabeth Warren promoting a war criminal like Hillary Clinton. https://www.huffingtonpost.com/bruce-fein/hillary-clinton-unfit-for_b_8313372.html Sadly in this fucked up world that we live in politicians have to deal with war criminals because there are so many war criminals in positions of power in the world. Regarding, "Lol you're funny calling yourself a progressive." Simple pleasures for simple people. I'm glad you were able to get an idiotic laugh in these sad times. Regarding, "I was against Iraq War but no progressive I know was meeting Saddam Hussein" You know how we prevent wars? WE TALK TO WORLD LEADERS INSTEAD OF JUST BOMBING THEM. Regarding, "promoting his propaganda like Tulsi was Asads." This smear is fucking absurd and straight out of the establishment playbook. You should be embarrassed. Tulsi went on a factfinding mission to try and find out what was going on in Syria rather than just accept the narrative been fed to us by the CIA and try to find a path to peace. That is exactly what she should be doing. That is what I want my politicians to be doing while you clearly just want us to label people war criminals so that we have an excuse to bomb everyone. It is fucking pathetic.
    2
  4101. gross comment. I hope you were paid for it
    2
  4102. The report he is specifically talking about just came out.
    2
  4103. Do we trust Kyle when the topic is water? Conflict of interest much?
    2
  4104. I don't like you. Free palestine.
    2
  4105. Jay regarding, "this doesn't bother me." It does bother me. And even if it doesn't bother you it doesn't change the fact that it benefits Trump far more than his salary would have. Regarding, "The government has proven itself inept with money since 1913." Not exactly. We are the richest nation in the history of the world for a reason. The problem is that all that wealth is consolidated in the hands of a few.
    2
  4106. Jay regarding, "What if Bernie had supported Jill Stein?" Then Bernie Sanders would be effectively blamed for Hillary losing. His ability to influence policy and the movement he started would have suffered a debilitating blow. The establishment would have all the excuse they would need to justify not changing a thing because they would be able to blame Sanders. Because he bit the bullet even Hillary shills have an impossible time defending the queen when she wanted to blame Sanders and everyone other than herself. And it is important as fuck that she be the one blamed for her loss.
    2
  4107. Tamila there is so much wrong with everything you say it is tough to know where to begin. Even if I did address your shit it isn't going to do any good so I'll just say good luck being an idiot in life. You are why Trump loves the uneducated.
    2
  4108. "since he's not in control of his businesses those tax breaks do not have much affect on him." and "You clearly do not understand how business works." That's pretty fucking funny.
    2
  4109. Tamila regarding, "A Sanders/Warren ticket would get crushed by Trump/Pence." All empirical evidence suggests otherwise. But cool smears. Good luck with your conman.
    2
  4110. Jay regarding, "Trump is taking a $1 formal salary" Yeah, he has found other ways of increasing his wealth while in office like giving himself a massive tax cut.
    2
  4111.  @ThunderfallFilms  A response like yours is what you give when you have nothing of substance to offer.
    2
  4112. You can go to whatever doctor you want under a universal system.
    2
  4113. Regarding, "So, this is the PRO-TRUMP-CHANNEL now?" He said nothing positive about Trump. Are you really this dense?
    2
  4114.  @TMAC803210  Ignorance is bliss. You must be very happy. Just ignore the fact you are lying and laugh. Figures.
    2
  4115.  @calebtorres7111  Regarding, "How the heck was Yang actively helping them and hurting Sanders" Because he sure as fuck wasn't taking votes from biden but he would be taking votes from sanders. Candidates don't operate in a vacuum. "Wait don't tell me." The fact that you don't already know the obvious answer to your own question does not speak well of you. "Sanders could have had the opportunity to try to unite with the other anti establishment candidates" Even after yang dropped out and it was very close between sanders and biden yang didn't take a side. "Bernie also screwed himself over" He did. But this isn't about bernie. It's about yang. His actions hurt bernie and helped the establishment. At best that means he is a useful idiot for them. At worst it means yang is a plant and the worst of the worst.
    2
  4116.  @calebtorres7111  It occurs to me that I'm repeating myself. I guess I assumed I hadn't already said all that seeing as how you completely ignored all the substantive points I was making to say the stupid BS you did.
    2
  4117.  @calebtorres7111  Regarding, "Yang took voters from Bernie" Thanks for at least admitting the obvious. Who does this benefit? The establishment. Who does this hurt? Sanders and the people of this country. "dude came out of nowhere" And thought he should be POTUS. And that makes sense to you? "just trying to solve problems" Launching a run for president that has no chance of success but does hurt the progressive and helps the establishment doesn't solve shit. That's him being the problem. "he doesn't owe anybody anything" Sounds like why he will never get my vote. I owe him nothing and he has done nothing but earn my scorn. "especially if they're not trying to help him out when he was in need" This country needed sanders and not biden as POTUS. Yang can GF himself.
    2
  4118. Ug. I wish I didn't have to keep having to say this. The DNC does want to win. Really. They do. It's just not what is most important to them. Their number one priority is maintaining the status quo and making sure nothing fundamentally changes. It's just that when they do this it looks like they are trying to lose on purpose. But they aren't and it's not really that debatable really.
    2
  4119.  @chadsimmons4496  Regarding, "It is why Trump won." Trump won because the country knew Hillary only won the primary nomination because of rigging. That was the overwhelming factor in who won the general and it's not even close.
    2
  4120. You should go and subscribe to him right after unsubscribing here.
    2
  4121. Hien. Huh? Could you translate that for someone who isn't currently tripping on LSD.
    2
  4122. @BallersKingdom That's not an argument but is exactly the type of worthless nonsense I'd expect from a person in a cult.
    2
  4123. Regarding, "it's super-easy to make bullets" Mullet man on the walking dead can do it so it can't be that hard.
    2
  4124. LMFAO As if warmonger propagandists paid for by katzenburg money is the "left."
    2
  4125.  @meanwhileinsooke  Speaking of grifters are you paid for everytime you copy and paste that smear?
    2
  4126.  @douggoldwater1734  "the media constantly tells you that everybody is racist" You know yang worked for CNN right? But corporate media is only terrible when yang isn't working for them claim yanggang.
    2
  4127.  @bobbucks  "the mechanisms in congress would not get Bernie's version of Health care done." What a bunch of nonsensical bullshit used to try and rationalize your conman's lies. M4A is ALREADY done for old people. "his fans are terrible." But you show why yanggang is terrible.
    2
  4128.  @SR-lh4rm  Regarding, "Any single payer plan has the right to call itself M4A." Yang's proposal wasn't a single payer plan not even close. That's why what he was doing was lying. "YOU are the fraud." LMFAO. I know you are but what am I wasn't a good argument in the first grade. "There are no "substantive problems" with Yang." Just keep telling yourself that all you want. It doesn't make it true.
    2
  4129.  @custodiancolorzoo870  Clearly you are just a sexist who hates women. (hopefully obvious sarcasm is obvious) Seriously thou thank you for all those truth bombs. I thoroughly loved it even thou I suspect if will fall upon def ears when it comes to Decker. You can't convince people who are being paid to think what they do. But who knows, maybe they are just wrong and it help them open their eyes.
    2
  4130.  @custodiancolorzoo870  The whole sexist narrative is just a lazy way for the disingenuous to dismiss substantive objections. I was even called a sexist in 2016 by a Hillary supporter when I said I was going to vote for Jill Stein as if that made any sense. I did read all your responses and loving it. I even thought about asking you to stop but only because I was concerned about the safety of Decker. I thought they might be the first person to ever get killed by words because your tongue lashing was so epic and on point.
    2
  4131.  @dennisfischer7676  To be clear you think that this countries forefathers are lunatics then?
    2
  4132.  Clifford M  Regarding, " poor triggered little snowflake" This is what you say when you have nothing of value to offer.
    2
  4133. @Anurag Chakraborty Regarding, "You should be used to the corruption by now." I am used to it but I will never accept it.
    2
  4134. @Anurag Chakraborty Regarding, "but what difference does it make??" Because it matters what people think and I prefer it when people don't make me feel like I'm living in the movie idiocracy the way you are.
    2
  4135. Yup. Exit polling in many states suggested widespread election fraud.
    2
  4136. I think it was more like 80 billion.
    2
  4137. Tiffany regarding, "it's hard for them to be effective." All third parties are going to be plagued by this problem. The major parties have seen to it. The entire game is rigged, not just the major parties internally.
    2
  4138. jewelry regarding, "yet to find a person more worthy of listening to politically than Bernie Sanders" He has done more to advance the progressive agenda than anyone else on Earth. Some are mad he hasn't been able to do it all but he can't. He is fighting the entire establishment. He is fighting uphill against a system rigged specifically to prevent people like him from winning. Sadly things are not going to change overnight at a time when we desperately need change fast. Regarding, "I agree with Bernie that working on the democratic party at this particular time is a better plan than abandoning it" I agree with this but I think the framing is important. I don't think "working on the democratic party" is as accurate and compelling as "taking over the democratic party." Too many people are already paranoid about working with the party. And that is not what I think the strategy is. It is about taking over the party and forcing the party to do what we want the same way the corporate dems are forcing the party to currently suck. It is not about coexisting. But we do agree on everything and don't sell your writing short. I have no trouble understanding your points.
    2
  4139. Regarding, "I can typo and bad grammar with the best of 'em" A person could make typos and use bad grammar and still be better at getting their message across than someone with perfect spelling and grammar. Peace. :)
    2
  4140. danny regarding, "I don't pretend to know why he didn't make it a "Yuge" issue." Like I've pointed out it is not a winning issue. If he made it a yuge issue like you wish he would have what do you think the result would have been? What did he stand to gain? Because so far as I can tell the only thing that would have been gained is that a few people might have been woke. And at what cost? Because I am confident that it would have very much hurt him and his cause in the long run. Sanders cares first and foremost about policy and think he was correct to not sacrifice his ability to affect policy going forward to talk about things people should already realize. It isn't as if he can offer unique information on the topic. Let me try to explain it from my perspective. I think votes were flipped. I think that exit polls were off waaayyy too much compared to election results. But I talk about it as little as I can. It just isn't a winning topic. Sure the people that agree with me agree with me but the people that don't already agree with me aren't going to be persuaded and are are going to start dismissing everything else I have to say. And there are other things that I want to say and be heard. I'm not willing to sacrifice all the other topics I want to talk about to try and convince people of something they are not going to be convinced by. And most of the public isn't willing to even consider the possibility that their "great democracy" is a fucking joke. Many can't even consider the possibility much less look at the evidence with an open mind. Rather they just shut you out and that would have happened to Sanders if he pressed this. In part because he is wise enough to pick his battles and didn't do what you wanted on this, he is the most popular politician in the country and in a better position to get the policy he and we all want. This simply would not be the case if he did what you wanted. It isn't a winning topic. Especially coming from a person who in a position of great bias. Americans just consider it whining because Americans are mostly sheep. Since I am talking about a topic that I generally consider taboo... http://trustvote.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/trust-vote.png http://www.electoralsystemincrisis.org/ https://www.nationofchange.org/2016/07/10/new-stanford-study-shows-serious-voting-discrepancies-favor-clinton/
    2
  4141. danny regarding, "The nomination which he won." That only makes sense if there was actually something he could have done to prove it. There isn't. There was no smoking gun at a macro level the same way there was a smoking gun in the bronx where voters were purged. And even if there was a smoking gun it isn't Bernie Sanders responsibility to be convincing people he got fucked over. That is what lawyers are for. You have as much of a right to make a case as Sanders because it was your vote. You are simply asking him to do the impossible. Regarding, "he (and more importantly, WE) sure didn’t gain anything by his rolling over." First off I obviously disagree with the framing that he "rolled over." But there is a cliche that is cliche for a reason. "Live to fight another day," is a thing for a reason. Falling on his sword for a battle that couldn't be won makes no sense. Regarding, "Then, after acknowledging that you, too believe the DNC/HRC committed election fraud, you write, “But I talk about it as little as I can.”" Yes I did. Did you bother to read anything else I wrote? I'm a fucking nobody who doesn't like to talk about that topic because it doesn't do jack fucking shit. And as much as I think there is evidence of election fraud I also concede that there is no smoking gun. There is only a good case build upon circumstantial evidence. And even thou I'm NO ONE I don't like to talk about it because I know what happens when I do... people shut me out and dismiss me as a conspiracy theorist. But you want Bernie Sanders to give the establishment that type of weapon to attack him? What could possibly go wrong with that plan other than losing the most credible progressive we have and giving the establishment a weapon to attack his cause forever? Regarding, "You’re falling for the “Americans are idiots” arrogance" Am I now? BECAUSE AMERICANS ARE FUCKING MORONS. As evidence of this I cite the percentage of people who voted for either Donald Trump or Hillary Clinton for president compared to the percentage of Americans who voted for a person with a soul for president. If I were going to defend those morons I would cite the fact that lots and lots of them are just too busy trying to stay afloat and pay their bills to realize how much they are getting fucked over and I would also cite the fact that the corporate media essentially brainwashes the population but I still think that in general we are a country of sheep. Regarding, "already KNOW the entire Establishment System is RIGGED" So they know it is rigged and they vote for the establishment? That is suppose to convince me they are not idiots? Sorry but I don't find that argument very compelling. Regarding, "Calling out that rigging, would have served to affirm what people already believed" There is yuge difference between believing the system is rigged and believing in election fraud. Rigging has been proven. Election fraud has not. You are conflating the two and acting if they are the same. Regarding, "Bernie and Jane) insisted they were crazy to believe" What evidence to you cite to justify saying Bernie and Jane insisted they were crazy to believe? Because I'm pretty sure this is bullshit even if you think they didn't do enough to talk about election fraud. Regarding, "Refusing to LOUDLY demand legitimate elections" Again you are conflating completely different things and acting as if they are the same. There is no reason to think Sanders doesn't demand legitimate elections. What you are actually saying is that Sanders didn't accuse them of election fraud. Say that. Don't twist words and say something completely different. Regarding, "Sanders still has the best reputation amongst any serving politician" Only because he didn't chose your plan of action. Thankfully he didn't squander this on a battle that couldn't be won. Or do you have a smoking gun that proves election fraud? Because if you do then you should be using it and taking it to a lawyer. But you don't. And neither did Sanders. Regarding, "Democratic Party is irreparable, as they have proven since the 2016 election." The "democratic" party is a fucking label. A label that is currently stuck to a shit sandwich. But if you can get rid of the shit sandwich it is just a word. I would also like to add that the party has been a fucking dumpster fire for long time before 2016. Regarding, "Pretending, wishing, hoping reality were different than it is will not move us forward." Clearly we have a different idea of what reality is. Because I'm pretty sure I live in a world where Sanders bitching about a less than concrete case of election fraud accomplishes nothing other than destroying him and his cause. And you pretending, wishing, and hoping that if only Sanders would have cried to Diane Sawyer about how he was fucked over it would have made a world of difference, the DNC would have said they were sorry and given him the nomination simply isn't the world I live in.
    2
  4142. danny regarding, "I did expect him to stand before those "super delegates" and make the case for why they should vote for him to BEAT Trump rather than take a chance with HRC" What world do you live in where the superdelegates were going to change their mind? And aren't we the side that is suppose to think superdelegates are an abomination to the system? Aren't we the side that is trying to make the case that they should be gotten rid of completely? Are you intentionally trying to make Sanders look like a hypocrite? The only reason he can credibly make a case they need to be gotten rid of is because he didn't try to use them to usurp the will of the voters. And even if he tried I promise you it wasn't going to do any fucking good. Regarding, "Do you remember the greeting he got at the Convention" Yes I do. Only because he agreed to endorse Hillary before the convention so that they would allow him in the building. All of the peasants had voted. She had more pledged delegates than him. He "lost." He endorsed the winner of the primary like he agreed to when entering the race. All the whining and bitching wasn't going to change anything.
    2
  4143. danny regarding, "IF those "super delegates" had told Sanders and us to fuck off, then I would have no ill feelings towards Sanders." Like 400 or 500 superdelegates came out to support Hillary before a single peasant was allowed to vote. I assure you they were telling you to fuck off then. But you think they were going to flip their allegiance after Hillary "won" more pledged delegates? You can't be serious. I assure you that you are the one being ridiculous. Am I right to assume then that you are in favor of superdelegates? Or are you just a hypocrite?
    2
  4144. JR I wasn't reading your mind. I was reading your stupid words. Sorry if you can't tell the obvious difference between the two. Did I say something that wasn't true? Or maybe, just maybe was it that the truth hurt and you are deflecting?
    2
  4145. JR regarding, "so calling her a Nazi is fine" Either that is exactly what I'm trying to say despite never saying or implying such a thing or you are an idiot making a strawman argument. It is definitely one or the other. Regarding, "yet I'm stupid." Yes. You are. And other stupid people existing have nothing do with it. Just because will g is also stupid doesn't somehow make you smart. It you think that is how it works it is only because you are stupid.
    2
  4146. Those people applauding Sanders in this video were from Jackson Mississippi. But yeah I'm sure they were all white progressives.
    2
  4147. No Google how can you be such a fucking moron? Don't worry, all I'm doing is "asking a question."
    2
  4148. I hope you are paid for this shit.
    2
  4149. Good people in policing are rare as fuck because 1) good people are not attracted to the job while douchebags are 2) training is generally shit 3) good people go bad or get the fuck out because they are surrounded by scum. But yeah... there are some but they are hardly representative of the field at large.
    2
  4150.  @ericthomas917  Regarding, "the fact that she and the squad voted for Pelosi makes them part of the problem" I'd be ok with them voting for pelosi if they really got something of value for their votes. They didn't have enough votes to demand someone decent be speaker but they did have enough votes to demand important concessions for progressives. But they got nothing of importance to the progressive cause.
    2
  4151.  @TheHuxleyAgnostic  Keep bootlicking for AOC and making excuses for her failures. It's EXACTLY what trump supporters do for their clown.
    2
  4152. Don't be sorry about it. It's true. She's the same person who didn't want to run against Hillary but now wants to run against Bernie. Fuck her.
    2
  4153. "BERNIE tells it like it is, i love it, this is the type of leadership we need" He tells you to vote for biden and you call that "leadership."
    2
  4154. If they don't it is because they want to "have their cake and eat it to." They would get to pretend to be progressive while burying progressive issues. That said I will give them the benefit of the doubt... for the moment. If they don't put it there I will give them the finger and they will be as dead to me as corporate media. Which would be too bad. I love Emma.
    2
  4155. Ok. It's been too long. I have given them a chance to put this on the main channel and they haven't. The only logical conclusion I can draw from this is that they are intentionally burying this story. I gotta think someone looks at these comments. The person who pointed out that it was the DCCC and not the DCC got his wish and they changed the title. But not the people who insist this needs more coverage. Fuck them. I know people say this shit all the time but I unsubscribing from this channel and the main. If I want news with an agenda there is everywhere else.
    2
  4156.  @talmudovsky  "You seem to be against freedom of speech." You seem like a troll. Are you?
    2
  4157. Yeah... it's not that simple. He agreed to support the nominee when entering the race and Sanders has a way of doing what he says he will. He said over, and over, and over, and over how much he didn't think Trump should be president. That he was going to do anything and everything he could to stop him from winning. Try not to act like this wasn't the case. Had he not endorsed Hillary and Trump won the blame would have been all effectively placed all on Sanders. Don't get me wrong there are plenty, like Hillary herself that still tried to blame him. But those attacks didn't stick because Sanders bit the bullet. And if you don't understand why it is important that Hillary be blamed for 2016 and not Sanders then... well... then I may as well just stop talking to you.
    2
  4158. There is zero evidence of voter fraud being a problem but we do know that there are over a million voting eligible Americans who don't have an ID. You are trying to solve a problem that doesn't exist and your "solution" to that non existent problem creates a problem. I shouldn't really need to explain this.
    2
  4159. @Pepe McTrump I'm not going to lie I find yours and Yang's ageism pretty funny seeing as how Sanders has the support of the younger generations OVERWHELMINGLY. It's not even close. You two are actually dismissing the young and what they want. It's pretty funny and idiotic, as is everything else you say. Good luck with your multiple conmen only one of which is orange.
    2
  4160. Propaganda + complacency = Idiocracy
    2
  4161.  @somkeshav4143  I like Bernie's chances as well but don't get overconfident. Even if Bernie has the most votes I don't trust they will be counted that way. It been said but it's worth repeating, he needs to overwin to win.
    2
  4162.  @somkeshav4143  Regarding, "we can only hope for the best" I understand the sentiment but don't forget voting, canvasing and donating. Sanders 2020!
    2
  4163.  @levanmikadze4748  "did you read my comments" Yeah. It's asinine to call him a dem.
    2
  4164.  @levanmikadze4748  "you are just being stubborn on your take," Go open a dictionary. Note that it defines republican to mean: "a member or supporter of the Republican Party." That's what it means. And being a democrat means, "a member or supporter of Democratic Party." "if Biden switched his party affiliation to Republican, I have to support him to be a republican.... That's just silly" That's not what I'm saying. Being a republicans doesn't mean you support all republican candidates. It means you support THE PARTY. It means you are a member of THE PARTY.
    2
  4165.  @levanmikadze4748  "I support those who share my political views and would fight for them ." We all do that. It's about if you support THE PARTY or not.
    2
  4166.  @levanmikadze4748  If I go out and vote for a dem or a republican it doesn't mean I'm a dem or a republican. I'm only that if I support THE PARTY.
    2
  4167.  @bcon2608  I legit can't take you seriously enough to keep responding to you. Keep advocating for the status quo... just like big pharma is lobbying for. You are literally on the side of the lobbyist money you rail against.
    2
  4168.  @levanmikadze4748  "you view it as blind support" Nope. It's just support. Blind support would be supporting all their candidates. "dictionary" It gives you the definition for the words you are using because you are using them wrong.
    2
  4169.  @tynao2029  "the USA has two major political parties on "the Left"." This is really dumb even by internet comment section standards.
    2
  4170. LOL. He doesn't even need makeup.
    2
  4171.  America first americans first  LMFAO You trolls are just funny at this point.
    2
  4172.  @warfossil  In the age of information ignorance like yours is a choice. I suggest the article titled, "Donald Trump Is Dropping Bombs at Unprecedented Levels" if you are actually interested in the topic which I suspect you are not.
    2
  4173.  @warfossil  "If you're going to accuse then have you evidence in order." In what sort of world do you need proof that the trump administration was dropping lots of bombs? Are you for real? That's like needing evidence the sky is blue. Just admit you are deeply unserious. Also... I have provided evidence... not that you care.
    2
  4174.  @brucecampbell6578  "zero US casualties in Afghanistan during his reign" Citation required. No possible way this is true.
    2
  4175.  @scottwaters998  "Go do something else instead of wasting everybody's time." They said not offering any evidence whatsoever, just wasting everyone's time.
    2
  4176.  @SoBayK80  "means Trump used 20 percent less munitions than predecessor" Trump did that in only half the year. He still had august, sep, oct, nov, and dec to pass obama. Do you think he didn't?
    2
  4177.  @brucecampbell6578  "correcting me" How on earth was that ever something you got wrong in the first place?
    2
  4178.  @SN00PICUS  "So you don't actually know if he dropped or ordered any bombs dropped" You must be trolling right?
    2
  4179.  @brucecampbell6578  "no one but my own confusion" So you just made it up? It's not even bad info you got elsewhere? That seems plausible. "Do you think I should delete my false comment or just leave it be?" When I make mistakes I fix them. Aka I edit them to add a correction. You do you.
    2
  4180.  @brucecampbell6578  "I am trying to fix my mistake." Like I said if I did something like that I will edit the original comment to include some kind of correction. "I offer no rationalizations." Fair enough. Everyone makes mistakes but not everyone can admit them. Good on you for admitting it. Peace.
    2
  4181.  @pitpride1220  Fair enough. I was thinking you were trying to plug andrew yang. That was my misunderstanding. I stand corrected.
    2
  4182.  @bondjames5874  Read it all. They are cool.
    2
  4183. Sorry not sorry for having "hate" for the people who are destroying the world.
    2
  4184. "This constant stream of hate" That's very hypocritical coming from the person who was just calling people, "butthurt."
    2
  4185.  @ballbag9641  Regarding, "what kind of dumb argument is that? “you would vote for trump if the other guy was worse” Yes, if the other guy was worse than trump (and i cannot conceive of a worse candidate beyond straight up fascist) then I would be morally obligated to vote for him because one outcome will be measurably worse? How is this so difficult to comprehend?" Holy shit you are stupid. Thanks for admitting that you would vote for Trump and still you can't seem to understand what is wrong with a philosophy that would let you do such a thing. God damn you are dumb. What you should be doing is having a litmus test for all candidates to get your support. You know the signs at carny's that read, "you need to be at least so tall to ride." Well you should have a sign that reads, "you need to be at least a certain amount of decent to get my support." If you had it like sane people do you might avoid supporting complete pieces of shit like you do and like you would for Trump. Fucking twat. I shouldn't have to explain this. It is seriously like you are intentionally trying to make everyone dumb.
    2
  4186.  @ballbag9641  You are seriously a fucking joke but I'm not going to lie... Hearing you admit that you would support Trump in the same post where you condescendingly say, "How is this so difficult to comprehend?" is really fucking funny.
    2
  4187.  @DualTasticToday  Not all wars are equal. There was actually good reason to think that the person who attacked us on 9-11, bin laden, was in afganistan. Bernie isn't perfect but ultimately I have more reason to trust he won't get us into war we don't need to be in even more than Tulsi. And he actually has a chance at winning the nomination.
    2
  4188. Legalize, tax, lube and regulate...
    2
  4189.  @velenfrog1656  This isn't about a VP pick... it's about a potential replacement for the top of the ticket.
    2
  4190.  @arionassis-niarchos2895  I hope you are being paid to say retarded things and aren't actually as dense as you seem. Either way you suck at life. Good luck with that.
    2
  4191.  @donHooligan  regarding, "Glass-Steagall" This is not talked about nearly enough.
    2
  4192. Only because she says on thing, "Sometimes it’s to get members on the record, so ppl can’t make excuses later. Sometimes these votes create real political pressure that forces developments. Sometimes we vote for the historical record - to let future generations know we did everything we could." And didn't force the vote. Fraud is a perfect description for anyone whose actions don't match their words.
    2
  4193. You don't even attempt an argument. You are projecting.
    2
  4194.  @weedidi7144  You say that like a person who has been brainwashed into only considering the 2 major parties. I'll write someone in who is good before I'm going to vote for someone I would ever call evil... even the "lesser evil" as if that is ok. It isn't. There are millions of people in this country. It really isn't too much to ask for that you not vote someone who is evil. Stop being a clown.
    2
  4195.  @weedidi7144  Regarding, "I'd be careful in calling people morons" If the shoe fits, wear it. I'm not just calling you a moron. I'm telling you exactly why everything you say is dumb as fuck. Regarding, "You've only thrown some strawmen and insults here so I think I'm done with this discussion." You think and say the things you do because you are an idiot. In reality you can't intelligently tell me why anything you say would prevent you and your philosophy would stop from supporting Hitler as long as you could convince yourself that Hitlers opponent would be worse. And if you can't intelligently tell me why you and your philosophy would stop you from supporting a guy like hitler, and clearly you would under the right circumstances, then you should probably go back and question that philosophy. You won't because you are not smart and/or an establishment tool working the vote for evil bullshit for terrible reasons. Regarding, "Have a good day." Try not to lie to yourself. This is obviously a condescending fuck you to me. The only difference between this and what I do when I call you a moron is that I don't try to hide my insults.
    2
  4196. Unintended, um... yes really. The "democratic" party has closed primaries for half the states. That is hardly the action of a party committed to making it easy to vote and no amount of terrible on the other side changes it. I'm not sure why you think I don't see Republicans shenanigans as well. I said I literally agreed with everything Sofa said and that included their comments on the Republican party. I guess you think I should ignore dem wrongdoing because of it. I don't because I'm not a retarded sheep happy to overlook evil as long as it is the lesser evil.
    2
  4197. Not to me. But I have a soul and don't get rich off of war.
    2
  4198. Some of you haven't signed the petition yet. Do it! Force the vote!
    2
  4199. This comment is remarkably stupid.
    2
  4200. I can't wait to hear Biden's response tonight when asked about gay rights the way Tulsi was.  I'm just kidding.  We know they won't ask him. I'm almost curious to see how soft the softballs they serve him are.
    2
  4201. Dunning and Kruger would like to cite you as evidence of their theory.
    2
  4202.  @ricksantorum9797  Why do I get the distinct feeling that you are same moron as John and Trump 2020?
    2
  4203. UBI good. Yang bad.
    2
  4204.  @alexkowalski8020  Regarding, "who knew knowledge of the deep lore of the rap game would come in handy for evaluating the trustworthiness of a prospective President" I'm not an expert but I didn't know about this. Therefor I don't think it's deep lore. Long story short: talk about Steve Mnuchin, not snoop dog when it comes to Kamala IMO.
    2
  4205.  @michaelsmith1262  So you make judgements about things without watching them?
    2
  4206. Blessing it's been a couple years since the last presidential election and still fuckers like you have nothing better to push your corporate shills then better then Trump. That shit wasn't compelling in 2016 and it still isn't compelling today. You need to be able to give the people something to vote for and not just something to vote against.
    2
  4207. Blessing regarding, "quite a bit by Russian meddling." I find this funny because you sound like one of David Brock's Correct the Record trolls. That is also why I don't really take the things you say very seriously. Regarding, "he pretty much brutalized Hillary" HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA I love Bernie and side with him on almost everything (that said he is not perfect nor do I pretend he is) and have spent lots of time addressing him not being harder on Hillary. And those people's opinions I understand. Yours is fucking absurd and revisionist history. Regarding, "Jill Stein further muddied the water by taking away just enough votes to make a difference in the swing states." Total bullshit and absolutely false. You either suck at math, are stupid as fuck, or, most likely in my opinion, are a paid liar. Hillary could have gotten every single Jill Stein vote even thou there is no reason to logically think she should have and Hillary still loses. Regarding, "The country is neither far right nor far-left." Meanwhile, despite your rhetoric, literally every single major issue Bernie Sanders advocates for is popular with the public? Regarding, " The Democratic nominee must be able to attract some moderate Republicans in order to win." And you only have to sacrifice 2 voters that should be your base to do it. This talking point was tried and is proven to be a way to lose. Regarding, "If by some chance Bernie ends up as the Democratic nominee, he will have zero Republican support." Which is fucking bullshit because some republicans recognize that he is genuine and not a sell out. Meanwhile all polling before 2016 showed that Sanders would have fucking crushed Trump and was getting about 10 points more than Hillary. I hope for your sake you are being paid to say this stupid shit and are not really this dumb.
    2
  4208.  @jivet3919  You are going to have to be more specific. Are you referring to yang or their supporter as being new to politics?
    2
  4209.  @jackripper5240  Regarding, "bernie's goal is not to engage or receive pac money from corporations. however, he receives money from individual contributors aggregated into PACs." Are you just trying to restate what I said without bothering to address the substance of it? Yang loves PACs. Sanders doesn't. Do you at least acknowledge that difference while you deflect from that fact?
    2
  4210.  @jackripper5240  It's very Warrenlike of him. She too thinks that selling out is a "necessary evil" as well and sees nothing wrong with the engaging in the corruption they claim to oppose.
    2
  4211. The most important commodity in politics is trust. Yang doesn't have it. Bernie does.
    2
  4212. Probably because Bernie has experience and a record to prove who he is while yang has nothing other than words in a world where trust is really important.
    2
  4213. Do vote. Thanks for that.
    2
  4214. no
    2
  4215. Bill Gates is evil.
    2
  4216. no
    2
  4217.  @avpthegreat  "You also have nothing to add to this conversation or to any conversation. Take your nonsense somewhere else." You are worthless but this is really funny coming from you. Do the world a favor and be quiet.
    2
  4218.  @andrewalton5042  I've read your comments in the past and loved them. It's just that you didn't do anything to indicate that you were joking in a world where there are people that would say that seriously so I was worried. I've already lost so much faith in humanity I guess I just needed to know that it was joke. Take care bud.
    2
  4219. I agree with everything you said except for blaming Warren's behavior on Hillary. Warren has always been a liar and political opportunist. She just apologized for her lies about Native American history. Hillary is terrible but she deserves the blame for this as much as anything... she doesn't. Warren deserves the blame. Leave it there.
    2
  4220. What a dumb comment on so many levels.
    2
  4221.  @Badfoxfinance  You are a moron... without bothering to disguise it.
    2
  4222.  @mypetcrow9873  My comment, that was removed, was sarcacm. That's what the /s means in addition to my comment making ZERO sense from the perspective of a believer. I'm an atheist. Obviously.
    2
  4223. Correct the record, is that you?
    2
  4224.  @cbd7575  Rapid weight gain/loss isn't good for your body.
    2
  4225.  Ariana Grande  If you don't understand the point they are trying to make it's only because you are being willfully obtuse.
    2
  4226.  Ariana Grande  Regarding, " like urge people to adopt dogs from shelters?" LMFAO. Nope. Their point is rather clear and concise. I can't break it down any better than the OP already did. "Just a publicity stunt nothing more." The point is self explanatory. Regarding, "biden already won so what else is there to promote" Do you really not understand why public opinion of elected officials while they are in office is important and carefully cultivated? I have a really tough time taking you seriously.
    2
  4227. Nobody is better than Sanders in government.
    2
  4228.  @66ALicEiNCHaiNS06  Go look up tyranny in the dictionary.
    2
  4229.    Are you just mad that whyamimrpink's picture is up under moron in my dictionary and not yours? I'm not going to lie, you make a good case for your picture being there.
    2
  4230.    Regarding, "I hope you learned your lesson." I'm well aware that you are stupid. Feel free to shut up and stop proving it.
    2
  4231.    Regarding, "Example, whyamimrpink78" LMFAO
    2
  4232.  @puffy_vegas7610  Regarding, "Wearing clothes does not make you sick" No shit sherlock. Do you think I was suggesting otherwise?
    2
  4233. Do your own research and stop being a lazy bitch who needs to be spoon-fed information. There is plenty of polling that shows that, for example, literally every policy position Sanders has is popular with the public.
    2
  4234. If people want to get actually good analysis I recommend channels such as: revolutionary blackout network, jimmy dore, due dissonance, and glenn greenwald.
    2
  4235. The real difference is that holmes conned rich people and will be punished for it while musk is conning peasants and getting tax money for which he will likely never be punished.
    2
  4236. What an epic sell-out bernie turned to be.
    2
  4237. I'm not so sure.... about the undercover part.
    2
  4238.  @Fafnd  Republican Light or maybe my favorite, The Diet Republican Party (DRP). Otherwise known as the derp party.
    2
  4239.  @Marshallizer  Any actual progressive wouldn't want to first fund a UBI on the backs of poor people which is what yang does. Watch the interview titled "Andrew Yang: Paying for a Universal Basic Income." When asked how are you going to pay for UBI the first thing he thinks of to pay for it is by gutting the social safety net and having the poorest of the poor pay for his UBI when any actual progressive would have the rich pay for UBI. He lied about supporting m4a while running for potus. He had zero business running for potus because he had zero name recognition and had never won a political office in his life. But his campaign would take votes from sanders but not biden making it a perfect gift for an establishment that was trying to stop sanders from the nomination. Non profits are this sign of the worst of the worst political conmen like trump and the clinton who also liked to parade their nonprofits around to virtue signal who great they are when they actually suck. I have more but that should get you started why I can't stand him.
    2
  4240. If you don't want to vote on m4a can you really be called the "left?"
    2
  4241.  @liberalsocialist9723  Regarding, "The consensus of progressives disagree with you, Jimmy Dore is not our lord and savior" Did I say Jimmy is our "lord and savior or are you just being moron who is too stupid to take seriously?
    2
  4242.  @liberalsocialist9723  Regarding, "Jimmy is where you get your arguments from hence why I say he is not our lord and savior." If you think I give a fuck about anything you have to think or say at this point you are mistaken. Please shut up. You are making everyone dumber.
    2
  4243.  @retromillenium  So it's not sad that the media isn't painting a fair picture of Bernie? Because that is the only type of sentiment that should have you losing your shit the way you are. You are acting like they said it was "surprising" or some shit. They didn't. Stop being an idiot doing what you are doing right now. Save that outrage for the many places it actually belongs and not for a post that is pure fact.
    2
  4244. We are still in like 9 countries right? So why do you think less civilians have been killed under him?
    2
  4245.  @kxr842  "every single thing has a purpose?" What do you think epstein's "purpose" was?
    2
  4246.  @lindeeblew1210  Do you realize how many people have been murdered in the name of your cults?
    2
  4247.  @lindeeblew1210  "get overly upset over the acknowledgement of God/Jesus" I also get "upset" when people seriously act like zeus is real.
    2
  4248.  @cherylwebb8340  "a judgment day is coming." The god of the bible commits straight up genocide in the noah story as the drowned an entire world filled with, among other things, babies and puppies.
    2
  4249. Nicholas A. I'm unclear what you are trying to say and what your point is suppose to be. Everything from "I know," which I'm not sure what part you are saying you know to; to "yup we will," like we will win the war on drugs? Is that what you mean? And if that is what you mean is that suppose to be serious? Or sarcasm? To the dates which seem irrelevant to conversation at hand. That said maybe you have a good reason for bringing up the dates but if there is that point is lost on me.
    2
  4250.  @misstrunchbull3953  "Is Bernie a fraud too?" When he voted for the current bill without it including a 2k check or a 15 dollar minimum wage.... yes. He is. Actions speak louder than words.
    2
  4251.  @misstrunchbull3953  "the same reason why Bernie ended up supporting him you dunce" Yang could have supported sanders even after he dropped out. He didn't. Yes. Yang is a fraud. Big time. Huge fraud.
    2
  4252. @Sam Lee "He said early on and repeatedly that he would support whoever that would win the nomination." Actually he said that he would support a candidate who embraced UBI which biden never did. God damn yang gang lies so fucking much.
    2
  4253. @Sam Lee "It was clear Biden was going to win." It wasn't even close to clear who was going to win when yang dropped out. God damn yang gang lies so fucking much.
    2
  4254.  @misstrunchbull3953  "Why is it so hard for dense people to understand this?" It's not "dense" to reject your BS and lies. Why are you so dense to embrace the lies like this?
    2
  4255. You are an idiot if you think they are radical leftists. Sincerely, an actual radical leftist.
    2
  4256. I'm fine but, as always, could be better but thanks for asking. Try not to take my comments seriously. I thought it was pretty clear they were jokes.
    2
  4257. If he wins as a democrat he can reform the party from the inside. That is the best plan and I support it.
    2
  4258.  @sonjakozman1699  Tell you what I'm going to write a few comments to you and suspect that at least one will be shadowbanned. You still might be able to read it in your notifications but if it's being shadowbanned you won't be able to see the comment if you look at the thread while you are signed out...
    2
  4259.  @sonjakozman1699  "banging on about shadow banning comments." Sorry not sorry for pointing out how when you said, "I think it's a bug..." you have no clue what you were talking about.
    2
  4260.  @noramusk4689  Regarding, "Sorry Charlie" Who is charlie? Regarding, "he was voted in office for eight years Fact" What the actual fuck are you talking about? Is there a point hidden in here?
    2
  4261.  @noramusk4689  Regarding, "You have to make decisions as president good decisions and bad decisions You can’t please everyone" What a way to rationalize terrible. I imagine trump supporters spout meaningless nonsense like this to defend their clown as well. I'll remember you if I ever need a POS polished.
    2
  4262.  Scorpio Way  Regarding, "Then you need to start remembering what the alternatives were." Do I? Does that somehow make Obama better than he is? Oh wait... it doesn't.
    2
  4263.  @noramusk4689  You are a malfunctioning bot right?
    2
  4264.  @jamessderby  Probably Hawkins. I'm honestly not sure who I am voting for. But I know at least two names I'm not voting for... trump and biden.
    2
  4265. He is superior. Not because he is a man but because the things he says are not retarded. It is the same reason everyone is superior to you.
    2
  4266. FYI Trump is president.
    2
  4267. Musk is just another rich POS conman.
    2
  4268. hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha! (breathe) hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahaha!
    2
  4269.  @meltedsnowman9637  Giving your own terrible comments a thumbs up is in bad taste IMO. And what's funny about this situation is how transparent it is. Ana is not good at blackmail or pretty much anything so it's funny. And it's funny that anyone would take her BS seriously or try to defend her or take her side.
    2
  4270. To be fair I've left more than my share of negative comments compared to my one downvote.
    2
  4271.  @Berkdogg79  Spartan beat me to it. I hate Chuck so much. But that question was good and important. I can't believe it came from him.
    2
  4272.  @brianholmes6392  This channel is affiliated with TYT so every time really.
    2
  4273.  @TheAlibabatree  Why would you trust someone who has no political experience and no record? How do you know he isn't just lying and pandering to you? You can't.
    2
  4274.  @cheesys8706  They would all cheat. But rigging a national election is not like rigging a party primary. I have evidence of cheating in the primary. Do you have evidence of cheating in the general?
    2
  4275.  @cheesys8706  "Its actually a little easier for the general," What nonsense. "you would only have to do it in a couple of swing states opposed to the primary" And all you need to know is exactly which states you need ahead of time because you know the election results a head of time. And all you need to do is overcome an actual opposition party with real oversight over what you are you doing. This is like rigging a football game on neutral turf. Rigging a primary is like rigging a home game where you picked the refs. "Yes I do have evidence, but I'm not going to risk my account posting about it." That's very convenient for you. I'm going to go ahead and not risk believing your BS then.
    2
  4276.  @dashx1103  "JD spun it" This has nothing to do with dore. It's pathetic you keep trying to make it about him.
    2
  4277.  @dashx1103  "isn't tied to the JD enemies list" It's tied to grim's BS regardless of who is calling him out. It's just a lazy way for you to try and dismiss the arguments being made to you. It's lazy, pathetic, and transparent. "JD went out of his way to misrepresent the Schumer story," LMFAO You are impossible to take seriously. It legit feels like I'm talking to a burner account for grim. "omitting that Grim led with the fact that "Democrats capitulated to a staffer" in failing to get min wage the first time." LMFAO That doesn't make anything better. "Democrats capitulated" is just another lie from grim. The dems did exactly what they wanted to do. They didn't "capitulate" anything.
    2
  4278.  @dashx1103  "I’ve addressed feeble points— which is all you’ve made." You haven't intelligently addressed a single point I've made. Not one.
    2
  4279.  @dashx1103  "He was highly critical of Biden." That's how controlled opposition gains your trust before telling you to vote for him despite the fact that he's terrible.
    2
  4280.  @dashx1103  "highly critical of Biden" This is completely meaningless. What matters is that he will tell you to vote for him.
    2
  4281.  @dashx1103  "it was a rational position." Only someone who has listened to too much BS from people like ryan would think that voting for evil is "rational."
    2
  4282.  @dashx1103  "therefore he's a shill" Just drinking mountain dew all the time doesn't make you a shill. You become a shill when you tell everyone else THEY need to drink it.
    2
  4283. Agreed. Bill Maher wants us to forget the fact the primary was rigged because the election is over and we need to move on but RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA is totally different.
    2
  4284. You have provided no evidence of Biden smelling men's hair or kissing them. Therefor he doesn't do this to men.
    2
  4285. Neither. Obviously.
    2
  4286.  @delboyg01  Regarding, " I get ur points in all these comments" So why are you fighting me? Regarding, "it's early yet" So what. The war has already begun so we probably should be being smart already shouldn't we? Regarding, "only time will tell." Sure. Only time will tell if Bernie gets the nomination or a corporate dem gets it. But those are the only scenarios based in reality other than the unthinkable happens to Bernie and his supporters are forced to look to Gabbard or someone else. Regarding, "the fake progressives know what they need to say to get the soundbites now, even if they quietly walk back their positions next day, it won't be on TV." Fake progressives tend to be opposing and fighting against Bernie. That includes politicians. Progressives need to be supporting and enabling Sanders. Period. Full stop.
    2
  4287.  @patrickmclean9796  To be fair it's not entirely the peasants fault. They are brainwashed with propaganda 24/7 because it works.
    2
  4288. Seems the paid trolls are getting to work.
    2
  4289. Just when I thought I was out he pulls me back in. Ok. I'll address that response since it is at least short. Seriously I hate to let your other garbage go unanswered but there is just way too much bullshit. I make no promises to talk to you any more after this. Even responding to you here is not smart on my behalf. Regarding, "I do know what disingenuous means." Do you really? You say you do but you demonstrate that you don't. Disingenuous defined, "lacking in candor; also :giving a false appearance of simple frankness" https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/disingenuous You know what is candid? Telling people the bill isn't going to pass. You know what is frank and honest? Telling people the bill isn't going to pass. It isn't about passing it now. It is about getting every politician of every party on the record for a policy position that has the support of the people and putting pressure on those that oppose something they should be supporting. Regarding, "He brought the bill up and THEN said that it had no hope of passing." You say this like these events happened years apart. You really seem to be working hard to smear. Regarding, "Bringing the bill up is disingenuous if he already knew that it had no hope of passing." There is a Republican President, Republican House, and Republican Senate. I guess he should just do nothing with his time so that people like you can complain that he isn't doing enough with his time in office. I personally like that he is continuing to fight and push for policies the people care about and need desperately. Regarding, "They obviously think it's a possibility so he's at least deluded them." Are you really telling me that there might be people saying stupid things in the internet comment section? Maybe I'd be more shocked if I weren't talking to you but probably not because I actually know what is going on unlike some. (I'm talking about you in case you are not smart enough to realize it.) Ok... seriously I'm done with you. This is a waste of time. You are obviously hopeless.
    2
  4290. God damn you. Regarding, "Bernie Sanders legislative victories' and came up with bupkis so I'm just not going to answer you." http://occasionalplanet.org/2016/03/04/a-list-of-bernie-sanders-accomplishments/ And even if Sanders passed no legislation, which he obviously has despite your smear, he is important because over the course of his entire life he has fought the good fight and been on the right side of virtually every issue in his long career. He can hardly be blamed for the rest of our government sucking balls. Please let me quit you. I really want to. I just have a hard time letting stupid go unanswered and with you there is so. much. stupid.
    2
  4291. You are not making this easy. At least the bullshit is stacked really high. That makes it easier to not address.
    2
  4292. Regarding, "by using the media to black out bernie coverage" There is no way that tactic will be as successful in 2020. In 2016 they were effectively able to act like he was pie in the sky and fringe. In 2020 will enter as the frontrunner. Regarding, "they are not above rigging the election again." No they are not. I fully expect the game to be rigged from start to finish. But ultimately I suspect there will not be enough dirty tricks in their playbook to successfully fuck him over in 2020 the same way they did in 2016. The game, although still rigged, has changed.
    2
  4293.  @naomiluciano2867  "lies what you gonna say ?" What? I can't take you seriously enough to respond to you intelligently.
    2
  4294.  @captserenity8154  "anger mixed with disappointment of my country." The feeling is mutual. It's nice to know at least a few people get it. This channel and the type of person it cultivates really helps restore my faith in humanity. And I need it.
    2
  4295. I agree with everything you said but must nitpick a fact. She didn't actually endorse Hillary over Bernie. She didn't endorse anyone during the primary but the effect was essentially the same. Especially when Hillary won Warrens state in the primary by about a single point.
    2
  4296. Same. Except it's more like 99 percent.
    2
  4297. I think you overestimate how incredibly difficult it would have been for him to win in a 3 way race. Even if he got the most EC votes that isn't good enough. He would have needed a majority of EC votes to win and that would have been all but impossible. Also if he would have run and Trump won Hillary and the corporate media would have been able to effectively blame him for Trump winning. He and his movement would have suffered a devastating blow. I guess what I'm saying is that if you think it couldn't have been worse then you are wrong. It is incredibly important that Hillary be blamed for her loss. Of course there are still those that want to blame Sanders and russia and sexism and... but I'm not talking about those idiots. I'm talking about the sane. Sanders is currently the most popular politician in the country and is in a position to win in 2020 only because he didn't run as a 3rd party candidate for the general in 2016.
    2
  4298.  @AcolyteOfLucifer  Regarding, "How does that make someone a fraud?" I'm not exactly sure what you are referencing but I'll assume you are talking about why are justice dems frauds. Well... frauds are people whose actions don't match their words. They are quite common when it comes to politicians. They, for example, will tell you they will fight for universal health care but then they will take a position of great power, use if for absolutely nothing, and vote for nancy pelosi as speaker and get nothing for it. That's what a fraud would do when a genuine person would use their power to get at least something of value for progressives like forcing a vote on M4A. Regarding, "You have a concerning low bar for what constitutes "fraud"" You might want to consider that you are not being willing enough to call people frauds when their actions are not matching their words.
    2
  4299. There are few politicians I dislike more than yang.
    2
  4300. This kid restores some much needed faith in humanity.
    2
  4301. I wish I were a youtube superdelegate so that I could give this comment a few thousand thumbs up. It's spot on and well said.
    2
  4302. Why? He literally never mentioned his relationship with TYT even while directly covering for their blackmail. Don't be a fool.
    2
  4303.  @WestfaliaStuff  " he acknowledged all major issues as such." I think my favorite part of that video is where he tried to claim that it wasn't his fault for not telling jimmy he was standing him up because he was too busy standing up jimmy with cenks nephew.
    2
  4304. Maybe the burden of proof for long lines should be on the ones claiming long lines.
    2
  4305. Just watched it. 1917 is an instant classic. So fucking good.
    2
  4306.  @jimbobaggins27  "The bully pulpit is actually a big deal" I don't really see this as that. I see it as pandering. Regarding, "it’s a good start" It's words. Get back to me when it's more than that and I might be more impressed.
    2
  4307. I'm not a trump supporter and no doubt you would be rightfully pissed if they were trying to make the orange clown look better than they are.
    2
  4308. It's not rocket science. It is just undemocratic if you believe in free and fair elections. Clearly the "democratic" party does not.
    2
  4309. Go subscribe to Bernie's youtube channel if you haven't already and vote for him the "democratic" primary. Thanks for that in advance.
    2
  4310. You still watch CNN and MSNBC? I prefer to do anything else with my time.
    2
  4311. Regarding, "we don't need the democrat label anymore. it's fatally tainted." Yes it is rightfully tainted. But the quickest way to get a major party that represents the people is by taking over the "democratic" party hostile takeover style. We need change now. And that is the quickest and easiest way to get it (not to be mistaken with easy).
    2
  4312. If they think that is so important to them there is nothing to stop them from doing so already. But the bottom line is that most people use their primary to vote FOR something, not sabotage.
    2
  4313. Sam and his crew might criticize biden but they will tell you all to get in line and vote for joe when it matters most. They are sheepherders leading you to slaughter.
    2
  4314.  @northernpunx1978  Did the OP say "just joe biden" or are you strawmanning?
    2
  4315.  @2727rogers  I think JFK might have been good if he wasn't murdered by the CIA.
    2
  4316. No we don't. Not everyone drives but everyone does live.
    2
  4317.  @spiceinsights  "we need to be held accountable for our actions too" Does this mean I can't wear a banana hammock to work?
    2
  4318.  @spiceinsights  "if you do prepare to be held accountable by your peers 😂" I'm prepared for all the marriage proposals.
    2
  4319. I'm all for kyle trashing ATM but to be fair I don't think it's kyle deleting dislikes... I think that's youtube. But I doubt they'd do such a thing for jimmy or richard medhurst.
    2
  4320. He is. And he has admitted as much in court.
    2
  4321.  @kylequest  In reality being a governor or being a senator are considered the norm for potential presidential candidates because even if there isn't a job that's exactly like being a president those are the jobs that are most close to it. They are the "minor leagues" (the minor leagues compared to being POTUS at least) of politics where people get experience in politics and get to show the people what they do with power when they have it (earn their trust) and not just talking about what they would do with power.
    2
  4322.  @whyme777x  Regarding, "McCain is only incidentally correct." So what. She is still correct the same way Trump is correct when he says CNN sucks. Maybe they both say what they do for the wrong reasons but ultimately what they are saying is correct on the surface. And if she is correct that means warren is wrong right? Because she is? And isn't that what is really what is important? Her opinion and not Meghans? Regarding, "She's only using an attack..." So what. It works. Because ultimately she is correct and Warren should be going on fox. Regarding, "You'll never hear a story from corporate media" Corporate media is shit. This isn't about that. This is about what is the best strategy to confront the corrosive influence of corporate media. And just ignoring it and hoping it goes away while you ignore it is dumb as fuck. You shine light on that shit. You tell them why what they are saying is dumb. You do everything you can to burst their bubble and confront the ideology. That is why Warren is wrong and McCain is right for once in her pathetic life. Fuck Warren for making me take that cunts side on something.
    2
  4323. For people who enjoyed this video I recommend this one as well. The very last minute (it starts at 11:10) helps put things in context in a way we can actually understand. It's so crazy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xQRC50yzNGY&t=13s
    2
  4324. Or here is a better idea tech... we regulate capitalism including walmart and mcds to prevent the types of abuses you speak of instead of allowing capitalism to run amok anywhere.
    2
  4325. rio you are giving capitalism the credit for what modern day science deserves and you are making shit up about socialism.
    2
  4326. Not really. At least not to them. Logic has no effect on the illogical.
    2
  4327. simps are going to simp
    2
  4328.  @3ld919  "Judas is good shit." 3LD talking to Jesus
    2
  4329.  @50jakecs  "I think you are ignorant about what the word "ignorant" means." This is what's known as projection in psychology.
    2
  4330. I love how every religion points to their holy book as evidence of their religion. And by love I mean hate.
    2
  4331. Moe that isn't proof.
    2
  4332. Bill regarding, "Hillary got more votes." Just ignore the fact that the game was rigged and the "democratic" party got to pick and choose who could and couldn't vote to help their anointed queen. Regarding, "his supporters can be as dumb as Trump fans" Sweet irony. Thanks for the laugh.
    2
  4333. thelinedrive regarding, "anything that happened that you could even suggest there was rigging in place happened when Clinton already had a commanding lead" BS. How about you take a little closer look at the rest of your own fucking paragraph... "super delegates who were clearly going to vote for Hillary" Before any of the peasants were allowed to vote Hillary Clinton superdelegates pledged themselves to Clinton. And this fact was paraded around by the media to make sure everyone realized the election was over even before it started. Regarding, "nobody went and voted for him in the primaries" Unfortunately we will never know what the votes would have been had the game not been rigged and the party not actively disenfranchise voters. 3 million independents in NY state alone were not allowed to vote in the primary.
    2
  4334. C L you are correct that it isn't going to be happening before 2020 but you are wrong that it can't happen after that. The key to getting a progressive chair and a party that doesn't suck balls is getting a progressive nominee of the party and that could very well happen with Sanders in 2020. I do not think they have enough dirty tricks to stop him. He then gets to pick the chair who picks the people under them and so on. Corporate dems can be purged the same way progressives were purged but to do it we need to win.
    2
  4335. Technocrat it's so strange how some of you can justify the unjustifiable. The DNC has rules that Perez is suppose to be impartial and unbiased and he clearly broke them but you don't care because you are a tool. No. I don't think everyone feels the same way I do. There are obviously plenty of corporate shills who rely on the parties gravy train, party members who are asleep, and party members who blindly support their team among others that are just fine with Perez but cool strawman argument that has nothing to do with my statement whatsoever. Are you listening to how silly you sound? Don't bother answering. It is rhetorical. I already know you are oblivious to how stupid you sound. Good luck with the whole retarded as fuck thing you have going on.
    2
  4336.  @joshuareynolds1545  "find something more productive to do" Calling out frauds is always a constructive use of time. "Dude is a human being." Huh. I had no idea. I once was blind but now I see. You changed me with this. Thank you. But even still I'm not sure how this changes things now that I realize he is a human and not something else. "He made the right choice leaving tyt." Too late. He's made too many inexcusable decisions before it. "The Dore situation happened weeks ago." Does that mean kyles BS just fades away after a couple weeks? That's not how it works. "Move on" I won't be here forever. While I am don't let it trigger you too much. "stop acting like Kyle just killed a guy." I don't. And instead of addressing the actual problems I have with kyle you spout BS like this.
    2
  4337. Use it to build third party support before using it on a guy not running.
    2
  4338. Nah. He was always this terrible. The only difference is your awareness of it.
    2
  4339. I gave it a rare thumbs down because yang is a conman... just like trump. But good at it.
    2
  4340. I'm still unsure why he thinks sitting on the sideline would be ok.
    2
  4341.  @Hunter_Brandon  "Win?" Yeah. Win. It sure as fuck isn't a loss despite anything you say. Did I want neera to pass or not? I didn't. If I can't celebrate that what can I celebrate?
    2
  4342.  @Hunter_Brandon  Regarding, "Who defeated Neera Tanden?" I care about this like I care about who killed bin laden. I don't. I'm just glad they lost. "If THIS is what you have to celebrate then get those 3 things first." Let's say I have all those things. Or 2 of the three. Or none. That has dick all with me celebrating this. I can walk and chew gum at the same time. It's like you seem incapable of enjoying anything. It's almost like your whole identity is wrapped up in being pissed even when something you should want happens to you. It sounds shitty being you.
    2
  4343.  @futurereflections4097  "I bet you’re all for that" I'm willing to take that bet.
    2
  4344. I want both bidens to lose.
    2
  4345. Whatever you got to tell yourself to rationalize supporting a terrible person. You aren't that much different than a trump supporter who rationalizes their vote for tiny orange hands by saying, "I'm still voting for Trump. Do i like it? Of course not! I could choose to vote 3rd party but my vote would mean biden would win. I hate it but trump 2020 is my only choice" Ultimately you are both fools supporting terrible people for terrible reasons.
    2
  4346. Some I assume are good people.
    2
  4347. Who do you support for president?
    2
  4348.  @alexbravo7467  Who do you support for president?
    2
  4349.  @alexbravo7467  Are you ok?
    2
  4350. What is kyle's thing? "His youtube channel, secular talk, an AFFILIATE of the young turks network." That's kyle's thing and why he claims the millions they take don't make them corrupt and why he might omit some blackmail they are doing.
    2
  4351. Yup. He went from being mad that Sanders was going to back the "democratic" candidate (like he needed to to run as a dem) to saying his supporters are why Hillary lost. If that endorsement were as important as he wanted to pretend then Trump wouldn't have won.
    2
  4352. Curm regarding, "Paul Ryan." Another punchable face from Wisconsin. Wisconsin has some very likable people for the most part but they do produce some of the most punachable faced politicians in the country.
    2
  4353. Remember when bernie said biden might be the next FDR? Was he right about that? Was he right to tell everyone we should vote for people like clinton? And biden?
    2
  4354. "always is right" Things a sycophant would say.
    2
  4355.  @TT-ue6xx  I'm going to try to repeat this because my original replies are being shadow banned. Land of the free am I right?
    2
  4356.  @TT-ue6xx  "Do you think he'd still be senator" I do. And if all he cares about is holding onto power then he shouldn't have it anyway.
    2
  4357.  @TT-ue6xx  "why is Bernie expected to be absolutely perfect" He's not. Why is he expected to get a pass for things we call out other politicians for?
    2
  4358.  @TT-ue6xx  "I absolutely believe the Dems would primary him" LMFAO It's like you know why he sells you out but instead of realizing it you rationalize it.
    2
  4359.  @TT-ue6xx  " I believe there are reasons he ended his campaign" He told chris hedges why... he didn't want "to be nadared." That's his way of telling you he's a sellout.
    2
  4360.  @TT-ue6xx  "I don't vote blue sorry to disappoint you" LMFAO You are disppointing bernie and lying to yourself. Bernie is blue in all the ways that matter and the label he gives himself is meaningless.
    2
  4361.  @TT-ue6xx  "Who is your politician of choice? If there was an election tomorrow who would you prefer to be president?" Kshama Sawant I think.
    2
  4362. And he can be trusted to fight for his... which is arguably more important.
    2
  4363. And she simps for mama bear.
    2
  4364.  @robingourde9366  "the Corporate Democrats who did that. Closet conservatives." The entire party who russiagated. Thanks for agreeing with my comment. Not that it should be necessary.
    2
  4365.  @jonnystarsmore3445  Term limits are not a solution. Getting money out of politics is. Get money out of politics and you won't care how long uncorrupted politicians stay in office.
    2
  4366.  @jonnystarsmore3445  Regarding, "people who fake" It's easier to tell if someone is fake if they have been around a long time. New faces are always capable of just telling you whatever you want to get your vote before selling you out. As for doing the right thing to try and win the next election... it only matters if you have another election to win.
    2
  4367. Don't get complacent because of this fellow Bernie supporters. 2020 is going to be an all-out war.
    2
  4368. Regarding, "driving on the doughnut rather than getting a new tire." What a great analogy. I'm stealing that. Thank you.
    2
  4369. It takes me two seconds to answer. Yes they should be abolished.
    2
  4370. In a sane world people like chris hedges would hold power, not people like biden or trump.
    2
  4371. It is the best way to get his message out and if you doubt this examine the coverage given to Jill Stein. Running in the party is the only way to reform the party. The EC and all the other ways the system is rigged make it all but impossible for a 3rd party candidate to win at the national level. Millions of brainwashed sheep will be voting for the democrat in the presidential election regardless of the persons name and it makes sense to try to get those votes. It would split left leaning thinkers. All of these are reasonable answers to what I think is a rather obvious question. Is it fair? Nope. But then again neither is trying to run as a 3rd party candidate.
    2
  4372. Sam and his right wingers may as well just advocate for censorship.
    2
  4373.  @jc7150  They are worried about "genocidal racism" but not the ACTUAL genocide going on right now.
    2
  4374.  @RevolutionaryThinking  You still aren't even attempting to say what he is lying about. You are projecting.
    2
  4375. @J G Is that suppose to impress me? It doesn't. And it shouldn't impress you or be relevant to you. Have some independent ideas about these people. Warren sucks because she sucks and it has nothing to do with Biden. Obviously.
    2
  4376. Exit polling is how you know if an election is on the up and up or if it's being rigged. Fun fact: exit polling from many primary states indicated widespread election fraud in the 2016 "democratic" primary.
    2
  4377.  Christian Soldier  The epic stupidity of your comments. Either way... good luck with them.
    2
  4378.  Christian Soldier  Go on.
    2
  4379.  @Catloves997  Regarding, " crony capitalism is literally just capitalism, though" It's not thou. The difference is regulation. Regarding, "The SocDem countries still have corruption" There will always be people trying to corrupt the system... even a socialist system. Regarding, "the Right Wing taking over, waiting topple over what progress they've made" Again... none of the is extinguished through pure socialism. There will forever be people trying to abuse, manipulate, and profit off of whatever system there is. Regarding, "The truth is that you can't have socialism and capitalism." Sure you can. Because we are talking about different things and different lanes. Health care... socialism. Cars... capitalism. Regarding, "The car manufacturing industry is highly problematic and unnecessary." Only when they are buying our politicians, running a monopoly, not providing their workers enough to live on, not providing safe working conditions, polluting the environment unnecessarily (as for what is or isn't unnecessary is a debate to be had and I concede the answer is not perfectly clear), putting out products that are not safe, and others, but that's the gist of it. Those are the types of things regulations are suppose to be for. Regarding, "It harms the environment and is generally unnecessary for those living in cities." I, and most Americans, believe in a concept of freedom. We don't want to be dictated by you or anyone as to whether or not we can or can't have a car, in general. That said, we lose that freedom when it is infringing on others and starts causing our neighbors harm. But that debate needs to happen and it is seldom perfectly clear as to what the balance is and where my arm ends and your arm begins. But generally that's the standard and as long as I'm not hurting you you shouldn't be bugging me. That said I care about the environment. I want our cars to be as clean as possible but trying to dictate if I can have one at all doesn't fly with me. Regarding, "Public transport should be all people need there, so it should be improved upon." Public transport should be improved because public transport should be improved. Do that and maybe more people would use it. I've never lived in a huge city nor would I want to. If I did there's no way I'd want to be using a car. Ultimately you are going to lose people when you start trying to dictate and micromanage their lives for them in this way. Where would this mentality end? Do we outlaw McDonalds because big macs are bad for people? I value personal freedom and don't give it up too easily. Regarding, "Know that regulations are able to be rolled back. That's the problem." This could be said of literally every good thing ever. I don't find it to be a compelling argument. Regarding, "The goal should be a better society for everyone." I agree with this... but not at the expense of all personal freedom. I want balance. And that's what I think a mix of capitalism and socialism provides. Is it perfect? Hardly. But nothing is IMO.
    2
  4380.  @Catloves997  I did read everything you said but ultimately we don't agree and I'm not willing to use the time to address all our differences. This thread isn't about socialism versus capitalism and I'm not interested in have an in depth debate about that. It's specifically about money in politics. Don't get me wrong those are related topics, but it's going way off the rails from that at this point. That said in a way I very much appreciate you putting your viewpoint out there even thou we disagree. I wish there was a hardcore socialist like yourself in the democratic debates. It should give people like "proud American" who loves to call Bernie and myself communists and socialists (even thou I'm not a hardcore socialist) some perspective. Then again it can't resonate with a person who is too far gone such as themself, but it very well might resonate with lots of the public who has been brainwashed into thinking Sanders is a communist and socialism is the devil.
    2
  4381.  @sharper68  "the katzenburg smear" LMFAO Smears are lies. It's fact that katzenburg gave tyt millions of dollars. Sorry not sorry if the truth triggers you but the truth is not a smear.
    2
  4382.  No Name  https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/out-of-touch-aoc-primary-challenger-says-vote-against-cares-act-slap-in-the-face-to-poorest-people-in-her-district
    2
  4383.  @Prague3203  Something right =/= everything right. She saved NY BILLIONS of dollars earmarked directly to Jeff Bezos.
    2
  4384.  @mchammer3432  LMFAO. You don't need to wait. All you need to do was read my point that she saved NY literally BILLIONS of dollars that were going to Amazon and Jeff Bezos? She did this despite your idiotic notion that a single decent person surrounded by nothing but swamp creatures should be able to get lots of things done. It's remarkable if she is able to do anything other maybe move the overton window on all the important issues everyone else is standing in the way of. Still she managed to pretty much single handedly save her state billions.
    2
  4385.  @mchammer3432  Regarding, "votes for the cares and heroes act" It took me two seconds to fact check this and I posted the source here. I even know it can be seen as not all sources cited do because someone other than myself gave it a thumbs up. I can only assume that you are just another person intentionally trying to mislead. You suck at life.
    2
  4386.  @mchammer3432  But thanks for pretty much proving my point about the paid trolls smearing.
    2
  4387.  @Mydogslove2laugh  "Jd only punches left." I've already said this but I guess it's worth repeating... the "democratic" party is not a left party. Therefore your comment is nonsensical.
    2
  4388.  @loulfw2513  how about a little empathy for Rachel? She has been negatively impacted by having to hear about these mass shootings. Maybe we should start a support group for people like her where she can talk to others that are tired of hearing about it. Seriously thou sorry for the sarcasm. I use joking to cope with shit sometimes. I am not content with the status quo and sadly it seems nothing is going to change anytime soon and it is infuriating.
    2
  4389.  @loulfw2513  regarding, "loved your hit single" Sorry but that wasn't me. Funny story thou... I was playing in the main event at the WSOP and some people came to me looking to interview me expecting the Vegas star because they only knew my name. I was like... sorry, that's a different Clint Holmes. I'm nobody Clint Holmes, the dream crusher of people looking for famous Clint Holmes. We, as a country, should be like, what can we do about this problem of gun violence. Instead we get, what can we do about the problem of hearing about our everyday gun violence. This country is pretty messed up.
    2
  4390.  @loulfw2513  don't get me wrong, it's not all bad. Most people are good people just living trying to live their lives, do the right thing, and figure out a way to pay their bills, but money in politics is really fucking things up from top to bottom. Those good people are being abused and used by the ones with power. They are being divided and set against each other. We are going to be leaving a world far worse then one we got... that's pretty messed up.
    2
  4391.  @elsagrace3893  I promise you me saying we should start a support group for people like rachel was sarcasm.
    2
  4392. Thulyblu regarding, "no actual downsides considering biology and evolution" There is an increase in the likelihood of genetic defects even it isn't as high as some might think. We live in a world with BILLIONS of people who are connected in ways we never were before. It isn't even that I have a problem with them going for their cousin... it is that I have a problem with them being too lazy to look outside their family and going for the first person that will play with their junk. We as a society are going to draw the line somewhere on what is acceptable and not when it comes to this. We will never be ok with brothers and sisters getting it on so the question is where is that line going to be? You want to fight this? Go ahead. But like I said I need some fucking comic relief and instead you have me arguing about this bullshit instead. I'm not too intellectually dishonest to admit that I'm more likely to be on your side when that side isn't being represented by a complete piece of shit that I want to take a piss on. Just let me have my fun please.
    2
  4393. Thulyblu regarding, "... first cousins about 10% more, and second cousins have some increase that is not statistically significant anymore." I concede that finding numbers about this isn't easy to do as I did a very quick look into it myself. Let's say I accepted your numbers up til 10% more. Intuitively it doesn't seem to make sense that it then goes from 10% to statistically insignificant the next ring out. It seems to logically follow that it would somewhere in the 4 to 5 percent neighborhood assuming that numbers were correct and again I can't actually verify them. But again I think you are missing the point. I don't think most are hear because they care deeply about 2nd cousin marriage but rather they are using this topic to laugh a person they despise in depressing times. Back in the day in a less populated less connected world where people died where they were born marrying your second cousin made more sense. In today's world I think that people should be going out and finding others to get with and not just going for the first thing they see. To me it has more to do with that then anything. But whatever. Seriously. I just want to make fun of Guiliani. Fuck that guy.
    2
  4394.  @kevinm3751  Don't get me wrong I'm glad that matt o isn't ignorant and made this video. But for most of the peasants who are just busy trying to put food on the plate there really isn't that much they can really do to fight the establishment. But for those that can please go for it.
    2
  4395. "We the people need to transition away from the corporate duopoly that runs rampant in this country." We do. But bernie tells you to vote for people like biden.
    2
  4396.  @Corgiss9  "what was the Alternative?" An actual revolutionary would have run third party or at least advocated for a third party candidate. "Truuump" People shouldn't vote for trump for all the same reasons they shouldn't vote for biden.
    2
  4397.  @Corgiss9  "what was the Alternative? Truuump" Millions of people knew trump was terrible and voted for him anyway using the same "logic" you use to vote for biden.
    2
  4398. David looks ready to do porn. I can't blame him. Covering politics is depressing.
    2
  4399.  JM 21  Are you willfully obtuse? Their point is obviously that the single act of owning a dog doesn't make someone a decent person.
    2
  4400. It was an incredible effort... at bullshitting and lying to everyone.
    2
  4401. I wonder how many people never even knew he was affiliated with them seeing as how he never mentioned it even while covering for their BS.
    2
  4402.  @ciamciaramcia99  Regarding, "Ofcourse Fox is worst than CNN and MSNBC. That doesn't mean they're better." Actually that would mean you think they are better.
    2
  4403. If kyle doesn't like TYT then why is he affiliated with them as he covers for their blackmail and corruption?
    2
  4404. All the policies he was selling would all have disproportionately benefited blacks.
    2
  4405.  @dcvalentine1  Yes. Yours was.
    2
  4406.  @jgambie3196  "What happened at The Hill DIRECTLY affects Kyle." This is clearly and obviously bullshit. It's not like kyle has ever worked for the hill. The have ZERO direct influence over him.
    2
  4407.  @jgambie3196  But I should add that kyle brought cenks nephew on to talk to him and krystal. That is again not the actions of someone who wants to stay out of it. Kyle just wants to have his cake and eat it too.
    2
  4408. Kennan, present them.
    2
  4409. I can't stand yang and it has nothing to do with the color of his skin.
    2
  4410.  @omararmour2823  "Liberals only see skin color" This is funny because so many people are talking about skin color. Does that mean you are all liberals?
    2
  4411. No. No they would not. They would be ashamed of you.
    2
  4412. On piles of money from selling his soul like a baby.
    2
  4413.  @mustbtrouble  4 replies but I can only see 3
    2
  4414.  @alicee2952  "it’s spam" It's not that. They are shadowbanning comments.
    2
  4415.  @NPC-bs3pm  Hopefully these might show in your notifications at least and I'm even going to go out of my way to try and get past the shadowbanning, more people have di ed of cov id during biden com pared to tru mp.
    2
  4416.  @NPC-bs3pm  There has been more spend ing for the mili tary dur ing bide n comp ared to tr ump.
    2
  4417.  @NPC-bs3pm  I got 2 out of those 3 to comments to show. That's pretty good.
    2
  4418.  @NPC-bs3pm  "on certain subjects" FYI the comment that didn't get through dealt with the topic of "forcing people out of the country," starts with a "d."
    2
  4419.  @NPC-bs3pm  "+port" Yeah.... they CRUSH all speech on that topic. Youtube has quickly become an all but useless forum for debate. And it's by design.
    2
  4420.    Regarding, " They have the same economic plan." https://berniesanders.com/issues/ Lots of stuff with lots of specifics. Compared to... https://www.tulsi2020.com/vision
    2
  4421.    Regarding, " Sanders would make a good VP." Well done on just deflecting and ignoring the points I've made.
    2
  4422.    I challenge you to give me one logical reason to support Tulsi over Bernie that I can't easily swat away like I've been doing.
    2
  4423. lowarail regarding, "he played the game" Yeah... he did. And we are better for it. Or would you rather the "democratic" party not needed rig the primary? In short stop being a fucking moron.
    2
  4424. JAYJAY regarding, "3%" I am pretty positive it's 5 percent. Regarding, "If the Democratic Party runs Bernie I will come back ." So are you just hoping he is able to win the primary without you? Or are you going to try to help him win the primary? Regarding, "But the choice between dems and republican is no choice ." You need to make a distinction between corporate dems and progressives working inside the party to try to change things, like justice democrats and Sanders. I love the Green party but they are rightfully plan B. Plan A is hostile takeover of the "democratic" party. We could use your help. And if they succeed in getting an establishment shill as their nominee I will be right beside you supporting the green party candidate, just like 2016.
    2
  4425. JAYJAY regarding, "As for Bernie I wish he would run but I am starting to wonder ." If I were a gambling man, and I am a gambling man, I would bet the house he runs assuming something crazy doesn't happen between now and then. And even if he doesn't then there should be a progressive option to support like Tulsi Gabbard. Regarding, "I will vote and donate for any progressive that I can" Excellent. Supporting progressives is the way to go.
    2
  4426. M M regarding, "Last time I checked, it was the republican party that passed the tax cut for the 1%" Since we are seemingly just spouting facts irrelevant to the conversation at hand... Last time I checked, it was Obama that made the Bush tax cuts permanent.
    2
  4427. Oh... it is evil. Just look at how the corporate media portrays the findings. Do yourself a favor and watch the video by the rational national about this.
    2
  4428.  @j0j0dartiste21  A sheepherder for the "democratic" party. And if you are getting at the fact that a made a typo an edited comment probably isn't the best way to do it unless you don't mind being a hypocrite.
    2
  4429.  @oxman5571  "cries a lot" This is funny considering you are crying about my comment. I shouldn't be surprised that sam cultivates an audience of hypocrites.
    2
  4430.  @grmpEqweer  Imagine having the handle "getthepitchforks" and boot licking for censorship at the same time.
    2
  4431. I didn't vote for Trump. I voted for Jill Stein and don't regret it in the least. Good luck supporting dogshit in the future.... just like Trump supporters. You are all fucking morons.
    2
  4432.  @JesseJames-or3kr  Regarding, "the reason we got trump was because Bernie or Busters voted 3rd party." First off this is total bullshit and if you actually believe this you are an idiot. But if you actually believed this then that should be all you would need to think Sanders should be the nominee if you actually care about getting Trump out of office. You are the reason why the phrase "those who don't examine history are doomed to repeat it." Because of morons like you.
    2
  4433. I totally agree. As much as it is easy and accurate to piss on Hillary we need to save some scorn for that terrible fucking question and for the corporate media who asks all the wrong questions.
    2
  4434. Ben regarding, "She shouldn't be on this tour anyways." I honestly am not sure what you are saying when using the word "shouldn't" here. I personally love that she continues to make an ass of herself and the party. Every time she opens her mouth she reminds everyone why she actually lost and it has nothing to do with the BS narrative that she pushes. That said I get why people are tired of her. Regarding, "You would think this loss would give her some sense of humility" Not to me. This statement would make sense if you were talking about someone who isn't a Hillary Clinton but because it is about HC there is zero reason to think this would be true.
    2
  4435.  @EastSide-qc5oy  I also think it's predictable and disingenuous coming from the same someone who entered the chat with, "So you retreat to your own bubble of lies and spin most likely. Maybe not you but a lot of people complaining about big media really just want their PREFERRED spin." Which is just deflecting from the topic at hand of corporate media propaganda. It's all the same you say so nevermind the lies and spin we are talking about. You are a useful idiot at best or a paid shill at worst.
    2
  4436. He is a racist. His tiny record includes gentrification and firing his black police chief for TERRIBLE reasons.
    2
  4437. And faith is overrated.
    2
  4438.  @babyt556  "necessities for survival and direction in life." Nope. I don't use faith and have both of these.
    2
  4439.  @jalabala2772  That's what funny to me.... even in their alternate reality ana is a complete POS who covered up a person she thought was a predator until he started exposing her as a fraud.
    2
  4440.  @gaston6800  Of course not. Do you anticipate him being majority leader forever?
    2
  4441.  @geddydesmond451  Regarding, "whats with the constant namecalling?" It's relatated to the constant stupid shit you say. Regarding, "Triggered much?" Talking to people who make me feel like I'm living in the movie idiocracy is frustrating. Regarding, "Jordan just explained to you they cheated." In the general? Because that is what you are claiming. Just because I have evidence someone cheats on their wife doesn't mean I can just assume they are also cheating on their taxes. I can think they wouldn't have a problem cheating on their taxes. But I can't just assume they do and act like I have evidence of it. Regarding, "But now you need evidence." I ALWAYS need evidence to hold a belief. Regarding, "Too bad for me I'm having this conversation with someone who calls everyone stupid and/or dipshit." Not everyone. Just because I do it to you don't mean I do it to everyone. It's like you are trying to prove my point about your lack of intelligence. So no evidence huh? I'm remarkably unsurprised by that.
    2
  4442.  @geddydesmond451  Long story short you have no evidence of cheating in the general election. Thanks for clearing that up now please shut up and stop making everyone dumber. Thanks for that in advance.
    2
  4443.  @geddydesmond451  You are not everyone. What a narcissist you must be.
    2
  4444.  @geddydesmond451  "At least youre persistent." If there is evidence of cheating in the general I want to know about it. But you have none.
    2
  4445.  @geddydesmond451  No evidence huh? You have all the time in the world to do everything other than that don't you?
    2
  4446.  @jacobdunckel4217  I'm not "virtue signaling." I'm having virtue, and standards, and principles. You should try it.
    2
  4447.  @jacobdunckel4217  Regarding, "Biden wouldn't ban trans people from the military." He'd happily send them to fight any and every war he possibly can. Wow. What a guy. What a rationale for supporting shit. Just. Wow.
    2
  4448. Mr it is about having a plan to takeover the party hostile takeover style which there is. That leads to a lot more wins. And I don't really care about "getting into the general" if it just means another a way to lose. Just being there doesn't mean it is anymore far for progressives that way because it isn't.
    2
  4449. Plan B is supporting the Green party (assuming the dems succeed in getting a corporate shill as their nominee). And if you wonder why that is only plan B it is because we live in a nation filled with sheep where a good person like Jill Stein only managed to get 1 percent of the vote against 2 of the most despised people in the country.
    2
  4450. I love the green party. I wish they were strong and competitive. I wish we didn't live in broken 2 party system. I wish the game were fair for them. But I'm a realist and reality is what it is. If the "democratic" party is reformed with Sanders leading it then all of a sudden the importance of trying to get the greens up and running is not really so important. The goal is getting a major party that represents the people. If we can get that while simultaneously ending (through change) a corrupt corporate major party all the better. That said even if Sanders succeeds in hostile takeover we should never forget the greens and stop trying to build them and make the game fair for them. They would still be important to continue to make sure the dems are pulled left and don't suck. But we desperately need at least one major party that doesn't blow and hostile takeover is the best way to go about it in my opinion (and Sanders).
    2
  4451. JR you care too much about parties when you should be prioritizing getting change in policy.
    2
  4452. Take some of the blame when people start getting thrown out on the street because they can't pay their back rent and biden and company aren't doing enough to address the upcoming problem.
    2
  4453. First and foremost we need money out of politics. We already have lots of parties it is just that people don't vote for them, in part because of money in politics fucking shit up.
    2
  4454. Never Biden. Never Trump. Someone decent 2020!
    2
  4455.  @elynum  "admitted he sexually harassed a woman" He apologized for a joke. You should admit you are a liar.
    2
  4456. It's a shame the thumbs down feature doesn't work for comments such as yours.
    2
  4457. Regarding, "If he makes it past the primary somehow, I suppose I could vote for him" The democratic establishment appreciates you not using the ability you have to shape their party and vote in their primary. Regarding, "but it will never happen." It definitely won't if enough people are willing to not even try like yourself. Fortunately I do not think this will be the case. Regarding, "They said that they can make a back room deal to prevent him from becoming president even if he does get the majority." No they cannot. I think you are referring to the court case where the DNC argued in court that they could pick the candidate if they want. They can but they don't. And instead they hold a primary which they are bound to. And even if they could, which they can't, nothing would be a quicker way to kill the party and that ultimately would be a win in and of itself even if not ideal.
    2
  4458. Huh? Superdelegates account for about 15-20 percent of all delegates currently (the percent may very well change before 2020). They are not there to usurp the will of the voters. They are there to frame the election. They are there so that the establishment candidate can seem inevitable. They are there so that the corporate media can put all delegate totals up and make it look like the establishment candidate is crushing. The establishment is corrupt but they are not stupid. If they ever use superdelegates to usurp the will of the voters and use them to give the nomination to a candidate who got less pledged delegate support they would very likely be setting in motion events that would KILL the party. And even if that situation would be perfect it would clearly be a huge win. For I am of the belief that the "democratic" party isn't going anywhere anytime soon but if they use superdelegates like that my belief about them not being killable would change very quickly.
    2
  4459. "when someone shows you who they are believe them the first time" maya angelou. Remember how kyle would never mention his relationship with TYT even when covering up their blackmail? Pepperidge farm remembers.
    2
  4460. Um.... no. The people that think stupid shit like that already support him.
    2
  4461. It's never a waste of time to call out frauds and point out their tactics.
    2
  4462. Ana "blackmailer" K
    2
  4463. They aren't stupid. It's more sinister.
    2
  4464. So does money. It's mostly the money.
    2
  4465. If hillary clinton and sam seder are smearing you then you are doing something right.
    2
  4466. TC regarding, "This really is getting tedious." Then stop. I'm not making you do shit. Regarding, "I think we should just respectfully agree to disagree." We can agree to disagree. That doesn't mean I'm not going to tell you why you are wrong. Regarding, "i hate that i'm in the position to defend Chuck Todd of all people." Why do you hate it if not because he is terrible at his job? Regarding, "I do not like MSM as much as the next guy." Clearly not... I'm the next guy. Regarding, "Todd should only be criticized if he gave his (incorrect) talking points, presented them as facts..." So to you it is perfectly ok to frame questions disingenuously and air edited comments completely out of context as long as you give the other side a chance for rebuttal? That is batshit crazy. I know this kinda unrelated to the conversation but I was wondering if you have stopped beating your wife? It really isn't cool that you kicked the shit out of her for no reason. Regarding, "We got bigger issues to worry about." I can walk and chew gum at the same time. One of the reasons we have all the other problems we do is because the corporate media does not give the public news. They give propaganda and work toward an agenda. An agenda that is not making the public informed (like it should be). Regarding, "12months ago we were all complaining about media blackout of Bernie" That isn't the only thing I was complaining about at the time. Why do you think the "left" has pissed and moaned about Faux News for so long? It's because what they put on the air is garbage with a purpose to mislead and misinform. Sadly networks like MSNBC and all the others are no better. Regarding, "now they invite him on their shows every week and we're still criticizing them" Yup. And I'm going to keep doing so as long as they keep being fucking terrible at their job. Just inviting on good people so that they can try to discredit them by asking misleading questions and showing edited, out of context film simply isn't good enough.
    2
  4467. And I'm still angry about it.
    2
  4468. He enables the corruption of his "go od fri end."
    2
  4469. The best part of the constitution is that is gives ways it can be changed with times. Despite this being a part of the constitution so many think of it as being a thing of perfection that shouldn't be changed. They are very wrong.
    2
  4470. I think he's been bought out by pocket pussies. He sure AF wasn't "neutral" like the BS he claims.
    2
  4471.  @kylehorvath9295  Among the sources I cited I just told you to watch the video we are talking on. That was dumb of me. But at least I get to have a good laugh at myself.
    2
  4472.  @rideordietheyretring2tranx382  You do raise a good question... who is dumber? You or Joe Biden with his dementia? I'm leaning you.
    2
  4473. Meh... even they suck, all but one that is. Bernie or bust.
    2
  4474. You can't hold him responsible for blatantly lying to the public for terrible reasons that predictably make everyone question a science community openly and willfully lying to everyone? I can and do.
    2
  4475. They do care about winning. It just may not always look like it because they care about maintaining the status quo far more than they care about winning. But they do care about winning.
    2
  4476. I didn't go to his inauguration but I remember feeling euphoric when watching it on TV. Wow does that seem like forever ago. He more than doubled the amount of wars being fought (after winning in large part to opposing the Iraq war) and now literally the only good thing he did (Iran nuclear deal) is being taken away. Things are worse than ever. These are depressing times. In short I can't agree more with Obama being a disappointment. The country never looks to Trump if he wasn't a complete failure.
    2
  4477. Sam seder is controlled opposition meant to sheep herd you into a corrupt "democratic" party.
    2
  4478. It mostly depends if you can get the government to give you billions of dollars or not.
    2
  4479. Saying the virus leaked from a lab is not an extraordinary claim.
    2
  4480. I never clicked so fast in my life. I guess I do.
    2
  4481. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9zZxBNRTkd4
    2
  4482.  @marlonsmith3923  Because they are tyrants looking for an excuse to be tyrants.
    2
  4483.  @marlonsmith3923  Also: It's been good to be a rich person. Bill gates has made billions and billions and billions of dollars during the pandemic.
    2
  4484. XYZ regarding, "he will be old as hell" He won't be 90 and I don't care about age as long as I think he can do the job.
    2
  4485. Duane regarding, "he sold out to the DNC." The establishment is going to try and use trolls to smear him with this garbage. Sadly there will be a handful of people duped into believing it.
    2
  4486. Marlon regarding, "Obama." Follow the money. You want to know who a person is going to represent look at who pays for their campaign. Regarding, "I thought he was already 90." He's not. Try using the internet for more than porn. And one of the problems with Obama was that he didn't have a long record to tell how he would govern. That is not a problem with Sanders because his record is so long. Age is a good thing so that you know what you are getting.
    2
  4487. Jumanji regarding, "The same shit will happen in 2020 just like in 2016." They will absolutely use all the dirty tricks they can think of that they think they can get away with but the game has changed since 2016. When Sanders entered the race in 2016 he was virtually unknown. He was down 60 points to Clinton. And the the only reason he "lost" was because of their dirty tricks. In 2020 he would be entering with the name recognition of rock star. He will rightfully be the most popular politician in the country. And that stuff is way more important than it should be in this country, especially with a media that actively tries to downplay any new outsider entering the race.
    2
  4488. Jeremy regarding, "Form a new party instead." I'm not sure why people say this so often. Personally I think the Green Party is pretty sweet and stands for all the things the "democratic" party should and they have the benefit of, for example, being established already. That said it is much more difficult to get any new or existing third party to supplant the 2 major parties. You realize correctly that, "DNC is constructed to disallow progressives." but you don't seem to realize that the 2 major parties have rigged the entire system from top to bottom to their benefit and to prevent other parties from getting in the game. Regarding, "Dems are dead." No. They absolutely are not. Just saying something doesn't make it true. And just because they should die doesn't change the fact that they simply not going anywhere anytime soon. Regarding, "No reviving from within." It is not about reviving. It is about taking them over hostile takeover style. The reason the dems are currently able to purge progressives the way they have is because Hillary won the nomination. If Sanders wins then progressives will have the opportunity to do the exact same thing to the corporate wing.
    2
  4489. meeg regarding, "the corporations that run the DNC will never let sanders take over the party" Fortunately for us it isn't completely up to them. Fortunately for us primary voters still have a say in the matter.
    2
  4490. Jon regarding, "well that isnt the only bill she passed" It is the only thing of note. I suspect you realize this otherwise you would have offered evidence of other important legislation she was responsible for. Regarding, "for years she battle the banks." I guess I'm not that impressed because banks are bigger than ever and only got bigger during the time she and Obama held power. Regarding, "she push the sec act that force banks ti admit wrong doing." Again I'm not impressed. I'd be impressed if she pushed them into jail. Regarding, "her voting records one if the most progressive in the Senate." This only means she is more progressive than the exceptionally conservative Senate. I am not impressed and have an independent idea of what I think progressivism is that has nothing to do with the Senate. Regarding, "if she not left enough to be considered one of us then who is beside just bernie and tulsa" Currently in government at the moment? Almost no one. But that is not really important to me as I don't have a quota of progressives I need to fill. I conceded long ago that she is better than most of our government but because I think very little of our government it doesn't mean much. Regarding, "listen dont like that bernine sign the crime bill but that not enough to tossed someone under the bus" Ok. But the bottom line is that there comes a time when someone needs to be tossed under the bus and dismissed for not being on your side enough and/or when a person determines the issues are important to them and people have a right to decide for themselves when and where that happens. Personally for me the issue I care the most about in politics is getting money out politics. I could literally agree with a person on every single issue but if they are going to fight to keep money in politics then they are dead to me because that is how much I care about that issue. Then after that there is a tier of issues that include reigning in the military industrial complex, medicare for all, protecting the environment, raising the minimum wage, and a couple others I can't think of this second. I don't trust her to FIGHT for any of these. Even if she gives lip service to something like raising the minimum wage I do not expect her to make it the priority it should be. You want to think she does and you want to support her then fine. That is your right. I don't trust her and I'm not going to be supporting her. I think of her as being similar to Obama. They both know all the right words to say but ultimately I do not think they represent me. Regarding, "that bill warren did wasnt such a band aid it gave people back billions" It absolutely was a band-aid to a person that wanted the banks broken up, glass-stegal brought back, and banking criminals put in prison. It was done so that they could claim they were doing something to fix the problem while doing nothing to prevent the same type of banking crisis from recurring in the future.
    2
  4491.  @solid1378  And it's not like dems currently control everything at the moment. Oh wait...
    2
  4492.  @BernardZarifovic  Some of them are in my family. And despite my trying to do anything and everything to wake them up they still don't seem to get it. It is frustrating beyond words.
    2
  4493.  @trosway  Your comments are far too stupid for me to take you seriously.
    2
  4494.  @edwinsoto6932  There was a lot I didn't mention. It wasn't meant to be a comprehensive list.
    2
  4495.  @edwinsoto6932  Fair enough. The patriot act should be included in any list talking about why he sucked.
    2
  4496. Meh. At this point I'm not going to even give them the views to tell them they suck.
    2
  4497. Regarding, "you couldn't even catch her repeating his exact words less than 2 minutes after he said them!" Did I literally say this? Or are you just making an assumption like dipshits love to do? Regarding, "You're just trolling because you know you're a phony account" And why do you think I'm a phony account?
    2
  4498. Have you ever heard the analogy about the pigeon playing chess? People like you inspired it.
    2
  4499. Wait a minute. Do you mean to tell me that you are getting wise to the fact that I'm trolling you and not engaging you intelligently? What tipped you off? Was it me telling you this repeatedly? I still have trouble accepting that you figured this out. Or at least on your own. You must have had help. Regarding, "Can't even explain" I absolutely can. I choose not to. Your inability to tell the difference between those two things proves my reasoning as to why I don't. And I trust that only the dumbest of the dumb (that's you) have no trouble understanding why him taking all that special interest money is a conflict of interest.
    2
  4500. Look man, it's been fun but you are getting boring and I'm going to go live my life. Feel free to continue to say more stupid shit. I will look at them and have a good laugh at your expense later when I do.
    2
  4501.  @mikeh6700  dumb kyle cultists still calling his lies nothing.
    2
  4502.  @AnthonyJPiccione  Saying the millions TYT gets doesn't make them corrupt while hiding the fact that he's affiliated with them, omitting the blackmail, and pretending to "stay out of it" with potty mouth jimmy dore to talk to cenks nephew about pocket pussies is why he's not honest. Obviously. "lol" Ignorance is bliss. I understand why you are happy.
    2
  4503.  @cesarmaganalinares6372  You lost me at, "I actually like Ryan and Emily."
    2
  4504.  @coryspence5903  "conflict of interest" He's helping an unserious candidate grift. Sorry not sorry if the truth hurts.
    2
  4505.  @coryspence5903  Kyle likes to help unserious candidates who officiate his wedding but have no prospects of winning take the money of hard working americans in a grift. How isn't that a conflict of interest?
    2
  4506. @Mark Sellon Dems continued to promise 2K after trump passed a bill with 600 dollar checks. 1.9 trillion is enough to give everyone a check of almost 7K. But dems can't even give the 2K they promised.
    2
  4507.  @meafrenchie7143  Regarding, "There is a time for empathy" Like when people are being victimized. Fun fact: trump is victimizing people here.
    2
  4508. If SBlackmare likes her then it is a safe bet she sucks.
    2
  4509. She literally works for and collects a check from the MIC this very moment. She should have been listening to Sanders. That way she might have avoided going to war in Iraq on behalf of the MIC.
    2
  4510. How about this... if you have a problem with it don't watch it.
    2
  4511. You don't vote for parties. You vote for people.
    2
  4512. You are correct to be pissed at our political system and pissed at the major parties but your tactics are fucking terrible to get the change you want. I'm not saying the party can be saved and reformed. It might not be. But I'm going to at least fight for it as much as I possibly can to know for sure. You know why they recently purged progressives from the party? Because there were progressives to be purged. And corporate dems can be purged in exactly the same way but to do it we need to win. And you know why they purge voter rolls and rig the game? Because they know how fucking important the primary is unlike you it seems. There are all sorts of fucked up problems. At least make them take your vote from you. Don't do it for them. That is exactly what they want. They want you to quit fighting. And if you want to vote for a 3rd party candidate in the general then you go right ahead. You don't owe them jack fucking shit at that point if you don't want. But realize that when you are voting you are voting for a person, not a party. I support Sanders because I believe in him. I'd vote for him if he were a dem, republican, green, independent, martian or other. The person is forever more important than a party label. If you don't like him then fine. But don't say you would vote for him if he were a green then. Then don't vote for him period.
    2
  4513. Johnny the DNC is a joke and should die but sadly they are not going anywhere anytime soon. The best thing for the country is for a progressive to take over the party and reform it. Sanders is perfectly positioned to do so in 2020.
    2
  4514. Everyone actually despises you.
    2
  4515. This isn't going to be my proudest fap but I like a challenge.
    2
  4516. If there was literally no difference then they wouldn't be bothering to write this NEW rule then would they. I agree about what you say about the need for a progressive overhaul of the rules. That, like any hope for change in the "democratic" party isn't about to happen until at least 2020 when there is a chance for a progressive nominee. Let's hope Sanders can overcome the rigged the game and do it.
    2
  4517. Riggable voting machines are only effective when sheep can be convinced of their results. That is why it was so important Hillary be portrayed as inevitable from the start. In 2020 Sanders will be the overwhelming favorite. If they flip that many votes we might have another revolution. That said I very much understand and share your skepticism but have no other choice than to fight.
    2
  4518.  @ChadHuey79  cool story that had nothing to do with the specific example in the video that DID include video footage. And it's not like we want a massive man hunt and road blocks. We would like, for example, the police to file a report. So that it's on record. So that they can use it to find trends of similar activity in areas.
    2
  4519.  @995109  regarding, "Are you equally mad at Obama as you are in Trump?" This isn't about Obama. Obama is not our President. Obama's campaign finance violations are not equal to Trumps. But even thou all of that is true why don't you just assume that I am (even if I'm not) instead of bringing up Obama as if him existing has something to do with Trumps crimes because... you know... they don't. I'd ask if you are equally mad at Trump as Obama but I'm not going to because the question is stupid beyond words and ignores the fact that their crimes in relation to campaign finance violations are not even close to being the same despite the things you idiots want to say.
    2
  4520. You mean the only independent senator who goes out of his way to be an independent?
    2
  4521. Regarding, "I'm talking about the guy who says he is an independent" Which I'm thinking he does because that is how he feels in heart of hearts and wants to make sure other see it as well. Regarding, "ran for president as a democrat" For about a half dozen logical reasons that I suspect you want to pretend don't exist like exposure for his ideas, not wanting to split left leaning thinkers, the electoral college, and the millions of sheep who were voting for the democrat regardless of their name to name a few. Regarding, "supported the democratic nominee" Like he said he was going to when entering the race. Who said over and over and over how much he thought Trump sucked and how much he didn't want Trump to win. Who certainly didn't want to be blamed for him should he win. You act like this was surprising. It wasn't. Would you want to be blamed for Trump? I wouldn't. He is like Hillary Clinton but with an overt side of in your face racism. Regarding, "says absolutely NOTHING about the illegal actions" That is absolutely not true. Just writing shit in all bold doesn't make it anymore true. You can make a case that he should have said more but you can't lie and think I should take you seriously. Regarding, "That is a fact." Nope. You are straight up lying. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9W6paY8RsPI Regarding, "and went on a fucking Democratic unity tour." Which unsurprising only showed how big the divide is and was used to talk about issues important to progressives like universal health care. Regarding, "Bernie could not suck democrats and the DNC's dick any harder." You say this but ignore the fact that he has done more to expose the rot in the party than literally anyone on earth. More than you could do if you had 100 lifetimes. You say this stupid shit like he is good for the party. Like it would have been had he not run so that they literally would have had no reason to rig the primary in the first place. You want him to be a fucking superhero who literally does it all for you. Sorry but he is human and he can't do it all like you want and irrationally think is reasonable. Regarding, ""Goes out of his way to be an independent"... Ha!" Um.. Yeah. I'm pretty sure just being a dem would be far easier. It would eliminate the stupid talking point establishment dems use to dismiss him of "he's not a democrat" which they are happy to do. But you go ahead and continue to smear him. You share that aspect with the establishment and corporate media. They thank you for being a useful idiot.
    2
  4522.  @jedison2441  So people should just give a thumbs up. That's how you are not a "sycophant" right?
    2
  4523. Nobody wants to be like Cenk.
    2
  4524. I can't get enough of ian carrol since being introduced to him recently.
    2
  4525. And what specific programs created by that president resulted in that debt? Because it wasn't created by him... it was created by an illegal war and tax cuts for the rich that had nothing to do with him.
    2
  4526.  @TheTerminator-1  you could have left it. Some things are worth repeating and emphasizing.
    2
  4527. Smears are lies. Aaron never said anything that wasn't true about your clown.
    2
  4528. Sam seder is controlled opposition meant to sheep herd you into a corrupt, warmongering, "democratic" party.
    2
  4529. Agreed. At least send someone who doesn't make up for tiny hands and tiny cheeto dick by shaking hands like a fucking psycho.
    2
  4530. Do you not have the internet? Next time do your own fucking research. http://opr.ca.gov/facts/list-of-scientific-organizations.html
    2
  4531. Actually doing your own research is where you went wrong. Alex Jones is not a reliable source of information.
    2
  4532.  @Starryhavenx  That's what I'd expect someone underthinking it to say.
    2
  4533.  @Starryhavenx  Would you feel the same way if the dodo used their platform to give good PR to trump while he were in office? Not that they would... but hypothetically speaking.
    2
  4534.  @ohtee2965  Regarding, "I feel sorry that you have such a cynical mindset." I feel sorry for you that you can be so gullible. Regarding, "I would be pleasantly surprised by his act of kindness" That's it? Nothing more? You wouldn't consider the possibility that maybe it would just be a photo op to try and get people to like him even if they shouldn't? You also never answered my question. Let's say trump did it... would you be ok with the dodo using their platform to give him good PR? Regarding, "does not need the positive pr of a video" He underperformed against an orange clown who was governing like a clown during a pandemic. Any sort of positively viewed person CRUSHES the orange clown. It shouldn't have been even close. Regarding, "seen by only a couple of million animal lovers" Weird right. It's almost like it's designed to get the maximum amount of sympathy from the target category. And if we were hot sauce lovers or even if we aren't but the politician thinks we love hot sauce we might get something like, "I got hot sauce in my bag." -Hillary Clinton.
    2
  4535.  @hirightnow  Let's say he did. Would you be ok with the dodo letting him use their platform for good PR?
    2
  4536.  @Starryhavenx  I find it telling that you never even attempt to answer my simple direct questions to you.
    2
  4537.  @Starryhavenx  If only you had a thread that you can look back. Tell you what. I'll copy and paste them as if you far more sincere than you clearly are. "Would you feel the same way if the dodo used their platform to give good PR to trump while he were in office? Not that they would... but hypothetically speaking."
    2
  4538.  @Starryhavenx  Somehow you still have yet to answer my simple direct question. I wasn't asking about trump... i was asking about the dodo. LMFAO. That's fine. I'm done caring what you think.
    2
  4539.  @Starryhavenx  Regarding, "the dodo only brought in a political figure, didn’t support him or anything?" Huh? Not that I really care. You still haven't answer my simple direct question.
    2
  4540. The answer to both questions should be the same. Stop blaming the question for Tulsi's mistake.
    2
  4541. @ "when" this is the first time he has done anything of note. Stop making excuses for him and this network who are complicit.
    2
  4542. @ Do yourself a favor and turn off the MSNBC. They are complicit.
    2
  4543.  @IcarianX  "started" Never have they gone after biden or mentioned leahy's law til now. You are making excuses for people complicit.
    2
  4544. Wow. I can't believe you are making me defend politicians. While you would be correct that pretty much every politician is corrupt painting with a brush like this tends to always be wrong. Let's say you, John Smith, decided to run for some kind of office. That would make you a politician, even if you didn't win. Do you magically become corrupt the moment you announce running? No. The point is that while almost all politicians are corrupt snakes. Not all are. Please don't paint with idiotically huge brushes like this going forward. Thanks.
    2
  4545. And typing things in all caps doesn't make them anymore true.
    2
  4546. There is no mass immigration so your welcome I guess.
    2
  4547. It's great for the reasons you mention.
    2
  4548. Joe Biden would veto M4A if it got to his desk.
    2
  4549. Teen regarding, "Stereotypes are..." You are the one talking about stereotypes not me. I am talking about labels and how it isn't incorrect to have preconceived notions about that label. That is why we even have the label in the first place... to give information about what we are talking about without bothering to elaborate about every minute detail of our beliefs. I call myself a progressive. And you would be right to have ideas about what that means. That is the point. That is why I have the label. Others might not want to call me that. They might have a different label they want to attach to me. And that different label is again there to say something about me. And just because labels can and does mean different things to different people and just because we are right to want to learn far more about a person than a simple label that doesn't change the simple fact that labels are suppose to mean something. That is their purpose. Even thou it is often misleading and far from perfect. I'm not claiming it is perfect. I'm actually claiming the opposite. It is also why I very often put labels in quotation marks. I very often write "progressive" and "conservative" as such because I understand that those things can mean very different things.
    2
  4550. Teen regarding, "That's more a stereotype than a fact" It isn't incorrect to have preconceived notions of political labels. That is sort of the purpose of having a political label in the first place. It is there to tell you something about the person who wears it. I should be able to know something about a person that calls themself a conservation or a progressive or whatever. That doesn't mean I know it all or that they can't have ideas that are opposed to my preconceived notions of the label but those labels do come with ideas attached to them. The conservative label comes with an idea of small government; a less intrusive government. That is what it is suppose to mean. It obviously doesn't always. It doesn't at time to individuals of the group. And it doesn't mean that always at large with the group. Abortion and drugs for example are areas where "conservatives" tend to love big government. And of course these ideas are not held by everyone with the label. But I am not wrong to think these people have the ideas they do. And I am not wrong to point out that their positions are at odds with the beliefs they claim to have.
    2
  4551.  @joenoyes4023  regarding, "no actually it is on top." I suspect you know that you are lying which makes your follow up about "fake news" all the more funny. Good luck with your continued efforts to lie and mislead the public with your bullshit but while you do it I hope you realize what a disgrace to the human race you are. Try not to lie to yourself about what you are doing the same way to lie to everyone else.
    2
  4552.  @joenoyes4023  regarding, "mental disorder." That was pretty funny coming from you. Thanks for the laugh dipshit.
    2
  4553.  @chrispeck308  You: "I'm not ideologically tied to capitalism in any way." Also you: "I'm sure however many beggars are theoretically produced by capitalism, would be exponentially dwarfed by whatever hair brained idea youd come up with to replace it." You are tough to take seriously.
    2
  4554. I have to assume that the only people still donating to them are getting handjobs from the party.
    2
  4555.  @markzuckergecko621  "you can have a tank." LMFAO Can I have nukes too in your fictitious world?
    2
  4556.  @markzuckergecko621  "tell me what exactly you think that means?" Guns that are seemingly made for hunting humans.
    2
  4557.  Rip Cord  "Only by fools" This is funny from people who think they are for self defense.
    2
  4558.  Rip Cord  "I’m stating that the AR doesn’t mean assault weapon," Neat. I've never said, "ar means assault rifle." I'm just pointing out that that's what people call those types of guns because that's what they are designed for. They are not designed for "self-defense." There are guns that are made for that. And they are NOT the guns we are talking about. But good luck with your deflection.
    2
  4559.  @markzuckergecko621  "WTF does that mean?" It's not going to be good for hunting deer. Hope that helps.
    2
  4560.  @skippy9273  "humans can simple dodge bullets from any other gun" LMFAO Did I say this? It must be easier to strawman than address what I actually say.
    2
  4561.  Rip Cord  "do you own any guns" Nope.
    2
  4562.  Rip Cord  "so you’re not even an American" LMFAO Where do you get this? Why am I even talking to you?
    2
  4563.  @skippy9273  "the propagandist definition of assault rifle..." I even gave you my own idea of what it means to me. Maybe address that. To me it's a gun that is not going to be good for hunting deer. They are guns designed for hunting humans.
    2
  4564.  @skippy9273  "there's nothing to address." You really don't think that when gun manufactures design guns they don't have a purpose for them when doing it? Or are you just pretending to not get it?
    2
  4565.  @markzuckergecko621  "be more specific" You too... do you really not think that when gun manufactures are making guns they have a purpose for them in mind? They certainly do. Some are made for hunting humans whether they or you will admit it.
    2
  4566.  @skippy9273  "Pistols on the other hand, are good for nothing but people." Pistols are good for self defense. They are not good if you want to kill more bullets than the gun holds.
    2
  4567.  @markzuckergecko621  "of course they do" LMFAO "I'm asking YOU" Why wouldn't you ask them? The people actually making guns designed to kill people? And not me? A laymen? "I want to see if you actually know what you're talking about" I'm not an expert and never claimed to be. But I'm smart enough to know that gun companies make guns designed for hunting humans while you don't seem to get it until pressed.
    2
  4568.  @markzuckergecko621  "t's realllllly funny watching you desperately try to dig out of it." You conceded the entire argument... "of course they do," That was my whole point. That's what I'm trying to stop.
    2
  4569.  @skippy9273  "it's not that I don't understand the purpose of guns" LMFAO "Guns are meant to kill things." Yup. We agree on this. "Some guns are better..." LMFAO Again... my point... some guns are better at some things. "they all ultimately have the same purpose" LMFAO Some guns "purpose" is self defense." That's why they were designed how they are. Some guns "purpose" are to kill lots of people. That's how they are designed. It's not the same. They are different for a reason and to claim otherwise is silly.
    2
  4570.  @skippy9273  "self defense and killing people are the same thing." Do you really not understand that not all killing people is self defense? I have better things to do than tell you the obvious ways they are different.
    2
  4571.  @skippy9273  You: "self defense and killing people are the same thing." Also you: "You're just making up definitions" Very funny.
    2
  4572.  @markzuckergecko621  "doesn't care whether it's legal to have a gun in the first place" But if we care if it's legal for them or not then we, as in society, have a chance to stop them from getting a gun BEFORE they try to murder. "people have the right to defend themselves from potential murderers" Yeah. Never said you don't. But if the time comes you would be best off having a gun that was designed for self defense right? Not if you were commando and gun shopping after you broke into the store right?
    2
  4573.  @markzuckergecko621  "homicide and killing are not the same thing" Thanks. Neither are, "self defense and killing people." "that's why self defense exists in legal terms." Self defense exists in legal terms because people understand the difference between it and all examples of "killing people." Because they aren't actually the same thing. And I shouldn't have to explain this.
    2
  4574.  @nothanks3236  " Fine. Anarchy." That's not what I'm advocating for.
    2
  4575. Holding people to account means being willing to call them out when they are selling you out. It's what sam doesn't do for the squad and his cult.
    2
  4576. Oh, you made two comments. That is totally the way to do it as opposed to making one comment that included multiple sentences or a paragraphs. What an idiot I am.
    2
  4577. will you again, like you did in your other comment say free speech protects people from other people but says shit more than once doesn't make it any more true. You seriously need to learn about what you are talking about.
    2
  4578. So you think that I should be watching a 2 hour lecture with the title, "should free speech be limited on college campuses" because that is how you learned about "American law." I'd get right on that but that has to be about the dumbest mother fucking thing I've heard of before and I've also read lots of your other stupid shit..
    2
  4579. will g so because someone is labeled a "free speech advocate" by you, or themself, or others that is suppose to be really important to me? It isn't. There are plenty of people, like yourself I'm guessing that consider themselves a "free speech advocate" as well but seeing as how you can't even understand what the very, very, very, very, simple concept of free speech means that makes what you say fucking meaningless. Rosanne is free. Her speech is free today, just like yesterday and the day before. Don't let those very simple facts get in the way from all the stupid shit you want to say thou.
    2
  4580. It's not even close. He acts like they don't know what they are doing. He acts like they aren't selling out. He's very wrong about both points.
    2
  4581.  @FullMetalSKid  Disagree all you want... they ARE selling out all the values they claim to hold.
    2
  4582. Because it's CNN.
    2
  4583. Acid isn't my thing. Feel free to pass that joint thou.
    2
  4584. JFK: "Ask what you can do for your country." The MIC: "I've got an idea but I don't think you are going to like it. And by "idea" I meant bullet.
    2
  4585. Clearly both
    2
  4586. Trump is a far worse person than Bush is, but Bush is still the far worst president.
    2
  4587.  @staraptorflock3661  That wasn't the same logic Kyle was using. You were just being dumb.
    2
  4588.  @fuelingthefire2389  That's probably not the type of thing you should want to admit in public.
    2
  4589. Imagine conflating the entire space industry with a conman and his lies.
    2
  4590.  @rhysknight8681  I'm referring to a company that is being run by a conman and making promises they can't keep. Stop bootlicking for a conman and covering for his bullshit with your nonsense.
    2
  4591.  @rhysknight8681  "A cheerleader for the demise of the space industry." Literally nobody is. You are a tool strawmanning what is actually being said.
    2
  4592.  @rhysknight8681  And you are being particularly hypocritical about it.
    2
  4593. 537 regarding, "how is the CIA hurting (sic) the country?" Holy shit. The fact that you don't already know the answer to your own question does not speak well of you. The CIA is creating and arming terrorists all over the globe you fucking moron.
    2
  4594.  @AarontheGreatXCII-kn4gj  Stop being a moron... I'll wait.
    2
  4595. The game has changed since 2016 when Sanders was virtually unknown.
    2
  4596. Braindead so is the point you are trying to make that because there are morons who are atheist then it is ok for religions to believe in shit without evidence? Your name is very apt and accurately describes all religion.
    2
  4597. Braindead regarding, "These is plenty of evidence for Christianity" No. There really isn't. Regarding, "not physically true" I'm only interested in the physical world. If it can't be proven there then it can't be proven period so far as I'm concerned. Regarding, "Just because the symbolical metaphor of God is not physically true, does not mean God is not true in a psychological sense" Saying, "Just because the symbolical metaphor of Zeus is not physically true, does not mean Zeus is not true in a psychological sense" or "Just because the symbolical metaphor of dragons is not physically true, does not mean dragons are not true in a psychological sense" Or insert unicorns or Xenu or anything else that can't be proven and it would make just as much sense.... aka it was meaningless. At least meaningless to people who think proof is important and kinda required for intelligent belief.
    2
  4598. Let me put it to you this way braindead... why are fundamentalists an embarrassment but not Christianity as a whole? What is the distinction to you? Because there isn't one of significance to me.
    2
  4599.  @Ludd439  There is a lot to love about Ojeda but he simply isn't as progressive as I want when it comes to policy.
    2
  4600.  @theciakilledjfk5973  While space is big to have all that it's also really big as in everything is far apart and getting around in it isn't easy.
    2
  4601.  @yugiohpokemon5285 I have no reason to believe a word you say and every reason to think you are a lying piece of shit.
    2
  4602.  @VMohdude-  Paid shills are a scourge on society.
    2
  4603.  @yugiohpokemon5285 Why would I waste my time on someone is being paid to not think intelligently?
    2
  4604.  @yugiohpokemon5285 Regarding, " does medicare for all cover prescriptions vision and dental and every surgery?" It absolutely would if we made it that way and that is absolutely how we should be making it. Or would you like to claim that such a thing is impossible while you continue to spout nonsense and bullshit?
    2
  4605.  @yugiohpokemon5285 Regarding, " the government doesn’t have the power to ban all private insurance even if Medicare for all passed which it wouldn’t anyway" Don't care. The goal is to create a system where private insurance has no place. Where universal health care provides for the needs of the people. You suck at life and everything you say is designed to make the people who hear it dumber. You are a disgrace to humanity.
    2
  4606. Kyle's a great friend if you are a blackmailer but if you are being blackmailed not so much.
    2
  4607.  @vidubhai  This, right now, is the middle of the game for fucks sake. Nobody is voting. No votes are being counted. You are acting like votes were cast and now the rules are proposed to be changed. Your comment is really dumb. By your "logic" the day after the election is the "middle of the game." Because so and so was elected. And we can only try to change the rules after they are or aren't reelected. Just admit you never want the rules to change for fucks sake.
    2
  4608. He was tested. The results weren't what I would have hoped.
    2
  4609.  Cherry  Sometimes the world is a better place without some people. Trump is one of those people. Biden is another.
    2
  4610. Do you want a leader or a follower? A leader is suppose to have answers on the important topics.
    2
  4611. That would be the most human thing about him.
    2
  4612. Nope. I vote. So should you... always.
    2
  4613.  @ECisvotersuppression  The electoral college is a fucking joke that should be abolished but let's not act like the EC just willy nilly chose Trump and it had nothing to do with people and their votes shall we. Clearly those things are related.
    2
  4614. LMFAO
    2
  4615. We tried but the game was rigged before they even started playing.
    2
  4616.  @alexandereckert5184  Regarding, "Trump isn’t a republican" This is dumb, even by internet comment section standards.
    2
  4617. Yang has no experience, no record to study, and no shot.
    2
  4618. Moronic anti-semites rule comment sections.
    2
  4619. Actually they increased it to 700 billion per year for the department of offense.
    2
  4620. Just tattoo sheep on your forehead.
    2
  4621.  @jivet3919  Regarding, "You implied all that with your first comment? Lol" He did. I remember when people were ashamed of their comprehension problems and not proud of them like you are.
    2
  4622.  @jivet3919  I knew EXACTLY what they were saying. Their writing was fine. Stop making excuses for your stupidity.
    2
  4623.  @jivet3919  Regarding, "You can’t just assume you reading comprehension skills can overcome someone elses poor writing." This is your EDITED comment where you are criticizing someone else's writing skills. Too fucking funny.
    2
  4624. Get it fixed. She is terrible. Her campaign can best be summed up as... no we can't and here is why.
    2
  4625. That's not how it works. And tens of thousands of people were being slaughtered in the donbas long before russia invaded.
    2
  4626. He already has. More then once.
    2
  4627.  @TheBestLife2184  You are in a cult.
    2
  4628. I am confused.... will there be no cost controls or will there be death panels? You fucking idiots can't even decide the best way to smear.
    2
  4629. That said for some personal experience is the only way they are capable of feeling empathy for a subject. For example I doubt McCain would have had the position he did on torture or homosexuality had he not been personally touched by both.
    2
  4630.  @n0wheregrrl  Ok. I don't find that surprising. It seems very consistent with what I said about McCain and seems like common sense results that I would suspect. It is not hard to understand why it's EASIER to relate to others problems after experiencing them yourself. That doesn't mean it's a REQUIREMENT and prerequisite for all empathy.
    2
  4631.  @1369Stiles  regarding, "there is a difference between empathizing with someone and relating to someone." Not really. You are drawing far too distinct a line and giving the human mind far too little credit. Empathy is, "the ability to understand and share the feelings of another" and that is the specific topic we are talking about. Humans have imagination. It allows us to imagine what it would be like to be in situations that we don't actually experience. But let's take your concepts and draw them out even further. Let's say what you are saying is true. That the only way for me to "relate" to a rape victim is to have been raped. Does that mean that as a rape victim I can "relate" to every rape victim? As if every rape is the same? Or do I only get relate to my own, very specific experience because, according to you the only way to relate is through direct experience and that is the only rape I've directly experienced?
    2
  4632.  @btccoins5514  regarding, "read your own statement, you said it and you don't realize it" I honestly have no clue what you are trying to say... and it doesn't bother me that I don't.
    2
  4633.  @btccoins5514  regarding, "If the person never experienced financial hardship in their life, do you really think that rich person could related to working person? Your logic say that yes, rich person WILL understand of what struggling working people are going through b/c they just "know"." Sigh... No. I am not saying that the rich person WILL (I find it especially funny how you put this terrible, terrible, terrible, strawman argument point in all caps) understand. I am saying that they, assuming they are not a sociopath, are capable of understanding. That rich person has a brain. That brain allows them to imagine what it would be like if, for example, all of a sudden their bank account was at zero. That people, who aren't severely damaged, have the they are capable of imagining being in situations they don't experience. Do you have as much trouble understanding this concept in another direction? Just because I've never been a professional athlete does that mean I'm incapable of understanding how sweet that might be?
    2
  4634. I'm only here to downvote.
    2
  4635. I saw an article last night where Biden was complaining that Bernie isn't a democrat... you know the guy who said he would run with a republican. Ultimately if you are looking for intellectual consistency corporate dems isn't the place to find it.
    2
  4636. were regarding, "That's why it's so heartbreaking to see this." To see what? Sanders acknowledge reality? Let's not pretend the game isn't rigged from top to bottom against 3rd parties shall we? Let's not pretend that the electoral college doesn't make a 3rd party candidate winning the general virtually impossible shall we? And we need to win. For the country and, if nothing else, to reform the party from the inside. As much as you want to just hope the party implodes the sad fact of the matter is that they aren't going anywhere anytime soon. That's the reality. Try not to lie to yourself about it.
    2
  4637. Eric regarding, "is bernie really a progressive?" I certainly think he is and as evidence I cite him fighting for progressive causes his entire life. Regarding, "look at him supporting bill clinton after NAFTA and welfare reform." Do you mean that you disagree with a guy who has been around forever on something? Wow. So do I even. Shit I don't even agree with myself when it comes to the past as my opinion on some things has changed over time. Regarding, "Both Chris Hedges and Ralph Nader thought Bernie was a fake progressive when he first started running in 2015, and I trust their judgement" I love both Hedges and Nader but ultimately I don't let them make up my mind for me and neither should you.
    2
  4638. Eric regarding, "Bernie Sanders wants to work within the Democratic party platform, and that alone makes him not a progressive." I envy your ability to think everything is so simplistic and black and white. I guess I too am not a "progressive" despite my own thinking on the matter because I want a hostile takeover of the party. I guess justice democrats are not progressive then. Regarding, "The Democratic Party is part of the system, the system that which..." I don't mean to rain on your parade but the only way to try and fix things is to work in the system. Even if you smashed everything to the ground and started to start fresh that fresh start would occur "in the system." Regarding, "You think a capitalistic system has any regard for humanity?" I think regulated capitalism (unlike the current capitalism we have that has run amok) is just great for almost everything. There is no better system when it comes to selling cars and computers as long as the government is doing their job making sure the playing field is level. That said there are exceptions. There is no place for capitalism when it comes to health care, war, education, and prisons. Those are areas where people should not be allowed to get filthy rich. Regarding, "And Bernie Sanders is part of the system." Which makes logical sense if you are trying to change said system. Regarding, "I think there is nothing but doom for us in the future." If we are doomed it isn't going to be because of capitalism. It will be because money in politics is fucking everything up from top to bottom. All problems are all but impossible to solve because our politicians are bought and paid for. They are not the independent arbitrators of the system like they are suppose to be... they are the ones tipping all the scales.
    2
  4639. Mydirty regarding, "And then they promptly turned tail and voted for the corporate warmonger." I guess him denying reality and pretending he hadn't lost the fight makes more sense to some. Regarding, "Bernie told you to jump off a cliff, would you do that as well?" I had no trouble voting for Jill Stein in 2016 in a swing state. Does that answer your question? Regarding, "He's not running!" I suspect if you actually believed this you wouldn't be bothering to trash him. Your comment reminds me of the shit Hillary Correct the Record would say. Just mindless bullshit completely devoid of substance.
    2
  4640. payton regarding, "You seem mentally impaired based on that statement . " Speaking of comments totally devoid of substance that Correct the Record would say we have payton.
    2
  4641. Eric regarding, "What happens when people don't want to admit capitalism is the problem? They smear you of course." Um... what? You might want to consider that America is the richest nation in the history of the world in part because of capitalism. You also might want to consider that the problems with capitalism in this country aren't because it's innately evil but because our politicians are bought off like I've already stated.
    2
  4642. TC regarding, "Stay classy." I try but fail at this quite often, especially when I think the person I'm addressing is disingenuous. Regarding, "The question i have for all these ppl screaming about 3rd party how many support the greens?" I've never understood the notion that we need to create a progressive party. The green party is already what they want to create. And they don't succeed because the entire system is rigged. A new party does nothing to address that fundamental problem. Regarding, "Cenk and Kyle created JD." Justice democrats were an amazing idea. Especially in a world where everyone feels the need to compare and contrast JDs really show the difference between real and fake progressives. Regarding, "Why is it all he does is whine?" I love Jimmy and there is a lot to whine about but that doesn't mean I agree with him on everything. Mostly I just disagree with his take with the value of trying to takeover the party from the inside. And even if I disagree with what Jimmy considers solutions there is great value in his shining a light on the many things that suck about the system that the corporate media won't touch with a ten foot pole.
    2
  4643. Eric regarding, "is not a justification for capitalism." Sorry if you have a problem accepting the fact that wealth is important even if it is hardly everything. Regarding, "France was a dominate power because of Louis XIV, you think because of that the French didn't overthrow their monarch?" Your point is lost on me. I'd ask you to elaborate but honestly don't care and think whatever your point is it isn't good. Regarding, "capitalism is innately evil" No. It isn't. And when you demonize and economic system as "innately evil" you make those words utterly meaningless when talking about things that are innately evil like torture. Regarding, "because it is a system that has no regard for sustainability or human survival" Sure it does. If everyone is dead then there is no ability to create wealth. Regarding, "it has no mechanism to check itself from destruction," There is a reason I advocate for REGULATED capitalism and trash capitalism run amok. I'd address the rest of your comment but I'm tired and off to bed. Please forgive me.
    2
  4644. It's the type of thing you'd expect north korea to do.
    2
  4645. I don't remember bernie ever speaking out against biden's ministry of truth. Do you?
    2
  4646. Free assange already. It shouldn't need to be said.
    2
  4647. US politicians don't care about their own citizens much less the people of Ukraine.
    2
  4648. He didn't vote... it was effectively a no vote.
    2
  4649. Wilson regarding, "I don't accept that it's "effectively" a no-vote. It is effectively a no vote. The number of no votes this gets is fucking meaningless. The only thing that matter is the number of yes votes it gets. You are acting as if he voted yes. He didn't and had he voted no there would have been ZERO fucking difference in whether or not this passed. No doubt Sanders will be asked about this. If he doesn't say that he was against it at that time then you can whine and bitch if you want but in the meantime stop acting like he said yes because, again, the bottom line is that all that really fucking matters is how many yes votes it got and Sanders DID NOT VOTE YES.
    2
  4650. L Wilson regarding, "he needed to take a stand on." Here.... it's all of 50 fucking seconds and there is plenty more out there showing he has taken a stand on this... but you go ahead and pretend like he voted yes if you want. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zDaliL71JeU
    2
  4651.  @Daintrain2120  5 replies but I can only see yours responding to a comment I can't see. Land of the free am I right?
    2
  4652. I love Tulsi but we would be wise to coalesce around the clear leader of the progressive movement... Bernie Sanders.
    2
  4653. Kyle P regarding, "She's got A LOT of work to do before she regains my trust and I ever consider voting for her" That's what I said after she turned her back on Sanders in 2016. Then I said it again when she turned her back on the DAPL protestors. Then I said it again after she voted for the giving Trump more money for bombs then even the orange clown wanted. And now you are saying it while she announces that she will be doing anything and everything she can to split progressive leaning votes in the primary and stifle Bernie Sanders in 2020. At some point we have to say she can't regain our trust right? Because I'm there. Fuck her.
    2
  4654.  @TheChiefsfan88  regarding, "I would just say that I think she's going to be significantly better than many of the likely primary candidates." Sure. But that isn't saying much. Anyone who would be a decent primary candidate has the intelligence and wisdom to clear the path for Sanders. We all already know how rigged the game is. We all know how much the establishment and corporate media are going to do anything and everything to stop him. All the decent people are going to busy helping him while all the sellouts are going to be cock-blocking him from the nomination like Warren is doing. If she actually just stepped aside she would have gone a long way to earning back some of my respect... instead... this. Regarding, "if she gets the nomination, we have to support her" I'd cross that bridge if we ever get there. That said we will NEVER get there and even she knows it. She KNOWS she isn't going to win. She is running to stab Sanders in the back. Period.
    2
  4655. He fails two important litmus tests of mine. He has zero political experience and has zero record to look at to know if he is full of shit or sincere.
    2
  4656. All no votes don't matter. They are meaningless and are only symbolic. The only thing that matters are yes votes.
    2
  4657.  madcheeseknight  Your smears are not good. Despite being in the senate for a long time he is one of their poorest members. As for him endorsing Hillary it wasn't surprising coming from a guy who said time and time again how much he didn't want or think Trump should be president. Who said time and time again that he would do everything in his power to keep it from happening. But good luck with your smears. Sorry they are not good and he doesn't give you more to work with.
    2
  4658. If you don't outlaw anything then there is no crime. Checkmate.
    2
  4659. He's not dumb, he's immoral. It's an important distinction.
    2
  4660.  @scruffopone3989  It's what science does.
    2
  4661.  @scruffopone3989  "No, Science asks questions" LMFAO You are literally proving my point. Yes. Science asks questions.
    2
  4662. Regarding, "These people can cause accidents" Don't let facts get in the way of your bullshit. http://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/abs/10.2105/AJPH.2017.303848
    2
  4663. He has done more to out the fakes than anyone ATM.
    2
  4664.  @daggerdan12  "Attacking other leftists at every opportunity is inane and irrelevant." As if TYT and their ilk is the left. As if calling out frauds and controlled opposition is "inane and irrelevant." Well done if you are trying to act like a clown and be as nonsensical as you possible can. "Purity tests are fucking dogshit." Another way to describe "purity tests" is having standards. Not having standards is the thing that's dogshit and it's the people who have none that want to think having them is the devil.
    2
  4665. Socialism is inevitable for a few things like health care. Regulated capitalism is just fine for most other things. The problem is that we have unregulated capitalism instead in the US.
    2
  4666. You should care about the values a person preaches and lives by more than the color of their collar.
    2
  4667.  @MaryBrownIsTheBlairWitch  Being free is not the same thing as being free of consequences from your actions. Fun fact: she isn't in a jail.
    2
  4668.  @k7u5r8t4  We already have things like the senate to give smaller states more say than they deserve. They shouldn't get to have more meaningful ballots for president.
    2
  4669.  @why-even-try-brotendo  Regarding, "You guys are complete idiots" Funny coming from a bootlicker. Regarding, " let's get a loss on M4A" Fighting for m4a is a loss? In what world? Regarding, "It was always going to end with Pelosi as Speaker." Yup. But they had leverage to get something for it and used squandered that leverage because they are frauds. Regarding, "You were holding NOTHING over their heads." They needed those votes for pelosi as speaker. Just lying like this doesn't help your case. It just means you are a liar who isn't really to be taken seriously. Regarding, "You are just a bunch of whiners stomping your feet." I don't pretend I was the one with any real power. AOC did. You are just bootlicker making idiotic excuses for her failure and her selling the people out.
    2
  4670.  @josh420masterB  Regarding, "How many times have you personally made attempts to reach out to AOC to try and change her mind on forcing the vote?" I was on her mailing list and responded to about 6 emails she sent me all with a message that she needs to force the vote or be forever dead to me. And the notion that I need to get her to do the right thing is asinine. STOP DEFENDING HER. STOP ACTING LIKE IT'S MY FAULT SHE DIDN'T DO THE RIGHT THING!
    2
  4671.  @josh420masterB  FYI after her vote for pelosi I sent her a last email calling her a fraud and removing myself from her mailing list. But good news that means you can blame me for everything since I'm done trying to reach out to her. It will forever be my fault when she doesn't do the right thing.
    2
  4672.  @why-even-try-brotendo  Regarding, "I probably got a little too aggressive myself but Jimmy Dore just makes my blood boil." You are getting mad a guy trying to force our shit politicians to do the right thing. It's messed up. Your priorites are messed up. You should be getting mad at the politicians standing in the way between you and m4a. But you are mad at Jimmy? Regarding, "He has never once admitted to being wrong about anything." I've disagreed with jimmy about plenty but I don't care about this. Not sure why you do. I'm talking about m4a. You are talking about jimmy. Regarding, "He isn't honest" And still you have yet to offer a single thing that he has said that is dishonest. Regarding, "He even said he made AOC. Wow! Just wow." It was clearly hyperbole meaning that he helped her and helped giver her exposure. He did. Kyle could say the same thing if he wanted but likely wouldn't. But this has NOTHING to do with m4a. It's like you want to talk about anything other than that.
    2
  4673.  @why-even-try-brotendo  Regarding, "The loss OBVIOUSLY being the vote." Which is moronic. Regarding, "did you think it would pass?" No. I didn't. That's not the only way you "win." It ALREADY was a success. It exposed AOC. I fucking loved her before this. Now I know she is a fraud as is anyone who opposed a no-brainer idea like this. Regarding, "Did you think the House would just go on without a Speaker if they "forced the vote?" " I think that pelosi would cave and grant the vote if she was actually pressured. But AOC and frauds like her didn't even try. Stop defending their actions with your nonsense.
    2
  4674.  @josh420masterB  Regarding, "Telling someone that they need to do what you say or you'll hate them forever isn't necessarily the most persuasive argument," I tried to sugar coat it and be persuasive at the time. But you just keep blaming me. It's clearly all my fault. I suck. If only I were better we could have nice things. Regarding, "I am not laying any blame on you." Of course you are. "How many times have you personally made attempts to reach out to AOC to try and change her mind on forcing the vote?" This sure as shit isn't blaming AOC. It's blaming me. Don't pretend otherwise.
    2
  4675.  @Bluebelle51  Well thanks for providing the source... kinda. When it comes to something like this it's very nice in a way to be blissfully ignorant of this like I was before. And now that I know... well let's just say it's a good thing I'm not the hulk or I'd be breaking lots of shit.
    2
  4676.  @Bluebelle51  I can imagine an ad for police for hire reading... "The dumber the better. Smart people need not apply."
    2
  4677.  @someonesomewhere8206  I trusted her. A lot. Those days are over.
    2
  4678.  @dontask3613  Regarding, "First off you can't use "He's like" right before paraphrasing someone in direct quotations." Yes. You really can... at least in a forum like this if not for a college paper. Words and language are merely a tool we use to convey a message. They were not being misleading in the slightest and their message was crystal clear... and THAT is what is important, not "rules" of language. You KNOW they are paraphrasing, or at least you should. That's what the "he's like" was for so there shouldn't be a problem.
    2
  4679. You are embarrassing yourself if you can't distinguish between "gossip" and smears.
    2
  4680. He has his own show on youtube and it's a must watch.
    2
  4681.  @lordlubu3029  "coming out with your sexual abuse is blackmail now" It's blackmail because she was trying to leverage an apology note for something that has nothing to do with sexual abuse. I hope you are paid well for your stupid shit.
    2
  4682. Trump's existence is already proof there is no god.
    2
  4683. At least not an all knowing, moral god.
    2
  4684.  @geraldgarcia777  I understand why you would think the pathological liar is lying about this but I think this might be the rare occasion when he is telling the truth.
    2
  4685. Regarding, "Are you smart enough to look in a mirror?" That is funny but not because of the reason you think. Thanks for the laughs.
    2
  4686. That's not funny.... that is just sad. Don't be afraid to seek help for the whole batshit crazy thing. Good luck losing your virginity.
    2
  4687. GWS regarding, "people who are so judgmental" Seriously go back, read your original post and try to realize why you are a fucking hypocrite.
    2
  4688. "a place where large numbers of people, especially political prisoners or members of persecuted minorities, are deliberately imprisoned in a relatively small area with inadequate facilities, sometimes to provide forced labor or to await mass execution" So yeah... that's exactly what it is.
    2
  4689. As much as I think the corporate media sucks balls you are saying something Trump would do... not Sanders.
    2
  4690.  @Popeslash  Sorry not sorry you are triggered by my free speech.
    2
  4691. She doesn't care what he has to say. She only cares to let everyone know what she thinks.
    2
  4692. It only sounds that bad because she knows her position is wrong.
    2
  4693. GWB thinks GWB should be in jail. I agree.
    2
  4694.  @beeyaybaracas3240  Regarding, "Kyle smears Bernie?" No. D Martin does. It accounts for about 92 percent of his comments.
    2
  4695.  @beeyaybaracas3240  Or real jobs.
    2
  4696. I'm only here by accident. I unsubscribed after krystal and saager left. Why anyone would still be here is beyond me.
    2
  4697. Let them try Hillary again. She would suck up all the establishment support and money before certainly getting crushed. They won't thou. Unfortunately they will pick someone with more charisma like Booker, Harris or Biden. They are all far more scarier then Hillary and they know it. Let's hope they are so foolish to try Hillary again even if the shitshow that would ensue would be tough to watch.
    2
  4698. You are doing it wrong.
    2
  4699.  @Avarn388  He's terrible. And the fact that he is able to dupe so many people such as yourself has me really scared by him.
    2
  4700.  @plotlinevideo3719  You mean like I already did in the other thread?
    2
  4701.  @fchau  That's the type of worthless BS you say when you have nothing of value to offer.
    2
  4702.  @fchau  "since you're so interest in the NYC mayoral race." I'm not. I just can't stand yang. "Who do you support?" I don't have a vote nor do I support anyone. I'm against yang because he's a conman. Don't overthink it.
    2
  4703. Sam Sedar SAD Joe Rogan has freedom of speech. Accuses him of "misinformation." Does it on the propaganda network MSNBC.
    2
  4704. @Chrobry Regarding, "Why do the simplest and most dumb comments get the most likes and replies?" Simple comments are easily read. A novel take time that many aren't willing to invest the time for. It also helps to get here early. And a message of vote sanders isn't "dumb." If you think it is it's because you are dumb. Lastly if you think I care about likes you would be wrong. I care about Sanders being our next president.
    2
  4705.  @JoeG2324  What a mountain of bullshit. Too much for me to want to address it all intelligently.
    2
  4706. So they are suppose to feel bad pointing out that Hillary was a complete piece of shit? That is what FOX news and the right does for their shit... pretend it doesn't stink. But when you do it is different right? I'm sorry if you have a problem with the truth but the fact of the matter was is that she is a disgusting human being and as much as I can't stand that Trump is President I am literally thrilled she will never be president.
    2
  4707.  @r.pinheiro549  I see through your comment. Who paid for it? The Koch brothers?
    2
  4708.  @r.pinheiro549  I love the green party but how are they doing getting into office and into positions of power? Justice democrats are running on the same values. Hostile takeover of the "democratic" party is sound strategy and it's working while the green party is failing. I'd love it if they would succeed but reality is what it is and the system is rigged as fuck against 3rd party candidates. Stop acting like the game is fair for them. It's not. Regarding, " AOC is dividing people" AOC saved NY from giving amazon 3 billion dollars. You are dividing people if you realize it or not.
    2
  4709.  @disabledbabe  Regarding, "I was kinda under the impression that any decisions he made would have to be approved by congress first even as commander in chief." The control congress has over the commander in chief is 1) control over military spending and 2) they are the ones who are suppose to declare war. That said the US is at war with everyone despite congress not making a declaration of war in almost a century. So as commander in chief the president has crazy power. Trump, if he wanted to, could unilaterally bring all our troops home if he wanted. Congress has no real say here. Had Bernie Sanders been elected president he certainly would not have a had congress that would help him. Even his own party for the most part would have opposed him. But still the president always has power even if not directly so. They have the bully pulpit to sway public opinion. It always matters who is president even if there are ways to stifle the amount of power they have.
    2
  4710. Popular enough to have trolls like you.
    2
  4711. 1) we understand that that is the nature of big countries, to fuck with each other 2) we understand that influences inside the country also try to do the exact same shit (like Correct the Record) but we can only do shit about the CTRs of the world but don't, while what do want us to do about Russia? Go to war? That's not an option. How about paper ballots? And ranked choice voting? Oh yeah... both major parties aren't fans.
    2
  4712.  @thenightingale7405  Did I dismiss it? Or merely try to tell you why it's not a MAJOR threat?
    2
  4713.  @thenightingale7405  I literally brought up paper ballots as a way to protect the vote. That's me trying to offer a way to "put locks on our doors."
    2
  4714.  @thenightingale7405 And a corporate media controlling the narrative. They gave trump BILLIONS in free media. How much do you think Russia spent?
    2
  4715.  @davids5126  I'm sure that 100K was the game changer then. And what they did was totally unethical and wrong. "Correct the Record" on the other hand... those are just patriots fighting for this country.
    2
  4716. Because he's exposing kyle as the fraud he is.
    2
  4717. Imagine calling a bunch of unarmed protestors a "coup."
    2
  4718. You support a war pig when you support sanders.
    2
  4719. Too seldom is someone so aptly named.
    2
  4720. I'm cool with that as long as you still make sure you do what you need to do to vote in their primary to shape them and make them better. Then go ahead and vote for whoever you want in the general for all I care.
    2
  4721. Trump also sold out and showed his true colors long ago.
    2
  4722.  @ScoopMeisterGeneral  Regarding, "I should have said" Don't feel bad. You really nailed it with your original response.
    2
  4723. @Avery Benson Regarding, "can we please stop this" I promise I'll stop when the dodo stops with the propaganda. Regarding, "I don’t want to have a comment fight." I'm sure it would be nicer if everyone would just agree with everything you say. Sorry not sorry. Regarding, "This is simply my take on what happened." Whatever you want to tell yourself and do instead of answering the simple questions I directed at you. I may not have succeeded but I actually tried to answer the questions you asked me.
    2
  4724. @Ben the brummie Regarding, "what’s with the fucking yoda talk are you okay in the head" I type fast and don't care about my grammar enough to proofread everything. Do you never make typos? Or are you just a natural hypocrite at everything?
    2
  4725.  @Max-pl6gp  Regarding, "why are you spending so much time thinking about it and discussing it." People in society need to be able to see and understand that this propaganda. It's kinda important for reasons that should be obvious. I've called this propaganda time and again. Do you really not understand why propaganda is a bad thing? Or do you just want to disingenuously act like this isn't propaganda? And act baffled and confused as to why I think this particular piece of propaganda is bad?
    2
  4726.  @Max-pl6gp  Regarding, "Like just piss off read the room" Sorry not sorry for not letting you go back to your bubble and shut off your brain. Sorry not sorry for asking questions that nobody seems willing to answer.
    2
  4727.  @TheSelfHelpTube  Regarding, "you're like..." LMFAO. What a very a remarkably unoriginal direction you have gone for your comment. It's like you are trying to prove that you are sheep engaged in groupthink nonsense. It's working. Not a single one of you have anything of value to offer the conversation. Not a single one of you can be bothered to address whether you would be ok with the dodo if they would have used their platform to give good PR to the orange clown while in office the way they are doing it for biden. Regarding, "Thanks for the easiest victory in the history of youtube comments. Imbecile." Do you and you fellow clowns really think what you are saying is intelligent and of value? Of course they do. They think this is about "winning youtube comments." And not being able to recognize when you are being brainwashed. This really is like living in the movie Idiocracy.
    2
  4728.  @murphdawgswizzle  Regarding, "i don’t like him either, but this was sweet." Even someone who claims to not like him normally is moved by the PR and starts to think he's better than he is. That's how you know you have really good propaganda.
    2
  4729.  @wannaplayagame7484  Regarding, "I believe that the Biden’s may have used this to boost there chances by showing humanity" While I feel like this is obvious it's hardly the point. I'm mostly taking issue with the dodo and their actions. Should the dodo being using their platform to create political propaganda such as this? Regarding, "I am glad that the dog got adopted." Don't get me wrong, I too am happy for that dog. That dog is likely to live a great life. Afterall it's not one of the brown people in other countries biden is looking to bomb and it's not one of the brown people in the US that biden is looking to mass incarcerate. That dog is far luckier than most people biden deals with.
    2
  4730. He's the most popular politician in the country. He's as popular as you are stupid. And that is really saying something.
    2
  4731.  @republicansthatdidntvotefo1605  "Might help you with making Your comments, and you Might Possibly look smarter?" Learn about capitalization so that you can avoid acting like a bot that is broken in the future.
    2
  4732.  @arimas1977  No lie. Thanks for the laugh.
    2
  4733.  @maximilian3394  I'm voting 3rd party for president.
    2
  4734.  @maximilian3394  Don't take my frustration personally. I just wish people would have standards for giving politicians their votes. If they did we wouldn't have people like trump or biden in government and the world would be a far better place.
    2
  4735. He is an independent.
    2
  4736. Not voting for shit is an option. I'm taking it.
    2
  4737.  @charfire222  So. Money doesn't buy happiness.
    2
  4738. Not SS (or at least that is what he would tell you). But he does want to gut the rest of the social safety net to pay for his UBI when it should only be paid for by rich people.
    2
  4739. manufacture
    2
  4740. consent
    2
  4741. for corrupt
    2
  4742. people like
    2
  4743. his good
    2
  4744. friend joe
    2
  4745. Better question, why wouldn't they "get away with being a pundit on US politics?"
    2
  4746. Do you want M4A? Sign the petition. Force the vote! https://forcethevote.org/
    2
  4747. "same as our war culture" The MIC is listening to rap music? That's why they love war?
    2
  4748. Regarding, "You might want to learn how superdelegates work before you call someone stupid" Actually I called you stupid because I do understand how superdelegates work. Now if you can explain to me how someone can win with superdelgates alone I will take back all of my insults and call you a genius. But you can't and therefore saying, "They only need one dirty trick and it's called the *Super motherfuking Delegates*" is dumb as fuck and provably false to people who actually know how the system works and can do simple math. I would appreciate it if you would stop saying stupid things and making everyone dumber when you speak.
    2
  4749. Regarding, "Don't hate the president, hate the system." I can walk and chew gum at the same time.
    2
  4750. Yup. People don't really change. In a related note Warren was a republican in the 90s while Bernie was busy being a progressive.
    2
  4751. I'll never vote for Biden. It he's the nominee I'll likely vote for the Green Party.
    2
  4752. Why are you expecting anything good from him? Don't expect anything good from him. You shouldn't. And you will never be disappointed.
    2
  4753.  @TheStockwell  I'll do my best to not crush your unfounded optimism then. :) peace
    2
  4754. Thunderfoot can't see through fauci? That's not good.
    2
  4755.  @millieo.5325  Regarding, "with Biden, we may be able to push him to help the American People" Biden will lie about crap like being arrested with mandela and working in civil rights but he won't even pander when it comes to helping the people if given the chance. Corrupt biden would veto M4A if he gets the chance. He wasn't lying to his big money backers that nothing will fundamentally change under him. Stop pretending otherwise.
    2
  4756. lovemovies regarding, "now that people know he's also the establishment" I have no idea why you say this. The sheep who supported him in the first place see a clear divide between him and the establishment because of shit like this. His popularity is not going down. I have no understanding how you can say and what this is suppose to be based on other than wishful thinking.
    2
  4757. I think I'm going to have carrots for dinner. Hopefully I get lucky and eat the right one.
    2
  4758. So no evidence then lovemovies? Thanks for proving my point. And even if I was the type of moron that thought Trump wasn't part of the establishment, which I'm not, that would have actually been evidence of people not knowing he is establishment. In short your latest reply was remarkably idiotic on so many levels.
    2
  4759. Sean... we get it. You are an idiot. There is no need to prove it any further.
    2
  4760. Sean, Trump not only is establishment, but he is a complete piece of shit who says thinks like "we have to take out their families." That is something ISIS should be saying... not a president. Stop being a fucking moron, making an ass of yourself, and defending that piece of shit.
    2
  4761. Regarding, "Stop spewing all this venom" How about you stop being a fucking moron first? Regarding, "think about what I'm saying to you." I have you fucking idiot. It's actually where the "venom" comes from.
    2
  4762. Regarding, "All you do is curse" Nope. You think what you do because you are an idiot. Regarding, "You have not responded to anything I've actually said." Me pointing out how Trump wants to emulate terrorists was a response to, "Trump is far better." That said I concede I have no real interest in telling you why almost everything you have said is dumb as fuck. I simply don't have the unlimited time, energy, and desire to do so. And even if I did I have no reason to think it would sway you. If you think Trump isn't establishment you are simply too far gone and too fucking stupid for me to want to engage you intelligently.... just like the carrot and flat earthers.
    2
  4763. Regarding, "Stop being so weak." Stop being a fucking moron... and now... a hypocritical moron. Do I need to tell you why you are being a hypocrite here like I need to tell you why everything else you say is fucking stupid? Regarding, "I challenge your world view and you just flip out?" You are literally making the world a worse place by spewing a bunch of nonsense. You are essentially taking a shit all over the place and you expect me to clean it up for you. Sorry... I have better things to do with my time then, for example, tell you why the notion that immigrants are what is fucking things up is stupid beyond words. You can't even grasp the simple concept of why I am not interested in engaging you intelligently. But you want me to talk about more complex topics that you have already demonstrated you can't grasp. Good luck with that. I have more reason to talk to my dog intelligently then you. They are far smarter.
    2
  4764. Regarding, "Why is that?" The fact that you don't already know the answer to this question really proves my point about you being an idiot. I shouldn't have to point out obvious shit to you. I shouldn't have to tell you that when people are face to face they, because of HUMAN NATURE, are more likely to bend over backwards to not be offensive, to be polite, and to treat idiotic ideas with far more respect then they deserve then when people are anonymous.
    2
  4765. You also might be a nice guy in real life Sean. You might be really smart in other areas of the world. But to me you are just a fucking idiot making excuses and rationalizations for a complete piece of shit. I have no tolerance of it and I'm not going to sugar coat it. You asked why I am not looking to engage you intelligently and I gave you an answer. Sorry not sorry if you don't like it.
    2
  4766. Regarding, "I don't think really know too much." That's your edited comment? What did it look like before?
    2
  4767. Regarding, "Put away your hostility and just think about it." I reread it. You are a total fucking idiot even if you have a legit point about problems with trade that is quickly negated by claiming that Trump is helping address the problem. That doesn't make your stupid conclusions about immigration and Trump not being establishment go away. Even a broken clock is correct twice a day... that doesn't mean it's not broken.
    2
  4768. Sean, please do the world a favor and stop being a fucking moron blaming all the wrong things for the problems we have. I've already told you time and again that I'm not interested in addressing all the stupid shit you say. That said I'll leave you with one thought before I ignore you and never address you again because I have better things to do with my time. You want higher wages? Raise the minimum wage. Jesus fuck this ain't rocket science.
    2
  4769. 888 regarding, "you think you're smart but you're a complete moron." I can't tell you how funny I find this. But then I get angry to know people like you exist. It sucks there are so many useful idiots for the establishment. Living in the movie "Idiocracy" sucks.
    2
  4770. Centrist regarding, "Calling someone an idiot is no way to win an argument," You are correct. I wasn't trying to "win an argument." I wasn't trying to debate them and I've already explained why. Sometimes you just want to express disgust with people saying stupid things without bothering to waste your time telling them exactly why everything they are saying is idiotic. I don't go around wasting my time using logic and reason with flat earthers but I will call them stupid, and for all the same reasons.
    2
  4771. Regarding, "I prefer to use logic and reason because it's just how I like to approach most things." While I tend to agree with you, I think it is ultimately illogical to try to use logic and reason on people who have already demonstrated they are illogical. If my goal were to try and be persuasive you would be absolutely correct. But I was just venting frustration. And that frustration is well deserved. Flat earthers beliefs are ultimately benign. Trump supporters... not so much.
    2
  4772. You think and say what you do because you are not smart. Good luck with that.
    2
  4773.  @randallhahn9245  Regarding, "I volunteered on the Sanders campaign in 2016 and again now" But he isn't anti-war according to your original comment? Regarding, "I still believe Tulsi to have the strongest foreign policy" While this is far less insane than your original comment it's still obviously wrong and I cite the same example given... the largest foreign policy blunder of the generation, Iraq. Regarding, "Tulsi still has a lot to say" Good for her. She should say it while doing the right thing and trying to push sanders over the top the way she did in 2016. Regarding, "I stand by my comment ." Meanwhile it's still god awful.
    2
  4774. Speaking of spreading lies how about the time sam said that mccarthey would be speaker if they forced a vote on M4A?
    2
  4775. @Vesta_the_Lesser Actually that isn't something we get to have an opinion about. Do you really not understand the difference between fact and opinion? The bottom line is that if sam wasn't lying then h jeffries would have been speaker instead of the republicans just voting over and over like they did.
    2
  4776.  @YourLocalZombie  "Not only was that an opinion" Nope. It was a lie. "McCarthy is the speaker and was at the time you posted that comment." I'm talking about 2020 when sam was lying that if dems didn't unite behind pelosi and if dems trying to "force the vote" the same way the republicans just did then mccarthy would be speaker. Try to keep up.
    2
  4777.  @YourLocalZombie  "it was an intentional lie and not his opinion?" It's possible he was only grossly incompetent but I think more of sam's intellect than that.
    2
  4778.  @TheMinneapolisKid  Youtube video titled, "DEBATE: Briahna Joy Gray vs. Sam Seder" at bad faith.
    2
  4779.  @danielcrafter9349  "can you explain" Yeah but if you don't already get it and some of you clearly don't you likely never will.
    2
  4780.  @danielcrafter9349  "lie, opinion and assertion" Sam asserted that mccarthey could have been speaker while dems had a majority. It was just a lie. And it's my opinion that it was deliberate.
    2
  4781.  @YourLocalZombie  "intentional lie" While it is only my opinion that it was it was intentional that is really irrelevant... it was a lie even if sam didn't realize it at the time.
    2
  4782.  @taearum5134  "It really sounds like you are ASSERTING that Sam was intentionally lying. This really doesn't sound like your opinion." I've repeatedly said that part is opinion. Sams sycophants are impossible to take seriously.
    2
  4783.  @YourLocalZombie  "You haven't explained how it's a lie." Just admit you are unserious and don't actually care about what I'm saying. "was he worried about losing control of the house?" He was pretending that a republican speaker while dems had a majority was a real possibility. It wasn't. He was just lying. This isn't as hard as you are making it. I can only think you are not a serious person.
    2
  4784.  @YourLocalZombie  At least you live up to your name of "local zombie."
    2
  4785.  @YourLocalZombie  "Why do you keep making multiple replies to the same post?" Sometimes I think to add something so I do. Sometimes I break them up because of censorship and I don't want an entire novel shadowbanned. You should be embarrassed you don't know the answers to your own obvious questions. "I am serious when I say you know the difference between fact and opinion and are choosing to conflate the two." I'm serious when I say you are projecting and don't know the difference between fact and opinion. That or you are just being intentionally obtuse because you lack intellectual honesty.
    2
  4786.  @YourLocalZombie  "I am serious when I say you know the difference between fact and opinion and are choosing to conflate the two." We don't get to have an opinion if a republican might be speaker while dems have a majority or if a dem could be speaker if republicans had a majority. Sam was just lying and you are not a serious person.
    2
  4787.  @sinoa1  Miriam Adelson... that's who you actually voted for. Look it up if you need to.
    2
  4788. Sam seder is controlled opposition to make sure you keep voting for evil oligarchs.
    2
  4789.  @LightTackleEthusiast  Regarding, "obfuscate the original topic." Thanks for being honest about what you are doing even if you are only doing so accidentally. I suspect you are only intellectually honest by accident and even when you being confronted facts and truth I am sure your go to is complete and utter BS like when you tried to claim, "I'm not deflecting." Regarding, "Your human you do it too..." I'm sure you think that but not everyone are intellectually dishonest hypocrites like you. But think whatever stupid shit you want to try and rationalize your actions and your being a disgrace to the human race. I know you will. But try not to lie to everyone else about what you are doing while you do it the same you are lying to everyone else.
    2
  4790.  @RedTrooperDoesGaming  Why are you only chastising them? And not the OP who was calling people "sore losers," and "shallow" amongst their crap?
    2
  4791.  @coolcorey13755  Some clearly do. Have you seen his simp army here?
    2
  4792.  @trollkiller1008  Energy companies do it all the time. Remember the "BP" oil spill? It was subcontracted out to "transocean offshore deepwater drilling."
    2
  4793. I read your comment. I was not impressed. I did not actually learn anything except your personal perspective. Seriously thou some things are worth emphasizing. Not everyone is as informed as you. I think it was pretty silly of you if you went there thinking there was going to be some ground breaking new information talked about. It was obviously going to be about things that people should have already realized but were worth repeating.
    2
  4794. Not really. It's for the worst of the worst. It's nice of them to let us know who not to support.
    2
  4795. VoteGreen regarding, "There is no reason to stay in the Democratic Party" If you are in a closed primary state you should be registered as a dem just long enough to vote in their primaries. It is stupid. It is wrong. It is undemocratic but it still something you should be doing. Take the opportunity you have to try and shape the party for the better when you can. And if you don't want to vote for them during general elections you don't have to and owe them nothing at that point.
    2
  4796.  @miriammaldonado604  "!!!!" ????
    2
  4797.  @philmerlot5090  "what you dems would say" Another thing an unserious clown would say. I literally insult dems.
    2
  4798.  @johnmcclain3887  "not voting" They want apathy. Make them rig it! Vote for non corporate candidates.
    2
  4799. tech maybe I am a simpleton because I am lost reading that.
    2
  4800. Thank you Bernie Sanders for fighting the war of ideas and winning.
    2
  4801. Israel is an apartheid state so...
    2
  4802.  @UnVictor  "what is there even to criticize about the situation" Fair enough. While I can't stand andrew yang I happily concede that many of the attacks on him are not legit and are just smears.
    2
  4803.  @sporedoutofmymind  Fauci lying to me didn't stop me from getting a mask. I'm not a dipshit. I know they work. I probably wouldn't have gone out and got one if only he told everyone the truth. If he would have given me a good reason to not go out and get one. Instead he lied to everyone.
    2
  4804.  @hlw1306  "Your ignorance regarding the state of working life in America is surprising." What exactly did I get wrong? "find we are going backwards" I know we are going backwards. I also know who has the house, senate and presidency and I'm trying to hold them to some small account. "find we are going backwards" Because of bernie and his party, not in spite of him.
    2
  4805. Your assumption was wrong. Her response was trash. And even if it wasn't, which it was, that would not have been a logical argument for Sanders not to do his own response. She could have said exactly the same things he did and that would have been just fine. Some things are worth repeating. But as it stands it's good that Sanders said what he did or nobody would have made the substantive points he did in a direct response.
    2
  4806.  keith gould  Meanwhile, in reality, I go to kyle for, in part, news.
    2
  4807. The deep state is a way to describe unelected officials in government who persist over decades in government. It's hardly a conspiracy to talk about them. Only a person brainwashed by watching too much sam sedar would attempt to deny that they exist like this.
    2
  4808. The hypocrisy and stupidity is strong with you.
    2
  4809.  @charlesandrews2360  Regarding, "70% of Americans agree with Bernie Sanders' Progressive Policies. Let's start with that." Why would we start there? I'm talking to a guy on the opposite side who maybe doesn't agree with sanders entire platform... but I am talking to a guy that I know I have common ground with even if not everything so I'm going to start there when talking to him. Starting by trying to get them to work with me on shit they don't support is a recipe for failure. Not only that but money in politics is the overarching problem that makes all other problems all but impossible to solve. Problems like health care, perpetual war, criminal justice reform, and pretty much every problem other than money in politics is impossible to solve because of the money in politics. So again it makes logical sense to try and address this first. Regarding, "You misspelled there" Yup. I make honest mistakes. You don't even seem like you are trying when you don't bother to use punctuation. And punctuation is a must if you want to be able to accurately convey a message. That's why you fail and me misspelling a word is irrelevant.
    2
  4810. You are just lying.
    2
  4811.  @Legio2Italica3video  Only one? Holy shit is that hard. I guess I'll go with her voting to give Trump, a person she claims is unhinged, an extra 80 billion per year for bombs.
    2
  4812.  @patrickbooth5091  I'm surprised you are still addressing me after making it perfectly clear nobody gives a shit about your "thoughts."
    2
  4813.  @patrickbooth5091  Actually I'm not that surprised. You are obviously very stupid.
    2
  4814.  @patrickbooth5091  The worst thing about people like you is that they are far too dumb to realize they are stupid.
    2
  4815.  @patrickbooth5091  But don't let that stop you from continuing to talk about someone so irrelevant you can't stop talking about them. It's pretty fucking funny really.
    2
  4816.  @patrickbooth5091  Aw, did you delete your latest stupid as fuck comment that include moronic gems like, "I didn’t bring up corbyn." Despite your original post where you bring up corbyn? Did you actually realize how fucking dumb that is? That would really be something. I can't believe that to be true. It must have been something else.
    2
  4817.  @patrickbooth5091  Nope. I can see your stupid comment now. YouTube must have been glitching. I knew you weren't smart enough to realize how dumb your comment was.
    2
  4818.  @patrickbooth5091  Nothing says irrelevant like can't shut the fuck up about them to someone who flat out tells you they don't care what you have to say. That's sarcasm in case you aren't smart enough to figure that out yourself.
    2
  4819.  @patrickbooth5091  But you calling others a clown while being a clown is forever funny. Thanks for the laughs dipshit.
    2
  4820. The fallout from the smears are the problem? Not the smears and blackmail that got us here? Nope. But fun fact: jimmy and mate were talking about OPCW whistleblowers before being smeared ya know.
    2
  4821. He compared jada to a sex symbol movie star and you act like he compared her to a hunchback. What is wrong with you?
    2
  4822.  @kski5432  "the 1st can also be infringed" Sure enough, my original response to you is being shadowbanned. The first is already being infringed. You should focus on that.
    2
  4823. What world do you live in where they weren't already doing anything and everything cut labor hours? In short you are being an idiot.
    2
  4824. Someone's stupid. It's you ace.
    2
  4825.  @chuckm1961  That's the same stupid shit flat earthers like to think and say when I call them dipshits as well.
    2
  4826.  @Babygirlly555  Yes, it is true that you are stupid beyond words.
    2
  4827.  @Babygirlly555  Actually IQs are not "opinion" and yours might be the first in history to be a negative number. My dog is smarter then you. The only thing that is irrelevant here is you.
    2
  4828.  @Babygirlly555  You must think you are entitled to respect. You must think I should take the shit you say seriously. You aren't and I don't. The only value you offer society is as a walking punchline to be made fun of. You are comic relief in sad times. It isn't enough to make up for that fact that you make everyone dumber with every stupid thing that you say but it is something even if you aren't a good use of oxygen.
    2
  4829.  @Babygirlly555  You think and say what you do because you are stupid. I literally just got done telling you why I was talking to you and it has nothing to do with caring about what you think. I guess you missed it because you aren't smart.
    2
  4830.  @Babygirlly555  No shit. You would have to be significantly smarter then you are to have the self-awareness to realize and be affected by what you are. You are the living embodiment of the Dunning-Kruger effect. You are far, far, far too stupid to realize you are stupid. There is a reason the phrase "ignorance is bliss" is a thing. That reason is you.
    2
  4831.  @TCt83067695  Thanks but keep in mind it isn't a particularly constructive use of time. Marlon isn't lying about it not bothering him and they have no ability to learn. I only use the time on him because I find the stupid shit they say funny and it's a good way to blow off steam about problems morons like them help exacerbate. I prefer to use my time more constructively generally but we live in sad times and I need the occasional laugh. That said if nothing else the time they spent addressing my trolling is time they weren't using making the word dumber with their word vomit elsewhere. So at least there's that if nothing else. :)
    2
  4832. Lost on purpose? She would have done literally anything to win.
    2
  4833.  @Greendalewitch  Regarding, "people will never forgive her." I was there a long, long, long, long, long time ago.
    2
  4834. All of your comments are meaningless.
    2
  4835. He's doing all the wrong things. Literally the only thing that he is good on is UBI and even that is as bad is at can get coming from him as he wants to pay for it regressively as hell.
    2
  4836. You don't "got it."
    2
  4837. I suspect only your comment is "ugly on purpose."
    2
  4838. Even yang supporters can't actually believe that can they?
    2
  4839.  @angrylefty7953  I'm going to include my bank account information and password just to be safe.
    2
  4840. Dynamic regarding, "So you support... That's the logical extension of that idea." I think that you are being illogical if you think they care about logic. They do not do any thinking for themselves. They let other people do it for them.
    2
  4841. I saw says, "Suffering is... from the creator." and "Anything that harms the body is wrong." Therefor your creator is wrong... assuming you care about logic and reason. Which clearly you do not.
    2
  4842. Thanks for leaving this video up even while it shows what clowns you guys are.
    2
  4843.  @mitchclark1532  Regarding, "How can you say they’re not just as corrupt as the GOP" 1) Trump was a really smelly POS. 2) I don't spend time and effort comparing and contrasting POS. "exist to do nothing but stop progressive policies from being implemented?" The dems job is to give the peasants crumbs so they don't pick up pitchforks. Crumbs are arguably better than nothing. But again... I don't really care who is worse. Both are terrible. The rest is just details.
    2
  4844.  @mitchclark1532  "there’s no problem admitting that both parties are corrupt." I agree with this 100 percent. Both parties are corrupt. I might even agree that dems are "just as bad" if I wanted to spend lots of time and effort comparing and contrasting POS but ultimately I don't.
    2
  4845.  @robertsvorinich890  But it's not like superdelegates get to decide all by themselves. Still... they WILL get their way.
    2
  4846. Nope.
    2
  4847. Accept no imitations. Bernie Sanders 2020
    2
  4848. Of all the many, many, many things that I despise about Biden, age is not on the list.
    2
  4849.  @chiggitycheckmate8364  That is definitely something we can agree on.
    2
  4850. Regarding, "You still haven't proven how Trump's a racist." Actually I have. If he wasn't a racist then he either would want a wall on both borders or he would want a wall on neither border. He only wants the wall with the country that is predominately brown because they are predominately brown.
    2
  4851. Marlon regarding, "Obama deported... is he a racist?" If it could be shown that Obama was targeting people and trying to apply laws specifically based on skin color then it would be racist... you know... like Trump advocates for. Regarding, "Don't tell me you voted for Hilary?" No. I didn't. In part because she is a racist.
    2
  4852. FYI 1.9 trillion is enough to give everyone a check of almost 7K. But dems can't even give the 2K they promised.
    2
  4853. "conversion to MAGA" Nowhere does he ever say anything positive about trump. You are just deeply unserious.
    2
  4854.  @chillydog53  We can hope bernie grows a spine? I'm done with that. His actions speak louder than his meaningless words. He will tell you to vote for joe and you likely will.
    2
  4855. I agree the US needs to distance itself from Israel but I think you only hurt that cause with your antisemetic comment.
    2
  4856. He was never ok. He was always a corrupt sellout. The only thing that changed was the publics understanding of him.
    2
  4857.  @1369Stiles  You are just as much an "armchair politician" as the OP is. But I'd rather be an "armchair politician" who is criticizing the powers that be rather than being a bootlicker for them.
    2
  4858.  @satchelraidincoming636  Huh?
    2
  4859.  @carolmckee8456  Regarding, "even better, don't bother to vote at all, because your childish protest vote will go unnoticed anyway." Meanwhile, in reality, the way to make sure you go unnoticed is by not showing up to vote at all. And even if what you said was true, and it's not, the presidential election isn't the only thing to vote on.
    2
  4860. There is nobody whose comments I love more consistently then yours.
    2
  4861. Regarding, "Biden was incredible" LMFAO. No. He merely won the debate by not being trump.
    2
  4862. That she would get a few million more votes just like she did.
    2
  4863.  @beautifulworld9829  I would have preferred you offered something of value. But I'm not unhappy to be done with this. Peace.
    2
  4864. I was going for ridiculous Jeremy. I should have made that more clear. Sadly I need to in a place where ridiculous is commonplace.
    2
  4865. "worse that Conservatives."? Is that suppose to sting without anything of substance to back it up? Sorry if bringing up the fact that nobody has died of MJ is inconvenient to the narrative you want to push. We live in a world where people die from aspirin for fucks sake but nobody dies from too much weed. Those are just facts. Facts that illustrate why what you say is really silly.
    2
  4866. John regarding, "smoke your brains out. It’s not my brain thankfully." I love how you imply how dangerous it is without actually bothering to try and prove your claim. And even if it were dangerous to me... which it isn't relatively speaking, so fucking what. I still should be able to do whatever I want to myself in a free society no? I mean... mountain dew isn't exactly good for people but that doesn't mean it should be illegal right?
    2
  4867. She is a corporate shill who is opposed to M4A.
    2
  4868.  @TheManOnTheRail  Regarding, "Is Biden too? Opposed?" Joe Biden was asked, "Let’s flash forward — you are president. Bernie Sanders is still active in the Senate. He manages to get Medicare for All through the Senate in some compromise version, the Elizabeth Warren version or other version. Nancy Pelosi gets a version of it through the House of Representatives. It comes to your desk. Do you veto it?" Joe Biden's response, "I would veto anything that delays providing the security and the certainty of health care being available now." He would veto m4a if he got the chance.
    2
  4869.  @dgc4059  Regarding, "Are you for real?" I'm not going to lie this is really funny coming from you.
    2
  4870.  @dgc4059  Regarding, "because they don't rely on us, we shouldn't help our allies out?" We shouldn't have troops all over the fucking globe for reasons that should be obvious. Because money isn't unlimited and because it's better spent in OUR country. We have no business nor the moral authority to be the worlds policeman. Regarding, "Do you have any idea how stupid that is when you think about it?" Do you have any idea how stupid it is to make up a strawman argument and call that argument stupid while ignoring the things actually being said? Regarding, "That's why the anti war movement can't get a majority in congress, because of this stupid "everything murica does BAD" approach to foreign policy." I call the bad things bad. The US doesn't need to have troops all over the fucking globe despite all the stupid shit you say. If any other country tried to do what the US does you would likely understand how wrong what they are doing is bad. But you suck.
    2
  4871.  @dgc4059  Regarding, "We don't have troops "all over the world"" Meanwhile, in reality, the only continent the US doesn't have troops on is Antarctica. Or at least I think. I don't doubt they do actually troops there. Regarding, "most of the money spent is not spent on bases but on upkeep of equipment we don't use...you don't seem to understand how this works." LMFAO. So the rationale you offer is that the money is used on equipment we don't use? LMFAO. It's like you are making a case against what you are saying but are too dumb to realize it. Regarding, "This is the problem with you guys, you talk about foreign policy like Ben Shapiro talks about Medicare for all, he doesn't know anything about it but has a strong opinion about what he thinks it might be." Look in the mirror you fucking moron. People like you inspired Dunning and Kruger to form their original hypothesis.
    2
  4872.  @dgc4059  Regarding, "we only have troops in countries with terrorism," Please give me a single country that has never experienced terrorism or admit that this is an excuse to rationalize having troops literally everywhere which is my problem and has been from the start. Regarding, "It's not a rationale, it's just a fact" A fact that you are bringing up for no good reason. I have a problem with the money being spent as much as I have a problem with how it's being spent. That "fact" is "rationale" to bring all the troops home and stop that spending. Regarding, "you act like we spend all these trillions on keeping soldiers in foreign countires." Do I? Because what I really care about are the TRILLIONS. While you deflect. Regarding, "Dunning Kruger seems to be the term of the decade for internet dipshits suffering from it." You are an idiot. Sorry not sorry if truth hurts. And I couldn't care less about your insults of me. It's like being insulted by hitler. It doesn't have the effect you want. It's more like a compliment because I think so little of you. Then again I am a moron for addressing you at all. You are hopeless and this is an epic waste of my time. Regarding, "It's kinda pathetic how you try to create your own reality and then act as if everyone bursting your bubble is wrong." LFMAO. You aren't totally worthless. Every now and then you say something like this that is unintentionally hilarious.
    2
  4873.  @dgc4059  No answer to my question right? The existence of terrorism is just an excuse to rationalize having troops literally everywhere right? Thought so. You suck.
    2
  4874. You know one thing I like about Trump? He's not Biden. But that doesn't mean I'm going to vote for the orange clown.
    2
  4875.  @tankie9997  If you are pro-censorship you are ONLY on the right. It's a right wing position.
    2
  4876.  @tankie9997  "all authoritarianism is left wing' ideologues." Prove me wrong then. What is an example of left wing authoritarianism? And good luck with that.
    2
  4877.  @tankie9997  "left wing authoritarianism" is an oxymoron.
    2
  4878.  @OutSideTheBoxFormat  "Give se examples were of people on the right calling for censorship." All of them. Because censorship is the innately right wing position. "The only ones I've seen protest free speech are on the left." If you protest free speech you are not on the left.
    2
  4879.  @pedopeter4166  Why would you think think they are a trumper? Full disclosure this is rhetorical. I don't actually care about your answer.
    2
  4880. You know there are more than just 2 parties right?
    2
  4881. I'm talking about anyone that represents you if the 2 major parties don't. But specifically referring to the Green party you do realize they do hold political offices around the country right? I'm not just talking about the presidential election. There are lots of other elections that are also very important. If you actually had a problem with just "doing nothing" you guarantee that result by staying home so what do you have to lose by going out and voting for candidates who share your values even if they are not a "democrat" or "republican."
    2
  4882.  @donHooligan  I'm done with the dems. I care as much that they rig their elections as much as bernie does... I don't. The party is dead to me.
    2
  4883. Her integrity can be found in her voting record on gay rights.
    2
  4884. Regarding, "Let's get real" LMFAO
    2
  4885. I have no clue what you are talking about.
    2
  4886.  @thegreatpotenza3034  "progressive never happens." Why would it? We have 2 right wing parties.
    2
  4887. You couldn't tell jimmy before the show he wasn't going to be on? You are a joke and a fraud. How did I like you for so long?
    2
  4888. I'd have to watch CNN to respect someone there. That isn't happening.
    2
  4889. As someone who can't stand yang... this sucks.
    2
  4890. Pappy regarding, "I never said anything of the kind." You may not have explicitly said it but that is clearly what you demonstrate you think... You demonstrate that you literally need to only know one thing about them and that one thing makes everything else about them irrelevant. Regarding, "it was a lie" Huh? You are using the word lie wrong just like you use the word sellout wrong. You are talking about a fucking endorsement. An endorsement is, by it's nature, an opinion. Regarding, "(to endorse) is not a serious thing" Yes. That is what I'm saying. I guess it has to do with the fact that I personally do not a give a flying fuck about endorsements candidates do and do not have when voting. I'm not a fucking sheep who needs to be told by others who to vote for. I make that decision for myself and don't give a fuck who Ro or anyone else endorses. Regarding, "You claim that I am making a mountain out of a molehill?" Yes. Absolutely. Regarding, "Its a specific statement of political policy." No. It isn't. It is a vague statement of a political person. There is absolutely nothing specific about it when it comes to policy. Ro could disagree with literally any position a person he endorses has and still legitimately be willing to endorse them. You know what is a specific statement of political policy? Specific statements of political policy and specific votes on political policy. Regarding, "I care about policy." You say this but you demonstrate otherwise when you say, "I don't really care about his past voting record." Regarding, "I honestly want to know." How about literally everything else the guy does other than an endorsement like, specifically, his voting record. Because like I've already pointed out that tells you far more about the guy. That tells you how he GOVERNS. Which I personally think should be far more important to you than it is because... like I've said, you demonstrate you don't give a fuck about how he has governed because of a fucking endorsement. Regarding, "If he is a sellout." I really hate that nowadays some people seem to think sellout means "does something I disagree with" as opposed to what it actually means.
    2
  4891. Term limits is not a solution. Money out of politics is an actual solution.
    2
  4892. Yup. Whites don't commit violence at all. That is sarcasm in case you are not smart enough to realize it without me telling you.
    2
  4893. Nancy Pelosi, Joe Biden, the other biden, david sirota...
    2
  4894. "Yet old Jimmy will vote left down the ticket." What the actual fuck are you talking about? This is simply not true. "Waste of time and air due to the source" This is funny considering you are spreading blatant and obvious lies. In this very video at the 11:00 minute mark, "there's no point in ever voting for a democrat again." You should be embarrassed.
    2
  4895.  @Tiredofthecensorship189  Regarding, "So your mad" I have a problem with lies. Why don't you? This is rhetorical. I'm way done caring about anything you think at this point. I tune out liars.
    2
  4896.  @Tiredofthecensorship189  "why dont you care about the border wall lies," I'm not a trump supporter in part because I care when someone is lying. I don't make excuses for the lies like you do.
    2
  4897.  @skeletonz7924  Regarding, "Trump cultist can’t accept he’s wrong doesn’t surprise me anymore" Does someone support trump here or are you just make idiotic assumptions?
    2
  4898.  @skeletonz7924  Just deflect and point at the other side when you are being called out for lies. Ironically it's exactly what trump and company do for their clown.
    2
  4899.  @mobus1603  Regarding, "he changed the amount. This isn't rocket science." "he changed the amount means he lied. This isn't rocket science.
    2
  4900.  @chrisofstars  Regarding, "I'm just here to study you" By asking bad non-descript questions off topic from the subject at hand? I feel like you are doing it wrong. Regarding, "I find you interesting, and useful. In ways." Are you always so vague?
    2
  4901.  @haleyclay7008  Regarding, "actually Biden said the 600 would be a “down payment” for the American people" Actually biden promised 2k checks. Stop bootlicking and lying for your clown.
    2
  4902.  @haleyclay7008  Regarding, "“President-elect Joseph R. Biden Jr. called the measure a “down payment”" Did he? In other words he lied about previous statements regarding the 2K. Regarding, "you can literally look up him saying it was a down payment" I don't really care how you and biden want to rationalize his lies. Him saying crap like this doesn't make him saying he would get everyone 2k checks just magically disappear.
    2
  4903.  @haleyclay7008  You are just deflecting away from the fact that he has also promised 2k checks. I gave you a direct quote where he promised 2k checks. Do you deny he said that? Or do you just want to try to deflect away from his lies?
    2
  4904.  @signsofbias  "was hotter than it is today." Then maybe stop lying to people and saying, "the planet has actually been getting warmer for over 8 thousand years?" "might help you grasp this conundrum" LFMAO I mean you did give your own dribble a thumbs up so you must really be onto something.
    2
  4905.  @MediaBuster  Yup. Always.
    2
  4906. It's not their stupid that has me terrified... it's their evil.
    2
  4907. The problem isn't technology. The problem is kyle sucks.
    2
  4908. If you think this is violence you should watch a ryan grim video. I did and my manhood fell off.
    2
  4909.  @boeing757pilot  Except they really aren't. A true progressive fighter would be incredibly popular and would be a great career move. Selling out is not a good career move.
    2
  4910. The billions the government is offering isn't acting as an incentive for pfizer who literally only cares about making money?
    2
  4911.  @Parth-Patel1997  Regarding, "the vaccine would have been made anyway" Are you really going to claim that the billions in incentive have nothing to do with it? Regarding, "As mentioned pfizer took 0 dollars from the American government for developing this vaccine" As mentioned they will take billions from the government if they do develop it. Do you really want to pretend this doesn't have an effect? How intellectually dishonest can you be?
    2
  4912. 19 percent is stunningly high.
    2
  4913.  @fustercluck2460  "didn't start any new wars" We were already at war with everyone and he stopped exactly 0 wars. "historic peace deals." If you can't get your facts straight your opinions are rightfully ignored.
    2
  4914.  @michaelbunner7387  "he right to vote NO CONFIDENCE" Yup. And if no confidence wins there should be a new election with NONE of the candidates who were on the ballot.
    2
  4915. Yeah, the mass shootings that are uniquely American compared to other countries are a "distraction." Unless of course you are one of the people who is shot. But that only happens once every few days.
    2
  4916. This is suppose to be a "can do" society. And if you do accept the fact that these mass shootings are happening even thou the same shit doesn't happen in other countries then I think it is logical that people be trying to figure out what we "can do." Because doing nothing is not getting it done.
    2
  4917. Your efforts have not gone to waste. There was an investigation and it showed that the martians are illuminati lizard people who suck Trumps dick for political favors. It also showed that there is something about their saliva that turns him orange and makes his hands tiny.
    2
  4918.  @keitth6935  regarding, "spelling errors." It's not just the spelling dipshit. Your grammar and comprehension is worse then a 6 year old whose first language isn't English, who eats paint chips, and drinks water with lead.
    2
  4919.  @keitth6935  regarding, "again take all of that an shove it in ass I am not here for English lesson but political" This is your edited comment? I can't even begin to imagine how dumb it was before you made changes. You really should be embarrassed about being you. Sadly you aren't smart enough for that are you?
    2
  4920. I agree, I think.
    2
  4921. Or maybe I can't. I'm confused.
    2
  4922. Don't do it if you don't have the money but he has a right to try and make a living doing what he does. I'm sure he isn't trying punish you but rather he is just trying to do something to thank his patrons. Don't overthink it and don't spend the money if you don't have it to give.
    2
  4923.  @Joseph-ro6wq  If a person or party attracts terrible/immoral people... it matters.
    2
  4924. It isn't about passing it now. It is about getting politicians on the record so we can vote out the ones who don't support it and get politicians who do. It is about gaining support for it. It is about having the issue talked about. Rome wasn't built in a day.
    2
  4925. Regarding, "good luck with that" Thanks.
    2
  4926. Maybe not. Big tobacco has been investing in weed for some time now.
    2
  4927. Free assange or journalists like pat will never be safe.
    2
  4928. It's based on a moral compass born of empathy. Not everyone uses a book of bullshit from the bronze age to make ethical decisions for them.
    2
  4929.  @RocketGator05  That government that had never let women vote and still wasn't letting women vote when you were talking? Yeah, they never represented the people and sucked long before the fed.
    2
  4930. Not being Trump is compelling. That said it can't be the only thing they run on.
    2
  4931. The thing is is that they don't feel they need to learn anything as long as the status quo is maintained.
    2
  4932.  @troy8420  "You would rather Trump?" You would rather biden? Why?
    2
  4933.  @Hhhhhh-sz9ud  Regarding, "It’s not just the money," If you are talking about corruption then it really is just about the money. Regarding, "it’s being around people who have a worldview shaped by that money" Even if being surrounded by nothing but swamp creatures might influence someone it isn't accurate to call that influence corruption. Influence by money is corruption.
    2
  4934. Antoine you are a fucking idiot. Regarding, "let's say TRUMP is guilty which he is" Guilty of what exactly? Don't you think that saying someone is guilty of something requires that you elaborate what they are guilty of? Nah. Dipshits just say people are guilty but never both to say what they are guilty of. That makes sense to dipshits. Regarding, "how does obsessing over it" I talk about analyzing the past because it is obviously important to anyone that isn't dumb as fuck. You call it "obsessing" because you know that word has negative connotations attached to it and disingenuously attach it with bothering to elaborate why it is obsessing and analyzing. I'd ask you what the difference is to you if I actually cared what you think. I really don't thou. I just want to try and make it clear to you why what you are saying is stupid. Regarding, "insane policies that are being shoved down our throats" How exactly does talking about this hurt with insane policies being shoved down our throats? Because it doesn't. People who are not dumb like you can walk and chew gum at the same time.
    2
  4935. Imperialism is a good thing?
    2
  4936.  @bradleyrobinson70  "You have missed the point." No you missed the point. I'm not interested in supporting what you think is the lesser evil. The lesser evil is still evil. "If the US didn't have 800 bases the CCP would." What nonsensical BS and terrible rationalization for your countries empire and wrongdoing. You need to beat evil guys to terrible? That's just hypocrisy. "Which world would you rather live in?" I reject your BS question as the nonsense it is. "I never said I trust the US." My mistake. I guess I thought the same guy who said more bases is a good thing would think that allowing military bases would require trust. But you don't require trust when granting your approval for military bases. My mistake. Fair enough. But you are an idiot. "Learn to read." Learn to think.
    2
  4937.  @sprybug  I think I might. Because after trump we have the possibility of someone decent in the WH in 2024. After Biden, whose presidency is certain to be a disaster, we are likely to get trump 2.0 in 2024. Not that it matters. I won't support either because I don't support terrible candidates.
    2
  4938. She *would if she ran against Trump. It's our job to see it isn't her. Accept no imitations. Bernie Sanders 2020
    2
  4939.  @mindfullygreen2870  If you think suicide is the answer you are wrong. You CAN'T be thinking clearly if that's the case. If that's what you are thinking/feeling then you should talk to someone to help you see why that's crazy. That and/or drugs are a thing that might be right for you. Life isn't perfect but it's far better than death. Go smoke some weed maybe. It works for me. But find something to enjoy and enjoy it. It's better than being dead.
    2
  4940. Who cares. They did run on things like 15 dollar minimum wage and M4A.
    2
  4941. People who voted against it will be held accountable for their vote. But that only happens with a vote.
    2
  4942. Forgery? Stop watching so much Alex Jones. That is batshit crazy.
    2
  4943. Anne your tinfoil hat is on too tight.
    2
  4944. Sorry but I feel no need to justify your bullshit with anything serious. Namecalling is not an argument but it is called for here.
    2
  4945. Shouldn't you be digging a bunker in the middle of nowhere and stockpiling guns and bottled water?
    2
  4946. I'm pretty sure I could spend every hour of every day for the rest of my life telling you why your crap is obviously dumb but I'm not willing to invest the time. Obama's birth was announce in a Hawaiian newspaper for fucks sake but you really need me to give you arguments why you saying his BC is not a forgery? Nah... I will be lazy and just call you names because you deserve it for thinking stupid things and worse... spreading your idiotic ideas to others. https://wikileaks.org/wiki/Obama_1961_birth_announcement_from_Honolulu_Advertiser I'm sorry but that is all the work I'm doing to tell you why your idea is moronic. Saying stupid things is much easier than giving good reasons why those stupid ideas are stupid. I guess I am lazy.
    2
  4947. Anne regarding, "In other words you are not interested in finding truth" See. This is what I'm talking about. I could spend the rest of my life on this bullshit and wasn't looking to get started but here I am.... The FACT of the matter is that Obama was born in Hawaii and people who suggest otherwise are fucking idiots. There simply is no good reason for it to have been lied about at the time. The establishment had their front runner at the time. It was Hillary Clinton's turn. They didn't need Obama. They didn't need to conspire to pretend he was born in the US (as if he wasn't). And it completely discredits everything else you say when you say such an idiotic, common sense defying BS conspiracy theory. I could even get on board with bitching about "800 thousand are dead with 5 million displaced because of his illegal regime changes" but I am completely lost because of you saying his BC was forged is so utterly fucking moronic. Regarding, "I do not care where the man was born" If that were actually true you wouldn't also say things like, "the birth certificate given was a forgery" in your original post. Again you are saying something that just doesn't make any fucking logical sense. Regarding, "Weapons of Mass Destruction was also in the Hawaiian newspaper but I am sure they got that right wink?" Do you really not understand why this statement is beyond stupid? You are comparing propaganda to a FUCKING BIRTH ANNOUNCEMENT. Or maybe that newspaper was just conspiring all that time ago to put it in their newspaper because of the long play. Obama was just being scripted all that time ago knowing he was going to be running for president in 2008. You say some things I could agree with but you do yourself, your cause, and honesty a disservice when you say completely batshit crazy things that make no MFing sense and you really hurt the cause of pointing out corruption by giving the other side ability to point at your batshit crap and allowing them to accurately portray them as fucking nuts because when you say things like Obamas BC was forged you are saying something that is fucking nuts.
    2
  4948. hopefully none
    2
  4949. There's plenty of the right pretending to be the left.
    2
  4950.  @dianalazaru  "rightwinger pretending to be a lefty?" Cenk for example. A guy who went to pro war rallies. Who won't let his workers unionize. Who takes corporate money and more. "we have the same thing on the right." No. You don't. Put up or shut up. "both teams are in full on war mode." Nope. The left side is the innately peace loving side. But there are warmongers who pretend to be leftists.
    2
  4951.  @dianalazaru  People can switch teams but that's not what I'm talking about. I'm talking about controlled opposition and politicians lying.
    2
  4952. Every time she pops her head up I'm reminded why I never voted for her. I kinda need that in the era of trump.
    2
  4953.  @apathy113  We don't really tax wealth thou... we tax income. Regarding, "Either way ...tax them! It's totally ridiculous that they are exempt in 2019 in the U.S. It's a goddamn paradox." Yes. We agree on all of this and the rest is really details.
    2
  4954.  @apathy113  Let's hope we get to find out for certain how much money it would generate.
    2
  4955. I am. When someone shows you who they are, believe them. Or at least something like that according to maya angelou (also i think).
    2
  4956.  @JiggityJack  Regarding, "I mean you are really shallow if you use that as a justification either way." Corruption isn't a reason for not voting for someone to you? It should be. Hunter was getting that money for a reason. And it wasn't his "expertise."
    2
  4957.  @JiggityJack  Regarding, "I think you are missing the point" Nah. I think you are missing the point. Corruption isn't acceptable. Regarding, "receiving special treatment because you are related to someone is a common place thing" "Special treatment?!?" LMFAO. Polish that turd. You are pretty tough to take seriously.
    2
  4958.  @JiggityJack  Regarding, "No point in assuming guilty until proven innocent here." Why not? This isn't a conversation about putting someone jail... it's a conversation about if we should give people doing this our vote. They look guilt AF because they are guilty AF. Rich oligarchs don't just set money on fire for no reason. That money was giving for a purpose. I don't need to know exactly what that purpose was to conclude it was nefarious. Again... Hunter biden has no expertise in the field he was paid. Regarding, "If something comes out where Biden was giving Ukraine something in return" Do you always need a smoking gun to come to obvious conclusions? It's like you want to be lied to?
    2
  4959.  @JiggityJack  Regarding, "Joe Biden's son being corrupt doesn't equate Joe Biden to being corrupt" LMFAO. I find it tough to take you seriously. There is exactly one reason to care about giving money to crack smoking hunter biden... it's his relationship to dad. Stop being willfully obtuse.
    2
  4960.  @JEW_UNIT  I too was duped into voting for Obama. The biggest lesson I learned from that is to follow the money more closely and I'm going to be supporting any candidate I think is selling out to fund their campaign the way he did.
    2
  4961. Let's not conflate defensive war and wars of aggression and pretend they are the same thing. They are not. Killing in self defense is not wrong. That is the exception to the rule.
    2
  4962.  @felang9257  Yeah, just bend over and take it thinks FE. Then again that FE might stand for flat earther considering their intellect.
    2
  4963. You are demonstrating a lack of knowledge as to what "sellout" means. Just because someone says something you don't like doesn't make the them a sellout. And to be clear eliminating is an example of reducing.
    2
  4964.  @spwie60  WARREN IS CONTROLLED OPPOSITION TO REAL CHANGE! ACCEPT NO IMITATIONS! BERNIE SANDERS 2020! Note: I hate all caps with a passion but thought I'd make an exception for you. Cheers.
    2
  4965. Regarding, "doesn’t get any more honest than trump" That is either great sarcarm or you are one of the dumbest human beings on the planet.
    2
  4966.  @nathanfielure4305 Regarding, " Yes you want followers to be presidents not leaders with a mind of her own." Um what? I honestly have no fucking idea what idiotic point you are trying to make, why you think you get to tell me what I think, and what I've said that makes you think whatever you are trying to say. How about you address the things I'm saying rather than what you think I think? Well done with this thou. It's very corporate media of you.
    2
  4967.  @nathanfielure4305 Regarding, " Maybe she doesn't have the time to entertain smaller minds." Ok. That is really fucking funny coming from a mental midget. I'm done with this. Take care.
    2
  4968.  @nathanfielure4305  One last thing before I go. Please remember that you don't care about politicians dodging questions the next time a candidate you don't like does it. I know you will because clearly you are a man of conviction, intellectual honesty, and sexual prowess. And this is totally not sarcasm.
    2
  4969. Actually health care is a privilege and not right in the US. That said it absolutely should be a right.
    2
  4970.  @bluesrockfan36  One more thing to add regarding, "All those videos were pushed by Bernie propagandists." You remind me of trump supporters who screech 'fake news' when presented with evidence their conman is lying.
    2
  4971.  @mrankitanks  I do think that his campaign was designed to try and stop sanders from the nomination. His campaign would take support from bernie but it wouldn't take it from biden. And in a world where every point matters yang was taking about 1-3 points in all national polls while the election is being framed. That momentum he stole was important in a world where everyone was conspiring against sanders and the dnc claimed pete buttigieg "won" the iowa caucus. He is a snake just as much as warren is.
    2
  4972.  @bluesrockfan36  Regarding, "every single B.S smear against Yang." Smears are lies. It's not a lie to point out that yang wants to gut about half a trillion dollars per year from poor people to pay for his UBI. "nuance for you, uh?" What you call "nuance" is just you deflecting from the problems I have with yang.
    2
  4973.  @andrewdwyer2456  Jimmy dore doesn't like yang either. He too must be a racist.
    2
  4974.  @bluesrockfan36  Regarding, "You're nothing but a pile of lies and half-truths." You say this because you are a liar. "No. Yang does not cut out half a trillion from "poor people"." He does according to him. Right here on youtube, "Andrew Yang: Paying for a Universal Basic Income" When asked how are you going to pay for UBI the first thing he mentions is, "500 billion dollars per year on income support" that he is gutting to pay for UBI. That's not "savings" that's gutting to pay for UBI. But as always yanggang will lie about it.
    2
  4975.  @bluesrockfan36  Regarding, "First: Jimmy likes Yang." Jimmy's video titled "Andrew Yang Smeared by POLITICO In Transparent Hit Piece." from 9 days ago at right about 4:10 in the video right after jimmy's guest gets done telling you how much they don't like yang jimmy's response, "I'm not on board with yang." "Stop watching and enabling racists." You make me like yanggang even less than I already do. That's not easy.
    2
  4976.  @bluesrockfan36  "The welfare system we have is broken and has failed us." It's one the few things our government actually gets right and yang wants to dismantle it. One of the favorite things people who love say about UBI is 'once you get it people will never even think about getting rid of it.' That's how people feel about food stamps. I mean what kinda person doesn't want poor people to be able to eat? You could never take that away. But yang has figured out a way to gut it all.
    2
  4977. Just like Bernie? He isn't a puppet for the corporations. Trump is garbage. Please stop saying silly things.
    2
  4978. It's far more that those "organizers" hearts weren't really in it and it was more pandering all along.
    2
  4979.  @dassnek4728  LMFAO. Ok bud. You are impossible to take seriously.
    2
  4980.  @zelda1477  Fair enough.
    2
  4981. Nori I don't have the time, ambition, or patience to tell you why literally everything you say is insane but who knows, maybe you are right and everyone that lives in Vermont is racist (that was sarcasm in case you were not smart enough to spot it). I suspect that even if I did it wouldn't do any good on you. But the bottom line is that the facts are not on your side. He is actually more popular with people of color than he is with whites. "Below is a breakdown of Sanders' approval ratings and the demographics, according to the survey: 58 percent of women 55 percent of men 62 percent of people ages 18 to 34 73 percent of African-Americans 68 percent of Hispanics 62 percent of Asian-Americans 52 percent of Whites 80 percent of Democrats" http://www.wesh.com/article/who-is-the-most-popular-politician-in-the-united-states/9531701 But good luck with your continued convoluted, unsubstantiated smears of Sanders, a guy that marched with MLK and has fought for equal rights his entire life.
    2
  4982. I want to quit you real bad but you make it tough. Regarding, "patience for ehite superemicy." You are insane. Let's say that Sanders didn't march with King. Even if that were true, and it isn't, would it make any logical sense for white supremacists to want to make that claim? Don't be afraid to use logic and reason while answering this because that leads you to the obvious answer of of course not. Regarding, "No black vote." So you speak for all blacks then? Even the blacks that were at the event being talked about here who were applauding him? Because that doesn't seem right to me. Well that and literally everything you say.
    2
  4983.  @beastmode6609  "selfish in order to protect ourselves and family" If you want to say that it's selfish to want to protect yourself that makes sense but isn't wanting to protect your family the exact opposite of being selfish?
    2
  4984. You are an idiot incapable of even the simplest of thought. WTF is that supposed to mean you ask? It is obvious to anyone that isn't stupid.
    2
  4985. Bernie would be the first person to tell you not to give money you can't afford. That said you sound cool. Bernie 2020.
    2
  4986. LOL
    2
  4987. Hurry up. The water is warm and trump is terrible.
    2
  4988. @idefix He can credibly argue he is the lesser evil of the two. The harder part for him will be winning the republican primary.
    2
  4989. @idefix Regarding, "I don't care who wins any primary." I tend to agree that about the republican primary. But I don't agree about this in the "democratic" primary. There is a reason the establishment fucked over bernie every chance they had. Regarding, "When you bet on the two teams of the Super Bowl" More than 2 teams can win the super bowl next year. Regarding, "you cannot lose and the establishment controls both teams. " But I agree with sentiment of what you are saying.
    2
  4990. @idefix Regarding, "It is difficult for you to understand my point of view" This sort of condescension is stupid af even if what you are about to say would be correct. Regarding, "you are a Democrat" I'm not a democrat and generally have nothing in my heart but contempt for the party. Regarding, "I am an independent, who has never registered" LMFAO Good for you. Well virtue signaled rather than making substantive points. We would likely agree on quite a bit but I doubt I'd like the smell of your farts the way you do. Let's not hang out.
    2
  4991. Regarding, "voted for military budget increase" Yup. I couldn't believe it. I mean, seeing as how her vote was meaningless to passing the bill, I expected her to pretend to be progressive and vote against it. She didn't even do that. And even thou I wouldn't be supporting that type of bill with any president the fact that it was being done while Trump is president is especially disturbing and unforgivable to me. Regarding, "at least one year." Seems like good advice. I admit to being duped by Obama. The guy gives a good speech. The lesson I think I've learned is the importance of following the money. My trust in a politician is directly correlated to how they raise their money. Regarding, "Sanders was indeed his 500 year perfect record." I'm not going to go so far as to call him perfect. There have been areas where I've disagreed with him. But ultimately he has been preaching the same shit since coming on the scene. Not only that but he has been willing to stand up for what he believes in even when what he believed wasn't popular. For example gay rights. He was fighting for that long before the country was on his side on the issue.
    2
  4992. There are so few decent politicians in the country. Because of this the Obamas and Warrens of the world are able to seem decent only because they get the benefit of being compared to worse politicians. The one good thing Warren has done was the creation of the consumer protection bureau. This on its own is a good thing but keep in mind when this was done. This was done in the wake of banks nearly collapsing the economy. We were at a point and time in history when we needed the banks broken up. We needed glass-steagal brought back. We needed crooks thrown in jail. All of those were achievable at the time. Instead we got that band-aide of banking legislation to appease the masses instead of the real reform we desperately needed at the time.
    2
  4993.  @Nathan-gn3ls  I think it's just a trick Kyle does to try and prevent the video from being demonetized. That said I can't say how effective it is or if it's effective at all. Don't overthink it. It's not really important.
    2
  4994. It depends on the state you live in. If you live in a state with a closed primary you must be registered as a dem to vote in the "democratic" primary. If you live in a state with an open primary then you do not have to be a registered dem to vote in the primary. Please make sure that you do what you need to do to vote for Bernie Sanders in that primary. Peace.
    2
  4995. 12 replies and I can see 9. I can't seem to find a single longer thread I can read in it's entirety.
    2
  4996. Regarding, "JD do not treat campaign finance reform as the #1 issue" Um what? It is literally the first thing they mention on their platform. https://www.justicedemocrats.com/platform
    2
  4997. At least the US still exports something I guess.
    2
  4998.  @krisfenton6113  What? She voted for pelosi and got nothing for it.
    2
  4999.  @kain6996  Regarding, "pelosi was gonna get seated no matter what" Only because "progressives" voted her and got nothing for it. Regarding, "would have looked like a temper tantrum" LMFAO Those are people fighing for m4a. What you are doing is throwing a temper tantrum. Regarding, "cost them political capital" Savy politicians understand that fighting for m4a builds political capital. Hacks like you pretend it's a bad idea.
    2
  5000.  @krisfenton6113  Regarding, "She wasn't going to get anything out of it" LMFAO Being seen fighting for m4a wouldn't be something? Not being a fraud wouldn't be getting something out of it? Regarding, "made M4A a loser issue to the centrist Dems" M4A is a winning issue. AOC knows. That's why she ran on fighting for m4a. Her actions on the other hand are that of an establishment conwoman. Regarding, "further entrenching incrementalism." I find you tough to take seriously. People who want m4a know it's a winning argument and it's a fight we want to have. If a vote on m4a would be a bad thing and "further entrench incrementalism" Nancy would bring it up for a vote herself. Regarding, "Let's get mad at AOC and the squad for not becoming kamikaze pilots and making it even harder to ever get M4A!" This is funny because they didn't leverage the power they had to fight for m4a during a pandemic making it even harder than ever to get m4a. Regarding, "I do like how some progressives are subject to the same sort of magical thinking that drove Trump fans to believe Pence would pull a crazy interpretation of the 12th Amendment out of his rear end and give Trump a second term." What? But since you are mentioning trump fans you remind me of them. They too are sycophant bootlickers who have trouble using logic and reason.
    2
  5001.  @krisfenton6113  One more thing regarding "She wasn't going to get anything out of it" I'm going to let AOC herself tell you why you are wrong. "A few reasons: Sometimes it’s to get members on the record, so ppl can’t make excuses later. Sometimes these votes create real political pressure that forces developments. Sometimes we vote for the historical record - to let future generations know we did everything we could." AOC telling you why force the vote is a worthwhile fight.
    2
  5002.  @krisfenton6113  Regarding, "You said nothing that was either logical or reasonable" How dare you say that about AOC. "A few reasons: Sometimes it’s to get members on the record, so ppl can’t make excuses later. Sometimes these votes create real political pressure that forces developments. Sometimes we vote for the historical record - to let future generations know we did everything we could." It's not my fault she is neither logical nor reasonable. Seriously though... I'm way done caring what you think. Keep licking that boot and making excuses and rationalizations for politicians whose actions don't match their words. I know you will. That's what bootlickers do.
    2
  5003. It wasn't taxpayer money you fucking moron. Are you intentionally lying or just stupid as fuck? Oh and everything else you said is equally stupid. You are a disgrace to the human race.
    2
  5004. Those are people who don't answer or anything else that could be considered an answer of "other."
    2
  5005.  @mikeottersole  Yes. They are.
    2
  5006.  @mikeottersole  So are their puppets. Like you.
    2
  5007.  @mikeottersole  You are complicit with each child whose life israel takes.
    2
  5008.  @mikeottersole  You are complicit in what is happening in gaza. Shame on you.
    2
  5009.  @mikeottersole  "not a religious person" Of course not. This has nothing to do with religion. This is about imperialism.
    2
  5010. I'd stay away from israel. They have been stealing land and committing war crimes since it's inception in 1948.
    2
  5011. He's a senator. And he's a sheep herder.
    2
  5012.  M G  I mean you did give your own idiotic comment a thumbs up so you must really be onto something.
    2
  5013.  M G  Did you know that typing in all caps is a sign of mental illness? And that isn't the only reason you should seek psychiatric help.
    2
  5014. It's not as easy as you'd think to grow the good shit. There is a lot of work involved. I speak from some experience from time living in Colorado. That said it was a great hobby.
    2
  5015. Lucky for you it's really enough to know.
    2
  5016. Maybe we have issue with Warren because she is a liar and not because of what's between her legs. "I’ve pledged not to take money from federal lobbyists or PACs of any kind." This is STILL up on her website. You would think that she would at least have the decency to remove the evidence that she is a liar after her flip flop. But nope. Still there. https://elizabethwarren.com/plans/campaign-finance-reform
    2
  5017.  @demsdebreaks8236  Goes from "I guess they don’t have confidence in their own candidate to stand on his own, so they have to attack." to "Wish Bernie would see that and do the right thing and leave." It's pretty tough to take you seriously, just like Warren.
    2
  5018.  @demsdebreaks8236  Regarding, "awww poor cry baby. Do you need a tissue." Do you at least have the self awareness to realize what a hypocrite you are? Or do you just not care that you are a hypocrite? Also... nothing says intellectual honesty like giving your own comments a thumbs up. /s
    2
  5019.  @demsdebreaks8236  Regarding, "did I upset you" I'm good. It's not like I'm going to go and cry about how mean you were to me like some do. Even if I did the corporate media wouldn't care because they are as honest as you are. Regarding, "Sorry not sorry." I'll take that to mean that you don't care that you are a hypocrite. Thank you for answering my question. Also seek help. I know it might be expensive right now but Sanders is going to fight to make sure you can get all the mental healthcare you desperately need.
    2
  5020. To make profit.
    2
  5021. Warren should be primaried.
    2
  5022.  @AnndenMark  Regarding, "I will predict Biden, then Harris, beats them both in that regard." At least that would mean that the people following them wouldn't be. I don't doubt that biden and harris are fondly remembered by many just because they aren't orange clowns or whatever follows the upcoming disaster that is going to be the biden administration. Regarding, "I will hold to hope I am wrong." Same. The bar is so low yet they never pleasantly surprise me.
    2
  5023.  @missmew3499  "they exploit themselves." With the help from a POS known as "dr" phil. Try not to lie to yourself about it the way you are lying to everyone here. He IS exploiting people no matter how much nonsense you spew.
    2
  5024. Yeah, there is no need for nuance thinks morons. Even the guy who is getting fucked over in the audio, who is exposing their bullshit, like Sanders, are all the same.
    2
  5025. Did elon pay you for this or something?
    2
  5026. Wait... you are blaming us for making this political but not the dodo even thou they are the ones giving us propaganda? Maybe you should STFU?
    2
  5027. It's not. It should be. But it's clearly not.
    2
  5028.  @kylequest  He's not even a progressive, much less a strong one.
    2
  5029.  @cockoffgewgle4993  "no it didn't" Yes. It did. And nothing you say contradicts it. The things you say actually support it... "predominantly affected the poor," Blacks are predominately poor.
    2
  5030. Taskmaster regarding, "There's no right answer." It is like you think this some kinda trick gotcha question. It isn't. Regarding, "There are an infinitesimal number of ways it could go." Yup. And all I was asking for from you was a single example, in all the many ways that might be, of a way things would be better because of what Trump did. Keep in mind that there are lots and lots and lots of ways it go wrong. That deal was the only thing stopping them from working on nukes. Like I said, sanctions are not suppose to be the endgame. They are a tool that we were using to bring them to the table to give up nukes. And it worked. For example if you asked me how Trump negotiating with NK could make things better then it was I, an avid Trump hater, have no problem giving you an answer... Trump negotiating with NK could lead to them giving up their nuclear program (exactly like how Iran had given up theirs) and that would be better then what was. (Note I'm not optimistic about it's possibility but it is, at the very least possible.) That's the goal. That's the endgame. That is what we had with Iran before Trump fucked it up and that was my point that I was hoping you might think long and hard about. Regarding, "If you're so smart, why aren't you president?" This question feels rhetorical but I'll answer it anyway. Being smart does not have nearly as much to do with being president as other things. For example just having the right last name like Bush or Clinton is far more important sadly. Also I would like to add that the idea of running for office (any office) sounds less fun then having all my teeth pulled and I'm kind of an asshole (like I've said). Regarding, "I'll continue to stay open minded about our countries future." Fine. But for the sake of the country be willing to call it out when it is wrong. The country is not innately great. It is only great when it acts great. Regarding, "to respect the office." I would be curious to hear what this means to you. I personally adhere to the phrase "respect is earned, not given," and an inanimate job isn't able to earn my respect so I do not feel the same. But like I said I would be curious to hear what that means to you because I'm honestly unsure what you mean.
    2
  5031.  @magpie3794  And stop acting like the consequences for standing up against the machine aren't DEVESTATING.
    2
  5032.  @magpie3794  "officials need to speak up, or quit when they see something wrong" We don't disagree about this. We disagree about how to go about it. We should be honest about what this means instead of pretending that everything tends to be just fine for the people that do. "What is happening to Snowden and especially Assange is horrific." Yeah. It is. That's the norm for people that speak up. So maybe let's not lie about it and say shit like, "Time to grow a spine." as if their spines aren't likley to be broken otherwise you are no better than the people using ukraine as cannon fodder. You are just asking people to sacrifice themself for YOUR political goals and you aren't being honest about what that means for them.
    2
  5033. The only difference I see is the first person is intellectually dishonest and the second person is intellectually honest. And I prefer intellectually honesty by a mile.
    2
  5034. "If Bernie has been my father or grandfather, I would have been EXTREMELY PROUD of him!!" He would have left you alone with joe biden to get touched.
    2
  5035.  @thermodynamics458  They are calling out a POS like biden and his shills like sam. Admitting your problems is halfway towards defeating them.
    2
  5036.  @thermodynamics458  But I get the gist of what you are trying to imply... you are trying to say that it's ICIP's fault that we can't have nice things and not the fault of a corrupt POS like Biden.
    2
  5037.  @thermodynamics458  "that makes zero contribution." You are projecting. That's what you are doing. But it's actually worse than that. Not only are not contributing anything with your BS but you are bootlicking for corrupt POS like biden. Don't you have something better to do with your time? "What actual work do you do to strengthen the left in America day to day?" I hold politicians accountable for their BS. I don't make excuses for their failures and act like the peasants are the problem. I know it's the fault of the rich and the powerful unlike some.
    2
  5038.  @thermodynamics458  "you do fork all" Do you tell Majority report that? That's literally all they do is talk. "We know Biden sucks." Do you? Isn't he the same POS that sam and his cult told you and everyone to vote for? "Tell us something we don’t know." Don't vote for POS like Biden. Your cult clearly hasn't figured that out yet.
    2
  5039.  @dashx1103  "Nothing wrong with that." Yes. There is something wrong with voting for evil. Stop saying there isn't. "And you can't tell other people how to vote." Have you told sirota that? That's literally everyone's problem with him... every election cycle he goes out and tells everyone to vote for the blue team AFTER telling you how terrible they are.
    2
  5040.  @TheZombie567  Regarding, "I had to edit to make sure everything was covered in the argument for a proper explanation" But you didn't feel like correcting terrible spelling while making changes? You instead decided to make sure your insult of others is bathed in hypocrisy? As you would say, "do your thing."
    2
  5041.  @TheZombie567  Regarding, "if you have an agruement..." I really hope you are just trolling me at this point. LMFAO
    2
  5042. Maybe she heard about ana's history of flashing in the work place and attempted blackmail.
    2
  5043.  @Junebug89  "Jimmy Dore's sexual harassment" Jimmy isn't the one who flashes people at work or blackmails. I'm blaming the right person and I suspect you know it or you would make an argument instead of what you are actually doing. Very classy. /s
    2
  5044.  @russellward4624  "maybe learn the definition" LMFAO You are projecting. "I've been holding back, letting you run your mouth as if your some kinda warrior for what's good in this world. That's about to change." Words a villain in a movie might say to blackmail the movies protagonist and words ana said in real life to try and blackmail jimmy. Facts.
    2
  5045.  @it-s-a-mystery  "explain what blackmail is" Explain it? How about I just read the definition: "the action, treated as a criminal offense, of demanding payment or another benefit from someone in return for not revealing compromising or damaging information about them" Let's break it down: "demanding payment or another benefit from someone in return" She wanted jimmy to "stop running his mouth." "revealing compromising or damaging information about them" And she was threatening to try and metoo him if he didn't stop. You don't even attempt an argument but it can't be anymore clear from someone who isn't being intellectually dishonest.
    2
  5046.  @it-s-a-mystery  "She threatened to release information about his behaviour if he didn't stop what?" Keep going? I already answered this? She threatened to try to metoo him if he didn't stop calling out TYT. I could only take you less seriously if you gave your own comments a thumbs up. Oh wait... you are doing that already.
    2
  5047.  @davidgoldstein1526  "Ana is flat out beautiful." Not on the inside. And that is what's important.
    2
  5048.  @Freakarmy  Meanwhile, in reality, Sanders crushes Trump.
    2
  5049. I was really hoping that if biden was going to win he would lose the EC. That way maybe it could be done away with.
    2
  5050.  @mangersavoir4213  tiny orange hands
    2
  5051.  @Stormy-pe2xc  well.... you voted for adelson
    2
  5052.  @rivercrossing5152  banging then
    2
  5053.  @rivercrossing5152  Not that I care but it wouldn't surprise me. They deserve each other... both frauds. F em.
    2
  5054. Neoliberals are not "leftist." Oh and pretty much everything else you say is also absurd.
    2
  5055. You mean politicians pretending to be progressive supported her.
    2
  5056.  @LiftedBuddha  You should probably just tattoo "racist POS" on your forehead. Everyone's going to figure it out anyway.
    2
  5057.  @LiftedBuddha  Regarding, "i can barely be racist" Don't be silly. You are actually comically over the top racist. It's pretty much your defining feature other than your stupidity and micropenis. Regarding, "im glad i still managed to make you angry" Not really angry, more sad. Sharing the globe with people like you is depressing.
    2
  5058.  @LiftedBuddha  Stop being so jealous. It isn't their fault you have a micropenis. But if you are really depressed do what you need to to end the pain. You wouldn't be missed.
    2
  5059. Pakman is here to manufacture consent for a corrupt party.
    2
  5060. I'd also like to add that I think people are going to try and make a lot about a running mate because he is older. The bottom line thou is that essentially nobody votes based on the bottom of the ticket. Whoever Sanders would pick to be on the bottom of the ticket I suspect will be just fine with me even if they are someone I don't even know about at the moment. That said Warren is not someone that would be just fine by me but, even thou I really can't stand her, it wouldn't be enough for me to not support Bernie.
    2
  5061.  @thedissidentleftist6997  "you blindly supports Fascism" No doubt it's easier for you to invent a strawman to argue against instead of trying to intelligently address the things I'm actually saying.
    2
  5062. Regarding, "poor little just fella blew a fuse." I guess what you are referring to is my lack of tolerance for a person like you who makes the world stupider with everything you say. Regarding, "What do you not understand about Constitutional Republic?" What do you understand about that having nothing to do with your original post. You only try to bring it up now to cover up the fact that your original statement was stupid beyond words. Regarding, "The fact that you want to focus on one program designed to care for the elderly instead of the system as a whole says a lot about your so called argument." That fact that you want to just dismiss this one program because it proves that what you said is stupid as fuck really says something not only about your argument but about you as a person. But if you want another way Americans not only accept but love socialism I will cite K-12 education which is another example of socialism that Americans are happy exists. But don't worry I'm sure you will have other pathetic excuses for why it doesn't prove that your original statement is fucking stupid. Regarding, "Now please come back with more insults in an unhinged manner again." You would rather focus on how I say what I do because it is easier than addressing the fact that I am able to show your comment was dumb as fuck. But if my anger at your stupidity brings you joy then good for you.
    2
  5063. That is pretty fucking funny coming from a mental midget.
    2
  5064.  @trusarmor4957  The point isn't that it would "good."
    2
  5065. You are an idiot if you think Sanders is a shill. He didn't vote for it for fucks sake. Not voting is effectively a no vote.
    2
  5066. Sir regarding, "we can certainly have a discussion without calling each other names" Sure we can but I'm going to call people names when I think it is justified. And I think it is a bit hypocritical of you to get pissy at me for calling you a name after you were doing the exact same thing to Bernie. Regarding, "I am disappointed in him" You want to be disappointed in him? You want to disagree with him on something? Fine. That is reasonable. What is unreasonable is extrapolating that because he did something different than you would have liked then he must be a shill. Regarding, "BDS movement" I can't speak intelligently about this. I confess that my priorities are domestic. I had to look up what BDS even meant. I personally want the US to mind their own fucking business, get out of the business of other countries and focus on their own citizens but ultimately foreign issues are not nearly as important to me as domestic. Regarding, "I continued to support him even after he accused Russia of sabotaging the elections" Do you really not think they messed with our elections? I assume they did and don't really even need any evidence of it. That said I also assume the US is fucking with everyone elses elections around the world and don't exactly need proof of this to think so either. Regarding, "a potential war if this continues to escalate" If we go to war with Russia it sure as fuck won't be Sanders fault and I expect him to be voting against it before it would happen. If he doesn't then you would really have something to complain about and I promise I'll be right beside you screaming for Bernie's head but in the meantime it seems silly to be blaming him for a war with Russia that hasn't happened. Regarding, "My support came to an end after reading the DNC's atrocious defense in the fraud case." So you stopped supporting Bernie because the DNC was proven to be corrupt as fuck even thou you never would have know if it were not for Bernie. Instead of being grateful to Bernie for increasing your understanding of the world you decided he need be shunned at this moment. I disagree. Regarding, "but not the DNC" You want to disagree with Bernie on this? Fine. That is reasonable. I don't even Bernie for having to decide how to proceed when it comes to shit like this. I would like to remind you that the establishment is and will continue to do every fucking thing imaginable to smear him. Hillary Clinton and the corporate media are accusing him of costing the queen the election in spite of this. Imagine how much easier it would be for them to make their bullshit arguments if he actually gave them a good way to attack him for being a whiner and sore loser. Americans fucking hate that. Even Hillary Clinton supporters are having an impossible time defending their fallen queen as she whines about her loss. Of course Sanders has actual grievances unlike her but he chose to not give them ammo to use against him. Sanders is all about policy and getting the policies he wants passed. He decided the best way to get his goals achieved is by ignoring this one battle and instead choosing to fight the other ones. You want to disagree with him? Fine. That is legit. But that doesn't make him a shill. Again, he is the only reason you are even woke on this. Regarding, "letting the DNC get off scot free" Do you really think Sanders getting involved would have changed the outcome of the court case? It wouldn't have. The only thing that he could have changed is that maybe a few more people would have been woke to how corrupt the DNC is. But in all honesty if you don't realize it by now that likely would not have made any difference. You would have been happier. But Sanders doesn't care about making you happy that way. He cares about making you happy by getting the policy he wants passed. And the best way to do that is by not rocking the boat this one time. A good general picks their battles. Because he didn't fight this one he is better positioned to win the rest of them. He is the most popular politician in the country at the moment in part because of how he handled this. That is important because we need him to be so that he can win and get the change we rightfully deserve.
    2
  5067. Dumpster fire > DNC
    2
  5068.  johndifool  I know right. We need to elect Joe Biden. He has worked in civil rights. He was arrested with Mandela. He's such a good candidate the NAACP always endorses him. He has never tried to cut social security and I know this is true because Biden has told me so and he always tells the truth. No alternative facts to be found here. You are very smart. And good looking. And sexually fulfilling to your partners. And this isn't sarcasm.
    2
  5069.  @theflyingwelshman5338  I think it was sarcasm.
    2
  5070. If you are getting smeared then you are doing a good job.
    2
  5071. Go subscribe to Bernie's youtube channel if you haven't already and vote for him the "democratic" primary. Thanks for that in advance.
    2
  5072.  @lewis9159  regarding, "She endorsed Clinton because the alternative was Trump" Which has absolutely nothing to do with her not endorsing Sanders over Clinton. Nobody gives a shit that she endorsed Clinton after the primary. They give a shit that she doesn't lead with any convictions... as, literally, always. At best she is a follower. At worst she is a sellout. Either way she can go fuck herself as I support someone far superior for the job.
    2
  5073. Regarding, "She wants it and knows that you need private insurance for certain procedures." If that's what she wants us to know she would be wrong. We don't need private health insurance companies for dick.
    2
  5074.  @Blodhelm  Regarding, "Whoa there buddy, turn down the paranoia dial a little." Because there aren't paid shills? Oh wait. There are and if you want to deny it it's you who has trouble with reality. Regarding, "Any system like Medicare for All will still have holes or procedures that aren't covered." Only if holes are left and there is no reason to leave them. Regarding, "Allowing for the existence of private insurance can fill the gap." Why again are there gaps being left? Why exactly is the private health insurance industry a better answer than just giving great comprehensive universal health care? Better idea, we close the gaps. Private insurance has no place in good system. They are completely unnecessary to a robust single payer system. Regarding, "Even single-payer systems still don't "abolish" private insurance entirely." The idea is to cover all areas that insurance would be used. You make it illegal to double up on coverage. And just like that they have no room to breathe and no reason to exist. The goal isn't to "abolish" them with brute force, but to destroy all the places they would exist. We give good universal care and there is no reason for them. And if you want a boob job or a dick implant you can pay for it out of pocket or finance it. Those are already the types of things that private health insurance doesn't cover. Regarding, "Having <1% of the population choosing additional and regulated private insurance vs forcing everyone to use it, is still a huge shift." Or better yet we just do it right the first time. Why are you determined to have a slice of cake when it would be better to just have the whole pie? Regarding, "Private insurance doesn't even need to be eliminated by law" Yup. That's the idea. To not technically eliminate it but to create a system that covers everything private health insurance would cover, to outlaw duplication of coverage, and just like that they have no reason to be and the world is a far better place. Regarding, "Not using the language of "abolishing" insurance however, can be useful for deflecting the panic of the uninformed who fear major changes but would be more amenable to the concept of a mixed system." Stupid people are going to be stupid regardless. I know what I want, a world where private health insurance companies are gone. Anyone not committed to that goal isn't fighting for what's right and what I want. I don't have time for word games. I want leadership and a clear representation of my values. Private health insurance companies have no place in out society. I'm not interested in half measures. That's what the ACA was and it was a failure and blowjob to the powers that be. It's time for the real hope and change that I was promised long ago but never received. Let's just do it right the first time shall we? Because the whole world is rightfully laughing at us while we let our people die unnecessarily.
    2
  5075.  @ECisvotersuppression  Regarding, "how? I just told you the truth." Why were telling me "med4all will NOT cover penis implants dude." Was there something that led you and your tiny intellect to believe I thought they did? Because I was actually saying the exact opposite you fucking moron.
    2
  5076. So don't vote. That is woke. Got it. What other brilliant solutions do you offer exactly?
    2
  5077. Regarding, "Why is it you are just repeating what I said." Thanks for proving my point for me. Forgive me for not continuing to engage you.
    2
  5078. Cash regarding, "Yeah I’ll vote for Sanders. Not Harris." I love Sanders. I think he is easily the best hope this country has to get the progressive change it deserves. And fuck Harris. No way I vote for her in the general and it sounds like she is going to be the establishment's choice this time around. That said it is still some time off and only time will tell.
    2
  5079. Riptide regarding, "Operation Chaos?" I think that would be more accurate if I were telling people to vote in the Republican party. I'm talking to progressives. The "democratic" party is suppose to be our party. Sadly it isn't and they only represent big money and corporate interests. I'm just trying to fight for what I think should be ours. And if I don't get what I want during the primary then fuck em.
    2
  5080. ND P regarding, "Medicare For All is an unrealistic litmus test" Yeah. Fuck that. Medicare for all is absolutely a litmus test I use. I will not support a candidate that isn't for it.
    2
  5081. Dennis regarding, "No, thank you." What do you stand to lose other than nothing? But you gain the opportunity to try and shape their nominee for the better.
    2
  5082. Truth Robot regarding, "Vote against your own interests by supporting the corrupt, bribed Democrats" Voting in the primary does not support the democrats. You are thinking of voting for them in the general. And it absolutely is in my best interest to get the dems to nominate their most progressive candidate.
    2
  5083. Aaron regarding, "You have a prime example of the second conservative party flipping progressives the finger and you want people to further support that party?" You do realize how they are giving you the finger right? They are ostracizing progressives that are in the party. In other words there are still good people there fighting for you and what you believe in, that is why the corporate dems need to give you the finger... because the fight for the soul of the party isn't over yet. And voting in the primary is not supporting the party. That is not voting for a democrat for office. It is merely doing what little you can to try and shape the party. Screaming and bitching at them just doesn't have the same affect as voting does.
    2
  5084. Truth regarding, "in many states Independents (the largest voting bloc in America) can not even vote in the democrat Primary." Yup. It is fucked up. It is wrong. It is undemocratic. Regarding, "Democrats are doing nothing to fix it, proving they are corrupt and only protect the rich." Yup. And do you know why they do it? Because THEY DON'T WANT YOU TO VOTE. What more reason do you need to go out and vote in the primaries? Register as dem just long enough to vote in the primaries and then demexit as soon as you have. It is really fucked up that you need to do that to vote in their primary but in all honesty the country is fucked up and this is one way you can fight to make it better.
    2
  5085. Alan regarding, "JOIN THE DNC AND BECOME THEIR MOUTHPIECE" First off it is impossible to take anyone seriously who only writes in all caps. Second he didn't exactly join the DNC. He is currently an independent and that is why the DNC is currently trying to force him to join them. I'm sure you are talking about him endorsing Hillary and that pissed you off. Fine. I get. I was pissed about that as well when he did. I wanted him to got the convention and give them all the finger. But he didn't and I understand why. He decided to endorse the "democratic" candidate like he was required to do when he entered the race. He didn't want to be blamed for Trump winning. Can you blame him? He is just as corrupt as Hillary but he, unlike her, he is fucking offensive. And remember what it was and what it wasn't. It was a fucking endorsement, not his soul. Only sheep vote based on someone else's endorsement. I fucking love Bernie Sanders but I happily voted for Jill Stein because it is my vote and I'm not a fucking sheep.
    2
  5086. hoodie regarding, "DESERT THE DEMS." So throw up the white flag and give up any opportunity I have to make them the party they should be? No. I have a better plan. Regarding, "CHANGE YOUR REGISTRATION NOW" I'm not a democrat. I am lucky to live in an open primary state. If I were not I would register as a dem just long enough to vote in their primaries.
    2
  5087. hoodie regarding, ""Justice Dems" are Democrats. Don't be fooled by a name." If you want a good indication how corrupt a politician is and how much they can be trusted you need to follow the money. Justice dems are not traditional dems because they don't accept legalized bribes. That is a big fucking difference you would be wise to not ignore.
    2
  5088. Jake regarding, "Third parties are no longer viable in America." That is not exactly my position. I love third parties. I want them to grow and get better. I need them to push the major parties. But winning is important and the major parties offer the best chances to win and when they have a decent candidate I will vote for them. I will also try to shape the major parties in the primary. That is my main point.
    2
  5089. Omar regarding, "she did not remain silent on DAPL." She was waaaaaaaaaaayyyy too late to the party. I want a leader, not a follower who is only being dragged.
    2
  5090. Jimmy regarding, "The DNC does not allow Independents to vote in their closed primaries" Yup. Their message is clear. They don't want you to vote in their primaries. Which seems like a good reason to vote in their primaries.
    2
  5091. Phillip regarding, "Even Bernie I don't trust anymore." That guy who has done more to expose the corruption in government? That guy who has fought his whole life for progressive values? That guy who turned his back on big money to run a campaign of the people? We are going to have to agree to disagree. Regarding, "Stop trying to revive a dead party" Clearly you are misunderstand what I'm trying to do.
    2
  5092. Nope. Sorry not sorry if the truth hurts.
    2
  5093. I'm going to wear a banana hammock to work and nothing else. When they ask what I was thinking I'll refer them to the brilliance of kyle "20 million dollars didn't change TYT" kullinski.
    2
  5094.  @realdealholyfield3699  My point is that I want to live in a world where celeste can be comfortable to make their comment and I object to the people who would be outraged about it. They aren't everywhere but they do exist and they bug the hell out of me.
    2
  5095. I feel like I'm slowly watching David get more and more pissed about what is going on while covering it.
    2
  5096.  @umiluv  Term limits solves nothing without getting money out of politcs. And yeah... getting money out of politics isn't going to be easy. But it is actually the problem with out politicians. They are bought. That's the problem.
    2
  5097. @Who_dey Gotwins I'm not a biden supporter and this isn't about biden but don't let that stop you from deflecting from your clown to talk about them. It's exactly what biden and trump supporters do when the topic is one of their clowns.
    2
  5098.  @chelsearunyan  Regarding, "And not to a liar" Some of Biden's many lies include things like: lying about working in civil rights, lying about being arrested with mandela, lying about his record, and more.
    2
  5099.  @maiwelsh8025  "would never have surrendered." Not according to the US generals who knew the war was already over. It was about showing off their new weapon to russia and if some people needed to be baked so be it.
    2
  5100. They are frauds. I'm done like them.
    2
  5101.  @g.marion5888  Great comment. Too bad it's being shadow banned.
    2
  5102.  @misterf7299  "take a lot of votes away from Biden, which in turn would almost certainly give the republican candidate the presidency in 2024" Biden is no better than a republican. It sucks, that's the way it is. But you keep finding ways to vote for it. I know you will with bernie's help.
    2
  5103.  @RickyParker666  No I can see the one without an argument.
    2
  5104. @J R "Kyle" Kyle probably cares because he's lost thousands of subscribers. His credibility is going the way of TYT and it didn't have to be this way but it is what it is. "wayward trumpers" LMFAO I've been a fan of kyle and krystal for longer than I've been a fan of jimmy. If I put with their BS that would make me the cultist, you know like you are doing.
    2
  5105. @UCnarqlkOrG575ED2_Es6ZUg "Didn't ask you bro." Is that what you want to hide behind? Makes sense. It's not like you were ever sincere in your curiosity.
    2
  5106. @J R I get it. You were pretending to be interested in the topic to try and make a terrible point and want to ignore what I said because it shows why what you were saying was dense.
    2
  5107. @J R " I asked Ricky a question" Do you want to know the answer to it or not? You've made it clear you don't. Intellectual dishonesty 101 It's not like you asked ricky what his favorite color is and that only ricky could know of what you speak. It's exactly what I said.... you are just disingenuously pretending to be interested in a topic to make a terrible point... a point of 'why should anyone ever care about jimmy.' I told you why and you won't even acknowledge it. It is what it is not that you will admit it.
    2
  5108.  @RickyParker666  "what fucking evidence are you asking me for?" Specific evidence. "Just look at the doores Twitter for 5 seconds," What am I suppose to be looking for and why isn't it true? "vaush" Like I said I don't know anything about him. Let's say jimmy is saying something about him I don't have a frame of reference if it's true or not. Point me at EXACTLY WTF you are talking about. "statements amongst a debate over abstract stuff being clipped down to make it look like vaush believes something he doesn't? Smears my dude, smears" LMFAO You aren't providing evidence. It makes me think the person smearing is you.
    2
  5109.  @RickyParker666  "like what they have in Australia? Yeah that's definitely still M4A" LMFAO If that is all you have don't even bother. Your original claim was that he was throwing m4a in the trash and abandoning it. Let's say this is what he said... so fucking what. I'm not exactly familiar with what australias system is. I'm betting that it's some sort of valiant on a universal system because that's what everyone around the world other than the US seems to have. Even if they didn't it could be explained that he was misunderstanding the system in australia. No where does he say anything akin to "f m4a" like your previous BS would have everyone believe.
    2
  5110. Trump supporter "logic" better than Hillary. Used to rationalize literally everything. Hillary support "logic" better than Trump. Used to rationalize literally everything. I wish you fucking morons would realize how similar you all are. Regarding, "he said he stood for something" So you are placated by meaningless pandering. No wonder they don't need to actually do anything to earn your vote. Regarding, "stop being a sore loser." How about you stop being a loser first? You may have not thought you were voting for this but obviously you were.
    2
  5111. I mean... how dare he be blackmailed. This is clearly all his fault. /s
    2
  5112. LMFAO. How much does the billionaire pay you to shill?
    2
  5113.  @tonyplow9882  "Not sure if he would say the same thing at this point, but he was forcefully incorrect when he said that." I'd think that if he really had a change of heart on the topic he would make sure everyone knows it. You would know it if he did.
    2
  5114.  @tonyclifton2230  "voting lesser of two evils" This is how you manufacture consent for voting for evil. I can only think the guy who wrote the book on the topic knows exactly what he is doing.
    2
  5115.  @tonyclifton2230  "Democrats while pretty bad..." Tony thinks they suck but he's going to manufacture consent for them in the same breathe. Maybe read that book you mentioned.
    2
  5116.  @InfoForYou8  "I’m just referring to your ad hominem ‘arguments’" You mean in your comment where you said, "Learn some logic," which is ad hominem?
    2
  5117.  @tonyclifton2230  "are miles better" Are they really? Or is it merely their job to give you enough crumbs to keep you placated?
    2
  5118.  @tonyclifton2230  "you don't seem to have an understanding of the book" If "understanding the book" leads me to vote blue no matter who and think that people who don't get the jab should starve I'm just going to have to learn to be ok with your interpretation. "I know it might have kept the rain off your head but you would have been wiser to read the book." That's not very nice of you to say. Where is E to talk about how ad hominem is bad?
    2
  5119.  @InfoForYou8  "You can actually just email him" So could you then right? The people who want to think and claim that his position has changed? Why is this suppose to be on me? Especially when if his position has changed it wouldn't matter very much at all to me? It wouldn't take away the authoritarianism he previously displayed.
    2
  5120.  @tonyclifton2230  "I am not saying biden is great" What's your favorite part of the "climate" bill? Mine is the part where they literally MANDATE drilling.
    2
  5121.  @nicka731  "isn’t the flex you think it is" Neither are the non binding words and virtue signaling that is the paris climate accord.
    2
  5122.  @tonyclifton2230  "Do you think trump would be doing a better job on the environment?" I think they are equally terrible enough that it's irrelevant between the two on the topic. "They were the two options?" You have infinite opinions when deciding who to vote for. I personally would prefer the option of using the ballot as TP as opposed to using it to vote for trump or biden.
    2
  5123.  @tonyclifton2230  "Do you truly believe that?" Do you truly believe that biden is better? Even after your talking points on the topic were easily dismissed?
    2
  5124.  @dashx1103  "if they become destitute" You are already talking about people who are destitute... and want to make it harder on them.
    2
  5125.  @tonyclifton2230  "chance of winning." As if you can "win" with biden or trump. That's how you "win." LOL
    2
  5126.  @tonyclifton2230  "it wasn't all bad" More people los t their liv es of c o v i d duri ng bid en.
    2
  5127. It's not sexual harassment to tell someone their bits are out so they can put them back where they belong. But exposing yourself in public is sexual harassment. Obviously.
    2
  5128. It's cold in Canada.
    2
  5129. You are an idiot using the word fact wrong.
    2
  5130.  @stefan4159  "no nuance whatsoever. So I'm just balancing it out a tiny bit." So copy and pasting your stupid BS is your idea of "nuance." That is remarkably dumb.
    2
  5131. soccer regarding, "No see I would actually listen" Really? Alan Greenspan says that it is fucking moronic but you would listen to me, a random guy in the comments section. No... your idiotic mind is already made up. All the facts are out there for you to know that what you are saying is stupid beyond belief... still you say them... while laughable calling Kyle a jackass. Regarding, "I'm not the one hurling insults here (other than at Kyle)." So you are admitting to being a hypocrite then. Well we agree on that.
    2
  5132.  @joshuasalem5022  Do you ever ask yourself how we got Trump? It didn't just happen by magic. Joe Biden and the corporate dems are how we got there. We need to break the cycle that got us here in the first place. Have some fucking standards and quit if with the blind party allegiance. Donald Trump WAS a self described democrat not long ago (during GWBs presidency). Think about that before you conclude that any blue will do. The dems are counting on you to shit yourself over trump so that you ignore the fact that most of their candidates are also shit. Better than Trump shouldn't impress you. Require more or they have no reason to give you more.
    2
  5133. "I'm doing you a favor here" Think what you want but you are actually an idiot. For example "Most people never experienced it, though," has to be one of the dumbest things I've ever heard and I've talked to flat earthers. Most people have never been sober? Really? Because I've yet to meet a single person who was born high and has stayed high their entire life. This statement could only be dumber if you, for some unknown reason, used "))" as punctuation at the end. Oh wait, never mind, it's as dumb as it gets.
    2
  5134. I'm surprised to learn that people still watch TYT.
    2
  5135. Yup. The election cycle has already begun. They have already started any and all smears to try and weaken Sanders. As for the establishment they will coalesce around one candidate. We will know who they picked when the superdelegates come out to tell the peasants who to vote for.
    2
  5136. You are the moron that inspired Idiocracy.
    2
  5137. Regarding, "try and put the right people in the right places" This is how you describe his goldman sachs cabinet? Regarding, "not his family members" His family members are too busy getting paid in Ukraine for their "expertise."
    2
  5138. Forgive me but I just don't care enough about you and your opinion to read that much less respond intelligently to it. Think whatever you want for all I care at this point. Take care.
    2
  5139.  @teresasimkins5518  It's too bad you don't have the internet to do your own research. /s
    2
  5140. If you think that you are stupid beyond words. Good luck with that.
    2
  5141. 53 replies and I can see 34. Things china would do.
    2
  5142.  @theamericanjoeshow  Take care bud. Have a great night.
    2
  5143.  @theamericanjoeshow  One last thing thou regarding, "I feel honored." This feels weird to me as this is not the norm. Most people "feel honored" by me the way Robert Baratheon "honored" Cersei by smacking her around. (Game of Thrones reference if you didn't watch). But thank you. You are being far too kind.
    2
  5144. what about attempted killed?
    2
  5145. Only ironically.
    2
  5146. Randy regarding, "she actually did end up endorsing Hillary in the end" She did this during the general after Hillary won the nomination. I believe pumpkin was taking about the primary when saying she didn't endorse anyone. And as much as I think endosements are not as big a deal as some people like to make of them, a Warren endorsement of Sanders, like a true progressive should be expected to do, would likely have changed things in Mass (Warren's state) where Clinton won by a cunt hair and other close races.
    2
  5147.  @donHooligan  The establishment is corrupt but they aren't stupid.
    2
  5148. Yeah, smart people ignore a lifetime of fighting for progressive causes because they didn't want Trump to win and be blamed for him winning. That would make sense to me if I were a fucking moron.
    2
  5149. Pretty surprising since yang is a corporate tool.
    2
  5150. etikk, kennet beat me to it. I don't care about age and neither should you as long as the person is capable of doing the job and so far there is zero reason to think Sanders can't do it. I think that you saying he is too old is just a way of trying to smear a person that you are looking for any and every way to smear.
    2
  5151. etikk regarding, "You want me to give evidence for thinking 80 years is a little over due for a potus?" The bottom line is that your argument boils down to the number and only the number. You are not offering any arguments as to why he can't do the job other than his age. What is the magic age to you? When is that magic line that I should stop caring about whether or not I think they can do the job and only start caring about how old they are? Don't answer this. I don't actually care. I care about whether or not I think they can do the job and there is no reason to think Sanders can't do the job. Regarding, "about the corrupted unDemocratic party f ex?" The party is fucking dumpster fire without the benefit of keeping you warm and is going to continue to be so until a progressive wins the nomination and reforms the party from the inside out. Regarding, "You think Bernie can save them?" It isn't about saving them. It is about taking them over hostile takeover style and making them what they should be and should have been for some time but haven't been. Regarding, "Do you think "we" can change the system through elections?" I want to hope so and I'm going to continue to try to do so until I'm certain we can't. You aren't suggesting we should just quit trying are you? Regarding, "Do you think the oligarchs wont cheet the next time?" Yes they are going to cheat and rig and do everything they can to hold onto their power but there is good reason to think they are going to lose in 2020. Regarding, "USA (and the world for that matter) is beyond saving within the frames of elections and politics in it's current form." So what are you proposing?
    2
  5152. @Anurag Chakraborty "you should be pointing your ICBMs at." We should be working toward nuclear disarmament. But don't let that stop you from fear mongering.
    2
  5153. @Anurag Chakraborty "You people disgust me." The feeling is mutual. Enjoy your nuclear weapons psycho. God forbid we ever had to fight a war and only had to use "conventional" WMD and not nukes while spending as much as the next 11 countries combined on "defense." That and I don't say we should be unilaterally disarming. I do say we should be working to WORLDWIDE nuclear disarmament.
    2
  5154.  @chickenbeek  Regarding, "if we were lucky he might actually do what he said on the campaign ( about wars specifically)" Hillary fucking sucks but even a piece of shit like her wasn't campaigning on committing war crimes like Trump did. "We have to take out their families." That is the type of shit trump said specifically about wars on the campaign trail.
    2
  5155.  @chickenbeek  And I agree with most everything else you said. But that particular comment really pisses me off. You say it like he was campaigning on pacifism or some shit. He campaigned on committing fucking war crimes.
    2
  5156. Pumpkins regarding, "They care about third parties and sticking it to the dem party above all." I disagree with them about the strategy going forward but I get it. The "democratic" party is a dumpster fire. Voter roles being purged. Progressives being purged. A rigged primary. Hope and change was same ole same old. People are rightfully furious with the party. People are rightfully distrustful of anyone with the label. Lots of these people were lifelong democrats who have been utterly betrayed by the people they thought were there to represent them and are ready to go anywhere else to get actual representation. But you are right that people still need to be logical about how to proceed. I am convinced that hostile takeover of the party is the best plan to get what we want but we need to be building alternatives as well at the same time. We need to be doing both and not committing to just one strategy.
    2
  5157. Do I really need to feel compassion for the trumps and epsteins of this world? If so I guess I'm fucked.
    2
  5158.  @ilexevergreen5405  Forgive me for not addressing everything you wrote. Regarding, "unproductive." There is a purpose. We are a social species. One way we make clear what behavior is and isn't acceptable in our society is by using shame. It's one way we can try to prevent people from being evil in the first place... by showing there are consequences for their immoral behavior.
    2
  5159. Even cancer doesn't like being compared to him.
    2
  5160. This. I noticed this at first as well.
    2
  5161.  @electric7487  It's a great song either way.
    2
  5162.  @timetaker7816  "I should probably not vote," Everyone should vote. But everyone should have standards for getting their vote that is much higher than either biden or an orange clown.
    2
  5163.  @matthewschwartz6607  He voted for war with Iraq. Stop being a bootlicker making excuses for POS.
    2
  5164. Because they only agree on 2 things (war and drugs) and are diametrically opposed on everything else.
    2
  5165. Watches TYT propaganda paid for by millions of katzenburg (clinton) dollars but thinks jimmy's bad. What makes me sad... comments like yours.
    2
  5166. It's both.
    2
  5167. You suck at life.
    2
  5168.  @plotlinevideo3719  "MSM smear merchants (that you sound like, BTW" I'm not the one who has worked for those "smear merchants." Andrew yang has. When he worked for CNN.
    2
  5169. America is going to elect a complete POS regardless if it's Biden or Trump. The world will learn little that they didn't already know.
    2
  5170. And about the 2k he promised. And about the bombs in syria. Pretty much everything biden is doing needs to be called out.
    2
  5171. I can't fap to this! yes this is a joke
    2
  5172. She saved NY from giving billions to jeff bezos despite being a lone decent soul in a sea of swamp creatures. We need more "wimps" like her.
    2
  5173. If you support an apartheid state in the 21st century you are lost.
    2
  5174. 1.9 trillion is enough to give everyone almost 7K. But dems can't even give the 2K they promised.
    2
  5175.  @jalenking810  "I know you guys want dems to suffer for not going bigger but they won’t." 1.9 trillion is plenty big. It's enough to give everyone a check of about 7K. Dems can't even give the 2k you promised. Why are you defending and bootlicking for corrupt POS who are lying to you and everyone about getting out checks of 2K when there is clearly more than enough to do it? And then some.
    2
  5176. Is this the type of idiotic nonsense pete supporters claim?
    2
  5177.  @holdenbrooksweaver  Regarding, "Sorry if you don’t like common sense." LFMAO. If this is how you want to respond to my points so be it. Sorry you are an idiot and I'm sorry I ever bothered to respond to your comment intelligently.
    2
  5178.  @holdenbrooksweaver  Regarding, "Hey genius," I'm not going to lie being insulted by you is more of a compliment really because I think so little of you. So thanks. Regarding, "does this video objectify women?" Sure. So what. Did you know... women are objects, just like men are objects? Did you know, women like sex, and that's ok? That if someone wants to be treated as an object of sexual desire they can? And there is nothing wrong with it? Regarding, "Get your head out of the ground." My head isn't in the ground. It's just that you seem to say exclusively stupid shit while actually being the type of twat that inspired dunning and kruger to form their original hypothesis.
    2
  5179.  @holdenbrooksweaver  Women get to choose how they are treated. You can support them in that or you can be you, an idiot.
    2
  5180.  @holdenbrooksweaver  Earlier in this thread I said, "I have trouble letting stupid shit go unanswered." but I didn't know I was talking specifically about you at the time.
    2
  5181.  @holdenbrooksweaver  Regarding, "just like your thinking." LMFAO. Thanks. If you think my thinking is backwards I'm doing it right. Good luck being the dipshit you are. I'm sorry I can't fix your stupidity for you.
    2
  5182. Youtube says there are 14 replies but I can only see a handful. Land of the free am I right?
    2
  5183.  @biograftirl  Thanks for admitting that this is political.
    2
  5184. You have a point due to the brain rot I got from your comment.
    2
  5185. "*Unpaywalled from 10.11.24*" -the title
    2
  5186. It doesn't matter how good he is for sam. Sam will vote for anyone regardless of who his blue team rolls out.
    2
  5187.  @LARPANON  If youtube didn't fudge the numbers you'd probably have twice that already.
    2
  5188. It's hard not to believe DWS because of her history of honesty and integrity. /s
    2
  5189. Too late. Let him go down with them.
    2
  5190.  @TheSpartan3669  Regarding, "Then why would anyone ever create something worth more than a billion?" LMFAO. Is this what would keep you up at night? Is this how you think business people think about business? Don't get me wrong... they think about making money and ways to do it... but the Jeff Bezos of the world aren't going to be like... I'm not going to try to make Amazon because I can only make a billion per year and/or I'm going to try to stop making money at a certain point. That's simply not how it works. If Jeff Bezos could only make a billion dollars a year he isn't going to only open Amazon for the first week of the year and then shut it down for the rest of the year because he is getting taxed and isn't making extra billions the rest of the year. Regarding, "If my company became worth 999 million what would incentivize me to work towards making it worth 2 billion?" First off you terms are wrong. People aren't taxed based on what their company is "worth." They are taxed on INCOME. On profit. Or at least for the most part. Their should be a wealth tax on assets but that is not what we are talking about here. You want a reason to keep doing good business and to keep making money? You still have it. You can still make a billion fucking dollars in a year. If that doesn't motivate you to keep making profit then you are mentally ill.
    2
  5191.  @TheSpartan3669  You want to know something that might actually happen if Jeff Bezos isn't able to hoard all the profit amazon is producing? Employees at amazon might be able to start keeping more of the profit from their labor. He might actually think that is a better option than paying the tax. Either way... fuck him and stop worrying about their ilk.
    2
  5192.  @TheSpartan3669  Regarding, "Why wouldn't they stop or at least reduce operations after making a billion for the year?" Common fucking sense. Seriously. I already covered this. If you are Jeff Bezos are you seriously going to close amazon for all but 2 days a year because you already made a billion dollars in two days? Is that good business? Are you sure you are going to make a billion next year operating that way? Regarding, "or at least reduce operations after making a billion for the year" Amazon is ALREADY a corporation that is looking to reduce their operation cost in EVERY conceivable way. They don't pay their employees out of the goodness of their heart... they pay them cause they need them. Regarding, "If your boss told you that he wont pay past 30hr a week wouldn't that discourage you from anything other than the minimum after you hit 30 hours?" If I had a boss that was only going to pay me for 30 hours I'm only going to work for 30 hours. Yes. But I'm a peeon. To conflate that with the Jeff Bezos type and how they operate is absurd and pure nonsense. If this type of comparison were apt, it's clear not, that would be akin to closing amazon for the rest of the year after I've made my billion. This is so apples to oranges it's nonsense.
    2
  5193.  @TheSpartan3669  Regarding, "They would just do as little as possible" They already do as little as possible. They don't have people wandering around aimlessly just because. Why the fuck am I addressing you? Regarding, "the two are comparable" LFMAO. Um.. no. Regarding, "here's something simpler:" Wow. Just. Wow. Regarding, "You own a deliver company which obviously costs money to operate." Yup. Companies cost money to operate. I can't wait to see how this goes off the rails. Regarding, "If I cap your profits at 100k you're not gonna continue operating at a loss until the next period." You jam packed so much stupid in this I don't even know where to begin. I'm going to try to keep this simple. If your company produces enough profit to get you capped out you are not operating at a loss. Your company is making money. You just don't get to keep that profit. You can close down till next year if you want. But you would only want to do that if you are really, really, really, stupid. Then again you might because you are you.
    2
  5194.  Tom Price  Regarding, "No." This is coming from the same guy who wants to belittle what they do and act like they don't earn their wage. Your ability to suck at life is almost impressive.
    2
  5195. As always everything you say is absurd.
    2
  5196. You might want to consider that I know what is going on and that is why I call you out for being an idiot and saying things that make everyone who read them dumber. Then again you might not be an idiot... you very well might just be another useless piece of shit sellout. Not that it really matters. Either way good luck being the disgrace to the human race that you are.
    2
  5197.  @TheMisfitPond  All substance? Hardly. The questions were terrible and the candidates aren't allowed to say anything that is too long for a bumper sticker.
    2
  5198.  @TheMisfitPond  Regarding, "I don’t like the fact that they frame the questions horribly" Good. You shouldn't. But don't underestimate how important and how bad this is. The corporate media is doing everything they can to use right wing talking points to frame every issue. They also do shit like trying to pit people against one another rather than trying to educate viewers on their positions. Regarding, "give so much time to a bunch of candidates nobody cares about." I'm actually of the principled belief that all candidates should be given similar amounts of time assuming they have earned their right to be at the debate. I'm also for having lots of voices being given the right to talk, especially when we are still this far out. I'm actually pissed that Mike Gravel was not allowed to debate and I'm pissed that 3rd party candidates are not allowed to debate during the general. Or political system is better and better served by allowing more inclusion. Regarding, "But considering the circumstances, Bernie did an excellent job at being substantive and quippy with his answers." Considering the fact that the format is god awful Bernie did fucking great and I'm very, very, very happy about it. It would just be nice if he didn't have to take loaded questions and if he were allowed to speak for longer on incredibly important topics.... and for others as well. Just because he did great doesn't mean the format is better than it is. Regarding, "politics also requires you to fire back in gimmicky ways if you want to reach more people." But it shouldn't be specifically designed to make this more important than the substance. How many times do the moderators cut people off when they have things they want to say? Let them speak for fucks sake. But take that time in account. If someone wants to run over the time let them but then skip the next question that might have gone to them and even out the time in that way.
    2
  5199. Yang is controlled opposition.
    2
  5200.  @twoshedsjohnson8540  Also thanks for admitting that raising the minimum wage doesn't cause business to cut hours not that you will stop from lying about it going forward.
    2
  5201.  @realtalk6195  There is at least one republican willing to vote for neera to negate manchin. I suspect bernie wasn't even alone. Or maybe it wasn't bernie for all I can say for certain. But if they don't bring neera up for a vote it will be because they don't have the votes. Which makes the original bar silly. Bernie never has the deciding vote. And if he does they don't vote so he can't get the credit.
    2
  5202. ​ @jordanromesburg6819  I think that maybe he should get credit when he isn't bending the knee, because you know he isn't bending the knee in this story right? He is doing what you want and everyone here seems to think that's a good time to spit on him. Maybe that's why you have trouble making friends. Maybe this isn't a good way to gain support for the things you care about? Don't get me wrong let's say he voted for neera and that's what we are talking about then by all means feast and attack him. But that isn't what we are talking about here.
    2
  5203. days regarding, "don't be so sure." Why not? Because a book of bullshit written in a time when people thought the sun revolved around the earth and that you got sick because of demons says so? I'll take my chances. There are lots of better reasons to do the right thing and be a good person then selfishly trying to get rewarded in an eternal afterlife that there is no good reason to think exists. And if there is a god and they care more about whether I chose to blindly follow and worship them instead of how I lived my life then so be it... they would never have been a moral god and god worth worshiping in the first place... like the god of the bible who committed genocide and cared more about telling people to not eat shellfish then they cared about telling people to not do slavery. The god of the bible was cool with slavery, just as long as it was done right.
    2
  5204. Infinite, you really think politics and religion aren't related? I assure you they are. Do you think it is mere coincidence that among all the countries the United States is at war with none are Christian nations? Because it isn't.
    2
  5205. Regarding, "I'm talking about the original comment." The one mentioning a bullshit religious myth right? About a guy who thumps a bible and talks about his favorite passage of 2 Corinthians right? On an open forum right? Where people other than just myself have also talked about religion right?
    2
  5206. Regarding, "What part of Laura's comment is Bible thumping?" You are strawmanning my argument. That said the part about hell is clearly bible related. Regarding, "You sir need to sit down and chill." Aren't you the same person who has a problem with me talking about religion? I'm sure you think that is waaaay different thou am I right?
    2
  5207. Biden is terrible. Sorry not sorry if the truth hurts.
    2
  5208. They should have put in a "brought to you by moderna" to throw people off at the start.
    2
  5209. Money in politics prevents either problem from being addressed. Get rid of that and all other problems become solvable.
    2
  5210.  @robertanderson6929  "I cannot help but notice..." I cannot help but notice that you talk like a bot.
    2
  5211.  @robertanderson6929  "Rhetoric and Logic education" This is funny because you are capitalizing words you shouldn't for no reason while trying to criticize others for their education. Thanks for the laugh.
    2
  5212.  @robertanderson6929  "The lack of Rhetoric and Logic education today is shockingly apparent." This is not an argument. It is in fact ad hominem. If you were trying to prove you are a hypocrite... you have! Well done! Bravo!
    2
  5213.  @robertanderson6929  "I use capitalization" You use it the way a malfunctioning bot would. "Are you seriously criticizing grammar?" No. I'm criticizing your hypocrisy. You are strawmanning my argument. Which actually proves my point. Thanks for that... not that it was necessary.
    2
  5214.  @pkway9394  Frauds are ok? What are you talking about? Are you ok?
    2
  5215.  @cory9309  You are pathetic to not care about blackmail and smears TBH
    2
  5216.  @krink084  "Dore seems to give Trump the free ride" I typed a very long original message to this yesterday but youtube's been censcoring me. Only now does it seem to be showing and it could cut out at any time including this message which I'm again using lots of time to type to only maybe have it disappeared. Anyways... Jimmy's talk about this frequently. He'd say things like... 1) the country is always going to have a right but it needs a left and doesn't have one... that's why he focuses on the "left" 2) of course trump is terrible. if you want to know why you can go everywhere else for that. 3) he's not president right now and hasn't been for a while
    2
  5217.  @snapgrouch702  Regarding, "Do you want a screenshot of the comment section?" Mostly I just want you to STFU and stop making everyone dumber.
    2
  5218. Do you really believe the bullshit you say? Regarding, "to prevent a Democratic Trump" You know who is a "Democratic Trump" to the DNC? Bernie Sanders. Regarding, "superdelegates have never prevented the person with the most delegates" Which strengthens the case for why they can be gotten rid of. And that isn't their purpose. Their purpose is the frame the narrative of the election. They are there so that when Sanders is up delegates early in the primary the corporate media can put all the delegate numbers up to make it appear as if Hillary is fucking crushing him. They are there so that the party can suppress people's votes in the largest state in the union by having their party insiders tell the media the election is over on a day nobody votes so people don't go out and vote. Who cares what Californians think... the party insiders have made their decision. Fuck you. You are clown. You know that what you are saying is fucking bullshit don't you?
    2
  5219. Carth regarding, "fairly progressive compared to her colleagues." The problem is that you are comparing her to her shit colleagues instead of having and independent idea of what a good politician is. She voted in favor of the 700 billion dollar a year department of offense budget. That's a deal-breaker for me among a few others.
    2
  5220. Are you fucking kidding? This is not a difficult concept. We took money that was theirs. It isn't rocket science dipshit.
    2
  5221.  @warsamemohamed7244  Regarding, "Both parties in the United States are bought and paid for there is very little difference between Republicans and corporate Democrats." I advocate for Bernie Sanders and justice dems because they aren't selling their soul to pay for their elections. There is a world of difference between them and the corporate dems.
    2
  5222. Covid has my write in vote if it can do this for me.
    2
  5223.  @Coheenez  Regarding, "it wasn't M4A in the dismantle the entire system immediately sense." It wasn't m4a in any sense. He was just lying. As are you. "But the objective is the same, to cover everyone." Is this how you rationalize him lying to people and running ads saying he supported a plan that he did not? "He endorsed Biden after it was proven Bernie had no shot. What's the problem?" It was just another lie from yang who after dropping out said he would only support someone if they supported UBI. Fun fact tulsi was running a campaign AND was supporting UBI at the time. Yang did nothing until he supported biden despite biden never doing what yang asked. This is just another example of yang lying and you pretending it's fine.
    2
  5224. Eco regarding, "You all have been duped." That is pretty funny coming from a Trump supporter. Thanks for the laugh.
    2
  5225. Say yes to justice democrats, say no to corporate democrats.
    2
  5226. If anyone should know what a coup looks like it should be the country that does them all over the globe. Jan 6 was no coup. And anyone claiming it is is not a seriously person.
    2
  5227. I've said it before and I'll say it again, sam "I don't care" seder is the Mancow of YouTube "political punditry," in that he has a massive audience yet he is TERRIBLE at it. The fact that he has gotten so big despite having no insights or intelligence for politics is an indictment of YouTube as a platform. That said I will never be sympathetic to the idea of banning. I'm not sam seder afterall.
    2
  5228. It's like some people don't think there is a bottom of the barrel. And that is where neera is.
    2
  5229. Too late. He's lost.
    2
  5230. This message has been brought to you and paid for by the for profit private health insurance industry.
    2
  5231.  @yugiohpokemon5285  You are what I'd imagine internet cancer would look like.
    2
  5232.  @yugiohpokemon5285  Does it bother me that you are working to make the world a worse place? Yes. Well done on being a disgrace to humanity.
    2
  5233. Corruption obviously. When organized crime is organized enough it isn't even illegal.
    2
  5234.  @cassiescornerreviews6884  "NIH DOCUMENTS PROVIDE NEW EVIDENCE U.S. FUNDED GAIN-OF-FUNCTION RESEARCH IN WUHAN" -the intercept
    2
  5235.  @cassiescornerreviews6884  But don't worry cause the same article assures you while they did fund the lab it wasn't the cause of the pandemic.
    2
  5236. Regarding, "My comment had nothing to do with the video." I guess that is why it was so stupid then.
    2
  5237. "who's clearly not a POS" Fun fact: yang clearly is a POS no matter what yanggang thinks.
    2
  5238.  @andrewsmicroscope  Regarding, "WHY?" He lied about m4a. His UBI is regressive as hell. And I suspect his presidential campaign was designed to help biden and hurt sanders. Even if that wasn't the campaign's goal that was what it did as it split the progressive vote. "he is a lot more decent than 90+% of politicians." He's not. But the fact that he has you fooled and duped the way 90 percent of politicians don't makes him more dangerous than most politicians.
    2
  5239.  @calvinsomers1197  "very intelligent comment" Thanks.
    2
  5240.  @andrewsmicroscope  Regarding, "I don't understand how UBI is regressive" A progressive UBI is paid for by rich people. Yang on the other hand wants to gut the social safety net to pay for his UBI. "Andrew Yang: Paying for a Universal Basic Income" When asked how are you going to pay for UBI yangs first thought, "500 billion dollars per year on income support" at about 1:25. "it doesn't make sense that his campaign was designed to hurt Sanders." Well that's what it did. Yang wouldn't take biden voters but he would take a handful of sanders voters in a world where momentum important So important the DNC claims pete buttigieg won the iowa caucus at the same time yang would be pulling a point or 2 in all national polls from sanders. "MSM HATED him" They hate trump too. So what? "did not promote him as an alternative to Sanders whatsoever." But those are the types of people that he would most appeal to. Them promoting him would have served to take votes from their viewers... biden voters. That's not where his support came from nor is that where I'm claiming it came from. "I can't think of another politician who is more rational or less dishonest than Yang." He hasn't even held a political office in his entire life and I can still accurately call him a liar because of the BS he pulled while just running for potus. "I'm not saying he's perfect, but he's a saint compared to any of the politicians I regularly hear about in the MSM. Who do YOU think is better?" Literally all of them. Because while all of them are terrible only yang has you fooled. That makes him more evil and more terrible. Would you prefer to be stabbed in the face or stabbed in the back? Because yang is a snake stabbing me in the back. Biden is terrible but it's not like he pretends to be on my side and it's not like he has you fooled. But here we are.
    2
  5241. If you actually think that then what does that say about your being here?
    2
  5242. Never Biden. Bernie Sanders 2020!
    2
  5243. His performance was great but don't let his rhetoric fool you.
    2
  5244.  @nickolassmith473  Regarding, "so what if I refuse to vote for Bernie if he wins the nomination. What if Biden supporters refuse to vote for him?" That would make them morons... but not because they would be refusing to support the blue team but because they would be refusing to support Bernie Sanders. How do you not understand that? Don't answer that. It's rhetorical. I know it's because you are an idiot.
    2
  5245. Fish regarding, "compelling argument" You think Jo needed to write out a well written report to tell you why literally everything you said was retarded? How cute but no. Just saying that what you wrote was complete and total bullshit unworthy of an intelligent response was more than your original post filled with drivel deserved.
    2
  5246. I only called her a fraud after she voted for pelosi and got nothing for it. Stop bootlicking.
    2
  5247. Sam's job is to sheepherd you into a corrupt democratic party. He's leading you to slaughter.
    2
  5248. @Russo2 He's from south africa. Stop being racist.
    2
  5249.  @whatmeworry8472  I think it's pretty safe to say that progressivism stands for peace (she loves war), getting money out of politics (she loves dirty money until she calculates it's not a good decision politically), and universal health care (she's a waffle). And those are all incredibly important issues on top of the priority list. That's why she isn't a progressive to me. You can disagree with that if you want but for me to make that conclusion based on those facts makes perfect sense whether they fit your definition or not.
    2
  5250.  @TheRatsintheWalls  What Nomeca said.
    2
  5251. John regarding, "many cannot afford it that work." Again you are not comparing it to what was before. Less people could afford health insurance before it was implemented. Millions more people have health insurance after it. Regarding, "It's a bad law" Yes. It is. We agree on this. But it IS better than what was before it. Regarding, "we shouldn't defend it" I'm not defending it. I'm telling you it sucks. But you shouldn't be defending making things worse which is what you seem to be doing. Regarding, "I don't believe that Obamacare is what we should be fighting for" I'm not fighting for it.... just pointing out that Trump is making things worse. That said there is a part of me that is glad he is doing this and making things worse because there is part of me that thinks him do so accelerates us getting single payer. That said Republicans control all of government and single payer isn't happening anytime and in the meantime I'd prefer if we didn't make things worse... again, like Trump is doing.
    2
  5252. John regarding, "hasn't presented a plan." Not an overarching plan like the ACA but a plan as in what he is doing to gut the ACA. That is his plan. Regarding, "The Republican party presented multiple plans all of which even they could not agree on or get passed." Yup. And Trump is taking it upon himself to gut the ACA with executive power effectively doing what the party was unwilling or too incompetent to do on their own. Regarding, "Why do you think the insurance companies are still contributing to Democrats in congress and Republicans? It is so they won't change anything." You are demonstrating why they ARE CHANGING THINGS... for the worse.
    2
  5253. The "democratic" party is a corrupt dumpster fire. She represents them perfectly.
    2
  5254. As long as israel is an apartheid people will oppose them.
    2
  5255.  @synchronium24  I swear some of these "people" are just shills trying to give people a reason to not fight against terrible things like neera.
    2
  5256.  @peterbondy  He's a partisan hack and let me prove it with a thought experiment... Hypothetically let's say Donald trump wins the "democratic" nomination. What does sam do? Spoiler alert: he would tell you to vote for the orange clown because that's what a partisan hack would do.
    2
  5257.  @bearislandthuglife3463  "never talked about Israel Palestine"... "Fuck AOC" I can remember them talking about how AOC voted to fund the iron dome. But I guess that doesn't count to you because it's about your cult. That's not how it works for intellectually honest people. When you aren't a hack like sam you are willing to call out all sides.
    2
  5258.  @bearislandthuglife3463  "The Channel your mentioned never talked about Israel Palestine" Meanwhile, in reality, they literally did a stream 6 hours ago titled, "International Leftist Coalition - Israel is an Apartheid State." Your BS is as transparent as sam's. You two deserve each other.
    2
  5259.  @peterbondy  So what do you think of bearisland here? He leads off with "never talked about Israel Palestine" which is an easily provable lie. And continues with "it looks like another Make Money by Saying Fuck AOC type channels, even Jimmy Dore Milked the Fuck AOC Cow got rich, and moved on to Anti Vaxx Grifting where the real "Capital Gains" for Grifters is today." Is this type of BS common for sedar's audience? You sure he isn't the one grifting? And pointing the finger at pundits when you should be pointing it at politicians with real power instead? FYI dems have literally all the power right now if you are looking for someone to blame for how things are. Joe rogan isn't the one fucking you over no matter how much sam wants to spend his time talking about him instead of... I don't know... how california dems with a supermajority aren't even voting on m4a.
    2
  5260. They are a way of preventing a contested convention (note-this is not the reason the DNC wants to keep them). To win the nomination you need a majority of delegates (the most is not good enough). Superdelegates are a way of making sure the candidate who has the most support (delegates) has a majority of delegates. I would be fine keeping them as long as they are required to vote for whoever has the most delegates. That way they are supporting the will of the people rather than fucking with it (like they do now). Don't expect the DNC to do anything like this because the only good reason for keeping them is not why they want to keep them.
    2
  5261. Regarding, "Why does pur government have so many areas in it where you have to win by a certain amount of a majority instead of just whoever got the most votes?" I can't give you a great answer to that. There are lots and lots of questionable rules in our government and this is just an example of one of them. Just getting rid of superdelegates altogether and making it so that the candidate with the most delegates wins (as opposed to needing a majority) would actually be the best solution to the problem for those of us that want free and fair elections. Sadly the party isn't willing to do that because maintaining their power is more important to them.
    2
  5262. This channel leads to mental health issues. It should come with a warning label.
    2
  5263. The only reason he wouldn't run is if he has health issues before then. Otherwise he isn't going to pass on the opportunity to help people the way he could as pres.
    2
  5264. @Soup on a stick Thanks for proving my point dipshit. Please forget to breathe.
    2
  5265. @Soup on a stick yawn. Why are you still breathing? Just stop. Thanks.
    2
  5266. This is manufacturing dissent. There are both and they come from the same playbook. Manufacturing consent is used to prop up terrible candidates. Manufacturing dissent is used to smear good candidates.
    2
  5267. PJ It would but less so than it would be overpriced as reading material.
    2
  5268.  @penpenultra  And you will always be prey for the "democratic" party. Who happily propped up trump in 2016 with the pied piper strategy. To prey upon people like you.
    2
  5269.  @penpenultra  And if I were going to vote for who I think is the lesser evil I'd vote for trump. Not because of the next 4 years which is going to suck regardless of who is president (and those 4 years would be better with biden as president) but because of 2024 and beyond. But I don't vote for evil. No one should.
    2
  5270.  @penpenultra  Regarding, "If you understand that another Trump term would be worse than a Biden one" What? I actually think that trump winning this election would be better for the US and world long term compared to biden winning. Not that it matters. Not that this is important to me. Regarding, "what are you advocating for?" Really? I'm an advocate for having standards for getting your vote. I'm an advocate for not supporting evil. That means that neither trump nor biden should be eligible to considered by anyone to get their vote, because they are terrible. You know the signs that carnies would have that would read, "you need to be at least so tall to ride." Well I'm advocate for everyone have their own signs that read, "you need to be at least a certain amount of decent to get my vote." And that amount of decent isn't reached by either trump or biden. Not even close. And if you don't have a sign like that and you are supporting POS... then you are part of the problem.
    2
  5271.  @penpenultra  Regarding, "Are you an accelerationist?" No. I'm not. If I wanted to burn everything to ground I'd vote for biden. If I were willing to support the lesser evil I'd vote for Trump. But I say vote for neither. Because neither is good. And you should only vote for good. And don't conflate good with perfect. I don't require perfection. I'm going to vote for someone I know isn't perfect. But I do consider them good and I don't consider them evil.
    2
  5272.  @penpenultra  Regarding, "You can't believe I'm being honest about even my voting." Don't blame me for having my doubts. Blame corrupt dems like hillary who use superpac money "correcting the record" otherwise known as professionally lying to cause me to have reasonable suspicion. Regarding, "Why would I feel the need to lie to some stranger in a YT comment section about that?" Pac money is spent in such a way to try and control the narrative. They can't just rely on corporate media propaganda forever. Things change. Regarding, "What a bizarre conversation we're having." Yeah. At least you haven't managed to strawman in this response yet. That's probably the first time. Regarding, "It's beyond you that someone could follow logic differing from your own." It's more that I don't find you very intellectually honest. It isn't a big leap to think you are also just dishonest dishonest. Regarding, "I haven't been propagandized to like you continue to suggest." That's why you can't comprehend that are other options than a giant douche and turd sandwich? So much so you just strawman the things I say, instead of addressing the things I do say? Regarding, "I haven't been propagandized to like you continue to suggest." LMFAO You are the same guy saying, "I didn't forget (that biden is a fascist). You assume I don't know that Biden is a piece of shit. Of course he is. (But that doesn't mean I won't support him. Of course I'd support a POS. Because I'm a moron.) I'm seeing this all through a utilitarian point of view as best I can. (willfully ignoring how this "point of view" has already gotten us to the place we are. And offers no solution as to how to get out of it. It's just "not trump." But I'd still support trump if he were the dem and It thought the republican was worse because "utilitarianism.") America has been knee-deep in fascism for a long time, but I'd rather not see it worsen. (That's why I'm voting for fascist light.!)" Regarding, "As of now it isn't pragmatic to vote third party, and it isn't a luxury the people can afford unfortunately." I'm way done giving a shit how you rationalize supporting a POS. But maybe don't try and make everyone as dumb as you?
    2
  5273.  @pragmaticpolitics1413  Regarding, "Show your dissent by voting for the most progressive candidate that has a chance of winning in every election." LMFAO. Yeah. Show your dissent by voting blue no matter who. But my arguments are stupid? Regarding, "No vote when you live in a democracy is a vote against democracy." What? Then again never mind. Whatever point you are trying to make I'm confident it's nonsense.
    2
  5274.  @scrumblybumbles6513  Regarding, "I don't understand why you think that Biden winning would lead to a terrible election in 2024 more than Trump winning." I don't know how to break it down any more simply than I already have. My logic isn't nearly as hard to follow as you make it seem. Regarding, "Only after Obama did Bernie became a legit contender for the Democratic presidential candidate" If it wasn't bernie it was going to be someone else. There is always going to be someone around to champion popular opinions such as getting money on out politics, M4A, giving peace and chance.... Biden doesn't even lie about being for anything decent policy wise. Sure, he will lie about working in civil rights, about being arrested with mandela, about his record and trying to cut SS and medicare over and over but he won't even pander to the left about issues we care about. Obama ran on HOPE AND CHANGE for fucks sake. He ran pretending to be bernie. But he was a sellout and clown. His signature achievement was republican health care. He gave us double the war and record deportations. So people rightfully turned their backs on a party that betrayed them. Over a 1000 seats were lost nationally. But they blame russia for their failures. Regarding, "3rd Party voters have 0 political power." You guys love to tell me what I'm doing is meaningless and it's my fault trump won. I wish you guys would pick a lane and stick to it. Not that it matters. I don't care about "political power." I care about supporting good. And I refuse to support evil. You should do the same. But you rationalize and excuse. But it's just BS.
    2
  5275.  @penpenultra  Regarding, "Strawmanning? Cry me a river. That was the most dishonest statement this whole conversation." LMFAO It's not my fault " In what way do you think your advocacy for abstaining from the current system would help?" is a textbook example of strawmanning and it's not your only one. But if I was being dishonest by being honest in your world. So be it. Because nothing you say makes any sense. Regarding, "You still can't grasp that a perspective differs from your own" LMFAO I've been well aware that, for example, the perspective of a lesser evils mentality has existed and will continue to exist. This is a perspective that exists and it's different than my own. You can't grasp that literally everything you say is wrong for one reason or another. Regarding, "my claim that voting third party will not help during this election." Why should I even care about your claim? I'm an advocate for not supporting evil. I'm about having standards and principles that biden doesn't come even close to reaching. Have you even attempted to claim he isn't terrible? Nope. On the other hand you concede he is terrible and you support him anyway. I really shouldn't need to tell you in perfect detail all the ways supporting evil is dumb. It's evil for fucks sake. I shouldn't have to explain supporting good anymore than I should need to explain not supporting evil. These are pretty basic concepts you are failing at. Regarding, " It has just the juiciest nuance only a brainlet could think of, but at least you made it that far." Funny from you. Have you thought about how far you will take your lesser evils mentality? Is there a boot you wouldn't lick as long as you think the other boot is worse? Or is support the lesser evil (nevermind that I'm supporting evil) as far as you have made it in your thought process? Would you support hitler if you thought their opponent was satan? Because utilitarianism?
    2
  5276. The algorithm: hold my beer.
    2
  5277. He's not fighting for you. He's selling you out. And he has his "good friends" back.
    2
  5278.  @sociallyineptspider-man2366  W's presidency includes 9-11, lies for war, torture, katrina, economic meltdown and more. Trump is fucking terrible but don't have TDS about this.
    2
  5279.  @sonjaleesloth  Regarding, "I still say Chump's the worst." Based on what? I gave you a pretty good list of things W did that was terrible even if it is hardly even close to being comprehensive. Regarding, "If he was a thinking man we'd be nuked already." Huh? Regarding, "thanks to George W." Yeah. Which kinda proves my point as to why W is still worse. He helped lay the groundwork for trump. Ultimately there isn't a single example of anything Trump has done that doesn't have some kind of similar example as W and his team did. But trump didn't lie us into a war did he? A war that we are still in this day? Trump hasn't expanded war at all despite some his best efforts to spark war. So really... how do you try to intelligently justify saying they are the same or that trump is worse?
    2
  5280.  D Dcass  Regarding, "Green vote is a trump vote." That's not how voting works.
    2
  5281. If you think warmongers bought with katzenburg money is the left I have a bridge to sell you.
    2
  5282. I suspect that it was her decision and no one is telling her what to wear.
    2
  5283.  @applefarm6126  Seek help. But not from "dr" phil.
    2
  5284.  @applefarm6126  Thanks.
    2
  5285.  @kirabarsmith9353  Great comment. That's why it's being censored. Land of the free, but only sarcastically.
    2
  5286.  Ahmad Hijaz  "nah" Back when I supported sanders I thought the world of the people who stood by him. This is what's left of his supporters and their "arguments."
    2
  5287. The establishment's idea of choice is letting the peasants pick between Republicans of today and 90s Republicans.
    2
  5288. Nope. Fun fact: writing in all caps is a sign of mental illness as is everything else you are doing.
    2
  5289.  @carlosatreides5653  I have a brain that enables me to be conscience. You should get one if you can.
    2
  5290.  @ssllsg9439  "have they directly said that assange needed to be imprisoned for releasing the documents." Is this the goalpost I've put down or are you just moving it for me? YES or NO?
    2
  5291.  @ssllsg9439  "this is my first comment" Yeah.... which you directed at me and I am wondering why. You say this like I or anyone should think it's a reasonable question. It's not. Or let me try to put it to you another way.... I reject your premise. "i have never moved the goal post" At best it can be said that you are putting it into a nonsensical place. "resounding NO!" You were addressing me... as if that's where I think the goalpost should be. I don't. Not even close. And it's nonsense to think it should be there. What would a reasonable goatpost be? Has TYT smeared assange and misinformed it's viewers with BS surrounding him? And the answer to this is a resounding yes. "Proof Manafort conspired with wikileaks" is but one example of TYT bullshit. TYT pushes all the CIA talking points as they happen and never question the BS they spew.
    2
  5292. @UCS0DXTORUV-vD2LMbdsPFwA "you lied" All you need to do is ignore the context that I've made perfectly clear. Intellectual honesty clearly isn't your thing. "youre realllly bad at making an argument aintcha?" I find this funny because it's not an argument at all. It's just ad hominem. ",let me simplify it so that even you can understand it." The problem isn't my understanding, it's that your argument is terrible. "using the metric of the number of videos that they released that criticize assange" I'm definately not and only a fool would think this is how things work. I've even explained it to you with the point you ignored and called bad. I'll try to keep it simple. I'm saying TYT smeared assange. They did. I gave you evidence for it. Even if they spent all their other waking hours of their life praising assange that wouldn't make that video with those smears go away anymore than the time OJ didn't kill people go into if he was a murderer or not. " i claim that theres at least SEVEN(7) other videos of TYT praising and defending assange." This is like claiming there were 7 days that OJ didn't murder people. I don't care. It doesn't have anything to do with what I'm talking about. It's deflection. "they criticize assange ONE time" LFMAO. You are using the word criticize wrong. The correct word is smear. And there are absolutely other examples but I feel no need to bother with them to prove my point. You are really tough to take seriously.
    2
  5293.  @ssllsg9439  For a good time watch the youtube video titled, 'Cenk Uygur's Lies & Smears OBLITERATED by Aaron Maté On Rising!'
    2
  5294.  @jeremypeterson705  They pretty much have to be after this.
    2
  5295. Pete is pure trash being brought to you by people who want to anything and everything to maintain the status quo.
    2
  5296.  @paulxbsog1972  Regarding, "i said they didnt cover it correctly and they didnt" Jimmy covered this exact story. Why am I even addressing you at this point. Regarding, "this entire "fraudsquad" take came from angered tulsi supporters." I was a bernie supporter and think fraud squad is spot on. Regarding, "they know theyre wrong." Please just STFU.
    2
  5297.  @paulxbsog1972  Regarding, "actual election fraud is called gerrymandering." Thanks captain obvious. Holy shit are you stupid.
    2
  5298.  @paulxbsog1972  "the truth sent you into insults." It's pretty impossible to tell the difference between you and flat earther right now. They like to say the same shit when I call them morons.
    2
  5299.  @paulxbsog1972  "yeah you are "stupid"" Talking to you at all is pretty dumb of me. Fair point.
    2
  5300. What a nice compliment of kyle.
    2
  5301. Jimmy's debating isn't his strength. It's his ability to methodically dismantle BS in youtube format, not debate format.
    2
  5302.  @waynemitchell8254  Regarding, "sorry, should clarify." Better yet you should stop letting corporate media do your "thinking" for you.
    2
  5303. Sam seder is controlled opposition meant to sheep herd you into a corrupt "democratic" party.
    2
  5304. Just imagine for a second a Sanders supporter made this type of comment about Hillary and company. The queen and her sheep would cry sexism.
    2
  5305. I don't get it. But I like that they make him happy.
    2
  5306. Yeah that makes no sense.
    2
  5307. Why? Imperialism.
    2
  5308. I can't tell you how much respect for him I lost when he shined fauci's shoes.
    2
  5309. Giant Meteor 2020!
    2
  5310.  @LBizKid04  regarding, "he brings up the crap about Jesus's story being copied from earlier religions" Only because it is. Or do you really want to claim that, for example, Jesus was the first time a virgin birth claim was made by a cult. Regarding, "is doesn't apply today" Um what? Are you really a bible thumper saying a part of the bible doesn't apply to today? That seems rather convenient although I concede I can't follow your logic or reasoning in the least. Regarding, "It's funny how Kyle says he wants to go through the Bible with a fine tooth comb" Is it funny? Because if anything this is disappointing. And do you really want him to do that? Do you really want him to address what the bible says about slavery? Or about how the god of the bible is a genocidal monster in the noah story?
    2
  5311. Firefighters, first responders, doctors, nurses, teachers, ect are pretty cool too. But yeah.. max is a hero. No doubt.
    2
  5312. You lost me at "I usually like Musk."
    2
  5313. So would you be here saying the same stupid shit if he gave Hillary a 99.99 percent chance of winning? Nate was not wrong!!! you would say. He gave a CHANCE of 99.99% Dear god people. Or maybe, just maybe would you realize then how silly you sound. He was wrong. You know what her chances ended up being? 0 percent.
    2
  5314. You don't see politics in this political stunt?
    2
  5315. He's been exposed. It's only downhill from here.
    2
  5316. Yang is the guy who lied about supporting m4a while running for potus. He's a fraud and con.
    2
  5317.  @schloops8473  Holy shit your comments are fucking terrible. Please forgive me for not addressing all the ways the things you say are stupid beyond words.... or don't. I honestly don't take you and the things you say seriously enough to address them intelligently at this point. I hope you are being paid for this shit and aren't actually as dense as you seem. Either way you suck. Good luck with that.
    2
  5318.  @schloops8473  bye bye. I "can't defend" my candidate the same way I "can't defend" the earth being round but it's unsurprising that's the conclusion you would draw because that's the same conclusion flat earthers draw when I stop wasting my time addressing them intelligently and your comments are of their intellect. You should be ashamed. Not only for the stupid things you say but for how you say them like when you intentionally misquoted me otherwise known as lying while you ironically called someone else corrupt. There's still hope for you (well, maybe not) if you would just pull your head from your ass and if Sanders can win despite your efforts to do the establishment's dirty work of smearing him for them. They thank you for being the useful idiot that you are and that is me giving you the benefit of the doubt. More likely you already know their thanks with the paycheck they give you.
    2
  5319.  @modemmark421  "BERNIE SANDERS STANDS FOR US!!" LMFAO "Vote for my good friend Joe biden." -bernie sanders actually
    2
  5320.  @AyKlay  "He was forced." No. He wasn't. It was a choice. Stop making excuses and rationalizations like this. It's transparently terrible.
    2
  5321. GRRM is just like Trump? Holy shit is that dumb... even by internet comment section standards.
    2
  5322. He will never get there. It's all downhill for the fraud.
    2
  5323. Yes they will throw everything at him including the kitchen sink but they don't have enough dirty tricks to stop him in 2020.
    2
  5324. strongheart regarding, "What is your source to make such a claim?" Sanders was down 60 points when he entered the race in 2016 and still only "lost" by a hair. In 2020 he will enter the race with the name recognition of a rockstar and as rightfully the most popular politician in the country. There are not enough dirty tricks in their playbook to stop him as clearly the game has changed.
    2
  5325. I don't think any demographics would benefit more than black americans when it comes to his proposals. Universal health care, paid college, criminal justice reform, legalizing weed, capping interest rates and so much more are all issues that disproportionately affect black americans.
    2
  5326.  @nimkal  Regarding, "The attention towards Tulsi however will help her to perhaps obtain a higher position beside the next president." Man do I really hope this isn't what Tulsi is thinking and why she is doing what she is doing. This is the type of logic and reasoning that I think Warren was using in 2016 and it makes me sick. I want politicians who are in it for the country and do what they do for the people, not themselves. And I think warren didn't run in the first place, or endorse sanders during the campaign, because she wanted to play nice with the anointed queen and try to position herself for a better job in the future. Now clearly their ideas about how to go about doing what's best for them would be very different if they were both just being self interested as one would be running for the wrong reasons while other would not be running for the wrong reasons. But if it's really about trying to do what's best for her and not about what's best for the country that would be downright terrible. And I do find myself wondering about that and questioning tulsi's motives. That is my biggest issue with her at the moment. She should know how unfair the game is and that if we are going to get a progressive president we need to be unified. Instead she is dividing us and making it more likely for a corporate shill like biden to win in my opinion. At best it has me questioning her judgement because I don't think she should be running and instead should be backing Sanders from the get go. All that said I very much want to think that it isn't about her and that her motives are pure. I desperately want to believe that she's running not for herself or to get a better spot down the road, but because the message she preaches about giving peace a chance is important and needs to be heard more. It's a great message and if that's her motive I very much respect it and appreciate it. And I'm inclined to give her the benefit of the doubt. Her campaign does give her the opportunity to have it be heard more and that is clearly a great thing. I just really wish she didn't need to be running against Sanders and splitting progressive support to do it.
    2
  5327.  @rainerzufall42  Regarding, "Reality is, that Tulsi won't split the progressive vote, while Warren will!" Um... what? How do you justify this logic? Why would one split progressive support but the other won't? That doesn't make any sense. Both are going to have supporters that are self identified progressives.
    2
  5328.  @worldwidehappiness  Regarding, "Everyone should fight for themselves" If you want a candidate who only cares about their own personal interest and is only doing what's best for themselves you may as well support Trump. I want candidates fighting for the people. Regarding, "not backing others" So do you vote for yourself then? Or do you back someone? Regarding, ""Bernies" policies are based on ideology rather than facts." Just go support trump. You sound "smart" enough for it based on the nonsense you spout. Seriously thou I hope you are just a paid shill and are not really this dense. Regarding, "not coming up with blanket solutions like $15 minimum wage." If you are such a tool that you think raising the minimum wage is a bad idea and their aren't fact to support it... well... I honestly have an impossible time taking you seriously. I'm trying to address the people who understand that raising the minimum wage is a good idea and that there is plenty of evidence to support it. Regarding, "If you get a standard progressive like Sanders, then he could well screw things up for progressives forever." If you actually think this you are an epic dipshit. Good luck with that and your efforts to divide progressives. Sanders 2020! Because duh.
    2
  5329.  @n0wheregrrl  Regarding, "Tulsi will pledge her delegates to Bernie if it comes to that." That's not how voting works. You don't get to just give your pledged delegates to another candidate. To win the nomination outright you need to win the magic number of delegates... all by yourself. If noone reaches the magic number the candidate who has the most delegates will have the best claim to the nomination. A split progressive vote makes it more difficult for any progressive candidate to get the magic number or the most delegates by the end. That's how voting works. Stop claiming otherwise. And it's a good thing candidate can't just give their delegates to someone else or corporate dems would just consolidate their delegates and it's good they can't.
    2
  5330.  @n0wheregrrl  Regarding, "she's as far to the left on domestic issues." But she's not as good. Sanders has been fighting the good fight on this as long as she's been alive. His rhetoric is sharper. And while he has fought for gay rights his entire life Tulsi has had to "evolve" on the issue. Regarding, "actually out-lefts him on foreign policy." Only in that this is her focus. And I appreciate her message. But I'm going to guess that part of the reason you say this (even if you don't many of her supporters do) is because she served in the military. As if that's an innately good thing. It's not. It's only good because she seemed to take the correct message from her service. But for every tulsi there is also a mccain warmonger coming from the service. And she shouldn't have needed to serve to realize what a danger the military industrial complex is. She should have been able to figure that out BEFORE choosing to go to war and help enable that military industrial complex personally. She seems to oppose the MIC for the same reason mccain opposed torture... personal reasons. When it would show far better judgment if she were able to come to those conclusions without it.
    2
  5331.  @nimkal  Regarding, "I never stated that was her mentality about her campaign." I wasn't trying to put words in your mouth and if that's the impression I left you or that I misrepresented your thoughts I apologize. I was trying to talk about my own thoughts, what I look for, and my own personal concerns, and not just with her but with all politicians in general. Regarding, "from watching her speak" In all honesty I think watching a politician speak is one of the absolute worst ways to think you know something about a politician. I'm not saying it should be ignored entirely, but I am saying that studying their record and following the money (who funds their campaigns) tells you far more about that politician than the words they use. Regarding, "Bernie is..." Yup. Bernie is the fucking man. He isn't perfect but considering how long his record is it is remarkable how consistently correct he has been over the course of his career. He demonstrates true leadership and is willing to take the right positions even when those positions were not popular with the public. Society seems to be catching up to him and now essentially everything he advocates for is what they want. Sadly the public often demonstrates a willingness to vote against their own self interests and beliefs. Hopefully they don't do that in 2020. Regarding, "His experience" As someone who was duped by Obama in part because he had such a short record to look back at (and because the guy gave a great speech which goes back to my previous point) I can't agree more. I value a long record as is the case with Sanders and I will feel more comfortable supporting Tulsi in another 8 years after she has been able to lengthen hers. Regarding, "even though I like her foreign policy." Yup. I love her foreign policy. I like how articulate she is about it. I like that it comes from a vet, not because I value it personally for reasons I've already given, but because I know so many Americans do value it and will take her message of peace more seriously when it does come from a vet (not that I think they should). I'd be just fine and happy as hell, mostly because of this specific issue, if she were Sanders VP or Secretary of State. But I'm of the firm belief that her time isn't now (for president) and that splitting the vote is a seriously concern and problem worth addressing. It's already going to be hard enough to get a progressive president without us handicapping ourselves.
    2
  5332. If you support Elizabeth Warren let's never hang out.
    2
  5333. "They would vote for a bag of crap if you put and elephant sticker on it" Didn't doel tell you to vote for demented, warmongering, racist biden? And you listened to him?
    2
  5334. So you would rather have trump than Bernie. Thanks for at least being honest about it.
    2
  5335. It's nice to know he wasn't ashamed about the torture like he should have been.
    2
  5336.  @thecryinglennyface166  regarding, "As for the close mindless, I based if of your rhetoric and attitude." Ok. I'm not really interested in trying to tell you why I think I am open minded but hopefully you are willing to refine this view of yours based on new information. There are specific reasons why I treat the paid troll why I do and like to think I've made those reasons clear. I also concede I can be a real dick. I concede I'm frustrated with the state of the world and understand that it comes it out in my "attitude." I have little tolerance and patience for stupid. And that little tolerance goes to nil when it comes to some specific actors that I'm convinced are just paid trolls. Sane people don't spend all their time listening to and respond to what they think is "fake news." I sure as fuck am not going to spend all my time at Alex Jones. Those actions are only best explained two ways... 1) they are insane or 2) they are being paid. Regarding, "I think you should always be willing to discuss these kinds of topics" I don't. Like I've said my time is valuable to me and I'm not wasting it on people I've determined are disingenuous. Do you keep wasting your time if and when you determine this to be the case? Do you always make sure to give logical arguments to flat earthers when they tell you the earth is flat? Because I don't. Regarding, "How do you know your smart if you don’t listen to others perspectives." You know what's far more important then being smart? Being right. And I do listen to others. That's what I'm doing with you. But I don't do it for everyone for reasons I've already given. Regarding, "I had no intentions of insulting you." I never thought you did. And even if you did I'd be a hypocrite for caring if you did because I obviously do it. I just thought you were wrong.
    2
  5337.  @thecryinglennyface166  No worries. I like a good back and forth. And at least you know that I am only using my time on you because I think you were worth it even if I was disagreeing with you.
    2
  5338. But only when he's actually fighting for us and not when he's voting for corrupt POS like Neera Tanden should he do something so foolish.
    2
  5339. Everyone should read "The Real Anthony Fauci" by RFK Jr. Fauci is trash.
    2
  5340. Nope.
    2
  5341. Democrats: guns are bad. Also democrats: all the missiles for ukraine.
    2
  5342. shame on you
    2
  5343. "True American Heroes" don't tell you to vote for corrupt people.
    2
  5344.  @westonbirch4681  "fool" That's what I think of the people who voted for biden like bernie told them to.
    2
  5345. I'll remember that if I ever come across someone bleeding out.
    2
  5346. While I tend to agree that they are a distraction Billy, we need some comic relief in sad times.
    2
  5347. Bart regarding Warren. I don't trust her. She didn't support Bernie during the primaries when it was important, she was late to oppose DAPL and more. Tulsi Gabbard or Nina Turner should be the first female POTUS.... after Bernie.
    2
  5348. Aitch regarding, "How is Sanders supposed to even run?" As a Democrat after they screwed him. When he ran previously he entered with very little name recognition and that was used against him. They used it by portraying Hillary as inevitable from the start in an effort to suppress Sanders support. What are you going to do? Waste your vote on him? Was the message they tried to send out. Superdelegates support at the start was also used to tilt the field. Even when Sanders was doing well at the start the corporate media was quick to put up numbers including the superdelegates with pledged delegates to misrepresent the state of the race. The DNC actively worked against him with BS planted stories and by not scheduling debates to help the queen. Thanks in large part to wikileaks this corruption (among other morally reprehensible conduct) was exposed. They can't do the same shit again and even if they do the game has changed. Sanders is now a rockstar in the political community with name recognition among everyone where he is currently the most popular politician in the country. No doubt the establishment will work overtime against him. Republicans will call him a communist and corporate democrats will call his plans unachievable but even though I think the public is by and large uniformed and more importantly misinformed due to corporate media, they know he is the real deal. All you need to do is look back at a very large body of work. His age works for him here. You know he genuine because he has said the same shit his entire life. Compare that to Hillary Clinton or any of your other politicians who have been around for a while... they flip flop all the fucking time because they have no principles. Having principles means saying things that are NOT popular with the public. Like when Sanders was supporting gay rights long before the public was. Or when Sanders was the darn near the only guy voting against the patriot act or the Iraq war. He's the real deal I can be sure about it because he is old and on the record all this time. Most people realize it and those that don't are likely going to be voting for a POS candidate anyway. Please let Sanders be healthy in 2020. The country needs him and less importantly so does the "democratic" party if they are ever going to be a party that isn't corrupt as fuck. If he isn't there will be someone else ready to take his place but I am not as sure the country will be smart enough to get behind someone else. Time will tell.
    2
  5349. Aitch regarding, "a third party will never get in to the debates" I get the point. Only a special 3rd party candidate would get into the debates. That said Sanders could have this last time had he run as a 3rd party candidate but only because he is already known. Jill Stein never had the chance to be known because the corporate media would only talk about her to smear her. I get your point but I am sure that if Sanders chose to run as a 3rd party candidate (which I would really want if the DNC fucked him over again) he would get in. Anyone else though is pretty screwed because the public is misinformed constantly and most people are just too busy trying to stay afloat to realize why the game is so fucking rigged.
    2
  5350. Aitch regarding, "Genuine, like when he crumpled after being abused by the DNC" What you are talking about are political tactics. How do you best serve your interests and try to get what you want done. I disagreed with Bernie very much in the moment and still do. That said it might actually end up being the best play for the long run to serve his interests. The country is in a perfect position so than actually progressive will be the next president. Even Hillary Clinton die hards have a hard time excusing her current whining and it is a turnoff to the public at large. (Note, Sanders actually had a legitimate grievance compared to the queen.) But he is genuine when it comes to POLICY POSITIONS. That is what is most important to me. I think it is very reasonable that people who want single payer have very, very, very different ideas about how it is best to get it but ultimately what is most important to me is that we both actually want single payer. Regarding, "Do you remember when he went up to do that, and the crowd cheered for him damn near 15 minutes straight even after he told them to stop half a dozen times?" Have you seen the movie Half Baked? The whole time I was fantasizing about Bernie saying fuck you, fuck you, fuck you, your cool, fuck you I'm running independent. I get it. I really do. I wanted him to run as 3rd party candidate. But I get it. At the end of the day he was still the same person fighting for the same things I want him to fight for even if I thought at that moment he was going about it wrong. I personally never questioned his resolve for the cause even while disagreeing with the tactics. Regarding, "The voters would have stood by him whatever direction he wanted to go." Maybe. I want to think so but ultimately I'm very cynical and do not think much of the public and our media. Him running as a 3rd party candidate would have been just another tool the establishment would use to attack him. Then there would have been the problem that he would need a majority of electoral college votes... having the most would not have been good enough. We will never know. I like to think that if he could have won then he DEFINITELY can win in 2020 and we are far better off with him late than never. Regarding, "he still got on his knees for the Dems." It was an endorsement not his soul. He didn't want to be blamed for Trump winning which is quite reasonable to me. I fucking love Bernie Sanders but I didn't vote for Hillary, I voted for Jill Stein happily. Only a fucking sheep votes based on an endorsement anyway. Regarding, "We could have had the most massive 3rd party vote in recent history" As much as I hate the party system and want more parties, as much as a I hate the "democratic" party, I think it would be best if Sanders wins as a democrat and not an independent or Green Party. As much as the "democratic" party should die I just don't see it happening. And what I think would be best for the country is if someone could reform the party from the inside out so that they actually represented the people and not the corporations. If he wins as a democrat he would be positioned to do so. If he wins as an independent he is unable to do so.
    2
  5351. Actually they will. I was called a sexist in 2016 for voting for Jill Stein. Logic doesn't matter for some.
    2
  5352.  @kfox420  It's fact that dems have all the power they need to codify roe into law. Sorry not sorry if that fact triggers you.
    2
  5353.  @j0j0dartiste21  "at this point that is irrelevant." LMFAO Of course it's not because the dems have all that power this very second but they would rather run on the topic than use the power they have.
    2
  5354. "almost all those people are crooked and you are stuck on semantics." If you are there to stick up for one of the crooks who happens to be particularly orange and has tiny hands that matters. It isn't "semantics."
    2
  5355. Does Musk pay you for this? Or are you really this dense?
    2
  5356. I'm pretty sure the person guilty of sexual harassment is the boss exposing their ass at work.
    2
  5357. Sheepherders are going to sheepherd. If you listen to sam and his crew he's leading you to slaughter.
    2
  5358. At peace I guess.
    2
  5359. And how exactly has Trump been trying to tackle big pharma for 2 years now? I could use a good laugh.
    2
  5360.  @unpaidtroll8475  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g_uGqFvli8Y Long story short... Trump should be supporting Sanders plans and you are a dupe if you think Trump is fighting for you.
    2
  5361. Shouldn't he at least be starting with the enterprise or enterprise a first?
    2
  5362. Meh. I consider Warren to be a mild progressive... at best.
    2
  5363.  @leovolont  Regarding, " who is exactly to the Left of Warren?" Lots of people that are supporting Sanders at the moment and not running against him and splitting the progressive vote. And as for candidates that are running, Tulsi. Regarding, "She is for Burning Down Wall Street, right?" She wages a good finger at them. And her rhetoric is great. Her convictions? I wholeheartedly question them. Regarding, "then you know that he came off like some grouchy old broken record caricature of himself" I concede that he didn't have an epic great night but you are talking about him like he shit the bed. That wasn't Bernie. That was Biden. Regarding, "Liz Warren had Glowed and Fizzed" One of the absolute worst ways to think you know something about a politician is to listen to their rhetoric. Politicians are rightfully known for being great liars. You should spend less time listening to them speak and more time studying their record and following the money of their campaigns. That tells you far more about who they are and those things can't lie. Regarding, "I heard Bernie did not want to do Debate Prep," LMFAO. Citation please. But if you want a real reason why he might not have been at his best he's been busy fighting for workers, their wages, and their rights. You can't be serious with this crap can you? I can only assume you are being paid for this shit.
    2
  5364.  Harry Mann Jr  regarding, "It's how well EVERYONE is doing." Meanwhile, in reality, about half the country has trouble paying for the basics. https://www.fool.com/investing/2017/10/01/why-half-of-americans-cant-come-up-with-400-in-an.aspx https://www.cnbc.com/2017/07/13/harvard-study-heres-how-many-americans-cant-afford-housing.html https://www.scarymommy.com/americans-afford-basic-needs/ https://money.cnn.com/2018/05/17/news/economy/us-middle-class-basics-study/index.html
    2
  5365. Just keep voting for corrupt dems like bernie tells you to. I'm sure that will help. /s
    2
  5366. Fun fact: california dems aren't even voting on universal health care despite having supermajorities. Dems have literally ALL the power while sam and his crew pretend that republicans are the only problem. They are controlled opposition and they are leading you to slaughter.
    2
  5367. Meanwhile biden is privatizing SS and bernie isn't doing anything to stop it.
    2
  5368. You would think that if you believe the shit you say you would just fuck off.
    2
  5369.  @amrs6713  I want to quit this so much but here I am... "her inner soul" She doesn't have one. It was bought by katzenburg. I've explained her actions. How do you explain them? If she wasn't blackmailing him what did she want? And why would she think jimmy would give it to her? "I don't know this person" Maybe just stay out of it then rather than mounting a terrible defense for her.
    2
  5370. The current system costs more because they take billions of dollars out as profit instead of using it to pay for health care. They also pay lots of money for advertising that could be done away with. They also pay lots more money than a single payer system because the current system is terribly complicated.
    2
  5371.  @jessicarobinson4563  ok, fair enough
    2
  5372. Still making the world dumber with your drivel I see.
    2
  5373. Yes.
    2
  5374. Wiltalk the establishment appreciates your stupidity and your smearing the darn near the only politician working against the oligarchy. They are grateful for you doing their work for them. You are a moron.
    2
  5375. I'm only here to say Ryan grimm sucks and give the propagandist a thumbs down.
    2
  5376. If you say so M C. I'm not sure why you think I give a shit about Venezuela. I don't. They are a country that the US has deliberately been fucking with for so long that they can't be an accurate indication of anything other than this countries ability to fuck with other countries. Not that that stops Trumptards from mentioning them as much as they possibly can. They seem to think that all they need to do is say their name and they have somehow made a great point because they are dumb fucks. I just thought it was important to point out how fucking idiotic the dipshit original posters comment is. The fucking moron doesn't even understand how quotation marks are used appropriately. But that is much less important than the content of his message which was stupid beyond words. I would have elaborated but clearly there is no point with a person of so low intellect that they cannot understand simple concepts and much less complicated thought. Oh and it's Venezuela and their not Venezeula and there.
    2
  5377. I'm not sure how you mean behind in your statement. You could mean they support him or you could mean they will only follow. The fact of the matter is that the "democratic" party will work against Bernie's proposals because they do not represent the people but rather their big money donors.
    2
  5378.  @rowzdwr  "even incitement and defamation, should always be free?" Fair point. No. I am not including that and do not consider that free speech. As always your rights end where my rights begin. That's where the line is drawn and I should have been more careful with my wording.
    2
  5379. Kylo regarding, "I’m well aware of what exit polling is" Sadly many are not. Regarding, "I just never knew about the discrepancy between the two." This isn't surprising. The corporate media effectively buried the topic and people who brought it up were mindlessly called conspiracy theorists as if that was the same as making a point.
    2
  5380. od regarding, "She got more votes." You can't be serious can you? That is like saying a guy cheating at poker didn't cheat because they won. You would have a really good point if we had free and fair elections in this country. But we don't. That is our point. How do you not get that?
    2
  5381.  @tentaklaus9382  Nope. And I'm not interested in anything from dsouza.
    2
  5382. If you are subscribed to shitlib doel you should do yourself a favor and move your subscription to an actual leftist channel like revolutionary blackout.
    2
  5383. I hope that comment was sarcasm. If it isn't you are dumb beyond belief.
    2
  5384. Raiterio I'm really fucking old. I don't do emojis or even try to bother to understand them. I honestly looked completely through the fact that there even was one there. What can I say... I like words.
    2
  5385. Your comment is remarkably dumb. That makes it just as bad as the cable news networks.
    2
  5386. I assume she is slithering in the the grass snake that she is.
    2
  5387. "very serious" No. Income inequality is serious. Assange is serious. War is serious. Health care is serious. You are talking about an UNARMED riot.
    2
  5388.  @Solmangrundy  "private hands" It's money that should be going to peasants to pay for health care, education, food, and housing but instead it's being funneled to one of the richest people on the planet. That's what you are defending and rationalizing. It's pretty gross.
    2
  5389. Lots are still in denial.
    2
  5390. To think that I used to support this warmonger. Shame on you bernie sanders.
    2
  5391. I'd ask how you came up with your arbitrary age if I cared more about how you came up with it.
    2
  5392.  @SpondonIAftab  Nope. I'm very familiar with their lies. Are you? Why are you making excuses and rationalizations for lying politicians? Are you always a bootlicker?
    2
  5393.  @SpondonIAftab  "We're on the same page" Clearly I was not understanding your tone. There are people who would say the things you are but seriously. I've been an advocate of a "sarcastic font" for a long time for comments like yours. Peace.
    2
  5394.  @wavegodrobsanders539  Black people are a minority therefore everything I have said applies to them.
    2
  5395.  @wavegodrobsanders539  If you seriously have a problem that people other than blacks will be helped in addition to the black people being helped by these things... well then you sound like a real piece of shit in all honesty.
    2
  5396.  @wavegodrobsanders539  Well, I don't have a problem with litmus tests. I think you should have them. I just personally think this is a really dumb one to have. I have them myself... like thinking medicare for all the answer and goal. I barely know much of anything about Williamson but I do know she thinks a public option, not medicare for all, is the answer. So yeah, not as progressive as bernie on that. Regarding, "Reparations must happen this election cycle." Good luck with that. Again, it's not that I'm against it, it's just that I live in reality. And in reality Williamson has no chance to win and even if she did wouldn't get reparations passed. MLK is rolling in his grave at your shortsightedness.
    2
  5397. Go away Rick Cea... Please, go away...
    2
  5398. True progressives don't vote for the 700 billion dollar budget for the department of offense like Warren did.
    2
  5399. I want to talk about. The corporate media is not everyone.
    2
  5400. Didn't bernie vote to give azov notseas money and weapons?
    2
  5401. Warren is just another politician who would say anything to win as are their shills.
    2
  5402. An all powerful being shouldn't need people do it's work for them. If you think they do it's only because they don't actually exist. Stop giving your nonexistent fake deity credit for things people are doing.
    2
  5403. Can you imagine being paid to spout complete and utter nonsense on tv?
    2
  5404. Well done on making me feel like I'm living in the movie Idiocracy.
    2
  5405. It's how our country was founded.
    2
  5406. Meanwhile, in reality, he is a warmonger.
    2
  5407. Or better yet he wins as a dem and reforms the shit out of the dumpster fire known as the "democratic" party.
    2
  5408. Regarding, "If you say... does just that?" I am too unclear about your question to be able to answer to it intelligently. Not that it is your fault. I might just be failing in my comprehension. Feel free to rephrase and reask if the rest of this doesn't address your specific question. Regarding, "liberals" I used to consider myself a liberal but don't really anymore because of neoliberals giving the term a bad name. Now I very much prefer the term progressive. That said labels are not really what is important but rather the policy positions we hold. Regarding, "we do not have any other person (other than Bernie)" I think that is why Bernie would call for a "political revolution" and actively encouraged more progressives to run for office. He recognized a need for new blood. I agree that the "bench" after bernie get very thin very quick but there are a handful of true progressives (at least they are in my opinion) that are not completely unknown. Tulsi Gabbard and Nina Turner are the next 2 that I consider to be leaders among the cause. That said I absolutely stress Bernie Sanders in 2020. He was virtually unknown when he started his run in 2016 and faced media blackout. In 2020 those won't be the problem they were. Anyone else would have those problems and I see no reason to handicap us in 2020 the same way we were in 2016. Regarding, "would like to see a big change" I think all the sane agree on this. The question that some of us disagree on is how is the best way to get the change we need now. I very much disagree that him running independent is the way to go and I'm convinced that hostile takeover of the "democratic" party is the best hope we have for that change. Not only do I think it is the easiest (not to be mistaken with easy, it's not) way, but it produces the best results. It kills 2 birds with one stone. Not only would it give the people a major party that would represent the people but it would kill a major party that is corrupt and terrible. Regarding, "Then there would be 3 major parties." Don't get me wrong I love the idea of doing away with a 2 party system and having a system that gives people more choices. There is enough difference of opinion that there really should be at least 4 major parties (I'm thinking of libertarian ideology specifically but there are more). But I see no reason to think that is at all possible anytime soon. The system is specifically designed NOT to allow more than 2 parties. The electoral college is but one example of this. Getting the most electoral college doesn't mean you win. You need a majority of EC votes to guarantee victory. The way the current system is designed what would be more likely should a 3rd party rise up is that simultaneously a major party would need to die (aka be reduced to 3rd party status). That "3rd party" then becomes a major party the way Republicans took major party status from the wigs in the time of Lincoln. But keep in mind that was a long time ago, in part because of how difficult it is but also in part because the 2 major parties have done a great job since then insulating themselves and preventing such a thing from happening again. The only way I see there being more than 2 major parties anytime soon is if there would be a major overhaul of the system from top to bottom that would include reforms such as ranked choice voting. Sadly this isn't going to be happening anytime soon and it isn't hard to understand why. The 2 major parties like the system just the way it is. I considered myself a dem for a long time. That is suppose to be my party. I feel like that is where I should belong. But I currently feel they are at least as much of an obstacle to getting the things I want as much as republicans are. And I think lots of people feel the same way and then conclude the best course of action is just to turn their backs on the dems and just look elsewhere. I get why they might think that. They feel betrayed. They were. It's just that I am convinced the smart thing to do is kicking out the corporate dems and getting our party back. That said if it doesn't work I will absolutely be looking elsewhere to vote. If the establishment succeeds in getting a corporate shill as the nominee I will vote elsewhere... like I did in 2016 when I voted for Jill Stein in a swing state.
    2
  5409. I won't. I don't support evil.
    2
  5410. Even the dem shill seems to be acknowledging you are "dupe" if you believed biden in the background. 1:54
    2
  5411.  @lmoral222  If you can't take a joke you need to get fucked as well.
    2
  5412. If that's your conclusions it's only because you are stupid or being paid to say stupid things.
    2
  5413. Well said.
    2
  5414. Regarding, "It's called "unconditional love" if you're not familiar." Have some perspective, you are talking about a politician not your child. I am reminded of Trump talking about how he could shoot someone and his supporters would still love him. It was one of the few times Trump said something that wasn't bullshit. But that truth and sentiment was sickening and it is still sickening when you express unconditional love for warren. Regarding, "I have no doubt of the Senator's intentions to do good." We are going to have to agree to disagree about this. And even if her intention are good her actions are shit. We need a leader for president and even if her intentions are good she isn't a leader. She didn't lead when it came to standing rock, sanders, jailing bankers and more. Regarding, "I agree we should all have litmus tests." Good. You should. And that was what I'm talking about and not needing to agree with someone about everything. Regarding, "Not voting to increase military funding while President Trump just isn't one of them for me." Ok. It is for me and not just because Trump is president. But the fact that she was willing to do so while Trump is president only makes her decision that much more asinine if she actually thinks he is the danger and menace that she likes to say while deflecting and distracting from the shortcoming of the "democratic" party. Regarding, "50% seems like a good starting point" Is that before or after she helped raise it by 10 percent? Look I like that you say you want to reign in the military industrial complex but, like warren, actions speak louder than words. I can't tell you how shocked I was that she voted for it. Not because I think she is a great progressive but because her vote was fucking meaningless. She could have voted against it and it still would have passed with ease. She didn't even feel the need to try and pander to someone like me when it came to such an important issue. Regarding, "it's getting funded whether Senator Warren voted for it or not." If you weren't defending her before you certainly are now. That vote didn't matter as to whether or not the bill would pass but it absolutely reflects her values and her values do not align with me. Regarding, "She plays Machiavellian tactics far more than I care for." Again defending her even if there is a criticism within. And I question whether this is a "tactic" and not her values. Ultimately it doesn't matter what her actual values are if she votes against them and has a public and private face like Hillary. Regarding, "One of my litmus tests.... stubborn person if you can't tell." I agree with all of this paragraph and I too can be proud and stubborn. I also concede that I can be a real dick. I don't sugarcoat my opinions so if I am offensive and crass don't take it personally. You sound very reasonable even if I disagree with some things you say. Regarding, "It was a monumental step forward" Nope. Bringing back glass stegall would have been monumental and those two things aren't even in the same ballpark. Regarding, "organized money lost that fight." They won the war thou didn't they? This was akin to the ACA. They are both examples of the establishment doing just enough to make sure to maintain the status quo and preventing real substantive change. They are both peanuts when thinking about the big picture. They are both examples of doing just enough to placate the masses so they don't take up pitchforks. Regarding, "there wouldn't be one." So you think that it was possible for them to do nothing to address a near collapse of the global economy? Because the fact of the matter is that if that wasn't done then something else, something more substantive, would have been in it's place. Regarding, "I assure you they got their caviar twisted in a bunch over that loss." We have to agree to disagree about this. The oligarchy is corrupt but they aren't stupid. They know that they have to throw the public a bone or two to, like I've already said, keep the masses placated. Regarding, "I know for a fact she supports Glass-Steagall being reinstated but the public has to be educated" If she actually supports it like you say then she should probably a leader on the topic. As it stands I've never known her to utter the words glass-steagall. Maybe she has between swinging at the low hanging fruit that is Trump and I didn't hear but had I heard I'd remember. That issue is important to me and important to the country. Regarding, "Bernie is far and away the most qualified person to be President right now both for his experience in politics and his agenda/worldview." I wholeheartedly agree with this. Regarding, "To end on a note upon which we can agree: LIZ, STAY THE HELL OUT OF THE 2020 ELECTION." Yup. I wholeheartedly agree with this. Again sorry for being rude at times. It isn't personal. You are very likable and highly intelligent even if we disagree about some things. Peace.
    2
  5415.  @davidiihouston6883  Just a reminder that c hayes doesn't care that the president has dementia.
    2
  5416. There is a big difference between meaningless pandering and "becoming more progressive."
    2
  5417. I know right. A black shirt.
    2
  5418. Thank you for this. To see so many on the "smart side" fawning for her is disheartening.
    2
  5419. Yup. They are lucky I'm a pacifist and not a gun nut.
    2
  5420. There's no such thing as "wherher."
    2
  5421.  @DallasTaylor  People such as yourself are impossible to take seriously.
    2
  5422. The irony is that she is destroying her political career. I've been a huge fan of AOC. She has the opportunity to be a progressive champion. Instead she is being exposed as a fraud.
    2
  5423.  @DallasTaylor  "Russian propaganda against Pelosi" LMFAO It's like you are trying to prove my point that you are rightfully ignored.
    2
  5424. Regarding, "my opinion is based on..." Try to remember that primary voters are going to have some say. Regarding, "i don't believe the dems represent the way forward" I was all about 3rd party going into the last general. I happily voted for Jill Stein but I concede I'm demoralized at that path after their showing. If she couldn't do better against 2 of the most despised politicians, make that 2 of the most despised humans I am not optimistic about that plan going forward. Don't get me wrong, I will vote for them again if there is nothing but Trump and a corporate stooge again in 2020 but that is plan B and I think it should be for everyone else as well.
    2
  5425. Nuke Holmes has a nice ring to it.
    2
  5426. Can I at least wish harm upon Twitter on Twitter? Because it's not a person?
    2
  5427. Blair regarding, "like I said I haven't seen ENTIRE videos devoted to Bush Jr. or Clinton or Bush Snr. and Donald Trump is literally swimming in a SWAMP full of billionaires" You need to expand your fucking horizons then. I assure you they are out there. Donald Trump is rightfully ridiculed by the sane for filling his cabinet with swamp monsters. Just recently Hillary Clinton rightfully faced backlash for her wall street speeches where she confessed to have a public and private positions. Corruption is fucking everywhere and smart people talk about it everywhere. Stupid people try to deflect from it by talking about anything or everything else. Hillary Clinton would blame sexism. Donald Trump would blame fake news. You blame racism. You want to talk about anything and everything other than the issue at hand. And the issue at hand is that there is something very, very wrong with Obama getting paid sick amounts of money from the same people he should have had put in prison but didn't. Regarding, "perhaps we can talk about THAT" I'm sorry people have a problem with corruption in government. Some of us are going to talk about it whether you like it or not and we are not going to change the conversation because you can't deal with the fact that Obama is corrupt just like the rest of them. Regarding, "the Bad Guys are in office and stealing from you right in front of your face." Yes it is, and maybe if Obama did the right thing while he was in office it wouldn't be continuing at the moment. You seem to care about the problem... but only when the other team does it. It is fucking pathetic.
    2
  5428. Regarding, "yes but if i would of voted for 1 of them Hillary might of gotten in." Way to go. You used the same idiotic argument people used to vote for Hillary. You played the exact game the establishment uses to make people vote between a douche and turd and not go outside voting for a douche and turd. You also seem to think they were different in some sort of important way but they are not. You voted for Hillary Clinton with an orange dick. Don't go patting yourself on the back for that. You are as much a part of the problem as Hillary supporters.
    2
  5429. Is that really all you have to smear him? He lives in texas? GTFOH
    2
  5430.  @paulari6264  "Sorry to put down your podcast god." It's fine. Insulting where he lives as if that some sorta gotcha is funny AF. Thanks for the laugh dipshit.
    2
  5431. So what? I don't think she would have handled the crisis better in any of the ways that actually matter (getting these people help). And considering our government is a fucking joke and was going to fuck these people over regardless I actually prefer the face of government be that of the clown as opposed to someone that might be able to put the public to sleep.
    2
  5432. If we can't it's only because they are frauds. There are more than 15 members who ran on m4a.
    2
  5433. That guy better be our next president... and I'm not talking about the Koch brothers.
    2
  5434.  @sharper68  Regarding, "look like statesmen" I'm not talking about look. I'm talking about damage. GWB, 9-11 on his watch, WMD lies to go to a war we are still in, economic collapse, tax cuts, bailouts, katrina, and more. Don't get me wrong trump sucks but his record on the job is still better than W. Not that that is suppose to impress anyone.
    2
  5435.  @drabolit  "he didn’t believe Biden strongarmed" Show him the tape. If he still says it AFTER you know he saw it then you might have a point. For all I know he hasn't seen it yet.
    2
  5436.  @t__a__z  Regarding, " I just made a mistake. Happens to everyone." Yes. It does. Regarding, "You have to be able to admit your mistakes" You don't now a days it seems. The world is filled with people who happily double down on wrong, even when being told exactly why what they said is wrong. Be proud that you are willing to admit your mistakes. You really should be. It doesn't happen nearly as often as it should.
    2
  5437. You are why Trump loves the uneducated.
    2
  5438. Free Assange!
    2
  5439. And vote. Get your friends to vote. Get a Bernie shirt and wear it.
    2
  5440. It will not ultimately stop Sanders but you are correct that the party, in general, sucks.
    2
  5441. Are you running for office? Or just a hypocrite?
    2
  5442.  @kellielaine5848  Bernie sold you out to sell his book and to, in his own words, not get "nadared."
    2
  5443.  @kellielaine5848  Are you running for office? Otherwise I'm not even suppose to be talking to you... according to you.
    2
  5444.  @kellielaine5848  "advanced the blueprint for our quality of life." Actually he is voting in lockstep with corporate dems and his good friend.
    2
  5445.  @kellielaine5848  Are you running for office? You should be with your ability to ignore, dodge and deflect questions while saying nonsense that just doesn't hold with reality.
    2
  5446.  C W  But maybe you shouldn't get your panties in a bunch seeing as how I think Biden is going to win. We are going to see how your plan works out. And don't be afraid to take some responsibility for trump 2.0 after biden is terrible if I'm right about how things play out. Enjoy the shitshow that is going to be of YOUR making.
    2
  5447.  @E-damnn  I honestly don't take you seriously enough to respond to you intelligently any further. You are absurd.
    2
  5448. The US is the most propagandized country on the planet.
    2
  5449. Yeah, they are not the jews... it's actually easier for a jew to be elected to political office in America then it is for an atheist.
    2
  5450.  @MasterQueef3762  People named "pathological liar" are probably not the type of person to be taken seriously. And yet they said, "I was just joking" which would have me believe they are being honest. Or maybe that was the lie. This is all very confusing.
    2
  5451.  @MasterQueef3762  I've got some snake oil for that.
    2
  5452. Did he ever actually call it "blackmail?" I'm pretty sure he didn't. EDIT: He did. Thank you for the timestamp soul.
    2
  5453.  @soul4saken  Fair enough. I stand corrected about that. Thank you for correcting me.
    2
  5454. It depends on the state.
    2
  5455.  @Tdriggs19  No... thank you in advance for doing whatever you need to do to vote for Bernie in the primary. If you live in a state with an open primary (like you should) you have little to worry about. But if you have a closed primary take whatever steps you need. They aren't going to make it easy and would prefer you not vote... so vote. For Bernie. Peace.
    2
  5456.  @motherboard424  Nah... they were always terrible.
    2
  5457. "on the DEFENSIVE" Just typing things in all caps doesn't make it true. They are murd ering journalists. That's offensive.
    2
  5458.  @rcarmisin3465  " Israel only retaliates" Is that how you rationalize the murd er of journalists? Maybe spare me your BS.
    2
  5459. Well done on destroying my faith in humanity.
    2
  5460. Regarding, "She doesn't take pac money" Corporate PAC money is but one example of dirty money. Regarding, "I get the logic. Get more dems in" It isn't about getting dems in. It is about getting the right dems in and keeping the wrong dems out. And the wrong dems to her include AOC and Nixon. Regarding, "Would make it easier for her if she did win the presidency." I will not support her for President. Regarding, "The left has pushed one of the potential bigger names in the 2020 election to move far left on multiple issues." I would be more impressed if I thought this was more than meaningless pandering. But I am convinced it is. Shit, even Trump has talked in the past about universal health care. Ultimately there is a world of difference between pandering and conviction.
    2
  5461. I want to believe in tulsi but I can't logically explain her staying in right now except for the fact that she is fake as well. AOC 2024.
    2
  5462. This is from the same people who bring you, "bUt BeRnIe IsNt a DeMoCrAt."
    2
  5463. Hasan regarding, "Who fucking cares if Trump was a Democrat in the past?" The point is that you need to have more nuance in your thinking then just blindly supporting a person who calls themself a democrat.
    2
  5464. Hasan I agree with your point about how party affiliation isn't everything and the like but not how you did. I care that Trump was a democrat in the past and like to think I've made perfectly clear why. It demonstrates why people need to support progressives and not blindly follow team blue... a team that includes people like Manchin.
    2
  5465. Then again every time she opens her mouth Bernie is flooded with money.
    2
  5466. Fuck Trump and fuck anyone dumb enough to support him.
    2
  5467. You will likely end up voting for whatever clown bernie tells you to.
    2
  5468.  BartJ583  Regarding, "Warren." I'm not a fan. As far as I can tell she is controlled opposition to the real change this country desperately needs and is in the race to try and kneecap Bernie. The corporate media really seem to like her as of late and even the wall street journal published an article about how wall street is beginning to support her. It probably has a lot to do with her willingness to take legalized bribes if she makes the general election. Accept no imitations. Bernie Sanders is the true progressive champion and has been all his life while Warren was busy being a republican in the 90s.
    2
  5469.  Pap Smear  While I share your enthusiasm and frustration I encourage you to stop short of telling people to off themselves. Thank you in advance for that as it really doesn't help.
    2
  5470.  BartJ583  Regarding, "Translation: "I do not know who Warren is, and before 2015, I had never heard of Sanders either."" Translation: I have nothing of substance to offer to your substantive points.
    2
  5471.  @zephyr2278  Isn't yang that guy with zero political experience, zero record to look at, and zero chance of winning?
    2
  5472.  BartJ583  Regarding, "Warren and Sanders have the same goals and the same credibility. There are differences in the details, but that's about it." Um... no. They don't. Major differences include Sanders not being willing to take legalized bribes if he makes the general and Warren telling us she will. Sanders has preached a message of peace while Warren pretty much always sides with the MIC even voting to give Trump more money for bombs than even the orange clown wanted. Those are not details, that's pretty much everything when considering a commander in chief and assessing their credibility. Regarding, "But those who deny that Warren is just as progressive as Sanders are probably Trumpets trying to sow discord among progressives." Or maybe, just maybe, they are progressives who have substantive issues such as the ones I've mentioned. Maybe they wonder why health care isn't one of the issues she mentions on her website among all the many reasons they feel she can't be trusted. Maybe they supported Obama but after feeling like they were duped are rightfully skeptical of politicians willing to sell out to big money. Maybe they question the authenticity of a "progressive" who called herself a Republican... not when she was young, but when she was in her 40s. Maybe the wonder why she didn't run in 2016 against corporate Hillary but wants to run in 2020 against progressive Bernie. Maybe they think they get to use information to make their own determinations who is actually progressive and who isn't in their minds. Regarding, "Warren and Sanders will eventually merge in some fashion; he will drop out and become her advisor; she will drop out and become his VP; all of this will happen before March. And you will be forgotten." Try to remember how wrong you were when this doesn't happen.
    2
  5473.  BartJ583  https://www.salon.com/2017/03/23/the-public-favors-cutting-defense-spending-not-adding-billions-more-new-survey-finds_partner/ https://time.com/4253842/defense-spending-obama-congress-poll-voters/ http://inthesetimes.com/article/21890/elizabeth-warren-war-military-iran-north-korea-venezuela-bernie-sanders
    2
  5474.  BartJ583  I don't have the time, energy, or ambition to continue telling you why literally everything you say is dumb. If I did I'd point out how incredibly popular every policy Sanders advocates for (with one minor, rather unimportant exception), that includes things like not wasting American wealth on bombs like you like to claim because you are not smart, is popular with the public. Have a nice day and good luck with the whole dumb as fuck thing you got going on.
    2
  5475.  BartJ583  Regarding, " I have to assume that you have no idea why that is." Of course you do because you seem incapable of an intelligent thought. Seriously I don't have the time, energy, and ambition to keep telling you why everything you say is dumb. That is a full time job I'm not interested in and even if I did you would continue to be stupid because I'm not a miracle worker. I'm sorry I can't fix your stupid for you. I wish I could but I can't.
    2
  5476.  BartJ583  Because corporate media propaganda is very effective that's why they do it, because lots of Americans are too busy just trying to pay their bills and put food on the table to be educated about politics, because Americans very often vote against their own interests, and because there are lots of stupid people in the world (just look in the mirror for evidence of this). Please just fuck off. I want so much to stop addressing you but I have a really hard time letting stupid shit go unanswered and that is literally all you capable of spouting isn't it.
    2
  5477.  BartJ583  And you are destroying what little faith I have in humanity left.
    2
  5478.  BartJ583 Because I don't agree with what you are saying you dumb ass twat. I didn't even mention the fact that Warren isn't a progressive and that the polls you are using have piss poor methodology. I do concede that there are lots of dumb fucks as you are proof positive of but that hardly means an election where a single vote hasn't been cast has been decided already like the dumb shit you have been spouting and implying. But yeah... I'm agreeing with what you are saying. /s
    2
  5479. If conmen aren't worthy of hate then no one is.
    2
  5480. "a place where large numbers of people, especially political prisoners or members of persecuted minorities, are deliberately imprisoned in a relatively small area with inadequate facilities, sometimes to provide forced labor or to await mass execution" -the dictionary Sorry not sorry if the truth hurts.
    2
  5481. The mask is off kyle. You are a fraud and everyone knows it now. Never forget.
    2
  5482.  @mikeh6700  I was a huge fan of kyle for a long time. If I were a cultist I'd put up with his bullshit. You are projecting.
    2
  5483. ​ @mikeh6700  " just calling out your silly take" As if you were making some kinda point when all you were doing is making ad hominem. "If you got "Kyle is a simp for TYT" from that video" The video where he never mentions the blatant and obvious conflict of interest that he is affiliated with TYT before covering for and never mentioning the blackmail? Yes. That's exactly what I got from it and you still haven't made an argument. "you are the one projecting." This is funny coming from someone who still hasn't made a single point but does demonstrate cult-like behavior.
    2
  5484.  @mikeh6700  ""Kyle is a simp for TYT"" The same video where he claims the 20 million dollars from katzenburg doesn't make them corrupt?
    2
  5485. trippple regarding, "maybe if he runs as an independent" Support good people and care less about the label they wear. Regarding, "I want the Democrats to die off quickly" As much as they should die you would be wise to accept the fact that they are not going to die anytime soon and plan accordingly.
    2
  5486. tripple regarding, "Tulsi Gabbards of the world are scarce." Yes they are. Thanks to the efforts of Sanders calling for a political revolution, calling for people of conscience to run, and inspiring them to do so they are becoming more common than they were but there is still much work to be done. And when you have the opportunity to vote for such people I suggest you do even if they have the audacity to run as a democrat. Regarding, "no way will I see her type of Democrat around where I live." There are no justice democrats where you are? Then why don't you run? If you want something done right the best way to do it is yourself. Regarding, "no appetite left for getting corporate shill politicians elected anymore" Neither do I. I support Sanders because I don't think he is one. And just the label a person uses and the tactic they use to try and get the policies they want doesn't make them a shill.
    2
  5487. Well done on destroying my faith in humanity.
    2
  5488. I am biased in my belief because I want her to endorse Bernie, but I also believe they are waiting for the right time to endorse. I also think Bernie and company were holding back the student debt relief plan for just before the first debate for similar reasons. They are just trying to be strategic in their timing. Or at least that's what I'm hoping.
    2
  5489.  Major Thought Ahead  Youtube deleted my response to you. Oh well. I'm not bothering to repeat it. In short stop rationalizing lies from the government. It's really, really, really dumb.
    2
  5490.  LA Lakers  Regarding, "tells one lie... and instantly his credibility is lost" That's how it works. Fool me once shame on you. Fool me twice...
    2
  5491.  LA Lakers  Regarding, "Trump tells thousands of demonstrable lies since he's been inaugurated...who cares!" I care about his lies. I also care about fauci's.
    2
  5492.  El Draco  Regarding, "emergency action" Is this really how you are trying to portray his lying? Really? Regarding, "Orange Traitor" I get that you want to deflect and talk about trump. I don't. I'm not talking about him. I'm talking about Fauci. Try to stay on topic. Try not to be too much like trump supporters who when people are talking about their clown deflect by talking about hillary or biden or pelosi or anything other than the problem with the person they are trying to defend.
    2
  5493.  @Malt454  Regarding, "This isn't about Trump?" When the topic is Fauci, then no. It's OBVIOUSLY not about trump when that is that case, which it was. It's about Fauci when it's about Fauci. This is not rocket science.
    2
  5494.  @Malt454  Regarding, "Neither is the idea that credibility, like most things, is relative." If you have a point I'm going to assume it's terrible like everything else you have said. Regarding, "If the issue is the credibility of the government on the virus" It kinda is. And Fauci's lie hurt not only his own credibility but that of the government for which he represented at the time. Regarding, "who creates the greatest loss in that credibility?" Do you really not understand that everything you are doing is whataboutism 101? So what if trump is worse. That doesn't make what fauci did good or ever ok. Just stop with this shit.
    2
  5495.  @matthatter56  Don't get me wrong, I agree that they shouldn't have been doing it while working but I personally didn't think it very relevant or important to the story. I also disagree with the notion that it reflects poorly on walmart as a whole. I can't believe I'm going to defend those fuckers for a second but I don't think they can be held responsible or accountable for every dumb thing their employees do even while working. I just don't think that's reasonable.
    2
  5496.  @emmacat3202  Regarding, "he was pretty close to Nina Turner." Let's just agree to disagree about this.
    2
  5497. You actually can... as long as there is a camera rolling... not that that makes sense.
    2
  5498. The only person that should stop is you.
    2
  5499. Are you seriously claiming Sanders cracked that joke to benefit Biden? Some people will say anything to try and hurt Sanders.
    2
  5500. It can't go to a second ballot or the party will steal it.
    2
  5501.  @7k769  Regarding, "but i am open to it" Wide open no doubt.
    2
  5502. I think "sell out" is the wrong term but I feel your point.
    2
  5503. That sheepdogging shit is a narrative being pushed by the same people that were "correcting the record" for Hillary Clinton.
    2
  5504. I busted my ass to pay off my student debt long ago but I'm fine with this because I'm not an idiot or ass. Wait... I am kind of an ass. Still I'm all for it.
    2
  5505. A public option would have the government have their own health insurance business that people could buy into the same way they buy into private health insurance. It is a good idea compared to what we have now... a system without it, but it doesn't go far enough fix our broken health care system. It would still allow the poison of the private health care industry to exist and fuck things up. Hope that helps.
    2
  5506.  @ninjanik3  It's a bandaid of a solution when the country needs major surgery. It was talked about most and if there was ever a time and place for it it was when obama was working on obamacare. He didn't even bother to fight for a public option when it was what progressives were calling for at the time as the bare minimum of change needed in that moment.
    2
  5507. You mean shows that aren't news shows? Who gives a fuck... they aren't even pretending to be the news. Apples and oranges.
    2
  5508. Harris and Biden are complicit in jennyside (sic). If you voted for them you are complicit too.
    2
  5509.  @ultrademigod  Can you tell me more about your cult? It's the first one I've been interested in joining.
    2
  5510.  @Ech0Bunnyman  I'm saying you are wrong to believe any politicians rhetoric... even patel.
    2
  5511.  @Ech0Bunnyman  "believe" Don't get your hopes up. I'd love to be proven wrong... but I won't be... not about this.
    2
  5512. I'm only here to call AOC a fraud. Fraud squad. Never forget.
    2
  5513.  @kickinitwithmydawg  Someone is forgetting about shit pie of the FCC.
    2
  5514. Maybe so but it's not believed nearly as much as it should be.
    2
  5515. It's still really early and I suspect they are trying to pick their timing carefully for maximum impact.
    2
  5516. Liz holmes' fraud was illegal. Musk on the other hand actually has billions of dollars in assets because he has gotten billions of dollars from taxpayers. When organized crime is organized enough it isn't even illegal.
    2
  5517.  @glennmiller9491  4 replies but I can only see 3.
    2
  5518.  @pseudonayme7717  "the people in power" Don't misunderstand me I know who does it and why. I'm just calling them out for it.
    2
  5519.  @alabamaman8885  "hurt the Democrats" I don't care. I'm not talking about the party. I'm talking about the goal of getting universal health care. That's what I care about. That's where my allegiance is. Not to some corrupt party. "As a progressive, I highly doubt you do." It sure AF aren't corrupt POS like pelosi or bootlickers for the party like sedar that's for damn sure.
    2
  5520. I feel like most the people that are try to portray defend to mean abolish are intentionally strawmanning and are willfully obtuse. The people who take the bible literally, while being dumb, actually believe their BS.
    2
  5521. Yang is a conman.
    2
  5522.  @phuggard  I've followed lots of bad people in the past. Olberman, maddow (everyone at MSNBC really), tyt, now kyle, and others. They all had a "mask off" moment and you are only left wondering why you ever liked them. Kyle's mask is off. I'm done listening to anything he has to say.
    2
  5523. "gives major grifter vibes. Sorry, not sorry." You should be sorry for making everyone dumber with this nonsense. Are you paid for this stupid shit?
    2
  5524. This is funny because it's clear that kyle's the one whose lost his mind.
    2
  5525. Can you imagine how dirty his porn name is?
    2
  5526.  @LMartinez-cw1zi  I'm thinking it's a bot. They love to "say" "y'all."
    2
  5527.  @falloutboy691  Have they ever told you not to vote for a dem in general election? This is rhetorical. We all know they haven't.
    2
  5528.  @falloutboy691  "corrupt dems like pelosi, sinema, manchin, clyburn," Sam will tell you to vote for all of these POS if they are in a general election versus the red team.
    2
  5529. Nice news skirt fraud.
    2
  5530. I almost want them to repeal it so that getting something better like medicare for all might be closer. It might be a situation where after you take one step back you can take 2 steps forward.
    2
  5531. Because he interviewed someone? You act like he joined them FFS. Clowns like you are impossible to take seriously.
    2
  5532. Its really appropriate that any video about rudy "9-11"guiliani be 9 minutes and 11 seconds.
    2
  5533. Just here to downvote this fraud hack sam.
    2
  5534. Please vote for this man.
    2
  5535. She can flash people at work? That would get me put in jail.
    2
  5536. Are you sad? Depressed? Have you tried unsubscribing? It comes with all sorts of benefits. Side effects include: sanity. Unsubscribing... for your health. Because you are worth it.
    2
  5537. Also... you should watch common sense sceptic's coverage of elon and starlink. Elon should be in jail.
    2
  5538.  @monotech20.14  "didn't much matter" Momentum is important in politics. It took what was suppose to be a time to talk about bernie and made it about pete. It literally tainted every single state after it... which was literally ALL of them.
    2
  5539.  @monotech20.14  "didn't much matter" You straight up know they are cheaters. Long story short you just don't care about it.
    2
  5540.  @CyberClu  Only 20? That might be tough. We would still have to leave some really good reasons off the list. :)
    2
  5541.  @PotatoeChipz  Let's never hang out.
    2
  5542. It's far more insidious than that.
    2
  5543. "The GOP mental gymnastics are astounding." This is funny coming from you morons. Biden isn't doing jack shit to stop war.
    2
  5544.  @DeclanTrippier419  "All you can say is how it's 'funny' yet this whole video proves otherwise." What? Do you really think we are completely out of the country? Do you think that all the CIA who was first in the country is now out of the country? We aren't. We are still in the country even if lots of the uniforms are out. "Trump said it himself, this was his doing" Wait... you care what trump says? Alrighty then. And FYI he's not president right now so I have clue why the fuck you are even talking about him or what he has to do with what's going on now. Biden is president.
    2
  5545.  @InfoForYou8  "left libertarian" I'm tired of people on the right trying to say they are on the left. Sincerely, an actual leftist.
    2
  5546. He is still stupid even though I think you are correct that he knows Bernie would beat him.
    2
  5547. The guy who destroyed sam in a debate.
    2
  5548. I don't care about azov notseas in ukraine.
    2
  5549. I repeated that donation of nothing so it doesn't count according to their dumb contest.
    2
  5550. I'm looking forward to the pathetic excuses and rationalizations the Trump apologists will make for this.
    2
  5551.  @eddymac5767  Better question: why are you licking the boots of corporate propagandist?
    2
  5552.  @furiousapplesack  "I said who should we watch," You are desperate to deflect and talk about anything other than your POS. It's funny.
    2
  5553. More importantly; one is good and one is evil.
    2
  5554. Sam and his crew will always cover for their team.
    2
  5555. She is just brainwashed and in a bubble. I'm betting she gets all her news from MSNBC. Even smart people can be brainwashed. As evidence I cite religion.
    2
  5556. Some of us aren't going to vote to give a person with dementia their finger on the nuclear button.
    2
  5557. Bernie wants you to think he's a radical so that he can dupe radicals into supporting his corrupt party.
    2
  5558. They will absolutely let him run as a dem because it is in their interests to do so. When he runs as a dem they can work to try and prevent him winning in the ways they did in 2016. If they force him out and make him run as an independent they ensure they lose during the general because left leaning voters are then split.
    2
  5559. FYI step 2 is: billions of dollars in government subsidies.
    2
  5560. I wasn't proud long before the orange clown.
    2
  5561.  @nucleargandhi2709  Regarding, "Sorry it upsets you that they're doing something to fight Trump." They would happily tell you to vote for trump if he were team blue just like he was during the W presidency. They are hacks. As I suspect you are.
    2
  5562. I'm pretty sure he was black when it started.
    2
  5563. Is that what repeating her own words is to morons?
    2
  5564. If he gets a plurality and they steal the nomination from him he should run independent.
    2
  5565. Regarding, "think what it did to his fuckin brain" You can't break something when it's already broke.
    2
  5566.  @richarddennis2772  You suck.
    2
  5567.  @bojacatorresbeatriz8481  You suck.
    2
  5568.  @leonpedro1135  You suck.
    2
  5569.  @adamchong67  You got this. I have anything else to do.
    2
  5570. Are you paid well for your smears?
    2
  5571.  @daviddoran3673  All of them? I guess there are more na zis there then I thought.
    2
  5572. Trump's empty podium wasn't going to just cover itself ya know. And they did cover him, a little bit, to smear him and tell you how unrealistic the things he wanted were.
    2
  5573. Holy shit do you say stupid things. Regarding, "Arguing over superdelegates is like arguing over what color socks to wear to your chemo session." Sure. That is why the "democratic" party is insisting on wearing the puke colored socks that alienate their base. But I'm sure they would agree to a parliamentary democracy. That would make sense if I were fucking retarded.
    2
  5574. Sam and his crew don't have much to say about the people who are actually in power. It's their job to deflect from them.
    2
  5575.  @whyamimrpink78  I'm not a superhero. I can't fix stupid so forgive me for not trying with you.
    2
  5576. Not without triggering the fallen queen.
    2
  5577. You do know the "democratic party" was wiped out in all levels of government during that time right? So what is your problem exactly? Don't bother answering. The question is rhetorical. I don't actually care what you think.
    2
  5578. He was "part of the whole DNC primary fraud" in that he was the only fucking reason there needed to be any fucking fraud. The DNC is corrupt but they, unlike you, are not fucking stupid.
    2
  5579. @M R Yes. Both sides smear him. Which is absolutely true. That's the point. Try not overthink that simple point and make it into something other then what it is. Jesus fuck... the point you are claiming they made, which they didn't, is made by adding one word that you are imagining... you are acting as if the original post says, "The media on both sides is EQUALLY trying to taint your character, you'll still have my vote." Here's the thing. That's not what they said. So do everyone a favor and stop acting like that's what they said. Thanks for that.
    2
  5580.  @mikeplurple4942  I support Bernie Sanders because I care about getting money out of politics, I want universal health care, available education, the environment protected, criminal justice reform, the minimum wage raised, the military industrial complex reined in, banks broken up and more... just like Trump supporters. And I refused to support Hillary Clinton and voted for Jill Stein in 2016 cause I'm sexist. And the "left" media isn't trying to smear Sanders. (at least this is what I think they were trying to say, I can't say for certain because it was written so poorly) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oYFRmxN2K1I (warning, the guy in the video is so "sexist" he doesn't date women) Seems legit.
    2
  5581. Regarding, "you think that Bernie Sanders will be the Democratic presidential nominee in 2020" Yes I do. Although what Tom Perez and the party did was sleazy as fuck I think you are overestimating the importance of who the leadership members are to the results of the primary. It is not nothing but ultimately primary voters are going to have their say and I am confident they are going to support Sanders overwhelmingly. Regarding, "it takes time to build momentum for a third party" Yes it does. Jill Stein got about 1 percent of the vote against 2 of most despised people in the country. Regarding, "what the hell was DemExit" A way for people to say they are dissatisfied with the "democratic" party. There are more self identified independents in the country than dems or republicans but the fact of the matter is that the majority of those "independents" are going to vote for a major party candidate in the 2020 presidential election.
    2
  5582. I edited my comment. Hopefully that makes my point more clear.
    2
  5583. ​ @TheCannaGuide  Yes. It is smart to want progressive pundits who call out frauds like TYT and don't want to hide from it.
    2
  5584. ​ @Hipfireturtle  Kyle needs to get better friends than TYT propagandists and blackmailers or not be in a line of work where you tell stories and take sides.
    2
  5585.  @Hipfireturtle  "it's easy to say that when it's not you or me in his shoes" It's not only easy to say but also easy to do for anyone who is intellectually honest. "do you really think it's that easy?" Do you think it's easy for me to call out kyle? After having been a big fan for a long time? I do it because that's what being intellectually honest is about. "I just don't think people can necessarily flip a switch like this" Kyle has been my go to number one source of news on youtube for a long time and I'm honestly considering unsubscribing right now.
    2
  5586.  @shanecrow94  I certainly won't right away. I'm sure I'll give him a second chance. And speaking of giving people a second chance that's what I did for dore back in the day. I was mad dore wouldn't support bernie. I also thought dore was wrong about the value in hostile takeover of the "democratic" party. I'm glad I stuck with him. I hope kyle rewards my faith in him at the moment... even if it's fading fast.
    2
  5587.  @Hipfireturtle  "Being a fan of someone's content and knowing them personally on a friend level isn't even close to the same thing, you know that right?" Not in any sort of meaningful way. "Not even trying to be rude" I don't care if you want to be rude. I just want a substantive point to respond to. This isn't one.
    2
  5588.  @Hipfireturtle  "Being a fan of someone's content and knowing them personally on a friend level isn't even close to the same thing, you know that right?" You don't even attempt to say why they should be treated differently. Or maybe I'm suppose to overlook terrible for friends. I don't. I think it's more my responsibility to not enable and embrace their BS. That's what I think a friend's job is.
    2
  5589. Morons like you almost make me root for human extinction.
    2
  5590. Trump is garbage and is trashed by them. Maybe rethink what you are saying and this is not coming from someone who like the corporate media.
    2
  5591.  @highprogressive  Look, I agree with like 99 percent of the things you say but warn against concluding that yang has your best interests at heart just because he is facing media blackout. I do not trust him personally.
    2
  5592. Don't be afraid to change your bullshit original post. Maybe it's "difficult to recognize bullshit" because of people like you spreading bullshit.
    2
  5593. Not sure if it was you or someone else who gave your lie a thumbs up. If it wasn't you it means that you were responsible for making the world a little bit dumber.
    2
  5594. @ You are blue maga.
    2
  5595. He's not. When someone shows you who they are believe them the first time. maya angelou
    2
  5596. It actually is in some very specific cases like 14 year olds with seizures. That said no one is advocating it for your average 14 year old.
    2
  5597. Do you always believe what the US government tells you?
    2
  5598. Actually he, as I do, support an all fronts approach. I support efforts of a hostile takeover of the party and I support building alternative parties if hostile takeover isn't successful. (or even if hostile takeover does succeed I STILL want viable alternatives) I support progressives. That is the important label to me. I don't care if someone is a democrat, green, independent or other. I'm happily not a registered democrat but I'm also fortunate to live in a state with an open primary. If I had to I'd register at least long enough to vote in the "democratic" primary. Leave room for nuance in your thinking. Be willing to support the guy getting fucked over in the audio even if he has the audacity to run as a democrat. That is very different that being willing to support corporate dems. Nobody is saying you should be doing that.
    2
  5599.  @captkeebz  As long as you don't support either major party you are acting smarter than most.
    2
  5600.  @goldbrick2563  Bernie will tell you to vote for the same party that says mayor pete won iowa.
    2
  5601. Yup. She wasn't corrupted. She was corrupt. And is just showing it.
    2
  5602.  Ash Win  Regarding, "In the video he implied he would drop out." LMFAO. Just tattoo idiot on your forehead already.
    2
  5603. It was always political because it's political theater. You would probably understand that if the dodo were doing a puff piece for trump while he were in office.
    2
  5604. Russia and china aren't the only countries propagandizing it's people. CNN sucks.
    2
  5605. Actually I don't rule out the possibility that they fought harder to torpedo a 15 dollar minimum wage than they fought for neera. But yeah. I obviously agree with your sentiment.
    2
  5606. 0:09 "We have friend of the show ryan grimm on." Ug. Why? Yuck.
    2
  5607.  @tommyob4762  "His whole shtick is bashing Dems about 99.9% of the time" Jimmy knows and tells you why. He says it's because the country needs a party on the left. And he is correct about that. There is always going to be a corporate party. But we need a left. That's why he attacks the dems. They are the ones who are suppose to be on the left but they are not.
    2
  5608.  @layinlow77  Don't sweat it. Their comment does come across a bit like they are a sith in star wars when you want to feel more like a jedi.
    2
  5609. It's the only place we know America won't bomb.
    2
  5610. WeLikeIt, dude, I'm just trying to make a joke in sad times.
    2
  5611.  @soulofhawk1742  I do agree with your sentiment but calling it "frustration" is putting it mildly. I was duped by AOC. That's partly why this hurts so much.
    2
  5612.  @Airith4  Keep hammering them with facts. Important facts about me that make me not like Warren include: she recently voted for an increase to the budget for the department of offense. An increase of about 80 billion per year. That increase alone would have been more than enough to pay bernies free college plan, the one the corporate media claims is "unaffordable." But that was money she felt was fine going towards bombs for trump to use. Also her willingness to take dirty money in general like you have already done (how that doesn't affect people is beyond me). There's also the fact that she didn't run against a corporate shill like Hillary in 2016 (and didn't endorse the true progressive of sanders in the race who only got the mix because warren didn't) but instead wants to run in 2020 against sanders now that he is the clear leader of the progressive movement. I also would point out that she didn't help or support DAPL protestors (sadly lots of people aren't familiar with this but for me this was really, really, really important). I'd also point out that she was a REPUBLICAN in the 90's while Sanders was busy being a progressive his entire life. If none of that sways them kick them out or move. Just kidding. Mostly. :)
    2
  5613.  @prog.rocker  Regarding, "was probably already doing quite well" And people aren't known for wanting more right? I watched uncut gems recently. You should too. It was really good. In part because the writers have a better understanding of human nature than you seem to have. Keep pretending all you want. Reality is what it is.
    2
  5614. Who could biden put up that you would think is worse?
    2
  5615. Tim is right. This shit isn't new. And you do the world a disservice when you act like it is new and try to blame trump and company as if they are the root of the problem. They aren't. They are merely a symptom.
    2
  5616. If you say so N B. Good luck with your continued efforts to demonize an economic system as innately evil even thou the original comment has nothing to with said economic system.
    2
  5617. You really have nothing better to do with you time huh N B? That must suck.
    2
  5618. Pretty much. But if you are looking for other ways to support them money helps. They aren't funding their campaigns by selling out so it helps if you have the means. That said if you don't have the means... don't. None of these candidates would want you to give money to them you can't afford. But as Peter Cuce correctly states not long before your comment, "(even) $1 to each just to help build up their donor numbers" helps send a message that you support them and their message... just like voting does.
    2
  5619.  @eleksitia  fair enough and you are being respectful while being wrong. If I take exception to copy and pasting it's because that is a favorite tool of the disingenuous paid troll. That said I am confident you aren't one. I just think you are wrong.
    2
  5620.  @C17Citadel  I know he does. It's just a dumb joke.
    2
  5621. If you want to know what "significant impact on the election outcome" actually looks like Jeri you should look at the "democratic" party and how they rigged the primary.
    2
  5622. Jeri regarding, "social media disinformation." You mean like the role Hillary Clinton's superpac "Correct the Record" played? Do you say CTR had a significant impact on the election? I suspect not.
    2
  5623. Regarding, "We don't know if it swayed 10 people or millions." You really should if your rhetoric suggests millions.
    2
  5624. To all those people that say there is no reason for superdelegates you are wrong. There is exactly one good reason and that is to prevent a contested convention. To win the nomination you need a majority of delegates and when more than 2 candidates run (which is essentially always) it is very possible that the person getting the most delegates does not get a majority of delegates and that opens the door for chaos and infighting that no party wants. Superdelegates is a way to stop this. All that said superdelegates are a fucking joke because, let's be real, THAT IS NOT WHY THE DNC LOVES THEM. That is not the primary reason they are there. There are there to try to influence voters. They are there to try and tip the scale from the very start. Hillary Clinton had 400 delegates before any of us peasants were allowed to vote because that was their not so subtle way of telling us who was suppose to win. People want to vote for the winner. People want their "votes to matter." And the DNC sent a clear message early that the only way to be on the winning side from the start and have a meaningful vote was going to be by voting for Clinton. Even after Sanders was up in pledged delegates early the corporate media happily put all delegates up together to make it appear as if Hillary Clinton was fucking crushing him. That is why they are there. I could deal with superdelegates sticking around because of, like I pointed out, the only good reason for them to exist. But then superdelegates, should they stay, should need to be required to vote for the candidate who gets the most pledged delegates. Period. The DNC would never agree to such a thing because the reason they are around is not for the only legit reason they should exist.
    2
  5625. Great video. But seriously... I stand with Palestine.
    2
  5626. You think using an empirical fact is intellectually dishonest? That is pretty fucking funny.
    2
  5627. You do whatever you got to do to justify the unjustifiable. Go ahead and play whatever mental gymnastics you want for all I care. It would just be nice if, while doing it, you don't call us intellectually dishonest for having the audacity to use a fact that contradicts the bullshit rationalizations you want to make to continue supporting the military industrialized complex and American imperialism.
    2
  5628. Regarding, "Nobody's asking them to 'excel' at anything." Ain't this the truth. US court rules you can be too smart to be a cop. https://www.globalresearch.ca/us-court-ruled-you-can-be-too-smart-to-be-a-cop/5420630
    2
  5629. ding ding, ding ding, SHAME!
    2
  5630.  @50jakecs  When she votes for a POS like pelosi for speaker and gets nothing for that vote instead of say pushing to get a vote on m4a. That's what I disagree with her on. Her being a fraud. Actions speak louder than words.
    2
  5631.  @CamMcGinn1981  What? Or better yet I'll explain my point from my own point of view... It's understandable that it's not easy for me to call out kyle after he's been my go to source of youtube news for a years now but I'm not going to overlook the many problems with this video. It would be gutless and wrong of me to not call out kyle when his actions betray what I believe and what I expect of him.... So I don't.
    2
  5632. Lock him up.
    2
  5633. The person who has said she is going to take legalized bribes if she makes it to the general? Yeah... that's smoke.
    2
  5634.  @longclaw22-72  Regarding, ""all true progressives" smh" Wait... are there "progressives" who don't want m4a? Oh yeah... there aren't. They are only people pretending to support m4a.
    2
  5635.  Craig Bowers  If you won't fight for m4a I hope you lose and you should lose.
    2
  5636.  @VileVengeance  Regarding, "would love if m4a got passed but be realistic" Force the vote wasn't demanding m4a be passed. Only that m4a be voted on. It's a remarkably realistic ask while you act as if we wanted unicorns for everyone. Regarding, "Is m4a going to stop the wide spread eviction rate in the country?" Did the frauds get something to help this when voting for pelosi or are you just deflecting at their failure to get anything for their vote? Regarding, "Is m4a going decrease the unemployment rate?" Does it need to to be a good thing? Or are you again deflecting? Isn't the fact that m4a would save lives enough? Or does it also need to tickle your balls while it saves lives? Regarding, "all of his fans just down play the failed coup" I'll take it more seriously when the government takes it more seriously. They let that shit happen so that they can trample your rights going forward. If the government were actually scared of the protestors they would have been treated more like BLM activists. When they start doing that I promise I'll take it more seriously. Regarding, "m4a would be great but it ain't happening anytime soon with all the shit that's been going on." Yeah. A pandemic going on makes this totally not the time. Maybe after the pandemic would be a better time to fight for m4a. Regarding, "They also downplay..." To be clear by your own definition you are "downplaying" m4a right? Try to realize why this makes you a hypocrite.
    2
  5637.  @longclaw22-72  Regarding, "they don't agree with you on strategy." Did you read AOC's tweet? Here this is AOC in her own words telling you why force the vote is a no brainer good idea... "A few reasons: Sometimes it’s to get members on the record, so ppl can’t make excuses later. Sometimes these votes create real political pressure that forces developments. Sometimes we vote for the historical record - to let future generations know we did everything we could." She is a fraud because her actions don't match those words. It's pretty simple really. Regarding, "its wrong and quite stupid to attack people and to question their ideologies when they don't agree with you on strategy." It's wrong and quite stupid to defend people whose actions do not match their words. It's what trump supporters do for their clown. Regarding, "you guys are turning it into a dealbreaker" She was elected to fight for m4a. If she doesn't do that it is a dealbreaker and of course it should be. I didn't support her to get the power she has to just betray us like this, support pelosi and get nothing for it. Acting like typical corporate twats is a deal breaker for me. Why isn't it for you? Regarding, "ironically helps the corporate dems" If you aren't fighting for m4a you already are a corporate dem.
    2
  5638.  @VileVengeance  4 instant thumbs up on an old thread in only 17 minutes? I wonder who is paying for them? Someone who profits off of sick people no doubt.
    2
  5639. I'd prefer a well known actor over a DNC drone anyday.
    2
  5640.  @kity1081  FYI that does nothing to diminish my point.
    2
  5641. Sounds like you think you were first to 420. You weren't. I've been high a long time.
    2
  5642.  @triggerwarning5762  "Let's make Covid illegal!" Mutations too. F it. All disease. But then big pharma wouldn't make all the money. Maybe we shouldn't.
    2
  5643. You want more? Fine. I guess I just realized that you knew that you were saying stupid things because you knew you were going to get flack for saying them but whatever. Regarding, "Fuck Bernie" Fuck Bernie? No. Fuck you. Bernie Sanders has done more than anyone else in the world to expose the rot in the DNC and the system. Thanks to Bernie more people than ever are woke to the systemic corruption that exists in our government. He has fought for progressive cause his entire life and despite being in government for a very long time has almost never been on the wrong side of an issue. Regarding, "he didn't fight" He entered the race down 60 points and only "lost" because of shenanigans. He fought like a motherfucker KNOWING the game was rigged as fuck when most people would have just given up Biden style. Regarding, "it was obvious he got cheated by Filthy Hillary" Yes. It was obvious. I'm not sure about you but I knew it was fucking obvious the game was rigged when 400 superdelegates pledged their support to her before a single peasant even voted. It was fucking obvious from start to finish but ultimately crying like a bitch Hillary Clinton book tour style is counterproductive to do what he wants done. Regarding, "ultimately fell in line and actually supported the bitch." When entering the primary he agreed to support the "winner" of the nomination. He lost and fullfilled his pledge. Sanders is like that... he does what he says he will do. But I think it had more to do with the fact that he didn't want Trump to win. Can you really blame him for not wanting to be blamed for Trump? Can you blame him for not wanting Trump to be president? I sure as fuck get it. He is just as corrupt as Hillary with the bonus of being downright offensive. Regarding, "she still blames him" She is a POS. I'm not sure why I'm suppose to be mad at Sanders for her actions. And I'm glad she blames him. She only makes herself and the corporate dems look that much worse when she does. Even Hillary supporters have an impossible time justifying her crying. Regarding, "He started a movement." Yes he did. It wasn't about him. It was about the movement. You should be happy he left this legacy instead of crying like a bitch Hillary Clinton style. Regarding, "TULSI GABBARD" I love Tulsi Gabbard. I'd be happy if she were President. But Sanders is the logical choice in 2020. He has the name recognition of rock star and is rightfully the most popular politician in the country. Gabbard would have the problems Sanders had in 2016 when he entered of limited name recognition and that is exceptionally important in a world where the corporate media will go out of their way to not cover non establishment candidates other than to smear them. And as much as I love what I know about her she does not have a very long record to look at and know for sure what we would be getting. Especially at the start of her career she seemed very conservative in her beliefs before seeming to evolve. Regarding, "I'm doing the "establishment's" work by promoting Tulsi" I'm talking about the other 99 percent of your bullshit that happened before that where you took a piss on about the only decent politician in government who, without him, you might not even know who Tulsi Gabbard was. Is that enough for you? Can I now call you a fucking moron with your approval? Like I said the establishment appreciates you smearing Sanders and thank you for doing their work for them. Now go fuck yourself. I don't care if you are only accidentally doing their work for them, the bottom line is that you are working against my interests and your own when doing so. It is fucking stupid so I'm going to call you stupid for doing it. Oh, and I did watch it. What dumbass reason do you think I didn't? Don't answer. This is rhetorical. I don't actually give a fuck what you think. I just wanted to call you dumb for saying stupid things.
    2
  5644. You are a fool then supporting a clown.
    2
  5645. Regarding, "citizens have guns but their guns are not out there committing mass shootings and mass murders." Either the person being talked about in this story wasn't a citizen or you are mental midget.
    2
  5646. Spoiler alert... You are a mental midget.
    2
  5647. Holy fuck are you dumb. Then again I'm dumb for addressing you further. What can I say... you are funny in your dumb as fuck way. Regarding, "what sane person would trade any violence for another form of violence" People who appreciate math. There is a reason mass murder with knives aren't a thing but mass murder with guns is the norm. Let's say the form of violence we would be trying to address were that of nuclear weapons. People had them and were using them. I would happily trade that violence in for violence using guns because of reasons that should be totally fucking obvious and shouldn't need explaining. The fact that you don't understand something so simplistic would be remarkable if you hadn't already demonstrated you are stupid beyond words. I don't even like calling you stupid. It feels insulting to stupid people.
    2
  5648. Regarding, "Dont shoot me Im a sane person Id much rather be stabbed to death." The level of stupid to think this was my point is... well there are no words. I hope you are just trolling me. I hope you are really not as dumb as you seem.
    2
  5649. Also, you are using quotation marks wrong. What you are doing is, in fact, lying.
    2
  5650.  @trevorfaulkner4934  Regarding, "She's not splitting the vote" Of course she is. The vast majority of her supporters would be supporting Bernie if she weren't in the race. Their voters come from the same pool of people... progressives. Regarding, "she's waking up more people to these regime-change wars" Don't get me wrong, there are aspects to her campaign that I love. But ultimately I think she is doing more damage than the good she is doing with her campaign. Regarding, "When it's time for her to drop out" And when do you think that will be? Before or after votes have been cast and the damage has been done. Shit, even if she dropped out TODAY, she will arguably have done damage to Bernie's campaign because (and even thou it shouldn't be this way but it is) momentum is a reality and of importance in politics. There is a reason Hillary was portrayed as inevitable in 2016 and they tried to do the same for Biden in 2020... because of momentum. If tulsi were not in the race the vast majority of her supporters would be supporting sanders and that would make all the arguments the corporate media make about his campaign struggling and shit like that that much harder to make.
    2
  5651. "There is no difference in quality." One are fans of a scientist calling out a conman. The other are fans of a conman getting rich with billions of dollars in taxpayer money. There is no difference in the quality between your comment and that of musk sycophants.
    2
  5652. Canada's "government health care" costs half as much, doesn't leave millions uninsured, and produces better results. Why would you defend the status quo? It clearly sucks.
    2
  5653. What world do you live in where they don't already do anything and everything in their power to automate?
    2
  5654. I'm done with you Trey. I'd rather save my time and breathe for people who are smart enough and have the empathy to not be ok with the status quo.
    2
  5655. David, "I don't know what Warren is doing." I do. She is trying to stop Sanders. She is terrible and not a progressive.
    2
  5656.  @PixelGunZodiac  March 13 what? Whatever your point is it's lost on me.
    2
  5657.  @PixelGunZodiac  Regarding, "What country did biden bomb?" Syria Regarding, "You're making things out of thin air." Nope. You are just woefully misinformed or actively trying to mislead people. Regarding, "Since..." I guess Biden should have thought about that before making promises you think he can't keep. And the truth of the matter is is that he can keep them. He and his corporate overlords don't want him to. Regarding, "We should be happy there is a stimulus at all." I guess we should have been happy trump was president based on this type of nonsensical logic. Trump: we should be happy there is a stimulus at all. Does that make sense to you? Well you don't make sense to me.
    2
  5658.  @OK-nr6se  "Biden is probably one of the best in modern history" He's really not. I'm not sure he's better than trump even. It took trump 70 some days to attack syria and it only took biden 30 some days.
    2
  5659.  @PixelGunZodiac  "The only media that actually covered that was.... Fox news." LMFAO. You are straight up lying. NBC "Biden orders airstrikes in Syria, retaliating against Iran-backed militias" Posted one day ago.
    2
  5660.  @PixelGunZodiac  You have bootlicking down to a science.
    2
  5661.  @PixelGunZodiac  Regarding, "Most of what i said is true" Is this your pathetic way of admitting that you are also spreading lies?
    2
  5662.  @PixelGunZodiac  "In a way most of us do spread misinformation" Is this how you rationalize lying to people? Is this how you rationalize not bothering to attempt to answer the simple direct questions I pose at you only to have you deflect?
    2
  5663.  @PixelGunZodiac  Regarding, " I did answer it," You suck at life. Do you lie about everything?
    2
  5664. People like social security. Spoiler alert... that is socialism.
    2
  5665. Sam seder is controlled opposition.
    2
  5666. Don't reproduce please.
    2
  5667. She was a child with idiots for parents. Have some perspective.
    2
  5668. I could only take you less seriously if you were named "U.S.Navy Pete".... oh wait.
    2
  5669. Regarding, "that’s such a awful comparison" Yeah, you are right. Here a better one for you. What she is doing is akin to setting fire to your house and you are giving her credit for putting the fire out after it burned your house to the ground. SHE WORKED TO RIG THE PRIMARY. And if you think the only example of her working to do so was passing the debate question to the Hillary camp then I have a bridge to sell you. And now you are willing to forgive her for it because she is exposing the corruption. BUT THERE WOULDN'T BE ANYTHING TO EXPOSE IF IT WEREN'T FOR PEOPLE LIKE BRAZILE. You want to forgive. Fine. You go ahead. I will never give her a pass for rigging elections.
    2
  5670.  @cpt.crunch9978  Regarding, "I'd argue they are definitely a threat to themselves" While this is arguably true it's still mostly just others and it's not even close.
    2
  5671. You are why Trump loves the uneducated.
    2
  5672. Bootlickers from both sides of the isle as guests who only make everyone dumber when they talk.
    2
  5673. Youtube: hold my beer.
    2
  5674. Do you want to force the vote? SIGN! THE! PETITION! Thank you.
    2
  5675. Bernie is just another corrupt warmongers in the "democratic" party. I'm ashamed I supported you.
    2
  5676. Try to cite your lies. You can't because they are lies. Guns save half a million lives per year has to be one of the stupidest fucking things I have ever read before. You suck at life. Next time when you lie to try to make your bullshit at least a little bit believable. Don't be afraid to be a decent human being and delete your bullshit. It's never too late to stop being a disgrace to humanity.
    2
  5677. I'd pay money to be able to downvote this crap again.
    2
  5678.  @alioth7403  It was at 978K when I first checked and have rejoiced every time he loses 1K.
    2
  5679.  @briancardio6567  Fair enough I suppose.
    2
  5680. I had forgotten about that. Thanks for reminding me and the laugh that came with it.
    2
  5681.  @martinscrapp7166  Is that why assange was persecuted? Or are you deeply unserious?
    2
  5682.  @PeaceIsJesusChrist  You don't know much about anything do you?
    2
  5683. It is only "authoritarian" if they are trying to legislate not saying something. That or you would be equally "authoritarian" for saying they shouldn't say you shouldn't say something (good luck unpacking that but I simply don't know of a better way to say it). Other than that I agree with your comment.
    2
  5684. I can walk and chew gum at the same time.
    2
  5685. "Once an agent always an agent?" Unless someone has REALLY switched teams... as in... they are calling out whatever agency they came from and/or whistleblowers.
    2
  5686.  @IdleCommentator  "just a liar" Nope. That was what kyle exposed himself to be when he claimed the millions don't corrupt tyt, when he lied by omission in not mentioning the blackmail, by ghosting jimmy because he has a potty mouth to stay out of it with cenk's nephew to talk about pocket pussies, and more. With friends like kyle who needs enemies. Then again if you are guilty of blackmail kyle will have your back so there's that.
    2
  5687. He didn't leave. He was kicked out. He had to be forced to do the right thing. He's a fraud.
    2
  5688.  @kadourimdou43  From israel apartheid and israel genocide.
    2
  5689. @Yiannis A Nomikos Meh. I'd vote for his corpse before I'd support a corporate dem.
    2
  5690.  @Derek_The_Magnificent_Bastard  Again... I wholeheartedly agree with everything you said with only one tiny caveat. I only wish everyone thought the same.... including Tulsi about "all progressives should be throwing their weight behind Bernie because he is by far the most popular." The only thing I don't exactly agree with personally is, "really the only person in my eyes that can beat Trump." Trump is terrible and most everyone realize it except for his most devout worshipers but they are far from the majority. Even arguably the most despised "democrat," Hillary Clinton, got millions more votes then him. And the only reason she lost the EC and general election was because she was accurately perceived to have won her primary illegitimately. We need Bernie not because he is our only hope of beating Trump, but because he is our best hope of winning the more important election, the "democratic" primary, against their corporate shills and our best hope of overcoming their rigged game. Should the dems succeed in getting someone like Biden, Booker, or Harris the nomination I am confident they will win the general assuming they win the primary without too much bullshit of theirs being exposed. That said it is incredibly important that never come to pass. We need a progressive and true change for the country desperately right now and not a corporate dem in the WH. Peace.
    2
  5691.  @Derek_The_Magnificent_Bastard  Well I can't disagree with any of that. Thank you for restoring some faith I've lost in humanity and progressives as I've been completely dumbfounded as of late how so many dismiss the effects of vote splitting.
    2
  5692. You get shamed because clearly you are an anti-semite.
    2
  5693. Bernie Sanders is good but that is pretty much it.
    2
  5694. Please do not reproduce.
    2
  5695.  @PinkbubblegumPop  I guess we are just going to have to agree to disagree about him being an amazing human being. He is pure trash who only appeals to think about things in the most simplistic and idiotic ways. We are talking about a guy who thinks they should be president. It really isn't too much to ask that people who support him offer ways he is suppose to make things better. We are living in a world with lots of really important, really big problems that need addressing. It shouldn't be too much to ask what his going to do to address them and improve people lives. Pete supporters have no answer for this. Even they don't know what he is looking to do because he goes out of his way to say giving policy proposals is a bad idea. He's akin to a plumber saying they don't have a plan to fix your leaking pikes and lead water in flint but he's not the last plumber you had. Talking about how the last plumber sucks doesn't address the problem. And that's kind of important. Or at least it is to people who aren't complete idiots gobbling up everything the corporate media serves them.
    2
  5696. You can't really be that stupid can you?
    2
  5697. Youtube says there are 3 replies but only let's you read 1. Isn't that the type of thing that is suppose to make china the bad guy?
    2
  5698. I'm already living the good life after the first check. I'm not sure why anyone would think I'd need more. I'm set for life already.
    2
  5699.  @ItsDillan  I was thinking I'd buy another house with the new check but I hadn't even considered getting a yacht (probably because I don't really care for sailing and get motion sickness easy). That's seems like the only logical use of that money for me at this point even if I'll never use it.
    2
  5700. I hope you don't actually believe that mountain of bullshit.
    2
  5701. They are bribed.
    2
  5702. Yeah but what's a video? Is that what perverts do to watch others? /s
    2
  5703. How anyone can say 'veritas' without laughing or acknowledging how they are proven to be sleazy propogandists is beyond me. It's like citing fox news but somehow they have even less credibility.
    2
  5704. You are the one making it about "personalities" instead of policy and strategy.
    2
  5705.  @tracy2762  Don't get me wrong... I'm not supporting this... I'm saying it was all experimental... and for anyone to say they knew what was going to happen is wrong.
    2
  5706. It should be more and probably is considering how bad at math youtube is.
    2
  5707. Money in politics is fucking everything up.
    2
  5708. "great legacy of Obamacare" LMFAO
    2
  5709.  @johnnyzeee5215  I'm sorry do you think I care much for a guy whose signature piece of legislation was republican health care and more than double the number of wars we are in? Add Obama to Sanders anti-endorsement list for all I care. If he did such a good job the country wouldn't have been willing to give the keys to the country to an orange clown after he left.
    2
  5710.  @MajimeTV  "they don’t have all the power" Yes. They do. They can do literally anything they want and republicans can't stop them. Those are the facts whether you accept it or admit it.
    2
  5711.  @MajimeTV  " the supreme court?" They don't make law. Just because you give your own terrible comments a thumbs up doesn't make them better than they are. It only exposes your intellectual dishonesty.
    2
  5712.  @MajimeTV  "And historically who is Biden? Did you forget he was a segregationist?" Biden is Bernie's "good friend." Maybe you should remind bernie of that, not me.
    2
  5713.  @kdnick8584  You don't think that is important to know and point out? Or are you just being intentionally obtuse?
    2
  5714.  @kdnick8584  Are you sure it's that? Or are you just mad that she is being called that the way peter is?
    2
  5715.  @kdnick8584  We all have biases and labels that accurately describe what we are. They are important. That's why we use them at all and why so many people try to MISUSE them like when biden calls himself "the most progressive" or other BS.
    2
  5716. Talk is cheap.
    2
  5717. If anyone is a "true democrat" it's Bernie, the guy whose policy positions on literally everything is in line with the majority of democratic voters. The "fair weather friends" are, for example, the democrats who don't support some kind of single payer system.
    2
  5718. Spencer regarding, "imagine someone tries to stab you, would you just stand around and wait for them to try to stab you again" LMAO. Do you ever try to think about this from the other side? Israel is illegally occupying other country's land. They are effectively stabbing those countries. Regarding, "You're argument is implying that yes, you should wait around and let them try to stab you again." Holy shit are you stupid.
    2
  5719. @IAM REAL Veritas doctors their videos and carlson is hardly perfect even if I he deserves some credit.
    2
  5720. @IAM REAL "That is a lie." I've seen the cut up pieces they have released as compared to the originals. I don't watch CNN crap and I believe my own eyes.
    2
  5721.  @frankporter6169  But I agree with the sentiment that voices of reason are becoming harder to find.
    2
  5722. Didn't dave tell everyone to vote for trump? He is "part of the problem." Pun intended.
    2
  5723.  @limmiesnoddy1977  I'm not defending Pelosi. Fuck her. She sucks. I'm just pointing out that if you haven't already realized how terrible she is this isn't likely to wake you from your sleep.
    2
  5724. Reminder that whyamimerpink's comments can and will make you dumber.
    2
  5725.  @3ld919  Regarding, "No one is denying Biden is a POS, but we can make a strong argument why Biden is better for the progressive movement, can you make an argument Trump is better for the progressive movement? If so, lets hear it." Sure... not that I should need to. I shouldn't need to explain why I don't support evil. The DNC is a dumpster fire that needs to burn to the ground so that something better can take it's place. Enabling that dumpster fire party has the potential to lead to something worse than Trump down the road. This isn't the last election ever. Trump afterall was a response to a party that sucks and sold out it's people after promising hope and change. If Biden wins then we are assured of a corporate twat representing team blue in 2024, and the possibility of a new trump who is even worse taking them on and beating them. If trump wins there is hope of actual progressive change and a progressive nominee in 2024. But I DON'T SUPPORT TRUMP. I'm not trying to get him to win. I support good and I'm willing to lose. You support evil... when you do that you can't win. I don't want trump to win. I don't want biden to win. But if you want to know if I think there is the possibility of trump being better in the long term... I do.
    2
  5726. Sam's job is to sheepherd you into a corrupt party that doesn't give a f about you.
    2
  5727.  @Ron-oe7hg  "so ..." So maybe we should do something about it? Instead of making excuses, rationalizations, and deflections.
    2
  5728.  @Ron-oe7hg  "where was your comment about THAT" Not that you care but I can't stand either major party or it's leaders. I'm smart enough to know they are both bought.
    2
  5729. Grim is controlled opposition meant to manufacture consent for corrupt politicians.
    2
  5730. I prefer to call them the corporate media.
    2
  5731. But they still fall for conman POS politicians like yang.
    2
  5732.  @havable  "Your Trump" I'm not a trump supporter. But just like trump supporters you are deflecting when the topic your clown. When it's about trump they will talk about pelosi, or hillary, or biden. Anything to distract and deflect from your con.
    2
  5733. The party had a supermajority and Obama didn't even try to get a public option. Stop making excuses for the inexcusable.
    2
  5734. Please sign the petition. Force the vote!
    2
  5735. You are an idiot. Good luck with that.
    2
  5736. Regarding, "Trump 2020." Thank you for proving my point that you are an idiot. Good luck with your conman.
    2
  5737. Bernie is here if you want to join reality.
    2
  5738. FYI 1.9 trillion is enough to give you and every american almost 7K each.
    2
  5739. He never actually had core beliefs... this is but another example that proves it.
    2
  5740.  L  Seemed self explanatory enough to me.
    2
  5741.  L  I don't think she is innately terrible but I do think she's a grifter looking to sell stuff and build her brand.
    2
  5742. You are correct but you are wrong to not include the corporate dems in your statement.
    2
  5743. Regarding, "AOC is less popular than Trump nationally too." Just think whatever stupid shit you want. Clearly you will.
    2
  5744. Absolutely. The FBI too.
    2
  5745.  @michaelhomes8049  "his youtube channel secular talk, an AFFILIATE of the young turks network." -wikipedia
    2
  5746.  @michaelhomes8049  I understand why you might not be aware of that. Kyle never mentions it even when saying TYT aren't corrupt despite the millions they get and while covering for their blackmail.
    2
  5747.  @hellfish2309  Long story short you don't have anything to debunk the claim and you still aren't bothering to provide any evidence.
    2
  5748.  @hellfish2309  "you’re arguing the affiliation you’re citing proves Kyle offers bias for sale... you got receipts, goon?" LMFAO. No. I'm arguing it's evidence. And it is the receipt which is something you never bother to provide. You might for example offer up TYT's homepage and tell me to look at "channels" and see what it says there. You might try to offer up evidence that they are not affiliated because secular talk wouldn't be listed in the "TYT Network" with channels such as tyt investigation, tyt conversation, rebel hq which I used to enjoy way back when it was called tyt politics and had jordan chariton. And you might say... secular talk isn't there to try and give your own receipts. But sure enough secular talk IS there. You still haven't offered a single point in all your BS. Literally all you have provided is ad hominem.
    2
  5749. Ruben regarding, "95% of the population of this country to this DAY are still asking "Who the fuck is Jill Stein and why should I care" Coincidentally the corporate media only talked about Jill Stein to smear her and lie about her. Regarding, "Get a decent amount of Green party people elected to local, state and federal government first" Clearly you do not understand how rigged the entire government is from top to bottom. There are rules in place about funding that only take place on the presidential level. If Jill Stein would have gotten 5 percent of the vote it would have helped fund their party. There are also other rules that often limit ballot access to candidates at those lower levels when the party is not represented at the presidential level. In short the system is rigged AGAINST allowing what you think needs to be done. Regarding, "maybe we'll give a damn about whatever attention whore" Consider me a skeptic of your bullshit. Clearly your mind is made up and you only came her to spout some bullshit talking points and to talk down about Stein. Regarding, "As usual, once the first Wednesday after a Presidential Election comes, the Green Party disappears like a fart in a dust storm." There are well over 100 Green Party members who hold office in about 18 states but don't let those facts get in the way of your bullshit.
    2
  5750.  @glennwilcock4593  I think it might be easier if I listed the places we don't have troops.
    2
  5751. You think they don't operate on US soil... you sweet summer child
    2
  5752.  @BobbyJ1998  Far too many. And it is infuriating that we don't have a major party in this country that can be said to represent peace.
    2
  5753. LMFAO. Good luck with your smears and stupid comments.
    2
  5754.  @paulsommerhalder9049  She lost it when she didn't support Sanders in 2016, or DAPL protestors, and voted for extra bombs for Trump, and was a republican not long ago when she was in her 40s, and her shit health care plan, and...
    2
  5755. Is that suppose to impress me? She only says what she should have been saying the ENTIRE FUCKING TIME at the very end as an after thought.
    2
  5756. No experience, no record, no business running, no business deserving support.
    2
  5757.  @iceKING860  Regarding, "realistically thats ALL he did was get people to converse about it....talk talk talk talk talk.....but do we have it?" Good point. I guess Jimmy sucks too because we don't have it. /s Ultimately the first step in passing transformative legislation is by getting the people support it. Sanders has helped do that. Maybe give him some credit instead of only scorn.
    2
  5758.  @f58534  You wanna beat Trump? Tell Biden to fuck off and get behind Sanders. Also, get and have some fucking standards for who you vote for or you may as well vote for Trump with that sort of idiotic thinking.
    2
  5759. Regarding, "ad hominems" Weren't you the same person who called David a "fricken idiot" in your original post? I'm sure you think that was different thou. Hypocrites always do. And he was incredibly polite to you while addressing the issues despite your claim. Never did he call you any names. NOT ONE. I on the other hand would have had no problem calling you a dipshit for the things you said as you clearly were misconstruing what he said.
    2
  5760. What world do you live in where it's going to come down to the two most progressive candidates? I want to live there. Sadly I live in reality.
    2
  5761.  @roderickburrell2060  You do not make sense.
    2
  5762. They aren't impartial... but not because of that.
    2
  5763. "No one in the MSM is talking about this except FOX." Are you trying to make corporate media look better than they are? Cause that's what you are doing to people who have watched the video and KNOW you are lying.
    2
  5764. Presenting opinion and presenting opinion as if it is fact are two completely different things.
    2
  5765.  @cameronmoore4061  "Everyone knows it came from a lab" You are just the other side of the "everyone knows it didn't come from a lab" coin.
    2
  5766. Try to realize what a worthless hack you are Jeremy. I can only imagine the defenses and stupid shit you would say in defense of trump if you thought he was on your team. Because that's what you do and that's what you care about... your team. Get yourself some intellectual honesty.
    2
  5767.  @clbazar  Regarding, "I take it you’re not voting for Biden." Nope. But if I bought in to your fictitious notion that it's a "binary choice." There are not only two choices on the menu. But anyways... let's say I agree with your lesser of two evils BS and wanted to play your game... I'd vote for Trump. Not for the short term. But because of 2024. 2020-2024 is going to suck. Period. Biden doesn't have a cure for the coronavirus. Or a plan to give people jobs, or money, or health care, or education, or anything of value. Nothing fundamentally changing in a world that DESPERATELY needing change is a recipe for disaster. Whoever is in the WH will be blamed for the upcoming depression in 2024. If it's biden we likely get trump 2.0. If it's trump we might actually get some hope and change that was promised long ago by Obama but never came. We might actually get a progressive. There is no shot at this with biden in the WH. So while trump in the WH is marginally worse for 4 years, long term I think Trump winning is the best bet for the country. But I don't vote for evil. Even if I think it's the lesser evil. I leave that to the many sheep that evil preys upon. I am willing to vote for good even if it means losing.
    2
  5768.  @Scroteydada  I'm not voting for Trump and I think Trump winning is best for the country long term. You are lucky I don't actually support evil like you say. That's what you do.
    2
  5769.  @Scroteydada  Regarding, "it's completely ahistorical" LMFAO. If you say so. In reality Trump was backlash to Obama not giving them the hope and change they craved. Regarding, "When democrats fail, the same base can turn to progressivism." Yeah. After Biden the country is still going to vote for a democrat. And that makes sense to you? What a waste of time this is. Regarding, "Blame doesn't do anything in itself," LMFAO. Are you really saying their are no repercussions for who the public blames for failure? LFMAO. Just stop.
    2
  5770.  @Scroteydada  Don't worry bud. I'm not going to vote for Trump even if I think it would be best for the country long term. I don't vote for evil. I leave that to people like you.
    2
  5771.  @Scroteydada  Regarding, "So this is all just class reductionism." It's all what having standards and refusing to support terrible looks like. Don't overthink it. Regarding, "You didn't list any social issues." I also didn't list things like war with russia. Where I prefer Trump by quite a bit. I wasn't really about that. It was about 2024. Again... try not to overthink it and deflect from that very simple point. Regarding, "many explicit acts of legislative discrimination of Trump's first 4 years" Biden's crime bill was racist as fuck. And this is actually relevant to the issue of if biden is worthy of support or not. Trump sucking doesn't make biden good. Regarding, "They deconstruct democracy more than any democrat in modern history. " This is just silly hyperbole and fear mongering. Talking to you is not a good use of my time.
    2
  5772.  @blueballedtech  Regarding, "I don't take you seriously if you're ok with fascism" I'm not ok with fascism and never have even implied that I am. So it's you that isn't to be taken seriously.
    2
  5773.  @kaijessen3654  Your assumptions say more about you than it does me.
    2
  5774.  @kaijessen3654  That still might be the least stupid thing you have said so far.
    2
  5775. Yeah... believing in supernatural bullshit with no good evidence is the way to not be "pathetic" think total fucking morons.
    2
  5776. Sam and his crew are doing ok so they don't seem to care much about the dems who are actually in power.
    2
  5777. AOC is still young. Nina Turner, who should be Bernie's running mate in 2028, AOC in 2036. President is usually the last thing someone does and I want AOC to be around a while.
    2
  5778. Speculator regarding, "she sounds like a teenager," While I agree that what she did was immature that wasn't the part that made me cringe. The part that makes me cringe is that some still look at words as innately wrong without bothering to look at the context. She was thrilled and made a childish joke. I too am a bit childish at times (note: this is an understatement) as I will forever think that a women talking about her dick and balls is hilarious. And it makes me cringe to think that a person expressing excitement and joy for their new job had that job taken away for what was obviously a joke born out of excitement for said job. We are not robots, never will be, and shouldn't be expected to act as such.
    2
  5779. Alexander it is in the billions range when all corporate media sources are accounted for but I wasn't addressing all corporate media but only MSNBC. Therefor had I said billions in my statement it would have incorrect. Embellishing the truth only hurts good arguments and enables people to dismiss them.
    2
  5780.  @jordanhenderson9213  " I just find it annoying when I see people using a word over and over when they clearly don’t understand what it means." Pretty funny coming from an idiot defending a person trying to blackmail.
    2
  5781.  @jordanhenderson9213  "Another idiot who uses the word blackmail without understanding that someone needs to ask for something in return for keeping quiet" LMFAO She makes it perfectly clear what she wants. She wants jimmy to stop running his mouth. That's what this is about. It's not about being a predator. She also makes that perfect clear. Please be quiet. You only make everyone dumber when you talk.
    2
  5782.  @jordanhenderson9213  "so you can’t find a specific quote where she actually asks him to stop" LMFAO. I can only point to her telling you and everyone exactly what she wants. I can also point to things like, "I've been holding back... that's about to change." "you’re doing the old “it’s obvious that was the intent even though it isn’t stated anywhere in the message.”" You are using quotation marks wrong. The intent is obvious because she tells you why she making the threat. The implication is PERFECTLY clear. She was sitting on her supposed blackmail material. She was going to metoo jimmy and she tells you why. But she hasn't. Even as she made her threats she didn't. Because it's blackmail. If she were going to go and expose jimmy for being a predator you just do it. You don't tell them first. Unless of course if you want to blackmail them like ana was doing.
    2
  5783.  @jordanhenderson9213  She says, "I've been holding back, letting you run your mouth, that's about to change." Let's say I said that to you and I was holding a knife to the throat of someone you cared about. I bet you wouldn't have as much trouble understanding that it's clearly and obviously blackmail. Stop being willfully obtuse.
    2
  5784. Literally every conclusion you come to is wrong.
    2
  5785. That's the type of worthless comment I'd expect from someone on that side.
    2
  5786.  @lurice0  "She wasn't blackmailing you with that specific incident" Thank you for conceding that ana was guilty of blackmail. I agree. She obviously was.
    2
  5787. SBlackmare really? You can't take 2 seconds to research it yourself? https://www.thecut.com/2018/03/kirsten-gillibrand-endorsed-andrew-cuomo-over-cynthia-nixon.html https://www.businessinsider.com/kirsten-gillibrand-endorses-cuomo-for-governor-cynthia-nixon-2018-3 http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/379412-gillibrand-endorses-cuomo-for-reelection https://www.cbsnews.com/news/sen-kirsten-gillibrand-endorses-andrew-cuomo-for-new-york-governor-over-cynthia-nixon/ thehill.com/homenews/campaign/379412-gillibrand-endorses-cuomo-for-reelection
    2
  5788.  @admiralhorde4809  Regarding, "I don’t process data the same way as you." Well if you want to be a little more constructive in this conversation maybe instead tell me what you think makes something a gotcha question in the first place if actually care about being enlightened. I get the vibe you prefer the darkness.
    2
  5789.  @JMC47000  Trump proves my point why a business man with no experience is a bad idea.
    2
  5790.  @Mnecrafter99  Obama has literally nothing to do with my comment. But since people want to insist on deflecting from the point I was trying to make there are 3 things people should most consider in a presidential candidate. 1) policy 2) their record 3) where do they get the money for their campaign Obama was a terrible president because of number 3. He was selling out. But seriously... my comment has NOTHING to do with him.
    2
  5791.  @Mnecrafter99  Regarding, "by the way you can’t be a real politician and get elected" You must be living in an alternate universe. Nothing about this statement is even remotely true. In reality people like political experience from politicians for the same reason they want their surgeons to have experience conducting surgery. Regarding, "People don’t trust government officials for a second." Cool. They shouldn't. But if you want to know who is pandering and who has sincere convictions study their record and follow the money. Those two things can't lie.
    2
  5792.  Whiskey Drinker  Regarding, "Don't kick yourself for voting Obama too hard." Easier said than done. It is difficult for to really articulate just how let down I felt by him. I feel like the biggest reason he won the primary over Hillary was because of his vote on the Iraq war and still he went to war everywhere. Dems love to cry about Trump (rightfully, but hypocritically) because Obama set records when it came to deportation. His signature piece of legislation was a REPUBLICAN health care plan. The only really great thing that he did while in office was the nuclear agreement with iran and that just got torn up because his presidency sucked so bad the country was willing to give an orange clown the keys after him. His failure was epic. But man... he really gave a great speech. Too bad actions speak loader than words.
    2
  5793. If you are subscribed to this shitlib you should do yourself a favor and take that subscription and give it to an actual leftist channel like revolutionary blackout.
    2
  5794.  @junechris  Is that really realistic? The game is rigged from top to bottom and essentially your answer boils down to 'beat the rigged game.'
    2
  5795.  @junechris  Good for you about a single ballot measure. That's like giving the country a bandaid when it needs major surgery. The country needs systemic change. That isn't going to happen by a ballot measure. Sorry to be Debbie downer but I almost think the empire just needs to crumble so that something better can take it's place.
    2
  5796. Planet regarding, "bern said he was going to figjt through the end of primary" He campaigned and fought while all us peasants voted. What did you want him to do? Hypocritically fight for superdelegates after he had less pledged delegates? Regarding, "sooner then he said" I can't really take this "point" seriously. He fucking "lost." It was over. Nothing he was going to say or do at that point was going to change that fucked up fact. The only question to answer then was what to do going forward. If it was his decision to support Hillary, like he said he would support the dem nominee when entering the race, then doing what he did was the best way to try and stop Trump from being president. Regarding, "pulled way too many punches during debates" Yeah. It is almost as if he wanted to win on the issues rather than by taking shots at Hillary. Some of us actually liked that about him. If you wanted a candidate who would do anything and everything to win then I'm sure you loved Hillary and company.
    2
  5797. Planet regarding, "damned e mails." When I said issues I was talking about policy. The emails are not, in any way shape or form policy. The emails are about Hillary Clinton. I liked that Sanders wanted to talk about policy and not about Hillary. I remember watching that debate. I even remember my thoughts at the time. You know what they were? They were, "that's why I fucking love that guy." I totally agreed with him at the time. I was fucking exhausted by the conversation of her emails. I, like Sanders, wanted to talk about war policy, and money in politics, and the minimum wage, and the environment and.... I wanted to hear ABOUT POLICY. But try and remember exactly when that was being talked about. The fact of the matter is that, at that point, the most damning information about Hillary's emails had yet to come out. Had that question been asked in a later debate his answer may very well been very different and my desire to hear about her emails may very well been very different because, like I accurately point out, things changed significantly after that. Regarding, "u found it refreshing that bern didn't want to debate it" I found it refreshing that a candidate wanted to talk about issues (as in policy). I mean look at the corporate media and how they cover shit. You know what is missing from their bullshit? Talk of policy. They would rather talk about scandals because that shit distracts from the much more important topic of laws that actually impact the public. Who Trump fucked for example doesn't actually affect me. Regarding, "Sounds like ur the hillary fan to me." Sounds like you are retarded to me when you say this. Regarding, "U probably voted for her cuz bern told u to." I voted for Jill Stein because she was the only candidate running I actually wanted to win. And as for who Bernie endorsed I didn't care. I fucking love the guy but only sheep vote based on someone else's endorsement and I'm not a sheep.
    2
  5798. That's exactly the type of terrible opinion I'd expect from a yang supporter.
    2
  5799. "outlandish misinformation is not suppressing free speech." Actually it is. If you are actually free you are free to be wrong. Who gets to decide what is "outlandish misinformation?"
    2
  5800.  Tiniest Violin  Regarding, "Biden way better than Trump" Let's say this were true, and it's not. Am I supposed to be impressed by "better than trump." Is that really all it takes to get your vote? If so that's remarkably pathetic.
    2
  5801.  @feslenraster  Regarding, "They AREN'T the same." Do they say they are the same? Do they need to be equally terrible to both be terrible? Is this how you rationalize supporting a corporate goon? You are why team hillary tried to prop up trump with the pied piper strategy in 2016. To prey on sheep like you.
    2
  5802.  @Aeschelon  I didn't want to think it was true... even when Cenk was lying about what Warren had said to him on his own show to his own face but I'm done with him at this point and he has lost all credibility with me. In case you don't know what I'm talking about there is a tim black video on youtube where he discussed it titled, "ELIZABETH WARREN SAYS SHE WOULD TAKE BRIBES FROM THE 1 PERCENT". (while Cenk lies about it) It really was inexcusable at the time but I was in denial... til now. I'm done with him now.
    2
  5803. Stop acting like we like Trump because we talk about how Brennon is a piece of shit who should be in jail for warcrimes you fucking moron.
    2
  5804. Showing his face isn't the problem.
    2
  5805.  @virginiavallek1654  "they're not wrong." You are wrong if you think this has to do with skin color. It doesn't and instead it has EVERYTHING to do with being rich and powerful. I'm white as snow and if I did that I'd go to jail because I'm a peasant.
    2
  5806. It's clearly already political. No one is making it that way.
    2
  5807. Richard regarding, "The problem is people being corrupted by money" Yes. Absolutely. Stick to that. It's the problem that makes all other problems impossible to solve. We get that and all of sudden maybe we wouldn't have political parties that are complete dumpster fires.
    2
  5808.  @reasonwarrior  "Group think is the problem" Is that why the MIC does what it does? Group think? Or are you unserious? "We are all individuals" Never do I ever say we aren't. "not peasants and elites" Yes. You are. Whether you like it or not. But that isn't even what matters. What matters is who you identify with. Who you support. You can also be a traitor to the class you are actually in.
    2
  5809. Yes progressives should force a m4a vote. And you should help force them. Sign the petition. Force the vote!
    2
  5810. We can't all get paid to say stupid shit on the internet like you.
    2
  5811. I agree with everything you said other than about love for Warren. I used to love her but have since come to see her as a fake progressive.
    2
  5812. Hillary Clinton has never gone to the wedding of someone who is "anti establishment." You are incapable of saying anything that isn't moronic. You are why Trump loves the uneducated.
    2
  5813. Marlon regarding, "Hilary is lucky she had a wedding." I wasn't talking about her wedding you fucking dipshit. You may very well be the stupidest person in these comments sections and that is really saying something.
    2
  5814.  @iBasheveryone  Do you want to pretend that we don't live in a world where hillary's paid army wasn't given millions to "correct the record?" Does acknowledging that reality mean I'm a "conspiracy theorist?"
    2
  5815. So you think that because it has happened before that makes it ok? It doesn't.
    2
  5816. Briana Joy Grey, the person in the video who is not bowing down, is a progressive.
    2
  5817. Sure. Our entire government is a dumpster fire who isn't interested in doing what's best for the people. But a guy like Bernie puts pressure on them from the time he would take office. He would use the bully pulpit like no other. He would make it perfectly clear who is responsible for making American's lives better and then we can punish them by replacing them. Think about how far the party's rhetoric has changed just since Bernie ran in 2016. Sure lots of it is pandering but it shows just how much he can do to win hearts and minds and change the public perception. Bernie knows he can't do it all by himself. There is a reason he talks about a need for a political revolution.
    2
  5818.  @kristonpohlman2685  There have been polls where M4A is favored by a majority of REPUBLICANS. That is what Bernie has been busy accomplishing while only a senator. That said the politicians hardly reflect the will of their peasants but it clearly demonstrates that he is doing something right even if he can't do it all by himself.
    2
  5819.  @kristonpohlman2685  It's an absolute no brainer. Again, Bernie can't do it all by himself, but if anyone can get it done it is Bernie. And if he can't during his time as president because of how terrible congress is he still will be able to push the country in that direction and make it that much more possible that the next president can finish this very important goal.
    2
  5820. Miss Malibu regarding, "Bill Burr," He is fucking hilarious.
    2
  5821.  @technosaurus3805  Regarding, "how about the greeter who is just doing it to get out of the house?" Yup. Pay them a living wage or maybe don't have a freaking greeter. Both work for me. Regarding, "Not everybody works full time." Thanks captain obvious. Do you have a point or just words? Regarding, "Not everybody needs a "living wage"." Who doesn't need a wage to live on? I don't care if you are rich and don't need money. If you are working 40 hours a week you should be paid enough to live on even if you have a sugar daddy or just work for the "fun" of working. Regarding, "You're more than welcome to pass minimum wage laws locally or at the state levels" Thanks. But your approval doesn't mean much to me. I was already looking to do things like this already in addition to a raising the national minimum wage. Regarding, "using the federal government as some sort of patriarchal father figure." LMFAO. What a nonsensical framing. I want people paid enough to live on so that the "patriarchal father figure" doesn't have to subsidize companies not paying their employees enough to live on because that's what happens and is happening at this very moment. Why do you insist having that "patriarchal father figure" paying people to keep the lights on and put food on the plate with yours and my tax dollars instead of having employers do what they should be doing.
    2
  5822.  @technosaurus3805  First off I'm going to laugh at myself for taking your corporate talking points seriously. Why I'm about to do this I have no idea. I guess I'm just bored. Regarding, "What you want will eliminate entry level jobs, offshore low skilled manufacturing jobs, jobs that can be mechanized, harm national security, increase global pollution and emissions and eventually lead to the inflation that makes the whole thing pointless" Nope. I want to raise the minimum wage. I get that you want to allude that if the minimum wage is raised armagedon would be unleashed but your fear mongering is just that, fear mongering. And it's silly. Regarding, "This is a time of high unemployment, riot damage and lockdown induced struggling small businesses." I guess everything is a hellscape so now isn't a time to try and improve people's lives? I don't find that very compelling. Regarding, "if you want all the small businesses that were devastated over the last year to go under completely in favor of billionaire owned megacorps that got a free pass and can afford it, then you may as well just admit you are pro fascism." LMFAO. If all the BS you spew were actually true and this would all benefit the super rich then the super rich would already be doing this to crush everyone and trying to make all this happen. In reality if you give all the peasants more money then they go out and spend that money. And not only do they have more money to go out and spend at small businesses but they just very well might be more likely to go out and spend their money at small businesses rather than at the megacorp because they don't have to pinch every penny and cut every cost they possible can just to put food on the table they way they do now. If you are a small business and you can't survive everyone having more money to spend at your shop then so be it. Paying your employees enough to live on is the bare minimum we need to ask of ANY business owner. "pro fascism" LMFAO What a clown you are. Regarding, "It's also extremely arrogant to assume that people are too pathetic to negotiate the wage they are worth" I'm long winded. There is a lot to address. And instead of addressing something I actually said you strawman and suggest that I've said things like, "people are too pathetic to negotiate the wage they are worth." I mean... what? Why am I here addressing you? It clearly doesn't matter what I say. You will here what you want. Regarding, "get to a fair wage" Get to a fair wage? Why should people have to "get to" a fair wage? Why shouldn't they be paid a fair wage to start? A wage that they can live on? Regarding, "The minimum wage should be eliminated" May as well bring back slavery while you are at it. It too would achieve all the goals you care about. Regarding, "your assumptions of cost of living in the rural Midwest is way too high." LMFAO. I made no assumptions of the cost of living in the rural midwest. I've actually never even used the phrase "cost of living" or mentioned the "rural midwest" until now. As I write this I'm beginning to understand why I started addressing you. This is really funny to me. Thanks for the laugh. Regarding, "You can buy..." Seeing as how it's like you are addressing someone other than myself who said something other than what I have I'm going to just go ahead and ignore all the nonsense attached to it.
    2
  5823.  @chrisbayridge23  regarding, "that corrupt cheating pile of shit Hillary Clinton is probably going to be running in 2020." I wish the establishment dems would choose her. She would suck up all the establishment money and support before inevitably getting crushed in the primary. They won't thou. The establishment is corrupt but they aren't stupid. They will be backing a much more scary establishment opponent (as in someone who is more likely to win the primary then Hillary) like Biden, Booker, or Harris. We will know for sure who their candidate of choice is when the superdelegetes coalesce early around a single establishment candidate. The war for 2020 is going to be brutal and it's already started. But the game has changed since 2016 when Sanders entered the race down 50 points and faced media blackout. Still it's not going to be easy. We need to do anything and everything we can to make Sanders our next President. And in the meantime get out and vote for progressives in the midterm.
    2
  5824. Regarding, "is this supposed to be controversial?" Yes. Absolutely and obviously. Seeing as how you don't understand this obvious truth I didn't bother to read the rest of your shit. I'm just going to assume it is equally idiotic.
    2
  5825.  @MarionetteMuse  And by the sounds of it he might not even have left of his own accord. He might have even needed to be forced into doing the right thing here. He's a fraud.
    2
  5826.  @MarionetteMuse  Sorry not sorry if the truth triggers you.
    2
  5827. I wish he would have played it. Because you are wrong and an idiot.
    2
  5828.  @michaelcooper3425  If the shoe fits you should wear it. And thinking her god awful response doesn't "fit the narrative" or paints her in a better light then you are demonstrating stupidity. That's why I call you stupid.
    2
  5829. 1:54 Colin tells you what you are in the background if you think Joe wants to raise the minimum wage. You are a dupe.
    2
  5830. Medicare for all please.
    2
  5831. CalliChan regarding, "You did." This is funny to me because your saying this is making lots of incorrect and terrible assumptions about me. Essentially everyone changes but that isn't what you are trying to say here. You are talking about yourself essentially and conflating my thinking with yours. And from your comment I think it is pretty clear that we don't think the same way about things. Regarding, "I couldn't stand Bill Maher," Well, I really liked him. In part because I liked him calling out religions for their bullshit which is very much lacking in the media and in part because he called out Bush and company for their bullshit at the time which again was very much lacking. Regarding, "he's always been a smug asshole" I'm a smug asshole so I'm not going to hypocritically care if someone is smug and you seem to be smug as well according to your comment. Now I don't care about you being smug but I do care about you seeming to be hypocritical. What's far more important than not being "smug" is being right. Maher used to say things that were right. Now, especially when he talks about Hillary and the "democratic" party he is wrong. Regarding, "who punches down at anyone who disagrees with him." When all other things are equal punching up is obviously preferable to punching down but that doesn't mean that punching down is innately wrong. When Neil Degrasse Tyson calls out flat earthers is that "punching down" and therefor wrong? We are all, Maher, you, and me all just fighting a war of ideas about things. It is debate. Ultimately what is important to me and why I personally have gone from likely Maher to hating him is the difference between me thinking he is right about the things he is saying and me thinking he is wrong about the things he is saying. I still think that he is right when he talks about how the Bush administration sucks and how religion sucks. But that isn't what he says now. Now he says stupid ass shit like he misses the Bush administration.
    2
  5832. Mostly for covering up the blackmail part but there are plenty more examples you seem to be intentionally ignoring.
    2
  5833. 15:18 Twitter before elon was working with government to censor true stories like hunters computer during an election and you are presenting them as if everything was all good with that company? I'm very tempted to unsubscribe. You clearly don't have as good an understanding as I thought.
    2
  5834. She saved her state from giving billions of dollars to jeff bezos. You are an idiot.
    2
  5835. Terrible advice. You have to understand that there are lots and lots of people who are sick and tired of getting fucked over and they know they are getting fucked over even if they blame the wrong people for it. Some want the whole system burned to the ground and see Trump as a way of speeding it up. Stop acting like the world is so black and white and huge groups of people can just be painted with a large brush. There are plenty of Trump supporters who would vote for someone good, like Sanders, but they aren't being given the chance. Some are racist fucks and total lost causes of course but that isn't everyone and you do a disservice by acting like they all are.
    2
  5836.  @andrewhunsaker4831  Regarding, "How on earth is it a difficult choice between Trump and virtually ANYONE else on this planet?" Fun fact: if bloomberg were the dem nominee I would definitively say trump would be the lesser evil. Not that I would vote for him. I don't vote for evil. Regarding, "The bs you're spewing is literally the definition of a false equivalency." Nope. I don't say they are equal. I make a case why I think a trump presidency might ultimately be better for the country in the long run. Regarding, "People should vote for good" Yeah. I say this and it triggers you? Really? Regarding, "I don't know if that's naivete speaking or you're actually just trying to exacerbate this false narrative." I'm telling people that they should vote for good. And that even if Trump nor Biden are equally bad they are both bad. I suspect you understand this otherwise all of your arguments to try and rationalize support for biden wouldn't all be orange man bad.
    2
  5837.  @hizzlemobizzle  Regarding, "It could get worse." It's GOING to get worse. Period. Or do you think it's going to get better with biden as we go into a full on depression. Biden doesn't have a magic recipe to end cornavirus ya know. People don't have jobs or money but at least we don't have mean tweets. Yippie. That's "better." Regarding, "We could reelect the crazy bastard" And while this would suck in the short term it at least offers the possibility of a decent candidate winning in 2024 and isn't likely to give us something worse than trump after him the way biden winning would. Regarding, "He would take that as a mandate that people really want fascism." I know right. He is just waiting for his second term to really enact his evil plans. That's when the country comes to an end.
    2
  5838.  Casey L.  Regarding, "Trump has..." LFMAO You don't really need to convince me Trump is terrible. I know he is. I'm not a trump supporter. Regarding, "So you defending him is absolutely absurd!" What's actually absurd is suggesting I'm defending him. Do you even bother to read what I write?
    2
  5839. The point he was trying to make was that this story was not getting the type of press that a stupid tweet would be getting for example. It really is not hard to understand and it is sad that you don't get it.
    2
  5840. Actually I think you do get it. And that is what makes your comment so epic stupid.
    2
  5841. progressive gen x'er beat me to it. Money in politics was a problem long before citizens united even if it did exacerbate the problem.
    2
  5842. Sanders is the most popular politician in the country with the name recognition of a rock star. He is one to beat. I'd love Tulsi as VP. And fuck Warren.
    2
  5843. He is the most popular politician in the country with the name recognition of a rock star whose positions are widely popular but some dipshit named mordec told me to "just accept it." Tough call.
    2
  5844. Ok Mordec. But remember what I said when 2020 comes and realize that you are, in fact, a complete fucking moron.
    2
  5845. You do realize an awful lot has changed since then right? You do realize the writers of the constitution went out of their way to make sure it could be changed right? It is called an amendment for fucks sake so you can't just pretend like it can't be changed just because can you?
    2
  5846. I honestly don't give a fuck what the founders "intent" hundreds of years ago was. I care about the hear and now and in the hear and now arguments protecting people right to stockpile weapons are fucking absurd and have no place in today's society.
    2
  5847.  @JoshuaTerence38  "i suspect dems know they have to walk on eggshells" They just voted for pelosi. Even if you are a corporate dem who love pelosi and think she is only attacked wrongfully you should still have some understanding that the rest of the world think she sucks. I suspect dems don't give a fuck.
    2
  5848. Sam sedar is controlled opposition who would rather go after the people holding politicians to account than go after corrupt politicians.
    2
  5849. It's not stupidity... it's greed and immorality. It's an important distinction to be made.
    2
  5850. Jeff regarding, "he already dropped out, why vote for a quitter?" Huh? When you have to lie to try to make idiotic points it makes you look bad.
    2
  5851. Jeff regarding, "so he didnt drop out of the race for presidential nominee for the dnc two weeks before the convention?" Do you really not understand the difference between the 2016 election and the 2020 election?
    2
  5852. Regarding, "yeah he gave up in 2016" He "gave up" in 2016 the same way the Yankees are "giving up" baseball in 2017. They both lost. Stop saying idiotic things please. Regarding, "what makes you think hell fight in 2020" Because he has spent his entire life fighting for progressive causes and 2020 presents the best opportunity he has had in his lifetime to get the change we all want.
    2
  5853. Jeff if you don't want to vote for him in 2020 fine. That makes you the quitter, not him.
    2
  5854. Regarding, "im the one who dropped out of the 2016 dnc nominee race." This conversation is about 2020 but you keep saying stupid things about 2016. I've read your comments before and they seem very smart. I'm awed at how fucking dumb all of your comments here have been.
    2
  5855. Regarding, "you cant lose if you dont play. He quit before the convention" He campaigned while everyone in every primary voted. Isn't that what we are suppose to care about? Aren't we the side that is suppose to care about voters and not party insiders? The convention is a fucking formality and glorified party for the party. The idea that he should have tried to override the results of the primary (even thou the process was rigged) is fucking absurd. That is what I expect of the establishment, not Sanders.
    2
  5856. I would also like to add that if you think things would have been any different had Sanders contested the convention you are delusional.
    2
  5857. Jeff regarding, "he was ahead of hillary in the primary." Um. No. He absolutely was not. Where the fuck are you getting your information from? Sanders had 1820 pledged delegates and Clinton had 2271. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries,_2016 Regarding, "If hed have gone to the convention hed have won." Um. No. Absolutely not. Come join me in reality.
    2
  5858. Jeff regarding, "we know that number was falsified." The primary was rigged and there was circumstantial evidence of election fraud but still your statement here is not accurate. And even if I agree with this statement, which I don't, you can't then go ahead and say, "he was ahead of hillary in the primary," which is empirically false. That makes you the one falsifying shit and only hurts all credibility you have to call anyone else out for lying. Regarding, "The numbers were rigged and all the evidence was on the table." That evidence you speak of isn't enough to get what is suppose to be an impartial justice system to say the numbers were rigged but you think the very biased DNC was going to swayed by your evidence? Wake the fuck up. Regarding, "If bernie went to the convention with all the evidence compiled about rigging he could have burned hillary to the ground of not taken down the entire dnc for corruption and bribery." No. He couldn't. All the fucking lawyers working on it can't do it but you think Sanders could have made the case? What the fuck is wrong with you? And Sanders was only allowed to walk through the door of the convention because he endorsed Hillary a week before it. If there is evidence of DNC corruption and bribery then you go ahead and make your case for it to the courts and bring them down. You sure as fuck don't need Sanders for something like and that simply isn't his role in the world. That is shit for lawyers not politicians and if you want it done take it to them. Now stop saying stupid things please. Reality is here waiting for you.
    2
  5859. Regarding, "i think if hed have gone and directly presented the evidence at the convention" If they knew he was going to he never gets in the door. If he hides it and starts saying what you want they turn the cameras off and kick him out. Regarding, "the people would have reacted" Um, sure. People would have reacted. Would he have gotten the nomination? Only in your dreams. Regarding, "The lawyers couldnt take down the dnc because it was never given major attention" "Major attention" is not a valid legal argument. Regarding, "showing that there is no actual vote." But there was an actual vote and Hillary won it until you can prove otherwise, which you can't. Regarding, "Bernie could have been the peaceful leader who gave that to us by directly speaking to the people" He could have said some shit that would have made you cum in pants but changed nothing. Instead he decided to continue the fight were it makes the most sense to fight and I support him for that because it makes sense. Regarding, "Whatever, but i definitely wont vote for him again." I guess that makes sense to you. Like I said before, that makes you the quitter not him. The establishment appreciate and thank you for your decision.
    2
  5860. Not if biden's bombs have anything to say about it.
    2
  5861. I trust sanders will continue to vote in lockstep with corrupt, corporate dems.
    2
  5862. I think she is waiting for a better time that will have more impact. We are still a long way away from anyone even voting yet.
    2
  5863.  ss  Regarding, "The way to change the Democratic Party, is from within." If you actually want the party to change maybe don't support the corrupt version of the party like you are. Why would they ever change when you enable them? Why would they ever change when they know you are going to vote for them regardless of how terrible they are? If you really want them to change don't enable them while they are terrible.
    2
  5864. I don't think they are trying to be for the revolution. I think they are trying to be for the news.
    1
  5865. King. I'm not sure what you heard but I was trying to say that you seem to expect them to have a slant toward your beliefs (revolution) and I think that is wrong.
    1
  5866. The email stuff is hardly nonsense. Hillary clearly violated laws including the FOIA. Considering the FBI didn't do more about that I do not think they are going to be interested in doing anything to hurt her. Clearly laws and rules are different for the rich and powerful even if I think you are correct that the whole lot of them should be investigated for violating campaign finance laws. I assume we still have a couple of them on the books don't we?
    1
  5867. John regarding, "Comey" I personally believe he was just trying to cover his ass because of fear of Wikileaks.
    1
  5868. Tanner regarding, "what else has he done?" I go the extra mile to stay away from corporate media these days but I remember him most from him being on a show called crossfire back in the day where their gimmick was they would have him representing the right, someone else representing the left and they pretended to do good news. It wasn't. It was just political theater and Tucker's costume included a bow-tie.
    1
  5869. Cobra regarding, "he's cool enough" Cool enough for what? Falling on a grenade?
    1
  5870. DMan is sexist and racist.
    1
  5871. Everybody but racists dislike Trump.
    1
  5872. Only a sexist cares about gender. I certainly don't care about gender. I care about who I think is the best person for the job and that has nothing to do with a person's junk.
    1
  5873. Who will win the first debate? It depends who you talk to. CNN and MSNBC have already declared Hillary the winner and Fox has already declared Trump the winner.
    1
  5874. jaime regarding, "they know perfectly well that socialists confiscatory taxes are just a new tipe of communism" I'm older and I realize that what you just said is dumb as fuck. Older people understand that some socialist policies like social security for example are not the devil you claim. Regarding, "Trump would have beat bernie with facts" Even Trump knows that your statement is dumb as fuck otherwise he would have debated Sanders in California rather than pussy out. Regarding, "Big companies would have supported Trump" Yes corporatations would have preferred Trump because he is a rich, elite, oligarch. The people would have loved to vote for Sanders because he actually represents them. Sadly they didn't get the chance. Regarding, "Trump wants to bring companies back" You could tell by the fact that his "make America great again" hats were not made in America. Regarding, "sanders wants to tax them" Wouldn't it be nice if corporations like GE paid their fair share? Regarding, "Sanders who didn't had the guts to use the email scandal against clinton" He wanted to run an issue oriented, clean campaign. Only a brainwashed Trump supporter would think this was a bad thing. Regarding, "that guy is not a winner" See you in 4 years. Enjoy the orange clown while he lasts.
    1
  5875. Jamie I'm going to give you more attention than you deserve. Regarding, "I didn't say anything about social security" You talked about socialism. Social security is socialism. Regarding, "I didn't say anything about... public services" You asked, "are you ok with government taking your wealth through taxation" Public services are paid through taxation. Regarding, "(two different things)" Thanks for clearing that up. I'm not sure why you think anyone was confused about this. Regarding, "you both haven't read it clearly." No you are completely misunderstanding. Regarding, "This is not about paying taxes, we all do , and its ok" Huh. Because it really seemed as if you were suggesting otherwise when you asked, "are you ok with government taking your wealth through taxation?" It really seemed as if you were not ok with paying taxes. Regarding, "This is not about paying taxes, we all do , and its ok, the problem is the "confiscatory tax" which is a new form of "expropriation" that communism used... "I won't take your business but I will take your money"" This is all absurd. So absurd I feel no need to address it. Regarding, "otherwise how would you fund socialism for 350 million people" It really depends on what socialism you are talking about. Nobody wants socialism everywhere. If you want to answer your own question you should figure out how social security is paid for and you can answer your own question. Again, social security is socialism. Regarding, "a huge government to waste it" People have different ideas about what government wastes money on. How do you feel about the US spending as much money as the next 8 countries combined on "defense?" Or do you only save your government is wasting money outrage for people trying to get universal health care? A country that ensures its citizens get health care is hardly waste to me. Regarding, "sanders wants to renegotiate trade deals" You are so all over the place with your "thoughts." Sanders correct that that NAFTA was terrible for the working class although I'm lost as to how you got to talking about this here. Regarding, "big companies will never pay," So we should just let big companies get away with murder then? I disagree. Regarding, "USA is the greatest country in the world because of capitalism not socialism." You can keep capitalism almost everywhere. But there are a few places where big business should be able to get rich. Sick people for example. I'm sorry but you can't get rich off of sick people and to do so is just sick. Again you seem to think he or anyone wants socialism everywhere. No one is suggesting that. You are just fear mongering. Regarding, "Trump also fought against a rigged system" Trump has exploited the rigged system his entire life. He even says so when he talks. Regarding, "MSM" I can't help but laugh when Trump supporters rail against the MSM. The MSM gave Trump BILLIONS in free media. They would cover Trump's empty podium while Sanders would be speaking in front of record crowds. He owes the MSM nothing but a big thank you. That corrupt enterprise did more to get him elected than Trump did himself.
    1
  5876. jaime regarding, "I lived it." All American live with it. Again, social security is socialism and it isn't causing the country to fall apart like you like to fear monger. Regarding, "the US isn't Latin America you are right about that, but it isn't Scandinavia either... That guy is the real populist, and the real demagogue, he is filling you all especially kids, with empty promises saying free this free that dont worry the rich will pay." Nobody but fools has this type of empty mentality. I don't really have the time or energy to tell you how you are wrong about everything. Regarding, "kids" Remember when you said, "Well thank you for the insults." Nothing hypocritical about that is there? When you insult people it is totally different. I admit I can be dick. But I also don't go around crying when people insult me except when people like you are hypocrites about it. I'm no kid. I'm betting I'm older than you are. But only a "kid" would think differently than you? Sheesh. Regarding, "look into socialism funding sources before you make your choice, and see if it really can apply to the US." Essentially every major country provides universal health care. We pay more for health care and get worse results. But god forbid we make changes like that for the better. The health care insurance industry needs to make their BILLIONS of dollars every year by price gouging. What would we every do without them. Regarding, "Goodbye" Goodbye. Good luck with your fear mongering elsewhere.
    1
  5877. IamRangers, regarding, "you don't know economics. Stop making up garbage" What vague BS "arguments." Those are the types of things people say when they have nothing of substance to offer. Regarding, "hillary clinton obsession." I can't stand Hillary Clinton. I'm glad she will never be President but don't let that fact stop you from saying something else that is dumb as fuck.
    1
  5878. There is also McNuggets. That isn't chicken.
    1
  5879. NYC did you really just cite blogs as evidence? That is why I come to you... for the laughs at your expense. I noticed you haven't bothered to answer my simple question. Your silence speaks volumes. I get it thou. Deleting that post is arguably the smartest thing you have done your life.
    1
  5880. NYC regarding, "The link" If you say so. I don't trust you enough to click on anything you would ever post. And even if what you say is true (I'll give you credit for telling the truth even thou I assume you are lying, but for arguments sake...) that is, according to you, "an example." An example of something does not demonstrate a complete picture. You love to use examples while ignoring the complete picture. That is NYC 101. NYC 102 would be ignoring questions you don't want to address. So what happened to that post you put up yesterday?
    1
  5881. Trump is the only reason he endorsed Hillary. I wish Bernie would have endorsed Jill Stein. That said I understand why he didn't even if I disagree with him on this.
    1
  5882. Kwisatz regarding, "it should be 1/10" Pick your sources better and you can do better.
    1
  5883. Agreed. The only thing I disagree with Jimmy on is that Hillary can come get my vote. She can't because I don't trust her. She would say literally anything to win but actions speak louder than words. I will never support her even if she said everything I want to hear because she is a liar not to be trusted.
    1
  5884. I won't support corruption and cronyism so I won't support Hillary. Never Hillary. I don't care if Bernie drops out and endorses her. I understand why someone will vote and/or support Hillary because she is the lesser of two evils but that is not good enough for me. Being better than Trump is too easy. I need more than that. I'd rather "waste" my vote for someone I can be proud to vote for like Jill Stein.
    1
  5885. destiny regarding, "you see trump is an evil" Yes Trump is evil. Only someone who is evil would say, "we have to take out their families," and we have to torture and worse even if it doesn't work. Regarding, "genius" No genius would try to sell steaks at the Sharper Image. Regarding, "The controversial things he said in the past made him very popular." No. He is hated by most of the country. He wasn't even able to get more votes than another disgrace to the human race like Hillary Clinton. Regarding, "now he's backsliding on some of his controversial plans like waterboarding or imprisoning Hillary Clinton" This is the characteristic of a liar with no princliples and you talk about it like that is a good thing. You are a moron and a sheep. Good luck with you clown and enjoy it while it lasts.
    1
  5886. destiny regarding, "this guy got 62 MILLION votes. that's why I call him a genius" The public are sheep who are too busy just trying to pay their bills to vote intelligently. They also have a corrupt corporate media actively working to brainwash people. Hillary Clinton, who is also a disgrace to the human race, got millions votes more than Trump and that doesn't make her a genius any more than the clown.
    1
  5887. destiny regarding, "he's an idiot but over 60 million people voting for him is just amazing." I agree with this. Stick to that.
    1
  5888. Any chance we could talk about important issues? Ya know... the issues the public actually cares about? Jill Stein is right on war/peace (foreign policy), education, health care, criminal justice reform, the environment and fracking, the TPP and jobs, taxes, jobs, equality, money in politics, ethics, financial reform and glass-steagal. This is what the public actually cares about so how about we talk about those. I assure you Jill Stein is on the right side of every one of those issues.
    1
  5889. Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Pot makes me happy, even if maybe I shouldn't be in a world where either Trump or Hillary is going to be President.
    1
  5890. There are always going to be states that will not be as important as others. That is unavoidable. Under no system is anyone giving a shit about Wyoming for example. At the end of the day one person one vote is the best because it is fair. Period. Nobody should have a vote that counts more or less than anyone elses.
    1
  5891. Mark regarding, "it's about 90 percent red. Shouldn't that count for something?" Of course it should. But their votes shouldn't count more than anyone else like the current, innately unfair system. I don't care what state you live in. I don't care if you live in a city or on a farm. I don't care if you are democrat, republican, or independent, everyone's vote should count the same and anything else is inherently wrong and unfair.
    1
  5892. Mark regarding, "the disproportional weighting to large urban centers" Urban centers have more people therefor more votes. It is what it is. That is not a valid excuse to give people in rural areas more valuable votes than people living in urban centers. Regarding, "this gives an unfair weighting to people in densely-populated cities" No. It doesn't. I don't care where you live. You get a vote. That vote counts as much as anyone else and everything else is a distraction and deflection to justify and unjust system that works otherwise. Regarding, "So in a state like Hawaii, with a social-cultural ethos far to the left of mid-Atlantic democrats, where does that leave us?" Hawaiians get a vote and their vote is just as valuable as anyone else in the country. Regarding, "doesn't it matter?" It does. It just shouldn't. Regarding, "Should that not be taken into account?" No. It absolutely should not. I'm not sure I can be any more clear. Fairness and equality doesn't care where you live.
    1
  5893. Mark regarding, "what you say might be equal. But that is not necessarily the same as fair." Actually only way to be fair is to treat everyone as equal. To treat people differently is obviously the unfair route. Regarding, "Numbers matter, but they are not the only thing that matters." They are the only thing that should matter when picking a winner of an election. Regarding, "I still think some special weight should be given to counties and states, regardless of population." That is, by very definition, unfair. Regarding, "I do not concede that NYC carries as much weight as 5 or 6 small-population states combined." It isn't about NYC. It isn't about small states. It is about one person gets one vote. It is about everyone having the same say regardless of where you live. Regarding, "we will have to agree to disagree." I'm not going to lie I have a difficult time understanding your position. Regarding, "Cheers, and thanks for making some excellent points!" Take care. Have a nice night.
    1
  5894. Hillary and Trump just try to say whatever they think their audience wants to hear. The just speak to different audiences. Never Hillary. Never Trump.
    1
  5895. Please do not write in Bernies name and vote Jill Stein instead. They are essentially the same policy wise but Jill Stein is actually running. If we are ever going to do better than a broken two party system third party candidate need support and votes.
    1
  5896. fakei regarding, "YOU = FOOL!" Very compelling. I know you are but what am I?
    1
  5897. Todo regarding, "thrilled right now because Trump won" Nobody should be thrilled Trump is President but nobody should be crying like a bitch that a corrupt POS like Hillary isn't going to be President. Progressives lost a long time ago when Bernie was cheated.
    1
  5898. Regarding, "Trump still would've won." He would have gotten crushed. Regarding, "all Trump supporters don't like bernie either." Ok. He can keep all his voters. Regarding, "i don't think the election would've changed much if it was against Bernie" Trump won because he got to face a corrupt corporate POS. The democratic base didn't turn out because Hillary sucks. Had Bernie run he would have gotten MILLIONS of voters to turn out for him that wouldn't show for a garbage candidate like Hillary.
    1
  5899. I was called a conspiracy theorist for saying the DNC rigged the election. Seems some conspiracy theories are true.
    1
  5900. I love Plutot. Not because he is smart but because he just says idiotic, ironic things like, "Clueless people, proud to be clueless" Instead of trying to make an argument. Plutot what does sovereign mean? Now watch as he ignores my question and instead accuses me of not knowing anything.
    1
  5901. Regarding, "because reasons." To sane, educated people the first amendment is a good reason. To an idiot this reason should be dismissed.
    1
  5902. Regarding, "You can already say, see, show, do almost anything you want." This is how a moron justifies taking away some of a person's constitutional rights. Plutot I have an X-mas gift for you. https://www.amazon.com/Constitution-Compact-Between-Sovereign-States/dp/1173876324
    1
  5903. Regarding, "Your comments too are sad, man." How predictable you are. You just say shit like this instead of offering anything of substance because when you try to offer substance it always ends up being complete bullshit that is quickly rebuked.
    1
  5904. Plutot you told me to read a book. I thought you would like it. I love how all of your responses are nothing but personal attacks. Why am I not surprised. Lucky for you there is a first amendment to protect your right to be a complete fucking idiot.
    1
  5905. Regarding, "did you just complain about personal attacks?" No. I commented about them. I actually enjoy them. I find them funny. They are partly why I talk to you. You think I am "complaining" because you have trouble understanding the English language.
    1
  5906. Regarding, "No your not having any fun right now." If you say so. You would obviously know best. Regarding, "Your comments are actually really sad." Amuse me Plutot and actually answer a question for once. What are your comments exactly then?
    1
  5907. Regarding, "No, you are not having any fun right now." You said that already. Any chance you would answer a question or are you just going to keep repeating idiotic insults?
    1
  5908. I'll take that as a no. Why am I not surprised.
    1
  5909. Plutot what are your comments?
    1
  5910. Dodge incoming.
    1
  5911. Dodge executed.
    1
  5912. I think I'll go burn a flag. I've never done so before even thou it is my right. Just for you. You too should shake things up. I suggest answering questions. That is how you demonstrate knowledge. Not by just pretending your shit don't stink.
    1
  5913. Daniel regarding, "How does that person care about America at all" I think people who burn flags obviously care about the country. They care so much about it that they are willing to protest it when it does wrong. Someone who doesn't care about the country wouldn't bother to be interested in what it is doing. Caring is a requirement of criticism.
    1
  5914. Plutot regarding, "Yeah. Pretty much like when a player from the Boston Celtics isnt happy about a penality, he burn his jacket. Because he really care." I love it when you actually try to make a point. It always just ends up being word vomit like this. I concede I don't have much of response to this. To respond I need something other than brain farts to respond to.
    1
  5915. Regarding, "Ever played any sport, Clint?" Yes. Regarding, "Try that, burning your shirt because your not happy and see what will happen." I'm not going to lie, I have a real hard time making sense of you "points" and "thoughts." I guess you think that sports are like the government, shirts are like flags, and burning a sports jersey should be illegal. I remember seeing a video of a guy burning his Kaepernick jersey because he was pissed Kaep didn't stand for the anthem. I guess you think they should be imprisoned like you think flag burners should be imprisoned because, as you like to say, reasons.
    1
  5916. Regarding, "Your comments are increasingly sad and cynical btw" Dammit. Your opinion means everything to me.
    1
  5917. Regarding, "yawn" Good point. I never thought of it that way.
    1
  5918. Regarding, "Its not an opinion." You need a dictionary. Time and again you prove to have no understanding of the meaning of words. You don't get to just make it up as you go.
    1
  5919. Plutot what are your comments?
    1
  5920. Regarding, "No, its not an opinion. Your comments are really sad." You said that already. Things don't become more true by just repeating them. What are your comments? I'm curious.
    1
  5921. Regarding, "No you not curious. You are jailed in your biases." You don't see any irony in this do you? You assume to know what I think despite me telling you otherwise but I'm the one jailed in bias. Very funny.
    1
  5922. Regarding, "You are jailed in your biases and you have ego issues." Not like you right?
    1
  5923. Regarding, "Dude, you are on my thread. You found me." Neo in the Matrix could learn about dodging from you. You might want to consider that I find you funny.
    1
  5924. Regarding, "You really have ego issues" Not like you right?
    1
  5925. Regarding, "No your not having any fun right now. Just ego issues." What are you doing?
    1
  5926. Regarding, "As I said" I'm not sure if you have noticed but I don't think much of what you have to say even if it is funny.
    1
  5927. Regarding, "says the guy whos replying for the last 4 days" Hypocrite much?
    1
  5928. Regarding, "Dude you are on my thread" I love how you think that doesn't make you a hypocrite. You say that as if you haven't been replying to me even thou you have.
    1
  5929. Regarding, "You are on my thread." Yes. I get that. You don't seem to get that you are bitching about me replying while you are doing the exact same thing. If you ever got a dictionary you would realize that is, by definition, hypocrisy. Regarding, "You found me." I stumbled upon you. I didn't seek you out. And it was very funny that the guy who claims to love the constitution was advocating for giving the first amendment the finger. Regarding, "You have huge ego issues, man." Not like you right?
    1
  5930. Regarding, "really sad and heavy." Not like you right?
    1
  5931. Regarding, "dude you are sad" Not like you right? Regarding, "yawn" I agree. I am bored of you. Take care dipshit.
    1
  5932. The world would be such a better place without religion.
    1
  5933. Cool regarding, "I think the world will still be violent." It absolutely still would be. Humans are very capable of being violent and that would not change if there was no religion in the world. It would just be nice if the number one reason humans have used throughout history to justify violence wouldn't be there. Regarding, "Or maybe the world would be more peaceful." It absolutely would be. Even if there were still violence in the world. Regarding, "But I'm not sure." I am. There are few things in life that I am more sure about. That said it is just a fantasy and not about to happen anytime soon. But it is fun to think about.
    1
  5934. Turbo regarding, "we are a constitutional representative republic, not a democracy" Most people don't care about labels but they do care about policies. There is something innately wrong with the person receiving the most votes in an election losing. The only label that is appropriate for that type of system is stupid.
    1
  5935. Urduib regarding "Hillary is worse than Hitler..." I am no fan of Hillery and will not vote for her but you are reaching too far. I don't care if Hitler was more honest than honest Abe. That does nothing to excuse his actions.
    1
  5936. Regarding, "Why do you have to be on a side?" We don't have to be on "sides" but we all have identities. I personally am very, very far to the left politically. That said I'd prefer a good person who isn't on "my side" than a terrible person who is on "my side." Regarding, "the left are full of dumb hippies and the right is full of dumb racists" For a person who doesn't like sides you really seem to like labels. I don't care for them very much.
    1
  5937. Yuge regarding, "Jill Stein doesn't stand a chance" If you say so. I don't care. Voting isn't about trying to pick the winner. Voting is an expression of a person's values. Jill Stein represents me, my priorities, and my ethics. She is the only candidate running I actually want to win. I don't care if Jill and I are the only two votes for her. She is getting my vote because she is the only candidate running who actually deserves it and the rest is just details and distractions meant to get me to vote against my own interests. Good luck with your douche or turd candidate.
    1
  5938. Jason I agree with everything you said other than, "both of the major parties now are eating themselves." I am not so optimistic. Trump and Hillary are rightfully two of most despised distrusted politicians in the country and still they get the support they do. The parties have the benefit of boatloads of bribe money. The parties have their own propaganda networks disguised as news networks. As much as I think they both should die I don't see them going anywhere anytime soon sadly. Regarding, "when I meet a Trump or Hillary voter I lose some to most respect for that person on an intellectual level." I get it but keep in mind that most Americans are dirt poor who would be fucked if they miss one paycheck. They are too busy just trying to make it everyday and pay their bills to be able to figure out why they are getting such a raw deal. Many Americans still get their "news" from the propaganda networks. The establishment has successfully pit half the country against the other half. While they fight each other they don't fight the establishment and oligarchy that are rightfully to blame for our problems. Regarding, "sorry for the ramble" Ha. Don't be. I need stuff like this rather than just "Correct the Record" lies and talking points. I wish I had a dollar for every time someone said I wasting my vote (from both Hillary and Trump supporters because they, like their leaders, are not very different). I'd give them all to Jill. Regarding, "if all the people who said they would vote for her" They do not seem to understand how self-defeating, self-fulfilling their mentality is. Why don't you vote for Jill? Because she can't win. Why can't she win? Because people aren't voting for her. Why aren't people voting for her? Because she can't win. Why can't she win? Because people aren't voting for her. And around and around it goes. Keep up the good fight. It is worth having even if we lose. Take care.
    1
  5939. Sure. Let's find out. Let's recount it all. But Trump doesn't like recounts after he won does he.
    1
  5940. Look how happy she sounds? Do you look with your ears? Also, she always sounds like that from what I've heard.
    1
  5941. Nothing is illegal for the elites.
    1
  5942. Blackty. I get it and I was agreeing with you. I was just citing a specific example.
    1
  5943. Get yourself some ball fresh to help with the smell.
    1
  5944. As much as I agree with your statement I disagree with you not including Hillary and her supporters at the same time.
    1
  5945. Blue blah regarding, "The ones who will vote for her despite knowing her flaws because of Trump" I'm sure if the devil were real he would have rationalizations and explanations for his actions as well. I think I actually prefer the people who support her who have good hearts but not enough intellect or political savvy to know what is going on.
    1
  5946. Satyagraha regarding, "If you support a con man scumbag like trump…you are clueless." No shit captain obvious. Not too good with reading comprehension are you? Do you really need me to explain the first thing I said of, "As much as I agree with your statement"? But you forgot to add... and If you support a corrupt, corporate, warmonger like Clinton you are also clueless.
    1
  5947. satyagraha regarding, "giving the choice I will vote whoever opposes that scumbag trump." Please realize that you have more than 2 choices in the upcoming election. If you choose to vote for a complete POS like HRC then are no better than a Trump supporter. Ultimately you both would be supporting evil no matter how you might to choose to rationalize it. Regarding, "I would have preferred Bernie Sanders." He is not running anymore so I question why you would even mention his name here unless you are using that fact as an excuse to support a candidate and party who, among other completely unforgivable, disqualifying offenses and deal-breakers, rigged the primary.
    1
  5948. The picture next to your name is ironic. You know who would be in favor of a living wage? Jesus.
    1
  5949. "Human" regarding, "He could have at least tried returning the money, since it wasn't exactly HIS." Do you even try to understand how things work or do you just say stupid things that feel right? The money he spent to buy that house was his money. Not money given to him in the form of campaign donations. Something like what you suggest would be illegal and nothing you are suggesting is how things have gone down in reality. Regarding, "where's MY free house" You have to be one of the dumbest people on the planet. It explains why you support Donald Trump. You are an epic idiot. You went from saying, "Bernie DID just buy" but now, all of a sudden, it was free. Do you have no shame? Do you have any problem changing the story when you find it convenient to lie? Or is lying easy for you and second nature? Regarding, "I sure could use one!" Go get a job loser. Stop blaming everyone other than yourself for your POS life. The real reason your life sucks is because of you. Stop lying and people might like you more.
    1
  5950. The war on drugs is a joke.
    1
  5951. Can anyone please answer this question for me... After Homosexicle said, "Clint Holmes show me..." I responded with "Ok" and several links. After that I responded with "good luck with the red pill." Can you people see that "Ok " response with links? I've just learned that youtube censors things from time to time and I'd like to know if that post is visible to people or not. Thank you in advance.
    1
  5952. Too bad you don't say the same about Hillary Clinton and the DNC who rigged the primary for her.
    1
  5953. She is more a symptom of the rot in the DNC, she isn't the cause.
    1
  5954. There is lots of love of money and oil.
    1
  5955. Huh... there are good lawyers in the world after all.
    1
  5956. "Human" regarding, "You KNOW you took down your thread" I haven't taken anything down dipshit. If it seems that way to you it is only because you are an idiot. Regarding, "Have fun under $hitlery" You know I don't support her right?
    1
  5957. Easier said than done. That is partly why the police army is there. They are not protecting people. They are protecting corporate interests.
    1
  5958. No. That is not the point.
    1
  5959. Proxima B was reached for comment and asked that humans stay the fuck out.
    1
  5960. Maybe we need a law where the losers need to disappear from public life. Not dead. Just off TV.
    1
  5961. TinTin Trump isn't establishment? Hillary Clinton went to his wedding. Trump called up Bill Clinton for a chat right before he announced he was running. Had he not run Hillary Clinton would have considered him for VP. I assure he is establishment to the sane.
    1
  5962. CNN would cover Trump's empty podium while Sanders would be speaking in front of record crowds.
    1
  5963. Jill Stein for President!
    1
  5964. Because eating burgers and jeopardizing national security are similar or sumthin (sic)?
    1
  5965. Pranav regarding, "Electoral college helps in inclusion of all areas of a country instead of big cities only" No. It doesn't. A candidate could win the election with only 11 states and lose after winning 39 states. The electoral college helps make sure states like NY, Texas, and California can be completely ignored and taken for granted. All votes should count the same. The electoral college ensures this isn't the case and that we have an inherently unfair system.
    1
  5966. These issues should disgust everyone. Sadly it doesn't.
    1
  5967. Jekko regarding, "and this is why the "orange clown" won" Yes it is. You should have just stopped there. Instead you had to keep talking. Regarding, "instead of discussing policies" This is policy dipshit. Obama could stop this shit right now and he doesn't. That is fucking policy but apparently you are too dumb to realize it. Regarding, "you liberals cry like babies and call people names lmao" You don't see the hypocrisy of your idiotic statement do you?
    1
  5968. Jekko regarding, "its not up to you to decide what i shoukd and should not do" AND "instead of discussing policies you liberals..." I get it you are a fucking hypocrite. You don't need to prove it anymore. :)
    1
  5969. Eatyourflesh, you are not very smart are you?
    1
  5970. I honestly don't care if it is possible or not. I'm voting for her because I think she would be the best President.
    1
  5971. Samasoku, loved the comments, thanks for the laughs. They are much needed in these sad times.
    1
  5972. Andre regarding, "If you don’t care about the feelings of others" So was this suppose to be your issue with the original post? Whose feelings do you think were going to be hurt by it? Debbie Wasserman Piece of Shit Shultz? Or were your feelings supposedly hurt? No that I really care but I am curious.
    1
  5973. Ashley regarding, "Doesn't the president have power over the law" The President has the power to sign things into law and make them the law of the land only after the house and senate present possible laws for him to sign. The Supreme Court then has the ability to overturn such laws if they decide that the laws signed go against the constitution and are determined to be "unconstitutional." Regarding, "executive order" I consider myself to have a lot of knowledge regarding American politics and I concede my understanding of executive orders is limited. That said there are limits to what a President can do by executive orders. What exactly those limits are are confusing to me though.
    1
  5974. Augie, where exactly did you get your 96% statistic from? But I think you were missing the point I was trying to make. I was not asking the opinion of economists, but rather the opinion of Libertarians who, if they stayed intellectually consistent, would be opposed to the TPP out of principle.
    1
  5975. Augie I would also like to add that not all trade deals are created equally. The TPP for example sucks because it is trade with countries that have essentially slave labor which I am confident economists recognize as a problem. Futhermore the some of the other most disturbing aspects of the TPP have nothing to do with the trade aspects. Good work on suggesting that the 96% of economists would believe the TPP would be a good. I assure you they do not.
    1
  5976. When snow bear says this they don't realize how epic stupid their comment is. Alcohol is a drug. Tobacco is a drug. Caffeine is a drug. Aspirin is a drug. I can go on.
    1
  5977. If all this is true then why haven't I heard anything about it from the MSM? (sarcasm obv)
    1
  5978. I'd still support the "democratic" party if they have the right candidate next time. If not I will continue to vote Green.
    1
  5979. Actions speak louder than words. I don't really care what she says because I do not trust her words at all. She would say literally ANYTHING to win. She can pander all she wants but, for example, when she says she is against the TPP I realize she is full of crap. It would be nice if she were more like Bernie but she isn't and she never is going to be.
    1
  5980. Ashton you have a point for sure. I want politicians to be talking the right talk but that is hardly the same as walking the walk. Regarding, "I find it hard to want to vote for either of them. They're both terrible." We very much agree on this.
    1
  5981. She is so anti science Dr. Jill Stein is a medical doctor.
    1
  5982. You are a moron. I'd offer more than just insult if I thought it might help. It won't thou so I'm not going to bother. Just want to tell you that you are stupid.
    1
  5983. Good for you Frank. Now you have something else you are first at in addition to being the number one idiot.
    1
  5984. Regarding, "lmao ur first names the closes ur ever gonna get to leg1t pusSi" What's that Frank? I'm sorry but I do not understand whatever retarded language that is.
    1
  5985. EBG. So you are ok with a presidential candidate who says, "you have to take out their families." That is ok with you? It is exactly something ISIS would say. Trump is also calling for the US to waterboard, aka torture, even if it doesn't work, which it has been proven it hasn't. What is wrong with you? What is wrong with Americans that Trump and Hillary can get so much support? Do you not realize there are other candidates running? Do you ever consider supporting a candidate that isn't evil? Or you just content to vote for the lesser of two evils like a good sheep?
    1
  5986. You are taking shit out of context. To vote in this country you need to be registered and we do not let illegal immigrants register to vote.
    1
  5987. Jake regarding, "He told illegals to vote without consequence." Um. No. He didn't. And to vote you need to be registered to vote. We do not let illegal immigrants vote. But don't let those facts get in the way of your bullshit conspiracy theory.
    1
  5988. "Human" I assure you I understand nuance quite well. The only reason you think this has anything to do with nuance and not you being an idiot is... because you are an idiot. Regarding, "You don't have to SUPPORT the person you're voting for" I'm going to try and break this down for you so that a person of your limited intellect might understand. There are several different ways you could support a candidate. Examples of supporting a candidate include, sending them money, working directly for a campaign, working indirectly for a campaign (talking on a message board), and, probably most important to candidates... VOTING FOR THEM. You do not have to do all to support someone. All of them are examples of supporting them. For example a person could not work in any way shape of form for a candidate, not vote for candidate, but if they sent a candidate a million dollar check to their superpac they certainly would be supporting them. A person could not speak a word of politics or spend a dime for a candidate but if they vote for a candidate they are supporting them. Again, this really is not hard to understand unless you are fucking moron. Regarding you calling me, "you retarded mother fucking BOOB." What you are doing is called projection in psychology. Thanks for the laugh dipshit.
    1
  5989. Regarding, "Oh, I realize that Lincoln was our president A LONG TIME AGO," Is this your rational for lying? Regarding, "MUCH has changed," Thanks for clearing that up. I thought things were exactly the same as then. I should really go tell my slaves things have changed and they are actually free. They too will be happy to have been enlightened by the moron that is you. Regarding, "Can YOU admit that an honest leader can NOT be elected under a system run by criminals" I'm not sure. I am sure that I am going to continue to support candidates worthy of my vote. I will never vote for a POS candidate like Donald Trump.... unlike an idiot I know (that's you.... you are the idiot. I figure I better tell you in case you were not smart enough to figure it out without me telling you.) Regarding, "now THAT'S the mother fucking unasked question that flew RIGHT over your head!" How exactly did it fly over my head if it was never asked? Wouldn't it have had to exist to go over my head? Wow you are not smart. Trump loves the uneducated for a reason. Regarding, "do you REALLY think an honest candidate can win in a playing field where EVERYONE is a liar, cheat, and thief," But if there is an honest candidate then not everyone is a liar, cheat, thief. I know you think you have a point, but it only seems that way because you are stupid. I'm going to keep supporting honest candidates and you are going to continue to support Trump... because you are stupid. Good luck with your conman. Thanks for the laugh. It has been amusing talking to you in a way but I'm done with you. I'd have a better chance educating my dog so I'm to stop wasting my breathe on you.
    1
  5990. User regarding, "You guys should calm down and let the other one vote for whoever he or she likes." Fair point. I concede I have little tolerance for Trump and Hillary supporters, and that tolerance goes to zero when they lack the intelligence to understand that voting for someone is supporting them (among other idiotic statements). Regarding, "If Trump wins, it's not your fault" If Trump wins it won't be my fault because I'm not voting for him. "Human" on the other hand... well, considering they are going to be voting for him it would actually be, by definition, their fault for supporting him with his vote. Regarding, "she is the worst presidential candidate the Democratic Party ever had." We can all agree on that.
    1
  5991. Do you not understand how many people rely on the water that pipeline endangers?
    1
  5992. After how the DNC has conducted themselves this election cycle I am quite embarrassed to admit that I have identified myself as a democrat for some time... til now. I am leaving the party and will not support them unless they make some major changes.
    1
  5993. The left isn't coming either (at least not this guy on the left). She does have the support of the media and the electronic voting machines with no paper trail. She also does have a case to be made that she is better than Trump (not that that is saying much).
    1
  5994. Never Hillary. Never Trump. Jill Stein for President!
    1
  5995. Oops.
    1
  5996. "Should the world give some one like El Chapo the death penalty" I do not believe in the death penalty period. Oh an your whole argument is absurd. Even the people who would like el chapo put to death don't want it done because of drugs. "who is responsible for many deaths" That is what the death penalty would be for. Do you really not understand the difference?
    1
  5997. Legendary regarding, "The death Penalty is debatable." It is for certain crimes. Like I said I am against the death penalty in all cases. That is my position. That said I understand that there is a debate to be had about having a death penalty for murders. What is not, at all, reasonable is a debate on the death penalty for drug offenses. Your original quote seems to suggest that you think it would be ok for El Chapo to be killed for drug offenses. That is absurd to me and to anyone with a conscience in my opinion. If you want to debate the death penalty for El Chapo murdering people that is very different. The problem is that you conflate the breaking of different laws. There are punishments for killing people and there are punishments for drug offenses (although arguably there should not be). El Chapo may also be guilty of jaywalking but that doesn't mean... some jaywalkers, like El Chapo, may very well deserve death.
    1
  5998. Please can I have whatever he is on? At least until after this election but better yet until 2020 and the next election. Thank you in advance.
    1
  5999. Except they are not destroyed and are still very much around. Except they were fighting a severe uphill battle with any Republican they nominated. Except he really isn't much different than a typical Republican.
    1
  6000. This reminded me of the sex talk show with Adam Corolla and Dr. Drew back in the day Loveline. The first episode I ever watched a girl called into the show and asked the question of whether or not semen was good for a person's complexion because her BF told her it was. I thought that was so fucking funny I nearly wasted some skin clearing piss in my pants. It still makes me laugh when I think about it.
    1
  6001. Venus regarding, "1% of the the United States should be allowed to dictate every election." Huh?
    1
  6002. Venus I guess he should have said you don't have any good reason for certain people to have votes that are more important than others.
    1
  6003. Lil Napoleon regarding, "you got to vote for it." I do not understand the point you are trying to make here.
    1
  6004. donHooligan regarding, "to city-dwellers...the most unsustainable creatures on the planet." At least you are being honest about why you happily want inequality. You admit you think some people are more valuable than others on election day. I think that you will find yourself in the minority with that type of attitude and will find the majority believe in fairness and equality.
    1
  6005. Shady regarding, "3. I hated both." So did I but I still voted. There were more than 2 candidates running. I voted for Jill Stein. Regarding, "Hillary doesnt." I can't stand Hillary. I love that she will not be President but again, this isn't about trying to help or hurt a politician or political party. One person, one vote is the right thing to do because it is the right thing to do and the rest is just details meant to justify injustice. Regarding, "Some states wont get representation." Of course they will unless there is a state where nobody lives. Otherwise they will get as much representation as they do people. Keep in mind that currently some states don't really get representation. Democrats are content to take California for granted and Republicans are content to take Texas for granted and swing states get all the love because the system is currently not equal nor fair. Regarding, "In the end the best thing we can do is look at the map and change electoral votes based on population." Or we could do away with the terrible idea of the electoral college that was brought to us by people that legalized slavery and didn't allow women to vote. The founding fathers were not perfect and the electoral college was just one example of this.
    1
  6006. Elephant regarding, "Genius! Where did you get such a unique idea?" Seems pretty common sense to me but it also seems to me that common sense is not as common as it should be in our country.
    1
  6007. Iron regarding, "No, but the other alternative is to give states like Iowa no real say at all." Iowa can have a say. They just can't have more of a say than anyone else on election day. I don't care what state you live in. I don't care if you live in a city or on a farm. I don't care if you are democrat, republican, or independent. We are all Americans on election day and we all should have an equal say in electing our President. But you go ahead and keep on trying to justify injustice. Just don't lie to yourself about what you are doing.
    1
  6008. Ironzealot regarding, "The president is not elected by the people." No kidding. That is exactly what is wrong with the current system. The people should be electing the President. Regarding, "That's also why the senate exists." We are not talking about the Senate but since you brought it up it is a check and balance so that small states have power and say in government. You want peoples votes to be counted differently. You do whatever you got to do to justify this to yourself. I know you will.
    1
  6009. bandholm regarding, "the President is the leader of the entire country, that he should be elected by the people, by direkte vote" We agree on this. I think some points were lost in translation. Regarding, "your system seems archaic," You are getting it right. Our system is obviously messed up. Only the very biased think a system where the person who gets less votes should win.
    1
  6010. Cesar Galvez regarding, "Equality? what the fuck is that" According to the dictionary "equality is: the quality or state of being equal : the quality or state of having the same rights, social status, etc." Under the current EC system votes are not equal. Votes cast in swing states are far more meaningful than votes cast in deep blue and deep red states. Under a one person, one votes system all votes would be equal. All votes would have the same weight. All votes would have equal value. That is equality.
    1
  6011. ppr how exactly is the current system with the EC any less dangerous than one person and one vote? That's right, it's not. You are just fear mongering.
    1
  6012. Misanthropic regarding, "the problem is that it's basically California, New York, and Florida decides who is president" The problem with you is that you think these heavily populated states should have less voice than you because they do not share your political ideals. I don't piss and moan that a huge state like Texas also gets to express itself. Regarding, "even if it was a popular vote only trump would still win" Um. No. He wouldn't have. And I'm not talking about trying to change the last election. I'm talking about making a fair system going forward.
    1
  6013. HWE regarding, "All of you, be honest; If Hillary was the one who won the electoral vote And Trump won the popular vote you wouldn't want to remove the electoral college." I have been saying for some time that, gun to my head, I'd prefer Trump win. This isn't about benefiting or hurting a politician or political party. This is about doing what is right. This is about a sincerely held belief that the person who gets the most votes should win regardless of how it affects the candidate I would prefer win. It is called having principles.
    1
  6014. pprocacci regarding, ""pure" democracies, by their very nature, inevitably trample individual rights and oppress minorities." Even what I am proposing is not a "pure" democracy. We would still have a system of checks and balances. How exactly does the EC change things for the better again? Because it doesn't. It doesn't, in any way, prevent the fear mongering you are peddling.
    1
  6015. Azayog regarding, "the electoral college is ALSO decided by the populous states." Again, this is worth repeating. A candidate could win 39 states and lose the general election with the electoral college in place. Therefor any argument that the EC makes sure the small states get are assured representation is absurd. Regarding, "However, a 1 for 1 vote would be decided ONLY be the most populous states." No. It wouldn't. Look at how close the popular vote in this election was. That type of election requires politicians campaign anywhere and everywhere. Even places they would expect to do well they need to campaign in to do better. Even in places they could expect to do terrible in they should campaign to get as much support as possible. There is no system where politicians are going to Wyoming to campaign but there is no perfect system. Only perfect fairness where everyone's votes count the same at the end of the day. Regarding, "and can almost utterly ignore the small states." No more so than with the EC. Win 11 states and you can ignore the rest if you want.
    1
  6016. Azoyag regarding, "the bottom 10 will have a negligible impact in the election." Look at how close the popular vote for this election was? If everyone gets a vote that counts the same a politician would be foolish to neglect any segment of society. Regarding, "There will be little incentive to campaign in these states," If you say so. I disagree. Your argument comes off quite hypocritical in that you ignore the fact that the EC gives little incentive to campaign in the largest states in the union like Cali, Texas or NY. Considering a politician has limited time and resources why would any Presidential candidate campaign in any of those states? And these are the largest states in the country but you don't seem to care that they get ignored. There is no perfect system that ensures a politician is going to campaign in Wyoming. There is only perfect fairness in the vote. People living in Wyoming get to have a vote just like anyone else in the country and their vote gets to count just as much as everyone else even if they don't get campaign rallies. Regarding, "Win California, and your opponent..." So seem to be thinking that all Californias would vote the same. There are Republicans in California you know. And it would be nice if their vote meant something. With the EC they may as well stay home and that would have just as much impact on the election. Regarding, "Of course, I'm not going to discuss what's fair and what is not" Why not? Fairness isn't a complicated topic. You don't have to be born in the US to have an opinion on what is fair. I suspect it has more to do with fairness clearly being against you. Regarding, "But the EC does allow better representation for the smaller states," Of course it does. It allows unfair representation. No vote should have more value than any others. No one should have more say than any others. The EC doesn't doesn't disproportionately help small states as much as it disproportionately helps SWING states.
    1
  6017. ppr regarding, "the American president would fail to represent a group of united states" Again, except that the EC ensures that certain highly populated areas of the country are not represented because there is no reason or incentive to campaign in Cali, Texas or NY. Those areas you speak about DO get a say when everyone gets a vote. They just don't get more say than anyone else. You WANT unfairness baked into the system because of clear bias.
    1
  6018. Lee regarding, "You should run for office" You shouldn't need to hold office to have a say in the government. We should all have a say in the direction the country takes. It is all of our country. We are all Americans.
    1
  6019. ppr regarding, "They ARE represented though." Try to use this type of "logic" in reverse. You are the same person that says things like, "the American president would fail to represent a group of united states" because small states would "only" get to have their votes count as much as any one else in the country. Yes Cali and NY is "represented" by the EC even if not as much as their population would suggest, but you are completely missing the point that politicians have ZERO incentive or motivation to campaign there. Imagine you are a presidential candidate. You have a limited number of resources and time. Would you spend ANY time or money in Cali, NY or Texas? Of course not because the very flawed EC system dictates how those states are going to be represented during the election. Your whole argument for the EC is that without it certain states are going to be ignored. But because of the EC only swing states are represented and fought over. Regarding, "Our founder knew first hand that Tyranny by the majority wouldn't fly." Our founders were racists who legalized slavery and didn't let women vote. They are hardly infallible or perfect like you want to imagine. The EC was partly to ensure that slave owners and their 3/5 people could have their say. Much has changed since then. Our notion of what is equal and fair has evolved for the better but some, like you, are still far behind and want to make sure that some voices are considered to be more important than others. You are wrong.
    1
  6020. Misanthropic regarding, "Citiation needed that our understanding has become better." We don't allow slavery and we let women vote. I'm not citing everything for you. Some things are considered common knowledge and asking for that stuff cited just makes you looks like a moron. Regarding, "People want the popular which is just, if not, most likely, more flawed than the EC." No. It isn't. If it were the popular vote, where everyone's vote counts the same there is reason to try and win every vote. No vote is more important than others. The EC creates a system of inequality where only there is only reason to seek out the valuable votes and ignore the meaningless votes. Regarding, "They didn't let anyone who didn't own land vote including the vast majority of men so your point is moot." No. That actually proves my point. The system put in place our godlike founding fathers was absurd, obviously unfair, and fucked from the start.
    1
  6021. Misanthropic regarding, "I don't actually like democracy." Just another reason for me to want to ignore you. I can't believe I've wasted as much time address you as I have.
    1
  6022. Zach regarding, "You forgot to mention that 57% of the U.S. population lives in those 11 States" I didn't forget to mention shit. The point that you seem to ignore is that the EC doesn't do what fans of the EC claim it does. Regarding, "I believe that's a majority is it not?" Yes it would be a majority of the country. Why do you assume all of those people vote the exact same? I tend to think some of those people would want to vote independently of one another. For example California has a way of always going for the democrats, but Republicans in the state should be able to have their votes count and matter and that is impossible with the EC. Regarding, "Guess you just thought that was useless information." It certainly is with the way you provide it. Again you think that those people would vote exactly the same. And now you, the guy defending the EC think what the majority of the country has to say is important. Hypocrite much? Regarding, "your argument as a whole is based on the premise of the United States being Democratic. It's a Republic" My argument isn't based on labels. I don't care about labels. I care about policy. The only label I would use to describe a system where the person getting the most votes loses is moronic. Regarding, "to prevent mob rule" and "people succumbing to groupthink" You "prevent mob rule" by making some votes count more than others and prevent "groupthink" by telling some people their votes don't get to count as much as others. However you want to do it what you are doing is justifying a system where some votes count differently than others. Regarding, "You seem to completely ignore that point." You absolutely reinforced my point but don't seem to understand that you did. Regarding, "I'm fighting for individual rights." No. You are fighting against the right of some people to have a meaningful vote. Regarding, "I don't dismiss people just because they didn't use perfect English." I didn't dismiss anyone even if I was dismissive. I addressed the guy who wrote a wall of text even if was a pain in the ass because it is tough to follow a wall of text. It was also noteworthy that in that wall of text part of their argument revolved around thinking he was brilliant and others were not and that is how, in part, he tried to justify thinking his vote was important while others were not. Regarding, "You don't understand the United States government and how it operates and I suggest you learn a bit more before responding." I do understand it. It is just that I have a problem with and want to see it changed. The idea that because I want it to be different I don't understand is very simplistic and moronic. Regarding, "He represents 100% of the United States Citizens." Thanks for clearing that up. I'm not sure why you think I thought differently. And since he represents 100% of citizens, 100% of citizens should have a say in electing him rather than just the citizens who live in swing states. Regarding, "Not 51, 49, 27 or any other number you care or more likely don't to pull out of thin air." This was hilarious considering you are pulling those numbers out of thin air. Thanks for the laugh. Regarding, "I would rather a president that tries to bring us together or no president at all, THAN YOUR SYSTEM that would happily suppress and represent 51 over 49." The EC does all that huh? A popular vote President would be the devil and the EC vote President would be like Jesus because of some sort of twisted logic in your head huh? Regarding, "Either we all get represented" You say this like you want it but you use it to defend the EC and a system where huge segments of the population don't get represented. Regarding, "repeating the mistakes of history." Way to close it out with another joke. The guy who wants to keep on letting the person getting the least votes win wants to keep repeating this mistake.
    1
  6023. Lee regarding, "Your thinking is the little blue on the map should make the decision who runs the country into the ground" I guess maybe that is how it sounds to someone who isn't good at thinking. My thinking is actually, again, and this is not very complicated, that everyone should get a vote, all votes should count the same, and the most votes should win. Regarding, "you see so much red" Land doesn't get to vote. People do.
    1
  6024. Mopar I want to quit you. You are so not worth the time but I concede I have a hard time letting stupid go unanswered and with you there is just so much stupid. Regarding, "PC" You have no fucking idea what the words you are using mean do you? To a dipshit like you somebody is "PC" if they disagree with you. I am not PC. I don't give a fuck about being PC. You should be able to tell this by my original reply but you can't because you are a fucking moron. I don't give a fuck about trying to not to hurt people feelings. I care about telling it like it is. You are fucking retarded. Regarding, "it's you that is the problem not me." Again, it is because you are dumb as fuck and a complete mental midget that you say things like this. You simply are not smart. Regarding, "I go to work to better myself" Nobody goes to work to "better themself." People go to school to better themselves. They go to work to pay the bills and make money. You say you go to work to "better myself," because, again, you are a moron. Regarding, "to pay for these dip shits to go play in the snow." God damn you are stupid. Do you bother to bitch at the billions of dollars of tax dollars that go to big oil and gas? Do you bother to bitch about the fact that they don't pay their fair share and as a result your moronic ass is forced to pay more? No. You know why? Because you are dumb as fuck blaming peaceful protests because you are simply not smart enough to understand the world around you. Regarding, "how come I can't have an opinion?" You get to have an opinion. As do I. My opinion is that you are dumb as fuck. Maybe you need a safe space from me so that you can hide in it because you are a fucking hypocrite. Regarding, "it's dumb." Yes. Your opinion is dumb. Regarding, "They are not doing anything" The fact that the pipeline is currently stopped proves, again, that you are a moron unable to comprehend even the simplest of ideas. Regarding, "PC... ignorant little babies who cry" This is funny while you cry like a little bitch with a skinned knee.
    1
  6025. Mopar regarding, "so all you can do is call names and swear." That is not all I've done. You only think it is all I've done because you are dumb. Regarding, "prove your point." I have and you thinking I haven't only proves it further. Regarding, "it is very ignorant that you feel the only way to better yourself is to go to school." Damn you are stupid. I never said going to school is the only way to better yourself. I talked of it as an example of a way to better yourself. Fuck you are stupid incapable of understanding simple thoughts. Regarding, "how is that even possibly the truth." It's not. That is why I didn't say it. You don't understand the words I use because you are not smart. Regarding, "There are many things to make you better like work ethic," A person with a good work ethic is a better person. But the act of work ethic doesn't serve to, "better myself." Regarding, "common sense" You can't create or destroy common sense. You either have it or you don't. You obviously don't have it. Regarding, "entrepreneurial skills." Again remember what you originally said. You said, "I go to work to better myself" Myself as in the person. It is funny you think are making a decent point here. You are in fact only proving my point that you are stupid. Regarding, "have fun with that one" You are stupid but you are funny. I love how you think you are having a drop the mic moment but you are only proving how dumb you are. Regarding, "so I can see you're upset so I did my job and showed exactly how you people react to a little truth or another opinion." LMAO. You think things like this because you are dumb as fuck.
    1
  6026. Ok. Seriously, I said it before but I really want to quit you. I'd have a better chance of educating my dog than you even if your idiocy is entertaining in a way.
    1
  6027. Mopar regarding, "regarding, regarding, regarding. come up with a new format." Nah. I'm good. It is how I tell you what I am exactly addressing. You already have so much trouble understanding it is my way to try to make it easier for you to understand. (still you can't) Regarding, "fuck you're dumb." You think this because you, in fact, are dumb. Regarding, "You're so predictable. You're just a child. or a young college student" Except I'm old as fuck. Morons like you love to try to assume things about others but they usually get it wrong because they are stupid. Regarding, "you little crying baby." I'm sorry if I hurt your feelings you stupid little bitch. I'll leave you be so you can go back to your safe space.
    1
  6028. Regarding, "you just used my line" Except I used it correctly.
    1
  6029. Mopar regarding, "you've been trolled like intended" You are a troll and I'm the sad one? I'm the bitch? You think things like this because you are fucking stupid. Epic dumb.
    1
  6030. Glenn regarding, "you're the dumbass" Bummer. Your approval means everything to me.
    1
  6031. Decent like Merrick Garland? He was praised by republicans right up until Obama nominated him. If dems care about SCOTUS as much as they claim they can demand Garland types and say no to Scalia types just the same way republicans are saying no right now.
    1
  6032. I'm sorry if the truth hurts.
    1
  6033. War I'm pretty sure alexander fleming was using sarcasm. I hope it was at least. That was how I read it. It is hard to tell sometimes only because there are a lot of morons out there. I've been saying for some time that I wish there was a "sarcastic font."
    1
  6034. You do need to vote just not for either of those 2. If we are ever going to do better than a broken 2 party system you need to go out and vote 3rd party. Jill Stein for President because she actually deserves your vote. I would also like to add that the presidential election is not the only election going on.
    1
  6035. Jill Stein for President! Please do not support terrible no good candidates like Hillary and Trump.
    1
  6036. Stack regarding, "it's a CTR troll. Pay no attention." What are you a Russian spy or something? Seriously thou I just wanted to "correct the record" in my own way.
    1
  6037. Spenser, I'm sorry to disappoint you but nobody really cares where the emails came from despite your efforts to change the conversation to that. We care about the content of the emails. We care about the corruption it has exposed. And I don't care if you think I'm gullible, ignorant, a troll or whatever insult YOU want to throw at me. I care first, and foremost about Hillary being corrupt as fuck and the rest are details and distractions from that fact.
    1
  6038. Terry Tater. The first thing Trump says in your video is praise for Hillary. Not very compelling if you are trying to make a case for Trump.
    1
  6039. Kaze, unfortunately I do not expect everybody will see the message. Even if everyone did, some people would disagree. I would still expect racists to support Trump and the super rich to support Hillary. Ultimately I'm not looking for 100%. (not that I'd object) I'd settle for people voting for the interests. In that case Dr. Jill Stein would win in a landslide.
    1
  6040. Go subscribe to TYT politics if you haven't already. Your welcome in advance.
    1
  6041. Regarding, "He's the ONLY one who can." Not exactly. Almost everyone in the world could beat Trump. Mostly they need to avoid nominating literally the worst candidate in the world to beat him. Shit they did that already and a corrupt POS like Hillary still got more votes. I agree that Bernie would be ideal but if he isn't healthy at the time I'd be just fine with Tulsi Gabbard, Nina Turner, and a few other true progressives. If they want to try Tim Kaine or another terrible candidate I will vote for the Green Party again.
    1
  6042. So if Trump were the democratic nominee (not that hard to imagine, he was a self described democrat not that long ago) and David Duke were the republican nominee you would vote for one of the two? Do you not realize that there are more than 2 candidates running? You are an idiot, that's all there is to it.
    1
  6043. I agree with Trump (kind of) and think Obama is full of shit. WTF. It is like I'm in another dimension.
    1
  6044. Thanks Sarah Silverman. Sorry but you are ridiculous to think that people should just fall in line and ignore rigged elections. You are ridiculous to think I should support a candidate that does not, in any way, represent me. I'm sorry you have a problem with free speech and the right to protest. I'm sorry you think we should ignore our own feelings and vote based on someone else's endorsement. I'm a moron because I'm not voting based on another person's endorsement? Seriously thou... you are being ridiculous.
    1
  6045. Face regarding, "I didn't ignore it" Well I didn't ignore you. I just do not understand how someone can think it can't get worse than Hillary. It can. And if you are not frightened of Trump then you are not paying attention to him. Like I've already said there is very little difference between the two. One of the way they are slightly different is who they surround themselves with and although Hillary surrounds herself with garbage the people Trump is giving power ARE worse. The people Trump is going to try to put on the SC, for life, ARE worse. And just because Hillary Clinton sucks that doesn't make these statements any less true.
    1
  6046. She is lucky to even have her name mentioned on most of these polls considering the biases of the people conducting them.
    1
  6047. The "land of the free"? Only ironically.
    1
  6048. Jordan you are an idiot and you sound high as fuck. I'd give you a more sincere response but it would be a waste of my time. You are an idiot. It's fine thou. Just don't "attach a thought to it." Thoughts clearly are not your thing.
    1
  6049. Look dipshit. Morality is obviously relative. That is very different that it "doesn't exist." And to suggest it doesn't exist is dumb as fuck. So dumb you do not deserve a sincere response. Go ahead and think that means I don't have a well thought response because I don't bother to waste my time on you. I am already being dumber than I should be by wasting far more time on you than you deserve, again. You took a philosophy course. Good for you. You are hardly enlightened. You are a fucking idiot.
    1
  6050. Your original statement was fucking absurd. Is that really impossible to grasp? Even you contradict yourself. You say, "Morality doesn't exist." and "Morality exists in thought." I don't have time for this. You are an idiot.
    1
  6051. Duck there is so much wrong with everything you say its tough to know where to begin but I guess I'll try... "Sanders lost fair and square"  Do you really believe this?  Are you really so blind?  Ug.  I'm one sentence in and I'm already questioning why I'm bothering.  If you don't already realize the system is rigged and not fair I have to wonder why I'm bothering. Superdelegates biased the game before it began.  I could be willing to accept superdelegates and their role in the process if, and only if, they would keep their fking mouths shut during the election process.  To have nearly 500 superdelegates pledge their support to Hillary before any of us mere peasants were allowed to vote is completely unacceptable.  It biases everything going forward and corrupts the entire election process tipping the scales of all elections to follow.  It allows corrupt and lazy newsmedia to report Hillary as having an insurmountable lead, creating a sense of inevitability and suppressing voter turnout... AS INTENDENDED AND COMPLETELY UNFAIR to anyone but the willfully stupid such as yourself.  There are more reasons why the system is unfair but why am I even bothering with you really.  I'd rather save the wasted effort. "by which she lost to Barack Obama in 2008."  Arguments such as this have always been the idiots way of justifying injustice throughout all of history.  Just because something has been does nothing to justify its existence or fairness.  You may as well be a confederate arguing slavery is fine because, "that's just the way it has always been." "Why must he incite volatile people and provoke useless rage?"  The only person inciting rage is you.  Stupidity, lies, and muddying the waters by people like you piss me off.  Unless you would like to be more specific about why you claim he incites volatile people when he time and again denounces violence.  Don't bother it's rhetorical.  We both know you are liar like your queen who has absolutely nothing to back up your BS claim. "he still can’t manage to disagree with people without being disagreeable."  You need to look at yourself in the mirror and think about what you see before you say things like this.  I admit that I can be quite disagreeable because morons like you piss me off and I have no problem telling you that you are a fking idiot.  But I also don't go around and tell others how they are being disagreeable because I am not a complete fking hypocrite like you. "The parties are private organizations. They get to set the rules, "  Every now and then you say something that isn't complete BS.  The problem with this statement is that you say it as an effort to justify injustice.  Just because they get to set the rules does not mean that the rules are inherently fair.  They have nothing to do with one another.  For example let's talk basketball since it was just in the news.  Let's say the NBA decided to change the rules and that from now on Cleveland gets to start each game with 10 points (the NBA dubs them superdelegate points).  That is within their power.  They too are a private organization.  Some teams would even be able to win some games against them.  Would it be fair though?  Obviously not... unless you are dumb as duck. "lies about her."  Have I lied about her at all?  You might want to consider that she is called a liar because she is a fking liar.  It isn't just a right wing conspiracy.  And her being corrupt is also not a right wing conspiracy... she just is corrupt as fk.  She has no principles.  There is nothing she wouldn't say or do to be President.  She just says what she thinks people want to hear. "You, however, want the rules changed because your guy isn't winning."  No.  I want the rules changed because the rules are unfair.  I, unlike your queen, have principles that I hold regardless of how they might affect me or my candidate.  I am willing to accept losing but I am unwilling to accept cheating and unfairness. "Maybe you should stop blaming the DNC," and "It's not the DNC's job to help Bernie win." The DNC on May 26, 2015... "Our goals in the coming months will be to frame the Republican field and the eventual nominee early and to provide a contrast between the GOP field and HRC."  THAT'S ON MAY 26 2015!  They go on to say, "Use specific hits to muddy the waters around ethics, transparency and campaign finance attacks on HRC."  Yup, it wasn't the DNC's job to help Bernie win... it was the DNC's job to help Hillary win. And that wasn't according to me... that was according to THEM you ducking idiot. I suspect you might be one of their paid operatives. This also isn't just some conspiracy theory.  POS David Brock thinks that this is good politics and has spent over a million dollars paying trolls like you because he, like the POS he works for HRC, have no ethics.  For your sake I hope that you are being paid for your willful ignorance and are not really so ducking stupid. "Sanders supporters suggesting that polls point to him as the best nominee - is ridiculous."  The only thing that is ridiculous is you.  We are talking about EXIT POLLS.  Do you know what those are?  Are you smart enough to know the difference?  They aren't polls conducted a week before an election or something.  They are polls taken where people are voting the day of an election.  They absolutely should be in line with election results and when they are not something is terribly wrong.  Go to trustvotedotorg to learn more.  From them, " when exit poll data varies more than 2% from electronic vote totals, the electronic vote totals are questionnable. If fact, 2% is used as the boundary by the US government when determining that the election in another country other than the US has possibly been stolen."  Discrepancy in favor of Clinton from exit polls on March 1, 2016; Georgia 11.9%, Virginia 4.3%, Vermont 1.1%, Mass 8%, Alabama 13.9%, Tenn 8.3%, Oklahoma -6.1%, Ark 5.2%, Tex 6.4%.  That is what we are talking about.  Something is clearly wrong with this picture unless you are a blind moron who either actually thinks we are talking about polls conducted before an election, or more likely the more I think about it, just a POS muddying the water so that hopefully others won't be able to see the truth. Duck you.  You suck at life.  I've wasted so much more time on you than you deserve.  I'm done caring what you think or have to say.  You are a lost cause and not worth any more of my time. Good luck with your POS candidate. You deserve each other.
    1
  6052. She would absolutely do that or anything else if it meant winning. She doesn't do what you suggest because she is incapable.
    1
  6053. No. As time goes on and you get closer to the election the poll should be more accurate. For example you are suggesting that it is easier and more reliable to predict what you will have for lunch 1 year from now as opposed to, say, tomorrow for lunch. Does that make any sense? When predicting things that are far off in the future you must account that time changes things. Hillary vs Trump would be greatly affected by world events. A stock market crash, a terrorist attack, a hillary indictment are all possible world events that would greatly affect the election. The greater amount of time the greater possibility of such things happening.
    1
  6054. Regarding, "Right before the election, the interval might be between 75% and 85%, which would mean a more accurate prediction of the outcome." Not exactly. Apparently right now it is 79% if we are to believe Silver. I personally think that 79% would be reasonable if we were closer to the election, but this far out I think he is very wrong to be as certain as he is. Too much could happen between now and then. He also thought Hillary had a better than 99% chance of winning Michigan immediately before their primary so... I don't really care what he thinks or anyone else for that matter. I'm not sure why he gets the airtime that he gets and I'd rather we just let the election play out without his opinion. That said I think his job is important as a pollster... just not as an analyst.
    1
  6055. You either do not understand the meaning of the words "literally impossible" or you are literally an idiot.
    1
  6056. You should listen to the video before commenting. He addresses your question in the video.
    1
  6057. Bob Dole does not deserve that. He was not corrupt like Hillary. I don't care about Hillary having no charisma. I care first and foremost that she is corrupt.
    1
  6058. It's tougher to rig the general election. The parties don't have all the tools to disenfranchise voters there the way they get to pick the voters in the primaries. There they also are not able to cancel exit polls and and it is more difficult to sweep the election fraud under the rug. That said no doubt they will be trying.
    1
  6059. Andrea I just find it very funny that they think anyone cares if they are subscribed or not. Do they think I'm going to be like, "ZP ZAP is not subscribed? I better unsub them." It is ridiculous. That said I'm not complaining. I think it is very funny.
    1
  6060. Who was never, ever, even a little bit considered? Bernie Sanders
    1
  6061. Purplefish regarding, "Everyone was pro fracking for the last 10 years." That is lie just like the queen you support. Regarding, "HRC at least claims she has learned to not be against it." So the fact that she lies about it is suppose to make me feel better? It doesn't. Weird you think that is an acceptable excuse. Regarding, "She's an old school politician that "triangulates" and doesn't pick a position until it's politically advantageous." In other words she has zero principles of her own. She isn't in for any kind of beliefs of her own or desire to do the right thing but for the ability to hold the power. She puts her finger in the wind to test how the public feels about certain issues but on others, the issues really important to her like going to war everywhere, the public can really go fuck itself. Regarding, "Second opensecrets is a whack job website." LOL. Regarding, "Yeah, destroying cell phones , emails etc is NO different what's happened in the past 14 years. Have you been asleep ? Powell, Rice, Bush / Cheney administration kept private servers AND destroyed millions of emails." The devil is in the details that you obviously are ignornant about or are conveniently ignoring. Even I agreed that she was just doing business as usual that is a fucking pathetic defense. You may as well be a lawyer arguing for your murderer cop that, "that's how it's always been... cops murder people therefor this is what you should expect." Regarding, "I doubt you were complaining about them." I assure I was and I'm not going to hypocritically ignore it because "my team" (not that they are my team anymore) is doing it. Regarding, "we need laws to prevent this," We do. They are called, among other things, FOIA laws that Hillary broke. Regarding, "The Clintons have about a million loser Repubs going through their Trash ( google Trey Gawdy and Bengazi for instance ) so she was rightly defensive on this issue." Cool excuses and rationalizations bro. If she didn't do anything wrong she shouldn't have any reason to have to hide everything. Regarding, "Election fraud was a large % caused by incompetence and a smaller % caused by people already being biased towards HRC." I can't believe you are actually willing to accurately admit that there was election fraud during the primary but, again, as usual, your rationalizations and explanations are pure shit. Regarding, "Bernie, he wasn't a Dem" Who has Bernie caucused with over the years? Who has Bernie voted with over the years? How do democratic voters feel about the policies he champions? Bernie is far more democratic than the "democratic" party. Regarding, "there's nothing wrong with DNC people from wanting a Dem to get the nomination" Wanting is one thing... colluding is another and is against their own fucking rules.
    1
  6062. Two problems with Bernie. First the hair. If only he didn't have the hair of mad scientist. Second if only he wasn't so principled to call himself a democratic socialist and/or independent all these years and chose to instead label himself a Democrat. These two changes and it wouldn't have mattered how much Clinton, the DNC, and the MSM lied and cheated... he would be the nominee regardless.
    1
  6063. I think you misunderstand my point and my positions mars. I love Bernie. I don't care about the hair or the fact that he calls himself a democratic socialist. I am just acknowledging that lots of people in America do care about such things. Even if you don't you should realize that many people do care about such things. Regarding, "he does everything 'wrong'" No. He does everything RIGHT. It's just that the packaging is less than ideal... that's why the issues I mention I accurately call superficial.
    1
  6064. Ashton. I agree that there was a lot of voter fraud. Specifically exit polling results, when they weren't canceled, look scandalous. I even mention these issues briefly in my original comment, "Clinton, the DNC... cheated." O-I-C, no I do not think you see. Regarding, "That's what you would do or be." No that is not who I do or be, but that is who many Americans do or be. Do you really not get the point? I absolutely love that he is genuine. But the point, again, is that many, many, many Americans are easily distracted by the something like the hair and many, many, many Americans are entrenched in party politics who are loyal first the DNC and suspect of someone who hasn't been calling themselves one.
    1
  6065. Adblock plus. Free to download.
    1
  6066. Yes, clearly we are being used by a corrupt DNC. Thank you wikileaks for exposing these people for their corruption.
    1
  6067. "Take a deep breath please." Fair enough. It's depressing times. Part of why we need her. "I dont have to like her VP pick and that doesnt mean I am smearing her." I do not in any way question your sincerity. I do think you are falling for others actively smearing her or more accurately her running mate. I think you should be talking about the issues and are falling for their smear. I concede I do not know nearly as much about him as I do her but I am confident, without even knowing all the facts, that the facts of him are being distorted to make him seem more extreme than he is. Even if he is I'd arguably be ok with. My political views are rather extreme these days. This country needs real change. "I believe that Trump is a bigot, a narcissistic and stupid person... Hillary is corrupt, also narcissistic and a liar... I still think Jill didn't make the best choice with the VP but still hope she gets to the debates and/or gets enough votes to get her platform talked about across the US." We agree on essentially all this other than the VP but again I know I do not know as much about her choice to be considered an expert at all about him at the moment.
    1
  6068. Fuck you if you supported DWS. You really kill my faith in America.
    1
  6069. If Hillary Clinton is a changed woman it is only because money has changed her.
    1
  6070. "we have to take out their families" ISIS, wait... not ISIS. My mistake. It just sounds exactly like something ISIS would say. That was actually Donald Trump.
    1
  6071. Why do I hate Trump? He is a liar, a racist, a misogynist, a hypocrite, a douche... wait. It would be easier for me to just tell you the one thing I like about him... I liked when he talked about and brought attention to how our politicians are bought and sold.
    1
  6072. I'm convinced they rigged the election. Never Hillary. Never Trump. Jill Stein for President!
    1
  6073. How amazing were the casting agents for casting Dash in Clueless? How easy did they make the job of the director of the movie? Stacy.... just be yourself. Action!
    1
  6074. Nez regarding, "if is up to me i wouldent allow it" I'm glad it's not up to you. I like freedom of speech just the way it is.
    1
  6075. Patricia, again I am not for Johnson as much as I am against Trump and Hillary. So who do you support? "dems included" I guess not Hillary then correct?
    1
  6076. So sad... http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/stopped-52-times-police-racial-profiling-40453378
    1
  6077. Niklas regarding, "Not sure if you noticed but that statement is the same Trump used to talk about Mexican immigrants and is known to be one of his most Racist statements to this day." I was aware that my statement was very Trumpian. It was done so as satire to express my anger in a somewhat humorous way. It is noteworthy that my statement can not be called racist as you imply. Cops are not a race. Do you get offended when politicians say things like "we need to kill terrorists before they kill us."? I'm betting not because you accept that terrorists are bad people. You do not accept the fact that a much greater percentage of cops are evil people as well. You likely think they are heroes who got into the job to serve and protect. You are wrong outside of a tiny, tiny minority. Regarding, "Can you see that that type of statement helps fuel anger" Yes I do. I am not a big fan of doing so but like terrorists and criminals deserve anger so does much of the gestapo police force here in America deserve anger because way too big a percentage of them are criminals in blue. Am I advocating going out and killing them. No. I am not. But the police in America need sweeping changes immediately. Regarding, "a group of people that are already heavily criticised" Not in my opinion. Although there are people like myself who heavily criticize them there are also plenty of apologists who make excuses for police who kill unarmed civilians. Regarding, "is in no way helpful to the situation?" The first step in solving a problem is accepting a problem exists. Regarding, "Unless of course you have some way to isolate these criminals?" BLM has a list of 10 things they want to address the problems; 1 end broken windows policing, 2 community oversight, 3 limit the use of force, 4 police independently investigated and prosecuted, 5 community representation, 6 universal body cams, 7 additional training, 8 end for-profit policing, 9 demilitarization, and 10 fair police union contracts. I've posted this list elsewhere and you wouldn't believe the blow-back I get from racists and police apologists. I think the list is quite common sense. Notice that nowhere on the list is killing cops or race ever mentioned in the list of 10.
    1
  6078. One other little food for thought. America imprisons more of it's citizens than anywhere else in the world by percentage of population and it is isn't even close. How ironic is it that we like to call ourselves the "land of the free."
    1
  6079. Bernie got somewhere in the neighborhood of 12 million votes. I'm not sure exactly the number but it not close to 3 mil.
    1
  6080. Gary Johnson is more likely to take votes away from Trump than Hillary and Jill Stein is more likely to take votes away from Hillary but who cares. I don't and neither should you. You are focusing on the wrong things. I am voting for Jill Stein because she best represents my values, policies, ethics, priorities, and more. I think she is the best person to be President. That is why I am voting for her and I don't really care who you think it favors. I suggest you also vote for the candidate who best represents your values, policies, ethics, and priorities instead of worrying about who is most likely to win.
    1
  6081. One word. Australia.
    1
  6082. Kyle is on point as usual.
    1
  6083. Calm regarding, "will not infringe on freedom of speech" Isn't Trump the same guy who sued Bill Maher over a joke? I really can't stand it when people claim to care about something and then support people who are guilty of doing the exact same thing they claim to care about. Regarding, "the next 4 years... pushing 3rd parties" I'm going to be pushing 3rd parties and the Green party regardless of who wins the Presidency but please stop pretending Trump will be better than Hillary in any sort of meaningful way. That is very naive.
    1
  6084. C Mac. No I think you misunderstood me. I was addressing CaLMCee. Regarding, "I support the Greens completely." Very wise. Regarding, "Since I was old enough to vote." I admit I'm later to the party than I should have been. I can't tell you how betrayed I feel by the "democratic" party for the support I've given them in the past.
    1
  6085. Was anyone else annoyed at Chris Wallace continually scolding the audience? They are human beings and it is understandable they give human reactions to things. If they actually have a problem with the audience DON'T HAVE A FUCKING AUDIENCE. Let them watch it on TV or the internet like everyone else.
    1
  6086. He tried to sell steaks at the Sharper Image. My point is that he is not smart.
    1
  6087. Andrea regarding, "Not smart, just lucky." He was lucky the DNC rigged the primary for Hillary and he was lucky that Hillary is probably the only general election candidate he could have beaten in the country.
    1
  6088. liyev regarding, "he is smart enough to know his audience" He is an idiot and so was his audience. Regarding, "That is the biggest reason that he won the election." The biggest reason he won the election was Hillary Clinton. Don't overthink it. The second biggest reason he won the election was corporate media giving him billions in free exposure. Donald Trump is about the 38th reason he was able to win. Actually it is more accurate to say that he won the election in spite of being Donald Trump. Regarding, "In a way, he won the election brilliantly" There was nothing brilliant about it. He did everything he could to lose but ultimately the existence of Hillary Clinton was too much to stop him from winning. Regarding, "We should stop underestimating him." I do not underestimate him but not because of his intelligence but rather because of his lack of morals, ethics, and principles.
    1
  6089. Samm regarding, "he is estimated to be worth around 4.5 billion" I'm talking about how smart he is. You are talking about money and his net worth. I assure you these are different things. The number one thing that enable the accumulation of wealth is having wealth in the first place. It takes money to make money. It doesn't take intelligence nearly as much. Trump has bankrupt casinos. Do you realize how hard that is? Regarding, "you're focusing on steaks" I'm focusing on his intelligence. The steaks were just a good example of someone being dumb as fuck. Regarding, "I noticed how you don't deny that you said he had little chance to win." I didn't think this was important to the discussion. I again don't think it has much to do with the topic I was talking about about his intelligence. I never said he had little chance but that has more to do with my opinion of the American public than it has to do with Trump. Regarding, "You voted for the DNC" Morons love to assume things. First the DNC wasn't running for office. I voted for Bernie Sanders and Jill Stein. I never voted for the DNC. The DNC is a disgrace. Regarding, "Both the DNC and the GOP are terrible organizations" Well we agree on something at least. Regarding, "You pretend the DNC is better" Where do you get this shit? Because I didn't talk about how the DNC sucks? They weren't the fucking topic. There are lots of things that I think but didn't bother to talk when my point is that Donald Trump is a fucking moron. Regarding, "Finally, you back a candidate who objectively screwed Bernie out of delegates" Did I? I understand why you backed Trump. You are both idiots. Regarding, "You deserve everything that came your way." This is funny and ironic. Remember you said this when Trump sucks balls. Regarding, "You pretend he's dumb with a superiority complex" I'm not pretending shit. He just is dumb and acts to feed his ego. Regarding, "but you backed a candidate" You might want to consider that every person who thinks Trump is a fucking moron didn't vote for Hillary. Before the election I was saying that I preferred Trump win so that the country might get a true progressive in 4 years rather than another corporate stooge. But don't let reality get in the way of your preconceived notions and dumbass assumptions. Don't assume you know everything about me because I'm rightfully calling your hero a fucking moron. Regarding, "had every outlet and organization behind her, with billions of dollars" Try to remember that the corporate media gave your king BILLIONS in free media and exposure. They would cover Trumps empty podium while Sanders would be speaking in front of record crowds. Regarding, "I only voted for him because..." Yeah. You are part of the problem. Another fucking moron who thought there were only 2 options. There weren't. Stop being part of the problem, refuse to give your vote for dogshit, and be part of the solution in the future.
    1
  6090. But we are just about to win the war on drugs. (sarcasm obv)
    1
  6091. Babut regarding, "Wrong. Wrong your wrong" You are wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong, so there.
    1
  6092. Williams regarding, "He's a sellout." You are using the term wrong. A sellout does something for money. There is zero evidence of Bernie doing this. If you bothered to listen to Bernie he said over and over that he didn't want Trump to be President. He said over and over and over that he would do whatever he could to prevent Trump from winning. I wanted him to give Hillary and the DNC the finger but when he didn't I wasn't surprised because it was exactly what Bernie said he was going to do.
    1
  6093. Nick regarding, "yeah but trump is absolute shit" Yeah but Hillary is absolute shit as well so your point is moot. I wasn't surprised that Bernie endorsed her. He has a a way of doing what he says he will and that is what he said he would do. Still he was wrong. Hillary and the DNC cheated. Hillary is epic fucking terrible as well as Donald being epic fucking terrible. He should have run as an independent, not for himself but for the country.
    1
  6094. Kuroi regarding, "He either believes the things the authoritarian racist/sexist part of the left say, or was pandering to them." This is so fucking vague and absurd. Are you capable of being specific? Again I care about policy, priorities, and ethics. How does this BS affect those specific things? Regarding, "Try to not be intentionally dishonest to avoid what I obviously said." There was nothing obvious about what you said and there still isn't. Regarding, "Obviously when I say that I mean his policatian postions." then talk about his political positions with some sort of specificity instead of complete vagueness. Or don't. Whatever. Regarding, "That's obviously in no way what I said" I admit I have a hard time understanding anything you say and was making fun of your idiocy. I guess you didn't find it funny. Regarding, "dismiss what I said without arguing what I said." You didn't say anything of substance from what I can tell and you still haven't. Again, do you have any thoughts about policy, priorities, ethics or just vague BS smears?
    1
  6095. Williams regarding, "Poor Berniebot," That is funny coming from someone who talks like a robot but with less substance or intelligence.
    1
  6096. Kuroi regarding, "Again, intentionally still being intellectually dishonest" If you say so. You might want to consider that I just don't think much of anything you have said because I haven't. It is difficult to respond to fragmented, moronic "thoughts." Regarding, "I didn't say anything of substance about my original comment yet because you refuse acknowledge what I said and instead pretend that what I said made no sense." Huh? I'm not pretending you don't make sense. You just don't make any fucking sense. You are funny at least especially when your next point is calling me retarded for poorly chosen words. Pot meet kettle. Regarding, "Also you said ''Again I care about policy, priorities, and ethics'' twice, and the first time you never said it prior, so you just look completely retarded." Ok, you got me. These were not perfectly picked words. I don't write here to be published. I don't proofread my shit. I write to try and convey a message. I may not have said, "I care about policy, priorities, and ethics" prior to saying, "Again..." but I did say, "Talk about policy instead please. Policy actually means something" to someone else. That was what I was referring to even if I concede I picked my words poorly. And you certainly are an expert in "completely retarded" aren't you so that does sting. Regarding, "able to understand what the sentence ''He is almost always wrong on race and gender.'' in the context..." Do you really not understand how vague and meaningless that insult was? I am able to understand that you are trying to be insulting but you were doing so very poorly. Is he wrong about race and gender because he is too far to the left on those issues? Is he wrong about race and gender because he is too far to the right on those issues? Is he wrong about race and gender because it isn't actually an issue and he thinks so? Is he wrong about race and gender because it is an issue and he doesn't think so? If you do not realize that those words were essentially meaningless, well that makes sense considering, but I can't understand what the fuck you are trying to say unless you offer a little more to your words other than the equivalent of "Bernie Bad!" Regarding, "a IQ higher than negative 5," "your so illiterate," and "than you shouldn't." Thanks for the laughs dipshit. Nothing completely retarded about that. Maybe you shouldn't be interacting with others.
    1
  6097. Eric regarding, "Bernie wrong on this. Unless you want to have more corruption." Yeah, we should just let corporations ship jobs overseas in a race to the bottom. (That's sarcasm in case you are not smart enough to realize it without me telling you.)
    1
  6098. Eric regarding, "I'm against outsourcing." So you are against outsourcing but you are apparently unwilling to do anything about it. Just saying, "I'm against outsourcing" doesn't do much to keep jobs here.
    1
  6099. I couldn't care less if Hillary started talking to the left of Sanders on policy. Actions speak louder than words. She has zero credibility with me. Same as Trump. Anybody who believes anything either of these people say is making a mistake in my opinion.
    1
  6100. Everybody knows satan is anti gun.
    1
  6101. Just booked my plane ticket. I need a vacation anyway.
    1
  6102. will regarding, "it's better to have someone who at least accepts Global Warming is a real thing" Is it really if they aren't going to do anything about it?
    1
  6103. The Great regarding, "she would do something about it" No. She wouldn't. She answers to her donors and not the people. She doesn't give a fuck about anyone other than herself and the people that paid for her campaign.
    1
  6104. will be my end regarding, "if Bernie was on constantly on her back" LMAO. You think she would have given a fuck. How cute. Regarding, "We now transition from one of the greatest democracies to fascist country." You know he is President and not dictator right?
    1
  6105. will be my end, Hillary is corrupt corporate POS. I'm thrilled she isn't President. That said I'm sad Trump is President. But as the US has terrible policies like war, war, war, war, war, war, fucking over the people, and sucking the corporations dicks I'd prefer the face of shit policies be that of Trump. Hopefully we can get someone decent in next time. This election was lost when the DNC rigged the primary for their POS candidate. Regarding, "Donald Trump isn't a dictator" No. He isn't a dictator. Regarding, "Trump is to Muslims and Mexicans what Hitler was to the Jews." Oh for fucks sakes has Trump committed a holocaust? Then fuck off with your hyperbole. Regarding, "He even wants to nuke the Middle East to take out ISIS, kill their families," Trump is a fucking liar you know that right? Of course you do but you don't bother to remember that he is a liar when he says something you think makes your case. I know how Hillary governs because she has already done it and it is fucking terrible. For all I know about Trump he has just been pandering to the extreme right to get votes and he will govern like the self described democrat he was not long ago. Time will tell how he governs. I'm not optimistic I can't know for sure til I see it. I could be sure Hillary was going to suck because that is all she has done her entire life... suck.
    1
  6106. If border walls are so important to Trump and his supporters why do they ignore the northern border? (Hint... the answer has to do with skin color.)
    1
  6107. The proof is in the works? Sure. If you say so. I'm going to go ahead and wait for your alleged proof but sheep like you don't need proof do they. Faith is good enough for sheep.
    1
  6108. You know Bachmann went home thinking. I fucking killed it. I was amazing. Great job me.
    1
  6109. Anyone else besides me embarrassed that they ever called themselves a democrat? I won't be making that mistake again anytime soon. Join me, dump the dems.
    1
  6110. Too many cops are criminals themselves. This is not right. Fuck you if are trying to rationalize and excuse the cops behavior here.
    1
  6111. Austin regarding, "Coincidence isn't a real thing." Sure it is sometimes. Don't be silly.
    1
  6112. The public option would be for more basic health care. Private options would include better insurance for more money.
    1
  6113. I'm going to give you guys more time and attention than you deserve. The biggest problem with our politics and political system is money corrupting everything. The biggest problem with our voters is a complete inability to be impartial and objective. People have their "teams" and fight for them, hearing only what they want to hear and ignoring the rest. The establishment has successfully pit half the country against the other half. As long as we fight each other we don't fight them. The best political commentary comes from fucking South Park. There is more truth coming from a cartoon than from all the MSM combined. Dirktha regarding, "Not all people living below the southern boarder (sic) are brown" Wow. Brilliant. Not all people living below the southern are brown. Thank you for enlightening me to this obvious truth. Now if you would like take a moment and go back to read my comment you might want to note that never have I said that all people living below the southern border are brown. You, like too many from both sides, hear what you want to hear and tune out the rest. I guess to you I also said all people in Canada are white even though I never said such a thing or meant to imply it either. Regarding, "you racist bigot" I'm not on your team, I don't support Trump, I called him a racist, that made you mad so you call me a racist bigot. So cliche and sad. Why exactly am I a racist bigot? I could use a good laugh in these sad times. Humor me. Regarding, "The fact is most illegals and drugs come from the southern border." Since you clearly are interested in facts here are some more facts for you. Immigration is currently at about a net zero. That means that for every illegal immigrant entering the country, one illegal immigrant is leaving the country. Canada, not Mexico, is currently about to legalize marijuana nationwide. And not all illegals, drugs, and dangers come from the southern border, and when you are only willing to address one border while ignoring the other you are going to be rightfully called a racist. Having principles means applying them equally across the board. Being racist means picking and choosing when to apply those "principles." Elana regarding, "According to the Department of Homeland Security..." According the department of Homeland security most illegal immigrants come on planes and you can't build a wall high enough that a plane can't fly over it. If illegal immigration is the issue as you guys pretend what are you doing about addressing this fact? Nothing of course because it isn't really about illegal immigration as you pretend. Facts are not as important as how those facts affect your team. And you cherry pick certain facts while ignoring others and try to present reality in the best possible light for your side. Regarding, "Of course I admit our legal immigration system is broken." And you don't seem to care. Never mind that we are a nation of immigrants. Never mind what it says on the Statue of Liberty. You got yours and you want to protect it. Fuck everyone else. Dirk regarding, "To that racist bigot Clint Holmes saying all people below the southern border are brown." Except that I never said all people below the southern border are brown. There is a word for what you are doing just there. It is called lying and it is disgraceful. Elana I'm curious why you don't bother to call him out for blatantly lying like this? Actually I'm not. Again the answer is obvious. Lying when your team does it is overlooked. You are only looking to call out the other side for lying. Concerned Citizen is certainly baffled why anyone would vote for Hillary because she is a corrupt liar. Well it doesn't help when your candidate too is a corrupt liar no matter how much you want to bury your head in the sand for it. Hillary and Trump are two peas in a pod. Birds of a feather flock together. Hillary went to his wedding. Trump spoke to Bill Clinton immediately before announcing he was running. They are both garbage and anyone supporting either of them is a fucking fool. Hillary supporters are able to rationalize the queens shit because they just point at Trump and say the same shit but it is always different than their own shit because of team identity. My political identity is as far left as you can possible go but I would support someone who is the polar opposite of me politically who is a good person over a corrupt POS terrible person on my "side." In general the absolute least people should want from a politician is that they are not garbage. Hillary and Trump are both garbage and everyone who supports either of them is part of the problem instead of being part of the solution. But what do I know... I'm just a racist bigot going to watch football now. Sigh.
    1
  6114. Elana regarding, "my team? I never said I'm voting for Trump." Fair enough. You are being correct obviously. When I was saying identifying you as part of that team it was more in the context of the "close the border" team than as being part of team Trump. Regarding, "I'm voting third party" What a logical, intelligent decision in my opinion. Trump and Hillary are rightfully two of the most despised, distrusted politicians in the country. The only way either have any support is because both are able to point at the other side and make an excellent case that the other side is crap. But don't you dare waste your vote on a candidate who isn't crap or you will be the one to blame for crap getting into office. It is absurd. Too bad Americans are sheep too busy just trying to make it and pay the bills to figure out what is really going on. Regarding, " I don't like bullshit and I'm against the oligarchy, that's my "team."" Good. Please continue to blame who is rightfully to blame for the decline in this country... it isn't illegal immigrants. They are a merely a convenient scapegoat used to distract from the super rich sucking all the wealth out of the country.
    1
  6115. Dirk regarding, "It is about security from a specific type of person... brown people." Yes. I did say this. Please consider the context. I obviously was not calling all people south of the border brown nor was I, in any way, trying to suggest so. To imply that that was what I was trying to say is utterly absurd. That particular comment was an effort to portray the mentality of a person who cares about one border and not the other. Again, you must be consistent and cannot pick and choose. If you think that was my meaning with those words did you understand me saying, "while ignoring white peoples illegal immigration" to mean that I was saying all Canadians are white? Because, again, that was not in any way what I was trying to say or imply and if you want to suggest it was that is fucking ridiculous. Regarding, "Illegals are not coming?" Illegals are coming, but according to the department of homeland security illegals are leaving at essentially the exact same pace they are coming in. Illegal immigrants are not innately terrible people as Trump portrayed when began his run. Most come here in search of a better way of life and the opportunity to get a piece of the American pie like I'm guessing your ancestors did. Some of course are bad people but I think the percentage of those is somewhere very near the percentage of bad people who are born in the US. Regarding, "How can the Government keep tabs on people that are illegally crossing the border." Aren't you the same person who said, "According to the Department of Homeland Security, statistically speaking, most of our illegal immigrants come from: Mexico, El Salvador, Guatemala Honduras, Philippines, India, Korea, Ecuador, Brazil, China, and lastly, "Other." In 2014, Mexicans made up 52% of all unauthorized immigrants." Do you understand why you are being a hypocrite here? You accept what the government says when it backs up the case you want to make but all of a sudden when the government says something that goes against the case you want to make you question what they say. You can't have it both ways if you are intellectually honest. They either can or can't keep tabs on people that are illegally crossing the border to you. As for answering your very disingenuous question I will say this. It is obviously an imperfect science. But our government, much to my dismay, pays very, very close attention to everyone in this country. It is not very difficult for them to know when non US citizens come into the country on a plane and leave on a plane. Of course there are also people coming and going across the border. (some illegally, some legally and then they stay too long) And again, the government is far too good at tracking people in this nation even if they are not perfect at it. I don't accept the word and numbers as gospel but I think they have a very good idea what there are talking about regarding the issue. Regarding, "And yes a majority of illegals and drugs come from the southern border." Even so that means the minority of illegals and drugs come from the northern border and you can't want to do nothing about it if you want to claim what you care about is illegals and drugs. Regarding, "yes those people legally immigrated into the USA" I think Native Americans would have a very different take on this than you. I would also like to point out that I doubt any of these people cared about the legality of their decision and would have immigrated regardless. These are people in search of a better life whether it was legal or illegal. That type of "crime" is akin to speeding. Regarding, "now is it fair to those waiting to legally enter the USA for someone to just cut in line" No. It isn't. But I get it, especially when, like I've pointed out and you have agreed, the legal immigration system is broken. And if you or I were outside the US and wanted to come here and knew this I don't doubt you or I wouldn't commit the same "crime." Regarding, "and still receive many of the benefits citizens receive?" Illegal immigrants are not eligible for essentially any benefits of being a citizen despite paying taxes when they get here. As soon as they go to a store and pay tax on an item they are paying into the system but get nothing for it the way you or I do.
    1
  6116. Dirktha I just looked back. You were not the same person who made the other quote. My mistake. I obviously confused you with Elana. I never would have written so much in response to you had I realized who you actually were. Again, that was my mistake about the quotes but I think my points are all still valid other than the "hypocrisy" comment. You were not being hypocritical at all. You have been consistently dumb with your statements and I apologize for calling you a hypocrite. You keep on blaming illegals for all the ills of the country thou. The establishment appreciates you being distracted, dumb, and chasing a bogey man they have created for you. Your problems are created by the powerless and not the powerful. These are not the droids you are looking for. If only there were a wall. That is the solution. SMH
    1
  6117. Dirk, I've really screwed the pooch. I need to make another correction. You actually are a hypocrite. I cite, "How can the Government keep tabs on people that are illegally crossing the border." (without a question mark even thou this clearly is a question, maybe I should ask to see your birth certificate), "majority of illegals... crossed the border," "yes a majority of illegals and drugs come from the southern border," and "The fact is most illegals and drugs come from the southern border." To be clear, you are questioning the government's ability to "keep tabs on people that are illegally crossing the border" at the same time that you, DirkThaAmazingMFwhoknowsthingsthegovcannot, "knows" illegals are here by way of coyote, mostly from the southern border, and they bringing drugs, and that's "the fact." So in fact you are a hypocrite. I take back my retraction and apology. Thank goodness. I'm not sure if you could tell but I really did not like apologizing to you. I think it had something to do with me being a racist and bigot.
    1
  6118. Tyler, Hillary is, at best, a neoliberal. In my opinion a better description of her would be a 90s Republican. The TPP is a done deal I am very sorry to say. Obama is likely to sign it and both Hillary and Trump would embrace it after getting elected. If Hillary were actually against it the democratic platform would have reflected such thinking but doesn't. The bottom line is that America is going to continue to get worse under either Trump or Hillary as commander in chief as you rightly point out. When that happens I would rather the blame fall on Republican leadership as opposed to Democratic leadership so that backlash and alternative is the left and not the right in 4 years. Regarding, "we only have 2 major parties" We arguably only really have one major party that plays a game with the public to maintain their power. And they use their power to make money for the people at the very top. America feels like a going out of business sale because the elite know their time is coming to an end but before that day they are making sure to loot the country for everything they can get their hands on til then. It's sad.
    1
  6119. Wilson regarding, "Are you a whiny bitch?" Dude, look in the mirror and try to be honest with yourself. What do you see? I assure you it is a whiny bitch. Regarding, "Stein isn't going to resolve shit, because she won't be elected." Sad but likely true for once. Kudos for something that isn't dumb as fuck for once. Unfortunately you make the wrong conclusions about this truth. You use it to excuse supporting evil. When the titanic (America) sinks I will at least be able to look in the mirror and know I didn't vote for the captain of the ship who led us into an iceberg. You on the other hand... you will be the real reason the country sinks into the ocean. Regarding, "I'm informed about Hillary," Clearly. You know she isn't Trump. That's all you need to know.
    1
  6120. Wilson regarding, "Clint you useful idiot" Thank you. You have been ignoring everything I say because you have nothing of substance to offer. I appreciate your insult. I wear it as a badge of honor. It is like being called names by ISIS. It means I'm on the right side of the issue. "Hillary is the devil I know, Trump is the devil I don't." Exactly. We know Hillary is evil. There is a mountain of evidence to support this. I again cite my long paragraph of major problems I have with Hillary that you continue to ignore because you have no decent retort to her epic suck. Trump on the other hand is a complete wildcard in that he is an unknown. He very might govern very differently from his rhetoric. He might just be pandering to the extreme right the way Hillary panders to the left... meaningless words. He very well might govern the from positions he seemed to hold only 10 years ago when he was a self described democrat for all I know. I know he is a liar. That is why I don't know how he would govern until it actually happens. Hillary on the other hand I KNOW WILL BE GARBAGE with 100 percent accuracy. Trump on the other hand, even if the chances are only 1 percent, might be a good president. And if he isn't then I want the alternative and backlash candidate in 4 years to the be the left. The real left. Not what Hillary pretends to be. And should Hillary win and after she sucks I fear the alternative the republicans put forward in 4 years as much as I fear both Hillary and Trump. Regarding, "I'm a moron," Yes. You absolutely are. I'm as sure of this as I am sure Hillary would be a terrible President. Regarding, "yet Bernie who's dick you've sucked also supports Hillary" Bernie endorsed Hillary. I love Bernie but he isn't God for fucks sake. Consider this his 1 percent. He is wrong. It happens when you are human because nobody is perfect. Even Bernie. The idea that you think this is a riddle you can't solve does not say much for you intelligence. You should be ashamed of displaying your stupidity like that. Sad you aren't smart enough to at least be quiet. It's ok. You are amusing in a moronic kind of way.
    1
  6121. Wilson regarding, "Fuck the Muslims" I don't know if you are familiar with the country's documents but Trump would not be dictator. He wouldn't actually be able to ban Muslims from entering the country. Regarding, "and Mexicans Trump will deport" It's funny you say this while supporting the corrupt DNC. You are too stupid to realize that Obama has deported more people than any President ever. But if it makes you feel good to say shit about other while supporting people actually doing it that is all that matters. Your FWEELINGS are what's important. Don't let reality get in the way of it. I am not sorry.
    1
  6122. Tyler regarding, "trying to get jill to 5% and get federal funding is actually a better use of my vote," So obvious an answer. Only an idiot doesn't realize that this is part of the equation. Wilson thinks the only thing that matters is voting for the winner. With his kind of logic if Trump wins HE WASTED HIS VOTE ON HILLARY AS WELL. Because isn't that all that matters? Voting for the winner? It isn't to the sane. Wilson will never get it.
    1
  6123. Wilson regarding, "Obama has deported many Mexicans," Understatement. More than any President before him. Regarding, "the Republicans don't think he's doing enough!" Republicans are like you. Lots of talk. How do you think they could make the situation worse? Regarding, "Plus he is going to build a budget busting wall." It's fine. Mexico will pay for it. Seriously thou do you have any idea how our government works? How do you think Trump would be able to do this on his own? Regarding, "Also no one thought Trump would get this far, so anything he says has to be taken deadly serious you fucking r-tard." I love it when you call me names. I don't know if you realized it but I actually do not like Trump. You can tell because, in part, I won't be voting for him. I'd rather not be defending the buffoon. Do you have anything to say about your queen? Other than NOT TRUMP! Regarding, "Oh and did I forget to mention that Trump is supported by fucking CONFEDERATES AND NAZIS?" It is funny you think this is an issue or something. Confederates and nazis get to vote. I am not surprised they prefer Trump but they really don't have much to do with anything. They do not have any real power in society. I think the endorsement of goldman-sachs is much more important for example but I wasn't going to bring it up because I'm not tarded like you. Regarding, "I never met anyone as fucking stupid as you. I'm almost in awe." It only seems that way to you because you are an idiot. You are unable to have thoughts more complex than NOT TRUMP! But you are amusing in the way a fool was amusing to kings back in the day. Maybe queen Hillary could bring the practice back and give you a job.
    1
  6124. Regarding, "That comment just told me all I needed to know about you." Small minds never need much to think they know something.
    1
  6125. Wilson you are kind of right in that I am a moron in my own way. I've demonstrated this by bothering to talk to you at all. You boil your argument down to the fact that I made a typo in the midst of writing a novel so that means I am stupid? That would make sense to an idiot with no intelligence whatsoever. My time would have been just as well spent trying to teach my dog algebra. I'm done thou although you are kind of funny in your stupid way. Good luck with the queen. Hopefully her and DWS can rig the general like they rigged the primary for you and you can get the candidate so impressive she might be better than Donald Trump.
    1
  6126. "yet Bernie who's dick" WHOSE dick "When they're at the airport I hope that think" I hope THEY think I don't bring things like that up in the moment because, let's be honest, only a mental midget would think an occasional typo accurately reflects intelligence. That said a mental midget would be happy to use a typo to name call and distract from a lack of articulate arguments. Ok, I have to quit you. I concede I have a difficult time letting stupid go unanswered and there is so much stupid emanating from you it is difficult to quit but... I'm tired.
    1
  6127. Actually I'm thrilled Hillary isn't going to be President and still think the electoral college is bullshit. I'm sure you position in favor of injustice has nothing to do with who you wanted to win thou right? Fucking hypocrite.
    1
  6128. Lano regarding, "but we dont cry just because we lost." Stop being so simplistic. Some people are "crying" about it because the system is dumb as fuck. The person who gets the most votes should win and that is my position not because of who I think should have won but because of what I think is right regardless of how it helps or hurts certain politicians or political parties.
    1
  6129. If we can't talk about this shit now and address it now we never will. I don't think we should be changing the rules for the past election but we need to change the rules going forward because, ya know, it's the right thing to do.
    1
  6130. Lano regarding, "but some people are acting like the result is unfair." Some people think it is unfair that the candidate who received less votes is unfair. You know why? Because it obviously is unfair. SMH If it wasn't unfair then saying, "I agree it needs to be changed" would make no fucking sense would it?
    1
  6131. Lano regarding, "I'm just saying it was set in the constitution so you have had a long time to change it!" No. That is not just what you are saying. And I don't care how long it has been in place that does nothing to justify it being right or fair. I bitch about this every election regardless of results. Regarding, "so as it stands it is a fair result" Just because there are rules does not mean the rules are fair. Let's say a soccer game started where one team got to start ahead 4-0. Does that mean the results of that game would be fair because they took the field? No. It would still be unfair because the rules would be unfair. Again, just because there are rules does not mean they are fair. If those rules were fair then, again, you wouldn't be saying things like, "But it dose need to be changed." It needs to be changed because it is not fair. How do you not get this?
    1
  6132. Auceza there is so much irony in a Trump supporter saying things like, "weak excuses," and "Don't trust the Green Party." You make excuses for Trump. You support Trump. It would be funny if it weren't so scary that there are so many people that "think" like you.
    1
  6133. Auceza regarding, "If Trump doesn't deliver what he promised, i won't support him anymore." You strike me as the type who can rationalize almost anything. Consider me a skeptic of this statement. Regarding, "Actually there is no hint that he won't keep his word." Let's just consider the past 24 hours shall we. Trump has previously said, "I don't settle cases. I don't do it because that's why I don't get sued very often, because I don't settle, unlike a lot of other people. You know what, let's see what happens in court." But that was what he said while campaigning for office. He didn't even wait til taking office before proving he was lying. There is literally no reason to think he will keep his word about anything. He is capable of contradicting himself in the SAME FUCKING SENTENCE. That is not easy to do. Regarding, "I don't take rumours and gossip serious." I wish you could realize how similar you sound to Hillary supporters. You are just fucking delusional and capable of believing whatever you want to believe. He is a conman and you have bought into his BS. Regarding, "Jimmy" Jimmy is the man because he says what true progressives like myself think. If you think so little of him you should just fuck off. Regarding, "Trump doesn't put all his cards on the table" Neither did Hillary. She too had a public and a private face.
    1
  6134. I wish I had a dollar for every hillbot saying Hillary won fair and square. I'd give them all to Jill Stein. Goodbye DNC. Rigging elections is not acceptable.
    1
  6135. It was more important that a corporate sellout won than the "democratic" party won.
    1
  6136. I had been a lifelong democrat but after the DNC worked to rig an election I am done with them. I will support the occasional democratic candidate like Tim Canova or Russ Feingold. But in general they are dead to me. I am happily supporting the Green Party because they actually represent me as opposed the DNC who paid me lip service while selling their soul to big money and corporate interests. Jill Stein for President!
    1
  6137. Gary Johnson wants to eliminate the department of education. I don't care how many ballots Jill Stein is on. I don't care what she polls at the day before the election. I will be voting for her because I think she would be, by far, the best president.
    1
  6138. Anyone else feeling full blown depressed that it's looking like either Hillary or Trump?
    1
  6139. It can't hurt.
    1
  6140. Sweet fear mongering. Ironic that democrats like to call republicans fear mongers. What if, hypothetically and understandably, I don't want either Trump nor Hillary to be President? What if I think there is something very wrong with the 2 party system? What if I am tired of people like you saying things like, "the race will be decided between only 2 opponents" especially when the 2 opponents you are talking about are 2 of the most despised politicians in the country? You say, "My candidate of choice would be Jill." But you don't plan to vote for her. You are the reason why "It's a sad truth..." I remember "But she does not have a real chance." being said about Sanders when he entered the race (except... ya know... they said he). And that type of self defeatist attitude didn't help him in the long run. Regarding, "A vote for Jill or any other third party candidate will be a vote Trump" Are you really so sure? If I were going to pick the lesser of two evils I think I would rather have Trump win. That said I am not about to support evil anytime soon and will be voting for Jill Stein. Regarding, "Supreme Justices." This is the democrats favorite fear mongering tool these days it seems. Other than maybe the ironic claims about war (hillary is a warmonger). But I was just wondering that, if this issue were as important as the dems claim it is... have you ever considered not confirming conservative justices? I mean, look at what the republicans are doing right now? I would think that if the issue were really so important then you would just obstruct unless republicans offered the type of terribly centrist justice republicans won't confirm. Meh. Let's be real, supreme court justices are of concern because democrats are pussies who cave on their morals... just like when they vote for such a terrible no good candidate like Hillary Clinton. Good luck with your continued efforts to fear monger thou. I'm going to go ahead an vote for the candidate I think would be the best President. If only you would do the same thing as well maybe people wouldn't get to say we only have two choices. Cheers!
    1
  6141. Regarding, "if you know why trump won" Trump won because he had the luxury of facing the most corrupt corporate democrat on the planet. He won because the democratic base didn't turn out for Hillary (and Trump still had less votes than a complete POS like Hillary). Sanders would have crushed Trump and it's not even a discussion if you didn't have your head up your ass.
    1
  6142. Victor regarding, "Is Hillary the lesser evil" Who cares? Evil is evil is evil is evil is evil is evil and the rest is just details for fools to talk about.
    1
  6143. This supports the case that Trump would be better than Hillary. We know Hillary is corrupt and would be bad. We honestly have no idea how Trump would govern until he actually governs. He is certainly pandering and lying with most his words. For all I know he will govern like the self described democrat he was not long ago. Still anyone who votes for him in an idiot (same as Hillary supporters) just to be clear.
    1
  6144. windscar nice effort as trying to portray all politicians as the same. They aren't.
    1
  6145. I'm hoping they learn and change. If they do I will support them. If not I will continue to vote Green. Time will tell.
    1
  6146. Jeommy. No, they keep working as long as you take them. (although you may develop some tolerance to the drug) And as long as you take them they will produce side effects. And many of those side effects are quite terrible depending on the drug.
    1
  6147. It's a start. They deserve at least another 0 at the end beyond the 100K.
    1
  6148. "What if he raped a baby?" Damn you for making me laugh at baby rape.
    1
  6149. Try to get her on the ballot if possible.
    1
  6150. Even if she did support Hillary after she won the nomination I get it. Bernie did the same thing. I disagree with his decision but I get it. Both her and Bernie fought the good fight but they lost. (er, were cheated) I don't think either Bernie nor her ignored or shunned you even if you disagreed with how to proceed after Hillary's nomination.
    1
  6151. A new poll shows Americans love and are obsessed with polls. Too bad they are not nearly as obsessed with policy, priorities, and ethics.
    1
  6152. Gary Johnson supports the TPP even though it goes against everything he claims to believe in. He bought and paid for by big money and corporations just the same as the two major party candidates. Jill Stein is the only candidate for peace, liberty, safety, and is not bought off by big money.
    1
  6153. I guess the DNC should have thought about that before rigging the primary. I guess Hillary should have thought of that before sucking her entire life. I'm sorry you have a problem with democracy. Good luck with the queen.
    1
  6154. I'm not a big fan of bombs but I would have been willing to make an exception for that party.
    1
  6155. Bob must be getting paid by "Correct the Record" by quantity not quality.
    1
  6156. Oculos regarding, "Try to keep your head up, we really have no idea where this could lead." The fact that we have no idea what is going to be next is what scares me. I expect Hillary will win rather easily (whether or not she has the votes). I do not think that is going to go well for the country. My best hope is that Republicans continue obstruction and she will be unable to get anything done. I fear they will get things done and that none of it will be for the better. I fear another bank bubble bursting soon. I fear tensions will, at best, get worse with Russia and, at worse, we will go to war with Russia. I fear continued dependence on fossil fuels and unwillingness to move toward renewable resources. I fear she will try to privatize social security to "save it." I think Obama signs the TPP but if he doesn't she will. I fear she will overturn Citizen's United (just kidding, like she would do that). I fear that terrible times under Hillary will lead to great backlash against the "left" even thou Hillary does not represent the left. I fear this ultimately leads to someone who is much worse than Trump following her from the right. Hopefully I'm just way wrong. Hopefully she is a great president and great for the country. It won't be the first time. I was very wrong to think that Obama was going to deliver on his promise of hope and change. Maybe I'll be wrong again about this. Time will tell. Regarding, "two emails" Are these from wikileaks or where did you get them? I'm curious to know what you are talking about but I value my privacy and don't want to get love notes from Erik and Bob. If you have links that would be better for me. Regarding, "it's good to see people who aren't easily swayed by manipulative words." There arguments are so terrible. We are suppose to believe, for example, that the Saudi Arabian government was giving millions of dollars to the Clinton foundation because they cared about humanitarian efforts?!? Who buys that? I guess there aren't any foundations in their own country they thought worthy to donate to. And the weapons deals that were going on at the same time were mere coincidence. Who could possibly believe that? There was another one of Hillary's CTR trolls who was saying that Trump was "100 times worse than Hilter." I fucking hate Trump but 100 times worse than Hilter?!? How is anyone suppose to take that seriously? I am so much more willing to believe in aliens. Hillary and Trump might be aliens for all I can tell. They sure don't seem human.
    1
  6157. Eric regarding, "how does that vote feel now" If you bothered to listen to anything I've had to say you would already know the answer to your question. What's wrong? Are you going to lose your job at "Correct the Record?"
    1
  6158. Bob regarding, "I've listened to what you've said and I already know that you'll feel great." Why am I not surprised you get it wrong. I would have felt great had Jill Stein or Bernie Sanders won. I do not feel great that Trump won. I do like that Hillary will not be President but that is hardly the same as being happy Trump won. I'm assuming you are out of a job. Take this opportunity to reevalute your life. Go get yourself a real job where you aren't lying to people. As it turns out people don't like being lied to or supporting a candidate who only won their primary by cheating. Go figure. Seriously, take this opportunity to do something better with your life.
    1
  6159. Bob regarding, "Better than caring for a relative with scizophenia, dimentia, incontinence, heart and lung problems 24 hrs/day" Clearly this was what I was referring to considering it is the first time you have mentioned it. I was obviously referring to you lying to people repeatedly on this thread and using terrible "logic" to defend a candidate who is indefensible. As for your better than caring comment I in all honesty don't find you to be credible in any way and tend to think you are lying because that is your MO. If not then take care of that person and do only that instead of spreading lies and stupidity in your free time.
    1
  6160. mud cat. I won't. Let's hope it doesn't come to that and a real progressive wins the nomination.
    1
  6161. Peter S... I agree that all the drugs you listed are all wonder drugs (in that they have exceptionally valuable medical uses) but marijuana is not like them in one very important way... NOBODY DIES FROM MARIJUANA.
    1
  6162. Smaak. Your original statement was, "Another word for "wonder drug" is "snake oil"." I think this was a stupid statement because it implies that you think MJ is the equivalent of snake oil. I assume you mean snake oil to mean; something that is sold as medicine but that is not really useful or helpful in any way. MJ on the other hand absolutely has medicinal value and is very helpful in a variety of ways. But I guess you are just really hung up on the "wonder drug" part. I guess you are suggesting that wonder drug means it cures any and everything that could ail somebody. I guess you were saying that if only it were a real wonder drug we would be able to smoke it and be immortal if it were a real wonder drug. Nobody but you thinks that is the definition of a wonder drug. Merriam Webster's online dictionary defines wonder drug to mean, " a very effective drug." That is the definition I was using. I'm sorry I was not using your fantasy version to define wonder drug.
    1
  6163. Regarding, "There is nothing that "cures what ails ya". You are an idiot. Please remember you said this the next time you get sick and stick to your beliefs. Do not take any medicine of any kind if you sincerely believe something so stupid.
    1
  6164. Or we could have a system where everyone gets one vote and the most votes win as opposed to another convoluted system like you propose.
    1
  6165. If you talk about it the Russians win. Stop being a communist. (sarcasm obv)
    1
  6166. The worst part of police is that they will defend their own at any and all cost. The officer in the video has no problem making excuses for what absolutely should be inexcusable.
    1
  6167. Is this really any crazier than the other Christian (or any other religion for that matter) beliefs?
    1
  6168. She needs to get in the debate. That would be a game changer.
    1
  6169. It was Gore's fault. If Hillary loses it will be Hillary's fault. http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/12/6/1260721/-The-Nader-Myth
    1
  6170. I'd rather it be Trump than Pence. Not that that is saying much. For Trump it is all about feeding his ego. He wants to be liked and loved and I think the people can use that to make Trump do some decent things.
    1
  6171. Someone else tipped me off to this fool proof way to get the truth. If you want to know what Democrats are doing watch fox. If you want to know what Republicans are doing watch CNN and MSNBC.
    1
  6172. Only because the dems wouldn't have the balls to do what the republicans are doing right now. Just out of curiosity why do you think the dems should not block conservative nominations considering republicans block a centrist?
    1
  6173. These are all symptoms of the over arching problem with our government.... money is corrupting our government at all levels.
    1
  6174. He was saying Trump would sign it if it were on his desk. Not that I agree with that.
    1
  6175. Fuck you. Bernie Sanders has done more to point out the corrupt system than ever could. Trump blames the powerless like illegals when he should be blaming the oligarchy. It isn't surprising thou, Trump is part of the oligarchy.
    1
  6176. Ignorance is bliss. And there are plenty of blissful Americans.
    1
  6177. David Payne regarding, "Trump did not end TPP." If the TPP never gets signed it will be directly correlated to Trump winning. Time will tell and I still have my doubts. I wouldn't be surprised if Trump gets into office and ultimately signs it because he negotiated a great deal and because there is an extra comma and now it is amazing and great. We shall see.
    1
  6178. MTG regarding, "I wasn't even fooled ONCE." Good for you. You got say I told you so. Now you can move along and feel good about yourself for ONCE.
    1
  6179. kari regarding, "You know the saying" In my defense it isn't as if the Republicans give much of an alternative. It would be a lot easier if at least one major party represented the people.
    1
  6180. Jimmy Dore as usual is on point and accurate calling out people for their BS. Keep up the good work.
    1
  6181. If anybody wonders why we are so quick to go to war... there is a lot of money to be made in war.
    1
  6182. Fuck Warren. Had she endorsed Bernie early this election cycle could have gone down very differently.
    1
  6183. I'm not a fan of religion. Stuff like this is why.
    1
  6184. Michael regarding, "you just voted for Trump" Only a mental midget would think so. I'm sorry you are not smart enough to understand. Good luck with the queen.
    1
  6185. matthew regarding, "the only one who handed Drumpf the country" There is some blame to go around even if Hillary is first and foremost responsible for losing because she has spent her entire life sucking. There are also Trump supporters, the DNC for rigging the primary, and MSM bitches like Sam who gave Trump BILLIONS in free media.
    1
  6186. You might be right. If the dems actually support it in more than just rhetoric it would be only because they fear obamacare is falling apart and needs saving.
    1
  6187. Good work on 100K. Here's hoping you can add another zero at the end of that.
    1
  6188. I do not think Sanders would be allowed to get much of anything done. That said he 1) Would be able to pound the establishment with the message the people really care about (getting money out of politics, give peace a chance... and so forth) and 2) I trust he would not break things the way I expect Trump and Hillary to... the way GWB was guilty of.
    1
  6189. I'd rather vote for a robot. They are more human.
    1
  6190. Fuck you if you support DWS.
    1
  6191. Alam did you bother to watch the interview? The man said gun to his head if he were to choose between Hillary and Trump he would choose Trump. Be careful what you wish for when you tell people they need to be choosing the lesser of two evils. I won't sleep well with either a Trump presidency or a Hillary presidency so I won't be voting for either of them. Good luck with your fear mongering thou. It is all you have. Sad that you can't tell people why they should vote for Hillary other than telling people Trump is bad. Jill Stein for President because neither Trump nor Hillary is at all acceptable.
    1
  6192. It's worse than that. He isn't just being obtuse. For example he was straight up lying about that incident. Check out tim blacks video titled, "ELIZABETH WARREN SAYS SHE WOULD TAKE BRIBES FROM THE 1 PERCENT" where he talks about Cenk's lying and gaslighting. It's messed up. I'm done with him and bitter at his betrayal and dishonesty. So should you.
    1
  6193. Youtube doesn't let us see how many dislikes because of videos like this propaganda.
    1
  6194. Do not vote for Neera Tanden.
    1
  6195. I will when they stop posting political videos.
    1
  6196.  @CatLover-uo4pu  Regarding, "this was not political" Literally everything having to do with a politician is political. Regarding, "this is just about Joe Biden taking care and adopting a dog" How does that make you feel about joe biden? Does it give you happy good thoughts about him and make you like him? Just like propaganda for him might do? Because this is propaganda?
    1
  6197. If AOC doesn't force the vote on m4a she too is a fraud.
    1
  6198.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  Every comment of yours makes me laugh so freaking hard when I think about how sam supports censorship and you support sam with that name.
    1
  6199. The only thing he has succeeded in is getting billions of dollars from the government to make himself rich.
    1
  6200. Regarding, "Most voters don’t pay enough attention to foreign policy." Meh. Arguably the biggest factor in Obama winning his first primary was because he voted against the Iraq war. That said it is accurate to say that people tend to care first and foremost about domestic policy over foreign policy.
    1
  6201. L98 regarding, "the answer is a mixed system" That is already every system in the world, including the US currently. So that really isn't the answer to the question how do we solve the problems we face. Regarding, "you don't have..." To get what you want the actual answers are things like raising the minimum wage and empowering workers. Regarding, "Socialism" Socialism is a must for things like health care, war, and prisons. Those are areas where it simply is not acceptable to let people get filthy rich and introduce huge profit motives. That said it is the wrong system when it comes to things like selling cars and computers. Capitalism is still the way to go for such things. But it needs to be regulated unlike it is now. We need politicians who level the playing field, not tip the scales, like they do now.
    1
  6202. Meh. I find intelligence attractive and stupidity unattractive.
    1
  6203. Regarding, "the black vote is going biden big time" Not really. But if you wonder why it helps when the corporate media buries stuff like this instead of telling him he needs to drop out like they used to. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AKCJ45QMyLU
    1
  6204. It's almost like he approves of people doing the right things and disapproves of them doing the wrong things.
    1
  6205.  @10tothebigguy25  When your praying doesn't do anything, and it doesn't, will you care? Of course not.
    1
  6206.  @10tothebigguy25  "Jesus loves you." Your cu lt teaches that I'm going to burn for all eternity because of the "crime" of disbelief." Actions speak louder than meaningless words, even when it comes to your fake deity.
    1
  6207.  @10tothebigguy25  Doesn't your book of BS say that those thoughts and prayers will work? While they won't? But don't let the fact that you are wasting your time stop you.
    1
  6208.  @tribalque2232  Regarding, "Could you not argue that by voting for him you are evicting a greater evil." Yes. The ministry of truth will always try to tell you that voting for evil is "good" and not voting for evil is "bad." Ultimately supporting good is supporting good and supporting evil is supporting evil.
    1
  6209.  @BertoxolusThePuzzled  Regarding, "Biden is borderline a war criminal." What do you call a person who assassinates a government official of a foreign government we don't have a declaration of war with? They are both correctly called war criminals.
    1
  6210.  @BertoxolusThePuzzled  "We have to take out their families." -Trump campaigning on committing war crimes.
    1
  6211.  @tribalque2232  Regarding, "If you want to make the argument that trump is somehow better" I think it would be best if trump wins. Not because of 2020-2024 but because of 2024. A biden presidency is a disaster in the making because this world is on fire and needs change desperately. It leads to trump 2.0 in 2024. Not that any of this matters. This isn't a reason to support trump. Because you don't support evil. Even if you think it's the "lesser" evil.
    1
  6212.  @BertoxolusThePuzzled  You are clearly an intellectually dishonest hack. Good luck with that. And forgive me for not addressing your BS intelligently. Or don't. I don't care what you think at this point.
    1
  6213.  @BertoxolusThePuzzled  I called Biden a war criminal just like I do Biden, and just like I do Obama. Deflecting by pointing at team blue doesn't cut it.
    1
  6214.  @BertoxolusThePuzzled  Regarding, "There is no deflection here just a statement of the facts" It's pure deflection. Obama being a war criminal has nothing to do with whether or not trump is one. And he is.... obviously.
    1
  6215.  @tribalque2232  I honestly think the world is better long term if trump wins. Does that mean I should support the orange clown? Or maybe, just maybe (and by this I mean obviously) I shouldn't vote for him. Because he is terrible. And because I should have standards and principles. Standards and principles that people like biden and trump should never come even close to reaching.
    1
  6216. Do you even have the intelligence to realize what a hypocrite you are? I suspect not. I am confident that would take far, far more intelligence then you have. Fyi yours was a rant and you are a hypocrite in addition to being stupid. I can only suspect you are also fat considering your track record of bitching about things you do and are.
    1
  6217. It isn't Kyle's fault Hillary is writing a book filled with lies. His job isn't to help a party. His job is to be a truth teller. If that divides people that isn't his fault. That is the fault of the neoliberals and corporate stooges.
    1
  6218. Term limits is dumb. Get money out of politics. That actually solves something.
    1
  6219.  @chasca23  They lose sight of who they are working for because they are being bribed.
    1
  6220.  @chasca23  Stop them from being bribed and you won't care how long they are in office.
    1
  6221.  @chasca23  Regarding, "Somebody 35 to 55 years older than their constituents cannot be responsive to the needs of the general public." Of course they can. This is just silly ageism. Regarding, "Both need to happen" Only one is a solution to the problems we face. There are benefits to having politicians with long records. That's how you know what you are getting. We should know that joe biden sucks because of his record. And if someone is actually doing a decent job that is actually representing the needs of their constituents then they should be rewarded and allowed to continue their job as long as they like for all I care. Do everyone a favor and focus your energy on the real problem... money in politics.
    1
  6222.  @Dave-cf4vd  Trump shut down the economy and gave you operation warp speed.
    1
  6223.  @d.owenpowell9023  "thousandair" You will always be poor and a traitor to your class.
    1
  6224.  @d.owenpowell9023  "thousandair" You are never going to be a billionaire. You are a tray-tore (sic) to your class.
    1
  6225.  @d.owenpowell9023  "thousandair" You will never be a billionaire. Maybe don't be a tray tore (sic) to your class.
    1
  6226.  @d.owenpowell9023  I'll remember you if I ever need the boots of billionaire polished.
    1
  6227.  @d.owenpowell9023  I can't even use the word I want to use to describe you. Billionaires have made sure to censor the word I'm replacing with benedict arnold to describe you.
    1
  6228. As if someone can "win" a nuclear war. Are you ok?
    1
  6229.    The candidate who went off to serve the MIC while Sanders was preaching give peace a chance? Nope. You are just being silly.
    1
  6230.    Regarding, "Being a medic is honorable," She could have been a medic for the red cross. She CHOSE to be a medic for the MIC. Regarding, "You're being selective aka not consistent." The irony. This is what projection looks like.
    1
  6231.    Regarding, "don't like being called out on your bull shit, you haven't changed a bit." LMFAO. You are still stupid as ever but not totally worthless. This is pretty fucking funny really.
    1
  6232.    Regarding, "Tulsi endorsed Bernie in 2016,way before Bernie endorsed the Queen of war mongering Hillary Clinton." What? Apples to oranges comparison. I'd elaborate but I already waste far too much of my life telling you why what you are saying is wrong, you not understanding it, and you thinking you are dunking on me while being an idiot. Regarding, "not hate the troops" I literally just said I don't hate them. I just told you why I question their judgement but it just goes in one ear and out the other doesn't it? Regarding, "Bernie's #1 reason for running is not ending wars but Medicare for all." Huh? Bernie can walk and chew gum at the same time. And who cares what someone says is the most important issue to them when I can tell you exactly why they are inferior on that topic. Nevermind my "hatred" for her service. How about her judgement? The Iraq war isn't ancient history. It was after she held public office... does she just get a mulligan on that or something? If Joe Biden said ending war was his number one issue would that just make his record go away or some shit? Regarding, "You show your hypocrisy every time you post" Regarding, "you have to get the last word and are very thin skinned" I straight up tell what I do and why I do it. What you are saying is wrong. And it has real world implications. Candidates don't operate in vacuum. They don't get to share delegates. Joe Biden didn't run in 2016 because of his kid, he didn't run because splitting the ballot is a real thing. I wish you were only 'the earth is flat' kind of stupid. That type of shit isn't nearly as dangerous. You are just another jerkoff trying to get people to vote against their own interests for terrible reasons whether or not you are smart enough to understand that that is what you are doing. Regarding, "you're more like Trump than you think" I don't pretend to be some nice guy. I'm a dick. I don't pretend to be otherwise. You actually are like trump in that you are a hypocrite. Look at the crying you do about how mean I am to you... as if that's all I do. I straight up tell you why I'm being mean while doing it. Regarding, "On many issues Tulsi is left of Bernie." No. She's not. And if she said she were she hasn't earned my trust the way Bernie has. Get back to me after she has a tenth of the consistency he does over time. Instead your antiwar candidate had to evolve on war after going to war herself. I war Bernie had the judgement to say no to. It's kindof a big deal unless you are the one who is an actual hypocrite. Regarding, "Bernie just isn't tough enough to win." May as well work for the republicans with the stupid shit you say. Regarding, "He needs someone like Tulsi to do his fighting for him." LMFAO. With friends like tulsi and warren who are both splitting the progressive vote knowing the establishment is going to fuck him instead of actually supporting him for president and instead supporting themselves, who needs enemies? Regarding, "So sad, my healthcare sucks." Your education as well.
    1
  6233.    Regarding, "You are a BernieTard." I'll proudly add you to my anti-endorsement list. That's like being called names by hitler. So thanks for that.
    1
  6234.    I wonder if you even support tulsi. You didn't even bother to mention her name in your latest idiotic response.
    1
  6235.    Regarding, "Ah you seem upset." Just frustrated with having to share the world with people who are too dumb to be cast in the movie Idiocracy. Regarding, "But not as upset as..." Your insults are absurd and when you do them they come from a place of pure hypocrisy while I admit I'm a dick.
    1
  6236.    And still not talking about tulsi either. At least you get to amuse yourself with your own idiocy. Maybe give it a thumbs up while you are at it.
    1
  6237. He's not the best. He's a fraud.
    1
  6238.  @0621a  Is that what baffles you? And not why do they chose a corrupt POS?
    1
  6239.  @benjaminharrison1522  "Sounds like somebody is salty that sleepy joe just got EXPOSED" Sounds like you are stupid AF. I have nothing but contempt for biden.
    1
  6240. You think that rifle is going to help you against what the US government has? Good luck with that.
    1
  6241. @Badatallthis Stuff " they need to be lectured in order to understand how they were wrong." How exactly is someone suppose to realize that they are wrong if someone isn't "lecturing" them IE telling them why what they are saying is terrible? Of course if you are wrong about something you would benefit from a "lecture." That's literally what Jimmy does. And it's a good thing. Obviously.
    1
  6242. John-Paul you are drunk right?
    1
  6243. Nah. But I understand why you might think and say that.
    1
  6244.  @Bluebelle51  Regarding, "They're trying to lose is why I say that" Except they are trying to win. Regarding, "they offer nothing" Nothing good but that is a different topic. They are trying to win. Now is winning their number one priority? Nope. If it were they might offer more. But they do want to win. To suggest otherwise is silly. Would corporate dems prefer trump be president or Bernie? Trump. But that doesn't mean they want to lose. Corporate dems want biden to win versus trump. That means they don't want to lose.
    1
  6245.  @whyamimrpink78  I have a better chance of getting a flat earther to say something intelligent than you so I'm not wasting my breathe using intelligent arguments you clearly can't and/or won't understand because you suck. Good luck being the idiot paid troll who sucks at life that you are. Don't be afraid to make changes in your life. I suggest you start with everything, not that you will... it would take more intelligence than you have.
    1
  6246.  @whyamimrpink78  Not having actual intelligent things to say and not wasting my time addressing you intelligently are very different things. You would understand that if you weren't proving my point that you are an idiot unworthy of my time for anything other than comic relief. What is your excuse for sucking so thoroughly at life?
    1
  6247. "will flood the west" Not if corporate media can help it and cover it up.
    1
  6248. I was just looking at it last night. 2 of the 6 "issues" she does talk about she is epic terrible at as well. End the corruption and whatever the headline about war was. Warren will take dirty money if she makes the general and Warren is one of the absolute worst when it comes to the MIC. She reeks of controlled opposition.
    1
  6249. Spoken like a Sith lord.
    1
  6250. She is really good at trading. Everything she touches seems to make money.
    1
  6251. Pete does what he thinks is best for his team while Warren proves she is a snake.
    1
  6252. So you agree with AOC that people only criticize her because they want to bang her? What is wrong with you people?
    1
  6253. Shouldn't we be talking about how Chris Cillizza is a human/snake hybrid?
    1
  6254.  En Lightning  All the more reason to do it.
    1
  6255. If it's a good idea for people who aren't jabbed then it's also a good idea for people who have been. And that's still an if IMO.
    1
  6256. Yup. I'll believe it when I see it and until then it is literally nothing. I don't think any good will come of it and, if anything, expect a dick measuring contest between the two but I'd be happy to be wrong if and when it would actually happen.
    1
  6257. Regarding, "actually it will happen, trump accepted the meeting" Yeah because he and Kim Jong Un have never reneged before right?
    1
  6258. Time will tell. Like I said I will believe it til I see it and until then it really is nothing. Don't get me wrong I'm all for diplomacy. I just expect Trump to fuck it up.
    1
  6259. Trump can't even shake hands like a normal human being for fucks sake and with those two I wouldn't be surprised if something so small as that might start a war.
    1
  6260. Regarding, "I would've been happy with her as a nominee or VP." Only in the same sort of disappointing way you were happy about Obama. Regarding, "Warren broke my heart during this election." Better this than getting married to a terrible person. She did you a favor by exposing herself. She was always terrible. The only difference is that now you realize it.
    1
  6261. Your comment fails to consider the fact that the government and election process does not actually represent the people. Election results can prove what the majority of Americans think about anything when a majority of Americans don't even vote. And some of those people don't vote, in part because neither major party represents them. Obama won in large part in 2008 because of him being against the Iraq war. I am confident that most American's want peace. Unfortunately our politicians do not represent the people and are not an accurate indication of the will of the people. And don't get me wrong there are plenty of Americans who lack empathy for people in other countries but I'm sure than can be said about humanity in general and that isn't uniquely American.
    1
  6262.  @thepolishlatinofromphilly9709  You're missing out in my opinion.
    1
  6263.  @thepolishlatinofromphilly9709  Well if you ever do the chance to watch it I'd recommend it.
    1
  6264.  Daniel Appleton  Data as a villain?! I'm not sure I care about the negative review anymore. I kinda wanna watch it now.
    1
  6265. He's more honest about being a POS than our politicians.
    1
  6266. That's only a "smoking gun" for a cover up, not the killing. Who cares. The CIA did it even if there will never be a "smoking gun."
    1
  6267. What an apt description of your comment.
    1
  6268. It's always funny to me when trump supporters call biden a liar and biden supporters call trump a liar. You support a liar. But you don't need to be such a hypocrite about it.
    1
  6269. Whataboutism 101. Estimates are not perfect therefor all estimates should be ignored. Well played. Everyone who read your comment is now dumber.
    1
  6270. As a human I don't really want to interact with humans? Other than some sexy time.
    1
  6271. Regarding, "Learn to read" Holy shit is that funny coming you. Thanks for the laugh dipshit.
    1
  6272. She is not a Russian asset, don't be ridiculous. She is a politician and it was a poor political move.
    1
  6273.  @JustMe-vk4fn  Regarding, "she certainly impressed Faux and tRump" Stop being a moron. She fucking trashed trump. You are listening to fucking trump and faux for fucks sake. Maybe they are just spinning shit and distorting reality like they always do because they obviously are. Seriously... stop being a fucking idiot.
    1
  6274. ​ @JustMe-vk4fn  You are smearing a patriot and active member of the US military as a "Russian asset." Bite me.
    1
  6275.  @JustMe-vk4fn  The irony of you calling me a horrible excuse of a person while doing it is actually quite funny really. Thanks for the laugh dipshit.
    1
  6276.  @JustMe-vk4fn  If you are going to keep being an idiot I'm going to keep calling you one.
    1
  6277.  @JustMe-vk4fn  Aren't you the disgrace to the human race who in your original post smeared a patriot of the United States military as a "Russian asset." What an immoral, terrible person you must be to do such a thing.
    1
  6278. Nobody cares about bald men like me. :(
    1
  6279. Lucky regarding, "you are fighting a losing battle by trying to fix either of the two parties from the inside" I disagree. I do not claim it will be easy. I do not claim it will be fair. I just claim it is possible and far easier than trying to start a new party from scratch or get the public on the side of the green party. And not only do I think it is the easiest way to get a party that actually represents the people but it would also end a corporate party. It is a 2 for 1. Regarding, "you dont understand what I am saying" I'm pretty sure I do. You position is not all that uncommon in forums like this. Regarding, "its not the politicians who were elected, that are making our laws" This is true only because we have the wrong politicians elected. Regarding, "The members of the DNC..." You don't need to convince me that the party is dumpster fire and the great majority of democrats should be voted out of office. We agree on that. The place where we differ is that I can see value in people who continue to run as democrats and do not think that all people under that label are to be treated the same way. Regarding, "so please tell me what good he is serving." Well, Sanders is one vote in getting what we all want... an end to citizens united. Sorry if you thought he could do it all on his own. He can't. You know what he might be able to do all on his own? Take over the "democratic" party. The winner of the parties nomination holds immense power to shape and direct the party. One of the reasons the party is so fucking terrible at the moment and is going to continue to suck for the time being is, in part, because Hillary Clinton "won" the nomination. The reason Tom Perez is the chair and not Ellison is because Hillary "won." The reason corporate dems were purging progressive dems is because THERE ARE STILL PROGRESSIVES FIGHTING FOR THE SOUL OF THE PARTY. And them being purged was a setback but it is hardly the end of the war. If Sanders or another true progressive wins the nomination in 2020 they get to pick the chair and that chair gets to pick the people under them and so on. Corporate dems can be purged the exact same way progressives were purged but to do that we need a progressive to win the nomination. Sanders is perfectly positioned to do so in 2020. The establishment is going to do everything they can to try and stop him. And I would appreciate it if you, a progressive, help Sanders instead of holding a grudge against the party and refusing to try to shape them. Regarding, "why would she want to continue to run in a party..." Because she, like me, think that taking over the party is the way to go. You realize the party is rigged internally. It is. But so is the entire fucking game. The game is also rigged against third parties so it isn't as if you have a path that doesn't also involve overcoming bullshit. Regarding, "Your way makes no sense, it just keeps us hanging by a thread without any chances of any changes being made in our favor... We need a third party." My way makes no sense? Jill Stein got about 1 percent of the vote against 2 of the most despised HUMANS in the country. I'm not sure why you think your way makes sense. But still I encourage you to go out and build viable 3rd parties. Even if people like me succeed in overtaking the "democratic" party we still should have good, strong 3rd party options to, if nothing else, pull the major parties to the left. BUT THEY ARE RIGHTFULLY PLAN B. WINNING IS IMPORTANT! And they are not going to be winning the presidency in 2020. Sorry but that is just fucking reality. Regarding, "Punishing the flame?" Yes. Because you care more about the flame (the "democratic" party) than you care about the people. Stop caring so much about a fucking label. CARE ABOUT THE PERSON. Fuck. It really is not so hard to understand. Regarding, "it doesn't matter how great a candidate might be," No. Just stop. There is nothing you can say after this that would make any fucking sense. The only thing that matters is how great a candidate is. Regarding, "because the majority of PEOPLE in the Dem party" I'm not talking about the majority of people in the party. The majority of the people in the party suck balls. But I'm not talking about the majority of people. I'm talking about good people. People that represent you but have the audacity to do so labeled as democrats. Support them or you are only refusing to support people who represent you. Regarding, "are going to continue to work for their donors, NOT us." What about the justice democrats whose donors ARE THE PEOPLE? Are you going to turn a blind eye to them? Regarding, "the few, and I mean very few, individuals that actually work for and represent us aren't going to get anything accomplished" Yes they need help but not supporting them is hardly helping. And even if Sanders isn't able to pass bills all by himself it sure as fuck helps to have him around so that he can continue to win the battle of ideas like he has currently been doing with medicare for all. Regarding, "I am trying to prevent some horrific things from happening .. Lets not talk about winning, ok?" Let's not talk about winning? Are you fucking kidding me? Winning is the only way you are going to prevent "horrific things from happening." Because the fact of the matter is that you are doing NOTHING other than feeling good about not voting for dems and patting yourself on the back for not being "fooled" by the party when in fact you are only being a fool who thinks they know all they need to know by looking at a party label. Regarding, "Time for a third party." They have always been there. You aren't saying anything new. And you don't seem to realize how rigged the entire game is including being against 3rd parties. Regarding, "I was a registered Democrat for forty years, that came to an end in 2016." You feel betrayed by a shitty presidency by Obama. You feel betrayed by a party that rigged it's primary. Fine. I get that and agree with that. But if you think the answer is to not support good people because they are still democrats then you are fucking insane. Stop thinking about party labels so much. Think about people. Support good people and let the rest of the bullshit fall where it will.
    1
  6280. Money changes people.
    1
  6281. I guess we shouldn't tax them at all then. Fucking moron.
    1
  6282. Regarding, "Corporations," why the fuck is this capitalized? Corporations are not actually people you know. Regarding, "Lower dividends for shareholders," aka the rich. Regarding, "Lower Wages for Employee's," holy shit are you stupid. What world do you live in where corporations already aren't paying their employees as little as they possible can? Regarding, "Higher prices for consumers." So logically to you must think we shouldn't tax them at all right? Because, like I said, you are fucking moron who thinks idiotic things. Regarding, "I will refrain from profanity because my IQ is over 100." Yeah because whether or not someone swears is what determines if a person is smart or a fucking idiot. Go back to sucking corporation dick. I don't have time for this bullshit. You are an epic moron. Good luck with that going forward.
    1
  6283. I was having trouble fapping to this. That helped. Thanks for the image. I'm not proud of my joke but I can't help telling it anyway.
    1
  6284. I'm just here to call kyle a fraud and give him a thumbs down.
    1
  6285. National embarrassment.
    1
  6286. He doesn't want your shoulder. He wants you to ditch the defeatism and fight.
    1
  6287. "You are perpetuating an ignorant idea" They removed all the usual rules so that they could give it to MILLIONS of people without properly testing it. Stop being a tool.
    1
  6288.  @vidzkid76  "That is a gross mischaracterization." Nah. It's straight fact that triggers you. I address the rest of your BS but I honestly don't take you seriously enough to want to waste my time. Good luck with your BS elsewhere. No one is buying it here.
    1
  6289. So trump it's trumps fault people are stupid? I mean it kinda of is... just not for this.
    1
  6290. Clearly you don't get it.
    1
  6291.  @razorkane77  I'm sorry but I have far better things to do with my time. You are what is known as hopeless.
    1
  6292.  @razorkane77  Yup... you are hopeless.
    1
  6293. This channel isn't "left." This channel's job is to smear people on the actual left.
    1
  6294. That guy was so good I showed it to a girl and I got laid.
    1
  6295. How about we remove the raise the MIC got recently. That is more than enough to pay for it.
    1
  6296. yes
    1
  6297. Regarding, "Don't understand why Tulsi or someone else should leave the race?" Because she has zero path to the nomination and if her goal is getting a progressive in the WH she is hurting those chances by splitting the progressive vote to the benefit of the establishment.
    1
  6298.  @MatuschkaRossija  You mean like David said about Warren who is actually doing far better than tulsi? Yeah. He did that. Do you have a point?
    1
  6299.  @MatuschkaRossija  Regarding, "If Biden leaves Budegig will get his supporters." True. Regarding, "So for Burnie it is better that more people stay in the race, that's my opinion." This isn't a one size fits all kind of a situation. Yes lots of corporate dems splitting the corporate vote is a good thing for bernie. But progressives taking votes from sanders is very, very, very, obviously very different. Many corporate dems in the race splitting the corporate vote is good. But progressive candidates taking votes that would overwhelmingly be going to sanders is bad.
    1
  6300.  @MatuschkaRossija  You can literally calculate this by asking people who their second choice would be. If tulsi dropped out her supporters would go to sanders overwhelmingly.
    1
  6301.  @emptyarthaus9535  Regarding, "get used to wearing that non-medical diaper on your face" LMFAO. I can't imagine being such a pussy masks scare me.
    1
  6302. Youtube says there are 6 replies but I can only see half. Isn't that the type of thing that is suppose to make china the bad guy?
    1
  6303.  @HaHaHaHolowence  "to function correctly" It's working exactly how they want it to. It's not a bug... it's designed that way. "dislike button even though it means nothing right now," Let's hope they never do fully remove it. There are still ways of knowing how many dislikes there are.
    1
  6304. Hillary likely wins if she did.
    1
  6305. The real war isn't between the left and the right. It's between the elite and the peasants.
    1
  6306.  @PlatinumAltaria  "peasants on the left" Don't get me wrong about as far "left" as you can go but that isn't really what's important. I have more solidairy and more in common with peasants on the "right" who love guns, hate the idea of socialized universal health care and want to make abortion illegal because we are in the same class. At the end of the day we are both peasants being shit on by the people in power.
    1
  6307.  @PlatinumAltaria  "they are not worse than Republicans" Not that it really matters who is worse but I disagree. I'd rather have the guy stabbing me in the face over the guy stabbing me in the back anyday. The dems are suppose to be my party and they are as big an obstacle to everything I care about as much as republicans are.... while pretending to be on my side. They are worse. Not that it matters who is worse between a douche and giant turd.
    1
  6308.  @PlatinumAltaria  "no one thinks Joe Biden is left wing" Bernie Sanders said he could be "the most progressive president since FDR." So...
    1
  6309. PlatimumAltaria: "no one thinks Joe Biden is left wing" Joe Biden: "this will go down as one of the most progressive administrations in American history."
    1
  6310.  @PlatinumAltaria  "no difference between neoliberalism and neoliberalism + racism." Both parties are racist so...
    1
  6311.  @PlatinumAltaria  "you think there's no difference between neoliberalism and neoliberalism + racism." I never said that. Do you have anything to offer about the things I actually say?
    1
  6312.  @PlatinumAltaria  "Both of those things can be true at once." People give me shit cause I use quotes from people to let everyone know exactly what I'm talking about. I mention this because you don't really give me any context as to what exactly you are referring to. I talk a lot. "No they aren't, don't be dumb." Same thing and either way this isn't an argument of any kind. It's just ad hominem and is in a funny way dumb as hell.
    1
  6313. As if it's jimmy's fault grimm is a clown.
    1
  6314. He has done more to expose the rot in the "democratic" party than anyone else on Earth but don't let that fact stop you from saying silly things.
    1
  6315. Ok, don't even bother to attempt to address my point and just go back to your stupid talking point then.
    1
  6316. Mark regarding, "what do you mean?" Holy shit. It really is not that fucking complicated. Let me try to break it down with you so that a fucking infant might understand... The fact of the matter remains that, like I said, "he has done more to expose the rot in the "democratic" party than anyone else on Earth." Would you like to dispute this? Do you disagree with this? Would you like to claim otherwise? I guess so because "Seth Rich" says dipshit. And the point of that is that, assuming what I said was true, contradicts your original idiotic "points." The fact of the matter is that first step in solving any problem is being able to admit and acknowledge there is a problem. Because of Sanders much of America is now in a place where they actually realize and are forced to face the fact of rampant corruption in their government (specifically the DNC) thanks in large part to Sanders. Regarding, "doesn't mean he was the big dog that exposed it" Are you fucking retarded? Do you actually think about and believe the stupid shit you say? You are talking about the politician who ran a campaign railing against money in politics, who refused to have a superpac, who called for a "political revolution," who immediately went back to being an independent after his campaign, who talked constantly about income inequality among other things for fucks sake. But apparently you were living in an alternate world where that wasn't the case.
    1
  6317. Regarding, "he knelt down and kissed the ring." So in other words you are willing to overlook all the good he has done because he endorsed Hillary Clinton. Try to remember what that was. It was a fucking endorsement but you act as if it was his fucking soul. When Sanders entered the "democratic" primary he agreed to endorse the winner. Sanders is loved, in part, because he says what he says he will do. Even after he "kissed the ring" like an idiot thinks team Hillary tried to do anything and everything to blame Sanders for losing. The only reason those attacks were unsuccessful was because Sanders gave them no ammo to attack him with. Had he not endorsed her he would been effectively blamed for the fallen queen losing. His ability to influence policy and his movement would have suffered a devastating blow. That didn't happen because he endorsed her. I fucking love Sanders but I don't care about his or anyone's endorsement because I'm not a fucking sheep. I happily voted for Jill Stein because it was my vote and no one else's. But you go ahead and continue to cry like a little bitch about it. I suspect you don't actually give a flying fuck about that endorsement. I suspect you are only talking about it because you think it is an effective way to smear Sanders. The establishment appreciates you doing their dirty work for them. You suck at life.
    1
  6318. Regarding, "she cheated" This is as close as you get to saying something that isn't dumb as fuck. You are right. She cheated. But that doesn't change the fact that SHE DID WIN and nothing Sanders could say or do was going to change that cold, hard, fucked up fact. Regarding, "the facts hurt you bad enough" You are mistaking. It isn't "facts" that hurt me. It is your stupid that hurts me and hurts this country.
    1
  6319. Just looked at your shit. Seems you like Alex Jones. Go figure. You pretend you care about that endorsement but clearly you don't. You just care about trying to smear him. You suck at life. Good luck with that.
    1
  6320. You just go ahead and dismiss everything I've said because of how I said it then. Sorry to trigger you. You are special snowflake and I'm sorry for every suggesting otherwise. Seriously thou you single handedly bring down the average intelligence of the human race by a point.
    1
  6321. Andrew yang coverage is easily the worst thing about this show.
    1
  6322.  Crickett  Because yang is terrible and their coverage of him is not good.
    1
  6323. I don't even know what a "sluice" is. You got me again algorithm.
    1
  6324. And was really hoping the fact that she did this would stop comments like this. Fuck her.
    1
  6325. Dore/Hedges 24!
    1
  6326. Nope. Even if she were the type of wife to defend he was doing it competely wrong. That was actually the problem.
    1
  6327.  @fingersmcoy  "A man defending his wife's honor," It's 2022. Your wife can defend herself. She doesn't need you to do it for her.
    1
  6328.  @fingersmcoy  He was trying to defend his own masculinity, what was left of it. And instead he gave the last little bit of it away that he had.
    1
  6329.  @sandyunderpants4376  Because you knew what norman knew better than he did?
    1
  6330. It doesn't matter if you don't support evil. And no one should support evil.
    1
  6331. You say that like Aaron can't stand him because of his identity. It has everything to do with the fact that yang is a liar and conman.
    1
  6332.  @MrTorbz  Yang lied about supporting M4A while running for POTUS. Do you really need me to prove it? The info about it is there if you want to see for yourself.
    1
  6333.  @MrTorbz  Regarding, "Wasn't really a lie though" Of course it was. He said he supported m4a and then when he came out with a health care proposal it wasn't m4a. He fucking lied. Don't defend liars. It's what trump and biden supporters do for their clowns. Be better than that.
    1
  6334.  @MrTorbz  "It just wasn't Bernie's M4A," It wasn't m4a. Period. Not even the most generous definitions of m4a could be used to describe what he proposed. He fucking lied.
    1
  6335. Both Obama and Biden are sellouts who represent big money. And there is lots of money being made in health care, especially in the US.
    1
  6336.  Ray Flo  Go back to school.
    1
  6337. I kinda think they do (correction, they don't) although I'm not positive. Not that it matters because if they do like I think I know it doesn't count for anything. That is really fucked up that US citizens get no say in who their president is.
    1
  6338. Dorothy regarding, "You are misinformed." No it seems that you are. "Like other territories, Puerto Rico can participate in the presidential primary process. It holds a primary election in the spring of each presidential election year. Then the parties choose delegates to the Republican and Democratic National Convention, who are pledged to vote at that convention for the winners of Puerto Rico's primary, but that's the end of their participation in the presidential election" But that is the end of their participation in the presidential election... IE they don't vote for President. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_voting_rights_in_Puerto_Rico
    1
  6339. Regarding, "Your point was to make the people of Puerto Rico seem not to be US Citizens." That was definitely not my point and I don't think that was the original posters point.
    1
  6340. No prob Dorothy. I agree the disaster in PR is fucking terrible and there is a good case to be made that they would have been better helped and made the priority they should have been if they could vote for President. Take care.
    1
  6341. And I can't speak for McKenzie but I interpreted his statement as an effort to point out PRs not being able to vote as a problem that he was trying to bring awareness to.
    1
  6342.  @courtneyliu  No where in your idiotic response do you even attempt to address the point I made. That is really telling. Regarding, "it'd help a lot if you actually have truth on your side." Pretty funny coming from you when you don't even attempt to say what I'm supposedly wrong about and you never provide a lick of evidence that it's wrong.
    1
  6343.  @brianholmes6392  Why would you get over someone being a fraud? When someone shows you who they are believe them the first time. maya angelou
    1
  6344. It's fair to say no one is dying from omicron.
    1
  6345. Maceo do you at least have the self awareness to realize you are a racist? I'm betting no. That would take more intelligence than you have I think.
    1
  6346. Maceo being despised by you is like being despised by Hitler. I wear it like a badge of honor. You are a disgrace to this country and to the human race. Go fuck yourself.
    1
  6347.  @amoxcillicpsychosis2967  I'm all for a living wage generally but I make an exception for fuckers like him who are being paid to make the world a worse place with every idiotic post they make.
    1
  6348. The US is only the land of the free ironically.
    1
  6349. He's a hack.
    1
  6350.  @dalekrenegade2596  Another hack against forcing the vote.
    1
  6351.  @dalekrenegade2596  You want me to feel bad for having m4a as a litmus test? I don't. If you don't support m4a you can fuck off. And if you don't support bring m4a to a vote then you obviously don't support m4a. It's really that simple. The "gate" is m4a. I'm not picking anyones side for them. They do that themselves.
    1
  6352.  @TheBigGSN5  Let's give the man credit for it being good sarcasm. At least I think that's what it is.
    1
  6353. Yeah but look on the bright side. It really shows how Bernie is moving the party. At least their pandering is going in the right direction.
    1
  6354. Let's say I hired a PI to go check out to see if my wife was cheating. I might even have a vested interest in finding out that she is cheating and want to find out she is cheating because of a prenup or something like that. But instead of investigating my wife for cheating the PI goes out to the bar with my money and uses it to get drunk. I would be right to want my money back and that is actually what is happened. Not that anyone here seems to care because orange man bad.
    1
  6355.  @chance2smoke  Is not offering any rationale whatsoever like you are doing but calling names your idea of being reasonable? You could try to explain why you think it's dumb but instead you are just being a twat. I think that's unreasonable and stupid. And I've told you why.
    1
  6356.  @chance2smoke  I mean did you watch the video? Or are you just willfully neglecting the part in it that mentions the money wasn't used to investigate but was instead funneled to the founders of the group? It happens are right about the one minute mark. Or maybe your attention span doesn't last a whole minute?
    1
  6357.  @Peasham  "He's not a part of the TYT network" Not according to wikipedia. According to wiki, "His youtube channel, secular talk, an AFFILIATE of the young turks network." But it's no big deal because as kyle notes the millions they got from katzenburg doesn't make them corrupt so it doesn't even matter that he's affiliated with TYT I guess.
    1
  6358. Good.
    1
  6359. Meh. I would have been glad if it was good.
    1
  6360. Don't feel bad this money won't help ukrainains either. Unless you mean help ukrainains get killed.
    1
  6361.  Gabe.  I mean you do give all your own nonsense a thumbs up. Can you be anymore intellectually dishonest? Just like the clown you support?
    1
  6362. So wishing harm on Jeffrey Epstein says more about me than it does him? Nah. You are silly.
    1
  6363. Meanwhile we keep having record breaking temperatures every year.
    1
  6364. Meanwhile the polar icecaps keep melting.
    1
  6365.  @abyssmanur3965  Trump U
    1
  6366.  @darkcrystalmagik3369  Regarding, "most ppl aren't intelligent" Well we agree on this. But still most people understand when a question is being answered and when it's not. It's not rocket science. What do you really want? You want the question to keep being asked... for what purpose? Because all you are going to get then is a politician lying, pandering, and telling them what they want to hear because after a question gets repeated it puts the politician in a corner and that's how they get out, by outright lying as opposed to saying nothing. That's not better. That's far more likely to mislead than a non-answer to your average joe shmo and doesn't give us the opportunity to sit here and rightfully trash them the way we are. Warren apologists could just claim you aren't being fair. They did answer the question (the second time). So what's your problem with her? You are just being mean and sexist and helping trump is what they will say. And I mean... yes. After they are in office it's nice to have people on the record with specifics so that they can be called out for their bullshit when in office but by that point the damage has been done because you would rather be lied to than just accept the fact that the answer was fucking terrible and already told you exactly what you needed to know. You have an answer. Don't insist on a better one because all you are really insisting is to be lied to.
    1
  6367. Are they really that different? Was there no overlap between the two?
    1
  6368. Let's say there is overlap would you even care?
    1
  6369.  @michaelangelo9119  Regarding, "I do care since 99% of the far larger rally were peaceful." 99 percent huh? You aren't perchance just pulling shit out of your ass are you? Let's say you learned it wasn't 99 percent, it was 95 percent. Would you care then? Or 50 percent? You clearly have no idea how much overlap there was so is there a point when you would care? Or let's say it 99 percent were at both. Would you still be like... "There were two events. The larger rally, the mob event. Very different." with 99 percent overlap.
    1
  6370.  @michaelangelo9119  Legit question, when you said, "There were two events. The larger rally, the mob event. Very different." did you have any idea how much overlap there was? You clearly don't. I just want to know if you can admit it.
    1
  6371.  @michaelangelo9119  Regarding, "the larger event was vastly larger with very massive crowds maybe 50 to 100 times larger" This tells me literally nothing. What percentage of people who rioted came from this? It's still anywhere between 0 percent and 100 percent and that's the type of information that I would consider valuable if you want me to think you have a point with your original OP.
    1
  6372. CNN makes those who watch it dumber.
    1
  6373. He will stop doing them after we get medicare for all.
    1
  6374. I need both.
    1
  6375. Or we go to war at the behest of the MIC.
    1
  6376. Look, I love diplomacy. I want peace. But the fact of the matter is that there is actually peace right now. I fear this could exasperate war. I don't trust Trump and I don't trust Un. There is actually less risk of war by doing nothing than those 2 dipshits meeting in my opinion. That said I would happily be wrong if it happens and goes well. But if doesn't go well, and I think it is very logical to think it won't. Then it may very well be the excuse the MIC needs to start another unnecessary war.
    1
  6377. Regarding, "any such meeting is a huge propaganda win." I agree with this. I personally think that is why Un would do this meeting more than anything and don't expect him to be willing to agree to much. He wins by meeting. But who knows... it is difficult to understand and anticipate people who are illogical. Regarding, "Making their regime feel more secure should improve the situation to conduct subsequent negotiation." Maybe. Regarding, "Trump and Un are both clueless dipshits, so should get on just fine." I see it turning into a competition of who has the biggest dick. Both of them are going to want to upstage the other. I do not see them getting along just fine. Regarding, "Trump’s cabinet are a bunch of personally corrupt scumbags" Yup. But regarding, "will delegate the work to people who want to achieve something useful." I wholeheartedly disagree and think that, to the administration full scale war is something that would see as "something useful." Regarding, "There isn’t any likely downside." Totally disagree. I could absolutely see full scale war resulting from this. Hopefully I'm wrong but I think fear of this is quite rational. Regarding, "Trump is a better President to have than Hillary would have been" Look. I fucking hate Hillary and I'm glad she will never be president but I would rather have her meeting Un than Trump even if not by much. But who is worse is totally fucking irrelevant at this point. Trump is president and he can't even shake hands like a normal human being for fucks sake. I suspect everything around the meeting will play out in much the same way... Trump trying to make up for tiny hands and show what a big swinging dick he is. And I fear Un is crazy enough and also has an ego big enough to foolishly give the US an excuse to wipe them off the planet. The more I talk about it the more I'm convinced this meeting is more likely to make things worse.
    1
  6378. There is a possibility that both "claim total victory," everyone is happy and we go further away from war. But I think the possibility that one or both of them say or do something stupid, that one or both of them take insult to something the other person does, or that a corporate media takes "insult" with something said or done (disingenuously or not) and the situation becomes worse (up to and including full scale war) and not better is clearly a valid fear. If Un were smart... I have little reason to think that he is smart. That said I am going to contradict myself a bit... I do think the meeting is smart of him as long as he isn't an idiot about it. I don't think he cares about selling product or even increasing his standing in the world, I think he wants to increase his standing with his people and give them reason to think he is on equal footing in the world. Regarding, "American Monster." That is how their government has portrayed America. They have really backed themselves in a corner. I'm not saying it is impossible for them to say America is the devil while at the same time visiting with the devils president but clearly that is not going to be easy for them to do. Look, here's the thing with me. I love diplomacy. I really do. It's just that I honestly don't see a lot to gain by diplomacy with NK. I don't consider them a real threat that it is important we deal with. That said I don't want them to get nukes because, at that point they could become more of an actual threat. So I guess maybe there is something to gain. But I also think this meeting is risky. I don't want full scale war with them and do see the possibility of it as an avenue to that happening. If this meeting happens and doesn't go well the MIC and the corporate media will do anything and everything to get another war. I'm not going to pretend I can say how this is going to play out. I clearly don't. I like Dore. I agree with most things he says but, in all honesty, I thought him acting as if there wasn't a potential downside of this meeting to be rather asinine. And you seem very reasonable. I agree with essentially everything you say but I think your original comment also ignores what I think is a very real possibility of this going wrong. We both want to stop the MIC. But I think this meeting may be exactly what they need to start war. Time will tell. I hope I'm wrong and I hope you are right.
    1
  6379. I mean seriously... as I read through the comments I think it is insane how many people don't see the real possibility of this meeting going bad and leading to full scale war. I'm not saying it definitely will happen but the notion that such a thing is impossible while America practices imperialism across the globe is fucking insane.
    1
  6380. Do you try to use the same idiotic logic when thinking about Hillary Clinton in 2016? Of course not. All polling says you are wrong... because you are.
    1
  6381. You busy voting for joe? Whose brain is melting? Whose corrupt?
    1
  6382. Odin regarding, "you're really not getting what i'm saying." I think I do. It is just that I wholeheartedly disagree with what you are saying. Regarding, "i would like to see trump go to jail for his crimes" This all you should be saying. This and only this. But.... you have to add a but after it because you are demonstrating that you don't actually care first and foremost about this. Regarding, "when weighed against the damage that pence would do as president, justice for trump becomes a secondary consideration" In all honesty I don't care about your rationalization. I've even said so myself that I think Pence may be worse. But to me that is a terrible no good reason to think that seeking justice for Trumps corruption to be secondary. Even if I knew for certain Pence would be worse that is not a rationalization for allowing Trump to go unpunished for corruption BECAUSE THAT IS HAVING PRINCIPLES. Regarding, "don't tell me i don't care about justice or that i don't have principles" Sorry but I absolutely will while you demonstrate a lack of principles and demonstrate time and again that you don't care about justice as much as you care about not having Pence as President. Regarding, "perhaps you don't understand what a disaster pence as president would be." People who are willing to sacrifice important principles always think they have good justifications for doing so. It is just that they are wrong. Regarding, "competent, respected, organized" None of these words actually accurately describe Pence. None. Not even close. He might be more competent, more respected, and more organized than Trump but that really isn't saying very much. And you completely ignore the fact that it would be more difficult for an administration to do things after the previous president was impeached. But again, all this is mute. All this is unimportant to me. I could think Pence would be a fucking nightmare but that doesn't mean I think that is a good reason to let Trump skate on his wrongdoing. That is what having principles actually look like. They don't get tossed under the bus. Regarding, "it's the lesser of two evils" I can't tell you how much I hate the lesser of two evils bullshit. Whatever you got to do to tell yourself that supporting evil is acceptable. It isn't. Regarding, "the temporary satisfaction one would get from seeing trump in jail" I won't deny that I would get some satisfaction from Trump being behind bars but it goes way, way beyond that. The bottom line is that people like Trump are emboldened to do what they do because they rightfully don't fear punishment because people like him are not punished. If we ever expect those people to fear punishment we need to actually punish some of them. And there is no better place to start than at the top. And again... there is the principle of the matter. Corruption needs to be punished. Period. That is what makes it a principle. There are no buts to be added after it. There are no rationalizations and excuses for not doing this. It is what is suppose to be done regardless of other circumstances. Regarding, "justice, or punishment" Justice IS punishment. There is no justice unless he is punished. Sheesh. Regarding, "i don't give a fuck about party politics" I concede using the words party politics was a poor choice of words to describe what you are doing. But that does not mean that what you are doing is ok or even a little bit reasonable to me. Regarding, "you've misunderstood my position" No. I absolutely haven't. I have strongly disagreed with your position. Regarding, "straw manned me on multiple fronts" The only way I've "strawmaned" you, is when I used the term party politics. But my point is still valid. Even if you are not saying what you are to benefit a specific party you are saying what you are because of politics. Specifically because you think Pence would be worse politically.
    1
  6383. Odin that shit is utterly ridiculous. Forgive me for not addressing it.
    1
  6384. Odin I'm done caring what you think. If you want to that think me not bothering to tell you why your hypothetical dilemma is utterly absurd and irrelevant to the immediate conversation at hand then you go right ahead. Don't let the fact that I'm just done wasting anymore of my time on you stop you from thinking whatever you want. Ultimately it doesn't matter what I say to you so I'm saving my breathe. If only I had unlimited time and energy I would tell you why what you are saying is insane. I don't so I'm not. I prefer to use my time and energy somewhere more useful.
    1
  6385. And you should be happy she is. Despite her polishing the turd that is the DNC she is actively trying to make it better. If it were only up to her there would be no superdelegates. She just can't come out and say it.
    1
  6386. So you think it is more important that she sacrifice her opportunity to make things better to tell you something you should already know? I disagree.
    1
  6387. Regarding, "if you're unwilling to actually fight to make it better" Um... SHE IS FIGHTING TO MAKE IT BETTER. Just maybe not in the way you want. Regarding, "What good does it do to publicly defend the very thing you're trying to eliminate" Because actually trying to eliminate it when you are on the inside is far more effective in bringing change than bitching about it from the outside. If this were not true you would have already eliminated superdelegates all by yourself. Regarding, "If taking a public stand sent a strong enough message, isn't that appointed position worth sacrificing?" Yes. But would her doing it be a strong enough message? No. It would be buried by the corporate media who have better things to talk about like Trump's latest tweet. Her stepping down would do next to nothing other than making you feel good and killing her chances at bringing the change you want or, at the very least, changes for the better. The fact of the matter is that she is taking the course of action that produces the most change although you don't get the benefit of feeling very good about it. The sad fact of the matter is that there is very little about our government that you can feel good about. You are right to be angry with the party but I think if you are going to direct it all at her you would be very wrong.
    1
  6388.  @robm6645  "cultists are leaving the channel" LMFAO. If they were actually cultist they would put up with the BS like you are doing cultist for kyle.
    1
  6389.  @robm6645  "By all means feel free to name BS that Kyle started" I already gave you an example, when they said the millions TYT takes doesn't make them corrupt and you are just ignoring it. I have more but I'm not going to waste my time when you demonstrate you aren't intellectually honest and interested in the points I'm already making.
    1
  6390.  @robm6645  Kyle lies about money corrupting TYT, gives lies of omission about blackmail, ghosts jimmy under BS pretense and more. That's actually why he's not an intellectually honest person. You are not an intellectually honest person not only because you like to lie about what's going on but about what I'm saying. You don't even just strawman like most bullshitters like you would but you go the extra mile by misquoting me. Even you should realize why that's intellectually dishonest. I suspect you do and just don't care. You should watch the video glenn greenwald just came out with. He was talking about you.
    1
  6391.  @robm6645  "drama" There you go again calling smears and blackmail "drama." I can't fix stupid for you. If you want to try and do something about it yourself watch that video I was talking about from glenn greenwald not that you will. "sarcastic" There are ways of doing sarcasm without lying like you were. There are red lines and you and too many are willing to just cross them. That's why you aren't intellectually honest. You have no substance. You have lies you rationalize as a "joke." Your cult leader kyle has no intellectual honesty. It's not surprising you don't either.
    1
  6392.  @robm6645  Let's say I gave you that it was a joke. Then at best you are being intellectually dishonest by strawmanning my arguments instead of addressing the things you could actually put into quotation marks. I really don't care how you rationalize you doing you. It's gross regardless.
    1
  6393.  @robm6645  "You have plenty of opportunities to show "smears" and "blackmail" are more than cheap insults" That's already been done by lots of people including glenn in the video I keep talking about. Even kyle concedes it was blackmail when he's not lying about it through ommission. "Sarcasm is literally saying the opposite of what you really mean" LMFAO. You were putting words into my mouth. I use quotation marks a lot. You were doing it wrong. It's lying. There are ways of doing sarcasm without misquoting others. Stop making excuses for your BS the way you make excuses for kyles. "continue justifying your behavior" What apt description of your bullshit. It's not my fault you were lying about what I was saying. I'm not even saying this is a big deal but I am saying it's wrong. It's a red line. You shouldn't do it. And not only do you do it but you don't understand what's wrong with it. Worse is you are trying to make everyone as dumb as you.
    1
  6394.  @robm6645  "you can't articulate what it means" LMFAO. "I've been holding back, letting you run your mouth as if your some sort of warrior for what's good in this world. That's going to change." Words a blackmailer in a movie might say while holding a knife to someones loved one's throat and something that ana actually said to try and blackmail jimmy in real life. The fact that I even need to explain that is crazy. You are tough to take seriously. As for smears saying things like paid for by russia and the like are smears if you have no evidence for it. Do you really struggle to understand these very basic concepts?
    1
  6395.  @robm6645  "Blackmail requires a demand for money or actions in exchange for silence." So the example I gave wouldn't be blackmail according your BS? It clearly is. You are a joke. I'm done wasting my time with your crap as much as I'm done with kyles.
    1
  6396.  @robm6645  "not the even remotely the same as threatening to kill someone's family" No shit sherlock. She was only threatening to try and metoohim. You can't be this dumb can you?
    1
  6397.  @robm6645  "sexual harrassment" LMFAO The one guilty of sexual harassment is the person exposing themselves at work. It's obvious to people who aren't morons such as yourself. I want to quit this but literally everything you say is wrong for one reason or another. You and kyle deserve each other.
    1
  6398.  @robm6645  "a real conversation" LMFAO Is that what you call you blatant and obvious BS? "definition of blackmail" Again... according to your "logic" you are claiming the example I gave which used the exact same words as ana is not blackmail. It's absurd on it's face. Everyone who is intellectually honest looks at that situation and realizes it's blackmail without pulling out a dictionary to pretend it's not with nonsense semantics. The hypothetical movie example is blackmail for the exact same reasons ana was blackmailing other than what they were trying to use as blackmail. One used a threat of a family member and ana threatened to try and metoohim. That's the only substantive difference. I'm crazy for explaining the obvious to you. It's clear you are lost and this is a waste of time.
    1
  6399.  @robm6645  I'd tell you to go to work with your ass out and see what happens but it's not like you have a job other than spreading BS do you? You are actually one of the few people who can go to work with their ass out. Good for you. Most people can't. Obviously.
    1
  6400.  @wildfire9280  "That is the advisable course of action," Millions of people knew trump was terrible and voted for him anyway using the same terrible "logic" as you. Together you ensure this country will circle the drain forever.
    1
  6401.  @wildfire9280  "That is the advisable course of action" More military spending.
    1
  6402.  @wildfire9280  "That is the advisable course of action" More immigrants being forced out of the country.
    1
  6403.  @wildfire9280  "That is the advisable course of action" More people have lost their lives to corona.
    1
  6404.  @wildfire9280  "That is the advisable course of action" Roe is gone.
    1
  6405. "Thank you for caring about the people of our nation" Look at how many replies youtube says is there and compare it to how many comments you can read. Isn't that the type of thing that is suppose to make china the bad guy? We don't even have free speech on a senators page. And that's while the dems have the presidency, house and senate.
    1
  6406.  @wildfire9280  "That is the advisable course of action" Look at how many replies youtube says are there and count how many you can see.
    1
  6407.  @wildfire9280  "That is the advisable course of action" We don't even have free speech in a senators youtube page.
    1
  6408.  @wildfire9280  "That is the advisable course of action" That's while the dems have the presidency, house and senate.... but bernie and you will only point at the republicans.
    1
  6409.  @ricomajestic  Let's recreate the same situation that brought us Trump... only now we can expect someone even worse after Biden fundamentally changes nothing in a society that DESERPERATELY needs change. What could go wrong. It can't possibly get worse than trump... unless they were actually competent of course.
    1
  6410. The most important commodity in politics is trust. Bernie has it while yours is a conman.
    1
  6411.  @whyamimrpink78  Your stupidity is almost impressive somehow.
    1
  6412.  @whyamimrpink78  I can't fix stupid for you. I'm not going to try. How about you not suck at life... then I might take you seriously. I won't hold my breathe for you to change. I suspect you are only capable of sucking at life.
    1
  6413.  @whyamimrpink78  I know I give you a hard time. You deserve it. You really do suck at life. You really are a waste of breathe. The world would really be better off if you would shut the fuck up. But you get a paycheck for doing what you do so you don't care. You fucking suck. Try not to lie to yourself about it the way you spend your entire life lying to everybody about everything. This is not hyperbole.
    1
  6414.  @whyamimrpink78  Regarding, "so you agree that universal healthcare does not guarantee care?" Care is not the same as immortality you fucking moron. Please shut the fuck up. Forever. Not just about this.
    1
  6415.  @whyamimrpink78  Guy with universal health care goes to hospital for shotgun to chest. Doctors can't save him. whyamisoremarkablystupid says they didn't have "care" because they died. Seriously. STFU you worthless piece of shit. Actually I value shit more than you. And it's not even close.
    1
  6416.  @whyamimrpink78  Thanks for proving me correct to never respond to you intelligently. I did that here and you proved me right that that is a complete waste of time. But don't get me wrong... thanks for fucking off. You saying nothing is as smart as you are capable of acting.
    1
  6417.  @whyamimrpink78  Good thing I bothered to make an argument for you once. Thanks for proving me right that it is a complete waste of time you worthless piece of shit.
    1
  6418. "Being an idiot is worse than being a grifter" We don't get to choose how smart we are but we do get a choice in how ethical we are. This statement of yours is VERY wrong.
    1
  6419. It's simplified my explanation as to why 'blue no matter who' is idiotic. From now on when people tell me that I think I'll tell them to go Bloomberg themselves. Seems self explanatory enough to me.
    1
  6420. This is totally the highlight of your day isn't it?
    1
  6421. He lied about 2k checks.
    1
  6422. @Anurag Chakraborty "Nobody has a right to comment on someone's dress." That's what I tell them about the jock strap I wear to work and nothing else.
    1
  6423. "You don't need to debate assholes who are factually wrong." Are you trying to rationalize not having free speech? Are you always so authoritarian like this?
    1
  6424.  @davidwhittaker9128  You are an idiot. Good luck with that.
    1
  6425.  @davidwhittaker9128  You are entitled to "open conversation" as much as flat earthers are entitled to it. Sorry not sorry for not telling you exactly why everything you say is wrong for one reason or another. Even if I did I have no reason to think you would get it.
    1
  6426.  @davidwhittaker9128  I couldn't take you any less seriously if you gave your own idiotic comments a thumbs up... oh wait... you do that already. I guess I can't take you any less seriously than I already do.
    1
  6427.  @davidwhittaker9128  You do have an instant thumbs up so you must really be on to something. That or you are just disingenuous as fuck and that is why I don't waste my time addressing you intelligently.
    1
  6428.  @davidwhittaker9128  Do they fix it so that your stupid comments automatically get a thumbs up at the troll-farm? Because they don't trust you to do it yourself?
    1
  6429.  @davidwhittaker9128 Regarding, " now im just laughing at you in real life" LMFAO. Too. Fucking. Funny.
    1
  6430.  @Shouldataken  LMFAO. Are you fuckers trying to prove my point that you are working at a troll farm? All of a sudden this dipshit chimes in on a thread a week old. Holy shit you fuckers are dumb.
    1
  6431.  @davidwhittaker9128  I shouldn't say fuckers. I can't rule out the strong possibility that you "two" are one in the same.
    1
  6432.  @davidwhittaker9128  And you are not even going to give "shoulda" a thumbs up for their stupid comment? What... it doesn't live up the high bar that your drivel does to deserve you giving it a thumbs up? You must really think a lot of yourself or not much of "shoulda."
    1
  6433.  @davidwhittaker9128  Make some changes in your life and seek help... this is me actually being serious with you for once. You don't need to be a disgrace to the human race forever. Be better than you currently are.
    1
  6434.  @harrisonpearl9306  You would rather attack jimmy who is fighting for m4a and not the politicians standing in the way of m4a? You are an idiot and your priorities are really messed up.
    1
  6435.  demigodzilla  I'm sure he would happily kick you in the balls as well having known nothing of your sexual preference. Stay stupid. I know you will.
    1
  6436.  demigodzilla  Regarding, "Get human decency." Holy shit that is funny coming from you.
    1
  6437. That's funny coming from a comment with zero facts.
    1
  6438.  @chrislechat420  Fuck the corporate media and fuck trump. I took your comment as referring to kyle because you gave so little context. Seems I mistook what you were actually trying to say. Peace.
    1
  6439. I'd be more impressed if it weren't just pandering.
    1
  6440. AOC is a fraud who voted for Pelosi and got nothing of value for it when she could have demanded a vote on m4a. She is a fraud. Never forget.
    1
  6441. It will have implications.
    1
  6442.  @rantsinpatwa  Actually it is.
    1
  6443.  @mtothealcolm  One thing I'd like to add... There were about a million reasons no one should have ever supported Hitler back in the day. But they did. If only he had been credibly accused of sexual assault. I tend to think it might have been a game changer and deal breaker for the people, like it should have been, like it SHOULD be for Biden (and should have been for Trump). And if someone being a sexual predator doesn't stop you from supporting them... well I doubt policy is going to do it for you either.
    1
  6444. Obama had a supermajority and gave us a republican health care plan. He got into office largely because he voted against the Iraq war and then proceeded to go to war everywhere. Bernie is right to want to play nice with Obama. But it is sad that this is the case. Obama sucked and his presidency was a fucking disaster unless you consider setting deportation records a good thing. If he actually did a decent job and not the terrible job he actually did the country wouldn't have looked to an orange clown after him because they were so desperate for the hope and change that he promised but never delivered upon.
    1
  6445. Since when do you need a reason for llamas?
    1
  6446. FYI there are literally zero good reasons for you to support Neera Tanden. If you do I can only conclude you are a fraud.
    1
  6447. TYT isn't the left and it's not smearing when what you are saying is true.
    1
  6448. You are hypocritically smearing a guy on the left.
    1
  6449.  @christianwoods2950  "hows they now left" Um... what? "I'm not just talking about tyt" I don't really care. For example jimmy "smears" donald trump who is clearly on the "right" so your comment of, "all you do smear people on the left" is clearly, obviously, and demonstrably nonsensical. So why are you SMEARING him. And smearing is actually correct in my context because YOU are the one lying.
    1
  6450.  @christianwoods2950  "I still watch his video but all hes been talking about are people on the left" You have watched all his videos but you have never heard him trash trump? You are full of shit. He trashes trump all the time. Don't be a liar.
    1
  6451. Let's say for a second that no one had reason to laugh at jimmy's joke and that was the truth... then what's the problem with his behavior? For making a joke that fell flat? That's still not harassment or even close.
    1
  6452. At least they didn't link it to anything good. They made sure it was all bombs.
    1
  6453. For those of you who enjoy David Doels youtube I suggest you also subscribe to Bernie Sanders youtube and representus on youtube.
    1
  6454. Was there blackmail at your high school?
    1
  6455.  @compassioncampaigner728  "Body of work is an asset to mankind." Arguably. And that's probably why the asinine things he said hurt so much. "Acknowledge your criticism" Huh? "nobody is perfect" Yeah. Obviously. But when you are saying things that could be used to defend literally anyone no matter how evil it's probably not worth saying.
    1
  6456. jon ward regarding, "TRUMP IS EVIL JUST LIKE HILLERY" Yup. Seems pretty obvious. Thanks for that. I needed some faith in humanity restored after reading Pandora Rice and Town Drunk's idiotic comments.
    1
  6457. That's stupid. /s
    1
  6458. Except they never bothered to declare war in the first place so they wouldn't have a leg to stand on.
    1
  6459. There is no reason to think a new progressive party would be any more successful than the currently existing progressive party the green party because of the way the system is set up.
    1
  6460. Winning as a dem, reforming the shit out the party, and purging corporate dems the same way progressives were purged would be much more of a fuck you to the corporate dems.
    1
  6461. No, it's Bernie Sanders. The guy who has told you time and again that he has no interest in your plan. You might want to listen to him, accept reality, come up with a new plan, and consider he might be better at this then you.
    1
  6462. The new rule is retarded but lets not pretend it is a game changer. This is Sanders last chance to run for president (assuming he doesn't get to run for reelection). It's not like they will put him in DNC jail if he runs for his senate seat as an independent after this. And a party label is not important at all compared to the person wearing the label. He will do what he needs to to run as a dem. Hopefully we never have to find out what he would do if he loses as a dem.
    1
  6463. Clearly the corporate dems are going to do anything and everything they can to stop him but I just don't think they have enough dirty tricks in their playbook to stop him. I say often that even thou the party sucks they are not about to die anytime soon. But that position would quickly change if, for example, the party used superdelegates to overturn the will of the voters. I also say it isn't reasonable to think Sanders can win as a 3rd party candidate. That position would also need to be reevaluated if they did such a thing. I honestly don't know what Sanders plan is if they succeed in fucking him over. Hopefully we never have to find out.
    1
  6464. I'm more excited for jimmy's takedown of this.
    1
  6465. Black hole 2024!
    1
  6466.  @quinndawsonosgood5261  TYT will if you pay them enough.
    1
  6467. Your comment is funny because I'd be willing to bet it came from a troll farm.
    1
  6468.  @craigfinnegan8534  "throwing out baseless insults" I made the same "baseless insult" you did in your OP. Not only are you a hypocrite but you must have remarkably low self awareness to not realize what you are doing.
    1
  6469. Then why are you staring at his crotch? His eyes are up here. /s
    1
  6470.  @SpeakerWiggin49  "Don't put words in my mouth." I used direct quotes from you. Don't be an idiot. "Tone deaf?" Yes. And I like to think I made it perfectly clearly why. "Ana Kasparian and Cenk Uygur are wrong on the substance" I do. Why doesn't kyle? I'd bet he wouldn't have as much trouble calling out his fellow affiliates at the time if they weren't affiliated with him and if they were instead the MSM. He never makes excuses for not getting involved in their "drama." Which are actually just lies and journalistic malpractice. "Kyle specifically said Jimmy was threatened and blackmailed and that's unfair." Only after he was called out for his journalistic malpractice where he told everyone he was going to tell it all and not leave anything out only to leave out what is CLEARLY the most important part the way only a fraud would. "TYT and TJDS will have to resolve between themselves" Go watch glenn greenwald's video about toxic pathologies of the left. He was talking about you.
    1
  6471.  @SpeakerWiggin49  "dishonest." LMFAO I too like to think that everyone can see who is being dishonest.
    1
  6472.  @SpeakerWiggin49  Me saying, "Then this is just "drama" between west and a university." Is me speaking for myself. Obviously. This is the basics and you can't get that right. It makes sense why you would struggle with far more complicated ideas and topics.
    1
  6473.  @SpeakerWiggin49  "you were just being lazy admit it." LMFAO Pretty funning coming from a liar who can't get the basics right. "You didn't bother to extract any logic from my first response, you created your own meaning from my statement" LMFAO You didn't bother to try and extract anything from my comment. You just created your own BS about how I was misquoting you rather than trying to address the point I was making. You are a joke and impossible to take seriously. But you are good at projection.
    1
  6474.  @mmolchin  "youre going to smear him as a fraud" Smears are lies. It's not a lie that he's a fraud. "not listen to any of his arguments?" I've listened to all his BS. I just don't feel like going over it with a dipshit like you really. "You realize how disingenuous that sounds right?" I never said I don't listen to his arguments. You are just lying. I just don't feel the need to go over them with you and explain why 2 + 2 actually equals 4. You realize how disingenuous you sound right? "I literally said Kyle would have a different opinion..." At best he is an idiot then. At worst he's a complete and total fraud. "youre not even listening to what he has to say" LMFAO You're not even listening to what I have to say. I really validates my decision to not go over all his terrible arguments with you in detail.
    1
  6475. Said no intelligent human ever.
    1
  6476. He sucks but you have to care about him. That said he has no place in this channel.
    1
  6477. What a vapid, idiotic comment... even by internet standards.
    1
  6478. Yeah... for example even when a right wing grifter like sam knows he's wrong he will go to, "i don't care" instead of admitting being wrong.
    1
  6479.  @seanpatrick1243  That is exactly the type of worthless "argument" I expect from anyone who listens to sam. And it's telling.
    1
  6480.  @briancardio6567  I'm calling him out. Do I really need to to tell you why that's different than being a fan?
    1
  6481.  @seanpatrick1243  "To everyone else you're just sounding a bit foolish" Team sam has nothing more than ad hominem. It's clear who the fools are.
    1
  6482.  @seanpatrick1243  bUt HaVe At It
    1
  6483.  @seanpatrick1243  "It's just sad, Jimmy. Just sad." That's how I feel about you. At least try to make an argument one time FFS. Or do you really not care that that's all you have?
    1
  6484.  @seanpatrick1243  "I challenge you to go back through your comments and point out one argument" You mean like the argument I was just making about how you don't even attempt any arguments? That you are literally trying to address? But hey... well done. You have attempted an argument. But it was awful. And it's telling that you don't even know why it's so bad. I can point out more argument I've made in this thread. Would you like me to?
    1
  6485.  @seanpatrick1243  "I challenge you" Took me two seconds to show an argument. Time for you to, "Never admit you were wrong." and " Never apologize."
    1
  6486.  @seanpatrick1243  "Your feelings" It's fact you weren't making an argument. And yours and my feelings are irrelevant to that point.
    1
  6487.  @seanpatrick1243  "that was a complete waste of time." Not for me. Thanks for proving my point that you wouldn't admit you were wrong and wouldn't apologize. I guess that this means, according to you, you are a right wing grifter.
    1
  6488.  @seanpatrick1243  "I'll leave you" You are best off not attempting any arguments. If you do I suspect they will be as easy to poke holes in as your only real try.
    1
  6489.  @seanpatrick1243  "I freely apologize." LMFAO You should be sorry that you can't accept facts when they are presented to you. "I will admit that it has been very interesting watching someone say absolutely nothing and claim a "victory." " It shouldn't be too interesting for you. It's in the mirror everyday looking back at you. "you're only competing with yourself." This is funny because you are trying to compete in this very thread. And doing it poorly. "muting notifications of further comments written by you" When you silence someone you don't prove them wrong. You only prove you are scared of what they have to say.
    1
  6490.  @seanpatrick1243  "your authoritarian nature than anything else. I as an individual should not be forced to read your nonsense, which seems to be your goal." Not once did I say you should be forced to read... "Anything less will just prove what a hypocrite you are." LMFAO You are impossible to take seriously. Please mute me or go back to not even attempting arguments again. It would be better than what you are doing. You are wasting my time.
    1
  6491.  @seanpatrick1243  I legit pity you.
    1
  6492. Meh. Bill Maher is far more fecal filth than Velveeta is cheese.
    1
  6493. They should be required to vote for the candidate who has the most pledged delegates but your suggestions would be a step in the right direction.
    1
  6494. Even Obama knows you are wrong, because, reality. https://www.aol.com/2010/01/27/obama-bailing-out-the-banks-was-necessary-but-i-hated-it/
    1
  6495. Don't be afraid to delete or edit your original comment since you care so much about getting shit right.
    1
  6496. Or you can leave your OP that is pure bullshit still up and prove that you don't care about correcting the record but actually care about lying and distorting the truth... because that's what you have actually done with your OP... you've made everyone dumber with your bullshit.
    1
  6497. you have an orange facial
    1
  6498. "God" gave us covid.
    1
  6499.  @kenfaulds8818  Fair enough. It's just I'm not looking to give credit for it to a deity I don't think exists as an atheist.
    1
  6500.  @kenfaulds8818  "we need both bacteria and viruses to balance each other out" Sounds like a pretty unintelligent design. "this video by Dr John Campbell is good news." We agree about this. Peace.
    1
  6501. And a lot of other things. But we can walk and chew gum at the same time.
    1
  6502.  @chaunceystewart9960  Sanders had a procedure that has left him MORE healthy than before. This is pure concern trolling nonsense to try and stop the candidate who actually deserves the job for the candidate who clearly doesn't.
    1
  6503.  @chaunceystewart9960  And if the unthinkable would happen... well there is a reason we have VPs. Maybe spend more time thinking about who should have the job rather than trying to predict when people are going to die like a psychic.
    1
  6504. Was there a time when elections weren't "popularity contests?" Also, yang is great conman. That is why he has a shot even if he shouldn't.
    1
  6505. You might want to consider that some people hate trump and can't stand to have politics interjected into the channel.
    1
  6506. It isn't about trust. It is about getting them on the record. The public is very slow but even they will vote people out when they flip flop on something that is important to them. We have to at least make them flip flop in the first place. We have to at least create consequences for those opposing it outright. Then when there are supposedly enough and when some of them betray us we vote them out as well. Look I don't trust them either. I wouldn't support practically any of them when they run even. I will continue to try and primary corporatists. But this isn't the time to attack those that are currently supporting this. Save that for when they actually are on the wrong side of an issue. That will likely be tomorrow. But attacking them for this is self defeating. How are you ever going to get people on your side when you attack them when they are actually doing the right thing?
    1
  6507. "Kyle falsely asserts Fauci is lying." The only person lying is you. Right here on youtube, "March 2020: Dr. Anthony Fauci talks with Dr Jon LaPook about Covid-19"
    1
  6508. I should add that fauci too is clearly a liar.
    1
  6509. Real liberals support censorship like sam am I right?
    1
  6510. I know right. I need 99 percent or I can't even get buzzed.
    1
  6511. I'm starting to think you are not smart.
    1
  6512. Isn't bernie the guy who just voted for billion for the MIC?
    1
  6513. Isn't bernie the guy who tells you to vote for cor rupt people like biden and clinton?
    1
  6514. Even trump sycophants tend to stop short of saying he is always correct.
    1
  6515.  @Xidanyu  regarding, "you can't justify one's wrong doing by compare it to a worse case." Can you imagine how it would look if we did? I'm not even sure what the worst of the worst is as there is essentially always something worse. Hitler and the holocaust? Well at least they weren't raped first. Oh wait, some were, what about them? Well at least they weren't flayed.
    1
  6516. Smells like Obama, ignorance, and propaganda.
    1
  6517. Thank you youtube for censoring. I'm sure that whatever comment you won't let me read is really bad. Thank you for keeping me and everyone safe from wrongthink. /s
    1
  6518. In the age of information ignorance is a choice. Search creepy joe biden and see what comes up.
    1
  6519. I'd like to know if exit polls match the results the way they should. SC always seems to have "surprising" results. That said I'm not surprised Biden won. I am surprised by the margin.
    1
  6520.  @joshuaherpolsheimer4699  Going to war on behalf of the MIC doesn't exactly count.
    1
  6521. What's dumb is not understanding that he is a conman at this point. It should have been obvious from the beginning for fucks sake.
    1
  6522.  @noah5793  Yang is a conman. He isn't a progressive.
    1
  6523. "literally prove the point" Except grim isn't "canceled." He's collecting checks from multiple billionaires to tell everyone to vote blue no matter who.
    1
  6524.  @abe8435  "the classic tool of people who seek to keep the left weak and divided." I'm as far left as I you can go but that's not what's important. The war that matters is between the peasants and the elite. And grim represents the elite.
    1
  6525.  @abe8435  "My point is you aren’t actually making any substantive points about why Grim is controlled opposition at all." Sad you need them. Controlled opposition tells you not to force the vote. Controlled opposition writes propaganda like, "CHUCK SCHUMER EYES A SECOND SHOT AT RAISING THE MINIMUM WAGE THROUGH RECONCILIATION" so that you can give chuck credit for the minimum wage despite him not actually doing anything to make it happen. Do you want more? "Someone watching this video who isn’t as invested in social media drama as you would have no idea what you are on about." Then ask. Instead of what you are doing instead.
    1
  6526.  @abe8435  "now you actually made some substantive points" Meanwhile, in reality, I was always making "substantive points." "See the difference?" You wanted "evidence" in addition to the point. And I gave it to you. Do you see the difference between a "point" and "evidence?"
    1
  6527.  @abe8435  "while not trying to cancel the person" What is "cancel" even suppose to mean? I support his free speech and everyone free speech. Just because I'm calling him out and just because I think useful idiots would be better off having ANY else on instead of him doesn't mean he should be "canceled" or I think he should be "canceled." "All it does is lead to endless fracturing and zero clarity" At the end of the day there is controlled opposition whether you try to call it out or not. But it's better if you do because if you don't it will destroy your cause of institution from the inside. Ryan isn't your friend. It's better you realize it.
    1
  6528.  @dashx1103  "Democrats capitulated to a ruling by a Senate staffer, the body’s parliamentarian, the first time around" Which is also BS. The dems didn't "capitulate," they did exactly what they and their donors wanted them to do and they used the parliamentarian and stenographers like grim to do it.
    1
  6529.  @dashx1103  "Democrats capitulated to a ruling by a Senate staffer, the body’s parliamentarian, the first time around." Which is another lie. Dems did exactly what they and they donors wanted, they used the parliamentarian to justify it, and they used propagandists like grim to sell it.
    1
  6530.  @dashx1103  "Democrats capitulated" Another lie. They did exactly what they and their donors wanted.
    1
  6531.  @dashx1103  "Democrats capitulated" Another lie by grim. They did exactly what they and their donors wanted to do.
    1
  6532.  @dashx1103  "Democrats capitulated" You are making my point why grim is terrible. If you listened to him you might actually believe this BS. His job is to manufacture consent for corrupt politicians and those 2 words prove it. The parliamentarian works for the dems.... not the other way around.
    1
  6533.  @dashx1103  "Democrats capitulated" It's like you are trying to prove my point for me that grim manufactures consent for corrupt dems. The parliamentarian works for the dems, not the other way around.
    1
  6534.  @abe8435  "You weren’t making points. Just assertions." LMFAO An assertion is an example of a point. "Get it?" I have receipts for everything I say. For example when I say grimm is a tool of the oligarchy, which yes, is an assertion, and my point, I can back it up with the fact that he gets paid by multiple billionaires.
    1
  6535. When you say, "this level of paranoia feels astroturfed" I can assert that you are silly. And my evidence of it is corporate media. Whom all sane people are "paranoid" that they do not actually have our best interests at heart.
    1
  6536. "this level of paranoia feels astroturfed" So am I wrong to be "paranoid" that corporate media is gaslighting me? Because I'm confident I'm right to think that. And I'm correct to think that of grim for all the same reasons. MSNBC brings him on for a reason.
    1
  6537. "I like how all the comments cannot even begin to engage with what Grim and Halper are discussing and are just centered around bs about their authenticity." The bottom line, whether you agree with people like me or not, is that we think ryan is controlled opposition. We think he is part of the problem. We do not think he is authentic. And we have really good reason to think that. Since that's the case it makes perfect sense that we are going to call him out and spend our time questioning his authenticity instead of acting like we think he's an honest actor.
    1
  6538.  @abe8435  "I think you might be right about him being controlled opposition" So it really shouldn't be too hard to understand why that's what I care about... and not what controlled opposition is saying ATM. "your evidence is really more inference and conjecture than proof" I don't have a smoking gun... other than the fact that he gets paid by multiple billionaires and billionaires don't tend to pay for things working against their interests. "It’s enough to say he’s wrong about “force the vote”" Not really. He wasn't just "wrong." He gaslight. " is overly impressed with Democrats," At the end of the day he will tell you to vote blue no matter who. And the rest of it up until then is just details to get there and to try and give him some credibility when he says it. "agreeing with him when he’s right is probably more productive" I don't deny he says something correct on occasion. It's just that I'm not going to spend much time giving him credit for it when I think he's only doing it to try and get people to trust him before he tells you to vote blue no matter who.
    1
  6539.  @abe8435  "When you attack his character rather than his ideas" I do both.
    1
  6540.  @abe8435  "I think you might be right about him being controlled opposition," I wrote you a much longer response to this that's being shadowbanned because of course it is. If you can't see it in your notifications let me know and I'll try to rephrase it enough that it isn't censored.
    1
  6541.  @abe8435  "He’s just not that important." Sadly he is. Him and people like him are partly how the elite manufactures consent for themselves. "Democratic Party" People like him are how they get any support. "the argument being made by the host and guest is correct," I legit don't even know what they are talking about in this clip although I have watched the full interview. "hope it gets across to people who hadn’t thought of it" If you listen to ryan grim unironically I hope I've given you something to think of. I'm not here to address anything he said here nor do I pretend to want to.
    1
  6542.  @abe8435  "who Grim is" You are missing the point. This isn't about him specifically. It's about people like him who manufacture consent for corrupt politicians. He's an example of it. He's an example of corporate media but he's trying to do in the "independent" area. " don’t think most libs even know who Grim is" They should. Katy should. And if they don't I'm going to tell them.
    1
  6543.  @abe8435  "better to attack his arguments, because there can always be more water-carriers for the Democrats" Nope. It's better to go after how they carry water so that you can tell when the next person like grim comes around... and you clearly know they will.
    1
  6544.  @abe8435  "relentlessly attacking Grim and whoever else just becomes a game of whack-a-mole" I'm trying to tell you how you know what a mole is and what isn't. The establishment is always going try and mislead you and it's important to know how they do it. For example you keep saying that grim said only good things in this clip. Maybe he did. But that's how he gains your trust before telling you why you need to vote for corrupt dems.
    1
  6545.  @abe8435  "You should speak to them privately" LMFAO Who do you think I am? One of the billionaires who pays him? "alienate a potential ally" You think he was going to support m4a until I said mean things about him? That sounds more like the type of excuse controlled opposition uses to try and rationalize not doing the right thing.
    1
  6546.  @abe8435  "There’s plenty of controlled opposition besides Grim right now, and more every day." Yup. It's like you are trying to make my point how important it is to try and call it out. And to show people how to recognize it. But somehow you are using it to claim the opposite. It's silly. "what does it matter if you and a minority of people know who’s authentic and who isn’t?" You really don't understand why it's important to know if your source is legit or controlled opposition? Really? "you have to make coherent arguments" LMFAO I'm confident I have been doing that from the very start. "not just name-call individual" While I have "name called" that isn't the only thing I've done.
    1
  6547.  @abe8435  "I pointed out you had no evidence" I have evidence. And I've given it to you after you asked for it. Just because i didn't lead with it doesn't mean I don't have it and haven't provided it for you. "Who cares?" I do. And so do you. Or why are you here? If you don't care? "You think Halper reads these comments?" Yes. I do. But maybe she doesn't for all I know for certain. "You think anyone who doesn’t already agree with you is persuaded by such content-free insults?" You say this like I haven't given you receipts when you asked for them. Do you think you are persuading anyone with this? "what he says in this clip has nothing to do with that." I just got done telling you that I don't even know what's in the clip. I straight up admit I don't care about it. "So you have to raise the level of the discourse" Is that what you think you are doing with this? LMFAO "you’ll just feel smug about calling out phonies and that’s all" I can lead a horse to water but I can't make em drink.
    1
  6548.  @olorin1710  "Chris Hedges" LMFAO I say literally the same things as hedges. I'm sure you call him an "anarchist" too no matter how silly it is.
    1
  6549.  @olorin1710  "Imagine what they say about Donald trump, rep Crenshaw, Taylor Greene, AOC, rep. Bush," I say the same things about these people for all the same reasons I call out grim. "It's a big club and you ain't in it." -george carlin, fellow "anarchist."
    1
  6550.  @olorin1710  "too bad you dont get it" How about you try to explain it then? Instead of what you are doing? "because CNN hates on both of them????" LMFAO So? Do you want me to tell you the, many, many, many ways they are different? What is your point?
    1
  6551. Danny regarding, "People who say "CNN sucks", but simultaneously view Fox News as a credible source are not exactly getting it right." CNN either sucks or they don't. Period. You could have said 'People who say "CNN sucks", but simultaneously view alien telepathy as a credible source are not exactly getting it right' and that would have been just as profound (as in silly). Regarding, "I'm not a fan of CNN's corporate bent" Another, more simplistic way of saying this might be, CNN sucks. Regarding, "the fact that Trump supporters think CNN sucks does not place me in agreement with them." I'm not going to pretend that I got to the conclusion that CNN sucks the same way the broken clocks got there because I didn't. All of the "logic" they use to come the conclusion is flawed but ultimately the conclusion is correct for all the wrong reasons. Regarding, "Their criticism comes from a desire to be further misinformed, mine comes from a position of wishing to be better informed." But ultimately you are both criticizing them right? That is my point. Try not to overthink it.
    1
  6552. Well said Peter. I agree with all of that.
    1
  6553. Lance regarding, "your post... is longer than Danny's" Yup. I'm longwinded. Regarding, "you're the one doing the overthinking." You can't possibly be conflating the length of the writing with how well thought out something is right? Regarding, "I think Danny's reply was concise and clear," I never took issue with that. It wasn't like I had trouble understanding what he was saying. Ultimately it seemed like he was just going out of his way to make sure that he couldn't be found agreeing with something Trump supporter says because I suspect they, like so many, have a team or tribe mentality that doesn't allow them to be found agreeing with the opposition. It's like if Trump supporters say CNN sucks then they can only allow themselves to say CNN is fine even if CNN does in fact suck. Regarding, "whereas you seem to be conflicted about why "CNN sucks"." Huh? I haven't even begun to address why I think CNN sucks in this thread. I've only asserted it. Are you suggesting they don't? Because they do. I can tell you why if you really need me to but I really shouldn't.
    1
  6554. Keith regarding, "A claim that "CNN sucks" based around the idea that Fox News is credible is very different" While there is a certain amount of truth in your statement the problem is that people are too trained to only compare things to other things and think that what is important is the comparison. It isn't. We need to be able to have independent ideas on independent things. We need to be able to identify if CNN sucks regardless of what else is going on in the world and regardless of if Fox news sucks or even exists. And we need to be able to do the same when it comes to politicians. Trump either sucks or he doesn't. Hillary either sucks or she doesn't. Just because there is something elsewhere that sucks more than the topic at hand that doesn't mean that thing that sucks doesn't. Regarding, "You can think CNN sucks without agreeing with the idiots at Trump rallies." Um... no. You really can't. At least not when it comes to the very specific topic of whether or not CNN sucks. They either do or they don't. Period. That doesn't mean you need to agree on exactly why CNN sucks. Why CNN sucks is an independent idea and topic.
    1
  6555. You are really making the point of revolutionary blackout in their video, "CIVILITY POLITICS is a TOOL of the Ruling Class"
    1
  6556. Dems aren't the ones who voted him into office... republicans did.
    1
  6557. Bloomberg isn't running because he is scared of yang... he is scared of Sanders. As he should be.
    1
  6558. Sam and his crew really are.
    1
  6559.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  "who hurt you kid?" No one. Am I hurting you? Does the truth hurt?
    1
  6560. Well said.
    1
  6561. Regarding, "God put Donald J Trump" So god exists and they just really, really, really suck huh.
    1
  6562. Why am I not surprised to see you hear saying stupid shit like this? Oh yeah... it's because you are a moron.
    1
  6563. Do you always gush over political propaganda like this?
    1
  6564.  @CAMSALT846  Nevermind. If you are from the UK and want to like this clown so be it.
    1
  6565.  @CAMSALT846  Both are racist. Both suck. As for which is "better" it really doesn't matter. Ultimately both are beyond terrible.
    1
  6566. Don't get me wrong, the CPB is a good thing in a vacuum. But at that moment, when we needed banks broken up, glass steagal brought back, and bankers put in jail we were instead given the CPB. That way dems could make it look like they were doing something about the financial crisis at the time when they should have been doing so much more. That's why the CPB does not impress me.
    1
  6567. @Laura Trump talks about how he's going to give everyone health care. So fucking what. Where was that talk from warren when the global economy was on the brink? That's right... she was busy working on the CPB, a bandaid of a solution when the country needed major surgery.
    1
  6568. Bernie is a sheepherder for a corrupt party. This is all meaningless talk before he tells you to vote for people like biden.
    1
  6569.  @smitty6480  "I really don't understand how people are getting confused by basic english." Pretty funning considering the rest of your comment. Regarding, "He said that paying unconditional income would help people need welfare less" Pretty sure the people already getting welfare are the people that need the most help. But yang wants to give them the least help to no help. If you already get the equivalent of his UBI then you get NOTHING from him. You just trade in the benefits you have for UBI. And since he doesn't want to change anything else about the system all that money will just funnel to the top like it does now.
    1
  6570.  @schloops8473  LOL Your comment is what you say when you have nothing intelligent and of substance to offer.
    1
  6571.  @peasant7214  Got it. I'm just very used to getting attacked when the topic is yang. Yang scares the shit out of me. I think he is a great conman and look how far a terrible conman like trump and biden are able to get.
    1
  6572.  @w.iraheta3769  Regarding, "Raising the minimum wage and a FJG would also in theory gut the social safety net which was a key Bernie Sanders policy." Yeah.... the good way. That "gutting" would happen organically as a natural result of good policy. It wouldn't be the starting point to help pay for an actual UBI. Think about UBI means. It means UNIVERSAL basic income. That means it should be helping EVERYONE. Millionaires would get a check and benefit from Yangs UBI. Billionaires would get a check and benefit from yangs UBI. But if you are the poorest of the poor who receives more than yangs UBI offers then you gain NOTHING. It's not universal to you. It's worthless to you while billionaires get a check. Regarding, "A UBI would be one of the biggest if not the biggest social welfare reform in history helping millions of people out of poverty." Not the way yang wants to do it. Yang's version of UBI means he bribes you and in exchange he gets to gut the entire social safety net and he offers ZERO systemic change on top of UBI. He lies about supporting m4a. UBI is it. It's all he has. And you aren't willing to change the current system then all that UBI money will funnel to the top just like now making the rich even richer at incredible rates. A good UBI means it's paid for only by the rich and is put on top of the current system. It also isn't can't be just a bribe to keep the current shit system. We still need universal health care to raise the minimum wage, and more. I support UBI but I can't stand yang. Those ideas can and do coexist.
    1
  6573.  @winstonz  That's his story as of now at least according to him... the same guy who lied about supporting m4a. Who when asked the question has also first answered that he would gut the current social safety net, until he realized that pissed people off.
    1
  6574.  @winstonz  Regarding, "u sound like you like the current system." Because I keep criticizing yang for not wanting to change it in any sort of meaningful way outside of UBI? And that makes sense to you? Regarding, "At least you got what you want if that's the case." It's not what I want. But don't let that stop you from pretending like it's something I want in lieu of addressing something I've actually said. It's very intellectually dishonest of you and known as strawmanning.
    1
  6575.  @winstonz  I'm not willing to take a small bribe in exchange for real fundamental systemic change that would include things like: universal health care, a living wage, a PROGRESSIVE UBI, and more. I despise the current system. Yang seems pretty happy with it for the most part. He just wants his regressively paid UBI.
    1
  6576.  @w.iraheta3769  ""Those ideas can and do co-exist” what do you mean by that." When I said that it was to mean that lots of people act like liking yang and like UBI are linked. They are not. I like UBI but I do not like yang. Those are the ideas that coexist for me. "The opt-in option makes it an natural transition not a forced one." Acting like this is an option is asinine. Letting people "pick" between getting 200 dollars in benefits and 1K in benefit is not a choice. The decision is being made for them. The billions and billions of dollars that yang proposes to gut from the current social safety net is not a "choice." It's silly to act like it is and like this is an "opt-in OPTION." " It’s up to the individual who is receiving certain welfare benefits" I find myself imagining that if the topic was cashiers asking, "do you want to pay more for that?" with every item scanned you would say the same silly things. That you would pretend like this is a real "choice" for consumers. That it is "up to the individual." This is not actually what real choice looks like. "for the rest of their lives" LMFAO. This is not suppose to be a lifetime commitment. Not that it really matters. What does matter is that if you are currently receiving any benefits from the government that is less than 1K a month you will be the first person to pay for yangs ubi with that money even thou you are already one of the poorest of the poor and in the greatest need of extra money when a good UBI would be paid for by the rich and only by the rich.
    1
  6577. That and where do they get their news are things I'd like to hear from pretty much everyone.
    1
  6578.  @imnotmike  Regarding, "Do you understand burden of proof?" Yes. Do you understand that you are stupid? Regarding, "If you're claiming Elizabeth Warren was pro dapl, it's up to you to show us the evidence." Holy shit are you stupid. NEVER did I say she was "pro-DAPL." Not once. Like never. How can you not understand this? We have words for a reason and you are using them wrong. Regarding, "I'm guessing you're a Jimmy Dore guy, huh?" I'm guessing your a Jimmy Dore hater huh? Two can play your retarded game. Regarding, "Why don't you go try to "help" a 3rd party, ok?" You say this but you are going to be the first person to cry like a bitch and blame 3rd parties when you lose aren't you? Regarding, "When they feel the need to break down your post and refute every single sentence you wrote individually." That's your problem with me? That I address the shit you say. That I don't just ignore points you've made like you have done to me repeatedly? You entered this thread with blatant lies. You continue to lie. Sorry if you have a problem with me point it out. I don't like it when people ignore the points I make. I treat people how I want to be treated so if I'm going to address your shit I'm going to address all of it. But if you want to think this fact is akin to making some kind of logical argument that would seem about right for you. Regarding, "Smart people will agree on 90%..." Try to realize that you are a fucking moron. It isn't my fault that literally everything you have said is either a lie or just stupid opinion. Regarding, "I won't waste my time reading your breakdown of every sentence I wrote. Make a single coherent argument or stfu." You want to dictate to me how I should make my arguments? Good luck with that. The bottom line is that you a lying fucking. From the very start. The very first things you said were lies and you continue to demonstrate that you are everything wrong with the "democratic" party in general.
    1
  6579.  @imnotmike  regarding, "You don't even know what a strawman argument is." Sure I do. Your very next sentence is a perfect example of it. Regarding, "You're saying Elizabeth Warren didn't personally show up to help the water protectors" While it is true that she didn't personally show up I've never even implied that I gave a shit about anything even remotely close to the word that resembles "personal." I even go out of my way to say that I didn't give a fuck about personal. But you hear and say this as if I did. That is you making a strawman argument. Now forgive me as I'm going to break from tradition and refrain from addressing the rest of the stupid shit you say. But that said it is as stupid as always from you. Your welcome for not addressing it point by point. I know how much that bothers you because you priorities are pretty fucked up when it comes to everything I suspect. But before I go regarding, "That's what I got out of your post." Of course that is what a mental midget would get out of it. Don't let the actual words I used fool you.
    1
  6580.  @imnotmike  regarding, "My next statement is a restating of your position." Yes. Incorrectly. Regarding, "it's a clarification." No it's not. If you wanted a clarification there is a way to do it. You say something akin to, "ARE you saying Elizabeth Warren didn't personally show up to help the water protectors?" That is how you ask for clarification. That's not what you did. You restated by position for me incorrectly. That is textbook strawman argument. It is as clear as fucking day. It is literally a perfect example of it. Regarding, "You're claiming Elizabeth Warren was against the Water Protectors and in support of the Dakota Access Pipeline." No. I'm not claiming anything of the sort. If this what you think it's only because you are stupid as fuck and I'm interested in repeating myself over and over and over to you like you are a fucking child so that maybe, just maybe this one time your brain isn't going to malfunction while I'm doing it. Regarding, "You failed to provide evidence" Yeah.. I guess you are correct about that but only because I don't feel the need to provide evidence for obvious facts. She didn't support the DAPL supporters. Did she? Are you claiming she did? I can provide evidence that she didn't support them but are you really so intellectually challenged that you want me to provide and do all your thinking for you or do you want to explore the world for yourself so that I also don't have to tell you the sky is blue. Regarding, "then you moved the goalpost" Nope. You lie as always. Same goalpost. She failed to support the DAPL protestors. That's the goalpost and it always was. You, as always, are either lying or stupid. Not that it matters. Either way you suck. Regarding, "What is your argument against Elizabeth Warren? So far you haven't made one." How about I just copy and paste it for you seeing as how I have made one? "Because to me things like turning her back on the DAPL protestors and her voting for the 700 billion dollar per year budget for the department of offense (MORE money for bombs then even Trump wanted) are also litmus tests that she failed miserably on." That is me "not making an argument" to a complete and total dipshit. Regarding, "You've just slung ad hominem bullshit around the room." Don't get me wrong I've called you plenty of names but I've been clear as day why I've been calling you them as I've been doing it. Regarding, "You made the conversation stink." Actually that was you when you entered by lying through your teeth. Regarding, "What specifically did she do that you don't like?" Are you embarrassed that you can ask this after I've said, "Because to me things like turning her back on the DAPL protestors and her voting for the 700 billion dollar per year budget for the department of offense (MORE money for bombs then even Trump wanted) are also litmus tests that she failed miserably on." Were those not specific examples?
    1
  6581.  @imnotmike  Good don't read it. I can't tell you how much stupid shit that saves me from correcting seeing as how literally everything you say is moronic and I have a problem letting stupid shit go unanswered. I probably should have just walked away from a person who's jumping off point was, "She has never flip flopped on anything. All she ever did wrong was to not endorse Bernie." Which are both just blatant lies from a liar who does it almost at a pathological rate. You aren't at Trump lying levels just yet but you are giving him a run for his money because you both suck at life.
    1
  6582.  Marshal Ivan Konev, 1st Ukrainian Front, Red Army  Regarding, "So he's yet another example of why the country's infrastructure, health and educational system desperately needs reform?" Very possible. That said it is my sincere belief, at this point, that they are a paid troll whose purpose is to spread disinformation and make everyone dumber. Something akin to "correct the record."
    1
  6583.  @imnotmike  regarding, "You people all just ignore facts and logic and truth. You're as bad as republicans." Holy shit this was funny as fuck. I've been thinking constantly why the fuck have I been addressing this fucking twat but now I know. Thanks for the laugh dipshit. I know why you love evidence so much... it's because you are living evidence of the Dunning-Kruger effect.
    1
  6584.  Marshal Ivan Konev, 1st Ukrainian Front, Red Army  Thank him for me. And happy new year to you as well!
    1
  6585.  @imnotmike  regarding, "I was curious where this nonsense dapl talking point was coming from, and I did some research. This is a talking point that originated in an article printed by The Observer." Holy shit. If you want to know why I think you are paid troll it's because of shit like this. DAPL is only a "talking point" to epic fucking morons. To the sane it was an important issue on multiple levels. It touched upon our energy needs as a nation, our government's relationship with energy companies, our basic freedoms like the freedom to peacefully protest and so much more. It was something that I cared about greatly when it was happening. And I noticed Warren's silence on the issue, not because of talking points and Jared Kushner but because of me you fucking piece of shit. Because I cared about it even if you didn't. And Warren said NOTHING. That said she technically did... but only long, long, long after the moment when she should have and when she had a chance to make a difference with her actions. It's a trend with her. She is no leader. I say this often then I should but don't doubt my sincerity when I say it to you as there are few more worthy of this being said to them... you are a disgrace to the human race. I really mean that. I hope your entire year sucks ass.
    1
  6586.  @imnotmike  because I was watching shit like this at the time you fucking moron and it has nothing to do with Donald fucking Trump. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NiOrffAZymA
    1
  6587. @GamingTV meanwhile, in reality https://www.weeklystandard.com/michael-warren/elizabeth-warren-supported-single-payer-before-she-opposed-it https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZcUsiJf0bWY https://www.masslive.com/politics/index.ssf/2017/03/sen_elizabeth_warren_explains.html nice try though
    1
  6588.  @Nether2342  regarding, "She hasn't flip flopped" Except she has. I literally just got done posting example of it for fucks sake. Regarding, "She's a democrat, is she not supposed to support the democraric candidate for president?" She is also so suppose to be a progressive. And she didn't support the progressive running for the "democratic" nomination. Is she not supposed to support the democraric (sic) candidate for president?
    1
  6589.  @Nether2342  Before I address all the shit you just said I'd like to take a moment to linger on the fact that about 20 minutes ago you were straight up lying. There was ZERO truth in your saying, "She hasn't flip flopped," because we don't get to have our own facts and she has in fact flip flopped on things. And it would really be nice if, before you try and change the subject to other all the other stupid you said if you would take a moment to acknowledge what an ignorant ass you were not long ago (assuming you aren't just a blatant liar). Any chance of that?
    1
  6590. @GamingTV holy shit what a steaming pile of bullshit. Seriously that was one of the dumbest things I've ever fucking read. Please forgive me for not addressing all the ways in which everything you said is wrong. It was only a paragraph but I could write a short novel about all the ways everything you said was wrong. Also, you too are still a straight up liar when saying, "never has she ever flip flopped." Because facts.
    1
  6591. Fighting for m4a and exposing frauds gets old fast to you?
    1
  6592. Patience friend.
    1
  6593.  @JagoffCitizen  If people didn't care about mate they wouldn't try so hard to smear him.
    1
  6594.  @jearl35  "sponsored trip" LMFAO This is apparently the people that are trying to defend kyle... smear merchants who spread transparent lies You are proving my point for me about the smears not that it was necessary.
    1
  6595.  @jearl35  "A Jimmy Dore defender doesn't get to get indignant at someone swearing." It's not about the swearing... it's about the hypocrisy.
    1
  6596.  @jearl35  "I'm not sure what you're trying to get at." One of the BS excuses kyle was giving for not backing up jimmy was his potty mouth. "Not that I expect a Jimmy Dore supporter to make much sense or logic." Hopefully I've corrected you on this as well then while I was at it.
    1
  6597.  @jearl35  "hypocrites, you came to the right place (Youtube that is)" You really prove this point by existing.
    1
  6598.  @jearl35  I concede that's a fair point. But some more than others.
    1
  6599. What do you think state media looks like? I think it looks like this... where they bring on military brass to give you propaganda.
    1
  6600. Regarding, "You need to be told this?? Wow." The irony. Thanks for the laugh.
    1
  6601. Are you for real? It's called sarcasm.
    1
  6602. The fact that so few people have actually signed the petition destroys my faith in humanity.
    1
  6603. Lied about supporting M4A. I can only imagine how many other lies I'd know about if he actually had a record. Good riddance to bad rubbish.
    1
  6604. "framing" is not the problem.
    1
  6605.  @Chazreal  Regarding, "the administration and the media..." The administration and the media are going to find ways to piss on you regardless of how good your "framing" is.
    1
  6606.  @Chazreal  While we would be wise to try and have good framing the notion that our framing is the problem and if only we did a better job with it everything would be roses and sunshine is just not the reality.
    1
  6607. LMFAO What?
    1
  6608. I'll bet you miss alex jones.
    1
  6609. You can't agree with them both anymore then you can agree with any two people with polar opposite views. Even if both made "good cases" to you ultimately one of them is right and one of them is wrong. You can't have it both ways and think they are both right.
    1
  6610.  @swankytiger2484  Clinton deserves everything she gets and then some... you are acting like she was called a Russian puppet or some shit. That would be something to actually be mad about.
    1
  6611. They can get new ones. We don't prop up bullshit industries just because of jobs.
    1
  6612. The hard part for him will not be beating Trump in a general election... it will be winning a corrupt "democratic" primary.
    1
  6613. This is the type of thing hillary's correct the record would say back in the day instead of making intelligent arguments. Now it's the type of thing bernie's sycophants do.
    1
  6614. Trying to stop the spread of the virus is a noble effort and far smarter than what you are doing.
    1
  6615. This is terrible. I enjoyed making fun of it.
    1
  6616. Regarding, "He is for ubi + higher minimum wage." He is against raising the federal minimum wage which is inexcusable. Try not to lie about it.
    1
  6617. Regarding, "He is all for a raising the federal minimum wage too." No. He is not. Or at least he wasn't when he could be quoted as saying, "leave minimum wage to the states."
    1
  6618.  @cotacachi12  From his own fucking twitter. We get to have our own opinions. We don't get to have our own facts. https://twitter.com/AndrewYang/status/991050364345602050
    1
  6619.  @cotacachi12  And I'd like to note just how absurd it is that I have to cite twitter as opposed to a voting record like I normally would because yang has zero experience in politics and no record to look at which is what I absolutely should have for any presidential candidate.
    1
  6620.  @cotacachi12  Regarding, "you do realize that quote is from april in 2018 right?" Yeah. Hardly ancient history. And it was made BEFORE he had reason to lie and pander. Again... the guy has no fucking experience and no fucking record. Regarding, "his campaign has gone through major changes." Meanwhile Sanders doesn't change on shit over decades. That's what having principles and convictions looks like.
    1
  6621.  @cotacachi12 ​ Regarding, "as long as its genuine" Yang is running for POTUS and has no record. Sure, give him the benefit of the doubt. Seems wise to me. And by wise I mean utterly devoid of logic and reason. Regarding, "We all change over time." You can't possibly be comparing this concept to a politician running to be president and a major policy change being made in the midst of running can you? Let's say I agreed with all this crap. At best, at the very best, it means that not long ago his judgment on a very important topic was idiotic. That's the best case scenario. The worst case scenario is that they are just trying to tell you what you want to hear before doing what they actually think, or thought, not long ago on twitter. Regarding, "He has probably the least reason to lie" Or he has the most because he, unlike everyone else, knows he doesn't have a record to account for. When Biden says he's the "most progressive" he knows his record is going to be a problem WHILE he says it. Imagine all the shit he would say if he, like yang, didn't have it. He could say literally anything and people don't have a good way to figure out if it's legit or bullshit. It must be nice for yang. He has ZERO reason not to lie about anything as long as he thinks that lie can help him win because he can get away with it like no one else. Regarding, "Bernie is consistent however I'd conversly argue being consistent holding the same stance with old ideas is not typically ideal." Yeah, a politician who has principles and convictions demonstrated over time so that you know what they stand for and that they aren't going to sway, pander and bullshit is the devil. Can't believe I'd support someone like that. Especially when they have been consistently correct about pretty much everything over decades and those "old ideas" are just as valid today as they were before. /s
    1
  6622.  @cotacachi12  Regarding, "based on the countless interactions I've seen of him I trust that he.is mostly "genuine" in how he runs his campaign." Everyone loves to think they can just listen to people talk and see into their souls. You can't. At least not reliably so. Because no matter how good you are there will forever be some great conmen out there that will fool you. Look at how terrible of a conman Trump is. Still people buy his bullshit. The two best ways to actually know something about a politician is 1) follow the money and 2) study the record. That's how sane people determine trust and your guy doesn't even have one the most important things to look at. Somewhere way under these important things is, listen to them talk. And even when you do that it need be done with a grain of salt for reasons that shouldn't need to be explained. Regarding, "He isn't a politician lol" The mother fucker is running to be president of the united states. He's obviously a fucking politician. I can't tell you how frustrating talking to you is especially with a condescending lol while saying something that is so obviously dumb it is really remarkable. I quit this. Grow a brain... for the country.
    1
  6623.  @cotacachi12  I thought I was pretty clear that I lost all reason to take you seriously when you tried to say that a person running for president isn't a politician and you wrote a novel that included a defense of that stupidity. Well done if you were just trying to destroy the last little bit of faith I have in humanity.
    1
  6624.  @cotacachi12  Regarding, "running for office doesn't make you a politician." You are either too dumb to address intelligently or too impartial to think clearly. Running a campaign, making political promises to people, telling people to vote for you, taking their money for political campaign and the like does actually make a person a politician... because reality. This is basic as fuck and not the type of thing we get to have an opinion about. And this is hardly the only reason why I find you impossible to take seriously at this point.
    1
  6625.  @cotacachi12  It was just the straw that broke the camels back.
    1
  6626.  @cotacachi12  Regarding, "you won't even explain why you think anyone who decides to run for office means you are a politician" "Running a campaign, making political promises to people, telling people to vote for you, taking their money for political campaign and the like does actually make a person a politician... because reality." Please shut the fuck up.
    1
  6627.  @cotacachi12  OMFG why are you still talking? Do me a favor and go and ask 10 people this question? What do you call someone who runs for political office? (note: this is what yang is doing at this very moment) I suspect that all 10 are going to answer: a politician because most can grasp simple concepts. Then again who knows. Maybe you have successfully made the people around you dumber and they will be baffled by the question. Even if you didn't agree with this obvious point you still should at least be smart enough to realize that I had "explain(ed) why (I) think anyone who decides to run for office means you are a politician." You don't understand the world in which you live. And if you can't understand the reality in which you live you don't get to have opinions that are taken seriously... and I'm not.
    1
  6628.  @cotacachi12  I really hope you are just trolling me.
    1
  6629.  @cotacachi12  Good luck in life. You will need it.
    1
  6630.  @cotacachi12 I https://www.dictionary.com/browse/politician https://www.dictionary.com/browse/musician?s=t
    1
  6631.  @cotacachi12  Regarding, "Trump isn't a politician either" LMFAO
    1
  6632.  @cotacachi12  LMFAO
    1
  6633. I heard you can actually have donations returned. You should try for that money you wasted on Warren.
    1
  6634. It has nothing to do with gender and he wouldn't be talking about it if Hillary were actually smart enough to just go away. You want to blame someone for this video place the blame where it belongs... with Hillary Clinton.
    1
  6635.  @s.solomon6534  Regarding, "I think it's SMART to respect everyone's ideology" This would include nazis so no. But I agree that neither Biden nor Trump are worthy of support.
    1
  6636.  @lynnrussell467  That is sarcasm right?
    1
  6637.  @s.solomon6534  Regarding, "Supporting free speech when you don't agree is when it really matters, tho!" I support and love free speech but that wasn't what I was talking about. I was talking about respect and that is earned while free speech is not. Regarding, "the country blaming whoever is in office for the misery that will be unavoidable in the next four years, couldn't agree more!" Yeah, the next 4 years are going to suck. A depression seems unavoidable, especially with our government.
    1
  6638.  Flightof2Owls  Regarding, "They said that about 2020 though." You are going to have to be more specific as to what I said that you are talking about. Regarding, "I wouldn’t be worrying about 2024 and beyond" I am confident the world is still going to be here in 2024 even if it is going to suck. Regarding, "climate change" Yeah. If it makes you feel any better I'm not sure we deserve to persist as a species.
    1
  6639.  Flightof2Owls  Regarding, "I was referring to the theory that Trump winning in 2016 would lead to a huge progressive sweep in 2020." Yeah, I've never claimed this. But Trump winning in 2016 did give progressives a chance at the WH in 2020. If hillary won in 2016 there would have been 0 percent chance of such a thing happening. Regarding, "I’m just saying how long can we keep fantasizing that Trump is going to inadvertently bring on a revolution?" I'm not a trump supporter and I have zero fantasies that include trump. I'd bang his daughter thought, much like trump would. Regarding, "we are right on the precipice of a progressive cascade" I don't share your optimism. I wish I did.
    1
  6640. Home Plate regarding, "a lot of states have closed primaries" Yup. It is dumb, wrong, and undemocratic but the establishment's message is clear. They don't want you to vote which is a pretty good reason to make sure you do. Regarding, "so one has to chose which of the progressives is worth registering for which party that year" Your registration does not matter at all during a general election. In the general you can vote for whoever you want regardless of what party you are registered to. Your registration is only important in determining what primary you can vote for (assuming you are in a closed primary state). If there is a green party primary for example then you go ahead and make sure you are registered with them but the fact of the matter is that essentially only the major parties have meaningful primaries. And when they are the only meaningful primary then you need to do what you need to do to vote as often as you can which includes primaries.
    1
  6641. Regarding, "you can only vote for one person in each contest in the general" Yeah, I'm pretty sure no one is saying or implying otherwise. At least until we get ranked choice voting like we should have.
    1
  6642. They have a strategy... it's run cover for the establishment. Too bad kyle buys the BS. They know exactly what they are doing.
    1
  6643. His takes have been hacky and terrible of late. For example he argued that the 20 million tyt got from katzenburg doesn't make them corrupt. Fun fact while doing this he never mentions his conflict of interest as he's still affiliated with TYT. But probably the biggest problem for him as of late is his failure to mention how ana tried to blackmail jimmy and acting like jimmy had no reason to be talking about what he was. Long story short his credibility is going the down rightfully so for the same reasons no one trusts TYT anymore.
    1
  6644.  @samiaamery4634  "Perfection just isn't attainable." No shit. But I at least need integrity and I see none of it in Kyle ATM.
    1
  6645.  @samiaamery4634  Really. When you say that the 20 million that TYT gets doesn't make them corrupt after everything else he has been saying over the years about money and it's influence... yeah. None. And again... while mounting his terrible BS defense of them he never bothers to mention his conflict of interest with them. It's just the same type of typically bullshit I'd expect from a politician and when I see it I recognize it as a no integrity because that's what it is.
    1
  6646.  @samiaamery4634  "none?" How much integrity do you see? And how much BS are you willing to accept?
    1
  6647.  @Yutani_Crayven  "someone who's trying to stay out of personality drama" 1) he's doing it wrong and is clearly inserting himself into this despite your nonsense and 2) smears and blackmail are not "drama." Obviously.
    1
  6648.  @Yutani_Crayven  "CIA" I've know about your comment since you posted it but was only able to start posting comments again recently (we will see how long it lasts). I bet you don't have that problem while you spread your BS.
    1
  6649. No. He shouldn't. That job should really go to someone supporting Sanders right now and not splitting the progressive vote to the benefit of the establishment.
    1
  6650.  @carjaune6793  When people like myself call warren an establishment puppet do you just try to mindless deflect from that fact using these types of silly "arguments?"
    1
  6651.  @carjaune6793  Do you respond to "warren is an establishment puppet" with mindless drivel like, ":) That's just you talking, buddy. Here let me do it too: "Bernie is an establishment puppet." Ok let me do it again: "AOC is an establishment puppet." Again: "Nina Turner is an establishment puppet." Thxs for the productive conversation :)" It would be just as worthless there as it is here.
    1
  6652.  @carjaune6793  Regarding, "You might say that about Warren maybe" Wait... do you mean to tell me the verdict is still out whether or not warren is a snake? That's only a maybe? You need to wake up.
    1
  6653.  @carjaune6793  Regarding, "You might say that about Warren" I say that about warren and I say it about yang. Do you have anything of substance to defend either well? Regarding, "Yang was just this random nobody" He had loose ties to the Obama administration. But yeah... he essentially was a nobody who had zero logical reason to think ANYONE would support him for president. He had no name recognition, held zero public office, and had zero reason to logically think he should be qualified to be commander in chief. But his campaign would serve a purpose... it would siphon a handful of votes from Sanders. It's not like he was taking votes from biden and his ilk. Regarding, "give Yang another listen," I've listened more than I care. For example I know that he wants UBI to be paid for as regressively as possible when it should always have been paid for as progressively as possible. His pandering has evolved to pay for it more progressively in theory... but so what about his pet pandering project. It was as meaningless as trump saying he was going to give everyone health care. He's a conman. And a far better one than Trump is and he became president. Do everyone a favor and wake up to this fact.
    1
  6654.  @carjaune6793  Regarding, "Warren ran for her own reasons" To split the progressive vote and cock block "sexist" Bernie Sanders. Regarding, "she thought she could win the primary" She took third in home state. Regarding, "Remember she was the frontrunner at one point?" I don't remember this. But only because she never was. Regarding, "she wasn't just sent there by the establishment to take votes away from Bernie." Of course she was. Long after Pete dropped out to help his team (and he "won" the Iowa Caucus according to the corrupt DNC) Warren was staying in to help her team as well. And by her team I'm referring to team establishment which she is clearly part of. Regarding, "To believe some kind of conspiracy like that is to dissociate yourself from reality." Wait? The DNC establishment wasn't conspiring to stop sanders at all cost? I'm the one dissociating myself from reality? LOL Projection much? Pete had good reason to stay in... but he dropped out... for a reason. Warren had every reason to drop out... she stayed in... for a reason. It really shouldn't be so hard to connect the dots. Regarding, "But that came late in the day" LOL. So what that it happened "late in the day." It shows what she was all about all along. She was in it to help team establishment, split the progressive vote, and stop sanders from getting the nomination. I'm sure you have rationalizations and excuses for her calling sanders a sexist as well, not that I really care to hear them. Regarding, "Yang ran because no one else was running on UBI" Did yang think this was the only way to talk about UBI? Did he think a guy with zero experience in politics was a good messenger? Did he just not care how his entering the race would affect everyone else? Regarding, "Why the hate?" He is an establishment tool that was one part of many that help orchestrate biden and stop sanders. I've made my feelings perfectly clear. I can only think you are not engaging me in good faith to so willfully ignore the things I'm saying in a way such as this. Regarding, "If that was really his machiavellic scheme, he would have kept on running past New Hampshire." It doesn't work this way according to you otherwise you wouldn't try to make excuses and rationalizations for warren saying BS like, "that came late in the day." You just move the goalposts whereever you want to fit the point you are trying to make no matter how silly what you are saying is. Regarding, "Bernie only ran into trouble 3 weeks later" Bernie lost the Iowa caucus by a razor thin margin according to the corrupt media and corrupt DNC. Regarding, "Bernie only ran into trouble 3 weeks later, in South Carolina? Your theory makes no sense." Bernie should have entered SC having won all the previous contests by clear margins making him the clear frontrunner. Because of the actions of people like warren and yang who were actively working to split the progressive hope while having zero legitimate path to the nomination the media was effectively able to portray the contest as open going into SC. They also didn't hammer biden for his lies about working in civil rights, about being arrested with mandela, about lies about his record, and more. You make no sense. Your excuses and rationalizations are sad. Regarding, "Let that sink in." Just putting UBI on top of a system like ours that doesn't change any else just creates wealth that will all flow to the top of the pyramid just like it does now. Let that sink in. And your conman doesn't really want to change much of anything. He is just getting you to trade in any hope of real hope and change you have for the system for UBI pandering. And even if Yang were president UBI wouldn't have a chance in hell of happening. Regarding, "(Are we good?)" I'm good. You are a sheep.
    1
  6655. He compared jada to movie star who was a badass and sex symbol but you act like she was compared to shrek. Why would you do that? Are you an idiot?
    1
  6656. I thought I should care about things like him being corrupt, his terrible record, his history of lying, and his cognitive decline. But I should have been caring about a publicity stunt instead. Thanks. /s
    1
  6657. That is exactly what this propaganda is meant to do.
    1
  6658.  @AviChetriArtwork  Regarding, "Sounds like you're a Trump supporter" I'm not. You sound like a moron. Let's say the dodo used their platform to give good PR for the orange clown and not biden would you be ok with that? And if not how do you explain your hypocrisy? Because I'm of the principled belief that the dodo should not have nothing to do with any politics or any politician.
    1
  6659.  @AviChetriArtwork  k, dipshit.
    1
  6660.  @AviChetriArtwork  That is exactly the type of worthless response I would expect.
    1
  6661.  @AviChetriArtwork  Then again thanks for not even attempting to answer my simple direct questions. No doubt if you would have tried it wouldn't have gone well.
    1
  6662.  @MichaelAronson  Vote blue no matter who just like sam tells you. Also... be embarrassed you don't know the answer to your own question.
    1
  6663.  @MichaelAronson  Me: controlled opposition for a CORRUPT party. And that is your response? If you were trying to prove you are unserious it worked.
    1
  6664.  @MichaelAronson  "And the person or persons doing the controlling would be . . .?" Please be embarrassed you don't understand what the words "corrupt party" means.
    1
  6665.  @MichaelAronson  " Is "Corrupt Party" the name of a person?" I can only think you are being willfully obtuse at this point. Even you must be able to understand my obvious point and who I'm talking about. Or maybe worse... you really don't. Either way it's clear you are not serious person, much like sam.
    1
  6666.  @willscanlon9843  I'm sure if you had something intelligent to say you would have gone with that instead of what you did do.
    1
  6667.  @MichaelAronson  I've never seen anyone so willing to act like they don't understand simple and obvious points like this? Are you trying to prove you are not serious? It's working.
    1
  6668.  @MichaelAronson  "vague and nonspecific" Imagine acting like "corrupt party" is "vague and nonspecific." Are you worried I'm talking about the republicans? I'm not.
    1
  6669.  @MichaelAronson  "You still haven't made a point." Just because you pretend you don't understand what my point is doesn't mean I haven't made one. Talking to you is like talking to a malfunctioning bot.
    1
  6670.  @MichaelAronson  "Correct." At least you admitted I made a point. That's better than just pretending and lying that I hadn't like you were doing.
    1
  6671.  @willscanlon9843  "I want you to control my opposition" Those are words.
    1
  6672.  @MichaelAronson  "Your point is you haven't made a point?" Are you going to pretend this now? That makes sense... for you. Not for anyone serious.
    1
  6673.  @MichaelAronson  Me: "you don't understand what my point is" You admitting I did make a point, that you were lying when you said I didn't, and admitting you just don't understand what my point is, "Correct." At least all that makes, "Your point is you haven't made a point? Derpity derp derp to you too." funny because you are projecting.
    1
  6674.  @MichaelAronson  You are paid for this right? Please tell me you just don't have your head that far up sams arce like this.
    1
  6675.  @willscanlon9843  "I'm hyper-gay as well" You aren't my type. Sorry.
    1
  6676. As it should. He does great work.
    1
  6677. Gaza is a concentration camp home to over a million children.
    1
  6678. They do know... that is why the work so hard to smear him. Conservatives, at least at the upper levels, are liars, not idiots.
    1
  6679. "Actual normal conservatives" is all but an oxymoron.
    1
  6680. So if I hope hitler dies that means I'm as bad or worse than hitler? Um... that's not how it works.
    1
  6681. This is funny because you are not being civil. Also, go fuck yourself dipshit.
    1
  6682. Isn't yang the only other guy hanging around who actually manages to have less experience than mayor pete?
    1
  6683. @Nightingale Regarding, " “Experience” is talking point." LMFAO. Ok dipshit remember you said this the next time you need someone for an important job, like if you need major surgery. Go without experience then when the fact of the matter is that, if you were being intellectually honest, you would admit that you would prefer that the person taking your order at mcdonalds and preparing your food have experience and that is hardly important compared to literally the most powerful person in the world. Yangtards are some of the dumbest motherfuckers imaginable.
    1
  6684. @Nightingale I guess I should add that I don't value experience just for the sake of experience. I'm sure as fuck not going to support Dick Cheney because of it. But experience in politics comes with a record, another thing your clown doesn't have. It's how you know if someone is legit or the moron you want to claim literally every politician is because you can't think intelligently and with nuance.
    1
  6685. @Nightingale Nice counter. Typically stupid from your average idiot yang supporter.
    1
  6686.  @zakadoke9912  Another typically worthless response from your average yang cultist. It's like you guys aren't even trying to justify your support. Which is fine since you really can't.
    1
  6687. Bloomberg isn't running because he is scared of yang. Bernie Sanders 2020
    1
  6688. I like him but even he knows he can't win.
    1
  6689.  @twrags201  Why exactly? He can't win. I could run for president too but I wouldn't exactly deserve coverage because it's tough to take either of us seriously. We have a progressive champion who can win. Let's focus on that shall we?
    1
  6690.  @twrags201  I honestly have no idea who you are talking about there and I watch lots of Kyle although not every single video.
    1
  6691.  @twrags201  Ok. Was it good coverage or was he trashing him? Cause if he was trashing him that's different and not what you are asking for.
    1
  6692.  @twrags201  Kyle pissing on someone isn't the same as what you want. Coverage like that is our entertainment in sad times, not the serious coverage like what you want. Don't act like they are the same. They clearly are not.
    1
  6693.  @twrags201  Don't get me wrong... I wouldn't be opposed to him covering gravel in depth. Shit I wish he did actually. That said I understand why he doesn't and don't fault him for not doing it. There's already 20 fucking "democrats" ahead of where gravel is. At a certain point you have to pick your battles. Kyle is one fucking guy.
    1
  6694. Only morons think a game is over and lost at halftime. 26 states haven't voted yet.
    1
  6695.  @philipboardman1357  Ok dipshit. You are stupid. I get it. I plan to go out and vote for him anyway.
    1
  6696. That and they will overwhelmingly go to biden. It's not pete was taking Sanders supporters.
    1
  6697.  @hmq9052  You are complicit in genocide. You disgust me.
    1
  6698.  @hmq9052 You are complicit in genocide when you support joe.
    1
  6699.  @hmq9052  You are complicit in genocide when you vote for joe. You disgust me.
    1
  6700.  @cjwaasdorp2478  You are overthinking my attempt at humor.
    1
  6701. strong regarding, "Why take the hard road? Because the two party system..." You don't need to argue that the 2 party system is joke. It is. But the system is rigged to prevent 3rd parties from succeeding the same way the "democratic" party is rigged against progressives. I would be all for building a new party or, because I think the Green party is what the "democratic" party should be, supporting them. BUT WINNING IS IMPORTANT. Taking over the "democratic" party is twofer if we succeed. It would kill the destructive influence of the corporate dems and give us a major party. It is clearly the logical way to proceed to me. That said please continue to build good 3rd party options. I will be voting for them when the major parties produce shit candidates. I happily voted for Jill Stein in 2016. BUT THAT IS PLAN B! Plan A is getting a progressive at the head of the "democratic" party because that is the most logical plan to get what I think we both want. Regarding, "You say Bernie is the most popular pol." Yes. He is. But it didn't happen overnight. He is currently as popular as he is because campaigned with class during the 2016 election. He is currently as popular as he is because he can't rightfully be blamed for Trump winning. Regarding, "we lost four years by him not separating from the Dems" Nothing would have hurt his (and ours, I think) cause by him being blamed for Trump winning. That is, in part, why Hillary wants to blame him. Because she knows it would be devastating for progressives. But it doesn't work because everyone knows it WASN'T Bernie's fault. Regarding, "Now or never for Independent party." You go ahead and try to build another party. I'll try to takeover the "democratic" party. And we can meet in the middle. We don't have to commit to one or the other. If the dem nominee is a corporate shill like Harris or Booker I will be voting for someone else. But like I said I think that is rightfully plan B. Regarding, "It's about more than one election" I don't disagree with this. But realize that your path is just as rigged as mine is. There is not going to be an easy solution for either of us. I just think mine is easier and therefor much more logical.
    1
  6702. Trump is terrible but he is correct when he says CNN sucks.
    1
  6703. Kasich sucks but it has nothing to do with his color or his gender. Stop being sexist and racist.
    1
  6704. It was also crooked when yang went to go work for them at CNN.
    1
  6705. I want it voted on regardless.
    1
  6706.  @pauljansen1137  Is ok that it's my opinion we would all be better off not listening to his BS on the topic? Your OP makes it seems it's not.
    1
  6707.  @tobysmith2081  Regarding, "the majority of senate supports medicare for all??! No?" That's not what I said at all but of course you would strawman. "Guess that means we dont have the numbers." It only took a handful of "progressives" to withhold their vote from pelosi so that we could get a vote on m4a. I don't pretend to claim that I think it would pass. But as a person who wants m4a that's a fight I want to have. And pelosi doesn't bring it for a vote because it's a fight they will avoid at all cost. "Idk how you came to the conclusion that we do" I suspect you come to your conclusions because you are paid for them. But maybe not. Maybe you are just a useful idiot for establishment goals.
    1
  6708.  @tobysmith2081  "Dude just look at how force the vote turned out." It wasn't even attempted by "progressives" in power. It can't be called a failure when it's not even tried. "you can say he's wrong" I can. And all the evidence says he is wrong as well. "just by looking at the numbers as to who supports medicare for all in congress you realize he's right" I know that by not fighting for m4a I can never win. I'm a progressive. I'm used to losing. That doesn't mean you don't fight.
    1
  6709. My understanding is that he is for it but in a kind of half-hearted sort of way. I really wish he did more talking about it.
    1
  6710. Please go have a long talk with trump about that.
    1
  6711.  @tonyclifton2230  Thanks for making my point about how grimm, "won't be the last one," not that it was necessary.
    1
  6712.  @tonyclifton2230  "defaming" Those are lies. I don't do that. I leave that to people like ryan and you.
    1
  6713.  @tonyclifton2230  "see this is the problem." You are impossible to take seriously. "It's pointed out..." It's pointed out that grimm is liar and you just ignore it. "You would rather listen to jimmy dore" Because I don't catch him lying on behalf of the powerful. "Would rather cut people down than do anything useful." You sound like grimm during force the vote. "Utter nonsense." This is funny all things considered. Thanks for the laugh.
    1
  6714.  @tonyclifton2230  "I asked you of his lies." No. You didn't. You are so intellectually dishonest you are even lying about this. "no actual examples" I've mentioned his lies about mccarthey possibly being speaker if dems tried to force the vote and you haven't even attempted to address it anywhere. "I also asked you about that and what to do when the vote was lost." You did. "You dodged that like the matrix also" The answer seemed so obvious I didn't even bother. Even AOC knows the answer even if she doesn't act like it. These are AOC's words on the topic, not to be mistaken with her actions, "Sometimes these votes create real political pressure that forces developments. Sometimes we vote for the historical record - to let future generations know we did everything we could."
    1
  6715.  @tonyclifton2230  "I asked you of his lies." I hope you are paid well to lie, just like grimm is paid well for his.
    1
  6716.  @tonyclifton2230  "I asked you of his lies." No you didn't. You are even lying about this. But I have mentioned grimm lies that mccarthey might become speaker if dems forced the vote. You haven't even attempted to address it.
    1
  6717.  @tonyclifton2230  "I also asked you about that and what to do when the vote was lost." The answer was so obvious I didn't bother. Even AOC knows this. This is from her twitter telling you the plan, "Sometimes these votes create real political pressure that forces developments." And why do we do it? "Sometimes we vote for the historical record - to let future generations know we did everything we could."
    1
  6718.  @tonyclifton2230  "this is my whole point you are calling him a liar." Interesting way for you to admit that you never actually ask for his lies... that when you said, "I asked you of his lies," that was actually just you lying.
    1
  6719.  @tonyclifton2230  "I asked you of his lies." Was a lie. I backed it up with evidence. And you have NOTHING.
    1
  6720.  @tonyclifton2230  "you do realise..." I realize that you are a liar just like the person you are trying to defend.
    1
  6721.  @tonyclifton2230  "concentrate on the phonys" LMFAO I am. And you are one of them.
    1
  6722.  @tonyclifton2230  "can you answer the question" I can. But I have no interest in dealing with a person who demonstrates they have no intellectual honesty.
    1
  6723.  @tonyclifton2230  "can you answer the question" Can you answer mine? When you said, "I asked you of his lies" you didn't actually ask for his lies had you? That was a lie was it not?
    1
  6724.  @tonyclifton2230  Bonus question, when you said, "I asked you of his lies," that was after I already mentioned his lie that mccarthey might become speaker if they forced the vote right? So why were you pretending that I hadn't already given you one? That you didn't even attempt to address? But you think I should have given you more? So that you could do what... ignore them too?
    1
  6725.  @tonyclifton2230  "Your a jimmy fan alright." Yeah. I don't like frauds and liars. Sadly they are all around.
    1
  6726.  @tonyclifton2230  "yeah I am a phony." While you are, and proving my point by not answering my simple and direct questions, this isn't an answer to anything I actually asked. "I'm a phony." You are a liar. And this short thread proves it. If you can't get your facts straight your opinions (that you are likely paid to have much like grimm) are rightfully ignored.
    1
  6727.  @tonyclifton2230  "I asked you of his lies." Not once have you even used a question mark much less asked me a question. You are a liar just like grimm who lied that mccarthey might become speaker if we tried to force the vote.
    1
  6728.  @redcapitalist  I could only take you less seriously if you gave your own moronic comments a thumbs up. Oh wait... you do that already. I guess I can't take you any less seriously than I do. Stop wasting perfectly good oxygen.
    1
  6729. Now this is real news.
    1
  6730. It's not meant to be won.
    1
  6731.  @luigimario4458  Bernie legitimately made about 2 million from his best selling book.
    1
  6732. Regarding, "What is your take on how $15 min. wage hurts small businesses and their workers?" It doesn't. What a mountain of bullshit you have written from start to finish.
    1
  6733. Not when those secret agencies are working on behalf of the government.
    1
  6734. I've watched it twice. Kyle can GF.
    1
  6735.  @Lavos2007  LMFAO You must be projecting.
    1
  6736.  @s7robin105  I wouldn't worry about it. I see no way she wins. She's just there to hurt Bernie and try to take some votes from him.
    1
  6737. YOU BLEW IT! Just kidding. Mostly. Bernie Sanders 2020!
    1
  6738. Holy shit a d martin comment that isn't trashing Bernie Sanders. I can barely believe my eyes.
    1
  6739. That's funny coming from a complete and total dipshit.
    1
  6740. You think this is tough to watch you should do a zoom call with toobin.
    1
  6741. @Brian Z "conservative propaganda" Weird way to frame the issue in a world with CNN and MSNBC propaganda. As if "conservatives" are the only ones being propagandized.
    1
  6742. V Ling regarding, "Founded as one? No." The country was founded by the richest of the rich in the country to protect their interests. In the early history of the US most states allowed only white male adult PROPERTY OWNERS to vote. In case you can't tell I'm politely (until now) calling your comment fucking moronic.
    1
  6743. That's like comparing and contrasting biden and trump... ultimately it doesn't matter. Both are terrible.
    1
  6744. It was set up to give slave states more representation than they deserved.
    1
  6745.  @haraldisdead  Regarding, "no, it wasn't." Yes. It was. Regarding, "states with large populations with those of small ones" Small ones? Like states that included 3/5ths people helping make them "small" or at least significantly smaller than their actually population because of 3/5ths people? You are actually proving my point but are too stupid to realize it.
    1
  6746.  @haraldisdead  Regarding, "I have a degree in history" What school so I can make sure to avoid it?
    1
  6747.  @haraldisdead  Regarding, "it wasn't instituted because of slavery." I'm not saying it was "instituted" because of slavery but slavery had HUGE effect. So much so that without it the EC may very well not have been the compromise. Remember the bar was, "The electoral college had nothing to do with slavery" not "the ec was instituted because of slavery." Regarding, "It was about population." And slavery had huge direct effect on POPULATION. Regarding, "you can be a condescending, insufferable asshole all you want" Correct. I'm right because I have the facts on my side. You can offer up the logical fallacy of authority but that doesn't make you correct. Regarding, "I'm not sure why you're even being so fucking aggressive about this." I fucking hate the EC. It is a POS that takes a system that is as best as it can possibly be and makes it worse so that some votes are more valuable that others. It sucks. And the BS that are spewing is only used to defend the archaic EC that should never have been started much less continued.
    1
  6748.  @haraldisdead  Regarding, "I'm not saying it didn't benefit slave States" Your OP, "The electoral college had nothing to do with slavery." Regarding, "I have a degree in history" But you don't understand why people lying about history is a bad thing? Well like I said your lies are used to try and keep the POS EC around. Even if that weren't the case the fact that you are spreading lies about history should be more than enough for you to understand why what you are doing bothers me. A person with a degree in history should understand better than most why people lying about history is a bad thing.
    1
  6749.  @haraldisdead  FYI I've never known anyone to try and bring up your talking point unless they were fans of the EC who were trying to justify it and rationalize it. That also likely has something to do with my hostility. And this is the time of year that I'm always willing to take a piss on the EC and point out the many, many, many ways it is terrible if you want. I don't only want to trash it when it causes the person with less votes to "win." So if you want to debate the EC and it's merits because you are a fan of it I welcome a debate on the topic. (full disclosure: I can be a condescending dick but you already know this). I mean maybe you were just taught bullshit (FYI I was taught in school that slavery did have an effect because, like you mentioned, it was about population) and thought you were setting the record straight and have no love of the EC. If that's the case just ignore this offer. But if your OP came from a place of love for the EC I welcome you to try and justify that love. The EC is garbage.
    1
  6750.  @haraldisdead  "disagrees with you" You were lying about history. You weren't "disagreeing with me." Regarding, "it still wasn't about slavery." Do you not realize you are just moving the bar around or do you not care that you are just moving the bar around. This was not your OP. Your OP was, "The electoral college had nothing to do with slavery" And your OP is factually incorrect because slavery had direct effects on population. And you know the EC was largely about states population. Do you think that slave states failed to understand how the EC was affected them? Even though I can clearly understand and tell you how it was very important and directly linked? But maybe they didn't realize that back in the day even thought they OBVIOSLY did and it OBVIOUSLY had to do with slavery. Regarding, " it had an effect on everything." Most importantly it had an effect on POPULATION right? But that didn't stop you from an OP that was nonsense right? You can either think, "(the ec) had an effect on everything (or more specifically the EC had an effect on population)." or you can think "The electoral college had nothing to do with slavery." You only get one lane to pick but you are trying to drive in both.
    1
  6751.  @haraldisdead  Regarding, "I despise the electoral college" We agree on this. Which makes your decision to try and reinvent history to make it seem like slavery wasn't a big factor in the founders decisions really baffling.
    1
  6752.  @haraldisdead  Regarding, "you could say that the invention of the steam Locomotive was "about slavery."" That would be far more accurate than saying, "The locomotive had nothing to do with slavery." But it still seems more than a little misleading and wrong. If you want to be completely accurate and keep it simple I'd suggest something like, "Slavery had an effect on the locomotive." This to me would be most accurate and check all the right boxes if you care about facts and being factual correct. And I do care about that. You should to.
    1
  6753. She lost to Trump therefor your whole surmise is just way off the mark.
    1
  6754. Yeah... that shit was infuriating.
    1
  6755.  @tee5634  Regarding, "I'm just trying to draw a comparison." You are doing it wrong. I disagree with Tulsi on this but that doesn't change the fact that your OP is absurd.
    1
  6756.  @tee5634  Regarding, "She paints a false equivalence between Trump and Democrats. While both parties and both Pelosi and Trump are corrupt" She says the type of things you say in your second sentence here. That makes you as guilty of "painting a false equiveillance between Trump and dems" as she is.
    1
  6757. Your comment should come with a triggered warning.
    1
  6758. He's a liar conman politician. Why would anyone love a politician?
    1
  6759. Giant Planet Killing Meteor 2020!
    1
  6760.  @sunjaym6277  "Mfa isn't a big deal in my opinion." In my opinion this opinion of yours is asinine. "VAT is regressive" I'm not even talking about that. Watch the youtube video titled, "Andrew Yang: Paying for a Universal Basic Income" When asked how are you going to pay for UBI the first thing he thinks of is on the backs of poor people. Hundreds of billions of dollars we currently spend every year on the most needy is gutted when any sort of actual progressive would of course pay for it first, foremost, and only by the rich.
    1
  6761.  @sunjaym6277  "you realize that a VAT is like a wealth tax that actually generates revenue and doesn't drive rich ppl overseas." You realize I'm going out of my way to not talk about the vat right? That it's not what I'm criticizing him for? I'm just kidding. You clearly do not. "Not to mention how yang doesn't plan on cutting welfare or social security." Hundreds of billions of dollars that we spend every year on welfare is going to be gutted to pay for UBI. Did you even bother to watch the interview I referenced before continuing to spread disinformation like this? He doesn't just make cuts. He guts. HUNDREDS OF BILLIONS OF DOLLARS PER YEAR. "yang supports a public option which is enough for me" So why was he lying about supporting m4a while running for potus? Is lying enough for you? It clearly is. "I just want poor ppl to have healthcare access." Everyone already has "access." That doesn't mean they can afford it.
    1
  6762.  @sunjaym6277  I mean look at yanggangs op. "When you can’t argue their policies you argue their credibility." And you all pat yourself on the back with how great you are when it comes to policy. So I bring up policy. What do you do? Lie. "Not to mention how yang doesn't plan on cutting welfare or social security." Except he does. Even according to you. "so yes welfare finding will be cut." This really is yanggangs idea of talking policy. They lie and lie and lie.
    1
  6763.  @sunjaym6277  Regarding, "My bad for screwing up my wording." You should apologize for lying. "Not to mention how yang doesn't plan on cutting welfare or social security." Is a lie. But that doesn't stop yanggang from giving it more thumbs up than any other reply here. "I meant to say that no one will be forced off their welfare benefits." Is this the new lie you want to go with? The intellectual dishonesty of yang supporters knows no bounds. If you are getting 200 bucks a month and can only get UBI by giving it up that isn't a choice. You are forcing people to give up their welfare benefits to get your UBI no matter how much you want to lie.
    1
  6764.  @sunjaym6277  Your problem isn't your "wording." Your problem is your lack of honesty... just like your conman.
    1
  6765. Never by anyone who is serious and didn't have an agenda.
    1
  6766. Galaxy regarding, "Because you owe the American people a better tomorrow." Too bad that isn't what the democrats stand for.
    1
  6767. Dude, the civil war is over. Today the fight is against the oligarchy which the democratic elites are part of and they don't give a fuck about you. You are on the wrong side. You are the equivalent of fighting for the confederacy in today's battle.
    1
  6768. Galaxy regarding, "The civil war is over?" Yup. The civil war is over. Stop being silly. Regarding, "are we not talking about confederate statues and monuments?" I understand why people want certain statues taken down but I honestly don't give a flying fuck about them. Regarding, "Are African Americans being told their not patriotic because they don’t stand for the national anthem." I honestly don't care what they are "being told." Douchebags have a 1st amendment right just like football players do. I'm going to respect their right to say stupid things and then I'm going to tell them they are douchebags. Regarding, "are police officers not shooting unarmed black man in the street?" What is the "democratic" party doing about this other than nothing? I specifically mentioned a broken criminal justice system already. I already rightfully blamed the "democratic" party for much of it. And you said nothing about it. You ignore it. Just like the "democratic" party ignores minorities. Again and honestly... you are part of the problem and not part of the solution. Regarding, "ARE WHITE NATIONALIST NOT MARCHING IN CHARLOTTESVILLE!" You want football player to have free speech and their ability to protest respected. Do you realize you are a hypocrite? And they are not marching with the confederate army for fucks sake. They are protesting because the fucking war is over. Sure there are civil right issues that can be addressed but you are being fucking absurd. All the crap you talk about shows a need for criminal justice reform. What is the "democratic" party doing about it? That's right... FUCKING NOTHING. They are too busy giving Donna Brazile a job.
    1
  6769. Regarding, "the war will be over" Sure. And the war on drugs will be over when nobody uses drugs. And the war on terror will be over when there are 0 terrorists in the world. You are hopeless. I'm wasting my time talking to you. Peace.
    1
  6770. Regarding, "Nobody gives the shit about Donna brazile, Joy, or anybody else that you criticize." If you say so. And isn't exactly about those people. It is about more than that. I'd elaborate but points are lost on you so I'm going to save my breathe. Regarding, "There’s much more serious problems in the world" You mean like the land of the free locking up its people and disproportionate minorities like I've already mentioned more than once that you have failed to address in any sort of way? I agree with that point thou. The problem is that the "democratic" party aren't working to solve any of these problems. The problem is they are MAKING THINGS WORSE. And you really should pull your head out of your ass and realize you are fighting for the wrong side and defending the people who are largely to blame for those serious problems. Seriously I want to quit talking to you. This is pointless. It is just that I have a hard time letting stupid things go unanswered and with you there is so. much. stupid.
    1
  6771. Regarding, "what side should I be fighting on" Progressives. And the "democratic" party is not progressive in any sort of meaningful way. Regarding, "sorry, if I sound rude" I don't care if you are rude. I'm rude. I care about when people say stupid things. Regarding, "don't stop talking to me." No promises. I really want to quit this.
    1
  6772. Regarding, "but sometimes there are necessary evils in life." This is how good people justify and rationalize supporting evil. And as soon as they are supporting evil then they aren't really good anymore.
    1
  6773. This isn't about me nor is it about everyone else in the world. This is about the corrupt democratic party. I don't require perfection but I do need a certain amount of decent and that party doesn't come even close to measuring up.
    1
  6774. Regarding, "They don't think logically." That is funny coming from a guy in a cult.
    1
  6775.  @maximilian3394  "progressives holding bidens feet to the fire" Just like they held pelosi's feet to the fire... they rolled over and showed there are no real progressives in our government.
    1
  6776.  @ArchlordZer0  "I mean, look at how much of the Democratic platform has changed because of Bernie. Climate Change, Student Loans, Medicare for All, Defunding the police, etc." I don't care about a party's pandering. Get back to me when they really change something fundamentally that needs fixing.
    1
  6777.  @maximilian3394  Regarding, "except the defunding the police" Why are you against this? The US imprison more of it's population than any country on earth by percentage of population and by total and it's not even close. I'm not in favor of abolishing the police but I am in favor of slashing their budget for the same reasons I'm in favor of slashing the military's budget. Especially seeing as how we agree on everything else I wonder why we disagree on this.
    1
  6778.  @maximilian3394  Regarding, "stop the spending on military industrial complex" Keep in mind that we also have a for profit prison system in this country that is also being fed.
    1
  6779.  @ArchlordZer0  Regarding, "Clearly you did not read what I said." Wait did you not say, "Politicians can always be pressured to listen."" Oh right, you did. Regarding, "Your response literally has nothing to do with what I just explained." I was trying to tell you why what you were saying was idiotic using what is known as a reductio ad absurdum argument. I was wrong to think it wouldn't go over your head.
    1
  6780.  @maximilian3394  Regarding, " is it possible to be registered under green party?" Yes. But more importantly support them when you get a chance and when they have a good candidate. Howard Hawkins didn't really impress me very much in all honesty but he was who I voted for in the general. Regarding, "I don't believe we have a people party "yet" if I'm mistaken absolutely please tell me" I think they are more a work in progress at the moment. I want them and the green parties to succeed but the system is rigged against 3rd party candidates. I've been an advocate of hostile takeover of the party. I thought we had something with aoc and the squad but not only their failure on the force the vote but their terrible arguments against it really have me feeling betrayed by them. Regarding, "I hope you and your family are staying safe and healthy as well during these times as well." Better than most in all honesty. We are fortunate. And thank you. Regarding, "Colorado" I lived there not too long ago. I loved it. Regarding, "Again thanks for everything in this discussion" You too. All too often I use this space to vent and too seldom get into real discussions like this. I've enjoyed it and it restores some much needed faith in humanity for me. So thank you.
    1
  6781.  @maximilian3394  Regarding, "force the vote" Force the vote was about trying to get progressive policy for progressive votes. To be speaker pelosi (or anyone for that matter) needs a majority of votes in the house. Force the vote was about having progressives who ran on m4a withhold their vote for anyone for speaker unless they brought m4a to a vote. Ultimately progressives caved, got nothing of substance for their votes for pelosi, and she gets to be speaker and we never get to have m4a voted on. It was a complete failure from the handful of politicians I thought might use their power for some real good. The idea was original proposed by jimmy dore. He has lots of videos here that detail what it was about and how it all went down. I really recommend at least one of his videos if you don't know about it more detail.
    1
  6782.  @maximilian3394  Regarding, "what exactly was our failure?" I don't think it's our failure. I think it's theirs. I think that among the tactics the establishment uses to keep control is with controlled opposition. It's like professional wrestlers. They act like they are fighting each other but at the end of the day the work for the same company for the same goals and those goals are not yours. Even "progressives" in the democratic party look more and more like failures. Force the vote outed them far quicker than they would have liked. I think they counted on not having any real power to use. But their votes for the speaker mattered. They had real power in that moment that was given to them because dems underachieved so much their votes mattered and they used that power like any corporate dem sellout would. It was depressing but ultimately I prefer to know that they are failures and at the very best as kyle describes them... they are weak. At worst they are corrupt, coopted and just another actor pretending to be on our side before siding with pelosi. If trump were so bad you would think pelosi would get some blame for his rise to power. But everyone just falls in line and votes for her. Even if you love pelosi you should understand that she is LOATHED in the country. That should matter to them but they don't care. She brings in lots of money selling the soul of the party. Regarding, "honestly for me i have nothing but love for AOC" I was one of her biggest supporters. I was on her mailing list. In the week or so before she voted for pelosi I used every email I got from her team to beg her to force the vote. I was one of her biggest advocates before force the vote. After it I'm done with her. I welcome her to try and prove me wrong going forward as of now her actions don't match her words and I'm not the type of person give politicians the benefit of the doubt. Regarding, "I just don't understand what it would take to get people to that reality" I really don't know. I wish I had better answers to your questions. I know you said you only wanted to look to kyle as a source but another must source in my opinion is that of chris hedges. It's sobering listening to him but he does also offer ways to try and fight the system as well. Regarding, "assange" Yeah. Free assange! Regarding, "THESE PEOPLE ARE NOT OUR FRIENDS these people are our ENEMIES" I can't agree more. Regarding, "I just don't understand what AOC or Bernie or people like them are thinking that just can't get them to accept that these people ARE NOT OUR FRIENDS,so frustrating" Few people have been bigger advocates of both AOC and Bernie in the past than me but the older I get the more I think... Nah. I'm still confident bernie's heart is in the right place. He really is a rare gem in a sea of swamp people. But AOC, and maybe I am just feeling betrayed by her actions with force the vote but I really think she is just another swamp creature. Even her tweet just a day or two after force the vote seemed like just a straight up troll of people like me.
    1
  6783. Regarding, "because she courted feminist extremist" Yeah. It was that. Not the fact that she was seen to have won her primary illegitimately. (this is sarcasm)
    1
  6784. Trump beats Biden in a general where Biden finished with the most pledged delegates in the primary. If Trump faces Biden after getting crowned by the party after getting less votes.... Trump will fucking annihilate Biden. It would be a landslide AND a down ballot disaster. But on the bright-side that might be the catalyst to completely destroy the Superdelegate Party.
    1
  6785. By the way the US is the most propagandized country in the world that is told lies about hunters laptop and WMD in iraq to name a few.
    1
  6786. Regarding, "A 3rd or even 4th party not taking corporate donations would sweep the other 2 away." I wish but sadly you are wrong. The green party does not take corporate donations and Jill Stein only got 1 percent of the vote (I'm told, but don't really believe) against 2 of the most despised humans in the country.
    1
  6787. Regarding, "Perhaps the next election will be between two even more despised candidates." I'm not sure how that is possible. I'm going to assume Trump doesn't get impeached so nothing changes there, and there really are no democrats that are as despised as Hillary was. And regardless I'm not hoping for despised, I'm hoping for change. Real change. Not that bullshit Obama promised. We need Sanders to run and win as a democrat. If he wins as a democrat he can reform the party from the inside. He could ban them from accepting their legalized bribes and enact other party reforms. Then we would have a major party that would be incentivized to listen to the people and be incentivized to listen to their big money donors like we have now. And if the democrats pick a corporate stooge like Harris or Booker then I will likely be voting for the Green candidate again.... but hopefully I get to vote for Sanders as a democrat (or Gabbard or Turner or any true progressive).
    1
  6788. Not some country club either... pound me in the arce prison.
    1
  6789. You can't be 100 percent better when the chance is 0 percent. Literally everything you said is dumb for one reasons or another.
    1
  6790. "We don't need anymore Republicans pretending to be a democrat." You voted for Biden right? That's why this is funny.
    1
  6791.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  "all you;re doing is showing everyone you're an emotional bad faith actor as you lash out like this." LMFAO Look at your comment. Your projection is funny.
    1
  6792.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  "showing everyone you're an emotional bad faith actor" You don't even attempt to address my point that biden is terrible.
    1
  6793. Probably not. History is written by the powerful and the powerful are fans of his.
    1
  6794. So you don't want me to p on you?
    1
  6795. I know it was about foreign policy but I'm still surprised he didn't find a way to mention where he puts his junk at night.
    1
  6796.  @JakXLT  Because getting help would be better then continuing to live you life being an idiot peddling conspiracy theories.
    1
  6797. Yup. A brilliant fraud.
    1
  6798. Regarding, "Only Trumpians would consider this story political" How aren't you a trump supporter with your level of stupid? Regarding, "You have a wonderful new family sir" Which is exactly what this propaganda is suppose to make you think because it obviously is political propaganda and you would likely have little trouble realize it if the dodo were using their platform to give the orange clown good PR like this.
    1
  6799.  @charlesbr7684  Regarding, "I believe if orange man had the soul in him to adopt a shelter puppy Dodo would have covered it too lol" I guess that joe was the first politician in history to adopt a dog. Otherwise we might have heard about other politicians in the past who have also certainly done this. Oh wait... Regarding, "Keep drinking that kool aid though little man." This is pretty funny coming from someone who doesn't seem to care about the propaganda in front of them. And I'm not a trump supporter, not that you care.
    1
  6800.  @charlesbr7684  Regarding, "I mean really, it seems like you got it together and are doing just fine... so keep up the good work 👏👏. 🤭🤭🤭" I'm not going to lie I find myself envious of people such as yourself. Ignorance truly is bliss. You must be very happy.
    1
  6801. No. It doesn't. Some people deserve some names. That is hardly the problem with fox. The problem with fox is that they are liars and intellectually dishonest and there is none of that here.
    1
  6802. The jab doesn't stop you from getting covid so your point is a moot point.
    1
  6803.  Ayo's Mood Entertainment  Was that like a computer virus, bot?
    1
  6804. Musk is one of the richest conmen on the planet and you want him to stop? Good luck with that.
    1
  6805.  @SamJohn52  I'm not a trump supporter and don't care about your whataboutism to deflect from facts you don't like to admit.
    1
  6806.  @SamJohn52  Is this the new BS you are going to start repeating in lieu of any sort of intelligent comment?
    1
  6807.  @SamJohn52  Regarding, "And your comment about Biden's "cognitive decline" was intelligent?" Go watch his recent debate performances and compare them to his debate performances while he was VP. Any sort of intellectually honest person can see the cognitive decline for them self. Joe has trouble finishing any thought these days. Regarding, "talk about repeating bullshit" Don't be afraid to check on your own. Not that you can without being the hack you are.
    1
  6808.  @SamJohn52  "And Corn Pop was a bad dude. And he ran a bunch of bad boys. And back in those days -- to show how things have changed -- one of the things you had to use, if you used Pomade in your hair, you had to wear a baby cap. And so he was up on the board and wouldn't listen to me. I said, 'Hey, Esther, you! Off the board, or I'll come up and drag you off.' Well, he came off, and he said, 'I'll meet you outside.'" Joe Biden
    1
  6809.  @SamJohn52  "By the way, you know, I sit on the stand, and it get[s] hot. I got a lot, I got hairy legs that turn blonde in the sun, and the kids used to come up and reach in the pool and rub my leg down so it was straight and then watch the hair come back up again. They’d look at it." Joe Biden
    1
  6810. As if only one party is guilty of that. It's the elite versus the peasants and the elite have both parties.
    1
  6811. Maybe. But I wouldn't rule out that she knows what's going on and she is just doing her best to make sad rationalizations for the status quo while knowing full well deep down just how absurd the things she is saying is.
    1
  6812. Regarding, "I support him and anyone else who is willing to stand up for the less fortunate." Cool. Again, policy if first and foremost what is important. But let's say everyone in politics looked liked Sanders. They are all old. Wouldn't it be nice if there were people of another generation? They are all white. Wouldn't it be nice if there were people who know what it's like to be racial profiled? They are all rich. Wouldn't it be nice if some knew what it was like to be poor and live paycheck to paycheck. They are all men. Wouldn't it be nice if there were some women with a unique perspective on reproductive rights? They are all Jewish... or let's be a little more general... they are all religious. As an atheist I would really really like it if there were at least a couple atheists in government. Not only would they be able to bring a different perspective but it would send a message to the public that there is nothing wrong being atheist to a public that considers them unelectable. I'm not saying you should be voting based on things like that. I'm not. And I'm not saying you are sexist if you don't want to vote for Hillary, that would be asinine, lazy, and pathetic. But ultimately diversity is a really good thing to have when it comes to our representatives. A diverse government is better suited to represent a diverse public.
    1
  6813. Except that superdelegates drive people away from the party and help get Trump elected.
    1
  6814. Technocrats idea of "radical elements," is people who are not mindless sheep like themselves. Technocrat would have voted for Trump if he were the "democratic" nominee.
    1
  6815. To me it is most about a principled position that killing people unnecessarily is wrong even if they are guilty. A society that doesn't kill has moral authority to say killing is wrong and sets an example for its citizens that life is precious. A society that kills people for killing people is innately hypocritical, loses all moral high ground, and devalues life in general. Lock em up and throw away the key if they are guilty. Also, like you pointed out, killing one innocent person makes you a murderer. Lastly as a bonus locking up people and throwing away the key actually costs less (because of lawyers and appeals and such) than executing them.
    1
  6816. William regarding, "People who can't kill will always be at the mercy of those that can, and in fact rely on those who can to protect themselves." It isn't about not being able to kill, it is about choosing not to when there is any other option. Nobody is suggesting self defense isn't legit. You are making a straw man argument that has nothing to do with the points being made.
    1
  6817. William regarding, "It's not a strawman, I'm arguing there's nothing wrong with killing in the right context." Actually it is a strawman because nobody is claiming there isn't a right context for killing. Self defense for example is a completely legitimate use of deadly force. But killing a person who has had their freedom taken away isn't self-defense. Regarding, "you think we gave a shit that they were innocent civilians caught up in a war?" I'm pretty sure there are lots of people that care about innocent civilians getting killed even if you do not. You seem pretty fucked up to me. Good luck with that.
    1
  6818. Regarding, "Except we didn't care back then" I am confident that, even then, there were people that cared about innocent people being killed. And if what you were saying were true (and it isn't).... so fucking what. Slavery was once legal. The past has nothing to do with whether something is moral or not. Regarding, "Simply "they deserved it"" I'm pretty sure that essentially every person that has ever killed anyone else thought the other person deserved it (with some exceptions). And in a society that kills people it thinks "deserve it" sends a message to its citizens that killing people they think "deserve it" is ok. I'd prefer to have a society that sends the message that killing people even if they "deserve it" is not to be done if there is an alternative because of the simple moral fact that killing is wrong. Period. Regardless of if you or anyone else thinks they "deserve it." Regarding, "there is no such thing as innocent in total war." Do you stop and think about the things you say before saying them? Because if you do then you are a fucking moron. Infants for example are innocent. Period. For you to suggest otherwise is really fucked up and demonstrates a real lack of morality. Forgive me but I'm done with this conversation. You clearly have no interest in directly addressing the original post but rather want to go off on idiotic tangents. We aren't talking about war fuckface. Or at least we shouldn't be. This isn't about that.
    1
  6819. Nah. Kyle went in willingly when he talked to hassan.
    1
  6820. So I assume that you don't drive on public roads, or use public education, or will collect social security right?
    1
  6821. Money in politics is the problem. Fight for getting money out of politics, not for term limits.
    1
  6822. For a good time check out the book "The real anthony fauci" by robert kennedy jr.
    1
  6823. SIGN! THE! PETITION! Force the vote! At forcethevotedotorg
    1
  6824. If only you had the internet so you could know that is obviously BS.
    1
  6825. There is a good reason why they do not have term limits and you are a fool if you think that new justices are going to be any better than the old.
    1
  6826. The lack of singing talent wouldn't stop me.
    1
  6827. Wrong... he will get rich.
    1
  6828.  @colmlarkin8665  That's why they are here with their propaganda.
    1
  6829. As am I but if I were living in a state with a closed primary I would be doing what I need to to vote in the "democratic" primary.
    1
  6830. Do you wonder what other conflicts of interest kyle is leaving out? Since he covered for TYT while not mentioning he was affiliated with them at the time?
    1
  6831. Don't worry, you should have always been supporting Bernie instead.
    1
  6832.  @damiarmyworld1314  Regarding, "sorry to disappoint" It's not just me. You fail humanity. Regarding, "YangGang are Independent thinkers who live in the present with an understanding of the future" You are idiots who supported a conman. Regarding, "Bernie supporters & his policies will never, ever help America to move forward" Ending perpetual war, universal health care, raising the minimum wage, breaking up the banks, criminal justice reform and so much more says you are a joke. Regarding, "thanks for voting in Trump for another 4 Years." I don't support Trump. You are just a clown spouting nonsense.
    1
  6833.  @damiarmyworld1314 Regarding, " your just an idiot" This is coming from someone who started their original post with, "Yangs not going anywhere" but thinks they, "live in the present with an understanding of the future." You are an idiot. People like you inspired Dunning and Kruger to form their original hypothesis. Thanks for the laugh.
    1
  6834.  @damiarmyworld1314  Regarding, "Bernie doesn’t even know how much his M4A costs" Canada pays half as much per person for their universal system compared to the US. It costs less for the public than what we already pay you freaking clown. Please just shut up now that your fellow clown is out.
    1
  6835.  @damiarmyworld1314  Regarding, "minimum wage of $15 is the reason why so many people are stressing out" The minimum wage is not 15. How are you making even less sense the more you talk?
    1
  6836.  @damiarmyworld1314  LMFAO. The worst thing about morons like you is that they are too stupid to understand they are dumb.
    1
  6837. Fun fact: typing in all caps is a sign of mental illness.
    1
  6838. Bernie is a just another corrupt warmonger for "democratic" party.
    1
  6839. I fucking hate identity politics so much. But that is really funny. Thanks for the laugh.
    1
  6840. You sound like a nazi telling jews to let us know who they are.
    1
  6841. He hasn't endorsed anyone. At least not for the presidential nominee in the primary.
    1
  6842.  @achakhakan4189  I feel like everyone might be talking about a different "she" since we are being vague AF in our comments.
    1
  6843. TYT should have no credibility.
    1
  6844. Regarding, "Why should one think he will show any degree of wisdom in his first big decision as the Democrat nominee?" To be fair it's not really up to biden. He is a puppet.
    1
  6845. How old are you? Wait... nevermind. The answer is no.
    1
  6846.  @christinagomez5079  Regarding, "Neera Tanden is hopeless!" Agreed. And if Sanders supports her and votes for her I can only think he is hopeless too.
    1
  6847. Fuck Rush Limbaugh and terrible people like him.
    1
  6848. Meh. Tulsi can still call her out for her support of the MIC. But I do think she might be the establishments plan b.
    1
  6849. He got in one little fight...
    1
  6850. FYI I think alaska already pays it people to live there.
    1
  6851. No he really isn't. The only significant difference between him and your average politician of both major parties is that he is an outright dick when the others are just better at hiding it.
    1
  6852. He doesn't support biden or the "democratic" party but don't let that stop you from saying stupid things.
    1
  6853.  @wkinne1  For good reason. The same reasons he trashes biden and company. But you do you and make up whatever lies you want to tell in your OP. Clown.
    1
  6854. I unsubscribed to both channels. Only by accident did I see this story on the main channel. I don't understand what the delay was but I am happy they did put it on the main channel.
    1
  6855. I'm pretty sure it was my bitching TC so I'm going to take the credit.
    1
  6856. The same way other countries do it. And don't be afraid to ask this question when bombs are the topic.
    1
  6857. That's not how anything works.
    1
  6858. I understand why you say that but I disagree. It is good that she is lingering because she helps expose the establishment for how much they suck.
    1
  6859. Mathew have you met the american public? They need constant reminding of what is going on or they are quick to forget. And those are the ones who actually know what is going on. Some haven't even figured things out yet.
    1
  6860.  @KimberlyCrawley  Thank you for answering my question. I think you have a valid point. That said I do also think that pretty much everyone who might make the mistake of saying something like, "boy with autism" are not doing so from a place of malice or to try and hurt autistic people. And while you might want to correct them I think you would be wise to make sure to give them the benefit of the doubt, not take it personally in the least, and not let it harm you. It only hurts you if you let it and that shouldn't in my opinion. What's in a person's heart is far more important than semantics. But this is a semantic lesson I will take seriously and try to not make going forward. I wish you well. Peace.
    1
  6861. I think that if Bernie Sanders were dictator he would do reparations. But he's not. And ultimately he is a politician making political decisions. I support reparations personally. But if I were running for president I think I would sideline that belief for political purposes. It's just not what most americans want. Instead Bernie tries to lift all boats, which is still great for descendants of slavery. Raising the minimum wage, making college available to all, relieving college debt, legalizing weed and so much more all disproportionally effect minorities.
    1
  6862.  @StormCrownSr  I left a lot more then that out but I thought I had already wasted more then enough time on someone who likely isn't interested in or can comprehend intelligent argument. This type of short, vapid comment is more likely put up by a bot or paid troll and that is me giving them the benefit of the doubt. Then again maybe they really are just as dense as they seem and are sitting in a basement somewhere.
    1
  6863.  @LK56835  If only you were dumb enough to forget to breathe... and you are so so close to that.
    1
  6864.  @thepolishlatinofromphilly9709  Do yourself a favor and stop wasting your time on this dipshit. Some people are too far gone. Logic, reason, and intelligent argument aren't for everyone sadly.
    1
  6865. "There were substantive critiques." There really are not if you actually want M4A. But that doesn't stop lots of fake pretending otherwise. All opposition to forcing the vote is garbage.
    1
  6866.  @johnnycanuck2  Regarding, "there absolutely are substantive critiques" No. There aren't. And I know about the BS of which you speak. It's all clearly manufactured nonsense that is only spewed because people want to find ways to go at it. It's all nonsense, don't pretend otherwise.
    1
  6867. Regarding, "whatever you do nothing will be perfect." This feels like a lazy way to rationalize and justify terrible writing. Nobody's asking for perfect. They are asking for logical consistency.
    1
  6868. "France and Germany gives over $5000 per month" Citation required for bullshit.
    1
  6869.  @paulhartson1  Regarding, "do your own citation" My god you are stupid. Sorry for asking for evidence of your claim. But I'm the troll? GFY
    1
  6870.  @paulhartson1  I found an article about germany doing a trial ubi of 1k but nothing about 5 because you are full of shit.
    1
  6871. They don't have to "allow him." But if they do it should be fair. (Sadly it won't be.)
    1
  6872. He didn't leave. He was kicked. He's a fraud.
    1
  6873.  @scottkeller8890  I call out frauds when I see them. If you can't handle it you should probably get a life. I doubt you have a problem with it when I call out the MSM or TYT. I was a fan of kyle's for a long time. I also concede I feel betrayed and pissed at him for the same reasons I feel betrayed and pissed at AOC after supporting her.
    1
  6874.  @scottkeller8890  Do you want to pretend it doesn't matter if he did the right thing of his own accord or if he was forced? I mean it obviously does. And if it's something you would just ignore you are pretty much just a cultist for kyle.
    1
  6875.  @scottkeller8890  "he betrayed" I think you are missing what's important here. "Kyle left TYT and that's all I was commenting on." Are you sure you weren't giving him credit for no longer being affiliated with TYT? I'm confident you were. And why should you? Why would you give someone credit for being FORCED to do the right thing? "that's all that matters to me" Really? You only care about your team? You don't care if that team has any ethics? You don't care if they omit blackmail while having a conflict of interest? That really should matter to you.
    1
  6876.  @scottkeller8890  "I don't understand what being apart of the TYT network even means" LMFAO. It's probably something that kyle should disclose don't you think? But he doesn't even mention it much less tell you how it worked even while covering up and omitting their blackmail. Kyle would tell you that politicians should disclose their conflicts of interest. He would tell you how they affect people and their coverage... unless it's him.
    1
  6877.  @jolee3389  "don't blame capitalism" Or better yet I will blame the root cause. "blame corruption and greed and a government" That is all corrupted because of capitalism and it's influence. Because money can and will buy or government officials so it does. You are only going to solve this if you get to the root cause... capitalism. You can't fix it. Stop pretending you can. You can only replace it will something better. Until then you government will ALWAYS be bought.
    1
  6878.  @jolee3389  "don't blame capitalism" My original reply to you is being shadowbanned because of capitalism... because everything is bought. That is the underlying cause. That is where the corruption comes from... capitalists.
    1
  6879.  @michaelrichardson989  "selfish things" Capitalism is innately selfish. It only cares about creating wealth. It would prefer you are sick so it can make money from you than you be healthy or happy.
    1
  6880.  @babyt556  "tell us how it’s going for you" I already know how it goes... that country will be bombed and sanctioned by the US.
    1
  6881.  @babyt556  "tell us how it’s going for you" I can tell you. Wanna know? Spoiler alert.... that country will be bombed and sanctioned by the US
    1
  6882.  @babyt556  "how it's going" Any country like that is immediately sanctioned and bom bed by the "land of the free."
    1
  6883.  @babyt556  "country without capitalism" Is immediately targeted for destruction by the US.
    1
  6884.  @omiikojackson6445  "You're the naivest person to believe capitalism played a role in this." This is funny because you are naïve if you think it didn't.
    1
  6885.  @jerichojericho9860  "there is always somebody at the top getting rich. Always." Should there be? Or are you just in a cult of capitalism?
    1
  6886.  @jerichojericho9860  "there always will be leaders and they will play us fools." I'm not talking about leaders. I'm talking about an economic system that doesn't care about you... it only cares about profit. "Not sure what you're going for." I'm a socialist.
    1
  6887.  @jerichojericho9860  "surely you..." I'm not here claiming anything is perfect. As a socialist I believe the workers should own the means of production. Surely you must acknowledge that if the workers owned the company they would do more to ensure safe working conditions and less derailments than if the train is owned by a capitalist who only cares about profit right?
    1
  6888.  @jerichojericho9860  "government/leader" I'm talking about an economic system and you keep wanting to conflate it with other things.
    1
  6889.  @jerichojericho9860  "The citizen and the government/leader are never equal in any arrangement." You say this like we shouldn't even try. You say this like a world where everyone gets access to the same health care system where you are a peasant or rich isn't possible. I promise you it is. At least in theory. So maybe let's try. And if our leaders know they will be getting the same health care the peasants do then maybe they will make it pretty good. Ultimately socialism, with it's flaws, is far superior to capitalism and it's not even close.
    1
  6890.  @necropolistc6357  "I live by a train yard" Ug. What a terrible "argument." "Rail Companies Blocked Safety Rules Before Ohio Derailment" because profit
    1
  6891.  @WeAreItt  "Capitalism unchecked leads to greed" Capitalism is innately greedy. It only cares about profit. You can't fix that. You can't "check" that. It's an innately broken, innately greedy system.
    1
  6892.  @kimsmith6469  "Go live in the non capitalist" I've lived in the US my entire life. I can tell you why it is terrible and failing but you clearly don't care.
    1
  6893.  @titanbuck7  Oh look it's a western troll. Or a bot. Either way they are irrelevant and clearly have nothing of value or interest to offer. It would probably have been better if they just didn't say anything at all.
    1
  6894. I find it funny that you start with a terrible premise such as "biden is the best chance to skunk trump" and then give reasons why sanders is the better general election candidate. I mean if you actually think Sanders supporters won't support biden but biden supporters will support sanders you should logically think Sanders is the best chance to beat trump. I can only assume you came to the conclusion you did for the reason you cite because you were dropped on your head as a child.
    1
  6895. Or most likely you were just packing in your standard moronic smears of bernie and his supporters without realizing they contradict themselves.
    1
  6896.  @sandiroberts6296  Regarding, "you totally misread what I said" No I didn't. You started your op with a completely idiotic statement. You then presented evidence that showed it was an idiotic statement assuming you actually believe the things you are trying to say. Regarding, "I said if Bernie wins the primary then Biden supporters will rally." Meanwhile, in reality, we live in a world where more hillary supporters defected and didn't support obama then sanders supports defected from hillary. Regarding, "Bernie folks were sore losers and either stayed home or voted third party." Yeah. Weird that people were pissed about all the shenanigans being done to fuck them over. It isn't that people had legit grievances, its that they were just being sore. And this is still the message the party is giving and you suck it up because you are an idiot baffled why people don't find you and your bullshit compelling. Regarding, "Jill Stein? Really?" Really. As a person who cares about war, money in politics, the environment and other really important issues such as these she was the only candidate who actually represented me on those issues. Hillary Clinton? Really? Who never found a war she didn't like, loves fracking, loves dirty money and legalized bribes she can pretty much go fuck herself. The only thing she had going for her is that she wasn't trump. Which is why she and her campaign intentionally propped up the clown using their piped piper strategy. Because they thought having trump would scare enough people to vote for her instead of just winning them over being by being a decent human being. Regarding, "She’s and Bernie supporters are a big reason we have that baboon in the whitehouse now." Yeah. It's their fault. Not trump supporters, or the dnc for rigging the primary, or the corporate media for giving trump billions in free media, or hillary for sucking. It's Jill Stein and Bernie supporters fault think total fucking dipshits. That's where they hold the blame. Regarding, "the funny thing is, we are on the same side." The funny thing is... we aren't. Lucky for me I get to decide who is on my side and who isn't... not you. Regarding, "I’m not going to fight with you." Nah. You are just going to continue to say completely idiotic shit and blame voters for not buy your particular brand of shit. Regarding, "That’s what’s wrong with this party now." There is a reason I and many have left the party... it's a piece of shit and I happily don't identify as a democrat anymore. Lucky for me I don't live in a closed primary state so that the party would be able to blackmail into joining it so that I can vote in the "democratic" primary. There is so much wrong with the party it is truly remarkable. But me getting to decide who is on my side and telling the people who aren't my side to fuck off isn't the problem. It's people selling their souls to corporations and you telling me I should support them because of some party label. Seriously everything you say is dumb as fuck. Stop watching so much corporate media, pull your head out of your ass and stop buying their bullshit. Thanks for that in advance.
    1
  6897.  @sandiroberts6296  Regarding, "you’re an unhappy guy aren’t you?" We are talking about politics... which means we are talking about war, climate change, the uninsured... if you talk about those things and you don't get a bit angry then you are either an idiot or not human. Regarding, "You are JUST like Trump supporters!" One of the only things I appreciate about trump supporters is their rage. They are right to be pissed. They know they are getting fucked over. They are just too fucking stupid to realize who has it in their ass. But yeah... I'm not like them in pretty much every other way imaginable. It kinda makes me feel like I'm not just like them. Or if I were just like them I'd probably be supporting trump wouldn't I. Regarding, " If you don’t like my opinion, then ignore it!" You mean like you aren't doing? Do you not realize how hypocritical you are being or do you think what you are doing here is different somehow? It's a public forum. If you don't want to be criticized don't say stupid shit. Regarding, "Just like Trumps base, you will attack anyone that doesn’t fit with your agenda." What a nonsensical thing to say. This is what you say when you have nothing of real substance to offer. Regarding, "YOU are the problem, not me!" Does this mean we aren't on the same side anymore according to you? Regarding, "I didn’t attack you!" Yeah... you only tried to blame me for trump being in office. But I'm sure you meant it kindly. Again... you are a hypocrite. And stupid. Regarding, "I will do what’s best for my country." ISIS thinks the same shit while they do what they do. Regarding, "blame everyone else for it!" Again... two seconds you were blaming me. So much hypocrisy it practically oozes from you. Regarding, "Consider our conversation over!" Now it's done? Too bad you don't live by your own words or you might have avoided making an ass of yourself further.
    1
  6898. @J Stone He did have one great achievement during his time IMO. The Iran nuclear deal was pretty fucking great. That said it was quickly and easily destroyed because he also helped give us Trump. But other than one thing... well let's just say my disappointed can't have been greater.
    1
  6899.  @texjohnson9208  Obama's "love." https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/obamas-deportation-policy-numbers/story?id=41715661 Obama's "peace." https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/jan/09/america-dropped-26171-bombs-2016-obama-legacy Obama's "unity." https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/11/10/the-decimation-of-the-democratic-party-visualized/
    1
  6900.  @texjohnson9208  Top notch trolling. Well done.
    1
  6901.  @injunsun  Regarding, " Obviously you haven't read her positions lately." Please dig deeper than her "positions lately." Politicians are rightfully known for being great liars. Don't just take their word and do some digging. Let's take her position lately of not taking pac money. I won't even point out that she has rolled pac money left over from her senate run into her campaign president, which she has, let's talk about the fact that that "position lately" only goes as far as the primary. She isn't going to take that money in the primary because she knows it's wrong and immoral. According to Warren, "corruption, the influence of money, touches every decision that gets made in Washington... Whatever issue brought you here today, I guarantee if there’s a decision to be made in Washington, it’s been touched, pushed, massaged, tilted over, just a little, so the folks with money do better than everyone else." That same warren will happily and hypocritically take pac money if she makes the general which means that her positions on anything can't be trusted because she openly admits she will take legalized bribes. Warren reeks of controlled opposition to real change. Her campaign is an effort to kneecap Sanders. She is terrible. https://publicintegrity.org/federal-politics/elizabeth-warren-president-pac-money-treasurer/
    1
  6902.  @injunsun https://dailycaller.com/2019/02/25/elizabeth-warren-no-pac-money-escape/ https://www.gloucestertimes.com/election/leftover-pac-money-funneled-into-warren-s-campaign/article_f013b2ae-0a8d-53d1-afb1-ce9f80dfcc64.html http://inthesetimes.com/article/21890/elizabeth-warren-war-military-iran-north-korea-venezuela-bernie-sanders
    1
  6903.  @Deranfan  Regarding, "biden has anoucend ground breaking New legislation' LMFAO Like what? The 2k checks that were a lie? Regarding, "morons still think "nothing will fundamentally change"" It was the one thing Biden said that I actually believe. Why don't you believe biden when he said that? Do you understand he is a liar as well? Good for you.
    1
  6904.  @Deranfan  Regarding, "he never lied about the 2k checks." It's impossible to take liars like you seriously.
    1
  6905.  @Kai-tn4yx  Regarding, "Biden has already gotten more accomplished for you in 1 day than Bernie has in 40 years." What exactly has biden accomplished in 1 day?
    1
  6906.  @Deranfan  "actual policy positions" You just lied that he gave people 2K checks while biden gives weapons to israel every 36 hours to bomb children. Supporting that war criminal says something about you. And it isn't good.
    1
  6907.  @Deranfan  Biden never gave 2K checks. You are just a liar who supports a war criminal.
    1
  6908.  @Deranfan  "You got the 2k checks." I think I would know better than you. Liar.
    1
  6909.  @Deranfan  You support a war criminal that is complicit in an ongoing jennyside. You are the moral superior to absolutely no one.
    1
  6910.  @Deranfan  "You got them" I got a 500 dollar check from trump that you are giving credit to biden for because you are not an honest person. Biden gave 1500 dollar checks. And no amount of lies and gaslighting from you will ever change it.
    1
  6911.  @Deranfan  "memory loss" You are evil... just like those you support.
    1
  6912.  @Deranfan  "You got them" Biden gave 1400 dollar checks. You are just liar.
    1
  6913.  @Deranfan  You are complicit in an ongoing jenny side.
    1
  6914.  @Deranfan  You don't just support evil when you support biden and harris... you support the greater evil.
    1
  6915.  @Deranfan  You are just lying about 2K checks. Literally no one got one.
    1
  6916. I used to like rachel maddow back in the GWB days. Better late than never figuring out things are what they are. We have all been fooled before.
    1
  6917. @amaditempe2380 Nick Dranchak is a thief and this is a scam. You should all be ashamed of yourselves.
    1
  6918. In a sane world the people responsible for this would all be put in jail.
    1
  6919. The US doesn't even let non US citizens have freedom of speech much less it's own. Free assange.
    1
  6920. God doesn't exist and neither will israel in the future.
    1
  6921.  @ShinyStarOfDeath  Your comment is funny because it's of the quality of a child.
    1
  6922. I'm already pledging my support for Jimmy Dore. Dore 24!
    1
  6923. Still seems like too inclusive a group.
    1
  6924.  @milesobrien2694  Yes.
    1
  6925.  @milesobrien2694  Regarding, "The extremes don't ever represent the majority." Jimmy's number one issue is m4a. That's not the extreme. It's what the entire world has and what the public wants. Regarding, "Mate and Jimmy preach to the same echo chamber claiming that only their picks are the true opinions. Get it?" They don't. This is. Just. Like. Your opinion. Man. Regarding, "OPINIONS are not facts." Thanks captain obvious. Do they ever say otherwise? Or are you just strawmanning the shit out of anything they would actually say.
    1
  6926.  @milesobrien2694  "It's too easy to be duped and deluded into thinking you live in a binary world." Some things actually are. There is right and wrong side to be on topics such as kids in cages, torture, and offensive war. Sadly it's too easy to dupe people into thinking some things, like topics like those, are not binary. I have litmus tests. It's another way of saying I have standards. You should too.
    1
  6927.  @milesobrien2694  "You can't even define "M4A"." Universal health care. It's like I can. Regarding, "A litmus test is not a standard for morality." So let's say I had a litmus test of "I don't vote for murderers" that wouldn't be a "standard for morality." Um... what? "Groupthink, mouthing slogans and claiming your way is the only correct way is demagoguery." I'm pretty sure actual groupthink would mindlessly embrace yang. Is saying "UBI" over and over a "slogan?" Or what do you even mean by "slogan?" I'll ask before assuming you can't define it. "It's America's largest export." Pretty sure it's the bombs. Something we are against. Sorry not sorry if that triggers you.
    1
  6928. I guess so since you are crying like a baby.
    1
  6929. Not this election apparently.
    1
  6930. Regarding, "I thought he was just hanging on to steal delegates." That's Warren.
    1
  6931. lukus regarding, "they have no actual rules to speak of." I understand why you say this but they actually do. Some they can break and some they cannot. If Sanders gets enough pledged delegates in the primary there is nothing the party can do to stop him at that point. Of course they will try and do everything they can to prevent it from getting to that point but I don't think they can succeed. He is rightfully the most popular politician in the country with name recognition. Those were important things he lacked when he started his campaign last time. Even with their dirty tricks I just don't see how they will be able to stop him. Time will tell. And if the party succeeds in getting a corporate stooge like Harris I will find someone else to vote for like the Green candidate in the general.
    1
  6932. Regarding, "If what he needs is pledged delegates, and those are chosen by the DNC" According to wiki, "Pledged delegates are elected or chosen at the state or local level, with the understanding that they will support a particular candidate at the convention. Pledged delegates are, however, not actually bound to vote for that candidate, thus the candidates are allowed to periodically review the list of delegates and eliminate any of those they feel would not be supportive." The party has a certain amount of self-interest. They are only going to cheat as much as they think it helps them. Let's say Sanders gets the most pledged delegates and they didn't vote for him. Not only would that be an easy way to insure they lost the general election, but that would be an easy way to implode the party on a national level. The rigging the party and insiders conducted during 2016 was considered to be a net gain at the time. They didn't think they were going to get caught (thank you wikileaks), and they thought their inferior candidate (compared to Sanders in the general) was still going to win. Even BS superdelegates would likely have (but maybe not I concede) switched sides to Sanders had he gotten the most pledged delegates. The biggest problem about them is that they are allowed to influence the campaign from the very start by declaring the allegiance to frame the election for the candidate they prefer.
    1
  6933. VoteGreen regarding, "The DNC is DEAD." Maybe they are dead to you but no they are not dead to the world as much as they probably should be. And since they are not going anywhere anytime soon I'm going to continue to do what little I can to make them the party they should be and that includes voting in their primaries. Continue to grow and improve the Green party. Get Green candidates on ballots. I will certainly be voting for many of them. But I can do that and try to reform the "democratic" party at the same time so I will.
    1
  6934. So you don't believe him because you disagree with a tactic? That is pretty fucking stupid. Winning 3rd party is not easy. It's not like getting the most electoral votes would have been good enough you know.
    1
  6935.  @climjames  It can always get worse. But I trust that jimmy would do good.
    1
  6936. So do you think I was evil for rejoicing when bin laden died?
    1
  6937.  @simnillittlemac8652  So I'm "evil" for rejoicing when evil is destroyed? And you are "good" for hoping evil lives and persists? Have you really thought this through?
    1
  6938.  @simnillittlemac8652  Forgive me for asking a question that you already answered but... Do you think I was evil for rejoicing when bin laden (aka evil) died?
    1
  6939.  @simnillittlemac8652  If you want to double down go for it. But I'd rather you not for the sake of my faith in humanity.
    1
  6940.  @simnillittlemac8652  Regarding, "Being happy that no more people will be killed by Bin Laden or any other evil person, does not make you evil." Babysteps it is then. Regarding, "if you rejoice in their pain, then that makes you evil." I've never used the word pain once. Don't strawman the argument. Regarding, "There is a clear difference." You can't even seem to answer my question. Or at least when you do you answer it wrong. Maybe things aren't as "simple" and "clear" as you try to make it all seem. I'm going to ask my very simple question again. And this question is very simple, unlike the entire category of ethics. Do you think I was evil for rejoicing when bin laden died?
    1
  6941.  @simnillittlemac8652  Regarding, "I assumed" Assumption is the mother of all fuck ups. Not really. But I like the saying. Regarding, "If you were happy when Bin Laden died because innocents would no longer be hurt," I mean... I picked Bin laden for a reason. Do you really need me to spell out the reason he was the example and not some random decent person? Regarding, "I think it is morally gray" Thank you for using the word gray. It's far more apt for the topic at hand than words like "simple" and "clear." Regarding, "I think it is morally gray at best to rejoice when someone awful dies," The fact of the matter is that the world would be a better place without certain people who are aptly called evil. There is no shame in admitting that. There is nothing "evil" about admitting that. Regarding, "they should rather get life in jail" I'd prefer trump spend the rest of his life behind bars. But let's not pretend like that is going to happen shall we? And I'm not calling for his murder. I'm a pacifist. But I would prefer he not be alive because he is evil. Do you think I was evil for rejoicing when bin laden died?
    1
  6942.  @simnillittlemac8652  And do you think I would be evil if I rejoiced if Trump died?
    1
  6943.  @simnillittlemac8652  Or here is a fun hypothetical for you. Let's say, hypothetically, everything we know about bin laden was wrong. He was misunderstood. He wasn't evil. He had nothing to do with 9-11 and was framed. But I still think he is evil and terrible and that the world would be a better place without him... Would I be evil if I rejoiced when that misunderstood, innocent bin laden died? The correct answer would be no. That wouldn't make me evil. It would have made me wrong.
    1
  6944. You want a zombie apocalypse? Sometimes dead is better. -old guy in pet cemetery.
    1
  6945. Maybe but I personally think it's more a case of him only getting his "news" from corporate media.
    1
  6946. Best theory I have is it's to siphon votes from Bernie in the huge state of NY specifically to try and keep him from winning the nomination on the first ballot.
    1
  6947.  @t814  Prohibition essentially. Duh.
    1
  6948. Fun fact: writing in all caps is a sign of mental illness.
    1
  6949. They can't all be bastions of truth like MSNBC. That's why sam goes there... to tell everyone how joe rogan is the one misinforming people, on the propaganda network MSNBC. If you listen to sam you are a sheep being led to slaughter. He is controlled opposition.
    1
  6950. "you said they ruined your life" As in that was their goal. "now you say they didn't" As in they failed. "we still dont know why your are angry" Because the fact that they failed doesn't actually make it any better.
    1
  6951.  @AngeloftheGodless  "here comes..." Why wouldn't you address what I'm actually saying? Why are you instead strawmanning me and putting words into my mouth and putting them into quotes like they are things I've said? How intellectually dishonest can you be?
    1
  6952. William regarding, "liplicked blue blow trol," 50 percent of these are actually words. I'm betting this is better than you usually do. Thank you for proving my point of why Trump loves the uneducated.
    1
  6953. I think you are giving her too much credit if you think she thought she was telling the truth.
    1
  6954. "you lefties make you're selfs look stupid" Holy shit that is funny, just not how you intend. Thanks for the laugh dipshit.
    1
  6955. His companies get billions of dollars each from the government. It isn't an "accident" that he is rich.
    1
  6956. Too bad he's not doing anything for them, unless you think voting for bombs and proxy war with russia will help them. It won't.
    1
  6957. "working folk that make up real America" No he's not. He's working for the MIC as he votes to give billions for a proxy war with russia.
    1
  6958. In reality bernie is working for the MIC as he voted to give them another 40 billion instead of giving that money to the american people.
    1
  6959. Bernie is actually working...
    1
  6960. for the
    1
  6961. MIC
    1
  6962.  @immortalfox3564  " to give every American healthcare" So why would he tell everyone to vote for joe biden when joe would veto m4a if it got to his desk? Oh right, he actually cares about his party most of all.
    1
  6963.  @immortalfox3564  "feeding children at school and helping the poor sustain themselves in the worst economic situation in US history" He's not doing any of that but he is giving billions of dollars for weapons.
    1
  6964.  @immortalfox3564  Actions speak louder than meaningless words. Especially from a politician.
    1
  6965.  @immortalfox3564  Bernie and his dems decoupled money for americans from the war funds. Their priorities are clear and they don't care about you.
    1
  6966.  @frankd.506  FYI trump isn't president. Maybe worry about the people who in office taking advantage of you instead.
    1
  6967. If dems actually cared about the people they would be giving you universal healthcare right now while they have all the power.
    1
  6968. They are like a women who has been cheated on a lot. They do have good reason to be skeptical.
    1
  6969. "Jimmy’s ego will be his downfall." Kyle told everyone they could fuck off in his latest bullshit video.
    1
  6970. Isn't Pete the guy who "won" the Iowa Caucus?
    1
  6971. There aren't any really well thought out disadvantages to forcing the vote.
    1
  6972. He didn't have integrity back then either then?
    1
  6973. His entire campaign is based on Obamamemberberries.
    1
  6974.  @ryananderson6321  Don't get so wrapped up in political theater. It's more like professional wrestling. Don't take so much from yelling at one another.
    1
  6975.  @JamesSmith-qv9qo  I have no idea who is good in the NY race. I'm not a NY and honestly am not looking that closely at it. But I am familiar with yang and EVERYTHING I know about him makes me despise him. I don't know who would get my vote if I had one to cast in that election but I can say with certainty yang wouldn't get it.
    1
  6976.  @tootspogsforever5590  So in another thread yanggang was patting itself on the back for being issue oriented. You prove what a joke and how empty yanggang is.
    1
  6977. I'd believe you more if you owned one of her farts in a jar.
    1
  6978.  @patthecat9357  But you aren't going to be disappointed? You don't even attempt to claim he isn't a warmongering POS.
    1
  6979.  @tinman5322  He's a pathological liar. Therefor "straight shootin" is beyond dumb.
    1
  6980. I think it makes more sense that he's covering for his fellow affiliates. He doesn't mention the blatant conflict of interest even when it's about TYT.
    1
  6981. yes
    1
  6982. She has real power in the form of her votes... like the one she used to make pelosi speaker and she got jack shit from it. AOC and sam are controlled opposition and they are leading you to slaughter.
    1
  6983.  @TheJumpsuitJack  More like true or you would have some sorta intelligent argument to try and combat it.
    1
  6984.  @TheJumpsuitJack  Or maybe you are like sam "I don't care" sedar.
    1
  6985.  @TheJumpsuitJack  "around personal feelings" Is that what me talking about AOC's unforgivable voting record sounded like to you? Is this really how you want to mindless ignore her record? Is this how you want to ignore the fact that sam doesn't care about things a real progressive should care about? "What's there to debate?" Just admit you don't care like sam already has.
    1
  6986.  @TheJumpsuitJack  "AOC's one vote" That's not her only inexcusible vote but it perfectly shows how she squanders the power she does have and acts in complete opposite to the values she claims to hold. These are AOCs own words that she has on twitter this very moment... " Sometimes it’s to get members on the record, so ppl can’t make excuses later. Sometimes these votes create real political pressure that forces developments. Sometimes we vote for the historical record - to let future generations know we did everything we could." She's also the same person who said that she wouldn't vote for nancy for speaker before she got in office. If you want to defend her how about you at least start with this one vote and then we can move on to her other inexcusable votes. "Sam is personal" LMFAO No. It's not. It's again another example of someone whose actions betray the values they claim to hold. It's evidence that he's a fraud in the same way aocs actions betray her. "It's opinion" Yes. It is. It's the opinion you come to when the values you actually hold and care about are protecting your cult. At best it's a biased opinion to try and maintain his access to AOC. At worst he is straight up controlled opposition whose job it is to sheepherd people into a corrupt party. He might pretend to care about their wrongdoing from time to time but that's only to get the sheep to trust him when he tells them all to vote for them when it matters most. "He's a commentator, not someone with similar power to goverent officials." Thanks captain obvious. Those are words even if they offer nothing of value to the conversation at hand. "knows exactly who Sam is" He's a sheepherder who will tell you to vote blue no matter who. He doesn't care about these people at all. At the end of the day he only cares what color jersey they are wearing. He's a hack. "Your personal beef is irrelevant." So according your "logic" that would mean you have "beef" with me? Then it too is irrelevant. "You probably aren't a "real progressive" in my eyes." I want universal health care, money out of politics, to give peace a chance, to break up the banks, reparations, free college, freedom of speech, freedom to decide what goes into my body and more. I also don't really care if you think I'm not a progressive or not. It's more important to me that you realize that people like sam and AOC are frauds, because they are.
    1
  6987.  @schmoborama  "“what goes into my body” LOLOL there it is." To be clear you think that the government should get to tell people things they have to put into their body? You probably think trump is an authoritarian but it really doesn't get anymore authoritarian than that. "freedumb to give covid19 to as many ppl as he possibly can," The jab doesn't stop people from getting or transmitting covid dipshit. "thinks you’re not a real leftwinger unless you also want our hospital system to collapse under the weight of an unvaxxed public." Seems like the problem is that there aren't enough beds. But those extra beds aren't very profitable. "Do you also claim the right to shit while you’re in line at the dmv?" Sam really cultivates some of the most intellectually dishonest MFers I've met. It's very cultlike.
    1
  6988.  @miac.4806  "They know she is a threat." A threat to vote in lock step with all the other corporate dems. She's a fraud.
    1
  6989.  @nothingtoitbuttodoit  "it's Jackson Hinkles burner account" Is that what you want to go with? Sam cultivates probably the most intellectually dishonest community I've ever come across, and I've talked to flat earthers.
    1
  6990.  @nothingtoitbuttodoit  Am I talking to sams burner account? You still mad hinkle got you to say the quiet part out loud? That you don't care about their shit record?
    1
  6991.  @TheJumpsuitJack  "Get a grip." Sam cultivates probably the most intellectually dishonest crowd I've ever come across. That, and comments of yours such as this, make it hard for me to take you seriously. That said you managed to sprinkle in some things that I don't think were downright terrible so I'm going to do my best to address them and ignore all the dumb BS like this. "Your problem seems to be you put too much faith in the political mechanisms of America and the political mainstream." I've made this mistake many times in the past but I don't think I don't this much anymore. I've been fooled to many times and I'm on to their game. "plan on peacefully prying power and wealth away from the capitalist class in the dramatic fashion" The truckers show a perfect way we should be doing this. "overthrow capitalism" I'm not sure this is a reasonable goal but I'm still happy to try to do this. People have to be mad. Sam puts people to sleep. "the planet on a more equitable, sustainable path" This problem is too big for me. I don't have "faith" in science but I am hopeful that people smarter than me can figure this out. "social collapse" I am absolutely not saying this is my goal but I also don't see this as something I absolutely need to avoid. Sometimes something needs to burn down so that something better can takes it's place. I'm not saying I think it would be better if "society" collapsed but I am pretty much over capitalism. And there would be no easy way to transition off it. "ideas" Make sure everyone is as mad as they should be... and use that anger to pressure the oligarchy. Make them fear our pitchforks (in a symbolic way, I'm a pacifist). "anticapitalist" This was mostly why I'm answering. I do consider myself this. "logic behind the speaker vote" It's really not complicated. Nancy needed their votes to be speaker. Use that leverage to get something of value for progressives. Asking for a vote on m4a makes sense. It was during a pandemic. Let people voting against health care pay the price after the fact. And they would. It didn't need to be that. But it absolutely should have been something. "alternative" If dems don't cave then noone is allowed to be speaker and the country debates the topic. Let them explain why they aren't even willing to even VOTE on m4a during a pandemic much less give you m4a. That it's that important to them. Let them pay the price after the fact. My allegiance is to m4a and getting it.... not to politicians or a party.
    1
  6992.  @TheJumpsuitJack  "I can tell you're from one of those pseudo-left communities like Dore." I can't tell if you are paid to make smears like this or just a useful idiot. " Because you've clearly never read any theory" Does it matter that I have? This seems like lazy stupid ways to avoid all points I made. Me: ""anticapitalist" This was mostly why I'm answering. I do consider myself this." Your response to that: "you seem averse to any serious anti-capitalist rhetoric." You don't seem very serious to me. "So anti-dem yet never once do I hear any coherent ideology based in Marxism, much less a stated adherence to Marxism." I'm sorry I'm not using all the labels you think I should. I personally find all the labels distracting and try to focus on the ideas behind them. Me: "The truckers show a perfect way we should be doing this." You: "We're gonna pressure the oligarchy with our mean words" I was wrong to take you seriously, even if only for a moment. "not sure you're able to grasp this: global capitalism is diametrically opposed to anything that means losing their grip on power. " I'm not sure you are able to grasp this: I've never said this isn't the case. You are arguing against a strawman and wasting my time. "Neoliberalism will break fascist and America will be ruled by fascists before you will "pressure" congress to get M4A" If you say so. "Revolution" I'm a pacifist or this is probably what I'd be advocating for. But I am a pacifist so... do the math. "protests like in Canada?" If you think actions like this don't help then you are DEFINATELY part of the problem and not someone I take very seriously. "Did you ever leave your house in 2020 and attend the myriad of large protests?" Let's say I didn't but only spent my time "protesting" as a "keyboard warrior." Who let my voice be heard in only that way would that really be the devil? Or does it only count if you are on a street corner using your freedom of speech? "the US is a police state on the verge of fascism!" LMFAO Are you really trying to blame this shit on me? As if it's my fault we can't have nice things? Meh. Somehow, someway I still think I will find the strength to sleep like a baby tonight. I know that I'm the victim and not the problem even if you do not or are pretending that's the case for bad reasons. "Pelosi won by like 10-15 votes" Meanwhile, in reality, the vote was 216-209. Are you lying to people? Politically illiterate? Or lazy and stupid? "McCarthy would be speaker" To be speaker of the house you need a MAJORITY of the votes in the house. Mccarthy can't get that unless dems vote for him. If no one gets a majority of votes no one is speaker and they do it all over again until someone is. Let's say that happens.... a debate starts about m4a during a pandemic and it's merits as people are made to answer for the side they are picking. Sam lies about mccarthey being a possibility. It's not. I mean... hypothetically dems could be out sick one day and only republicans show up for work. They have a majority and vote him in. So what. Dems still have a majority and can kick his ass out immediately for someone else when they actually choose to show up for work. You are wasting my time. I'm done with you.
    1
  6993.  @TheJumpsuitJack  So when I'm commenting here it's dumb. When you do it it's fine because of hypocritical reasons. And when I tell the truth I'm being stupid but when you are straight up lying to people "Pelosi won by like 10-15 votes. And if she lost, McCarthy would be speaker. Not "nobody," it's fine. All righty then. "How old are you? And how long have you been politically engaged? Really weird lack of basic knowledge." You are suffering from dunning-kruger. Do everyone a favor and STFU.
    1
  6994. So it's the fans fault for not liking that shit movie. Why don't they just like whatever piece of shit is served to them think dipshits. You are an embarrassment.
    1
  6995. Don't. He has earned nothing but contempt and ridicule.
    1
  6996.  @Debre.  Meh. I'm convinced that lots and lots of Biden's support comes from people like Alyssa Milano who only care about getting trump out and wrongfully thought (because of the corporate media) that biden was the best person for that job. After that narrative is destroyed they should be looking toward the guy with the highest favorables named Bernie Sanders.
    1
  6997.  @RobertDavis-qt2ve  Last election Hillary was polling within the margin of error with the Donald while Bernie was beating him by 10 points. Stop being a complete idiot.
    1
  6998. There was nothing "problematic" about his behavior. What's problematic is your expectation that human beings need act like robots instead of acting human.
    1
  6999. Warren dumped M4A and if any of the other names you have listed support it it's only pandering. None of them are going to fight for it. Stop pretending they will.
    1
  7000. Saying Elizabeth Warren supports M4A simply is not true.
    1
  7001. Regarding, "This has people from all parts of the political aisle" It has corporate sellouts from all sides of the aisle. That's the problem. We want people of principles who believe in things like getting money out of politics, giving peace a chance, universal health care, criminal justice reform and legalizing weed, defunding the police and more. Instead we have this lineup of terrible people who pretty much oppose all of that.
    1
  7002.  @willcoleman2458  Regarding, "It’s almost like you missed the part where I said “whether or not you think they actually care about it and are willing to fight for it is up for debate" No I didn't. Warren dumped supporting m4a on the campaign trail. That said what is in a person's heart actually is what is important and not the BS they spew. Trump has said he wants to give everyone health care. TRUMP SAID THAT. So are you going to add him to the list of advocates?
    1
  7003.  @willcoleman2458  Regarding, "Warren never dumped M4A," LMFAO. Yes she did. Just like she dumped her promise to not take dirty money during the campaign.
    1
  7004.  @willcoleman2458  "I think right now people want to see improvements in our health care system, and that means strengthening the Affordable Care Act," Elizabeth Warren. This year, during the pandemic.
    1
  7005. This should be made into an advertisement for tape.
    1
  7006. riiiiiiiggggght
    1
  7007. That thing that is ballooning the deficit is not the problem the same way someone quitting their job wouldn't be part of the problem for their money issues.
    1
  7008. If you believe what you wrote you are an idiot.
    1
  7009. Regarding, "You folks asked for this." No. I didn't.
    1
  7010. "Very nice gesture." Um... no.
    1
  7011. Regarding, "publicly wishing death upon somebody is pretty much calling on that person to be killed." It's not. I can be a pacifist and hope evil gets what it deserves at the same time. They are not mutually exclusive.
    1
  7012.  @cheydinal5401  Regarding, "Publicly saying "I wish there were to happen" is like saying "Please, somebody do this"." Except it's not. And I gave you a specific example where it doesn't. Regarding, "there wouldn't be tons of assassination attempts?" Let's say there was... so what. I'm not responsible for the actions of crazy people. I would only be responsible if I called for them to be murdered.
    1
  7013.  @cheydinal5401  One more thing regarding, "is like saying "Please, somebody do this"." Nobody is saying that anymore than a girl who dresses slutty is saying, "please, somebody rape me." Crazy people who do crazy shit are the one's responsible for their actions. Not "normal" people who are being misunderstood by crazy people because they are crazy.
    1
  7014. Amazing you don't realize you are strawmanning the argument being made to you.
    1
  7015. If all she cares about is improving her own personal position I hope she never gets it.
    1
  7016. You would have a better point if CNN and MSNBC were having all their videos demonetized. It's about more than just him.
    1
  7017.  @kyleg8839  Regarding, "this guy has posted video after video of this" It's been in the news lately, and not just from him. And he talks about the news so it seems to make sense. Don't be afraid to not watch if you aren't interested. Regarding, "he isn't CNN." Yeah... CNN doesn't have this problem. Are you ok with the double standard?
    1
  7018.  @kyleg8839  Regarding, "but at the end of the day I’m a realist." I imagine that almost every terrible thing in the history of man has been attempted to be rationalized this way. The world changes. But not with an attitude like this. Regarding, "if you want to make the big bucks" Dude... again... it's not just about him and the money. I mean, it's kindof about the money. But only in that that money is needed to produce the content. Without it only the CNNs of the world get to give their biased corporate view of the world. It's about controlling the narrative. People are leaving corporate news. They are looking to independent media. So corporations are looking for ways, like this to control that too. Regarding, "if you wanna fight the moral fight, then be independent" How do you do that when you can't pay the bills and keep the lights on? If you want there to be an independents you need to be willing to fight for them the way they are fighting for you. Or you can complain that they are shining a light on a problem like you are doing. I'd prefer you wouldn't. Regarding, "this isn’t gonna change" Certainly not with your attitude. And even if the system doesn't change that doesn't make it any less important that people be informed as to why things are the way they are. People need to know how corporations are controlling the flow of information. Regarding, "by making every video comp;aiming about not getting ad money" I can only imagine how frustrating it is to spend the time and effort he does to make the great quality videos he does only to have them be immediately demonetized with no explanations given. And it's not every video although he has talked about it far more as of late, but again, it's in the news and a hot topic. Regarding, "it gets lame" Are you going to be ok? Maybe we can start a support group for people like you? Seriously thou... you don't have to watch. I certainly don't watch all the videos in my subscriptions. And if I start watching something and it loses my interest I go to something else. I don't bitch about how everything isn't perfectly catered to me. You are not the center of the universe.
    1
  7019.  @kyleg8839  No I think you are missing the point. I've said this before but you don't seem to get it... it's about more than just money. The Joe Rogan's of the world aren't alone and their misguided beliefs and their narrative need to be challenged. Even if youtube never changes anything ever the world would be a better place if people like joe would gain a greater understanding of how things are instead of them continuing to think the silly things they do. But whatever. I'm done with this. If you don't get it by now you never will. Just go back to thinking I'm delusional. I'm done giving a shit what you think at this point.
    1
  7020.  @biograftirl  You said to deflect from and ignore the point being made.
    1
  7021.  WinstonS84  No. The point isn't moot. Make the situation hypothetical if you need to. The point remains whether you acknowledge it or not.
    1
  7022.  @tedmaloof234  Regarding, " So it's alright to poison the water system as long as you put up a wind turbine or 2?" If that's what you think I'm saying you are an idiot.
    1
  7023.  @raffriff42  "That's Obama you're thinking of" Nope. It was both. Sorry if the truth hurts. "Economic relief for people was a bad thing?" The largest upward transfer of wealth in history. "Stopped 0 wars" Yeah. There were a lot to choose from. "Started 0 wars" Despite his best efforts and it's not like there were too many new countries to start them with. "built by Obama" Does that make it ok are you just unserious? "you're gonna have to explain this" If a foreign government assassinated a US official like the hit trump ordered on sulimani I suspect you wouldn't need it explained... I suspect you would have little trouble realizing what it's obviously a war crime in addition to all the drone bombs that killed civilians under his watch. You are tough to take seriously but that's pretty obvious if you need it explained to you why trump is terrible.
    1
  7024.  @raffriff42  How do you clowns manage to get you head so far up the arce of a politician like this?
    1
  7025.  @anderander5662  "I thought he got rid of ISIS as a threat" He didn't. "I didn't realize he started the Ukraine War." He "only" gave them a bunch of weapons before it. "the cages you mentioned were built and used by your Saint Obama" Does that make it ok? Does it matter I don't support Obama? Or are you just deflecting because you are unserious?
    1
  7026.  @anderander5662  "That's funny..." Sorry not sorry if the truth hurts. Just call it fake news like a clown.
    1
  7027.  ezsticker6370  "yes, he did" I'll point out the same thing to you that I do obama supporters.... if they actually did a good job would the public have replaced them with absolute clowns after them?
    1
  7028.  ezsticker6370  "brain damage" This is funny coming from someone who doesn't even attempt an argument. "Fake news" I don't watch corporate media because they don't have arguments or anything intelligent to say... just like you!
    1
  7029.  @beeman4266  "didn't have any wars started when he was president" We were already at war with pretty much everyone and like I said he stopped 0 wars and continued all the MANY wars left to him.
    1
  7030.  @beeman4266  "kids in cages was BS and they were built by Obama" Were they "built by Obama" or was it "BS?" Tough to take you seriously when you speak out of both sides of your mouth. Obama making them and biden continuing them doesn't change what trump did in the middle which was the same as them both. If you don't care about it all the time you are just a partisan hack and unserious person.
    1
  7031.  @beeman4266  "Economy was doing phenomenal, stock market too." Meanwhile, in reality, covid happened and you are not a serious person engaging in reality.
    1
  7032.  @beeman4266  "better president than Biden" That's as "impressive" as being a better president than trump... it's not. I don't care which piece of poo you think smells better. It's still poo.
    1
  7033.  @beeman4266  "more people died" So instead of caring about the people who died on his watch you are doing this. It's pathetic and the same types of "arguments" dems try to make.
    1
  7034.  @beeman4266  "still didn't start any wars" He really tried when he assassinated a foreign official of a government we didn't have a declaration of war with. He gets credit for all the many, many, many wars he continued. "they'd have roasted him for it" Imagine thinking this is a legit rationalization for his actions. I accept this as much as I accept it from biden supporters... I don't.
    1
  7035.  @BasementPepperoni  "DRUMPF trying" And biden supporters claim republicans are why biden can't get the people nice things. It's just pathetic excuses from a bootlicker.
    1
  7036.  @BasementPepperoni  "typical response" This is funny because your response is nothing but name calling and non arguments. "it's ALWAYS the fault of someone else, right?" No one here including myself is saying that but don't let that stop you from strawmanning instead of something more intelligent. "Facts and logic don't care about your "fee fee's"" This is funny because your comment doesn't include a single fact or logical argument. Instead you are giving namecalling, strawmanning, and nonsense.
    1
  7037. @Melvin Deeply "What's he doing here? Is this comedy?" It's elitism.
    1
  7038. It's not going to disappear. You are just going to have to deal with essentially getting a cold every now and then.
    1
  7039. If you agree with this I find it impossible to believe you haven't bought any of their other BS.
    1
  7040.  @elitemuscle  "i have no problems doing whatever China tells us not to do" You have no problem provoking a nuclear power...
    1
  7041.  @elitemuscle  I have no problem telling you how silly that is.
    1
  7042.  @elitemuscle  "China wouldn’t be making these kind of threats" LMFAO What do you think the US would be doing if roles were reversed. Try to be honest if answering.
    1
  7043.  @elitemuscle  "we should not let them dictate how we handle our business." Try for a split second to image roles are reversed.
    1
  7044.  @elitemuscle  Also... don't reproduce. Thanks in advance for that.
    1
  7045.  @elitemuscle  Youtube is shadowbanning your latest comment. And no matter how cringe and terrible it is I do support your free speech and wish it was shown.
    1
  7046. If everything were equal... like if I did that... I would be in JAIL.
    1
  7047. "why did he cancel the keystone pipeline." Because it was a politically inconvenient pipeline. Why did he open a hundred different pipelines at the same time?
    1
  7048. Correction, "New federal data shows the Biden administration approved 3,557 permits for oil and gas drilling on public lands in its first year, far outpacing the Trump administration’s first-year total of 2,658." So... thousands of pipelines, not a hundred.
    1
  7049. "You're dumb sometimes jimmy." This makes me giggle all things considered at least.
    1
  7050.  @jamessudbury6006  "did you also compare trumps first year with obamas 5th year?" I wasn't comparing anything. The article that I was getting the fact that biden has approved thousands of pipelines has. Don't you feel a little silly trying to give him credit for shutting down a single pipeline as he opens thousands more? Or are you just easily impressed by corrupt people?
    1
  7051.  @jamessudbury6006  "Is that how it works?" Biden gets credit for shutting down a single pipeline even as he opens thousands more? Is that how it works?
    1
  7052.  @jamessudbury6006  You: "how about that one time biden took a step forward because it was a particularly inconvenient pipeline?" Me: "what about the 3557 steps back?"
    1
  7053.  @jamessudbury6006  "why don't you compare trumps last year with Biden first year?" Because it's irrelevant to the point being made. Why do you keep trying to deflect from the fact that biden is approving thousands of pipelines and you are trying to give him credit for shutting down a single pipeline?
    1
  7054.  @jamessudbury6006  My questions are rhetorical but still it would nice if you would try to answer them the way I answer yours.
    1
  7055.  @jamessudbury6006  "you'll never know why gas shot up in price." Were we talking about why gas shot up in price or are you just proving my point that you are deflecting? If you don't answer my simple and direct questions I don't think you can learn. "why gas shot up in price." Because biden is playing a sanction war with russia and losing badly.
    1
  7056.  @jamessudbury6006  " Biden first year you'll never know why gas shot up in price" If bidens first year with 3K plus new pipelines caused gas prices to skyrocket then trumps first year of only 2K plus pipelines caused gas prices to skyrocket then right? Because that's how it works according to you? Oh wait...
    1
  7057. Those are your edited words?
    1
  7058.  @ip4157  Yes I've called tiny orange hands an idiot, among other things. I take it you don't understand the point I was making so thanks for proving it.
    1
  7059.  @ip4157  Respect is earned, not given.
    1
  7060.  @ip4157  Idiots love making assumptions.
    1
  7061. Let's say I agreed with you that MJ is not a good thing, which I don't, so fucking what. Then alcohol sure as fuck isn't a "good thing" but that doesn't mean making it illegal is a good idea as prohibition proved. We are suppose to be the "land of the free." Meanwhile we lock up more of our citizens then any country on Earth by percentage of population and it isn't even close. Blacks are 4 times more likely to be in jail for MJ even thou they smoke at the same rate as whites. Go spend some time in a state that has legalized it and realize the sky doesn't fall in when they do. Rather their police get to focus on real crime and tax revenue is created hand over fist. It is a fucking no brainer.
    1
  7062.  @PetBunnyDebbie  "Biden was our only hope of preventing Trump from taking office" More military spending under biden.
    1
  7063.  @PetBunnyDebbie  "Biden was our only hope of preventing Trump from taking office" Biden kept the cages.
    1
  7064.  @PetBunnyDebbie  "Biden was our only hope of preventing Trump from taking office." More people lost their lives to covid while biden was president and he had the jab.
    1
  7065.  @PetBunnyDebbie  "Biden was our only hope of preventing Trump from taking office." More money for war during biden.
    1
  7066.  @PetBunnyDebbie  Biden has kept the cages and put more people in them.
    1
  7067.  @PetBunnyDebbie  "We know that catering to the billionaire corporations is what's ruining our country" And you will vote for biden like bernie tells you to even if he's bought by the people you are talking about.
    1
  7068.  Tyg  "He just wants republicans to vote with the Majority of People which they never do." LMFAO Maybe he should worry more about the democrats. They are the ones who have the presidency, house, and senate and they too are not voting with the majority of people.
    1
  7069.  @jimcarrington6744  "YOU failed us all" LMFAO Are you really blaming me? A peasant? And shielding bernie? A guy with real power?
    1
  7070.  @jimcarrington6744  "YOU didn't spread the news far and wide enough!" LMFAO You mean like bernie was doing when he told everyone to vote for a POS like biden?
    1
  7071.  @jimcarrington6744  "It is all your fault" Yeah... It's my fault... not the dems, who have the presidency, house and senate. It's my fault claim complete bootlickers.
    1
  7072.  @jimcarrington6744  "It is all your fault, that the public goes along with corporate media" It's my fault... not the corporate medias fault, claim completely unserious people.
    1
  7073.  @melanies.6030  "It IS changing" Everyday we get closer to making Idiocracy a reality.
    1
  7074. David regarding, "trump spoke like no politician has before" I guess you can say that but that doesn't mean he ran a good campaign. He is a clown only not funny. Regarding, "How do you know Bernie wouldn't have sold out" Bernie has been preaching the same message his entire life. He has fought for the same things his entire life. He has principles and you can tell because he was willing to support his positions even when they weren't popular with the public (gay rights before it was cool, opposed the patriot act, opposed the iraq war, ect). Lastly if want to know how much to trust a politician follow the money. Sanders didn't have a super pac to answer to but only the people. Hillary Clinton went to Trumps wedding. Right before Trump ran he had a chat with Bill Clinton. If Trump didn't run he would have been considered by Hillary for VP. And you think they are different? They aren't. At least not in any important ways.
    1
  7075. sha floyd forgive me but I feel no need to respond to your drivel. I only have so much time and I'm not going to start a new full time job correcting your crap.
    1
  7076. If you haven't already done so please take your money out of the banks. Use credit unions.
    1
  7077. 78 I get why you would think they are a troll but I disagree. I am pretty sure they are just really that stupid.
    1
  7078.  @rabiusule9384  Even if they did (they don't) it would still be like calling out a slave for how they revolt. The OP is deeply unserious.
    1
  7079.  @TheShawny122  Is that how you rationalize supporting evil or something?
    1
  7080.  @TheShawny122  If someone pisses you off more than trump does trump get your vote?
    1
  7081. "I have no idea WTF JD is talking about when he says hello if they cut the Federal gas tax that there's no guarantee that the oil companies will just take it by jacking up prices." LMFAO It's not rocket science. "talks like..." No. He doesn't. You are inferring. And if the tax is removed, and their product should be cheaper, there is NOTHING that would stop them from just jacking up the price at the same time so that you save nothing. This isn't nearly as hard as you make it and you are strawmanning what is actually said here. You said it correctly in the first sentence but failed to understand simple words and concepts.
    1
  7082.  @bluehero-96  Literally anyone the party chooses to get behind is "eligible." Nobody will enter the convention with the magic number. And let's not act like the party has any interest in letting Bernie be the nominee.
    1
  7083.  @borninthewronggenerationno3873  LOL. I was wrong. You can't do better. I'm sorry for giving you credit you didn't deserve.
    1
  7084.  @bluehero-96  Dude... don't get me wrong. 1) The DNC is a dumpster fire. 2) Bernie should be the nominee, because he's Bernie. But your notion of "eligible" in your original response is nonsense. It doesn't mean anything. Well I guess it does mean something... to you it means, "that's who I think should be the nominee." But you are doing it wrong. Just say you think he should be the nominee and use legit reasons for it. Reasons like, he has the best chance against trump and the like. Don't make up nonsense arguments about "eligibility." And regarding, "the will of the people." Is subjective. Which people? I know you think it includes you but does it need to? You know it's private club. And even as a Bernie supporter I know that they can make a good argument that he isn't the "will of the people." He "lost" to a candidate with a terrible record and was losing his mind. The will of the people is the will of fucking morons who didn't make sanders the nominee overwhelmingly outright. I would give up both my balls to make Sanders the nominee. I won't give up my integrity by making up nonsense like you did when talking about "eligibility." He's as "eligible" as anyone.
    1
  7085.  @borninthewronggenerationno3873  Wait... you are still talking? LMFAO! What a pathetic fuck you are. Don't be afraid to get a real life that doesn't include being the piece of shit that you are.
    1
  7086. Bueller? Bueller? Bueller? Bueller?
    1
  7087.  @demounit2505  Huh?
    1
  7088.  @timn5008  And thank you.
    1
  7089.  @timn5008  Regarding, "Of course one should not support evil. Pretty obvious." I agree that it should be obvious but lots of people don't seem to think so. How many people voting for trump think he is terrible? That he is evil. But they are going to vote for him anyway because they think he is the lesser evil. And how many people voting for biden think he is terrible? That he is evil. But orange man bad. So the lesser evil is getting their support. Regarding, "But there seems to be disagreement on what constitutes evil." No doubt. And we can all have conversations about what is evil and what isn't. For this conversation thou it's simple. It's just, don't support evil. I get to decide for myself what is evil and you get to do the same. We don't need to agree with each other about what is evil. But whatever I decide is evil... I won't support. And everyone else should say the same even if we have disagreements about what constitutes evil. Regarding, "I think it's evil to sanction other countries" You added more context but I'm going to address this without it. I am ok with countries using sanctions. Not for the specific purpose of getting, "citizenry to rise up and overthrow a government," but as a way to resolve differences among nations without going to war. But if, at the end of the day you disagree with me and conclude that sanctions are evil then you shouldn't be supporting them. Because you shouldn't support what you think is evil.
    1
  7090.  @deirre  I guess youtube deleted my response to you because they thought I was being too mean. So be it. Your drivel really wasn't worthy of an intelligent response anyway.
    1
  7091.  tw_bass  Regarding, "Stop watching and reading so much "Fake News"" This is your response to my comment? Really? Just ignore and deflect from the point I was making to make assumptions and criticisms about where I get my news even though you don't know where I get my news and it has nothing to do with the discussion at hand? Ug. If you have convinced me of anything it's that humanity is doomed.
    1
  7092.  tw_bass  Regarding, "calling someone dumb" Huh? Is this suppose to be English for something? Regarding, " did you even comprehend what she said?" I admit I can't comprehend the point you are making as you make zero effort to offer any context whatsoever. And the fact that I don't comprehend you is just fine with me.
    1
  7093.  tw_bass  You got me. There is absolutely nothing wrong with "calling someone dumb, did you even comprehend what she said?" That is just perfect English and well said. I guess I just didn't realize it before because I'm so jealous of your intellect and writing. Shakespeare would certainly agree.
    1
  7094.  tw_bass  calling self smart, talking like Tarzan.
    1
  7095.  @alexandernerep152  Regarding, " I am sorry, that comment was intended for Clint Holmes." And it was just as dumb to intend it for me. But thanks for the laugh.
    1
  7096.  @alexandernerep152  Regarding, "what corrupting" In the age of information ignorance like this is a choice. I'm not going to waste my time telling you why trump is corrupt anymore than I'm going to waste my time telling you why biden is corrupt. They just are. Take my word for it. Regarding russiagate. No. I'm not talking about russiagate. Regarding, "If trump is a racist," He is. Regarding, "Biden is a mega racist." Biden is also racist. But I thought you wanted to talk about trump? Maybe stay on topic. Don't deflect. Both sides do it. It's infuriating and stupid. Regarding, "Obama was..." Fuck obama. Do you want to talk about him or do you want to talk about trump? Stop deflecting. Regarding, "You seem to be a person that believes everything the media tells you," Corporate media is propaganda. You sound like a waste of my time. Regarding, "Trump is the only person in the world that is guilty before proven innocent" LMFAO
    1
  7097.    Think what you want for all I care. So dumb.
    1
  7098.  @alexandernerep152  Regarding, "of course you wont," Sorry not sorry. I also don't waste my time telling flat earthers why the earth isn't flat, and for the same reasons. It's just not a good use of time.
    1
  7099.  @alexandernerep152  Regarding, "so trump is corrupt and a racist, but you cant say why?" Of course I can say why. But why should I have to? This is captain obvious shit. Do you want me to tell you why the earth isn't flat next? I also called trump a war criminal in the same post and gave you a very specific reason as to why. Weird you don't address it all.
    1
  7100.  @cctv5348  Actually I have infinite choices when it comes to my vote.
    1
  7101.  @cctv5348  Regarding, "dropped no nukes." LFMAO. Polish that turd. Even obama biden democrats can say this.
    1
  7102.  @cctv5348  Regarding, "what principles and values do you really hold ?" Maybe just stick to the one I gave of "don't support evil." Especially since it's the most relevant for the conversation at hand. I'm not really in the mood to give you a comprehensive list of all my principles and values.
    1
  7103.  @cctv5348  Regarding, "how so, it would seem your options are finite." I can write in literally anything. The options are infinite.
    1
  7104.  @cctv5348  Regarding, "i dont believe obama was charged with dropping nukes prior to his presidency," Huh? Are you saying this like trump was "charged" with dropping nukes or something? What is charged suppose to mean in this context. Ultimately neither obama biden democrats nor trump have dropped nukes.... as if this is something that might impress me about either. It doesn't. It's akin to bragging that either haven't blown up the moon. Like... so what.
    1
  7105.  @alexandernerep152  Regarding, "do you believe everyone on the right believes that?" No. Do you think I think that or are you just being stupid?
    1
  7106.  @alexandernerep152  Regarding, "He hates all, but in the end he wants you to vote blue no matter who." LMFAO. Strawman much? Just ignore my trashing of biden and you do you. Moron.
    1
  7107.  @cctv5348  Regarding, " i see you edited your reply" Is that a problem? I'm not going back and changing meaning or something except when I might type too fast and forget an important word like "not." Regarding, " i mean he was charged with being a high risk factor in regard to the deployment of nuclear weapons." Not by me. Even if I had talking about this like it would impress me is crazy. Didn't launch nukes. LMFAO. How about we just stop talking about this forever. It's not relevant.
    1
  7108.  @alexandernerep152  Regarding, "not a good use of your time?" Yup. Are you under the impression I've never wasted some of my time before? Or are you just being stupid as always.
    1
  7109.  @cctv5348  Regarding, "why use such a poor example" It's a great example. It's known as a "reductio ad absurdum" argument in logic. Regarding, "hitler and churchill would have been a far better example." LMFAO. Um... no. This is a nonsensical example. I don't think churchill is evil. This is not as hard as you are making it.
    1
  7110.  @alexandernerep152  Regarding, "So what you are saying is..." What I'm saying is that there are rules in the international community. We have actions that have specific labels. The action of assassinating a public official of a foreign government is a war crime. I consider war crimes are evil. I don't support evil.
    1
  7111.  @alexandernerep152  Are you ok with war crimes or not? This is rhetorical. It seems clear you are.
    1
  7112.  @alexandernerep152  Regarding, "he wants to bring home soldiers, but it hard when democrats stop him when ever he tries." LMFAO Trump is commander in chief, he can do WHATEVER THE FUCK HE WANTS when it comes to this. He doesn't need congress to "declare peace" so that he can bring the troops home. It's on him. You could be an Olympic mental gymnast if that were a thing.
    1
  7113.  @cctv5348  Regarding, "Churchill unleashing the black and tans on the irish" I am not an expert on churchill. I even concede I'm quite ignorant about him considering his role in history. From my layman's understanding of him I don't consider him to be evil. Furthermore this is nonsensical because hitler and churchill didn't run a campaign against each other. You are talking about alliances in war. It's so apples to oranges it's asinine. Regarding, "id deem trump as the lesser of two evil" That's you calling trump evil. That's not my opinion of him.. it's yours. So you are cool supporting evil. It's too bad. And far too common.
    1
  7114.  @cctv5348  Regarding, "perhaps you are not as wise as you think. Bloody sunday is..." You are conflating wisdom and knowledge. They are very different even if they are related. And how "wise" do you think I think I am? I just conceded my lack of knowledge about churchill and you acting I think I know everything when I just told you I don't. Maybe you are not as wise as you think. This whole conversation is nonsense. Tell you what... Let's say I thought Churchill was evil. Let's say I thought Churchill was a war criminal. Would that stop me from joining with allied forces in WW2? No. It wouldn't. Because your analogy is nonsense. Because joining WW2 isn't "supporting churchill," a single individual, obviously. It's supporting the allied forces against the nazis. And that is NOT EVIL. Even if I thought Churchill was.
    1
  7115.  @cctv5348  Regarding, "Smoking a joint is the lesser of two evils compared with injecting smack." Except neither are actually evil. Injecting smack is stupid. But not evil. At least in my opinion. Regarding, "It doesnt make the joint smoking evil. " LMFAO. Yeah. That's exactly what it means. It's being called evil. Words have meaning. And you are using them wrong.
    1
  7116.  @TheGodsrighthandman  Regarding, "And WHO gets to decide what is 'evil'? We do. I get to decide for myself and you get to decide for yourself. But whatever you determine is evil is ABSOLUTELY something you shouldn't be supporting. Tell you what... I'm just going to copy and paste what I've already written very early in this thread... "Regarding, "But there seems to be disagreement on what constitutes evil." No doubt. And we can all have conversations about what is evil and what isn't. For this conversation thou it's simple. It's just, don't support evil. I get to decide for myself what is evil and you get to do the same. We don't need to agree with each other about what is evil. But whatever I decide is evil... I won't support. And everyone else should say the same even if we have disagreements about what constitutes evil."
    1
  7117.  @TheGodsrighthandman  Regarding, "Is Trump evil?" He is a war criminal and evil.
    1
  7118.  @cctv5348  Regarding, "Its not wise to defend someone as not evil when your definition of evil would include the person that you admittedly thereafter had a very sparse knowledge base about." Maybe so. Maybe it isn't wise for me to have said I didn't think Churchill is evil based on my overall knowledge of him. I'll give you that. But try not to lose focus of the point. Let's not make apples to oranges comparisons. Let's not act like there isn't a difference between picking an alliance in a war and voting. The difference is large. Regarding, "I dont believe my introduing you to some history is unkind. Im not sure how you see me pointing out that by your own definition it would seem Churchill would qualify as evil, when you stated in ignorance of his historical knowledge that he wasnt, is unwise." I don't mind a history lesson. I do mind tangents and prefer to stay on topic. I'm talking about voting. You are talking about alliances in war. Sure the "don't support evil" part extends over both. But you are talking about a war and a person as if they are interchangeable and the same thing. It's silly. The war =/= churchill. Regarding, "who do you ally with trump v biden." Neither. Both are evil. And here we are talking about individuals. Not a nation. Regarding, "enabling a greater war criminal" So 1984. Voting for good is enabling evil and voting for evil is good according to the ministry of truth.
    1
  7119.  @cctv5348  Regarding, "as a substance injected or smoked heroin is an evil substance." I can agree with that. But it isn't what you said before. Before it was, "injecting smack." Injecting smack is an action. Smack itself is an object. Apples and oranges. Regarding, "You can call heroin users stupid if you like," I can. But I didn't. I said I thought the action of shooting up is stupid. Action of shooting up =/= a person shooting up. Very different. Just like apples and oranges. I'm tired. And tired of apples and oranges comparisons.
    1
  7120.  @TheGodsrighthandman  Regarding, "He's shot one Iranian," A government official we don't have a declaration of war with. That's a war crime. I suspect you would have little trouble understanding this reality if roles were reversed and Iran did the same thing to us.
    1
  7121.  @TheGodsrighthandman  Regarding, "Your TDS is off the scale there, son " You got some orange balls on your chin.
    1
  7122.  @TheGodsrighthandman  Regarding, "Then keep what you consider evil to YOURSELF!" No.
    1
  7123.  @TheGodsrighthandman  Regarding, "Disseminating who/what you consider evil is tantamount to trying to influence others which drectly contradicts your statement about making your own decision on the subject" LMFAO. Everyone can decide for themselves and any "influence" I have doesn't change that.
    1
  7124.  @TheGodsrighthandman  I'm not stealing your free will to make decisions for yourself by speaking. You are just silly.
    1
  7125.  @TheGodsrighthandman  God doesn't exist. Best change your name. I've decided for you. Cause that's how it works right?
    1
  7126. Oh... so wanting to disavow, for example, Joe Manchin isn't reasonable? Fuck right off if you think so little of Kyle. Why the fuck are you here if you think the shit you do?
    1
  7127. I love how proud you are to be triggered.
    1
  7128.  @randyhooks1214  Think whatever stupid shit you want. I know you will.
    1
  7129.  @randyhooks1214  Did you happened to notice that I think you are stupid beyond words?
    1
  7130.  @randyhooks1214  I get it... you are stupid. Feel free to shut the fuck up and stop proving it.
    1
  7131.  @PhantomFilmAustralia  She got millions more votes than the orange clown despite being one of the worst people on the planet who was seen to have cheated to have gotten there.
    1
  7132. @TheDrewSaga That was already my point.
    1
  7133.  @PhantomFilmAustralia  Regarding, "You missed the point completely." How about you explain your point to me then? Or is it just not a very good point? Which was my point.
    1
  7134. @TheDrewSaga You are preaching to the choir.
    1
  7135. Helped stop NY from giving billions of dollars to Jeff Bezos.
    1
  7136. If you had the audio you would hear the cop asking the person they were dragging along if they were ok. So it's fine. Not really obviously.
    1
  7137. It's more like justice then a prank imo.
    1
  7138. Why shouldn't it be a right? It is a need. Your telsa on the other hand is not a need.
    1
  7139.  @TruthFreedomStrength  Regarding, "you don't get to decide what is a need. I say I need therefore I need it." You are impossible to take seriously. We don't get have an opinion about what are needs. You are just an idiot. Good luck with that.
    1
  7140.  @TruthFreedomStrength  Please just shut up. You are making everyone dumber.
    1
  7141. "a place where large numbers of people, especially political prisoners or members of persecuted minorities, are deliberately imprisoned in a relatively small area with inadequate facilities, sometimes to provide forced labor or to await mass execution" It's exactly that. Source, the dictionary.
    1
  7142. Who? I'm pretty sure the answer to your question is no.
    1
  7143. Is it really that stupid to think there is cheating going on in our elections and that everything isn't on the up and up?
    1
  7144.  @Nikaleigh1010  Regarding, "you didn't get the outcome you wanted." Is that what happened? Or was the money never used to investigate voter fraud but was instead used to line people's pockets? You would have a point if the money was used to investigate voter fraud but that is clearly not what happened.
    1
  7145.  @Nikaleigh1010  This is akin to paying a private investigator to follow my wife to see if she is cheating on me and instead they used my money to go get drunk at the bar. And everyone seems happy to defend the PI just because orange man bad.
    1
  7146. There is room for him to do both and he has.
    1
  7147.  @ScholarVisual  Regarding, "He said over and over again he would not touch social security or any other welfare programs." He talked out of both sides of his mouth. In one of his early interviews, when asked how he would pay for UBI the answer was, the vat tax, and GUTTING social service programs. Programs like food stamps. He said people would get a choice... trade what you have or keep it. It was NOT a benefit that would stack. He was conman. Regarding, "or any other welfare programs. You wouldve been able to opt in to UBI and forgo your current welfare plan." Wait... you seem to get it. Forgo your current welfare plan. AKA gut it. AKA if you were on the bottom and the type of person who needed UBI the most you might get NOTHING from a yang presidency. If you were already getting 1K a month in help you get NOTHING. The end result of that proposal is to try and end all those programs. Regarding, "He never once said he would cut SS" True. And I never said this specifically. But he would have because he was a conman. You know republicans would use UBI as a justification to try and cut it. And I know yang is full of shit and would have helped them the same way biden can be trusted to not protect SS even while he says he would never touch it.
    1
  7148.  @ScholarVisual  Regarding, "not one time did he EVER say he would GUT other social programs" Those were not meant to be exact words. That is my correct interpretation of what he says. You get it, kinda. "forgo your current welfare plan" The end result of this is a gutted welfare plan. If he didn't plan to gut the social safety net he wouldn't ask people to trade their current welfare. Regarding, "Not an ambiguous beat around the bush NO. But a direct NO." Forget the conman's words. Think about what happens in his world... a world where people are asked to trade in their current welfare... welfare goes away. That's gutting an important part of the social safety net. Those are again people who might gain NOTHING under yang. If you don't trade away what you have that is certainly the end result. Their world goes on exactly as it was. Regarding, "if I forgo that 500 and opt in for $1000 UBI. Now if Im making 1500 a month on Government assistance," Nope. Forgo that 500 means lose it. It's gone. You get 1K and gained 500 more than you had.
    1
  7149.  @ScholarVisual  Forgo means gone. Goodbye. No more. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/forgo
    1
  7150.  @ScholarVisual  Regarding, "get the $1000." Yeah. I guess I misread, "Now if Im making 1500 a month on Government assistance," to mean you were saying they would get 1500. Regarding, "I could CHOOSE to keep my $500 a month." Not much of choice. Ultimately this is a person that needs that 1K a month the most. And they get are one of the people who get the least. And after they make the decision to forgo that 500 that program that was giving them that money disappears... another description of that is gutted and gone. Regarding, "That is completely different from making CUTS and DEFUNDING social welfare programs to pay for UBI." Hardly. If it were actually funded people could get both. But they can't. Because it's gone... just as it's designed to happen. I'm done with this. This is all mute at this point. You either understand that he was going to get rid of all these programs or you don't.
    1
  7151.  @markmagennis8798  Yes. But that doesn't have anything to do with this.
    1
  7152. Your comment destroys my faith in humanity. But the faith lost is restored because your comment has zero thumbs up. Maybe there is hope for us afterall.
    1
  7153. I'm not exactly sure but the response all too common and normal. I'm reminded of nicole schezinger on conan.
    1
  7154. I hope you are at least paid for this BS.
    1
  7155. Or because he comes across as cheap. Like too cheap to splurge for a comb. I love Sanders but it is a fucking joke. Stop being offended by everything and save it for when you should actually be offended.
    1
  7156. for the covid in trump
    1
  7157.  @user-sy5ij1bh4i  I've been a huge fan of kyle for a long time but I can't overlook his recent BS. Force the vote might not have gotten us M4A or even a vote on M4A but it's still outing frauds to this day.
    1
  7158. Nope.
    1
  7159.  @tylerd1297  Everybody clings to when their team says something good... nevermind the fact that their team are run by liars.
    1
  7160. @ "not blindly endorsed him" Yes. He did.
    1
  7161. "western values?" What are those exactly? And who represents them? People like biden? Take your "western values" and shove them.
    1
  7162. "enemy of free speech" This is funny because there is only a coins flip chance that my original reply to you is being shadowbanned. The only speech that is guaranteed to be "free" is that of their narrative.
    1
  7163. Regarding, "Does it sound like a joke genius?" I didn't think so. I thought you were just stupid but I was hoping, for your sake, that it was just a joke. As it turns out the only joke is you huh? That is too bad for you. Regarding, "Simple, they aren't facts. 75% of what Jimmy says about Obama are lies, smear, or half truths." First, you are wrong. I suspect you realize this otherwise you correct him instead of just stomping your feet. Second, even if what you say is true (which again it isn't), maybe Jimmy is just stupid... and that wouldn't make him racist. And for you to say he is racist shows that you are really, really stupid.
    1
  7164. The lies started when Chris opened his mouth and ended when he closed it.
    1
  7165. This is a day late and dollar short from a network who told you to vote for biden and harris. They are complicit.
    1
  7166.  @internationalrtg5602  Regarding, "Notice how I abused the breaking news banner" If hell were actually freezing over that would actually be a reasonable use of the breaking news banner. Also... GREAT original comment. Thanks for the laugh.
    1
  7167.  @whyamimrpink78  Nobody cares what you think you paid shill.
    1
  7168.  @whyamimrpink78  Stop wasting perfectly good air.
    1
  7169. Joe forgot to give the corporate media the credit they deserve for burying stories like these. I'm sure they would have found the time to give it the coverage it deserved if Bernie did the same. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AKCJ45QMyLU
    1
  7170. "does not want to ruin his credibility by admitting that he lied or at least twisted the truth." His credibility and that of the government for which he represents was gone when he STRAIGHT UP LIED.
    1
  7171.  @carteraakhus5242  He straight up told you why he lied. Not that it makes it right.
    1
  7172. So many lost causes here. proud american, whyamimrpink, armando, you guys are all hopeless.
    1
  7173. whyamirpink regarding, "saying the ACA..." Literally nothing you say is true. Nothing. It is amazing really. You would think you might say something true just by accident. It is like you are the first person in the world with a negative IQ. You only make people dumber when you share your "thoughts" with them.
    1
  7174. proud regarding, "you gonna..." You are either epic stupid, a troll, or paid to say stupid shit. I'm betting on epic stupid but whichever you are it does not reflect well upon you.
    1
  7175. proud regarding, "wouldn't rush to judge others when you clearly lie about caring for strangers with no healthcare." Well I don't care about you but your statement is still incorrect.
    1
  7176. whyam regarding, "how can I argue against that?" I don't care. I'm not interested in having an intelligent conversation with you. There is no point.
    1
  7177. proud regarding, "oh ok. so you do care..." You know when I said I thought you were epic stupid? I think I might be changing my mind. I'm starting to think you are actually a troll. But whatever, it doesn't really matter. Good luck with being whatever you are. Your parents must be very ashamed.
    1
  7178. proud regarding, "at least I am HONEST" If that is true then you are just epic stupid. Or maybe an epic stupid troll. I hadn't considered that option.
    1
  7179. proud american you are an idiot and clearly lack what is know as empathy. You make me an ashamed american.
    1
  7180. Chase regarding, "He doesn't believe anything he says." Very possibly. It really is tough to tell. He might just be really stupid but you may be right.
    1
  7181. Either way there is no point in trying to have an intelligent discussion with such a person. My dog is more likely to say something smart. They are good for a laugh thou at their expense.
    1
  7182. Chase regarding, "you're trying so hard to troll" Agreed. That was just trolling. And bad trolling I might add.
    1
  7183.  @joshingle9526  I've been a huge fan of kyles for a long time. If I put up with his BS that would make me a simp... you know... like you are doing.
    1
  7184. I often wonder why sam has a platform or audience.
    1
  7185. Regarding, "Then you don't give a fuck about your country." That is a statement that would only be accurate if you are Russian. You are completely ignoring his context and the fact that he is Canadian because I am confident that you are trying to say that all Americans need to care very deeply about Russia. Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong about that. Personally I think your effects are best spent prioritizing giving a fuck about the US and less of a fuck about Russia. Maybe, just maybe they fucked with us (in the small way that they did) because that is what we do... you know... EVERYWHERE.
    1
  7186. Regarding, "If you don't give a fuck a foreign country is intervening in our democracy." It isn't that I don't care about what Russia did. It's just that I understand that what Russia did to fuck with the election is dwarfed by what the "democratic" party did to fuck with the election and that I think you are wildly overestimating the influence Russia had. Regarding, "It's not "just maybe..."" Are intentionally misunderstanding my comment and ignoring the context? I have a hard time believing you don't understand this without me spelling it out to you but "Just maybe" in that context had NOTHING to do with whether or not they did or did not fuck with us. That should be really fucking obvious seeing as how I then say "in the small way they did," as in... ya know... they did, in a small way. Just maybe had everything to do with the next word you decided to cut off. It was EXCLUSIVELY about the BECAUSE. Holy fuck I can't believe I have to explain that. Regarding, "I didn't miss the context at all." Just like you didn't miss the context of my "just maybe" comment? Let's agree to disagree about this. Regarding, "The context was Dems don't give a fk about Russia." Which would relevant if I was talking about Jon's comment but I wasn't. I was talking about yours. The one where you say, "Then you don't give a fuck about your country." Regarding, "I need to prioritize you say." Yes. You obviously need priorities and Russia should be nowhere near the top of that list like it seems to be.
    1
  7187. Seems you edited your comment while I was writing mine. Forgive me but I'm not about to go back and make changes because I am quickly losing interest in this.
    1
  7188. Regarding, "the foreplay" is that what you are calling completely misinterpreting the things I said? Regarding, "You deny or downplay Russia's involvement yea?" If you wonder why I might quickly lose interest in the things you say it is, in part, because you demonstrate a complete inability to understand what I'm saying without me having to repeat myself several times and clarify myself. The answer to this question should already be perfectly clear to you yet you still ask it. I do not deny russia fucked with us but I do not think it is the big deal you want to make it out to be. Especially when compared to all the other things going on the world and when put in context with all the things going on the world. Regarding, "u don't have to reply to every point" Thanks. You don't have to tell me how to reply. I reply to every point I think is worth replying to when I reply. I do everything in my power to not ignore the points people are making or I don't reply at all. Regarding, "Postulate your case." I feel like I've already been really clear about what I'm trying to say but I guess I'll repeat it, condense it, and use as small and few words as possible (although, as I type this I have to wonder why I am doing this). This is my point... You need to be focusing your attention on what YOUR country is doing instead of what Russia is doing. Regarding, "I already know what your going to say" Is that so? I guess maybe you could have the conversation for both of us. Is this the type of thinking that has you responding to things I absolutely don't say instead of the things I do say? Regarding, "I know who you are getting ur misinformation from" Who is that exactly? Dave and who? What specific misinformation? Since you are psychic you don't per chance have more useful information like lottery numbers do you? Regarding, "be an asshole" I don't care if you want to be an asshole. I'm an asshole. I care far more about you taking my words out of context, ignoring the points I actually make, talking about things I don't say, making assumptions about me, and thinking you know what I'm going to say before I actually say it. How about you be an asshole but while you do it you have zero preconceived notions about me and my positions, and address what I actually say? Now if you want to make the case that Russia is super fucking important (and it seems pretty clear to me you do) then how about you just fucking do it. But while you do it I would encourage you to consider the fact that, like I've said, we do the exact same shit everywhere and the fact that the "democratic" party and corporate media did far, far more to wrongfully fuck with the election than Russia. Oh... and one more thing while I'm at it. Consider the fact that had Hillary won the election the russia coverage would be DRASTICALLY different because it is all a smoke screen to make excuses for the fallen queen and return to the status quo without changing anything.
    1
  7189. LMAO. Ok. I admit it. I lied. I've just read everything you have written now. It is beyond asinine. I'd elaborate further but, like I've said and continue to think, I'm done caring what you think and I am not interested in telling you why pretty much everything you have said is wrong. Of course you will think it is because your points are great and I just can't refute them. Of course you are going to strut around and think you are brilliant. I'm fine with that. I just don't care what you think. Take care. Thanks for the laugh.
    1
  7190. The MSM, who gave Trump billions in free media, who covered Trumps empty podium while Bernie would speak in front of record crowds, who called the primary election for Hillary on a day no one voted and more had less of an impact than Russia? That makes sense to you because you are a mental midget. I'm sorry. I just can't tell you why everything you say is stupid. If only I thought more of you and your opinions I might but I don't. I don't care if you want to call me names. Go ahead. It's funny to me. For that to bother me I would need to care what you think and I don't. But again, thanks for the laugh.
    1
  7191. Feel free to rant some more thou. I will read it and laugh at it but I am just not interested in responding to it.
    1
  7192. Biden should be in prison for war crimes.
    1
  7193. Your comments are reliably retarded.
    1
  7194. I don't expect the truth to have any effect on you. It never has before.
    1
  7195. David do yourself a favor and don't waste your time trying to talk intelligently to whyamipink. It won't do any good. That said if you want to talk to them just to hear what stupid shit they say next then, by all means, carry on.
    1
  7196. By the time... your name is funny. Thanks for the laugh.
    1
  7197. Count regarding, "The fact that Trump made anyone think he’s populist shocks me" Trump loves the uneducated. Eric and Michael please stop playing the game of piece of shit smells worse. They were both shit and the rest was meaningless details.
    1
  7198.  @stargazerh112  They only censor really good comments. I'm confident it wasn't about flat earth that they are suppressing.
    1
  7199. Not helping from someone who doesn't like yang. Be better.
    1
  7200.  @danalexander2149  Or keep sucking at life then. Whatever.
    1
  7201. It's like you are getting your talking points from the DCCC.
    1
  7202.  @gregutz4284  Regarding, "getting "paid what your worth" isn't having the federal government set the minimum amount of pay." If people were actually getting paid what they were worth they would be getting more like 25 bucks an hour. But my choice of wording was maybe not the best and I should probably have gone with "paid enough to live on" instead of "paid what your worth." And yeah... people need to be paid enough to live on for reasons that should be obvious.
    1
  7203.  @gregutz4284  Both questions have the same answer: greed. Better question: why are you trying to deflect from the topic at hand?
    1
  7204. "Elon himself probably only has 100mil for himself." If that were true he would be an epic terrible businessman after his companies have gotten billions of dollars in subsidies.
    1
  7205.  @nunyabisnass1141  "i dont know if that would make him terrible to be honest" We are going to have to agree to disagree then. If you are getting billions of dollars and you aren't a billionaire then you have to be an idiot or are at best... a very failed businessman.
    1
  7206.  @celinehary3222  I'm convinced she is on something. At best it's just pure fear and nerves. Not a good look for a presidential candidate but corporate tools like Bill Maher would have us believe she is great. Manufacturing consent is a real thing and they use it for terrible people like her.
    1
  7207. Money in politics is the problem that makes all other problems all but impossible to solve.
    1
  7208. michael regarding, "How many times?" Twice (as I hang my head in shame). I was enthusiastic about it in 2008. Obama gives a great speech, he voted against the Iraq war and I was very happy to vote for the "peace" candidate. By 2012 I was not at all enthusiastic about it but I admit I still did. I had considered myself a democrat all my adult life and still saw them as being better than the Republicans at the time. I concede it probably took more time than it should have to realize that the 2 major parties aren't different in any sort of meaningful way and the biggest lesson I think I've learned is follow the money. My trust in a candidate is going to be directly correlated to how they raise the money for their campaign.
    1
  7209. FYI this sexist Bernie Bro happily voted for Jill Stein for President in 2016 and plans to support Sanders again in 2020 if he runs.
    1
  7210. James he wasn't born in Kenya. Stop acting like an idiot. There are plenty of legit things to say if you want to put him down. Stick to those if you want to make him look bad otherwise you only make yourself look bad.
    1
  7211. Ok James Gray. (rolls eyes, slowly backs away)
    1
  7212.  @josephweeks3815  I think Carter was pretty anti war as well and the hostages were just a means to get rid of him.
    1
  7213.  @blacknap0le0n56  "stealing insinuates lying" They are clearly not the same even if you can rightfully put them into a category of "things bad people do."
    1
  7214.  @blacknap0le0n56  I got this thread confused with another thread and I made a response to you that was bad and I deleted it quickly after realizing my mistake. My comments here are not meant to be taken too seriously and don't really care about engaging in this further. Peace.
    1
  7215.  @russellbarbee6974  "There's no significant difference." I suspect you would understand the difference if I told you bullshit versus stole your car. They are pretty fucking different. Obviously.
    1
  7216. I just had horse food... aka corn.
    1
  7217. Pretty sure he would still be "just talking."
    1
  7218. They are merely the one paying the bill, not "running" it.
    1
  7219.  @patchwurk6652  "Who died and made you the arbiter of ethics?" It feels like you are just hypocritically mad it's not you. Anyways... we do. Society. And we've decided that things like blackmail are abhorrent and wrong and need to be called out.
    1
  7220. Why would you only mention trump and not biden?
    1
  7221. Corporate media is trash.
    1
  7222. Is it your field of expertise? Or are you being a hypocrite?
    1
  7223. You: "her hateful stupidity" You not realizing your blatant hypocrisy, "She is utterly despicable."
    1
  7224. "Why I left the left...because I found a profitable grift." That does sound like something seder would say behind closed doors but it's still not correct because seder was never on the "left." Sam represents the elite and always has.
    1
  7225. It's the dems job to give you crumbs and keep you placated and it's working.
    1
  7226. How many replies can everyone see in the "land of the free?"
    1
  7227. "still supporting the progressive candidates as i can." They aren't in the "democratic" party and they aren't in this video.
    1
  7228.  @bgbthabun627  No I do not. I think he is a sheepherder for a corrupt party.
    1
  7229.  @lindablackwell4852  "he's a regular troll" I make arguments. The only troll here is you.
    1
  7230.  @bgbthabun627  "that actually makes sense." So you don't want to even attempt to address what I said? Bernie is currently voting in lockstep with corporate dems and when it's time to vote he will tell you to vote for the blue team no matter who the candidate is.
    1
  7231.  @bgbthabun627  What's your favorite part of the bill? Mine is the part where they MANDATE drilling.
    1
  7232.  @bgbthabun627  Back when I supported bernie I used to think his supporters were so smart. Now the only people left are sycophants who won't even attempt to defend him. It's telling.
    1
  7233.  @chioma3100  Beto is terrible but he did have one thing going for him... he wasn't Ted Cruz. That guy's face is scientifically proven to be punchable. I've actually been proposing a "punch ted cruz in the face" bill that would charge a person 10K to punch ted in the face. All proceeds would go to pay down the national debt and I figure the entire national debt would be paid off in only a few years as long as ted could stay alive. That said he probably wouldn't but whatever... I'd be fine with that too.
    1
  7234.  @cygnusx-3217 So let's say you were making a good point, and you aren't, then what's the plan? Should we pack up our bags and quit because Trump is inevitable and can't lose? Or do we try to crash the stock market?
    1
  7235. That currentaffairs article was a long read but totally worth it.
    1
  7236. Seek help. Or at least real journalists.
    1
  7237. Meh. The corporate money has been playing both sides for a quite a while now. That way they always win.
    1
  7238.  @richardhall6034  Your comment is funny because you don't care that trump is an immoral POS.
    1
  7239.  @arthurfonzarelli9828  Your stupidity is almost remarkable. Good luck with that.
    1
  7240. But the skirt that caused the joke in the first place isn't cringe?
    1
  7241. Eisenhower is the exception, not the rule.
    1
  7242. Yeah this was just like CNN says total fucking idiots.
    1
  7243. Um.. no.
    1
  7244. Sanders versus the world... as always.
    1
  7245. "This guy is the most successful scammer ever. By far." Meh. Fauci was the one that has thunderfoot fooled.
    1
  7246. What work are you talking about? Voting for more bombs for trump? Yeah... warren did that while Sanders didn't. Seriously thou raven... you are an idiot spouting nonsense.
    1
  7247. I feel the exact same way... but sarcastically.
    1
  7248. You are a moron. Good luck with that.
    1
  7249. Only ironically.
    1
  7250. No big deal as long as it isn't fucked with dildos.
    1
  7251. Regarding, "3.3 billion" I don't need to check this to know it's stupid AF and wrong.
    1
  7252. No he didn't. Stop acting like he voted yes. He didn't. There is no real difference between a non vote and a no vote.
    1
  7253.  @dulynoted2427  We are working to try and make a younger Bernie clone to be his running mate.
    1
  7254.  @tgr.4550  Regarding, " then don't listen to him." I try not to. Unfortunately some people are actively trying to make the world around them as dumb as they are. I mean, just giant walls of bullshit. Mountains of it. Bullshit on top of bullshit on top of bullshit. And apparently you think they "NAILED IT." People like you two make me worry that humanity is doomed.
    1
  7255. FYI you don't have to vote for a POS. And you shouldn't.
    1
  7256. I wish morons like you would call her out for how she uses the power she has... aka her votes. Go back to sleep. Let sam convince you that republicans are the problem when dems have literally all the power.
    1
  7257. ​ @anibalhyrulesantihero7021  Yeah. That doesn't mean that so called "progressives" don't have deciding votes in must pass bills. That means they have leverage. Leverage they have squandered to get jack shit for the people that are suppose to be on their side. They were suppose to be different than the corporate dems but instead they are voting in lock step with them. They are just as full of it as the corporate dems. They played you.
    1
  7258.  @anibalhyrulesantihero7021  "They don't have leverage at all." Meanwhile, in reality nancy pelosi needed their votes to be speaker. Stop listening to sam's BS. He's lying to you.
    1
  7259.  @anibalhyrulesantihero7021  "corporate Democrats wouldn't be getting away with everything" Actually they are getting away with everything because the so called progressives are sellouts and frauds.
    1
  7260.  @anibalhyrulesantihero7021  Sorry not sorry if the truth hurts.
    1
  7261.  @anibalhyrulesantihero7021  I see you got a "fuck joe manchin" playlist. Sam might virtue signal and tell you how mad joe manchin makes him but at the end of the day when it matters most sam will tell you you should be voting for joe as long as he is the one representing your cult in a general.
    1
  7262.  @anibalhyrulesantihero7021  "Progressives don't have control at all." They have control of their votes. And they use their votes to act just like the corporate dems. Actions speak louder than meaningless words. If it votes like a corporate dem it's a corporate dem.
    1
  7263.  @anibalhyrulesantihero7021  "You're being truthful" You got one thing right at least.
    1
  7264.  @anibalhyrulesantihero7021  "Manchin... is too powerful" So you are able to understand that a single senator has power and leverage because of his deciding vote but fail to understand that the squad has any power or leverage when pooling their deciding votes? Are you being intentionally obtuse?
    1
  7265.  @anibalhyrulesantihero7021  "Progressives were against..." So how did it pass?
    1
  7266.  @anibalhyrulesantihero7021  "The rest of the Democrats voted for the gutted" Fair enough. I concede they did not have deciding votes in this specific instance. Why did AOC vote for pelosi? Because that example is different.
    1
  7267.  @anibalhyrulesantihero7021  So why did AOC and the squad vote for her?
    1
  7268.  @anibalhyrulesantihero7021  You just showed how joe manchin had power and leverage because of his deciding votes. AOC and the sqaud had it here. What did they get for it? Manchin got the world.
    1
  7269.  @anibalhyrulesantihero7021  "kevin mccarthy" He couldn't be speaker unless dems voted for him. Sam is just lying by suggesting he might have been speaker.
    1
  7270.  @anibalhyrulesantihero7021  "There weren't other other Democrats to challenge Pelosi" They could have wrote my name if they needed to. Stop with the excuses. " is a coal baron millionaire," LMFAO Is that why he's powerful? And not because of his deciding votes? What is this? How about an answer to my simple and direct question... what did AOC and the squad get for their votes for nancy as speaker?
    1
  7271.  @anibalhyrulesantihero7021  So what did AOC and the squad get for their deciding votes? Oh right... nothing. They sold you out.
    1
  7272. You do realize that banning something does not make it not exist right?
    1
  7273. Meh. There are lots of people who "aren't democrats." Bernie's the man because he has been doing and saying the same correct things for decades.
    1
  7274. Forrest gump was a sweetheart and joe biden was a warmonger. I've thought about it. It makes zero sense.
    1
  7275. Ass regarding, "Did the Iran deal stop then from attempting to make weapons? NO they were developing weapons obviously that's why trump dropped out of it" Bullshit. I'm not sure if you are intentionally lying or just stupid as fuck. Either way you suck at life and continue to make everyone dumber when you open your mouth. You cried like a little bitch because I didn't prove that the OPs post was bullshit. And even after I do you just completely ignore it. Maybe I wouldn't be so angry if people like you weren't making the world a worse place.
    1
  7276. declan regarding, "who's the pathetic one here Clint" You are. We get to have our own opinions. We don't get to have our own facts and you are a fucking liar.
    1
  7277. Regarding, "Key word managed as in we will not show the UN the sites where we test ballistic missiles and enrich uranium." Do you really not anything about uranium? Because it leaves behind a pretty easy to follow trail that lasts for a long time. Just moving it isn't good enough to hide the trail. As always I am unsure if you are intentionally lying or just stupid. Not that it matters. Either way you suck at life.
    1
  7278. Managed access as in they are letting officials in you fucking moron. Do you really not know what the word ACCESS means? The only reason you don't admit it disproves your stupid claim is either because you are intellectually dishonest or stupid. Correction it is probably both.
    1
  7279. Ok dipshit. Just act as if managed someone miraculously changes the meaning of the word access. Just act as if it isn't access if it doesn't happen this second even thou I've already pointed out that uranium leaves a trail that is easily followed and tracked even if that access doesn't happen this second. But I'm happy to quit this as well. Logic and reason is wasted on people like you. But I would appreciate it if you didn't lie and make everyone as dumb as you are in the future. Thanks in advance.
    1
  7280. If you have a direct line to Jesus (you don't) use it for something cool like curing cancer or ending world hunger. Or does your fake deity not give a shit about those things?
    1
  7281. You can't lose something you never had.
    1
  7282. Bolton and McCain are vying for the title of worst person in the world.
    1
  7283. I'm so happy I don't have a job that requires I watch CNN.
    1
  7284.  @edwardsanchez3708  Are your cats the ones working with youtube to censor?
    1
  7285. *cant
    1
  7286.  @ghostratsarah  Regarding, "openly targeting the military" What loaded terms to describe ending war and fighting the MIC. Regarding, "openly targeting the military is the surest fire way to lose the majority of momentum among the public." Obama beat Hillary back in the day in large part to the fact that he voted against the Iraq war. And people in the nation have even more severe war fatigue now. Things like slashing military spending is incredibly popular with the public, because reality.
    1
  7287. For a little perspective Bernie was called a communist by one of the candidates. Weird that type of shit pisses some off. And by weird I mean really predictable.
    1
  7288. Still peddling the bullshit that Nader cost Gore the election in 2000 huh? And doing so while trying to justify making sure there are more Naders? Your comments are always asinine but good luck continuing to polish the turd known as the "democratic" party in the future. We know you will.
    1
  7289. One more thing while I'm at it. Abraham Lincoln was a 3rd party president.
    1
  7290. Funny thing is is that I bet he shave his legs... liar that he is.
    1
  7291.  @bLackmarketRadio  Idiots (that's you and I figured I better make it perfectly clear because you are an idiot) love making assumptions.
    1
  7292.  @bLackmarketRadio  Why bother when you do it for me? Tell me more about myself. I could use a good laugh.
    1
  7293.  @bLackmarketRadio  And...
    1
  7294.  @bLackmarketRadio  That's not about me dipshit. Nobody cares about you. This is about me getting to know myself.
    1
  7295.  @DANISEVIL  "knowing it's not possible is maturity." It's a self defeating attitude that accepts the unacceptable. It's a self defeating attitude that excuses the inexcusable. Why isn't it "not possible" when literally every other country around the globe has it? Accepting that it isn't possible is a sign of patheticness and weakness.
    1
  7296. Aaron is the guy outing a coverup of people murdered in syria. Your comments are terrible as always. I hope you are paid well for you BS.
    1
  7297.  @21b4ll3r21  Regarding, "do you have any idea how ridiculous you sound?" I'm not the one using platitudes. Regarding, " can easily say.. berners remind me of trump fans shouting MAGA when they say "NOT ME, US"" If that's all you have to say you may as well be maga. "yang gang and maga are nothing alike" Nothing alike? Let's count the ways. 1) both yang gang and maga tout their conman is "not a politician" 2) both yang and trump have non profits they can point at to virtue signal how great they are 3) both said they wanted to give everyone health care and both lied about it 4) both yang gang and maga are some of the most disingenuous lying mfs i have the misfortune of coming across 5) both yang gang and maga are led by conmen
    1
  7298. The powers that be redefined the word vaccine rather than give the world an actual vaccine.
    1
  7299. Don't mistake what he is doing as "no understanding." It's far more nefarious.
    1
  7300. 1) any of the members who ran on m4a to win their seat. 2) not let her or anyone who doesn't bring m4a to a vote to the floor. The only way ANYONE becomes speaker is if they promise to bring m4a to a vote. 3) little to nothing and I don't care. It's a no brainer to force the vote.
    1
  7301. One more thing regarding, "There’s no alternative speaker to promote" Of course there is. People like you are pretty tough to take seriously.
    1
  7302.  @MasterMarcon  "doesn’t result in anyone being primaried because of it?" Either A) it does pass and we get m4a or B) there will be people going on the record against it and literally ANYONE standing in the way of this is exposed as a fraud even if some fakes can find shade.
    1
  7303.  @MasterMarcon  Of course people would and could be primaried because of this. That's why nancy and the other corporate shills will fight so hard to prevent this vote from happening.
    1
  7304.  @MasterMarcon  Regarding, "people like me" As in morons who don't understand why this is a no brainer if you want m4a. Regarding, "the only people standing in the way of it will be people who already are on the record opposing it: the blue dogs" If you say so. I don't really care. Ultimately whoever stops it WILL pay a price if they are forced to vote on this. It isn't rocket science.
    1
  7305.  @MasterMarcon  "what does a vote where they confirm they’re against it do?" Because the public is more likely to hold voting against m4a against someone during a pandemic than just saying they are against a hypothetical idea that, unless is actually brought to the floor for a vote is more accurately portrayed by corporate media as "pie in the sky" and "unattainable fantasy" rather than an ACTUAL VOTE TO GIVE PEOPLE HEALTH CARE THAT THEY ARE VOTING AGAINST.
    1
  7306.  @MasterMarcon  Do you really not know the answers to your own questions?
    1
  7307.  @MasterMarcon  FYI I love AOC and have supported her in the past. If she doesn't force the vote then she is dead to me. That's the type of thing I get to learn because of force the vote.
    1
  7308. Nah. They should all do it. It makes perfectly clear where their biases are. I have more issue when they pretend they don't have their favorites when it's clear they do.
    1
  7309.  @pizzahuttmorelikepizzabutt2066  "he only tells the "truth" about one side." Of course he's called out republicans and their ilk. But also tells you why he considers the "left" to be the "problem." That there will always be a terrible right but we need an actual left and we don't. You are just lying and it's... "super suspect" That you act like he's a trump supporter or some shit. He always said he's terrible. "You think repubs or Tucker Carlson are telling the truth about Syria?" Nope. Jimmy dore is the truth teller and that's what this is about. Repubs and tucker will deflect, much like you are.
    1
  7310. Yes he did but that doesn't mean I care for your whataboutism argument.
    1
  7311. You have issues. Seek psychiatric help.
    1
  7312. Hitlery regarding, "Bernie the weak boy sanders" That wouldn't be considered clever at a kindergarten level. "awakened citizen" is impressed thou and was wondering if you would like to dress up like Trump and 69.
    1
  7313. Awakened citizen regarding, "did you have fun typing all that billshit I didn't read" So you go from saying the only reason I didn't respond to the idiotic things is because I couldn't which is obviously idiotic because I did. Then when I do they claim they stick their fingers in their ears and didn't read it. Then says, "Stop projecting your homosexual fantasies onto others," which demonstrates that they are lying when they say they didn't read my posts. Too fucking funny. You are a disgrace to the human race but at least I can get a good laugh at your expense.
    1
  7314. LMFAO. Bernie has opposed superdelegates since the beginning of time. Try not to let it trigger you too much.
    1
  7315.  @kenmck7802  Please leave the identity politics bullshit out of it.
    1
  7316.  @kenmck7802  "Pretending to be Black when she's as WHITE as they come." This is identity politics 101 whether or not you realize it or admit it. And it's garbage. If you really want to be effective in trashing her leaving this shit out of it. I rightfully tune out you and anyone who invokes this type of garbage. You may as well be biden telling tell people they aren't black for voting for him. He's wrong for doing that shit and you are wrong for doing what you are for the same reasons.
    1
  7317. Not exactly. If people were "immune" they wouldn't all be getting a cold. This is what's now as at it being "endemic."
    1
  7318.  @igotaglockinmysock  Regarding, "politicians can't get in any dodo video?" In a world that made sense they wouldn't allow their channel be used for political theater and photo ops. Yes. And it applies to literally all politicians. Regarding, "Lmao grow up" Grow up and recognize propaganda when you see it you sheep.
    1
  7319.  @igotaglockinmysock  Regarding, "I just don't understand why everyone is having a hissy fit over him being in a video about his dog he adopted two years ago." It's political propaganda inserted into what was puppy videos. This is suppose to be the place we go to ESCAPE things like politics. It has zero business here, of any politician or political party. Not that they would ever have done such a thing for the orange clown.
    1
  7320.  @igotaglockinmysock  Regarding, "because you called me a sheep, I already know you're a trump supporter. Says all I need to know about you" I also just called him an orange clown so you are obvious wrong about this. You should consider the possibility that you are wrong about everything. You really should consider the possibility that you are sheep if you can't recognize obvious political propaganda such as this.
    1
  7321.  @igotaglockinmysock  Regarding, "ok gotcha" No. You don't. And likely never will. Regarding, "I'm a sheep because i think dodo can post whatever they want!" Is that what it sounded like to you? I was actually saying that you are sheep because you can't identify easily identifiable propaganda. But don't let that stop you from strawmanning me and saying silly things. Regarding, "I guess I am wrong about everything." You were the same simpleton that came to the moronic conclusion that I must be a trump supporter because of stupid reasons right? Well you are wrong about everything else it seems. Regarding, "Thanks for enlightening me." I can't. You are what is known as "hopeless."
    1
  7322.  @igotaglockinmysock  Regarding, "information" Check Regarding, "especially of a biased... nature" They wouldn't do the same thing for trump, and rightfully so because they shouldn't be giving political photo ops for any politician. Regarding, "used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view" That is being used to promote, publicize, and make you feel happy good thoughts about a specific politician and POTUS elect. Regarding, "Does a video about joe biden's shelter dog sound like that to you?" Yes. It clearly checks all the right boxes. Regarding, "Or are you actually the simpleton?" Dunning-kruger effect much?
    1
  7323.  @igotaglockinmysock  Regarding, "It's because Trump hasn't adopted a shelter dog." LMFAO. No. They wouldn't. What about every other conservative politician? Have they never done so as well? Regarding, "I'm sure they would cover it" LMFAO. You really think so? Tell you what, let's use a reductio ad absurdum argument. This is not meant to compare or equate biden for hitler. What if, hypothetically, hitler were alive and well? Would the dodo cover it? And give hitler some good PR? Because hitler loved puppies according to his camera team? Would they cover that? Should they cover that? Regarding, "They have done this with plenty of other people and celebrities." But not a single politician that I know of and I have been watching for some time... and for good reason. Because this was one of the last places on earth we used to be able to go and not think about politics. Sadly we now get political PR. As for the rest of your crap I'm bored of addressing it. I already feel like I've wasted far too much time addressing you as is.
    1
  7324. It was an endorsement... nothing more. Stop pretending it was his soul. I was and still am a supporter of his who wanted Sanders to tell Hillary and the DNC to go fuck themselves but I get it. He didn't want to be blamed for Trump winning and can you really blame him after watching Trump in action? Again I fucking love Sanders but I didn't give a crap who he endorsed. Only sheep vote based on someone else's endorsement and Sanders supporters are not sheep like the general public. I happily voted for Jill Stein and would do so again if the same election were today.
    1
  7325. I can tell how out of touch he is by the way he reaches average americans.
    1
  7326.  @myNameWasNobody75  I guess after they make a movie about the current genocide you might start caring about it.
    1
  7327.  @myNameWasNobody75  you're like a bot by AIPAC. You gaslight.
    1
  7328.  @myNameWasNobody75  They aren't random. If you were intelligent you would know that. Good luck with your gaslighting for apartheid israel!
    1
  7329.  @myNameWasNobody75  Zionism is a akin to notseaism. You disgust me for the same reason notseas disgust me.
    1
  7330.  @myNameWasNobody75  You disgust me for the same reason I'm disgusted by notseas.
    1
  7331.  @myNameWasNobody75  "The Zion card." You should be ashamed of being a zionist for the same reason notseas should be ashamed of their ideology. You disgust me.
    1
  7332.  @myNameWasNobody75  You should be embarrassed about being a zio for the same reason notseas should be embarrassed about their ideology. It's too bad you aren't.
    1
  7333. Me? Less than 1.
    1
  7334. He absolutely did not misspeak and his point was clear. White people built America as in white people built all the systems in place and made all the rules that everyone plays under. Comeon man. You are too smart to seemingly go out of your way to misunderstand this point and obvious truth to try and make your completely unrelated point about labor.
    1
  7335.  @nicnac9443  Regarding, "I think you misunderstood" I definitely did not. You wanted to make a point how minorities were instrumental in being the labor that built much of America. There is a way to do it that doesn't including going out of your way to intentionally miss David's point about whites males being the rule makers since the founding of the nation. Maybe, just maybe it was unintentional misunderstanding. I can't say for sure. I can't read your mind. But it sure as fuck feels like you are going out your way to INTENTIONALLY miss his point that is OBVIOUS and easily understood by anyone not going out their way to not get it so they can say something they think everyone doesn't already know, but should, and has literally nothing to do with the immediate topic at hand.
    1
  7336. Check out the video of antonio brown farting on his doctor if you haven't already seen it.
    1
  7337.  @TheBlazersfan22  That doc doesn't even appreciate that he's getting for free what AB could have put into a jar and sold.
    1
  7338. pink pearl regarding, "YOU said no one had heard of him." Yeah well I gave you more credit than I should have for being able to use context. I had no idea you were going to take it literal and think I was saying absolutely nobody in the world had heard of him including his mother. How fucking dumb are you? The point, not that you seem capable of understanding even the simplest of ideas, is that compared to people like Lady Gaga and Kim K he is completely unknown and only a fucking moron like yourself would think to compare them and try to put them in the same category. Regarding, "how do you justify Jimmy's coverage of Woody Allen's commentary on Weinstein?" I don't need to justify jack fucking shit. Jimmy can do whatever the fuck he wants to do. He can go ahead and cover Louis CK if he wants. But I suspect that the reason Jimmy covered Woody Allen's commentary on Weinstein for the same reasons he covered Weinstein. It includes the phrase "on Weinstein" for fucks sake. How the fuck are you so dumb you don't know the answers to your own idiotic questions? Regarding, "At least Sam Seder had the balls to discuss CK." Now it all starts to make sense. You are a Sam Seder ball sucker. Go watch him them fuckface instead of trying to invent stupid conspiracy theories as to why Jimmy is not talking about Louis CK. You two deserve each other because you are both fucking morons.
    1
  7339.  @scruffopone3989  I thought the story you sedar clowns went with is that he talks about force the vote too much? Try to keep your BS stories straight at least.
    1
  7340.  @scruffopone3989  "they're not the same" LMFAO Force the vote is literally about universal healthcare. You can't be anymore intellectually dishonest if you tried.
    1
  7341.  @brentpham1155  You are being "fair" the same way she was "going off script." You are both making up lies to cover the truth.
    1
  7342.  @brentpham1155  Regarding, "I never wrote that she wasnt reading off a teleprompter." And never do I say you said this. I do point out that you are rationalizing and excusing her immoral and lying behavior. And you were.
    1
  7343.  @brentpham1155  We've all seen movies where a person is giving a speech and in that speech they have a moral dilemma. A dilemma they use to "go off script." Her PERFORMANCE was a just that of a terrible actor trying to replicate what she has seen in movies. It's abhorrent. And you shouldn't be defending it as being anything other than that. To be fair.
    1
  7344.  @iBasheveryone  " "Abhorrent"?" Yes. Abhorrent. "You act as if this actually affects your own life." Propaganda like this manipulating the public obviously affects me.
    1
  7345. It is difficult to know where to begin to explain why literally everything you said was silly. I guess I'll just try to start at the start. Regarding, "Kyle, you're just like all the trumptards that can't manage to forget about Hilary." Um... no. Absolutely not. You are comparing people who "can't forget about Hillary" only to try and justify Trumps suck to someone who "can't forget about Hillary" because Hillary is actually still relevant to this world in many different ways and acting as if their motives and rational are, in any way shape or form the same when it is obvious they are totally fucking different. Regarding, "It's been over a year" How exactly do you think this is relevant to the conversation? When exactly did this conversation expire? Was it the day after the election to you? A month after? 6 months? What point are you really trying to make with this? Regarding, "she lost" The phrase that goes something like, "those that don't examine the past are destined to repeat" is a thing because it is really fucking accurate and important. We, as in society, need to know why she lost accurately so that we are able to avoid it in the future. And that is does not mean that we need to make sure the Hillary Clinton's of world need to win going forward but we need to examine the past to make sure that the Donald Trumps of the world don't win in the future. Hillary Clinton needs to be made by the public to take responsibility for her loss. The bullshit narrative that she lost because of russia or bernie or comey or sexism or all the other bullshit excuses of her loss and that bullshit needs to be squashed because in general bullshit needs to be called out and specifically because this particular bullshit would serve to excuse her failure. Regarding, "she's irrelevant now" No. She absolutely is not. She is why Tom Perez is the chair of the party and why they continue to suck balls. She has the ear of many of the country. Kyle could never mention her name ever again but she is still going to be talked about by the corporate media. She is being asked these questions still because she isn't in fact irrelevant. There is a big difference between what you want to hear talked about and what is actually relevant. If she were really so irrelevant like you claim then why the fuck are you even commenting? Regarding, "stop dedicating stories to revive her from the dead!" It is difficult to express how hard it is to take your comment seriously. I'm actually surprised I've written so much about it as I have. I'm not going to claim I've done an excellent job addressing it. I haven't, in part because it is so fucking absurd I can't really even take it seriously. But if you want to think imply that if only Kyle were to stop talking about Hillary then no one else would the you go right ahead. Sane people realize that such a notion is fucking absurd thou. It is that that I have take the most exception with. Well that and the fact that you think Kyle talking about her is done so in the same way Trump supporters do it. Both those notions are seriously beyond stupid.
    1
  7346. Regarding, "All that writing and all you managed to do is look backwards in history." Yeah because studying history is totally unimportant am I right? Regarding, "I get the point you're trying to make." Do you? Because literally everything else you say suggest otherwise. Regarding, "all those points can be made without talking about Hillary's opinion on why she lost" Context is pretty fucking important. When debunking flat earthers or others spouting bullshit do you think it is logical to do so without talking about why they think what they do? Because that makes no fucking sense. Regarding, "do you really care about her opinion?" Not in the context that I think it valid or reasonable but I do care about her opinion in the context that her bullshit needs to be corrected. If I used this type of stupid logic I for example, wouldn't think that fox news bullshit needs to be corrected. But because bullshit needs to be called out and corrected I do care. I'm not going to leave it around to let it stink up the joint. Regarding, "I sure don't!" Yeah. I can totally tell by you feeling the need to engage in this conversation. How about, if you actually believe the bullshit you are saying, then you do anything else with your time? Kyle and myself think it is important to call her out and we are going to continue to do so despite your whining. Regarding, "Yes I know Kyle isn't like the trumptards" Thanks for stating the obvious. I guess I was confused when you started your original post with, "you're just like all the trumptards." Regarding, "but they still talk about her at the end of the day." What a simplistic view you have. I guess I think context is important unlike some. Regarding, "You can't tell a trumptard to..." In all honesty I don't spend a lot of time worrying about Trump supporters. I am more concerned about people who are capable of using logic and reason. Regarding, "telling the people on your side to move on as well" I'm not sure who the people you think are "on my side" or "not on my side" are regardless that type of team mentality shit isn't for me. I also don't give a fuck about "moving on." That isn't a priority for me the way it seems to be for you. I care about truth. I have no tolerance for stupid and bullshit and will call it out regardless of who is doing it and how long ago it happened. Regarding, "How long after the election do you want to continue talking about her?" At least until I think the narrative is correct. At least until the corrupt forces that allowed her to rig the primary have been more adequately dealt with. I have no expiration on this especially when she still has a platform to be making excuses for her loss which she obviously does. Regarding, "Eventually you're gonna have to move on bro! Why not fight the problems of today today?" 2 points. First I can walk and chew gum at the same time. Second if you think corruption in the party isn't a "problem of today" then you are fucking insane. Just recently there was audio of Hoyer talking about how the party insiders are happy to put their finger on scale. You act like this shit is ancient history and totally solved. It isn't. Stop being ridiculous. Regarding, "Yes, Clinton was a neo liberal... but she's not the only one." It's like you are trying to make my argument for me with this statement. Regarding, "The difference is she has no power" I wish you realized how naive this statement is. And isn't just about "her." It is about all the people around her and the people that continue to try and excuse her loss on anything other than her. If they are able to blame russia or any of their other excuses then there is no need to change.... it wasn't really their fault afterall according to their bullshit. Regarding, "I'd rather focus on the ones with real official power.... like Tom Perez." The only reason Tom Perez is the chair is because Hillary Clinton "won" the nomination. You are acting as if this shit takes place in a vacuum and they are independent of one another when they are clearly joined at the hip. Regarding, "You could attack him without having to talk about Hillary. Do you see my point!" So you want me to gloss over the part about why he has the power he does because you can't stand to hear Hillary's name or something? Do you see my point? Because your point is garbage. Regarding, "If you ignore her, she will go away." You could say the same thing about herpes but that wouldn't make that true either. Regarding, "If you give her the platform, whether they are bashing her or praising her, at the end of the day, you are still giving her a platform." She already has the fucking platform for fucks sake. This shit happened regardless of Kyle and myself. Seeing as how that is the reality I'm going to use my platform to bash her because she needs bashing.
    1
  7347. Sorry bud not everything can fit on a bumpersticker. I wasn't looking to get pulled into this but you did ask for an explanation. Next time be careful what you wish for and don't say so many things that need to be corrected. Do us both a favor and don't reply. You haven't said anything that hasn't been terrible so far so I have no reason to think that is going to change.
    1
  7348. Regarding, "it's clear to me the one who isn't willing to have a discussion is you." Um, no shit sherlock. My original comment demonstrated that I wasn't looking to have a discussion. I said I wasn't looking to have a discussion. You didn't ask for a discussion. You asked for an explanation and I offered it even thou, as I suspected by your original comment, you would have difficulty understanding it. Regarding, "You literally replied to every word I said...literally!" Yup. I go out of my way to not gloss over and ignore things people say like so many. You say this like it is a bad thing. To me it is a good thing. Regarding, "I'm definitely not asking for a bumper sticker argument, so don't start with the strawmen argument." It was not a strawman argument. It was hyperbole. You don't like how I do things, fine. Ignore me. I am far less relevant than Hillary Clinton and you think she shouldn't be talked to or acknowledged so that shouldn't be hard or unreasonable. But instead you think that I need to respond to you how you want me to. Not only in how much I say but in how I say it. You want me to be nice to you. Sorry but that isn't happening either. I'm long winded and I'm a dick but I'm honest. Take it or leave it. Do us both a favor and leave it. Regarding, "my opinion=we don't need to talk about Hillary to accomplish the mission." I don't even know what your "mission" is much less have an accurate idea if I agree with it. Like I've said the closest thing I have to a "mission" is correcting bullshit so that it doesn't continue to stink the place up. Regarding, "Your opinion=we need to talk about her so we don't repeat the same mistakes." Very simplistic and hardly representative of my beliefs. You leave out important aspects such as the need to make sure that Hillary is blamed for her loss so that the powers that be are forced to make appropriate changes and not act as if it wasn't really her fault. Regarding, "I believe you're too focused on an individual (Hillary), rather than the ideology she represents." And you have come to this conclusion because I accurately say that she isn't irrelevent despite your silly claim. And you come to this conclusion without knowing anything about me other than the that fact and the fact that I think your comments are absurd. I spend lots of time fighting her ideology and people like her but don't let that get in the way of your assumption. Regarding, "I'm more worried about the ideology because that's where the real source of the problem is." You know what one of the best ways to fight that ideology is? It is by pointing out how it has failed in the past... you know... like Hillary Clinton. Regarding, "Those of us in progressive circles know her downfall" So you think that Kyle and myself should only be talking to and addressing "those in progressive circles." We should be ignoring people like the person asking his insane question and pretend that they don't exist or matter. Sheesh. Regarding, "Kyle is preaching to the choir here. Everyone in his audience knows she's crap" Some things are worth repeating. Some things are worth emphasizing. Especially when the person in question, despite your claims, already has a platform to shout their bullshit. Based on your "logic" there would be no need to give logical reasons why Alex Jones, Hannity, Joy Reid and many others bullshit needs to be corrected either. We all already know that right? Well I for one am glad that Kyle does what he does. If you don't like it then you should start your own channel and you can dedicate as much of it as you like to pretending Hillary Clinton doesn't exist.
    1
  7349. Regarding, "your argument is all over the place. And it's super annoying." If I thought more of your arguments and opinion this would be far more meaningful. Seeing as how I don't... ok... whatever. Regarding, "What gets me is that it's you that was triggered by my comment, then you come after me but you leave no room for any sort of discussion" Your original comment is akin to saying the earth is flat in that it is stupid as fuck and makes everyone who reads it dumber. I know you, just like flat earthers, think their opinion and comments should be taken seriously by me and given respect but it doesn't. I just wanted to give you my two cents that said that I think what you said was dumb as fuck without really bothering to elaborate as to why. You, like the flat earther, have already given what you are talking about "thought" and still have come to utterly insane conclusions. There is no reason or logical argument that is going to make a difference to either of you on the topic. But you were nice and asked for an explanation so I thought I'd give it. Man do I regret that now. Regarding, "cuz you didn't want a discussion" Yeah. I don't have unlimited time and energy or I would happily try to walk through why literally everything you say is wrong. Regarding, "Then you attack my freedom of expression by telling not to comment if I disagree with Kyle's point." No. I tell you that what you are saying is stupid. You don't get this because you clearly do not do nuance very well. If what you said is true then it would be equally true to say that you were "attacking kyle's freedom of expression by telling him not to comment about Hillary Clinton." I don't say that because saying that would be stupid. Regarding, "Then I reply to your points, then you continue to tell me not to express my opinions." No. I tell you that what you say is stupid and I ask you to stop because I have a weakness in that I have a hard time letting stupid shit go unanswered. Seeing as how you only say stupid shit I concede I'm going to have a hard time not responding to you. Regarding, "you haven't presented anything empirical or objective to back up your argument" I guess, for example, pointing out that Hillary has a platform of her ideas when that is obviously true despite the stupid shit you say isn't "empirical or objective." Regarding, "you are complaining about my opinion by claiming I'm wrong right off the bat, and no room for discussion" Same stupid shit flat earthers say. Your opinion is wrong because it is wrong. Sorry for not being anxious to have a discussion with you or them. Regarding, "I can care less about what you have to say" The fact that you are responding demonstrates that what you are saying is bullshit. Regarding, "it seem you cared a whole lot more" Like I've said I care about the truth and I have a problem with people like you taking a shit all over it. Regarding, "Chill out, stop being so triggered, and actually open your mind to other opinions" Should I be open to the opinion the earth is flat? Of course not. I'm not about to be open to your stupid as fuck opinions either for the same reasons. I'm betting you understand that. But because it is your stupid as fuck opinions you can't understand why I am not open to your dumb ideas because they are yours. Regarding, "especially when discussing subjective matters" Saying, "you're just like all the trumptards that can't manage to forget about Hilary" and "she's irrelevant now" are not subjectively wrong. They are objectively wrong.
    1
  7350. Stop being a dipshit and I won't have to be "triggered." I won't hold my breathe thou. You can't change the fact that you are dumb. It is who you are.
    1
  7351. Good thing I wasn't holding my breathe waiting for you to not be dumb. I'd elaborate but there is obviously is no point.
    1
  7352. You sure do love talking about strawman arguments even thou you demonstrate you have no fucking idea what you are talking about. No, I would be wasting my time because you lack an ability to use logic and reason effectively. By the way that was me calling you stupid in case you were too stupid to realize it.
    1
  7353. Dipshit it would have been a strawman argument if I were claiming that you believed the earth was flat. That would be a "perfect example of a strawman argument" and that was absolutely not in any way shape or form what I was doing. You think the things you do because you are stupid.
    1
  7354. As always you think the things you do because you are stupid. Good luck with that. But thanks for not responding anymore. I feel like just being exposed to you is making me dumber.
    1
  7355. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
    1
  7356. Do they? Or are you just racist?
    1
  7357. This is either good sarcasm or you are an idiot.
    1
  7358. No. It would only be shocking if they were covering it they way they should.
    1
  7359.  @TheBelegur  "I thought Kayleigh McEnany and Dana Perino where good." "good" They are professional liars. Is being a better liar really "good?"
    1
  7360.  @TheBelegur  I recommend some george carlin standup on politics. He had it figured out in a time when it was FAR harder to see it. "it's a big club and you ain't in it." "they don't give a f about you. AT ALL!" -carlin
    1
  7361.  @TheBelegur  In a sane world the president themselves would answer questions. But then they would be held accountable for the lies. That's why those people have jobs. To tell lies on behalf of corrupt politicians.
    1
  7362.  @TheBelegur  "If fake news wasn't twisting everyone words..." Is it better when they censor? This comment of yours is being shadowbanned.
    1
  7363.  @TheBelegur  "his right to free speech" It's ironic that you think you and him have free speech in the same thread that your words are being shadowbanned.
    1
  7364.  @TheBelegur  "I could care less." They said while AGAIN being shadowbanned. But you did give your own a comment a thumbs up. That must mean you are really onto something. /s
    1
  7365.  @TheBelegur  "If I am not for me who will be?" I'm going to care that you are being censored even if you don't care about it.
    1
  7366.  @TheBelegur  "I am woefully ignorant of it." Let's just say that if we actually had free speech then you would be able to read all the replies that youtube says is there. But threads where you can read all the replies are all but non existent.
    1
  7367.  @TheBelegur  "I am woefully ignorant of it" It's arguably more sinister than outright censoring because when that happens you KNOW your message isn't going out. But they shadowban so that you can think your comment can be seen even when it can't. I'm only aware of some of your comments because they show in my notifications... but if I were just some random looking at the thread or by myself when signed out then several of your comments in this thread cannot be seen.
    1
  7368. "China kill half the world." Are they the one with troops all over the globe?
    1
  7369. "she knows exactly what she's doing" Look at who she married and try to understand why you are being silly.
    1
  7370. Better yet, AOC to get primaried.
    1
  7371. You think he is sexual predator. That should be enough for reasons that should be obvious to the point of never needing be explained. But if you want to act like the problem with Biden is that he isn't our "first choice" and not that he is just a disgrace to our species... you are pretty hopeless. Good luck with your sexual predator.
    1
  7372.    Don't forget to give your own comment a thumbs up like you always do.
    1
  7373.    Regarding, "you continue to be wrong about everything." I'm not going to lie... this made me laugh. You have nothing better to do than make an ass of yourself do you? Feel free to troll me because you have no friends. I don't care at this point. I mostly just pity you.
    1
  7374.    Say whatever you what but try not to lie to yourself the way you lie to everyone. For example you know you give your own comments a thumbs up even if you haven't here. You have even admitted it to me in the past FFS. But you are so used to lying all the time aren't you that you just play pretend. Everything about you is fake. Hopefully even you realize it on some level. Then again you might be full on delusional and in denial. Whatever. It doesn't really matter. Either way you are a disgrace to humanity.
    1
  7375. Go out and vote if not for Biden or Trump. They aren't the only candidates nor is it the only election to vote on.
    1
  7376. I'm not a trump fan and I disliked so you are wrong about this.
    1
  7377.  @jamescipikoff-walker7736  I'm a sane person who doesn't appreciate political photo ops given by the dodo to any politician. Why don't you care about this type of blatant propaganda? I suspect you would if they were letting trump use their platform for political theater but not here, why exactly?
    1
  7378. 26 states haven't voted yet. Only morons think the game is over at halftime.
    1
  7379.  @techedzee  Regarding, "sorry but I don’t live in fantasy land." LOL. Clearly you do. Regarding, "We can only burn Joe." Um what? Joe can still burn but he has it on lockdown? The guy with dementia? You are impossible to take seriously.
    1
  7380. If you care about credit instead of caring about results you are lost.
    1
  7381.  @chickenfishhybrid44  Regarding, "I was just stating the obvious that most the media would have never allowed that to land well." Is that what you were doing? You were doing it wrong. Your OP addresses "noone." Now you are talking about the "media" like they are the same thing or some shit.
    1
  7382.  @chickenfishhybrid44  I prefer to agree with people. Sadly I don't get the chance to as much as I'd like. Let's say your OP was, "Don't kid yourself, noone in the corporate media would allow Trump a lick of credit for pushing for a vaccine lol," I could have actually understood your meaning, agreed with you, and given you a thumbs up. That's what I would have liked.
    1
  7383.  @chickenfishhybrid44  "She was saying that Trump missed a real big political oppurtunity by not talking up the vaccine production." He did. Because even if the corporate media wouldn't have given him credit some of the peasants who vote would have.
    1
  7384.  @flyrodmike  "condoned by the oligarchs" I really do agree. But hedges would make the oligarchs scared. So scared they might even be willing to give some decent crumbs... unlike what we are currently getting.
    1
  7385.  @j.f.m5936  "He wouldn’t get anywhere near the presidency." Yeah. But the campaign would still be worth it. To have a candidate championing the important issues and dragging the overton window to the left would be invaluable even if he would never be allowed to win.
    1
  7386. Annoying and dumb.
    1
  7387. It was an act of environmental terrorism committed by the US.
    1
  7388. Knowing that makes you smarter then most people.
    1
  7389. If they were really scared then they would have been dealt with how BLM protestors are.
    1
  7390.  @antipolitics  "the capital owners." They were planning ways to use this event to further their long term goals (for example by trying to reign in freedom and liberty) BEFORE this happened.
    1
  7391.  @antipolitics  The powers that be knew what was going to happen and let it happen.
    1
  7392. Everybody knows they are not free as in they don't cost money. But they are free in that they are being paid for by the person getting the benefit at the time. The people who want to attack someone on that grounds isn't to be taken seriously regardless. They are not going to be appeased by re-branding. They will still call you a communist and other stupid shit.
    1
  7393. While I generally agree with your comment there are exceptions. AOC for example isn't "hesitating," she is being strategic IMO.
    1
  7394. Still they make billions without you. You might want to consider yours isn't the only opinion.
    1
  7395. Sure he did but don't let the facts get in the way of you lying.
    1
  7396. Worst. Idea. Ever.
    1
  7397. Please stop crying about having to contribute to society, a society that benefits you by building roads, schools, and public services. Or leave and go find your utopia elsewhere.
    1
  7398.  @camelopardalis84  Regarding, "I will look into Warren's record on - for lack of a better term - MIC issues." Her record isn't very long. It doesn't include things like a vote for or against war with Iraq. It has more to do with her rhetoric on the topic. And it's never been that of actual progressives like Sanders or Tulsi, it's been that of a typical neoliberal warmonger. Regarding, "MIC issues. And did I get that right?" Military industrial complex which is own personal description of foreign policy. Regarding, "People called her a progressive because weapons were being built in her home state?" I'm saying that people, who were trying to explain her hawkish when it comes to war and foreign policy, were rationalizing and excusing her positions on the topic because so many jobs in her state are tied to weapons development. That that is why she said what she did on foreign policy, not because she is just the type of terrible person who would eventually vote to give billions more in bombs to a commander in chief she calls unhinged, even more money for bombs than the unhinged guy wanted. Regarding, "Or were there just people who felt the need to defend her becauses they liked her for that weapon manufaturing?" I don't really read comments all the way through. I read them as I try to address points as they are being made. Hopefully I've already answered this. I was talking about warren apologists. Who knew that what she was doing wasn't very progressive but wanted to continue to claim that she was a progressive. Regarding, "I fell for Obama in 2008" As did I. What a great conman. The biggest lesson I learned was to follow the money more. Obama was selling his soul. Sanders on the other hand has a campaign that's being paid for by US. And politicians represent who pays for their campaigns. Regarding, "There must be such a huge portion of people in the US who never gets the chance to vote for someone who's in line with or even to the left of them " This country is pretty messed up. I'm old as dirt and I've voted in all presidential elections available to me. 2016 was literally the first time in my entire life that my vote was important. In every other election ever I could have just stayed home confidently knowing that my vote was meaningless because I was living in a deep red or deep blue state and my vote wasn't going to matter. 2016 was the first time ever that I was in a swing state at the time of the election. My very first "meaningful" presidential vote in my entire old as dirt life. I "wasted" it on Jill Stein. I say wasted with quotes because I again knew it wasn't going to matter. It wasn't a waste though. And I've never regretted it. She was the only candidate running that I actually wanted to win.
    1
  7399. Puberty, and call me larry.
    1
  7400. Trump being a POS isn't a logical reason to vote for Biden anymore than Biden being a POS is a logical reason to vote for Trump.
    1
  7401.  @bobbybostic7947  Regarding, "assuming there are strings is about as presumptive as assuming there aren't" I'll assume you are being intentionally obtuse then. You are impossible to take seriously. If you are being serious you are stupid beyond words... good luck with that. Regarding, "then make a pledge to support whoever the DNC pics as their nominee." Because I vote my values and, for example, joe biden doesn't represent me. Good luck with your stupid vote blue no matter who bullshit. You suck at life. No joke.
    1
  7402.  @bobbybostic7947  No strings right? Meanwhile this is actually the reality in which you exist. Maybe get to know it instead of making the world dumber the way you are. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5tu32CCA_Ig
    1
  7403.  @bobbybostic7947  I did a lot more than just insult you. I told you exactly why I was insulting you. The irony is that I hope you are a troll. For your sake I hope you understand why everything you say is idiotic and only serves to make the world dumber.
    1
  7404.  @bobbybostic7947  Just when I thought you couldn't be any dumber you prove me wrong. Wow do you suck.
    1
  7405.  @bobbybostic7947  I really hope you are being paid for your crap. I really hope you are not as dumb as all your comments. Not that it really matters. Either way you are an embarrassment to the human race.
    1
  7406. Hopefully this ends up being the only thing that guy ends up being known for.
    1
  7407. Does nothing to solve the problem which is money in politics.
    1
  7408. Stop with stuff like this and focus on the class divide. That's what matters.
    1
  7409. @William Tell "the class divide that feminists have largely created" No. I'm talking about a class divide that has been there since this country was founded by slaveowners.
    1
  7410. I know right. I used to like him. Better to know he's a fraud and be heartbroken than follow a fraud.
    1
  7411.  @nambochimbanskeyold  If I had the wrong impression I would have given your nonsense a thumbs up. I don't appreciate his lies.
    1
  7412.  @nambochimbanskeyold  I was mocking you.
    1
  7413. I want more people who are pissed at this country. They should be.
    1
  7414.  @whoopsie890  "having the MAGA Q-Anon people take over" Like there was any possibility of that happened. LMFAO "speed up fascism" It's already here. Your democracy was dead a long time ago. Maybe realize it.
    1
  7415. If your taxes would go up by that much under president sanders you are rich as fuck and can afford it.
    1
  7416.  @deathbysvent  What? I wasn't talking about USA insurance companies. I was talking about who a President Sanders is going to be making pay for his proposals like medicare for all and it isn't the working class, at least not the bulk of it. He has made clear that the rich and corporations will be paying for the bulk of it. Wow is this thread way off the rails says a person who is from the US.
    1
  7417.  @deathbysvent  Fair enough. I assure you that you did misunderstand my comment and the point I was trying to make. It happens. I was trying to point out who exactly Sanders is proposing pay for his proposals and it isn't the average joe. I'm a diehard Sanders supporter because he's working for the working class and asking the richest of the rich to start paying their fair share.
    1
  7418. That was a really long video if it was only about him being his friend.
    1
  7419. Everyone has their bias but the people who are open an honest about facts, like Jordan being honest about being a friend of Jimmy's, means he is far less likely to be letting their bias be the only thing going on. I think Pakman is a joke and his arguments were asinine and I'm not friends with Jimmy as if that has something to do with the arguments being used. Forgive me for not telling you why what Pakman said was dumb because I think Jordan already did a good enough job on that front.
    1
  7420. Regarding, "The problem that people have with Jimmy isn't that he is wrong" So you have a problem with someone that, according to you here, isn't wrong. You obviously do think he is wrong as demonstrated by everything else you said. You want your cake and to eat it too. Sorry but I don't have the time or ambition to continue this.
    1
  7421. She had the chance to be a hero and ride the momentum all the way to the WH. Instead she is losing all the credibility she had with the people that got her where she is. If she wanted the cushy life she is fucking up.
    1
  7422.  @stevekake3359  Do you know if that's the same math the government is using? So when they just gave out 600 dollar checks (1/10 of the 6K), does that mean they calculated it was costing them 200 billion? Because if that's the math the government is going by and a 1.9 (rounded to 2 is just fine) trillion dollar stimulus could be used to give everyone checks of 6K then I want to start telling everyone that.
    1
  7423. If you vote for terrible you are part of the problem. Vote for good.
    1
  7424.  @sgutie517  I'm not telling you or anyone to vote for biden. I actually tell people he is terrible, just like I do trump. Don't vote for terrible or you are part of the problem.
    1
  7425. Gross video. You should be ashamed of it.
    1
  7426. Our "media" is more accurately called propaganda for the rich and powerful.
    1
  7427. We all wish you stayed in school. Then you might realize that you wouldn't be the one paying for this.
    1
  7428.  @colonelangus8247  Regarding, "making Kyle a multi billionaire" LMFAO. You can't be real. Even the characters in Idiocracy weren't this comically stupid.
    1
  7429.  @colonelangus8247  Dude... just do everyone a favor and shut the fuck up. You are making the world dumber with every stupid ass thing you say.
    1
  7430.  @colonelangus8247  I'm arguing that you are a moron. You would understand that if you weren't a moron.
    1
  7431. I liked it more when I had no idea pepsi had a game show.
    1
  7432. "There are so many better battles to fight," Like bootlicking and defending that POS apparently. You have no credibility.
    1
  7433.  @xellos5262  Regarding, "Because I disagree with you, I am bootlicking?" You are defending the indefensible actions by the powers that be. It's bootlicking 101. Regarding, "You do realize that the "You're either with more or against me"-mentality you are demonstrating here is the same mentality Trump-Supports have, right?" You do realize that bootlicking is exactly what trump supporters do for their clown right?
    1
  7434.  @xellos5262  Regarding, "I am "defending" nothing." You are impossible to take seriously. This is clearly you defending biden. "it is hyprocritical to pin this one on Biden now. There are so many better battles to fight" Regarding, " I am putting out simple facts." You are a joke and a waste of my time at this point. Goodbye.
    1
  7435.  @xellos5262  Regarding, "you deal so much with trumpists, you've become one yourself" This is too funny coming from a bootlicker making rationalizations and excuses for your supreme leaders failure. The only thing that is missing is biden in orange face.
    1
  7436. They will try but the game has changed. Sanders has name recognition and popularity he lacked when starting in 2016.
    1
  7437. Your grammar is that of someone who has had too much lead.
    1
  7438. Regarding, "not showing CONTEMPT for the left" Do you actually believe this stupid shit while you say it? You probably think he doesn't show contempt for the left when he says he would veto M4A if he gets the chance as well? You are an idiot. As are all trump and biden supporters.
    1
  7439. Warren used to be a republican who wouldn't dare run against a fellow republican, hillary clinton, in 2016. But now she is running to try and fuck bernie over. Try to realize what a joke she is.
    1
  7440. I don't understand why your comments don't get significantly more thumbs up because they are always true. I wish I were a youtube superdelegate so that I could give them a few thousand thumbs up.
    1
  7441. Tamila I wish you were as good at being a human as you are good at being a troll. I must admit... you are an excellent troll.
    1
  7442. It's bernie versus the world. He only gets other politicians to pretend they are on his side from time to time.
    1
  7443.  @UCVibes  I have no idea why you think it would pass our senate but I wish I shared your optimism.
    1
  7444.  @UCVibes  The only reason it passed in the house is because they were all counting on it dying in the senate.
    1
  7445.  @UCVibes  Regarding, "Cut out the foolish strawman argument." I have made no strawman argument. Regarding, "It passed the house because it was the politically correct thing to do." I don't have time to take you seriously.
    1
  7446.  @UCVibes  Regarding, "Why would Mitch McConnell be so dead set against bringing up a vote for the $2000 per person?" I guess using your idiotic "logic" that means that nancy pelosi is stopping a vote on m4a only because she knows it would pass or some shit. In reality you are just an idiot spouting nonsense.
    1
  7447. Does it really matter if he's an egomaniac if he has great ideas? Or if anyone is going to be an egomaniac shouldn't it be the person with great ideas?
    1
  7448. It's CGI
    1
  7449. As if I do twitter or facebook.
    1
  7450. Speak for yourself clown.
    1
  7451. Or the god of the bible when they geocided the entire globe in the noah story. I'm just kidding. The bible is bullshit.
    1
  7452.  @chadsimmons4496  While there is lots of truth in that none of that changes the facts that 1) Hillary still got millions more votes and 2) if she would have been perceived to have won her nomination legitimately by the public the EC wouldn't have been close. That said I agree this is a waste of time at this point and we can agree to disagree. Peace.
    1
  7453.  @JM-nt5ex  "drama." Imagine calling topics such as smears and blackmail, "drama." "unsub to Kyle because of the TY-Dore drama" You should unsub because kyle is exposing himself as a fraud. "When someone shows you who they are believe them the first time." maya angelou
    1
  7454.  @JM-nt5ex  "I get it bro" No. You don't. "you have your script" What a nonsensical way to dismiss the points being presented to you. "my favorite youtuber told me to and unsub from Kyle" LMFAO. You can't even tell the truth about your "favorite youtuber." Jimmy never said this. You are just lying. Weird thing to do about your "favorite." And again... this isn't about dore. It's about kyle. Kyle is why you should unsubscribe from him. But whatever. You are free to make mistakes.
    1
  7455.  @JM-nt5ex  "my favorite youtuber told me to and unsub from Kyle" Err.... wait a minute. You are the same person who said you don't watch dore. Unreal. You suck.
    1
  7456. Nothing says integrity like advertising to people that you support M4A and then come out with a health care plan that isn't even close to M4A. /s
    1
  7457. All of that is idiotic. Forgive me for not being willing to get into any details. There is too much to correct.
    1
  7458. Koss regarding, "You don't hear the stories from these people who have had family members die because they had to wait to long or because the quality wasn't good enough." You do know that there are millions of people without health insurance in the USA right? You do know that we pay far far more per person for insurance that the rest of the world right? You do know that the USA actually gets WORSE results for health care than other countries right? Like I said everything you say is idiotic. Why am I even bothering?
    1
  7459. Koss seriously I can't correct everything you write. But I'm going to just this once for your last reply... Regarding, "it sucks" Ok. This isn't a stupid thing to say. This is spot on. Unfortunately it all goes downhill from there. Regarding, "If you let the government take it over you will get a low quality product for a high price." No. Fortunately we have countries that we can be compared to. Canada for instance. And their existence proves that what you are saying is wrong. Regarding, "The VA" The VA despite it's problems is MORE POPULAR THAN THE PRIVATE FOR PROFIT HEALTH INSURANCE INDUSTRY. Regarding, "post office" Is pretty fucking amazing to me. The amount of mail they handle and how long it takes all seems like a bargain compared to the price IMO. Regarding, "single payer healthcare that worked but it won't because of the government." There is no perfect system but the government is better than a for profit private health insurance industry who does nothing to improve care but whose sole purpose is to make money. And make money they do. They take BILLIONS out of the system every year that would be better used to provide coverage. They waste money on advertising. And they are incentivized to provide less coverage if it allows them to make more money. They are uniquely terrible even more so than the government. Lastly the nature of insurance is that the more people you cover the more the costs go down and it only makes sense to put everyone in the pool seeing as how EVERYONE NEEDS COVERAGE. There isn't a single person in the world that can safely go without health care insurance. Seriously I'm done with you. I know it is lazy but I only have so much time.
    1
  7460. Koss regarding, "I agreed with you and you still want to argue" I can be a real dick and I have a problem with all the BS arguments against. To me this is such a no brainer that I have little to no tolerance for the bullshit against it. Regarding, "Maybes single payer will work and maybe it won't" Canada and other countries prove it can work even if not perfectly. We just need people and politicians with the will to make it work. Regarding, "government doesn't have a great track record of taking something and making it better." I can understand this point because our government is filled with people who have a vested interest in making government bad. Still I am going to fight for good government. It isn't going away anytime soon so it may as well be the best government possible. Regarding, "If the post office was so awesome then why did fed ex and ups have to come in and do what they did better, faster, and cheaper?" I can't speak intelligently about this. I mail something about once a year but I guess I've never had a problem with the post office. I guess maybe (and I'm absolutely just speaking off the cuff) Fedex and UPS are able to pay their employees less but I have no idea honestly. Regarding, "They VA is popular to people who don't have to deal with it." No. These are opinion polls based on the people they serve. People who use the VA are happier with it (not the be mistaken with perfect) than people who use the private health insurance industry. Regarding, "He literally had to wait a month for them to tell him he had mouth cancer." I'm not sure what to say about this. Again nothing is going to be perfect. Wait times are going to happen everywhere. I assure you they happen in the private for profit health insurance industry as well. They are ultimately the biggest problem with the VA... wait times. The service they provide after you see somebody is considered to be superior than what the private industry provides because the private for profit industry is more concerned with making money than actually providing care. Regarding, "All I want people to do is weigh the pros and cons before they go into this head first." There are 3 major things I consider be important when it comes to pros and cons. 1. The number of people the system covers. Currently millions do not have insurance. 2. The cost person for health care. Currently Americans pay far, far, far more per person for health insurance compared to other countries. 3. Results. Americans actually receive worse care than other countries. For example compare infant mortality rates in the US to other countries.
    1
  7461. Grant regarding Medicare. And Medicare is for the high risk pool. It covers the most expensive people to cover... the people the private for profit health industry would happily cut loose as soon as they can when it is cheaper to do so.
    1
  7462. Ok Koss whatever you say. I'll happily stop wasting my time here. I knew it was a bad idea from the start and should have trusted my gut.
    1
  7463. No. They don't. Censorship is the answer only to idiots.
    1
  7464. Is that what it sounds like I'm saying to a complete fucking moron? No. Pedophiles should be in jail.
    1
  7465. 1) I have barely given milo a thought because I have better things to do with my time. 2) I defend a person's right to speak about anything because I'm not a fascist snowflake triggered by words... even mental midgets such as yourself get to say whatever stupid shit you want. If you want to talk about how it should be ok for 30 year olds to shag 13 year olds ok. I'll attack the idea and use that information to make sure to keep an extra close eye on you for actually doing it and if you do I will see you are put in jail. 3) I understand the worst way to win a war of ideas is to just not allow others to talk. 4) Had I knowledge of this or given a flying fuck about it I would have attacked him with ideas instead of attacking his ability to express ideas. 5) There is a world of difference between having sex with a 13 and talking about the concept of consent in the abstract although I'm sure you would love to conflate the 2 and pretend they are the same thing. (note: I honestly don't give a flying fuck about the specific case you are talking about nor am I going to pretend to have any knowledge of the specific case you are speaking.) 6) Typing in all caps is a sign of mental illness.
    1
  7466. Don't be afraid to stop strawmanning me like a complete fucking moron. I'm just kidding. I know you can't. I know it is a side effect of being dumb.
    1
  7467. One more thing... if you think the war to silence people will stop before it gets to an epic idiot such as yourself you should really think again.
    1
  7468. I think you are mistaking my frustration with your stupidity with being mad.
    1
  7469.  @brucesmith54  Fine... existential.
    1
  7470.  @IMSiegfried  I accept that type of "logic" coming from you as much as I would accept it coming from a trump supporter defending the orange clown. I don't.
    1
  7471.  @belkyhernandez8281  "Why should a woman comment about his skirt?" Because if it shows his ass what he'd be doing would rightfully be called sexual harassment and that's the type of thing you point out and call out.
    1
  7472. Michael regarding, "I was saying that the blame game tactic is not as obvious." I am honestly very unclear what point you are trying to make. Regarding, "I was quoting the Nag Hammadi Library of which you probably have little to no knowledge of them." You are correct. I don't have any knowledge of them. I am personally much more interested in nonfiction. Regarding, "Try this on for size." No thanks. I'm good. Regarding, "I am an occultist." Forgive me but I am not interested in your particular brand of crazy. I personally think there is little difference between your brand of batshit and any one else's brand of batshit and don't work that hard to draw distinctions between them. You are able to prove the supernatural as much as anyone else. That is to say you can't prove the supernatural. I personally am only interested in things that are supported by evidence and reason. But you go ahead and think whatever batshit crazy things all you want as long as you don't hurt others while doing it.
    1
  7473. Regarding, "I do not believe in the supernatural." You should probably talk to the dictionary people then. Occultist, "belief in or study of the action or influence of supernatural or supernormal powers." Regarding, "hidden in plain sight" Cool oxymoron. Something cannot be hidden and be in plain sight at the same time. I'm not going to lie... I'm not particularly interested in your beliefs. How about you just go ahead and state the point you were trying to make if you have one. I think were trying to before but I concede I was lost.
    1
  7474. Regarding, "Something can be hidden in plain sight." No. It can't. Something can be hidden or something can be in plain sight but nothing can be "hidden in plain sight." Those concepts are mutually exclusive. Hidden innately means not in plain sight and in plain sight means not hidden. Regarding, "The temple of Luxor in Egypt is a representation from a portion sense of the body of a man." Again I honestly have no idea what you are trying to say. Feel free to just think I'm too stupid to get it if you want because I can make as much sense of this as I can of a foreign language. Regarding, "I am on the mystical side of it." Again and I'm trying to be rude but I'm not going out of my way to be polite, but I am not interested in what your beliefs are. If you have a point, other than I should be an occultist too, and it pertains to the conversation at hand then by all means go for it. But it feels like you are just trying to recruit new occultists. If that is what you are trying to do I would prefer you move along.
    1
  7475. Michael regarding, "religious art in the cathedrals as an example of hidden in plain sight." What you are talking about is either in plain sight, it is hidden, or it somewhere imbetween. It isn't both. We have words for a reason and you are using them wrong. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/hidden Hidden, "being out of sight or not readily apparent : concealed" aka NOT in plain sight https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/in%20plain%20sight In plain sight, "in a place that is easily seen" aka NOT hidden Regarding, "You will see things in this artwork if you are familiar with astronomy that will blow your mind." You really are selling your beliefs the same way as religion. You are talking about vague shit that will "blow my mind." Well, you are not exactly blowing my mind. I am not interested in your beliefs. I'm not sure how I can make this anymore clear.
    1
  7476.  @alia7750  " Insulting or bringing people down for being religious." That's not what being religious means. Obviously.
    1
  7477.  @محمدخالد-ط7ل5ل  Good luck with your cult. Try not to lie about what you are. You are a cultist.
    1
  7478. Jason regarding, "both parties are corrupt" We agree on this. Regarding, "if either party fails they both lose. If one crashes the other will crash as well." If one party dies they do both lose but there is no reason to think that if one party dies they will both die. Rather they would go to more of a traditional 2 party system with a party that represents big money and an another party that represents the people and workers. Regarding, "They work for the same corporate overlords." Not exactly. There is a great deal of overlap in who owns the 2 parties by big money interests hedging their bets on both parties but they are not exactly the same. That said it would be correct to say that both parties are owned by corporate interests. Regarding, "The parties (dem, rep) need the people divided..." Kinda. The establishment pits people against each other. They get the left to blame the right and they get the right to blame the left (and minorities and immigrants). Anything to distract them from blaming who they should be mad at... the oligarchy, the corporations, and the rich. But even if the public all of a sudden became woke to their game it wouldn't end the game but rather just change it. Then it would become a battle between the masses and the oligarchy. This would be a game changer and good but it would hardly be the end of the system as we know it. Regarding, "If they lose one the other won't have an enemy." Sure they would. It would just change their enemy. Regarding, "Neither party is going anywhere" This is what it boils down to. NEITHER PARTY IS GOING ANYWHERE even though they both should die. But since they are not going anywhere the best hope to get change and what we want is by taking over one of the major parties and making it work for the people. That is the way it is suppose to be. It is just that money in politics is fucking everything up.
    1
  7479. Good news! We are already as dumb as possible!
    1
  7480. I'm a pacifist but all I can think about when I see Ted Cruz is how much I want to punch him.
    1
  7481. Putin is getting rid of the azov nazis. Or are they not "corrupt" to you?
    1
  7482. I legit hope you are paid for your comment adam. But you might just be brainwashed.
    1
  7483. You probably think Tilleman is "controlled" as well.
    1
  7484. I don't know the answer to the question but even if they are separate I don't think it is a very good plan.
    1
  7485. It's a better idea than more guns and I appreciate you trying to think of new ideas. What you were proposing was very similar to the Chris Rock approach... charging thousands of dollars for bullets because, "then there would be no innocent bystanders." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VZrFVtmRXrw
    1
  7486.  @fuckamericanidiot  That's what I think of people who are yanggang and who offer meaningless comments such as yours. You are both.
    1
  7487. There's no way Biden or Trump could do these. The name "presidential fitness test" is a lie.
    1
  7488. Regarding, "I choose to publicly react." So can I. I'm using shame. That's how a social species such as humans makes clear what is acceptable in our society and not. Trumps behavior is not acceptable. This is one way I make that perfectly clear to other humans so that they will not emulate the behavavior. And if they do they know there will be consequences such as this... shame! ding ding Shame! Shame! Shame!
    1
  7489.  @LD-tn6ff  With that in mind I too hope you respond to the substance Custodian offered. I noticed you never responded to my comment. I suspect you won't respond to Custodian for the same reason. The facts simply are not on your side.
    1
  7490.  Clifford M  Regarding, "Take your fucking meds" If only you could take a pill to stop you from being stupid AF.
    1
  7491. jewelry regarding, "Until Bernie decides there is no longer any use in attempting to infuse the democratic party with progressives" There might be a time for this but I don't think it is now. I confess that for a brief time I thought that time was during the "democratic" convention in 2016. I wanted Bernie to go on the stage and tell them "fuck you, fuck you, fuck you, you're cool, fuck you, I'm out and running with Jill," Half Baked style. Ultimately he didn't and I'm currently glad he didn't. Takeover of the "democratic" party is crazy valuable and because he didn't run with Jill we still have the chance to do it. Running with Jill would have also been risky. If Trump wins Sanders is blamed for it. Shit they still try to blame him for it, it is just that they are not successful at it because he gave them no ammo to use. And if Trump would have won the cause would have been forever hurt. Dems love to blame Nader for GWB but imagine how they would have blamed Sanders for Trump. But there still might be a time to say enough is enough. If superdelegates are used to usurp the will of the voters (like they have never done) I would certainly be insisting on Sanders running 3rd party. But I would cross that bridge if/when we would get there. I don't actually see that happening.
    1
  7492. jewelry regarding, "you left out" I assure you I was not trying to take you out of context but rather I am just trying to make clear the point of yours that I was addressing. Regarding, "until I hear different from Bernie" Clearly I love Bernie and trust Bernie but I will never blindly follow someone. Even Bernie is capable of being wrong and I will say so when I think he is. But this is really nitpicky. Clearly we essentially agree on everything. You must be very smart. :)
    1
  7493. danny regarding, "it'll take you less than the 33 years" I am not young and think we are probably about the same age not that it really matters. Regarding, "you will have had your energy" I'm just happy to still have some energy and am happy to get energized by anything these days. The idea of taking over the party gets me fired up. Regarding, "time" Since you think time is important, how long until you think a 3rd party is going to have a legit chance in the presidential election? Regarding, "money." I can't imagine anyone that donates money to a party. When I donate money I give it directly to the people I want to see elected. Regarding, "The DNC's..." The party leadership is a dumpster fire. We don't disagree on this and you don't need to tell me the ways they suck. I am well aware. That is why we need to kick their asses to the curb and in all honesty I think there is a pretty good plan and chance of it happening in 2020 assuming progressives can coalesce around a candidate. Regarding, "State DNC" What happened in Cali was outrageous. But in the long run that type of shit is only going to cause the people to realize how they are getting fucked over and get them to do something about it. That is but one battle in a great war. And if you want to grip about how your state was specifically fucked over I would be willing to add that having superdelegates "call" the election for Hillary a couple days before the peasants in the state were allowed to vote was also fucking outrageous and clearly designed to try and suppress votes. But ultimately I'm not here to bitch about all the ways they have fucked over the people but rather trying to formulate a plan to go forward. Holy shit I just sounded like Tom Perez. Not good. Make me think I should rethink some things. I don't want to agree with him on anything. That said looking forward is important because we do agree on how fucked up the past was. I'm not pretending the primary was rigged for example. Regarding, "I have NO DOUBT that Bernie won the nomination." I actually tend to agree with you. I question the primary election results. Exit polls indicate election fraud. But one of the reasons why they were able to get away with it, assuming they did flip votes, was because the corporate media was able to portray Hillary as inevitable from the onset. They can't do that in 2020. In 2020 Sanders is clearly the favorite. And if he starts losing states that he should be winning people will be forced to take notice and there is no plausible deniability. Regarding, "The fact that he refused to acknowledge what was happening" That isn't his role. That is ours. America fucking hates whiners and anyone perceived to be whining even if their whining is justified. Nobody is in a more biased place to call out rigging than the candidate who is getting fucked over. That is why it was nice when Brazile came out with the information she did. (She still fucking sucks but i was nice.) And look at how she was attached and how the corporate media worked to dismiss what she revealed. And she wasn't nearly in a biased position like Sanders would be to talk about rigging (slightly biased though, she did want to sell some books). I don't need Sanders to tell me he got fucked over. And the people that still think the primary was fair aren't all of a sudden going to see the light if Sanders bitched about how he was fucked over. Even Hillary supporters had an impossible time defending their fallen queen on her blame everyone book tour because Americans are sheep who are conditioned to think this is just excuse making. And the American public certainly wasn't ready to think that maybe votes were actually getting flipped. At least not without rock solid smoking gun evidence of which there was none. Sadly there was only circumstantial evidence. I very well might be voting for the Green party candidate in 2020 the same way I voted for Jill Stein in 2016 but that is plan B and I absolutely will be voting in the "democratic" primary and think everyone else should as well.
    1
  7494. Eleanor regarding, "then you better make sure new voting machines are in and..." I want more accountability when it comes to counting votes but I think you are overestimating my importance and ability to control such things. I have issues with vote totals. One of the reasons I think we need Sanders is because he is too popular for them to be able to flip enough votes against him without getting called on it.
    1
  7495. Keen regarding, "Fall off the roles," If you live in an open primary state then by all means demexit. But if you live in a state with closed primaries then you damn well better do what you need to do to vote in their primaries.
    1
  7496. danny regarding, "I don't F**kbook" We definitely agree on that.
    1
  7497. danny regarding, "are you seriously this obtuse or just being a troll?" What a lazy and pathetic way to dismiss what I am saying. I suppose this is much easy than arguing that I am saying something that is untrue. Regarding, "...AL Chair of the DNC..." Nobody is arguing that the "democratic" party is decent. I'm pretty sure we all agree that they suck. I'm not sure why you think it is important to talk about why they are terrible. The debate is about strategy going forward and how is the best way to get progressives in positions of power. Regarding, "That's what you want to hook your wagon to?" I don't care about the party. I'm not looking to "hook my wagon" to anything. I'm looking to take the reigns. But since you mentioned it how are the Green parties chances looking in the Alabama senate election? Just pointing out how terrible the "democratic" party simply isn't good enough for me. There has to be an effective plan to do something about it.
    1
  7498.  @scruffopone3989  "anti-vaxx and anti-mandate are effectively the exact same thing" I don't understand how anyone can buy your BS. It's remarkably transparent.
    1
  7499. I don't care about smug. I care about lies and he told too many of them.
    1
  7500. Don't do that. Find a 3rd party candidate to vote for and vote in all the elections happening other than the presidential election.
    1
  7501. Nah. They see the writing on the wall and know the reality. They are trying to maintain some semblance of respectability. You can only get away with being wrong about everything for so long.
    1
  7502. It's the elite versus the poor. Not china versus the US.
    1
  7503. don't blame victims like an ass
    1
  7504.  @virginialawler7725  You don't even attempt to back up what you are saying. It's like even you realize you can't back up your opinion with anything of substance.
    1
  7505.  @virginialawler7725  One example of bernie not voting in lockstep with corporate dems since joe took office... that's all you need to provide for me to take your opinion seriously.
    1
  7506. Um no. It's not. Under AOC's plan they would not be paying 70 percent in total. Holy shit are you stupid.
    1
  7507. This is TYT. It's affiliated with them. All frauds.
    1
  7508. Biden was looking to sell his soul long ago but the rich told him to come back later. Well he's back with his hand out.
    1
  7509. Isn't this channel here to manufacture consent for a corrupt "democratic" party? They must not be very good at their job.
    1
  7510. You answered your own question.
    1
  7511.  @TheHuxleyAgnostic  Regarding, "Betrayed everyone, by just getting done campaigning for Bernie against the DNC" I love how you just deflect from the problems I have with her to pretend and act like her other actions are what I have a problem with. It's impossible to tell the difference between bootlickers for trump and bootlickers for AOC. You are all morons making excuses and rationalizations for politicians who are betraying the people. Regarding, "You Dore Knobs are completely insane. The left's equivalent to Trumpists." This is so funny because trumpists make excuses and rationalizations for their leaders failures the way you are. If only you all would hold your clowns more accountable the world might be a better place. But you will keep licking that boot won't you.
    1
  7512.  @TheHuxleyAgnostic  Regarding, "Trumpists just make shit up to be outraged about. Trumpists have purity tests if you're Trumpy enough. Trumpists slander anyone who doesn't do what they want." You got one thing correct. I have "purity tests." If you aren't fighting for m4a you are worthless to me. But if trumpist actually had decent and reasonable "purity tests" they wouldn't be trump supporters.
    1
  7513.  @TheHuxleyAgnostic  Regarding, "the very thing you'd still need to do even after a failed vote, not fighting for M4A?" Because all future fights to get supporters of m4a and punish opponents of m4a are hindered by actions to not put everyone on the record. If voting on m4a is such a bad idea why doesn't nancy bring it up herself?
    1
  7514.  @Bigmattr1985  Please do not reproduce. Thanks in advance for that.
    1
  7515. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Deep breathe. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
    1
  7516. Um... yes. Please do register to vote. Don't let them win without a fight. I assure you the establishment loves it when you stay home.
    1
  7517. Have you met our government?
    1
  7518. Are you new to the right wings "thoughts?"
    1
  7519.  @espenha  "It wasn't bullshit." It absolutely was. You are a liar and POS actively making the world worse for a billionaire conman using bullshit to do it. I have no doubt you are paid to do what you are doing. Not that you can be trusted to be honest about it. But you should know the truth... while you lie about it. And I hope that somewhere deep down you have trouble sleeping at night knowing that you are a liar actively working to make the world a worse place. If you ever look around and think the world is getting worse know that that is happening in large part because of people like you who do what they do for a living.
    1
  7520.  @espenha  Flat earthers are stupid but even they can look at you and rightfully think, "what a stupid terrible person that is making the world worse."
    1
  7521.  @espenha  I'd ask you to get a soul but you would only try to steal one from a decent person.
    1
  7522. It's been dead for quite a while already.
    1
  7523. Imagine thinking fox is "fair and balanced."
    1
  7524. Neera is bringing them for the biden adminstration.
    1
  7525. She lost all my respect when she sold out m4a to vote for mama bear.
    1
  7526.  @nogoodtsunax  "Then you aren't really for M4A" Yeah that makes no sense. The person not for m4a is AOC.
    1
  7527. You are an idiot "prince."
    1
  7528. Yeah, because grammar is what is important and not thinking things that are completely moronic.
    1
  7529. No thanks. I've concluded that you are too dumb to bother talking intelligently to. If you don't already realize why what you have said is dumb there isn't going to be anything I can say to enlighten you. I'll just let the stupid shit you have said speak for itself.
    1
  7530.  @TCt83067695  I agree with King Infinite. I think you are drawing the wrong conclusions. I agree with Kyle on this one and disagree with Rational National about impeachment being a good idea.... not because I'm "(not) interested in holding a corrupt president accountable," but because I have ZERO faith in Nancy to be able to effectively make the case. And a bad attempt at focusing on impeachment (which is what I think would likely happen) would only make Trump stronger. Don't get me wrong there are problems with not trying impeach him. It sets a god awful precedent, but ultimately I don't trust the dems to do anything other than botch the job if they try. And ultimately I think the party is best trying to build themselves up, offer alternatives to republicans, and sell themselves to the public rather than just trying to tear down republicans even if they absolutely deserve it. Lastly I think you are giving this clown former republican far too much credit.
    1
  7531.  @TCt83067695  Regarding, "Tell me you don't see anything wrong with that." I do see something with that. Obviously. I literally address it. I concede this is a far from perfect idea, but we live in a far from perfect world. We live in a world where not only do you have an inept "democratic" party but we also have a complicit republican party that you have zero reason to believe would vote to impeach and they hold majorities in our government. Even if democrats did exactly what you think they should you should realize that, because of the state of our government, you have ZERO logical reason to think it would succeed even if the dems made a great case and did all the right things. Regarding, "we're assuming he'll be defeated in 2020 which I personally doubt" Literally an democrat, even the terrible ones, all can beat Donald trump assuming they are perceived to have won their primary legitimately by the public. That said there is good reason to think they won't but that is ultimately the only thing they need to beat the orange clown who got MILLIONS less votes than a complete piece of shit like Hillary who was rightfully perceived to have cheated to get there. Even she would have won if people thought she didn't cheat and she was fucking terrible. And if you think dems can't beat the orange clown in elections then why the fuck do you think would be smart enough to impeach him intelligently? Because it should be far easier to win an election which even incompetent dems have done than it is to impeach. Regarding, "And even if trump loses, the new president will not pursue criminal action because it would look like a banana republic where leaders are going after their political rivals." He's not a rival at that point. At that point he is nothing. This is a far more effective and easy way to try and punish him for his crimes. This is what Obama should have done to GWB and Cheney for war crimes. I suspect he didn't because he was going to do them himself. But this is the far more intelligent way to go about this. Again... he wouldn't be a rival at that point because at that point he lost. But they are rivals NOW. Regarding, "So the guy would totally walk. How progressive of Kyle." Makes no fucking sense. You argue they should go after their rivals this second but not after they aren't rivals anymore. I don't get it. Regarding, "Kyle is agreeing with Pelosi on a pivotal issue." It's an issue that has ZERO chance of success. Therefor I don't think calling it "pivotal" makes any sense. Regarding, "Amash is principled enough" He's so "principled" that he would still happily call himself a republican if pence were president. His principles are really messed up. The biggest difference between trump and your average republican is that he comes with a side of pure offensiveness. It's not like the any of them can be said to not be corrupt and pure evil, they are just better at hiding it than trump is. Regarding, "Bet your bottom dollar imma give Amash some credit for being ahead of Kyle" We are just going to have to agree to disagree on this then. I suspect that somehow he has calculated for himself that this decision is ultimately in his own best interests even if I can't say exactly what he is thinking. And we are going to have to agree to disagree about whether or not try to impeach is a good idea. That said if dems chose to go that route I wouldn't think it's the worse idea. I just think the potential downside outweighs the potential benefits personally. And don't get me wrong I do question my own assessment on this. I don't find myself on the other side of AOC, David Doel and others whose opinions I very much respect and on the same side as a piece of shit like Pelosi. Things like that alone are enough to make me question my own judgement on the matter. But ultimately I've come to my own opinions on the subject even if not very fiercely. I hope that, if nothing else, you can understand that my opinion doesn't come from a place of, "(not) interested in holding a corrupt president accountable" but rather a place a place of political calculation where I see no good options available to me. If I thought there was a feasible path for impeachment I'd certainly be agreeing with you.
    1
  7532.  @TCt83067695  So after writing to you I decided to look a little more closely at how impeachment works. My understanding was that both the house and senate voted on impeachment. That seems to have been wrong and only the house votes on the first part of impeachment that doesn't come with removal from office (you know like Bill had). So I don't know. Maybe you are correct about this and I'm just being wrong.
    1
  7533. Look at the third party option? That's been tried and it's not like that is working or fair either.
    1
  7534. The show has been on for a long time.
    1
  7535. I'm still subscribed, for now, but don't watch them like I watch some others. I tend to only watch their coverage these days if there is a specific topic I'm interested in. I don't recall significant Russia rage from them but that might only be because of how little I watch.
    1
  7536. Pat regarding, "I often noticed that they post the same clip about progressive candidates on different tyt channels at different times, possibly to catch more viewers." I have noticed that too and that is why, for the moment, I'm giving them the benefit of the doubt. But let's just say, hypothetically, this doesn't air on the main channel. Do you think that is ok? Why do you think they would put this on the channel that has 164K subscribers but not the channel that has 3.8 million subscribers? Do you think they don't think the audience of the main channel would find this interesting or relevant? Because to me, the only reason they might choose to not put it there is to bury it.
    1
  7537. I unsubscribed to both channels and only by accident did I stumble on this story on the main channel. I like to think it was because they missed my subscriptions. Whatever. I'm glad they did the right thing ultimately even if it took them longer than it should have.
    1
  7538. NextTurn I still have issues with their coverage at times and disagree with some things they do. But it isn't reasonable for me to expect to agree with everything they do. This story is important. This is good coverage. This hardly pushes the establishment agenda. And ultimately they are not burying it only on this channel so ultimately this is not the right to be criticizing them. Save it for when they are fucking up and this isn't it. Like I said this story is really fucking important in my opinion and I'm happy they are doing it.
    1
  7539. I'm going to have to disagree with you a bit about "russia gate" being total bullshit. Don't get me wrong I think that their influence was being wildly overblown and think it wasn't contextualized as well as it should have been at times, but I do think that they fucked with the elections to a certain degree. I do not think it is at all unreasonable to think they did the same shit Hillary Clinton's "correct the record" did. That said I concede that there were many claims that were wildly overblown but at the same time I think the people complaining about "russiagate" are also wildly overblowing shit as well. For example I never heard anyone calling for war with Russia but very often that is the impression people complaining about russiagate would essentially claim they were doing. I guess what I'm saying is that I personally think there was something to be covered but it did not deserve the amount of attention it was given by both sides. And for the people complaining about russiagate I wish they would have spent more of their efforts pointing out that even if russia did what was being claimed the US does the exact same shit which is again another reason why it isn't unreasonable to think russia did the same shit.
    1
  7540. Regarding, "why is everyone, all of sudden, critical of Russia doing this?" I feel that this is the case because of the latest evidence, because of Trump ties to russia, and because of Trump derangement syndrome. And don't get me wrong... I love Trump bashing. Fuck that guy. But it needs to be put into context. We can't forget that the bullshit he does has all been going on for a long time already. He gives an ugly face to our ugly practices. Let's use it. Regarding, "Other coutriers like Israel and Saudi Arabia effect our elections WAY more." Meh. I'm not quite as sure but do agree that both effect our elections. I also do care for whataboutism arguments. Just because other countries do shit is not a legit reason to ignore things that are "bad." Even if I totally agree with this that wouldn't mean that it is ok for russia to fuck with our elections and for that to be ignored. Regarding, "but who is doing the over-blowing" Like I said, in my opinion, both. Regarding, "Russia/Putin and Trump connection has been the majority of their stories." I concede that I don't follow TYT all that much. I think it has more to do with Trump derangement syndrome than it does with russiagate. But I am speculating to a huge degree and concede I'm no expert of their coverage at large. Regarding, "Establishment needs to people to hate Russia so they can bomb Syria... thats it." The people are fucking sheep. They don't need shit to bomb anyone these days. Regarding, "John Bolton is currently pushing for Regime change in Syria." Bolton is scary as fuck and a disgrace to humanity. I do feel that that is being talked about to a certain degree. TBC got stuff to do.
    1
  7541. Regarding, "latest evidence." I concede that the word "evidence" might not be the correct word but I am referring to, for example, CIA reports that russia interfered with the election. Now, don't get me wrong, it is wrong to blindly accept their assertions as fact (I certainly don't, I question them, and I think they are lying) but it would be equally wrong to act as if those assertions aren't being made by the United States spy agency when they are. Just dismissing this shit as if it isn't happening is wrong. Unfortunately you do need to point out the lack of evidence of their claims. Regarding, "no has seen a court room" If I required people being tried in court for me to need to think there is wrongdoing then I would think Wall Street doesnt commit crime. No one "seeing a court room" proves nothing to me.
    1
  7542. Regarding, "Trump was suppose to be anti-Establishment." Huh? Says who? Trump is as establishment as they come. The only problem the establishment has with him is that he puts an ugly face on their policies. They only wish he were better at hiding his corruption. Regarding, "the Establishment has nothing or they dont want to prosecute anything" Why do you think the russia shit was pushed as much as it was? I'll go first. It wasn't about war. It was done to give cover to Hillary Clinton. It was done so that her loss could be excused and therefor there would be no reason to change anything. It was to make the case that the election wasn't her fault, it was russias. Therefor we can all go back to the status quo. If they acknowledged the fact that it was Hillary's fault then that would necessitate the need for change.
    1
  7543. I am skeptical about the outlets I trust. And to a certain degree I wish I were able to absorb more information even from outlets I don't trust just so that I can be informed to the bullshit they peddle. That said, for example, I have completely boycotted corporate media because I just can't take it. You are correct that the establishment has lots of money and lots of weapons at their disposal. I often refer to them as "the machine" because I think it apt to their power and influence. I too appreciate the conversation. Take care.
    1
  7544. @ "You seem to be against freedom of speech." I don't even mention the topic. You are tough to take seriously. "Are you?" No. I am not.
    1
  7545.  @talmudovsky  "You seem to be against freedom of speech." You seem to suffer from brain damage. Do you?
    1
  7546. *100 senators
    1
  7547. Laughing is often a defense mechanism.
    1
  7548.  @timmcgrath1117  Regarding, "You might have a point" I clearly do. Regarding, "there's a time and a place," You don't exactly choose when to spring your automatic defenses. This is a "decision" that is made at the subconscious level. Regarding, "I don't think you ought to be laughing about something like this." Even after understanding where the laughter comes from? You are acting like this is done for malicious purposes. Or to make light of a dark situation. It's not. It's an understandable reaction from a human being. Stop expecting them to act like a robot that is programmed to give a shit about your delicate sensibilities. Regarding, "This isn't some woke culture BS either" It really feels like silly virtue signaling. Regarding, "I just find it ridiculously inappropriate." It's a ridiculous topic. Some things can just be too much for our brains to really process. I find your lack of understanding as to how humans operate pretty ridiculous.
    1
  7549.  @timmcgrath1117  I think you are just virtue signaling. Whatever. I don't care what you think at this point.
    1
  7550.  @timmcgrath1117  Only to tell you I think you are stupid. You would realize that if you weren't proving my point that you are stupid.
    1
  7551. Maybe but it doesn't really matter... Bernie doesn't need them. He is the most popular politician in the country who champions causes that are all popular with the public. He would crush in an election where party elites are not allowed to pick and choose who is allowed to vote.
    1
  7552. Yeah he's the grifter... not the controlled opposition making excuses for corrupt politicians.
    1
  7553.  @GR-wf2ig  "what does that have to do with him being an obvious grifter?" I'm saying you are projecting and that the only grifter is sam. Maybe you watch too much of sam and his grift. But at least I think he has done enough to keep access to AOC whereas I doubt she will be talking to jackson anytime soon. "You realize logically that they can be both be grifters, right?" Yup. But only one is and the other actually cares about the things sam should care about but doesn't,
    1
  7554.  @rockguy5821  Regarding, "shouldn't he be fighting for whats right" I literally just got done giving you reasons why what he did can easily been as "what's right" from his perspective. Again.... the guy talked over and over and over about how much Trump blows. He said he was going to do everything in his power to stop the orange clown from being pres and after a couple years can you really blame him for that? Would you want to, not only be seen to have helped Trump but to have actually helped Trump. He was put in a no win situation after the DNC's actions. If he gives them the finger then for all I know you would be here blaming Sanders for Trump being in the WH and you "lost respect" for him for "not doing what's right" by helping tiny hands. Regarding, "what people are going to think about him" It's not about what people think of him. It's about what people needed to think of HILLARY. And the DNC. And the corporate media in the wake of Trump's victory. That's what is important... not what they think about Sanders. Do you think he was happy about it? Because I assure you no one hated it more then him. But it WASN'T about him. It was about doing what he thought was best for the country. If you want to argue that what he did wasn't in the countries best interests, fine. I get that. There is a good argument to be made for it. But don't act like there isn't a good argument to be made for what he did because I like to think that's what I just did even if you lost respect for him while he did it.
    1
  7555. Lastly I'd like to just add what it was and what it wasn't. It was an endorsement, not his soul. Few love and support Sanders as much as I do but I don't really give a fuck about his endorsements. I don't let him or anyone tell me who to vote for. I happily voted for Jill Stein in 2016 in a swing state.
    1
  7556. Maybe you should listen to yourself. If you hate his content don't watch it and move on with your life.
    1
  7557. "a bought and paid for scheme and that we could no longer trust any of it" The only reason to not trust it if something isn't true. And it's true. That's what matters. Stop acting like something else could possibly be more important than that.
    1
  7558. "How much worse would it be without vaccines?" People in africa died at a lesser rate than people in the US and they didn't have access to the jab cause bill gates couldn't make money from them.
    1
  7559. It might have something to do with the fact that underage drinking is proven to be a problem worth addressing... among other things.
    1
  7560. I find it amusing how you give your own retarded comments a thumbs up like the loser you are.
    1
  7561. Regarding, "I tell her that I will not vote for evil, and her mouth drops." I've been there. Then my mouth dropped that the idea of not voting for evil seemed so crazy to someone else. Like, how could saying something like that be controversial at all?
    1
  7562. I would like to add that you should vote. Find someone running (or not and write them in for all I care) and vote for them. Vote for good. Not only that but that is never the only election going on. That said... whatever. We are going to make sure you get to vote for Sanders in the general.
    1
  7563. He's really not.
    1
  7564.  @ImaginaryMdA  Because trump is terrible? No shit. But that doesn't make biden magically not suck. Trump has even said that he would give everyone health care. It was obviously bullshit but at least he has the sense to lie about supporting universal health care. That's usually what the dems do. Lie about being for the people. Ultimately both trump and biden are terrible and can be trusted to do nothing but terrible.
    1
  7565. Please point to a single article that assured us Trump would cause WW3 or admit that you are a liar.
    1
  7566.  @richardruss7481  Nobody is pretending joe's brain works... the only one "pretending" is you when you give joe a pass. You must work for the empire... just like joe.
    1
  7567. Is this the type of person who is going to stick around for the newly unmasked kyle? It makes sense.
    1
  7568.  @annaclarafenyo8185  "a joke" Fair enough. In my defense no doubt there is someone out there who would say your comment and do so sincerely. I've said this world needs a sarcastic font for a long time.
    1
  7569.  @annaclarafenyo8185  "right-wing" I'm definitely not.
    1
  7570.  @annaclarafenyo8185  "Than why would you say Kyle is "unmasked"? " I've followed a lot of terrible people over time. Pundits like Olberman, maddow, TYT, nomiki konst, others, and now kyl and krystal. Politicians like Obama and AOC have had me fooled. And at one time all of them were "unmasked." It's like you finally see them for who they were. It's ugly and after you see it you can't unsee it. Kyle's mask is off. I've seen it before and never regretted pulling the plug after seeing it. I'm done with him. "honest person" Lies of ommision about blackmail even after jimmy addressed it directly in a phone message after kyle ghosted jimmy because he's too vulgar to "stay out of it" with cenk's nephew to talk about pocket pussies and diminish the importance of smears and blackmail. Claims I could wear a banana hammock to work and no one could say anything about it. Claims millions of katzenburg dollars doesn't corrupt TYT while never disclosing the conflict of interest that the was affiliated at the time. In his latest "apology" the "reasoning" he gave for not telling jimmy he was standing him up was because he was too busy standing him up. We are just going to have to agree to disagree about him being an honest person. It's easy to talk to the talk but actions speak louder than kyle's meaningless words.
    1
  7571.  @annaclarafenyo8185  You should check out glenn greenwalds video titled, "TYT-Jimmy Dore War Shows Toxic Pathologies in Liberal Discourse" That's an honest take about what's happening... unlike kyle.
    1
  7572.  @annaclarafenyo8185  "AOC is a sincere honest leftist" She's a fraud who says the right thing... But before I get to it I'm going to have to dig. I marked her terrible tweet that shows her hypocrisy but apparently she has deleted it. Anyways the tweet tells you all the reasons why force the vote was a good idea at the time... because it can create pressure, because it shows we did all we could. That was the spirit of the tweet. She made this after force the vote. She made this after I sent her over a dozen emails (not that I think she actually got to see them but no doubt she knows that others like me said things similar) demanding she use the power she had. She didn't. She's a fraud. Actions speak louder than meaningless words. "edeluded by right wing propaganda" LMFAO I had expectations for her that she set. She said she would fight for me and for m4a. Instead she voted for pelosi and got jack shit for it. She also gaslight everyone at the time with BS like Kyle has been BSing everyone. "You are being fed disunity propaganda that sets you against others" It's not my fault when people's actions betray their meaningless words. That's on them. "Kyle did nothing wrong." Didn't I give you a bunch of specific things he did wrong? It's tough take you seriously when you just ignore them to say this.
    1
  7573.  @annaclarafenyo8185  He said 20 million dollars (of establishment money and that is me calling it that because that's what it is) doesn't make them corrupt. It's asinine. It flies in the face of everything else he has said in the past. It's the sign of a fraud. An honest person would be consistent when talking about the big money in politics... in the past he would always call it corruption until the day he didn't for a people he was affiliated with not that he would mention it.
    1
  7574.  @annaclarafenyo8185  "It doesn't make them 'corrupt', it makes them 'mainstream media'." Are you in some sort of alternate universe where the MSM isn't corrupt? Sounds better than the reality in which I exist. "You are confusing money" LMFAO. Just stop. It's money. It affects things. Always.
    1
  7575.  @annaclarafenyo8185  " AOC still fight for everything you claim to want." Meanwhile, in this reality, she didn't. She folded and didn't fight at all when it mattered most. "She thought 'force the vote' was stupid" Literally everything she said in the tweet she scrubbed says otherwise. You can't just go back and forth without being a fraud. "(becuase it is)" LMFAO Fun fact: literally the only way we can get m4a is by voting on it. "You are not a leftist" The no trues scotsman fallacy is in full effect. "you are right wing propaganda" I think you might be projecting. "Either because you fell for it, or because you are a propagandist yourself." This is where you go when you have nothing of substance to offer. Have you watched that video by glenn yet? I'm just kidding. You clearly haven't. It's too bad. He was talking about people like you.
    1
  7576.  @annaclarafenyo8185  "You are a right wing propagandist." Just repeating stupid crap like this doesn't make it anymore true ya know. It's also not any sort of intelligent point. It's again exactly what glenn was talking about. Have you bothered to watch the video I was talking about? It must be the "ring wing propaganda" of which you speak. Anyways. I'm done with this. You are clearly a waste of time and projecting.
    1
  7577.  @annaclarafenyo8185  "You are not an honest person, there is no point in this discussion." Projection 101
    1
  7578.  @annaclarafenyo8185  "She is fighting" You just ignore what I say to spout nonsense. You are impossible to take seriously. "AOC hasn't changed her mind" You literally just ignore the points I make to spout nonsense. Remember the tweet I keep referring to? That SHE DELETED. Because it exposes her as a fraud.... SHE CHANGED HER MIND ABOUT IT. You can tell because she DELETED it. That's a person CHANGING their mind. But if you can't acknoledge the reality in which you exist I have little reason to take you seriously just like I have no reason to take AOC seriously. The tweet she deleted but I've gone out of my to find... "Sometimes it's to get members on the record so people (AOC is talking about herself and you here) to make excuses later. Sometimes these votes create real political pressure that forces developments. Sometimes we vote for the historical record - to let future generations know we did everything we could." I agree with AOC about this. You can tell because I supported force the vote. You can tell she is fraud because she didn't live up to and ignored her own words before deleting them the way she has.
    1
  7579.  @annaclarafenyo8185  She knows what fighting looks like and she chose not to. That makes her a fraud and you tough to take seriously.
    1
  7580.  @annaclarafenyo8185  "A Congressperson has to CHOOSE THEIR FIGHTS" LMFAO She chose not to fight for m4a when she said she would. That makes her a fraud no matter now many asinine excuses and rationalizations you make for her behavior. She was suppose to be different than the average dem but she voted in lock step with them and got nothing for progressives. She's a fraud.
    1
  7581.  @annaclarafenyo8185  "YOU need to organize OUTSIDE CONGRESS" LMFAO. I organized to get AOC into her job. I gave her money and she betrayed me and the things she said to get along with crooks. That's how I was on her mailing list to send her several emails telling her what I rightfully expected of her and what she absolutely didn't do because she was a fraud.
    1
  7582.  @annaclarafenyo8185  "Sometimes holding a vote is good, sometimes it's not." You and AOC don't want the national debate during a pandemic that absolutely would happen before they would be voting on it. I do. I know that fighting for m4a is the only way we might get it. I know that burying the topic to go back to same old same old is not the answer. I suspect you do as well. Pelosi knows. If voting on m4a were bad for the cause pelosi would do it herself. The establishment fights tooth and nail to not have the vote because it would be good for m4a. Are you really this dense? I hope you are paid for your shit for your sake because pretty much everything you say is stupid AF.
    1
  7583.  @annaclarafenyo8185  You ever watch that video by glenn? Or do you think glenn greenwald is right wing propaganda?
    1
  7584.  @annaclarafenyo8185  "YOU MUST NEVER, EVER talk badly of her. EVER." What the AF is wrong with you? Even trump sycophants don't say things this stupid about trump.
    1
  7585.  @annaclarafenyo8185  "She's different from the other dems" Talk is cheap. Her actions are the same as the other dems who voted for pelosi. "she SUPPORTS MEDICARE FOR ALL," Why? Because she says so? Her actions betray her. Fun fact: trump has said that he wanted to give everyone universal health care. Does that mean he's actually an advocate of m4a? "Legislators can't act alone" No shit. But it only takes a handful of progressives to withhold their vote from corporate dems and frauds like AOC prove they won't use the power they have. "you already know that, propagandist." LMFAO This is seriously hilarious from someone who can say shit like, "YOU MUST NEVER, EVER talk badly of her. EVER." and not do so ironically. You are projecting.
    1
  7586.  @annaclarafenyo8185  Have you ever considered the possibility that AOC is just pandering to you? And only telling you what you want to hear to get your vote and your money before selling you out? Because that's what's actually happening.
    1
  7587.  @annaclarafenyo8185  It mirrors nancy pelosi who when first elected to office back when dinosaurs where still around used to say she supported universal health care. Turns out she doesn't and you can tell because actions speak louder than meaningless words.
    1
  7588.  @annaclarafenyo8185  "The 'handful of progressives withholding votes' gambit has been used ONCE" Was it? I'm not so sure. But let's say for a second you are correct about this... it only proves all the points I'm making that if the people who pretend to be progressives and who call themselves progressives coallesed that they have power. Instead of acknowledging that power you were instead just diminishing it with BS such as, "Legislators can't act alone." And you know what.... legislators do act alone. Every time they vote on something that's them acting alone in that moment even if they have outside strategy to coalesce power. " That's worth your whole life" You mean like the people who will lose their lives because they don't have access to health care no thanks to AOC selling everyone out and giving away the power she had for literally nothing? I think it does. "propagandist," You must be projecting right? You say this more than you even attempt to try and make a point. Are you paid for this shit? I mean really? "The fight for medicare for all won't be won" Because we have people like AOC who demonstrate through their actions they won't fight for it. I made the point before that if voting on m4a would be bad then pelosi would bring it up for a vote herself. You just ignored it. It's very telling of your intellectually honesty. Or lack thereof I should say. "TALK IN CONGRESS IS WHAT THEY DO." Are you unaware of the voting? Is that why you are putting this nonsense into caps like putting it all in caps makes it better than it is? It doesn't. "There is no other thing that they do." You are impossible to take seriously but things like this keep me coming back. It's so blatantly and obviously detached from reality it's hilarious. How you could say something like this and not know what's wrong with it or be embarrassed about it is so so funny. "propagandist" Are you paid for everytime you call someone that? If so you must be rich.
    1
  7589.  @annaclarafenyo8185  Seek help.
    1
  7590.  @annaclarafenyo8185  You are projecting propagandist.
    1
  7591. "he would probably support a US coupe." LMFAO When you have to make up your smears you don't have a legit gripes.
    1
  7592.  @davidowens2067  I get it. You have no intelligent argument to make whatsoever. You have ad hominem, nothing else, and talking to you is an epic waste of time.
    1
  7593.  @davidowens2067  Dore has always been against war and you are just a tool spouting BS.
    1
  7594. "he would probably support a US coupe." FYI that is you making shit up even if you aren't smart enough to realize it or intellectually honest enough to admit it.
    1
  7595. Youtube claims there are 15 replies to this comment before I write this and I can see 6 of them. Freedom of speech am I right? /s
    1
  7596. Who is paying you for this?
    1
  7597. Me too. I do not have the patience to deal with someone like that.
    1
  7598. Warren has no chance. And for good reason.
    1
  7599. Is it really that stupid to think there is cheating going on in our elections?
    1
  7600. He's not going to and for good reason. The game is just as rigged against 3rd parties as it is inside the "democratic" primary and the EC makes it all but impossible for a 3rd party candidate to win the general.
    1
  7601. I can't. Not that it matters... Bloomberg winning isn't going to happen.
    1
  7602.  @levanmikadze4748  "he doesn't support them" Correct... so not a dem.
    1
  7603.  @levanmikadze4748  "Jimmy are true democrats" Jimmy is a true leftist. The democratic party is a right wing party. Jimmy is not a dem.
    1
  7604.  @levanmikadze4748  "I am a republican" If you don't support the republican party you are not actually a republican. It's not "logic." You are just using words wrong.
    1
  7605.  @bcon2608  "Big Pharma and the Insurance giants" These are the same people spending money hand over fist lobbying to keep the current system. "It’s almost like they lobby billions of dollars to get their way. Or is lobbying just charity?" LMFAO And they are getting their way. "Idiot." This is funny all things considered.
    1
  7606.  @bcon2608  "will empower The People?" No. It will cost half as much. It will cover everyone and other countries, who ALSO have lobbying and corruption, have PROVEN it. "Are you dense?" Nope. You are projecting.
    1
  7607.  @bcon2608  "obamacare" Was designed to save the system because they don't want it to change. They spend BILLIONS to make sure it doesn't. And you side with them because you are not a serious person.
    1
  7608. And even after all the Ukranians are dead the US will still use those dead bodies as martyrs to try and get others to sacrifice themself fighting russia.
    1
  7609.  @warfossil  "Article was most likely written by someone like yourself with TDS." They said giving zero evidence, something they previously claimed to care about deeply. They said acting like the trump administration didn't continue ALL of the wars left to him by obama. You most likely have a trump tramp stamp tattoo.
    1
  7610.  @paddyo3841  "In the age of disinformation..." Trump stopped 0 wars. The MIC carried on just fine while he was in office. Stop pretending otherwise. It makes you look like a clown.
    1
  7611.  @reinsmano  "I don’t understand this statistic." It was written in 2017.... that's why they didn't have the numbers for the entire year. I shouldn't have to explain this. It should be obvious. But I will add that it's from an article titled, "Donald Trump Is Dropping Bombs at Unprecedented Levels" because I suspect my comment where I talk about it is being shadowbanned.
    1
  7612.  @reinsmano  "The U.S. Never Dropped As Many Bombs On Afghanistan As It Did In 2018"
    1
  7613.  @reinsmano  "Why should you not have to explain a statistic without a date?" It was perfectly explained in the previous response that was shadowbanned. And then I explained it and still you don't get it? "why would you use a stat from 2017" I was using the article because of it's headline. The "stat" was from that article talking about how trump was dropping more bombs in 2017 than obama did in 2016. All this to prove that trump has dropped any bombs because apparently that something I needed to prove to unserious clowns. Please stop wasting my time.
    1
  7614.  @Wolfe-xz6tr  "easily exposed lies." They said while not even attempting to expose any lies.
    1
  7615.  @SoBayK80  "Your math" The very next line in the article reads, "At this rate, Trump will exceed Obama’s last-year total by Labor Day."
    1
  7616.  @SoBayK80  "I think you're too histrionic to think clearly, and that's what they want" I think you are deeply unserious, and that's what "they" want.
    1
  7617.  @brucecampbell6578  "63" If you say so. I have more reason to not trust than do at this point.
    1
  7618.  @paddyo3841  "you are using my argument" I have no clue what you are talking about at the moment and I'm fine with that. "your assumption that Trump had any power stop the MIC" Trump was literally commander in chief. It's far more than an "assumption." If he couldn't do it who could? "he was able to end said MIC warmongering" My argument is that he didn't even try. If he did he might have gotten JFKed. But he didn't did he?
    1
  7619.  @paddyo3841  "How can u mention the MIC and yet still think Trump or any potus has any real power" He is literally commander in chief and that position comes with real power whether you can admit it or acknowledge it. Trump didn't even attempt to use that power. But the better question is why you defend him like you do. "I agree “ u have no clue”" Oh right... you have dunning kruger. "Trump HAD TO GO because he said the quiet part out loud and that is unforgivable" Yeah... he would straight up tell you that we were going to steal syria's oil. He was the establishment.
    1
  7620.  @QuetzalcoatlOdin  "he may not have stopped any wars," It's not like he didn't have lots to choose from. "he didn't start any." And there were few of these to choose from. We were already at war with everyone. And he tried his best when took out sulemani. "Any of the presidents that you like or even don't like that you can say the same for?" Why would you think I like any of them? "As for dropping bombs somebody's lied to you they didn't run out of bombs while Trump was in office, they ran out of bombs while Obama, Obomer was in office." The only person lying right now is you. I've never said that they "ran out of bombs while trump is in office" or anything even close to that. That's just fiction you are making up.
    1
  7621.  @QuetzalcoatlOdin  "that's not enough that you wrote those words" They weren't my words. It was from a source that I was providing. "Back it up or shut the f****up" Make take your own advice and be quiet. I already gave evidence. If you don't like it I don't care.
    1
  7622.  @QuetzalcoatlOdin  "mindlessly call it fake news." Yeah. You can offer counter evidence but you don't even try. "You supplied nothing but words typed on a screen." I'm sorry I'm not bringing left over bombs to your place or whatever you think I should be doing that I'm not. "I suggest strongly you back up" I suggest you be quiet instead of proving you don't have anything intelligent to say.
    1
  7623.  @QuetzalcoatlOdin  "who's article" It's legit impossible to take seriously people who need proof that trump and his administration were dropping lots of bombs. Do you need evidence the sky is blue?
    1
  7624.  @tflg3257  "Obama was the bomb dropping king." Then trump dropped more than him (at least per year he did). Sorry not sorry if the truth hurts.
    1
  7625.  @QuetzalcoatlOdin  "back it up" I already have provided evidence of the absolute obvious. What is wrong with you?
    1
  7626.  @scottwaters998  "hide" Hey where did you go?
    1
  7627. It would help even if not that much.
    1
  7628. Edit: the following original comment of mine is dumb. Ignore it. Wouldn't your comment mean young "borrowed that" from MLK? I suspect you don't say that ever, because you comment seems about plugging him and dissing sanders, not about intellectual honesty.
    1
  7629. If you can't even spell unsubscribed then this isn't the channel for you anyway.
    1
  7630. Sam Sedar, "I'm tired." You are. You also suck.
    1
  7631. That's funny coming from a paid liar such as yourself.
    1
  7632.  @repvoid7680  "It's like these people expect Kyle to always only agree" This is funny coming from someone who can't handle people leaving kyle after he exposed himself as a fraud. If I were a cultist I'd put up with his shit. I leave him because I don't.
    1
  7633.  @JohnAllenRoyce  "Constant stream" of hypocrisy from you
    1
  7634.  @JohnAllenRoyce  "Constant stream" As for my "hate" I save it for the elite, where it belongs. And don't have it for the majority of people who are peasants.
    1
  7635. Sexist says what? I'm just kidding. Fuck pelosi. You are totally correct.
    1
  7636.  @ballbag9641  Regarding, "yes, if there was a candidate worse than trump it is my moral obligation to vote for the better candidate no matter how reluctant." Yes. You are remarkably dumb so much so that you would vote for Trump if you thought their opponent was worse. That's actually why lots of people voted for Trump yah know. Because while they couldn't know for certain how Trump would govern because he never had they knew damn well what a piece of shit Hillary would be because she had proven herself to be a piece of shit so they thought they were voting for the lesser evil while being a moronic twat just like you. But let's not pretend that your stupidity stops there and I'm not even going to go into you seemingly thinking that only 2 people run in elections. But rather the fact that that fascist running against Trump who would cause you to support Trump... well... you would support that fascist as well as long as you thought their opponent was worse. Because no where do you ever bother do you ever have standards to get your vote. You would vote for the second worse person on the planet as long as you thought their opponent was the worst. It's remarkably fucked up. I suspect you know better but are pretending not to push your idiotic message of vote blue no matter who. Regarding, "I really don’t understand why you’re arguing against strategic voting" I'm not arguing against strategic voting and you would understand this if you weren't an idiot. I'm arguing for standards. Let's say you have more than one person who meets your standards then by all means you can be strategic then. What you can't do is support evil... even if you think it's the lesser evil. Regarding, "I fundamentally disagree so this is as far as I can probably take this." Thank you in advance for shutting the fuck up. If only you had done it sooner the world would have been a better place.
    1
  7637.  @ballbag9641  Regarding, "i’ve lost too many brain cells arguing this shit." You never had any to begin with but this correctly describes everyone exposed to your nonsense. Later potential Trump supporter.
    1
  7638. So you are well aware of his journalistic malpractice of not mentioning his affiliation with TYT in the past... even when covering them and covering up their blackmail. You still stand with him? Alrighty then.
    1
  7639.  @higorss  Anything that doesn't fit the BS narrative they want pushed.
    1
  7640. hey look idiot trolls be idiot trolling. what a surprise...
    1
  7641. Regarding, "NO MORE WAR!" You are supporting the candidate who went to serve a terrible war personally over the candidate who actually has a chance of winning and was saying that war was wrong.
    1
  7642.  @DualTasticToday  Regarding, "I like Bernie." I get that but ultimately care most about your VOTE. Regarding, "Did you read my post?" Yeah. The part where you lose me is at, "I'm voting for Tulsi unless..." Bernie is better. I gave a perfectly logically reason why that should resonate with someone also saying, "NO MORE WAR." You support a candidate who WENT TO WAR PERSONALLY while Sanders was saying no to that war. Maybe support him. Regarding, "there must be a reason they disliked Tulsi even more." Corporate media says mean things about Trump. That isn't logical reason to think a person is good. This "metric" is nonsense.
    1
  7643. I mean shesh… you claim to care about a "CONTESTED CONVENTION" but are supporting a candidate and campaign that is making that contested convention more likely. When if you actually cared about it you and tulsi should just be getting behind Bernie and pushing instead of splitting the progressive vote and making it less likely Bernie wins on the first nomination. You aren't taking people that would be voting for biden or Buttigieg.
    1
  7644.  @DualTasticToday  Regarding, "she would give them to Bernie." That's not how voting works. You don't get to just give your delegates to another candidate. Sanders wins this by getting the magic number of delegates on the first ballot all by himself. That's the reality and you and tulsi are hurting that cause. If it goes to a contested convention where pledged delegates do get to cross lines... well, then we have already lost and Bernie will CERTAINLY be screwed out of the nomination.
    1
  7645.  @DualTasticToday  Regarding, "You don't know who would vote for her you are just guessing" No. I'm not just guessing. Polls when done correctly are straight up science. Even manipulation doesn't explain her lack of support nationwide. People didn't not go out and caucus for her in Iowa by accident and I knew it ahead of time without "guessing."
    1
  7646.  @DualTasticToday  Regarding, "So if no one gets the magic number they all just go home then?" No. Then the establishment uses all their dirty tricks, party insiders, and get their way. Regarding, "Maybe Bernie should make alliances now." Or better yet... win on the first ballot. Or are you intentionally trying to make sure he doesn't? It's Bernie versus the world already... which side are you really on?
    1
  7647.  @DualTasticToday  And by "it's Bernie versus the world" I actually mean it's US versus the world. You can be on the right side right now. Why aren't you?
    1
  7648.  @pepperjack6749  Regarding, " call someone corrupt without any evidence" Do you really need me to hold your hand and show you all the money he raised for his campaigns? Just because something is legal doesn't mean it's not corrupt. Regarding, "My guess is you have nothing more than your team jersey" Idiots love making assumptions.
    1
  7649.  @pepperjack6749  Regarding, "No evidence" Legalized bribes is evidence. You not acknowledging reality doesn't change that. It is also evidence of why you deserve ridicule and are not to be taken seriously.
    1
  7650.  @pepperjack6749  I'm not acting "tough," I'm just not being an idiot. Not everyone can say the same. you keep on keeping on /s
    1
  7651. @H MAX Yeah... flat earthers think I should spend my time addressing the stupid shit they say as well. Sadly I don't have unlimited time or energy and I'm forced to pick my battles and there is nothing I'm going to say to you that is going to change the fact that you are an idiot spouting nonsense.
    1
  7652.  @George-jv2ed  He's the thing thou... he isn't right. Sanders isn't even a pure socialist much less a communist but if you want to think they are correct then that is only because you are as dumb as your friend. And if you have a problem with what I'm doing the take a look in the mirror you fucking hypocrite because it is exactly what you are doing.
    1
  7653.  @George-jv2ed  You are using the word fact wrong. But try not to get pissed when I factually state that you and your friend are both morons.
    1
  7654. Tell me again how you don't care that sam want's joe ro gan censored with your handle. It's forever funny.
    1
  7655.  Culture Warrior Alert System  "BEEP BEEP BEEP" What is that even suppose to mean? Is that all you have to say about sam's support of censorship?
    1
  7656.  Culture Warrior Alert System  Are you ok? Fun fact: typing in all caps is a sign of mental illness.
    1
  7657.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  " we're heading to the shelter" Is that what you call your safe space where you can ignore the substantive point I'm making?
    1
  7658.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  "the shelter" Hopefully they censor joe rogan there. Because I know you don't actually care about free speech.
    1
  7659.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  "you think if you're not a free speech absolutist" LMFAO Is that how you want to rationalize your hypocrisy on the topic of censorship? "you've said absolutely nothing of substance" LMFAO I'm fine with you thinking this. It's funny. "bad faith" I don't rule out the possibility that this describes your hypocrisy on the topic as well. Either way it doesn't speak well of you.
    1
  7660.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  "it makes you "pro censorship"" If you think that joe rogan should be censored, like sam does, then yes of course that makes you pro censorship. And nothing you can say changes that fact.
    1
  7661.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  "shadow banned" Nothing you can say can defend the type of censorship sam advocates for when it comes to rogan. You are lucky if your words aren't being shown. They are doing you a favor. That said I support your right to say it. Because I, unlike you, actually support free speech.
    1
  7662.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  "spotify is responsible for that" Sam thinks that spotify should censor joe. That's the fact whether you realize it or admit it.
    1
  7663.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  "spotify is responsible for that" No doubt that's what youtube says to rationalize their censorship.
    1
  7664.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  "spotify is responsible for that" But youtube isn't responsible for bad info? But that censorship is bad and spotify censorship is good, or at least that what's you think if you are a hypocrite.
    1
  7665.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  "culture warrior alert was correct" Maybe you think youtube is correct? Maybe they should be censoring me huh?
    1
  7666.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  Because you don't actually care about censorship. You clearly think that spotify should be censoring joe. That is so funny. Thank you.
    1
  7667.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  "Sam is not a free speech absolutist." Sam supports censorship. And so do you.
    1
  7668.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  "1 instance" That's all it takes to support censorship. You either support free speech or you don't. Sam doesn't. And clearly neither do you. Which is why your handle is so funny.
    1
  7669.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  "1 instance" "So what if OJ killed people that one time. It doesn't make him a murderer." -f youtubecensorship, probably
    1
  7670.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  "repeated patterns of behaviors prove larger conclusions, cherry picking data like you proves exactly the opposite of what you claim" Do you use this to try and argue that OJ isn't a mur derer? Because it's just as meaningless here.
    1
  7671.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  Me: "Oj is a mur derer." ilovecensorship: "1 iNsTaNcE proves nothing!" CWAS: "BEEP DERP BEEP"
    1
  7672. How the fuck can't you already know the answer to your question? There are several legit answers to your question and the fact that you don't know any of them doesn't speak well of you. Here's a starter list for you. It's not meant to be comprehensive. The game is rigged from top to bottom against 3rd party candidates. To win the presidency you need a majority of EC votes. Just getting the most isn't good enough. It would eliminate any ability he would have to reform the "democratic" party from the inside and we desperately need this. If he won it would ensure both major parties oppose everything he tries to do. Do you need more reasons? Because just one of these is literally a good enough reason and I've given you several. Do the world a favor and stop with your retarded talking point.
    1
  7673. If you support pelosi you are at least as dense as anyone supporting republicans. And no... I don't support either major party.
    1
  7674.  @cathjj840  Candidates cannot give their delegates to one another. That is just straight up bullshit.
    1
  7675. I'm not sure what "thought" is dumber, that Bernie is a sheepdog or that Trump is worth a vote. Both are so remarkably stupid that you have me reconsidering whether or not my vote for Stein was a good call. I'm scared to have any common ground with you.
    1
  7676. Yes. You do. Get on with that and good luck with it... it isn't going to be easy but it's worth it.
    1
  7677.  @compareandcontrast9833  "call them out?" Did he mention the blackmail? Or maybe I watched a different vid.
    1
  7678.  @compareandcontrast9833  "call them out" Didn't he say TYT aren't corrupt despite the millions in katzenburg money? Maybe I watched a different vid.
    1
  7679.  @compareandcontrast9833  "she didn't ask for anything" She made it perfectly clear what she wanted. She wanted him to stop running his mouth nonstop. "Jimmy even backed up the story." LMFAO Ana's story? Is that really the BS you are claiming? "Jimmy took the easy money?" Cool smear with nothing to back it up.
    1
  7680.  @compareandcontrast9833  "she didnt say shut up or else" LFMAO. She really did if you have any intellectual honesty and aren't just trying to get a pass because of BS semantics garbage are you? "He said he did it so yeah." You say "it" like "it" is harassment. That's my polite way of again calling you a liar. "pro assad lobby group" LMFAO What nonsensical smears.
    1
  7681. Nobody is interested in your CIA propaganda here.
    1
  7682. How about Sanders/someone who doesn't stab him in the face instead?
    1
  7683. Damn right.
    1
  7684. This is what you say when you have no defense of your piece of shit candidate.
    1
  7685. It wasn't a "mistake." It was a deliberate lie.
    1
  7686. Both parties cover their tracks as best they can and thanks to the laws they write they are both able to more than they should. That said if anyone doesn't realize both parties do it it is only because they are not paying attention in my opinion.
    1
  7687. Both parties are owned by the corporations and are dependent on their money. The parties are shit. That is why we need a political revolution.
    1
  7688. If they haven't actually assaulted anyone but made the dumb mistake of applauding, then they would be better than the guy who actually committed assault.
    1
  7689.  @Richard.Atkinson  "Just subscribe" I'm not willing to do that but I do have money.
    1
  7690. I think you are being a little bit biased. Warren is a blatant liar and terrible person. She is just another politician that would say anything to win. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y1IFJMU0K-M
    1
  7691. He's trying to takeover twitter because he thinks there is money in it not because of any sort of nobel intention. Twitter and musk both suck. They deserve each other.
    1
  7692. I never liked peterson but now after hearing him bootlick for that conman musk I can't stand him.
    1
  7693. He's rich because his companies get billions of dollars from the government. If you are an american this should piss you off.
    1
  7694. It isn't just republicans doing it and you sound like a partisan hack when you suggest it is only them.
    1
  7695. What a worthless comment yours is.
    1
  7696. You think you are too smart to be propagandized? Your ego is bigger than your brain.
    1
  7697. Musk gets billions of dollars in government subsidies. That's why you should care. He's getting rich with your tax dollars dipshit.
    1
  7698. Pete regarding, "HE WON." You got me there. He did win and I want to win. But that isn't the only thing I want. How you go about it is just as important otherwise you really haven't won anything and you have just become the evil you want to replace. If all you care about is winning then you very well might start thinking saying things ISIS would say like, "we have to take out their families" is the way to go because winning. Maybe demonizing immigrants, and building walls, and lying, and meaningless pandering is the way to go because of winning. Unfortunately the context of where that guy wrote his shit is gone but it really had nothing to do with your words. I want to win. But winning in and of itself is meaningless unless you win something that is worth something. Your comment also completely ignores the actual reasons why Trump won that are not in any way shape or form appropriate to this conversation. For example Trump got the benefit of his empty podium being covered while Sanders podium was ignored even when he was speaking in front of record crowds. He got BILLIONS in free media. He had Hillary Clinton and company at his back propping him to try and make her seem less terrible. Your words of he won would be just as meaningless if you were trying to use them to characterize Hillary Clinton's "win" over Sanders in the primary. I'm sure you would think that in that instance we need to be like Hillary right because winning? We should be cheating and rigging shit right because winning? Well again I still think that is fucking moronic and pointless. Emulating pieces of shit like Trump and Hillary is hardly the answer. What good is winning when it means I get the same bullshit I'm fighting against. But I guess that is "pompous" "delusional" and I should "wake up." I think it is quite practical. Let's just agree to disagree about it shall we.
    1
  7699. Matthew regarding, "Truth is treason in an empire of lies." I guess Sanders is a traitor then. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9W6paY8RsPI
    1
  7700. Matthew regarding, "Sanders distinguished the blame from the DNC and shifted it to DWS." Ug. He says, "the DNC was supporting Hillary Clinton" before DWS is even mentioned. That totally isn't calling out the DNC am I right? And even when DWS is talked about she was THE CHAIR OF THE DNC and not some outsider from the party being used to scapegoat the parties actions. She was their leader at the time. That is totally being "loyal." I'm sure you think he is loyal to them as well when he preaches for a "political revolution." Why exactly would anyone think we need a political revolution if the DNC is getting it done? Regarding, "That is why I commented on Mr. Hammond's comment on why Sen. Sanders did not call out his own party." Ok buddy. Just ignore the clip which is but one example of Sanders calling out the DNC that disproves the original claim. Just ignore the evidence that proves it is wrong. Keep thinking whatever you want. But if you want to be honest at least say things like, "Sanders should have done more to call out the DNC." Then at least you wouldn't be lying.
    1
  7701. Matthew regarding, "Your anger is clouding your judgement." My anger comes from all the lies and bullshit that is so prevalent. People get to have their own opinions. They don't get to have their own facts. Regarding, "You can't even take down your own straw man." Would you care to elaborate or just make a vague smear?
    1
  7702. Matthew regarding, "i'm sure you would think" I said this to someone other than you to demonstrate why the original "logic" they were using was wrong. If their "logic" were correct then the logical conclusion of their argument would to think.... If it isn't what they think then hopefully it would cause them to rethink their original logic. And if I was terribly misconstruing their logic and reasoning then, by all means they could correct me. Regarding, "You want.." So apparently I can't use a persons words to formulate ideas about they think. I need to only address direct quotes and am completely unable to infer a person's thinking based on context? I would hate to put any words into your mouth so how exactly have I put words and arguments into your mouth that you don't actually think? That isn't something I'm looking to do so, by all means please take this opportunity to correct me. Regarding, "I did not smear you," If you say so. I tend to think addressing my "anger" as opposed to my points without actually addressing the points is a smear. I also think that saying I'm making strawman arguments without bothering to give any strawman argument I've made is also a smear. I also think that saying, "I pointed out how your emotional responses on these comments makes your arguments unappealing regardless of your absence of logic," is also a smear. How about you talk about how what I say doesn't have logic instead of just asserting it and justifying it because of my emotion.
    1
  7703. Matthew regarding, ""So apparently I can't use a persons words to formulate (i.e. distort) ideas about what (i assume) they think." Why yes you can, however, by doing so you are using a straw man logical fallacy i.e. arguing against an argument never made" This is funny because what you did is strawman my argument. I'm not ok with distortions. I'm not looking or trying to distort a persons argument. If someone says, "all orange people are awesome" I am not strawmanning them if I say things like, "I'm sure you would think Trump is awesome." or "then I assume you think Trump is awesome." even if they haven't said those exact things. Yes those are assumptions to a certain degree but they are logically consistent with the original argument. It is only a strawman when someone is incorrectly (ie distorting) someones beliefs. Again I ask if you would please specifically direct me to where I was distorting your beliefs rather than just vaguely asserting it. Regarding, "Also stop being rude to people who agree 99% with you" First off I concede to being a bit of dick. I have little to no tolerance for bullshit and often feel as though living a world that has me drowning in it. And even if I agree with someone 99% of the time that doesn't mean I'm going to give them a pass if they are blatantly lying 1% of the time.
    1
  7704. So we go from the lie of, "Bernie never mentioned that he was robbed" which is a lie because we live in a world where among other things, Bernie has said, "the DNC was supporting Hillary Clinton" to "Cos he took the money and shut the hell up, returned home to enjoy his pay. He's fraud too" which is rationalized by the responder, in part, because of the lie. But I'm not suppose to be angry about this bullshit? Good luck with that.
    1
  7705. Matthew regarding, "If you see a difference in opinion as blatantly lying, you're gonna have a bad time." If you think you get to have an "opinion" about facts you're gonna have a bad time. Like I said we get to have our own opinions. We don't get to have our own facts. Bernie Sanders either mentioned something or he didn't. We don't get to have "an opinion" if he did. On the other hand we get have an opinion if he did something enough, an opinion if what he does is right or wrong, and opinion of his motives among others. But we need to be able to agree on facts otherwise, in all honesty, your opinions quickly become meaningless.
    1
  7706. Matthew regarding, "enjoyed spending the fortune he made during the election." Straight up lie. You suck at life.
    1
  7707. Cool story. Where exactly does it indicate that any of that money came from the election?
    1
  7708. Another cool story. The phrase goes guilty until proven innocent right?
    1
  7709. Bravo. I applaud how misleading your statement was. You got me. Clearly you were not trying to leave the impression that he made that money off of the election instead of saying something that wouldn't have been terribly misleading like he made a fortune off his book. I bow to your bullshit. Well done. I really mean that. Technically what you said wasn't false. I stand corrected.
    1
  7710. Regarding, "Truth is treason in an empire of lies." That is still funny considering the original post is a lie.
    1
  7711. Every now and then you get a glimpse of decent journalism from the corporate media and it always (on those rare times when it happens) leaves me fantasizing about a world where that is the norm and not the exception.
    1
  7712.  @weedidi7144  Regarding, "But it's not being a clown to consider only candidates from the major parties who has a realistic chance of getting elected." It really is when you think both major party candidates are evil. The only wasted votes are votes for terrible people who have no right to the job. Regarding, "It comes down to your personal choice and how you reason when casting your vote, but there are reasonable arguments for both schools of thought." You are an idiot. The "logic" you are using could be used to justify voting for Hitler for fucks sake as long as you think Hitler is running against satan or someone worse than him. There is nothing about that that can be called reasonable. Nowhere in anything you say do you require standards for getting your vote. That is why you are a fucking moron who is making everyone dumber with everything you write.
    1
  7713. The arguments aren't "lazy" Kyle. It just looks that way because their position is indefensible.
    1
  7714. This is a rare occasion where I disagree with Kyle. I do not want to tell parents how to parent unless it can be demonstrated that what they are doing is damaging to their child. So far as I can tell there isn't enough evidence to say circumcising a kid that will not remember the procedure has adverse affects in life that justify the state telling them they can't.
    1
  7715. Are they even trying to hide the fact it's propaganda anymore?
    1
  7716. Is that literally all it takes for you to think someone is "reasonable?"
    1
  7717. Evidence of the Dunning-Kruger effect right here.
    1
  7718. No way he has the self awareness to be embarrassed by that.
    1
  7719.  @samg.5165  Regarding, "Bear in mind, debate performance is not necessarily the same as being right on the issue" It is for me and it should be for everyone even if you have a point. Regarding, "She ripped Bloomberg's balls off," Pretty low hanging fruit. Literally and figuratively. Regarding, "which is a good thing for her dying campaign" A campaign that is going to continue to die. Had her performance actually been that good this wouldn't be the case.
    1
  7720.  @samg.5165  Regarding, "It should be" So make it that way. Tell everyone you think the person who said the right things is the winner... not act like it's more important how people say things rather than what they were saying. Regarding, "political debates are ultimately bloodsports." Jean claude van dam was not on the stage and never will be because it's not actually a "bloodspot." It's not about killing your opponents. It's about convincing people to come support you. Even if warren successfully killed Bloomberg on stage that only means Bloomberg is dead... not that people are supporting warren. Regarding, "She might have destroyed his chances and pretty much burned half a billion dollars of his fortune in the span of 5 minutes." He never had chances to be destroyed. Even Bloomberg knows he can't win. At least not in any sort of conventional get the most votes kind of way. It's about keeping Sanders from winning on the first ballot. And that threat is just as real today as it was yesterday. Regarding, "It's not something just anybody could have done" It really is. Bloombergs record is atrocious in multiple ways. You say this like we are talking about Bernie. Regarding, "She could have revealed herself to be the reincarnation of Abraham Lincoln, and I'm not sure it would have save her campaign." How can anyone who you think the public thinks so little of can even possibly "win" to you? You realize that she is the equivalent of a little league team playing in the majors (they can't possibly win the long game) but they got a hit against the worst pitcher in the bigs (Bloomberg) so they "win." Never mind that later in that game they demonstrated how no good they are. Are you for democracy Warren? Nope. But it's cool cause I made a piece of shit look like a piece of shit for a minute. You should just be impressed by that. Ignore this. Regarding, "At this point, many candidates have likely given up on the presidency already" The establishment's game is to try and keep sanders from winning on the first ballot. That's why so many people with no prospects are sticking around. Regarding, "In that respect, Warren has really outdone everyone else." She went from being a person Sanders supporters would have been happy with as a running mate to someone who is given snake emojis constantly. Her campaign has eliminated the possibility she be included in a Sanders campaign. Warren is a failure when it comes to improving her future political aspirations. Not only that but she should be caring about US, not about her future job prospects.
    1
  7721. Pandering
    1
  7722. Jimmy is doing a new episode with joe tomorrow. I assume this is hype for it.
    1
  7723. While there are lots of stupid people out there it isn't only because of that. Our public is brainwashed by corporate media propaganda 24/7 and sadly it does work. That's why they do it.
    1
  7724. There is a difference between a right to a place to live and having a right to a nice place to live. You want an upgrade you have to pay for it.
    1
  7725.  @alexkowalski8020  Regarding, "This was before the internet, so unless she had access to Snoop Dogg's underground mixtape somehow, it's pretty much a lie" Don't get me wrong, I don't believe Kamala, but Snoop got pretty big before his first album because he was being feature with Dr. Dre on his album and his projects. I don't know about 2 years worth before his first album but there is reason to think people were well aware of Snoop before he really blew up. I'd leave this attack of her on the wayside and stick to the far more substantive ways she sucks.
    1
  7726.  @sammylong3704  But is this one a lie? And even if it is this avenue of attack is a really, really bad one. I even went to look it up to check my memory. From wiki, "His music career began in 1992 when he was discovered by Dr. Dre and featured on Dre's solo debut, "Deep Cover", and then on Dre's solo debut album, The Chronic. He has since sold over 23 million albums in the United States and 35 million albums worldwide.[5][6][7] Snoop's debut album, Doggystyle, produced by Dr. Dre, was released in 1993" Snoop was big before his debut album. And even if she were lying about this you would be wise to stick to the many many many and far better ways to take her down a peg. This is not the way to do it coming from someone who doesn't like her.
    1
  7727. I prioritize supporting progressives above "putting the democratic party in their place." As such I will continue to support the handful of progressives running inside the "democratic" party. I will also continue to oppose corporate dems. Supporting progressives is what is important. I will do that whenever and whereever I can even in the dumpster fire know as the "democratic" party.
    1
  7728. Regarding, " I will concede and take an L if you show me an example of free healthcare costing less and having better quality." I just did that you fucking moron. Regarding, "Change my mind!" I'd need to know what you are getting paid to say the stupid shit you do so that I could make a better offer.
    1
  7729. Do they pay you trolls by the hour or by the number of mindless posts you make?
    1
  7730. Maybe you trolls should start a union to try and put some pressure on your bosses the koch brothers.
    1
  7731. I find it funny how you pretend to care about what would be best for Bernie. And by funny I mean I find you pathetic.
    1
  7732. Not really. I assume politicians are POS. And yang has done more than that to prove to me he sucks.
    1
  7733. And I'm sick of worthless comments like yours.
    1
  7734. Regarding, "When Bernie was asked if he would have defeated Trump he simply froze and said nothing" Yeah... Bernie thinking to himself, "Are you fucking kidding me? We live in this world with all it's problems and that is the type of stupid fucking question you want to ask me and not about war, or education, or the justice system, or the environment, or money in politics, or health care, or... You can't be fucking serious can you?" Is way more compelling then literally every piece of empirical evidence, aka polling, that supports what I'm saying and says you haven't got a clue. Regarding, "No, I am not being paid" You really should be. David Brock pays for people to say the stupid shit you do.
    1
  7735. At Home regarding, "you tube comments are being purchased by extreme right wing social media farms." Let's not pretend that the "extreme right" is the only one who engages in this unethical behavior. Let's not forget about Hillary Clinton's superpac Correct the Record that spent MILLIONS during the election to do exactly that and those same people continue doing it to this day. Another reason the "democratic" party is impossible to take seriously when they pretend to have moral high ground. They demonstrate they have none and have no problem doing the same things they "oppose" when it serves their interests.
    1
  7736. How can anyone listen to that guy and not want to tax him enough to make him irrelevant?
    1
  7737. Since joe biden has been president he has voted in lock step with all the corporate dems. When it comes to what matters he is EXACTLY like them.
    1
  7738. Since biden has been president bernie has voted in lockstep with corporate dems. When it comes to what matters most he is exactly like them.
    1
  7739. There is nothing more weak, pitiful & stupid than morons like you PROMOTING politicians whoring themselves to big money interests. The irony of you calling anyone else stupid is pretty fucking funny. Thanks for the laugh dipshit.
    1
  7740.  @garym6338  Regarding, "Yang’s solutions are a lot more palatable and realistic" LMFAO. His whole thing is UBI. What's its support in congress? Some people don't care about trust like they should. Even when it comes to vetting a politician, a job known for attracting conmen, people don't seem to care. Trump is an epic terrible conman and look at how many sheep follow him. Well there are actually some really great conmen out there that you should be protecting yourself from but clearly are not.
    1
  7741. Who care if they are beyond rehabilitating? That is what a life sentence is for. And regarding, "these people will be a drain on society for the rest of their life." If you actually care about the cost, which I'm betting you don't, it is actually MORE expensive to kill someone than lock them up for life because of facts.
    1
  7742.  @meh23p  More would go to Sanders than would go to Biden. That's why she stays in. She's fake.
    1
  7743. They certainly had motive to make her silent. Dead people tell no tales.
    1
  7744. She isn't a progressive though and this is but another example of it. Forget the terrible answer and look at her actions. She voted to give Trump, a person she calls "unhinged" more money for bombs than even the orange clown wanted.
    1
  7745.  @scottb5494  Regarding, "Oh c'mon, she is a progressive." Why? Cause you say so? Or cause Warren says so? I don't get to have my own say on the matter? Is Biden a progressive because he says he's the most progressive? Much less an actual progressive? Regarding, "You don't need a 100% on a political purity test to be a progressive." Thanks. I don't go around saying this so I don't know why you are either. But there are some key issues for progressives IMO and she fails all the major tests. War and the MIC, again, as an example she voted to give Trump extra money for bombs. Health care, she is a waffle. Dirty money in politics, she is for it until she calculates it's not in her best interests. Those are the major litmus tests to me and she fails them all miserably. Regarding, "Bernie has held his views for longer, which is why I will be voting for him in the primaries" It's not just about holding views... it's about views you are willing to fight for. Warren has forever been a fairweather progressive. And that is me being polite. I consider her more controlled opposition to progressivism actually whose campaign, for example, is meant to try and cockblock the actual progressive, Sanders, for a person who wasn't willing to run against Hillary in 2016. Regarding, "But seriously, if progressives bash everybody but Bernie, this is a problem." Love for the squad. Solidarity with Tulsi against the Russian smears shit and ultimately I get to decide for myself who I consider to be on my team and not you. Regarding, "The things they are saying about Warren is ridiculous." I gave you a very specific thing that I consider to be inexcusable about warren's voting record. You just ignore it and claim this shit. Regarding, "If they keep slandering Warren, and Bernie drops dead tomorrow, who are we going to vote for? Biden?" If the unthinkable happened I'd hope that Nina Turner might try and take up the vacuum he would leave behind. If she wouldn't and had to pick among the candidates running as of now I'd choose Tulsi. She doesn't pass my "100 percent political purity test" but I actually consider her a progressive while I do not for warren whom I have zero interest in supporting.
    1
  7746.  @scottb5494  One more thing regarding, "smears." What the fuck are you actually talking about? Smears are lies. So what lies was Kyle saying about Warren? Or maybe, just maybe you think the truth hurts.
    1
  7747.  @scottb5494  Regarding, "Anyone that doesn't hold your views 100% are garbage." LMFAO. I literally just got done telling you that I don't agree with Tulsi on everything AND that I would support her and this is your response? Strawman? And nothing about those alleged "smears" you are alluding to and nothing about warren's vote for orange bombs. Are you sure you aren't a centrist already? Regarding, "You can't alienate everyone else, and expect people to eventually join you." Meanwhile, in reality, Warren alienates me and I've told you exactly why. I honestly don't give a shit about trying to convince her to join my team or not. I'm not running for office. That's her fucking job to convince me to join her team. And if she is actually on my team and I just don't realize it she shouldn't need me to convince her to be doing the right thing... she would just be doing it because it's the right thing to do. Regarding, "Have fun not compromising one bit." LMFAO. I gave you the far and away three most important issues to me and why she fails them all. To you that's "not compromising one bit." Ok bud I'm way done taking you seriously at this point.
    1
  7748.  @scottb5494  Regarding, "I was kinda on the fence anyway, but I think I'm going to change my primary vote to Warren." OMFG. LMFAO. Just when I thought I couldn't take you any less seriously you do this. Clearly I was wrong about that. I could take you even less seriously somehow.
    1
  7749.  @scottb5494  Stupidity like yours almost makes me want to root for climate change and the end of humanity.
    1
  7750.  @scottb5494  I mean... I was really hoping to do something about climate change and then I met you. Now I'm dead set rooting for climate change. That's what you sound like.
    1
  7751.  @scottb5494  What smears? You are accusing Kyle of smearing Warren. Don't you think such an accusation should be backed up with at least a tiny bit of substance?
    1
  7752.  @scottb5494  Otherwise what is really going on is that you are just smearing Kyle.
    1
  7753.  @scottb5494  But whatever. It's all rhetorical at this point. I'm way done actually giving a fuck what you think.
    1
  7754. Bernie was called a communist on stage by one of the CANDIDATES who bought their way on stage. Corporate media: why do some of your supporters get mad?
    1
  7755. There is far more truth in satire like the Onion but I agree with your sentiment.
    1
  7756. Trump's brain takes the best dumps. Just ask him. Seriously thou Kyle is being too kind suggesting Trump has a brain.
    1
  7757.  @MK-oz2lf  Regarding, "which just means you're regurgitating someone else's opinion" LMFAO. This is the only thing you can "logically" think? You are an idiot and impossible to take seriously. Sorry not sorry for not telling you exactly why in great detail. Even if I did have little reason to think you are smart enough to gain anything from it.
    1
  7758.  @MK-oz2lf  And my comment is coming from someone voting third party. I'm going to try and build support for alternative options... not set my ballot on fire by voting for Tulsi who has done nothing but disappoint as of late and isn't even running for president. She is busy telling people to vote for Biden. But that can't possibly be my own thoughts because stupid reasons right? It's not enough that you can't be stupid all alone huh? You got to try and make everyone as dumb as you?
    1
  7759.  @MK-oz2lf  You are remarkably stupid. Forgive me for not addressing you intelligently. Or don't. I don't actually care what you think. But good luck in life. You will need it.
    1
  7760. You are joking right?
    1
  7761. Terrible idea. He should point out their bias and how and why they are terrible but threatening to not play is terrible optics and strategy. You may as well be cartmen threatening to go home on south park.
    1
  7762.  @zakbrowne8470  Regarding, "as if they don't know their biases." It's obviously not about them but about the viewers. Lots of them do need to hear it. Regarding, "their wallets" What? They have an agenda and it has so much more to do with than just money for a network. Do you think they covered trump's empty podium and while avoiding sanders speaking in front of record crowds was good for ratings for them? They would love for Sanders to do what you propose because it would give them ample opportunity to act like he's "being petty," "being like Trump in attacking the media," and "whining." Now don't get me wrong they already do that shit but that's all the more reason to not give them any more ammo than they deserve. He needs to promise to always speak truth to power and be willing to go as many places as reasonably possible to speak the truth. They would prefer blackout. That was the gameplan in 16. Now they have to listen at least more than they did. He needs to use that microphone and call them out to their faces if necessary while doing it.
    1
  7763.  @zakbrowne8470  Sorry bout many typos. I'm sick and medicated.
    1
  7764. Context matters to people who aren't idiots.
    1
  7765. Fair enough. I misunderstood your point. I thought you were trying to say that it was hypocritical to give this women a pass (which I do) while chastising Trump (which I do) for saying what he did.
    1
  7766. Meanwhile she takes votes that would overwhelmingly go to sanders and sets them on fire with no path to the nomination.
    1
  7767.  @VicePresidentKamala  Ultimately I think there is nuance to be had between "evil" and "wrong." I literally just got done saying I don't want to worry about motivations and I'm doing it anyway. Meh... Whatever. Anyways I think wolfe is wrong and not evil. If you want agree to disagee about that so be it.
    1
  7768.  @Johnny_Rico.You_Know_WhatTo_Do  "claim your political opponents are nazis?" I'm pretty sure he didn't say that tucker was a nazi but did say that he used a tactic of theres. I concede it was dumb of him. I personally don't think he's evil. We all get shit wrong especially when it comes to politics.
    1
  7769.  @binary  "I used to disagree with Tucker on a lot." Yup. "Now I find myself agreeing with pretty much everything" His positions on immigration and china are still terrible. He has others but if you find yourself agreeing with him it's only because he's talking about russia and assange. Which yeah... he is right. And I will give him credit for those things. Some are slower than they should be IMO.
    1
  7770.  @binary  Let's agree to disagree about that then. I don't care.
    1
  7771. How's the smear business going for you today?
    1
  7772.  Ariana Grande  You are underthinking it. I can only think it's intentional. Regarding, "sometimes mi amor, things are as simple as adopting a dog and NOTHING more" Yeah. That's when you and/or your neighbor do it and don't involve a camera team shortly before running a campaign for president.
    1
  7773.    So you have nothing better to do with your time than say stupid shit here huh? Figures.
    1
  7774.  @66ALicEiNCHaiNS06  I have. Make a point or keep quiet.
    1
  7775. Should he? You a big fan of stop and frisk for big gulps and don't give bagels to homeless people?
    1
  7776.  @castello544  Well, it's not my fault you can't do basis research for yourself. If only you had the internet and a working brain. I'm not going to hold your hand and walk you through basic shit like you are a 5 year old. But think I'm the one who is a dipshit because I can for all I care. In the age of information ignorance is a choice. Then again maybe it isn't a choice for you and you are just really, really, really stupid.
    1
  7777.  @castello544  Sorry I can't fix your stupidity for you. If you actually care about getting the answers you seek use the internet like someone who isn't retarded. There are plenty of them that do polling.
    1
  7778.  @castello544  I'm sorry you have me mistaken for someone that is your bitch. You could have just typed public opinion polling into goggle like someone who isn't dumb as fuck but apparently you thought I was going to do your research for you even after telling you that I wasn't. If only there were people like pew, gallup, and others on the internet that someone who wasn't dumb as fuck could check out. But just think I don't do your homework for you because I can't for all I care. You might want to consider that I don't because I think you are pathetic.... because I think you are pathetic.
    1
  7779. The idea that more guns is a solution to gun violence demonstrates an inability to logic.
    1
  7780. Except the party has gone through lots of changes over time but don't let that stop you from thinking they can't.
    1
  7781. "They live in a bubble" LMFAO Look in the mirror. And tell me again how you don't care that sam wants to censor joe rogan with your name.
    1
  7782.  @Damacles9  Dems are corrupt warmongers who would veto m4a if it made it's way to the presidents desk. If you think they are the "left" you are a dupe.
    1
  7783.  Nicholas Time  "he doesn't want Rogan arrested he wants his platform taken away" Yup. He wants joe censored. He wants his corporate overlords to censor him. "wanting the market to decide" LMFAO he wants the market to censor. "I personally want Rogan lined up against a wall, denied a cigarette, and then ****" LMFAO Seek help.
    1
  7784. You are commending a person for committing assault over a joke. You should seek help as much as will.
    1
  7785.  @lindaguthrie558  ""How would you react if it was your wife" How would I feel if my wife was compared to a movie star sex symbol? I certainly wouldn't commit assault like a triggered child. "People need to think before they speak," You should take your own advice.
    1
  7786.  @lindaguthrie558  "place yourself in that position" I started balding in my 20s and now I'm old as dirt. My bald head has been made fun of. Never, ever have I even considered committing assault because of it. I'm not a child unlike some. "Will Smith was protecting his wife’s honor" He was committing assault.... over a joke... where his wife was being compared to a movie star SEX SYMBOL. It's like you don't think about the things you say before you say them.
    1
  7787.  @lindaguthrie558  If you are trying to destroy my faith in humanity it's working.
    1
  7788.  @lindaguthrie558  " no I’m not" LMFAO " I’ve seen so much damage by people who would rather run their mouths" But people committing assault don't do damage? If someone hurts you with words you think they can be attacked? "actually think about the possible hurt that is in it" Do you even read what I write? I said it before but I'll repeat it so that maybe you might attempt to think about it and address it... jada was being compared to a MOVIE STAR SEX SYMBOL. But you are acting like she was being compared to a leper. Maybe think about the possibility that it's actually a COMPLIMENT because it really is. "I stand up for humanity" You stand for stupidity and for a person who committed assault because they got triggered over a joke. I suspect you listen to waaayyy to much corporate media and it's warping your brain.
    1
  7789.  @lindaguthrie558  I was straight up infatuated with demi moore at the time. I went to go see that movie just because she was in it. That's who jada was being compared to. That's why you think will smith should have been able to assault him? You stand with him while he does that? You support that? You need help much like will does.
    1
  7790. I think that goes against being a humanist.
    1
  7791. *progressive
    1
  7792. They were just trying to pick their time wisely and I approve of their decision to do it now.
    1
  7793. "Working for corporate media is bad except when yang does it." yanggang
    1
  7794. You should check out Bernie Sanders.
    1
  7795. It not a challenge. It's a statement of fact. Someone has to be on the bottom of the barrel. And their name is neera.
    1
  7796.  @mikeryan2070  "These alot of cold hearted neocons. Left to take Her place." Yup. Are any of them actually worse like you claimed in your OP?
    1
  7797. "Fredo will be back on in a month." Let them put bring fredo back. He might bring down CNN singlehandledly.
    1
  7798. @speedruiner Bernie has sold out the people of the US and the people of Ukraine.
    1
  7799.  @speedruiner7213  Do I really need to explain how he is voting for war instead of pushing for peace?
    1
  7800.  @speedruiner7213  How he has gotten nothing of substance for the actual left and the peasants?
    1
  7801.  @speedruiner7213  "I guess I'll just take your word for it" That is your response as I'm explaining it to you? Are you trying to prove you are deeply unserious?
    1
  7802. "Irritated because I did not think the same as you" This is known as projection in psychology.
    1
  7803. "Which votes would you consider in Bernies case to be for war?" Billions of dollars for a weapons in Ukraine.
    1
  7804. "Barely explain it" In the age of information ignorance like yours is a choice. I've also gone out of my way to try and answer your questions while you have dodged and ignored mine.
    1
  7805.  @speedruiner7213  "projection? How would you know?" It's clear that you are triggered by my opinion and you are projecting. And I know because of your words.
    1
  7806.  @speedruiner7213  "if one is for war or not?" Yes... choosing to send weapons for war instead of calling for peace makes you for war. That's how it works. I should haven't to explain that. This all seems like a "you" problem.
    1
  7807.  @speedruiner7213  You are impossible to take seriously. I hope you are at least paid well for your nonsense.
    1
  7808.  @speedruiner7213  "care to elaborate?" No. You are wasting far too much of my time already. "I suppose I'll just take your word for it." This is funny coming from someone who is gaslighting and lying.
    1
  7809.  @speedruiner7213  "My thoughts: you have an opinion, nothing wrong with that, it's just not very informed one." I think you are paid to gaslight people but don't rule out the possibility that you are just a useful idiot. Either way you are wasting my time. "to have an attitude" I'm not the only one with an "attitude" but at least I'm not an epic hypocrite about it like you are.
    1
  7810. @speedbootlicker I'm going to keep advocating for peace. Bernie will keep voting with the military industrial complex. And you will gaslight about it all regardless of anything I have to say.
    1
  7811.  @speedruiner7213  Spoken like a person who doesn't have anything intelligent to say.
    1
  7812.  @speedruiner7213  Or maybe you just don't care that bernie is voting with the military industrial complex. Serious people do. Unserious people act like it's something new.
    1
  7813.  @speedruiner7213  "Surely you can't be serious." What an apt way to describe everything you have said.
    1
  7814. Are you ever embarrassed at what you see in the mirror? Because you should be.
    1
  7815.  @jbak420  Is that why you like him? Of course... because you are stupid as fuck.
    1
  7816. You are seriously one of the biggest disgraces to the human race ever... and that is really saying something in a world with lots of terrible worthless people. You are the arguably the worst we have. What a waste of flesh and air.
    1
  7817.  @whyamimrpink78  The same way I don't have counter arguments for flat earthers. I do have a counter argument. Not that I'm wasting my time addressing you intelligently. In part, because I've told you this before but you don't listen or care about counters. You care about spreading your bullshit far and wide because you suck at life and are a worthless person.
    1
  7818.  @whyamimrpink78  You are a piece of shit who is paid to be here. You make the world worse by existing.
    1
  7819. Is creepy biden touching you right now?
    1
  7820. What about Tilleman? You know the guy getting fucked over in the audio who released the information? Does he fit your narrative to you? Because he doesn't. Would you not support him because he had the audacity to run as a democrat?
    1
  7821. The guy going out of his way to expose the corruption simultaneously supports the corruption? I'm not a dipshit so I understand that makes no fucking sense.
    1
  7822. Is smarter than you. Does it hurt?
    1
  7823.  @happyappy19931  For example you seem unaware that joe often says sentances without a "F" bomb. Being smarter than you is not hard.
    1
  7824.  @happyappy19931  You don't know that rogan forms sentences without "F" bombs all the time or you are intentionally lying about it. It's not the actions of someone smart.
    1
  7825.  @happyappy19931  Tell you what... how about you prove that Rogan can't form a sentence without an F bomb first and when you can't I'll have proven my point.
    1
  7826.  @happyappy19931  Try to prove that rogan can't for a sentence without an F bomb. When you can't I'll have proven my point.
    1
  7827.  @happyappy19931  "prove" You first. Prove your OP and when you can't I'll have proven mine.
    1
  7828.  @happyappy19931  "prove" You first. Try to prove your OP. When you can't I'll have proven my point.
    1
  7829. I am 100 percent certain you are pulling numbers from your bum.
    1
  7830.  @gerardcomeau2160  What a remarkably uncompelling "argument."
    1
  7831.  @gerardcomeau2160  Maybe you should stop being an idiot then. Or at the very least just shut the fuck up.
    1
  7832. Are you really trying to rationalize voting shaming with semantics?
    1
  7833.  @darkphoenix2  Regarding, "Let's use a better word." Just say yes to my question. Just admit you are using semantics to justify and rationalize your voter shaming.
    1
  7834.  @darkphoenix2  Try not to lie to yourself about what you are doing.
    1
  7835.  @darkphoenix2  To be clear... I do it. I voter shame. Shit I wanted to voter shame kystal when she said she voted for hillary. I don't care that you do it. I care that you are trying to have your cake and eat it too. I care that you aren't being intellectually honest about what you are doing.
    1
  7836.  @darkphoenix2  Regarding, "I don't even know what your problem is." I care that you are trying to have your cake and eat it too. I care that you aren't being intellectually honest about what you are doing." My problem is that you are voting shame and pretending you aren't. You are trying to use semantics to weasel your way out of what you are doing. It's not intellectually honest. That's my issue.
    1
  7837.  @darkphoenix2  Regarding, "If you do it too, then your problem must be with my reasons." What I don't do is pretend I'm not shaming people when I clearly am.
    1
  7838.  @darkphoenix2  Regarding, "I didn't say that I don't do it." Your OP literally starts with, "I wouldn't shame a voter for their choice." Look. I've made my point. You will either take it to heart or you will continue to use semantics to rationalize your behavior as being something different than what it is. Take care. Peace.
    1
  7839. You are strawmanning the majority of us who just want sensible gun laws like universal background checks.
    1
  7840. It isn't surprising that you are for universal background checks as pretty much everyone other than congress and the nra are for it still we don't have it and you wonder why some of us might have a problem with that as this country faces an epidemic of mass shootings that other countries don't face. Let me ask you this regarding the epidemic of mass shootings... what is your position on them? Is it that you don't care? Is it that you don't think think they are actually happening? Don't think they are a big enough problem to address? Don't think we can do anything about them? Or just think that is the price of "freedom?" Or other?
    1
  7841. Regarding, "i don't know how to deal with mass shootings" While I appreciate your honesty the bottom line is that the status quo is clearly not working for lots of us and many us demand we at least try to do something about it otherwise it can easily be said we are being complicit in and further mass shootings. We know for certain what happens when we do nothing. And if you want to get an idea of how a country might address the problem we know that as well. Look at what Australia did and their results speak for themselves. Regarding, "you cannot punish every gun owner" Do you say things like you cannot punish every car owner because the DMV exists? Because that notion is just as silly as what you are saying here. Regarding, "How's that any different from saying all Muslims are responsible for terrorism?" I don't even know where to begin to address this but let's just say that it is my opinion that it is obviously different. I also refer you to my original response. I am not looking to ban all guns nor do I think that is a plausible solution in our gun happy society. But we already live in a society that doesn't let people own any weapon they want as we should and the debate about what weapons we should allow in a society with the problems we have demands to be addressed and rethought about unless you are content with the status quo. I am not and question the sanity and morality of anyone who is.
    1
  7842. And I tend to be the screaming type who can be a real dick. I can appreciate you having problems with legislation that has been proposed but I encourage you to not let that stop you from trying to formulate your own ideas about how we might make things better assuming the status quo with frequent mass shootings isn't doing it for you. I promise you that if you look there are ways of addressing the problem that don't go so far as banning all guns.
    1
  7843. CNN is crap propaganda.
    1
  7844. It's not alright and people are going to watch it. Wishful thinking isn't the same thing as reality.
    1
  7845. "no reason?" LMFAO This wasn't the place for you. Thanks for f'ing off.
    1
  7846.  @Marshallizer  Yup. He's a sellout and conman.
    1
  7847.  @jbak87  "You mean they set up charities to counter criticisms of their inhumane decisions and suspicions of their character?" Yup. If you want me to even give your nonprofit a chance. If you want me to think it's out actually doing good then don't use it as a prop to advance your political career. And forgive my typos.
    1
  7848.  @jbak87  Not just vanity but like you said before, "counter criticisms of their inhumane decisions and suspicions of their character?" But when it comes to politicians they are even worse. These organizations are perfect places for corruption and quid pro quo.
    1
  7849. Someone died.
    1
  7850. I prefer it when she endorses her fellow corporate shills as they go down like the titanic. I also like that when she talks because it reminds me why I didn't vote for her. I need that in the era of Trump.
    1
  7851.  @liberalsocialist9723  Regarding, "So DSA, TYT, Families worker party, PNHP, Justice Democrats, Jacobin, and the plethora of left wing commentators are all the swamp now?" Pretty much if they aren't using their power to force the vote. That's how it works. Regarding, "Jimmy Dore is the only true God King we should obey?" I listen to anyone trying to get m4a and ignore anyone trying to stop it. This isn't rocket science. Regarding, "Who doesn't want to vote on m4a? " The dems are going to control everything and it's not going to happen not that they are they only one's stopping it from happening.
    1
  7852.  @liberalsocialist9723  Regarding, "the plethora of left wing commentators are all the swamp now?" I mean if you didn't already know that TYT sucks you should really know it now.
    1
  7853.  @retromillenium  Ok. Be a twat but don't wonder why you are never asked to any parties.
    1
  7854. CNN and MSNBC are not the "public."
    1
  7855. Follow the money. That is a good indication of who you should and should not be supporting.
    1
  7856.  @kxr842  I'm pretty sure they are saying there is no god. Don't overthink and try to make it into something other than that... like you are.
    1
  7857.  @kxr842  "people's actions are different than how the universe works." So you are just going to move the goalpost and hope everyone doesn't notice? Your comment was, "every single thing has a purpose?" You can't claim epstein isn't a "thing" just because it proves your previous statement is nonsense.
    1
  7858.  @kxr842  It's telling that instead of answering my simple and direct question you ignore it and move the goalpost.
    1
  7859.  @kxr842  "Take for example a phone someone build it but what people do with it is up to you." Your god, who is suppose to be omniscient, created epstein the way humans create phones. But if I create a phone I don't know how it's all going to turn out before it happens the way your god created epstein knowing exactly what they what they were going to do.
    1
  7860.  @kxr842  "he knows the outcome of all paths" And still they created a world they knew they would end up flooding. Maybe they just enjoy mass murder.
    1
  7861. Sure, neoliberal garbage.
    1
  7862. It has nothing to do with his skin color and everything to do with him being rich and powerful, obviously. Stop being an idiot.
    1
  7863. Nobody has died from MJ. I dare you to cite your bullshit.
    1
  7864.  @pjk7138  People are easily bought. "Can't believe how many leftists simp for this hack." It's far more understandable buying into his BS than trump supporters and biden supporters buying into them. I also think a huge portion of "yanggang" are paid trolls and the same people hillary paid to "correct the record."
    1
  7865. No. It's not.
    1
  7866. And it's not even close.
    1
  7867.  @phazon100  If you think that you might want to consider that you are an idiot.
    1
  7868.  @phazon100  Get a real hobby.
    1
  7869. Bernie is a sheepherder for a corrupt party.
    1
  7870. So good. Thanks for the laugh.
    1
  7871.  @Bisquick  "does anyone wanna highlight why?" Simply put, he manufactures consent for corrupt politicians. "with anything specific" Let's say it was only super general... like he's part of the corporate media, who collects a check from multiple billionaires wouldn't it be enough? If you take issue with the world and are looking for people to blame then politicians and their propagandists are a good place to start. "does decent reporting" LMFAO "who cares?" The peasants who realize that their problem isn't other peasants. And you. Or why are you here defending him? " it's always "his bullshit"" Do you ever wonder how terrible people are able to gain power? They do it with help from people like grim.
    1
  7872.  @Bisquick  "what bullshit?" He spends his time on twitter blaming peasants and he spends his "professional" time manufacturing consent for the elite. For example his article titled, "CHUCK SCHUMER EYES A SECOND SHOT AT RAISING THE MINIMUM WAGE THROUGH RECONCILIATION" it's meant to try and manufacture consent for chuck shumer, as if he's doing something about raising the minimum wage.
    1
  7873. krista regarding, "no way would Hillary be worse than Trump" Let's say I agreed with you and I'm not sure I do, but let's say I did. Is that suppose to impress me? Better than Trump. Wow. So what. This is a pretty pathetic bar to set and pretty meaningless. You know what is meaningful? As you say, "she was corrupt." Yes she was corrupt. Case closed. The rest are just meaningless details meant to get the public to choose between 2 pieces of shit. Stop playing the stupid game the establishment wants you to play.
    1
  7874. Blast regarding, "anyone but trump" No. Not anyone. Not David Duke. Not Sarah Palin. Not Hillary Clinton. Vote for good people and be willing to lose or you are part of the problem instead of being part of the solution.
    1
  7875. What do you think about the biden administration sending weapons to israel every 36 hours for the last year plus?
    1
  7876. Because he dropped out of high school? /s
    1
  7877. Imagine thinking Trump is a crazed lunatic and also voting to give Trump more money for bombs then even he wanted. Oh wait.. I don't have to imagine... I can just look at Warren.
    1
  7878. And while McCain is a total nincompoop she is actually correct about this.
    1
  7879. I speak dog. What they said is translated to mean, "I don't like Let It Burn."
    1
  7880. Because even though the dog doesn't like you they have trouble remembering your name.
    1
  7881. Trump does that to himself. He got BILLIONS in free media last time. They even covered his empty podium while Sanders was speaking in front of record crowds.
    1
  7882. She's not. And why would you say this? Let me guess... because she's "better" at taking on the MIC? She literally collects a check from the MIC this very moment.
    1
  7883.  @stumpe9662  She was fucking terrible until she crushed Tim Ryan. Thankfully she had that moment to salvage an otherwise terrible night.
    1
  7884. The rail barons couldn't have broken the strike without bernie. Bernie is controlled opposition.
    1
  7885. Regarding, "he didn’t expose." Seriously... what do you want from him? He was literally the only reason the primary needed to be rigged. And you realize this. As you should. You shouldn't need Sanders to tell you the game is rigged. And if you don't already realize it you aren't going to wake the fuck up because the person who is in the position of most bias is telling you he got fucked over. The people who need to be shouting it are us. That's our job. Sanders is already doing his. By gaining support for him and progressive causes and by not unnecessarily giving the corporate media ammunition to attack him with.
    1
  7886. One simple question for you: do you understand that socialism like k-12 education in america already exists?
    1
  7887. Fair and balanced. LMFAO
    1
  7888. Even shit doesn't deserve that.
    1
  7889.  @thehumanity0  regarding, "There is a valid argument to be made whether campaigning with Hillary and Biden helped or hurt him." The conversation is about Hillary and DWS not Hillary and Biden. And no. There is no valid argument to be made that campaigning with, or even getting close to, Hillary and DWS was helpful. It was stupid beyond words and just saying I'm in a bubble isn't the same as making a legit argument. In all honesty I concede I'm not bothering to make much of an argument myself but I also feel no need to explain this anymore then I feel the need to explain that the Earth isn't flat. Regarding, "there is possibly a 50/50 chance that those campaigns might've actually helped him" Um... nope. Regarding, "you don't know and you have no way to prove that." Hillary lost the state to Trump for fucks sake. DWS is rightfully despised. There is no good reason to think doing anything to attach himself to those two would be beneficial. Literally nobody who wasn't going to vote for him already were going to be convinced by getting close to those two. But there are definitely people that might have supported him who didn't because of them. This isn't rocket science. Regarding, "I just find your smugness overwhelmingly arrogant though." I don't give a fuck. If you want to have a problem with how I say the things I do I don't fucking care. The fact remains that I'm right about this and there is ZERO doubt about it.
    1
  7890. So you want people to be rightful to question everything the government says because they are openly and willingly lying to everyone?
    1
  7891.  @asiburger  " I want them to question everything, actually." So do I. But that's not what I asked. I asked if you think it's right that we give them all good reason to question the government. In other words do you want the government to lie the way fauci did and you seem to support. Or maybe, just maybe you should advocate for an open an honest government rather than bootlicking for liars.
    1
  7892.  @asiburger  Fauci is a liar. That's that you are advocating for. That's what you are with "on this." That's not me generalizing. That's your original post. Now go back to making excuses and rationalizations for a lying government. I know you will.
    1
  7893.  @asiburger  "until it hurts those, you could be lying to instead." He told people not to wear masks during a pandemic. Good thing that didn't hurt anyone. Oh wait...
    1
  7894.  @asiburger  "until it hurts those, you could be lying to instead." He gave everyone just cause to question everything the government says even a suppose person of "science." He's a disgrace and his lie certainly cost people their lives.
    1
  7895.  @jwallah346  "he would have been called a liar no matter what" I only call him a liar because of the blatant and obvious lie. Stop defending liars like this. It's pathetic.
    1
  7896.  @jwallah346  "You only call him a liar because like so many people you are too stupid to understand how science works" Faucci straight up admits that he was lying about masks. You only defend him because you are a moron. "you think all experts have some evil agenda." I think he is evil because he told people not to wear masks during a pandemic. People died because of his lies.
    1
  7897.  @sonjakozman1699  More people were deported under biden than under trump. And biden kept the cages.
    1
  7898.  @sonjakozman1699  More people have died of covid during biden's presidency compared to trumps presidency, and biden had the jab.
    1
  7899.  @sonjakozman1699  There is more military spending under biden compared to trump.
    1
  7900.  @sonjakozman1699  "banging on about shadow banning comments" All 3 comments to you were 100 percent factual and they are being shadowbanned. It's the type of thing you should care about but you do you.
    1
  7901.  @sonjakozman1699  "Get help." I'm not going to lie this is funny coming from you. Thanks for the laugh.
    1
  7902.  @sonjakozman1699  "thanks for being insane" You are projecting. This is like a compliment considering the source. Again.... thanks for the laugh.
    1
  7903.  @scooterallen1834  "Trump put America first" You are just as silly as biden supporters.
    1
  7904.  @sonjakozman1699  do you have anything of value to say?
    1
  7905.  @sonjakozman1699  "You are like a dancing bear." Do you really have nothing better to do than troll? I almost pity you.
    1
  7906.  @noramusk4689  Regarding, "Don’t say that he wasn’t all that bad." Set records deporting people. Doubled our wars and dropped so many bombs the country that spends as much as the next 11 countries combined on war was actually running out of bombs. Signature piece of legislature was republican health care. He left the country in such a shit place they gave the keys to the country to an orange clown after he left. What the actual fuck are you talking about? Regarding, "Let’s see what Joe Biden will do" You can't already tell? Let's hope that Trump 2.0 (then again who knows it might actually be trump 1.0 to follow him) after the inevitable failure that will be the biden presidency is as incompetent as trump 1.0 was.
    1
  7907.  @noramusk4689  So yes. You are a malfunctioning bot. Thank you for answering my question.
    1
  7908. No.
    1
  7909.  @jamessderby  Well I'm not.
    1
  7910. It's scientifically less safe than being a policeman.
    1
  7911. She is dumb because of the things she says... not because she is a women. You are dumb because you don't seem to be able to understand this... and it has nothing to do with your gender. I don't even know what gender you are. Either way you are stupid.
    1
  7912. Speaking of the KKK.... KKK=dumb as fuck. Would you like to argue otherwise? It would seem you would based on all the other stupid ass shit you say. Or don't.... but that would make you a hypocrite.... in case you actually want to know how to use that word properly.
    1
  7913. What say you fuckface? Is the KKK stupid?
    1
  7914. I'll just figure you are too busy putting on your white robe and burning crosses in people's yards to answer my simple question.
    1
  7915. Fuck yang. I'm so tired of people on the "smart" side praising him when he is just another establishment tool to try and siphon votes away from sanders.
    1
  7916. Check exit polls for primaries!
    1
  7917. He is a garbage person. Shame on anyone who supports him.
    1
  7918. If you support joe biden you are complicit in genocide.
    1
  7919. Just admit that you're CIA.
    1
  7920. Because your love of him is justified and you are objective or some shit? Oh right, you are not, you are just a dipshit hypocrite.
    1
  7921. Yeah, we better not tax them at all thinks mental midgets.
    1
  7922. Regarding, "the dems were for it then." Were they? They control everything now. Stop making excuses and bootlicking for them.
    1
  7923.  @smilergrogan2361  Regarding, "i say they passed the bill." They love doing political theater like this when they think others can stop it. That way they can take credit for accomplishing nothing. They have all the power they need to pass it now and yet they don't. Stop making excuses for corrupt politicians. I say if they really want to pass it they can. Why aren't they? Regarding, "the bootlicking comment might please your fellow cult members" I'm not a trump supporter if that is what you are trying to claim. Regarding, "to me the bootlicker is the fool who blindly follows the most dishonest crook in u,s, history" LMFAO. So it doesn't include licking the boot of a POS like biden who is largely responsible for war and mass incarceration? Don't let that stop you from licking that POS boot. I find it tough to tell the difference between you and trump supporters. You are all bootlickers worshipping your clown.
    1
  7924.  @smilergrogan2361  Regarding, " if you;re the cllnt holmes that used to sing in a.c." I'm not.
    1
  7925.  @smilergrogan2361  I'm willing to call you a turd polisher if you would prefer.
    1
  7926.  @smilergrogan2361  LMFAO I have a degree in psychology. Good night.
    1
  7927. You just called a political stunt pure. LOL
    1
  7928.  @Cocoa.Tresbelle  "a home tht is PURE" Biden is a liar, a warmonger, corrupt... Regarding, "he deserves a home" Everyone deserves puppy videos that are not political propaganda.
    1
  7929.  @dknights6414  I'm making fun of joe biden and people who vote for the "lesser evil."
    1
  7930. I hope you are paid to say stupid shit like this. I hope you don't actually believe your drivel.
    1
  7931. They need to try and justify Hillary's loss as being anything other than her being so incompetent and corrupt she couldn't beat a corrupt orange clown.
    1
  7932.  @meltedsnowman9637  "laughing" And is this where the new goalpost is? Don't you maybe want to instead try to back up your BS about how he was being "sexually derogatory?"
    1
  7933.  @meltedsnowman9637  "I'm not defending or taking her side." When you act like she still deserves respect despite her actions, when you characterize jimmy's actions as "sexually derogatory" then yes, you are taking her side and you are putting blame for this crap on jimmy as if that's reasonable. It's not. "It should be pretty clear from my comments that I think Ana is way more in the wrong than Jimmy." It should be pretty clear I don't care. " I don't think that Dore deserves no criticism either." I'm not a sycofant who defends dore on everything and agree with him about everything. For example I'd happily admit he has a huge ego. I want you to defend your calling him "sexually derogatory." What is that even suppose to mean? And how do you justify it? Because to me it's just a smear and not true based on the actual events. "It just seems like the Dore sycophants take anybody not siding absolutely with Jimmy completely 100% on everything as taking the opponent's side" Of course you want to call me a sycophant. That's certainly easier than backing up your BS. Put up or shut up. How do you justify your words? Instead of just calling me a sycophant for having the audacity to point out what's wrong with them? "They simply can't handle someone not agreeing with them on absolutely everything." What nonsense to excuse and deflect from your BS.
    1
  7934.  @meltedsnowman9637  I asked you before and you ignored it to call me a sycophant. I'll give you another chance to answer my question the same way I've answered all of yours... Don't you maybe want to instead try to back up your BS about how he was being "sexually derogatory?" Or to put it another way... how do you justify calling him "sexually derogatory?"
    1
  7935.  @meltedsnowman9637  "They simply can't handle someone not agreeing with them on absolutely everything." I mean... look in the mirror. I'm sorry you can't handle me not agreeing with you on absolutely everything.
    1
  7936. You are mistaking constructive for idiotic. They are very different things.
    1
  7937. Your words are so dumb. It is cute that you actually believe your bullshit.
    1
  7938.  @stormy5377  If you go to wikipedia and check out kyle's page you can read, "his YouTube channel Secular Talk, an affiliate of The Young Turks network" right near the top.
    1
  7939.  @stormy5377  Then again don't. Just trust me. I really don't care for wikipedia.
    1
  7940. Imagine being a blackmailer or a person who covers for a blackmailer...
    1
  7941.  @JackDaniels-ru2xy  LMFAO What was jimmy wrong about exactly?
    1
  7942.  @dmitchel0820  Trump and Hillary had foundations. Trump and Hillary have books. So fucking what. A record is a way of knowing if a candidate is full of shit. Ultimately you have no clue how Yang would govern because he never has whether or not you want to admit it. Stop being a fucking clown. If you were going to have surgery tomorrow you sure as fuck would want a person with experience. But for some reason you are able to rationalize voting for a person to the highest political office in the country who has NONE. Stop being an idiot.
    1
  7943.  @TheAlibabatree  Regarding, "Historically speaking, our best presidents and leaders were usually the ones with little or no experience." The number of presidents is not a statistically significant number. Ultimately the fact remains for the sane that experience is a good thing. Let's say you are looking to hire someone for ANYTHING, mechanic, plumber, gardener, ANYTHING where you, as a person looking to do the hiring, would consider a lack of experience a good thing and/or where experience would be a bad thing. You are seriously just trying to reverse engineer things to say to come to the idiotic conclusions you have already drawn. Regarding, "Politics is not a science," Meanwhile, in reality, there is a reason colleges teach courses in POLITICAL SCIENCE. It's rules are not as rigid as math but there is science EVERYWHERE in it. Regarding, "its more of an art or a game, whether we like it or not." Um... nope. Regarding, "Constitutionally speaking, the president doesnt have very much power," I don't know if you've noticed but their power has gone way beyond what the constitution intending. Their is so much power in their signing statements alone it's fucking remarkable. It is rightfully called the most powerful position in the world. Regarding, "outside of military" You mean the area where Yang just totally shit the bed? Our president is commander in chief. Regarding, "His/her job is more sociological." This is part of it but hardly the majority of what they do. Regarding, "To bring the country together" Meh. Not really to me. But let's say I thought this, how is this an argument for yang? He's polling what? Like 1 or 2 percent. Regarding, "and insure trust and hope for the future." Meanwhile, in reality, the legislate and those things have widespread implications. Just today I watched this video that has nothing to do with the shit you claim and has everything to do with facts on the ground and implications for who we have as president. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MPqJIzIIzoE&t=369s Actions matter far more than you seem to think.
    1
  7944.  @TheAlibabatree  Regarding, " You say that experience is ALWAYS better, no matter the profession." Yup. Because obviously. Because reality. Regarding, "Again, i would agree with you on almost any profession and any topic... but like i said, politics is different." We even have a name for the logical fallacy you are using. It's called special pleading. Regarding, "Think of the biggest, most impactful pop artists of the past 100 years." Do I really have to? Regarding, "None of them were experienced." Meanwhile, in reality, they do have experience at their craft. They have all practiced signing or playing instruments. They didn't just one day sign in the shower and magically hit it big. Regarding, "They tend to be a (or THE) driving force of cultural change." I think wildly overestimate the impact of pop music. Regarding, "i agree that recent presidents have overstepped their bounds" It's not even really about that even if this is true. It's about the reality that the POTUS is rightfully called the most powerful person in the world while you want to act like they are just a talking head like Sean Hannity or Rachel Maddow whose biggest impact is rhetoric. It's not. They power is far and wide and they impact so much it's fucking remarkable. Even when it comes to all the power they hold in putting people in their incredibly important jobs and positions. The power of the president is fucking huge and you are comparing them to fucking pop stars all just to try and reverse engineer terrible, terrible, terrible arguments for your preferred candidate.
    1
  7945.  @TheAlibabatree  By the way, sorry about my many typos. I haven't been proofreading like I normally do because I'm having a hard time taking the things you say seriously. Regarding, " I do believe that social unity is the main issue for US presidents" Yeah... it's not. Watch the video I gave. Society is unified in that climate change is real and important and compare that to the actions taken by trump in the video. It's about policy. Regarding, "As far as Yang's polling numbers.. so what?" Well you did just get done trying to say that unifying is what's really important and he hasn't been able to unify shit... and this is from a person who doesn't really give a shit about polling. It's just that, from your own arguments, you should, because unifying. Regarding, "If no one knows who you are, you poll low." You know what might help with that? Experience.
    1
  7946.  @TheAlibabatree  Regarding, " Your first 3 paragraphs dont offer any counter arguments at all." If that's what you want to think at this point I really don't care. I've already wasted far too much time addressing you at this point.
    1
  7947.  @TheAlibabatree  Dude... I quit. This conversation is ridiculous. Peace.
    1
  7948.  @TheAlibabatree  I'm quitting because I can't fix stupid for you. But if you want to think it's because I'm defeated... ok. That's fine. For that to bother me I'd have to care what you think and ultimately I don't.
    1
  7949.  @TheAlibabatree  Regarding, "I do like Yang" So do I, as a person. As a presidential candidate? That's asinine. Regarding, "i just dont think he has factored in automation to his policies the way i would like." Automation is going to change society as it already is doing. Bernie offers education, universal health care, a living wage, an increased social safety net and more. All of these things help offset the negative effects of automation in the future. And if UBI becomes feasible more in the future so be it, it's not like it has to happen this second nor am I convinced it is the great idea yang makes of it... especially in how he offers to implement it. Regarding, "I also think he's too old." He does so much more than I do in a day I can't even imagine. You have ZERO logical reason to think he can't do the job. And should the unthinkable happen and he died, well there is a reason we have vice presidents. I predict that on the day Trump chokes and dies on a burger Bernie will go out for a run like he still does. I love that he's old. That way I know EXACTLY what I'm getting. I was duped into voting for Obama in large part because he was young and didn't have much of a record for me to look back at... and he still HAD a record, just a short one. Yang has literally NONE. These are the things you should care most about: a politicians policy, their record, and how they raise the money for their campaign. Bernie has it all and a legit shot of winning... unlike yang.
    1
  7950.  @TheAlibabatree  Don't take my insults personal. I concede I'm a dick. But the conversation was boring me, pretty pointless, and wasn't going to lead to either of us changing our minds. Seriously think long and hard about experience. Realize that if you were responsible for hiring anyone for anything you would want it. And you ESPECIALLY should want it for someone being considered for the most powerful position in the world.
    1
  7951. He's not really "selling out." He was already a sellout. It's just a desperate attempt to try to be relevant. Because he isn't.
    1
  7952.  @cheesys8706  "because I don’t want to lose my account you assume something is not true?" Pretty much. If I had evidence I wouldn't be a bitch about it and make excuse about your "account" like you couldn't just make a new one. I assume if you actually had evidence you would provide it. I know I would.
    1
  7953.  @cheesys8706  I honestly don't give a shit what you have to say if you aren't going to provide any evidence. Sorry not sorry.
    1
  7954.  @larchlarch9851  If you can't understand that ryan grim is shill paid by multiple billionaires to manufacture consent for the oligarchy then I feel sorry for you.
    1
  7955.  @dashx1103  "because of a grudge with a certain podcaster" It's actually because he's a shill for the elite. Because he uses lies to manufacture consent for them. No doubt it's easier for you to strawman the actual argument thou.
    1
  7956.  @larchlarch9851  "that's just right wing propaganda." This is what you say when you don't have anything of substance to back it up. "Don't be a shill for them." This is funny because you are shilling for ryan grim. "Ryan Grim is all about integrity and good journalism." Grim writes articles like, "CHUCK SCHUMER EYES A SECOND SHOT AT RAISING THE MINIMUM WAGE THROUGH RECONCILIATION" So that simpletons like you will give chuck credit for "something" while he isn't actually doing anything to raise the minimum wage.
    1
  7957.  @dashx1103  "I don't believe Schumer is working to raise minimum wage" So ryan lied, even according to you. As for the rest of your wall of text I'll assume you find terrible ways to rationalize that lie but don't really care what they are.
    1
  7958.  @dashx1103  "He lied about what?" "CHUCK SCHUMER EYES A SECOND SHOT AT RAISING THE MINIMUM WAGE THROUGH RECONCILIATION" ryan grim BS In reality chuck shumer is looking for ways to stop a raise in the minimum wage and is finding convenient excuses like the parliamentarian to not raise it.
    1
  7959.  @dashx1103  That was you who said this right, "No. I don't believe Schumer is working to raise minimum wage." It's almost like you too think ryan grim was lying.
    1
  7960.  @dashx1103  "The Dems didn't surrender?" Yup. They never fought. "Refusing to overrule the parliamentarian wasn't capitulation?" LMFAO They wanted their employee to do exactly what they did. That's why they were there, in that job. The parliamentarian works for the dems, not the other way around.
    1
  7961.  @dashx1103  "The Dems didn't surrender" The dems are the boss. The parliamentarian works for them. This would be like elon musk telling people that he "surrendered" to his secretary and hid behind that to claim he couldn't do something. It's transparent BS and it's absurd. Elon is the boss. At the end of the day the decisions are Elons. Elon can fire his secretary and get someone to do what he wants just like the dems decide who their parliamentarian is.
    1
  7962.  @dashx1103  The parliamentarian works for the dems. To claim the dems can't do something because of them is asinine. It's like elon musk claiming he couldn't do something because his secretary forbid it.... as if he isn't the boss. As if the decisions aren't ultimately his. It's silly. And only someone who listens to far too much ryan grim would buy it.
    1
  7963.  @dashx1103  "It is kind of funny." The only thing that's funny is that this is all you have in response to my comments. "I’m going back and forth between this and another Halper segment" I don't know why you think this is funny, why you are bring this up when it has nothing to do with what we are talking about, or why you think I care about anecdotes. "I’m defending Aaron against feeble accusations about him." LMFAO Is that what you think you are doing with this response? Is this you "defending ryan grim from feeble accusations?" But you aren't saying anything of value. You aren't even attempting to address my points. I hope you are doing better defending aaron than that. Like maybe make an argument... or are you just telling everyone how you are here defending ryan grim? As if that would be a point there?
    1
  7964.  @dashx1103  "I’ve addressed feeble points— which is all you’ve made." Projection 101. "solely on failing to support force the vote" This is simply not true. "an article that doesn’t say what you claim" I didn't "claim" it said anything. I quoted it's headline. "You’ve claimed that Grim is condemnable as a journalist, but you’ve made no case for it." Was I misrepresenting his claim or was I not making an argument? At least pick a disingenuous lane and stick to it. "Other than to assert accusations" That you don't refute.... "regurgitate what some podcast claims." Except when you are deflecting to talk about jimmy when this isn't about him. FYI giving your own comment doesn't make it any better than it is. It only shows your disingenuousness.
    1
  7965.  @dashx1103  "I’ve addressed feeble points" Also, no, you haven't. You ignored my point about the parliamentarian. "No. I don't believe Schumer is working to raise minimum wage." You agreed with my point that schumer isn't actually trying to raise the minimum wage. "solely on failing to support force the vote" While I did bring up force the vote and it wasn't my only problem with him this is all you did to "address" that point. Lastly you don't even attempt to address my point that he's paid by multiple billionaires. You have successfully addressed ZERO of my points.
    1
  7966.  @dashx1103  "He was highly critical of Biden." That's what controlled opposition does before it tells you to vote for him despite the fact that he's a corrupt POS. "it was a rational position." Only someone brainwashed by too much sam would think that voting for evil is rational.
    1
  7967.  @dashx1103  "he’s a “good journalist” or not." Good journalists aren't shills for corrupt people and corrupt parties. But good luck with your BS. I hope you don't actually believe it. I hope you are only paid to say it.
    1
  7968.  @dashx1103  "He didn’t favor the “correct” candidate? That makes him a bad journalist?" It's makes him a shill for corrupt politicians just like the people working at fox and all the of corporate media.
    1
  7969.  @dashx1103  "he voted for between two terrible candidates just doesn’t define whether he’s a “good journalist” or not" Good journalists call out terrible politicians. Shills like sam tell you to vote for terrible candidates.
    1
  7970.  @dashx1103  "he voted for between two terrible candidates just doesn’t define whether he’s a “good journalist” or not" He didn't just vote for him... he told everyone else to vote for him. Good journalists call out corrupt politicians. Shills like sam tell you to vote for them.
    1
  7971.  @dashx1103  "who he voted for between two terrible candidates just doesn’t define whether he’s a “good journalist” or not" This isn't about who he voted for.... this is about him telling everyone else then needed to vote for a corrupt politician. What do you think controlled opposition does if not that?
    1
  7972.  @dashx1103  Good journalists call out corrupt politicians like biden. Shills like sam will tell you to vote for them.
    1
  7973.  @dashx1103  "And there it is." Yes. There your intellectual dishonesty is. Me: "He tells everyone THEY need to vote blue no matter who." You: "He didn't vote like I wanted him" "therefore he's a shill" LMFAO That's what shills do.. sell their product. At the end of the day his product is corrupt dems.
    1
  7974.  @dashx1103  "therefore he's a shill." Let's say someone told me to drink mountain dew. That would make them a shill for mountain dew just like grim is a shill for the corrupt dems.
    1
  7975.  @dashx1103  Grim tells everyone to "drink" the dems at election time. Therefor he's a shill for them. That's EXACTLY how it works.
    1
  7976.  @dashx1103  "Hilarious. "He reported bad stuff about the guy I don't like. But he decided that guy was the lesser of two evils -- so he must be a 'shill.' If he doesn't vote the way I do, he's definitely a shill." Dear god." You are using quotation marks wrong. That's my polite way to say that you are lying.
    1
  7977.  @dashx1103  "so he must be a 'shill.'" He tells you to vote for them every general election. That's why he's a shill. And the rest is just meaningless details.
    1
  7978.  @dashx1103  He actually: grim is a shill because at the end of the day he's blue no matter who. He'd tell you to vote for donald trump if he were represent that team because that's what he ALWAYS does. That's why he's a shill. And just because he occasionally tells you how he thinks the dems are bad to gain your trust before telling you to vote for them... it's textbook controlled opposition.
    1
  7979.  @dashx1103  "he decided that guy was the lesser of two evils -- so he must be a 'shill.'" If someone is telling you to vote for evil they are shilling for evil... at best. At worst they are pure evil.
    1
  7980.  @dashx1103  You know how I can tell bernie sanders is a shill for joe biden? He told everyone to vote joe. That's how it works. That's what the word means.
    1
  7981.  @dashx1103  And I know grim is a shill for the dems not because he votes for them.... but because he tells everyone else they need to vote for them. That's how it works. That's LITERALLY what the word means.
    1
  7982.  @dashx1103  "Was it while he was reporting on corruption at the Mountain Dew plant?" LMFAO Would that it make it better? That he's telling you to drink something after telling you about the sludge in it?
    1
  7983.  @dashx1103  "Was it while he was reporting on corruption at the Mountain Dew plant?" 'Mountain dew is TERRIBLE for you. Now go drink it.' -ryan grim, probably
    1
  7984.  @dashx1103  Correction, I should have said, "Mountain dew is TERRIBLE for you. Now go drink it. -ryan grim, *if mountain dew paid him to say it
    1
  7985.  @nicka731  Great comment nick. That's why it's being shadowbanned. Land of the free am I right? /s
    1
  7986.  @dashx1103  "It was a "rational" perspective." Millions of people voted for trump knowing he was terrible but they are brainwashed into thinking they need pick one of the major parties. There is nothing rational about the perspective. It's supporting evil.
    1
  7987.  @dashx1103  "It was a "rational" perspective." That "perspective" is how they get you to support evil. This is how they play you. Jimmy dore just did a great video titled, "Democrats Are FUNDING Radical Republicans" exposing what they do and why they do it. Grim enables the behavior. JD does good journalism by calling it out.
    1
  7988.  @dashx1103  "Good v evil." LMFAO Yup. There is actually evil in the world. All the bad happening isn't all by accident. Some of it's by design by people that want it to happen. But if you don't think someone is evil they can't be evil I guess according to you. You don't even need to consider the possibility or attempt arguments I guess. You can just laugh it off. FYI this is but one reason among many why I've never taken you seriously. I'm not talking to you. I'm only talking at you.
    1
  7989.  @dashx1103  "That is a "rational" perspective." You seem to think that anyone who has an "argument" is being "rational." Are flat earther to you? Because they have "arguments?" It's not. That's not how it works. It's just another example of you NOT being rational.
    1
  7990.  @dashx1103  "ONLY rational perspective." 'People who think the globe isn't flat aren't the only people with rational perspective.' -dash x, probably
    1
  7991.  @dashx1103  "I certainly understood people who acknowledged that Biden sucked, but sucked less than Trump." Actual rational people don't care who is worse because neither should get anyones vote. It's like trying comparing maxwell and r kelly to figure out who sucks more. Ultimately it doesn't matter who is worse because you shouldn't be voting for either.
    1
  7992.  @dashx1103  "I certainly understood people who acknowledged that Biden sucked, but sucked less than Trump." So do I "understand" why they do it. But that doesn't mean it's ok or "rational." They are voting for evil, making the world worse, and not acting logically. Voting for good is actually what acting logically looks like. Voting for evil is not.
    1
  7993.  @dashx1103  "I almost took you seriously for a minute." You don't take me seriously because I call out grim? But you take people seriously who vote for evil? Millions of people knew trump was terrible and voted for him anyway because they thought he was "less evil." Those are the types of people you take seriously. Who you think are acting "rationally." People who vote for terrible. FYI I call out those trump supporters the same way I call out biden supporters. I don't care when they think trump is "less evil" either.
    1
  7994.  @dashx1103  You: "That the way we think is the ONLY possible way to think." Also you: " I almost took you seriously for a minute." I'll leave you to think that yours is the only way to think... and for you to do it really hypocritically.
    1
  7995.  @dashx1103  "believe there is ONLY ONE rational perspective" I'm not addressing every perspective. I'm only addressing the one that supports evil. And yeah... supporting evil is not rational. And the only people who claim otherwise are evil trying to convince good people to support them and useful idiots for evil. "Deciding on who to vote for in an election isn't remotely the same as recognizing the world isn't flat." You are "rationalizing" supporting evil. I'm not saying it's the same. But I am saying it's arguably just as dumb when it's broken down. " I'd like to think you know that and are just trolling now." Think whatever nonsense you want. I know you will at the end of the day. "your own BS" LMFAO I'm here saying don't support evil and the people enabling it. You think that's BS? "I notice you still haven't answered my questions." Wait... what? I'm doing my absolute best to address every point you are making as you make them. I'm tempted to go back and count the many questions of mine you haven't answered but that list is going to be way too long for me to want to do it.
    1
  7996.  @dashx1103  "it has nothing to do with Grim." Grim is a tool of the dems. He writes articles to manufacture consent for them, like the one I've already cited.
    1
  7997.  @dashx1103  "it has nothing to do with Grim." You seem to think grim is a "good journalist." I wanted to show you what good journalism actually looks like. Grim is more of a stenographer for people in power.
    1
  7998.  @dashx1103  I've said my peace and wasted too much time addressing you. I'd done. Good luck with your BS. I hope you are paid for it like grim is paid for his.
    1
  7999.  @dashx1103  "you ignore all the serious commentary and reporting Grim did/does regarding Biden, the Dems, the DNC, the DCCC, etc. Why?" I don't ignore it. I know that even propagandist networks such as CNN and FOX do "decent" reporting on occasion. That's how they get anyone to believe they are on their side before they sell them out. "Doesn't suit the narrative, and isn't discussed in your echo chamber." You want me to admit that grim doesn't say 100 percent terrible things. It's true. I could say the same about donald trump. It has nothing to do with what I'm talking about. It's just you deflecting. Me: "grim manufactures consent for corrupt dems" You strawmanning the argument actually made to you: "Ultimately, this seems to come down to the fact that Grim apparently thought voting for Trump was worse than voting for Biden." Ultimately everyone is going to have an opinion about who is worse between the two. It doesn't matter. This is about who you should vote for. And you shouldn't vote for evil. The notion that you need to pick between the two major parties is just BS the major parties use to keep them in the system. And they use propagandists like grim to do it. "You've compared Grim holding that opinion to believing the Earth is flat." What I was doing is known as "reductio ad absurdum" in philosophy. "Which pretty well discredits you." You are projecting. And your lack of knowledge discredits you. And I'm foolish for continuing to waste my time. "an opinion you've co-opted from someone else" What a pathetic and lazy way for you try and dismiss the points being made to you. It's what you say when you don't have substantive arguments to make. "Pretending your opinion is fact" If you vote for evil you are enabling and supporting evil. That's not my "opinion." It's fact. And nothing about it being the "lesser" evil changes it.
    1
  8000. No ryan grimm? Cool. This can get a thumbs up then.
    1
  8001. "Once you have dehumanized a group of people, you can justify all sorts of atrocities committed against them." You mean the way sam and company dehumanize conservatives? And republicans? Even while he votes for people that belong in that party?
    1
  8002. "Once you have dehumanized a group of people, you can justify all sorts of atrocities committed against them." Like one of the top comments right here, "I literally can’t wish enough bad things on Candace Owens." It proves your point. It also proves this is a place of hypocrisy.
    1
  8003.  @christopherweise438  "I literally can’t wish enough bad things on Candace Owens." That's what's getting upvoted right here by sam's sycophants.
    1
  8004.  @christopherweise438  I thought you should know because you claim to care about that sort of thing.
    1
  8005.  @angie99656  You are missing my point and making the point of the OP but not about "christians." It describes sam and his audience, like you.
    1
  8006.  @angie99656  "I genuinely hope Karma comes back to her in a huge and very unpleasant way." Very "sam" of you.
    1
  8007.  @paffles6696  "doesn't make OP's comment wrong" I agree with the OP's statement. It's spot on. And I'm pointing out how sam's audience is filled with hypocrites. "pretend that both sides are the same" Both sides can be hypocrites without both sides being equal. But you will pretend that it is. "Candace Owens" I'm not a fan of owens. This isn't about her. It's about sam and his crowd who all prove with their actions that they are hypocrites. And you prove you don't care about it. You will always find a way to dismiss it no matter how silly.
    1
  8008.  @CerebralPugilist  English and simple concepts aren't for everyone.
    1
  8009.  @CerebralPugilist  "a question triggered you so bad" I concede that people like you, who make me feel like I'm living in the movie Idiocracy, frustrating. "I will attribute that to your acknowledgement/admission that English and simple concepts aren't for you." LMFAO Of course you would. "when asked for clarity." Forgive me for not take you seriously. Or don't. I don't care.
    1
  8010.  @CerebralPugilist  Tell you what I'll take you more seriously than I should and try to explain this to you like you are a child...
    1
  8011.  @CerebralPugilist  I agree with the OP. My point is that the audience here, who gives the OP a thumbs up, are the same fanboys who gave the comment, "I literally can’t wish enough bad things on Candace Owens" a thumbs up as it's also one of the top comments here. And it shows that the fanboys here are nothing but hypocrites.
    1
  8012.  @CerebralPugilist  Although I'm not sure why you would understand that when it was all perfectly clear the first time I explained it.
    1
  8013. ​ @CerebralPugilist  Sam has dehumanized people. That's why, "I literally can’t wish enough bad things on Candace Owens" gets all the love that it does here.
    1
  8014. Remember when Obama made fun of the orange clown at the correspondents dinner? I do. And it proves that you are a moron.
    1
  8015. You make a gay pride parade look straight by comparison.
    1
  8016.  @Philbert-s2c  Putin isn't the one keeping americans from having health care. He's not the one keeping american wages down. Dems have the presidency, house and senate but yeah... it's putins fault we can't have nice things claim completely disingenuous twats.
    1
  8017. I figure that's about how much he is "affiliated" with TYT. About 10 to 15 percent. "His youtube channel, secular talk, an AFFILIATE of the young turks network" -wikipedia"
    1
  8018. They should support Sanders because he deserves support. Fuck yang and his supporters. They can't fuck off quick enough.
    1
  8019.  @bigtee2000  Donald fucking Trump is my president... but yeah... my problem is that I need a fucking candy bar think idiots.
    1
  8020.  @delboyg01  Regarding, " You don’t seem to understand WHY the DNC has packed the field with so many no-hoper Presidential candidates?" Cool. I look forward to being educated by you then. Regarding, "That IS to unsure that Bernie can’t get the 50% he needs on the 1st round, then on the 2nd round they can bring in the super delegates and say all was fair!" Which is pretty much exactly what I think. That is why I have a problem with Tulsi running and siphoning votes away from sanders. I want to do anything and everything to get Sanders enough delegates on the first ballot. Tulsi makes this goal harder to achieve. Regarding, "If you really want Bernie you also have to support Tulsi so she can chip away votes from the no hopers!" Meanwhile, in reality, Tulsi voters, if she were not in the race, are likely to go almost exclusively toward Bernie. She isn't taking votes from Biden and the establishment. Because duh. Regarding, "Bernie cannot win this alone" That's the only way he can win it. Regarding, "the only other candidate who you can guarantee to give Bernie their votes IS Tulsi." Candidates can't give their pledged delegates to one another. Even if it goes to a second ballot and a contested convention Tulsi can only advice her delegates to support Bernie and ultimately those delegates can do whatever the fuck they want at that point. If you are planning on the second ballot you are setting yourself up for defeat when we should be focusing on the first ballot. That's the only place we know we can't get fucked over. Regarding, "I really hope you have a better understanding of what is going on now!" The irony. Two can play your game. I really hope you have a better understanding of what is going on now!
    1
  8021. What does it say about kyle he covers for anas blackmail attempt and won't talk about it?
    1
  8022. This guy for President. Hey everybody. WE ARE ALL GOING TO GET LAID!
    1
  8023. She didn't actually need bipartisan approval. Dems control everything.
    1
  8024.  @Peasham  "got zero ties with TYT" Not according to wikipedia. From wiki, ""His youtube channel, secular talk, an AFFILIATE of the young turks network."
    1
  8025.  @siggizippan8076  So does that mean that 51 percent of Canada is a "visible minority?" Because that is what I was talking about... Canada, in general. And it's really white. Especially when compared to Mexico, which is also what I was doing. Maybe you should stop being stupid and think about the points I was actually making instead of the points you were imagining. Toronto is not representative of Canada as a whole which makes your "point" idiotic.
    1
  8026.  @mostcom  That's exactly the type of quality comment I'd expect from tyt cucks.
    1
  8027.  @simonsays3063  I literally just unsubscribed from rebel hq. I have no time from fake progressives shitting on actual progressive priorities.
    1
  8028.  @cognitivelytheredragon9111  Sorry if the truth that they got a 20 million dollar bribe from team clinton. It's not my fault they are sellout frauds.
    1
  8029.  @simonsays3063  M4A and forcing the vote. It's the thing that cenk has been busy lying about for his corporate overlords.
    1
  8030.  @simonsays3063  Cenk is spreading lies like you can't hold the vote or republican mccarthy will be speaker because cenk is fraud and liar trying to make sure people don't get health care.
    1
  8031.  @simonsays3063  As for why they are shitting on progressive priorities that can best be answered by cenk in a youtube video title, "Interview with Cenk Uygur" by "Lauren steiner" feel free to fast forward to 11:45 and you can hear cenk admit taking 20 million from team clinton.
    1
  8032.  @simonsays3063  I was subbed to this channel back it was called tyt interviews or something like that. I seriously only forgot this is tyt trash.
    1
  8033.  @simonsays3063  Regarding, "Last week you wrote almost the same thing." Nope. Definitely not here. And this was literally the first time I took aim at rebel hq. Why are you lying about this? I mean I know why cenk is lying (because of the 20 million) but why are you?
    1
  8034.  @mostcom  "most liked comment" Is that how you judge things from inside your bubble? The bubble disapproves and that's enough for you while engaged in groupthink? Figures. Regarding, "since you sound like MAGA" I don't support the orange clown. But don't let that stop you from saying stupid shit. It's exactly what team maga does. Regarding, "So did you give it a try?" Did you even try to think about how 20 million from team clinton might affect the "news" you are getting? Do you even attempt to care if what you are soaking up is propaganda or not?
    1
  8035.  @mostcom  Do you tell yourself you support M4A but don't want it voted on because stupid reasons that you were fed to your from fake news sources?
    1
  8036.  @mostcom  "looks like it's so most liked comment." Oh wait... you are just patting yourself on the back because your bubble predictably approves of your moronic comment devoid of any substance whatsoever. LMFAO. Good for you I guess. Nevermind that you are pathetic.
    1
  8037.  @mostcom  " I don't let lamebrain nitwits like you determine my self-worth." Whatever you got to tell yourself while ignoring the fact that you are soaking up and mindlessly defending propaganda paid for with team clinton money.
    1
  8038.  @mostcom  I'm pretty sure not caring about things like that makes you the "lamebrain nitwit."
    1
  8039.  @mostcom  Not only do you not care about it you mindless defend it with crap like, "pound salt up your *ss" and then pat yourself on the back because it got the most thumbs up as if you did something good.
    1
  8040.  @mostcom  "pretty much now tell your mommy." This really is the type of quality comment I've learned to expect from you. Bravo. You suck at life.
    1
  8041.  @cognitivelytheredragon9111  Regarding, "You sound like an ignorant arsehole." Pretty funny coming from you. Regarding, "Take your bullshit claims and backwards logic and shove it." Bullshit claims? You offer nothing. No evidence at all. That's what bullshit looks like. That's what you offer. NOTHING. Regarding, "And if you dislike TYT, get the fuck off the channel." I happily am and will let you get back to your bubble and groupthink because you can't handle anyone saying anything contrary to your cult. Regarding, "The rest of us don’t have time for your pettiness. " The rest of the world doesn't have time for your stupidity and your embrace of propagandist bullshit. Do everyone a favor and wake the fuck up.
    1
  8042.  @cognitivelytheredragon9111  Ignorance is bliss. You must be very happy.
    1
  8043.  @cognitivelytheredragon9111  Do you not understand why you are being a hypocrite? Or does being a hypocrite not bother you?
    1
  8044.  @cognitivelytheredragon9111  I mean you are the same dipshit who has yet to offer a single point of any kind right?
    1
  8045.  @cognitivelytheredragon9111  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PKyVivA7-TI
    1
  8046.  @cognitivelytheredragon9111  You go ahead and tell yourself whatever you got to to rationalize not saying anything of value but being a complete and total hypocrite. I know you will.
    1
  8047. Dore's awesome and forcing the vote is a no brainer to anyone who actually wants m4a.
    1
  8048. Say things that aren't true about said turd. That's how. Obviously.
    1
  8049.  @peterhardie4151  Obama was actually correct and romney was being stupid. And the US's proxy war doesn't change that.
    1
  8050. Don't we even have a rusty bucket without vomit to vote for? Fuck it. They have my vote.
    1
  8051. It's an ass candle.
    1
  8052. Shouldn't an actual ally to Sanders be supporting him for president? Not running against him and taking votes that overwhelmingly would be going to him if she dropped out while not having any path to the nomination.
    1
  8053. I lost both my parents that way. Now you know.
    1
  8054. Nah... he's just a tool to try and siphon votes from Sanders and always was.
    1
  8055.  @CJonesApple  I already told you why he was running. He's just another way to try and keep Sanders from winning on the first ballot.
    1
  8056.  @CJonesApple  Regarding, "So effectively a spoiler?" Yeah. Candidates don't operate in a vacuum. There is a reason Biden didn't run in 2016 and it had nothing to do with the death of his kid. It had everything to do with not splitting the establishment vote. If he ran Sanders likely ends with the most pledged delegates at the end of 2016. Regarding, "he's not fake" Agree to disagree. At best he is a useful idiot for the establishment who splits the progressive vote to the benefit of the establishment.
    1
  8057.  @LonerWeirdo  Regarding, "I do believe he's sincere, believes what he says. Which is a hell of a lot more than I can say about most politicians" Most politicians have a record that they have to contend with. Yang get to say literally anything when most politicians have records that prove they are lying. Oh and still he is a proven liar. Like when he runs ads saying he supports M4A and when he releases his actual health care plan it's nothing close to M4A.
    1
  8058. Don't be afraid to find a person who doesn't suck should the unthinkable happen. That said don't worry. Sanders is going to win this.
    1
  8059. LMFAO FYI I still can't stand andrew yang and your bullshit only makes me despise him more.
    1
  8060. Actually he's busy giving billions to na zis in ukraine.
    1
  8061. Actually he's giving billions to the MIC and funding a proxy war.
    1
  8062. Is that why he voted to give billions to the MIC?
    1
  8063.  @jime3281  " you were already full of shit and acting in bad faith to begin with" What an apt statement for yanggang. You never even attempt to say what I've been lying about. Yanggangs intellectual dishonesty rivals that of trump supporters.
    1
  8064. He is commander in chief FFS. Stop pretending like the decision isn't his to make.
    1
  8065.  @steveennever9905  Regarding, "have I done this before?" Yes. "Trumps decision" As if it might not have been up to the commander in chief is you pretending. Regarding, "did he?" Who cares. It's his fucking call while you make excuses and rationalizations for his failures. Regarding, "There are countless military sycophants capable of shifting the perceived powers of the American empire without Washington noticing." And only one commander in chief who can do literally whatever they want when it comes to american foreign policy. That means that all responsibility is theirs.
    1
  8066.  @steveennever9905  Regarding, "I think I'll need an example, then." Let me try to break this down as simply as I possibly can. "When was it ever proven that was Trumps decision" Trump is commander in chief. Therefor it's HIS FUCKING DECISION what is going on in Syria. Period. End of stop. Don't pretend otherwise. Which is what you have been doing.
    1
  8067.  @steveennever9905  Someone: "why are you not blaming Adam Gase for the Jets being terrible?" Steve: "When was it ever proven that Gase even has anything to do with the team and what they are doing?" Me: "He's the head coach. Why are you pretending he's not? What is wrong with you?"
    1
  8068.  @steveennever9905  Regarding, "Was this on command of Trump." It obviously doesn't matter. It's his responsibility either way while you pretend it's not.
    1
  8069.  @steveennever9905  Maybe gase is giving his players really good instruction. Not that it matters in the slightest. The play of the jets is their responsibility.
    1
  8070.  @steveennever9905  Maybe Gase doesn't show up for practices or do any real coaching. That wouldn't make him not responsible for his team anymore than trump being disinterested in what his war machine is doing would make him not responsible.
    1
  8071.  @steveennever9905  Regarding, "So you believe the ABC report is documentation of Trump giving orders of troop withdrawal from Afghanistan." No. I don't. I say it doesn't matter in the context of meaning that ultimately whatever happens is trumps responsibility. Nothing more. I'm done with this painful conversation. You are an idiot.
    1
  8072.  @InfoForYou8  I admire your persistence but question why you make replies to yourself instead of just making one post.
    1
  8073.  @InfoForYou8  I don't have the passion for your topic that you do. I'm more interested in giving peace a chance, protecting the environment, providing health care, getting money out of politics, criminal justice reform... I guess if you force me to pick a side I'm on yours. But it's just not very important to me in all honesty. Sorry. But good luck. I admire the passion and encourage you to go where it takes you.
    1
  8074.  @InfoForYou8  "I encourage you to check them out" Maybe another time. You wouldn't think that nuclear war should actually be a possibility but sadly I don't rule it out with the psychos controlling things. Raincheck.
    1
  8075.  @InfoForYou8  "IP laws are the main cause" Nah. Money and greed are the main cause of all the problems IMO. And money in politics is the problem that makes all the other problems seemingly impossible to solve, including yours.
    1
  8076.  @anomanderrake96  "attention span lasts for a month." That seems like a really long time. I thought a person's "attention span" was measured in minutes.
    1
  8077.  @anomanderrake96  I looked it up and it actually said 8 seconds is the norm. We were both giving americans attention span far too much credit.
    1
  8078.  @krausewitz6786  Nobody here is going to take you seriously.
    1
  8079. When someone shows you who they are, believe them the first time. maya angelou
    1
  8080. Even if I thought WW3 was inevitable, which I don't, everything else you say still makes no logical sense.
    1
  8081. lando regarding, "Warren is a Progressive" Progressives backed Sanders in 2016. Progressives backed the DAPL protestors. Progressives don't vote for a 700 billion dollar per year budget for Trumps department of offense. Actions speak louder than words. She is progressive in the same way Obama was progressive. They aren't but they give a good speech.
    1
  8082. In other news hell has frozen over.
    1
  8083. I'm shocked. Shocked I say to see you here.
    1
  8084. Because I was correct when I pointed out that the only reason you dropped William Binney's name elsewhere was because you wanted to act smart. The fact of the matter is that, before that day, you had no fucking idea who he was which makes you wanting to name drop him like you were smart only proves how dumb you actually are. Way to go me for being able to call you out on it immediately but in all honesty figuring out an idiot like you is not difficult.
    1
  8085. I'm sorry if my response was too long for you. I know you have trouble reading more than just a few words.
    1
  8086. Who do I think I am talking to? A complete fucking moron. I'll leave you be thou. At least your original post here wasn't epic stupid like my last unfortunate run in with you.
    1
  8087. If you say so. I guess I'll just have to settle for having arguments that are not moronic then.
    1
  8088. Regarding, "Clit." You are the 591,973 person to tell that joke. You must be very unoriginal. I was ready to leave your dumbass alone but the problem with me is that I have a problem letting stupid go unanswered and when you open your mouth it is always dumb as fuck.
    1
  8089. Clearly he didn't.
    1
  8090. I guess Bill and I have one thing in common.
    1
  8091.  @dreaminglifepodcast  I wasn't really guessing. That's what you were doing. I was taking your assumption for granted and telling you what I'm doing.
    1
  8092.  @dreaminglifepodcast  So you just know what Bill is doing? I don't think this is as deep as you give it credit for.
    1
  8093.  @dreaminglifepodcast  So is Bill Gates grinning right now still? And do you know for certain or are you just guessing?
    1
  8094.  @dreaminglifepodcast  I am. I was trying to figure out what Bill is up to that would make him do that. I have no idea and it make me smile. Do you know?
    1
  8095.  @dreaminglifepodcast  How do you know all this? What else do you know? Do you know his bank account numbers as well perchance?
    1
  8096. And why exactly would you think that someone who gets into office because of big money would want big money out? Wishful thinking and faith in meaningless pandering are not acceptable answers.
    1
  8097. You must be deeply unserious.
    1
  8098. Contrarian? He's right about pretty much everything.
    1
  8099.  @mat3714  Regarding, "psycho dimmy" You are either a troll or an idiot. Either way I'd be silly to take you seriously.
    1
  8100.  @mat3714  If that's what you want to think I honestly don't care.
    1
  8101.  @mat3714  I can't fix stupid for you. I'm not going to try.
    1
  8102.  @mat3714  Jimmy gives substance but I have better things do with my time than tell you all the ways you are stupid but only end up having you be too dumb to understand anything I've said.
    1
  8103.  @mat3714  I will happily troll you if you would like.
    1
  8104. Joe made sure that crackheads not named hunter spent their lives in prison.
    1
  8105.  @Jbo2000  Your comment is funny because you are likely a CIA propagandist. I hope your soul was worth it.
    1
  8106. Don't forget to vote on Super Thursday Biden supporters. Sanders supporters go out and vote today.
    1
  8107. Nikosi, um no. They are not doing that now. The key word in my statement is EFFECTIVE. I even go out of my way to point out that they do try to blame to him. But they are not effective arguments to the sane because of what Sanders did. Had Sanders ran 3rd party and lost those attacks would have been INCREDIBLY effective. If you do not acknowledge the difference between those 2 scenarios then you are being willfully blind to the reality of things. Oh and as evidence I cite the response Hillary had on her blame everybody other than herself book tour. Even Hillary supporters had an IMPOSSIBLE time defending their fallen queen while she was doing it.
    1
  8108.  @klyerobinson3069  They only look dumb because they are so corrupt.
    1
  8109. Good one.
    1
  8110. G Bashem regarding, "All about the ratings," although they care about ratings it is hardly all about them. They have an agenda they want to push and they will happily sacrifice ratings to push that agenda. Do you think they don't cover progressive candidates because they are bad for ratings? Do you think they covered Trumps empty podium instead of covering Sanders talking in front of record crowds because of ratings? Nope. First and foremost they care about pushing their corporate agenda.
    1
  8111. Holy shit is that dumb.
    1
  8112. I know right. The generic brand is like half as much! /s
    1
  8113.  @dashx1103  It knocks me out. When I take it I try to stay up cause it's kinda trippy but I'm always out in 30 mins.
    1
  8114. He lied about supporting m4a while running for potus. He's a liar and conman.
    1
  8115. Do you generally find yourself blaming victims?
    1
  8116.  @81orez  Well maybe you shouldn't be blaming victims here because that is exactly what they are.
    1
  8117.  @81orez  Regarding, "What I am saying that people need to prepared to fight for their believes" But that isn't the only thing you are saying or I never would have commented. "they are bring this BS to themselves." You are blaming the victim. It's pretty clear, it's pretty indefensible, and I hope you think about it and don't do it anymore because it's not ok in this circumstance or any that I can think of. Regarding, "Also what are the points of your posts?" To make you think about what you are doing so that you don't do it in the future. You seem to understand that blaming the victim isn't ok generally but are doing exactly that in your OP. Hopefully you realize it and change your behavior. Peace
    1
  8118.  @81orez  Or let me put it to you another way.... I believe that people shouldn't blame victims as a matter of principle and I'm willing to fight for it.
    1
  8119. He's certainly going to be on the ballot in the "democratic" primary so please do whatever you need to do to make sure you can vote for him there. Don't let the party shut you out with their bullshit.
    1
  8120. Richard medhurst is live right now. It's way better than kyle and it's note even close.
    1
  8121. Consider the possibility that you are a moron.
    1
  8122. It's not that simple. Not even close. But it must be nice to think things are so simple. I almost envy that type of stupid.
    1
  8123.  @EriqOrtiz  I didn't say I wasn't voting. If it sounded like I said that to you it's only because you are an idiot.
    1
  8124.  @EriqOrtiz  "This isn't about electing Biden" LMFAO May as be a trumptard saying stupid shit like, "This isn't about electing Trump" while advocating for voting for their clown.
    1
  8125.  @EriqOrtiz  I made 2 points. And you prove the second point by not being able to understand the first.
    1
  8126.  @EriqOrtiz  Tell you what... I'll try to keep it simple for you. Not only do I not want trump to be president, but I also don't want Biden, who is a warmonger, who would veto M4A if it got to his desk, who proudly authored the racist crime bill that exacerbated the problem of mass incarceration, who wants to keep fracking, who is corrupt, whose brain is melting to be president either. So it's not as simple as you make you seem, not even close. For reasons that should be obvious. And if it seems simple to you, and if you can't understand my point then you might want to consider the possibility that you are a political hack dipshit.
    1
  8127.  @EriqOrtiz  And I forgot... Biden is a POS liar who would say literally anything to win. I have a problem with that. For reasons that again should be obvious.
    1
  8128. What's sad is that you don't seem to recognize that the difference between this being about Joe Biden and being about a nobody is the difference between this being political propaganda it not. And I dislike propaganda.
    1
  8129.  @darktemplar446  Open a dictionary. Read what it says propaganda is and tell me why you think this isn't propaganda when it fits the definition we all use perfectly. Or tell me why you think it's ok that the dodo put out propaganda. But don't be an idiot like you are. Thanks.
    1
  8130. Go to hell joe. There... I fixed it for you.
    1
  8131.  @marcschmitz8471  And the patriot act. And fuck anita hill.
    1
  8132.  @elizabethsmusicandarts1590  How I'm the only one to give your comment a thumbs up is beyond me.
    1
  8133.  @WestfaliaStuff  Kyle can repent just like cenk can or harvey weinstein can. That doesn't mean I should just mindlessly accept either.
    1
  8134.  @WestfaliaStuff  And kyle never repented for the journalistic malpractice of never mentioning his affiliation with TYT while covering for their blackmail.
    1
  8135.  @WestfaliaStuff  "He was a founder of the justice democrats - together with Cenk." Literally all of them are proving themselves to be frauds. "how did he cover for Ana's blackmailing attempts" In his video titled "Kyle Addresses Jimmy Dore & Aaron Mate vs TYT" where he tells you he's going to "cover it all" and "not leave anything out" he literally leaves out the most important part... the blackmail.
    1
  8136.  @WestfaliaStuff  And while making that video he was affiliated with TYT at the time. It's a clear and obvious conflict of interest that NECESSITATES any sort of intellectually honest person disclosing it. He didn't and he didn't do that before omitting the blackmail. He's a fraud.
    1
  8137.  @WestfaliaStuff  "retract it" The video? No I just went and made a couple comments there since I had it up.
    1
  8138.  @WestfaliaStuff  "We weren't slighting him even a little bit." Kyle talking about standing up jimmy.
    1
  8139.  @WestfaliaStuff  Kyles excuse for not telling jimmy he was standing him up, "we were recording a show." In other words he was standing him up to go on a date with team pocket pussies.
    1
  8140.  @WestfaliaStuff  "be completely honest, we want to get away from the war as possible" He was talking to cenks nephew and ADDRESSES the "war" in that interview. He's full of shit.
    1
  8141.  @WestfaliaStuff  I'd "get it" and jimmy probably would too if he actually stayed out of it and wasn't in reality diving head first of his own accord. I'm addressing 21:09 in that terrible video you think absolves him.
    1
  8142.  @WestfaliaStuff  "he acknowledged all major issues as such" It has more downvotes than upvotes.
    1
  8143.  @WestfaliaStuff  I'm done ranting and think I've made my point pretty clear. Ultimately your decisions are yours. Peace.
    1
  8144.  @WestfaliaStuff  "when someone shows you who they are believe them the first time." That video was his second chance and it has more downvotes than upvotes for a reason. Don't be a dupe.
    1
  8145.  @WestfaliaStuff  "I've never been a friend of purity tests," You should. It's otherwise known as having "standards." And you should have them.
    1
  8146.  @WestfaliaStuff  "the progressive left needs to squeeze the buttocks together," You can't leave the door open for frauds and controlled opposition or you let clowns like TYT and kyle in the door.
    1
  8147.  @WestfaliaStuff  "expect them from others to the degree you'd expect them from yourself" Huh? I've never said anything like this. "give him a chance to grow more." No. He can grow without me if he wants. If I put up with bullshit like his I'd be a sycophant cultist. I wouldn't put up with his behavior if jimmy were doing it either. "Him leaving the extended TYT netwrork is a good indicator that he does" It's meaningless pandering and virtue signaling to try and salvage his rightfully shredded credibility. It's a response to being ratioed and unsubscribed to.
    1
  8148.  @WestfaliaStuff  "I was just reading all your comments as if they were spoken by a 'space marine inquisitor'." Whatever gets you off. "but not really not rooted in the real world." Cool story but I think it's telling you don't even attempt to back this up with anything. "Let's hope nobody ever judges you," I'm judged all the time as is everyone. But nobody has every said I covered up for a blackmailer. "karma is a mirror." Karma doesn't exist. Obviously.
    1
  8149. Correction: Colbert's respect has been gone for a long time.
    1
  8150. It is about saving money. And covering everyone. And providing better care. Take off the tin foil hat. It isn't about "control."
    1
  8151. You are an idiot. If anything, "control" is why we DON'T have it.
    1
  8152. Regarding, "that's what I'm saying, you fucking moron." It's not my fault your original post is poorly written. The statement of, "It's not about saving money, it's about control, and power over others," paints a picture of the belief that the people who want to save money (aka supporters of single payer, "It's not about saving money") are the ones who want control and power ("it's about control, and power over others"). This is a common argument for those that oppose single payer. They like to say things like, "they don't care about saving money (or this isn't going to save money), they just want control of health care."
    1
  8153. Well I usually don't have trouble understanding what people are trying to say. Then again I'm not usually talking to idiots.
    1
  8154. But the "democratic" party isn't screwing us? They just got done lying about 2k checks.
    1
  8155. @Renegade Rocker What a pathetic rationalization to bootlick for the "democratic" party.
    1
  8156.  @flyingsnake3737  Regarding, "They havent even taken a seat and you are already shitting on the parade." Wait I should be throwing a parade for lying POS? Regarding, "Lay the pipe down for a day will you ?" I can only wonder what you are smoking that gets you to defend that dumpster fire party.
    1
  8157.  @drewchk5254  Of course that's what you would say because you can't say anything intelligent to defend your clown.
    1
  8158. He's already president so suggesting the guy already in charge is also "radical change" is epic stupid.
    1
  8159.  @randomtees  If this is truly apolitical they would have done the same thing for the orange clown when he was in office right? Oh wait... they wouldn't.
    1
  8160.  @zaatas  Regarding, "his words mean a lot." I guess we are fucked. Biden is a liar who has lied about working in civil rights, being arrested with mandela, his record, 2K checks, a 15 min wage and more. Regarding, "I mean Trump just used "words" and on Jan 6th" Why does it feel like you are just deflecting to talk about how cheeto man bad?
    1
  8161.  @zaatas  " acting like the words mean nothing is wrong man." We only do that for the bidens and trumps of the world because they are liars.
    1
  8162.  @zaatas  Acting like the words of liars is wrong man.
    1
  8163. Worst idea ever if you actually care about getting progressive president in 2020.
    1
  8164. As if they are trying to do revolutionary things. Don't misunderstand what is going on... it's a scam from the start.
    1
  8165.  @Fokadas  "waste time on light hearted crap" If you don't get some "light hearted crap" you are going to turn into a real arce no one will want to be around or talk to. "These two idiots." Maybe go away if that's how you feel. You don't need to be here.
    1
  8166. The primary was over and he had lost. 50 states had voted. As of today only 24 have. Clearly not the same although you want to pretend it is.
    1
  8167.  @yance0024  Regarding, "So bernie is doing better than he was in 2016 and is likely to win?" Um... what? Are you an idiot or intentionally misunderstanding what I'm saying?
    1
  8168.  @yance0024  Then again it might be both.
    1
  8169.  @yance0024  Regarding, "I’ll connect the dots for you." If this is what you want to call you being an idiot so be it. Regarding, "Bernie is doing worse than he did in 2016," Is he? I don't recall exactly where he was after 24 states and even if he is "doing worse" you are using this information in a way that only a moron would. Regarding, "a race he lost, so he’s definitely not winning now." This is not a logical conclusion and is so wrong in so many ways that it's almost remarkable. You either are an idiot of epic proportion or are just another disingenuous twat trying to reverse engineer things to say to justify the conclusions you want to reach. 2016 and 2020 are different in lots and lots and lots of ways. To act like they are identical is absurd. To act like any contest is over at halftime is absurd. You are absurd. Regarding, "the question is WHY did he support her" Are you new to Bernie? Did you not hear Bernie say over and over and over and over that he would support the dem nominee? Did you not hear him say that he didn't think trump should be president? And that he was going to do anything and everything to stop him? I can only conclude that ignorance such as yours is willful.
    1
  8170.  @yance0024  Regarding, "you’ve got lots of anger in you" We aren't talking about our favorite football team... we are talking politics. That means we are talking about people without insurance in the age of the coronavirus, war, kids in cages, people not making enough to live on, climate change and so much more. Why aren't you angry? Regarding, "If Bernie somehow wins, I’ll look silly but gladly come back to this comment to admit I was wrong." I'm sorry... do you think I am claiming Bernie has a great shot right now? I'm not. I know he is behind. I know it doesn't look good. That's not the point. The point is that isn't not over. We don't get to have an opinion about this. For people who claim to care about math maybe wait til he has MATHEMATICALLY lost. Even if Sanders doesn't win that doesn't mean that you and the things you are saying is right. You are wrong... regardless of how things turn out. Regarding, "If Bernie drops soon and endorses Biden, this won’t age well." If he did so before being mathematically eliminated you would have a point. But you don't. And he won't. At least not until he has lost... because of math.
    1
  8171. What's your bible say about slavery? I'm sure it says it's wrong in no uncertain terms right? No slavery seems like it would be commandment worthy. Does it? What does it say about slavery. I always love how you cultist polish that turd.
    1
  8172. Your comment is funny because you are hating a joooo.
    1
  8173.  @voccsaycee30  "he is not Jewish." He is. I think that makes you an anti...
    1
  8174.  @voccsaycee30  You are smearing a jew. I can only conclude one thing from that.
    1
  8175.  @voccsaycee30  You are smearing a jew because he isn't a "z." That makes you an anti....
    1
  8176. Do not vote for Neera Tanden. If you do you are a fraud.
    1
  8177. I'm so done with you and your BS after you voted for a proxy war with russia. I'm embarrassed that I was fooled by you.
    1
  8178.  @pauldecristoforo  You should be embarrassed about your comprehension skills. It isn't the world's fault you don't understand what a simple word like "unofficial" means. Kids in grade school understand it even if you don't.
    1
  8179.  @pauldecristoforo  We all understand that you have the comprehension skills of a 5 year old that eats paint chips and drinks water with lead. You don't need to keep proving it.
    1
  8180.  @pauldecristoforo  You think and say the things you do because you are stupid.
    1
  8181.  @pauldecristoforo  Seriously thou, do you even realize what a fucking hypocrite you are? Was that your idea of a "cohesive sentence?" Do you really not realize that you insult people? Or do you just not give a shit that you are a hypocrite?
    1
  8182. I'll take your silence to mean that you understand what a hypocrite you are but you are too big a bitch to admit it.
    1
  8183. "the left" Carlin was smart enough to know neither side gives a fuck about the peasants.
    1
  8184.  @MlSHKlN  It's not the "left" that want censorship. It's the elite. Stop being a tool.
    1
  8185.  @MlSHKlN  "using the left" Corporate media is not "the left." They are elites. "the left wants it." I'm about far left as you can go. That means I want things like universal health care, giving peace a chance, protecting the enviornment, money out of politics, breaking up the banks, and more. No where on my list of things do I include censoring people. I actually go out of my way to protect people freedom of speech and that's what's on my list as an actual "leftist." When they were looking to deplatform alex jones I spoke out against it because of principles and not because I like that clown. But don't let that stop you from your BS that only helps serve the oligarchy's interests of dividing the peasants into the "left" and the "right" before conquering them all.
    1
  8186. There is a reason bernie sanders calls for a political revolution.
    1
  8187. No. Because votes matter more than money and people are not wanting to vote for corporate sellouts. If money was the only thing that was important Hillary would have crushed instead of being crushed.
    1
  8188. Arguably. What does that say about tiny orange hands?
    1
  8189.  @hugo-jp4eo  Regarding, "I knew you didn't know how Trump was worst except being republican " Is that your takeaway? He wants to take away healthcare with no plan to replace. He tore up the iran nuclear deal. He's worse on the environment. He is more of a twat and more. Not that it really matters which piece of shit is worse. I'm not voting for either.
    1
  8190. Dems love excuses to fail like the filibuster.
    1
  8191. They also know that a healthy middle class can spend money buying their shit... just like Henry Ford did.
    1
  8192. The option to die. No thanks.
    1
  8193.  @ligerllama  I'm sorry but I can't take you seriously enough to respond to you intelligently. Do yourself a favor and stop being an idiot. Thanks for that in advance, not that you will.
    1
  8194.  @ligerllama  Maybe look back at your OP that you edited. A public option doesn't eliminate the middle man you fucking moron.
    1
  8195. He is a POS who loves war and happily lies just like the clown they are going to replace.
    1
  8196. You say that as if he was the only one to do it. He wasn't.
    1
  8197.  @woobiefuntime  "hes the best thing" You are proving my point for me. Only a brainwashed sheep says something like this.
    1
  8198.  @woobiefuntime  "What is the alternative" Don't support and enable evil like him and his ilk. They are the problem, not the solution. But that's who sam told you to vote for and the type of person he will tell you to vote for again. Have some freaking standards to get your vote FFS.
    1
  8199.  @woobiefuntime  "hes not on the same level of evil as trump." 1) are you sure? More covid deaths under biden, more military spending under biden, more deportations under biden. 2) so freaking what if he is? The bottom line is that morons like you would vote for trump as long as you thought their opponent was "more evil." You are still enabling and supporting evil when you should be supporting good and willing to lose.
    1
  8200. Self defeating attitudes are self defeating.
    1
  8201. He absolutely is. Which begs the question... why do you support republicans?
    1
  8202. Epic joke. Thanks for the laugh.
    1
  8203. Capitalism is terrible.
    1
  8204.  @northernpunx1978  "I'm merely pointing out that in 80 years none of them have helped the middle class. Sniffer Joe is just one of the gang." You are doing it wrong. I don't disagree with this. I doubt the OP disagrees with this. I have a problem with strawman arguments coming from everyone. Even people I whose opinions I likely agree with.
    1
  8205.  @northernpunx1978  In other words don't tell someone to "wake up" when they aren't demonstrating they are asleep. Don't act like they said "just joe biden" when they have not. We likely agree about most everything. Just don't do things like this going forward. Thanks. Peace.
    1
  8206. Could you maybe edit that comment so that it makes some sense?
    1
  8207. Or better yet Sanders and people doing the right thing supporting him and trying to push him over the top rather than him and people who are helping establishment fucks like Biden by splitting the progressive vote.
    1
  8208. Seeing as how that isn't going to happen let's just stop talking about killing anyone instead shall we.
    1
  8209. Regarding, "stays exactly how she is" She's already told she won't. She's told you that she is going to take legalized bribes if she makes the general.
    1
  8210. What have you made? I could use a good laugh.
    1
  8211. Which is made all but impossible because of money in politics fucking everything else up.
    1
  8212. Everyone thinks their cult is different.
    1
  8213. Look into what zelensky is worth.
    1
  8214. Once a fraud always a fraud. I can only wonder what other conflicts of interest he has that he isn't telling us about.
    1
  8215. He still might be a role in a biden administration if yang is willing to let his corporate propaganda job at CNN go. One way or the other yang will be back, just like hemorrhoids. He is one of the best conmen the establishment has.
    1
  8216.  @nicholi8208  If you have something to say, say it. Don't think I'm clicking on the link of someone I think is an idiot. Then again I think I'd prefer it if you didn't say anything.
    1
  8217. Blame dodo for the hate. It's their fault for interjecting politics into the channel.
    1
  8218. It will stop being news the day they stop sucking. Til then some things are worth repeating.
    1
  8219.  @alienanxiety  Regarding, "It's a complete waste of time to make fun of mainstream media." You are an idiot. Regarding, "We all know it is shit." Who the fuck is 'we all?' Corporate media still gets far more views than kyle and company. Regarding, "It's not going to convert anyone" Knowledge is power. Even in the comments section here people still defend and rationalize their shit. Regarding, "it won't make the media change." It's about exposing them and their bullshit. The DNC isn't going to change. Does that mean we shouldn't call them out for their shit while they do it? Regarding, "So he might as well do a segment on the sky being blue." You are being absurd.
    1
  8220.  @rootbeer331  I've been an advocate of assange since BEFORE he was put in prison. Frauds like kyle and you call smears and blackmail "drama."
    1
  8221.  @rgdssd  "blackmail of journalists?" Yes. Blackmail. Even your cult leader kyle has conceded it was blackmail. "This is all a whole bunch of brouhaha over nothing." I can't imagine calling smears and blackmail "nothing." I hope you aren't really this dense. I hope you are paid for this crap. "I've been holding back, letting you run your mouth like your some kinda warrior for what's good in this world. That's going to change." Something a villian in a movie might say to blackmail you while holding a knife to the throat of one of your loved ones and something ana kasparian actually said to try and blackmail jimmy.
    1
  8222.  @kylequest  So all people who have never been president are equally qualified then? Obviously not. You are just a tool trying to reverse engineer idiotic things to say to come to the conclusions you want to come to.
    1
  8223. For your sake I hope you are paid to be the clown that you are.
    1
  8224. I agree and I'm surprised he hasn't been doing better so far. He is an empty suit... but he's a smooth talker. He reminds me of Obama.
    1
  8225.  @jameshumphrey9939  Regarding, "people don't generally think anything really" Nope. People like you are not the norm.
    1
  8226. tech so because it doesn't guarantee and solve the problem 100 percent we shouldn't be taking steps in the right direction?
    1
  8227. You make it sound like it's close when pretty much the entire government including almost everyone in the "democratic" party, is corrupt.
    1
  8228. Biden was lying about 2k checks but you go ahead and be a partisan hack. Very scary stuff.
    1
  8229.  @sparklyunicorn5431  Speaking of people who are losing their minds, "I'm a Democratic candidate for the United States Senate. Look me over. If you like what you see, help me out; if not, you can vote for the other Biden. Give me a look, though." Joe Biden, while running for president.
    1
  8230. @J C Regarding, "obviously I’m not stupid as much as you are." LMFAO. Well said. /s
    1
  8231. There is nothing wrong with regulated capitalism for almost everything (not health care and war). The problem is that that isn't what we have. Instead we have capitalism run amok and it's driving the nation into the ditch.
    1
  8232. Yang works for MSM. Yeah... you shouldn't trust him.
    1
  8233. It's not TYT's fault kyle is a fraud.
    1
  8234.  @joshuareynolds1545  They can share some blame sure but ultimately this on kyle and his fuckups are his own.
    1
  8235. *humanity
    1
  8236. Just when I thought I couldn't love this channel anymore you threw some shade at fauci. Love your work!
    1
  8237. Now is the time? It wasn't back when he told everyone to vote for biden and clinton?
    1
  8238. Why do I feel like this is being said by a person supporting a candidate who is in favor of fracking?
    1
  8239. Regarding, "slightly flawed candidate" LMFAO Are you a professional turd polisher per chance?
    1
  8240.  @TheViewFromUpHere  Biden is a warmonger, a liar, is corrupt, and his brain is melting. "slightly flawed candidate" LMFAO
    1
  8241.  @TheViewFromUpHere  Regarding, "And your other choice is 100x worse. Choose wisely." I have more than 2 choices. For example I would rather take my ballot and whip my ass with it before I'd vote for either Trump or Biden. I don't vote for POS. I leave that to morons like you.
    1
  8242.  @TheViewFromUpHere  I'd tell you to choose wisely but why. You clearly won't.
    1
  8243. Yang still has zero experience in politics and has zero record to look at to know what we would be getting right? Get back to me when he has either of those incredibly important things that you should require for a presidential vote.
    1
  8244. @Paolo V Regarding, "Biden, Warren, Pete, and Harris" You would support all these people if they just came out of nowhere and told you what you wanted to hear because that is exactly what you are doing with yang. Ultimately you know they all suck because of a record.
    1
  8245. @Paolo V Regarding, "stop assuming that I’m you." Yeah. I use logic, reason, and intelligence while you are you. Regarding, "Andrew Yang has better policies" So if Joe Biden came out with better policies in your opinion you would support him? Nope. Because Joe has a record while your clown doesn't and a record is important to the sane. Regarding, "Funny how you assume things about me." I'm assuming nothing. I'm trying to tell you why the things you are saying are dumb as fuck.
    1
  8246. @Paolo V If you ever have to have major surgery make sure to pick someone who has never done it before. Because who needs experience for important tasks am I right?
    1
  8247.  @Prague3203  Regarding, "Have you heard of a guy named Henry Ford?" Nope. No clue. Make sure that you too, if you ever need important surgery, pick a guy with no experience. Do it. And if you ever question that moronic decision just close your eyes and think of Henry Ford to try and justify your stupidity.
    1
  8248.  @Prague3203  Regarding, "You're argument about Yang not being an effective leader because he's not a career politician holds no water." Strawman much? Never do I ever even use the words "effective leader" or say anything even remotely close to this. Instead I use words like experience because they mean different things.
    1
  8249.  @clarkkent2409  Regarding, "What's with the cursing? Chill out and be civil." Words are merely a tool we use to convey a message. I don't know of a better way to express the frustration I feel when talking to fucking morons than by using curse words. Trump is fucking president among about a billion other major problems going on the world. It pisses me off and frustrates me. If you don't share that frustration that might be best expressed with swearing then you clearly don't grasp what we are really talking about.
    1
  8250. @Paolo V Yes. Please don't bother with me because there isn't anything intelligent you can say and what you are saying only serves to make the world dumber.
    1
  8251. LMFAO You are speaking for plato? Ego much?
    1
  8252. Plato is not an idiot. You are projecting yourself onto them.
    1
  8253.  @bomblade15  1) because candace is irrelevant to me. and 2) I haven't even watched the video. I don't really care what the latest propaganda from sam is. And I don't need to to be able to call him out.
    1
  8254.  @50jakecs  "Seder uses facts when he forms an opinion" Sam would tell you to vote for donald trump if trump were representing his team in a general election. It's fact that sam has never told anyone not to vote for his team when it was time to vote.
    1
  8255.  @50jakecs  In other words sam doesn't care about the facts. He has his cu lt and he sticks to it regardless of any facts.
    1
  8256.  @50jakecs  Sam's is akin to candace. They both have their corrupt teams and that is all that's all that's really important to either.
    1
  8257.  @thedissidentleftist6997  "watch at you repeating yourself nowaday. It's sad watching you spirals into madness." Well written. /s LMFAO
    1
  8258. This is funny because someone in yanggang in the comments was doing the exact same thing and calling anyone like me who doesn't like him racist against asians. Because that's they only reason I might not like that conman and liar.
    1
  8259. Regarding, "she adds a distinct voice to it, being anti-regime change war and a check to the establishment for their corrupt behaviour." There is nothing distinct about any of that. Bernie already brings all of that without a blatant conflict of interest with the MIC. Regarding, "How many times has she helped Bernie in the meantime" We get one vote to cast in the primary and she is splitting the progressive vote. That doesn't help Bernie. That helps the ESTABLISHMENT and people like Biden. Regarding, "As the race gets tighter," The race is ALREADY incredibly tight. It would have really been nice to maybe get an extra point or two of support in Iowa don't you think?
    1
  8260.  @norbertgeorge  Regarding, "If you consider everything that happened so far, you can expect a lot more." I do. But this isn't some kind of innate reason for tulsi to stick around. Regarding, "You have to agree with me that it is all but helpfull for Bernie to voice an anti-regime change war" Is it nice that Tulsi goes around preaching a message of peace? Yes. It is. Is that benefit vastly outweighed by the problem of splitting the progressive vote? Not even close. Regarding, "Don't assume that all Tulsi's votes would go straigth to Bernie." I don't assume all of them go to Bernie... but she sure as fuck isn't pealing off Biden Bloomberg and establishment voters. Candidates don't operate in a vacuum and it's pretty predictable where support goes after someone drops out. They even poll people for their second preference. Who do you think Tulsi supporters are most likely to support in the even that she drop out? Regarding, "Moreover, it is a primary contest, so to hell with all who claim one having to drop out of the race for the other to benefit," Go look at your first paragraph here. "If you consider everything that happened so far, you can expect a lot more." Tulsi shouldn't be dropping out to benefit Bernie... she should be dropping out to help US. Those people that you know the establishment is trying to fuck over. Where they demonstrate they don't fight fair. That is the world we live in. We need to be UNITED as progressives if we are to win. She is running AGAINST Sanders right now. To me it seems she cares more about building her brand than helping the progressive cause. Biden didn't run in 2016 not because of his kid or some shit. He and the establishment he works for knew that splitting the vote is something to think about and a real concern. Had he run in 2016 he likely splits the corporate vote with Hillary and Bernie has the most pledged delegates at the end and history would have been very different. Let's hope Tulsi isn't fucking this up the way Biden didn't while he took one for his team.
    1
  8261. If you're not first you're last.
    1
  8262. SBlack regarding, "There's no such thing as a meaningless vote." Are you intentionally missing the point or are you stupid?
    1
  8263. SBlack regarding, "I ask you the same." Only because you are an idiot with comprehension issues. The first thing I said was, "While I agree that this is a good thing..." as in meaningless is not be taken literally but in context. You said you were smarter then Trumptards elsewhere but I fail to see it.
    1
  8264. Blessing regarding, "None of the Democrats voted for Trump's military budget." Except for all the ones who did. Are you intentionally lying or ignorant? 38 percent of them in the house and 76 percent of them in the senate voted in favor. The overall votes were not even close. The increase in military spending alone would have MORE than covered Bernie's "unaffordable" plan to provide college education... but that would have been for books and students... there's no money for that. We are talking about bombs and death... there is always money for that. That is where both major parties can find common ground.
    1
  8265. Blessing regarding, "I am not sure her success can be repeated in every part of the country" Yup. But not for the reasons you think. It has more to do with a corrupt corporate party actively working against progressives. AOC had to overcome media blackout and a party who did everything they possibly could to tip the scales against her. As for everything else you said it is just as absurd and misguided. I've already address those stupid as fuck talking points too often to want to do it again with you. The "democratic" party should know what it takes to get my vote. I've told them repeatedly. But they don't care. They care more about preventing progressives from getting into office then they care about preventing people like Trump from getting into office. Team Hillary elevated him for fucks sake so that her corrupt ass might seem palatable to the stupid. And still you want to continue with the fear mongering about Trump. Sorry but Trump sucking balls isn't a good reason to support shitty dems. It is a reason to not support Trump and I don't.
    1
  8266. Blessing regarding, "What does it take to get your vote?" I'm going to take your question serious even thou you are totally disingenuous and just using it to try and portray my ideas for me because, even thou you suck and your framing is bullshit, it is a good question. Let's start with the process. I first need to think that the candidate got there legitimately. That means that they didn't get there only because they were propped up by a party actively working overtime to tip the scales in their favor. Next I look at policy. Do they represent me and my ideas? Will they fight for the things I believe in? Are their priorities where mine are? Lastly I look at the person. Are they a good person? Do I think they are ethical? Those are things I think about when deciding if someone is going to get my vote. Regarding, "You want the whole enchilada" Yeah. I want the whole enchilada. You don't? But do I require the "whole enchilada?" Nope. I think of it this way... you know the signs they have at carnival parks that read, "you need to be at least this tall to ride."? Well I have similar thinking when it comes to getting my vote. It reads, "you have to be at least a certain amount of decent to get my vote." And that line only looks like perfection to someone like you because your line is the pathetic standard of "better then Trump."
    1
  8267. I really need to add that something that is very important to me is where they raise their money. Candidates who get there because of big money and corporate cash represent big money and corporations. Candidates who get there because of the little guy represent the little guy. They go with who got them there and it isn't hard to understand why. Therefore I look closely at how they get into office (aka how they raise the money for their campaign) because it tells you more about how they will govern then their rhetoric.
    1
  8268. If Rand Paul were running for President I would think long and hard about supporting him (that said I can't say for sure) over a corporate dem because I think he is far more genuine then any of your corporate dems and because I love his positions on the military industrial complex and the war on drugs. That said he is a fucking DISASTER when it comes to domestic economic policy. Still I would consider voting for him. That is hardly the mentality of someone who needs it all. But you keep telling yourself I do. I am confident you will regardless of what I have to say.
    1
  8269. 8:50 "Is that a conspiracy?" It depends if they are trying to hide their plans. If they are hiding their plans then it's a "conspiracy." If they are doing it in the open and not hiding their plans then it is not.
    1
  8270.  @GazMatic  "Open conspiracy and secret conspiracy are both valid terms." We are talking about "conspiracy" and conspiracy means hidden. Source: the dictionary. "A conspiracy is an agreement to commit a crime" Not necessarily. It can still be a conspiracy and still be "legal."
    1
  8271.  @GazMatic  "I literally looked up the definition" So did I and the first thing that comes up... "a secret plan by a group to do something unlawful or harmful."
    1
  8272.  @GazMatic  "a secret plan" As in it needs to be a secret.... "unlawful or harmful" as in bad but not necessarily illegal.
    1
  8273.  @GazMatic  "I also used a physical one" LMFAO "the online ones tend to change" Those are the ones that can be cited here. You claim your book says anything you want but we can only check the online ones together.
    1
  8274. Not everyone... sadly.
    1
  8275. You mean smear. If Sanders can do the job, and there is no reason to think he can't, then that is all that matters. Or at least it should be the only thing that matters.
    1
  8276. It's all absolutely what anyone paying attention should expect and already see but it is nice to have concrete evidence of their shenanigans.
    1
  8277. Regarding, "bye trolls" That is pretty funny coming from the walking, talking right wing talking point.
    1
  8278. Eric regarding, "you commies need rounded up, and hung for treason." Your English needs work comrade.
    1
  8279. Meg I'm not about to claim he is king fuckface because he isn't but he is still the party chair. That is hardly a "lackey." And even if I agree that he will just be replaced with a different piece of shit so fucking what. Make them do it. Make them at least acknowledge that what they did was wrong the same way they did with DWS. Make them go to the bench and get someone else. Don't throw in the towel and let them win without fighting. That is what they want. Lastly the idea that they will just replace him with something worse is pretty silly to me.
    1
  8280. National, off with their heads? That is the type of shit I'd expect to hear from Trump or ISIS. Think about that for a second. Are those the type of people you want to be like?
    1
  8281. National please forgive me for not reading that but I'm not interested in how you are rationalizing that off with their heads shit.
    1
  8282. Explicit if that really makes you laugh then you should seek psychiatric help right away.
    1
  8283. Thanks for the tip national. That was pretty smart of you to realize how uneducated I am based solely on me taking exception to you calling for beheading people. Then again only someone who is uneducated would have trouble seeing the value of taking people's heads.
    1
  8284. Explicit was there really something unclear about the word "psychiatric?"
    1
  8285. National regarding, "the rich." I never addressed the rich. I addressed you. Regarding, "since you haven't read what I wrote." Actually I have read what you have written. I haven't read everything you have written. There is a difference. Regarding, "Moderate Democrats (suck)" Thanks for clearing that up. Because of my lack of education I thought that maybe you were looking to behead good people.
    1
  8286. National again, I did read you talking about beheading people so I am in a position to judge that shit. The only reason you think I'm being "childish" is because you are mad I didn't bother with the stupid rationalizations you want to present for the immoral shit you already said. I would be equally "childish" if I didn't bother reading flat earther arguments after they got done telling me the earth is flat. I really don't need to know more. I have all the info I need at that point.
    1
  8287. The rich are garbage. They are the type of people that would be happy to take someone's head like an immoral piece of shit if it suited their needs just like another immoral garbage person I know.
    1
  8288. National I'm really not sure how to make it anymore clear that I am not interested in the stupid as fuck rationalizations you have for the immoral shit you said. Still you keep at it and now that I have read some of your rationalizations I was clearly correct for not wanting to waste my time on your bullshit. Enjoy your completely immoral philosophy that is EXACTLY like those you hate in its methods!
    1
  8289. National regarding, "do you kiss your mom with that mouth?" Nope. But I'm sorry if you have a problem with naughty words. Try to understand that they are merely a tool we use to communicate. They can't, for example, take someone's head off. Regarding, "You seem emotionally fragile." That is pretty funny coming from the guy who just got done being offended by naughty words in the previous sentence. Regarding, "Maybe you need to talk to a therapist." When I go I'll be sure to ask them what they think of your beheading people philosophy when I go. I suspect they will want you to see you. Regarding, "Get those nasty emotions out before you go off the deep end and do something violent." This is coming from the guy who entered the conversation telling me I need to be collecting heads. Too fucking funny. You can't make this shit up. Regarding, "Clearly you can't help being simple minded." I'm sure it seems that way to the simple minded. Regarding, "But you might be a danger to yourself or others." Not like Razor. He is definitely not a danger to others am I right? The chopping heads guy?
    1
  8290. I'm dismayed people continue to watch him. He's the same fraud who didn't defend jimmy dore or aaron mate.
    1
  8291.  @joshuareynolds1545  He exposed himself as a fraud. "when someone shows you who they are believe them the first time" maya angelou.
    1
  8292.  @joshuareynolds1545  "Kyle is not our enemy man." We are going to have to agree to disagree about this. "Kyle may might not be the leader we all thought he was" This is easily the most polite way I've ever heard anyone called a fraud before. "policy issues." It's easy to talk the talk. AOC can really talk a good game. Obama too. But actions speak louder than words. "It's not his job to defend Jimmy." It's everyone job to defend journalists being smeared and blackmailed. Please watch glenn greenwalds video about toxic pathologies of the left. "What I meant about "Kyles human" is that he's flawed just like everyone else." If you are going to give nonsense that could be used to defend literally anyone including hitler you probably shouldn't bother. I followed lots of terrible pundits in the past. Olberman, maddow, tyt and kyle. At a certain point all of them were unmasked. After you see it you can't unsee it. You are left wondering why you ever liked them in the first place. Kyle's a fraud.
    1
  8293. A broken clock is correct twice a day but it is still broken... like Trump.
    1
  8294. The cameraman is a lucky guy. Happy thoughts for both of you.
    1
  8295. He is, like zelensky. But you can sellout in any creed.
    1
  8296.  @Coteoki  Literally everything politicians do is political. This is clearly political PR. I suspect you have little trouble realizing that and seeing it if the dodo did the same thing for the orange clown while he were in office.
    1
  8297.  @Coteoki  And if I wanted propaganda telling me why I should like a POS like Biden I can go everywhere else. This is suppose to be one of the last places I could go to get away from politics. Sadly that isn't the case anymore.
    1
  8298. And the exact same thing can be said of anyone supporting Biden.
    1
  8299.  @TheBestMovieAlive  I'm not a trump supporter. You are just deflecting the same way trump supporters do when I call out their clown. I just care when someone is a corrupt lying POS. But you do you. Be "smart" while voting for a lying, corrupt POS like Biden. What could possibly go wrong by electing Joe "nothing will fundamentally change" in a world that desperately needs change? I mean that wasn't the exact same thing that got trump elected was it? Oh wait... it was. Let's hope Trump 2.0 in 2024 is as incompetent as Trump 1.0 is.
    1
  8300. Is that why Bernie "lost" the Iowa Caucus to Pete? Oh right... you are just an idiot.
    1
  8301. If we lived in a just world Kyle would have mentioned he was affiliated with TYT before calling out their blackmail. Instead he didn't mention his affiliation or the blackmail. Kyle is a fraud.
    1
  8302.  @jcrb8894  "your part of the problem" Can't say I find your "argument" very compelling. People who don't offer any sort of logic and reasoning for their beliefs are part of the problem. You know what that makes you?
    1
  8303.  @jcrb8894  Also, *you're
    1
  8304. How about you just enjoy some rare good news for once. I assure you that her coming out with this is good news.
    1
  8305. Beanie baby. I don't like them and it's still not even close.
    1
  8306.  @ToxicAudri  Sam's audience is clearly not too bright.
    1
  8307.  @wilcee238  "You do realize that since you’re here, you’re part of the audience right?" Do you really not realize the difference between sams fans and people who are criticizing him? Of course you do. But grasp at semantics and pretend like you have a point. It's funny.
    1
  8308.  @Kloutkulture  Ignorance is bliss so I understand why you think everything is so funny. I almost envy you.
    1
  8309.  @biograftirl  Regarding, "it’s NOT okay to hate on others!" It's not ok to hate terrible people? Or maybe what you are saying is asinine. For example I hate Jeffrey Epstein. You really should too.
    1
  8310.  @biograftirl  What a remarkably vapid, worthless comment.
    1
  8311. Didn't help. It's just an empty space.
    1
  8312. Thanks for your concern trolling twat.
    1
  8313.  @AlienoidGamer  And being genuine is obviously a compliment for most people but maybe fools like garuna prefer fakes and frauds.
    1
  8314.  @garuna5688  Considering the source that's more like a compliment. Thanks dipshit. I appreciate the laugh.
    1
  8315. I am concerned about your intellectually honesty. It seems you have none and are nothing but a partisan hack.
    1
  8316. I'll bring the beer.
    1
  8317. Sam can always have the people he doesn't like censored... because he's cool with that and not really on the left.
    1
  8318. He's been on the wrong side of history his entire life. Why would he stop now?
    1
  8319. It was one of the exceptionally rare time that I disagreed with Mike. We should not be looking to emulate terrible people. We win by being better then them, not like them. That doesn't mean that something like impeachment is off the table but it is only to be used with grounds and not used only as a political tool.
    1
  8320. You and people like you are why Hillary Clinton and her team thought it was a good idea to prop up a piece of shit like Trump (see pied piper strategy if you don't know what I'm talking about). They know that you don't need to think your candidate does not suck balls. You only need to think your candidate is less shitty. Nevermind that they are still shitty. Do everyone a favor and start having standards to receive your vote. And set the bar a little higher than better then Trump. It should take significantly more then that to impress you and get your vote.
    1
  8321. Regarding, "I don't care about what you have to say" You go ahead and tell yourself whatever you want but the fact that you responded to me proves otherwise. Regarding, "you don't care about what I have to say." Actually I do and that is why I responded. I hoped that it might make you reevalutate the things you said. Guess I failed in that. Fortunately it wasn't exclusively for you. It is also for other who might read this. Regarding, "I am however starting to despise progressives with all they hyperbole and instigating. Now that I see how they are, I am so turned off by them." It's not hyperbole. You know Trump was a self described democrat not long ago right? And if you take issue with "emotion" then you don't truly understand where the anger and rage comes from and it comes from a place that is well justified. Do you think I want Trump to be President? I sure as fuck don't. But I spread the blame around to rightfully include the DNC for rigging the primary, and Hillary for propping him up, and corporate media for giving Trump billions in free media and more. You blame progressives. Regarding, "I am NOT going to stop voting democrat just because a candidate is "corporate" or "centrist"." You can lead a horse to water but you can't make em drink. You go ahead and keep making the same mistakes over and over and over all you want. That is very common for humans to do. Regarding, "That is what a lot of people did and that is how we got your beloved Donald Trump." You are not first person even in the last 24 hours to say I love that orange clown because I have the audacity to criticize corporate dems. Not surprising for lazy thinkers to think such bullshit.
    1
  8322. That's what would happen to men. The drinker fails to account for girl power. /s
    1
  8323. He's already told you why he lied. Not that it was a good reason.
    1
  8324. "what's the problem." I don't even know where to begin.
    1
  8325. It's the weed.
    1
  8326. Why is "vote blue no matter who" bullshit? This guy.
    1
  8327.  @EE-gv9wt  It wasn't even attempted by the people with power and it still got us something. It outed frauds and controlled opposition like TYT among others.
    1
  8328. "She's true to her principles" No. She is not. These the principles she claims, "Sometimes it’s to get members on the record, so ppl can’t make excuses later. Sometimes these votes create real political pressure that forces developments. Sometimes we vote for the historical record - to let future generations know we did everything we could." And she didn't force the vote on m4a.
    1
  8329. Tilleman was the guy getting fucked over.
    1
  8330. No prob. I totally agree with all the points you made. Thanks for giving me some reason to have faith in humanity.
    1
  8331. Was he right to vote for billions for the MIC and a proxy war?
    1
  8332.  @TT-ue6xx  "Do you think he'd still be senator if he didn't?" Yes. And if all he cares about is holding power then he may as well not have it. "why is Bernie expected to be absolutely perfect" He's not. Why do you give him a pass for things you wouldn't for other people? "This man has been fighting for the regular citizens for decades!" Does that include the times I'm citing or not? Because you know it doesn't. You are just making excuses and rationalizations. "tries his best to help the citizens while the rest of our politicians" He tells you to vote for POS politicians. I'm pretty sure that doesn't help.
    1
  8333.  @TT-ue6xx  "He's not gonna be perfect but he cares and tries his best to help the citizens while the rest of our politicians help corporations." He's a sheep herder for the "democratic" party who try to take all the revolutionary spirit in the country and funnel it into a status quo party.
    1
  8334.  @TT-ue6xx  Bernie's job is to take all the revolutionary spirit in the country and funnel it into a status quo corrupt party and he's really good at it.
    1
  8335.  @TT-ue6xx  He will tell you to vote blue no matter who or how terrible.
    1
  8336.  @perseuspersikus6830  "are you off your pills again?" Ad hominem and nothing else. It's what you do when you have nothing intelligent to say. If you did you would have gone with that instead.
    1
  8337.  @TT-ue6xx  Bernie's job is to take all revolu tionary spirit and funnel it into a cor rupt status quo party. He is controlled opposition.
    1
  8338.  @TT-ue6xx  "Things aren't black and white, there are shades of grey." Do you think I don't realize this? Or is this just the type of mindless nonsense that could be used to rationalize literally anything?
    1
  8339.  @TT-ue6xx  "No one is gonna agree 100 percent all the time" Do you think I don't realize this? Or do you have nothing to say about the things I actually say and think?
    1
  8340.  @TT-ue6xx  "he has never stopped his fight for the people of this nation" He sells out the people every time he tells you to vote for corrupt oligarchs like biden and clinton.
    1
  8341.  @TT-ue6xx  "you're probably not shadow banned" I know I am. Count how many replies youtube tells you there are and count how many you can see. The difference is the number of comments being shadowbanned.
    1
  8342.  @TT-ue6xx  "it's probably triggering something thinking you may be a bot?" LMFAO Go look at russel brands comment section and see how much youtube doesn't care about bots. But they censor people like me.
    1
  8343.  @TT-ue6xx  "Bernie started doing multiple things I didn't agree with then that's another story" He is voting in LOCKSTEP with corporate dems. So you must agree with corporate dems.
    1
  8344.  @TT-ue6xx  "There's no one who's perfect and it's unrealistic to expect someone to be." LMFAO You keep strawmanning. Never do I ever say I want or need perfect.
    1
  8345.  @TT-ue6xx  "look at how hard they tried to get her out of office! Imagine what they'd do to stop her from being President." "Do you really think she'd be allowed to make it that far though?" I think that if voting really mattered they wouldn't let you do it. Nobody decent will ever be allowed near that job. "And what if she started voting for things you don't agree with?" I'd call her out for it. I'm not a sycophant. My allegiance is to things like health care and peace, not politicians.
    1
  8346.  @TT-ue6xx  "And what if she started voting for things you don't agree with?" If you go back in time you will find that I used to be one of bernie biggest supporters. I used to make comments that would get upvoted here. So...
    1
  8347.  @TT-ue6xx  "Okay so you wouldn't support her then?" Never said anything even remotely close to this. I can only think you are being intellectually dishonest.
    1
  8348.  @TT-ue6xx  "I've seen how the repubs get results" Fun facts: dems give millions of dollars to REPUBLICAN candidates and the hillary propped up trump with the pied piper strategy.
    1
  8349.  @TT-ue6xx  "They focus on a few issues at a time and they get it done." Dems never stop them when they can. They enable them at every turn.
    1
  8350.  @TT-ue6xx  "Of course I wish we could stop funding the MIC" Does bernie? That guy who just voted for bill ions in wea pons to ukr aine?
    1
  8351.  @TT-ue6xx  "allow others the same." Am I stopping you from voting how you want or something? Or are you just being absurd?
    1
  8352.  @TT-ue6xx  "Okay so you wouldn't support her then?..." FYI this comment of yours is being shadowbanned. What do you think you did to be censored? Were you acting too much like a bot?
    1
  8353.  @TT-ue6xx  Before you ask... how do I know of your comment if it's being censored? It shows in my notification but not the thread. And no one other than myself can see it.
    1
  8354.  @TT-ue6xx  How can I or you tell if a comment is shadowbanned? Log out and look at the thread. Then you know what EVERYONE is able to see and not just you.
    1
  8355. MSNBC are complicit and war criminals.
    1
  8356. "Blaming others for her failures." Not like the entire "democratic" party who blames russia for hillary clinton's loss am I right?
    1
  8357.  @robingourde9366  "Blaming others for her failures" Remember when the "democratic" party blamed russia for hillary's loss? Peppridge farm remembers.
    1
  8358.  @robingourde9366  The entire "democratic" party has earned the conservative card. Who blames others for it's failures. Who projects. Who are hypocrites. Who are conservatives. And sam will tell you to vote for them when it comes time. Because that's what sheep herders do.
    1
  8359. He's not really taking elon's side. He's pointing out the shitlibs opposed to him and WHY they are opposed to him and it's not because of good reasons.
    1
  8360.  @jonnystarsmore3445  Regarding, "they are part of the solution" They aren't. The problem isn't that politicians are in government too long. The problem is that they are bought. Term limits solves nothing. If anything I prefer we not have term limits. I like long records. Getting rid of term limits without getting money out of politics helps the establishment. Their candidates will always have money behind them. When we actually have a good politician who there is no reason to kick them out. If AOC keeps doing a good job (not be confused with perfect) and doesn't take legalized bribes then she can stay around as long as she wants. Corporate sellouts are always going to have the revolving door to go back to make money in the private industry. There is a seemingly unending supply of corporate stooges to take the old guards new place but we only get a handful of progressive champions. It's more important to us that our guys be able to stick around than it is to make the corporate guys rotate more often. GET MONEY OUT OF POLITICS. That's the problem. Solve that. Everything else is just details.
    1
  8361. Youtube says 5 replies and I can see 3...
    1
  8362.  @edwardmartinez9459  "another weak mind!" I don't know what they said because I can't see it but I suspect that they were at least attempting an argument which is more than can be said of you.
    1
  8363.  @edwardmartinez9459  "Bozo what are you talking about?" LMFAO This is hilarious considering how incoherent the rest of your comment is. "You are minded my point was we can allow eggroll maker's to tell us what we can and can't to what are you trying to say think logical then answer!" Can you translate this into English for me? I don't speak Dumbarce.
    1
  8364.  @kolonelkingkraker  I understand your sentiment but we should not be emulating pieces of shit. We need to be better than them.
    1
  8365. 9/11 first responders is but one example of a progressive issue he advocated for.
    1
  8366. I'd ask what the fuck you were talking about if I weren't convinced that you are just lying and making a stupid as fuck strawman argument.
    1
  8367.  @nick6426  "the only thing he did wrong is that he did apologize when he shouldn't have." Well said if you were talking about jimmy's apology note to ana but wrong about kyle.
    1
  8368.  @kaisermoneybags4450  Do you ever say anything that isn't worthless or idiotic?
    1
  8369.  @kaisermoneybags4450  I expect you do seeing as how you only say things that are idiotic or worthless.
    1
  8370.  @kaisermoneybags4450  Regarding, "trump doesn't have a cult" Recently, when confronted with the fact that Trump's crony straight up admitted to quid pro quo a Trump supporter could be quoted as saying, "It doesn't matter. I support President Trump no matter what." Even Trump knows his supporters are essentially cultist when he acknowledged that he could murder someone and his fans wouldn't give a shit. In short you are a fucking moron spouting nonsense and lots of his supporters, while not all, can easily and accurately be described as demonstrating cult behavior. Regarding, "how generic" Worthless comment. Regarding, "I could say the same to you." Worthless comment. Regarding, "I've said three things. All of which are factual. What is idiotic or worthless about any of the three things I've said in this reply section?" Stupid and worthless. The worst thing about dumb fuckers like yourself is that they are far too stupid to realize they are dumb. Good luck with that.
    1
  8371. Makes me hate humanity.
    1
  8372. Tulsi is cool, but not as good as Bernie.
    1
  8373. No. You are the problem. Asshats like you think they know better than an educated informed person like kyle as to who is one of their "own" and who has the best chance of winning. Kyle gives evidence and reasons in the video. You are just little bitch triggered by the truth retreated to a safespace. Good. The IQ of this place will go up significantly without you.
    1
  8374. By treating education the way we currently treat the military... give them more money than they need.
    1
  8375. I never said it was an end all be all but I do think it is one of the biggest problems with the system. I also said what I did because I wanted to express my personal priorities of what I think good government is. I want a government that prioritizes educating people much more than killing people.
    1
  8376. Long story short: force the vote is a no brainer if you want m4a. Hopefully that answers your questions.
    1
  8377. 90 percent of the public wanting universal background checks should tell you that your point is fucking moronic and misguided.
    1
  8378. Bo regarding, "Goldman Sachs" Are you talking about Trump's cabinet?
    1
  8379. Gond regarding, "Saying they will support it is not enough for me." I agree. Just because someone says they support doesn't guarantee my support as much as saying they don't support it guarantees my opposition. In general my trust is directly correlated to how they raise their money.
    1
  8380. Phlegm regarding, "help the republicans win every election for the foreseeable future." Hillary Clinton was not different than a republican in any sort of meaningful way. If you supported her you are the one ensuring a republican so far as I'm concerned.
    1
  8381. Not really. We don't punish thought crime.
    1
  8382. Sorry. Bernie is too busy voting for bloated military budgets and weapons for ukraine.
    1
  8383.  @_Painted  "Bernie Sanders is a good man and a good leader." He's the guy who told you to vote for biden and hillary right? Let's agree to disagree about him being a "good man" or "good leader."
    1
  8384.  @_Painted  "What he says..." Talk is cheap. At the end of the day he will tell you to vote for corrupt people like biden who will do nothing to help people's lives. He's a she ep her der and he's leading you to slau ghter.
    1
  8385.  @_Painted  " I will take that endorsement into consideration when deciding who to vote for." Bernie has already told you he's falling in line and that he will support biden. Do as you are told like a good sheep. Don't think for yourself.
    1
  8386.  @_Painted  "We’re not at 2024 yet." Yup. Only 2 years of failure but I'm sure he will turn it around now. /s
    1
  8387.  @_Painted  " then I will consider that a failure and will factor that into my voting decisions in 2024 as well." You will tell yourself that the republican is worse and vote for the dem regardless of who it is or how bad they are. It's what you did when voting for biden and hillary right? Well I'm sure will do the same in 2024 just like bernie tells you to.
    1
  8388.  @_Painted  "I voted for a third party" Good for you. It's what you should be doing... always. "I did vote for Biden" LMFAO "worse than expected so far," More military spending than trump. More covid death under him than trump. More deportations than trump.
    1
  8389.  @_Painted  "I did vote for Biden" You are just the other side of the trump coin. You are all dupes.
    1
  8390.  @_Painted  "a Republican candidate..." LMFAO I mean you already voted for biden and he belongs there. I guess I shouldn't be surprised.
    1
  8391.  @_Painted  "he is doing a bit worse than expected so far" More covid death under biden than trump.
    1
  8392.  @_Painted  "he is doing a bit worse than expected so far" More deportations than trump. Cages are still there.
    1
  8393.  @_Painted  "he is doing a bit worse than expected so far," More military spending than trump.
    1
  8394.  @_Painted  "he is doing a bit worse than expected so far," More people have di ed from co vid under him compared to trump.
    1
  8395.  @_Painted  "he is doing a bit worse than expected so far," He's dep orted more people than trump and the cages are still there.
    1
  8396.  @_Painted  "Can I be frank?" Do you need permission? Are you normally not? "What do you want here?" To call out bernie for his BS. To wake you and/or people like you. "Are you trying to convince me to vote for Donald Trump?" LMFAO Have I even said his name? I tell people not to vote for trump for all the same reasons I tell them not to vote for biden. "I agree with his policies on social programs" In other words you are placated by his words when you should be looking at his voting record and looking at the people he tells you to vote for. "I believe that he actually cares about the well-being of the common person in America" That's why when he tells you to fall in line and vote blue no matter who you certainly will. This is what contro lled oppo sition wants you to think before it sells you out.
    1
  8397.  @_Painted  "I believe he hasn’t sold out to political corruption" Even when he votes for a pr ox y war? Even when he votes to support the M I C?
    1
  8398.  @_Painted  "I am at very least going to listen and consider what he has to say about the candidates who are running" Spoiler alert... He's going to tell you to vote for the "democratic" nominee no matter how abho rrent.
    1
  8399.  @_Painted  "Are you trying to convince me to vote for Donald Trump?" I haven't even said his name. I tell people not to vote for him for the same reasons I tell them they shouldn't vote for bernie's "good friend."
    1
  8400.  @_Painted  "I am at very least going to listen and consider what he has to say about the candidates who are running." Spoiler alert... Bernie sanders is going to tell you vote for whoever the blue team puts up. If they put up trump he would fall in line and tell you and everyone to vote for them.
    1
  8401.  @_Painted  "You never said which candidate you support or why." I don't want to tell you who you should be voting for. I'd rather tell you how you should be deciding to vote for and you can figure it out yourself... Vote for good. Someone YOU think is good. Some YOU do NOT describe as the "lesser evil." That's still evil. Vote for good and be willing to lose. People like trump and biden are not eligible and anyone who tells you that you that you should be voting for them are suspect.
    1
  8402.  @_Painted  "If you only believe in nihilism" I believe in voting for good. Biden, trump and their ilk are not good and should NEVER get anyones vote under any circumstances.
    1
  8403.  @ivandafoe5451  "You are being tiresome and fatally unrealistic." You are si mping for a politician when you should be holding their feet to the fire.
    1
  8404.  @ivandafoe5451  "It can ONLY be changed one nomination, one candidate, one vote and one representative at a time" Is this what you tell yourself when voting for a terrible person like Biden? So that you can feel good about it? You remind me of trump supporters. Fools, all of you.
    1
  8405.  @ivandafoe5451  "The Democrats have to be changed from being the lesser corrupted evil into the good by changing the party into one that represents the people, not the donors." And bernie will tell you to vote for them. And you will. Because you are a tool.
    1
  8406.  @ivandafoe5451  "The Democrats have to be changed" You are in an abusive relationship with people that aren't going to change. You are only enabling them.
    1
  8407.  @ivandafoe5451  "The Democrats have to be changed" Millions of people voted for trump knowing he was terrible. They just thought he was "less evil." You are the other side of that coin and together you make sure that the country will circle the drain forever.
    1
  8408.  @ivandafoe5451  "You are being tiresome" LMFAO That I'm the one being tiresome and not your dumpster fire party who has the presidency, house and senate is doing nothing for the peasants.
    1
  8409.  @ivandafoe5451  "impossible situation that America has gotten itself into...with 2 dominant bad parties." I have an idea... don't vote for them! And now it's not "impossible."
    1
  8410.  @ivandafoe5451  "Of course constantly voting for the lesser of evils is an unacceptable option...but NO ONE PERSON can change that by themselves." LMFAO Bernie isn't even trying. He tells you to vote for evil.
    1
  8411.  @ivandafoe5451  "Of course constantly voting for the lesser of evils is an unacceptable option...but NO ONE PERSON can change that by themselves." It's not bernie's fault for not being able to do this. It's bernie's fault for not trying.
    1
  8412. I don't forgive him. This isn't honest nor was his other BS. But he did a good job at torpedoing all credibility he had. He's a fraud. Best accept it.
    1
  8413. She saved her state from giving billions of dollars to Jeff Bezos.
    1
  8414. Ste regarding, "I think the idea of reforming the Democratic Party is currently a desperately hopeful and almost unattainable ideal" I have no illusions that this is going to be easy. It won't be. The establishment will do anything and everything to stop it. They would rather lose to republicans than lose to progressives but I am convinced it is very possible, in part, because we have a not so secret weapon in Bernie Sanders. Regarding, "that will hopefully occur during the midterms." No shot although there is reason to be hopeful that some progressives can win some elections. But the party leadership is going to continue to be a dumpster fire until 2020. Regarding, "The current corporate establishment members of the DNC need to go, they don't deserve to be there." I very much agree. The only way I can see this happening is by getting a true progressive to win the nomination in 2020. The nominee holds immense power to fill positions, make reforms, and shape the direction of the party. Part of the reason why the party is currently so fucking terrible is because Hillary "won" the nomination in 2016. As long as we get the right leader in 2020 they get to pick a progressive chair, who picks the people under them and so on. Corporate dems could be purged the same way progressives were purged but to do this we need a progressive as the nominee. Sadly until then the party is going to continue to be soulless.
    1
  8415. I'm surprised anyone buys his BS anymore. Don't forget to vote blue no matter who like bernie tells you to.
    1
  8416. Speaking of corrupt organizations why do you think isn't on the main channel?
    1
  8417. Regarding, "I thought we didn't care about Obama being close to Bernie. I certainly don't. Obama scammed us out of the change he promised." Obama's presidency was a disaster. That said him being an ally is preferable to him being an enemy as much as possible. I don't trust him and think he is working behind the scenes to stop Bernie. But I want it to, at the very least, stay behind the scenes.
    1
  8418. You don't even try to correct him because you are projecting.
    1
  8419.  @DailyHit319  America pays TWICE as much as the rest of the world per person for health care. You are an idiot.
    1
  8420.  @DailyHit319  Good lord you are stupid beyond words. You pay twice as much as everyone else you fucking dipshit because you are too fucking stupid to comprehend why it costs so much. I hope you are being paid to be an idiot.
    1
  8421.  @DailyHit319  You are so busy being a selfish prick you don't stop to realize that your being that selfish prick is costing you more than anyone else in the world for the same shit. If only you were significantly smarter than you are... then you might be smart enough to realize you are an idiot.
    1
  8422. If Tulsi didn't have that moment where she put Tim Ryan in place her entire night would have been a total trainwreck. Thank goodness she managed that moment.
    1
  8423. @J G Don't worry, comprehension skills aren't for everyone.
    1
  8424. @J G I guess it's not surprising that you wouldn't be ashamed of your stupidity.
    1
  8425. @J G I find myself imagining you living in the 1940s saying, when the conversation is about Hitler and using moronic capitalization, "Hitler is Better than Satan" as if that is a valid point when in reality you would only be making an ass of yourself and spouting irrelevant nonsense... just like you did here.
    1
  8426. @J G Thanks for reiterating that you have no comprehension skills to speak of not that it was necessary. Most people are embarrassed when they can't comprehend simple concepts but you don't even have the intelligence for that do you? I wish you good luck. You are going to need it.
    1
  8427. @J G LMAO. I take that as a compliment considering the source so thanks dipshit.
    1
  8428. @J G Nope. Just frustrated to have to share the planet with morons like you. For example I write, "LMAO" and your conclusion is that I'm mad... because you are an idiot.
    1
  8429. *pathetic
    1
  8430. Jennifer being part of the "democratic" party is why I want no part of it.
    1
  8431. She is not a corporate dem. She is a Sanders supporter working within in the party. I understand why you are pissed but the bottom line is that she can't come out and say, "the system is fucked. We are fucking people over," because then she loses the opportunity she has to try and make it better because the bottom line is that, despite any reforms they do make for the better, it is not going to be perfect or even good after the fact.
    1
  8432. Regarding, "her attitude is 'we are not going to get to a place where....' and that is the problem" Look, I agree that it is a problem that they are not going to be going as far as they should with reform but "we are not going to get to a place where" is not "attitude." That is acknowledging reality. And the reality of the matter is, despite it sucking and being wrong, is that superdelegates are not going to be disappearing at the moment no matter how much all 3 of us (including her) think they should. Yes she polished that turd. Unfortunately that is a prerequisite to work in the party. Regarding, "the dems - they refuse to acknowledge that nothing short of root and branch reforms are what is needed to stop the electoral losses." I'm sorry to be the bearer of bad news but the fact of the matter is that they (the corporate dems) don't care about losing as much as they care about maintaining the status quo and keeping their power and control of the party.
    1
  8433. Regarding, "why can't she come out and say 'the system is fucked' ?" She can. She chooses not to because she then loses the opportunity she has to make the system better. And is it really that important that she say the system is fucked? Do you not realize it is fucked? I certainly do and don't need her to tell me it is to realize it. Those that are not woken to the fact that the system is fucked are not going to be woke if she does come out and say it. You have to pick your battles.
    1
  8434. Mega regarding, "She's a worthless corporate sellout." I'm betting you think that about everyone who isn't you. I'm betting you said the same shit about Sanders when he endorsed Hillary. I kinda understand where you are coming from. Corporate sellouts are everywhere in our government. But you need to realize that there are a few people that are working for you and when they come around you would be wise to support them instead of smear them. Otherwise no one will be interested in helping you.
    1
  8435. Mega you are right to be pissed at corporate dems but you need to look a little closer at people. You can't think you know everything about someone because they use a tactic you disagree with. You need to dig a little deeper. I agree with almost everything you say but smearing her because she doesn't go out here and publicly say superdelegates are bullshit is shortsighted.
    1
  8436.  @SlackerU  You must realize the parties would change overnight if they weren't being flooded with money thou right? Take out the legalized bribes and they will start caring about the people and their votes. Yours is but an example of how money in politics is the overarching problem creating and enabling all the others.
    1
  8437.  @SlackerU Regarding, " Taking money out would make changes but it secures nothing." Ask yourself this question, why are the major parties the dumpster fires they are? It seriously is not because they are, "Private Corporation with no legal requirement to count votes," it's because they are corporate tools selling their souls for money. They wouldn't make themselves that way, nor would the courts defend them for it, if it weren't for all the money. Regarding, "Taking money out would make changes but it secures nothing." You can say this about problems like health care, the MIC, education, criminal justice and literally every problem out there but the fact of the matter is that if you remove the money in politics those problems can effectively be addressed. It's the money fucking EVERYTHING up. That's the underlying cause. All other problems are the symptom of that.
    1
  8438.  @Catloves997  Regarding, "Doug Ford" Fair point I guess. I'm not an expert on Canadian politics but as an outsider on the topic I concede I have no real understanding how the fuck that guy could be elected.
    1
  8439.  @kaulthelegend  Wouldn't ranked choice ballots help address that problem? Wouldn't that have prevented Doug Ford?
    1
  8440.  @Catloves997  Regarding, "My proposed system is much closer to straight up communism." Yup. And I'm not interested. Forgive me for not going balls deep into everything you have said.
    1
  8441.  @Nikki-oe7gr  Regarding, "I loved that Bernie rejected the premise of the question." While I agree with pretty much everything you said, and even agree that the premise of the question and the question was bad, I disagree that he should have rejected it there when he knows he doesn't have time to elaborate. It's just not a good look for presidential candidates to do this because it looks like they are trying to dodge the question to lots of the public IMO even if he is ultimately correct.
    1
  8442.  @MultiRusty9  What a remarkably uncompelling "argument."
    1
  8443.  @BMoser-bv6kn  I feel like that is what justice democrats are trying to do. Our job is to put pressure on politicians and make perfectly clear 1) how important getting money out of politics is to us 2) that we press them to make their position on the topic clear and 3) that we will hold them to that position and 4) that we are going to vote based on the issue. We do have power. It's called our votes. Use them. Don't just sit on the sidelines. If both major party candidates are bought then find a 3rd party candidate who isn't.
    1
  8444.  @MultiRusty9  Regarding, "name a politician who has been honest and never "flip flopped"? They dont exist." Does a complete fucking moron such as yourself at least understand that they are moving the goalposts by a fucking mile with this? Look dipshit, the thing you don't seem to understand is that politicians go with who gets them in office. And by "gets them in office" I don't mean who votes for them, although it should. It means who pays for their campaign. Politicians who get into office because of the people represent the people while politicians who get into office because of big money and corporations represent big money and corporations. Even a complete fucking moron such as yourself should understand a concept this simple. Sadly you won't will you.
    1
  8445.  proud American  If I could vote for King Dipshit you would have my vote. Your comments are so remarkably stupid they almost cause me physical pain to read them. We need negative IQ points to describe people such as yourself.
    1
  8446.  @MultiRusty9  Are you intentionally trying to destroy my faith in humanity with your mindless drivel? If so it's working.
    1
  8447.  @MultiRusty9  But you know what... I could use a good laugh at your stupidity. Please elaborate why "there are no politicians looking out for the little guy" is a logical conclusion. Because you have offered no evidence whatsoever to try and support this claim and are merely mindlessly asserting it.
    1
  8448.  @MultiRusty9 Because we live in a world where providing education, providing health care, capping interest rates on predatory lenders, ending wars, protecting the environment, reforming the criminal justice system, breaking up the banks, and so much more, stuff the people you are smearing like the mindless fuck you are, would help the little guy and are things the little guy wants. Please enlighten me thou as to what I'm not getting. Why aren't those people, fighting for those things that would help the little guy, not for the little guy? I want to be smart like you. Please feel free to add some insults. I find those fucking hilarious coming from people such as yourself.
    1
  8449. "Nothing will change." That's what people like sam want... who tell you to vote blue no matter who. Who will shame you if you don't vote for the guy who promises to his big money donors that "nothing will fundamentally change." Sam is a sheep herder.
    1
  8450.  @glen7228  " If I remember right, Sam Seder and TMR were not exactly rah rah Biden supporters" LMFAO Sam and his clowns absolutely told everyone to vote blue no matter who. It's what they ALWAYS do when it matters and people are voting. Sam tells you how mad trump makes him but if trump were representing the dems in a general sam would not only tell you to vote for him but he would shame you if you didn't because he'd call trump the lesser evil. It's what he ALWAYS does in general elections. "Biden over Trump was pretty much a no brainer, don't you think?" Nope. I think trump is the lesser evil... not that it matters. I don't vote for evil. Period. And neither should you.
    1
  8451.  @glen7228  Not a single reply can be seen by anyone other than us. "Land of the free" am I right? Speaking of censorship sam thinks joe ro gan should be censored.
    1
  8452.  @glen7228  "So you're saying it's better to not participate at all" Nope. There are always more options than two corrupt parties to pick from. I say vote for good. "How does that accomplish anything?" It more constructive than voting for people that I know are terrible. There are millions of people who voted for trump knowing he's a POS. Don't be the other side of that idiot coin. "Trump would be better for the country" There were less covid deaths under trump. There was less military spending under trump. Trump would be better when it comes to dealing with russia. Imagine that... I'd trust trump more than biden and his dementia. "Your whole argument about Sam Seder telling people to vote Blue no matter what is just BS." It's fact. If it's not you can you please point to a single election where sam didn't tell people to vote for a dem in a general... I'll wait forever because you can't. "He saying vote Blue, because it's the better choice" He will straight up tell you you are voting for corrupt POS. Does it really matter if that's "less evil." Because that's the argument he makes. He tells you that you need to vote for the lesser evil. Sorry not sorry if the truth hurts.
    1
  8453.  @glen7228  "WTF are you talking about, you're all over the place." LMFAO I'm doing my absolute best to address all of your terrible points as you are making them. "Stay on point, finish one debate before starting a new one." LMFAO Is that what you think you are doing? "Do you want to discuss censorship?" I can. My point at large is that sam is terrible and that is an example of him proving it. "Tell me your feelings on Florida's "Don't say gay" laws" Are you the same guy who was saying stay on point in this very post? And now you are doing this? Is the hypocrisy intentional?
    1
  8454.  @glen7228  "Stay on point." My point is that sam sucks and I've been laser focused on that. Your comprehension problems are not my fault.
    1
  8455.  @stdesy  "I see your reply" Some of them... starting with the one where I called out the censorship. But that wasn't my first comment. Count how many you can see and compare that to the number that youtube tells you is there and note the difference. It's censorship.
    1
  8456.  @glen7228  "I'm starting to think you're having two conversations." You are clearly continuing to think silly things. "What point of mine" What? I'm suppose to be making your points? That's not how it works. I'm making my point and telling you exactly what it is. "Nothing about that has anything to do with what we were talking about" Again... I'm talking about sam and why he's terrible. Censorship is another way to do it. Real leftists believe in free speech. Sam isn't a real leftist. He's controlled opposition meant to sheep herd you into a corrupt, warmongering, right wing, "democratic" party. "So there it is, you don't like Sam Seder." Go on you. You figured this out even after I made it perfectly clear. Bravo. "You haven't addressed a single one of my points" Your OP starts with, "Nothing will change..." as if you want things to change right? Well I'm trying to tell you why you are listening to the wrong person. Sam is doing great. He has lots of money. He doesn't care if things change. He'd prefer it if things stay the way they are because as it is he'd doing fine. "you've made some senseless statements" LMFAO I can't make you smarter than you are. They all make perfect sense and I'm even telling you why. If you can't understand that's on you. "haven't backed any of them up with any kind of explanations" LMFAO Me doing this despite your BS, "can you please point to a single election where sam didn't tell people to vote for a dem in a general... I'll wait forever because you can't." Not only have I explained myself but I've given you a way to intelligently address what I'm saying. Instead you are doing this and ignoring my point and rhetorical question. "how about we start with why you don't like Sam Seder," LMFAO I'm doing my best to tell you. How about you try to address my points the way I'm doing for yours instead? "other than you don't like him telling people to vote Blue, or is that it?" Let's say that was my only reason. Would that not be enough? FYI dems have the presidency, house and senate and things aren't changing. Don't you want things to change or not?
    1
  8457. "Our law makers are all comfortable wealthy people, living comfortable wealthy lives." You are also describing sam. Who tells you to vote for his POS comfortable, wealthy lawmakers of the blue team. Good luck with sam. Good luck getting any change. You are a sheep and sam is leading you to slaughter.
    1
  8458.  @glen7228  "I was asking you to make your own points," I already had. And instead of addressing them you are claiming I'm not making any. It's wasting my time. "putting things in quotation marks" I do this to tell you exactly what I'm addressing. "cryptic statement and expecting me to read your mind" LMFAO I'm being as clear as I can. Again, I can't fix your comprehension problems. "You're making a lot of assumptions about who I am and who I listen to." LMFAO You don't think it's fair of me to assume you listen to sam? While you are commenting on sams message board? I'm having a tough time taking you seriously. I legit hope you are just trolling. "My original comment had absolutely nothing to do with Sam Seder did it?" LMFAO I don't really care either way. "I don't know why you decided to jump in and act like I'm some idiot" You do keep acting like an idiot. You do have seem to have an impossible time understanding even the simplest of points. "doing as I'm told" LMFAO Actions speak louder than words. Look at your OP, "comfortable wealthy people, living comfortable wealthy lives." Do you only care about this when talking about politicians? Or maybe you should also care about this when talking about sam? Like I'm pointing out. Like I'm arguing. And just putting your fingers in your ears doesn't make that point go away. Address it or don't. But don't pretend like I'm not making an argument. "I can't see how my comment implied that," You comment implies you should care about all the things I'm pointing out about sam. I'll just figure you are a hypocrite who doesn't care about any of it. You are just virtue signaling. My mistake. I thought you cared if things changed. I thought you cared if someone was rich and it was changing their perspective. It's clear to me now you really don't. "I don't think he's a shill for the corporate Democrats" Which is why I'm trying to wake you the f up. Every election he tells you to vote for those corporate dems. Because they are less evil. Nevermind that they are evil... sam will tell you to vote for them. And you will won't you? "Just because a person is wealthy, doesn't mean they're corrupt or disingenuous." Have you talked to the person who wrote your OP? The one who said, "Our law makers are all comfortable wealthy people, living comfortable wealthy lives. Even the progressives lose touch..." What happened to that guy who seemed to care about that sort of thing? "I'm not even sure he's a Democrat." LMFAO He's been a pundit for a really long time. Whose advocated for lots of politicians. If he's not a dem then you should be able to cite at least one general election where he didn't advocate for the dem. Of course he's a dem. What is wrong with you? "vote for the person who you think will do the best job" LMFAO You both voted for joe biden right? I know sam did but so did you right? You think he's the best person for the job? The corrupt guy? Who proudly wrote the crime bill? Who voted for the Iraq war? Who would veto m4a if it made it's way to his desk? Who wants a ministry of truth? That's the guy you think would do the best job? LMFAO You CLEARLY listen to too much sam. "real leftist" Real leftist care about corruption and money in politics. We care about the enviornment and don't want fracking. We want peace and to stop giving money to the MIC. We want to defund the police so that money can be used for other priorities. I want criminal justice reform and more. The dems are obstacles to ALL of that. But if you listen to too much sam you will think you need to vote for them anyway.
    1
  8459.  @glen7228  "I am interested in what you think a real leftist is." One last thing to add but it's not about being a leftist... it's about being a person. I believe in paragraphs. Learn about them and use them.
    1
  8460.  @glen7228  I wrote you a novel but youtube is censoring it for others. If you can't see it so be. I'm not wasting more time of mine trying to repeat it for you. I'll just have to let the censors win that one.
    1
  8461.  @glen7228  "That's a cop out. Simply answer the questions I asked without writing a novel" LMFAO Sorry not sorry a novel isn't good enough for you. "Which party has consistently voted against change and protecting big money's influence on policy makers?" LMFAO Both major parties. Obviously. "How would Trump have been a better choice than Biden?" Most importantly we wouldn't be fighting the same proxy war with russia and wouldn't be implementing sanctions that are raising the cost of fuel and crushing americans. If trump were president you would care about all the people the US is deporting. While biden does it you don't care. "Are you saying it's better to not participate rather than pick a side?" Not once. I say pick the side of good. And neither major party represents it. I say lots and lots and lots of things. Too much maybe. Address the things I actually say instead of doing this. "What do you think it is to be a real leftist?" They believe in money out of politics, giving peace a chance, protecting the environment, universal health care, and more. They support all the things that dems are obstacles to achieving much like republicans. "Those are simple questions, no need to write a book" You can't even comprehend simple answers. I'm going to say what I want to say. You are going to be triggered and confused regardless. "you have a point about posts not showing up." Just like I have a point that sam supports censorship. "Are you saying those posts are being censored?" I am. Or would you like to propose an alternative theory? I could use a good laugh.
    1
  8462.  @glen7228  "Simply answer the questions" I even wasted more time on you answering your terrible questions. If you can't see them it's not my fault. But you will call it a "cop out" because you are stupid. I'm done caring and done wasting my time trying.
    1
  8463.  @glen7228  "That's a cop out." I answered your questions again. It's not my fault if you can't see it. How much time do you think I should waste on you?
    1
  8464.  @glen7228  "Why so hostile" Among other things I'm literally being censored. "maybe that's what's getting your posts deleted." Among the posts that can't be seen by others is yours... the one where you start off writing, "Biden has always been a moderate corporate owned Democrat..." Is that why you think this comment of yours is being censored? Or is it because they have some trigger words that's setting off the bot doing the censoring?
    1
  8465.  @glen7228  "I promise you fuel prices would be right where they are now even if Trump was president, probably higher. And if you're so smart, tell me why I'm wrong." LMFAO FYI trump was already president for 4 years and we know what the fuel prices were before him. We should also know why the prices are going up. And there is good reason to think that trump wouldn't have made the same mistakes. I mean he might have. But I KNOW what biden IS doing and it's terrible.
    1
  8466.  @glen7228  You: "Why so hostile" " From this little exchange of ours, I can tell you are very hard to get along with. One of those people who thinks they're the smartest person in the room." Also you: "I think you're a poser." I admit I'm condescending and mean but I'm not a hypocrite about it like you are.
    1
  8467.  @glen7228  "you are obviously the only person you listen to" LMFAO I'm literally addressing YOUR words. I can only do that after I listen. But tell yourself whatever you need to tell yourself.
    1
  8468.  @glen7228  "You tell yourself whatever you need to tell yourself, because you are obviously the only person you listen to." This is funny because those are the words you were using to not answer my questions and to run away.
    1
  8469.  @glen7228  I went out of my to answer your question even when they were terrible. You don't even attempt to answer mine. You are a coward.
    1
  8470.  @glen7228  I noticed that there is suppose to be a new reply but I can't see it and assume it was yours. Don't cop out. Type it again.
    1
  8471.  @glen7228  I can't see number 33 either. It's your fault. Don't cop out.
    1
  8472.  @glen7228  35 is another no show. Don't cop out.
    1
  8473.  @glen7228  Have you calmed down yet? Just remember that if your message isn't showing it's your fault, according to you. Don't cop out now.
    1
  8474.  @glen7228  "It took you 4 hours to come up with that?" It took you 6 hours to come up with this? LMFAO "surely you can do better." Clearly you can't do better. Clearly you are just avoiding answering simple and direct questions. It's funny. Thanks for the laugh.
    1
  8475.  @glen7228  "Where'd you go?" LMFAO I've been here all alone. Are you ok? "Here I am ready to answer simple and direct questions" LMFAO What are you waiting for? This is funny because you are literally not answering any of my questions. Really, are you ok?
    1
  8476.  @glen7228  "I'm not avoiding or copping out" In reality you are not answering simple and direct questions. According to you that is "copping out." "or being censored," LMFAO You absolutely are. If you want to know what comments can or cannot be seen take a look at the thread while you are signed out. You can't even figure this out. If you can't get your facts straight your opinions are rightfully ignored. "when you come up with your simple and direct questions let me know" LMFAO They were the words followed by question marks that you already have not answered.
    1
  8477.  @glen7228  "or being censored" You are. If you want to know which comments of yours can be read and which are being censored you can check by looking at the thread while not signed in. If you can't get your facts straight your opinions are rightfully ignored.
    1
  8478.  @glen7228  "when you come up with your simple and direct questions let me know" LMFAO Look for question marks... as if you care. I won't hold my breathe waiting for you to answer any of the questions you dodged.
    1
  8479.  @glen7228  "Oh I did go look, way back when you first accused me of not answering." Did you? And you still don't know what a question is? And you still didn't answer any? Is this like you looking to see if you were being censored and getting it wrong? Like I said people who can't get the facts straight have opinions that are rightfully ignored so that's what I'm doing. I've wasted FAR too much time on you. I'm done making that mistake. You want some questions to answer try these.... were you being censored? You were. So were you demonstrating that you don't understand the world in which you exist when you said you weren't? Again... you were. So I'm going to treat you like it. Goodbye.
    1
  8480.  @glen7228  "YouTube has rules" The country has rules about free speech. Youtube has censorship. Of course a fan of sam can't tell the difference. You can't get your facts straight.
    1
  8481.  @glen7228  " Imagine what it would be like if they didn't moderate their content." It would be a free speech platform that would still be subject to laws such as defamation. FYI I'm not really talking to you anymore. I'm only talking at you from this point.
    1
  8482. Imagine calling censorship, "moderate their content." What a boot licker you are.
    1
  8483.  @glen7228  "I still think it is odd that you seemed to know what I said in my posts that you claimed you weren't seeing." Sometimes youtube sends a notification but not always. I still think it's odd how little you understand the world in which you exist, unless you are being intentionally obtuse.
    1
  8484.  @glen7228  "never my job to figure out that posts were missing" Is that how you rationalize your LIE? It's your job to not lie if you want to be taken seriously.
    1
  8485. Do the labels really matter? It's about policy.
    1
  8486.  @msmanchez626  "Make conclusions on the info for your self." That is clearly what the OP is doing. If they weren't making the decision for themself they would just mindless excuse that hack the way you are. "You are part of the problem. You would take part in book burning" You are part of the problem. And you can tell by how you immediately strawman the argument. No one is advocating burning books but that is certainly an easier than addressing the arguments actually being made to you. You are part of the problem.
    1
  8487.  @GTA5Player1  Go watch Jimmy Dore. He breaks down in perfect detail why ryan grimm is a hack.
    1
  8488. LMFAO. I hope you don't actually believe the shit you say.
    1
  8489.  @savstradamus3996  Regarding, "when in fact many people have valid strong criticisms of her." You mean like you aren't even attempting to do?
    1
  8490.  @larrybgood3923  Regarding, "since when is legitimate criticism smearing?" You mean like the people in this thread that have straight out lied about her record? Yeah... that's smearing. That's not legitimate criticism. Regarding, "You can shoot the messenger but you can’t kill the message. If you can’t defend your viewpoint without engaging in name calling (smearing) then I can only assume you know you’re wrong but can’t admit it. " Name calling is not smearing when it's true. Is it a "smear" when I call a flat earther a moron? Of course not. You are just being an idiot. Smears are when someone is lying. Again... what exactly what people have done in this thread. You can shoot the messenger but you can't change reality. If you can't defend YOUR viewpoint without bothering to give any facts like you haven't then you are a complete waste of time. Why I even addressed you is beyond me.
    1
  8491.  @larrybgood3923  I don't just call you an idiot. I also tell you exactly why you are an idiot. And your being an idiot proves my point.
    1
  8492. What a cunt Todd is.
    1
  8493.  @Mydogslove2laugh  "only punches left?" As if either major bought party can call themselves the "left." "he's a grifter." Because he has the audacity to call out corruption in the "democratic" party? That's not how it works and not what the word means.
    1
  8494.  @357-swagnumultramagax9  "jimmy is fraud" I once was blind but now I see. Thank you so much for this. You are very wise, breathtakingly good looking, a satisfying lover, and this is totally not sarcasm.
    1
  8495.  @Mydogslove2laugh  "he never calls anyone else out." Which is simply not true. He would also add the problem as he sees it is that there isn't an actual left party in the country. "Never criticizes the right." He also doesn't praise the right. And if you need to be told that trump is terrible you can go literally anywhere else in the world. Which makes your comment of, "you can only take so much of the same BS" funny AF. Jimmy is different.
    1
  8496.  @elsagrace3893  regarding, "there is nothing to do about it." Since when have Americans adopted the, we are fucked and their is nothing that can be done when problems arise mentality? Regarding, "US citizens both Democrats and Republicans, conservatives and liberals want to keep their guns." US citizens, both Democrats and Republicans, conservatives and liberals want UNIVERSAL BACKGROUND CHECKS. Regarding, "The right to bear arms is in the constitution for good reason." It is an antiquated document written in the time of muskets that has little to nothing to do with what is going on now. It can be taken out of the constitution the same way it was put in... with an amendment.
    1
  8497. MAGA and blue MAGA are both cults.
    1
  8498. Thulyblu regarding, "that's probably because people don't go out of their way to find out how far the relation goes" Huh? Are you saying that Rudy maybe just didn't know he was fucking his 2nd cousin? Regarding, "it's INEVITABLE that EVERYBODY is related to you to some degree" You keep saying this like it is really important and relevant. You even chose to put some it in all caps so it must be important. But if it were so important than couldn't this "logic" be used to justify brothers and sisters getting it on? I concede this point. I just don't think it at all relevant to the discussion. Regarding, "You could also do that on the grounds of him being gay if he was gay" If I thought being gay was morally question but I don't. I do think that 2nd cousin is morally questionable even if I have barely given it much of a thought til today. When I looked at research I was surprised there wasn't convincing overwhelming evidence that 2nd cousin was very dangerous for their kids. That said it does seem that, to at least some degree it is more dangerous than looking further outside the family which, like I've said many times, think is bad for other reasons as well. Regarding, "Just know that it's actually not really really valid criticism." Meh. Although my mind is more open to the idea I still it is wrong. And is it really that important? For example I'm not telling people they shouldn't be fucking half the population like some. I'm telling them they shouldn't be fucking a couple dozen more people than you (plus or minus depending on the family) because, in part, healthy kids is pretty fucking important to me even if that percentage isn't as high as I was assuming before the day started.
    1
  8499. Kavian regarding, "Who gives a fuck?" Most people I know. Regarding, "Albert Einstein married his cousin, Charles Darwin married his cousin." Still I'm pretty sure both Einstein and Darwin would concede that this is not considered a logical argument but rather an anecdote that doesn't consider a changing world. Regarding, "Why doesn't anyone talk about that morality of that?" You just did. It is talked about. But you conflate something like that which does not have a simple solution to someone who wants to have kids with one that obviously does and that simple solution is don't fuck your cousin and go outside the family to reproduce. Regarding, "why don't we ask those people to stop getting married and breed too?" Are you intentionally trying to compare apples and oranges or do you really not see how these topics are totally fucking different? Seriously... fuck you. And I wasn't trying to be serious. I just wanted to come here and make a joke but you fuckers need to make fucking cousins your crusade.
    1
  8500. Kavian I'd be a hypocrite if I had a problem with you saying, "fuck you too," for the sake of you saying it. I don't. I do have a problem with hypocrisy thou. If you want to say things like "I didn't make any personal attacks" and "you need to chill" you probably shouldn't have opened with that because seems pretty obviously hypocritical to me. And in the future if you want to avoid personal attacks from me then you shouldn't be saying stupid as fuck things. I really shouldn't need to tell you how the topic at hand is completely different than "women over 34."
    1
  8501. Kavian regarding, "How is it different?" Ok. I guess I'll do my best to explain the obvious to you even thou I think it is pretty absurd that I need to. The question I'm concerned with is how do we, as a society, do everything possible to make sure that people who want children are able to do so healthily (within reason). When you bring up "women over 34" even thou it has nothing to do with the conversation at hand, the "solution" would be to not allow them to have children. Period. With anyone. There is no way to make them younger than 34. This conversation isn't about telling a group of people that they can't have children, period, with anyone, but rather that they shouldn't be having children with their cousin because of an increased risk to their kids. There is a way to not have cousins fucking. The OBVIOUS difference is that I'm not trying to tell people they can't have kids at all, which would be the logical conclusion of your "point," but rather that they should going the extra mile to make sure that if they are going to have kids that their kids are healthy. Being 34 is not a choice. Fucking your cousin is a choice. How can you really not get that without me spelling it out?
    1
  8502. Derp Jesus, cool spam jerkoff. That picture is exactly how I imagine you look.... but dumber.
    1
  8503. Kavian regarding, "having a child over 40 IS a choice" No shit. I love how you think this is brilliant when in fact it demonstrates that you are going to completely ignore the point. I'm not looking to take away anyones ability to be able to choose to have kids away. I'm looking to ensure that people who make that choice are doing everything possible to have healthy kids. How is that not clear? Regarding, "I'm not buying the whole it's bad "just because of genetics"" Oh really. What was your first clue? Was it, in fact because of the other reasons I am against it that I've already stated per chance? Regarding, "What if two cousins just casually fuck without ever wanting to have a child?" I'm against it. For the same reasons I'm against brothers and sisters wanting to casually fuck. Do you use this same argument to try and justify that? I'm betting not because I suspect you know the argument is stupid. Regarding, "I bet my last dollar that you still think it's wrong because you're biased and were taught it's disgusting by the society and you're unable to think for yourself." I love how because I have a different opinion than yours it is because I'm "biased" and because I can't think for myself. Don't be afraid to actually read what I've written before saying stupid shit. Like I've said and will repeat I've barely given this topic a thought before this conversation. And now that I have given it more thought I'm still against it. We live in a world with BILLIONS of people. And I don't think it is unreasonable to want people to look outside their family for people to bump uglies with. Regarding, "I suggest to work your anger issues and hostility" Thanks for setting the example. I'm always sure to take this type of advice from someone who tells me to fuck off. Since we are offering each other advice I suggest you work on not being such a hypocrite and moron. Bye.
    1
  8504. Kavian regarding, "I never told you to fuck off" You got me. It was, "Fuck you too." That is way different. But thanks again for proving that you are an idiot. FYI I'm not at all angry with you at the moment. I'd need to actually care what you think for that.
    1
  8505. I agree that Citizens United needs to go and it exacerbated the problem but understand that money in politics was a problem before it.
    1
  8506.  @v_enceremos  Dude I don't really give a flying fuck what stupid reasons you think deflecting from this is reasonable... it isn't to the sane. We have a president crying like a bitch about free speech. That is news worthy and relevant despite whatever shit you want to say.
    1
  8507. I literally just got done writing this to someone else. I'm lazy so I'm just copy and pasting it. I seriously do not care about term limits. They are not the problem. The problem is money in politics. If politicians were not selling their soul you wouldn't care if they stick around... like Bernie Sanders. Big money doesn't have a problem with term limits as there are plenty of up and comers willing to sell their soul. Your "solution" only serves to increase the rate the revolving door turns, nothing more. Forget about term limits and focus on getting money out of politics.
    1
  8508.  @mehwhyausername1  Regarding, "basically, we're on the page" I have little doubt of this. Unfortunately I tend to focus on the areas of disagreement I have but don't let that fool you to think I don't think we are the same team. I have no doubt we are. But I am going to nitpick the one are where we aren't on the same page and where we disagree in my opinion. First off I understand why so many progressives like the idea of term limits. They see terrible politicians getting elected over and over and over and they want to do something about it. Term limits seems like a way to address this and so it gains quite a bit of traction in progressive circles. The problem with this to me is first it distracts from the real solution of getting money out of politics. Second it's treating the symptoms of the problem rather then the disease (I feel that Trump would be another example of this to some, more so outside the progressive ring but he too in my opinion is a symptom of our dysfunctional system and isn't the cause. And lastly it has unintended consequences that they don't really think about that are quite detrimental in my opinion. I think term limits only hurts us in the long run because our champions are more important to us and I want them to be able to stick around for as long as they possibly can. The terrible politicians who get to stick around for 30 years aren't special people. They don't get reelected because of anything good they are doing. That means that the next sellout after them is going to have no trouble replicating their success. The powers that be just give their money to a different terrible person who also isn't special and nothing changes. Instead of one terrible politician over 30 years you get several terrible politicians over the same period of time. That's hardly a win because terrible politicians are a dime a dozen. But the truly great progressive champions are rare and when they come around it's important to me they be allowed to stick around. FDR had some major problems and did some highly questionable things (Japanese interment camps is the first thing that comes to mind) but overall he did some really epic great things and there is a good reason why the public didn't want him to go. I'm fine with that. I prefer it actually. I want Bernie Sanders to be able to keep his job as long as he wants. I want one of progressives newest heroes, AOC, who is incredibly young, to be able to keep her seat as long as she wants it and as long as she keeps fighting for all the right things they way I think she is doing now. Term limits hurt us more than it hurts them in my opinion. At best I think it's neutral overall, hurting us as much as it hurts them. Because the real impact in my opinion about term limits is that it affects the incumbency bias. Because being an incumbent helps whoever has it, way more then it should. It does help the terrible candidate whose been in office for a long time. It's just no a game changer to them in my opinion the way it is for us. So that's why I think term limits are actually a bad thing. But more than that I want to focus on the thing I know is game changer. The one thing that I know would revolutionize our government and change things for the better. I want us to focus on getting money out of politics. I know it's kind of our mantra and already talked about quite a bit, but it's preached by our side for good reason. Peace.
    1
  8509. The US government is not your friend.
    1
  8510.  @kevinm3751  I'm not religious but I really the message of the serenity prayer. I'm not advocating for ignorance but ignorance is bliss and when it comes to things like this there really isn't much you can do about it.
    1
  8511.  @markbrodie48  "trumpy baby got elected" Whatever you gotta tell yourself to rationalize voting for a guy who is just as terrible as trump.
    1
  8512.  @markbrodie48  "it’s called splitting the vote" What splitting what vote? Both trump and biden are right wing corporate clowns that literally no one should vote for.
    1
  8513.  @markbrodie48  "would have meant that trumpy baby got elected …it’s called splitting the vote" You would vote for trump if he were representing your blue team and pat yourself on the back for it because the other guy would be "worse."
    1
  8514. @yumpladukfoo It's definitely not not the mustache. Yes... it's the mustache.
    1
  8515.  @iga279  "she is a true dinosaur" She is old. But dinosaurs went extinct and there are plenty of people to take nancy spot after she's gone. Nancy used to say she supported universal health care back in the day... just like her successor and fellow shill AOC.
    1
  8516.  @regmcg4171  "She was one of JFK’s interns" She was on the grassy nole.
    1
  8517.  @joshuabuell2097  "he was studying medicine" Are you 100 percent sure the guy with a bunch of hidden dead bodies isn't a cereal killer?
    1
  8518. Um... no.
    1
  8519.  @InsekiJisatsu  "to a girl" I find it funny how you are calling a women a "girl." It's pretty disgusting.
    1
  8520. Nope. The correct answer to, "Do you support abolishing private insurance?" is YES. I support abolishing private insurance because corporations making money off of sick people is sick.
    1
  8521.  @willwright2099  Regarding, "that is NOT what Both #MedicareForAll bills do!" I'm not talking about the M4A bill. I'm talking about what we, as progressives, should be fighting for. I'm talking about what our goals should be and ending private health insurance absolutely should be our goal because they are soulless institutions that have no place in our society. STOP MAKING EXCUSES AND RATIONALIZATIONS FOR THEIR EXISTENCE. They should have as much place in our society as for profit private prison industries. IE NONE.
    1
  8522.  @willwright2099  Holy fuck. I am not talking about the M4A bill. I don't know how to make that anymore clear.
    1
  8523.  @Tsukasa2727  So what is the punchline of that "joke" suppose to be?
    1
  8524.  @Tsukasa2727  You think the narcissist was making fun of himself? Really? LMFAO
    1
  8525.  @Tsukasa2727  When has trump ever made fun of himself before this?
    1
  8526.  @Tsukasa2727  Regarding, "I didn't realize every joke someone made had to have a precedent" This is your BS story. I'm just looking for you to try and justify it intelligently. The dude is a narcissist. They don't make fun of themselves. Regarding, "I know its hard for someone like you to believe anything other than the worst possible interpretation of what Trump says" Nah. It's just that I'm going to believe my "lying eyes" over your bullshit.
    1
  8527.  @Tsukasa2727  Regarding, "I didn't realize you were a doctor," I never said I was. Regarding, "did you examine and diagnose him in person yourself?" Examine, as in watch.... yeah I have. Do I have to be "in person" while doctors don't even do that these days? Regarding, "I thought not." Keep in mind that you think what you do because you are stupid. Regarding, "So there isn't any basis to claim he that cannot make fun of himself." LMFAO. Yeah. And there is no room to claim that Joe Biden has cognitive decline... unless of course if you listen to him talk. Regarding, "Further, there was whole "covfefe" ordeal." LFMAO Regarding, "He made fun of himself when that happened." How so exactly? By not admitting that he was an idiot? Which is actually what he did. Regarding, "So is that bullshit as well or are you just really bad at picking up social cues?" You are hopelessly stupid... as is trump.
    1
  8528.  @Tsukasa2727  Since you edited it to now read, "Wait, you're his doctor,?" LFMAO. Trumps doc says he would be, "healthiest individual ever elected." Now that guy knows what he is talking about. LFMAO https://www.cbsnews.com/news/doctor-says-donald-trump-would-be-healthiest-individual-ever-elected-to-presidency/
    1
  8529.  @Tsukasa2727  Regarding, "You're entire argument relies on the idea that it is literally impossible for him to make fun of himself." That and the joke doesn't make sense. And that I have no reason to think he was joking. And that there is no reason for it to be funny. But yeah, "entire argument." Regarding, "I give you an actual example of this," No. You didn't. What joke? You said something about covfefe but no actual joke given. If you think you gave an example it's because you are dumb. Regarding, " you just deflect and attack me instead." I countered your bullshit and tell you exactly why I am calling you what I do. Regarding, "Nice argument there bud." LMFAO. This is pretty fucking funny coming from you. Regarding, "Trump is a complete moron and is full of himself" Are you a doctor or some shit? How can you say this? Did you examine him in person? Regarding, "that doesn't prevent him from making a dumb joke." Except it obviously wasn't a joke. It was obviously what is known as a gaffe in politics.
    1
  8530. The person driving. Not that you care trump cultist.
    1
  8531.  @patsyleeoswald9912  Regarding, "It kills everyone who gets it." The only person saying this is a moron like you.
    1
  8532. Spoiler alert?
    1
  8533. It's not that you don't have a point JH, it's just that I enjoy some alex jones for comic relief in sad times.
    1
  8534. dipo let's not pretend that the people who find him compelling are ever going to be swayed by logic, reason, and intelligent arguments.
    1
  8535. whyamisuchafuckingliarloserandPOS regarding, "Kyle is at the same intelligence level as Alex" That is pretty funny coming from a liar and piece of shit like you. I saw your stupid name in my notifications and thought you were addressing your lies in the other thread. But nope of course not. That would take some intellectual honesty. Instead you are here, doing what you always do... making an ass of yourself, saying stupid things, and being the general disgrace to humanity that you are.
    1
  8536.  @krackerr  "Marianne seems genuine at least" Then at best she is too naive to run in a corrupt party. At worst she is just another lying politician trying to dupe you for your money and vote. "doesn't awnser my question." Yeah. I'm trying to do you a favor and steer you away from a corrupt party and person while you seek for bad reasons and ways to try and stay in it. "The public need to pull some France style protests and make some changes." Yeah. And we shouldn't be wasting time and energy working to change a corrupt party. Maybe spend that energy on a new party or ANYTHING else.
    1
  8537.  @IdleCommentator  "uncritical cultists" The uncritical cultist for kyle said so they could go back to an echo chamber.
    1
  8538.  @robm6645  "Echo chamber of what?" People such as yourself who make excuses for kyles BS like you are in some kind of cult. "what are the ideological differences between Kyle and Jimmy?" Jimmy believes that smears and blackmail should be called out. Kyle calls it drama, ignores it and diminishes it. "The only thing you can be talking about is drama" I use the words smears and blackmail and you call it "drama." Is that your idea of substance? It's not.
    1
  8539.  @IdleCommentator  "a single timid disagreement" Let's see... 1) says 20 million doesn't make tyt corrupt 2) doesn't call out blackmail 3) doesn't defend smears against mate 4) ghosts jimmy because he has a potty mouth and to stay out of it with cenks nephew to talk about pocket pussies 5) secular talk is AFFILIATED with TYT and he never bothers to mention the blatant and obvious conflict of interest. I can go on but that's at least enough to dispel you "single disagreement" nonsense. "Jimmy has now went and essentially started throwing straight up insults at Kyle" I'm glad. He should. So am I. And it's not our fault that kyle's behavior is abhorrent and wrong, that's on him. "essentially calling Kyle a POS and a pig." It's about time. Jimmy was far too nice to kyle in his previous response to kyle's backstabbing.
    1
  8540. I wish he would have run as an independent but he didn't. He isn't perfect afterall. Let's get him in office next time. Better late than never.
    1
  8541. So you wouldn't vote for BJG, the person in this video if they wore the wrong stripes? Look, don't get me wrong the "democratic" party is a dumpster fire and there is practically no one in it I'd advocate voting for. But you don't vote for parties. You vote for people. Vote for people who aren't liars when you can find them (I know it's all but impossible) regardless of party.
    1
  8542.  @benjaminhenderson7059  Then again proven innocent doesn't even seem to be an option for you at all so I probably shouldn't have acted like it is.
    1
  8543.  @benjaminhenderson7059  There is some dirt on earth that is younger than me and I've never voted for a republican ever. I doubt I ever will. But I'm not ruling it out because ultimately my judgement is on the person and not the banner they fly.
    1
  8544. Not only should that liar not be president but she should be primaried.
    1
  8545. Joe McCarthy is that you?
    1
  8546.  @melitocards3460  "Russia isnt communists anymore." Yeah. What you are doing is waaaay different. You are very smart. And this isn't sarcasm.
    1
  8547.  @ciamciaramcia99  Regarding, "Better means more of a good thing" No. It doesn't. Open a fucking dictionary. We don't get to have our own independent meaning of words. https://www.dictionary.com/browse/better
    1
  8548. Is that why they are planning to burn me for all eternity for the "crime" of disbelief? I'm just kidding... they don't exist.
    1
  8549. I guess she should have thought of that before she, her campaign, and the media working for her chose to elevate Trump to try and make her corrupt ass palatable to the public.
    1
  8550. I don't suppose you remember that the game was rigged from the start right? Of course not. You are obviously stupid.
    1
  8551. Yes. It was rigged. And that makes your point meaningless. 3 million people in NY state alone were not allowed to vote among many other facts you choose to ignore.
    1
  8552. I can't imagine defending Harris. You are insane.
    1
  8553. So many useful idiots in this world.
    1
  8554.  @fearlessfiction6506  I'm not a trump supporter. Is this how you defend your clown? Deflect? Trump supporters do the same shit.
    1
  8555.  @fearlessfiction6506  Regarding, "this proves who the real online bullies are." Same person, two seconds earlier, "Go to hell. " LMFAO Are you always so blatantly hypocritical like this?
    1
  8556.  J S  At least their name is apt. "Fearless fiction." It's spot on.
    1
  8557.  J S  I'm not even sure they are a harris supporter. I think they are just a troll.
    1
  8558. Don't forget to save some blame and disgust for their enabler, the corporate media, as well.
    1
  8559. Um... no.
    1
  8560.  @KaiserMattTygore927  Trump got millions less votes than a complete piece of shit who was rightfully perceived to have gotten their nomination though cheating and he did so through lying, demonizing people, and campaigning on committing war crimes. I guess I don't find that nearly as impressive as you for some reason. Oh and all the substantive stuff they say Bernie should be doing he's already doing. In short I think your take is remarkably dumb.
    1
  8561.  @parallel9201  That's not an argument. But I'm not really looking for a fight. I was trying to give you something to think about it. If I failed at this point so be it. I've said what I wanted to.
    1
  8562. Christians are suppose to follow both the new and old testament. The new testament clearly states the old testament is still to be followed. You should read your own bible.
    1
  8563.  @gaaggghard4111  Do yourself a favor and read your the bible. Start with Matthew 5:18-19. Or better yet just ignore it. It's just a book of bullshit anyway.
    1
  8564.  @gaaggghard4111  http://www.evilbible.com/do-not-ignore-the-old-testament/
    1
  8565. Nah. It's because they are both not named sanders but they try to justify it with what's between their legs.
    1
  8566. Nah. Don't get me wrong "electability" is overemphasized, overused, and misused by the corporate media but its a real thing and real to people. It is also a logical argument to use when calculating who you vote for. The problem is that when people calculate it wrong and/or only care about without bothering to think about whether or not someone should be elected first. But let's say I have two candidates that I like, that I think would make a pretty good president, as is the case of my thinking about Bernie Sanders and Tulsi Gabbard. Well then I am to consider electability. Because even if winning isn't everything it's still really important and something to be considered. But only after you have concluded you think they would do a good job if they get it. I don't care about Biden's "electability" anymore than I care about trump's "electability" because neither are worthy of the job.
    1
  8567.  @k3v1n47  Regarding, "Is it? How do you measure it?" Polls Regarding, "How do you prove its existence?" Common sense doesn't hurt Regarding, "Define it?" The likelyhood of a candidate's ability to win election senarios Regarding, "What is the logic of it?" If winning is important to you, and it should be even thou, like I said it isn't everything. Then it can and should be used in certain scenarios to best use your vote. Regarding, "it's inherent logic" Winning is important. It helps you maximize your chances of winning. Regarding, "What makes either of these candidates, "electable"?" Are seriously new to politics? This list is so long and extensive it's almost infinite. The fact that you can't think of a single thing that might make one person more electable than another is remarkable in a terrible way. Let's say a person is a nazi. That makes them less electable... at least to me... cause I'm not a nazi. Anyways back to your terrible question. I'm a Bernie Sanders supporter, in tiny part, because I think he is more electable. As evidence of this I cite things like, he has more name recognition than tulsi. Tulsi has problems with name recognition in 2020 like sanders did in 2016. He also does better in polls. There are no polls, none even including bad polls with terrible methodology that make them useless, that have tulsi in front of sanders. Let's say I'm wrong... and tulsi wins the primary. I'd support her in the general. I won't vote for bernie because... well it should be obvious that he wouldn't be very electable at that point. I could vote for him. I'd still thing he would be a better choice for president. But I won't. And it is because of electability. This is merely an extreme example of it. Regarding, "What measurement can you use to show that either of them is "electable"?" Polls. Seriously. It's fucking science when done correctly. Regarding, "Who decides before an election's first vote is cast who will win this election." No one decides. There is a reason we go and vote. Regarding, "Clinton was considered electable in 2016, 2008." Considered by who? Not me. Oh... you mean by people with financial interests in propping her up said she was the most electable. Yeah... they are full of shit. Don't be afraid to formulate your own opinions about who is more electable than others. Or if you are going to listen to people listen to people like kyle at secular talk and not corporate propogandists for better insight. Regarding, "And yet Trump is president." If you have a point here it is lost on me. I honestly have no fucking clue what you are alluding to. Is this back to because hillary was more electable? She wasn't. It wasn't even close. I know this because of polls. Polls showed Sanders crushing trump by about ten points. Hillary was within the margin of error of polls. Trump is president because the "democratic" party didn't pick the electable nominee. Regarding, "Biden was Vice President for 8 years. How did "electability as you said "not capable of doing a good job" work out?" Um what? Again your point is lost on me. I suspect that's the case because it's idiotic. I'll try to address your comment but I might be missing the mark. Biden might be electable. Trump might be electable (note, he obviously was since he was elected). That doesn't mean shit to me. I'm not going to support either of them regardless of how electable or not electable they are. I reserve my support for people who are worthy of it and neither those 2, or hillary, are people that come even close to good enough to get it. Regarding, "Electabilty, is nonsense. Random crap. A con. Bullshit. A lie." This is seriously some of the dumbest shit I have ever read and trying to explain otherwise is like explaining why water is wet. I'm seriously dumbfounded that I'd have to. There is a reason people vote for people that are running for office and not for people that aren't running. It's because electablity is a real thing. Pull your head out of your ass. Seriously.
    1
  8568.  @k3v1n47  Regarding, "Clinton was ahead in the polls vs Sanders." This is empirically false based on polls in the immediate wake of the general election. Seriously. This is just straight up bullshit. If you are referring to other polls... like polls done closer to when sanders entered the race and before people got to know who he was... so what. You are misunderstanding the nature of "electability." It isn't a stagnant thing that doesn't change. It's not a number assigned to you at birth. It changes. Let's say someone goes and kills someone. It would also kill their "electability." Because it is a real thing and because duh. I am not going to continue to address the rest of your shit. I am glossing over it and holy shit are you stupid. You give flat earthers something to look at and laugh at.
    1
  8569.  @k3v1n47  Holy shit. No joke. You are an imbecile. Good luck with that.
    1
  8570.  @k3v1n47  Seriously. Really dumb.
    1
  8571.  @k3v1n47  The worst thing about stupid people is that they are too stupid to realize they are stupid. You are the living embodiment of the dunning-kruger effect.
    1
  8572.  @k3v1n47  Seriously. No joke. You are a fucking idiot.
    1
  8573.  @OvarosX  "Andrew Yang is loved by Democrats and Republicans alike he is also beloved by the independent left and right." Long story short: humans are easily bought.
    1
  8574.  @SquidDesign  His UBI is as regressive as it can possibly be, he lied about supporting m4a while running for potus, I think his campaign for potus was designed to help stop sanders from the nomination. I have more but that should give you a general idea why I think he is an epic fraud.
    1
  8575.  Frank Rauen  Regarding, "The New York Times cares" Why do you care what the new york times thinks? Emulating terrible people with terrible ideas that you criticize only makes you a hypocrite.
    1
  8576.  @SquidDesign  I just responded to you with a comment that begins, "Regarding, "Do you want to live in a crumbling world" If you can't see it please let me know. Youtube loves censorship.
    1
  8577.  @SquidDesign  Figures even though there is nothing even remotely offensive about it. Thanks for letting me know. I care enough to try again. One sec.
    1
  8578.  @SquidDesign  Hopefully you can see it now.
    1
  8579. I'm so happy that doesn't help.
    1
  8580. Cause he is fine with Bloomberg cutting into Sanders if at all possible.
    1
  8581.  @zackdurant1584  regarding, "Belief is the state of mind in which a person thinks something to be the case with or without there being empirical evidence to prove that something is the case with factual certainty." Yup. Regarding, "You saying “you should need good evidence” to believe things goes against the definition of the word." Um... no. It doesn't. You CAN believe whatever the fuck you want. I don't dispute this. You SHOULD only believe things because of logic, evidence and reason. Regarding, "Like I said earlier you don’t need evidence to believe something" I'm not talking about "need" and I'm not disagreeing with this statement. Again, you can believe whatever you want. There is a word for this type of belief... its called faith. It means believing in things for no good reason and it is a synonym for religion for a reason. Regarding, "Because I don’t believe said things so I could care less if people said" Thank you for admitting that the difference between the two is that said things are affecting you. That's the difference... nothing more. And that if you were a believer in the flying spaghetti monster and weren't a believer in god then that is what you care about. That your position has nothing to do with principles. Regarding, "If people believe such things I would ask them why?" Do you think that I haven't had this conversation with religious apologists before? Do you think this is my first rodeo and I have no idea why the religious think the things they do? And after they answer that question and their answers are fucking absurd... then what? Regarding, "then I’d deduce from they’re reason as to why they believe it whether it’s logical or illogical." and "Those are all things in the natural world you could test to see if those things exist or not." This is you being illogical. You know you can't test the shit you want to claim exists. You know there is zero tangible evidence for your claims but you believe them and your out is it's fine cause you can't prove otherwise. That's not how it works to the sane using logic. Regarding, "That’s entirely different from whatever caused the universe." No. It's not. There is a reason the Big Bang is the most widely accepted theory of how the universe was "created".... and that's assuming it was ever "created." It may very well be eternal. The universe might be in a repeating state of expansion and contraction where the laws of physics might be very different (or the same, who the fuck knows) after each cycle. Or the universe might be essentially what is a black hole in another universe. I'm not going to claim I know but I do think that among the explanations I think the idea that it was created by a single deity who, for example, cares very deeply about whether or not I eat shellfish to not be a plausible explanation in any way and it seems far more likely that that type of explanation is certainly just wishful thinking BS born in a time when people thought sickness was caused by demons. Regarding, "The scientific method only works in the natural world" That's fine because is no good reason to think there is anything other then the natural world because faith is not good reason.
    1
  8582.  @zackdurant1584  regarding, "I never claimed a god exists" Ok I guess. I do admit that I make assumptions at times and I do admit that I assumed you were a believer. It seemed only logical coming from someone insisting that disbelief isn't the default when it comes to god. Regarding, "your preconceived notion on how what I believe is “fucking absurd” You believe that disbelief in the things isn't the default right? Well that is fucking absurd and it's not a preconceived notion... it's straight from you. Regarding, "The universe according to the majority of the worlds scientists definitely isn’t eternal it had a beginning" You are talking about the universe as we know it. You are talking about the universe in the wake of the big bang. As for what the majority of scientists say about what was before the big bang the consensus is pretty much... we have no fucking idea. And they concede that there aren't even any good ideas about how testing such a thing is even possible. It may never be. Regarding, "if you’re proposing an eternal universe theory I’m going to ask you why you believe that?" Because it seems more plausible then it all just blinking into existence to me. That the universe (or a universe if you want to consider it different the one now) was just different before the big bang. Or that it was existing as a singularity and that singularity was "the universe." Regarding, "what was its cause?" Why does the universe require a "cause?" And if there is a cause wouldn't all the same questions apply to it? Let's say the big bang was "caused" by god farting. Then what caused god? And what gave god gas? Regarding, "most scientists agree that the universe isn’t in an repeating state of “expansion” and “contraction”?" Again, scientists have no real fucking clue what was before the big bang because there is no know way to test or look for evidence then. It is all just speculation. I personally find the black hole theory most interesting. A black hole is much like a singularity like what is suspected to be what was in the immediate moments before the big bang. That what is on the other side of black holes in our universe are other universes that may or may not be like this one.
    1
  8583.  @NPC-bs3pm  I'm going to write you a few replies that all are likely to be shadowbanned based on my experience. All are 100 percent true...
    1
  8584.  @NPC-bs3pm  Bid en is de port ing more people than trump, and he has kept the cag es.
    1
  8585.  @mustbtrouble  "I think I deleted 1" When you delete a comment the number goes down because facts. "Y’all are nuts" Facts aren't for everyone.
    1
  8586.  @mustbtrouble  they do not what?
    1
  8587.  @mustbtrouble  go down? of course it does and it takes 2 seconds to test...
    1
  8588.  @mustbtrouble  this is going to be the 26th reply... at least until i delete the 25th reply of now. then it will be the "new" 25th reply.
    1
  8589.  @mustbtrouble  sure enough, it went down and now this will be the 26th reply after it went down to 25.
    1
  8590.  @mustbtrouble  Shouldn't your lies be at least a tiny bit plausible?
    1
  8591.  @mustbtrouble  "ad hominems are the losers retort." Your hypocrisy is funny at least.
    1
  8592. As jimmy says yang wants to pay for UBI regressively, like for example, by dismantling the current social safety net.
    1
  8593.  @schloops8473  Regarding, " they attack the most progressive policy" I love UBI. This isn't about UBI. We are talking about yang and HIS problems. Maybe don't deflect like this. Regarding, "pretend he wants to "dismantling the current social safety net"" Tell you what... I'll go and find the first interview I ever saw with him. It was shortly after he announced his candidacy for presidency. When asked how he would pay for the UBI the very first thing he mentions is all the money we spend on a social safety net and his plan to pay for UBI was by gutting it. I'm not pretending shit.
    1
  8594.  @jamesjones7397  Yang gives you the choice of picking between the current system and UBI. That will gut the current system. A true progressive would be putting UBI on top of the current system.
    1
  8595.  @schloops8473  I tried to post the link but youtube doesn't like that apparently. Right here on youtube there is a video titled, "Andrew Yang: Paying for a Universal Basic Income" from Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs. It's only 7 minutes and it has yang telling you himself about how he plans to gut the current social safety net to pay for UBI.
    1
  8596.  @schloops8473  You are impossible to take seriously. I shouldn't be surprised you are fooled by the conman.
    1
  8597.  @redneckscumbags4422  " i saw that interview with ben shapiro" I'm not talking about an interview with ben shapiro and I'm well aware that is talking points have "evolved" but he has said that he wants to dismantle the current social safety net to pay for UBI. "he said there is less needy for the current programs" So the people on the bottom who already need help from the government are going to get no help to the least amount of help in the form of his UBI. That's why he sucks.
    1
  8598.  @cjcholbert  "a big Yang supporter" Think long and hard about it. Yang seems just like any other neoliberal when it comes to war. He lied about supporting m4a while running for potus. He wants to pay for UBI as regressively as possible. He sucks as far as I'm concerned. My opinion is that he wants to bribe everyone to keep the current shit system just like it is. And if you aren't willing to change the current system in addition to a UBI then all that UBI is going to just funnel to the top like it does now.
    1
  8599.  @redneckscumbags4422  "i've never heard him say he's gonna dismantle social safety nets to pay for UBI." Did you even listen to the interview I referenced? Where the first thing he says he will use to pay for UBI is the all the money we are currently spending on the social safety net? Regarding, "everytime it's some nitpicking cynical interpretation of his comments" Talking to yanggang is very much like talking to hillary's correct the record troll army.
    1
  8600.  @redneckscumbags4422  "it's pure cynical conspiracy lunacy" Gaslighting with BS like this much?
    1
  8601.  @redneckscumbags4422  Regarding, "you didn't reference any interview." I did. This is copy and pasted. "Right here on youtube there is a video titled, "Andrew Yang: Paying for a Universal Basic Income" from Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs. It's only 7 minutes and it has yang telling you himself about how he plans to gut the current social safety net to pay for UBI."" So why are you lying?
    1
  8602.  @redneckscumbags4422  Regarding, "you can have a choice whether to keep your social program or take the UBI" LMFAO. Yeah. So the entire social safety net is being used to pay for UBI. Literally all of it. Do you get 100 a month? It's gone. You trade it for UBI. Do you get more than yang is going to give for UBI? Yippie you. You can keep what you have but you gain jack shit making UBI completely worthless to you even though you are the person who is likely in most need of it. A person who isn't gutting the social safety net to pay for UBI doesn't take literally all the money meant for that social safety net to pay for his UBI. You are either willfully obtuse or paid to obfuscate and lie. I suspect you are a paid shill. All that money he says he's going to use to pay for UBI... that was all the money that USED to pay for a social safety net. But he plans to gut it. Literally all of it. All of the money that was is now gone. No matter how much you want to lie.
    1
  8603.  @redneckscumbags4422  "why are YOU lying? I'm at 1:45 ..of that video," You mean you were lying about me not posting a source then. Thanks for clearing up who is the liar.
    1
  8604.  @redneckscumbags4422  Right before that timestamp you speak of he tells you that literally all the money that is currently used for a social safety net is whipped out and gutted to pay for UBI.
    1
  8605.  @redneckscumbags4422  "you're obviously intentionally disingenuous at this point." You were lying about me providing an interview and you are lying about yang gutting the social safety net. "he was saying we're already paying millions for social safety nets" Yup. And he was saying how he would gut them to pay for UBI. Regarding, "they are not double dipping" You are gutting the social safety net to pay for UBI. UBI should be helping everyone. But what you call "double dipping" means the people on the bottom loss everything the social net had to offer them. It's gone. Instead they get UBI and only UBI because you just gutting what is the social safety net. Regarding, "so that savings" That "savings" is what used to be the social safety net. That was the money that used to pay for it. Unless yang has his way and it would be gone. It is the most regressive way possible to pay for UBI.
    1
  8606.  @redneckscumbags4422  "You're obviously a paid DNC operative..or someone who works for TYT, majority report thanks" LMFAO Projection much? At least you are kind enough to admit you were lying about me not providing a source. Not that you are intellectually honest enough to admit. I'm a jimmy dore fan. And jimmy rightfully knows yang sucks.
    1
  8607.  @redneckscumbags4422  Regarding, "you only provided me a link after I asked you to" LMFAO. You suck so much it's almost impressive somehow. You hadn't even joined the thread and I cited it.
    1
  8608.  @redneckscumbags4422  "how much are you getting paid by the DNC?" Fuck the DNC. How much are you paid to shill for yang?
    1
  8609.  @redneckscumbags4422  Full disclosure I concede you might not be a paid shill for yang. I don't rule out the possibility that you are just a useful idiot for your favorite snake oil salesman.
    1
  8610.  @redneckscumbags4422  Regarding, "so nothing to say about "gutting" welfare?" I've gone over repeatedly how all the money used to pay for the social safety net is gone. You being a moron doesn't mean I haven't said anything on the topic just like you saying I hadn't provided a source was just you lying. Why I am talking to you at all at this point is a mystery.
    1
  8611.  @redneckscumbags4422  Regarding, "i've already refuted your bogus claim." LMFAO. Think whatever stupid shit you want at this point but it would be nice if you weren't trying to make everyone as dumb as you are. Regarding, "The money for social safety net isn't gone," LMFAO. It is. That's how yang plans to help pay for UBI according to him. Regarding, "it's no longer needed by ppl who are getting more from UBI" By this "logic" UBI isn't needed by anyone. It's suppose to be universal. That's the U part in UBI. But if you already get more than UBI from the government it's not universal to you. It's NOTHING to you. They are the poorest of the poor who are already getting help from the government. But they are the ones who don't need extra? You suck so much.
    1
  8612.  @redneckscumbags4422  Speaking of people who don't need UBI, millionaires and billionaires would benefit from yang's ubi but if you are the poorest of the poor who is already getting help from the government you very well might gain NOTHING because yang guts the social safety net to pay for UBI. All the money that was going to pay for a social safety net is gone. That's what gutted means. There's no more money there. It's gone. Yang told you were it went. He could pay for UBI on the backs of rich people. But instead he is paying for it on the backs of the poorest of the poor and by gutting the social safety net no matter how much you lie.
    1
  8613.  @redneckscumbags4422  "You're an obvious DNC paid LIAR at this point." Projection 101. I can't keep wasting time addressing your bullshit. I'm not paid to be here.
    1
  8614. This is funny coming from the "math" people.
    1
  8615. "I would like to remind you that our country has various means of destruction.... and if our territorial integrity of our country is threatened, we will certainly use all the means at out disposal." He's talking about nukes and it's pretty obvious.
    1
  8616. youtube video titled, "Putin Says Russia Not Bluffing About Using 'Various Means Of Destruction'" I expect more honesty from grayzone viewers.
    1
  8617.  @kenjack6674  "HE did NOT say HE Would use Nuclear weapons" In what sort of world does "all the means at our disposal" not include nukes? Oh wait, it does and you are just an unserious clown.
    1
  8618.  @kenjack6674  "They are the ones threating Nuclear war" Yup. "NOT RUSSIA" Russia is threatening to use nukes to defend itself. Stop getting triggered by facts. It's not a good look.
    1
  8619. Drugs
    1
  8620.    Regarding, " I will be voting for Tulsi in the primary" Yeah... like I said, splitting the progressive vote. The establishment appreciates you being a useful idiot for them. Regarding, "so should anyone who wants to get rid of Trump" And like I said, Bernie crushes Trump and has for years. Regarding, "have a shot at a peaceful world." You prefer a candidate who served the MIC personally because she wasn't smart enough to listen to Bernie while he was preaching peace.
    1
  8621.    Regarding, " You're points are meaningless" Wow. The irony. I take you don't have an intelligent reason why Tulsi is superior to Sanders then. Regarding, "Her service gives her creditably to achieve peace." Bernie Sanders has been preaching a message of peace for longer than Tulsi has been alive. And the commander in chief doesn't need credibility to bring the troops home, only the will. Regarding, "You are the one being an idiot." The irony. This is coming from a person who can't offer one decent reason why they think their candidate is superior. Regarding, "I vote for the candidate who I agree with most and that candidate Tulsi Gabbard." Meanwhile you can't offer a single logical reason why you agree with Tulsi more. Regarding, "Gabbard has a better chance of beating Trump, why are you ignoring my reasons, hypocrite." Except she doesn't. Your feelings are not evidence. Regarding, "I did aka republicans see Bernie as a commie. They see Gabbard as a young good looking woman who served in the military. Swat that away dip shit." The think commie means, "someone who doesn't agree with them on everything." The only reason Tulsi isn't smeared by the right more is because they rightfully don't fear her and her chances of becoming the next president. But as soon as they would fear her and/or she became the nominee you can damn well count on these types of attacks being leveled on her. I suspect you are going to claim otherwise because you seem to have no intellectual honesty.
    1
  8622.    So is the best you really have to offer misguided ideas of "electability" without any numbers to back it up? Because, again, Sanders crushes Trump by about 10 points consistently. So why should I care about this when there is ZERO logical reason to think Sanders wouldn't crush the orange clown?
    1
  8623. @UCdMfejqJLxRocuQnueYRFqw Regarding, " They have the same economic polices," Just repeating nonsense over and over doesn't make it true. Look at Tulsi page and look at Bernies. They are NOT the same. I also gave you Bernies proposal to cancel student debt. I think you tried to claim that Tulsi also supports it but you don't bother to offer ANY evidence. Regarding, "Tulsi is better on foreign policy" No. She's not. Sanders has preached a message of peace for longer than Tulsi has been alive. The only case you can make that she is "better" is only based on the fact that she focuses on that above all else. Even when she was asked about the gender pay gap she thought talking about foreign policy was a good idea even thou it wasn't. Regarding, "Tulsi will get more republican and independent votes, combined" 1) Citation needed. 2)Also the "electability" bullshit is best used by the corporate media. 3) Sanders crushes trump 4) Is electability a good reason to support Biden who also crushes trump at the moment? Because it's not. Regarding, "Pretty simple, yet you are so triggered you can't even let those simple facts soak in." If I'm "triggered" it's because everything you just said is moronic for one reason or another. If I'm "triggered" it's because dumb fuckers like you are going to split the progressive vote when you should be doing anything and everything to help Sanders. But if you want to think that me countering the things you say with evidence that I can prove is just me not letting your stupid shit sink it... well I can't fix stupid for you. Regarding, "You seem to miss that said I would vote for Sanders in the general" Wow do I not give a fuck. I barely give a flying fuck about the general. The war that matters is the "democratic" primary. Regarding, "What has Sanders said on Venezuela?" Americans by and large do not give a flying fuck about Venezuela. Sanders isn't going to go invading them if he is commander in chief so stop acting like this is important. It's not. He's been busy getting Amazon to raise their minimum wage and has been busy fighting for workers rights with Walmart workers because that's the type of shit americans rightfully care about and not about a country halfway across the globe as long as we aren't going to go invade it and Sanders wouldn't. Regarding, "What about Julian Julian Assange?" I'll tell you what... this is easily the best point you have managed to make. Sanders should be speaking out more forcefully on this and I wish he would, but ultimately if you don't trust Sanders to do the right thing when it comes to this I think you are just being intentionally obtuse. Regarding, "Gabbard is a better debater," Let's agree to disagree about your 100 percent biased subjective opinion. Her debate performance was ATROTICOUS up until she had her one moment that I concede, was great. But she is lucky as fuck that clown teed up his stupidity for her otherwise her night would have been just fucking terrible. Regarding, "Sanders is too nice and unwilling to take the gloves off." "Too nice" can arguably be said about Tulsi as well. As for the gloves shit that gets old. Bernie closed a 60 point gap with Hillary while having the entire establishment and party working against him because he is different and better than your average politician. And that includes how he campaigns. He doesn't try to tear people down, that's not what he's about and if that's the type of politicians you like you may as well support Trump because that's ONLY what he is about. Sanders is about presenting his vision of America and about presenting solutions to solve the many problems we have. And people rightfully love him for it. Regarding, "And don't forget Sanders supported Hillary Clinton" You mean Sanders did exactly what he said he would? As always? Go figure. Can you blame him for not wanting to be effectively blamed for Trump as president? I don't. And it is really important that Hillary, after losing, be blamed for her loss as opposed to Sanders and the movement he started. And don't get me wrong Hillary and company have tried to blame anyone and everyone other than her but ultimately there is reason why those excuses never stuck. Even Hillary's most diehard supporters had an impossible time defending the fallen queen on her blame everyone other than Hillary book tour. Regarding, "Would Sanders endorse Harris, Biden or Mayor Pete?" Don't know, don't care. I care about making Sanders the next nominee of the party and he has a chance unlike Tulsi. If Sanders doesn't win I'll pretty much be rooting for climate change or a giant meteor at that point because this might be our last chance to get the change this country so desperately needs and deserves. And you are hurting those chances. For good reasons or bad you ARE a useful idiot for the establishment. And the same can be said of Tulsi as well. Regarding, "She is the superior candidate," No. She's not. Bernie has been a progressive fighting for progressive causes for longer than Tulsi has been alive. He is a leader on domestic policy while tulsi is following him. He didn't need to serve the MIC personally to come to the obvious conclusions about war. His favorable are higher. He is polling higher. He demonstrates leadership that has moved the party (at least in it's rhetoric) so that his big ideas that were all called "pie in the sky" as recently as 2016. He is arguably why tulsi is known to you because without him tulsi wouldn't have been able to follow him in 2016 so that she could get props for it. Regarding, "she would have a better chance to beat Trump" You have no evidence for this while I have polls for the last couple years that all show Sanders beating Trump by wide margins. Regarding, "she would pick Sanders to be her VP." So dumb. Gabbard would have been first on the list for people I think Sanders should pick for his VP but that was before Tulsi decided to stab him the back and split the progressive vote. Now I'd prefer it be someone like Nina Turner who is doing the right thing and helping Sanders overcome the rigged system. That said... who the fuck cares about the bottom of the ticket. Regarding, "Sanders most likely would pick Warren." You base this and most the things you say on your gut and nothing more. Regarding, "Bringing up Sander's age doesn't helping your case." Huh? Well I love age. I love that I know EXACTLY what I'm getting with Sanders. Don't get me wrong I think I know what I'd be getting with Tulsi but ultimately I can't be nearly as sure because she is still really young. One of the reasons why Obama was able to dupe me was because he was young and because he didn't have a very long record for me to look at and those problems all exist with Tulsi while they don't for Sanders. Regarding, "All you can do is fault a young woman who wanted to do something after 9-11. pretty pathetic." What's pathetic is the lack of intellectual honesty from Tulsi supporters. Their favorite bullshit argument about tulsi is how she is so great on the topic of war even thou she SERVED THE MIC PERSONALLY. And it wasn't ancient history or some shit. This was AFTER she had already held political office. Don't get me wrong I appreciate the fact that she seemed to take the right message from her service but she should have been able to figure this shit out without it and it makes me question her judgement. She seems to oppose the MIC for the same reasons warmonger John McCain opposes torture and supported gay rights... because of personal experience. Well you shouldn't need personal experience to come to the correct conclusions, especially on something as obvious as this. There was lots she could have done after 9-11 that didn't involve enabling the MIC. But she worked for the MIC, probably something you generally would have a problem with if it wasn't about your favorite candidate. You and Tulsi are making it more likely an establishment fuck like biden or someone else wins the primary whether you realize it or not.
    1
  8624.    That really is all the evidence you offer for any of your claims isn't? In other words you offer nothing. Thanks for admitting it.
    1
  8625.    Regarding, " For some strange reason if Gabbard isn't on the primary ballot, I've decided to support Harris or Mayor Pete. Just to spite your dumb ass, I hope your happy." Let's not pretend that you haven't only been about anything but Bernie from the get go. This is but another example of you trying to justify it while using nothing but the dumbest reasons humanly possible for it. The establishment thanks you for your work, your lack of morals, and your lack of intelligence.
    1
  8626.    Do you ever say anything that isn't moronic?
    1
  8627.    I'll take that as a no to my question.
    1
  8628.    Logic, reason, and intelligent argument aren't for everyone sadly. That's not my fault.
    1
  8629.    At this point if you ever did say something that wasn't moronic I might die of shock.
    1
  8630.    Somehow you are making even less sense than before. I didn't think that was possible.
    1
  8631.    LMFAO. The fact of the matter is that the biggest thing Tulsi has going for her and the thing that her supporters most love to give for her being great is her willingness to take the MIC to task. People with those priorities should care that she served and enabled the MIC personally (and very, very recently). Sadly it seems lots of them don't think about it and/or when they do try to rationalize it and excuse it the way you do. I can't make you be intellectually honest. I can only introduce you to reality. It's on you to embrace it and acknowledge facts such as these.
    1
  8632.    That's funny coming from a guy helping Biden and the establishment.
    1
  8633.    Of course you will because are not capable of an intelligent thought.
    1
  8634.    But since you are bringing up Biden for no good reason whatsoever it's noteworthy that he didn't run in 2016 against Hillary and if he did it would have been a game changer because splitting the vote is a real concern to those with functioning brains.
    1
  8635.    I was thinking that you were the type of person who inspired dunning and kruger to form their original hypothesis but after that I can only think that you are a soulless shill being paid to spout nonsense. Either way you suck. Good luck with that.
    1
  8636. Look man don't get me wrong, I think the ending sucked balls. But if some people loved it... so what. Good for them. I wish I loved it. Why do you feel the need to insult those that do? Do you want to take their joy from them? Do you just get off on being a dick? Do you just want to try and feel superior? Do some introspection.
    1
  8637. The EC was set up so that slave owners would have more say then they were entitled. It takes a system that was as good as it was going to get, most votes wins, and fucked it up by making votes count unequally.
    1
  8638. Voting isn't about picking a winner. It's about an expression of values. When you vote for POS like Clinton, Trump, or Biden it says something about you. And that something isn't good.
    1
  8639. You should be ashamed for voting for trash candidates who don't deserve the job.
    1
  8640.  @tmofog  LMFAO. Do you say exclusively stupid things?
    1
  8641. That's easier said then done for lots of different reasons steve. Mark is the type to want to play nice and disney rode over him.
    1
  8642. Speaking of crap team and out of a job.... joe biden.
    1
  8643. Anyone saying "joe biden is a dealmaker" is a person you should never have on the show.
    1
  8644. No votes are fucking meaningless. Stop acting like he voted yes.
    1
  8645. Regarding, "How about the times he did vote yes?" Why don't we have a talk about it then rather than pretending he voted yes on this and acting outraged over fucking nothing.
    1
  8646. Coyote regarding, "there's not much to say beyond citing these as times he went strongly against progressive ideals" Nobody is fucking perfect, not even you (spoiler alert). I honestly don't have the ambition to go deep into your shit list. This story isn't about that. I'm looking to address the specific issue at hand. Regarding, "He never gave more than the Democratic party reason for voting yes, if he even made a statement." I am honestly having trouble understanding this sentence. Are you trying to say he hasn't spoken out in favor of internet neutrality? He has. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dBHjfTKfdQs&t=112s Regarding, "We're not the enemy here, we all believe in similar things, fight for similar goals--and we want him to be real," Ok, nevermind... now I am understanding what you are saying. Still I'm not going back to edit cause I'm lazy and instead I'm just going to go ahead and try to address you here... Yes. We all are fighting for the same team. And I do understand that some are pissed at Bernie because he hasn't done things exactly how they wish he would. But I am convinced he is our best hope going forward to get the change we need and deserve as a country. The establishment is going to smear him every fucking way they possibly can going forward. They are going to try and use every angle and every dirty trick at their disposal because they fear him. He isn't their puppet. And there are legit places people can point to. Again, nobody is perfect. You will never agree with everyone on everything. But I don't want bullshit like this to get in the way. This is not a legit place to get pissed. Non votes really are the same as no votes other than for the symbolic message. So I take issue with people blowing this up and pretending it is something it is not. Regarding, "You know that to be true, so why take issue with me saying that he isn't always on our side when he takes positions that are clearly oppossed to progressive or leftist policies?" Because this is not one of those times. He has always been on the side of net neutrality. I honestly don't know why he didn't vote and I am going to give him the benefit of the doubt for not voting but ultimately is not important that he did. I am not a fan of McDonalds. It is only emergency food and an emergency bathroom for me. I don't need to go to McDonalds to tell them I don't want a BigMac today and if I did that would be about as meaningful as Sanders voting no (not meaningful). It is only important that McDonalds know when I want something and it is only important when people vote YES. No votes are fucking meaningless. So I take exception with those acting as if Bernie sold his soul and that is why he didn't vote. I believe there are many false actors looking to take advantage of the situation to pretend this is something it is not by people who are looking for anything to smear him whether it is legit or not. Almost all the times when people are trying to trash his record it is by using misleading info. That said it isn't perfect. Go figure... he has been in government for some time. But I am convinced he is about as good as it gets and I do trust him unlike I trust essentially any other politician. I also see him as our best hope for getting the change we need. This country is really fucked up. Our politicians are really fucked up. The 2 major parties are really fucked up. Sanders has the best chance of making things better. If he is elected as a democrat in 2020 he could, for example, ban the party from accepting legalized bribes going forward among other much needed party reforms. Then there would be hope of having a major party that cares about the people rather than their donors. Regarding, "We've just been wrong before and lied to often" I understand this and I agree. Obama for example really fucked us. I admit to being duped. He gave a good speech. The biggest lesson I think I've learned is follow the money. When Sanders runs a campaign with our money and not the corporations I trust him to see to our interests and not the corporations. Regarding, "That is not misleading, and the languege I used was not exaggerated." If you want I will go back and look at your grievances more closely. I'm betting there are things in there I don't like. But I am tired and this is already waaaay too long. Regarding, "not enough to enact meaningful change" I have no illusions that he will be able to bring about sweeping change. Both parties will fight him. The corporate media will fight him and smear him. But if could enact the simple party reform it would be a big start to something better. And even if he doesn't accomplish anything significant I at the very least trust him not to make things worse and, this is very important in my opinion, he can start to win the battle of ideas. Look at medicare for all for example. You know the establishment doesn't want to talk about it. He forces them to. He is single handedly winning the battle of ideas on this issue. We need that if nothing else. Regarding, "If he doesn't take a stand against the economy-crippling wars" He stood up and spoke passionately about why we shouldn't go to war with Iraq in the wake of 9-11. He was one of the very few to not vote for the 700 billion dollar offense budget. He isn't Rand Paul on this one issue but he is light years better than the corporate dems. Regarding, "kill or slow the movement" Sanders has done more to wake the country than anyone else in the country in my opinion. He is the only reason most people are beginning to realize the "democratic" party is shit. The establishment is a big ass machine that chews up and spits out most decent people. Sanders has survived it and is currently the most popular politician in the country for good reason. He has fought for the issues you care about all his life... with an exception or two but keep it in context. I am convinced he is the best hope for progressive values but he is going to need the continued support of progressives as everyone else is going to call him names whether he deserves it or not. Peace.
    1
  8647. Regarding, "this story is about that." I considered the story to be about the FCC, net neutrality, and the vote for chair. Everything in the world is connected if you want to go far enough but I really did not consider this to be about war or foreign policy in any way. Regarding, "war is the largest and most impactful business on Earth," The military industrialized complex is a fucking joke and I think we can agree it needs to be reigned the fuck in. As much as I can't stand most everything about Rand Paul I would be willing to vote for him for President just because of his ideas of the military. Personally if it were only up to me I would slash the fuck out of the department of offense. Jill Stein was considered crazy because she said wanted to cut it in half. I would go even further. Something like one dollar more than the next highest spending country in the world would be about right with me. That said I confess I am not nearly as well informed about foreign policy as I am domestic. I am no expert about a lot of what the country is doing not that I'm sure anyone really is (by design). Regarding, "I understand that Sanders has spoken out against some military interests in the past" For me the biggest issue is Iraq. This was immediately in the wake of 9-11 and to me I think it took a lot of balls for Sanders to say what he did on the Senate floor at the time. Now with the gift of hindsight his words were prophetic. He was right about everything. Regarding, "spreading the Russia hacking conspiracy." I personally think waaay too much is being made of this. I do think Russia fucked with our elections although I don't know for sure by how much or can even say specifically how. I should add that I think the DNC did much more fucking with it than they did. I do not think we are going to war with Russia anytime soon. I am much, much more concerned about us going to war with North Korea. That said I'm not even so sure we will be doing that anytime soon seeing as how they do not have resources to be plundered. Regarding, "My worries lie with the impactful military decisions he's helped further" Can you be more specific? Forgive me if I am asking you to repeat yourself. I admit there were specifics in your original response to me that I didn't address because I was not looking to talk war at the time.... but now that we are here what are your big issues exactly? There really isn't much that I'm aware of, although I know there are some nuggets where Bernie is not perfect on this. Regarding, "His votes" Again what specifically are you talking about? I've been of the understanding that for the most part congress doesn't bother to vote on stuff like this anymore. Instead they have been happy to let the President run amok making the decisions to fight their vague "war on terror" since about the time Sanders was voting against the Iraq war and against the Patriot act. Regarding, "The machine that has..." Sadly I agree. We do desperately need to reign in the machine. I was dumbfounded that the Senate recently voted on a bipartisian basis to spend an extra 80 billion a year on them and most people in the country don't even know. The corporate media wanted to know exactly how crazy Bernie would pay the 53 billion per year for college but they didn't think the 80 billion a year for bombs was even worth mentioning. Sadly the only places where the 2 parties work together consistently are in areas that fuck over the people and serve the establishment. It is depressing. Regarding, "Nearly all of our problems stem from the military-industrial complex." I understand why you would say this but I disagree. I believe that nearly all of our problems stem from money in politics. To me that is the virus that infects everything it touches. Money in politics enable the military industrialized complex. This country is an oligarchy. There was a great study that showed policy is dictated by what the super rich want and what the people want is utterly meaningless. Regarding, "They may not be corporatists in the traditional sense," Sure they are. It is all about the money. But I am nitpicking and agree with everything you are saying in this area. Regarding, "Sanders' votes to continue wars" Again I do not understand this. Again I really thought they have all (congress) gone out of their way to not vote on war since about Iraq and have given the President the ok to do whatever they want essentially unilaterally. Regarding, "We've got to work with countries around the world for a political solution to get rid of this guy..." I think you would really have a good point if he said military solution. But he didn't. He said political solution. That is how we should be handling bad leaders and bad actors in the world. I don't have a problem with sanctions (although they are far from perfect and not a solution for everything). I do have a big problem with bombs. Regarding, "those are foul, false words that should never leave the lips of someone who claims to be progressive" I consider myself a progressive and I could see myself saying that. But I guess if you think he his just lying (false)... well I just don't know why you assume he is just lying. Bernie seems as genuine as they come from in the land swamp creatures. Maybe I'm being fooled like I was by Obama but Sanders has been around much, much longer and in that much longer record I see very little to think he is just bullshitting people.... especially when I see how hard the establishment tries to fuck him over... that only speaks well of his character IMO. Regarding, ""evil dictator" Assad lie" I don't think the US should have done what it did. I do think the US lied to make their case for war. But I also think you are lying to yourself if you think Assad was a good guy. That said there are zero leaders in the world I can say (I hope there are some... again foreign policy is not my expertise) are good guys (or gals of course). Regarding, "you'll never see a Sanders presidency that decreases the military spending parasite in any meaningful way" I'm not sure how he could do this on his own. As commander in chief he could choose to not us the military how they have. He could refuse to sign big military budgets but it isn't as if the president drafts those bills. Again for me what is needed most is getting the money out of politics... at least for one major party... then that party will represent the people, win elections, and then the military budget can get slashed. Regarding, "I promise you that centering your entire political awakening on one person or thing that can be destroyed or corrupted is a dangerous balancing act" I do not put all my hopes in Sanders. Rather I see him as the best hope for getting the changes I want. Regarding, "Both corporatist and military agent must be usurped" I don't feel the need to distinguish between the two. They are both really just about making money and consolidating it for a few to me. The military is just a little more evil because of the killing. Regarding, "This generation doesn't have..." I fear we may have already passed the point of no return. That said I try to be an optimist but it can be really hard at times.
    1
  8648. Ok. I agree with you that he was wrong on this. But let's not pretend this was his soul. It is an endorsement. His voting record is far more important.
    1
  8649. 100 percent is all the deficit. More then 100 percent would mean there would be a surplus.
    1
  8650. AOC is a fraud who voted for pelosi and got nothing for it when she could have forced a vote on m4a. Fraud squad. Never forget.
    1
  8651.  @DBJ345  Regarding, "I mean ye don’t have many progressives in the Democratic Party so ye kinda need her " If you don't fight for m4a you aren't a progressive and you are worthless to me.
    1
  8652.  @DBJ345  Regarding, "Man don’t just give up and never vote again," I'm not. I'm just giving up on people who expose themselves as frauds and not going to vote or support the fraud squad again. Regarding, "you’ll get no where and achieve nothing with that," I'd also get nowhere if I just ignore it when people sell me out. Regarding, "she’s among the few democrats that can actually bring change" Yup. She just had the chance to bring actual change and instead voted for pelosi and used her vote to leverage nothing of substance. She is a fraud. By all means if she wants to try and prove me wrong about that going forward she can go ahead and try. But until them I'm going to keep calling her a fraud the way I do any politician whose actions don't match their words.
    1
  8653.  @DBJ345  Regarding, "she didn’t sell out" Yes she did. Regarding, "she just thinks that if she cozy’s up to Pelosi, she’ll get change" I didn't support her to get cozy with pelosi. I supported her to fight for m4a. She had a golden opportunity and didn't. Stop making excuses and rationalizations for her failure. Leave that to trump supporters to do for their clown.
    1
  8654.  @DBJ345  Regarding, " it’s not she got rich or anything so by definition she didn’t sell out" LMFAO according to you she used it to get cozy to pelosi. You don't have to get money to be a sellout. You can gain "status." Stop defending her. Start holding POS politicians feet to the fire.
    1
  8655.  @DBJ345  Sellout: a person betraying one's principles. AOC's principles according to a tweet only a few days ago, "Sometimes it’s to get members on the record, so ppl can’t make excuses later. Sometimes these votes create real political pressure that forces developments. Sometimes we vote for the historical record - to let future generations know we did everything we could." Those are her principle according to her. But she didn't force the vote. That makes her a sellout.
    1
  8656. Man do you suck at life.
    1
  8657. If only you had the internet to check it yourself.
    1
  8658.  @delboyg01  We agree on that. It really isn't about it being on her website. It's about if she can be trusted to fight for it if she were in the WH. And she can't.
    1
  8659. He shouldn't and won't because he cares more about the people of this country and trying to get progressive change then he cares about fucking over the "democratic" party.
    1
  8660. I understand why people want to punish the party. They rightfully feel betrayed and want them to die so badly they blind themselves to the fact that that simply isn't going to happen. We need to not be blinded by anger and act smart. Hostile takeover of the party is rightfully plan A and if that fails 3rd party is plan B. We all want government and parties that don't suck. I'm convinced Sanders has the best plan to get it.
    1
  8661. I love ranked choice voting. If the dems actually cared about "spoilers" they would support it. Obviously they don't thou. They only care about the talking point of "spoilers."
    1
  8662. You'd think that if there were a thread where I might be able to see all the replies it would be this one... with one reply. But nope.
    1
  8663. They have an agenda that has more than just ratings in mind. They will happily sacrifice ratings when those ratings don't fit the narrative they want to portray.
    1
  8664.  @melissasouthard900  Regarding, "Biden won the electoral college." When exactly did they have their vote? I must have missed it.
    1
  8665.  @melissasouthard900  Regarding, "Do you actually think trump will get the votes?" Nope. Just telling you why what you are saying is wrong. I feel like you sorta understand that what you were saying was wrong by deflecting from the point I was making instead of trying to address it and/or answer my simple direct question to you.
    1
  8666.  @olafbrolaf3968  sorry, but you are an anti-semite. shut up! Two can play your stupid game.
    1
  8667.  @thomsenz1638  "so voting progressive is also culish?" Everyone should vote their values. But if you are voting for anyone who is telling you what their values are but they are lying and demonstrating their values are something else... then you are in a cult and demonstrating cultlike behavior.
    1
  8668. Speaking of rich people you should look into how much zelensky is worth. Apparently being a corrupt puppet of the US pays good.
    1
  8669. Bernie just gave a corrupt government in ukraine billions of dollars.
    1
  8670. Bernie just voted to give a corrupt government in ukraine billions of dollars and...
    1
  8671. How many replies can everyone see? Land of the free am I right?
    1
  8672.  @grmpEqweer  "a government-owned platform" Neither is my phone service but they don't have the right to censor and neither should youtube. Stop making excuses for censorship.
    1
  8673.  @mikeconley9590  I'm the one whose words are being censored. Believe me when I tell you it's not the type of thing that I shouldn't be able to say.
    1
  8674.  @donalddonald6625  You are also missing a pretty terrible comment posted by the ironically named "getthepitchforks." But I support their right to say it because that's what being for free speech means.
    1
  8675. You are wasting your credibility with whataboutism. And Musk is the guy who buys politicians like trump.
    1
  8676. That's not how debates work. I think you are giving advice for a rally.
    1
  8677.  @the367thday  I'm glad you are not running or advising Bernie then.
    1
  8678.  @the367thday  It's not about "fighting" it's about not being a fucking moron. Sound debate strategy is to give good answers to the questions you are being asked. Terrible strategy is to try and script answers and stick to them regardless of the question being given and/or to dodge and deflect from the questions being given to go off on unrelated tangents.
    1
  8679.  @georgelilly1847  Regarding, "you kinda gotta blame the voters as well," No. You don't. You can claim they are wrong but you can't blame them. You blame the actual wrongdoers and the perps and the makers of what is. The peasant voters are not that. They are VICTIMS in this scenario. They deserve the blame no more than a women who is raped deserves blame even if she was wearing something slutty. You only blame wrongdoers, and never blame victims. Even if the victims are arguably being acting stupidly.
    1
  8680.  @georgelilly1847  Regarding, "do those that support trump have no responsibility for bringing him into power" Yes. They can hold responsibility without holding blame. Regarding, "poverty and right wing propaganda have lead them there" You clearly understand that they are victims. Don't BLAME victims. It's really as simple as that.
    1
  8681.  @georgelilly1847  Regarding, "I find the rape comparison both disingenuous and wildly offensive to rape victims." We are talking about victims right? That's the similarity that both share. My comparison is perfectly apt. Again... you seem to understand on some level they are victims. "years of poverty and right wing propaganda have lead them there" You can't just ignore this and then blame them for the circumstance when you should be blaming, "years of poverty and right wing propaganda have lead them there."
    1
  8682.  @georgelilly1847  Do better please.
    1
  8683.  @georgelilly1847  Regarding, "I think you are overly concerned with a single word rather than the obvious meaning based on the context of the rest of my comment." I don't care about semantics. I care about a concept. It's pretty simple. It goes. Don't blame victims. Do you have a problem with the concept and my point? If so how? You demonstrate with your own words that the people you are talking about are victims. "years of poverty and right wing propaganda have lead them there" We both seem to agree about this. This makes them both victims in our minds. So how do you justify blaming them? Shouldn't you be blaming "years of poverty and right wing propaganda have lead them there" instead of them? And if so how and why do you get there?
    1
  8684.  @georgelilly1847  Regarding, " I also think the rape comparison is still mad fucked up." Then you need to demonstrate how one or the other isn't a victim. Instead you prove the opposite with your own words. Regarding, "Say that a woman got raped cause she wore a short skirt" Nobody gets raped because of what they wear. That's blaming the victim mentality and it happens all to often on every topic imaginable where there is a victim. No matter what that topic someone always, invariably tries to blame the victim, just like you have, and they are ALWAYS wrong.
    1
  8685.  @georgelilly1847  Regarding, "The difference in case you don't see it is that rape victims had there own agency violently ripped from them, and voters didn't, its pretty simple" LMFAO. So the voters were asking for poverty and propaganda over time? It's there fault? Or maybe, just maybe, you should blame, "years of poverty and right wing propaganda." It's pretty simple. Blame the poverty and propaganda.
    1
  8686. Why would she be embarrassed thou (according to her)? I honestly think she doesn't think it was her fault. She thinks it is the fault of Americans. I think. I don't know for sure and I concede it is difficult and not fun trying to get inside her head.
    1
  8687. I totally get it ben. I'm not exactly disagreeing with you either. You are correct that any normal person would be embarrassed and ashamed of losing to Trump but Hillary is far from normal. She needs to make these excuses because her ego can not handle, accept, or process that it might actually be her fault.
    1
  8688. If you want an example that isn't fictional just use bin laden. I felt high as a kite the day he died and I don't think I was on anything.
    1
  8689. Sam seder is controlled opposition.
    1
  8690. This comment section is a cesspool. Really sad for kyle's people.
    1
  8691. Bernie is smart enough to know that there are things far more important than the letter after his name.
    1
  8692. "The US military is where sovereign governments want it." Except for all the many places that don't. Like the many countries the US is illegally at war with.
    1
  8693.  @stingray427man  Regarding, "This video was about bases “not war,” you obviously don’t stay on topic do you?" And you are obviously an idiot or are a paid liar to suggest that the US doesn't have military bases in countries and with governments we are war with and not, "where sovereign governments want it." Sadly I can't stop you from lying to everyone but I can call you out for your bullshit. tHaNkS
    1
  8694. And Gore wasn't evil. A useful idiot for evil, maybe. But not evil incarnate himself. Now being a sexual predator is a prerequisite to be a major party nominee.
    1
  8695.  @EastSide-qc5oy  "I get annoyed when people phrase things the way he did without just coming out and saying what they mean." So you asked a question you already know the answer to instead of just saying what you mean?
    1
  8696.  @EastSide-qc5oy  "I didn’t know what HIS answer would be." If you say so. I'm not sure why considering everything else they have said. What answers did you think they might have given? Poor people own the MSM and their agenda is peace?
    1
  8697.  @EastSide-qc5oy  Regarding, "I was automatically supposed to predict exactly what his answer would be based on that?" Yes. Absolutely. This. "What are you even talking about?" What wrong answer do think they might have logically given to your question that made asking it worthwhile? I'm saying your question's answer is so obvious it's worthless and it only serves to derail the conversation and topic at hand.
    1
  8698.  @DamTheKid  My mistake. Long live matt and glenn.
    1
  8699.  @therealallpro  Here. This was Tim Black breaking it down as it was happening. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=itiacoqgdQI&t=205s
    1
  8700.  @lilye6824  Citation is there. But the short story is... warren goes on Cenk's show. Says she isn't going to "unilaterally disarm" if she makes the general (aka sellout). Cenk lies about this fact and gaslights progressives who were calling out warren for what she said on his show and pretends like she said something other than what she actually said.
    1
  8701.  @therealallpro  If you were genuinely interested in what I was talking about and checked out the video detailing what I was talking about I'd be curious to here your thoughts. Am I making a mountain out of a molehill or am I correct to be furious about this in your opinion? To me there simply is no good excuse for Cenk's actions and makes him think he is just another political hack.
    1
  8702.  @lilye6824  Same question to you that I gave therallallpro. Now that you know what I was talking about, your thoughts?
    1
  8703.  @angelwingszq11z  Regarding, "Please give more detail." I gave you a video that's over 15 minutes and then the cliffsnotes of what is being said in the video. That tends to be more detail than most people want. I've made perfectly clear what I'm talking about. If you don't understand at this point that's on you.
    1
  8704.  @angelwingszq11z  Because this bothers me enough that I'm willing to do your homework for you. Here is Cenk lying on twitter to gaslight progressives for the benefit of Warren. https://twitter.com/cenkuygur/status/1150227331434213376 Here is the proof Cenk is lying. An interview with Warren where she says she "won't unilaterally" disarm, aka she is going to take all the dirty money she can get. Note: this was before warren flip flopped on this position because she was taking heat for it. And even if this were after she flip flopped Cenk would STILL have been lying. Because he says she never said what she did to his own fucking face. Sadly I can't seem to find the original on tyt. This video has emma talking about it with a clip of the original at about the 1 minute mark. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u51WMlwDcRo
    1
  8705. Their time would be better spent making underwear that plays with your balls.
    1
  8706.  @babyt556  "both" They are also mutually exclusive... you can either be using critical thinking OR you can be using faith. You can't do both at the same time and critical thinking is good while faith is terrible.
    1
  8707. "I'll be in it one day." Millions of fools, probably.
    1
  8708. Is there really a good argument for letting jen spew propaganda for the establishment?
    1
  8709. The public has been brainwashed into thinking there are only 2 parties that matter and the entire system has rigged the game against 3rd parties. So...
    1
  8710. Regarding, "thing isn’t the same" They are exactly the same in that you need neither and both kill you slowly. Regarding, "We need it to live." You do not need mcdonalds. There are a million other kinds of food. Regarding, "It doesn’t even get you high." Yeah... it does.
    1
  8711.  @havoc467  "she never asked him to stop running his mouth." And all you need to do to say this is to ignore what is clearly implied. "wasnt going to hide how disgusting he is." Except she was.... even when writing her threat. She had the chance to "expose him" but she was instead trying to blackmail him. "unless shes asking for somthing" I literally gave a direct quote of what she wanted. She wanted him to stop running his mouth.
    1
  8712.  @havoc467  "oh yes because thats TOTALLY whats happening" LMFAO. Yes. It is. "she did the thing, but actually its just "implied"" Why are you acting like implying something isn't doing something? It's weird unless you have an agenda. "actually its written right there huh" It is. She tells you exactly what she wants and it's strange that you pretend otherwise. "Do you even fucking read what you write?" I can't even imagine how this would work or make sense. Do you even think about what you say before you write it? "why bother hiding his sexual harrasment" You mean like she continued to do even after writing her threat? She was hiding her BS claims of harassment to try and use as blackmail. It's sad you don't know the answers to your own questions. It doesn't reflect well upon you.
    1
  8713. Self defeating attitudes are self defeating.
    1
  8714.  @gaston6800  You are right. I'll just stop fighting for nice things and be a self defeating twat like you. /s
    1
  8715. "for attention" Maybe don't give them what they want.
    1
  8716.  @danbaumann8273  Huh? I haven't even watched the video yet. I'm commenting on the title. If it's Actual Justice Warrior's opinion that they are doing it for attention and what they did was bad then why is he giving them what they want? According to him?
    1
  8717.  @danbaumann8273  "Culturally destructive practices need to have attention drawn to them." Does this imparticular person who this guy thinks wants attention need attention? Is there really no way to do this without giving them the attention they crave? "Ignoring them, which really nobody can," I can. I'm even showing you how it's possible. "helps them in their destructiveness because the perps know that too" You are literally giving them what they want. Maybe, just maybe, if you and AJW weren't giving them the attention they are then maybe, just maybe they wouldn't have any reason to do what they are. It's like they want water. And you know they want water. I can only think you are giving it to them because you are stupid.
    1
  8718. Matt for a good laugh check out his channel. He has some videos that he made that are fucking hilarious. Regarding, "As long as people like him are kept from power, we'll be fine." So we are fucked then? I cite Louie Gohmert.
    1
  8719. War right?
    1
  8720. I miss George Carlin.
    1
  8721.  @geddydesmond451  Regarding, "I readily admit its an assumption." LMFAO. You, two seconds ago, "evidence? Pretty sure there is evidence they cheat." Regarding, "I assume because the DNC has been cheating for years that they didnt suddenly stop to make a fair election for Trump." It's pretty stupid to think that rigging your own party election is the same as rigging a general election. It's clearly not and is an apples to oranges comparison that requires EVIDENCE. But don't let that stop you from making that logical leap. And it is a logical leap. Don't pretend otherwise the way you have been all this time until finally being forced to admit you have no evidence. Regarding, "You dont admit shit." I don't have to admit lying about evidence but you do. Regarding, "You just talk shit" I know being pressed for evidence must have been very hard on you. Sorry not sorry I don't give a fuck about what you think and only care about what you can prove and you can't prove jack shit. Regarding, "No thoughtful conversation." I'm not going to lie this is really funny coming from you. Thanks for the laugh.
    1
  8722.  @graywalkerjoin3rdparty74  I'm familiar with what you speak but it's still not evidence. I'd happily have it all investigated better than it is now. I do away with "proprietary information" when it comes to elections so that it can all be investigated and all the machines can be opened up. I again wouldn't be surprised if we did find good evidence some day. But as of now we don't.
    1
  8723.  @graywalkerjoin3rdparty74  Get the audit. I support it happening. That might lead to evidence. If the general was rigged I want to know. But to make that conclusion I need the evidence first.
    1
  8724.  @geddydesmond451  Regarding, "if someone reported uncle handsy Joe just sniffed another little girls hair, would you still run around demanding proof/evidence and calling everyone who didnt agree with you names?" The report of joe sniffing a girls hair is the evidence dipshit. I wouldn't need to have to ask for evidence. I'd already have it. Obviously. I call you names because you are not smart.
    1
  8725.  @graywalkerjoin3rdparty74  Regarding, "Evidence is what justifies the Audit." Can you be more specific? I thought the audit was required by law? Or maybe I'm just thinking about the ballots being turned over. Regarding, "one way or the other, is what the Audit hopes to find." I'm not sure about your phrasing but hopefully you agree with what I'm about to say. An audit should only hope to find the truth. It shouldn't hope to find wrongdoing. But if there is wrongdoing it should out it. Regarding, " I agree there is no Proof at this time that has been admitted into court." I think you are a bit wrapped up in semantics. Evidence and proof are synonyms. The only real distinction people tend to make is in that they tend to consider "proof" to mean evidence that is beyond a reasonable doubt or the like. But call it what you want... proof of cheating or evidence of cheating... they mean the same thing to me. Regarding, "We definitely need Election Transparency for future elections so these questions cannot arise." The whole system should be reformed from top to bottom. Sadly I don't think that's about to happen anytime soon.
    1
  8726.  @graywalkerjoin3rdparty74  Regarding, "I distinguish between the terms." I concede there is a difference. I told you where I think that difference is. It's very similar to your explanation and I think we are essentially say the same thing but only slightly differently. But ultimately they are synonyms. That treasure in your analogy is also rightfully called evidence. Both the map and the treasure are things you can point at and cite. Neither are just a "gut feeling" or "faith."
    1
  8727.  @earlviney5212  Regarding, "Because its impossible." It's clearly not. GWB stole a general election.
    1
  8728.  @JayBee-cr8jm  Israel just bombed another child. And you are complicit.
    1
  8729. Regarding, "I voted for Trump." Idiot. Regarding, "This is awesome." It's political theater and you are dumb.
    1
  8730. Trump is a pathological liar and you are a total fucking moron when you believe what he says.
    1
  8731. "nazis need homes too" -some shitlib, probably
    1
  8732. I will. That doesn't mean I'm voting for dementia joe.
    1
  8733. Um... no. That is not what he's saying.
    1
  8734. If you really think it seems that way it doesn't speak well of you. It makes me think you have comprehension problems.
    1
  8735. Regarding, "how else should one comprehend "it seems to take progressive policies and diversity to win?"" Are you sure he said exactly that? Otherwise you are using quotation marks incorrectly, lying about what he said, and proving my point about you having comprehension problems.
    1
  8736. Timestamp your quote then. I welcome you to prove me wrong.
    1
  8737. Well you do whatever you want to do to rationalize your lying. If you would have been a little more intellectually honest about it I might have continued but seeing as how you are going to double down on stupid I don't really care to continue. People who can't get simple facts correct have opinions that are meaningless. Take care.
    1
  8738. Imagine thinking bri is the one who no longer has any credibility after this.
    1
  8739. That is a great point and well said.
    1
  8740. Whatever you got to tell yourself to rationalize voting for shit. I'm going to vote for someone I want to actually win and I'm prepared to lose.
    1
  8741. Yeah.... it's better to not be willing to hear other points of view and have your beliefs challenged. It's easier and better to just stop listening.
    1
  8742.  @howiedick6857  How so?
    1
  8743.  @howiedick6857  I assure you a message of listening to opposing viewpoints and hearing them out is something of substance and great value to the sane. Sorry you can't hear it even if you did read the words. Comprehension isn't for everyone.
    1
  8744.  @howiedick6857  LMFAO. I would have lost any respect for you I had when you gave your idiotic comment a thumbs up... if I had any to lose. Seriously thou... thanks for the laugh.
    1
  8745.  @howiedick6857  "I also gave your comment a thumbs down" You are an idiot but I'll at least give you some props for owning acting like a total fucking moron. I really expected you to just lie about this or just ignore your actions altogether.
    1
  8746.  @howiedick6857  Even you didn't think enough of your last comment to give it a thumbs up huh? I agree that it was dumb... even for you.
    1
  8747.  @howiedick6857  Regarding, "you don't know me well enough to say that." To say what? That that particular comment was dumb even for you? Yeah ok. It really wasn't and you are always that stupid. That works for me.
    1
  8748.  @howiedick6857  Do you ever say anything that isn't wrong and retarded?
    1
  8749. Don't get me wrong, I don't like Booker, but I thought his performance was pretty good for the most part. He reminds me of Obama... a smooth talker in an empty suit.
    1
  8750. Remember that although it is an uphill battle parties do change. The "democratic" party was once the happy home of racists back in the day. The key to reform is getting the party nominee. They get to practically unilaterally shape and reform the party. They get to pick the chair who pick the people under them and so on. Corporate dems can be purged the same way progressives were purged. I don't care about statements. I need change and that is the quickest and easiest (not to be mistaken with easy, it is anything but that) way to get it.
    1
  8751. Yes I listened to the video JR. I am unclear why you think I didn't. If you think that this is going to push Sanders out I think you are very mistaken. And you are very correct about the notion of a new party MrB. We already have a progressive party called the green party. A new party is superfluous. Oh and progressive is a synonym to populist when it comes to policy JR.
    1
  8752.  @TriViuM2k22  I'm not talking about his motives (except when accurately pointing out they are wrong). I'm talking about his words. And if you don't think, for example, that "CNN sucks" then ultimately you are wrong.
    1
  8753.  @TriViuM2k22  Fair enough. That said it was my original point. I guess I could have done the same thing to you with, regarding, "he says it its about legit news that he doesnt agree with," I'm pretty sure that I didn't say that he did. Instead I attempted to address your point. My original points still remains and is still perfectly accurate... Trump trashing the corporate media is arguably one of the most correct things he does, even if he does it for the wrong reasons. Because ultimately the corporate media blows. I'm not trying to defend Trump. I'm trying to piss on the corporate media.
    1
  8754. I am never giving up the word retarded. If you think I am comparing them to a mentally handicapped person you would be wrong. I have no problem with mentally handicapped people but I do have a problem with retards (climate change deniers would be an example). Keep in mind that I'm old and stubborn and that's a word I've used my entire life. I accept that some might have a problem with it. Ok. I don't care. Language is just a tool we use to convey ideas. CONTEXT IS EVERYTHING. The people who want to ban the use of certain words without bothering to consider context are just being lazy in my opinion.
    1
  8755. Regarding, "Trump is sterilizing immigrants" The orange clown is pure evil. But I have no reason to think that he even knew this was happening.
    1
  8756. Nope. Fauci is.
    1
  8757. Obama was a far more successful conman.
    1
  8758.  @batgurrl  By promising hope and change and bringing the same old same old.
    1
  8759.  @batgurrl  He brought us war, set record deportations, his signature piece of legislature was a republican health care plan and he left the country in such a shit place the country gave the keys to an orange clown after he left. Try not to lie to yourself about it.
    1
  8760.  @batgurrl  Regarding, "the country was not in a shit place" Only countries who are in a shit place elect orange clowns. Regarding, "maybe modeled on Romney care" Which was modeled on an idea from the heritage foundation, a republican think tank. It was their idea to try and save the for profit health care system from collapsing and keeping the country from actually getting a decent health care system. Regarding, "Trump turned this country into an international laughingstock" It wasn't before? As it waged war everywhere? As it denied it's people health insurance even during your clowns presidency? Regarding, "a pandemic he did NOTHING to stop" I'm sure Obama would have stopped the pandemic. I'm just kidding. You are impossible to take seriously. I'm done with this.
    1
  8761. Everybody makes mistakes but not everyone can admit it when they do... joe straight up admits his mistake and they correct the record and you think that is something that need be insulted? Nah... that type of behavior should be praised. Worst video I've seen you make.
    1
  8762. Stop calling it incompetence David. It's not. It's deliberate.
    1
  8763. That's still too much.
    1
  8764.  @loulfw2513  Cenk and Kyle were cofounders of the justice dems. The more it looks like it the more all of them are shit.
    1
  8765.  @elynum  "you obviously want to deify Jimmy and didn't listen to what he said or you just like it when he objectified or sexually harasses/humiliates a woman" You obviously want to smear people as sexual harassers. "Come with a better thing than just calling me a liar," I also told you why you are lying while you ignore it to spout crap like this. "you sound like these republicans who watch video and deny things happen." I'm older than dirt and have never voted for a republican in my life but no doubt saying nonsense like this is easier for you than addressing what I actually say.
    1
  8766.  @loulfw2513  I want to trust kyle but I'm not sure I do ATM. His take here is just terrible.
    1
  8767.  @loulfw2513  "Kyle has admitted that experiment failed." Meh. He'd rather insist they aren't "corrupt" for bad reasons.
    1
  8768. Boycott amazon if you haven't already.
    1
  8769.  @positivemobile  Then why are you resubscribing?
    1
  8770.  @positivemobile  I really only comment on the internet to let off some steam and rage at a world I know I can't change. Now that I've apparently changed something I don't know what to do with that.
    1
  8771.  @tom4115  I give you a straight up fact and you give me, "another who doesn't understand economics...." You are a deeply unserious "person."
    1
  8772. "fan of both shows" Let's never hang out. Good luck with your shitlibs.
    1
  8773. The people who think corporations aren't already doing everything they can to automate their workforce are a special kind of stupid.
    1
  8774. Are you really as dense as you seem Robert? Or are you being paid to say stupid things? Like I said these corporations are already trying to automate their workforce or would you like to continue to deny this and pretend the things you are fear mongering about aren't already happening like a total fucking dipshit?
    1
  8775. The fact that you don't understand my point without me holding your hand and explaining the obvious to you doesn't speak well of you. My point is that they are already doing what you are fear mongering about. It's not like they are waiting for the country to raise the minimum wage to try and cut their labor force to the bare bones and automate. We already live in a society that is trying to train its people to check themselves out of the store rather than have a person do it for them. We already live in a society where all truck driving jobs (and there are a shit ton of them) are in jeopardy... and it has nothing to do with the minimum wage and raising the minimum wage does nothing to exacerbate the problem that already fucking exists. If I adhered to your dumb as fuck "logic" then we shouldn't have a minimum wage at all. Shit we should go back to slavery because there wouldn't be a way for even a machine to compete with free labor. That type of thinking is asinine and I shouldn't have to explain why.
    1
  8776. But you go ahead and continue to support your tax dollars going to subsidize the richest of the rich like a total fucking dipshit if you want. You can't fix stupid.
    1
  8777. Regarding, "Nice discourse." Sorry if you think the stupid things you say are entitled to politeness and respect. They aren't. You literally are making the world a world place when opening your mouth and I have no tolerance for it. Sorry not sorry. Regarding, "underpaid because he needs gov assistance." Aren't we suppose to value work? Don't we think that a person working 40 hours a week is doing the right thing? Should that person need to go to the government to help pay their bills? Especially when the places they work for are making record profits? Regarding, "I see a person who is living above his means." You're right. They should be living in their car, only eating ramen noodles, and forgo health insurance. I probably should note that this is sarcasm in case you aren't smart enough to realize it without me telling you. Regarding, "there should not be a minimum wage." Of course. Just another regulation holding back these corporations that profit billions every year thinks a mental midget. They should be allowed to pay even less so that the government and our tax dollars need to do even more to fill in the gap. Good plan. And by good plan I mean holy fucking shit are you dumb.
    1
  8778. One more thing regarding, "Nice discourse." Do you at least realize you are a hypocrite? Weren't you the same person who started their original post calling people morons and closing it by calling people ignorant? But I suppose you think that was very different then what I did. Hypocrites always do.
    1
  8779. I refuse to talk about personal information about myself because I value my privacy and have nothing to prove to a complete and total fucking moron such as yourself. That said I'm not surprised you would ignore and deflect from the substantive points I've made and try to make it about me personally. I'm done with this. Like I said you can't fix stupid. Good luck with whole dumb as fuck hypocrite thing you have going on.
    1
  8780.  @jamesharris3746  Ok. Fair enough. My misunderstanding. That I agree with.
    1
  8781. To think I really liked this channel at one time. What was I thinking?
    1
  8782. Regarding, "insanity that said Clinton could beat Trump." I fucking hate Clinton but she got MILLIONS more votes. And she would have easily won the EC had she only been perceived to have won her primary legitimately.
    1
  8783. Money in politics is the problem. Not old people in politics.
    1
  8784. They go to pete on the first ballot. They are pledged.
    1
  8785. Jimmy is a hero. AOC and her ilk are frauds. Fraud squad. Never forget.
    1
  8786. You know there are more than 2 parties right?
    1
  8787. "you hate him? You can't stand him?" He isn't the only one. What makes him scary is that he is a far better conman than the donald trumps of this world.
    1
  8788. You are an idiot.
    1
  8789. I agree with everything you say except that MAGA is centered around a single guy.
    1
  8790. The next president of the United States, Kanye West. Seriously thou his comments about slavery are insane.
    1
  8791.  @GTA5Player1  I'd start with youtube video, "Intercept Reporter CAUGHT Falsely Accusing Jimmy Dore Of Lying" to learn more.
    1
  8792. "The space force was a good idea." Yup. But why do we stop here? I want a drone army, death star, stargate, battlestar, transporter or at least the flying cars I was promised in back to the future.
    1
  8793. He provides an unlimited source of BS.
    1
  8794.  @LeShawnTho  "You're just shouting into the wind on YouTube like me. You are of no importance." Let's say this were true.... at least they aren't being a willing hypocrite about it like you are at least.
    1
  8795. While I agree with you about the elite that is not true of peasant republicans. For example they, at least to some degree, understand that corruption is a problem and that our politicians are bought.
    1
  8796.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  "says the guy who can;t logic his way out of a paper bag" I can't tell you how funny this is coming from you. Thanks.
    1
  8797.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  Pretty please tell me again how you don't care about sam calling for censorship with your handle.
    1
  8798.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  "outliers being irrelevant to valid conclusions" I've asked you this before but you ignored the point. Would this be a way to not call OJ a murderer? Because it's just as meaningless when you do it here.
    1
  8799.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  "spreading covid misinformation" So do you think corporate media should be censored for their covid misinformation? Or just joe rogan? FYI your argument is the same nonsense youtube uses to try and rationalize their censorship. You are impossible to take seriously.
    1
  8800.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  "Killing people" LMFAO You are misinforming people and accusing joe rogan of "killing people." If what you say is true, and it's clearly not, then charge him with murder or manslaughter. As it stands it's just misinformation being spread by you.
    1
  8801.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  "Killing people" This is funny because you misinforming people and claiming that joe has killed people. If what you were saying is true, and it's obviously not, then he should be charged with a crime, not censored. And you could arguably be charged with slander. Imagine accusing joe of killing people like you are.
    1
  8802.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  "the line is causing harm to people" Causing harm to people is already illegal. You only censor because you want to. "you refuse to understand that because this is a religion to you at this point" LMFAO Projection much?
    1
  8803.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  "causing harm to people isn;t remotely illegal" It is. That's why when you slandered joe and said he killed people it's illegal.
    1
  8804.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  "causing harm to people isn;t remotely illegal" It's why rape and murder is illegal. Or do you live in an alternate universe?
    1
  8805.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  "you have a real problem with understanding scale." LMFAO What a silly "argument." "Can you provide a single compelling reason why anyone should ignore the 20 years of Sam clearly not being "pro censorship" to replace all of that information because during a pandemic he advocated that Rogan be held responsible for using his platform to cause harm?" Let's try this "argument" but change a couple words and see how it does... "Can you provide a single compelling reason why anyone should ignore the 20+ years of OJ clearly not murdering people to replace all of that information because one time he went out and killed some folk?" Do you really not understand why your argument is terrible? "Stop with the emotional lashing out and explain why 1 time trumps 20 years of evidence of the contrary." LMFAO Stop with the emotional lashing out and explain why a person advocating for censorship means they don't advocate for censorship again? It's funny. "If Lebron James has a bad game and only scores 2 points and fouls out then by your logic Lebron James is a terrible basketball player, which is absurd." LMFAO A better analogy would be to say that if lebron threw a single basketball game that would always make them guilty of it. And not amount of games where he didn't throw a game would change it.
    1
  8806.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  "if your argument is covid misinformation doesn;t cause harm, that 2 is ridiculous" LMFAO Never do I say, "covid misinformation doesn't cause harm." You are a very tedious person to talk to. You would rather strawman than address the things I'm actually saying.
    1
  8807.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  My comments are being censored. The irony.
    1
  8808.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  "if your argument is covid misinformation doesn;t cause harm, that 2 is ridiculous" Not once do I say that. Maybe address the things I actually say.
    1
  8809.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  "you're a very tedious person to talk to" This is funny when combined with a strawman argument from you.
    1
  8810.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  "If Lebron James has a bad game and only scores 2 points and fouls out then by your logic Lebron James is a terrible basketball player, which is absurd." That's not my logic. I understand that people have off days. They can't control that. But they can control their actions. A more apt analogy would be to say that the black sox will forever be guilty of throwing games for one series. And deflecting to talk about all the games they didn't throw doesn't change that fact.
    1
  8811.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  "by your logic" By your logic OJ isn't a murderer because it's only once. And people who bring up that one time are "cherry picking." Even you should realize on some level how silly that is.
    1
  8812. Except karma doesn't actually exist.
    1
  8813. How apt your name is.
    1
  8814. Do not underestimate their intelligence. They are smart. If they look dumb it is only because they are corrupt.
    1
  8815. The irony of you calling others idiots is really something else.
    1
  8816. The problem isn't the idea... it's the execution. His books will prove that assuming he finishes them.
    1
  8817. Jimmy's got a potty mouth so instead we got to talk about pocket pussies and minimize smears and blackmail.
    1
  8818. Regarding, "In Bernies own words." You mean, in Bernies own, out of context words. Here is the complete context for people who would rather not be lied to... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dO95ND0P9LU&t=0s
    1
  8819. Joan I would also like to add that you should be ashamed of yourself.
    1
  8820. He's kept one: nothing will fundamentally change.
    1
  8821. I smoke more weed than joe and I don't have the problem with math he does. It's not the weed. Some people just suck at math.
    1
  8822.  @robertglass3944  What joe was doing is exactly what they do in math class. What is your excuse for saying stupid shit? Are you high as balls. I am. Still I know what math is.
    1
  8823.  @kylehorvath9295  Regarding, "He is just speculating bud." He is doing more than that. "Speculating" better describes who you think JJ Watt is going to sign with. The OP is, "Well Hope you realize that DNC is very much capable of rigging the Presidential election too." except are they? They offer no evidence and expect us to just take their claim and agree with it. Regarding, "DNC unequivocally rigged the 2016 primary" Yup. Regarding, "there is a mountain of circumstantial evidence they interfered in 2020 as well" The DNC says Pete won the Iowa caucus. That's more than circumstantial evidence. But that's in the primary. Being able to rig a game being played on your home court in your hometown with a referees you are hiring for the game isn't the same as rigging another game. The primary is not the general. It's an apples to oranges comparison. Regarding, "I don't think it's crazy to suspect foul play in the general election too." I don't doubt their is foul play afoot. But ultimately I need evidence and there is none when it comes to the general. Regarding, "I however personally think the DNC didn't interfere in the general" We agree on this. Don't get me wrong I'd quickly changes this opinion if given some good evidence and wouldn't be shocked if some did come out but as of now I don't have it and I'm not going to pretend I do. Regarding, "The DNC and its donor base really don't care if Biden or Trump get elected" Meh. Lots of money spent on the general says otherwise. If it didn't matter I don't think the rich would set their money on fire like that. That said I agree that it doesn't matter much. But it does matter a little. Regarding, "The underlying detail that no one seems to address is that many people (Right and left) have little to no confidence in our electoral system and feel alienated by said system." I agree. Regarding, "Its not blantant fraud (i.e. changing votes)" Are you sure? Exit polls in the 2016 primary indicated widespread election fraud in the "democratic" primary. And now they barely even do exit polls. Regarding, "The average person realizes their voice has little sway on the political system and aren't educated enough in civics, economics, communication, law, or other subjects to properly articulate this feeling of marginalization." Even if they can articulate it and understand it that doesn't do much. The system is rigged top to bottom. Regarding, "At the end of the day are you going to trust a pick pocket with your car?" No. Regarding, "No evidence they're a car thief, just a pick pocketer right." I have contempt and hatred for the DNC. I think they are crooked and corrupt. I think they would happily cheat in the general if they thought they would get away with it. I wouldn't be surprised at all if evidence of cheating was found. But right now I don't have that. So I'm not going to pretend otherwise.
    1
  8824.  @kylehorvath9295  Regarding, "beyond the wikileaks stuff" If you don't know about what happened in the Iowa caucus be sure to check it out. It's appalling. If you really want to check it out some of the stories I'd recommend (and I'm not going to put up links because youtube tends to not allow them. you should have all you would need by checking out articles such as...) "Iowa Democrats won’t correct errors on caucus tally sheets, emails show" from the chicago tribune "What a Surprise! DNC’s Shadow App Founder is a Pete Buttigieg Supporter — App Crashed and Now Pete Is Ahead of Bernie – How About That!" by the gateway pundit "Iowa autopsy report: DNC meddling led to caucus debacle" politico Long story short bernie crushed in iowa but the party conspired to give the state to pete. Just recently tom said the quiet part out loud when he just talked about how important he knows momentum is in elections. That's why they didn't let bernie get what was rightfully his. Status Coup just did a video on youtube talking about it titled, "Tom Perez Subtly Explains DNC's Motivation to Rig 2020 Iowa Caucus"
    1
  8825.  @kylehorvath9295  Regarding, "I was mistaken" No problem. It happens. Regarding, "I just saw the "your wrong show me proof" mentality" I never said they were wrong. (full disclosure I did think they were wrong and would not be able to provide evidence) but I do want proof. I want that from everybody for pretty much everything. Regarding, "facebook" I happily don't do facebook. Sorry. Regarding, "Thanks again for a genuine and thoughtful response! Cheers!" You as well. Cheers.
    1
  8826.  @kylehorvath9295  A couple other things you might want to check out that aren't this include: and I'm going to try and provide links this time... https://tdmsresearch.com/2016/06/20/45/ Also there is the stanford study from the 2016 "democratic" primary. I can't seem to find it because I suspect google are suppressing it's ability to be found but I did find this article that references it and mostly just tries to discredit it (I think, I confess I didn't read it all and just skimmed). https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/stanford-study-proves-election-fraud-through-exit-poll-discrepancies/
    1
  8827.  @kylehorvath9295  Hopefully those links show. I've posted twice with them. If they didn't let me know.
    1
  8828.  @rideordietheyretring2tranx382  Regarding, "you're a horse face pony soldier" That is the type of quality of response I would expect from you at this point.
    1
  8829.  @rideordietheyretring2tranx382  Regarding, "that's exactly what a fascist bootlicker would say because you have no argument" That's exactly what an idiot troll would say. Two can play your stupid game.
    1
  8830. MSNBC and CNN are just paid propogandists.
    1
  8831.  @Bickle121  I'm going to address your BS as if I take you seriously. I do not. "when asked about specific people they say “I can’t answer that” because it may involve an ongoing trial but when asked generally they say no." You are full of it. You are claiming that they can make a general statement like "no" to everyone but they can't do it for individuals? And that is suppose to make sense? "may involve an ongoing trial" What BS. If anyone knows if there were feds there it should be the freaking fed right? And despite you BS claims they absolutely HAVE NOT denied having anyone there. "increased funds," I wish I were able to fail my way into more money like this. Is there even a situation that you think calls for less cops? Because I suspect it doesn't work like that for you. But there's always a reason for more cops am I right? Maybe if they get more money then they will be able to afford more of their own to send in there. And then it can be an actual coup instead of the glorified riot/protest. As a US citizen I'm well aware of what an actual coup looks like. We do it all the time all over the place to other countries afterall. This wasn't one.
    1
  8832. You are being serious aren't you.
    1
  8833. That's a lot of cringe.
    1
  8834. Musk is a parasite that has gotten rich because of US taxpayers. His companies get BILLIONS of dollars. That's why he's rich.
    1
  8835. Is he already dead? Then no. Sincerely, Karma.
    1
  8836.  Paul :  You make me hate the human race.
    1
  8837. Are you trying to prove your name?
    1
  8838. Your comment is embarrassing. If anyone is getting paid to make people dumber it's people like you.
    1
  8839. who are you? I'm just kidding... I don't actually care.
    1
  8840. Not only will I never support you ever again but I'm going to rail against you ever chance I get.
    1
  8841. It's a title you hold for life as is president.
    1
  8842. "There is no lesser of two evils." Of course there is. Trump could prove it by pardoning assange. Just because he doesn't mean there isn't a "lesser" when it comes to evil. But even if there is a "lesser" evil you don't support it because it's evil.
    1
  8843.  @42Mrgreenman  Regarding, "even if there were "Good men"..." Don't get me wrong I'm not arguing anyone in this scenario is good. I'm just pointing out that there is such a thing as a lesser evil. For example a guy who kills their wife because they caught them in bed with a golf pro can accurately be said to be evil. But it's also accurate to say they are "less evil" than a mass murderer because there IS such a thing as a lesser evil.
    1
  8844. Regarding, "He needs to do some volunteer work." In a federal pound you in the ass prison.
    1
  8845. Regarding, "Are you kidding me, Kamala Harris the winner, you are wrong" Dude. She clearly was the winner. He's not talking about her in general but of her performance. Yes she sucks in general. But that's a different conversation and topic. You are conflating things when you should be able to compartmentalize what you think of her in general and of what you think of her PERFORMANCE. And performance is the correct term because they are essentially actors in that format.
    1
  8846. Lori regarding, "I voted for the lesser of two evils!" Even if I agree with this and I'm not sure I do. YOU VOTED FOR EVIL. Thank you for admitting it.
    1
  8847. You were preaching to the choir but I thank you for it. I agree with everything you said. Like I said we are living in sad times and I'm exhausted by it. But it is nice to know that there are at least some people who get it and blame the right people for the problems that are so prevalent. There are plenty of people who know they are getting fucked over but they blame the wrong people like immigrants for example. I wish you and your family well.
    1
  8848. I found myself thinking about my own comment here and would like to add that if there is a group of people who could legitimately have a problem with immigrants they would be Native Americans. I would totally understand it if they (I'm guessing you are by your name) would take issue with immigration after an imported culture of greed has fucked them over for so long. I would totally understand that. My issue was specifically directed at people whose ancestors are immigrants but now want to close the door on other immigrants as if they are what is wrong with society today when they are not.
    1
  8849. Regarding, "Bernie should dye his hair." Um... no.
    1
  8850.  @justtubingby129  His whole brand is authenticity. Everything about him hasn't changed for decades... even his hair.
    1
  8851.  @justtubingby129  Let's not mess with that. Trust me.
    1
  8852.  @MichaelAronson  Did he? Sounds dumb. Shouldn't you be defending sam instead of deflecting to talk about jimmy?
    1
  8853.  @MichaelAronson  "Why do I need to defend anyone?" Because you are only here because I'm talking about your man crush sam.
    1
  8854.  @MichaelAronson  "Oh I just told you why I'm here." Actions speak louder than your meaningless words. You are only addressing me because I'm telling truths about sam you don't like. Try not to lie to yourself about it.
    1
  8855.  @tauriqabdullah6130  "He's in denial" Is it denial? Or is money corrupting things as usual? Kyle is still affiliated with TYT but he never mentions it even in a video where it's specifically about TYT and where he would bury a story about ana and blackmail. "I don't blame him" I do. I do a lot. Why wouldn't you blame him? His silence says something about him the same way MSM silence about assange says something about them. It says both can't be trusted.
    1
  8856. Beautiful dog. Beautiful girl. What's not to like about these videos?
    1
  8857. Meanwhile, in reality, dems have the presidency, house and senate but yeah... mitch is the one with all the power. /s
    1
  8858.  @AQuietNight  "China claimed they had virtually ended the spread" As if they are the only corrupt government to make such a claim.
    1
  8859.  @AQuietNight  "[China and Europe are] getting under control, and we are likewise getting under control," Donald trump while the United States neared 2.7 million cases of the virus.
    1
  8860.  @AQuietNight  Regarding, "You are ignoring the pattern of misinformation by China." I straight up acknowledged they are liars but pointed out they are hardly the only one. The only person "ignoring" is you. "Treatment was based on early information supplied by China" If you are listening to china uncritically that's on you and really dumb. "It has since come out the early data supplied by China was inaccurate by design, not by mistake." The next thing you know I'll find out the US government might be guilty of doing the exact same thing. Fortunately I'm sure china is the only country doing this right? And yes, this is sarcasm.
    1
  8861. Because she rightfully doesn't want to conflate her talking about yang with an endorsement of yang.
    1
  8862.  @brianbattaglia2187  "Lack of substance = her calling names" That's funny because you are the one lacking substance. You are straight up lying about krystal. Saying that she has problems with yang is not calling yang names. But that won't stop the real liars... yang gang, from doing what they do best, LIE.
    1
  8863. "Every reasonable person knows" Sadly they do not. Even "reasonable people" can be propagandized. That's why they do it.
    1
  8864.  @laurenbrillante89  I have family member who buy the BS. They are reasonable under normal circumstances. But they are brainwashed.
    1
  8865.  @laurenbrillante89  If people didn't buy the BS in mass numbers there would be revolution.
    1
  8866.  @TheTruthDragonNJ09  He lied about what warren said on his own show to own face about her saying she would sell out in the general.
    1
  8867. How many pothead comedic heroes do you have?
    1
  8868. FYI I think Chappelle is still my number one but Jimmy is definitely on my list.
    1
  8869. All the problems he complains about involve their for profit motive.
    1
  8870.  @BB-ki7he  Regarding, "the government they fuckup anything they touch" Canada pays half as much per person for their system, that doesn't leave millions uninsured, where medical bankruptcy isn't a thing, where they live longer, and their infant mortality rate is superior. If their government is "fucking up everything they touch" what does that say about the US health care system where let's compare: pays twice as much per person, leaves millions uninsured, leaves millions in medical bankruptcy, where their people die sooner, and their babies are less likely to be born alive. Regarding, "Medicare for all does not get rid of profit motive" Literally the only thing the current system cares about is profit. Health insurance companies offer NOTHING of actual value to the system. They are just a leech that cares about making money. And they will happily do anything and everything to stop you from getting care if it means they can make a buck. They spend billions of dollars on people whose job it is to figure out ways to deny you coverage. M4A does not cure everything. But it goes a long, long way to destroying the profit motive of the current system.
    1
  8871.  @BB-ki7he  Regarding, "Canada isnt perfect" No shit. They are just better in every single metric that matters. As for the rest of your bs I really don't care anymore.
    1
  8872.  @BB-ki7he  Regarding, "reallly you dont know much about canada huh?" Maybe make a point instead of this stupid shit. Regarding, "you dont care about the 3rd leading cause of death in america" What the actual fuck are you talking about? I'm just kidding. I'm way done caring what you think at this point.
    1
  8873.  @BB-ki7he  Regarding, ""Medicare for all" would not help this it would only incentivize them to hide the problem even more." FYI this is not evidence. It's just a nonsense claim. If you actually brought any evidence I might care more about the things you say. As it stands I'm done wasting my time addressing you.
    1
  8874.  @BB-ki7he  Regarding, "How is it a nonsense claim" Because you offer zero evidence for it and you act as if I should just accept your claim while providing no evidence for it. You are acting as if you have some innate point. You don't. Regarding, "government already hides the problem the whole media hides the problem" Let's say I agreed with what you are saying. You still have provided zero evidence that, ""Medicare for all" would not help this it would only incentivize them to hide the problem even more." Maybe give me a single reason why this is true. Regarding, "You are even afraid to talk about Iatrogenesis" More like I don't find much reason to be talking to you. Regarding, "i bet you dont even know what it means" I don't. And you haven't given me any reason to care about it either. Let's say you provided evidence that, ""Medicare for all" would not help this it would only incentivize them to hide the problem even more," I might start caring more about the things you say. But as it stands you have been nothing but a waste of time. Regarding, "You think im lying about it or something?" I think you are moron and you haven't that hasn't provided evidence of your claim that, "Medicare for all" would not help this it would only incentivize them to hide the problem even more," And you continue to prove that point by misunderstanding my problem with you and misunderstanding that you haven't backed your claim up with shit. Remember when I was making the claim that canada has a superior health care system? And that they are better by literally every metric? Well I didn't just make that claim. I provided evidenced. You provide jack shit. And I can only wonder why I'm wasting my time talking to you. Regarding, "Literally just type in iatrogenesis death into google if you dont know." I don't care at this point. You have given me less than no reason to.
    1
  8875.  @BB-ki7he  Regarding, "wow you are ignorant." Wow are you stupid. Regarding, "What evidence did you provide exactly?" "Canada pays half as much per person for their system, that doesn't leave millions uninsured, where medical bankruptcy isn't a thing, where they live longer, and their infant mortality rate is superior." Why am I talking to you? LMFAO
    1
  8876.  @BB-ki7he  Regarding, "when it would take 1 sec to find out what im talking about." What your talking about? I don't care. I care about evidence. You have given none.
    1
  8877.  @BB-ki7he  Regarding, "I tell you how to find evidence" I know how to find evidence. You can tell because when I was making a claim I provided it. Do you know how to find evidence? If so you would be wiser to provide it before this. That way I might care what you have to say.
    1
  8878.  @BB-ki7he  Regarding, "I dont provide anything because i expect you to know this" Also you, "government already hides the problem the whole media hides the problem" And still no evidence to support the claim of, ""Medicare for all" would not help this it would only incentivize them to hide the problem even more." Full disclosure: even if you provide evidence at this point I'm way done caring about it or anything you really have to say at this point.
    1
  8879. So you are going to use the actions of one person to paint a picture of an entire group of people? That is pretty fucked up.
    1
  8880. Beer and Steroids would make a great name for a band or album.
    1
  8881. When people go to the polls we can at least try to check the results with exit polls. When people vote by mail we have nothing like that. We are just suppose to accept the results. I am not ok with that.
    1
  8882. Force the vote! Sign the petition. https://forcethevote.org/
    1
  8883. It's BS and you respect it at the same time and that makes sense to you how?
    1
  8884. I mean they never needed to start them in the first place.
    1
  8885. "Go listen to him." Words are meaningless without trust and I have no good reason to trust him.
    1
  8886.  @janeseamore1370  Everyone loves to think they can just listen to someone talk and see into their soul. They can't. At least not reliably so. That's one of the reasons why you want someone who has a record. It's how you know what a person does with when they actually have power and aren't just talking about it. Your guy doesn't have it. Look at how terrible of a conman trump is. Still how many buy his BS. Well there are actually some great conmen out their and you should be protecting yourself from them. Look at all the liars on the debate stage. Booker is a great one to me. But he has a record so I know he is full of it. Regarding, "Hes a brilliant man." Great conmen are. There is a reason he has been saying and advertising that he is for "medicare for all" when he actually isn't anything near it. Trust is earned. Not given. And I haven't even gone into the obvious reasons you should want experience and he has none of that either.
    1
  8887. Trump got billions in free media from corporate media. They covered his empty podium while Sanders was talking to record crowds.
    1
  8888. Regarding, "Oh I understand. So rape is 100% consensual." Translation... you don't understand are going to double down on stupid.
    1
  8889. Aurel regarding, "Oh so then taxes are voluntary?" Jesus fucking christ. Yes. They are. If you don't like them you go ahead and form your own fucking country dipshit. Taxes are the price we pay for living in a civilized society. They pay for roads and schools and lots and lots of other shit that are good for the common good. If you don't want that common good then go elsewhere and start your own fucking country were you get to be free and don't have anything that resembles civilized society. I don't get to say this often but I would like for you to get raped. Then maybe, just maybe you would be able understand why what you are saying is fucking moronic.
    1
  8890. Aurel nobody is forcing you to live here. Do the country a favor and leave.
    1
  8891. Chris told you to vote for biden and harris. He and MSNBC are complicit.
    1
  8892. I was legit happy the day Osama bin Laden died... I guess that means I'd happily slaughter innocent civilians.
    1
  8893. "the second time was sketchy" LMFAO. Yeah. Only the second time was a sketchy vote.
    1
  8894. Regarding, "We need that 700 billion cause Russia be hacking and ISIS has Machetes" Obviously. But why isn't it more? There should be a military parade everyday and those cost money. Sadly we will never know why Warren didn't demand more because she was never asked by a journalist who only cares about her future and not the country's.
    1
  8895. Yes I realized you were being sarcastic as was I. I called it the department of offense originally for a reason. It is a fucking joke what we spend on the military. That is shit that should talked about constantly. That is something "journalists" should be grilling politicians about. They don't because they blow. And our politicians blow because they vote for it. Even a politician that many consider to be progressive. There is nothing progressive about voting for that bill to me. I don't even get to know why she voted for it because she isn't even fucking asked and it pisses me off. She gets asked about where she is going to be years from now.... How about talking about where she is this very fucking second. That is what is important.
    1
  8896. I personally would prefer it if "journalists" would ask questions that are not fucking stupid. I care a lot less about trying to pin her down on her political future as much as I care about trying to pin her down on her political positions. She should be being asked about her support for the 700 billion dollars for department of offense... more than Trump even wanted but she was happy to give. That is what she should be asked about and then maybe I'd agree that her dodging the question is somehow important.
    1
  8897. Bernie's job is to take all your revo lutionary spirit and funnel it into a cor rupt, warmongering party. He is a sheep herder and he is leading you to slaughter.
    1
  8898.  @rextrek  "what have you done to HELP OTHERS?" Let's say I haven't... what does that have to do with the point I'm making? Or are you just deflecting?
    1
  8899.  @Secretary.of.Edukation  All the neocons including our current president who bernie told everyone to vote for. What is your point?
    1
  8900.  @Secretary.of.Edukation  "deflection right on time." LMFAO You say this like that's what we were talking about. In reality it is YOU who is bringing up something completely off topic. "Again...who started the 20 year 2.3 trillion dollar fake war in Afghanistan?" LMFAO You say this like I didn't just answer it. Here... I'll copy and paste the answer I've already given while you do this nonsense... "All the neocons including our current president who bernie told everyone to vote for." "deflection right on time." This is ALSO funny because you don't even ATTEMPT to answer my question after I've answer yours. What does this have to do with my OP and the topic at hand?
    1
  8901.  @Secretary.of.Edukation  "who started the 20 year war in Afghanistan?" Who just voted to give billions in weapons to ukraine?
    1
  8902.  @Secretary.of.Edukation  "a warmongering party clown" Yup. That he is controlled opposition. Do you know what that means? It means he pretends to be on your side but it's only just talk while he supports and enables a warmongering PARTY. His party voted for that war. The famous picture of GWB signing it has joe biden right there and that's the guy bernie tells you to vote for.
    1
  8903.  @Secretary.of.Edukation  "you were literally" I also LITERALLY answered your question and you pretended I didn't. And you are doing it while ignoring my questions. Maybe just go away.
    1
  8904.  @Secretary.of.Edukation  " you were literally talking about a warmongering party clown" And you were citing a war that his party was voting for. You are acting like the dems hands are clean. They most certainly are not.
    1
  8905.  @Secretary.of.Edukation  "that's actually not what "warmongering" means at all. But whatever keeps you bathing in your own ignorance" I never even attempted to define what warmongering means. But whatever keeps you bathing in your own ignorance.
    1
  8906.  @Secretary.of.Edukation  "But whatever keeps you bathing in your own ignorance" People like you inspired dunning and kruger to come up with their original hypothesis.
    1
  8907. I stand in solidarity with cornel west. That doesn't include the fraud kyle as I also stand with jimmy dore. Kyle can stand alone now that he left the warm TYT blanket.
    1
  8908.  @JohnSpartan-117  What a worthless comment. Maybe just keep you mouth quiet rather than proving you have nothing to say.
    1
  8909. Don't reproduce. Thanks for that in advance.
    1
  8910. Your comment is funny because you offer no substance austin. Don't let being a hypocrite bother you. It clearly doesn't.
    1
  8911. He is not delusional, he is corrupt. It is an important distinction.
    1
  8912. It is if he wants to be taken seriously.
    1
  8913. Killua your mom wants to let you know your white sheets are done. Sounds like you are set for you Klan rally.
    1
  8914. sdkeller regarding, "Kind of hard to do when the DNC just dumped every Bernie and Keith supporter." Yup. What they did was really messed up and shows why it is important that a progressive like Sanders win. The only reason they were able to do what they did was because Hillary won the nomination. The table turns if Sanders wins. And although these insiders have way more power and influence than they should ultimately primary voters are going to have their say and they are going to support Sanders overwhelmingly. Regarding, "We'll have to burn the DNC to the ground" The major parties have effectively rigged the game to prevent themselves from being destroyed. We need to take over the party and Sanders is our not so secret weapon to even the very tilted playing field. Regarding, "If by some miracle we elect Bernie, the neoliberals and the CIA will assassinate him." Sanders can be trusted to pick a progressive like Gabbard or Turner to run with him God forbid something like this happen.
    1
  8915. Okami loves Trump and thinks his farts smell great so I don't really feel the need to address any of his "thoughts" intelligently.
    1
  8916. CWG there is nothing that you wrote that has any place in reality.
    1
  8917. Stay classy mikhail.
    1
  8918. Derick, I find it amusing how idiots like you need to label everything so that they can try to make sense of the world. It is also funny how you do it wrong and think that communism, socialism, and democratic socialism are the same things when to anyone with half a brain they realize they are not. If you actually took a history class I am certain you failed it.
    1
  8919. Jon Smith I'm not sure what exactly you are trying to say. But regarding, "putting a purity test that even bernie cant past" I'm not sure what "purity test" you are talking about that Sanders can't pass. But people need to have a way of testing their politicians to see it they actually represent them and their wishes and when they fail them they need to be held accountable. I personally do think Warren is a "fake progressive," and the most recent evidence I have of this is because she voted for the 700 billion dollar per year department of offense budget. That is completely unforgivable to me. That is not "progressive" as I see it. That demonstrates a lack of values, and an agenda that is completely opposite of mine. When she does that she demonstrates she is actively working against what I want and so, rightfully, I'm not about to support her. Especially on an issue that I consider to be very important and fucking no brainer to be on the right side of. I'm honestly shocked she didn't vote no just because she knew her vote didn't matter. Would you like me to go back further with other examples of why I don't like her? And yes she has done a few good things but ultimately I do not trust her in any way shape or form. Regarding, "and now bernie," the establishment is going to smear Sanders in any and every way possible they can to try and hurt him. They will attack him for being a "fairy duster" whose plans are not achievable, and at the same time they will attack him as being a fake progressive. The bottom line is that those attacks don't work on me because I know what his records looks like and it is a very, very long record. And I don't agree with it 100 percent, but ultimately I conclude that he is working for the issues I care about and he is consistently on the right side of the issues, so I support him.
    1
  8920. B A regarding, "the system is so corrupt they will find away to prevent him from winning like they always do" In 2016 most of the public had no idea who he was. Things have changed. As long as he is healthy in 2020 he will steamroll the competition. Regarding, "Bernie does not fit into the plans of the elite Bourgeoisie of Merrill Lynch and Wall Street" No he doesn't. That is why he fits into my plans and the plans of most the rest of the public. And there are a lot more of us than there are of them voting.
    1
  8921. Jon regarding, "thing is if you look at warren record she extremlu progressive" I'm familiar with her record. That is why I'm able to point to her voting for the department of offense budget. Do you think that is the vote a progressive makes there? Do you think it is even close? Do you consider it an important vote? Because to me a progressive clearly votes no, it isn't even close, and this is VERY important to me. Regarding, "the consumer proteion" This was a good thing that she did. It is also the ONLY real good thing you point at and be proud of when it comes to her. And remember when and where it took place. This was legislation passed in the wake of wall street nearly collapsing the economy. This was a bandaid put on an amputated limb. It was not nearly what we needed at the time at a time when we should have been able to do much more. Regarding, "fight among themselves" That assumes I think she is "one of us." And sorry but I'm not convinced. I don't trust her and I am not interested in supporting her. Progressives are not a monolith like the major parties. We don't blindly support our team. When Warren doesn't endorse Sanders in the primary, when Warren doesn't support DAPL protestors, and when Warren votes yes on the war budget among other issues that are exceptionally dear to me then I'm not going to have her back because so far as I can tell she doesn't have mine. Regarding, "didnt always agree with bernie" Nobody is going to agree with someone 100 percent of the time. You have to decide for yourself what issues are most important to you. But you if you find that a politician is not supporting your priorities you need to act accordingly. I do not agree with Warren 98 percent of the time. And even if I did I would still need to question supporting her if that 2 percent are the issues I care about the most.
    1
  8922. Regarding, "The laws we have they didnt break." Um. No. They absolutely do all the fucking time. You can tell by the fact they they are fined all the fucking time. They just don't give a fuck about the fines because they make more money breaking the law in the first place and have no fear of being put in jail for breaking the law. Do I really need to give you more specifics about this? Regarding, "As for breaking up the banks. How?" Remember when we cut them a check for about 700 billion with no strings attached? We should have attached some fucking strings. This isn't rocket science. Regarding, "Problem with the line in the sand you drawn..its a line you admit there no one that can measure up to it." Nope. I say there are few, especially when I am only limited to people that are currently in government. Nina Turner, Jill Stein, Russ Feingold are a few names of people I would happily support and I'm sure there are others that I don't know about that I would if I got to know more about them. I'm just telling you I'm not interested in supporting Warren. Sorry if you can't handle it. Regarding, "Warren pushed to fight the banks" And currently the banks are bigger than ever. So why exactly am I suppose to be impressed by what she did? Regarding, "She not just putting lip service to it. She been activily pushing for it and passing bills that help labor." She is just putting lip service to it and so are you when you follow it up with "help labor." Again, I want the banks broken up, I want glass stegell, I want criminal bankers put in jail, and anything less than that or fighting for those things are mere lip service to the problem. Regarding, "He added millions of people on Health care that wasnt." Another fucking bandaid to appease people like you. The dems controlled all of government and they used their power to pass a fucking REPUBLICAN HEALTH CARE PLAN as opposed to a progressive health care plan like medicare for all. THEY DIDN'T EVEN FIGHT FOR A PUBLIC OPTION FOR FUCKS SAKE. The only reason Obama won in 2008 was because he opposed the Iraq war. People wanted peace. And he took us from about 3 wars to about 8 wars. He set record deportations. He persecuted journalists and whistle blowers. He expanded the surveillance state. He made the Bush tax cuts permanent. Drones. He didn't prosecute torturers. Income inequality grew. He expanded drilling. And more. But if you need one piece of evidence of how much of a fucking failure he was as president consider the fact that after him the country ELECTED DONALD FUCKING TRUMP. Is Obama better than GWB and Trump? Yes. But that is a pretty fucking pathetic bar to get under and I have an independent view of what makes a good president that doesn't involve comparison to other pieces of shit. Regarding, "if you want money out of poltics question is how." First and foremost we need at least one major party that isn't complete dogshit and currently we don't have that. We need a progressive like Sanders to win the nomination and to reform the party from the inside out because they are a fucking dumpster fire who does not give a fuck about you. They only do enough to try and appease people like yourself so that you think they are working for you because if you realize how badly they were fucking you over you might burn them all at the stake.
    1
  8923. They do not give a fuck about you. Want proof? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5tu32CCA_Ig But I'm suppose to believe no laws were broken. https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/08/08/big-bank-fines-total_n_5659317.html
    1
  8924. B.A regarding, "If Bernie wants to win he should run independent" Like I think I've already said here (maybe not, I tend to preach the same stuff over and over) he needs to run and win as a dem. Although their primary is rigged it is actually easier to win that way because of the exposure. The game is rigged in many ways that favor the major parties. And that is the only way to ensure not dividing left leaning thinking voters in the general. But that isn't even the most important reason. By far the most important reason that he needs to win as a dem is so that he can reform the party from the inside. Regarding, "the burning house Devilcracts" As much as they should that party isn't going anywhere anytime soon. That is why they need to be reformed as opposed to ignored. Regarding, "they are proving more Day by day that it’s all about Corporate interest" It's been that way for a very, very long time. If it seems like they are proving it more as of late that is only because of Sanders and company exposing them. The latest purge of progressives in the party was because of him and his ilk trying to do good. The reason the progressives were not more successful and were purged was because Hillary "won" the nomination. The exact same thing could be done to them if Sanders wins in 2020.
    1
  8925. If you want to donate you can find it.
    1
  8926. You are walking, talking evidence of the dunning-kruger effect.
    1
  8927. Meh. Only to the people who are wise to it. There are definitely some that aren't able to see through and do buy their bullshit.
    1
  8928.  @BernardZarifovic  I'm still going to keep trying to reach them but ultimately it is up to them to be able to see the truth. At the end of the day manufacturing consent (which is what this is) is real, and effective, and that's why they do it. It does work even if it doesn't work on everyone. And I appreciate the efforts of Doel and people like him who are wise to it and work to expose them like this for what it is.
    1
  8929. No it's far worse than that.
    1
  8930. Ken is thrilled that a women can be equally as big a war mon ger as a man. "now I'm actually giving some respect." Yeah... she is has done nothing but use her political office to make herself rich and that was bad but now at least she is trying to start WW3. Yippie! /s
    1
  8931. Why is him voting no so important to you? No votes are fucking meaningless. The only thing that matters is how many yes votes it gets. Sanders did not vote yes... stop acting like he did.
    1
  8932. Sam seder is controlled opposition and sheep herder for the "democratic" party.
    1
  8933. That's how I felt about jimmy when kyle was covering up tyt's blackmail and not mentioning he was affiliated with them at the time.
    1
  8934.  @mydogsioux  Regarding, "since Trump doesn't own an animal why would they?" The point you are willfully ignoring is that if trump did have a pet they wouldn't give him the PR they are for Biden because this IS political. Regarding, "Jesus, you conservatives twist everything. " This is really funny because I'm not a conservative. So who is really twisting things? Regarding, "Bunch of snowflakes, lol." I find myself envious of morons like you. You are all so easily amused by your own stupid. It must be nice.
    1
  8935.  @chachaguillotine187  I do know. Still it's important to get them all on the record so that they pay for their positions, obviously.
    1
  8936. The west wing was fucking great.
    1
  8937. You are "sketch" for your comment.
    1
  8938. That's not preaching. Not even close.
    1
  8939.  @cesarmaganalinares6372  Ryan likes to manufacture consent for chuck shumer by lying to everyone and acting like he's fighting for a 15 dollar minimum wage when he and his party are actually busy torpedoing it. He also spreads lies like mccarthy might have been speaker if politicians forced a vote on M4A. He's terrible. Do everyone a favor and realize it.
    1
  8940.  @cesarmaganalinares6372  "Learn how to message" I'm not really here to change hearts and minds. I'm more here to vent at people who I think are the problem and people like ryan are the problem. "I don’t follow the Twitter wars." I wasn't talking about twitter I was talking about an article that propagandist grimm wrote titled, "CHUCK SCHUMER EYES A SECOND SHOT AT RAISING THE MINIMUM WAGE THROUGH RECONCILIATION" as if chuck is on the peoples side and was working to raise the minimum wage. He's not but ryan was manufacturing consent for him as if he were.
    1
  8941. To everyone who is commenting... yea... bUt dO yOu cOnDeMn hAmAs?
    1
  8942. Either you are hunter or you are a complete tool for the elite.
    1
  8943. See Greg, that is what I'm talking about. I'm sure m rude would eat up all the stupid shit you say. I have actually picked up an economics book even though I am not claiming to be an economist. It said you were one of the dumbest people on the planet just not in those exact words. I already posted this in this very thread. I feel like the economist in the article has, unlike you, opened an economics book. Check it out and maybe the next time when you talk you won't come across as such an epic moron. http://money.cnn.com/2016/02/08/news/economy/sanders-income-jobs/index.html
    1
  8944. Sorry Greg but I find it impossible to take you seriously. I'm not sure if you are stupid or trolling not that it really matters. Either way you suck at life. I can't tell you how tired I am of telling people like you why your stupid talking points of "Venezuela" and "communism" are dumb beyond words. Even if I do you are clearly not intelligent enough to gain anything from intelligent thought and reason arguments. So forgive me but I just don't have the ambition and desire to waste my time telling you why literally everything you say is wrong. But good luck going through life a halfwit.
    1
  8945. Pokemon regarding, "trump." Good luck with your conman and his Goldman Sachs cabinet.
    1
  8946. Pokemon, how about you go back to playing with your cards and leave important matters to the adults.
    1
  8947. "really good" I feel the exact same way! But sarcastically.
    1
  8948.  @k1zer100  You should be more concerned about his conflicts of interest with marianne williamson.
    1
  8949.  @project_hominoid  "Conflicts" Yeah... like the clintons attending trumps wedding kyle has marrianne officiate his. Both are examples of conflicts of interest even if you are only able to recognize one but not the other.
    1
  8950.  @solitude7566  "his show" Do you think he would let all of them officiate his wedding? Or just the grifter marianne?
    1
  8951.  @solitude7566  Of course you don't. Now go give marianne some money like kyle tells you to.
    1
  8952. They really didn't make any other promises other than platitudes like "restoring the soul of the nation." So that and all other promises. But again... at least they didn't promise much. I'm a glass is half full kinda guy.
    1
  8953. Regarding, "and they have been just as dangerous as any drunk driver." This is just utter nonsense. You wrote a lot so I'm going to stick to this one point just to see if you are worth addressing anything else or if you are just trolling. Are you really going to try and claim that person who has smoked weed is as dangerous behind the wheel as a person who is drunk? Is that really what you are trying to say? Because that is asinine and if you actually believe such nonsense it can only be coming from a person with no experience with the things they are trying to talk about. I'm not saying that people should be allowed to legally drive while stoned... I'm not. And neither is anyone else. But the fact of the matter is that, when people break the law by driving drunk and when people break the law by driving stoned there is absolutely no comparison between the two as far as how dangerous they are. Please answer these questions for some context and then I will consider moving on to other things you have said... Have you ever smoked weed? Have you ever drank alcohol? Have you ever driven while stoned? Have you ever driven while drunk? Do you actually believe stoned drivers are as dangerous as drunk drivers?
    1
  8954.  @joeblast8004  Regarding, "That's a horrible argument. You vote for the lesser of two evils." No. Voting for evil is a terrible argument. I shouldn't really need to explain why. But do whatever you have to do to ignore the fact that Biden and company gave us trump and biden and company will likely lead to another trump after his inevitable failure. Do whatever you need to rationalize supporting evil and terrible. I know you will because you are a brainwashed sheep.
    1
  8955. While I agree with the sentiment of your comment I do think that scientology is dumber in that it's so new which should make their claims easier to call bullshit. It's harder to call bullshit about things that happened thousands of years ago. Hubbard on the other hand... it's easier. There is a part of me that really loves the emergence of scientology as a religion because it should make people of other cults examine theirs. There are plenty of christians that will ridicule scientology but the fact of the matter is that their methodology isn't any better. It should be a demonstration of how their particular cult came about. Sadly not enough see the parallels.
    1
  8956.  @StarDestroyerXerO  Regarding, "Sometimes you give up on empathy," Do I? Regarding, "You might feel bad about it" What are you talking about? I'm talking about a person straight up rejoicing people being taken advantage of.
    1
  8957.  @jaydisqus3353  Regarding, "he knew we'd laugh him off the stage." You elected biden for fucks sake. Who would lie about working in civil rights, about being arrested with mandela, about how good he did in school, about his record, about pretty much everything other than the fact they would veto M4A if they get the chance because they corrupt as fuck, just like the orange clown is. But yeah... pat yourself on the back for literally nothing and try not lie about the fact that you would vote for trump if he were the dem nominee and you thought team reds nominee were worse. You would gobble those orange balls wouldn't you?
    1
  8958.  @StarDestroyerXerO  Regarding, "maybe they deserve it." They deserve to be victimized?
    1
  8959.  @StarDestroyerXerO  Regarding, "They are victimizing themselves" Nope. You are just blaming victims.
    1
  8960.  @StarDestroyerXerO  Regarding, "They are victimizing themselves" They aren't "victimizing themselves" anymore than a women who dresses slutty is "victimizing themselves" or "asking for it" either. When someone takes advantage of someone else there is a victim and there is a perp. Don't blame victims. Thanks. Take care.
    1
  8961.  @jaydisqus3353  You think that is going to discourage them? Or maybe you just suck?
    1
  8962.  @jaydisqus3353  Regarding, "they'll stop voting." I'll take that as a you just suck as an answer to my question.
    1
  8963.  @jaydisqus3353  Regarding, "Regarding, "so, you aren't that smart?" What? Is that what you thought you heard me say or something? If so you might be dumber than I thought.
    1
  8964.  @jaydisqus3353  I am happily done addressing you further after this. Have fun rejoicing in people being taken advantage of. But try not to lie to yourself about what that says about you. You may as well be a trump deplorable.
    1
  8965.  @jaydisqus3353  Regarding, "trump is gone, deal with it." I'm not a trump supporter but lucky for you I can't think less of you for saying your latest dumb crap.
    1
  8966.  @jaydisqus3353  What an apt description of everyone of your comments and your life.
    1
  8967. Fraud squad. Never forget.
    1
  8968. His disciples care. And so do I. I need the occasional laugh in sad times.
    1
  8969. We have been used and abused forever. We know the game isn't fair. That said I'm not panicking. Tuesday should be glorious.
    1
  8970. When yang went to go work for CNN I knew he was a fraud. Not exactly. I knew it before then.
    1
  8971. He's literally trashing her here. It's like you watched a completely different video before posting your comment.
    1
  8972. Regarding, "the party will just let him win the nomination" The establishment is going to do anything and everything they possibly can to stop him. Fortunately for the country it isn't exclusively up to them. There is this thing called a primary. It is where the peasants vote and get to have their say. It isn't especially fair but it does exist. You would be wise to learn about it's existence. Regarding, "The Democrats will just cheat him out of another election..." Who knows. They may not even need to do that much cheating if enough people think like you and aren't willing to fight. Regarding, "My vote doesnt count anyway" So this is how you rationalize not fight huh? Regarding, "the establishment will either purge my name from the voter roles, or they will hack the voting machines." Why do you think the establishment fights dirty? It is because they know how important the primary is. They don't want you to vote. You are too happy to oblige them. Good luck with your crying and bitching while people like myself are going to continue to fight. Take care.
    1
  8973. So you are going to be voting along party lines. Way to go. You share that stupid ass trait with staunch dems and staunch republicans. You might be right that I am being silly for thinking Sanders can win the primary since he can't even get people like you to support him there. If enough people think like you they won't even need to rig the game. You shouldn't feel bad about voting 3rd party in general elections. I certainly don't regret voting for Jill Stein in 2016. But that doesn't mean I'm going to sacrifice my ability to push the "democratic" party to the left as much as I possibly can because fighting for what is right is more important to me that proving how pissed I am at the party because I'm not a fucking child.
    1
  8974. Here... educate yourself. https://www.theguardian.com/news/2017/dec/05/portugals-radical-drugs-policy-is-working-why-hasnt-the-world-copied-it
    1
  8975. You compare her to other democrats when you should have an independent idea of what a politician is and is suppose to be doing. A wet bag of dogshit smells good when compared to "most of the democrats," but that doesn't impress me.
    1
  8976. You can't really be this dumb can you?
    1
  8977.  @Redtecho  Correct. If you think I'm the idiot it's only because of the dunning-kruger effect you are experiencing.
    1
  8978. That's what our rockets are doing. They are "deescalating" the situation. Or at least that's what the warmongers say.
    1
  8979. I think finding a 3rd party candidate who is actually running is the better plan than writing in Bernie.
    1
  8980. Regarding, "Do you honestly think JUST getting Bernie Sanders elected is going magically get progressive policies enacted?" Nobody thinks this. Well... maybe one guy but I have yet to meet them. Regarding, "If we fail to flip the Senate decisively and expand our control of the house, then it will not matter if Bernie wins." Wrong on so many levels. I'll give you one example. The title of commander in chief does not require congressional approval for everything. Regarding, "Who is going to carry Bernie's torch when he leaves?" This is such an irrelevant point and is unimportant. You know who will? Someone. Their name is not nearly as important as you think it is. But if you want to know who the heir apparent is it will be whoever he picks for VP. Regarding, "Sorry but age is going to be an issue for many votets." I can't do much about stupid people with stupid priorities. I will point out that with age comes knowing exactly what you are getting. That point will resonate with voters who felt duped and let down after voting for Obama back in the day because he didn't have a record like Bernie's to look back at.
    1
  8981.  @jamesfiegel9675  Why not both?
    1
  8982. Vote for joe biden! Am I right?
    1
  8983. Even a moron like trump knows you are full of shit.
    1
  8984. Regarding, "Tho the folks in the Democratic party,,, currently,, may not be for that" They definitely are not but they are not going to be able to stop him in my opinion. The game has changed since 2016.
    1
  8985. It is still (at the very least) kinda new even if you have a point.
    1
  8986. You forget Bernie.
    1
  8987. If the question is so "legit" then why wouldn't she ask the same thing of biden if given the chance? He did just get done trashing civil rights leaders afterall. Why doesn't the corrupt corporate media ask biden why civil rights leaders should work with him? Because they aren't trying to "get" biden. They are only trying to "get" nina.
    1
  8988. Musk gets billions of dollars from the government because he's their type of POS. They will never give me that kind of money.
    1
  8989. @Hollowhammer regarding, "You are a sad little twat aren't you?" Think and say that if you want to avoid and deflect from the facts. I know you will. I at least am not trying to redefine words to try and make idiotic points like your dumb ass.
    1
  8990. Dalton regarding, "maybe a few more decades and we coulda won" Sadly we will never know now thanks to this DA. It's all his fault if we don't win.
    1
  8991. Let's say for a second that it wouldn't be "fair." Would that be a logical reason to set 5 trillion dollars on fire? Because if it isn't then you might want to consider that your question is stupid.
    1
  8992. Wouldn't you being here prove your own stupid point wrong?
    1
  8993. Probably because she voted to give trump, a person she thinks is unhinged, more money for bombs then even he wanted. Or maybe because she didn't run in 2016 against a corporate tool like hillary but wants to run in 2020 against a progressive like sanders. Or maybe because she didn't support DAPL protestors despite being a "native american" herself. Or maybe because she didn't support Sanders in 2016 after his campaign surged. Or maybe it's a combination of those things and more.
    1
  8994.  @bceyre8204  Peppridge Farm remembers. And so do I.
    1
  8995.  @0cagman0  "Imagine having your bar for a good politician so low that just getting elected is enough." Who are you talking about or why are you saying this? Literally no one here has said that.
    1
  8996.  @0cagman0  "good politician so low that just getting elected is enough." Good politicians don't get elected. In our society it's more a prerequisite that anyone able to win need be terrible. But keep talking to yourself.
    1
  8997. "God save true Republicans." Only republicans exist but both manage to be frauds.
    1
  8998.  @teck1756  "Are you kidding me?" LMFAO Nope. I hate to break it to you but the guy who ran for president, asked people to vote him, made promises, and governed just so happens to be a politician. Who woulda thunk? "Trump not being a politician is what I love about the guy." Well he is one. You could also call him things like "oligarch." So act accordingly and lose the love for him.
    1
  8999.  @samuelefesoa7317  "after inauguration." They are a politician when they RUN for office.
    1
  9000.  @samuelefesoa7317  And before he ran for office he was the guy buying politicians.
    1
  9001.  Austin Feltron  "desantis or Josh Hawley or somebody else that is smart and stands for the right values." LMFAO
    1
  9002.  Austin Feltron  "desantis or Josh Hawley" "It's a big club and you ain't in it." "They give a f about you. AT ALL!" -george carlin
    1
  9003.  @rongarcia2128  "I don't think God loves fascists" Wasn't the god of the bible that guy who drowned an entire world including babies and puppies?
    1
  9004. You calling others stupid is fucking funny. Thanks for the laugh.
    1
  9005. I honestly don't know why he isn't supporting Canova and wish he would. That said how about focusing on all the good he is doing and stop acting like you expect him to do literally everything. As for Dore he is absolutely making the correct call to not go on his show and I enjoy Jimmy's show. You know, or at least you should, that if he went on Jimmy's show the media would act like he just went on Alex Jones.
    1
  9006. While I agree that we need to question and challenge those in charge I think that people wildly overblow the importance of endorsements. The guy is running around growing support for incredibly important progressive issues and causes. That really should be enough. I think the world would be a better place if endorsements weren't a thing. People shouldn't need to be told by Bernie or anyone else who we should and shouldn't be voting for. People should be figuring that shit out by themselves otherwise they may as well just be sheep. Sanders also has a right to go on or avoid whatever platforms he wants. If you want to think him not going on Jimmy's show is something he should be punished for so be it. I vehemently disagree and think I've already given you a good reason why not going on his show is the only logical choice. He is still a politician operating in a political environment and that means making political calculations. Going on Jimmy's show would be giving the corporate media a weapon they would happily use against him when he absolutely needs to make smarter decisions then that if he is going to overcome the rigged game in 2020. It would be the political equivalent of an unforced error in tennis. There would be little to gain but it would cost him dearly. He already is talking about the things he wants to talk about. Things like medicare for all and raising the minimum wage (to amazon). He shouldn't need to go on Jimmy's show to explain all the obvious reasons starting a 3rd party is a dumb idea and why he is choosing to instead try hostile takeover of the "democratic" party.
    1
  9007.  @jokerswank6082  I think you overestimate the effectiveness of fire. It's not some magical cure for being a corrupt POS.
    1
  9008.  @jokerswank6082  Ultimately I think you are wrong to think they can be pressured into doing the right thing.
    1
  9009.  @jokerswank6082  The only "pressure" that affects them is money.
    1
  9010.  @jokerswank6082  "then what would you suggest? An insurrection?" I would be a full blown advocate of revolution if I weren't a pacifist. But I am a pacifist so no. All the solutions are widely known. Give peace a chance, get money out of politics, universal health care, criminal justice reform, protect the environment and more. And Biden and his ilk are all an OBSTACLE to getting any of those solutions. They are the problem. Not the solution. Get people like them out of power and things might actually change. As for how to get them out of power... I wish I had all the answers. I'm sorry. I don't.
    1
  9011.  @jokerswank6082  "if people power doesn't work?" It's really all I have. And I advocate for an "all hands" strategy. Which means I'm an advocate of hostile takeover of the "democratic" party and I'm an advocate of trying to build up 3rd parties. Ultimately I think the biggest solution to the problem is getting people to stop supporting POS like biden and trump. How that is done in the long run is not simple and I again sadly don't have all the answers. I wish I did.
    1
  9012.  @jokerswank6082  "Doing nothing clearly hasn't worked." I haven't been doing nothing. I've been trying to wake anyone that is willing to listen. I supported Sanders in the past. I supported justice dems in the past. Arguable it's not working. Arguably it's been a failure and the squad are all frauds. But I've been trying even if I've been failing.
    1
  9013.  @jokerswank6082  "hostile takeover of the DNC" This has been the plan that I most advocate for. And I thought it was working. I thought we had some actual progressives in the party. And the AOC and the squad took the gift of power that they had and voted for pelosi as speaker and got nothing for it. That's why I'm less of an advocate of this plan and more of an advocate of supporting 3rd parties these days. That plan has many of it's own problems but it's tough to keep thinking hostile takeover is the best plan at the moment. I would love it if the squad proved me wrong about this going forward but ATM I think they all suck and are nothing more than controlled opposition. Regarding, "even better if the GOP splits" Maybe. Or maybe this gives the dems all the more reason to not have to do anything for the people. IMO it would almost be better if the republicans were strong because if they were that would give the dems reason to not suck. As it stands not being an orange clown is good enough for them but not even close to good enough for me. Regarding, "the concept of 3rd parties." We do need society to stop ignoring 3rd parties. But arguably they are right to ignore them because the entire system is rigged against 3 parties making it all but impossible for them to succeed. Regarding, "Getting rid of lobbies (AIPAC is one example) would be of great benefit also." Money in politics is the problem that makes all other problems impossible to solve. If you gave me one thing I could fix this would be it. Get money out of politics and then other problems such as health care wouldn't be impossible to solve the way they are now.
    1
  9014.  @enricog9540  What stupid nonsense are you babbling? I'm just kidding. I don't care.
    1
  9015. Israel: stealing land, ethnic cleansing and committing genocide since it's inception in 1948.
    1
  9016. I have to wonder if he's faking that too.
    1
  9017. Do I need to address this issue? In a world where canada pays HALF as much per person compared to the US?
    1
  9018.  @mikehoncho5488  Regarding, "You leave your country for that " What? Americans go to canada for drugs. Nobody from canada goes to america for drugs.
    1
  9019.  @mikehoncho5488  What point are you trying to make? What exactly am I suppose to be scared of?
    1
  9020.  @mikehoncho5488  FYI Canadian babies are more likely to be born alive and their life expectancy is longer than that of americans. Just in case that has something to do with whatever point you are trying to get at.
    1
  9021.  @mikehoncho5488  Regarding, "getting psych meds is easy" I might need some of these after this conversation. I have no f'ing clue what this has to do with the topic at hand. Regarding, "Getting dialysis treatment is an entirely different world" I'm done caring what your point is if you have one.
    1
  9022. There is nothing wrong with apologizing if there is actually something to apologize for. There wasn't here but that doesn't mean never apologize ever.
    1
  9023. If you can't afford a subway sandwich you sure as fuck can't afford it if your car breaks down. I'm actually happy to think you can't afford a 5 dollar footlong. You are a disgrace to the human race.
    1
  9024. Regarding, "people, at times, face financial struggles" No shit sherlock. Almost half of all americans in the last year. But you keep polishing that turd and telling yourself it's no big deal like the total fucking moron you are.
    1
  9025. Fuck Trump. Fuck Biden. Bernie Sanders 2020.
    1
  9026. I think calling it a cult is more apt.
    1
  9027. Regarding, "There's a difference between a cult and a religion." The only difference society makes between a cult and a religion is how socially acceptable said cult is. Sure... there is nothing cult-like about a religion that tells you you need to believe their book of bullshit or you will burn for eternity in hellfire. There is totally nothing coercive about that. Do you know what the word you are using means?
    1
  9028. Regarding, "Christianity teaches us to be good for goodness sake" Um... no. It doesn't. It teaches you to be good because if you don't you will spend eternity in hell. And by "good," they mean that you are inherently evil, bad, and flawed. And the only way you can get into heaven is by asking JC for forgiveness of all your wrongdoing. That it doesn't matter how terrible a person you are. You can be Hitler and get into heaven as long as you ask for forgiveness for your sins before you die. And that you could be the equivalent of a saint on earth, who lives their life helping others, and you are going to burn in hell if you don't accept JC before you die. That's what your book of bullshit says. Try not to lie to yourself about it the way you are lying to me. Regarding, "Christianity is the number 1 religion in the world because its opinion on right and wrong is the strongest." It didn't hurt that they did a really good job killing people of other faiths over the years. Would you accept this type of bullshit argument if Scientology was the number 1 religion the world? Because popularity has nothing to do with truth. And I'm sure that your cult, because they have such a great opinion on what is right and wrong, goes out of it's way to tell their sheep that slavery is abhorrent and wrong right? I mean, something like that is worthy of a commandment right? Nah... instead your book of bullshit tells you how to conduct slavery and do it right in the eyes of your fake deity.
    1
  9029. I certainly don't blame you if you don't want to address what I said. There really isn't much an intelligent person can say to defend your books position on slavery. And that your religion is capable of rewarding the worst person to ever live and condemn the best person because that isn't what it really cares about. That said I'd be disappointed if you don't. I'm always amused at the rationale and mental gymnastics the people in your cult make when presented with those facts. And I wasn't even bringing up the fact that your god is a genocidal monster (the noah story for example). I suspect that you would try to dismiss those facts and bury them with the best parts of your book as if that would make the facts I presented go away and not true. But they are. Try not to lie to yourself about it. And some internal contradictions, which that book is filled with, doesn't make anything I said not true. Don't be afraid to come join us in the future and leave your bronzed age BS behind. There are far better reasons to do the right thing and be a good person then to try and get rewarded in the afterlife. And if there is a god and they care more about you getting on your knees for them then they care about you being a good person then fuck them. That isn't a god worth worshiping anyway. I'd rather hang with satan... the one who doesn't commit genocide in your book of BS. But don't worry about that. Neither of them are real. You only have this life. Make the most of it.
    1
  9030.  @BobbyU808  Regarding, "I refuse to demonize any of them." You don't demonize POS lying politicians? Why not? Regarding, "the establishment wants me to do in order to keep us fighting amongst ourselves instead of against them." I agree with this. I my insult is calling yang a "clown." I'm not calling you a clown even if you support him. I do think supporting him is very misguided. Regarding, "Peace." Speaking of peace that's an area that makes me skeptical of yang... his positions on war and peace. What aaron and jimmy are doing is honorable. They are defending someone they don't like based on principles. It's nothing like what political hacks like politico do. Hack only care about a person team. People of virtue can set party politics aside like this to address the specific issue.
    1
  9031.  @BobbyU808  Regarding, "I don’t demonize people because that is part of the establishment’s strategy to censor us." I don't demonize people either. Do you think I did that to you? I didn't. Even if I were to say something like you are "stupid" or the like that still isn't a demonization. I call myself stupid when it comes to many things. "demonizing" is about intent. About being innately evil. Dumb isn't that even when I do say that about people. "Politicians are different. I will call politicians out if I think they are wrong" Which is pretty much always so I'm pretty much always calling them out. And not only do I question their actions but I question their morality. They are "demons" who have sold their souls. That's how they get where they do. "I am wary of demonizing them because it can appear that I am demonizing their supporters." People are always going to gaslight you like this. There is a clear distinction between a candidate and a candidate's supporter. It's the difference between the boot and the people the boot is stepping on. One is a victim. The other is rightfully demonized. Regarding, "The only politicians I will go hard at are establishment politicians like Pelosi and McConnell." McConnell is arguably one of my favorite politicians these days. He is "honest" about being a POS. It's not like he promises 2k checks or a 15 dollar minimum wage. That's arguably better than the ones who lie about it and pretend they support things only to sell me out. I go hard at them when they are lying. That ends up being pretty much everyone. The older I get the more I think the cliche 'if voting worked they wouldn't let you do it' (or at least that's the gist of it) is true. "My use of “peace” has nothing to do with war and peace. It is an olive branch of sorts" I know. Your point wasn't lost on me. You are clearly a much nicer person than I. Regarding, "I recognize the humanity in most people," I don't really even try when it comes to the elite. But when it comes to the peasants... of course. Again... the people are victims. Regarding, "I mostly support progressive policies but not their ideology." I'm not sure I understand the distinction. Regarding, "Nothing wrong with ideology until someone strictly adheres to it and morphs into an ideologue. Ideologues are the most dangerous people on earth" I feel like you are making a big jump from "ideology" to "ideologues" and acting like they are the same thing. So if I can follow you... you support progressive policies but not the ideology even though there is nothing wrong with an ideology only when you get extreme about it? How do you even support progressive policies without supporting progressive "ideology?" Do you have an ideology? If so what is it? Regarding, "I do not think Jimmy dislikes Yang." I do. And I only think he covers him because 1) jimmy does like UBI and 2) jimmy can't resist stories of corporate media smears and they do do that of yang. Let's say jimmy was a yang supporter... he sure AF didn't fight back when aaron repeatedly said he don't like yang. And jimmy's not the type to keep an opinion to himself even if his guest is saying the opposite. Regarding, "he is beginning to see the utility of universal basic income." UBI is not yang and yang is not UBI. I like UBI. I do not like yang... even a little bit. Regarding, "Unfortunately, he has not studied Yang’s ideas in depth so he is vulnerable to progressive talking points against Yang," Go on... Regarding, "the “regressive” nature of Yang’s ubi funding mechanism." It is regressive. Youtube video titled "Andrew Yang: Paying for a Universal Basic Income" the first thing yangs offers to pay for UBI is by gutting the social safety net. All the money that once went to pay for a social safety net is gone to pay for UBI. That's as regressive as you can possibly get when you should be having the rich pay for it. Regarding, "I was surprised at Aaron’s near-hatred of Yang" I was too. Full disclosure: I loved it and feel the exact same way. I was THRILLED to hear him say it. Regarding, "his use of progressive talking points against him" This seems like a bad way to dismiss what someone is saying. Just because something is a "talking point" doesn't mean it's wrong. You need to say why what he is saying is wrong and not this. Regarding, "his heart is in the right place" That's just it... I don't agree with this. Regarding, "his ideas are pragmatic" He has one idea that is worth a shit and even that is as bad as he can possibly make it. I think he is shit on essentially anything that isn't UBI with minor exceptions on smaller topics. Regarding, "I prefer focusing on implementing policies that will actually make a fundamental difference in our lives like universal basic income" He's trying to bribe everyone to keep the current shit system. He isn't even trying to keep the current shit system. He wants to make it worse by getting rid of the social safety net that does exist before giving you your UBI. And then... because he doesn't want to change ANYTHING else then all that UBI will funnel to the top just like it does now. "universal healthcare" While running for POTUS yang lied and said he supported m4a. Then when his health care proposal came out it was not m4a. Not even close. He is a liar. "ending endless wars." He sounds a lot like a neoliberal warmonger in a lot of ways. Those things you just listed as important are things that yangs really sucks on. That probably is why aaron and jimmy aren't big fans. "The only quicker way to bring about change is through an actual Revolution where blood is spilled and I prefer we not go down that road if at all possible." The establishment is lucky I'm a pacifist. Mostly I just think we are fucked. I don't pretend to have all the answers. But I'm telling you why I don't like yang. Regarding, "Long comment but you asked. ~ Peace." I'd be a hypocrite if I had a problem with long replys but add some paragraphs next time. Thanks. Peace.
    1
  9032.  @BobbyU808  Regarding, "I do not think you are demonizing me at all." Good. I'm not trying to. Even if we disagree about some things this is the type of conversation I enjoy. I should that there is a type of "person" that I do also demonize. It's people who I think are shills and disingenuous. They are largely to blame for how toxic alot of the conversations have become because their "arguments" are so terrible and they can't be swayed by logic and reason because they are paid not to. "I’m only nice until I’m not." Same. I do concede I can be a real dick at times. Especially when talking about topics such as politics. If you aren't talking about war crimes and your blood doesn't boil you lack empathy in my opinion. "I don’t love it as much as you apparently do." I do tend to reply to everything. Even things like this that I probably shouldn't. "Jimmy did not refute him but neither did he join him." He did. Aaron first says he doesn't like yang at about the 4 minute mark. Jimmy's response, "I'm not on bored with andrew yang either." "This does not prove anything but I have heard Jimmy talk about Yang in a positive light." More likely you heard jimmy talk positively about UBI and you are conflating it to extend to yang. I've heard jimmy defend yang against bad faith smears but I've never heard him really endorse him as a person or as a politician. "He once said that he is glad that Yang is running for mayor because he considers Yang anti-establishment." That's praise of "anti-establishment" and is not really praise of yang. I can't stand trump, but I'm glad he ran. It helped expose just how rotten the "democratic" party is. But again... that doesn't mean I like trump even the slightest little bit. "while it is true that not all talking points are not “talking points” as I frame the term, some are." If you have a problem with "talking points" then you need to break down what is wrong with them. What you are doing is just dismissing points being made as "talking points" as if that refutes those points in some sort of way. It doesn't. In short I think you would be wise to just dump the terms "talking points" and instead just treat the things people are presenting to you as POINTS. Instead you seem to call them talking points and that is enough to just dismiss them outright for you. "For example, “Yang wants to gut the social welfare net to pay for his ubi” is simply not true." It is perfectly true. Saying yang doesn't want to gut the social safety net is the lie. And that is what you are spreading. If yang didn't want to gut the social safety net to pay for UBI then his UBI would be built ON TOP of the current system. But that isn't what he wants. He wants to gut it to pay for UBI. Those are the facts. In the interview I cite the very first thing he thinks of to offer as to how to pay for his UBI is taking hundreds of billions of dollars that was going to go pay for our current social safety net and he was going to raid it. Make it disappear and use it to pay for UBI. THAT'S GUTTING. Please stop suggesting it's not. "Yang’s plan, ubi would stack on top of social security, Medicare, Medicaid, SSDI and housing benefits, among other things." No doubt this is how he sells you his UBI but why you so convinced he isn't lying to you and would gut SS to help pay for UBI when he is already willing to gut food stamps to pay for UBI? He thinks one is "double dipping." Why should I think he doesn't feel the other is "double dipping?" Are you sure he wouldn't also be willing to gut SS as a compromise if need be? Or let's say yang is everything you think he is and he's everything I don't think. And he passes UBI. It's even funded progressively like I want. But then he goes away. How long until corporate dems and corporate republicans gut SS and say it's fine because you have UBI? Ultimately yang has already told you he is going to gut the social safety net. I mean how much money does he need to raid from it for you to agree with that? Does he need to take every last dollar? Hundreds of billions of dollars per year isn't enough for you to consider it gutted? "one can argue that this is the first step towards gutting the safety net, but conservatives used this same slippery-slope argument against proposed laws to ban automatic weapons." Dems have never held a goal of getting all guns. Republicans and corporate dems all have dismantling the social safety net on their to do list. It's a pretty apples to oranges comparison for that reason. "Another progressive talking point, which Jimmy unfortunately ascribes to, is that Yang plans to fund his ubi with a regressive vat tax." As far as a "vat" tax I'm no expert, don't claim to be, don't care about this argument, and speak intelligently about it in the least. For that reason I'm going to skip it. It's already regressive because he wants to take billions of dollars earmarked for poor people to pay for it. The rest is just details to me. "if someone lives abroad, his ubi would be suspended but would accumulate" Huh? Why would we give people living in other countries this? Not that this is very important to the discussion at large. But this seems very wrong to me. "(since the one of the purposes of ubi is for the money to be spent in one’s community in order to stimulate the economy" So they can come collect a check and then go back to where they were living. Accumulate some money UBI. Go get it. Repeat. I hope this isn't how it would work. "This is real power because the elites fear only one thing - the country going bankrupt." Yeah. I'm pretty UBI is there plan. Especially as designed by yang. Bribe the peasants with a set number of crumbs that is as small as you can possibly make it (that's why you gut the social safety net to help pay for it). That way they are content and willing to overlook the fact that all the other problems are overlooked and all that UBI money funnels to the top just like it does now. This country is headed toward collapse. UBI is the elite play to keep the gravy train rolling in a world where they understand SOMETHING needs to change. Universal health care would be far worse for their bottom line that UBI would be. So that's what they are going to give us. A small bribe to keep literally every other shit institution we have. A small bribe that is going to all end up in their hands anyway. Yippie. "Ubi would level the playing field like nothing else besides a real revolution" While I do consider a good UBI a game changer and "systemic change for the better" universal health care and a living minimum wage would both do more in the long run to level the playing field. Those are actions that allow the people on the bottom to keep the money they have. Instead of just giving them money they know will go to the rich in the long run. "he also supported ending endless wars" If you say so. He seems like a neoliberal warmonger from everything I've heard him say. " rank choice voting" This really shouldn't impress anyone. It should be a given. "imposing a ban on politicians from sitting on corporate boards and engaging in paid-speeches during and after leaving office" What a half ass measure in a world where we need all money out of politics. "strengthening union rights, de-privatizing prisons, the public funding of elections" He talks pretty good talk here but I don't really care as I think he is a conman. Any of this only holds weight when I think someone isn't just pandering. Yang hasn't held a political office in his life. For that reason I shouldn't even be able to say he is a liar. I should only be able to realize that after he talks office. But he has already proven he was a liar on m4a. An issue that is far, far, far more important to me than of these issues. So even if I agree with the things he says why should I believe him? When I already know he is a liar on one of the issues that is most important to me? Donald trump said he would "give everyone great health care." So what. That only means something when that person has credibility and your guy doesn't have that. "working towards universal healthcare" You aren't slimy but I hope you felt a little slimy saying this bullshit. "working towards..." How weaselly. I want universal healthcare. I don't want to "work towards" it. This is like trying to have your cake and eat it too. I'd respect yang more if he would just admit he doesn't care about it rather than lying about it like this.
    1
  9033.  @BobbyU808  "the decriminalization of all drugs including heroin, and the legalization of the sex trade" The best thing about yang is that he does push the overton window on some topics. I concede this is a good thing. But that is not the person and I do not think the person is good. "Yang had the most expansive policy of all the candidates" It's easy to say you support things when you don't have any actual power. AOC says she will fight for m4a all the time. That doesn't mean she would force the vote. "platform" Biden platform included: 2k checks, 15 dollar minimum wage, a public option... I guess what I'm saying is is that I don't really care about a person's "platform" very much. It looks like Yang might win mayor. It he does he can prove me wrong about what I think about him then. Til then it's just talk. Talk I put less than zero faith in. Prove me wrong yang. Be great. But I won't hold my breathe because he isn't. "he was the only candidate to point out how America has interfered in the elections of many countries" So bernie has never done this according to you? You should check again. "He also pointed out on the debate stage and on CNN as a commentator that having a “D” next to your name was considered toxic by the working man." I don't give people credit for saying things that are ridiculously obvious and take zero courage to say. "Joe Biden and the real president, Kamala Clinton." They are both just puppets for corporate interests. "we could not coalesce our forces" It was clearly possible. You should ask why it didn't happen. Why was yang running to the left of sanders? He sure as fuck wasn't going to take biden voters. But there he was... cockblocking sanders and serving establishment interests in a race he had zero fucking business being in.
    1
  9034.  @BobbyU808  "that’s on Bernie and his supporters." It's not their fault Warren stayed in. It's not their fault tulsi and yang were running against sanders when they should have been doing anything and everything possible to push him over the hill. Pete and amy did what was best for their team. Why didn't the so called "progressives?"
    1
  9035.  @BobbyU808  Regarding, "I think that the reason why you despise Yang..." I openly admit that it's one of the reasons I don't like him, don't trust him, and question his intentions. Of course this factors in. As does the fact that he wants to gut social security to pay for UBI. Almost everything he does makes me not like him. It all plays a factor in why I don't like him. "simply because he ran against Bernie and that you, along with your progressive cohorts" You can leave out the "along with your progressive cohorts" like I either needed them to come to this conclusion and/or I speak for some kind of group other than myself. Why shouldn't I hold this against yang? Do you not hold warrens actions during the primary against her? Candidates don't operate in a vacuum. We know where they do and do not draw their support. Yang being in the race helps the establishment and their goals of stopping sanders. At best that makes him a useful idiot for them. At worst it means his campaign was designed to siphon votes from sanders from the left and stop him from the nomination. "need a scapegoat to blame for Bernie’s loss" This isn't about bernie. This is about yang. I have lots of blame to place at bernie door but again... this isn't about him. The whole establishment conspired against sanders to stop him. I think yang was in on it. Hypothetically if I'm correct about that it means he is a POS. I concede I could be wrong about this. I concede this is merely opinion. But I have lots of evidence that makes me come to the conclusions I do. You are again using really weak ways to dismiss my arguments. You should be telling me why yang should have been in the race (he obviously shouldn't). You should be telling me how him being in the race wouldn't hurt sanders (it obviously did). The "arguments" you are using to dismiss may as well come from warren supporters to defend her and I don't accept those coming from them anymore than I accept them coming from you. Warren is a snake. I suspect you agree with that. But maybe not. Well I think yang is a snake for lots of similar reasons. I also have almost no good reasons to like him. "Instead of looking inward for answers as to why Bernie lost" Instead of looking inward at yangs campaign, which this actually about, you are deflecting to talk about sanders campaign and their mistakes. Which are many. But this isn't about Sanders. " I had hoped that the Democratic Party would looking inward for answers as to why someone like Trump was able to defeat their candidate. Instead, they doubled down and blamed the American people" Actually they blamed russia. Which is just BS fiction. The party straight up conspired against sanders. That isn't fiction. The DNC said pete buttigieg "won" the iowa caucus. Let's not act like I'm peddling bullshit like russiagate. " if you truly believe that Yang’s objective was to gut the SSN" When asked how are you going to pay for UBI the first thing he thought of was on the backs of poor people. Yeah. That makes me think he isn't a progressive. "that he is a con man" Yup. 100 percent. And a good one at that. Which makes him scary. " then you would prefer Biden to Yang." What? I say lots and lots and lots and lots of things. I write epic novels. You could address one of the many many many thinks I think and you know I think them because I say them... or you can strawman me with shit like this. Again you are deflecting to talk about other people. This is about yang. Biden is a also a conman but he is a fucking terrible conman. It is a miracle he is potus. As for how I'd prefer... who gives a fuck. I'm not going to support either anytime soon. Yang could actually win my vote at some time. He is young and I could change my mind but I don't think I will have to. I think that after he actually gets a job in politics he will prove he is a fraud just the way AOC is proving she is a fraud. I'd love it if you guy proves me wrong. Time will tell. But he won't. And when he gets a job and sucks don't be afraid to call him out for his BS. "Biden better than Yang is an absurd proposition on its face." I can't tell you how happy I am to stop having people compare and contrast Biden and trump and to talk about who which POS I think smells worse like it matters. It doesn't. If yang was just a plant and only in the campaign to try and stop sanders then that would make him worse than biden. I prefer people who stab me in the face (which is far more what biden would be doing) than people who stab me in the back (which is what yang would be doing assuming my conclusion is correct). "The first thing I thought was that this guy did not sound like your typical politician." That's a favorite thing cited by people enticed by the conman donald trump. Another favorite of the professional conman is getting yourself a non profit that you can parade around to signal how great you are. It's also the type of thing that is perfect for corrupt politicians and quid pro quo. Yang is a great conman. "everything about his past life told me that this was a man who walked the talk." He's like pete buttigieg. A person who has designed their entire life around the goal of being president. Pete is a terrible conman and talks like a robot. Yang is a great conman. Feel free to send me all you know about his non profit and the like. I only conclude a person is a con after knowing about them. I became an atheist cause I read the bible.
    1
  9036. When people make the government care.
    1
  9037. Too late to save his credibility.
    1
  9038. Pretty rude to say that while in the universe.
    1
  9039.  @ThePanMan11  They pretend to care about things like corruption and war it's all an act meant to get you to vote for POS like Biden.
    1
  9040.  @ThePanMan11  Sam will act like joe manchin and people like him make him mad but he will tell you to vote blue no matter who when it really matters.
    1
  9041.  @ThePanMan11  Can you explain in your own words why you listen to controlled opposition like sam?
    1
  9042.  @ThePanMan11  Can you explain in your own words what controlled opposition is? Or do you listen to too much sam and have no idea?
    1
  9043.  @j0j0dartiste21  "why you should abstain from voting" I don't say this. Can you explain why you aren't addressing what I actually say?
    1
  9044.  @j0j0dartiste21  "voting for the Republican" I don't say this either. Not even close.
    1
  9045.  @j0j0dartiste21  "a dead end third party?" Why should you vote for good people? Who actually deserve the job? Who aren't corrupt? Who aren't terrible? Who actually represent people like me? And not the elite? Do you really not know why you should vote for good people and not for corrupt POS?
    1
  9046.  @j0j0dartiste21  You listen to too much sam if you don't know the answer to your own question. It's obvious.
    1
  9047.  @j0j0dartiste21  Do you really need me to explain to you why you shouldn't vote for evil?
    1
  9048.  @j0j0dartiste21  Even what you think is a "lesser evil?"
    1
  9049.  @j0j0dartiste21  Do I really need to explain how a "lesser" evil is still evil?
    1
  9050.  @j0j0dartiste21  Do I really need to explain to you why you should vote for good?
    1
  9051.  @j0j0dartiste21  You don't even attempt to deny that the dems are corrupt and warmongering.
    1
  9052.  @j0j0dartiste21  If I need to explain obvious things like that it's only because you are being brain washed by too much sam.
    1
  9053.  @ThePanMan11  "I don't think you know what controled opposition is..." I know that this is ad hominem and not an argument. You don't even attempt an argument while answer your terrible questions that you should already know the answer to. Go back to sleep. Go back to voting for evil. I know you will.
    1
  9054.  @ThePanMan11  "I suspect this won't be a fruitful conversation" I answered your question knowing that you are insincere. You walk away because you know you got nothing.
    1
  9055.  @ThePanMan11  You: "your hostile tone" Also you in the same paragraph: "incel on tinder"
    1
  9056.  @ThePanMan11  Thanks for saving me from more hypocrisy from you.
    1
  9057. You are just being willfully ignorant at this point if you want to think climate change is a hoax and I expect that no amount of evidence is going to sway you. I'm certain I'm an idiot for talking to you at all.
    1
  9058. Regarding, "please refrain from addressing me in the condescending manner for which you seem to have a penchant." Nope. I am going to do as I see fit. I am justified in being condescending to you for the same reason I'd be justified in being condescending to a flat Earther. Your position does not justify respect. Only scorn. But you will kind of get your wish. I am done with this. I don't have the time or ambition to tell you why gravity is a thing either.
    1
  9059.  @hirightnow  Regarding, "Never occurred to you that they might have done this themselves to raise awareness of shelter adoptions, I guess." Does this mean that giving Trump positive PR would be ok if they could raise awareness? But ultimately they would never use their platform to give him this type of good PR if it were an option. Regarding, "You've fallen so hard for Trump's propaganda that you probably broke something." I've called trump an orange clown in this very thread. You are an idiot.
    1
  9060.  @hirightnow  How is it that literally none of you morons are capable of answering simple direct questions?
    1
  9061.  @ohtee2965  Regarding, "I'm sorry that you're evidently incapable of partaking in civil discourse without resorting to childish insults." I am capable of partaking in civil discourse. I'm also capable of feeling frustration with feeling like I'm living in the movie Idiocracy and it sometimes shows. It's a side effect of being an imperfect human. You get to call me things, like cynical, but I can't call you things even after breaking down exactly where my frustration comes from and what my problems with the things you say are. Seems hypocritical enough. Regarding, "Maybe if you didn't call people names they'd be more interested in talking with you." Whatever you got to do to rationalize and excuse not bothering to answering the simple direct questions I've ask you as well. But at least you got to say your peace while ignoring the substantive points I made to you. Am I the only person name calling in the thread? So why do you only choose to lecture me? Regarding, "We're done." Good. You can save me the frustration of not answering my questions further. Thank you.
    1
  9062.  @ohtee2965  Regarding, "I'm sorry that you're evidently incapable of partaking in civil discourse without resorting to childish insults." I went back and looked after just assuming I called you more names than I had. Literally the ONLY name I called you was "gullible" and that was after you called me "cynical." What a hypocrite you are.
    1
  9063.  @venicebeachsportsnetwork6677  In what sort of alternate universe is the government working with corporations to censor true stories of political importance during an election a "big nothing burger." Are you trying to prove you are unserious?
    1
  9064.  @sascha...  The government working with corporations to censor true stories of political importance during an election. sascha "iT's A nOtHiNg BuRgEr."
    1
  9065. Imagine acting like the government working with corporations to censor true political stories is a "nothing burger" like some are.
    1
  9066.  @venicebeachsportsnetwork6677  Me: "the government working with big tech to censor a true story of political importance during an election." You" "hUnTeRs BoNeR" What an unserious clown you must be.
    1
  9067. Someone doesn't understand how percentages work.
    1
  9068.  @dustinb4286  Then why don't you explain to me how losing a percentage of income would cause them to want to close and forgo all income. Because that makes no fucking sense unless you are an idiot. This is the equivalent of your "logic." I've got a winning lottery ticket that I know will give me money. I was thinking of cashing it in. Then I found out I wasn't going to get to keep all the money I was to get because a lot of it was going to get taxed. So I didn't bother cashing it at all. Because I'm dustin, stupid beyond words, and this makes sense to me.
    1
  9069. There are no communists in this story so what the fuck are you talking about?
    1
  9070. "Bernie's resilience & will to fight these self-serving monsters fills me w hope" Isn't he the same guy who tells you to vote for swamp creatures like biden and clinton?
    1
  9071. @ "When" Never did say anything like this before the election. And never would he have said anything if harris won. Turn of the MSNBC. It's not good for you.
    1
  9072. @ Never did they call out biden like this. Stop making excuses for people who buried this until now. Hayes and MSNBC are complicit.
    1
  9073. @ You listen to people who manufactured consent for biden and harris during a jennyside (sic).
    1
  9074.  @IcarianX  "him Ayman and Joy Reid" All manufactured consent for biden and harris during a jennyside (sic).
    1
  9075.  @IcarianX  "him Ayman and Joy Reid" Did you vote for harris like they all told you too? While they sent weapons to israel that were going to end the lives of children?
    1
  9076. @ "him Ayman and Joy Reid" Did you vote for harris like they all told you too?
    1
  9077. It's impossible to know if you are talking about trump or david because of how your comment is written.
    1
  9078. do you think maybe your mom jump farted you out?
    1
  9079.  @steveguy7165  Can you translate that into English?
    1
  9080.  @steveguy7165  How do you claim mass immigration if you also claim they are all sneaking in?
    1
  9081. The elite are not "the left" nor do they represent it... jimmy does.
    1
  9082.  @fourmilier.  Quotes doesn't change that fact that they are not the left. It's only what they want people to think... and you are helping them.
    1
  9083.  @fourmilier.  What you are describing isn't "the left." It's a blue cult.
    1
  9084.  @fourmilier.  It's a political party and their tools. It's not "the left."
    1
  9085. If "beating trump is more important" then you would rather have a president worse than trump in office... according to your own idiotic logic.
    1
  9086. Kyle is just being honest about the person asking the questions motives. They wanted to try and make nina look bad as much as you want to try and make kyle look bad with your drivel. That's just a fact and that's why it's a "gotcha question."
    1
  9087. Your fearmongering is really pathetic.
    1
  9088.  @overimagination2812  huh?
    1
  9089. There is a pretty big difference between, "being open to something" and "being FOR something."
    1
  9090.  @DesiDash256  Regarding, "Point is, Yang coming out FOR it in Dec is in no way being "first" at it." If that were actually your point and you cited an article where someone was FOR it then I wouldn't have a problem. Don't act like that is what you did in your original comment. I'm a fucking diehard Sanders supporter who is here to pretty much put yang supporters and the stupid shit they say in place but here you are doing the type of shit I'd expect them to be doing. It doesn't help. Be better than your original comment. Thanks for that in advance.
    1
  9091. You should go have a long talk with the orange clown.
    1
  9092.  @Freedomisadream  You should never reproduce and have kids. Please don't. Sincerely, society.
    1
  9093.  @Freedomisadream  I should also add that "You should look you’re children in the eye and tell them you are a scared mess" is really funny coming from a coward scared of masks.
    1
  9094.  @Freedomisadream  People scared of their own shadow can look at you and think, 'what a pussy.'
    1
  9095. Yeah. But still it was nice for him to have on a great person like norman.
    1
  9096. Not enough people have signed the petition. Do it if you haven't already. Force the vote! https://forcethevote.org/
    1
  9097.  @MichaelAronson  "he's against the existing third parties. They're awful." This is funny because sam tells you to vote blue no matter who. Because they aren't awful am I right? Are people still buy your guys bullshit? It's remarkably transparent.
    1
  9098. I want to see who followed that. It couldn't have been easy.
    1
  9099. Marasma regarding, "The only conservative stances he takes are on the national debt and..." Don't get me wrong, I think there is a pretty good case to be made that these labels in today's society are ultimately rather useless. I personally call myself a progressive and consider myself to be about as far left as possible on almost every issue. That said I think the national debt is a major issue that needs addressing. I want the debt and deficits under control. I probably have very different ideas about how to address this problem but I assure you this "progressive" cares about it very much. The real problem with these labels in my opinion is that the politicians who wear them and the people that wear them tend to have very different ideas of what makes someone or some issue "conservative" and "progressive." You say "the only conservative stances he takes are on the national debt" because "conservatives" want to claim to care about the issue. But the fact of the matter is that their claims and the facts don't jive. The deficit exploded under "conservative" GWB because of unfunded wars and unfunded tax cuts. The deficit under "progressive" (and to be clear I do not consider him progressive) Obama fell. The deficit under "conservative" Trump is set to explode yet again because of tax cuts. My original point is that we should have an idea of where people stand based on their labels. Ultimately the facts are often very different thou. "Conservatives" claim to care about the debt and deficit. There actions demonstrate they don't. (and in this sentence I am talking about politicians, not the people).
    1
  9100. It takes a lot of math to add up all the social safety net benefits he is looking to gut to pay for his regressive UBI.
    1
  9101.  @ForsythJC  "Can you provide a reference?" Youtube video titled, "Andrew Yang: Paying for a Universal Basic Income" When asked, how are you going to pay for UBI the first thing yang thinks of to pay for it is by gutting hundreds of billions of dollars that were going to go to poor people to pay for it when any sort of actual progressive would only have it paid for on the backs of rich people.
    1
  9102.  @ForsythJC  I'm interested to hear your response when presented with the facts. I suspect you are going to respond much like trump and clinton fans do when presented with evidence they don't like but I'm hoping you can prove me wrong about that.
    1
  9103.  @ForsythJC  "responding like Trump and Clinton fans" You are rationalizing, excusing, and lying on behalf or your conman. It's exactly what trump and clinton supporters do for their cons.
    1
  9104.  @ForsythJC  Let's say someone asked me how I would pay for UBI you know what I'd say? Rich people. Yang tells you he's going to gut almost half a trillion per year that was going to help poor people to pay for his UBI, no matter how much yang supporters want to lie about it.
    1
  9105.  @ForsythJC  500 billion dollars per year = gutting because MATH
    1
  9106. Is that sarcasm? Or do you really not want to have people that are going to fight for their beliefs and will instead role over?
    1
  9107. McConnell is a POS. But I absolutely want the people I support to fight for our ideas as much as he fights for his corporate overlords.
    1
  9108. If you really want to know what a person is about and how they will govern then you should follow the money. She is a sellout being bankrolled by big money. It's why she didn't prosecute Steve Manuchin.
    1
  9109. I hate watch once in a while.
    1
  9110. Call out Biden for his bullshit about a 2K check or I'm done with you rational national. You are way to partisan these days. If I wanted someone to cover for the "democratic" party I'd watch corporate media.
    1
  9111. So that's why Trump loves the uneducated.
    1
  9112. you are projecting
    1
  9113.  @ImBarryScottCSS  That's easily the best doublespeak dunk I've ever heard.
    1
  9114. But the establishment thanks you if you want to keep smearing sanders and the best hope we have for progressive policies in the near future.
    1
  9115. No. Fuck you.
    1
  9116. Do you need Bernie Sanders to tell you what to think or can you think for yourself? Well.... I guess when you do try to think for yourself it seems you think dumb things. You want to cry and bitch about him endorsing Hillary? Do you not see how important it is that Hillary is blamed for her loss and not him? Don't get me wrong they still tried to blame him but it didn't work because he didn't give them ammo to use. Stop crying like a bitch. As nice as it would be it isn't reasonable to expect him to do everything. As a politician... go figure... he needs to play some politics. It sucks but there isn't another way to get what we want.
    1
  9117. Go back to school. Science teaches that things like this get more contagious and less deadly. This is what that looks like.
    1
  9118.  @wizmo57  "Grow up." Is this your idea of being an adult? Hypocrite much?
    1
  9119. Parker it wouldn't have been all that long ago that I would have agreed with you. These days thou I really don't. More and more I see the major parties as two sides of the same POS coin. Of course there are exceptions when examining individuals but to me the "democratic" party (in general) isn't better in any sort of substantial way than the republican party.
    1
  9120. Sam sedar is controlled opposition.
    1
  9121.  @ZERO_O7X  Is he one of the several billionaires sam gets a check from?
    1
  9122.  @ZERO_O7X  Do you think that controlled opposition is just some crazy conspiracy theory that doesn't actually exist or do you merely think that your favorite clown isn't one?
    1
  9123. I'm here to rage at kyle's BS.
    1
  9124.  @chrispeck308  "capitalism" Cares about money and nothing else. "would be exponentially dwarfed..." I propose housing is treated as human right not that you care. Money ruins everything and capitalism is trash.
    1
  9125.  @chrispeck308  "All they need is housing." That is not what I said. That is but one example for an economic model known as socialism. I suspect if you had something to say about the things I've actually said you would have gone with that rather your "sophisticated" strawman argument. "Have you ever spent any time with the down trodden?" Yes. "Their problems are way deeper than housing" True. They are living in a sick society that has been corrupted from top to bottom by money and it's influence. They live with a for profit health care system that cares only cares about making money and would actually prefer to have an unhealthy society to make money from them rather than very healthy unprofitable people. "it's beyond laughable to think that's the solution" I'm not going to lie this is hilarious from a big fan of capitalism such as yourself. "Do you think offering a completely useless ideological diagnosis of the problem" I'm confident it's better than shilling for capitalism like you are. "followed by an obviously ignorant solution, suggests that you somehow care about those at the bottom?" Yeah. For one I acknowledge their suffering under the current capitalistic system and seek to change it while you are here advocating for the status quo and attacking people wanting real systemic change. "Or do you just take any opportunity you have to whine about capitalism?" Acknowledging your problems is halfway towards defeating them. You are suffering from what's known as dunning-kruger.
    1
  9126.  @chrispeck308  "you said nothing about socialism" It's literally an example of socialism. It's literally an alternative to capitalism. "I fail to see how my response wasn't to what you said." Even after I took the time to explain? Sadly that seems plausible.
    1
  9127.  @chrispeck308  You: "I'm sure however many beggars are theoretically produced by capitalism, would be exponentially dwarfed by whatever hair brained idea youd come up with to replace it." ""defending the status quo" an honest representation of what I said?" Really? FYI capitalism is the status quo. I shouldn't have to explain this. "I don't think I'm the one overestimating my intelligence" I know I can be condescending but at least I don't lie about it like you are. Lastly... stop editing your comment to add large amounts of things repeatedly like you are. If you want to add something then you should be responding again.
    1
  9128.  @chrispeck308  "keep reaching bud." Keep advocating for the status quo while lying about it. I know you will. "radical change will do what you claim," Imagine thinking that treating things like housing and health care as a human right wouldn't improve the lives of the peasants like you are. How deeply unserious you must be. "isn't the same as defending capitalism," You are defending capitalism. And you are doing it in a world where there is a homeless epidemic in the richest nation in the history of the world. You can advocate for change like I am or you can advocate for the status quo like you are. But I wish that you could at least be honest about it. You can't even do that.
    1
  9129.  @chrispeck308  "isn't the same as defending capitalism," Imagine acting like "I'm sure however many beggars are theoretically produced by capitalism, would be exponentially dwarfed by whatever hair brained idea youd come up with to replace it." isn't defending capitalism like you are. It's really dense even by internet comment section standards.
    1
  9130.  @chrispeck308  "isn't the same as defending capitalism" You weren't even sure what my "hair brained idea" was apparently because I didn't use the word socialism to describe it and still you knew it couldn't possibly be as good as capitalism. But yeah... nOt dEfEnDiNg CaPiTaLiSm.
    1
  9131.  @chrispeck308  "willful misrepresentations" You mean direct quotes where you express your love of capitalism? I'm done wasting my time addressing you. Good luck advocating for capitalism and the status quo and then lying about it in the future.
    1
  9132.  @chrispeck308  "That doesn't make me an ideologue willing to defend it to no end." You are such an ideologue you said any alternative would be hair brained and now you are lying about it. I have an ideology and it includes socialism. I also have have intellectual honesty, something you don't.
    1
  9133.  @chrispeck308  "you don't have to prove that beggars are inordinately produced by capitalism?" I suspect I'm obligated to prove my beliefs as much as you are. Actually since you are already getting what you want as you are advocating for the status quo it really should be on you to show how the system is succeeding. Is it? Or is there an epidemic of homeless? Of beggars? Of mental illness? Maybe I don't have all the solutions but I absolutely know the current system is failing while you are a clown.
    1
  9134.  @chrispeck308  I quit. If you were trying to destroy my faith in humanity you have succeeded.
    1
  9135.  @Jensth  "dictorship" It's telling that you have to strawman my argument instead of addressing the things I'm actually saying. You are tough to take seriously. "GUARANTEE" I don't guarantee that you are paid for you silliness but I do suspect it.
    1
  9136.  @Jensth  "show me a socialist country that is not a dictatorship and not capitalist" Why should I have to? Do you just have zero imagination? And zero intellectual honesty? So that is why you are strawmanning the things I'm saying instead of addressing the things I'm actually saying? Do you have to show me a capitalist country that isn't a corporate dictatorship ruled by money? Because just because it doesn't exist doesn't mean I'm going to ignore the things you are actually saying because I'm not a clown.
    1
  9137.  @Jensth  I literally don't have the desire to try and intelligently respond to your crap much less read it. "Socialist revolutions always lead directly to hell" Meanwhile I currently live in capitalist country that feels like I'm living in a dystopian novel but I'm not suppose to worry about socialism to clowns like you. Nope. According to unserious minds such as yourself I'm instead suppose to worry about your fearmongering instead of what I'm actually experiencing. I should just ignore the fact that capitalism only cares about money. "starvation, stagnation, poverty and war. Historical empirical evidence show this, without a shadow of doubt" History has shown us without a shadow of a doubt that capitalism is fine with all of this... starvation, stagnation, poverty and war as long as someone is on top getting rich but you don't see that, acknowledge that or care about it because you are not a serious person. I hope you are paid for this. I really hope you don't understand all the obvious things wrong with the things you say. You are impossible to take seriously. "starvation, stagnation, poverty and war. Historical empirical evidence show this, without a shadow of doubt" FYI social security is socialism. You should be able to tell because it's part of the name but you are so unserious I doubt you even realize it. And all that socialism is a good thing while you moronically act like it would cause the downfall of society.
    1
  9138.  @Jensth  "Socialist revolutions always lead directly to hell" Imagine being so unserious that you act like social security is what's wrong with society. Imagine thinking a health care system would be better if it were capitalist. You are f'ing clown.
    1
  9139.  @Jensth  " free schools and healthcare." It's called socialism dumbass. "A capitalist country does not have to be a coorporate dictatorship" Meanwhile, in reality, the person who spends the most money wins about 90 percent of the time. That isn't democracy. That's corporate dictatorship and that is what ALWAYS happens... but hey prove me wrong if can. Show a country where the candidate spending the most doesn't win. Show me an actual democracy. I know you can't but that isn't actually what's wrong with all your nonsense. You are wrong because you have been so brainwashed into the cult of capitalism you can't even imagine any other system.
    1
  9140.  @Jensth  "Capitalism is not the problem." Yes. It is. Capitalism will not give you food if you are starving because their is no profit in it. Capitalism will not heal you if you are sick because there is no profit. Capitalism will not house you if you are homeless. Capitalism only cares about accumulating wealth. Money and capitalism ruins everything.... but hey as long as you have enough money you likely don't care about all the suffering it's causing.
    1
  9141. What does the bible say about slavery again? Is that really what we are suppose to "get back to?"
    1
  9142. Meh. He isn't doing anything wrong. Even his "apology" is fine as far as I'm concerned.
    1
  9143.  @reav3rtm  He had a chance and he's shown everyone he's a fraud. "When someone shows you who they are believe them the first time." maya angelou
    1
  9144.  Rip Cord  "Shall not be infringed" Your "land of the free" imprisons more of it's population than any country on earth, even all the countries you don't think are free. What are you waiting for?
    1
  9145.  @nothanks3236  " the stones to vote against "the current thing" so I see that as progress." It's meaningless political theater. If those votes would have been needed to pass the bill they too would have voted for it. It's political theater. Stop believing it and taking it seriously. It's just more lies from lying politicians.
    1
  9146.  @Regenmacher175  "when he feels the need to criticise them." He doesn't care about them giving the state department a raise because he's a hack. He doesn't care that they waste the leverage they have because he's a hack. And you don't care that sam isn't holding them to account because you are a hack in a cult. Sam is sheepherder leading you to slaughter but you are too stupid to see or too intellectually honest enough to admit it. But at least he has maintained his access to AOC. She will keep talking to sam while she will NEVER talk to a person like jackson because jackson is willing to call her out while sam makes excuses and rationalizations for her failures. "fixation on the Squad, and AOC" Is clearly born out of the fact they are suppose to be different than the average corrupt dem. Pelosi didn't say she would be different but they did. I hold them to a different standard than people who don't pretend to be on my side yes. Of course that's how it works. If you can't understand that or comprehend that it's only because you don't care about things you should be caring about... just like sam.
    1
  9147.  @Regenmacher175  "I might disagree with their votes but I know their overall intention is to fight for left-wing ideas" Their votes are inexcusable. It's easy to see if you aren't watching propaganda like this. Action speak louder than words. Even trump has said things akin to "everyone should have health care." Action speak louder than meaningless words. You are being pandered to and lied to and their ACTIONS make it clear while you and sam focus on rhetoric instead of action. George carlin knew it in a time when it was far harder to see it. "They don't give a fuck about you." It's not apathy or self defeatist to recognize the reality in which you live. It's empowering. But you would rather be deluded into thinking that people making inexcusable votes are actually on your side because you don't like what it means to admit the fact that they aren't. You are a deluded cultist as much as trump supporters are.
    1
  9148.  @Regenmacher175  "defeat left-wing ideas" LMFAO You are talking about people fighting for the IDEAS of universal health care, giving peace a chance, breaking up the banks, criminal justice reform, protecting the enviornment, getting money out of politics and more. You are conflating that with POS politicians who virtue signal about those ideas before selling you out. Those PEOPLE do need to be defeated because they aren't actually fighting for the ideas they claim to support in words but demonstrate they do not in their actions.
    1
  9149.  @Regenmacher175  You and your ilk would rather be mad at peasants for having the audacity to be mad about corrupt politicians' inexcusable votes instead of rightfully being mad at the politicians for their votes.
    1
  9150.  @Regenmacher175  "If you're actually a left-winger" I definitely am. "think Hinkle is left-wing" He clearly is. You know how I can tell? He actually cares about it when the state department is getting a raise and so called "lefties" go along with it and get nothing for it. And so do I. Sam doesn't because he hack who cares about his cult. "your point of view does not really interest me." You are not intellectually curious about things you should... just like sam. You virtue signal to lefties like me while demonstrating you don't actually care about me or my interests. Just like sam I don't care sedar. I'm a person who used to support the dems. I gave money to AOC but now I call her a fraud and you don't care why. It's telling. "You're mad at 6 people" They are the few who actually pretended to care about the things I do before selling me out. Nancy used to pretend to care about universal health care a long time ago but she doesn't anymore. I can only get mad at people I had expectations for or mad at them for breaking their promises. AOC and the squad promised to fight for universal health care so of course they are the ones I care about when they don't. "all the other politicians" Who never pretended to be on my side. Who I've never supported. Who were never suppose to be on my team in the first place. I actually have more respect than them because they don't even pretend to be on my side while so called lefties stab me in back and their shills like sam don't care about it. "Hinkle does not make videos about right-wing corporatists or Republicans" You can go everywhere for this. You act like he thinks they are good. You act like you need to be told that they are terrible when you clearly do not but you ABSOLUTELY need to be told how AOC sucks because you don't realize it even when it's clear as day. No one here is saying republicans are good. You are just deflecting to point at them because you can't intelligently defend the people in your cult. When I talk to right wingers I don't spend my time telling them how AOC is terrible. They already know. But I will tell them trump sucks and you know what they do? They do the same stupid BS you do. They deflect to talk about the other team and how they suck as if it has jack shit to do with the flaws in their own cult. "easy scapegoat" LMFAO It's like even you understand they can't be defended on some level. Sorry not sorry if the truth hurts and you can't handle it. The facts simply are not on your side no matter how much you put your fingers in your ears to ignore it. "magically make the policies happen" LMFAO They are deciding votes in must pass bills while you pretend they have no power or leverage. Their is nothing magic about what I'm talking about. If you think it is it's only because you have been brainwashed by too much propaganda. "Getting them elected is great because their ideas become part of the mainstream discourse as opposed to fringe ideas but there's not much else you can expect" Wait... we can't expect them to live up to the ideas they claim to hold while running? We need to just take in the ass when they bend us over. Sam doesn't care. Neither do you. You are part of the problem. You and your ilk are straight up stopping me from getting things I care about. You and sam are the white moderate MLK warned everyone of.
    1
  9151.  @Regenmacher175  "you CLAIM to be left-wing." Yup. I should know. Sam claims to be left wing but doesn't care when the state department gets a raise and so called progressives vote for it and get nothing for it. "You SAY he cares" Yup. I even concede I could be wrong about it. I even concede I don't care if he doesn't if his actions help me. And it works the other way too. For all I know for certain sam's heart is actually in the right place and I'm unable to figure that out because he acts like a useful idiot. At the end of the day all that matters is a persons actions and not why they do what they are. If your actions are hurting my cause I will treat you like my enemy and if you actions are helping me I'll treat you like my friend. "he came across as an insufferable wokescolder and as a performative virtue signaler" Nonsense attacks that have nothing to do with substance. Its just a string of smear words as if it's his fault he might be mad about things. Look in the mirror. How insufferable are you? You keep blaming peasants for being mad, you signal virtue but do it to protect terrible politicians. You want so scold jackson because reasons that have nothing to do with his arguments. It's pathetic and transparent. "right-wing" You are talking about the guy who cares about cops getting a raise. The left is suppose to be ones who want to defund the police. I'm pretty sure the right winger is the guy who doesn't care that they are getting extra money even after knowing what they are doing with that money and it's abhorrent. "Part of defending left-wing ideas is calling out right-winger" LMFAO We are. Right wingers want more money for the state department. Right wingers vote for nancy pelosi and get nothing for it. Nancy pelosi and the dems are right wing party. "Curious why you lot don't do that" LMFAO Curious why you don't call out people acting like right wingers. But it's fine as long as they are in your cult. Look.. you wrote a lot more but I honestly don't take you seriously enough to want to address it all intelligently. Much like sam I find you impossible to take seriously and I'm not really talking to you... I'm only really talking at you.
    1
  9152.  @Regenmacher175  " Note how you didn't address Dimmy kissing Tucker's boots all day" I don't care. And not for terrible reasons like sam has but for good reasons. I want people who watch fox news to be able to hear the message that jimmy preaches of: giving peace a chance, universal health care, getting money out of politics, freeing assange, and more. This is just a mindless smear to act like he goes on to tucker to talk about right wing issues or come at anything from a right wing perspective. He talkes to people that are cultists and gives him tools to possible break free. You act as if jimmy is giving tucker a platform. It's the opposite. Tucker is giving jimmy a platform to preach the things you should care about but don't because tucker. I don't like tucker. I don't watch tucker. But if I did I would definitely need to be exposed to the ideas that jimmy brings and it's good that he brings them to them. They need to be broken out of their cultlike mindset as much as you do. Shutting people up doesn't prove them wrong. It only proves you are scared of what they have to say. Even if tucker was a tool who was wrong about literally everything so freaking what. Go there and tell them all why they are wrong. "Tucker... the Squad" Look at you. You are making excuses for me wanting to hold POLITICIANS accountable. But think I should care very deeply about holding a single pundit accountable? Like I said... I don't watch tucker. I can't defend him and don't want to defend him. I want his audience to be broken out of their cult as much as I do you. I might not take you very seriously. Or fox viewers very seriously. Or tucker very seriously. But I have no problem with anyone talking to anyone. Debate is healthy. Fun fact: nancy pelosi literally refuses to debate anyone and has for a long fucking time. If I were a partisan hack for the dems I might not care about this. But I'm not a hack. I'm a person with principles so I do. "your hero is not even willing to use that tool at his disposal or to support voting third party" I'm not sure what you are talking. I'm pretty sure it's BS. "I didn't even mention examples like Greenwald's" LMFAO What? Greenwald? When did this start having something to do with him exactly? "Maybe this is language you understand:" I think that at best you are useful idiot. At worst I think you are paid to mindlessly smear people the way you are. "those guys are right-wing sellouts" You bootlick for corrupt dems. The establishment projects it's faults 100 percent of the time and this is just another example of it. "the Office of Foreign Disaster Relief" Yeah. I've noticed this is the BS being used to act like giving a raise the to state department was like the only way to get this passed. The BS is so remarkably transparent I am left baffled how anyone takes it seriously. I mean... really. Do you want to act like if they didn't get that raise this would never have happened? You clowns are professional turd polishers. Sorry I'm not buying your BS. It's still a turd. OBVIOUSLY. "Hinkle just seems to have conflated the state department with the Pentagon" LMFAO No dude. You are making excuses for what the state department is doing with that money. Even that intellectually dishonest sam conceded that what the state department is doing is wrong. But that was after he conceded that he didn't speak out against it.
    1
  9153.  @Regenmacher175  "Tucker only has Dore on..." I don't care what tuckers motives are. His audience desperately needs to hear the message dore preaches and I'm happy he's bringing it to them. "Jimmy is at best a useful idiot to the right-wing" LMFAO By talking about the issues the left is suppose to care about? By addressing things from a purely leftist persepective? And that makes sense to you? At best you are a useful idiot who only serves to divide people that should be united. "Dore does not call out Tucker on ANY of his BS." I don't watch tucker but I watch jimmy. I can remember tucker straight saying that he changed his mind and started supporting the free assange movement because of jimmy. So dore went on his show to preach a left wing message that changed tuckers mind and likely much of his audience on an INCREDIBLY important issue to people on the left and on an INCREDIBLY important issue to me. Long story short you are full of shit. "That single pundit has a lot of influence over what right-wingers in the US in general think" And jimmy got tucker to go from wanting to persecute assange to wanting him free. That's what you are crying about as if it's a bad thing. "validating him" You think tucker needs jimmy's validation? It's tucker's own audience dipshit. They need a left wing perspective... like free assange and give peace a chance and that's what jimmy brings to the program. You are painfully stupid.
    1
  9154.  @Regenmacher175  "Primarying the politicians you disagree with is the only way to do that" I'm not in AOCs district. That means I'm literally incapable of holding her to account according to you. Great plan dipshit.
    1
  9155.  @Regenmacher175  But maybe, just maybe she will lose her next primary if people such as myself call her out as the fraud she is.
    1
  9156.  @Regenmacher175  "you're full of shit because you claim you want to hold people accountable while not using the tools necessary to hold them accountable." LMFAO You say this to me but not to sam as he makes excuses and rationalizations for her failures. "while not using the tools necessary to hold them accountable." AOC isn't in my district dipshit. I have my wallet and I have my voice and little else to hold her to account. "You want to posture" Nope. I want her to actually fight for the principles she ran on. "Sometimes it’s to get members on the record, so ppl can’t make excuses later. Sometimes these votes create real political pressure that forces developments. Sometimes we vote for the historical record - to let future generations know we did everything we could." I want the AOC who wrote that... not the sellout who betrays those words. "posture and have people tell you how virtuous and principled you are without ever doing anything" I'm going to copy and paste this again. This is AOC posturing and pretending to have virute without ever doing anything she says in her own tweet.... "Sometimes it’s to get members on the record, so ppl can’t make excuses later. Sometimes these votes create real political pressure that forces developments. Sometimes we vote for the historical record - to let future generations know we did everything we could." Those are AOCs words. But I'm the one posturing? I'm the one virtue signaling. But not her? Yeah right. You are completely full of shit.
    1
  9157.  @Regenmacher175  "You want to posture and have people tell you how virtuous and principled you are without ever doing anything more than going on twitter or youtube. Sorry, that ain't going to get your preferred policies passed." Be sure to tell AOC that. As if you would. "Sometimes it’s to get members on the record, so ppl can’t make excuses later. Sometimes these votes create real political pressure that forces developments. Sometimes we vote for the historical record - to let future generations know we did everything we could." -aoc's twitter
    1
  9158.  @Regenmacher175  "you're full of shit because..." You really made my case for me that AOC is full of shit.
    1
  9159.  @maytalcliff9497  "Tucker had already said that Trump should pardon Assange" Did he really? I don't watch his show but is that really what happened? Because I saw the show with jimmy where he told his people that jimmy changed his mind. Why would he do that if his audience should have known that was BS even I couldn't? Why would he have to gain to lie to people about that when his fans are the ones who could know that he lying? And if tucker was lying about this then that should only hurt his credibility while you act that jimmy gives him credibility. Furthermore I thought that tucker is a pure right winger. You mean to tell me that he's further to the left than the democrats on an issue that is INCREDIBLY important to me? If that's the case are you sure tucker is the right winger (I mean he is) and not the dems (but so are they)? "outright and easily disprovable lie" LMFAO Like I said. Then disprove him. Which you aren't actually doing. You are merely claiming that he was lying. He might have been. Like I said I don't watch him. But I've also made it perfectly clear why I don't care about it and you have given nonsensical BS to try justify your hate. (well, not you but the other guy mostly). " He goes on Tucker’s show and says that having progressives in the democratic party is actually worse than not having any." So what? That's his opinion and there is nothing wrong with it. You are only triggered because you think it hurts your cult when you should be caring that cult sucks. "His anti-intervention talk" Thanks for at least admitting this... that jimmy goes there to talk anti-intervention. Jimmy rightfully trashes CNN and MSNBC but he would certainly go to those propaganda outlets too to talk if it means he can spread an anti-interventionist message. But CNN and MSNBC aren't going to have him on for that and beggars can't be choosers. I'd prefer to be on major networks even if they are garbage to tell everyone that sam, the squad, the democrats, the republicans, and the corporate media all suck. That isn't an option for me. I have to settle for what I can get so I'm telling you here instead. Now while you are here stop being an idiot.
    1
  9160.  @maytalcliff9497  "Assange helped out daddy Trump" You only care about your cult. You don't care that cult is terrible. I protect journalists. I don't want them persecuted. Wow do people like you suck. "Sam happened to be a guest on Chris Hayes’ show" Yeah. Sam gets access to MSNBC because he's a fucking tool of the establishment. Jimmy would go there to even though they are POS. They aren't about to invite him because they are scared of what he has to say. "Sam was the only one pushing back against that cable news narrative" Jimmy has absolutely pushed back on that exact same narrative... "While Jimmy was..." But don't let that stop you from lying about it. This isn't like talking about tucker. I'm familiar with jimmy's work and you are full of it. "relentlessly trashing Bernie" Again... you are just straight up lying. I was a bernie supporter. I was furious that jimmy endorsed tulsi over bernie. But jimmy absolutely was not "trashing" bernie even if he had criticisms of him at the time. Your lies are straight up transparent. I watched jimmy that whole time, had my own criticisms of him, but you just lying. "Sam used his Hayes..." Hayes is a propagandist... as is tucker (note: I'm not saying they are "equally" guilty of this before you go there because you clowns always do) But I don't care if sam goes there. I'm not a hypocrite like you are. "he hasn’t been invited on cable news for ages" He instead gets access to AOC because that's who he's covering for and making excuses for these days. Do you think AOC would talk to jackson? Of course not. Jackson would hold her to account for her indefensible voting record and sam doesn't care about it. "I certainly don’t mind one bit being called an idiot" I know. That would take self awareness you do not have. "I’ll wear it as a badge of honor." The feeling is mutual when I get insulted by people in your cult.
    1
  9161.  @maytalcliff9497  When all the shitlib controlled opposition is attacking you... like sam is. You know you are doing something right.
    1
  9162.  @maytalcliff9497  "Sam used his Hayes" Sam just went on MSNBC to scold joe rogan... as if joe rogan is the one misinforming people and not MSNBC. What clowns you all are. Good luck with your cult.
    1
  9163. Very tempting... but I don't even want to give it a view.
    1
  9164. will g regarding, "by the profession they do they would be an expert duh." I am awed by someone's ability to literally say nothing of value such as yourself. Bravo. Never have I addressed or talked about anything even remotely close to what makes someone an expert or not in their respective fields but cool strawman argument that has NOTHING to do with what I was talking about. I was specifically talking about why I was suppose to accept your label of them as "free speech advocates." I am sure that was the topic at hand was it not? Do you really not understand the difference between the two topics? And for you to top it all off with "duh." Well... thanks for the laugh. Seriously. That is fucking hilarious. I didn't actually watch that video because, like I said I'm not an idiot and if you think I'm going to watch something that apparently has you believing the stupid shit you think doesn't seem worthy of my time. I did read the video description thou and it included, "opposing viewpoints." As in, there are more than 2 people and they think very different things. Are they both "free speech advocates?" I'm not sure why I both to ask you questions. You don't answer them and when you do try to you are actually answering things that are not being asked.
    1
  9165. You don't even realize that you were changing the conversation do you? It takes a real special kind of stupid for that. That and an inability to even bother to try and answer even the simplest of questions.
    1
  9166.  @JumpyJoker18  LMFAO. They are well known for telling you what you want to hear. You should be surprised if these were actions but they are just words.
    1
  9167. Or AOC or any of the other progressives in the house.
    1
  9168. The only reason he talked about Gaza was because he thought it was a way to attack Trump, not for the legit reasons he should have.
    1
  9169. I and people like me give a shit because we want to make it clear that no one is above the law and to be treated that way.
    1
  9170. Because I give a shit I'm going to continue to call out bullshit when and where I see it. This for example is bullshit so I say so. Especially with this specific topic I think it is important to try and head off the possibility of such a thing actually happening by expressing myself on the topic and making it perfectly clear that such a thing is not to be tolerated before it would happen. I do concede I am unclear what your point is suppose to be if it doesn't have anything to do with the specific question you asked.
    1
  9171. Regarding, "There really never is an actual point." Um. What. Remember when you said, "I think you miss the point." Are you intentionally trying to contradict yourself? Regarding, " I am told to OBEY" Um what? Can you be any less specific and cryptic? Because I think not. Regarding, "Told to never question my lawgivers." Um what? Who says that? And so what if they do. How about if that actually happens to you you just tell them to go fuck themselves? Regarding, "I figured out how to be kind and fair" Cool. Good for you. You should. That said I am lost to why you are using the words you do as you do. Regarding, "Why do I need an overseer?" Why do you think I or someone else thinks you need an overseer. What the fuck are you talking about? You sound high as fuck. Regarding, "Why do you need an overseer?" You are the first person I've ever know to say to me that I need an overseer and my response to that is... I don't. Duh. What are you on? It sounds like some good shit.
    1
  9172. I'll take you word for that. I love weed but that is pretty much it for me. Be (reasonably) safe. Take care.
    1
  9173. I started celebrating him losing 1K when he was at 978K.
    1
  9174.  @DJ-ov2it  "sad life" For being happy that kyle is facing consequences for his BS? Your "reasoning" seems sad to me.
    1
  9175. I like it. Only evil people don't believe in justice.
    1
  9176. "vote for corrupt biden" -bernie sanders actually
    1
  9177. Yeah but do you have any advice on a good soldering iron?
    1
  9178. So would you be a manchild if the dodo gave this type of PR to trump while he were in office? Would you be all "butt hurt?" Or would you maybe be rightfully made about that?
    1
  9179. Regarding, "She was a treasure." More like she was after treasure.
    1
  9180. I just made one 7 minutes ago. Make sure to read the whole thing. It isn't as if I'm a fan of them... especially how they currently exist. But there is one good argument for keeping them as long as their power is drastically changed.
    1
  9181. It's like a corporate stamp of approval and red flag for voters.
    1
  9182. People who have never tried to use it.
    1
  9183. He can delete trump? Are we living in the matrix? But seriously... yeah to what you are saying.
    1
  9184. There is a reason they made sure this guy isn't on the ballot. They are scared of him and people like him... and they should be.
    1
  9185. He's dedicated. But not really the best.
    1
  9186.  @me56ize  "I read up on it" I admire your dedication as well. "The plumber at least was dedicated and tried to fix it." I know and agree. That's my point. I genuinely feel bad for the guy. That experience would have had me rethinking literally every life choice I had made up until that point. Not really. I would have walked off and said fuck it. I don't have his dedication.
    1
  9187. Don't worry about Bernie. He isn't perfect but he is the real deal.
    1
  9188. What are you? While you hypocritically give "salty shade."
    1
  9189. " thought the supreme court was unimportant" Nope. They thought it doesn't matter which corporate team is putting them on... they will continue to represent the corporate interest. CT is on the court because of biden. Biden fought harder for him than obamas nominees.
    1
  9190. You might want to consider that opinions vary and if mcdonalds were as bad as you portray they would have been out of business long ago instead of making billions every year.
    1
  9191. The powers that be will be happy to know that their propaganda is working just as designed on you.
    1
  9192. I don't disagree with your decision to give the finger to the "democratic" party but I would like to point out that they did the same shit to Bernie while you were voting for hillary. The only thing that changed was you.
    1
  9193. Biden isn't going to pick a progressive. But she is arguably the best option of the people he might consider.
    1
  9194.  @firefox5926  Hopefully Bernie wins the nomination and he picks a running mate who isn't currently doing anything and everything they can to cockblock him on the way to the nomination like Warren is currently doing.
    1
  9195.  @SickRedApple  regarding, "I don't know where this talking point came from." It comes from the common sense center from sane minds. Regarding, "There is no harm in multiple progressives running." Of fucking course there is. The people who are "progressive" are only a percentage of the democratic electorate. More progressives splits the votes among those people. I don't consider Warren a "progressive" but there are plenty that still do. Those votes that she gets are votes that if were not cast for her would most likely be cast for Sanders. It isn't that Sanders is owed those votes or entitled to them but that is the reality. She has a choice to make about if she wants to split the progressive votes with Sanders, hurting his chances of winning the primary, or doing the right thing for the country and stepping aside because she should realize how rigged the game already is and that Sanders needs help and not the harm she is doing. Fuck her. And fuck you for making me explain things that should be obvious as fuck. I want as many corporate dems in the primary for the same obvious as fuck reasons. I want them to split the vote. This is basic math level logic.
    1
  9196.  @SickRedApple  regarding, "If at the end of the primary Warren has 25% of the delegates, Bernie has 30%, and Kamala Harris has 35%, Warren will drop out and endorse Bernie and then Bernie gets the nomination." That's not how it works. If at the end of the primary Warren has 25% of the delegates, Bernie has 30%, and Kamala Harris has 35% then HARRIS is going to win. Warren doesn't just get to give her delegates to Sanders. Where do you get this shit? Are you intentionally lying? Do the right thing and delete or edit your bullshit.
    1
  9197.  @SickRedApple  regarding, "You are just plainly wrong." Are you fucking kidding me? Do you read the shit your write? How the fuck am I wrong? Regarding, "You only get the nomination if you get the majority of the delegates." No fucking shit sherlock. Exactly right. And how much less likely is this of happening when those delegates are being split between multiple progressives? Can you figure out the simple math? You only get the nomination outright with a majority of delegates but the bottom line is that the person who gets the "plurality" is the one is all but certainly going to get the nomination for reasons that should be obvious as fuck. Or you can just lie to people and say shit akin to, 'let's get as many progressives running because splitting the votes doesn't hurt in a world where you need a majority of delegates and the person who gets less delegates will win because I'm stupid but you are wrong.' Regarding, "35% of the delegates is not a majority ergo Harris wouldn't be the nominee." Says the same motherfucking moron dipshit who simultaneously says, "Bernie has 30%, ... and then Bernie gets the nomination."
    1
  9198.  @SickRedApple  How about you address the cold hard facts I'm mentioning you twat instead of acting like any website supports the stupid shit you say because it doesn't?
    1
  9199.  @SickRedApple  One progressive getting over 50 percent equals win. 2 progressives with less then 50 percent (individually) but more then 50 percent in total is not a win. Do you disagree with either of these statements? Because they are both facts. Therefor the only logical conclusion the sane can draw from these facts is that splitting the vote IS bad. That makes you fucking stupid.
    1
  9200.  @SickRedApple  Or maybe you aren't stupid and a useful idiot. Maybe you know exactly what you are doing and are just working overtime spreading disinformation.
    1
  9201.  @maxwellmontgomery3421  regarding, "from someone who isn't even running for president?" Do you have any idea what the date is? Because if you did you might realize why what you are saying is dumb.
    1
  9202.  @Youbetternowatchthis  "as far as we know. There might be a way around the light speed" It's more accurate to say that as far as we know (which I concede is incomplete) light speed is the maximum speed in the universe.
    1
  9203. Emilia, who is that?
    1
  9204. I was thinking that maybe that was a 3rd party candidate I wasn't aware of. I think your vote would have been more effective had it been for a 3rd party candidate rather than a write in. That said I think a write in for an anime character was a better vote than for either Trump or Hillary.
    1
  9205. What do you think is going to happen? I could use a good laugh. Note: a rigged election is still an election.
    1
  9206. If he were really good at his job he wouldn't be working there. "Better than most at MSNBC" isn't something to be admired anymore than "better than most serial killers."
    1
  9207.  @paddleduck5328  And look what he did with that time? He used it to ask one of the most asinine questions I could possibly imagine. His behavior simply isn't to be praised.
    1
  9208.  @paddleduck5328  She did make the most of that terrible question.
    1
  9209. Richard medhurst is live right now. Do yourself a favor and check him out. If you like joe you will like him.
    1
  9210.  @The_Highlander001  Regarding, "how would you actually get rid of it?" It really isn't that hard and an effort to get this done is already being attempted. You need states controlling a majority of delegates to agree to give their delegates to the candidate who wins the popular vote. States have already signed onto this. But it only kicks in when they get the necessary majority. And any state that isn't one of the few swing states should be interested in this. This isn't rocket science.
    1
  9211.  @The_Highlander001  Regarding, "You're nit being totally honest" Wait... you know what I'm talking about but I'm the one not being totally honest? Really? Regarding, "this has been talked about for the last ten years." Yeah. But the path is still there right? And it makes perfect sense for a states with a majority of delegates right? But pretending it doesn't exist and that the more impossible options are the only options is "honest?" Ug. Regarding, "I live in Massachusetts" Don't care. Regarding, "the public does not care" Actually they do. Actually they tend to have a problem with the person getting less votes winning. I care. Am I not part of the public? Regarding, "the states that you need with the most electoral college votes are all hard red states that will not join it" It really says something about them doesn't it. That party politics is more important than making sure your states have meaningful votes. Texas residents may as well stay home when voting for president. Their state is huge and yet their votes for president are MEANINGLESS. Everyone in texas can comfortably stay home knowing it doesn't matter. And their representatives are going to keep it that way because they have zero principles and are partisan hacks. Fuck both parties. I want the EC gone because it's wrong and stupid. Most votes should win. Some votes shouldn't count more than others. Fuck the EC because it's terrible.
    1
  9212.  @andrewlaurence8274  Regarding, "It's already enacted in Massachusetts" Figures. Someone is not being totally honest and I'm confident it isn't me.
    1
  9213.  @The_Highlander001  Regarding, "When I say the public does not care, I am talking about my state, " Your anecdote is stupid and wrong. I hope you are just trolling me. I'm pretty over taking you seriously at this point.
    1
  9214.  @The_Highlander001  Regarding, "No, you really should do your research, here is what it says. On Wednesday August 4, Massachusetts Governor Deval Patrick signed the national popular vote bill. " So they are correct and you are an idiot who has been lying. Please shut up. You are making everyone dumber.
    1
  9215.  @The_Highlander001  "I live in Massachusetts and the state government will not even look at it, the Governor said he veto it, and the public does not care." Also you, "you really should do your research, here is what it says. On Wednesday August 4, Massachusetts Governor Deval Patrick signed the national popular vote bill." You suck at life.
    1
  9216.  @The_Highlander001  Regarding, "you took someone's word and did not check for your self, typical of a progressive." LMFAO. Actually I did check you. You are a liar. I hope for your sake you are just trolling. Not that it really matters.
    1
  9217.  @The_Highlander001  Please stop wasting perfectly good oxygen.
    1
  9218.  @The_Highlander001  I guess I'll just have to settle for not being a worthless POS like you who is comfortably saying others are "You're nit being totally honest" while being a hypocritical liar.
    1
  9219.  @The_Highlander001  You should care about honesty. You don't because you suck.
    1
  9220.  @The_Highlander001  Actually you are a liar. Try not to lie to yourself about it the way you lie to everyone else about everything.
    1
  9221.  @The_Highlander001  Nah. Fuck you. Because you are a liar.
    1
  9222.  @The_Highlander001  Regarding, "how do you get a deep red state to go for your idea" One election where the republican loses the EC and wins the popular vote should be enough because they are like you... pieces of shit without principles... just lies.
    1
  9223.  @nuocnamphu5454  Getting what you want is not simpler because of the constitution.
    1
  9224.  @nuocnamphu5454  But yeah... no delegates at all would be better.
    1
  9225. Bernie Sanders shot JFK from the grassy knoll.
    1
  9226. Bernie Sanders nailed Jesus to the cross.
    1
  9227. Bernie Sanders killed all the dinosaurs.
    1
  9228. Bernie Sanders goes ass to mouth.
    1
  9229. Oh wait... no. That was italian guy. Italian guy goes ass to mouth.
    1
  9230. Chris buried the info for months. He should share a cell with biden.
    1
  9231. He talks about free speech on colleges IN THIS FUCKING VIDEO (and probably a hundred other times in other videos). But yeah... it's the liberals that are stupid. I would also like to add that... "but the other side does it" is a fucking pathetic excuse and rationalization used by idiots to try and justify the unjustifiable. No doubt you claim that you fucking love the Constitution. But when the President says he wants to piss on it you are happy to unzip his pants for him. You are fucking sheep and fucking idiot.
    1
  9232. Regarding, "I'm not licking trumps cooch" It sure seemed like it when you chose to go after liberals when Trump is pissing on the Constitution. Especially when you are doing so in the comments section of a liberal who DOES THE EXACT OPPOSITE of what you are crying about.
    1
  9233.  @totemr4039  Not when it comes to palestine. He sounds like a sellout to israel. Literally everyone is better than biden or trump. You have do far better than that.
    1
  9234.  @NeaEmrys  "What's with this illusion that everyone that pretends to have all the answers actually do?" If you want to call someone a leader they should have answers. Otherwise call them a follower cause that's what they are doing. "They don't" I'm looking for someone who does have answers... and correct ones at that. If RFK doesn't have them it's fine. I'll vote for someone who does.
    1
  9235.  @deannaartzbennett244  He went out of his way to throw roger waters under the bus. Good luck with that... or at least good luck trying to convince suckers of that.
    1
  9236.  @deannaartzbennett244  "Glenn Greenwald interview?" Yes. I did. He failed.
    1
  9237.  @deannaartzbennett244  "he has More to offer" He is an inferior candidate compared to cornell west with an inferior strategy (running 3rd party).
    1
  9238.  @deannaartzbennett244  "Qualified to Both Challenge and CHANGE Entrenched POLICY," He sold out rodger waters and backed apartheid.
    1
  9239. So much irony. Thanks for the laugh dipshit.
    1
  9240. Yeah because the Green party is killing am I right?
    1
  9241. What are you babbling about? In what sort of fucked up, illogical mind can you say that the most popular politician in the country, who only "lost" a primary after entering the race down 50 points due to shenanigans was "squashed like a roach," and the Green party is the answer. It is like you are living in some sort of alternate universe.
    1
  9242. Holy shit white lightning you just said something that isn't completely retarded. I barely even know what to do with that. Yes he was cheated. Yes he was robbed. Maybe if you originally said shit like that instead of shit that isn't completely fucking moronic such as Bernie was squashed like a roach then I might think more of you than flat earthers.
    1
  9243. Regarding, "the best would be Bernie no doubt." Um. Yeah. No fucking shit. Meanwhile she is going to try and cock-block him. She is going to run which will serve to ONLY decrease Sanders chances of winning the nomination. She deserves all the ridicule and resentment that she gets AND THEN SOME. If anyone needs to fuck off it's you. You are too fucking stupid to understand that what she is doing is only to try and fuck you and your interests over. You are just too fucking stupid to realize it.
    1
  9244.  @Etheoma  Let's agree to disagree about if you are stupid or not shall we?
    1
  9245.  @Etheoma  I don't give a fuck about your IQ claim or typos. I care that pretty much everything you have said is stupid as fuck. I'd elaborate but I've concluded you are not smart enough for me to even bother wasting my time using intelligent arguments on you. I am willing to troll you if you want.
    1
  9246.  @Etheoma  I'm sure that is how an idiot thinks it sounds when someone decides to use their time elsewhere for logical reasons. It's exactly the same shit flat earther say when I walk away from them. It's indistinguishable. Bravo on that. If you wanted to sound like a flat earther you accomplished it. But thanks for proving my point about you not being worthy of my time. Sadly for me my time and energy is valuable to me and I'm not going to waste it saying smart shit to you anymore then I'm going to waste it saying smart shit to dogs and walls and for the same reasons.
    1
  9247.  @Etheoma  Do you really not have something better to do on news year then to try and talk to a person who has already said they think you are a moron unworthy of intelligent conversation more then once?
    1
  9248. We have the electoral college because it was a compromise to appease racist slave owners and their 3/5ths people.
    1
  9249. Do paid trolls like you get overtime today? I'm positive none of you have the day off.
    1
  9250.  @sias.2569  I agree that's where they are coming from. And don't get me wrong I'm happy they are looking to come out and vote for Bernie as they should. My point is that they should be voting regularly.
    1
  9251.  @emhu2594  Regarding, "If you want to vote for Bernie, you have to be a registered democrat." This is true of only about half of states. That said I agree with your sentiment completely.
    1
  9252.  @johnnygarcia1598  Regarding, "only if he lives in a red state." New York has a closed primary. It's hardly a red state.
    1
  9253. More than their expected share.
    1
  9254.  @yugiohpokemon5285  Do you get paid by the hour or by the comment? I always wonder how it works for paid shills like yourself.
    1
  9255. Do you really not realize that we don't use the popular vote to elect presidents?
    1
  9256.  christopher weise  Regarding, "He only ran for POTUS as a Republican" Translation: he is a republican. He ran as a republican and won the nomination for the republican party. And the nominee of a party determines what it means to be a member of that party... not the other way around. Thanks for proving my point for me not that it is really necessary.
    1
  9257.  christopher weise  Also regarding, "Trump was a lifelong Democrat" In reality he was a democrat for the 8 years during the GWB administration and that's it.
    1
  9258. Musk is a conman getting billions of dollars from taxpayers to get rich. I don't get you not getting why people don't like him. It's really weird.
    1
  9259.  @Trambo1997  I could only take you less seriously if you gave your own idiotic comment a thumbs up. Oh wait. You did that already. I guess I can't take you any less seriously than I do.
    1
  9260.  @YourMom-cu8yt  I could only take you less seriously if you also gave your own comments a thumbs up and your name is "your mom." Oh wait...
    1
  9261.  @samhhaincat2703  Not all mistakes are created equal. In other words it depends.
    1
  9262. Blackmail of a journalist is politically relevant. And he buried it disingenuous. He's a fraud.
    1
  9263. Meh... while religion is stupid as fuck let's not make light of people with actual mental disorders shall we?
    1
  9264. Not all of us are partisan hacks like you... thankfully.
    1
  9265.  @zapatavive8957  Not only are you a hack but you are a very stupid one at that. I know you are but what I am was a great comeback in the first grade but if you say that as an adult you are hopelessly stupid.
    1
  9266.  @zapatavive8957  Tell you what... why am I a hack? I could use a good laugh.
    1
  9267. Meh. I wish she would. She wouldn't win and would split corporate dems votes.
    1
  9268. No prob. It is understandable you might make that mistake because the corporate media, who is quick to say how paying for college is unaffordable and unrealistic, didn't even feel the need to mention the extra money going for bombs that would have more than covered Bernie's plan for free college tuition.
    1
  9269. Sadly it isn't going to be stopping anytime soon because war is a great way for some to make money. The "war on terror" isn't meant to be won. It is meant to be perpetual. And so it will be unless we can get a President and government to stop it. Actually Trump has spoken about health care but that is only to tell us how he is dismantling obamacare. I'm torn about this. On one hand the ACA is pretty terrible but it did cover more people than before it. I'm hoping that it going away only accelerates us toward universal health care. Time will tell but there is no way it will happen under President Bone Spurs.
    1
  9270. LMFAO
    1
  9271.  @whipstitchwebwork1383  Spoiler alert! No. He shouldn't. Obviously.
    1
  9272.  @jivet3919  Regarding, "I understand" Clearly not. Regarding, "who’s “border logic” we’re you referring to?" Asked and answered. "Not directed at anyone specific to the video but rather to anyone who continues to support the war on drugs as it is."
    1
  9273.  @jivet3919  And by the way it's "whose" and "were." Not that I care about grammar but because I care about hypocrisy.
    1
  9274. Please sign the petition if you haven't already.
    1
  9275. Regarding, "I disagree Biden lost miserably." You should check yourself for cognitive decline and political hackery immediately, as should biden.
    1
  9276. @MB Food for thought... Trump was a self described democrat during the bush year. My point is you need to dig a little deeper then a party label. Corporate whores are corporate whores and people don't support them for good reason. Lastly, when given a choice between the corporate whore on the republican side and corporate whore on the "democratic" side I forever prefer the republican corporate whore because they are far easier to replace with a progressive.
    1
  9277. I hope for your sake you are being well paid for this stupid shit.
    1
  9278.  @SoxPox  If you think the things you say you are hopelessly stupid.
    1
  9279.  @SoxPox  Actually we have a secret handshake. How exactly did you become a mental midget? I'd like to know so I can avoid it.
    1
  9280.  @jenpogurl  Do facts always bother you like this?
    1
  9281. I have no way of knowing for certain who you are talking about. If you are talking about pete or chris I'd agree with you. If you are talking about kyle I'd disagree.
    1
  9282.  @KiTheMC  I figured it was either him or pete but I hope you understand my point, take it for the constructive criticism it was meant to be, and use it to improve your writing in the future.
    1
  9283. Pretty sure the "D" stands for dipshit.
    1
  9284.  @fredmidtgaard5487  The dems control everything. Try not to lie to yourself about who is to blame when nothing fundamentally changes. Maybe they can use that power to give the people republican health care, perpetual war, and mass deportations just like Obama did. Or better yet maybe the "d" stands for dumpster fire. That's what the party is.
    1
  9285.  @fredmidtgaard5487  Regarding, "That was a very negative perspective!" Sorry not sorry if the truth hurts. Regarding, "with the Republicans being worse than that then there is no hope for the future?" If dems are going to cover for their clowns as much as maga covered for theirs... yeah, I think we are screwed.
    1
  9286.  @fredmidtgaard5487  Regarding, "I think in each individual case there are often clear right things to do" Sure. The republican party doesn't do this about 100 percent of the time. Regarding, "Choosing right most of the time is quite good." The "democratic" party chooses wrong about 99 percent of the time. What is your point? You can't be alluding to nonsense like the dems usually do what's good and what's right can you? They are the same party that won't even vote on m4a and was lying about 2k checks.
    1
  9287.  @fredmidtgaard5487  Regarding, "even a little bit forward is better than backwards" You say this like Biden and company accomplish it but don't offer anything to back that opinion up. Regarding, "So whats you solution?" All the solutions are well known. Get money out of politics, give peace a chance, universal health care, criminal justice reform and more. Biden is an obstacle to all the important solutions but don't let that stop you from supporting that POS.
    1
  9288.  @fredmidtgaard5487  Regarding, "even a little bit forward is better than backwards" Obama, Biden, and the dems are largely to blame for trump. And biden will be largely to blame for trump 2.0 after his inevitable failure. That's not driving forward. That's driving into the ditch.
    1
  9289.  @eleaticeyes813  Way to really bring something of value to the conversation. You are certainly very smart, handsome, and sexually fulfilling to women. And yes, this is all saracasm.
    1
  9290.  @seanjones2456  Regarding, "You must be an incredible "D"?" I mean we can't all be out defending incredible dicks and douches in the "democratic" party can we? We can't all only blame republicans for the shitshow we are living in?
    1
  9291.  @seanjones2456  Regarding, "The republicans have to drink from the punch bowl that they pooped in." If you are making a point it's lost on me.
    1
  9292.  @eleaticeyes813  Regarding, "is that sarcasm?" Whatever will keep you from saying stupid shit to me.
    1
  9293.  @seanjones2456  Regarding, "Just enjoy the inaugeration buddy." Why would I enjoy this? Regarding, "Look on the bright side, Trump's attendance will beat Joe's today!" Why would I care about this or think it's the "bright side." Regarding, "Good luck in New York Don!" Why would you wish him good luck? Regarding, "It should be interesting." In a watching a real life horror movie kinda way.
    1
  9294. It hurts that thunderfoot went full simp on fauci.
    1
  9295.  @garyddlewis3067  "a free, independent and democratic country" You mean puppet of the US who couped its democratically elected government in maidan.
    1
  9296. He also brought cenks newphew on to talk to him and krystal.
    1
  9297. Because it's yours. Because you are stuck with it. Because you grew up in it and have fond memories in it. Even if you are not very proud of it or happy with it's direction.
    1
  9298. What do you think his position is on US flags made in russia?
    1
  9299.  @TheBestLife2184  Like I said you are in a cult.
    1
  9300. Both parties are owned by the MIC. Neither represent peace.
    1
  9301.  @btccoins5514  regarding, "There is big difference between morale and empathy" No shit. For example I've never addressed the topic of morality. Regarding, "that is the stupidest statement ever." Ok buddy. I feel bad for you as it seems clear you are incapable of feeling empathy for people and things you haven't experienced. It's quite sad. There is a word for people like that. We call them sociopaths.
    1
  9302.  @1369Stiles  Regarding, "can i relate to dead people?" This is where you want to start? Really? Even sociopaths can relate to dead people because we have all literally experienced what's like to not be alive. Or have you always been alive? Well, being dead is probably a lot like what it was before you were born. As for all your other examples I honestly don't give a fuck what you want to think at this point. You sound like a pretty shitty person and if you find yourself incapable of relating to your girlfriends grief at losing something she loved. It's like you are trying to redefine what the word empathy means and it's tiresome.
    1
  9303.  @btccoins5514  regarding, "there is no point arguing with someone who don't understand their own position." Right... because I'm the one who doesn't understand my position... not you. Regarding, "About Pro Athlete, most people see ONLY glamor side of it but what they failed to realize to see is the hard work behind, they just think that they just became pro overnight." LMAO. Yeah. You got me. Being a pro athlete and being paid vast sums of money for playing a game that I already want to play for free sounds like total shit now that you bring up "hard work." Or maybe I'm not a lazy fuck who is fine with hard work and have already done it already... without the same rewards for it.
    1
  9304.  @1369Stiles  regarding, "you are a fucking moron." The feeling is mutual. And seeing as how walls of text are a pet peeve of mine I'm going to avoid reading the rest of your shit. I'm going to just assume it's as retarded as everything else you have said and carry on with my day.
    1
  9305.  @n0wheregrrl  regarding, "It's not." If you say so. I don't find this compelling when not backed up with anything of substance to go with it. Regarding, "you could say that it's the closest that science has come to proving that money really IS the root of all evil." Correlation and causality are not the same thing and you seem to be conflating the two. Regarding, "if you're interested, you should also check out the research that I posted for btc coins." Meh. I'm really not. From the cliffsnotes you have provided there is nothing really interesting about the study you are referencing and what it demonstrates seems consistent with what I'd expect. I'd be more interested if it showed something I wouldn't expect to happen. Rich people are less likely to feel empathy is akin to saying water is wet. They both fall under the duh category for me and don't draw my interest.
    1
  9306.  @n0wheregrrl  Yes, that was my misunderstanding. I mistakenly thought you were disagreeing with a point I made. I'm obviously not disagreeing with your point as demonstrated with my comparing it water being wet. I only would have found the results really interesting if they said otherwise.
    1
  9307.  @n0wheregrrl  Regarding, "it's one thing to say that, intuitively, it SEEMS... and another thing entirely to be able to say that peer-reviewed studies DEMONSTRATE that it appears to be so." Fair enough. When you bring this up this video address a study that I feel the same way about. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5tu32CCA_Ig Regarding, "Your mileage may vary." Huh? I'm not sure what you are trying to say here? Are you calling me old? Because I am. One thing I'd like to add about the difference between correlation and causality... (and this is "intuitive") There is good reason to think that the type of person who is drawn to try and accumulate vast sums of wealth isn't as likely to be a very good person in general then you average person. That and the type of person who succeeds in accumulating vast sums of wealth is more likely to have engaged in other questionable decisions. There is a reason the phrase (and this is paraphrased if not correct), "behind every great fortune is a great crime" is a thing... there is truth to it. So those people that are willing to commit "great crime" are also going to be less likely to feel empathy. It isn't the money causing it... that's just who they are. They feel no empathy and they have lots of money, but one isn't causing the other. Or that the causation is in the other order and it is more apt to say that feeling no empathy causes lots of money. Because you don't care about who you are stepping on to get it.
    1
  9308. The worst thing about stupid people is that they are far too stupid to realize they are dumb.
    1
  9309. Nah. I love it.
    1
  9310. "She's nothing but a keyboard twitter warrior" LMFAO. Look in the mirror hypocrite.
    1
  9311. Seth is talking about his war crimes for political gain. I guess I'm saying I disagree that he has character to attack.
    1
  9312. Jimmy Dore Show regarding, "Who is smearing Bernie? WTF are you talking about?" Don't be afraid to read all the comments under your video. If you did you would know exactly what I'm talking about. You would also know that I've answered that question in this thread. I was talking about your viewers and about the people commenting on it. I'm talking about the ones who call him a communist. I'm talking about the ones who call him a sell out, controlled opposition sheep herder working for "democratic" party. And I'm talking about all the bullshit between. That's what the fuck I'm talking about and I shouldn't need to repeat myself or explain what is pretty fucking obvious.
    1
  9313. Eric regarding, "Do you even understand what wealth is? Wealth is not money or capital, wealth is the ability of a given person to leverage human or natural resources that exist in the system." Um... do you understand what wealth is? Because, according the independent arbitor, the dictionary, wealth is, "an abundance of valuable possessions or MONEY." Look man I know you want to go off on a tangent and make this conversation about how capitalism is the devil but it isn't about that nor am I interested in opening that rather huge book of conversation. It's about Sanders and I'm not looking to go off the rails from that.
    1
  9314. big regarding, "I'm calling it now, contested convention and berne gets screwed again?" The establishment is corrupt but they are not stupid. They are well aware that one of the only ways they jeopardize the future of the parties existence is by using superdelegates the way everyone fears. Ultimately that isn't their purpose because if they did use them that way it would very possibly lead to the destruction of the party. And I'm confident most of us would be happy to see the party crumble so if nothing else let's make them do it. Let's make them use superdelegates that way... you know... like they have never ever done.
    1
  9315. late you lost me at, "trump has done a lot more to wake the american people up" I feel no need to read the rest.
    1
  9316. Grizzly regarding, "Why is it that none of the words you use, or actions you take, actually change the balance of power in America?" I'm pretty sure hostile takeover of the party, and "political revolution" are effective ways to change the balance of power in America. What do you offer? 3rd parties? Like I've already pointed out Jill Stein got 1 percent of the vote against 2 of the most despised humans in the country. That leads me to believe it isn't a viable plan.
    1
  9317. Eric regarding, "he wants to save America, rather than to teach Americans how to save themselves." He talks about a political revolution. He has encouraged and talked about how people need to run for office and get involved. Here's the bottom line... the game is rigged as fuck. It isn't that Bernie is the only one who can help lead us in a new direction but he is best positioned to do so. He won't face the problems in 2020 that he did in 2016. In 2016 he was virtually unknown. He faced media blackout. In 2020 he is the most popular politician in the country with the name recognition of a rock star. He will have front runner status and the corporate media won't be able to ignore him. We need advantages like that if are going to have hope of overcoming the rigged game.
    1
  9318. William regarding, "the establishment wants a communist like Bernie in power" The Jimmy Dore Show has no fucking idea what smears I'm talking about. Meanwhile we have stupid fucking comments like this. That said thanks for proving my point for me you fucking twat.
    1
  9319. Cheryl regarding, "some people do not understand terms?" I agree with you. Take for instance the people calling Sanders a communist.
    1
  9320. Regarding, "he wants to save America from capitalism" One of the things I like about Sanders is that he says what is on his mind and what he thinks. Never have I heard him say something like this. The closest he gets is when he talks about capitalism when it comes to a specific topic... like health care. Regarding, "through reforms that smooth out the rough edges of capitalism." To me this is just a long way of saying regulation. Breaking up monopolies, ensuring safe working conditions, ensuring reasonable wages, protecting the right to unionize, and more are just regulations to ensure capitalism is not allowed to run amok. Regarding, "But it doesn't work." It absolutely did. Regarding, "Over the long run..." The notion that because regulations can be rolled back, need to be continually addressed, and aren't a perfect til the end of time means they "don't work" is really silly. I really prefer to address all points as they are made but I'm not going to do that for you going forward. Like I said and you want to continue, this is pretty much all about capitalism and not about sanders. That said I will address some things. Regarding, "Roosevelt ushered in the political and economical reforms, but he never..." It isn't reasonable to think someone can do everything. Those reforms speak for themselves and I take issue with what I think is diminishing great accomplishment. Regarding, "A democracy only exist when..." Let's agree to disagree about your very narrow definition of what need be for there to be a democracy. There is a reason the word representative is a synonym for the word politician. For example I don't need to be "actually participat(ing) in the decision making" when it comes to an issue like the war on drugs. If I consider that a priority then I get to support a candidate and they are suppose to represent me on that issue. I don't need a direct hand for their to be democracy. Regarding, "or Bernie, really inform the voters" Bernie Sanders is a guy who wants to talk tirelessly about the issues. Regarding, "I would say they terribly misinformed the voters." Let's agree to disagree. And if they are "terribly misinforming the voters" then what would you call what corporate media does? Regarding, "because they want to get rich and climb the social ladder." Yeah... it's called human nature and it isn't going anywhere anytime soon. Guys want to get their dick wet. It's pretty much their motivation for everything after they reach puberty. Without it you are likely to have a complete waste of a human being who accomplishes nothing with their life. Getting paid, getting the girl, and being popular drive us to do what we do. It helps make us productive and useful to society. You can't get rid of it and shouldn't really want to because without it you lose an important driving force for the human race. Who needs to aim for the stars if their isn't an alien to bang or, at the very least, a woman on earth to be impressed by it. Regarding, "Can you not see that the politicians wants to be corrupted," That said there are exceptions and it isn't the only thing that drives us. There are still plenty of people who just want to make the world a better place, whose priority is looking out for their fellow man, and they understand that a place to do that is in politics. Not everyone wants to be corrupted even if there are some who are good with it. And those are the people we should be supporting for political office. I feel like you are all over the place and now I too am all over the place when I want to have a very specific discussion. If you think I'm missing your point I'm fine with that. It really feels like all you care about is trying to piss on capitalism as innately evil. It isn't. It is merely an economic system. You hate it. Fine. I don't care.
    1
  9321. Regarding, ""Dictionary" is an independent arbiter?" Um.. yeah. In that it is what everyone thinks words mean. You just asserting, "wealth is the ability of a given person to leverage human or natural resources that exist in the system," is not backed up by anyone's understanding of what the word means as it's used. Holy shit are you all over the place with the rest of comment. Even after I've made it clear that this topic is suppose to be about Sanders nowhere, in that really long post do you even try to mention his name. I'm done with you. Peace.
    1
  9322. Regarding, "the dislike ratio is wild guys" Because this was one of the last places I could go and not have politics shoved down my throat not that you actually care. Regarding, "who cares if its Joe Biden." I do. And I'd care if it were literally any politician because the dodo has no business getting involved in politics. Regarding, "When Trump actually starts to care about animals THEN they can make a video about him." Forget the orange clown. They wouldn't do it for anyone of the right even if they would come with really cute titles like "turtle adopts dog" after mcconnell adopts a dog or something. Regarding, "Stop being snowflakes about it." Is this your idea of not being a snowflake? Crying because people rightfully don't want politics here? Why exactly are they snowflakes but you aren't for crying that they have the audacity to express their opinion? Regarding, "Its a dog video," It's not. It's PR for a politician.
    1
  9323.  @lilyillustrates5903  Regarding, "he already won lmaooooo" The only thing that's funny is that you think you have a valid point or something. Regarding, "do you honestly think that this was the Dodo paying ad revenue money to the dems." No. Is that what you think I said? I didn't. Not even close. Regarding, "it wasnt political." Of course it is. Literally EVERYTHING to do with politicians is political. Regarding, "It was about a prominent figure adopting a shelter dog." It's a publicity stunt. You must be able to understand that on some sort of level can't you? I'll bet you would if trump were doing the same thing. Regarding, "Its going to shine more light on that." It's going to drive people away from the dodo and kill their brand. Because this is a place they go to get away from politics... not get PR for them. Regarding, "And for such an "in depth" argument on why I was "wrong" I've never seen someone spew out so much bullshit in my LIFE lmao." And yet you fail to make a single decent point that can't easily be swatted away. Regarding, "Its a video about someone getting a dog." A particular somebody of great importance while you act like it was just your average joe like is all the other dodo videos that are not political propoganda. Regarding, "They weren't boosting any political propaganda or agendas." They were merely using their platform to give good PR for a politician. Something they absolutely wouldn't do for trump if roles were reversed because this obviously is political. Regarding, "the election you idiot" It's funny you call me an idiot while simultaneously misunderstanding what I say. I know this isn't going to sway the election. It's not about the election. Did you know that politicians benefit from a good public image in ways other than just the election right?
    1
  9324.  @leonpedro1135  I am not going to forgive you and you should be ashamed of yourself. Get a real job doing anything else.
    1
  9325.  @anewfuture  "You will notice that all of the states that have enacted that are Democrat states." So what? Aren't there enough dems states to win a national election? So you don't need any "republican" states. "In which case, you wouldn't need to change the system to begin with" Fun fact: The dems like having the broken system. That's why they don't fix it. Not because they can't. "Democrats will win every cycle" The already would if they weren't corrupt. They lose because they are paid to lose. They are paid to make sure nothing fundamentally changes. Because the system that's in place benefits them.
    1
  9326.  @PaulDouglas11  "That won't happen without a Constitutional Amendment" Maybe read my comment before you open your mouth and prove you don't understand the world in which you exist.
    1
  9327.  @RRBrown-fj2xv  What do you propose then? Should we let the minority rule?
    1
  9328. He was authentic when he said, "nothing will fundamentally changed" in a private media to his high dollar donors. But yeah, I agree with your sentiment.
    1
  9329. It's worse than AOC being silent... she has been openly terrible and gaslighting people the way corporate dems like to.
    1
  9330. Thanks for the laugh.
    1
  9331. That deflection is used for men as well as women. I get it quite often myself... as if there aren't legit reasons to get emotional over the state of things. And as if humans who act like robots are better somehow.
    1
  9332. You lost me when you said you wanted to infringe on freedom of speech and freedom of press. What a terrible idea.
    1
  9333. The peasants of america are decent for the most part. The same cannot be said of the peasants of israel.
    1
  9334. Provide evidence. Til then I will call it a skydaddy.
    1
  9335. I seriously would like to know if you get paid by the hour or by the number of stupid posts you make. Which is it?
    1
  9336. Free assange and jail GWB.
    1
  9337. Fuck Warren. Tulsi Gabbard or Nina Turner.
    1
  9338. K Joe McCarthy
    1
  9339. Is your orange clown in on it?
    1
  9340. You say that like you are happy that she is provoking nuclear powers. Are you ok? Or do you have a death wish?
    1
  9341.  @novusordoseclorum5065  "who are responsible" Dems have the presidency, house and senate if you are actually looking for who to blame for how things are. But you won't.
    1
  9342. It's hardly pointless. It starts an important debate.
    1
  9343.  @joecool3332  They did report that trump and bill had a good talk right before he announced his run. I'm surprised they did and didn't bury it.
    1
  9344. I guess the dems should have thought about that before running a rigged primary. I guess Obama shouldn't have sucked so much the country would turn to an orange clown.
    1
  9345. I do.
    1
  9346.  @pennywells9824  Regarding, "I think innocent is those that are violently attacked while doing their job." Even when that job involves something like, for example, warmongering they are still "innoncent?"
    1
  9347.  @alanhyt79  Yeah. Good news. They have excellent health insurance while millions of people lose theirs.
    1
  9348.  @alanhyt79  The "democratic" party controls everything and they won't even vote on m4a.
    1
  9349.  @pennywells9824  Regarding, "If you read my comment I did say those that supported trump were not." Huh? I don't care if you are a trump supporter or not? I haven't even brought up the orange clowns name. Regarding, "Read before you get sarcastic or snarky." Is this your idea of not being sarcastic and snarky? LFMAO
    1
  9350. This is why the phrase the pot calling the kettle black is a thing.
    1
  9351. You don't want to vote for the dems in the general? Cool. I can respect that. They do suck after all. But please vote in the "democratic" primary to do what you can to shape the party, make them better, and pull them left. That doesn't mean you owe them anything when the general comes around if you don't want.
    1
  9352. Regarding, "if we had open primaries I would but that just another of their fucked up undemocratic tricks" Closed primaries is fucked up. It is dirty. it is undemocratic. But their message is clear. THEY DON'T WANT YOU TO VOTE. What better reason do you need to make sure you do? Regarding, "i like being an independent" and "I agree more with greens more than dems." I absolutely agree with both of these and live in a state with open primaries. If I didn't I would be registering with the "democratic" party just long enough to vote in their primaries. It is really fucked to have to do such a thing but I think it is important enough to go through the hoops. Regarding, "just so messed up they rig it." Yes. Yes it is. So messed up like so much in our country is these days. Regarding, "superdelegates are the furthest thing from democratic" I actually think closed primaries are worse but whatever. It is fucked up we can make a sizable list of things that are fucked up with our democracy.
    1
  9353. Let me guess, you are a proud Trump supporter right?
    1
  9354. I'm actually not a fan of labels. I had a guess and apparently I was wrong. I wasn't the only one. All of your assumptions about me were wrong as well. Go figure.
    1
  9355. To be clear I didn't just jump to a conclusion. I asked a question to gain more information.
    1
  9356. Possible sure. Is it? No.
    1
  9357. Don't paint large groups of people with huge brushes like that. I'm old, busted my ass long ago to pay for my college, and still fucking love this plan.
    1
  9358. Trump gave the empire and ugly face when they would prefer someone like obama. Trump isn't your savior. He's just another POS oligarch.
    1
  9359. The irony of yanggang calling others a trojan horse is really funny. Your guy is a clown.
    1
  9360.  @hybin1716  I'm starting to think she might be fake. I KNOW Yang is fake.
    1
  9361.  @hybin1716  Regarding, "when you have nothing to say you come back with the classic. " I know you are but what am i". Lol" Your stupidity is remarkable.
    1
  9362. CNN isn't "news," it's propaganda.
    1
  9363.  @sanfransoho  That ideology being common fucking sense.
    1
  9364. There is no difference between not voting and voting no. Stop acting like he voted for it.
    1
  9365.  michael piro  Literally EVERYTHING you say is stupid for one reason or another. It's fucking remarkable. It's like you are trying to prove the "even a broken clock is right twice a day" saying wrong.
    1
  9366.  michael piro  Regarding, "You still haven't offered 1 retort to my argument" LMFAO. Yeah. I don't bother telling flat earther why the earth isn't flat either for the same reasons. Reasons you can't understand because you are stupid beyond words.
    1
  9367.  michael piro  You are comic relief in sad times. I'm here to laugh at you. Nothing more. Not that I suspect you can understand or use this information in any sort of intelligent way.
    1
  9368.  @user_.b  ah yes, the cfpb. While that would be a good thing in a vacuum we don't live in a vacuum. Try to remember when that was created please. It was a time when we needed substantial reform regarding finance. We needed glass-steagal brought back. We needed crooked bankers put in jail. We needed banks broken up. And we were in a place to get things like that... really, really, really important things that were going to be harder to get because we were just on the brink of financial collapse. But we didn't get any of the important things we really needed and instead got the CFPB. It's a good thing the same way band-aids are good things. But the country needed major surgery. We got just enough to appease people like you when we should have gotten real reform. Sorry but that doesn't impress me for the same reasons the ACA doesn't impress me. Would you like to try again? Regarding, "she supports Medicare for all." Even Donald Trump has gone on record to say he supports some kind of universal health care. I require more then just rhetoric and pandering. Regarding, "She's pushing a new anticorruption law." How's it coming? Is it about to pass? Is it already as Hersey says, "(doing) more for working people than a billion of you of you ever could" or is this just a cool talking point with zero tangible results?
    1
  9369. Maybe. But it might just be a case of him trying to reverse engineer things to say to defend his terrible candidate.
    1
  9370. @J Stone Don't be dumb. And voting for Trump would be dumb.
    1
  9371. You should fuck off. You won't thou. Either because you are insane or paid.
    1
  9372.    Is that what you think you are doing? "Debating?" Holy fuck you are stupid.
    1
  9373.    I understand that what I was doing wasn't debating because I'm not a moron. Not everyone can say the same.
    1
  9374. Fuck Warren. I do not want anyone that is willing to vote for 700 billion dollars a year for the department of offense. There is nothing progressive about that to me.
    1
  9375. I totally agree. She would suck up all the establishment support and money before inevitably getting crushed in the primary. She won't thou and we will have to contend with a much more scary establishment shill like Booker, Harris, or Biden.
    1
  9376. Jeff was that just a retarded way of saying that the only form of tyranny is coming for your guns?
    1
  9377. It is a litmus test in that I will never support a candidate who doesn't support it. That said just because a candidate says they support doesn't mean I will necessarily believe them. That is done on a case by case basis.
    1
  9378. This didn't mean trump was a good person anymore than it means yang is.
    1
  9379. Then you aren't paying attention. That is the norm... not the exception.
    1
  9380. Sad? I don't have that. Quite the opposite.
    1
  9381.  @scruffopone3989  "What Jimmy does is ask questions with prepared answers that support his worldview." Newton had the audacity to ask questions about gravity because of his "worldview." Einstein asked if space and time are linked because of his "worldview." What's the alternative? Should we be spending our time entertaining all the ideas that don't make sense to us? Is that what you do? Is that how you get to making so little sense with literally everything you say?
    1
  9382.  @scruffopone3989  You are impossible to take seriously.
    1
  9383.  @DeadMouse32  Are the people who put up kyle's bullshit such as yourself.
    1
  9384.  @DeadMouse32  Does one statement make all the BS magically go away? That's not how it works. Even you must realize that but are just being intentionally dishonest.
    1
  9385.  @DeadMouse32  dude literally said millions of dollars doesn't make TYT corrupt while neglecting to mention the conflict of interest that he is affiliated with TYT. He's a fraud. Wake up.
    1
  9386. He assassinated a foreign official of a government we don't have a declaration of war with. He stopped 0 wars. Trump is a warmonger and deflecting to talk about biden and pelosi being warmongers too doesn't change that.
    1
  9387. "The evidence is they cause more accidents" Repeating bullshit over and over doesn't make it anymore true. I gave you evidence that you claim is bullshit but that doesn't stop you from repeating it. Obviously you don't care about evidence. You care about regurgitating your bullsht propaganda.
    1
  9388. And even if it did, "cause more accidents," which it doesn't, that isn't a legit argument to make it illegal. Alcohol actually does cause more accidents but we don't ban people from drinking alcohol because we believe in freedom. Instead we ban drinking and driving. Freedom means getting do whatever the fuck you want until you begin to hurt others.
    1
  9389. 9th army regarding, "but it does hurt others can't you see past your own lies." You just say shit and feel no need to bother to back up your bullshit with anything of substance. I could smoke all the weed in the world and I would still be smarter than you.
    1
  9390. Yeah. I lived in Colorado not long ago while it was legal. I couldn't get anywhere because of all the car accidents. There was rioting. There was looting. Buildings would just fall down for no reason. Nobody had jobs because they were all too busy getting high. Pets would eat their owners because they got second hand smoke. Wait a minute? It was actually just like everywhere else minus the persecution of smokers. You are an idiot. And why am I not surprised you didn't understand the humor in my grammaring? Oh yeah, it is because psychos are not known for their sense of humor.
    1
  9391. "Your gonna give someone lung cancer," This isn't even fun anymore. This is like picking on a 4 year old.... but dumber. Good luck going through life as an idiot. I've wasted enough time on your stupid shit.
    1
  9392. Regarding, "please delete all your comment's" Nope. I only do that when I'm wrong to set the record straight. Seeing as how I didn't say anything that wasn't true I don't feel the need. I also think that is an incredibly strange request. If you tell me why you want me to delete them I will reconsider your request.
    1
  9393. 9th army regarding, "Said things that weren't true, since I was trolling you towards the end there. And you repeated everything I said pretty much," what? Are you saying I said things that weren't true or are you saying you said things that weren't true? So you were trolling? But only at the end? You literally only said things that were idiotic so I'm not sure what you think the difference between you trolling and you not trolling is. Was this last post a troll? Because it creates far more questions than it answers because of how poorly written it is. Are you saying you want me to delete my stuff because I repeated your lies before saying why they were lies? And even so why would you care? As long as I'm saying why what you said is bullshit I don't know why I should delete my comments. You know what, don't bother answering any of that. I don't care what the answers are and I'm not deleting my comments. Take comfort in the fact that they will likely never be read by anyone. Take care.
    1
  9394. It was my intention to not respond to your gibberish. Sadly I'm not perfect and one problem I have is that I have trouble letting stupid shit go unanswered and with you there is so. much. stupid. Good luck with your future trolling thou. Hopefully it compensates for you not having an actual life or being able to have intelligent conversations.
    1
  9395. I call you names because you deserve it. I call an apple an apple for the same reason. If you have a problem being called stupid then you should not be saying exclusively stupid things. I could write a novel as to why what you just said was dumb. I'm not going to because it doesn't matter. There is nothing that I can say or do that is going to change the fact that you are fucking moron. But if you insist on just a taste of the reasons why what you just said was dumb let me dissect the first part. Regarding, "Marijuana is and will stay illegal in most of the country thank God." It absolutely is not going to be staying illegal in the country for long. You are on the wrong side of history. Case studies of states that have legalized it prove that society doesn't all of a sudden crumble because of legal weed. Literally nothing changes except for the millions generated in tax revenue and the failure to persecute smokers who are going to smoke whether it is legal or not. And as for the god that you are thanking... 1) your all powerful god can do whatever the fuck they want so if they care so much about stopping weed then they should do something about it themselves and 2) you should look at what the bible (which I assume you claim to care about but certainly know nothing about) says... timothy 4:4 "everything God created was good." But seeing as how there is no evidence of god this is really mute. But that doesn't stop you from all your other idiotic beliefs (assuming you actually believe the shit you just said and were not trolling) that you hold because you are poisoned by religion. You and your religion are actively making the world dumber. Sorry if I have a problem with it. Being able to use logic and reason are clearly not for you so by calling you names hopefully you can feel at least enough to shame to just shut the fuck up and stop poisoning society with your bullshit.
    1
  9396. I want to quit this so bad. I know this is pointless. But like I said I have trouble letting stupid shit go unanswered.
    1
  9397. Actually the atheist population is growing. Therefor we are becoming more secular.
    1
  9398.  @Oktaviii  Yeah. Becoming secular isn't going to happen over night. Still that is the direction we are going... even if not fast enough.
    1
  9399.  @gingy30  Regarding, "certain beliefs can get you cancelled." So do you have a problem with people canceling their disney plus subscriptions? Or do you pick and choose when to get outraged over "canceling?"
    1
  9400.  @MaryBrownIsTheBlairWitch  Yeah. Those types of consequences. They happen and they are just fine. Stop being so triggered.
    1
  9401.  @MaryBrownIsTheBlairWitch  Regarding, "I want Star Wars to go on" There will always be an owner of star wars that is willing to take your money for things like "the last jedi" and "the rise of skywalker" even if disney goes under.
    1
  9402.  @gingy30  Regarding, "I don't have a problem with people canceling" Of course you don't. You are a hypocrite who picks and chooses when to be outraged over "canceling."
    1
  9403.  @johnbemery7922  "States" wouldn't control elections, PEOPLE would. And you don't seem to mind the fact that with the EC a handful of swing states control elections while a state large enough to be a nation of it's own like California have votes that are rendered meaningless.
    1
  9404. I'm here because... well, you can imagine.
    1
  9405. Not only the money but the corporate media coverage of him.
    1
  9406. Everybody roasting this trash video really gives me hope for humanity. Capitalism is TERRIBLE.
    1
  9407. The US has a way of bombing countries other than themselves... among lots and lots and lots of other obvious reasons.
    1
  9408.  @heckpeanuts  Regarding, "I'm aware." Then I'm confused why you don't already understand the answer to your own question. Regarding, "he only covers US." He doesn't only cover the US. Here is but one example from a couple days ago talking about Doug Ford, a canadian politician. And I, an American, find it interesting for the same types of reasons he is interested in American politics. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qPDTIy1p3mE Regarding, "Imma leftist btw" Cool. But do better getting your facts straight at the very least.
    1
  9409.  @heckpeanuts  He's interested in politics and people who are interested in politics don't only care about the politics in their own countries. Not only that but to have true understanding about the topic you need far more than a local understanding on the topic. Also... trump. Say what you want about the clown but he's fascinating in a scary as fuck kind of way. We also live in a global economy now. The actions of foreign countries affect yours. I'm not trying to be a dick but in all honesty I think the question is a little silly because the many answers to it seem obvious. And being new is no excuse for spouting lies that are easily debunked in two seconds. That's where you really lost me. Because even if your original question seemed dumb to me at least it didn't include bullshit like your response did for which there simple is no excuse. If you are on the left you gotta bring nothing but facts. We don't get away with spouting bullshit and lies like the right does. Best learn that now and act accordingly.
    1
  9410.  @heckpeanuts  One more thing regarding, "a small foreign news outlet" This is a strange description to me. He's a guy with a webcam doing political punditry. I think he does everything all by himself including editing. You could do the exact same thing if you wanted. People watch him because what he says is on point and it resonates with them... regardless of the country they, or he, live in.
    1
  9411.  @heckpeanuts  Look man, I absolutely concede that I can be a real dick and that my message is very often (and certainly with you) better received if I go about being more diplomatic. But I'm a condescending dick whose not trying to pretend to be otherwise. I feel like I'm living in the movie Idiocracy at times, it gets tiresome, and it does show. I admit this. But it would also be nice if you would just admit, "yeah... that was bullshit I said and that was wrong of me" rather than just getting defensive and getting mad at me for taking issue with bullshit. I have no tolerance for it regardless of the side it comes from. You would be wise to focus on what I've said rather than how I've said it. Because even thou I'm a dick the points I've made are on point.
    1
  9412.  Vox Populi  His game plan is to keep Sanders from winning on the first ballot and he has the money to possibly make it happen. Don't understand him or his plan. Oh and tauriq that was what's going on. If you wonder why his debate performance came across terrible it wasn't because of lack of preparation. Sometimes there is no good defense for being evil incarnate your entire life.
    1
  9413. Regarding, "To wish death on Trump would mean you basically wish death on Obama, Bush, and almost everyone in Washington" Yeah. So what?
    1
  9414. Better yet let's cancel the POS politician who voted for pelosi and sold out m4a?
    1
  9415.  @why-even-try-brotendo  Regarding, "Tucker Carlson considers Jimmy an ally." AOC considers Nancy Pelosi an ally. I wonder why that is 🤔
    1
  9416.  @josh420masterB  "I've clearly wasted too much time on this conversation already." Yeah. By making excuses for AOC and trying to shift the blame to me. Do better going forward.
    1
  9417.  @why-even-try-brotendo  Regarding, "You are CLEARLY the unreasonable one here. The world has ended" I never said "the world has ended." Not even close. Cool strawman argument. Very "reasonable" of you.
    1
  9418.  @why-even-try-brotendo  Regarding, "I thought it was just hyperbole. Like Jimmy saying he made AOC." Fair enough. Thanks for making my point for me 🤡
    1
  9419. He's a fraud.
    1
  9420.  @65minimom  Regarding, "for someone who wants specifics, I suggest you use the name of person you are discussing" Huh? I said who I was addressing. I said what I was addressing. I never used the word specifics (or anything close). I am lost when reading your comment. Did you mean to be addressing someone other than me?
    1
  9421.  @dontask3613  Actually no one is going to take you even remotely serious with your fake outrage. I'm not here to talk about Yang. I have nothing to say about him for this thread and I was here to listen to others about Yang. I only chimed in because of what you were doing because it makes me not want to take YOU seriously. Not the other way around. Regarding, "its misleading since Yang has never said that shit." Except it's not misleading because the only way you can misunderstand it is if someone is going to be an idiot and go out of their way to "misunderstand" and ignore the meaning of words like, "he's like."
    1
  9422. 4:58 Whatcha doing down there steff?
    1
  9423. She does such a good job grooming I'd put up with her roasting me while doing it.
    1
  9424. Why do you think he was suggesting their was fuckery? To me it seemed more like he was surprised there wasn't fuckery.
    1
  9425. Sam Seder is controlled opposition.
    1
  9426.  @MichaelAronson  Do you really not know what controlled opposition is? Or are you just being intellectually dishonest?
    1
  9427.  @MichaelAronson  Sam's audience is so uninformed I wouldn't doubt you don't even know what it is.
    1
  9428.  @MichaelAronson  How aren't you embarrassed by your ignorance?
    1
  9429.  @MichaelAronson  I'll ask again... do you really not know what controlled opposition is?
    1
  9430.  @MichaelAronson  Or maybe you are paid to play dumb just like sam is.
    1
  9431.  @MichaelAronson  "Opposition to . . . what?" The "democratic" establishment. Obviously.
    1
  9432.  @MichaelAronson  "Sam is the opposition to the "Democratic establishment"?" What? Sam's job is to get you to vote blue no matter who. "So he's a Republican?" LMFAO No where do I say anything even remotely close to this.
    1
  9433.  @MichaelAronson  Do you really not know what controlled opposition is? Maybe learn.
    1
  9434.  @MichaelAronson  "Do you not know either?" I'm sorry for not answering your question originally. I really thought you were trolling. I really didn't think you wouldn't know how something so basic and important in politics works.
    1
  9435.  @MichaelAronson  "Then what is he opposition to?" He pretends he is opposed to dems when they are doing wrong. He will tell you how mad joe manchin makes him. He will pretend that he cares when joe biden does something wrong. But he doesn't. It's all pretend opposition. It's all pretend caring. At the end of the day when it really matters his job is to get you to vote blue no matter who and that's what he does.... always.
    1
  9436.  @MichaelAronson  "Then what is he opposition to?" Let's say he were real opposition... he would inform his audience about topics such as controlled opposition. But you seem completely oblivious and politically illiterate. It's telling.
    1
  9437.  @MichaelAronson  "one question that I keep asking you is getting you very upset" Your ignorance that almost seems willful is frustrating. I question if you are sincere and suspect you are not. Either way I like it more when the people I talk to don't make me feel like I'm living in the movie Idiocracy.
    1
  9438.  @MichaelAronson  "Then what is he opposition to?" I'll repeat myself because of shadow banning...
    1
  9439.  @MichaelAronson  Sam pretends that he is opposed to dems when they do wrong but it's all an act. At the end of the day when it really matters he will forever tell you to vote blue no matter who.
    1
  9440.  @MichaelAronson  Third time trying to post coming up... Real leftist want free speech. Controlled opposition like sam likes censorship.
    1
  9441.  @MichaelAronson  I'm not even being controversial in what I'm saying but being censored.
    1
  9442.  @MichaelAronson  The real left wants free speech. Sam is cool with censorship.
    1
  9443.  @MichaelAronson  The real left want free speech. Sam does not.
    1
  9444.  @MichaelAronson  Sam doesn't support free speech. The real left does.
    1
  9445.  @MichaelAronson  I'm done wasting my time. Good work censors.
    1
  9446.  @MichaelAronson  The real left supports the first amendment. Sam does not.
    1
  9447.  @MichaelAronson  "you wrote 10 more comments" I know I'm being shadow banned. If I'm going to take the time to write something I want it to be read.
    1
  9448.  @MichaelAronson  "Can you answer the question yet?" LMFAO I've was trying but letting the censors win this one. You are hopeless anyway.
    1
  9449.  @MichaelAronson  "he opposition to" Sam pretends to care that joe manchin and joe biden make him mad. At the end of the day he will tell you to vote for anyone representing the blue team.
    1
  9450.  @MichaelAronson  "what is he opposition to" Sam pre tends that joe man chin and joe biden make him mad. But he will always tell you to vote for them because he doesn't actually oppose any of them. He supports them.
    1
  9451.  @MichaelAronson  "You're not even being coherent." Your comprehension issues are not my fault.
    1
  9452.  @MichaelAronson  My message finally showed. I support the first amendment and free speech. Sam does not much like youtube.
    1
  9453.  @MichaelAronson  "what is he the opposition to? Where is the opposition part?" Answer: "pre tends that joe man chin and joe biden make him mad" Aka opposition
    1
  9454.  @MichaelAronson  Or let me try to explain it to you another way... "opposition" sam is "opposed" to donald trump. You can tell because he spends time talking about how he's bad. "controlled" But sam would tell you to vote for donald if he were representing the dems in a general election. He will always tell you to vote for the blue team.
    1
  9455.  @MichaelAronson  I can't do anymore than that to break it down to you like you are a 5 year old child. Good luck.
    1
  9456.  @MichaelAronson  Sam doesn't have princ iples, it's more like a religion that he represent.
    1
  9457.  @MichaelAronson  "He's never said this" He doesn't need to. Actions speak louder than his meaningless words. "Sam opposes Republicans and supports dems." Regardless of who is representing his team or how terrible they are. "You just described every single dem voter." Nope.
    1
  9458.  @MichaelAronson  "You just described every single dem voter." Not all are cultists like sam is.
    1
  9459.  @MichaelAronson  "you just said he doesn't oppose them" I can't make you smarter than you are. I quit.
    1
  9460.  @MichaelAronson  "his actions have never supported Trump or told anyone to vote for him. You're not being coherent again." Sam has been a pundit for a long time. In all that time he's never told anyone not to vote for the dem in a general election. Stop wasting my time.
    1
  9461.  @MichaelAronson  "Yes" In other words he absolutely would tell you to vote for a POS like donald trump if he was representing the blue team. Thanks for proving my point for me, not that it is necessary.
    1
  9462.  @MichaelAronson  "Yes," Thanks for making my argument for me.
    1
  9463.  @MichaelAronson  "You made my argument for me." LMFAO If you say so.
    1
  9464.  @MichaelAronson  I've said what I wanted to say and can't make you smarter than you are. I'm not going to try. Good luck.
    1
  9465. I'm embarrassed to be the same species as you. You are a disgrace to the human race.
    1
  9466. You go ahead and ignore the fact that he has done more to expose the DNC for their suck than anyone on Earth then.
    1
  9467. You might want to consider that people don't think you are smart for good reason.
    1
  9468. Your original comment was stupid beyond words. Hopefully that is an adequate answer to your question.
    1
  9469. Jimmy is legit our only chance to vote for someone good in 24. Dore 24!
    1
  9470. whyamiretarded doesn't give a fuck about facts. He is a proven liar.
    1
  9471. The "land of the free" imprisons more of it's citizens by percentage of population and in total number and it's in large part due to that crime bill.
    1
  9472. Good for you to find something in life to laugh about. I'm confident you need it as I'm confident that the rest of your life is incredibly sad.
    1
  9473. Sorry I'm late, I had to get my popcorn ready.
    1
  9474. "Not sure why Elon gets all this hate." He gets billions of dollars from taxpayers to make himself rich. I'm not sure why anyone would bootlick for elon unless he's paying for it.
    1
  9475.  @kebuhrogers  "explain how billions of dollars in taxpayer money go to Elon" 1) His companies get billions of dollars from the government. 2) Because he owns the companies getting billions of dollars he is effectively getting billions of dollars in value added that goes to his net worth.
    1
  9476.  @kebuhrogers  Please explain why you are bootlicking for a billionaire conman who gets billions of dollars from the government for every company he has.
    1
  9477.  @kebuhrogers  Don't you think that naming yourself "telsa" is a step too far? Don't you find it hurts your credibility as you try to bullshit people?
    1
  9478.  @kebuhrogers  "probably partial" I suspect this is as honest as you are capable of being and still you manage to be full of shit. It would be more honest to say you are probably an elon musk burner account.
    1
  9479.  @kebuhrogers  "Tesla are in my driveway" I guess it's good you like it considering my tax dollars helped pay for it. "stop giving trillions and trillions of dollars to oil and gas companies" Whataboutism bullshit 101 to deflect from your conman.
    1
  9480.  @kebuhrogers  "the two biggest reasons I like Tesla" The value added to your stocks from government subsidies isn't here? Weird.
    1
  9481.  @Hrithmus  "I would rather Elon get my tax money" I would rather you not be an idiot bootlicking for a billionaire conman but here you are. "oil Tycoon" Good thing no one is arguing they should be getting rich on tax payer dollars then as you deflect and distract from your conman by pointing at other terrible people. "you’re worried about Elon lol" I can walk and chew gum at the same time. You aren't worried about elon as he bends you over and takes money from your wallet? Idiocracy is real. Well done joey telsa you have brainwashed this one.
    1
  9482.  @Hrithmus  "Elon get my tax money" At least you know why people don't like musk. So maybe stop lying that you don't.
    1
  9483. They can't all be stories about cops being dicks. We need a good laugh every now and then in sad times.
    1
  9484. He's controlled opposition whose going to tell you to vote for the guy privatizing SS.
    1
  9485.  @frankd.506  I'm peasant whose pissed at how things are. Why are you ok with the status quo?
    1
  9486.  @Popeslash  Maybe apply for biden's ministry of truth since bernie doesn't speak out against it.
    1
  9487. Don't get me wrong I'd dance a jig if the party blinked out of existence but that sad reality is that the party isn't going anywhere anytime soon even if the world would be a better place if they didn't exist. Seeing as how that is the case hostile takeover of the party is not a terrible idea and worth trying. Corporate dems can be purged the same way progressives were purged.
    1
  9488. *tyt
    1
  9489. Yang ran ads saying he was for M4A. Then he came out with a health care plan. It wasn't M4A or even close.
    1
  9490. Biden was saying things that weren't batshit crazy on film? That sounds like something that would needed to have been doctored to create.
    1
  9491. LOL. Yes he is. Both physically and mentally.
    1
  9492.  @beautyfultrini  Regarding, "A sick person would be resting away from the public." Not necessarily if they are mentally sick.
    1
  9493. Watch the video first to avoid asking stupid as fuck questions that have already been answered and to avoid saying moronic shit like, "Her reporting is good." If her reporting is good then you must love Alex Jones and Glenn Beck conspiracy theories as well.
    1
  9494. Do you have as much trouble figuring out who is going to pay for it now? Except as of right now it's going to cost trillions more.
    1
  9495. I'm sure ISIS and others with no moral compass agree with you.
    1
  9496. That is what this propaganda would have you believe about that terrible person that is biden.
    1
  9497. Sam and his crew are controlled opposition meant to sheep herd you into a corrupt, warmongering, "democratic," party.
    1
  9498.  @JC19171  They aren't kidding. They are willfully lying. Just like their orange cult leader likes to do.
    1
  9499.  Barney  Regarding, "Ding dong the witch is dead!" Thanks for admitting that you are a hypocritical POS. Not that we didn't already realize it.
    1
  9500.  @Audigiant  Being a progressive means being for universal health care, providing education, criminal justice reform, giving peace a chance, getting money out of politics, giving people a living wage, protecting the environment and more. But none of the ideology has anything to do with hoping an epic terrible person that this world would be better without gets to live a long life.
    1
  9501.  @Audigiant  Regarding, "BS." Think whatever stupid shit you want for all I care then. Good luck in life. You will need it.
    1
  9502.  @Audigiant  Regarding, "I do not rely on luck. So I do not need it." What do you use then? "Intelligence?" LMFAO. Awesome.
    1
  9503.  @Audigiant  Regarding, "Show me a "progressive" who is not deep into the race-baiting game." Pretty funny coming from the only person talking about race in the thread. And by funny I actually mean stupid and hypocritical.
    1
  9504.  @Audigiant  Regarding, "So, you rely on luck? Brilliant." Is that what you heard me say? If so it's only because you aren't brilliant and lack comprehension skills.
    1
  9505.  @Travis371  So you went from, "gotta love the "tolerant and compassionate" left." to "You're disgusting," in the same paragraph. Do you at least have the self awareness to realize what an epic hypocrite you are? I'm betting no.
    1
  9506.  @Travis371  Regarding, "Apparently you can't grasp what sarcasm is." Wait... are you really claiming that you were being "sarcastic" when telling people they are "disgusting?" LMFAO Nah. You are obviously a liar in addition to being a hypocrite.
    1
  9507.  @Travis371  Regarding, "you're an awful human being." Is this more sarcasm according to the liar and hypocrite?
    1
  9508.  @Travis371  Regarding, "disgusting part wasn't sarcasm" So that was hypocrisy then? Regarding, "I also like how you didn't reply to the fact that you're an awful human being. That goes to show that you already know you are. Thanks for proving my point." Except I did reply. Sorry for disproving your point then cause apparently that's how things work according to you.
    1
  9509.  @Travis371  Tell you what... I'll take this exchange to mean a simple, 'no, I'm an idiot who is far too stupid to understand when I'm being a hypocrite,' from you.
    1
  9510. It's better to not follow a conman selling snake oil.
    1
  9511.  @destronia123  Edison was not a conman and don't speak of their names in the same sentence like that. Gross.
    1
  9512. "I've been holding back. Letting you run your mouth as if your some kinda warrior for what's good in the world. That's about to change." Things a blackmailer might say to you while holding a knife to your loved one's throat AND something that ana actually said to try and blackmail jimmy.
    1
  9513.  @zach.0  It's clearly blackmail and that's not an argument.
    1
  9514.  @Chimera144  Nah. While all people are capable of being shitty I disagree that almost all people are shitty.
    1
  9515.  @Chimera144  I understand and share your cynicism but I encourage you to try and give people the benefit of the doubt. Even if someone is "being nice" for self interested reasons like it makes them feel good so be it. IMO most people value and want to "be nice" and would always "be nice" for the sake if being nice if all things are equal. But all things almost never equal. Sadly people have other self interests (such as greed). And that's we all tend to fail and be shitty to one another.
    1
  9516. You never had it.
    1
  9517.  @canadablake  She was the one who told me.
    1
  9518.  @alisat221  "This video is good." Nope. And it shouldn't take an arm twisting to get kyle to speak up about this. And he seems like a coward for wanting to sit it out.
    1
  9519. Your comment is funny because sam clearly is as well.
    1
  9520.  @rve420  Sam's fan's don't even attempt arguments.
    1
  9521.  @MephilestehDarkness  "lying" LMFAO
    1
  9522.  @DRChupacabrah  "One is independent" LMFAO He's blue no matter who every general election. "organically funded" He gets checks from multiple billionaires. "go look up "grifter"" They should have a picture of sam next to it.
    1
  9523.  @DRChupacabrah  ""independent media"" LMFAO He's blue no matter who PROPAGANDA. "B) name one They bring him on MSNBC for a reason.
    1
  9524.  @DRChupacabrah  "ok, bozo." We have all been fooled before. Don't blame the messenger.
    1
  9525.  @DRChupacabrah  "ok, bozo" Rubin fans say the same thing when he's called out.
    1
  9526.  @rve420  "You listen to an old man yell at clouds" LMFAO You are proving my point for me not that it's necessary. "there is no argument to be made." This is as close as you get to telling something that's true. Yes... you have no arguments to be made. If you did you would give them instead of what you are doing.
    1
  9527. In his defense your dog has been hit in the head significantly less.
    1
  9528.  @celerywarrior6493  Meh. I think it's brutal and not just because I relate to it.
    1
  9529.  @LazarheaD  Regarding, "Not if the DNC have anything to say about it." Lucky for us it isn't only up to them. Vote in the primary.
    1
  9530.  @Jackass_Gamer  I don't agree that it's the only way to beat trump. Even one of the worst people in world managed to get millions more votes than him. That said I do think it's the only way we SHOULD beat trump.
    1
  9531.  @borninthewronggenerationno3873 Regarding, " You need more than millennial voters to beat Trump" Did you know that like half of eligible voters don't? Regarding, "Bernie’s main support a bunch of kids" I'm old as dirt.
    1
  9532. @Chrobry Regarding, "I think you do care about likes." Get place to start your novel. By telling me you know what I think better than I do. Do I really want to intelligently address this? Nah. I'm going to go watch football instead.
    1
  9533. @Chrobry Regarding, "I'm now highly certain you are addicted to Likes and that is all you care about." You are a moron. I hope you don't like me.
    1
  9534.  @manpig9633  Even that is too nice for you. Pigs play in shit but even they aren't as dumb as you.
    1
  9535.  @manpig9633  Regarding, "I can identify as whatever I want so don’t go against you fellow left wing friends." Well said. /s Seriously thou you don't need to prove my point that you are an idiot. We get it.
    1
  9536.  @manpig9633  It's not your "identity" I have a problem with... it's your stupidity. You would understand that if you weren't proving my point for me.
    1
  9537.  @manpig9633  Regarding, "and what point am I proving?" That you are a moron of epic proportions. Don't feel too bad about it. I have some stupid in me as well even though not nearly as much as you. It's what has caused me to waste any of my time addressing you when it obviously is not a good use of time. Take care dipshit.
    1
  9538.  @isidorodimaio3419  The point is that corporate media is propaganda. Few things prove it like telling the public Joe Biden is the "electable" one and Bernie Sanders was crazy during the primary.
    1
  9539. The "best democrat" in your opinion voted in favor of the 700 billion dollar per budget for the department of offense. More than even Trump wanted. Doesn't say much for the party or her does it.
    1
  9540. Elon and twitter both suck. They deserve each other.
    1
  9541. He's already told everyone he's falling in line behind biden. Maybe realize how spineless he is.
    1
  9542.  @vincentbatten4686  If you think anyone good is going to come from inside that dumpster fire party you are deluding yourself.
    1
  9543.  @nicoleklover  "so spines you came here to watch his speech ehh?" Can you translate this into English for me? I don't speak dumb arce.
    1
  9544.  @nicoleklover  "oh good retort" LMFAO I legit have no idea what you were trying to babble about.
    1
  9545.  @nicoleklover  "so spineless you came here to watch his speech ehh?" And now that you edited it it isn't any better. You don't seem to have any understanding what makes a person brave or not. It certainly has nothing to do with watching a speech.
    1
  9546.  @nicoleklover  "Bernie’s video is going to get more traffic" And will see all the substantive points I'm making that you can't refute. I'm ok with that.
    1
  9547.  @Jamesthefrog  "I don't understand how you can watch this video" I didn't watch the video nor do I claim to. I'm talking about the messsanger and not the message. His message is great... until it's time to vote and that's when it really matters. Vote blue no matter who like bernie tells you.
    1
  9548.  @Jamesthefrog  "Do you benefit on intel corporation buying stocks and putting jobs overseas. And paying tax money so they can do it more?" Is any of this actually happening? Is bernie changing anything when it comes to this? Or is it just meaningless talk and virtue signaling while nothing changes?
    1
  9549. That's hilarious from anyone watching sam seder unironically.
    1
  9550.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  You ascribes censorship as a foundation of only 1. You are not equally against them all, you thinks youtube is particularly bad and plays up outliers as the norm. You don't care about sam supporting censorship. You are a hypocrite.
    1
  9551. If only you had the internet to figure it out.
    1
  9552. It always matters who is president. Especially as their role as commander in chief.
    1
  9553. I "need" herpes more than him.
    1
  9554.  @regulate.artificer_g23.mdctlsk  Jimmy dore defends his friends when they are being smeared and blackmailed... not everyone can say that.
    1
  9555.  @regulate.artificer_g23.mdctlsk  That's not an argument and you are just ignoring my point to spout BS. Even you should know that. But maybe not.
    1
  9556. Only deeply unserious people call a bunch of UNARMED protestors a "coup."
    1
  9557.  @NelsonLikestoTalk  "what would you call" Protest or riot. Obviously.
    1
  9558.  @NelsonLikestoTalk  "I didn't understand." That is plausible. "You think it was a protest or a riot? Or both?" I think that either can be used to describe that day, depending on the time of the day. It started as protest and after the cops LET them in it became a riot.
    1
  9559.  @NelsonLikestoTalk  youtube video "The Capitol Police - Let 'Em In"
    1
  9560.  @NelsonLikestoTalk  "Why do you say the cops let them in?" Ive seen cops crush BLM protests. They knew long ahead of time there would be protestors at the capital that day. The let them in and were rewarded with BILLIONS more funding for it.
    1
  9561. Bernie completely sold-out his "revolution."
    1
  9562. The only joke is you.
    1
  9563. Every time I see your pic I almost throw up in my mouth a little bit.
    1
  9564.  @therussiantrollnetwork7464  Same goes for every stupid AF thing you say.
    1
  9565. Will smith wanted to destroy his career and credibility and that makes sense to you? The academy wanted to prove they they are a joke and that makes sense to you? Consider the possibility you are stupid.
    1
  9566. Is the last fart she sells worth more?
    1
  9567.  @pk7ghalm23  More importantly she lies everyday.
    1
  9568. If only all journalists were like Max. Long live Max!
    1
  9569. So you are an idiot ignoring all he evidence then. Thanks for clearing that up.
    1
  9570.  @sohaibshehzad2314  Lucky for me reality doesn't care if you agree with me or not... it is what it is.
    1
  9571.  @sohaibshehzad2314  Regarding, "Such a self assured state of perceived realities" Sorry not sorry for trusting my eyes and not you. This is just lazy shit you say when you don't have anything of actual substance on the specific topic at hand to offer.
    1
  9572.  @sohaibshehzad2314  Regarding, "why the hostility ?" I guess I have a problem with terrible candidates like Yang who are out to sabotage good candidates like Bernie. Is that really so hard to understand... even after I've told you exactly what my problem with your comment is?
    1
  9573.  @sohaibshehzad2314  Regarding, " So how should your problems with my comment effect me ?" You should learn from your mistakes and do better. You won't thou will you? You will continue to act like Bernie and Yang are similar enough to be spoken of in the same breathe like they are interchangeable. Hopefully people won't listen to you thou and understand how ridiculous your statement is. I'd prefer to just give comments like yours a thumbs up and carry on. Sadly youtube doesn't give me that as an option.
    1
  9574.  @sohaibshehzad2314  Regarding, "get a grip silly boy" The irony. Then again I was being silly for ever taking you seriously and ridiculous comments like this prove it. Don't worry... I'm done wasting my time with you.
    1
  9575. @Avery Benson Regarding, "are you a republican?" I've never voted for a republican in my life.
    1
  9576. @Ben the brummie Regarding, "People have a right to share there opinion" You, two seconds ago being a hypocrite, "take your opinions some where else." But I'm happily done addressing you further.
    1
  9577. @Avery Benson Regarding, "I don’t know why you think you can be rude to people who did nothing. " Why do you only choose to criticize me for "being rude?" Am I the only person doing that in your opinion? Or are your biases showing further?
    1
  9578. @Avery Benson As for why I might be frustrated with the things being said that has to do with the fact that they make me feel like I'm living in the movie Idiocracy except my president is worse and that is understandably frustrating.
    1
  9579.  @buecherdrache1  Regarding, "Instead I get the feeling you didn't want to answer them." I promise you that I had trouble understanding the points you were trying to make. Looking ahead at your writing it is again really tough for me to understand and address properly. Your statements are like answers to questions I don't ask and your questions are just bad. Regarding, "The press wasn't there, because nor was Biden shown to hold a speech, answer a question or anything like that, which always happens when big press is there." Wait... is this something you think the press should be covering? If so why don't they cover it when I do it? Was I asking why the press wasn't there or something? Because I didn't which makes your meaning tough to get. Regarding, "You don't need to answer, just please take this into consideration." Who cares how the information was gotten to the dodo. Was this literally the first time the dodo every got this type of info on politician and an animal? Because if they have been political in the past I've never seen it and I was subscribed for a long time. So why is this the first time we have every gotten this type of political PR? And if trump and company did it would the dodo have covered it for him? And given the orange clown an undeserved bump? Based on nothing more than political theater? Regarding, "It might be a cultural difference, because where I am from private lifes of politicians are, well, private." LMFAO. It should be and can be. The only reason that this becomes public is if team BIDEN WANTS IT TO BE. Regarding, "So why is everything a political person does, aimed to influence the public in your opinion?" Not everything is. Take the legalized bribes they take. That is meant to be hidden and not affect you. But this... adopting a puppy. Of course they want that to affect you. That's why they are telling you about this and not the dirty money they are taking. If this wasn't meant to influence my opinion of biden I wouldn't be hearing about. That's how you know it wasn't meant to influence you. This on the other hand is designed to make you like him. Regarding, "Especially on a channel that is only about animal rescue?" I was a subscriber for a long time before now. It was only about animal rescue. Now they have chosen to be political. I hope it kills their brand. It should. Sadly it likely won't because people are sheep. Regarding, "Like if Trump was shown on a channel about golfing how he is playing golf, no press, no questions, just him playing, I would just assume he is playing golf without any deeper meaning." Do they only choose to show trump playing? And not any other politicians at all? If they did would you then think it maybe has deeper meaning? Fun fact: first politician I've ever seen here. I guess a conservative, or libertarian, and nazi has never done so as well. And if a nazi adopted a dog should the dodo cover it? And give them good PR the way they are for Biden? (I am not comparing or equating hitler to biden. Please do not suggest I am.) Regarding, "So what is different for you about this video?" Let's keep this simple. Propaganda is defined as information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. Is this video information? Check. Is this video biased? I've never seen them promote another politician ever and have zero reason to think they would have given trump this type of good PR while he was in office if they had the chance. Biased? Check. "used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view" Used to promote, publicize and make you feel happy good thoughts about a particular politician and POTUS elect. How exactly doesn't this fit the textbook definition of propaganda? Or do you just not mind propaganda?
    1
  9580. @Avery Benson Regarding, "I don’t understand why you are criticizing the government for Joe Biden’s choice to get a dog." I'm actually criticizing the dodo for giving us propaganda. But don't let that stop you from strawmanning me. Regarding, "Are you against Joe Biden??" I think Joe Biden is a terrible person. That does have something to do with why propaganda for him bothers me. That said all propaganda bothers me. Why doesn't this propaganda bother you?
    1
  9581. @Avery Benson Regarding, "I am VERY DONE with your stupid crud that you are typing it the comments." Thanks for not exposing me to your hypocrisy further. That way I won't have to keep telling you in detail why what you are doing is hypocritical. Thanks.
    1
  9582. @Avery Benson Regarding, "I Like dogs" That's kinda the point of the channel... we all do. But thanks for clearing that up. Regarding, "I genuinely think that it is great that he got one." I know. That was the point. Regarding, "This has nothing to do with politics" LMFAO. You feeling rosy thoughts about a politician has nothing to do with politics? Regarding, "You knew what you were clicking on when you tapped on this video," This is true. It was clearly propaganda based on the title. Regarding, "Goodbye and please get your stupid crap out of this comment section" This is funny because literally everything you have written has been stupid for one reason or another.
    1
  9583. @Avery Benson Regarding, "I now understand you are a republican." Thanks for proving my point that you are either a moron or insincere. I've never voted for a republican in my entire life and never will but don't let that stop you from continuing to say exclusively dumb crap.
    1
  9584. @Avery Benson Regarding, "I am sorry that I made you upset for unknown reasons" I literally just got done telling you exactly what makes me upset. Stupid crap like this where you pretend to not understand what my problems are and then in the next breathe contradict yourself. Regarding, "You make valid points" If only this was the only thing you were saying. Regarding, "in my opinion it is offensive the way you are saying it." Am I the only one being offensive? And crass? Whether you like it or not we are talking about politics because this is political. That means we are talking about things like war, people without health care, education, mass incarceration, kids in cages, and more. These are things that should make your blood boil while you act like I have no reason to care about the topics of which I'm speaking. And I've asked you this but you never bothered to answer but am I the only one guilty of this to you? And if not why I am I the only one you are taking issue with? Regarding, "I sincerely do not think this is a propaganda" Care to offer anything of substance? I broke down how it fits every category of the definition of the word. You offer what exactly? Regarding, "Thank you for considering that not everyone has the same opinion." I know people don't share my opinion. But I can only respect your opinion if you bother to back it up with something.
    1
  9585.  @dirtydeedsdirtcheep3007  Regarding, "please, just stop" Those are my sentiments about the dodo giving us political propaganda such as this. As for me not giving my opinion further... no. I'm not going to do that. Sorry.
    1
  9586.  @dirtydeedsdirtcheep3007  Thanks. Your approval means everything to me. /s
    1
  9587.  @ys1876  Regarding, "Spoken like a true trump supporter." Spoken like an idiot. I've called him a clown repeatedly in this thread. Regarding, "meaning you don’t vote." I do vote and never said anything even close to this. Meaning you aren't to be taken very seriously. Regarding, "you’ve got some serious built up anger." Why aren't you angry with our government? Regarding, "except you don’t vote." I do vote. Just repeating stupid crap doesn't make it anymore true than it is. Regarding, "You really come across as a negative angry person that hates the world." I don't hate everything. I hate stupid people and stupid comments. Maybe say something of value and I won't have to feel so negatively towards the things you say.
    1
  9588.  @TheSelfHelpTube  Regarding, "you're using big words that are beyond your scope again, son." You're making worthless comments son. Regarding, "But this not meaningless." Is this your idea of using words correctly? Regarding, "There are positive repercussions that will echo for decades." And yet you fail to cite a single substantive example for you claim making your claim meaningless. Regarding, "Stay hollow, dickhead." Stay stupid and hypocritical. I know you will.
    1
  9589.  @momochan2145  Regarding, "you sound like..." Is this really what you have to offer the conversation at hand? Your life is only going to get harder because you are a moron. Hang in there dipshit.
    1
  9590.  @poketay  Regarding, "this was taken two years ago" I have zero clue why people bring this up like it's an innate point or something. It shows nothing. Other than the fact that biden team was planning a presidential run a couple years when they CERTAINLY were. Any sort of legit presidential run by people like biden is planned years in advance. Regarding, "This wasn’t a political propaganda scheme" Of course it was. Regarding, "he just wanted to adopt Major." If that is the only thing he wanted why is the dodo covering this? I've adopted and I wasn't doing it for PR. You can tell, in part, because it didn't land on the dodo. Regarding, "He came with no security guards, not even his wife, on an Easter Sunday." Let's say you were a politician and hypothetically wanted the good PR. You would also want it to not look like it's for PR and would act accordingly. As for "on an Easter Sunday" you cite this like it's evidence it's not pandering. It actually makes it look MORE like pandering. Because not only are you pandering to dog lovers but you are pandering to the religious. Regarding, "He actually didn’t really want to take pictures," Do you believe everything he says? This is the same guy who lie about working in civil rights. This is the same guy who lied about being arrested with mandela. This is the same guy who lies about his record. Do you ever think he might be lying about this? Seeing as how he lies about far more important things? Regarding, "The only reason why it’s coming out now is because he wasn’t in the political spotlight two years ago, so nobody cared." Wait... so people only care now because he's in the "political spotlight." Thanks for admitting that this political. Regarding, "Of course, when the first EVER shelter dog gets to be in the White House, a lot of people are going to care and the media is going to report it." If trump, or any other politician (fun fact before you answer, being a nazi is a political ideology) engages in this type of blatant pandering should they all be covered like this? If mcconnell does the same thing tomorrow should that POS also get this same type of coverage from the dodo serving to increase his popularity and make people like him more than they should? One more thing to add the dodo is not "the media" or the news like you make it seem.
    1
  9591.  @poketay  I'd like to take this opportunity to at least thank you for what I think to be a sincere comment. I don't care that you wanted to say "duh" even if I think your comment was dumb. I appreciate that I at least think you are trying to engage intelligently and sincerely. I can't say the same for most of the comments here.
    1
  9592.  @poketay  Regarding, "If any huge/well-known political figure adopts a dog, it’s going to be covered by media outlets." Should it? Is that really news worthy? Do you want to act like this isn't treated differently depending on the politician, the outlet, and their "team?" The dodo are not the "news." If there is a person or outlet that should be reporting this it shouldn't be them. Regarding, "I don’t understand why adopting a dog would be considered political though." Literally EVERYTHING having to do with a politician is political. Regarding, "Why is it political ONLY when Joe Biden adopts a dog?" Because he's a politician. And it is political for all other politicians because they are politicians. Regarding, "Millions of people adopt, are those considered to be political and PR stunts as well?" Some of them certainly are. Let's say you are Jeffrey Epstein and not dead. One way you might want to make people think you aren't the monster that you are might be by adopting a puppy and getting the dodo to cover it. Should they cover it? Nope. Because Jeff is a monster. As for if the dodo should be covering this for any politician the answer should always be no. Whether you agree with their politics or not. That is what the principled position should be. That is what not being political looks like. Not being political is choosing to NEVER use your platform to give good pr and propaganda like this. Regarding, "This is only getting press recently because he’s running for President." Let's say you aren't one of the media darlings. Do they all get covered? Or do they pick and choose? Regarding, "it’s still the same act." Whose doing it matters. Regarding, "He contacted us privately about wanting to foster a dog and then he eventually ended up adopting him after he fit perfectly into his family and got along great with his other dog." Neat. Regarding, "The Dodo is covering it because ..." Have there never been any heartfelt stories of conservatives adopting? If so why have I never heard them here? Why is this literally the first time I've seen them cover any politician? Do you support Biden politically? What if you didn't? Do you still think it would be ok to give this type of PR for trump while he was in office if it were possible? Regarding, "If this was a PR stunt, he would’ve had cameras and media coverage at the time of the adoption." Is that really all you think it takes for something to not be a PR stunt? If this wasn't a PR stunt I wouldn't be hearing about it PERIOD. Regarding, "This is only getting press recently because he’s running for President." Are you trying to prove my point that this is political? Regarding, "If he wasn’t running then I doubt the media would care." You again keep lumping "the media" with "the dodo." Is there really no distinction between the two in your mind? Regarding, "The Dodo only really covers special or unique adoption stories, otherwise this channel would be overrun with millions of random adoptions." Which is just fine until they use their platform to give PR for a politician. And I'd prefer to hear about a random adoption by a person who isn't using the dog as a political prop and for political gain. I know you think Joe would never do such a thing. But what if it wasn't someone like him? As if he already doesn't have a long history of telling lies for political gain? But let's say you thought they might just be doing it for PR? Should it still be covered like you think it should be saint biden? Regarding, "Why would he lie about not wanting to take pictures because he needed to be back with his family on Easter?" Why would he lie about being arrested with Mandela when it's easily checked and proven false? Why would he lie about working in civil rights again in 2019 even after he went on the record in 1988 (i think, it was after his first failed presidential run) saying that he absolutely hadn't? Because politics and because people are dupes who believe far more than they should. Regarding, "we all convinced him." LMFAO. Even if he didn't get the photo op he certainly wanted and played hard to get about he still would likely get to have people tell everyone about biden adopted a puppy. And then, after telling them the story of our hero there would certainly be many that would come to conclusions such as, "we can all agree that this was a wonderful thing for him to do." No matter the rest of their actions in their life like the OP has. Or, "It proves once again that Joe Biden has a heart of gold." Let's say hypothetically that this was propaganda meant to make people like biden, those are the types of things they might say right? Don't be afraid to think about this from the perspective of a person you DON'T already like. Regarding, "Him adopting a dog is not political." You are the same person who also said, "This is only getting press recently because he’s running for President." are you not? If it were actually not political I'd be more inclined to agree if I weren't hearing about it here. Regarding, "If Trump or any other big politician adopts an animal from a shelter, media outlets are going to cover it." Are you sure? All the exact same media outlets that covered this? Or maybe you are talking about media outlets like fox, the daily beast, alex jones and other propaganda networks. Are you really sure the dodo would cover it? And if not I again ask why I've literally never heard another story on the dodo involving a politician. Regarding, "You keep saying it like it’s a fact, which it isn’t." Let's say you shared my opinion that this was only done for PR? What then? Do you make any distinction? And if so how do you explain the hypocrisy? Maybe it would be better to have a principle position before having to make the judgement call if it's PR or if it's not. Maybe it would be best to just not cover any politician? Regarding, "There are many media outlets covering the story, not just The Dodo," Maybe we shouldn't lump them all together into the same pile shall we? Maybe we should make some distinctions between who should be getting political and who shouldn't? The dodo is absolutely a place that should NOT be political. Period. They shouldn't be using their platform to give that type of bump to ANYONE.
    1
  9593.  @etherspin  Regarding, "if you think guys like Barack Obama enter the White House with an ambition to attack people with drones as opposed to being in impossible situations and trying to save the most lives then I don't know what to say to you" Tell yourself whatever you want to rationalize him more than doubling our wars while in office and dropping so many bombs we ran out at a time.
    1
  9594.  @etherspin  Regarding, "yes it highly depends who is doing the act as to whether its a stunt" But not a guy running for president right? That is totally the type of person to think is doing it for legit reasons. /s
    1
  9595.  @rebeccayoung4019  Regarding, "why do you even care if it's a PR stunt or not?" Why do you not care if you are being manipulated? Do you really make zero effort to distinguish between people being genuine and people pandering to you?
    1
  9596.  @-king-6481  Regarding, "the dodo does these videos to support adoption and to help save animals" Which is a great cause when they aren't using the platform to give a politicians political PR. It's a terrible thing when they use their platform to give political propaganda such as this. Regarding, "they’ve had famous people before" They have. Covering "famous people" isn't a problem. Covering politicians is. I don't care about them covering famous people. I care about them covering politicians. It's an important distinction you seem to be willfully ignoring. Regarding, "because he’s *famous*." Has a famous politician never tried this PR before? If not why is this the first time the dodo has used their platform to give good PR for a politician? Jeffrey Epstein is "famous." Bill Cosby is "famous." If they were alive and well and adopting should the dodo use their platform to give "famous" people like them good PR? Regarding, "earlier you kept saying that someone else’s comments and questions were hard to understand" I did. Regarding, "i don’t see how, i read through them and they seemed just fine." Good for you. Still you offer no actual evidence or anything of actual substance here. Regarding, "you might think this is propaganda," It literally checks ever box of the definition of the word. Regarding, "you might think this is propaganda, and as there might be some public favor, that being the dog lovers, this is not propaganda." I have no clue what point you are trying to make. Someone else might gather your meaning but I honestly can't. I welcome you to try and clarify your meaning. Why exactly isn't it propaganda? How doesn't it fit the definition that we all use? Regarding, "propaganda being “information, especially of a biased or misleading nature" It's biased because if trump were doing the exact same thing the dodo wouldn't be using their platform to cover it the way they did for biden. It would be covered... but by other networks engaging in propaganda. And you can tell it's propaganda because they are the same places that aren't covering this story about biden because BIAS. If this information isn't biased why have I never seen another politician of any kind on the dodo in the past? Was there never another story about a politician adopting a dog before this? Regarding, " there’s nothing biased about it, except that he’s democratic, but that’s not biased." Thanks for this nonsense. It really brings nothing to the conversation. It's just like you are trying to intentionally confuse and conflate things by saying even what you think is nonsense in your own sentence. "there’s nothing biased about it.... but that’s not biased." Brilliant. Let's say the dodo would only do this type of story for a democrat? But not a republican or trump? That would be bias right? Well do you have any evidence that they would do this for trump or someone like him? Do you have evidence showing their decision wasn't made from a position of bias? Regarding, "he is not trying to promote a political cause." Wait... that guy who just got done running for president doesn't support a particular political cause? Or political philosophy? Oh right... he obviously does. That's why he ran. To support his political cause and political philosophy. Regarding, "You also kept bringing up how you don’t see Trump on here" I keep bringing up how I've never seen another politician of any political ilk here before. And I loved it. I loved that this was one of the last places I could go and not have political propaganda shoved down my throat. But those days are now gone. Regarding, "trump does not have a dog. simple as that." I envy people who think everything is so simple. It must be nice. But let's say he was hypothetically adopting a dog tomorrow. Should the dodo cover it? And give the orange clown and terrible person good PR for it? Is that really how they should use their platform? Regarding, "maybe you could try to not start every single sentence with “regarding” idk just a thought, makes everything you say boring to read" Nah. I like that people know exactly what I'm addressing and don't care if you think I'm boring. I'm not writing to entertain. Maybe you could try it for me? And specifically target the many direct questions I've asked you in the same manner that I have answered all of your questions.
    1
  9597.  @poketay  Regarding, "I won’t be entertaining your messed up mindset anymore." I can't say I'm surprised that you have chosen to go this route instead of answering the simple direct questions I have asked of you. Why bother showing that my mindset is messed up with arguments and logic? It's easier to just make the claim, not back it up with anything, and walk away. Regarding, "You're a lost cause." This is pretty funny all things considered. Go back to your bubble where it doesn't matter if you have answers or not.
    1
  9598.  @poketay  Your welcome for answering literally every question you asked me. It must be nice to have them answered seeing as how you spent the time asking them. Don't let that bother you from just ignoring mine. Sad it doesn't.
    1
  9599.  @poketay  Regarding, "You arguing/getting worked up about Biden adopting a dog is weird." I may as well address this seeing as how you edited it in. What's actually weird is that you are going to pretend that's what my problem is. It's not. I can only think you are intentionally trying to misunderstand what my issue is. My issue is that the dodo is engaging in political propaganda. Not that you actually care. Just go back to pretending it's something else.
    1
  9600.  @poketay  Regarding, "I answered your questions" Nope. I just wrote you a novel that included many specific direct questions that you chose to ignore.
    1
  9601.  @poketay  Regarding, "You repeating your questions multiple times, will not change my answers." I repeat my questions only because they aren't being answered. I'd prefer to address an answer but that's only possible if you provide an answer in the first place. Regarding, "It’s like talking to a brick wall," Yes. That is what talking to you is like. Because you, like the brick wall, doesn't answer simple direct questions. Examples of questions that I've asked you but you haven't even attempted to answer include questions like (note: this is not meant to be a comprehensive list): "Has a famous politician never tried this PR before? If not why is this the first time the dodo has used their platform to give good PR for a politician? Jeffrey Epstein is "famous." Bill Cosby is "famous." If they were alive and well and adopting should the dodo use their platform to give "famous" people like them good PR?
    1
  9602.  @poketay  Not that it really matters what your answers to my questions are at this point. That information is really only useful when it's not coming from the type of intellectually dishonest person who dodges your questions while simultaneously pretending they are giving you answers.
    1
  9603.  @poketay  Regarding, "If other politicians adopted animals (which there haven’t been any, other than Biden), then The Dodo would most likely cover it." Do you really think that no other politicians have adopted other than the bidens before? Really? For example Sarah Palin adopted a dog for her son with down syndrome. Did they cover it or not?
    1
  9604.  @momochan2145  Regarding, "I didn’t mean it as insult at all" I still find it hard to believe that, "Just void of life..." was not meant as an insult. I did take it as such and doubt I would have been the only one to take it that way. Whatever. I don't really care about any of this. Regarding, "the comment page of the dodo channel is like the LAST place I’d choose to argue with anyone." Normally I'd agree with you. But normally they are not giving political propaganda.
    1
  9605.  @momochan2145  Regarding, "Sorry it came off that way." Fair enough. I believe you. I'm sorry for my misunderstanding. Don't worry about it or give it another thought. Take care. Have a nice day.
    1
  9606.  @theBravoTwins.  Regarding, "OK!" OK! Regarding, "So this entire comment section is You yelling at people" For the people wondering and asking why I tend to start points by using "regarding," I do it because I like it when people know EXACTLY who and what I'm addressing. You don't even bother to start your post by directing it at anyone but I'm going to address this as if you are talking to me. Regarding, "You yelling at people" What exactly do you mean by yelling? I thought that typing in all caps is yelling online. I may type the occasional word or phrase in all caps to try and emphasize my point but I never "yell." Or at least my understanding of what that means in this context. You aren't perchance just being a hypocrite are you? And criticizing me for having the audacity to ask people questions and not just agreeing with everything they say in the exact same manner you are doing of me? Regarding, "this entire comment section is You yelling at people" This simply is not true. This comment section is also made up of people like yourself who are "yelling" at me. This comment section also includes me asking lots and lots and lots of questions. And they have almost exclusively been ignored. It also includes people displaying the after affects of effective propaganda. The entire comment section is not just me "yelling" at people. Regarding, "u have no factual evidence" I'm not going to lie this is actually quite funny coming from the person who started their post with easily provable BS. Regarding, "whether if this is propaganda or not" I literally brought out the definition of the word and walked everyone though how this exactly fits that definition. You are the one not bringing evidence or facts. Maybe your time would be better spent telling me and everyone how this doesn't fit the definition of the word propaganda? Regarding, "have u noticed that the date was MARCH 28 2018!" I have. Have you noticed that I've addressed this already? Regarding, "THIS IS YEARS AGO WAY BEFORE THE ELECTION!" I can tell you really think you have a good point because you wrote it in all caps and put an exclamation mark at the end of it but I fail to understand why you think this is such a good point. You just stating this like it's a gotcha moment, drop you mic and walk away. It's not. It's evidence of nothing. In fact... if you are claiming that this information is only being talked about because of biden's presidential run you are only proving my point that this IS POLITICAL. If it wasn't political and had nothing to do with politics we should have been hearing about this years ago when he wasn't in office (planning a presidential run and a go at another spot in office but whatever). Regarding, "whether we believe in someone or not, let’s be positive" Wait... it doesn't matter if we believe them or not? It doesn't matter if they are just pandering or not? Do you really not care if you are being manipulated? Regarding, "and not hypocritical," It feels like you are calling me a hypocrite but not bothering to back it up with anything of substance. Very hypocritical of you mr. "u have no factual evidence." Regarding, "This is a happy story whether it’s for show or not" To be clear you think that even if this was done for the sole purpose of political gain and that even if the puppy is being used as a prop for nothing more than political propaganda it doesn't matter? And that makes sense to you?
    1
  9607.  @readthecomic7946  Regarding, "somehow you’re creating all these theories" I'm calling propaganda what it is. Maybe try to make an intelligent argument why this isn't propaganda instead of what you are doing. Regarding, "ITS A DOG DUDE, CHILL, HE JUST ADOPTED A DOG." I find this funny because you are telling me to chill and typing in all caps at the same time.
    1
  9608.  @carolynl3933  Regarding, "Has no one noticed that Clint Holmes is a troll?" I find this funny coming from a person whose comment has nothing of value to offer. Regarding, "Look at how many people they managed to successfully agitate." And still they can't be bothered to answer simple questions directed at them. I'd like to think that if they are agitated it's only because on some level they realize they don't have good answers to the areas they are being pressed. Regarding, "Just ignore people like these" Yes, just ignore people who ask you questions. Just ignore people who don't share the same views as you. Just shut off your brain and refuse to engage anyone outside of your bubble. Whatever you do DO NOT try to justify the beliefs you hold. And yes, this is sarcasm. Regarding, "not like you can win any argument anyway" People seem to care too much about "winning" in my opinion. How about debate for the sake of debate? Because what we think matters? Is that never enough for you? Regarding, "“Regarding” gibberish" You must be remarkably unoriginal to go here for an insult. Regarding, "Yes Clint go ahead and respond with the same starting phrase again" I will. Thank you. And thanks for your approval. It means everything to me. /s Regarding, "you honestly really need a life" This is what you say when you have nothing of value to offer. Let's say you thought this was propaganda? And you found it on a channel that you loved? And you loved the channel in the past in part because, like you have said over and over, it was one of the last places on earth you felt you go and not be bombarded with propaganda? And you just got to enjoy puppy videos? And you love puppies because duh? But then you honestly get what you think is propaganda? In a world that you think is already filled with too much propaganda? Let's say all that were true, is my reaction really so unreasonable? Or are you just trying to minimize the points I'm making without actually bothering to say anything of value?
    1
  9609.  @readthecomic7946  Regarding, "You are literally just calling it propaganda because it was recorded." What? Is that really what you think? Is that how my words sound to you in your head? I'm not going to lie I have real hard time taking you and anyone seriously who can so completely misunderstand what is going on. Regarding, "Here’s my theory." What you write after this isn't a "theory." It's you asking a question. Do you really not understand the difference between a theory and a question? Regarding, "If the president of the united states walked into your adoption center, would you not record it?" Where do I begin. I guess I'll start by pointing out that biden was not potus when he adopted but you are acting like he is. Second your question completely misunderstands the problem with the situation. The problem isn't that someone would record the event. The problem is that the situation is innately political and should be treated as such. I'm going to answer your question with a question that I think serves to point out what the problem is with the situation you are describing... What if Hitler were alive and well and walked into the adoption center, would you not record it? You might. And so what. That is not what is what is important. What is important and the good question you should be asking here but are not is... what are you going to do with that recording? Are you going to create propaganda with it? Most people understand that would be bad and come to the obvious and correct conclusion because most people have no trouble admitting or accepting that hitler is terrible. But is hitler being terrible the reason you shouldn't create political propaganda for him? It's not. You shouldn't create propaganda for anyone because it's propaganda. Because propaganda is something that is innately bad and should never be created for anyone even if you don't think they are terrible like you do hitler. Regarding, "You are literally just saying its propaganda" Is that "literally" all I'm doing? I'm pretty sure I've also walked everything through how this fits the definition of propaganda perfectly. Here. This is copy and pasted in case you missed it. "Let's keep this simple. Propaganda is defined as information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. Is this video information? Check. Is this video biased? I've never seen them promote another politician ever and have zero reason to think they would have given trump this type of good PR while he was in office if they had the chance. Biased? Check. "used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view" Used to promote, publicize and make you feel happy good thoughts about a particular politician and POTUS elect. How exactly doesn't this fit the textbook definition of propaganda? And this is propaganda. You can tell because it fits the definition of the word perfectly." That was me walking you through how this is propaganda. Not giving evidence or argument is what you do. The definition is now right in front of you. Maybe try to offer an argument why it doesn't fit.
    1
  9610.  @readthecomic7946  Regarding, "This video was taken WAY back in 2018." LMFAO. Kinda. It was taken in 2018. But the notion that 2018 is like the distant past or a long lost bygone era like you are framing is asinine. Regarding, "This was BEFORE he announced that he was running for president." Yup. Do you want to act like a presidential run only begins the day they announce? That major campaigns like this aren't planned meticulously years in advance? Regarding, "How would this be propaganda if it was taken so long ago?" Let's start with what the word "propaganda" describes. The "propaganda" is this video. It wasn't created long ago. It was only recently posted. Regarding, "your point regarding them not promoting trump" My point is actually far more broad and that I've never seen them promote ANY politician before this. Regarding, "Trump, never adopted a dog, so how exactly would they promote him?" They have never used this platform to promote ANY politician to be the best of my knowledge. Even if they did it really proves nothing. Look again at the definition of propaganda. It doesn't require that information be biased to be called propaganda. It's more of a red flag and warning that it's propaganda. It's not required in all cases. If it were the definition would instead be, "Propaganda is defined as information, OF* a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view." Regarding, "This channel is all about animals and them finding their forever homes" I know. Which makes it a perfect place for political propaganda. It is a perfect place to gain the sympathy of dupes who predictably let down their guard and shut off their brain when a puppy is around because puppies are adorable. Regarding, "Trump never took the time to do that." If he did do you think they would cover this? Do you think they should cover it? In the same manner they have for biden with the predictable response of making people like the orange clown more than they should? Should the dodo be using their platform to predictably give good PR for any politician? Let me ask you a few more questions that maybe you can answer while others won't... Let's say you KNEW it was PR. Biden straight up told you so. That he doesn't care about the dog but they wanted to adopt them for a good photo op and good publicity. He even knew of a friend at the dodo (this is all hypothetical and is not meant to accurately portray what I think happened) that was going to cover it for him. They had it all planned out to even try and make it look as "normal" as possible. It can't look planned or the effect isn't as good. So you know all this but it's not like you have it on tape or something. It was just what you yourself heard joe biden say because reasons. Can you agree that if all this were true you wouldn't want the dodo to cover it? And give him exactly what he wanted? Or do you want to claim as others have that it wouldn't matter. And that it would still be a feel good story? Let's assume you wouldn't think it would good to give him the PR and propaganda he wanted. How do you justify that belief but still hold the belief that this is just fine? What exactly is the difference between the two? Wouldn't it maybe be best to just be of the principled belief that it has no business here regardless? Because they are politicians and literally everything they do is political? Wouldn't it be better to not leave it up to individual judgement? And just leave politics out of it completely?
    1
  9611.  @dmmice2344  Regarding, "How stupid people are!" We agree on one thing... people are pretty stupid. Regarding, "It certainly wasn’t a political ploy!" Obviously. I can tell because you used an exclamation mark for your statement. That's even more compelling than arguments made of reason and logic. /s
    1
  9612.  @dmmice2344  Regarding, "you’re a jackass" It's nice that you at least don't feel so strongly about this to use an exclamation mark for it. So thanks.
    1
  9613.  @dmmice2344  Regarding, "I think you have too much time on your hands." Is this your idea of spending time wisely?
    1
  9614.  @dmmice2344  Regarding, "by sending you that funny video?" What moronic nonsense are you babbling about? I'm just kidding. I don't care.
    1
  9615.  @dmmice2344  1.5/10 trolling
    1
  9616.  @patveldon6843  Regarding, "As Rump..." Your whataboutism BS is trash. But thanks for proving my point that this is political.
    1
  9617.  @patveldon6843  Regarding, "can’t defend the liar, grifter, corrupt cult leader you are on your knees to huh" Either that or I don't support him, have called him an orange clown in this thread repeatedly, and you are kind of too dumb to address intelligently. It's definitely one or the other. Spoiler alert, it's the second thing.
    1
  9618.  @Willbravo886  Regarding, "u subscribed to Keyush “Key” the stunt dog?" Yup. Love that dog. So much personality. Regarding, "Sherpa" I love how excited key gets when told sherpa is going to visit.
    1
  9619. @NinjaPuppy AroundtheWorld Regarding, "your gonna look into my profile" I essentially never do this. I wish I would have before addressing you. You really are a child. I wish I would have realized that before addressing you and acted accordingly. My first reaction to seeing that was feeling bad. I would have addressed you differently had I known. I do just assume the people I'm addressing here are adults. That is my mistake. But you really should take some time to consider the points I'm making. You are going to grow up in a world that will actively try to manipulate you. They might take your love of dogs or anything else you love and try to use it against you to try to make you like someone you shouldn't. Be mindful of it. Learn what propaganda is so that you can mitigate it's effects because IT IS OUT THERE. Whether you realize it or not. And go read the book 1984.
    1
  9620.  @sassysoutherngirl7658  Regarding, "Of course this video now. How funny" Well said. /s
    1
  9621.  @rubygreby1473  Regarding, "Another attempted Coup D'etat. Get it yet?!?" Thanks for proving why propaganda rots people's brains and needs to be fought. Not that such a point should really be necessary or need be made.
    1
  9622.  @2056-j3s  Regarding, "This reply section is full of nolife arguers and is retarted AF LOL" Thanks for bringing quality comments such as yours. /s I'd ask why being a hypocrite doesn't bother you but I don't expect you are even capable of understanding your obvious hypocrisy.
    1
  9623.  @jindmann227  Regarding, "stop making this political" I can't make something about the potus elect political. It obviously already is. Regarding, "literally shut up" Nope. You should do that if you have nothing of value to offer. And that is why I'm not really bothering to intelligently respond to anything you wrote. I have no good reason to.
    1
  9624.  @cvntacious  Regarding, "you’re dumb as hell" Opinions vary. Let's see why you think what you do. Regarding, "this dog was adopted in 2018 " I've addressed this countless times in this thread. You are clearly dumb as hell.
    1
  9625.  @wannaplayagame7484  As a person who is not a biden supporter do you think it's a good thing that the dodo chose to produce this piece of political propaganda? Because that is clearly not a good thing.
    1
  9626.  @PeachDragon_  Is that really how you rationalize not caring about political propaganda? ItS nOt A dOg RoBoT.
    1
  9627. Sam seder is controlled opposition meant to sheep herd you into a corrupt "democratic" party.
    1
  9628. Max headroom?
    1
  9629.  Frederic Bastiat  The irony of you calling others a "retard" is pretty funny. They do not save the government money, the government pays them to lock people up and that payment includes PROFIT when the government could do the exact same thing without the profit which means cheaper. Your stupidity is remarkable.
    1
  9630. The butt candle?
    1
  9631. Meanwhile, biden is privatizing it and bernie isn't stopping him.
    1
  9632.  @republicansthatdidntvotefo1605  "He's slightly😉 out numbered" He had deciding votes on must pass bills and used that power to get NOTHING of value for progressives and no amount of gaslighting from you will ever change that.
    1
  9633.  @maximilian3394  Voting for a corrupt POS like Biden DOENS'T WORK! I WISH IT WOULD BUT IT WON'T!
    1
  9634.  Daniel Stone  The only wasted votes are votes for terrible people who don't deserve to win.
    1
  9635.  @maximilian3394  Your idiotic wall of text in all caps is impossible to take seriously. Seek psychiatric help.
    1
  9636.  @maximilian3394  I actually have more respect for trump supporters who think their clown is the second coming that you. Sure you are both morons supporting evil terrible people but only one of you is willfully supporting what they know is a corrupt POS.
    1
  9637.  @maximilian3394  Yup. I have tons more respect for people who aren't willfully supporting what they know is a corrupt POS.
    1
  9638.  @maximilian3394  They are just wrong. You are wrong and willing to support what you know is evil.
    1
  9639. @UCgkD-TC-lS_xbx0VpglMQTw Regarding, "your wilfully supporting corrupt POS" Nope. That's what you do. I don't support evil. Period. The "lesser evil" is still evil. Regarding, "supporting trump supporters!" I don't support them. I just have more respect for them than I do you.
    1
  9640.  @maximilian3394  If it makes you feel any better the trump supporters who vote for him knowing full well he is terrible but vote for him anyway using their version of your "logic" as they cite biden/hillary/pelosi as the reason they need to support what they know is evil and vote for trump.... well I lack respect for both of you equally.
    1
  9641.  @maximilian3394  Regarding, "you dont support evil?" Nope. That's what you do. Regarding, "You support Trump supporters" Support and respect and not interchangable. Regarding, "who DESERVE NONE" That's reserved for you. Everyone can be wrong. But you can't willfully support evil the way you do. I mean you can, but it has consequensenses. Regarding, "respect is one of thoes your showing support for what YOU KNOW IS EVIL as well!" You are impossible to take seriously.
    1
  9642.  @maximilian3394  Regarding, "it's not gonna get you anywhere" I'm sure you will go far supporting what you know is corrupt and terrible. /s LMFAO
    1
  9643.  @maximilian3394  Regarding, "leverage" LFMAO. The only leverage I have is my vote. If I vote blue no matter who I take that leverage and toss in the trash. Why am I addressing anything you say intelligently? LMFAO
    1
  9644.  @maximilian3394  Regarding, "I don't support evil I support the lesser" The lesser what dipshit? Evil. The lesser evil is fucking evil. I don't care if you think hitler is a lesser evil compared to satan. Maybe he is. It's not relevant. If you support hitler you are supporting evil. The rest is just details. Just stop.
    1
  9645.  @maximilian3394  Regarding, "voting third party is a vote for NOTHING" Is that why you are writing in all caps as if it does matter somehow? I live in a swing state. I know my vote matters.
    1
  9646.  @maximilian3394  Regarding, " getting rid of trump is good enough for me" Whatever you got to tell yourself to rationalize supporting evil. No doubt you would support trump if he running on team blue and you thought his opponent were worse. That's what mindless sheep do.
    1
  9647.  @maximilian3394  Regarding, " if trump was a blue and he was doing what he us doing now HELL FUCKING NO I WOULDN'T BE VOTING FIR TRUMP" Yeah right. Hypothetically trump is the dem nominee and you think the republican nominee is worse. What do you do? Try not to lie.
    1
  9648.  @maximilian3394  So no answer to very simple very direct question?
    1
  9649.  @maximilian3394  Regarding, "IF TRUMP WAS A BLUE INSTEAD OF A RED IF HE WAS THE LEADER OF MY PARTY RIGHT NOW I WOULD FLIP IN A HEART BEAT" So you would support the republican who you think is worse in my hypothetical?
    1
  9650.  @maximilian3394  So if trump were the dem nominee and you thought the republican nominee were WORSE you would, "FLIP IN A HEART BEAT" And support the candidate you think is worse. And that makes sense to you?
    1
  9651.  @maximilian3394  Take care. Peace.
    1
  9652.  @BeeKee404  Regarding, "So not voting at all?" I'll be voting. But not for Trump or Biden. Regarding, "one of them will still be selected" Yup. But not because of people like me but because of the masses of don't have standards for getting their votes like they should.
    1
  9653. I guess you think it would only be reasonable if he said it was going to happen on a wednesday at 10:30am. You know what actually has no value? Your comment.
    1
  9654. No. Because you lose your base. I'll be happily voting 3rd party rather than vote for republicans dressed in blue.
    1
  9655.  @JasperHoogland  Regarding, "that would increase the chance of more trump, wouldn't it?" Yes. The fact that the democratic base doesn't want to vote for republican light increases the chance of trump winning. It's actually how he won in the first place. Regarding, "Why would you risk that?" Oh... I get it. Why wouldn't I vote for Biden? Because I'm on the left and he doesn't represent me? I'm not going to sacrifice my values and principles out of fear of Trump. That's actually why hillary and company propped up the orange clown in 2016 to prey upon that type of mindsight. I'm glad I don't have it. I'm not motivated to vote against trump. I'm already doing that. I don't support him. And I actually am of the belief that trump winning would be best for the country long term. Not because of 2020-2024 which is going to suck regardless of who is the president but because of 2024. If Biden is president during the next 4 shit years the country will blame the "left" and look to elect trump 2.0 in 2024. If trump is president the country will turn to the left in 2024. So if I supported what I consider to be the lesser evil I'd vote for the orange clown. But I don't play that game and neither should anyone. I vote for good. Not evil even if I consider it the lesser evil. Regarding, "Just trying to understand the weird shit happening in the USA." Good luck with that. I'm in the US and I don't claim to understand it all.
    1
  9656. I'm not bashing him (well, maybe I am bashing his judgement a little for good reason) and I do appreciate the fact that he is doing the right thing now... it's just that it is important to note how less meaningful it is when it takes personal experience to come to obvious conclusions. Like I've said before but it's worth repeating... you shouldn't need to fall out of a plane to be pro-parachute.
    1
  9657. We know the for profit system is an epic scam. We know Canada pays half as much per person for their universal system. I wish you had the same skepticism for the current fucked up system.
    1
  9658. I guess there aren't enough billionaires giving sedar a check to make you wise up.
    1
  9659.  @stevencoardvenice  I'm "anti-death penalty." You know how you can tell? I'm against the death penalty. ALWAYS. That's what being "anti" something actually means. You accusing jimmy being "anti-vax" is nonsensical. It would be just as nonsensical if you accused someone of not supporting the death penalty if they merely thought a single person should not be put to death but still wasn't against the practice in all cases... you know... like I am. I'm actually anti-death penalty. I'm the type of person you could describe that way. Not someone who merely has a critique of the death penalty but still thinks people can be put to death by the state.
    1
  9660.  @stevencoardvenice  "Your attempt to defend him is nonsensical." This isn't an argument. It's ad hominem and nothing else. Ironically giving ad hominem and nothing else is nonsensical. If you actually had an argument that made sense I suspect you would give it. I think it's telling that you don't even attempt to offer one. "Are you vac cinated?" This doesn't affect you so it's none of your business.
    1
  9661.  @kokofan50  This planet is actually humanity's future.
    1
  9662.  @kokofan50  A handful of people on a space station and your pipe dreams of living on mars don't really count.
    1
  9663.  @kokofan50  "the space industry" I'm sorry are people actually living in space? Or is that just where your head lives?
    1
  9664.  @kokofan50  Musk is selling people living in space. Try to keep up.
    1
  9665.  @kokofan50  And that's where people are going to continue to live, on earth... so that's probably where our focus should be and not subsidizing a billionaire conman.
    1
  9666. Imagine not caring that it's political propaganda because you are an idiot.
    1
  9667.  @rewalproductions6320  I get it. You are that idiot who doesn't care that it's political propaganda where I once was able to just happily enjoy videos about puppies.
    1
  9668.  @kity1081  Regarding, "this dog was adopted two years ago" Irrelevant. Regarding, "this isn't propaganda." It is. Regarding, "it's to congratulate biden for winning the election!" LOL. A courtesy they would never be willing to extend to the orange clown if roles were reversed (and rightfully so because they shouldn't be doing this for any politician) because it obviously is political.
    1
  9669. He compared jada to a movie star badass and sex symbol. How dare he am I right? People like you are absurb. What is wrong with you?
    1
  9670. To be fair (and by fair I mean fuck that guy), neither did Trump.
    1
  9671. Are you intentionally missing the point or do you just not care about the ways Warren sucks?
    1
  9672. I guess I should add that your commentary is just so goofy and dumb... and that is me being kind.
    1
  9673.  @garfieldGG  I get it... your commentary is goofy and dumb. You don't need to keep proving it.
    1
  9674. Regarding, "Little facts lots of opinion stated as fact." What an apt description of your comment, except saying "little facts" is too kind.
    1
  9675. It's not really a review. That's what happens after. It's more like predictions.
    1
  9676. Generally I believe in fairness and in everyone being treated equally under the law. But you know what... fuck that. I think that cops who break the law should be punished more severely when they break the law because of what their job is. Like twice the penalty. Then again this doesn't really do shit unless cops start being held accountable at all.
    1
  9677. It shouldn't be surprising that people who are illiterate like yourself have the worst opinions.
    1
  9678. "Why is it so hard to put money in Research and Development for Clean Energy while producing fossil fuels for power." It's not hard. They don't want to. Our government is bought.
    1
  9679. And bernie takes all your progressive love and revolutionary spirit and funnels it into a corrupt party. He will tell you to vote for joe. And sadly you will.
    1
  9680. Bernie will take all your love and funnel it into the "democratic" party. He will tell you, "progressives" to vote for joe biden. And sadly you will.
    1
  9681. Bernie will take that love and funnel it into votes for corrupt people like his "go od fri end joe."
    1
  9682. Bernie will take that love and do everything he can to use it to manufacture consent for corrupt people like joe biden.
    1
  9683.  Ahmad Hijaz  He's already told everyone he's supporting joe for president again. You remind me of trump supporters who when faced with a reality they don't like mindlessly say, "fake news."
    1
  9684.  Ahmad Hijaz  "noep" You can't even spell one word responses correctly. LMFAO
    1
  9685.  @Kalivermore925  At least enough to get a better picture.
    1
  9686.  @MrOoglebog  Even goose was able to take a polaroid of the other guy in top gun.
    1
  9687. Corruption like the military industrial complex? Do you remember when Warren recently voted in favor of an extra 80 billion per year for bombs for the department for offense, even more money for death then even Trump wanted? Peppridge farm remembers.
    1
  9688. Superdelegates are a fucking joke and should be abolished but you are exaggerating.
    1
  9689. Regarding, "Bro why do the dems do this," Short answer, corruption. Long answer, money in politics.
    1
  9690.  Haifa Hoffman  Without guaranteeing health care to people all that UBI money would just flow to the top like it does now to pay for overpriced health care. We need to change the system first.
    1
  9691.  @TheHuxleyAgnostic  Regarding, "Forcing the vote won't get you M4A "now". " I don't care in the slightest. I mean, I want it now and we should have it now but getting m4a immediately is hardly the only way we "win" the battle. Regarding, "At best, you get the vote, it fails, and it gives you ammo to use against anti M4A candidates in 2022" This is way more than enough for me to want this to go to a vote. Regarding, "Worse, you don't get the vote" This is hardly worse. It's actually what we have this very second. Regarding, "you paralyze the House" LMFAO What? This sounds like nothing more than silly fearmongering based on nothing. Citation required. Regarding, "propaganda against the progressives" Again this is already the status quo so there is nothing lost by trying to get a vote. Regarding, "progressives won't let them get minimum wage passed" So we should let the possibility that silly arguments like this "progressives won't let them get minimum wage passed" stop us from fighting to get nice things? And that makes sense to you? Regarding, "won't let them get lowering social security eligibility passed" If corporate dems try to make arguments like this it only makes them look terrible. That's bad how exactly? Regarding, "whatever else they can use to make it look like progressives are hurting the people" You mean like they are already doing right now and nothing changes? Regarding, "they could even orchestrate losing the speakership to McCarthy, and blame progressives." To be speaker you need a majority of votes. So how do you think they orchestrate mccarthy as speaker? By voting for him? Because that's the only way mccarthy becomes speaker. Or if progressives vote for mccarthy but they obviously aren't going to do that either. Regarding, "Jimmy's plan isn't 100% risk free." Then give me a single risk that I can't easily swat away as nonsense.
    1
  9692.  @TheHuxleyAgnostic  Regarding, "If a house speaker isn't elected, the house is paralyzed." But a house that won't even vote on m4a isn't paralyzed? Ultimately if you know anything about pelosi you would understand that she WILL bring m4a to a vote if it means the difference between her being speaker and her not. Regarding, "No bills would be brought up to vote on." I don't care. Do you know what they do actually like to pass? Regarding, "Corporate Dems could just keep putting up Pelosi as their candidate for speaker, and if you keep making protest votes for someone else, the house will stay paralyzed." LMFAO. This would absolutely not happen. If it did I like you worry about I don't care. Let them explain why not voting on m4a is worth "paralyzing" the house. Regarding, "You just need enough no shows, or abstentions, to lower the threshold needed to win." Wait, it's our fault if they don't show up to vote or some shit? I have trouble taking you seriously. Regarding, "Have 9 corporate Dems play sick. Have 3 threatening to abstain." LMFAO. You sound the same type of idiot who would be the first ones blaming progressives for this. Regarding, "Not sure someone who doesn't know how the government works can swat away anything on the topic." LFMAO. Really funny all things considered. Do the Koch brothers pay you for this crap? Or are you just a useful idiot for the establishment? Pelosi doesn't want this. She thanks you for your bullshit and stupidity.
    1
  9693. ".you get a lot sayings wrong." This is either a good joke or hypocrisy.
    1
  9694. You sound like you are disappointed they didn't launch their nukes. Are you ok?
    1
  9695. Was it thou? I thought it got lots of viewers and made them money. I thought those are pretty much their only goals.
    1
  9696.  @GoodBaleadaMusic  "you killed my grandmother." LMFAO In your own words... so stupid.
    1
  9697.  @pleiadesstarr453  If they want someone to blame they should probably be pissed at the WIV and the people like faucci who funded it.
    1
  9698. Please timestamp where thunderfoot actually said that or admit you are a liar for musky balls.
    1
  9699. Everything you just said was fucking stupid. You are clearly a fucking moron. Good luck with that.
    1
  9700. No shit sherlock. I decided not to waste my time making an argument because you are clearly too fucking dumb to bother with one on.
    1
  9701. Why bother when you have demonstrated you can't understand even the simplest of thought? I don't waste my time refuting flat Earthers either for the same reasons but do insult them for the same reasons. You are a fucking moron. Nothing I say will change that.
    1
  9702. Oh now you young assholes want Obama to do the right thing just as consistently as you have always wanted him to do the right thing. How dare you be so intellectually consistent.
    1
  9703. The DNC considers Sanders to be a "crazy person" because he is corrupted by their big money.
    1
  9704. She worked for her father's PAC which advocated for gay conversion therapy while Sanders has been fighting for gay rights for a long, long, long, long time.
    1
  9705.  Michael Timely  Regarding, "I am voting against Trump because he is an obvious liar" This is funny because you are voting for an obvious liar. Biden worked in civil rights, was arrested with mandela, was endorsed by the NAACP, didn't try to cut SS and medicare. Or at least those are just some of the many, many, many lies he has said. He would say literally anything to win. Not that you care about his lies... only trumps.
    1
  9706.  Michael Timely  Regarding, "You are just as dishonest has he is." Based on what exactly? Pretty funny to accuse me of dishonesty while not bothering to back it up with anything. And by pretty funny I mean you are pretty pathetic. Regarding, "You don't have the morality, the integrity or the credibility to judge anyone. You are a liar just as much of a liar as he is." You said while offering zero examples of me lying. It's almost like you have zero morality, integrity and credibility.
    1
  9707.  Michael Timely  At least it makes sense why you don't care about biden lies since you are a lying POS yourself.
    1
  9708.  Michael Timely  Regarding, "So you're not defending Trump?" How intellectually dishonest can you be? This is literally everything I've said about trump. "I'm voting against Trump and Biden both. Both are liars and both are evil." No. That's not a defense of trump. Even you understand this. But you pretend otherwise because you are a liar. Regarding, "your story is that they're the same?" Never do I ever say they are the same. Not that you care. Just spout some lies. Very trump and biden like of you. You are all intellectually dishonest liars. That said you all being intellectually dishonest liars doesn't mean you are all equally intellectually dishonest liars. Regarding, "If you can't tell the difference you should just stay out of it." If you can't tell that I never say they are the same you might want to consider the possibility that you are an idiot. But even you are smarter than that aren't you? But you are a liar so you lie.
    1
  9709.  Michael Timely  Can't wait to hear the newest lies to try and rationalize yours and biden's bad behavior. No doubt it will include lots of deflecting to talk about trump.
    1
  9710.  Michael Timely  Don't forget to make it 100 percent strawman as always you intellectually dishonest hack.
    1
  9711.  Michael Timely  Do you feel guilty about being so intellectually dishonest? Does lying for your cult bother you at all? Don't bother answering. These questions are rhetorical. Your words are meaningless for the same reason Trumps and Bidens words are meaningless. Bunch of liars... all of you.
    1
  9712.  Michael Timely  To be perfectly honest with you your responses have been so stupid and intellectually dishonest I can't take you seriously. But tell yourself whatever you want to rationalize your stupid comments that are filled with lies.
    1
  9713.  Michael Timely  And I'll take that as a no to my question of if being an intellectually dishonest liar bothers you. It obviously doesn't. Not that it's surprising.
    1
  9714.  Michael Timely  But I'm not going to lie, going from "You are just as dishonest has he is. You don't have the morality, the integrity or the credibility to judge anyone. You are a liar just as much of a liar as he is." To: "To be perfectly honest with you, your responses have been so over the top crazy I can't take them seriously." Is kinda funny. I don't know how being so openly hypocritical like this doesn't bother you at all. Then I remember that you are an intellectually dishonest liar.
    1
  9715.  Michael Timely  I can't tell you how glad I am that I'm not you. I'm so happy to have things like morality, integrity, and honesty. Don't be afraid to make some changes. You don't need to be the POS that you are.
    1
  9716. Regarding, "They only need one dirty trick and it's called the *Super motherfuking Delegates*" I wasn't aware that superdelegates consisted of more than 50 percent of all delegates. Wait, they don't and you are saying stupid things again.
    1
  9717. Galaxy regarding, "is rude to everybody" Yup. I have little patience and tolerance for stupid.
    1
  9718. I'm old as dirt. The time for patience is long over. If you don't want me to insult you then don't say stupid things.
    1
  9719. Crunch a big part of the reason why I think taking over the "democratic" party is the best plan is because I accept the reality that they are simply not going anywhere anytime soon. That said, if superdelegates are used to usurp the will of the voters the way you fear, the way they have never actually done, then the "democratic" party may very well implode. And that would be a win even if not perfect. But you go ahead and keep spouting bullshit about how all they need is superdelegates and people who actually know how the system works will continue to call you stupid.
    1
  9720. Regarding, "We have to evolve beyond that" You understand that the DNC is rigged internally but you seem to not understand the entire game is rigged in favor of the two major parties. You do not have a magic formula to avoid a rigged process. I accept that the game is rigged because I live in reality. I'm not sure if you do because you are not living in reality if you think your plan doesn't involve overcoming a rigged process as well.
    1
  9721. What are they saving us from? An eternal hellfire they created?
    1
  9722. This. We need to win on the first ballot or the establishment has all the tools to stop him. It's been said but it's worth repeating... he needs to overwin to win.
    1
  9723. Said the critical drinker never.
    1
  9724.  @whyamimrpink78  He means Canadians infant mortality rate is superior to that of the US and they live longer. You are a disgrace to the human race. Please stop wasting perfectly good oxygen.
    1
  9725.  @whyamimrpink78  Why are you still wasting perfectly good oxygen?
    1
  9726.  @whyamimrpink78  You are seriously one of the most despicable pieces of shit on the planet whose whole existence is spent making the world a worse place to live in.
    1
  9727. Your statement is completely lost. None of this is really true. When Kyle talks about the war on drugs and minorities it has to do with facts such as: whites and blacks use marijuana at essentially the exact same rate (if anything whites use it slightly more) but blacks are 4 TIMES more likely to be charged with marijuana. It isn't that "minorities only care about using drugs and not getting arrested" but it is about a system with systemic racism who is designed to disproportionately affect minorities. That's what he is talking about.
    1
  9728.  @Rick_Riff  Regarding, "why did they have to create laws involving drugs if its systemically racist?" What? Nobody had to do anything. Regarding, "So but for the drug laws the system is not racist?" What? Drug laws are racist. The system is racist. Note: I am not trying to say that all drug laws and and everything about the system is racist and or innately racist. Rather I am trying to say that racism exists in both. Regarding, "Or was the system already racist?" The system has always been racist. It might always be a little bit racist. It should be our goal to make it as close to having zero racism as possible. The crime bill that joe helped author made the system more racist when we should be making laws that make the system not racist (or at least less racist). Regarding, "why would they need to create new harsher drug laws?" What? Are you just lazy with the English language? Nobody "needs" to do shit. I'm trying to answer your questions but I'm honestly having a very difficult time doing it. People chose to make harsher drug laws. I for example am opposed to that. I want weaker drug laws. So when you ask why people "need(ed) to create new harsher drug laws?" I am lost, baffled, and can't really give you a very good answer because your question is flawed. Regarding, "what other laws are racist?" Another great example of racism in drug law is sentencing for crack versus cocaine.
    1
  9729.  @Rick_Riff  Regarding, "you're illustrating what I was kind of complaining about" I absolutely concede I'm having a difficult time understanding what you are trying to say and what your points are. That said I do believe you are an honest actor and genuinely interested. For that reason I encourage you to try and restate what you were originally complaining about and I'll try to take another stab at it if you want. Regarding, "when I ask for specifics are drug laws or incarceration rates." It literally cannot get more specific then talking about this then by talking about the laws on the books and how they affect people. If that isn't specific to you then what is? Regarding, "I know for a fact that minorities care about more than drugs and crime." What? You know that? So does everyone else. I know of nobody who says anything even remotely close to, "minorities only care about drugs and crime" so I have no understanding why you would say this as if anyone in the world is suggesting otherwise. Regarding, "I'm skeptical of the modern day claims of systemic racism" How can this be? Remember the very specific example I gave of blacks being 4 times more likely to be convicted of marijuana even thou they are slightly less likely to be users? How do you explain this fact if not for racism? And just to be clear this isn't an example of an innately racist law. Marijuana law isn't innately racist. It isn't meant to target minorities more then whites. It's the ENFORCEMENT of that law that is racist. That is an example of "the system" being racist. If you want an example of law being racist I refer you to my other incredibly specific example given. Laws involving sentencing for cocaine and crack are innately racist laws. Crack is treated far differently than cocaine not because it is a significantly worse drug but because of who it's user are. Crack is not used equally among the public by percentage of population nor is cocaine the way marijuana is. That's why crack is treated like such a far greater crime. And that's why it's racist as fuck. Please feel free to try and explain either of these examples without racism. And good luck with that. Because there simply is no good and intelligent way to do it. There are terrible no good bad ways to do it. But no good ways.
    1
  9730.  @Rick_Riff  Regarding, "there are racist elements within law enforcement and the justice system." That's the point. That is why this discussion is happening. That is what kyle is talking about. That is what I'm talking about. This is something everyone should be agreeing on. There should be no debate about this even thou there is. And what we can debate on and disagree on is what should we as a society be doing to address this problem. Assuming you think it's a problem. Racists might not think it's a problem. They are likely for it. Regarding, "believe factors other than racism (such as poverty) may be more significant with some claims" Poverty is important as well. No one is claiming otherwise. Not only is there racism in our law and system but there are examples of "classism" (I'm sure there is a better word for this and/or I can be more articulate but I think you should be able to get my point). But just because that is a problem as well is no reason to not talk about the problems of racism as well. We as a society should be able to walk and chew gum at the same time. Regarding, "That's all I hear about," That's all you hear about? You never hear anything about income inequality? Or about a for profit private prison industry? I assure you it's out there.
    1
  9731. She's lucky I'm not Joe Biden.
    1
  9732. You are not smart.
    1
  9733. It's hard for me to not gloat. Feeling bad for the orange clown is not possible.
    1
  9734. This. It's such a no brainer. Sad the "smart" side is having trouble with it.
    1
  9735. I'm Bernie or bust. They are anybody but Bernie.
    1
  9736. I'm pretty sure it wasn't originally Omar's idea either. Ultimately assigning credit in a world where original ideas are practically non existent isn't really relevant. Who is fighting for those ideas and who is in the best position to bring about those ideas is.
    1
  9737. I guess I should add that I love Omar and think she is great.
    1
  9738.  @herbbluntman2287  I vote my values and Biden doesn't represent me. Also, I don't care what you think about it. Lastly I am confident Biden won't get the nomination. But if he does, I'm not voting for him.
    1
  9739.  @herbbluntman2287  Regarding, " Voting you values would be great" It still is great. If only everyone did it we wouldn't have the problems we do. Instead we have dumb fucks like you that buy the establishment narrative. Well I don't. You are part of the problem when you think voting for your values is the wrong idea somehow. Regarding, "How many congressional elections has the Green Party won in the last 20 years? Oh, that's right, NONE! They're nothing more than a spoiler that insures the greater of two evils wins." They are an alternative to essentially a one party system. Voting isn't about "winning" it's about an expression of a person's values. If I lose I do so supporting candidates I want to win and I don't want Biden to win.
    1
  9740. I'll celebrate enough for both of us.
    1
  9741. We are only ironically called the "land of the free" at this point. America locks up more of it's citizens by percentage of population and it isn't even close. We are actually the least free country in the world according to this important metric.
    1
  9742. Neither major party represents the "left." It's the elite versus the peasants and they are the elite.
    1
  9743. "Musk derangement syndrome" Projection much?
    1
  9744.  @Mehffort  I'm not the one bootlicking for the billionaire conman.
    1
  9745.  @tyvernoverlord5363  "you lick the boots of "billionaire conmen" that you love the smell of leather coming from." What the AF are you talking about?
    1
  9746.  @Mehffort  "you are a clueless reality denier" You think and say what you do because you are suffering from what's known as the dunning kruger effect.
    1
  9747.  @tyvernoverlord5363  "I really have to spell it out now do I? I guess I do." I guess I need to spell it out for you... you are just making assumptions about me and doing it wrong. I'm actually a person who said not long ago someone in one of these threads that all billionaires are POS. That you don't get that much money without being terrible. Not that you really care what I think. You would rather just make incorrect assumptions and strawman.
    1
  9748.  @tyvernoverlord5363  "I'm essentially calling you and everyone around a hypocrite." FYI I'm essentially calling you an idiot.
    1
  9749.  @tyvernoverlord5363  "its not hard to make presuppositions" It's easy to do but there is good reason why intellectually honest people try to avoid it. "The "lefty" ones are better at it then the "wing nut" ones." You sound like you were the hypocrite you were setting out to berate. "not for the reasons you think" I haven't even offered my reasoning. You should stop making assumptions about people. "you don't care what I think." I never said I don't care what you think. I've said you are an idiot and you are proving my point.
    1
  9750.  @Mehffort  "continue to get NASA contracts" When organized crime is organized enough it's not even illegal. Not that you care. You are just a tool worshipping a conman.
    1
  9751.  @Mehffort  "people like you are just immune to any form of reason or fact," You are walking talking evidence of the dunning kruger effect but stuff like this is funny so thanks for that at least.
    1
  9752.  @Mehffort  Or better yet you should tattoo "no u" on your forehead.
    1
  9753. Real progressives want to fight on m4a. TYT are not progressives. They are controlled opposition.
    1
  9754. You are not smart.
    1
  9755. There is so much wrong with everything you say. Forgive me for not addressing it intelligently. I just want you to know just how remarkably dumb I find your comment and youtube doesn't let me just give your drivel a thumbs down like they should.
    1
  9756. Those are the people in the debate that he is talking about. Sincerely, Captain Obvious.
    1
  9757. @user-bw8yn8tt9p That doesn't make it any better... especially if he's going to straight up defend him.
    1
  9758.  @shakacien  Regarding, "Who said "tHe oNlY OneS"" I didn't say you said the only ones like it's worth putting in quotes. You just make it seem like only one team is doing it because you are also advocating for voting for people who are also clearly cheating. As for the rest of your nonsense I'm forgive me for not addressing it intelligently or don't. I don't' care.
    1
  9759. Some people likely didn't show. You need a majority of those that do show and vote.
    1
  9760. Is that what you tell yourself while provoking a nuclear power?
    1
  9761. Regarding, "She's gone to the mat for her anti-war positions; Bernie has not." LMFAO. Meanwhile, in reality, she went to serve the MIC personally in the disaster known as the Iraq war while Sanders was preaching give peace a chance. This is why Tulsi supporters are impossible to take seriously.
    1
  9762. Progressives are facing a major roadblock here because Hillary won the nomination. Had Sanders won the nomination all this would be going very differently. But please work to build the Green party. They are my plan B in general elections when the dems do not provide a true progressive on the ticket (which is almost always lately), and if nothing else they are needed to try to pull the dems to the left even if they do eventually change.
    1
  9763. What is there to be smug about? Biden winning? That only makes you smug if you don't understand how terrible biden is as well. And that doesn't tend to be the case here.
    1
  9764. Maybe as well claim a billion since you are just making shit up.
    1
  9765. Idiocracy is real.
    1
  9766. Do you think the "democratic" party is really much better? They are not.
    1
  9767. The party but is a dumpster fire but don't throw the baby out with the bath water. Keep in mind that the guy getting fucked over in this audio is a "democrat." Support progressives whenever and whereever you can find them. They are few and far between in that party but they do exist and you should be supporting them. Fuck that party but support good people.
    1
  9768. If anyone does actually love it it's only because they have been healthy and haven't needed to try and use it.
    1
  9769. Go out and vote for him overwhelmingly so that no amount of BS can hide how popular he is.
    1
  9770.  @oompaloompa9139  "new level of gaslighting" How absurd.
    1
  9771.  @oompaloompa9139  Do you always just allude to making points without ever saying anything of real substance?
    1
  9772.  @oompaloompa9139  Regarding, "It's ok if you don't get the substance." Is it really? Because I'm not ok when people don't understand what I'm talking about. It defeats the purpose of me bothering to speak in the first place. But this is par for course for you... just allude to being smart without bothering to actually say anything at all.
    1
  9773.  @oompaloompa9139  Regarding, "I actually said a lot." No. You didn't. You just acted like a high and almighty twat who is above trying to explain any of their points they have alleged made after being pressed for it. You just pointed a dictionary as if using words is the same thing as making a valid point or saying something of substance. It's not. But whatever. I'm way past giving a shit what you point was at this point even if you bothered to elaborate.
    1
  9774.  @oompaloompa9139  Regarding, "So you weren't sure what the point was, and your way of asking for clarification is to say "how absurd"?" Nope. I was calling what you said absurd. Then rather than bother to offer up anything of value as to why it wasn't absurd (and you never did in the first place) you just acted like a high and almighty twat rather than defend your bullshit. Do the world a favor and just keep your trap shut from the start. Thanks.
    1
  9775. Watch the video. He doesn't like yang for good reason. He sucks.
    1
  9776. Regarding, "What don't you get about the ONLY anti-war candidate being relevant all the way to the convention ???" Bernie Sanders preached peace in Iraq while Tulsi said get me a uniform. She still collects a check from the MIC this very moment. You are just being ridiculous.
    1
  9777. The entire primary system should be overhauled to include all states voting at the same time and to all be done by paper ballots.
    1
  9778. And by time I mean over the course of several days or a week to give more people a chance to vote. It would cost more but investing in democracy seems like a good idea to me.
    1
  9779. I vote for people... not parties. But yeah... if I vote for a person and they do terrible things I would share some responsibility for that.
    1
  9780. Lucky for you you will never know. Not all heroes wear capes. Yes, this is sarcasm.
    1
  9781. People who have a safe way to feel good are less likely to use a more dangerous way.
    1
  9782. Or here is a better idea... don't kill people.
    1
  9783. Jo regarding, "why tax it? was not a stupid question, it's a plant that I can grow at home how are you going to tax that?" Yes it was a stupid a question. Tomatoes, flowers, carrots and lots and lots of things are plants that you can grow at home and if you asked why tax those they would be equally stupid questions that demonstrate a lack of understand as to how the world works. Regarding, "you responded to a perfectly reasonable question" Nope. You are an idiot and I told you why. Regarding, "out right lies about what you spend on war so who's the liar?" You are the liar because I can demonstrate why you are lying. You just asserting I'm lying isn't exactly the same. You don't seem to understand that because you are not very smart. Regarding, "I know more about your corrupt government than you do" You assert this after this thread. That is beyond stupid. Do I need to elaborate as to why? Meh, even if I did I doubt you would be able to understand. Regarding, "what fucking patience" The type of patience you would have gotten had you not said retarded things from the very start and continue to exclusively say. Regarding, "have a nice day maybe watch a bit of william binney when you get the chance" You are just a jerkoff who thinks they are a genius because they watched a Jimmy Dore clip and now feels the need to masterbate themself about it instead of actually addressing any of the points I've made. You suck at life.
    1
  9784. Jo literally everything you say is dumb. It is truly remarkable. Forgive me for not addressing all your shit. I don't have the time or ambition. I will address some things thou... Regarding, "if you were to decriminalise it than it would not be the commodity you make out to be, that would need legalisation, which is something different" Yes there is a difference between decriminalization and legalization but I have no understanding why you think this is all of a sudden relevant to the topic hand. It is almost as if you want to try and talk about something new because if you actually bothered to address any of my points and stay on topic you realize you have nothing intelligent to say. Regarding, "if you think you can turn cannabis into the new high tax cigarette type product of the future, think again," Aren't you the same idiot who started his stupid thoughts with, "assume away! it makes an arse of you" and now all of a sudden you want to make assumptions about what I think even though I have done nothing to express the belief are suggesting I have. The beliefs that I have actually expressed included things like, marijuana should get taxed because that is literally what we do to essentially everything (I'd like to add a DUH). That was literally the ONLY thing this thread was originally about. I don't blame you for wanting to branch out and off this topic because there is no way you can stay on it without looking like a complete and utter dipshit but keep in mind that if you wanted to talk about other shit you should have started threads for those "thoughts." Then all of a sudden we found ourselves talking about war even though that has NOTHING to do with why weed is taxed but we got there none-the-less because you are stupid. I expressed other beliefs that including the FACT that the us does not spend most of it's tax dollars on war, even if I do think they spend far too much on war. Then there is the belief that MJ taxes can and would be used for infrastructure because of the compelling fact that they are doing so this very second. Then I had other beliefs such as I owe you ZERO respect, you have said things that are empirically false, and that you are a fucking moron (and a couple others). If you have something to say about topics that have already been discussed and you want to elaborate on them go ahead but in all honesty I'm not interested in trying to talk about whatever random new bullshit you want to talk about next because you have done nothing to demonstrate that it would be worth my time. You have lied and said utterly moronic shit. I guess I share some blame for ever entering this thread considering has epic fucking stupid content of your original post. Lastly regarding, "don;t you think?" In all honesty I am having a difficult time trying to understand what you are even trying to say. If you are trying to suggest that because there is a black market MJ industry currently it would have any affect on a legal MJ industry then you, as usual, would be moronic. Any black market industry is immediately destroyed when MJ becomes legal nationwide. That said maybe you were just being so brilliant I wasn't able to understand what you were saying because, like I said, I'm not even sure what the fuck you were trying to say.
    1
  9785. Jo regarding, "not reading that" Next time I'll try and keep it short enough to fit on bumper sticker for your dumb ass.
    1
  9786. This thread has given me a new laugh. Regarding, "have a nice day maybe watch a bit of william binney when you get the chance LOL" This shit is fucking hilarious because, before the day you wrote this, you had no fucking idea who William Binney is and name dropped him to act like you are king shit when the fact of the matter is that you are dumb as fuck.
    1
  9787. Thanks for taking the time to write that. If I were a jerkoff I might say something moronic in response to it such as, "yeah not reading that," but only a real bitch would do that and I'm not a bitch. I am tempted to respond to why everything you just wrote is stupid but, even if you did read it, you wouldn't be smart enough to understand it.
    1
  9788.  @LARPANON  To be fair biden not make it 4 years.
    1
  9789.  @YourLocalZombie  "McCarthey is speaker" And you know who isn't speaker... h jeffries. But that was the same type of lie sam was telling in 2020. McCarthey was never going to be speaker then and when sam told everyone he might be he was just lying.
    1
  9790.  @YourLocalZombie  "My psychic powers" Most people know what I'm talking about when I refer to "force the vote." And it happened in 2020.
    1
  9791.  @YourLocalZombie  "I don't understand" Sam is a liar. And he told a big lie in 2020 about force the vote because he is controlled opposition.
    1
  9792.  @automanvw  No I'm saying he made a really important lie back in the day because he's controlled opposition for a corrupt party and he will always tell you to vote for the blue team no matter what because he's a partisan hack.
    1
  9793.  @YourLocalZombie  "opinion" We don't get to have an opinion about how the democratic process works. Sam was just lying about it and it was to give AOC and the squad cover for failing to get anything of value for the left.
    1
  9794.  @russellward4624  "Being wrong doesn't make something a lie." If you are wrong about a fact that is exactly what a lie is. Sam was lying about a fact. It's known as a lie. Just call it fake news. That's what a trump supporter would do in your position.
    1
  9795.  @j0j0dartiste21  "if enough Democrats abstained from voting" But why would they do this? Oh right... they wouldn't. And even in a hypothetical where enough dems didn't show up for work one day then they could IMMEDIATELY vote on speaker when they do all show up for work and vote. "there was the chance for McCarthy to win. And for what?" McCarthy is actually speaker right now and we don't have that. "A floor vote that was bound to fail?" Real advocates for M4A want this fight even if it will fail. Controlled opposition like sam and the squad will lie about it and squander their power like they did.
    1
  9796.  @j0j0dartiste21  "A floor vote that was bound to fail?" Just admit you don't want to pressure politicians. Just admit you are a clown who listens to too much sam propaganda.
    1
  9797.  @YourLocalZombie  "It really seems like you have some personal dislike of Seder and co and you've decided to redefine words like lie and opinion to make them out to be liars for expressing opinions" It really seems like you are just an unserious clown with their head too far up your favorite pundits bottom if you are going to not understand the difference between fact and opinion like this. It's pretty pathetic.
    1
  9798.  @YourLocalZombie  Anyone who says that a republican might be the speaker while dems have a majority is just lying. And that's what sam said. Sorry not sorry if the truth hurts.
    1
  9799.  @sinoa1  yeah... he sold you out.
    1
  9800.  @sinoa1  You are in the stage known as "denial."
    1
  9801.  @sinoa1  No dude... you know all. Trump works in mysterious ways am I right?
    1
  9802.  @sinoa1  Nope. But I know trump sold you out. You voted for adelson.
    1
  9803. @Stein Mauer I can make a prediction, much like you just did.
    1
  9804. @Stein Mauer Is it? Or is it impossible to know?
    1
  9805. @Stein Mauer "I literally said it is impossible" Yeah. It was silly the first time. "learn 2 read" I was asking a question about your comment of "cool." I was asking if that it actually is or if that that too should be impossible according to you since that's the type of silly thing you think. But you couldn't comprehend that while telling me to "learn to read." That's funny. Thanks for the laugh.
    1
  9806. @Stein Mauer "I literally said it is impossible" You are going to stand by this and double down even after I pointed out the fact that you made a prediction in the very same comment where you say it's "impossible to predict." Again... thanks for the laugh.
    1
  9807. @Stein Mauer "I lean towards no" Fun fact: That was a prediction.
    1
  9808.  @soenke294  "correctly pointed out it was impssible," Meanwhile, in reality, it's easy to make a prediction and I really shouldn't have to explain this. If you are trying to destroy my faith in humanity it's working.
    1
  9809.  @soenke294  "an actual prediction" It was an "actual prediction." Really... I shouldn't have to explain that.
    1
  9810.  @soenke294  "correctly pointed out it was impssible," So you think it was impossible but asked in your OP anyway and that makes sense to you?
    1
  9811. Try to realize that you feel the way you do because you are stupid.
    1
  9812.  @peterpeter8217  It's either that or only swedish people work there.
    1
  9813. Don't be fooled into think the "democratic" party is much better. They are not.
    1
  9814. Old people for Bernie here. Wish there were more of us.
    1
  9815. So Hillary should just get a pass because she is a woman? Don't answer. It's rhetorical. I don't actually care what you think.
    1
  9816. And still it happens.
    1
  9817. Meanwhile, in reality, he will get zero Iowa delegates.
    1
  9818. That "grifter" isn't the one you will ever find on MSNBC manufactuing consent for the elite. But sam will.
    1
  9819. Reply
    1
  9820.  @moonshapedpool  " I'm already blasting this shit for free" Antonio Brown uses it to get health care I think. Check out the video of him and his doctor for a good laugh.
    1
  9821. You are why Trump loves the uneducated.
    1
  9822. I'm only here to downvote.
    1
  9823. So you are a proponent of making votes not count equally. Good idea you clown. Swing states should decide the fate of the USA. Fuck off
    1
  9824. Adopted regarding, "obviously you not very good at researching" That is pretty fucking funny coming from you. Your original claim was, "Warren AND Sanders voted in favor of allowing the Obama Administration to MURDER, straight up drone Americans on America soil if they ever wanted to" Which is complete fucking bullshit and misrepresentation of reality. What you should have said, if you didn't want to be a liar, was that Warren and Sanders voted in favor of confirming John Brennan as CIA director. Please tell me that you understand why those 2 things are completely fucking different.
    1
  9825. Adopted regarding, "Warren AND Sanders voted in favor of allowing the Obama Administration to MURDER, straight up drone Americans on America soil if they ever wanted to" I am pretty sure that you are lying but I have been wrong before. I challenge you to back up this claim otherwise I'm going to consider it bullshit.
    1
  9826. Adopted I wish that, at the very least, you would be willing to acknowledge that you were lying before before moving on to another avenue to smear them. I would also like you to consider that a person who is happy to lie about shit to try and make their points isn't a very good source to be talking about moral judgements.
    1
  9827. Yeah adopted, I did some research into what you said and have concluded that you are fucking liar because what you said simply did not happen so far as I can tell and it is pretty fucked up that you would be willing to lie in such a way. Facts are pretty important. We don't get to have our own facts.
    1
  9828. brandx regarding, "what’s your issue with the military budget?" The fact that you ask this question does not speak highly of you. I consider this topic so absurd and obvious I'm not going to spend much time addressing it. I will encourage you to research Eisenhower's words about the military industrial complex. They are as relevant today as ever. Regarding, "Do you think being the undisputed heavyweight champion of the world..." I'd rather be considered this because of economic power and not military power. Regarding, "Our military might and ability is the only reason we are still free" There are lots and lots and lots of countries that are free that don't burn the money we do on the military. Clearly freedom is not directly linked to a massive military. Actually there are plenty of countries that are more free than us. The United States locks up more of its citizens than any country on Earth by percentage of the population and it isn't even close. By that very important metric we are actually the least free country on the planet. Let me close with a condescending "look it up sometime."
    1
  9829. brandx regarding, "maybe if you knew what you were talking about," What a lazy and pathetic way to address what I say. How about you say why you think I don't know what I'm talking about rather than just assert it. Regarding, "you wouldn’t sound like someone who’s never actually BEEN to other countries" You don't understand why saying this is idiotic do you. I'm not going to claim to have seen the entire world but I have left the country about 10 times. Again this is just lazy and pathetic attempts to discredit what I say without actually bothering to address what I say. Regarding, "How could ANY country be a a super power with only their economic success?" Can I safely assume that you think the US is the only current superpower then? I also don't claim to care about being a superpower. That is not valuable in and of itself and think that only someone with really fucked up priorities would think this is very important. I do think that you need to understand that military power is impossible to sustain without economic success and the current bloated military budget puts sustained economic success in jeopardy. The US could cut their military budget in half and STILL have the largest military budget in the world. Regarding, "Military power is what keeps others from just waltzing in and taking over." This isn't entirely false. We certainly are doing a good job just waltzing in and taking over countries. Regarding, "Having the best technology for the military is NOT cheap." Is the sort of retarded as shit you think to justify the need for spending as much as the next 10 countries in the world combined, even when most those other countries are allies? I also am not obsessed with the need to have the best military technology. I am more obsessed with the need for the best health care, and education, and culture, and working conditions, and middle class and... Regarding, "And as far as being free, I’m not talking about criminals in the prison system" Of course not. Because freedom totally isn't about how many people we put in jail. Regarding, "and believe me, the vast majority belong there" Of course you think they do. Crime is uniquely American. The rest of the world has it wrong... not the US. It isn't that the US locks up too many people, it is that the rest of the world need to be imprisoning more of their citizens. Regarding, "I challenge you to name ANY country where the citizens are more free than we are...go ahead. I’ll wait." You are an idiot. https://www.cheatsheet.com/money-career/10-countries-with-more-freedom-than-america-monetarily-speaking.html/?a=viewall http://www.newser.com/story/189338/35-countries-feel-more-free-than-us.html http://www.offthegridnews.com/current-events/you-wont-believe-which-19-countries-have-more-freedom-than-america-so-says-this-new-study/ http://nomadcapitalist.com/2014/01/05/top-5-countries-freedom-press-us/ https://www.alternet.org/11-things-other-countries-do-way-better-america http://foreignpolicy.com/2015/11/02/move-over-america-canada-is-the-land-of-the-free/ Regarding, "See the difference is I know what I’m talking about from FIRST HAND experiences." Anecdotal evidence is only good evidence to fucking morons. The same types of morons that want to make claims about other people without knowing anything about them. Regarding, "You know what you see on Facebook or maybe “the view”" You know... morons that make shit up about others. The fact that I fucking hate facebook and would never open an account there and don't watch the view are completely unimportant to dipshits like you. Facts are not nearly as important to you as they should be. Regarding, "You’re out of your league snow flake." Only because your "league" is somewhere below a kindergartner.
    1
  9830. brandx regarding, "You really are a hard-core liberal, huh?" I consider myself a hard core progressive. You really are a hard core moron huh? Regarding, "I wouldn’t really mind, but your 15 paragraph speech is still wrong on facts." You say shit but you don't feel the need to bother to back up your meaningless words with evidence. I don't just tell you are wrong (like you have a way of doing)... I tell you why you are wrong. It is what people who are not idiots do. Regarding, "You’ve left the country 10 times...ok so you must have travelled far and wide and seen many other countries...care to name any?" I could but this type of shit is utterly meaningless. This is a fucking comments section. I could say literally anything and there is no reason for you to believe me and there is no way you can check what I say. Intelligent people like to talk about things that can actually be verified. Also... like I've already stated, anecdotal evidence can't really even intelligently be called evidence. Regarding, "See, I’ve been..." I have no reason to believe anything you say. I've already concluded that you are fucking moron and it isn't much of a leap in logic to think that you are also a fucking liar in addition to being dumb as fuck. But good story and good luck being retarded going forward.
    1
  9831. Regarding, "THATS WHAT I THOUGHT YOU MIGHT SAY" And still you chose to make idiotic points. You are truly dumb beyond words. We need to invent new words to describe people like you. Regarding, "I’ve been to those places and more and seen the horrible results of your “progressive” ideologies." You are stupid beyond words.
    1
  9832. Ok. You got me. That was stupid of me. I was thinking Puerto Rico. I concede that was dumb of me but it doesn't change the fact that everything else you have said is dumb.
    1
  9833. There is no comparison between driving while drunk and driving while stoned. That said this point is irrelevant... no one is advocating for people to drive while stoned.
    1
  9834. Do you always blame victims like this? It's pretty sick.
    1
  9835.  @gadget58  "dumb is voting for a 3rd party" The only wasted votes are votes for terrible people who don't deserve to win. Vote for good and be willing to lose.
    1
  9836.  @KathleenMcCormickLCSWMPH  "getting the governor and her minions out is crucial." Are you really sure that new swamp water is going to help? Good luck with that. If you succeed you can use the same "logic" to go back to supporting democrats next time. Sure they will still be bad but... "getting the governor and her minions out is crucial." Over and over and over and over and over...
    1
  9837.  @fustercluck2460  "The only thing dumber was your response really." This is funny from you. "The new republican party (maga) is the way forward." Things an unserious clown would say.
    1
  9838.  @davidmonzon2557  "the 3rd party candidates worth voting for are?" Anyone who supports peace. "prevent us from getting into a war?" I know republicans and dems aren't. "or will there be so few of them that they have no real power to change anything." If voting really mattered they wouldn't let you do it. I'm going to vote for good and I'm willing to lose.
    1
  9839.  @wade5941  "You would know." I would know what? I don't even know what you are talking about because you aren't bothering to say.
    1
  9840.  @davidmonzon2557  "peace treaties being signed under trump" Like what? Oh right... "I'm voting for candidates that want to end foreign wars." You are voting for liars who are telling you what you want to hear to get your vote. "I just don't think voting third party is realistic in the broad sense" But you think voting for the uniparty makes sense?
    1
  9841.  @lacyjoywhitefeather1452  "Independent here, just voted Straight Republican across the board" Vegetarian here, just ate a huge steak. That's what you sound like.
    1
  9842. Candidates can't give their delegates to someone else. Stop it with this bullshit.
    1
  9843. always working for the "*democratic" party There. I fixed it for you.
    1
  9844. Regarding, "Edgy." Huh? How do you not realize that makes no fucking sense?
    1
  9845. I preferred it when dodo wasn't being a political prop for obvious reasons, not because I have a miserable life.
    1
  9846.  @Sleeleelee  It's political theater. Theater they never would have performed for the other side because whether or not you realize it or are willing to admit it... it's clearly political. Everything involving a POTUS or POTUS elect is.
    1
  9847. Actually this is the best possible thing he has ever done with his time.
    1
  9848. Please sign the petition. Force the vote!
    1
  9849. Sam Sedar is the type of POS that MSNBC feels comfortable putting on air. He is controlled opposition.
    1
  9850. MSNBC would never allow Dore on air. He actually challenges the oligarchy's BS.
    1
  9851.  @scruffopone3989  "he spends the vast majority of his time being mad about AOC or Ilhan Omar" FYI dems have all the power at the moment. That's why you should be focused on them dipshit. "whining about vaccines giving him an upset tummy." Just like a sedar sycophant to nonsensically frame authoritarian mandates in such a way.
    1
  9852.  @scruffopone3989  "going after the Senate Dems that are holding everything back. I wonder. Why he doesn't do that." He literally is. AOC had real power with her vote for speaker and used it get literally NOTHING of value for progressives. "I love how Jimmy's fans are basically just small boys who can't accept any public health policy" I love how you just mindlessly handwave away what is clearly authoritarian policy. You think you can tell other people what they have to put in their bodies. You don't. But you would have made a good nazi.
    1
  9853. LMFAO. Good luck with your idiotic smears. Sorry not sorry that people see through your bullshit.
    1
  9854. "What is there even to criticize?" His lies about m4a. His UBI is regressive as hell. And more.
    1
  9855.  @nolangutierrez9572  "ubi and regressive dont belong in the same sentence" It depends. Let's say poor people pay for 100 percent of the tab to fund UBI and then rich people get a check. Would it really be progressive? Wouldn't that be regressive as hell? I'm a progressive. Let's say someone aske me how I'd pay for UBI you know what I'd say, "rich people." Yang on the other hand when asked how are you going to pay for UBI first wants the poorest of the poor to pay for the first 25 percent of it. He wants to gut "500 billion dollars per year on income support" to pay for his UBI. That's why I rightfully say he is regressive. For this I cite "Andrew Yang: Paying for a Universal Basic Income" right here on youtube at about the 1:25 mark.
    1
  9856.  @nolangutierrez9572  Regarding, "You dont mention how it would reduce poverty by 74 percent" When yang wants the poorest of the poor to pay for the first 25 percent even before getting starting I find it impossible to believe your claim or take it seriously. "It would also be the largest transfer of wealth from the rich to the poor in history." Without changing the system at large all that money is going to funnel to the top just like it is now. The rich will become even richer. "Do you still say it's regressive when the bottom 92 percent of people come out on top?" Just because you pulled this from your ass doesn't make it true. Do you even consider how this might be the case even after I straight up tell you that yang wants the first quarter of it paid for by the poorest of the poor?
    1
  9857.  @nolangutierrez9572  Regarding, "its always funny when people who watch youtube say they are into policy." Is it? Regarding, "Go look at the distributional analysis by Max Ghenis." Does it take into account how regressively yang wants to pay for his UBI? "This stat is not outta my ass." I believe you. I suspect it came from someone else's arce and you are just reciting it without even attempting to address the substantive point I made of you. In other words you are deflecting.
    1
  9858. "I see a whole lot of anti mask nonsense creeping into the comments here." I mean it's not like our government didn't just admit lying to everyone about masks. Is it really their fault for not trusting everything else they are being told?
    1
  9859. Or to put it another way it's pretty fucking stupid to go from "I still can't disagree with fauci" to "I see a whole lot of anti mask nonsense creeping into the comments here" when fauci was spreading anti mask nonsense.
    1
  9860.  @sporedoutofmymind  "he knew the audience and acted appropriately." He told people to not wear masks during a pandemic. How stupid can you possible be to think that was the correct call? "Imagine how bad that would have gotten if he had been straight up" If people are sheep who are going to respond to what faucci says then maybe he should have told them to just make their own fucking masks instead of lying to everyone cost peoples lives and their last little bit of trust in a government they are already right to be skeptical of.
    1
  9861.  @sporedoutofmymind  "if the medical field didn't get masks and collapsed, *we all die*." LMAO. So instead of telling the public how important this is and that they should make it a priority you instead lie to them? "They were the essential of the essential." So maybe tell the people to make them masks. And to give them the professional masks. And to make their own instead of going out and buying them. The notion that the world was going to fall apart and the only solution is to lie to everyone is fucking asinine. And it ignores the precedent you are setting and giving everyone legit reason to question a government that is lying to everyone no matter how much you want to pretend it was necessary.
    1
  9862.  @sporedoutofmymind  "You didn't see the news stories about doctors in garbage bags and having to wear bandanas because they couldn't get their hands on PPE?" Lying to people doesn't help this problem. Telling people to make masks for themselves and to leave the professional masks for these professionals might have actually helped this problem. I went out and bought the goods. If only I were given a good reason not to. I wasn't. I was lied to. Even you believed the BS fauci was spouting that "you should be wearing a mask" you still might with the thinking that it can't hurt. Shit you might wear two. Because he never tells you about what is suppose to be a legit concern over a shortage for professionals.
    1
  9863.  @sporedoutofmymind  "you know that people would have said "no, I want a professional quality mask" and hoarded them for themselves" If only they were a government who had the power to buy up the masks themselves. Lying was clearly the only and best option. "This is a uniquely naive view that everyone will behave as you tell them in a pandemic" LMFAO. You are the one saying you need to lie to everyone because they are sheep. "Maybe now that we know a lot more about what's going on" Fauci always knew it was a lie. "Maybe now that we know a lot more about what's going on" Maybe it didn't help that instead of telling the people to wear bandanas for themselves they were being told lies by fauci and company.
    1
  9864.  @sporedoutofmymind  "we had people hoarding N95s in their garages" Yet you never say how lying would help alleviate this problem. "It only took $5-$10k to completely fill a garage." If only they were a government with the power of regulation to stop such behavior directly. Better to lie to people and hope for the best instead right? "Plenty of people have that liquid cash on hand, especially homeowners." Making mask buying at such a level for the peasants illegal. "He made the right decision." He made a terrible decision that did nothing to solve the problem you care about, cost people their lives and cost peoples trust and faith in their government and "science" professionals. "Most people that don't just can't accept that in the middle of a pandemic, the medical profession is more important than them, and I'm not even in the medical profession." Most people can't accept the fact that their government and the people working in it suck. Most people defend the indefensible. And it's sad. "Politics relies on reading between the lines," This is what people like to think and say before defending a government lying to it's people and telling them not to wear masks during a pandemic. "If you're waiting for a public figure to tell you the truth 100% of the time every single time you are in for a long ass wait." I'm not waiting for that. But in the meantime I'd settle for people not defending liars. I'd prefer you call them out. But here we are.
    1
  9865.  @sporedoutofmymind  "makes hoarding look less attractive." As if this is going to stop anyone. Oh no I'm not going to make as much as I'd like or think otherwise. That is going to stop me. Said no one ever. "Just look at the stock market for this in action. Demand rises and falls all the time based on what public figures say." We were in a pandemic. Demand was going to be high regardless of fauci's bullshit. "He already told us to to stay inside and shelter in place." Well deflected. Politicians would be proud. "We shouldn't have been outside or in contact with others, period." That's not what the conversation was about. It was about if people should be wearing masks when they are in public no matter how much you want to lie on behalf fauci.
    1
  9866.  @sporedoutofmymind  Regarding, "Then you've never actually had to make a business deal or investment because I don't know if you actually comprehend the idea of risk or ROI." We were in a pandemic. You are just making up shit to say at this point and are pretending that faucis bullshit was going to stop anyone. It's sad.
    1
  9867. You must be very proud.
    1
  9868.  @younggotti8195  regarding, "uh huh." Thanks for proving my point for me. I couldn't have done it without you being stupid.
    1
  9869.  @younggotti8195  regarding, "you haven't made a point...you called me stupid" My point was that you are stupid. You don't understand because you are stupid. Thank you for continuing to prove my point.
    1
  9870.  @younggotti8195  regarding, "my original post is a point dum dum" What? Are you moronically trying to say this like I've said you haven't made a point or something? Because I haven't. If that's what you think it's only because you are stupid... like any point you have tried to make. But you can keep on proving my point for me if you want... not that there is any need to prove it further. You're stupid. We get it.
    1
  9871.  @alohatigers1199  "You think republicans care?" No. I don't. This isn't about them. You deflecting.
    1
  9872. The "democratic" party has already cheated.
    1
  9873. Sam seder is controlled opposition meant to sheep herd you into a corrupt, warmongering, "democratic" party. Sam might pretend to care about the dems are bad but when it really matters he will always tell you to fall in line and vote for them regardless of how abhorrent their candidate is.
    1
  9874. It's like they aren't even thinking about all the bombs that could never be built with that money. Bombs lives matter.
    1
  9875. Magoo regarding, "Less money in politics? Since when?" Since never. Go back and read what I wrote. I'm not defending Republicans, I'm insulting them. I'm saying that not only do they want tax cuts for the rich but they also want war, less regulations (like gutting the EPA), corporate welfare (like bank bailouts), money IN politics, and all sorts of other things that suck for the country.
    1
  9876. He doesn't have much going for him other than... he's not ted cruz.
    1
  9877.  @frankd.506  "only Republicans." That's very hypocritical of you.
    1
  9878.  @frankd.506  "only Republicans" You gotta make sure bernie's good friend can stay in politics forever? And nancy too right?
    1
  9879.  @frankd.506  "Like I was serious" Wait... that was a joke? Now that's funny. But not for the reason you want.
    1
  9880.  @frankd.506  "to repeat" I like it when people know exactly what I'm talking about. "you really come off like a troll" LMFAO This is funny all things considered. This really comes off as projection to me. "Kirk" I'm familiar with james t kirk of star trek but that's about it. "Not like you would admit anyway." You can only think this because of projection. I've given you no reason to not believe what I say.
    1
  9881.  @frankd.506  "Not like you would admit anyway." It's not like you would admit that you are a boot licker for one party and are a hypocrite about it. Your reply makes sense.
    1
  9882.  @frankd.506  "Not like you would admit anyway." You are more likely to believe a politician than a peasant like me.
    1
  9883. That part really made me cringe. We don't get to have an opinion of what violence means.
    1
  9884. I can't imagine the type of stupid that it takes to think that, because she "got more votes" that is evidence that it wasn't rigged. That is like saying a poker cheater played by the rules because at the end of the game they had the most money in front of them. In short you are an idiot of epic proportions.
    1
  9885.  @apissedant  regarding, "I can't imagine the level of stupid it takes to be you." Try to realize that your thinking I'm stupid is coming through the lens of someone who is stupid. You are the living embodiment of the dunning-kruger effect. You aren't nearly smart enough to realize how fucking dumb you are. Regarding, "What was rigged?" Um... Yes. Obviously. In more then one way. Regarding, "Who was either prevented from voting, voted despite no legitimate right to vote, or had their votes switch from Bernie to Hillary?" How about you do some research you fucking twat? Start in the Bronx for answers to your questions. Regarding, "You sound like Trump." Again... you think and say the things you do because you are stupid.
    1
  9886. You lose people when you focus on it being black versus white. It isn't. It's about the haves versus the have nots regardless of their skin color.
    1
  9887.  @BrokeBoyGaminghtx  I guess you mistakenly think my comment was about "those sorts of people." It isn't. It was about you mischaracterizing the problem as racial in nature when it is about class. And when you mischaracterize the problem it is you that becomes the problem when you should be part of the solution.
    1
  9888.  @storage-space4927  "we live in the United States" You have offered literally nothing of value to the conversation. But thanks captain obvious.
    1
  9889.  @storage-space4927  "focus more on..." Maybe just admit you don't care about RFK's abhorrent position. That would be far more honest than what you are doing.
    1
  9890.  @storage-space4927  You are making excuses for the inexcusable. Do you always do that? Or just for RFK?
    1
  9891.  @storage-space4927  Are you for real? Instead of caring about RFK's inexcusable position when it comes to israel/palestine you want people for "focus more on..." because you know his position is terrible. And if he wasn't terrible on that position I doubt you would have any problem "focusing on it." But instead you are here... making excuses for inexcusable and wasting my time.
    1
  9892.  @storage-space4927  If RFK is willing to sell out the palestinians why don't you think he'd do it to you?
    1
  9893.  @storage-space4927  You never bothered to answer my simple and direct question... if RFK will sell out the palestinians what makes you think he won't do it to you?
    1
  9894.  @storage-space4927  "Not our problem" Does RFK think that? Or does he want to continue to give US wealth to israel? I'm just kidding... you don't care or at least pretend to not care because RFK is on the wrong side of history.
    1
  9895.  @storage-space4927  Cool nonanswer. Thanks for wasting my time.
    1
  9896.  @storage-space4927  Is that what you tell yourself instead of answering a simple and direct question? Maybe just be quiet instead.
    1
  9897.  @storage-space4927  "I answered..." No. You didn't. And now you are lying about. I'll repeat it a third time... if RFK will sell out the palestinians why don't you think he would do it to you? It's rhetorical at this point. I'm done addressing you and done caring what you have to say. If you were trying to prove you were wasting my time you have succeeded. Goodbye.
    1
  9898. Nah. I think he's just a sellout to special interest groups.
    1
  9899. People are more likely to die from seltzer then they are of weed. Nobody is perfect. Not even Kyle.
    1
  9900. Sam and his crew are out trying to smear real journalists, as always.
    1
  9901.  @chromiumdioxide3328  Regarding, "news organizations should be unbiased and objective, just telling the American people what the news is and what helps them." Meanwhile, in reality, the decision of what is or isn't news and the decision of what helps the American public and what doesn't is being made by people with biases because it's being made by humans and humans are innately flawed and biased. Does the fact that kyle endorse Sanders publicly mean he can't be objective? Or is it merely just an honest example of the lens he sees the world through?
    1
  9902.  @Crimsonfangg  Regarding, "I'm aware of that, but in the case of NYT that bias is causing them to lie and deceive." So be mad about the lies and deceit… not about the fact that they are endorsing a candidate. Regarding, "Having a bias doesn't excuse bad journalism" No shit. Be mad about bad journalism. Don't make up things to be mad about like an endorsement. Regarding, "Kyle Kulinski acknowledges his bias, but he still gives credit where it's due and tries his best to be honest and objective." Because what's important is the JOURNALISM itself. Not whether or not someone is actually doing the right thing and being open and honest about their biases and where their journalism comes from.
    1
  9903.  keith gould  Regarding, "all of who have biases." So what's the problem with them actually telling you what these are? Why do you seem to think it would be better if they tried to hid them more?
    1
  9904.  @radon3292  Regarding, "Kyle is a single person, where NYT has thousands working for them." Is this how you rationalize a double standard in your mind? It doesn't work that way. Regarding, "So you think everyone at NYT supports Warren?" Nope. Do I need to? Does this mean it isn't an accurate representation of them and their anybody but Bernie viewpoint that they are pushing?
    1
  9905.  @chromiumdioxide3328  Regarding, "My issue is when an organization that is supposed to be objective decides to endorse candidates." No it's not. You would prefer they tell everyone to not vote for people like hitler and to vote for people like Sanders. This "position" of yours is coming from hypocrisy and bias. Ironically is exactly what they do all the time.
    1
  9906.  @chromiumdioxide3328  Ultimately they support someone behind the scenes. The only question is if they tell you who it is or you get your wish and they lie by omission. Pretending to be objective isn't actual objectivity.
    1
  9907.  @chromiumdioxide3328  Ok. You would prefer they not tell people to not support hitler and they not be telling people to support great people like Sanders. That's the better world you are fighting for. Got it. Thanks for clarifying.
    1
  9908.  keith gould  Regarding, "they never admitted their obvious bias." I know right. Wouldn't it be better if they did?
    1
  9909.  @chromiumdioxide3328  Regarding, ", thank you for telling me what I believe." What did you settle on? You don't want the media to tell people to avoid people like hitler and not to tell them to support people like sanders? That's what you are fighting for right? That's what you believe right?
    1
  9910.  @chromiumdioxide3328  You are right. It was wrong of me to think that you would prefer the media to tell people to not support people like hitler and to instead tell them to support people like Sanders. I was giving you credit for common sense you clearly don't have. I'm very sorry about that.
    1
  9911.  @renierdumadag934  Regarding, "Kyle Kulinski is one person endorsing his personal pick for a candidate. That's very different from a news organization having a pick." It's really not.
    1
  9912.  @DreamStepper  Regarding, " that doesn't mean you throw away any attempt at objective reporting." No shit. Have a problem with reporting that isn't objective. Regarding, "some people do think they are objective" There are always going to be idiots who think stupid things. It's not about them. It's about whether or not it is a good thing for "news organizations" to be open about their bias. I prefer they are. Some prefer to be lied to as much as possible... as if they aren't already doing enough of that already.
    1
  9913.  @thomassmith6027  Regarding, "They're not objective" Are you "objective?" Or maybe do you have a place where your beliefs come from like everyone else?
    1
  9914.  @cg29legend  Regarding, " I'm from the Netherlands and the newspaper I get my news from I actually trust because they are unbiased." Are they really unbiased? Or is more apt to say that you share their biases?
    1
  9915.  @thenewtalkerguy496  Regarding, "Why is it not Kyle's job to support Sanders?" For the same reasons it's not corporate media's job to support candidates. They obviously do... but that's not their job like it is for who are suppose to be actual political strategists. Regarding, "The problem is that these "news organizations" make claims like "fair and balanced" or "honest and unafraid"" And even when they don't do this. When they actually say... he we support terrible people for terrible reasons you still cry. Figure out what you actually want.
    1
  9916.  @dhruvs8139  Regarding, "the thing that makes Kyle different from NYT is that Kyle doesn't pretend to not have biases, he's open and upfront about them." Open and upfront like telling you who they support? And you are still taking issue with them for it?
    1
  9917.  @elendil6144  Regarding, "I simply pointed the fact that you never saw a neutral one and that they DO exist in Europe." Life is not neutral. It's not a setting in your car.
    1
  9918.  @wholetime1938  Regarding, "What makes y’all believe he doesn’t put out misleading information about other candidates?" I check shit. So should you.
    1
  9919.  @elendil6144  Yup. I'm a prick. It's frustrating living in the world today and having to share it with people who are too dumb to be cast in the movie Idiocracy. Nothing to say about the substance of my argument thou? Good. I'll figure it will be as worthless as your comment where you make sure to be an ass to me for being ass... nothing hypocritical about that am I right?
    1
  9920.  @DreamStepper  Regarding, "giving NYT far too much credit in the process." The NY times is a fucking dumpster fire that spews propaganda. They suck. Regarding, "You're conflating two different things" That's what you are doing. I'm asking the question of whether or not news outlets should be open about their bias in this sort of way... the exact way that kyle is open and honest that he supports Bernie Sanders. I say they should and this is a good thing. The world would be worse if we just insisted they didn't actually spend this one second being honest about who they are and who they represent seeing as how they spend all their other time trying to put a veil on it. Regarding, "would never be open about their corporate interests." They just said to vote for corporate tools because vagina. Seems pretty open to me.
    1
  9921. You pic says "I'm with stupid" when it should say, "I am stupid."
    1
  9922.  @pathofzeros  "the deep state made me do it!" That's not what I'm saying. I suspect that even you get that but are disingenuous. I'm saying that you can stop putting "deep state" in quotes like that. It's a real thing that exists. "thank you for guiding me to clarity" I'm not hopeful that you have the self awareness needed for such a thing.
    1
  9923.  @pathofzeros  "this conspiracy" The deep state is not a conspiracy dipshit. It's something that actually exists.
    1
  9924.  @Dos_Caffeine  "it's a conspiracy" Nope. It's a thing that actually exists. It's just a way to describe unelected people that spend decades in government shaping our lives. They are completely unaffected by whether or not democrats or republicans have power. Their jobs are unaffected by such things.
    1
  9925.  @Dos_Caffeine  If you deny their existence you are just denying reality and are demonstrating you are not to be taken seriously. We can disagree about some things. Whether or not a deep state exists or doesn't is not one of those things. It clearly does.
    1
  9926.  @pathofzeros  "when you're back to reality, maybe you can have actual conversation" This is funny coming from someone who wants to deny the existence of nonelected government officials who spend decades in government regardless of what party is in power. "I'm not into conspiracy" Don't kid yourself. You aren't into reality.
    1
  9927. He's fighting for his corrupt party and "goo d fri end" joe.
    1
  9928. I don't need perfect. I need not evil. Biden and Harris are straight up evil people.
    1
  9929.  @VernalScott  Evil loves the help. Hitler was elected too.
    1
  9930.  @VernalScott  So was Trump.
    1
  9931.  @VernalScott  Ultimately you are supporting evil people.
    1
  9932.  @VernalScott  Yeah... that's not an argument that your clowns aren't evil. Thanks for not even trying.
    1
  9933. "He made it clear that this is only until more surgical masks became available." Actually he made it clear that he was lying. Stop bootlicking.
    1
  9934. "it was not known at the time that masks protected the wearer" I can only think you are intentionally lying at this point. It's very annoying.
    1
  9935. What about landing?
    1
  9936. You are lucky to get that peasant. Sincerely, the establishment.
    1
  9937. I'd rather vote 3rd party to try and build their support.
    1
  9938. This isn't true. And the OP knows it isn't true. They lie because they suck at life.
    1
  9939.  @The_Highlander001  LMFAO. I'm not going to lie pretending you don't already know about the National Popular Vote Compact even though you do while calling me a moron at the same time is pretty funny. Thanks for the laugh dipshit.
    1
  9940.  @The_Highlander001  Don't be afraid to look in the mirror and make some changes.
    1
  9941.  @The_Highlander001  Just a friendly reminder that you don't need to be a lying piece of shit today. You can be better than you are. Pretty much anything different than what you are would be better.
    1
  9942.  @The_Highlander001  So you aren't taking my advice and are continuing to be a complete piece of shit huh? Figures. Really... you don't need to be the lying piece of shit you are.
    1
  9943. Nope. I know I won't be voting for Trump or Biden.
    1
  9944. Give her a platform? She is on the view. I assure you she already has a platform. And that is why responding to her intelligently is important.
    1
  9945. no. she is not in office ATM
    1
  9946. Greg, your write butt eye don't kare.
    1
  9947. Dems have everything and this idea is DOA.
    1
  9948.  @learntospellpeople  Meanwhile, in reality, "Progressives" like AOC won't force a vote, corporate dems won't support it, and even if it passed both houses biden would veto it. WTF are you talking about?
    1
  9949.  @charlesandrews2360  We don't even seem to have common language. I use English.
    1
  9950. I've got some lighter fluid and I'd be happy to use it... even if it's not the actual protocol.
    1
  9951.  @aclayton231  And the clown was right when they said Biden is corrupt.
    1
  9952. Bernie=good friends with a corrupt joe biden.
    1
  9953. Bernie = sheep herder for a corrupt party
    1
  9954. I welcome your anger. Go fuck yourself with your bullshit.
    1
  9955.  @Legio2Italica3video  Regarding, "I suppose your point is she should have voted against it on principle?" Um... yeah. You know... like Sanders did. Are you really suggesting she should get a pass and it doesn't matter because her vote wasn't a deciding vote? Are you really this fucking stupid or are you a paid shill with no soul?
    1
  9956.  @Legio2Italica3video  Regarding, "why would she vote against..." Because real progressives are seeking to reduce military spending... not voting to increase it by over 80 billion... MORE THAN EVEN THE ORANGE CLOWN WAS ASKING FOR AT THE TIME! But what could go wrong giving trump and bolton more money for bombs am I right? Seriously... you suck at life. Stop wasting perfectly good oxygen.
    1
  9957.  @Legio2Italica3video  Regarding, "zero actual impact no matter what she would have done" What a pathetic way to rationalize her support of the MIC... as if this makes her vote ok. Regarding, "You interpret her negatively based on your own standards of ideological purity" Sorry not sorry for having standards. Regarding, "not on the totality of her record or career championing progressive policies" You are a fucking joke. Good luck with your progressive champion who has already said she will be happy to take legalized bribes in the general if she gets there. That's very progressive of her. I'm done giving a shit what you think. I've already wasted far too much time addressing you.
    1
  9958.  @Legio2Italica3video  For your sake I hope you are just being paid to say the stupid shit you have been. Either way you really do suck at life. The things you've written are almost painful to read they are that idiotic. It's the type of shit that caused Dunning and Kruger to form their original hypothesis.
    1
  9959. I will never understand people that care more about a party label than anything else.
    1
  9960. The rich are doing great. That's who should pay.
    1
  9961.  @stevencoardvenice  "I love your nuanced approach" Thanks. I certainly like it more than "nuanced" militarism.
    1
  9962. Sadly lots of people care what they think.
    1
  9963.  @torrancejones2072  Lots and lots and lots of those people vote. Obviously they are relevant as well whether or not you want to admit it. Relevance is not limited to people that agree with you.
    1
  9964. Regarding, "Wall Street despises her." I don't agree with this. I'm not going to claim they love her but the fact of the matter is that she has done NOTHING to hurt their bottom line. She did some grandstanding with some execs but ultimately nothing was achieved by it of substance. Nothing. I can make a pretty good case to be made that what she did ultimately hurt the country because so many people are appeased by rhetoric. They think that is the same as action when it isn't. And this country needs action not words. Regarding, "You may argue that this is all for show" I probably should read everything before I start typing but I don't. I read up to a point I think needs addressing, do so, then go forward. I obviously do think it is all for show. Considering nothing of substance has ever come from what she has done I think it is only logical to think it is for show. Like I said about Obama he also gave great speeches. He also talked a good game. Maybe he wasn't as direct with certain individuals but the point is that there is a world of difference between action and words. Regarding, "I think Warren wants to be president" I disagree with this but can't say for certain. I personally think that she is just happy to play the game and looking to get paid (and she will get paid, big time) when leaving office. Regarding, "she is making political calculations where she can still seem viable to progressives without crossing the democratic establishment." I guess. But I honestly have an impossible time understanding her vote on the 700 billion per year budget for the department of offense. I mean seriously... I am incapable of understanding it. It isn't as if they needed her vote to pass it. I fully expected her to make the political calculation that she had better vote against it if what you thought were true. She didn't even think it a good idea to pretend to be progressive when it came to that. So I am not pretending to know for certain what the fuck she thinks even if I have some guesses. Regarding, "I do think Warren is not a narcissist like Hillary Clinton." That is really not much of a compliment. That said I agree with you. Essentially no one is a narcissist like Hillary Clinton except Hillary Clinton. Regarding, "I think she is smart enough to know that two progressives running against each other in the primaries would ensure another establishment democrat wins." I hope you are right. I really do. In all honesty I actually expect her to run in the primary at the behest of the establishment to hurt Sanders and try to siphon votes away from him. Time will tell. I hope you are right and I am wrong. Take care. Thank you for the conversation even if we don't agree on everything.
    1
  9965. If there was a time to "obliterate Wall Street" it would have been immediately after they nearly collapsed the economy. That was the time to break up the big banks, bring back glass-steagal, and jail criminal bankers. Instead we got the consumer protection bureau. Yippie. (that was sarcastic yippie) Just enough to appease the people and prevent getting real change.
    1
  9966. I agree that if there is a time for change it's now. My point is that I don't think Warren is, at all, the one to do it. I see her as being exactly like Obama... they both say the right things and give great speeches but when it comes to action... not so much. I don't like Warren and don't trust her. Actions speak louder than words.
    1
  9967. You are going to be fine. Those aren't legs, it's CGI. And I don't charge nearly as much as your therapist. Your welcome.
    1
  9968.  @rugdnit911  "The 2a is non negotiable" It's already literally an "amendment." Do you care about the constitution or not? Because the best thing about it is that it allows itself to be changed and you fail to understand that.
    1
  9969.  @kski5432  "the 1st can also be infringed" It already is being infringed. There is probably only about a 90 percent chance that this comment that I'm writing won't be shadowbanned. "Would that be you thinking?" No. I wouldn't support any sort of new laws restricting the first amendment. But I understand that it is an amendment and that the consititution was not some perfect document that can't be changed. I understand that it already has been changed.... many times. Do you?
    1
  9970.  @psychonautpupildiallater7734  ""God given right"" You can't even prove your god exist much prove they have "rights" they have given you.
    1
  9971.  @psychonautpupildiallater7734  ""God given right",.. how is that negotiable?" And I honesty have no clue what you are talking about. I must have missed the commendment where "god" says thou shalt not limit your ability to own guns! Was that number 11?
    1
  9972.  @psychonautpupildiallater7734  "You obviously haven't read the Constitution then." You don't even attempt to say what I'm getting wrong. Maybe just be quiet.
    1
  9973.  @kski5432  "we go based off wording" Not about which one they put first? Even when I'm sure they put that one first and this one second for a reason? Well I'm sure you care very deeply about the part of the 2nd where it says "well regulated" at least then right? I'm just kidding. We both know you don't.
    1
  9974.  @kski5432  "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." You must be devastated that you are not allowed to have nukes huh? Is it unconstitutional you can't?
    1
  9975.  @kski5432  "The First Amendment..." Do you have a point? Or are you just wasting my time?
    1
  9976.  @angelald8172  " protects the first and all the rest for that matter." I'm not sure what you are waiting for. All your guns aren't doing anything to stop them from infringing on the 1 amendment and all your rights already. Seriously... what are you gun nuts waiting for?
    1
  9977.  @spunkinater  ".the government is not your friend." Thanks captain obvious. If it makes you feel any better I want the government and the militarize police disarmed first. "Protect yourself" No amount of guns is going to do that. But good luck with that.
    1
  9978.  @UniqueBreakfastTaco  "maybe dont act like the smart guy when you dont qualify." Sorry not sorry if facts trigger you. The constitution allows itself to be changed and I've made zero statements about how likely that is at the moment.
    1
  9979.  @UniqueBreakfastTaco  "maybe dont act like the smart guy when you dont qualify." People like you inspired dunning and kruger to form their original hypothesis. You legit concede the only point I'm making and somehow that makes me the dumb guy?
    1
  9980.  @Kiyoone  " it does not represent the COMMON PEOPLE INTERESTS anymore." When did that document allowing slavery represent the peasants?
    1
  9981.  @Damn3dYank33  "Do you realize there are more than one Constitution?" Yes. For the purpose of this conversation I'm talking about the United states constitution.
    1
  9982.  @UniqueBreakfastTaco  "i see i was correct with my first assessment" Your deflection that was completely irrelevant to anything I was saying? Have it for all I care. I see I was correct in everything I was saying.
    1
  9983.  @davyboy9397  "can we agree that only allowing the police state to have weapons isn't a good idea ?" I'm the same guy who in this thread said that I want the militarized police disarmed first, assuming it's not being shadowbanned. My comments very often are. I say defund the police. I think that should answer all your questions.
    1
  9984.  @davyboy9397  "You really want to allow the Fed" I say abolish the FBI and abolish the CIA.
    1
  9985. Janitor
    1
  9986. Yang worked for CNN. And corporate media hated trump. Does that mean you should support the orange clown? Your thinking is flawed and yang is terrible.
    1
  9987. Regarding, "clearly a world where I'm not snarky and mean to other people on the internet." Yup... I can be a real dick. Regarding, "Name calling is unnecessary." Maybe so but I thought it justified. The shit you say isn't just entitle to respect and when you say shit that I think is dumb as fuck I'm going to tell you so and not sugar coat it. Regarding, "Of course that's something they have been doing." Um... yeah. That's the point. Therefor there is no reason to think they are all of a sudden going to cut hours from 36 to 32 now if there is 36 hours of work to be done. Absolutely nothing changes in that regard. So stop pretending like those dynamics all of a sudden changed after wages went up. If they could have 32 hours of labor getting it done instead of 36 it would already be happening.
    1
  9988. I would like to add that you also confuse me in that you fucks don't want progressives to split the vote and not run as dems. You want to eat your cake and eat it too.
    1
  9989. Talk is cheap. Especially from a politician.
    1
  9990. Yup. You should probably be more focused on how dems are lying to you about things like 2k checks.
    1
  9991. You should unplug for a bit. Go outside and leave technology behind. Or watch animal videos on the dodo. I find those are effective at cheering me up.
    1
  9992. Or try this to induce smiling. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tkw57uGnSrs
    1
  9993.  @spartan2ar949  Well I'm not going to pretend to know what is going on with you but I encourage you to persevere. Life is far from perfect but ultimately worth it... especially compared to the alternative. You want to talk about it? I've got somewhere to be very shortly but I will get back to you at some point.
    1
  9994. There are definitely some people that voted for Obama but now are voting for the orange clown to try and burn the "democratic" party to the ground. Do they count?
    1
  9995. The "land of the free" since it's inception, with slavery.
    1
  9996. Thanks for the laugh.
    1
  9997. Nina Turner would be best for this incredibly premature comment.
    1
  9998. Dems have the presidency, house and senate if anyone is looking for who to blame for things.
    1
  9999. Do you always blame victims like this?
    1
  10000.  @chuckm1961  Regarding, "I see nothing in his words, his tone or his manner that suggest to me he is lying." You are either an idiot or are projecting your clear and obvious deep bias on others. Good lord. You would think we weren't already talking about a liar who will say literally anything for political gain. Stop being willfully idiotic. But if you are spout your bullshit here I can only really think that you are just another paid, disingenuous shill trying to reinvent reality. Good luck with that now shut the fuck up. You are making everyone dumber with everything you say.
    1
  10001.  @chuckm1961  I have less reason to take you seriously than I do flat earthers. You don't realize it because you are an idiot. Please just STFU... for humanity.
    1
  10002.  @chuckm1961  Guy has been know as being creepy forever... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wcpX2wYUr88 Guy is known to be a fucking liar... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AKCJ45QMyLU But I should just pretend he is telling the truth? You are an idiot.
    1
  10003.  @chuckm1961  Regarding, "I am a rational person" LMFAO. You are the living embodiment of the dunning kruger effect.
    1
  10004.  @chuckm1961  LMFAO. Think whatever stupid shit you want. I can't fix stupid for you. Good luck with it.
    1
  10005.  @chuckm1961  Please shut up.
    1
  10006.  @chuckm1961  You aren't the "average stranger." You are akin to a flat earther. Not only are you all morons but you are determined to make the world around you as dumb as they are. Have a nice day. Or don't. I don't care and don't pretend to.
    1
  10007.  @chuckm1961  Literally everything you say is idiotic for one reason or another. If only you were significantly smarter than you are. Then you might at least be smart enough to realize that you are an idiot.
    1
  10008.  @chuckm1961  Regarding, "Happen to know what projection is?" It's that thing I mentioned in one of my first replies to you. God damn you are an idiot.
    1
  10009.  @chuckm1961  LOL. Ok dipshit.
    1
  10010.  @chuckm1961  LMFAO. You suck so much.
    1
  10011. While I tend to agree I know they want apathy. I'm going to continue to go out and vote for anyone other than their corporate candidates just to stick it to them.
    1
  10012.  @fun_ghoul  Do you even know what the word apathy means? "lack of interest, enthusiasm, or concern." Not voting is = lack of interest in voting = apathy but not according to me but according to the dictionary.
    1
  10013. No.
    1
  10014.  @chillerwhale1655  You are right. TYT aren't corrupt despite the millions from katzenburg according to kyle. You got me. Great rebuttal.
    1
  10015.  @vulcanh254  "Krystal and Kyle are pure guys." Yup. They couldn't have jimmy on because of his potty mouth. That's why they brought cenk's nephew on to talk about pocket pussies.
    1
  10016.  @chillerwhale1655  "lol did i say anything about ana or cenk?" LMFAO You seemed to think I wasn't making a point. I was trying to tell you why you were wrong but I've overestimated your ability to think. "just because kyle is an affiliate doesn’t mean he agrees with them or covers for them when they’re wrong." True. He covers for them because he covered for them by not mentioning the blackmail in his last video among many other examples like saying the 20 million they get doesn't make them corrupt. That's kyle covering for them and spouting BS which covers for them. "you’re literally doing the thing that kyle talks" You seem to think I care about kyle's takes ATM. I don't. They are terrible and nonsensical as are yours. "it’s cringe." I find this funny coming from you. Thanks for the laugh. And I'll also state the obvious fact that everything kyle's been doing of late has been cringe, terrible, and dishonest.
    1
  10017.  @f58534  "that's like writing a contract in pencil." Are you really so dense that you are acting like the contract is through them? And not that they are just reporting on in? "if you go to TYT website both Jimmy and Kyle are there." Jimmy is not affiliated with TYT. Kyle is. Just stop it with your deflections. You are embarrassing yourself.
    1
  10018.  @f58534  "that's not true" It is. Sorry not sorry if it hurts. "don't matter how you twist it" LMFAO. Yeah. It doesn't matter how YOU twist it. "Mr it's true because Wikipedia says it true." It's true because it's true. Never do you even attempt to give evidence why it wouldn't be. Well at least not in any sort of intelligent way. "If Kyle is associated with TYT than Jimmy is too" Nope. Tell you what go to TYT's homepage and look under the "channels" tab. There under "TYT network" you can see tyt investigates, tyt conversation, rebel hq (which I used to watch back when it was called tyt politics and had jordan chariton on), and you can find secular talk. No jimmy dore show. Because kyle is affiliated with them and jimmy is not.
    1
  10019.  @f58534  I'm looking at TYTs homepage right now. Secular talk is there. The Jimmy dore show is not. You are full of it.
    1
  10020.  @f58534  One of us certainly is. I welcome anyone to go look at TYT's homepage and see for themself. Secular talk is in the "TYT network" and the jimmy dore show is not. Reality is what it is. No amount of your BS changes it.
    1
  10021.  @f58534  LMFAO. It looks like kyle and TYT have cut the cord as of literally today. Secular talk is no longer there but it ABSOLUTELY was there earlier today. Kyle is trying to do the right thing now. It's too late.
    1
  10022.  @f58534  Have you heard the news that kyle just left TYT? Or is that not happening in your alternate universe?
    1
  10023. It's really not and nobody cares about the semantics nor is it important to the discussion.
    1
  10024. "We're all still human man." Would you recite this BS if we were talking about Jeffrey Epstein? Well it's just as nonsensical here.
    1
  10025. You are rooting for evil terrible people.
    1
  10026. It's obviously about m4a.
    1
  10027.  @ewalker1057  I find it hard to believe that you don't understand why attention would be directed at AOC as opposed to everyone else. AOC was the one saying she would fight for m4a. AOC is the one whose words aren't matching her actions. Regarding, "It should be about HR 1384 Medicare for All Bill that was presented in 2019." LMFAO. What? You are deflecting.
    1
  10028.  @ewalker1057  Regarding, "The entirety of Congress is needed and should be held responsible. Not just one individual." I find it difficult to take you seriously when you say everyone should be held accountable when you don't seem willing to hold one of m4as more vocal advocates for it accountable. AOC has been given a gift because corporate dems did so terrible. If she doesn't take this opportunity it says something about her. Stop shielding her from responsibility and then we can start holding everyone responsible. Regarding, "Hes ignored the fact Medicare for All Bill HR 1384 is already composed and was presented to Congress." Was it voted on? That's why he ignores it, and rightfully so.
    1
  10029.  @ewalker1057  Regarding, "it's the responsibllity of the entire Congress." We are trying to force the entire congress to vote on m4a. We are literally trying to get what you are whining about. Regarding, "Knowledgeable of functions of each branch of government is lost." Did I say something wrong? Regarding, "No bill like HR 1384 can pass without the majority of Congress." No shit. Don't care. You are a waste of time.
    1
  10030.  @ewalker1057  Regarding, " Ignorance and bias makes it just Congresswoman Ocasio-Cortez responsibilty" It's not just her. It's about all the progressives who ran on m4a. But she is the face of that group. That has nothing to do with things like gender. Do you intentionally try to sound like a "Correct the Record" troll?
    1
  10031.  @ewalker1057  Regarding, "He should have made it soley about forcing the vote." As if AOC has nothing to do with forcing the vote. You are a joke.
    1
  10032. Shame on anyone who supports genocide joe.
    1
  10033. There isn't a issue of substance where he is better than Sanders.
    1
  10034. But yeah... he's better than Biden and Trump... as if that is suppose to impress anyone.
    1
  10035. I think Shit Pai might be second personally.
    1
  10036. He's far worse than a coward.
    1
  10037.  @thug0071984  You believe yang so it isn't surprising that you are quick to believe other conmen. The DNC isn't covering up the results of the Iowa caucus because of yangs great showing. No final results but I can still say with confidence that yang got 0 delegates... as he should.
    1
  10038.  Brian Delgado  Not her entire life. It was only into her 40s. That's totally a normal time to not only switch parties but essentially claim to have switched 2 parties over as she pretended to represent the left of the left. Then again maybe it had more to do with the fact that she was embarking on a political career and she was just pretending and lying like she always does.
    1
  10039. Elon is a conman who has gotten billions of dollars in government subsidies. Stop being a tool for a rich and powerful conmen.
    1
  10040. Fair enough Charles. I just wanted to point of the hypocrisy of a lot of religious people. There are plenty of Christians for example that understand how insane Scientology beliefs are but fail to examine their own religious beliefs. I was just looking to point out how crazy they all are. That said there was nothing wrong with your curiosity and I apologize for implying there was.
    1
  10041. I'm not sure they are "just as corrupt." And I really don't care who is worse if anyone is. I just care about corruption.
    1
  10042.  @mitchclark1532  To put it another way I could make a tier list for murderers. But why? Being a murderer is enough info. The rest is just meaningless details. That's how I feel about corruption and the people doing it.
    1
  10043.  @mitchclark1532  We do both agree that both parties are corrupt. That's ultimately what is important. Peace. And cheers.
    1
  10044.  Layth Adrian  I'm going to figure you meant to say that to sam. It seems more apt to be towards him.
    1
  10045.  @whensomethingcriesagain  I agree to disagree and I'd be happy to be wrong.
    1
  10046. Meh. Both are fucking gross to me.
    1
  10047. Capitalism is just fine for most things but it needs to regulated unlike the current system we have of capitalism run amok.
    1
  10048. LMFAO that you thought enough of that to write it.
    1
  10049. or...
    1
  10050. We are number one in medical bankruptcies.
    1
  10051.  @thespeedofchillax6691  Regarding, " warren in 2016...the progressive left practically begged her to get in the election against Clinton" All true. Regarding, "she promised the ppl of mass she would finish her senate term before doing anything else so she waited till this time around to run" As if that's why she didn't run. The reality is that she stepped aside to make room for the corporate Clinton. Did she promise she wouldn't endorse a true progressive like Sanders instead of the corporate tool as well? Instead she thinks now is her time. Now that the progressive movement has a clear leader and champion. Now she wants to run instead of doing the right thing and helping the guy we know the establishment is going to work overtime to fuck over. Regarding, "i think it's comical how many ppl that are now huge supporters of bernie are playing tribal politics," Ok bud. Tell yourself it's "tribal politics." When in reality we keep getting more and more reasons to not trust her. It isn't the fact that she has been on the wrong side of litmus test I have, like when she didn't support DAPL protestors, or when she voted to give Trump and the MIC more money for bombs than even the orange clown wanted, or that she has said she will happily take legalize bribes if she makes the general, or that she is dividing progressive support making it more likely a corporate clown like biden get the nomination, or the fact that she has a way of waffling on M4A and her convictions can't seem to be trusted, or the fact that corrupt corporate media seem to have really started liking her while true progressives tend to only get shit on by then, it must be a tribal mentality on my part and not about the substance. Regarding, "bernie himself constantly goes out of his way to not disparage her and they are very close friends" I fucking love Bernie but I make up my mind about people and don't let others do it for me. It's a side effect of NOT being a sheep or tribal. Regarding, "are people's memories that short or are most of you all just that young that you aren't old enough to remember much before this last four years politically?" I'm old as fuck with a long memory. Speaking of that I'm not a big believer that people really change. In a related note Warren was a self described republican in the 90s. I don't find that to be common among people I consider to be true progressives... at least not that late in life. Real changes like that tend to only happen when people are younger.
    1
  10052. "I don't know and I don't care." -sam seder
    1
  10053.  @SamJohn52  Is you being a broken record reciting the same BS your idea of "getting over it."
    1
  10054.  @SamJohn52  Regarding, "A friendly reminder to get on with your lives" This is pretty funny coming from a guy copy and pasting stupid crap all over.
    1
  10055. As if only the left does that.
    1
  10056. If only we had a world filled with "grifters" who were fighting for m4a.
    1
  10057. @It's All On A Whim Regarding, "Why stop at just Medicare 4A?" Are you under the impression that people don't also support other policies? Why are you pretending that we only want m4a? Regarding, "Why don't we get bigger US cash payouts too like a permanent UBI for just being citizens, 3k per month or even 5k" I'm open to the idea of UBI but 1) I am far, far, far more convinced that health care should be treated like human right than I am convinced that money should be treated like a human right and 2) if we just had a UBI without reforming the current system we have then all that UBI money will flow to the top just like it does now. Without reform it's just money that ultimately gets vacuumed up at the top just like all the money does now. Regarding, "That way we can all party party party the whole night long !" Wait, you were being sarcastic? And to think I took you seriously for a moment. That was dumb of me.
    1
  10058.  @user-ht3sc3sz7h  Regarding, "Performative moralistic grandstanding, gatekeeping and stabbing your own in the back" What an apt description of AOC's actions. How you can't you think about HER when writing those words is beyond me.
    1
  10059. @It's All On A Whim I can't take you seriously enough to respond to you intelligently at this point.
    1
  10060. @It's All On A Whim "Intellegently ? At this POINT ? YIKES .. do you really think everyone thinks"LEFT" ? ??" Are you trying to prove my point that you shouldn't be taken seriously?
    1
  10061. Chris Hayes has buried this info til now. He is complicit and should be charged as a war criminal just like biden and his administration.
    1
  10062. I don't care about term limits. Imagine what would happen if we had money out of politics. That would actually change things for the better.
    1
  10063. This is sarcasm right?
    1
  10064. Does anyone know how much the 1400 checks cost of the 1.9 trillion? I ask because I was wondering how big the checks would be if all 1.9 trillion went out as checks.
    1
  10065. "Now lets say Chris made fun of a transgender, he would be locked in jail." You are straight up delusional. Freedom of speech is a thing even if you don't know about it. Most people do.
    1
  10066. Bernie already told you he's going to fall in line behind dem ented joe.
    1
  10067.  @chillydog53  "he's afraid" I wish it was only that. I think it's more likely that he's a tool to sheep herd people into the party and always has been.
    1
  10068.  @finn8248  Rice is just another warmonger. Has she never found a war she didn't want to fight.
    1
  10069.  @finn8248  She may as well be condelleza rice when it comes to war.
    1
  10070.  @finn8248  Regarding, "What makes her a warmonger?" LMFAO. The fact that when giving the option between war and peace she goes with war 100 percent of the time.
    1
  10071.  @finn8248  And we actually don't get to have on opinion if she is a warmonger or not anymore than we get to have an opinion if GWB is a warmonger or not. She either is one or she isn't. And she is. Because facts.
    1
  10072.  @finn8248  I don't think youtube is going to let you see my recent post. In short I'm telling you what I think of you. And it isn't nice.
    1
  10073. Chris should share a cell with biden for burying this story for months.
    1
  10074. Corporatists are doing what they think is best for their team while Warren proves she is a snake and is also doing what is best for team superdelegates.
    1
  10075. Because the party isn't going anywhere and some want to fight for the soul of the party.
    1
  10076.  @wilnerolivier7971  Get yourself checked for TDS.
    1
  10077.  @kathleenfubler431  Regarding, "Have fun with that!" Let's not act like there is a fun option. The next 4 years are going to suck regardless of who is president. Neither Biden nor Trump have a plan to give people jobs, money, health care, or education. Both are terrible. Regarding, "you'll getYrump again" Maybe. I actually think it would be better if he won. Because then he gets blamed for the upcoming depression and we might actually get the hope and change that was promised long ago but never came. If Biden is president during the upcoming depression we are likely to get something worse than trump after him. That said I'd never vote for trump even if I think it would be better he won. I don't support terrible. I leave that to everyone else.
    1
  10078.  @satchelraidincoming636  Regarding, "But on June 1st, 2020, President Donald J Trump ordered federal police officers to use tear gas analogues, truncheons, rubber bullets and bodily force on peaceful protesters and foreign press." I remember when Obama and Biden sat on their hands while peaceful protestors had their rights trampled at the DAPL protests. That doesn't mean I should vote for Trump. Did you only just realize on June 1st that Trump is terrible? You should have figured that out long ago. But him being terrible doesn't make Biden good or acceptable. And Biden being terrible doesn't make Trump good or acceptable. Both suck. Both are terrible. Neither are worthy of support. The rest is just details.
    1
  10079.  @calmingwaves3134  Regarding, "A shaky plan." It's not really a "plan." It's my principles. I don't vote for terrible people and neither should anyone. The world would be a better place if everyone just refused to vote for terrible people. Regarding, "You're really banking on..." Again, I don't have a plan or a crystal ball to predict the future. My gut tells me that I think Trump winning would be best in the long term (but worse in the short term) but that is hardly the point or why I'm voting how I am. If I were "really banking on..." then I'd probably vote for trump. But I don't vote for evil and terrible because I don't vote for evil and terrible, not because of some masterplan.
    1
  10080.  @calmingwaves3134  Regarding, "Okay. But I don't follow my gut," Is that what you think I'm doing? Even after I made it perfectly clear that what I'm doing is following my principles? Do you not have principles and follow them? Regarding, "I'm all about logic and plans" That said my gut loves to use logic. I don't think that a biden presidency would be a disaster for no good reason. I don't think that a trump 2.0 response to a failed biden presidency is a possibility for no good reason. It's how trump got in office in the first place. Regarding, "I think lesser evil voting is ethical" No doubt plenty of trump supporters rationalize their support the same way. Trump sucks but Biden/Hillary/Pelosi/Obama so that's why they support evil trump. The problem with voting for lesser evil is it's still evil. Does voting for Hitler become "ethical" if you think his opponent is worse? Regarding, "Especially because once we get Biden/any democrat we can start seriously protesting/burning Targets to get Biden to do the will of the people." LMFAO. Agree to disagree. And I'd like to add that few people own the responsibility for a rioting public more than Joe Biden because of his racist crime bill that led to mass incarceration. He's already why we are in the mess we are in. But what could possibly go wrong after Joe fundamentally changes nothing in a world that DESPERATELY needs change is president? What could go wrong? It's not like it could get worse than trump could it? Oh wait... just imagine if trump were competent. It can get worse. And likely will after a biden presidency disaster. Don't pretend otherwise. Don't pretend he can be pushed to do the right thing. He's bought. He has no empathy for millennials or pretty much anyone for that matter. He doesn't magically become better because of who he is facing.
    1
  10081.  @calmingwaves3134  Regarding, "VOTING for Hitler is ethical" Really? Saying this out loud doesn't make you rethink your position? You really want to double down?
    1
  10082.  @calmingwaves3134  Regarding, "yeah voting Hitler or Biden is ethical. Makes sense to me." Voting for hitler is ethical and that makes sense to you? You are lost. Do you have any principles that you live by? Or just plans that you rationalize?
    1
  10083.  @calmingwaves3134  Regarding, "You made it clear you think Biden and Trump are going to hurt the same amount of people," No. I didn't. One of them would ultimately end up being worse in the long run. Regarding, "Biden might even create an (unprovable) worse future--through conservative backlash." Literally everything that hasn't happened is "unprovable." Do you find fault in the logic I used? Wasn't Trump, in part a response to "democratic" failure? Do you doubt Biden would be a failure? It's not like he has a cure to the coronavirus. Regarding, "Biden polices on paper" "Policies on paper" are worth the word of the person. Biden is a liar. Trump's "policy on paper" during 2016 was that he would give everyone health care. Biden's "policies are paper" are worthless to me. He has proven to me who he is. Regarding, "I think an organized protest could move him further." You are going to move joe Biden, who would veto M4A if it got his desk? Who openly admits to his donors that nothing will fundamentally change under him? Really? Have you met dementia joe? Trump is more susceptible to being moved by fox news than biden is about anything. Regarding, "So from my thoughts, what I'm doing is logical." Just ignore the fact that Biden is terrible. Just ignore the fact that he is corrupt. That him being in office likely leads to trump 2.0. Just ignore his warmongering. Just ignore his dementia. Just ignore his lies. And then maybe you can convince yourself you are being logical. Trump supporters tell themselves they are logical as well. Ultimately you are all idiots supporting terrible people for terrible reasons.
    1
  10084.  @calmingwaves3134  Regarding, "I'm not going to put suffering on my neighbors for a maybe" If you are voting for biden and he wins you are voting for suffering because that's what he brings. All of his terrible is partly on you. You aren't absolved of your role in terrible because you thought something worse was going to happen if you didn't. Regarding, "if Biden wins and is followed by a very progressive follow-up (which is possible)" There is ZERO good reason to think this is a possibility for several obvious reasons that are so obvious I shouldn't need to mention them and won't. Regarding, "I agree with everything you say about Biden" Yet you still manage to be part of the problem. Regarding, "still think he's better." Even if I agreed with this it would be irrelevant. He's awful. And awful people shouldn't be supported and voted for. Regarding, "I'm not a single issue voter," Neither am I. This isn't an exact order of my priorities but it's in order a little bit. Money in politics. Biden is corrupt and terrible. War. Biden is warmonger. Health care. Biden would veto M4A. The environment. He talks a better game than trump and this is arguably where he is best compared to trump but he still represents corporations and their interests. The drug war. He is largely responsible for mass incarceration. Education. He ain't paying for it. Jobs. He's outsourced them every chance given. Trumps rhetoric is right about his role in our awful trade deals. Spying. He voted for the patriot act. Banks. He loves them big and corrupt. He voted to repeal glass steagal. Dude's fucking terrible. The existence of an orange man doesn't change that fact.
    1
  10085.  @calmingwaves3134  Regarding, "there was no other option" There is always another option. There are literally infinite options. You CHOOSE the guy who sucks. People who voted for Trump ARE responsible for trump. Regarding, "I picked what all the available data said was the better one" You try to talk about "data" like you are a robot. Like you know the future. Regarding, "I'm guiltfree with that decision." If Biden starts war with Russia you own that. Please feel guilty should such a thing happen. You really should. Regarding, "the ethical decision is clear" To support evil? To support terrible? Ethically clear? And you admit you would make the same terrible arguments for hitler? I'm done with this. You are an idiot. I can't fix it for you.
    1
  10086.  @calmingwaves3134  But before I go regarding your stupid analogy... It's more like you are voting to for a candidate that is going to kill your first born because the only other "electable" candidate wanted to kill your first two born. And you are too big a coward to fight for good and use your vote for something better.
    1
  10087.  @calmingwaves3134  Regarding, "when people say they're done" Man do I want to be done with this but nobody is perfect and what you say is so frustratingly terrible. Regarding, "you made two glaring logical errors. So even if you don't see this, at least this can help anyone who reads this. Data does not let anyone know the future--it is just the closest we have to predicting the future so it's ethical to use it." When did I make this logical error? When do I say we can't make predictions? I'm pretty sure I don't. I've even made them for fucks sake. When I do it's my "gut," when you do it it's "data." Regarding, "As for Biden starting a war with Russia and it being partly on me--If you put your child on a school bus and that child dies in a bus accident, some people feel guilty, but they shouldn't, sending a kid to school is the right thing to do, if there's no other way, no need to feel guilty, you did the best you could with the information you had." Biden is a warmonger. Biden is poking Russia. Biden is far more likely to start war with russia than trump is. That's information you have isn't it? While you support him? While you enable him and his war agenda? Are trumps supporters not partly responsible for trump's actions? Or is that privilege only reserved for you? Regarding, "you did the best you could with the information you had" Everything thinks they are doing their best when they are actually just supporting terrible candidates for terrible reasons. Regarding, "How?" Well, I don't start with self defeating attitudes. I'm also prepared to lose. If you are never prepared to lose you really don't have any principles. Vote for something good. Even if you are likely to lose. Or vote for evil. And own their terrible when they win. It's on you. Regarding, "Your analogy is good if your alternate vote saves all your sons from death." If we ALL die, we die. So be it. Some things are worth fight for. Some things are worth dying for. But you would vote for the guy who is going to kill your first born. And sleep like a baby after it telling yourself you did good.
    1
  10088. If you are currently watching TYT unironically you should rethink your life decisions.
    1
  10089. He uses US taxpayers to make himself rich. That's the POS you "love."
    1
  10090. Canada manages to pay half as much per person for their system so I guess I'm not too worried about your silly fearmongering.
    1
  10091.  @octagondoctor  Regarding, "you can't equate what Canada does to the US." I wasn't "equating" them. Regarding, "So many things are different." No shit. Regarding, "What is medicare 4 all going yo achieve if Big Pharma is still up charging?" I don't even know where to begin. You eliminate the multiple complex system that costs billions every year, you can eliminate the middle man who job is ONLY to produce profit and has NOTHING to do with health care. Regarding, "Do you even know what GPOs are???" I find this funny coming from someone who can't grasp the concept that m4a would be a good thing with great benefits because it doesn't tickle your balls while doing it.
    1
  10092.  @octagondoctor  Regarding, "you are not very smart" That's the dunning-kruger effect you are experiencing. Regarding, "M4A would be good." Is that why you are spending your time pissing on it? Regarding, "But what good is a goverment healthcare plan, if hospitalizations are cost prohibitive and medications are 10x more expensive here than anywhere in The world." If canada can provide a universal system that costs half as much as the us they prove I don't need to shit myself about what you think I should be scared of. Regarding, "You are mad because I simply showed you reality." I'm frustrated with having to share the world with morons like you that make me feel like I'm living in the movie Idiocracy. I'm done addressing you.
    1
  10093.  @octagondoctor  "M4A doesn't solve the healthcare problem," The phrase, "Don’t let perfect be the enemy of good." only needs to be a thing because you are that epic stupid that you need to be told this.
    1
  10094. I am by no means an expert on this topic and can't speak intelligently about it. That said I feel justified in thinking that this is a terrible idea because of the administration pushing it.
    1
  10095. FYI Trump is a racist because, for example, the guy who loves walls only cares about building a wall between us and the country that isn't predominately white. If he wasn't a racist he would want a wall between us and canada. But he doesn't care about a wall there because racism.
    1
  10096. You may very well be the worst troll every.
    1
  10097. No I had it correct the first time but you go ahead and think what you want.
    1
  10098. "Looking for news in the corporate media is like looking for love in a brothel." That statement is accurate and awesome.
    1
  10099. Common sense. That sadly isn't as common as it should be.
    1
  10100. What took him so long to report the truth? Oh right... hayes is complicit and a war criminal.
    1
  10101.  @charlidamelio-wd7hf  As if Ariana Grande is "political." LMFAO
    1
  10102.  @Inamichan  Regarding, "how is this political?" I'll try to keep this simple. Because it's the POTUS.
    1
  10103.  @charlidamelio-wd7hf  Regarding, ""that's my point dumbass" Maybe consider the possibility that your point is dumb. Regarding, "they're both public figures." But only one is political figure right? That's the distinction you are ignoring. Regarding, " it is only political if they outright stated who they support politically" Nope. It's political because it includes the POTUS elect. Literally EVERYTHING they do is political because of who they are. To pretend that this is nothing more than a publicity stunt for biden is willfully obtuse. And I'd say the same if they were doing this for the orange clown.
    1
  10104.  @charlidamelio-wd7hf  Let's say the dodo gave the orange clown a nice photo op while he was in office to help make him seem more human than he actually is and to try and improve his public image. Do you really think that wouldn't be political? It obviously is whether or not you are willing to admit it.
    1
  10105.  @charlidamelio-wd7hf  I'd like to add that I am confident the dodo absolutely would not have granted such a photo op to the orange clown. Because they understand that it is political even if you don't.
    1
  10106. You are overthinking it. Dave is a fucking LEGEND whose heart is in the right place. He's just waaaaay wrong about this one. It happens.
    1
  10107.  @maryroux8828  "it's an old English quote." Is that how you are trying to rationalize comparing a black man to a dog? Ok racist.
    1
  10108. Maybe so but it's not going anywhere.
    1
  10109. This.... but I thought it would still take longer than a single day.
    1
  10110. That is some top notch trolling Angela.
    1
  10111. Gay rights. Makes me think you have not followed her very closely.
    1
  10112. I'm tempted to respond to your drivel but I don't consider you sincere so I'm not going to waste my time.
    1
  10113.  @giovannifoulmouth7205  Regarding, "I guess you had vastly different expectations." A statement like, "Biden is incredible" has nothing to do with expectations. Even if you thought he was going to shit himself on stage and he didn't that still wouldn't make your statement make any more sense than it does.
    1
  10114. It costs half as much per person as the us, covers everyone, better infant mortality rate, better life expectancy, medical bankruptcy isn't a thing. It crushes the US in every important way even if it's not perfect.
    1
  10115.  @mikec2ify  Regarding, " Just saying this guy and you make it sound like it's the best ever. It isn't." "Best ever?" What the fuck are you talking about. I'm saying it's better and gave you every important way to judge a health care system and a universal system like Canada has is superior to the US system in every way. Regarding, "I have seen the way the US gov't runs stuff around here, why would I want the Government to run the health system too?" Government run health care in the US, while being grossly mismanaged is still rated far better than the private health care industry and it's not even close. If you want to sit here and trash what we are talking about I'd like to hear your thoughts on the US system? Because if you have issues with universal health care systems I can only think you would conclude the US system is dumpster fire assuming you are objective, which I suspect you are not.
    1
  10116.  @mikec2ify  Well done on buying health insurance fear mongering propaganda and using anecdotal stories to draw broad conclusions. Do yourself a favor and fact check everything I said in my original response to you. "It costs half as much per person as the us, covers everyone, better infant mortality rate, better life expectancy, medical bankruptcy isn't a thing. It crushes the US in every important way even if it's not perfect." Tell me any part of that statement that is incorrect based on your "research."
    1
  10117.  @mikec2ify  Nothing will change if people like you continue to be dumb, that's for sure.
    1
  10118.  @mikec2ify  No prob. In the future don't use anecdotes to formulate broad opinions and don't give videos instead of trying to articulate the points you are trying to make. Both are beyond idiotic. And do yourself a favor and trying to figure out if anything in my original point is incorrect. If you are capable and intellectually honest enough to realize that it's nothing but fact you might be able to stop yourself from looking like an ass in the future.
    1
  10119.  @mikec2ify  Actually I said that what you were doing was making you look like an ass but don't be so hard on yourself, we all do it from time to time. Maybe just change the specific behavior I'm talking about in the future.
    1
  10120. Me too. Nobody's perfect.
    1
  10121. To be fair Jakub, you are an idiot.
    1
  10122. You remind of people looking for witches back in the day. If they lived they are guilty. If they die they were innocent.
    1
  10123. I guess everyone should just sell out then. There is no point in fighting for change since we have already lost and have no hope for change.
    1
  10124. So you have surrendered. I haven't. I'm going to keep fighting.
    1
  10125.  @seanmatthewking  He's a racist warmonger who would veto m4a and represents big money. He belongs in the republican party but still fits right in at the "democratic" party.
    1
  10126.  @xMetalhead2000  Even trump said he would give everyone health care. Yes. I think they will lie.
    1
  10127. "Ana used to dress wildly inappropriate for a news room" How dare he state this obvious fact after ana exposed herself to everyone at work. /s
    1
  10128.  @mandarintomato9205  "were you there?" Nope. Were you? Or do you at least have good reason to question the story as told by jimmy despite it all making perfect sense and adding up? "Who is to judge what is inappropriate in dress" We do. Would you mount this type of idiotic defense of me if I wore a banana hammock to work and nothing else? "it is outrageous for Kyle and Krystal to throw Jimmy under the bus like they have done." Stick to this and scratch all the other BS.
    1
  10129.  @SkillsofAWESOMENESS  Regarding, "that's the great thing about being an Iowan." You might not even be able to support the candidate of your choice in your state while they are running. That's the great part about being an Iowan? Really? I knew it sucked there but damn. We aren't on the same team. I have to choose between voting for Sanders and voting for Yang. Yangs campaign splits progressive thinking voters making it more likely a corporate clown like Biden wins in an election of crazy importance. We don't get to share voters, votes, and delegates. That's the reality.
    1
  10130.  @SkillsofAWESOMENESS  Regarding, "I can't tell if you're insulting Iowa or the caucus system." Both really. The point I was trying to make is that a system that doesn't always allow you to support the candidate of your choice is not a good system. That isn't a "feature." That's a flaw. As much as I think nobody should be supporting yang I think that everyone should be able to support him should they choose. Regarding, "the way I see it is, either Yang or Bernie builds up momentum in the early stages and then carry that through the rest of the states." The way I see it a campaign for yang, a person who has zero experience in politics, no record to look at to know if he is legit or full of shit, and should have nobody's support but sadly will because people are idiots, hurts Sanders, the guy who actually has a chance to win the primary because he actually deserves trust and more, and hurts his chances to build that momentum you are talking about. Yang takes support from people like Sanders, not biden, who gets to cling to his bullshit about "electability" because of the help he is getting from yangs campaign who is splitting progressive support in an election where we need be united. You know about momentum. Maybe spend some time caring about how yang is fucking with it.
    1
  10131.  @SkillsofAWESOMENESS  Regarding, "We SHOULD be, but that's just not how the system works." Don't blame the system for your decision to forgo a once in a generation politician, who has proven to you over decades in the public eye to do exactly what they say for a guy you probably had never even heard of a year ago because they have no experience in politics. And because they have no experience they also have no record. It's that thing you use to know if a politician is full of shit which they usually are.
    1
  10132.  @kamilszczesny2563  Regarding, "becase She doing all She can to do things better" Is she? I'm not as sure. We will find out going forward though won't we. Regarding, "You people keep making her a enemy" "You people" Maybe have a better idea who you are talking to before lumping them into a huge category. I fucking love AOC. That doesn't mean that she is beyond criticism. Regarding, "You dont deserve her" What a crock of shit. I deserve to have a government filled with people like her. Instead she is practically alone. You might not deserve her for her all I know. But I'm not going to assume you don't.
    1
  10133.  @Timmsh88  If a vote on M4A were actually so useless the powers that be wouldn't be fighting so hard to stop it from coming to a vote.
    1
  10134.  @TheShawny122  Regarding, "They won’t pay the price." I guess we should just accept defeat then and not bother fighting the good fight. And yes, this is sarcasm.
    1
  10135.  @yellowtheyellow  Gross that that is all you have to offer the conversation at hand.
    1
  10136.  @beautifulworld9829  Regarding, "It is weird comment" It's really not. Regarding, "warren a snake not an action" What? More often than not it takes far more than a single action to be called a snake. You also can't just lump all actions that you disagree with together and act as if they all hold the same weight. Regarding, "Open your eyes and dont attack others who already see through someone." I find this funny because you seem to take issue with me "attacking others" while "attacking me" in the same sentence. Seems hypocritical enough. If you want to try and make an intelligent case why AOC is a snake you go ahead and try if you want. But that's not what you are doing. And what you are doing is worthless, hypocritical, and dumb. Regarding, "It might just takes you a little longer, which is ok." Politicians represent who gets them into office. And by gets them into office I mean who pays for their campaign. That's who politicians represent. AOC is funded by the little guy so, unsurprisingly, she represents the little guy. You many disagree with some of her tactics but that doesn't mean they are a snake. Snakes are the ones taking that dirty money and representing the people giving them that money. That's what warren does. It's an incredibly important distinction you are ignoring. But that's ok. It might just take you a little longer to understand the world in which you exist. Which is ok. I guess. But it would be far better if you weren't making everyone dumber til you get there like you are. Thanks.
    1
  10137.  @lexicon612  Literally everything you just said is idiotic and wrong for one reason or another. Everyone who read it is now dumber. I award you no points and may god have mercy on your soul.
    1
  10138.  @lexicon612  Regarding, "Keep your unjustified childish insults to yourself." "unjustified." LMFAO. You are walking talking evidence of the dunning-kruger effect.
    1
  10139. Not your fault Jeremy. That is mine. There are people who say similarly silly things without sarcasm. We need a sarcasm font.
    1
  10140. Musk is a conman. Sorry if the truth hurts.
    1
  10141.  @DanieleGiorgino  That's like saying a broken clock isn't broken because it got the time right once.
    1
  10142.  @gaulindidier5995  He is, was, and forever will be a conman.
    1
  10143. Furthermore if he were elected it would make getting peace more difficult.
    1
  10144. Teachers are known for being stupid. Oh wait...
    1
  10145. Although I think you are correct your statement is wrong. It puts the burden of proof on you. Can you prove there is no god? Of course not. Therefor it is just as fucking absurd a statement as saying there is a god.
    1
  10146. So you are cool being just as absurd as the religious. Nice to know.
    1
  10147. It's not much of a "drug cartel" when you don't deal drugs.
    1
  10148.  @juansantiago2901  If they are still going to be around maybe we shouldn't let them make truckloads of money off of drugs the way they are now. Money they use for other nefarious shit. Stop acting like something needs to be perfectly effective to be a good idea. This would cripple them and they would prefer things stay just the way they are for good reason even if you can't see it. Money is power and they make lots of it with drugs.
    1
  10149.  @juansantiago2901  Regarding, "do you think a hitman is just going stop killing people" Do you think I think this or something? Or anyone does? No one thinks this is a miracle cure all and I'm not talking about murder. Drug cartels are known as drug cartels because that's where their money and power come from. They aren't in the business of killing people for money. They are in the illegal drug business. And killing is more of a side effect of that business and bad guys can diversify but that is hardly a logical reason for obliterating an entire industry that has created all that wealth in the first place. Make them adapt for fucks sake if that's your biggest fear. But stop acting like this isn't wouldn't be doing a lot of good. Because it clearly would even if wouldn't create a perfect utopia or some shit. I'm done with this. This conversation is making me dumber. Even you seem to understand it would do some good but are way too hung up on the fact that some problems would still exist. Well yeah... no shit. Don't care and neither should you because perfection should not be the enemy of the good.
    1
  10150.  @juansantiago2901  "before accusing me on making you dumper do some basic research" LOL. Ok bud.
    1
  10151.  @juansantiago2901  Your stupidity sold me. Forget taking away their primary source of income. That was a dumb idea. Let them continue to make truckloads of money and give them an illegal business they are willing to defend with violence. That's way better I guess cause Juan dipshit and reasons.
    1
  10152. Portugal reduces crime but because crime still exists juan says stupid shit. https://www.theguardian.com/news/2017/dec/05/portugals-radical-drugs-policy-is-working-why-hasnt-the-world-copied-it
    1
  10153. They are not. That's why they include a margin of error.
    1
  10154. They didn't push here because they "thought she would be strong in the general." They knew she was weak. That is just the bullshit they used to try and justify them rigging the game. And don't think that losing to Trump was there biggest fear. It wasn't. They preferred him win than Sanders.
    1
  10155. He never promised universal health care. He promised a public option. But the public option was scrubbed from his website so you can safely call that a broken promise.
    1
  10156. You are using the word fair incorrectly. Just because something is not against the law doesn't mean it is innately fair.
    1
  10157. You obviously have no idea what the word means. The NFL for example could let the patriots start with 20 points every game. But that would have nothing to do with whether or not it would be fair. Oh and he DNC breaks its own rules. Stop being an idiot.
    1
  10158. Regarding, "Your NFL example isn't accurate." Yes. It absolutely is. Your original statement is "Their party, their rules." The NFL example is exactly the same. The NFL is their league, it's their rules. They CAN do whatever they want but just because they can do whatever they want that has NOTHING to do with whether or not what they are doing is fair or not. Let me try to break down why the things you have said are silly in question form. Would it be fair if the NFL let the pats start with 20 points each game? Well the point is that people obviously understand that it is not fair. But if all the things you have already said were true then you would have to concede that it is "fair" if you actually believe the garbage you say. Ultimately the point I'm trying to make that you don't seem to understand is that the fairness of rules is a completely independent thing from those rules. I'm not saying they shouldn't be able make rules. I'm saying they shouldn't be able to make unfair rules... like they do... like giving the pats 20 points would be. Regarding, "I said do something about it, act according." I really don't give a flying fuck about this part of your statement. It is just a pathetic way to excuse what they are doing and saying that it everyone else's fault somehow they are not "acting accordingly." I guess if the NFL gave the Patriots 20 points the that just means the Steelers need to "act accordingly" and start a new football league. Regarding, "Meaning form another party..." I feel like subconsciously you know what they are doing is not fair... and that is why you think people should be starting another party. Regarding, "What use are DNC rules if their candidate loses?" Like for example if their candidate loses to an orange clown after they did everything they possible could to prop up their establishment shill? Like superdelegates were suppose to make sure "unelectable" candidates don't get the nomination but instead they ensured the unelectable candidate was the nominee? The fact of the matter is that unfair DNC rules is actually helping their candidates lose. The DNC doesn't care about that thou. You are misunderstanding the purpose of their rules. It isn't about wining. It is about maintaining the status quo. Regarding, "The problem is the public not the DNC" You say you aren't an idiot but you demonstrate that you are. Regarding, "And yet it was Trump vs Clinton. Is that a coincidence?" No its not. The party put their thumb on the scale from the start. Sometimes by using the rules unfairly, like when about 500 superdelegates came out to support Hillary before a single peasant was allowed to vote. Like when the election was called on a day NOBODY voted. And sometimes by just blatantly ignoring their own rules. Why do you think DWS was forced to step down? Keep polishing that turd. Keep pretending it is "fair." And I'm going to keep calling you an idiot.
    1
  10159. Ok buddy. If you are incapable of addressing the substantive issues I mention because you are too big of a snowflake to handle how I mention them that is your problem. I can't say I'm surprised. You know there was a third option... just fucking ignore my insults and address the issues. I guess you don't understand that was a choice because of (insert insult here).
    1
  10160. Nah. He still has the big house. His wife took the "poor house" in the divorce. She is the one you really need to feel sorry for. She went from being married to the richest man in the world to only being worth billions. I can't imagine losing all that wealth. I don't know how she stays so strong. Seriously thou... fuck them both.
    1
  10161.  @joehilner4830  They are never going to stop being a POS but at least no one takes them seriously anymore.
    1
  10162. You are talking about a war criminal who had an official in a foreign government we don't have a declaration of war with assassinated. Peace prize. LMFAO. Just as worthless as Obamas.
    1
  10163. "idiots and uninformed" Hardly. But it looks that way because of how corrupt they are.
    1
  10164. Biden is a POS and his brain is melting. Think you might be biased much?
    1
  10165.  @TheManOnTheRail  Regarding, "Sure hope you get something sorted out." So do I. That said I have zero hope for the future of this country. I just hope we don't take the whole world with us when we crumble. Regarding, "We have the NHS. It's not perfect but its still better than brilliant." I know it has it's problems but I'd happily trade our system in for yours. Regarding, "Good luck." Thanks. We need it.
    1
  10166. If it were really about making people healthy and wasn't about making money then they would give the people universal health care.
    1
  10167.  @dgc4059  Regarding, "Europe doesn't rely on the US" Cool. Then they don't need our troops and you can shut up and stop making everyone dumber. I'm done wasting my time on your drivel.
    1
  10168.  @dgc4059  That has to be one of the dumbest posts I've ever read and that is really saying something.
    1
  10169. Kyle was in the wrong. He wasn't being smeared. People had LEGIT problems with him based on FACTS. What apples to oranges bullshit. It's just another thing kyle was wrong about.
    1
  10170. I guess maybe you and kyle think that jimmy should have displayed no integrity the way kyle as he lies for ana. That he thinks jimmy should have lied for him. What nonsense. Kyle was going around using the n word more than rappers and some people didn't like it. They weren't lying about kyle.
    1
  10171. There are already all sorts of 3rd parties.
    1
  10172.  @OutSideTheBoxFormat  That's not an argument.
    1
  10173.  @tankie9997  "For instance the USSR banned religion publicly" An action like this is, by it's nature, right wing authoritarianism. "does that make the USSR right wing?" When it comes to that specific issue. Yes. It clearly does make them right wing. "All these issues..." I'm not talking about all issues. I'm talking about one specific issue. And if you take a certain position on that specific topic then you are taking the right wing position and are only wrongfully called left wing when it comes to that. Hypothetically they could be "left wing" on everything else but more likely they are right wing when it comes to all the other stuff as well. But again, we aren't talking about all that other stuff. We are talking about one specific topic.
    1
  10174.  @tankie9997  Regarding, "you've redefined left wing to mean non authoritarian" More like I'm pointing out that authoritarian is right wing by definition. The problem with your framing is that you want to act like the "left/right" labels are given before committing actions. For example I consider myself a "progressive" and "leftist." But those labels become meaningless if my actions are that of a "conservative" and "righty." Joe Biden has said BS in the past like he is the "most progressive." That doesn't mean he's actually on the left. Being on the left is determined by your actions regardless of how you want to label yourself. My point being that no matter how much you want to act like a "leftist" can be "pro-censorship" they cannot. At least not in the context of which you are speaking. Being pro censorship and being authoritarian are innately right wing. Those are the types of things that actually determine if you are on the left or the right. Actions speak louder than words.
    1
  10175.  @OutSideTheBoxFormat  To be clear there are plenty of people who PRETEND to be on the left who support censorship. But actions speak louder than words.
    1
  10176.  @OutSideTheBoxFormat  At least you are trying to make an argument even if it's terrible. Good for you.
    1
  10177.  @OutSideTheBoxFormat  "Waiting for those examples for your claim." All of them is an answer to your question.
    1
  10178.  @mathurex211  "what do you call censorship of right-wing voices? Right-wing?" Yes. It's right wing. "You have to admit you're being hyperbolic and flagrantly biased with your definitions." I'm not. "left" and "right" are not how you feel about yourself. It's where you fall on the spectrum. Censorship is on the right and freedom of speech is on the left. It's not arbitrary.
    1
  10179.  @mathurex211  Are you worried that you are a "leftist" on some things? Don't be.
    1
  10180.  @mathurex211  Regarding, "Clarify your definitions of left-wing and right-wing." It depends on the topic. If the topic is war and peace then peace is the left and war is the right. "Are you trying to pose that left-wing governments that engage in censorship are engaging in right-wing ideology?" Pretty much. I'm saying that governments who engage in censorship are clearly engaging in right-wing ideology on that topic. And that you are wrongfully calling them "left-wing." " left-wing governments." A truly left wing government would support peace, protecting the environment, universal health care, a living wage, and the like. Those are "left wing" positions.
    1
  10181.  @mathurex211  "Also define authoritarianism. And define objectivism while you're at it." Open a dictionary. Authoritarianism, "the enforcement or advocacy of strict obedience to authority at the expense of personal freedom" That's right wing.
    1
  10182.  @mathurex211  "Do you believe left-wing governments can promote capitalism?" No. Capitalism is the right. Socialism is the left. At least when this is the topic economic theory. If you are capitalist you are not "left-wing." You are right wing.
    1
  10183.  @mathurex211  "Do you believe the Soviet Union was headed by a right-wing government?" Yes.
    1
  10184.  @mathurex211  Regarding, "the soviet Uniom was a socialist state." It's really not. Don't be fooled by a label and name. "You just said socialism was the left." The soviet union did not have anything that resembles true socialism. It was a bastardized version at best.
    1
  10185.  @mathurex211  "thus leftwing, but socially conservative?" Of course people can be different things on different topics. Of course I could be "left wing" because I'm a socialist when the topic is economic theory. And I could be "right wing" on a completely different topic. Nobody is just one thing or the other. But they are just one thing or the other on INDIVIDUAL topics. Which is again what I'm addressing. If the topic is say, freedom of speech versus censorship well there is a clear side that is the left side and the other side is the right side. And I do concede there is a "spectrum" on the topic. But not a very important one. For example when the topic is yelling "fire" in a crowded theater I'm against it. Still I think I can only be said to be on the "left" for the topic. I'm kinda mad I got into this conversation. "left versus right" is not the important conversation. The important conversation is where do you stand on individual topics. EVERYONE should be for free speech. NOONE should be for censorship. The rest is really just unimportant details and I'm honestly bored of this conversation.
    1
  10186.  @mathurex211  "Don't you see you're running away." If that's what you choose to think I don't care. In reality I don't have unlimited time and energy that I feel like using to address your wall of text or anything else at this point. I've said what I want to say. Get it or don't. I don't care anymore.
    1
  10187.  @tankie9997  "I'll leave it there." I should have done that a long time ago myself.
    1
  10188. That is the type of statement that requires evidence otherwise you are a douche.
    1
  10189. Even yang's supporters know he has no chance in 2020.
    1
  10190.  @brucelee8926  You only have one primary vote. Bernie is the one who deserves it and he is the only one of the two with a chance at the nomination.
    1
  10191.  @peperlover99  Capitalism is just fine for most things as long as it's regulated. Don't conflate that with capitalism run amok... which is what we currently have.
    1
  10192.  tiglath pileser  For some reason I don't find your name calling without any substance whatsoever very compelling. Go figure. And I didn't say a word about socialism which makes comment of, "drop your stupid anti socialism" remarkably stupid.
    1
  10193.  tiglath pileser  Regarding, "you're a liberal" Idiots love making assumptions because it's easier to address their unfounded assumptions rather than the words actually being said. Regarding, "you're automatically anti socialist." That must be why I'm one of the fiercest advocates of universal healthcare huh? Regarding, "Second..." Holy shit. Are you really about to try and address the substance of what I said? Wow. It only took you a shit ton of insults, moronic assumptions, and me pointing out the complete void of any substance before this to get here when this is where any intelligent person would have started. Regarding, "capitalism ie exploitation of labour" That's what regulation is for. To prevent this. To ensure safe working conditions, a fair wage, a right to unionize, and more. That said I'm way done giving a shit what you think and it's too bad because we likely see eye to eye on many things. But you are cunt and clearly a total dipshit in many regards. Good luck with that and go fuck yourself.
    1
  10194.  k halliday  Nothing that you said changes the fact that what the OP posted was true. I love Bernie. But he isn't perfect, he fucked up, and now he is selling the same bullshit his brand is suppose to be against.
    1
  10195.  k halliday  That's what I love about true progressives. We don't cover for our team when they fuck up. If you want to make excuses for your guys go be a partisan hack on every other team.... they welcome that shit.
    1
  10196.  babajohn100  Regarding, "WE did our part." Meh. Exit polling indicates widespread election fraud, again. We can do more, as can Bernie. None of us are perfect. Regarding, "HE is the one who decided to bow out early in the game" I'm not saying I agree with his decision because I'm not sure I do, that said I think the context is important. There was a pandemic going on. After he "lost" on super Tuesday, and "lost" important contests after and it looked as though biden was inevitable. It's tough to ask people to go out and risk their health when that is the case. It was also before Tara Reade was decided to be covered by the corporate media who conveniently buried the story until after Bernie dropped out. There are certainly things to be mad at Bernie about, but ultimately I think he is just an imperfect person who is trying to do the right thing while always being put in really tough situations. It's our job to continue the movement. Sad we don't have a clear leader going forward anymore. Bernie can walk with us but we need a new champion by 2024.
    1
  10197.  @joesecord3066  Regarding, " I doubt she dodged because she didn't have an answer." Really? So what answer to the question do you think she had that she didn't bother to express instead of the tangent she went on? Regarding, "it's important for her to distinguish herself from the other candidates" Agreed. And instead she decided to dodge and deflect the question given to her. It made her look exactly like every other piece of shit politician we have. Regarding, "foreign policy is something she has over all of them." Cool. No need for balance then. No need to demonstrate well rounded qualifications then. Jesus fuck. Would this have been a logical argument for Rudy "9/11" Guliani? He was mayor of NY on 9/11 yeah know. So he should probably mention it every chance he gets even when being asked about things that have nothing to do with it. Regarding, "it was more likely done as a strategy rather than actually dodging a question." It was a loaded, bullshit, terrible question for which there is no really good answer. Which is why she should have said that... rather than deflecting and dodging. Even a generic politician answer of "I'm willing to do whatever possible when presented with legitimate ways to even the gender pay gap" and "of course men and women need to be paid the same for equal work" would be far superior to what she did.
    1
  10198.  @joesecord3066  Regarding, " Do you actually think Tulsi is clueless about women's issues in the workplace?" No. That's why I don't say this. I do say she didn't have a great answer to the question... and you know what... NEITHER DO I. But that doesn't mean I think I'm clueless about women's issues in the workplace either even thou I likely have much less of an idea as a man. Regarding, "I can admit that it was a bad answer and I like Tulsi." I too like Tulsi. And you admitting that it was a bad answer is far more than can be said of most of her fans. And as a fan of hers I'm saddened by the cult mentality I think they are demonstrating. Regarding, "I don't think you're giving a fair take on her motives for dodging." Ok. I think you are wrong. Their is no rational reason to think that she had a good answer, and that she thought she had a good answer, but instead said, fuck it, I'm going to talk about shit unrelated to the question.
    1
  10199. Partly because he hasn't yet I'd guess.
    1
  10200. Meh. To me it is mostly just speculation at this point. In theory I think it is a good thing but in practice I expect Trump is going to fuck it up. Only time will tell for sure. As of now I don't think there is a lot to say other than guesswork and I personally prefer facts.
    1
  10201. As do I. I believe in diplomacy and talking to people but if I were a betting man, and I am betting man, I'd bet Trump fucks it up. Both Trump and Kim are all about dick measuring contests and that is what I see this turning into. Hopefully I'm wrong... it's only guesswork at this point. I wouldn't be at all surprised if they don't even meet.
    1
  10202. Kyle betrays jimmy then resigns from TYT but it's too late all his credibility is gone. Nice news network fraud.
    1
  10203. Party, party, party, party, party, party, party!
    1
  10204. I don't know. I do know that Canadians pay half as much per person for their system than Americans. I do know that they don't leave millions uninsured and that medical bankruptcy in their country isn't a thing. I do know their infant mortality rate is superior to that of the US and their life expectancy rate is superior to the US.
    1
  10205. This channel looks at everything as left versus right when they should be looking at it as elite versus peasants.
    1
  10206. Nina and biden are not the left nor do they represent the left. They are elite and they represent the elite.
    1
  10207. This channel ironically feeds the division that the elite use to pit the "left" peasants against the "right" peasants instead of picking up their pitchforks to fight the elite like they should.
    1
  10208. The world is so insane that people are ok advocating for the genocide of people in gaza.
    1
  10209. Canada pays half as much per person for their system, that doesn't leave millions uninsured, where medical bankruptcy isn't a thing, whose results are better.
    1
  10210.  @Andy_Capp39  Your question is funny because if the government did m4a that would be the government doing something good. I also wonder why you don't spend a little more time criticizing the current for profit health care system that currently has you bent over. I would think that would have your attention more than your fears.
    1
  10211.  @Andy_Capp39  Furthermore if you think that canada is doing what is best for their people when it comes to health care (they certainly are compared to the US) then it shouldn't be so hard to imagine that the US government is capable of doing the same.
    1
  10212. More and more he stinks of sellout. He was straight up lying on Warrens behalf about shit that was said to him on his own show. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=itiacoqgdQI&t=749s
    1
  10213. One of them has a history of lying for political gain. One was a republican while the other was a progressive. One can be trusted as commander in chief while the other voted to give a person they call "unhinged" even more money for bombs than the orange clown wanted. One loves dirty money until she calculates it's not in their best interests. The idea that it doesn't matter between those two people is asinine.
    1
  10214. People who write "change my mind" have minds that can't be changed on the topic they are addressing. Change my mind.
    1
  10215. I will never understand anyone who cares more about a party label than anything else.
    1
  10216. Hello regarding, "You don't see a difference between the major parties and third parties?" Yes. Of course I do. I think you are misunderstanding my point if you think I was suggesting otherwise. Regarding, "It's where the money comes from." Bernie Sanders isn't all of a sudden going to be raising his money in totally different place depending on where he would run. Regarding, "the Democratic Party refused to fix itself" The party is a dumpster fire. They are not going to all of a sudden change unless they are forced to change. Sanders could force them to change but only if he wins as a democrat. I think you would be wise to help him. Regarding, "They seem to be actively working against change." Yup. I'm not claiming otherwise. Regarding, "I'm not giving any support to that party," I guess we think of things very differently. When I vote I don't consider myself to be supporting the party of the candidate I'm voting for.... I'm supporting that person. I care about supporting good people and honestly don't care what party label is on them because the person is forever more important than a party label. That is my point. I love Bernie Sanders. I support him. I don't care if he wants to call himself a dem, green, independent, republican, martian, or other. That isn't what is important to me and don't think that should be important to anyone.
    1
  10217. Hello regarding, "the Democratic Party is corrupted." The "democratic" party is sucks. I referred to them as a dumpster fire. You don't need to tell me the ways the party sucks. I know they do. Again, that isn't the point. Regarding, "You say that it hasn't affected Bernie's integrity" I didn't say that but now that you mention, yes, I do believe that to be true. Regarding, "the way he pushes the Russiagate narrative" I think this BS is being completely overblown. I don't think this is, at an important issue and at all an important issue to him. He doesn't call for war with Russia. He has merely said that the activities surrounding their actions be investigated. I consider that to be very reasonable. I do think they fucked with us. I think it is only logical to think they did. They are being accused of the exact same shit David Brock and correct the record did so I don't think it is that unreasonable to think they did. I also think the US fucks with everyone else so I'm not going to act like them fucking with us would be a great surprise. And just because I think they did and I think it should be investigated I hope that doesn't mean people think I want war with Russia. I don't. Not in the least. But again I think you are missing my point. My points is that if you think Bernie has been corrupted and if you think Bernie talks about Russia too much then DON'T FUCKING SUPPORT HIM. Period. Don't support him if he runs as a Green or Independent. Stop acting like the label is more important than the person. Regarding, "The Democratic Party..." Again, more shit about why the party is a dumpster fire. It seems clear to me that you are missing my point. Yes the party sucks. We don't disagree on this. Regarding, "The only way that they are going to be forced to change..." and "he will not be allowed to win the 2020 primaries." So it seems pretty clear that you think and want them to change. I am pretty sure that your do nothing til they shape up approach is not good personally. And even if I thought it was good strategy (and I don't) I personally am not willing to wait. This country needs change right fucking now. Sanders will be allowed run in the 2020 primaries. I'm not going to pretend the game isn't going to be rigged. It is. Which is all the more reason to try and help in my opinion. I also think voting in the primary is one way that you can force the party to change. If you want them to be progressive then vote in it for the most progressive candidate you can find. And if they succeed in forcing a corporate shill into the general you don't owe them jack shit and are right to vote for anyone else. Regarding, "Bernie is allowed to win the primaries, I might be willing to support him at that point" It would really be nice if you would support him before that because he isn't likely to get to that point without some help. If you want progressive democrats then fight for it. Don't just bemoan how much they suck. And I'm not saying you should be doing so blindly. Do it if you believe in him. If you don't then don't. But don't act like the party label attached to him is more important than the man himself. It isn't.
    1
  10218. Piers really is but norman saved this clip.
    1
  10219.  @Ben-mz8uc  no shame no you!
    1
  10220.  @Ben-mz8uc  I would never be in or support that apartheid state.
    1
  10221.  @Ben-mz8uc  "They don't want people like you" Yeah... you support an apartheid ethnostate in the 21st century.
    1
  10222. The South Park episode with the KFC comes to mind and Cartman bitching about getting gravy that isn't pure KFC.
    1
  10223. All but Sanders.
    1
  10224.  @thegreatpotenza3034  "tyrant" Both of your replies are being shadowbanned. It really proves your point.
    1
  10225.  @thegreatpotenza3034  "Left or right." You are looking at it from the wrong lens. The war that matters isn't between the left and right, it's between the elite and peasants. And governments tend to always represent the elite.
    1
  10226.  @jamesmorrow1646  Imagine calling a small riot a "coup." Just stop.
    1
  10227. Normally I'd agree but in this case I don't rule out him just being crazy.
    1
  10228.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  "you're the insufferable one" But sam isn't? While he's pro censorship? And you aren't? With your name? As you defend sam?
    1
  10229.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  "He's not pro censorship" He literally called for joe rogan to be censored. "you're spewing talking points" I'm not giving "talking points," I'm telling the truth. Why aren't you? "spreading lies only proves you folks are doing the wrong things" LMFAO I agree that you spreading lies does not speak well of you.
    1
  10230.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  Maybe check out the video titled, "sam seder calls for joe rogan to be censored on msnbc." I won't tell you what it's about. I don't want to spoil the ending.
    1
  10231.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  "1 video" That's how it works. It only takes on video of sam advocating for censorship for sam to be pro censorship. "Here's how data works" Heres how data actually works... let's say you murdered someone... all the time you spent not murdering people doesn't really matter in deciding if you are a murder or not. "You folks have no critical thinking skills at all." I can't tell you how funny this is. Thanks from the bottom of my heart.
    1
  10232.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  "1 video" Thanks for conceding that in that video sam was advocating for censorship.
    1
  10233.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  "oe Rogan Doesn’t Realize How In Over His Head He Really Is" So people that are "in over their head" get to be censored? Just admit you are pro censorship and maybe change your name.
    1
  10234.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  "he called for Rogan to be held responsible" He called for rogan to be CENSORED. LMFAO Just admit you are for censorship.
    1
  10235.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  "held responsible" How did he think joe should be "held responsible?" This is rhetorical. We all know he was calling for censorship.
    1
  10236.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  "no point in this since you're reporting my posts like every other bad faither" There is no point in talking to you but I'm going to expose you and sam anyway for people that aren't bad faith actors such as yourself.
    1
  10237.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  Sam called for joe rogan to be censored. Don't take my word for it people... look into it yourself.
    1
  10238.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  "since you're reporting my posts" What an insane thing for you to lie about.
    1
  10239.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  You: "telling someone to search a video title from your pet cat show as proof of something is genuinely pathetic stuff" You two seconds without the self awareness to really your hypocrisy: ""Joe Rogan Doesn’t Realize How In Over His Head He Really Is" Watch that and stop cherry picking."
    1
  10240.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  But I'm the one acting in bad faith? LMFAO Projection much?
    1
  10241.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  Your handle is "f youtubecensorship" but you don't care when sam wants joe rogan censored but I'm the bad faith actor? Your BS is transparent.
    1
  10242.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  You don't care about sam wanting joe rogan censored with that handle and I'm the one acting in bad faith?
    1
  10243.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  Doesn't your BS need to be at least a little bit believable?
    1
  10244. I'm not sure. Him not voting is no different than if he voted no. The only thing that matters is the number of yes votes something like this gets. The number of no votes is completely irrelevant.
    1
  10245. Sounds like someone needs a nap.
    1
  10246. hoodie regarding, "This is BAD because she is gambling on winning a bigger, more influential position, thru misleading the public." This is not an unreasonable statement by any means but I still think it is a net win for the public. The establishment was going to have their shill and they were going to try to win by misleading the public regardless of this. But this at least can hopefully get people talking about what is the overarching problem with our political system today... money in politics. Anything and everything that draws attention to this issue, anything and everything that forces the corporate media to talk about it is a good thing. When establishment shills are being forced to admit being bribed isn't a good thing that is good even if they are just pandering. Like I said I'm not going to vote for her but I'm glad she is doing this. I see your point but I ultimately I disagree and think it is a net win. I think the same about her supporting Bernie's medicare for all. I didn't believe her, I thought she was pandering, but again I was happy she was doing it even if I am convinced she was doing it for all the wrong reasons.
    1
  10247. SrShenanigans regarding, "so is every other politician" I understand why you say this but I don't like this statement because it implies all politicians are essentially equal and they most definitely are not.
    1
  10248. James the Green party is my backup plan if the dems successfully push another corporate tool through. Plan A is Sanders or another true progressive as a dem.
    1
  10249. Population size isn't what matters because a large population also means more people to pay for it. What matters is how much it costs per person. Canada pays about half as much per person for health care compared to the US. We can't afford not to do it.
    1
  10250. I guess they don't want to hear public opinion when trump speaks as well because they do the same thing there.
    1
  10251. And why exactly would it bankrupt the richest country in the history of the world when that doesn't seem to happen to poorer countries? Oh... and nevermind that it would cost significantly less then what we are currently paying for health care.
    1
  10252. He absolutely spoke out against trump being censored. Do you just have no clue what you are talking about or are you intentionally gaslighting people? "If you were honest." He is honest. Why aren't you?
    1
  10253. Jimmy even spoke out when they were trying to censor alex jones and he spat on alex before that.
    1
  10254. Superdelegates are a fucking joke but in all honesty if I were making a list of my problems with the party they wouldn't even make the top 10.
    1
  10255. Wishful thinking isn't reality.
    1
  10256. Yeah. It's obviously because he lives in a country where he is mostly surrounded by christians and not muslims. It's the same reason why Zeus worshipers aren't the first thing that comes to his mind. Good luck with your persecution complex.
    1
  10257. Stephen Hawking's corpse is smarter than you.
    1
  10258. What do orange balls taste like?
    1
  10259. You bring down the average intelligence of the world by over a point.
    1
  10260. You are why Trump loves the uneducated. Too bad you aren't a lot smarter. Then you would be able to realize how dumb you are.
    1
  10261. Cute dog in your picture. And I'm sure they are smarter than you.
    1
  10262.  @christopherjohnson4218  Ignore the troll.
    1
  10263. Chris Hayes and MSNBC are complicit in what is happening much like biden is. They should all share a jail cell.
    1
  10264. Your question could only be dumber if you didn't use a question mark for it. Oh wait, never mind.
    1
  10265.  @lordnemesisthesperg  Regarding, "I'm not a Republican I was for Bernie" I don't care. Regarding, "I'm not blind" Agree to disagree. You don't seem to see that there is no substantive difference between republicans and corporate dems. You are acting like one is uniquely different. It's not.
    1
  10266.  @lordnemesisthesperg  Regarding, "This tare it down crap is insane." What would be more insane would be that there would be no consequences of repeated police murders. Eventually people get pissed and shit happens. Regarding, "I know hundreds of people who have lost their jobs and mow struggling and not one who has died from getting covid." I don't care. This has nothing to do with your idiotic comments that imply that republicans aren't part of the problem. That's what I care about. Stop doing it. It's flat earth level stupid.
    1
  10267.  @lordnemesisthesperg  Regarding, "this shit they're doing has nothing to do with murder" I get it. You are stupid as fuck. No need to keep opening your trap and proving it.
    1
  10268. Are you projecting? Not once did he mention a g-string. That's you doing that.
    1
  10269. So you attack jimmy? Lame.
    1
  10270.  @anubis8491  "attacking tyt does nothing" Exposing frauds is never a bad thing.
    1
  10271. I'm almost ready to root for climate change and human extinction at this point.
    1
  10272. My thumbs down on this video is for ryan grimm and andrew yang.
    1
  10273.  @elingrome5853  No lie. A sane person would think it a warning sign and red flag. A cultist would think it's a good thing like the OP does.
    1
  10274. Did I you pathetic douche? Because ultimately there is a difference to be made between people who have different views but are honest actors and pieces of shit like you and crip. I'd elaborate but there is no point. You don't care what I or anyone on the left thinks either so let's not pretend you do.
    1
  10275. Regarding, "if anything you are the one trolling my comments" I absolutely am. But that just means I'm being honest about what I'm doing. Unlike you.
    1
  10276. Regarding, "Why do you think I subscribe to tyt, kyle and david pakman?" Because you are obviously a troll. Only a troll or total fucking moron wouldn't know the answer to their own retarded ass question before asking it.
    1
  10277. Sonny regarding, "Just think about it what kind of pathetic life do you have" I'm here because Kyle does a better job informing than corporate media. I'm here because I agree with what is being said. That said there is value in knowing and following the other side. But to spend literally all your time at the other side saying stupid fucking shit like this fucking moron can be explained in three ways... 1 they are a troll 2 they are being paid or 3 they are fucking insane. And you would be correct to say the same about me if I spent all my time at alex jones and the like.
    1
  10278. Regarding, "what do you mean “spend all my time”" I mean more time then me you fucking moron... and I spend a lot of time here. Arguably too much.
    1
  10279. Mexican Trump fan... I feel like I'm at a troll convention. It's the who's who of moronic trolls all in one place. I need to go shower from this. Good luck being total fucking idiots together.
    1
  10280. I don't need policies, I'm not Trump. That's even better. Sincerely, Joe Biden.
    1
  10281. Regarding, " so stop fucking yelling about it already you freaking brats." Do the world a favor and realize what a hypocrite you are.
    1
  10282. Oh and everything else you said was dumb as fuck.
    1
  10283. Sam is worse because sam is a POS that fools you.
    1
  10284.  @ursamagickmt672  She is only where she is because people believed she would fight for m4a. If the only thing she cared about is her career than she is doing herself a disservice. You sound like you used to work for hillary's CTR with your BS.
    1
  10285. Maceo shouldn't you be a Klan rally?
    1
  10286. Regarding, "one of the most progressive Senators in the country." Is this suppose to impress me? Have you met the senate?
    1
  10287. McConnell makes me hate turtles like Trump makes me hate orange people.
    1
  10288. When someone show you who they are believe them the first time. maya angelou
    1
  10289.  @lelandgrover9036  He wasn't even honest in this video. Like making excuses for not telling jimmy ahead of time he was being replaced by cenk's nephew. Someone else here made the comment but I'm going to steal the point... in this video kyle essentially tried to excuse standing up a women and not telling her he was going on a date with her because he was too busy standing her up. So it's not his fault he couldn't tell jimmy he wasn't going to be there for their date. There is literally zero honesty in anyone that tries to pull some shit like that in an "apology."
    1
  10290.  @lelandgrover9036  I've been a huge fan of his for a long time. He's dead to me. I've followed lots of terrible people in the past. I used to like keith olberman, I used to like rachel maddow, I used to like TYT, I used to like nomiki konst. And every time they showed me who they were enough for me to pull the cord and cut them loose it's never been a bad call. I've never regretted it later because ultimately they are showing you who they are. It's not going to change. I'm an atheist but I like the serenity prayer's message for things like this even though it sucks because like I said I was a big fan.
    1
  10291. She's going to run against sanders in 2024 as well according to you?
    1
  10292. Long story short: monopolies are bad.
    1
  10293.  @Tiredofthecensorship189  Regarding, "So how have I lied?" You are the guy who was lying on behalf of biden right? And telling people he didn't promise 2k checks? That was obviously BS.
    1
  10294.  @janinedaniell1967  Regarding, "WTF is the lie about 2000 dollar cheques??? Biden promised 2k checks but it's now 1400 checks.
    1
  10295.  @Tiredofthecensorship189  Regarding, "He said he wanted 2k in Americans hands" He promised 2k checks would go out. He is a liar. Stop defending lies and liars.
    1
  10296.  @energybeacon4397  Regarding, "I don't know what you're talking about" In the age of information ignorance is a choice. Regarding, "he has already mentioned the $2K checks." When and where? Certainly it's the type of thing that would necessitate it's own video right? So where is it?
    1
  10297.  @MercenaryTau  "I posted the link nearly an hour ago" I have no clue WTF you are talking about and it really doesn't bother me.
    1
  10298.  @MercenaryTau  Regarding, "I posted the link nearly an hour ago. In the age of information ignorance is a choice." LMFAO Yup. I'm ignorant of what you are talking about. I don't even know what you are suppose to have linked for fucks sake.
    1
  10299.  @MercenaryTau  Was that link suppose to be in this thread? Because "I posted the link nearly an hour ago. In the age of information ignorance is a choice." Is the ONLY comment you have here.
    1
  10300.  @MercenaryTau  Well done. Now you have actually given me a link. And I do stand corrected that david has not done any videos about this debacle. But as I watch this I can only think that he is being FAR, FAR too nice to biden in that video. David shouldn't have trouble calling him a liar in that video and is instead trying to rationalize and excuse his actions. I mean he is saying that people should get more money but he stops short of calling biden a liar when he was CLEARLY lying. FYI I'm watching that video as I write this but those are my sentiments as I listen. I have as much uses for excuses for biden as I did for trump.
    1
  10301.  @mobus1603  Regarding, "ou'd criticize him for that, too" Except biden isn't responsible for both checks. The 600 dollar check that you want to give him credit for he has nothing to do with. He promised 2K checks. He is a liar and you are a bootlicker.
    1
  10302.  @Tiredofthecensorship189  "he cant do basic math." 1400 =/= 2K You are a liar, as is biden.
    1
  10303.  @tugger  Regarding, "600+1400" Why does biden get credit for things the orange clown did?
    1
  10304.  @MercenaryTau  Regarding, "original link didn’t show" This is a problem that happens all too often. I did see the video. David never calls biden a liar when he was clearly lying. It's pretty hacky.
    1
  10305.  @mobus1603  Regarding, "I don't even like Biden." Then why are you lying for him bootlicker?
    1
  10306.  @noble61483  Regarding, "I know your just trolling people" Actions speak louder than meaningless words. This goes for you as it does biden. If you actually think I'm trolling why would you address me the way you have with idiotic nonsense like, "get over it" just because I have the audacity to call out POS politicians when they are lying. I'm not trolling. I just take issue with lying politicians as everyone should.
    1
  10307.  @FireRupee  Regarding, "He's not lying for Biden." I have no idea who you are even referring to at this point. There are many people lying for biden. Regarding, "Different people have different expectations sometimes." I accept this type of "logic" to defend biden supporters as much as I accept it to defend trump supporters. I don't.
    1
  10308.  @perthdude21  Regarding, "David Doel has covered Biden's refusal to pass $2k checks." I just watched the video. I do stand corrected in that he did cover it as for his coverage... Regarding, "He's quite critical of Biden for only going for $1.4k." And yet he stopped short of calling him a liar when biden was clearly lying. That's behavior I'd expect from corporate media... not david.
    1
  10309.  @janinedaniell1967  Regarding, " Is this not $1400 ion top of the $600 stimulus cheque already approved?" Why don't we include the other payment we got months ago since we are just figuring out ways to give the people less than what biden promised? Regarding, "That seems logicaal to me." You may as well tattoo partisan hack on your forehead. You wouldn't think this crap were logical if trump were trying to do the same bullshit.
    1
  10310.  @chrisofstars  Regarding, "Why are people like you the way you are?" I care when politicians are lying to me. Why are you the way you are? And when I say that I mean why are you trying to excuse the lies of your supreme leader the same way trump supporters do for their clown?
    1
  10311.  @chrisofstars  Regarding, "You're very defensive to attack me without knowing nothing about me." I know that if I were ever to ask someone, "Why are people like you the way you are?" it woudn't be said in a positive light? I feel like the only thing I've really done in this thread is take issue with biden lying about 2k checks. So I can only assume that that is why you are addressing me and doing it the way you are. Regarding, "Suspicious.." What an apt description of your comments. If you want me to know something about yourself maybe do that. Or tell me why you are perplexed that I don't like it polticians lie because that's all you really know about me. If you have something to say, say it.
    1
  10312.  @chrisofstars  Regarding, "Don't worry about it." This works for me. Peace.
    1
  10313.  @tailswinsmore5054  Regarding, "alternative facts arnt lies." Are you really saying this to justify lies by biden? If so it's very trump supporter of you.
    1
  10314.  @88marome  Regarding, "So Biden didn't lie." How aren't you a trump supporter?
    1
  10315.  @tailswinsmore5054  Regarding, "I just stated it wasn't a lie" Which is a lie. Regarding, " it's an alternative view point." LMFAO How aren't you a trump supporter with this type of "logic?" Regarding, "You're a liar for calling me a liar." LMFAO You are impossible to take seriously.
    1
  10316.  @haleyclay7008  "Georgia, there's no one in America with more power to make that happen than you, the citizens of Atlanta, the citizens of Georgia and that's not an exaggeration. That's literally true," Biden said. "If you send Jon and the reverend to Washington, those $2,000 checks will go out the door, restoring hope and decency and honor for so many people who are struggling right now." That is biden lying. Don't be a liar and bootlicker for him.
    1
  10317.  @rain73ful  Regarding, "That's no fault of Biden's." Of course it's his fault he is a liar. Regarding, "He's trying to work with the Congress he has." He got the government he said he needed to give out 2k checks. But he lied. Regarding, "At least give the guy a couple of months to govern before you tear him down!" I guess I should have given trump some time to conclude he was a clown when he was POTUS as well. I didn't because I know exactly what I'm getting. Biden has a lifetime history of being terrible. I'd be a fool to expect anything different now.
    1
  10318.  @haleyclay7008  Regarding, "You obviously believe one thing and I believe facts" This is really funny all things considered. I gave you a direct quote from biden where he lies about and promises 2k checks. You just ignore it and spout nonsense like this. You are a clown. As is your king.
    1
  10319.  @haleyclay7008  "those $2,000 checks will go out the door," That's biden lying. No amount of BS you say changes that fact.
    1
  10320.  @rain73ful  Regarding, "The last time I checked, 600 and 1,400 equal $2,000." Yup. And all you need to do to do this math is ignore the fact that biden had nothing to do with the 600 check you are giving him credit for and ignoring the fact that biden promised a single 2k check after his team got elected. Regarding, "then he will have kept his promise" He promised passing 2k checks for the people. 1400 is not 2k. Stop defending his lies. Regarding, "which would make you wrong about him!" LMFAO. He is already proving me correct by lying. He promised 2k checks. It was a lie.
    1
  10321.  @dont90know  Regarding, "It only makes sense that they would bump it up to 2000 instead of sending out another 2000." I swear morons like you want to lose to republicans next go around.
    1
  10322.  @haleyclay7008  Regarding, "I have to protect my energy" Whatever you got to tell yourself to ignore the lie biden told. Just ignore it and pretend he didn't promise 2k checks. Regarding, "It’s not that big of a deal to me" But you thought you would go out here and defend biden's lies. LMFAO
    1
  10323.  @haleyclay7008  Just walk away and pretend he never said, "those $2,000 checks will go out the door." Save that energy for the next time you try and gaslight everyone and spread lies.
    1
  10324.  @dont90know  Regarding, "sure I'm the moron" Well we agree on this. Regarding, "I can only imagine how angry you must constantly be about everything." Perpetual war, corrupt politicians, income inequality, mass incarceration, kids in cages, deportations, millions without insurance, medical bankruptcy, and more. Yup. I'm pretty much furious when I talk about anything relating to politics. Why doesn't stuff like this make your blood boil? Either 1) you don't really understand the world in which you live or 2) you lack human empathy or 3) you are paid well enough to not care.
    1
  10325.  @dont90know  And that long list of problems that piss me off includes lots of things joe biden is directly responsible for... especially mass incarceration and war.
    1
  10326.  @haleyclay7008  Regarding, " dude like I said you going this hard for what?" I appreciate your lying for biden as much as I appreciated trump supporters who lied for him. I don't. It shows. It shouldn't be too hard to understand where I'm coming from. Why are you lying for biden? Why is that so important to you that that is how you want to spend your time right now? He promised 2k checks but it was a lie. Why do you think that is worth spending your time to defend? I gave you a direct quote where biden promises 2k checks and you just ignore it. Sorry not sorry if I find BS like that infuriating. Regarding, "Like I said before have a nice day and relax a bit." I don't care.
    1
  10327.  @haleyclay7008  Regarding, "he was trying to be combative" Yes. I was trying to challenge you and your beliefs. Why is that such a problem? Do you just want to live in a bubble? Regarding, "I don’t know that man and he doesn’t know me" What you are saying says something about you. You know I can be a real condescending dick right? It's ok. You can admit. You can even call me out for it if you want. I'll happily admit that and concede that all you want. But that has nothing to do with the points being made. Regarding, "He sounds like he is a bit older than me so I didn’t want to be rude." There is dirt that is younger than me but I'd clearly be a hypocrite if I cared if you wanted to be rude. I respect that you don't. I don't respect that you just ignored the points I was trying to make. Regarding, " Also if I see that the conversation isn’t going anywhere productive I usually end it as well." While I agree that our conversation wasn't looking to be too constructive it would still be nice if you would take the time answering the questions I've given you the same way I've answered every single question you and everyone else has asked of me even if I was mean while doing it.
    1
  10328.  @Tiredofthecensorship189  Like a favorite comedian of mine said, "it's a big club and you ain't in it." "They don't give a fuck about you."
    1
  10329.  @cliberg  Regarding, "you tune out liars, but embraced tRump," I don't support him and have called him an orange clown in this very thread but don't let that stop you from lying about it. Makes sense you support biden. You are both liars.
    1
  10330.  @Tiredofthecensorship189  "Clints a petty grifter, with no logical bone in his body." LFMAO. I'm not going to lie this makes me laugh.
    1
  10331.  @bernardkennedy9211  Regarding, "How could he send out 2000$ checks doodt?" He also has no plans to do this. Regarding, "Boy ur one of those tRump followers aren't you?" I hope you are just trolling me.
    1
  10332.  @tailswinsmore5054  Regarding, "I forget who's ..." Did biden forget as well? Is that why he lied and made promises you think he couldn't keep? Regarding, "who had hands in it and how 600+1400 is not the same as 2000." Why should biden get credit for things the orange clown passed? Regarding, " copy and past "Biden is a liar" 87 times into a comment thread." I answered your questions. Don't be afraid to do the same for mine.
    1
  10333.  @tailswinsmore5054  Regarding, " I forget who's in charge of writings laws and passing stimulus money, what branch? Executive judicial or legislative? What branch is Biden part of?" This is like saying I wouldn't be lying if I said was going to fly to the moon and back because I'm not an astronaut so it's not fault that what I said about flying to moon and back is BS. That's why it's not lying. And that type of "logic" makes sense to you. LMFAO
    1
  10334.  @tailswinsmore5054  Regarding, "Did Biden explicitly promise $2000 in one lump sum" Yes. This is exactly what he did. See how I answered your questions? Notice that you didn't do the same thing for me? "By electing Jon and the Reverend you can make an immediate difference in your own lives, the lives of people all across this country because their election will put an end to the block in Washington on that $2,000 stimulus check, that money that will go out the door immediately to people who are in real trouble." Those are bidens words. But I'm suppose to give him credit for things trump passed? He promised 2k after he got his people in. He is a liar.
    1
  10335.  @tailswinsmore5054  "Want a $2,000 check? Vote Warnock." Is a direct quote and is a lie. Do you really need me to break down in great detail why this is a lie? I really shouldn't. It should be self explanatory. Do I need to point out that the 600 that trump and company passed had nothing to do with warnock? That he wasn't even in office when that money was passed to be given out? That he still owes everyone a 2k check?
    1
  10336.  @tailswinsmore5054  Regarding, "I still don't see a lie in your selected quotes, I see advertising." I'm sure you would say the same thing if republicans did the same things. I'm just kidding. You are clearly a hack. Regarding, "You have a strange level of understanding..." LMFAO Fun fact: you still haven't answered any of my questions while I've answered literally all of yours.
    1
  10337.  @tailswinsmore5054  Regarding, "oh please for give me let me return the favor. The answer to your hair splitting is "it's self explanatory"" LMFAO I was silly to take you seriously at all.
    1
  10338.  @greenguided4646  Regarding, "600 already passed mathematician." Thanks captain obvious. We are all well aware. You are offering nothing of value to the conversation at hand. Regarding, "you don't know math do you?" I took calculus in college even though it had nothing to do with anything I was studying because it was an easy A and was good for my GPA. I also know when someone is saying stupid shit instead of making any sort of intelligent point.
    1
  10339.  @sassyviking6003  "republicans are slowing down the process and sending trolls like you out to lie about it." LMFAO. Dems control everything. But don't let that stop you from spreading lies.
    1
  10340.  @sassyviking6003  Regarding, "Major resolutions require 60 votes, thus the republicans in the senate can obstruct." You are bootlicking excuse maker for POS politicians. Regarding, "Nice try, Come back when you have an actual argument or accurate information to share/" LMFAO Dems could get rid of the filibuster if they want but they would rather have excuses and rationalization for not getting anything done. Regarding, "Not lying, you are." Biden promised 2k checks immediately after getting the senate he wanted. Now it's 1400 maybe in a couple months. I really don't care what pathetic excuses and rationalizations you want to make for your POS team. They are as much the problem as republicans are.
    1
  10341. The lyrics to song are actually "i'm a car man" but I understand why you hear conman. I did as well for quite some time.
    1
  10342.  @MostLovedGod  He is a conman so it's fine. I understand why that's what you sing.
    1
  10343.  @MostLovedGod  I used to be like you and was interested and surprised to learn that my mind was playing tricks on me.
    1
  10344.  @signsofbias  "what bs?" Are you kidding? "do not negate each other" LMFAO Of course they do. If it was warmer in the "medieval warm period" than it is now then it hasn't been "getting warmer for over 8 thousand years?" You are saying, according to you, that it was cooler now than it was then. So not warmer. Please be embarrassed that you need this explained and for giving your own terrible comments a thumbs up.
    1
  10345.  @signsofbias  "Please prove me wrong" I think there is zero percent chance you will admit that I have. Please prove me wrong about that.
    1
  10346. Elon is not a savior. He is just another POS billionaire oligarch.
    1
  10347. Regarding, "OK I get it u gota hit Warren cuz she hurts Bernie." Clearly you don't get it. Regarding, "u never point out that Bernie voted for Biden's 94' crime bill" Sure he has. Regarding, "NO one is askin why Bernie sided w/Biden." Probably because we already know. Bernie made his reasoning clear at the time of the bill and his story has never changed when he has been asked about it, and he has been despite your bullshit that is detached from reality.
    1
  10348.  @shredboiardee1878  Not that they would ever "actually think critically and tell you whether or not you have a point." It's just another lie from yanggang.
    1
  10349.  @misstrunchbull3953  A person with an organization that I criticize constantly is jeffrey epstein (at least when he was alive). Let's say I went to go work for him. That would make me a fraud the same way yang going to work for CNN makes him a fraud. Obviously.
    1
  10350.  @misstrunchbull3953  "claiming that you know whether or not someone is lying" It was a lie. Sorry not sorry if the truth hurts. There is no way you would be here talking to me or would have attempted to fulfill your promise of "tell you whether or not you have a point" if wasn't here more than a week later pointing out your lie. Try not to lie to yourself the way you lie to others. "Yang may not believe that CNN are frauds" He has called them out for their behavior constantly no matter the BS you want to spew. Do you need me to give you direct quotes to shake your memory? "if you can't beat em, join em" philosophy can work here," I accept that from ghilainne maxwell as much as I accept that from you and yang. I don't. For reasons that should be obvious. "I believe the main goal overall was to gain exposure" If that's your goal you are a sellout. "Just dont draw conclusions and write people off so easily just because of that evil, evil CNN." LMFAO. Maybe you should be drawing some conclusions from it? Maybe the company people keep tells something about themselves because it obviously does. "It's not the be all end all of good politicians vs bad politicians is all I'm sayin." Yeah. It's but one in a really long list of huge red flags that yang has waving outside his camp.
    1
  10351.  @misstrunchbull3953  Regarding, "did you ever consider that I actually exist outside of the internet?" You sure were able to get here quick after getting called out. It took you less than an hour. But in the entire week since your promise you said nothing and had ZERO intention of ever returning to this thread. Try not to lie to yourself the way you lie to others. "You're entering dumbass territory now brother." LMFAO You would know. You have been there the entire time.
    1
  10352.  @misstrunchbull3953  "All that writing, and i'm still not convinced." It's impossible to convince someone who is only capable of lying about "critical thinking." I can only convince people who are actually capable of it.
    1
  10353. Warren sucks and still your comment is absurd.
    1
  10354. They are controlled opposition.
    1
  10355.  @boeing757pilot  "I'm not sure that they understand that." Of course they get it. Promising to fight for m4a and a 15 dollar minimum wage is how progressives got into office in the first place. The "democratic" party at large knows exactly how popular these policies are. That passing them would be good for them electorally. They won't and don't pass these things not because they don't get it but because winning is not their priority. First and foremost their job is to maintain the status quo at all cost.
    1
  10356.  @bobbygrewal5547  Regarding, "I don't think Warren will budge" Which makes it yet another reason why she isn't worthy of support. Not that I needed another one. She was pretty much dead to me the day she voted to give Trump, a person she thinks is a psycho, more money for bombs then even he wanted.
    1
  10357.  @bobbygrewal5547  Warren is overrated. I used to really like her. I wanted her to run in 2016. But she didn't. She instead chose to step aside and make room for Hillary. She could have backed a true progressive in Sanders after he surged. She didn't. And since then she has been a constant disappoint to me. From her lack of support of DAPL protestors, to voting give trump more money for bombs she gives me reason to question her. And now it's 2020 and this is the time when she chooses to run for president. Now that the progressive movement has a clear leader. Now that a progressive is the most popular politician in the country. Now she thinks it's time for HER. When she should be doing anything and everything to help Sanders for the country. We know the establishment is going to try to fuck him and she is lubing his ass for them. Seriously... fuck her. Her campaign seems like an effort to try and siphon votes from Sanders and make it more likely for an establishment shill like Biden to win and nothing more.
    1
  10358. Integrity
    1
  10359. Honesty
    1
  10360. Because she wants them to be better than the dumpster fire they are. Take your pick. Those are all legit answers to your question.
    1
  10361. Why are you not standing against the MIC? Why aren't you blocking 40 billion for bombs?
    1
  10362. I'll take the over 0.5 scientology lawsuits til the end of time for all my money.
    1
  10363. Why do you only care about one wall? Why not two?
    1
  10364. Biggest loser: democracy.
    1
  10365. I don't care about that. I care that he is and always has been a liar.
    1
  10366.  @fustercluck2460  "He didn't actually." I've seen pictures of them hanging out. I'm going to believe my lying eyes and not a liar like you.
    1
  10367.  @TwoBassed  "more common guest" Do you really care who is worst? Isn't that just a meaningless detail?
    1
  10368.  @cadeschmitz8334  "he was in the least amount of wars atleast" What? He stopped 0 wars. Trump was in as many wars as obama left him... and it was a ton.
    1
  10369.  @cadeschmitz8334  "didn’t start them though" Why would I care about this? Why would this make it better? He was commander in chief and he used all that power to fight ALL of the wars obama started... because after trump took office they BECOME his wars as much as they were obamas.
    1
  10370.  @fustercluck2460  "SEVERAL historic peace deals" I could only take you less seriously if yours was a brand new account for the election cycle... oh wait... you already are that.
    1
  10371.  @Boethius411  "was for show?" Yup. It takes lots of political theater to make it look like they are different. It's like pro wrestling... they act like they hate each other but at the end of the day they all work together for the same people.
    1
  10372.  @TwoBassed  "and never return" Let me get this straight... it's your belief that he went, saw it all, and DIDN'T blow the whistle, and that is your DEFENSE?!? You are lost.
    1
  10373. That sounds like something he would say... because of the dementia.
    1
  10374. Regarding, "First off “white nationalism” is protected by the First Amendment." That ad is a joke but saying white nationalism is bad is also protected by the first amendment. Fuck biden and fuck you for making me defend him for something.
    1
  10375.  @lchaney  It's the left wing that knows he is a hack.
    1
  10376. Regarding, "I don’t care that she changed her position," Forget the actual position for a minute that you seem to think is a good thing for idiotic reasons... Focus on the pandering. The fact that she just says what she thinks people want to hear and has ZERO convictions. You don't care about that? Regarding, "You know, all these people saying if it’s not Bernie they won’t vote for anyone else. What’s really your game here?" I voted for Jill Stein in 2016 in a swing state and have zero regrets. I won't vote for Warren. You figure out the rest. Regarding, "Are you really concerned about the dark dark road this country is riding on or are you just in love with Bernie?" I'm really concerned about the dark dark road this country is riding on. Regarding, "I don’t understand the logic." You know the rides at carneys that read "you have to be at least so tall to ride?" Well I have a sign in my mind for politicians that read, " you have to be at least a certain amount of decent to get my vote." Liars like warren don't measure up so I don't vote for them. It keeps me from supporting evil and terrible. That's the logic. What logic do you use to not support evil? If you don't have any you should really get some.
    1
  10377. I agree they should die but they are not going anywhere anytime soon. The best hope for the party is that Sanders win as a democrat so he can reform the party from within. He could, for example, ban them from taking their legalized bribes among other much needed reforms. They maybe we could have a party that cares about the people and not their big money donors.
    1
  10378. They think it's being open minded with both sides and that both sides always have an intelligent argument to be made. They of course are wrong.
    1
  10379. It doesn't matter who represents the blue team. It could be donald trump and sam would tell you you need to vote for them. He's a cheerleader, not a journalist.
    1
  10380. I wish you understood how similar you are to Trump supporters.
    1
  10381. Yang is trying to win. Gravel openly says he isn't trying to win. In other words your "logic" has failed you.
    1
  10382. Regarding, "Willfully uninformed people will soon realize..." Huh? It's the nature of willfully uninformed people to not realize anything.
    1
  10383. I honestly believe her heart is in the right place unlike lots of the corporate media pundits... it's just that she is really, really, really wrong.
    1
  10384. It's not.
    1
  10385.  @koru9780  Canada pays half as much per person as the US. In Canada medical bankruptcy isn't a thing. In canada everyone has health insurance. In canada they live longer and their infant mortality rate is superior to that of the US. They are not the same. Not even close. Stop saying stupid shit.
    1
  10386.  @koru9780  Regarding, "You have misunderstood dear." Ok. Fair enough. I assumed that you were saying that Canada has the same system as the US since the topic being discussed was the US health care system. Forgive my rudeness. Peace.
    1
  10387. Regarding, "I can sit here and say a million terrible things if I never do anything terrible am I a bad person?" While I understand the point you are trying to make I would just like to point out that "say(ing) a million terrible things" IS an action. And it has real world effects even if those affects aren't as noticeable as say... murdering people.
    1
  10388.  @kalinroar3366  Regarding, "I instead say something entirely mundane" Is that what you are doing now? Before it was, "say a million terrible things." So you went from "terrible" to "mundane." Regarding, "So I think it's in our best interests to focus on people's actions because words without action" Words without action? You are doing it again. WORDS ARE AN ACTION. It's like you are trying to have your cake and eat it too.
    1
  10389.  @kalinroar3366  It's like saying... I don't do drugs. I just drink alcohol. But alcohol IS a drug. If you drink alcohol you do drugs. And saying, "I don't do drugs," is just nonsense.
    1
  10390.  @kalinroar3366  And again, I understand the point you are trying to make. You are just doing it wrong.
    1
  10391. Bernie pointed out time and again that Canada pays half as much per person.
    1
  10392. Your comment is either very constructive or very hypocritical. Spoiler alert.... it's hypocritical
    1
  10393. I'm white as snow and if I assault someone I go to jail. That is privilege of the rich and powerful... obviously.
    1
  10394. Biden is privatizing SS and bernie isn't stopping him.
    1
  10395.  @aurora571000  Biden has been successfully finding ways to privatize SS and bernie isn't calling it out much less stopping it.
    1
  10396.  @Josephrealdill  RFK sold you out to israel.
    1
  10397. Not Warren. Gabbard, Turner, or someone other than Warren.
    1
  10398. It has nothing to do with his skin color eric and everything to do with him being rich and powerful.
    1
  10399. Also, Trump is orange.
    1
  10400.  @zainiabdullah621  Do you need a dictionary? Or are you just trying to prove you are deeply unserious?
    1
  10401. She was always a puppet. You are only just realizing now.
    1
  10402. Yes. She did. By MILLIONS of votes. And that is coming from someone who despises the bitch. Stop being a fucking moron.
    1
  10403. For your sake I hope you are drunk.
    1
  10404. Sorry not sorry if the truth hurts. Thanks for fucking off. The collective IQ goes up without you.
    1
  10405. I don't do twitter. But dunking on cenk is tempting.
    1
  10406. You know it's rigged against the Green party as well right?
    1
  10407. Malachi regarding, "what about progressive democrats?" I personally support progressives regardless of their party affiliation (because I am first and foremost a progressive) and encourage everyone to do so. I identify as a green party member more than any other party but blindly voting for any party and blindly ignoring other parties is small-minded thinking in my opinion. I'd prefer to leave that trait to staunch republicans and staunch democrats.
    1
  10408. 700 billion per year. An increase of 80 billion.
    1
  10409. Really? That's what annoys you? I'm an atheist and I would use the word. It's merely a synonym for fortunate and I feel fortunate to be alive. That doesn't mean I'm giving credit for that to a sky wizard.
    1
  10410. Obama's message is clear... fall in line.
    1
  10411. Regarding, "After watching this video, all those reservations are wiped off." The people putting out this propaganda will be happy to hear this. Regarding, "I trust America is in equally good hands now." Biden is a corrupt lying POS warmonger whose brain is melting. You comment makes me think humanity is doomed.
    1
  10412.  @madgad43  Regarding, "That made me believe he could be a good human, if not a good politician. Possible, I got duped by the publicity gimmick." He is a terrible person and a terrible politician. I can give you more detail if you want. Ultimately you were duped and I would encourage you to be far more skeptical than you are.
    1
  10413. "MAGA people crying" You think they are the only people who can't stand her? LMFAO I can't stand trump for all the same reasons I can't stand pelosi.
    1
  10414. How did he get "owned." By a bunch of lies? It wasn't a debate. It was a question and answer format. Kyle asked a question and Christie lied through his teeth.
    1
  10415. You are again talking about this like it was a debate. It wasn't. As for the fact that perception matters... sure. Of course. By Kyle can't do everything by himself. People have to take some responsibility and initiative of their own to figure out was is true and what isn't. Kyle can't "prove" anything in that format. He can only speak the truth and hopefully people do what they need to to figure out for themselves what is true and what is bullshit. That "proof" you think Kyle should have presented is just countered with more lies and bullshit. There is nothing he can do to prove anything to the uniformed lazy listener. People need to look into whether or not there is evidence weed is a gateway drug for themselves. Then when they learn that is nothing but bullshit they will then have the very accurate perception that Christie is a liar and then they should be trying to figure out about whether or not anything he said was true... and it wasn't. In the age of information ignorance is a choice. Sadly there is nothing that can be done for people that choose to be ignorant.
    1
  10416. But cross totally won me over.
    1
  10417.  @PutXi_Whipped  "Vaush" I'd bet money he is a CIA asset.
    1
  10418. I can respect that as long as you do the same for orange clowns.
    1
  10419.  @tonyclifton2230  lies about mccarthey being speaker and more
    1
  10420. Yup. It's her votes that are the problem. Fraud squad. Never forget.
    1
  10421. Well said if you are talking about trump.
    1
  10422.  @aeris2001  Regarding, "anyone else" How exactly do you define "sadism" just so we can be on the same page. Regarding, "There no need to enjoy the suffering of others." There might not be "need" for it. But it's human and understandable when the big picture is looked at. If I had a time machine and could go back and kill hitler I would. And I'd enjoy it for reasons that should be obvious. It's about the suffering that isn't going to happen. Regarding, "What's progressive peoples excuse." Sometimes the world would be better off without some people and there is no shame in acknowledging this.
    1
  10423.  @aeris2001  Regarding, "Enjoying the active suffering of another conscious creature is how I define sadism." So I'm not a sadist because I only want covid to win the battle? And don't care if he suffers? Quick and painless would be just fine. Regarding, "we should rise above base impulses." We are a social species. One way we make clear what is and isn't acceptable in society is by doing what we are doing with trump right now. Not only does it send a message as to what behavior is acceptable but it sends a message as to what the consequences of being evil is. Those consequences include shame.
    1
  10424.  @aeris2001  Regarding, "that is not sadism" Good. Just so that we can agree that I'm not a sadist. Regarding, "that does not make it moral just because its in our nature." But that thing... that is in our nature, is how we make clear what we consider to be moral and immoral. Or let me try to put it another way.... just turning the other cheek to immorality is not an option for good reason. Regarding, "though shame has also been misused" Of course. I'm not talking about that. I'm talking about it's good use. Regarding, "In criminal justice the primary goal in my opinion should be incapacitation, closely followed rehabilitation." I agree with this but you are going off on a tangent. We weren't talking about the criminal justice system. Regarding, "Its just human's basking in their sadistic impulse in my opinion." I lost an incredibly important person to me who was murdered. The person who committed the murder was killed while trying to be apprehended. Had they been taken alive I wouldn't want them tortured, or even killed (I am against the death penalty) Prison for life would have been just fine. But was I bothered in the slightest that instead they were dead? And that evil was destroyed that day? Hardly. But I kinda get why some people would want revenge if in my place. Ultimately that isn't the role of the criminal justice system nor should it be.
    1
  10425.  @elynum  I honestly can't take you or your BS seriously enough to respond to it intelligently.
    1
  10426.  @elynum  "That's because you haven't been responding to it intelligently." You mean the comment that got 25 thumbs up after your idiotic BS got 2? This comment of yours is funny because the person not saying anything intelligent is you.
    1
  10427.  @elynum  You also haven't apologized for your lie... not that I'm surprised by this.
    1
  10428.  @aerialhorizonrc7827  "focus on himself" He's trying to get out ahead of a blackmailer. That is focused on himself and doing what's best for him. "progressive channels" As if warmongers bought with katzenburg money who like to blackmail, who smear assange, who tell you not to force the vote on m4a is progressive. You should probably focus on yourself and do something about the BS you are spewing.
    1
  10429.  @elynum  "I stand reprimanded and humiliated." Don't be silly. That would take self awareness you clearly don't have.
    1
  10430.  @aerialhorizonrc7827  "Republican" LFMAO There is dirt younger than me and I've never voted for a republican in my entire life. You can't possibly be more wrong than you are not that it will phase you or matter to you.
    1
  10431. He never denied covid. Smearing jimmy with lies like yours is pretty right wing.
    1
  10432. They do. But maintaining the status quo is more important to them.
    1
  10433. I love Nina Turner but why go with someone who would have the same problem Sanders had in 2016 of lack of name recognition? Name recognition is supremely important in a society that, in all honesty, is not very bright. No thanks. I'd rather go with the candidate that is the most popular politician in the country with the name recognition of a rock star. That shit is important if we are going to overcome an establishment that will do anything and everything they can to prevent a progressive from winning.
    1
  10434. Yeah I think you are full of shit Neon. If you want to prove me otherwise I'd like a source that, "50% of Americans between the ages of 80-85 have dementia" because I am confident that is complete bullshit pulled straight from your ass.
    1
  10435. So even your source, whose facts I question, say you are lying. Thanks for proving me right. You lying, "50% of Americans between the ages of 80-85 have dementia" Your terrible source, "45% of American seniors 85 and older"
    1
  10436. Regarding, "That was on Alzheimer's only" So you were giving me shit that wasn't specific to the question asked. Do you have Alzheimer's? Keep in mind that you might have it but it isn't diagnosed.
    1
  10437. So I'm looking at your other source. It seems it too is only about Alzheimer's. Does it also do nothing to answer my original question?
    1
  10438. Regarding, "if he did 2" We do not elect presidents to 2 terms at a time.
    1
  10439. Regarding, "you want to pretend it is not a real possibility that is fine." I'm not going to let fear of something possibly happening that I currently have zero reason of thinking is currently happening dictate my actions. I question your motives. I expect the establishment will try to use Bernie's age against him the way you are trying in a disengenous manner. Maybe you are not actually being disingenous. But I suspect may very well be. Regarding, "I personally I am not comfortable with those stats." I'm going to ask you again for a source for your claim. Not sources for other information but a source that backs up what you said. Regarding, "I believe being a progressive is about more than 1 man." Of course. But look, if you want to pretend that Sanders isn't the best hope for getting progressive policy, WHICH HE ABSOLUTELY IS, that is fine. See I can be condescending as well but I'm not going to wrap up my statement with hypocritical bullshit like, "nothing but polite," when you say everyone who disagrees with you is in a "cult of Bernie."
    1
  10440. "32 percent of people age 85 or older have Alzheimer’s dementia" Or does it talk about all dementia somewhere else in your source.
    1
  10441. "Dementia affects about half of the population age 85 years or older." So close. I would like to add that "dementia" is a very loaded word. Scientists and the public have VERY different views of this word and what it means. To a scientist that is anything and everything. That are the people that aren't even diagnosed and are just beginning to forget things. To the public that is full blown gone and the worst of the worst of people with dementia.
    1
  10442. Regarding, "concerns about this and how people seem fixated on one man. It is something the Trump fans do. Which to me is neither progressive nor left thinking." I gave you legit, logical arguments why we should be supporting Sanders and not fresh blood. I guess you tried to address them by saying we just need to introduce people to Nina which is completely detached from reality and the sad honest truth of America. The public are idiots. In their defense it is hardly all their fault. Most of them are too busy with their everyday lives just trying to make it and pay the bills to pay attention to everything going on in politics. They are also brainwashed by a corrupt corporate media on a daily basis. The fact of the matter is that you are insisting on something that doesn't need to be done. And you want to do it for something that doesn't currently exist. And you are using the exact same arguments the establishment is going to use. And you are telling me I'm just like Trump. And you are giving statistics that you can't cite. I'm done with this. Good luck.
    1
  10443. In an ideal world Sanders would be younger or there would be someone just as good and younger to replace him. We do not live in an ideal world. We live in a world where the "democratic" primary is rigged as fuck. To overcome that we need any and every advantage we can get to beat it. We need popularity and we need name recognition. Trump is a complete piece of shit but one major thing he had going for him in 2016 was name recognition. WE NEED THAT. It isn't about a cult of Bernie. It is about accepting those cold hard facts and acting according. I'm not willing to sacrifice an important advantage because of fear of something possibly happening that I am certain is not currently happening. We live in a country where the establishment is fine with Diane Feinstein running for office. I am not. But not because of her age but because of everything else. But just go ahead and call me the "cult of Bernie" if you want. Seriously I want to quit this very bad. It is just that I have trouble letting terrible go unanswered.
    1
  10444. Paragraphs? Hit enter a couple times.
    1
  10445.  @troy8420  "You would rather Trump?" I would never vote for trump for the same reasons I'd never vote for biden.
    1
  10446.  @troy8420  "You would rather Trump?" But I didn't exactly answer your question. Yes. I do think that trump is the "lesser evil." But again... I'd never vote him or any evil.
    1
  10447.  @troy8420  "You would rather Trump?" More military spending under biden.
    1
  10448.  @troy8420  "You would rather Trump?" More peo ple have pas sed of co vi d during biden.
    1
  10449.  @troy8420  "You would rather Trump?" Mo re pe ople de port ed under bi den.
    1
  10450.  @troy8420  "You would rather Trump?" Biden has kicked more people out of the country and has MORE people in cages.
    1
  10451.  @lalat7260  "I support President Biden" You don't even attempt to say why. It's telling.
    1
  10452.  @christyann2268  "No golf excursion expenditures" LMFAO Trump is TERRIBLE. And this is the type of thing you lead with? I wish biden were playing golf instead of doing what he's doing.
    1
  10453.  @christyann2268  "President Biden doesn't publically admire, praise and cuddle up to the worlds most notorious dictators" He was just giving fist bumps in saudia arabia.
    1
  10454.  @christyann2268  "There haven't been over 30,000 provable lies told by President Biden." LMFAO I'm tempted to start a comprehensive list but I don't have the time or money to hire the team that would be required.
    1
  10455.  @christyann2268  "Honesty and action regarding Covid under President Biden." More people died of it under biden and he had the jab. LMFAO You don't have a single substantive way he is different when it comes to results for the country.
    1
  10456.  @christyann2268  "No coup attempts by President Biden." If anyone should know what a coup is it should be the US cause they do so many of them to other countries but the clearly do not.
    1
  10457.  @christyann2268  "This list goes on and on and on." You still haven't even given me a single way that's better than I can't immediately dismiss.
    1
  10458.  @christyann2268  "That's one" Actually I've addressed every single one of your points. The only reason you can't see them all is because right now, while biden is president, we don't have real free speech and I'm being shadowbanned.
    1
  10459.  @christyann2268  "refute the rest of the list." I already have but will do my best to get it past the censorship that's happening in biden's america.
    1
  10460.  @christyann2268  "No golf excursion expenditures" This comment of yours is also being shadowbanned. I'm only able to see it because it's in my notifications. Some land of the free.
    1
  10461.  @christyann2268  "doesn't publically admire, praise and cuddle up to the worlds most notorious dictators. " Biden just got back from cuddling up to saudia arabia so that they might give us oil.
    1
  10462.  @christyann2268  "dictators" Biden literally just got done cuddling up to sau dia ara bia.
    1
  10463.  @christyann2268  "30,000 provable lies told by President Biden." Biden is also a patholo gical liar. Lied about being arrested with mandela. Lied about his school history. He had to drop out of running for president back in the day for plagiarism.
    1
  10464.  @christyann2268  "Covid" Mo re people pas sed of it during biden, who had the jab.
    1
  10465.  @christyann2268  "Biden doesn't publically admire, praise and cuddle up." He literally just got back from doing this with sau dia ara bia.
    1
  10466.  @christyann2268  I've DESTROYED everything on your list in a world where it should be easy to say why you are better than the orange clown.
    1
  10467.  @christyann2268  "hardly a cuddle or invite to the Oval office" The police literally open the gate and let them in.
    1
  10468.  @christyann2268  "hardly a cuddle or invite to the Oval office" If they would have been black lives matter protestors they would have been treated COMPLETELY different.
    1
  10469.  @lalat7260  Youtube says there are 32 replies but you can only see 18. Some land of the free. But keep blaming only trump.
    1
  10470.  @christyann2268  "President Biden is NOT a pathological liar." His ended his first presidential run because of plagiarism.
    1
  10471.  @christyann2268  "you know full well President Biden is NOT a pathological liar." He ended his first presidential run because he was plagi arizing.
    1
  10472.  @christyann2268  "a pathological liar." I think my favorite lie of his was about how he was arrested with mandela. But it's hard to pick. There are so many to choose from.
    1
  10473.  @christyann2268  "pathological liar." Biden did not fight for civil rights.
    1
  10474.  @christyann2268  "pathological liar." Look up why he ended his first presidential run. Youtube keeps hiding it.
    1
  10475.  @christyann2268  "pathological liar." Look up why biden stopped his presidential run in 1988.
    1
  10476.  @christyann2268  "President Biden is NOT a pathological liar" Of course he is. Just like trump is. And you are just as unserious as trump supporters who claim he isn't.
    1
  10477.  @christyann2268  "Any excuse will do! (Because you know full well President Biden is NOT a pathological liar.)" I know biden is a pathological liar just like trump is.
    1
  10478.  @christyann2268  "You can't," I've worked really hard to get at least a couple of him many, many lies to show. You don't even address them because you can't, and you know it.
    1
  10479.  @christyann2268  "List the lies" But I'll add... he promised everyone a 2K check.
    1
  10480.  @christyann2268  "lies" He promised a public option.
    1
  10481.  @christyann2268  "lies" He said he fought for civil rights when he was working at a pool.
    1
  10482.  @christyann2268  "lies" He said he was arres ted with mand ela.
    1
  10483.  @christyann2268  "liar" He's a pla giar ist.
    1
  10484.  @christyann2268  "lies" He has tried to cut SS multiple times but li es about it.
    1
  10485.  @christyann2268  "President Biden is NOT a pathological liar." He said that he would treat sau di ara bia, that country he just got done begging for oil from, like a "pariah" state when he was running.
    1
  10486.  @christyann2268  When you say biden isn't a liar you sound just as silly as when trumps fans say that about him.
    1
  10487.  @christyann2268  "liar" "you're not going to get cov id if you get these vaccinations." -biden, who literally just had co vid
    1
  10488.  @christyann2268  "liar" "you are not going to get co vid if you get these vaccin ations" -that guy who literally just had co vid
    1
  10489.  @christyann2268  "You've worked REALLY hard" Youtube is all but becoming a useless place for debate because of all sen sore ship. "two lies?" And still I managed to get 8 different examples of him lying to show. You call it two and don't address them even a little bit. That should tell you something. Lastly it's hardly meant to be a comprehensive list. I don't have that kind of time or energy.
    1
  10490. I hope you are joking. That said I can't be sure because there is so much stupid in the world.
    1
  10491. Locked groove regarding, "there’s another country openly being able to influence people’s opinions on politics and social (sic) issues in this country through misinformation warfare." I am all for talking about and analyzing this shit but I must point out and ask the question of, what did Russia do that was so different than the things Hillary Clinton and company did? Keep in mind that she had a superpac named "correct the record" that did essentially the exact same bullshit as all the things russia is being accused of.
    1
  10492. Gangstas are best known for not wanting to get involved. /s
    1
  10493.  @BocaoZ  Yeah... my point is that no one is using them. So it could get worse. I'm a glass is half full kinda guy clearly.
    1
  10494.  @pkia898  "threat" I think you overestimate how strong israel is and underestimate how strong their neighbors are.
    1
  10495. Rumor has it Canada is looking to build a wall and pay for it... to keep americans out.
    1
  10496. Literally no one says it's the US's fault alone but don't let that stop you from building that strawman.
    1
  10497. gross
    1
  10498. Tell us about your hairy legs again.
    1
  10499.  @bradleyrobinson70  But you trust the empire with bases all over the globe and is spending as much as the next 12 countries combined on "defense" including china? Who has lied us into wars for oil? Who has tortured some folks? Who doesn't even follow it's own constitution when waging war?
    1
  10500.  @bradleyrobinson70  The CCP isn't the one with an imperialistic empire, bases over all the globe and spends a tiny fraction the US does on war. Trusting either is stupid AF.
    1
  10501.  @bradleyrobinson70  "you mad bro." People bootlicking and rationalizing an evil empire bothers me. "I'm happy the CCP don't have 800 bases. You though I'm pro America. I'm not." You are an idiot who is trying to have your cake and eat it too. You are rationalizing and justifying the US and it's empire and want to claim you aren't being "pro america" while being pro america have 800 bases all over the globe. It's stupid AF. "I'm not even from the US. I'm Canadian." That makes sense. Your government is using your tax dollars to give you universal health care while mine is using my tax dollars to wage war. "Learn to think? Thing about what?" Why an imperialist empire is obviously not a good thing even though you seem to stupidly think it is. "I study the world political seen everyday." And rationalize a US empire with bases everywhere and is waging war everywhere. Even study can't fix stupid. "Nothing you have said have moved my position." I can't fix stupid for you either. I wish I could but unsurprisingly I can't.
    1
  10502.  @bradleyrobinson70  "What if Germany in the 1940's managed to get a base in every country. Learn to think. :)" I'm not going to lie your advocating the US having bases all over while simultaneously citing how someone else doing the exact same thing would be the devil is really funny. I'm awed that you don't see how stupid that is.
    1
  10503.  @bradleyrobinson70  "Try to bring a new point without calling me stupid. I bet you can't do it." Try to say something that isn't stupid. I'll bet you can't do it.
    1
  10504.  @bradleyrobinson70  "so you would be fine with 1940's Germany winning and being the world power today in 2021?" Obviously not. Never said anything even remotely close to this. You need to learn to read.
    1
  10505.  @bradleyrobinson70  "You still didn't come with a new piont" You still haven't said anything that isn't stupid.
    1
  10506.  @bradleyrobinson70  "Go on call me stupid again." I will. "That's all you have left." If you ignore the points I'm making when not calling you stupid then I guess this BS is true.
    1
  10507. Warren is not a progressive and her entire campaign was designed to torpedo the Sanders campaign. Her campaign was meant to split the vote.
    1
  10508. Probably because Obama didn't actually want a universal system. He wanted to protect the health insurance industry and increase their profits. He succeeded.
    1
  10509. So your solution is to make votes in some of the largest states in the country like NY, California, and Texas fucking meaningless and let swing states dominate the country. You don't give a fuck about the perception that some only a handful of voters get to pick... you just want to pick who gets to pick.
    1
  10510. The only part of this video I take exception with is that you thought there was reason to take Shapiro seriously before this video. There wasn't. That was only Shapiro reinforcing what everyone should have already know about him... that he was not be taken seriously... ever.
    1
  10511. This is great. You may as well start another new thread with stupid shit. Question for you.... you do actually realize Rosanne is free right?
    1
  10512. will g thank you for, as usual, not bothering to answer my very simple, very direct question to go of spouting stupid shit. IS ROSANNE FREE? This is not brain buster. This is not a gotcha question. This is not me not knowing what I'm talking about. This answer to this question demonstrates why you obviously have no fucking idea what you are talking about. If she isn't free then you have some valid points. But she isn't therefor literally everything you say is stupid.
    1
  10513.  @snowstrobe  God forbid we don't elect biden who can be trusted to elect nothing but corporate clowns to the court. God forbid we don't elect biden who is why we have Clarence Thomas on the court because of his unforgivable actions toward Anita Hill. As always the mantra to blackmail us into voting for garbage. Why do you think Hillary and her team tried to prop up trump? So that people like you can try to blackmail us into voting for god awful terrible people who are literally the antithesis of EVERYTHING I believe in.
    1
  10514. Do you say that nonsense when the topic is pedophilia?
    1
  10515. You shouldn't need to be told that they are joke propogandists... then again you likely are as well.
    1
  10516.  @yisun-sin5879  They have proven to doctor their videos. You either know this and are pretending not or just an idiot. Either way you suck at life and are a clown not to be taken seriously... just like veritas.
    1
  10517. Wow, so many trolls in this thread. I love that Bernie has all you clowns so scared.
    1
  10518. Actually the orange clown is your president right now whether you like it or not.
    1
  10519.  @Notsydz  I can't ruin a dumb comment. You did that yourself.
    1
  10520. In the age of information ignorance like yours is a choice.
    1
  10521. Get help if you are being serious. Death sucks.
    1
  10522.  @mindfullygreen2870  I hope you feel better. If you don't get help.
    1
  10523. AOC literally stopped NY from giving billions of dollars to Jeff Bezos.
    1
  10524. Train derailments like this are signs of a failed state.
    1
  10525. Too bad you don't try to hold american politicians to account like this. But you are propagandists POS. Be ashamed. You are an embarrassment and why things suck.
    1
  10526. Yup. As wrong as ben was I'm glad he was on.
    1
  10527. Gates is a "philanthropist" in the same way an arms dealer is a "peace maker."
    1
  10528. In that case you probably shouldn't be registered with them.
    1
  10529. Sugar, labels are how the lazy decide who is for what. They think that if someone has a label like liberal, progressive, conservative, democrat, republican or other they know all they need to know about that person without bothering to think deeply or with nuance about that person. The powers that be use them to try and mislead about the positions of people. They use them to try and demonize large groups of people and ideas (socialists for example). Don't get me wrong, they aren't going anywhere anytime soon and they do have purpose to very small degree. But that purpose is wildly overblown by the corporate media and the topic of labels are deliberately misused by people trying to derail a far more constructive conversation.... aka specific policy. I label myself a progressive. But how much can that really tell you? That label might mean something completely different to me then it does you. Or I might be intentionally trying to deceive you about my beliefs by using it. Ultimately the only way to really know about the important shit a person thinks is to dig far deeper then a fucking label and to study a persons actions.
    1
  10530. Regarding, "No Neo liberal would ever be my friend. Ever." I have to yet to meet a single person who labels themself as a neoliberal... but they do exist. Thanks for proving my point that labels pretty much suck balls and that you need to look at policy and actions.
    1
  10531. Regarding, "you are pretty dense." I went out of my way to be polite to you even while disagreeing. I see no reason to bother with that now. Regarding, "Labels do matter." No. They absolutely do not unless they are accompanied by more information. And seeing as how you need that other information to have any understanding how accurate the label being used is then the label is ultimately superfluous. Regarding, "You don't quality as a progressive if you are for Neo liberal policies." Again thanks for proving my point. You can't talk about this shit intelligently in any way without talking about policy. Regarding, "Therefore the Democratic Party doesn't quality." Labels are there for people like you who want to lump large groups of people into a group without bothering to think intelligently about what you are saying. You know justice democrats are democrats right? That they are part of the democratic party? That they are progressive? Because of....ya know... policy. Regarding, "Anything else dense to say about labels?" You probably have no idea why you and your politics can cause others to want to throw up in their mouth and punch you in the face. You should really try harder to be persuasive instead of trying so hard to think you "won" an argument to feed your tiny ego. Respond if you want but I'm done giving a shit what you think about this or anything. You like labels so much I'll use one for you... douchebag.
    1
  10532. I suspect you think everyone is triggered because everyone is frustrated with your stupidity. And I am amused that you made those conclusions while not reading what I wrote... as if that makes any sense. You might want to consider that you think others are stupid only because you are a mental midget. Good luck with the whole dumb as fuck thing you have going on.
    1
  10533. I feel like you have... and if so you are doing it wrong.
    1
  10534. Trump won by sucking and being obnoxious? That's not how it works.
    1
  10535.  @dianalazaru  "vice versa" LOL. Who are the leftist pretending to be on the right?
    1
  10536.  @dianalazaru  Is hannity a closet lefty?
    1
  10537.  @dianalazaru  "is used by all teams" Nope. It's authoritarian in nature and innately not leftist ideology. Let me try to put it to you another way.... when has a politician ever been more left wing in office than they pretended to be? It's none existent. But they will pretend to want a public option while running to forget it in office. "who is a true team member" The left is being crushed. We don't really have a team. The squad are frauds. I'm wonder if kyle is fraud after being a huge fan of his for a long time. I don't feel immune. I feel sick.
    1
  10538.  @dianalazaru  "the left is not being crushed and will never be crushed!" It's being pummeled. We can't even get a vote on universal health care during a pandemic. This country is an oligarchy. "The Left couldn't be crushed by the most vicious and diehard conservatives for centuries." I don't care about "the left" as some sort of ideologic team. To mean that means policy. "The left" means giving peace a chance. It means protecting the environment. It means money out of politics. It means criminal justice reform. It means breaking up the banks and bringing back glass steagal and it means more. The left is losing all the battles. It's being crushed. "There is no need to feel defeated" Except for when you aren't winning and essentially never win. I'm a realist. "the Left has no place in reality" Because being on the left means giving peace a chance? There is plenty of room in reality for that. Far too much room. It should be common sense. "world peace" I know this might sound counterintuitive for you but this is what I'm willing to fight for even if I won't be able to achieve it. "ideal in the heads of idealists." I happily have ideals. That doesn't conflict with being a realist. "You can view it as compromising to reality" I think you are conflating what is and what our goals and ideals are. And concepts like these aren't exclusive to politics... they extend to my personal life as well. For example I know I'll never be perfect but that is the ideal that I strive for knowing I'll never achieve it. "refuse to accept reality" When exactly have I done this? "And therefore they suffer." If I suffer it's only because I am a realist and ignorance would be bliss. "the Left is ok" I feel more qualified to speak for the left. This country is an oligarchy and leftist values are being crushed. As evidence I suggest a brief youtube video titled, "Corruption is legal in america."
    1
  10539.  @dianalazaru  "the reason you don't get those policies through, is less about politics being corrupted (although corruption indeed has reached a problematic level) and more about a broad public opposition." So we have perpetual war, stagnant wages, money in politics, and corruption because those are the things are popular with the people? They aren't. We only have those things because our politicians are corrupt and bought. "polls show those policies are widely bipartisan but that is not the case" I honestly don't read everything before I start writing. I start at the top and work my way down doing my best to try and address all substantive points as I go. I can't imagine this is going to get better. This is terrible and it's a fact that even among republicans and "righties" "leftist" ideals such as universal health care are the popular positions. No sane individual would try to defend the current POS system the US currently has that costs twice as much as everyone else, leaves millions uninsured, and produces inferior results. "Both teams accuse the other of being stupid, or evil or corrupt or whatever" Both parties are corrupt. Neither party represents the people. Both parties are bought. "finding true compromises with the other team." The only times the major parties agree on something is when they simultaneously agree to fuck over the public with things like war and bailouts and corporate socialism. "skipping this step, they either do nothing or fall back on authoritative methods to push through their policies" Dems control everything. They don't need to compromise. They only need to have the will to try and help the people but they won't because their allegiance is to the money that's bought them.
    1
  10540. Maybe care more about trust in a world were you know people happily lie to you. Yang has no experience in politics and no record to know what you are getting. Sanders is the real deal and has proven it with time in office. Good luck with your guy. Maybe he is the rare exception of an honest politician even though you have no reason to trust him.
    1
  10541.  @mosesfilms947  Regarding, "he isnt a politician" Do you listen to yourself? He's running for president of the united states. He's obviously a fucking politician. Regarding, "e helped created thousands of jobs for his Non profit, Venture for America" Maybe don't say the exact same shit trump supporters would say to justify their clown. I want nonprofits nowhere near my presidential candidates as it's an avenue for corruption and pay to play. Regarding, "He has experience, just not experience sitting in an office" Must be nice. If he had that experience he would have a record that he would have to be accountable for. When Joe Biden says he's the "most progressive" I get to look and point at his record to prove him wrong. Without it yang gets to say literally anything and we don't get to see if he is telling the truth or full of shit. It must be nice. Well I require trust at this level and so should you.
    1
  10542.  @mosesfilms947  That's funny coming from someone who doesn't even understand that they ARE a politician but they are a politician with no experience and no record to back up their words. Do you not know that politicians are known for being full of shit, liars and conmen or do you just not care that you don't have what you should to know if your politician is full of shit, a liar, or a conman?
    1
  10543.  @mosesfilms947  Regarding, "ok he is a politician now" Thanks for clearing that up and being willing to concede the blatantly obvious. Bravo. Regarding, "he is not a career politician" Because the problem with politicians is that they are all just good people that get corrupted by the system or some shit? Maybe Mitch McConnell was a great person who just got corrupted after getting there with the best intentions. Or maybe it's the type of field that scumbags are drawn to because it's a position that comes with power and money. Regarding, "You have to look at a person's reasons for running for president." Sure. You know what I don't have to do? Take a person's word for why they are running for president. Regarding, "If you do some research on Yang you will realise he doesnt even want to be president" LMFAO. Why? Because that's what he told you? Because if he were there to set himself up for the rest of his life he would have just told you and been honest about it right? Someone who is there to cash in wouldn't lie about that. That would be going to far. Regarding, "he sees problems that are a threatening our country" Does he? What's the problem with our government and our politicians? According to yang they don't know any better. According to yang they are out of touch and just don't know how to help the American people. Yang is full of shit. The problem is that our politicians are bought. They sell their soul and serve the corporations and big money interests because they are being paid, not because they don't know any better or just don't get it. They do get it and just don't give a fuck. Thank god for yang... to come save us from a guy who has proven for decades that he isn't corrupt, isn't bought, has experience, has been fighting the good fight since forever, and has been consistently right about everything since forever even when it wasn't politically convenient. Regarding, "do some research on him" I've done my research. And I've done it far better than you. I for example know he is a politician and have known it for some time. You know what else my research has produced? No experience and no record. Now why would that be a problem? Well first I want experience for literally anything if possible. I prefer the cashier at mcdonalds and the guy flipping my burgers have experience if possible and those jobs aren't really that important. But I REALLY want it for important jobs. Like if I were ever going to have major surgery (and I have), I want the person doing it to have experience. I don't want it to be their first time using a knife. Because obvious fucking reasons that I shouldn't need to explain they are so obvious. But it's even more important than that for politicians. Because I really want that experience for politicians because with that experience comes a record. That's how I get to know in no uncertain terms what people do with power when given it. I'm not looking to take politicians word for what they want to do when in office... I want to see it because I know most of them are fucking liars and you should as well because again... it's common sense. Look at all the candidates running. Look at how full of shit they are. Everyone is pretending to try and be progressive (well, mostly) and everyone is pretending to want M4A. Well the way I know they are full of shit and pretending and pandering is because they have records that I get to look at. Your clown doesn't have it and I'm not in the habit of taking politicians at their word and neither should you. The best two ways to actually know what a politicians is about is 1) follow the money and 2) study their record. Those things don't lie and your clown doesn't have one of them for me to look at. Way less important than those things are... listening to them speak. And when you do that you should be doing so with great skepticism because again... obvious reasons I shouldn't need to explain because everyone should know politicians tend to be liars. I beg you. Wake the fuck up and use some common sense.
    1
  10544.  @mosesfilms947  Regarding, "no need to be so toxic" Fair point but you really shouldn't have too much trouble understanding where my frustration comes from. This world desperately needs the hope and change that was promised long ago but never came. Not only do we have an entire establishment looking to crush us we have people willing to give faith to a guy who hasn't earned it. I fear for the future and fear America is going to fuck this up because they are really good at it. It's frustrating. I'm admittedly frustrated. Regarding, "When it comes to policy I prefer Yang the most." Let's say I agreed with this... and I don't. So what. He hasn't earned your trust. Let's say Biden came out with best policy in your opinion... what would that really be worth? Regarding, "What would u say are types of experiences" There is a reason that being a senator or being a governor is considered the norm for any potential candidate. Those positions are most similar even if there isn't anything that is perfectly comparable to the most powerful position in the world. Regarding, "and qualities you need to be a leader of a nation." First and foremost trust... and it isn't easy to get from me coming from any politician. I'm rightfully really, really skeptical of all politicians. After that all the obvious stuff... intelligence, empathy, compassion... Regarding, "The only legal requirements you need to be president" I'm not talking about the legal requirements. I'm talking about my requirements. I'm not talking about who COULD be president, I'm talking about who SHOULD be president. Regarding, "Thise dont sound like lies at all but substantive solutions." Let's be real... I know yang supporters like to pretend it's about other things but what they really care about is UBI. That's what you are talking about here right? Maybe democracy dollars sprinkled in but it's really about this. It's an interesting idea whose time isn't now. 1) There's zero support for it that I know of. Maybe there is a senator or guy in the house that's for it right now but I don't know who they are. 2) The way yang proposes to pay for UBI is regressive. 3) Without fixing all the other major problems of our society all that money is going to funnel to the top the exact same way it now. 4) I fear that if implemented it would be used as an excuse to dismantle all other social programs. Regarding, "Have you listened to the man speak?" Um... of course. But I'm not a big fan of words from a politician. Look at how terrible of a conman we have in the WH. It's remarkable anyone buys his BS. But they do. Well there are actually some epic great conmen out there. Obama was one of them. That guy could talk the talk. He had a supermajority and used it to give us republican health care, double our wars, and left the country in such a shitty place they gave the keys to country to an orange clown. And he even had a record. It was how I was duped by him. I looked at him voting against the Iraq war, and thought that because that was partly why he was even elected in the first place it would mean something. I was wrong because he was an epic great conman who had a record even. The biggest lesson I learned from that mistake was follow the money better. I didn't do that like I should have. If I had I would have realized he was selling his soul. Let's say an epic great talker like Obama was saying everything yang is saying... you would believe him right? But should you really with the benefit of hindsight? Regarding, "He knows wtf he is talking about" So does any epic great conman. The best lies are rooted in some truth. Regarding, "just like bernie does" Bernie has earned trust so it's just not the same. Regarding, "I wouldn't mind Bernie as president but some of his solutions are outdated." No. They aren't. Because the main problems haven't been changing. Income inequality levels are reaching great depression era levels. Perpetual war, millions without insurance, corruption in government and money in politics, the environment, the banks, education, criminal justice reform, the minimum wage and so much more are not problems of a bygone era. They are problems that have perpetual, persistent, and need to be addressed just as much as they did decades ago. And again... without fixing those "outdated problems" all that UBI money is going to go where exactly? In our pocket for a second before going to the richest of the rich. Regarding, "Yang has a vision for the future that I and millions of other Americans get behind 100%." The only thing that's really unique about his vision is UBI. You really love that vision? Ok. That doesn't mean you should be trusting that guy to carry out said vision. He needs to run for office, not at the top, and work his way up proving that he is legit with actions and not just words. That's how trust is built and how he should reasonably go about getting people to support him.
    1
  10545.  @mosesfilms947  Regarding, "This is the reason why I like Yang, he has got nothing to do with the establishment and there interests." Are you really so sure? What do you think the establishment's game is this primary? In 2016 it was clear... we all fall in line and support the anointed queen. In 2020 the game and their strategy has changed. If they tried a strategy like that and put one person up against sanders he would crush them and they would lose. So instead they are going with a throw anything and everything at the wall hoping something sticks (because they knew how flawed biden was and how he wouldn't stick for most). Their strategy is to have so many candidates that support becomes spread so thin no candidate gets a majority of delegates on the first ballot and force it to a contested convention where they hold all the cards. Harris isn't a threat to take lots of sanders supporters. But she will take some in a huge state like Cal. The same can be said of Bloomberg and the state of NY. And so on. None of them take many votes from sanders but they all take a handful and those handfuls add up. But let's say you are the establishment trying to plot this strategy. Wouldn't it make sense to try and get someone who can try to effectively take votes from the left somehow? But how can you do that? How could the establishment effectively come at sanders from the left? They can't. At least not with any candidate that is known. So you find someone, anyone, willing to play ball and do their dirty work for them. They need to be unknown and not have a record that could tip off the plan or the game is up. Now I'm not saying with certainty that this is going on but isn't it at least a little bit conceivable to you that this may be the case? Wouldn't that be a pretty good plan from their perspective? So maybe don't conclude with certainty that, "he has got nothing to do with the establishment and there interests." When I talk to yang supporters and mention that he doesn't have much experience one of their favorites to come at me with is that he did work with Obama. I'm not sure what you think about Obama as you have never addressed him. I clearly do not trust him and that's the person they like to cite for his "experience." To me that sets off a million red flags because Obama is conman and establishment as fuck. Do you agree with that? Or do you still have "hope and change" beer googles on? Regarding, "He holds the interests of the people and you can hear this when he speaks." No. You can't. Everyone loves to think they can just listen to people and see into their soul. They can't. Just stop. Because no matter how much you think you can... and you may even be excellent at it, you can always be fooled. I made my living playing poker. It was my job to read people. And I was good at it. Far better than the people around me (for the most part) who were trying to do the same. And still I don't sit here and think that I can just see into a person's soul reliably when they talk. I know that bluffing is forever going to be a thing and that some are really, really, really good at it. That's why even I, a person who read people professionally for a lifetime, don't spend my time trying to read these people. It is not a reliable source of information. So I follow the money and study their record. Regarding, "Of course though maybe holding a position in office will be a test of character, but that is where people go to get corrupted and greedy." Politics isn't some evil that corrupts people, it's a field that attracts evil people. There are exceptions but if you want to know why so many terrible people are in politics my explanation is far more apt. Warren didn't get "corrupt" after entering politics. She was a 90s republican and a liar before she got in the game. Regarding, "so it cant be regressive if it is working for other countries" Um... no. These are what these words mean in the context I'm using them here. Regressive (or regressive tax) = people on the bottom pay a higher percentage of income than people on the top. Progressive (or progressive tax) = people on the top pay a higher percentage of their income than the people on the bottom. It's regressive because math. I thought that was your guys thing? Regarding, "TO be honest I dont think anyone wants to have to file for welfare. Would you? I wouldnt." No. I wouldn't want to file and never have. But it should still be there for those that need it and there are people will still need it because it's not like 12K a year ensure everyone is going to be able to get by. Not even close. Regarding, "It is a system that keeps the poor poor." Those people might stay poor but it's not like it's because of the welfare. This sentence is just nonsense. Regarding, "You get rewarded for being poor essentially" You go from realizing that no one wants to be having their hand out to calling it a "reward" for being poor practically in the same breathe. Ug. Regarding, "UBI rewards you for doing pretty much anything." It has NOTHING to do with what you are doing. You could do nothing and you still get it. Therefor it's not a reward for anything. It would be an entitlement. As for whether or not it should be I'm honestly not sold on that. Health care and education on the other hand... well I have no question that those things should be entitlements and those fights are far more important to me. (Note: yang is not what he should be when it comes to health care.) Regarding, "People will have a cushion to fall back on if things go to shit." That's what social programs are designed for. It that's really the problem you want to address wouldn't more targeted and specific solutions be better capable of addressing this problem? And not a widesweeping entitlement across the nation. Regarding, "I disagree" You can disagree all you want but UBI does nothing to change the system at large. And the current system funnels all the money to the top. That's a fact. Regarding, "What is wrong with giving the people money" I'm not saying it's "wrong." But I will absolutely say it's not my priority. Not even close. My priorities are getting money out of politics and ending corruption (number one because it's the problem that makes all other problems impossible to solve), universal health care, ending perpetual war, protecting the environment, providing education, raising the minimum wage, breaking up the banks and monopolies, criminal justice reform (and ending the war on drugs), immigration reform, protecting workers and lots and lots of shit that's really important to me. Just giving people money whether they need it or not isn't on my list of priorities especially if it means putting all of my actually priorities on the backburner. Regarding, "If Yang doesnt make the nominee" He's not going to be the nominee. And you get one vote to cast in the primary. I hope you make the right choice.
    1
  10546. It has been used often to describe him... but don't let that stop you. It's what you should be calling him.
    1
  10547. Don't hate to say it. It's the truth.
    1
  10548. It will put pressure on the DNC to open their books and reform. How effective that pressure is going to be is unclear.
    1
  10549.  @thebossman222  I'd rather be insignificant than be responsible for things like war and mass incarceration.
    1
  10550.  @thebossman222  Regarding, "So what Trump has done then?" I don't support the orange clown and I don't really care to engage your whataboutism bullshit. Regarding, "To the immigrants?" Fun fact: Trump deported them a lesser rate than the Obama administration did. Regarding, "War" LFMAO. Trump sucks so much but it's like you are trying to bring up topics that make him look good. Trump didn't start a single new war during his time in office.
    1
  10551. You just called it news. LMFAO
    1
  10552.  @liamgartlan5961  It's not. CNN is propaganda, not news.
    1
  10553.  @TannerWilliam07  Reading your comments you used to work for "correct the record." It's the same BS and tactics.
    1
  10554.  @Holipsism  Dunning and kruger needed some inspiration for their original hypothesis.
    1
  10555.  @TannerWilliam07  "this is just a bot reply" Your stupidity is almost remarkable somehow.
    1
  10556. Don't let the fraud fool you.
    1
  10557. She is fucking terrible. But don't be close minded yourself. She is actually correct about this. Warren is very wrong to not be willing to go on fox.
    1
  10558.  @thestatusofyourslavery8324  Trolling right?
    1
  10559.  @thestatusofyourslavery8324  I mean, you keep giving your own idiotic comments a thumbs up so you must really be on to something. This is sarcasm in case you aren't smart enough to figure it out on your own.
    1
  10560.  @thestatusofyourslavery8324  Nothing says intellectual honestly like giving all your comments a thumbs up. Did I say intellectual honesty? I actually meant garbage.
    1
  10561. While I think you are greatly underestimating the deficit I do agree that we should be taxing cults.
    1
  10562. Musk has gotten rich off of US taxpayers. He's gotten billions of dollars in subsidies. You are an idiot but I'd bet that even you could be a billionaire if you were getting literally billions of dollars from the government.
    1
  10563. Yes to free speech. No to elon musk. F that guy.
    1
  10564. You need to write with more nuance then that if you care about accuracy, and you should. The corporate dems would rather have corporate cash than win elections would be accurate, unlike what you wrote. Justice dems, who are also dems, go out of their way to give that corporate cash the finger.
    1
  10565.  @Peopleofthesun386  You don't need to keep talking and proving you are a moron ya know.
    1
  10566.  @Gnolomweb  No. I don't vote for dogshit.
    1
  10567. It's not decency. He tries to hide it. He just isn't nearly as good at it as Harris and has foot in mouth syndrome.
    1
  10568. and I'm NOT going to be supporting any candidate selling out that is.
    1
  10569. I love Tulsi but my biggest problem with her is that she is running against Bernie Sanders and making it more likely a corporate shill like Biden wins by splitting the progressive vote in my opinion. I wish she were supporting Sanders when we all know the establishment is going to try and fuck him over and not opposing him.
    1
  10570.  @chadsimmons4496  Regarding, "nonsense" Hardly. Splitting the vote is a legit concern and you think it isn't imagine for a second how Joe Biden running in 2016 would have a been a game changer. Regarding, "She'll back out or win." What world do you live in where these are the only two options? Where running and losing isn't a thing? Cause that isn't this world. And when she backs out matters. If you are talking about her backing out after some primaries have been held the damage has already been done. Any pledged delegates that she earned are gone and lost forever at that point. All the votes that she got that would have gone to Sanders matter, not just because of those votes but because of momentum in politics. Regarding, "She will not hurt Bernie." She is to Bernie what Biden would have been to Hillary in 2016. Biden didn't run because even thou he sucks he understands and realizes that splitting the vote hurts their cause. Our best chance of getting a progressive president is by unifying and rallying around the clear leader of the progressive movement, Bernie Sanders. That's the reality. Please realize it.
    1
  10571.  @chadsimmons4496  Regarding, " You are assuming a Tulsi voter will automatically be a Bernie voter, if not for Tulsi." Not every last one of them but the great majority clearly would. For you to claim otherwise demonstrates that you are not intellectually honest and are just trying to reverse engineer things to say at this point. They sure as fuck wouldn't be likely to be going to the Joe Biden's of the world. Sheesh. And the reverse works as well because logic and reason. I'm a firm Bernie Sanders supporter. I have no interest in supporting anyone other than him. If the unthinkable happened and he died today my support would then go to Tulsi for obvious reasons. They are aligned on policy. They are both progressives. They are people that share the same voting base. Stop being a clown trying to claim otherwise. Tell you what... when you find Tulsi supporters ask them who their second choice would be if she dropped out today. Regarding, "That is Hillary-like." Only if you ignore the nuance of what I'm trying to say.
    1
  10572.  @chadsimmons4496  One more thing regarding, "this is all your opinion" Meanwhile, in reality, people posting Bernie/Tulsi and Tulsi/Bernie is very common. You know what I don't see? Tulsi/Biden. You know this is the case but you are just being intellectually dishonest.
    1
  10573.  @chadsimmons4496  Regarding, "Grow up. "Intellectually dishonest". Lol. Unbelievable." This sequence of words is pretty funny. Yes you are being intellectually dishonest when you can't admit that if Tulsi were not running the great majority of her supporters would then go to Sanders. That's the reality and you damn well know it.
    1
  10574.  @chadsimmons4496  Regarding, "if were, and a Tulsi supporter," You would almost certainly say you would be supporting Sanders if she dropped out. Because reality. Regarding, "you would be hurting Bernie's campaign more than her" I'm not about trying to "hurt" a campaign. I'm about trying to use logic and reason to achieve my goal of getting a progressive in the white house. This should be a share goal among progressives. That's my "principle." That's what I want and I'm trying to achieve. If you have a problem with that, or how I do it I honestly don't care. It's coming from a person who is clearly being intellectually dishonest to try and validate the conclusions they have already drawn. Splitting the vote is a legit concern for people with shared interests and similar goals. When you try to deny this you are denying reality.
    1
  10575.  @chadsimmons4496  Regarding, "so my opinion differs from you, that's me being intellectually dishonest... Got it." We can have our own opinions. We don't get to have our own facts. And it's a fact that the majority of Tulsi's supporters would support Sanders if she dropped out today. Regarding, "Ron Paul voters." Aren't really relevant to this conversation if they aren't going to support any other dem nominee if Tulsi dropped out. It's about the people that would go elsewhere in the party if Tulsi isn't around. Regarding, "I sure as heck wouldn't be smearing Tulsi Gabbard" I love Tulsi but I have substantive problems with her including the one I've mentioned. It's my opinion that progressives should be helping Sanders overcome the rigged game, not taking votes away from him. She is taking votes away from him. Not every last Gabbard supporter, but most. Regarding, "especially while giving Warren a pass." I trash Warren. And among the reasons I give for not liking her include her not running against Hillary in 2016. Her not endorsing the true progressive Sanders when he did run because she didn't. I trashed the shit out of her for running in 2020 because I thought she too would split the progressive vote. It is only intellectually honest of me to have the same objection for Tulsi while Tulsi does the same thing. Regarding, "Warren has the voters you should be worried about taking Bernie's bubble." I type this as I go and address all the points I see as I go along the way. I've already addressed this. I am worried about Warren's effect. But if you think it's a valid point for Warren why don't you think the same of Tulsi? Or is this merely you trying to be me? As for why I haven't talked about Warren specifically til now... well it hasn't been about her til now. Regarding, "There are a dozen corp dems splitting that vote." The establishments behavior here and their disregard about splitting their vote can be explained two ways. I think there is truth in both. First: they don't care about splitting their vote because for them it's all about stopping Bernie on the first ballot. Every candidate will steal at least a handful from him especially in their home states. Kamala takes Sanders voters in California, Booker in Jersey, O'rouke in Texas and so on. Secondly the establishment, while trying to act like Biden was their guy, knew exactly how deeply flawed their candidate of choice was. So they threw everything at the wall hoping that one of them would eventually stick... kinda how Kamala has been doing and kinda how Warren, the new darling of the corporate media, has been doing. I wouldn't be surprised if eventually they do coalesce around an establishment candidate of choice. Regarding, "This is the same conversation I have about Jill Stein "stealing" Hillary votes." I voted for Jill Stein in 2016, in a swing state. Clearly these things are not the same. I'm not saying anyone, even Bernie is "entitled" to anyone's votes. He's not. But progressives should have common goals that we should be working towards. And if you are doing things that works against those common goals, like making it more likely Biden gets the nomination, I'm going to start questioning their sincerity towards progressivism. Jill Stein had every right to be there because she had a lane that hillary didn't fill. If I didn't vote for Jill I wouldn't have been voting for Hillary. That is simply not the same as Bernie/Tulsi. They ARE running the same lane. Then you have to start to asking why and fearing the effects. Regarding, "It is an assumption. Period." There is plenty of polling done about second favorite candidates. There is also common sense. Bernie and Tulsi are closely aligned. Their voters come from the same pool. Progressives. It is far more than an assumption at this point. Regarding, "The people who write Bernie/Tulsi...are not splitting anything." These are people trying to have their cake and eat it to. They are trying to show support for more than one candidate when the fact of the matter is that they only get one primary vote to cast. I assume they plan to cast it for Bernie, but clearly they also like Tulsi, as they should, because they are in the same lane. Regarding, "You included that with Tulsi/Bernie...two different groups of people." How different are they really? They aren't. They are all progressives. The only difference is who they think should be at the top of the ticket. They are all progressives, with similar goals, even if one specific difference persists. And the reality is that if either of them is going to get the nomination the chances of getting one of the two is best if they would be working together from the start rather than opposing one another and splitting their shared voter pool. Regarding, "Anyway. I'm done with this age old debunked Ralph Nader gave you Bush psychopathy, ingrained in way too many Americans." Because I'm that guy who you think it's ingrained into huh? Meanwhile I voted for Nader. But this time it wasn't like my voting for Stein. That time I wasn't in a swing state. That time I was in a state whose election was decided long before I voted. So I voted for Nader because I liked him and because I wanted to support more than just the two major parties and show my support for more options. Had I been living in a swing state at the time I absolutely would have voted for Gore. Nader did "steal" my vote in a way. But only because I knew my vote wasn't going to matter. And at the end of the day we can determine how many votes were "stolen" and how elections would be different without people in the mix. And no Nader didn't cost Gore the election. But you can't act like him running doesn't affect other candidates because candidates don't operate in a vacuum... they affect the people around them and often times how they affect things is pretty easy to see and predict ahead of time. Regarding, "The point is the condescension from the Gore side, unable or unwilling to follow their own advice and vote Nader...while assuming "the other" should just fall in line." I'm not telling tulsi and her supporters they need to fall in line. I am trying to give logical reasons why I think they should be supporting sanders and not tulsi. If ultimately they disagree so be it. This is an area where we can have a difference of opinion at the end of the day. But we can't act like Tulsi's campaign doesn't affect Bernie's campaign. Because it does. How important that effect is is what people can have their own opinions about. Regarding, "Bernie has been saying the same thing for 50 years. Has been on the right side of most every issue during that time." Which is why, among other things, that all progressives, including Tulsi, should be backing him in a world where we know the game isn't fair. Regarding, "Nobody listened BECAUSE of the "split the vote" concept." I've never heard bernie talk about it ever. But I'm not bernie. And there are plenty of people who understand the concept. Again... joe biden in 2016. If you think he didn't run because of his son you would be wrong. He didn't run because he was clearing a path for hillary and wasn't willing to chance splitting the establishment vote because splitting the vote is a real thing to be considered. Regarding, "Tulsi ABSOLUTELY still needs her voice on that stage." Don't get me wrong, there is an argument to be made about benefits of her running. I love another progressive talking about progressive issues. I love her message of peace and about taking it to the MIC. But ultimately I think the downside of her running outweighs the good. In an election where every vote and every delegate matters I would prefer ensuring that Bernie gets every vote that is possible. It's my firm belief that progressives would be wise to be unified from the start. If people don't find the points I make compelling, so be it. But I'm going to make them. The "democratic" primary is far too important for us to fuck it up and I'm bothered by what I see as a very big, very avoidable mistake being made in real time.
    1
  10576.  @pooppoop7896  Regarding, "Overwhelming evidence, yet it won't hold up in court... how ironic" Do you come to the conclusion it's ironic when this same conversation is about trump? I suspect you would have a much better understanding if he were the topic. It's a side effect of being a political hack like you are.
    1
  10577.  @pooppoop7896  Regarding, "You don't know anything about me" I use the word "suspect" and asked you questions for a reason. Regarding, "I absolutely would take issue if the roles were reversed" So why don't you care about the dodo propping up Biden with this PR if you would care they did it for trump? What exactly is the difference? Regarding, "voter fraud allegations" Nothing about this thread is specifically about this. The OP doesn't say Biden cheated to win the election... they merely call them a crook.
    1
  10578.  @nathanfielure4305 Regarding, " It's BS because they want to play identity politics." If that's what you think then maybe, just maybe, Tulsi should have said that.
    1
  10579.  Curtis Edward  Regarding, " "That guy" she destroyed, whose name you can't remember, was busy answering stupid questions, while she was repeating her name and platform." That was a great moment for her. Great. Really great. Don't let the fact that I'm pissing on the same guy she pissed on distract you from that fact. That was the Tulsi I wanted the whole fucking debate. Instead she fucking sucked up until then. Her performance (and that is rightfully what all these politicians are doing in this terrible format) was dreadful up until then. If she never had that moment there would have been no doubt that she would have rightfully been considered one of the biggest losers of the night. Regarding, "Sometimes it's better to be Tulsi Gabbard the Question Dodger than it is to be that one Lady in Red who crushed that one guy." So Tusli Gabbard, the person who fucking crushed a guy AND who didn't dodge and deflect wasn't an option?
    1
  10580.  @nathanfielure4305  Regarding, " It depends on the question." No doubt Trump supporters tell themselves the same thing when the orange clown dodges. Regarding, "Not one size fits all." It really is. That is what having principles on the matter looks like. Regarding, "Thanks for the compliments." No problem. I'm sure most my anger towards you just because I know you are better in every way. That the things you say are just so fucking smart and I'm jealous of you. It's totally not because you make me feel like I'm living in the movie Idiocracy.
    1
  10581.  @eldritchpumpkinghost2968 Regarding, " it would have been a bad political move tho." So dodging and deflecting is the smart political move? Let's agree to disagree. People tend to find that shit repulsive, that is unless their candidate is doing it. Then it tends to be fine because people are biased idiots.
    1
  10582.  Curtis Edward  Regarding, " The reason that she had that moment was because she set it up." You cannot actually believe this. Those two things had NOTHING to do with one another.
    1
  10583.  @nathanfielure4305  Regarding, " There's no reason to make that a principle just look consistent to trump supporters." I'm honestly unclear as to what the fuck you are trying to say. But there is every reason for a politician being straight is a principle to be admired. And if you get a bullshit question.... the call it a bullshit question. Regarding, "Doesn't make sense to set an arbitrary standard when we are more than capable of evaluating a situation objectively." That's funny. You clearly have no objectivity. It should be the standard and a principle that we set for all politicians. Otherwise dipshts like you are just going to "objectively" make excuses and rationalizations for their candidates dodges. You take issue with the question? Fine. What the fuck is wrong with her taking issue with the question if that's yours and hers problem? Regarding, "We may end up thinking like idiots just to please them." Your conclusions are remarkably stupid. You are clearly working backwards from the answer you want to come to. You may as well be a corporate shill trying to figure out ways to justify war with the shit you are doing.
    1
  10584.  @avalaw1927  Regarding, "Who are you supporting??" I support Bernie Sanders. If the unthinkable happened and he died today I'd be supporting Tulsi Gabbard. Regarding, "I guarantee you whoever he or she is they have dodged a question" Nobody is perfect. But the difference between you and me is that when someone I support does something I don't like I call them out for it. I don't mindless defend those actions. Do you say this same shit when Trump dodges and his fans defend him for it? Regarding, "You going to respond??" I'm doing that right fucking now. Why aren't you? Why are you instead saying the same stupid shit Trumptards would say to defend their clown? I fucking love Tulsi and if you wonder why I'm so outraged a large part of it comes from that. Arguably I'm more pissed at her when she does it because I expect more from her. But calling out a person I support is EXACTLY what I'm doing this fucking second.
    1
  10585.  @SwiftySanders  You know what else is good to know? Youtube videos with titles such as, "Yang Admits He's Been Lying About Medicare For All" "Andrew Yang Backpedals from Medicare for All" "Andrew Yang Gets Called-Out Over His Health Care Lie" "Andrew Yang Reaffirms That He Does NOT Support Medicare For All"
    1
  10586.  @quaternio  "Our welfare system is one of the few successful government programs?" Studies show that every dollar put into programs like this pays itself over multiple times in value. I mean, it's not as good an investment as bombs are but still it's not a complete failure.
    1
  10587.  @Josh-oj9mm  Well done on reminding me why I can't stand yang gang thou. Not that I needed to.
    1
  10588.  @Josh-oj9mm  " "reeeeeeeeeee i have to pay 0.5 cents more on my mars bar! i'm so poor!"" reee I can't intelligently address what you are actually saying so I'm going to lie about what you are saying. Standard operating procedure for yanggang.
    1
  10589. Holy shit are you dumb as fuck. I could use a good laugh though... What exactly did Trump do to make America $4 Trillion since taking office?
    1
  10590. Come on buddy. I want to be smart like you. What exactly did Trump do to make America 4 Trillion? It must be pretty fucking amazing. Did Trump steal it from Mexico or something? What did he do? I eagerly await your answer.
    1
  10591. Come on Nismo I looked up "Trump has made America $4 TRILLION in his first 6 months in office," and it tells me you are full of shit. As it turns out Trump really hasn't done jack fucking shit since getting office other than stacking his cabinet with swamp creatures. So what the fuck are you talking about? Maybe I just don't go to the right websites. Maybe this is at alex jones or breitbart so that is why I'm such an uninformed idiot. I want to be smart like you. What did Trump do to make America $4 trillion? If what you say is true and not complete fucking bullshit surely you would want to say and gloat about how amazing Trump is. I'm waiting. I can't fucking wait. Please respond. We live in sad times and I could really use the laugh. Please respond and don't be a fucking coward. It wouldn't reflect well on Trump supporters if you puss out.
    1
  10592. He made zero effort to fight for anything other than it.
    1
  10593. There's lots of people who would like to do the same, but in a world where so many people are trying to pay the bills and just make ends meet this is hard. If only they too were making more. Then they would be more able to go to mom and pops stores and pay a little more instead of needing to save that extra dollar at walmart so they can pay the rent or for their overpriced health care.
    1
  10594.  @jeffsullivan1926  Regarding, "How do you Americans deal with the stress of healthcare." I don't know. This is my horror story... I used to be young a long time ago. I was working hard... more than full time hours but was only officially "part time" so that they wouldn't have to offer me health insurance at my work when I started having pretty serious health issues. I was able to get the work done but as many americans did I was forced to file for medical bankruptcy to pay for the expensive procedure and week in the hospital because I didn't have health insurance. No doubt I should have had it myself but I guess I thought I was invincible and young enough that I'd be ok. I was wrong. At least it opened my eyes. At least then I knew better and was going to make sure I would be protected in the future. I didn't want to go without health insurance ever again. But now I had a "pre-existing condition" which meant that if I were going to get health insurance I was going to have to pay absolutely ridiculous rates. It's health care. Everyone needs it. No matter the age. No matter their stupidity for not going out and getting protected themselves... they need it. And we can give it to the people. We already pay TWICE as much as our northern neighbors per person for our system and theirs doesn't leave millions uninsured and produces better results (superior infant mortality rate and superior life expectancy). It's a fucking no brainer to the sane. But there are lots of people who get filthy rich off of the sick and they are able to buy our politicians. I sometimes wonder how they sleep at night. Probably on mattresses stuffed with cash.
    1
  10595.  @jeffsullivan1926  Regarding, "wow man, sorry to hear that" Thanks but it's nothing really to what some have to deal with. There are people who try to ration life saving medicine because they can't afford it among so many other crazy horror stories. This country is pretty messed up and it's been this way for some time. It's why the country was willing to elect a complete disgrace to the human race like trump after obama. They know this country needs to change direction. Sadly obama didn't bring it and they were willing to try anything that might possibly be change even thou they had no good reason to think trump was the answer. Hopefully we can get sanders in 2020 and start a new course for this country. It desperately needs it. Take care to you as well. Peace.
    1
  10596. Yeah. They are too kind. Pelosi is terrible.
    1
  10597. Can't be trusted to fight for the people (anymore)? Wake the fuck up. He never fought for the people. He pandered and lied to the people before selling them out.
    1
  10598. I get that you are trashing him already but really... it's not enough.
    1
  10599.  @IMSiegfried  Regarding, "We can not survive with trump in office for that long." You are obviously being hyperbolic. And does a country that doesn't give it's citizens health care, locks their citizens up at a higher rate, is the greatest threat to world peace, and is filled with corruption really deserve to exist?
    1
  10600.  @IMSiegfried  Regarding, "Both the DNC and RNC are corrupt." Yeah. So don't tell me I need to vote Biden and corruption. Regarding, "We need Ranked Choice Voting." I'd be for it. But I'm not going to let it not being around stop me from supporting decent candidates.
    1
  10601. Nori regarding, "he marched with King" and literally all polling regarding Sanders, you clearly have a hard time dealing with reality, facts, and evidence so I'll leave you to your delusions. You might want to consider that the reason you can't see the hate (without saying things that are utterly insane and detached from reality) is because it doesn't actually exist. Take care. I don't have the patience for this.
    1
  10602. Correction: maybe just tattoo I'm a idiot on your forehead instead. It sends the more correct message.
    1
  10603.  get it right  It's better than their plan B of bombing a planned parenthood or some other equally stupid thing.
    1
  10604.  @beastmode6609  "doing the right thing" You are conflating completely different things. I wasn't talking about "doing the right thing" and neither were you until now. That's a different topic. We were talking about being "selfish" versus altruism. "doing the right thing...affects your family's quality of life." Let's say your idea of "doing the right thing" didn't just "affect their quality of life" but literally causes someone you love to LOSE their life. Are you sure you are really doing the right thing?
    1
  10605. I give two shits about your "movement" if it isn't fighting for M4A.
    1
  10606. Holy shit are you dumb. I'd elaborate but it isn't worth the time. I could write a novel of brilliant insight and it is wasted on an idiot like you. If you think that explanation was long imagine how much I have to say about all the stupid things you have said. Literally everything you have said is fucking moronic. Too bad you don't realize that, much less know how to spell realize.
    1
  10607. Just go watch CNN reruns to see your clown.
    1
  10608. I suspect the people who paid for you comment are the same people working overtime to smear him.
    1
  10609. What terrible rationalization to not cover important facts. Trump, the POTUS, may as well never be talked about or covered then according to your "logic."
    1
  10610.  @TlvcledekxCnuc  "Purity test" is just smear for people who have the audacity to have standards. Nobody is perfect and we don't require perfection. You are just being absurd.
    1
  10611. Yup. Too bad she is a fraud.
    1
  10612.  @LARPANON  Bigger disappointment? Kyle or Obama?
    1
  10613. I think you are conflating how nice a person is with whether or not they are correct on an issue. I have family members who are willing to walk off a cliff with corporate dems. That doesn't make them bad people. It makes them wrong. Have some perspective. And when you demonize people who are wrong you don't persuade anyone, you cause them to double down and entrench themselves.
    1
  10614. The makers of this propaganda will be happy to learn that is the message you took from this.
    1
  10615.  @anonuser6867  That's worse than trump how exactly? Oh right...
    1
  10616. So is TYT
    1
  10617.  @mostcom  TYT sure could buy a lot of shit with that 20 million they got from team clinton. But no thanks. I leave eating shit to fans of this crap.
    1
  10618. He's the only reason the last two primaries even needed to be rigged and he is also why m4a is as popular with the public as it is. He is the most popular politician in the country so that's why his opinion matters and yours is irrelevant.
    1
  10619. It's tough to willfully put a target on yourself. And that's what doing this does.
    1
  10620.  @serenachenaille3451  Regarding, "Welcome to primary politics, bitch." What a pathetic "defense" of Warren. Regarding, "The progressive agenda doesn't need crybabies like you." Nah. It doesn't need morons like you and blatant liars like Warren. Regarding, "Vote for Bloomberg. He's more your style" Good lord you are stupid. I'm surprised you aren't a trump supporter.
    1
  10621. Another day, another flip flop from liar warren. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/elections-2020/elizabeth-warren-appears-to-drop-opposition-to-unlimited-money-group-backing-her-campaign/ar-BB10dCBN?ocid=spartanntp
    1
  10622. People commenting.
    1
  10623. I'm only here to mock any video with such a title. You are lost and trying to mislead others. What a gross premise for a video and not because I support RFK... I just believe in democracy... unlike the person who made this video.
    1
  10624.  @TheOldSchoolGamer93  There likely is in a world where people are far too happy to settle for a "lesser" evil.
    1
  10625.  @The_Smegma_Mastermind  Regarding, "If he manages to not take on any big money interests," That's not going to happen. Regarding, "he may very well be more progressive than Biden." But he is already arguably more progressive than biden because romney isn't single handedly responsibly for mass incarceration of the poor and predominately minorities. Not that it really matters. Both are ultimately POS.
    1
  10626. You are a mental midget who can't do simple math.
    1
  10627. 221, nah. We should handicap ourselves by going with the candidate who has the same major problem Sanders had in 2016 when entering the race of a lack of name recognition (obvious sarcasm is obvious). And as much as I do like, trust, and list Gabbard as first on the short list of VP candidates the fact of the matter is that she doesn't have a very long record. And even though her record is very short she has evolved a lot on some very important issues. Because Sanders is older I know for certain exactly what I am getting with him. I cannot be as sure about Gabbard. One of the reasons Obama was able to fool people into thinking he was progressive was because he didn't have much of a track record to go off of like Gabbard. The establishment is going to do anything and everything to stop a progressive from winning 2020 just like they did in 2016. We need every advantage we can possibly get if we are going to win. Sanders is the most popular politician in the country. He has the name recognition of a rock star. He is the only logical choice and is our best chance of winning. I don't care about age. I care about policy and so should everyone else.
    1
  10628. 221 I was agreeing with everything you said. I was disagreeing with the original poster. A running mate is overblown as an issue. I know of nobody that votes based on the bottom of the ticket. That said I trust Sanders would pick someone good. Don't get me wrong about my comments about Gabbard and her short record. I love her. She is the first person I list as favorites for VP (followed by Nina Turner). I just want to make the point of why age is, in a way, an excellent thing to have. Regarding, "Warren." Fuck her. I don't trust her and am not looking to support her. Not endorsing Sanders in 2016, not supporting DAPL protestors, and voting for the 700 billion dollar per year budget for the department of offense were all unforgivable to me. That said, to prove my point about people not caring about the bottom of the ticket, even thou I don't like her she wouldn't stop me from supporting Sanders were he to choose her (although I'm confident he won't and wouldn't be happy if he did). Regardless of who Sanders would pick the bottom line is that he would pick someone. That is essentially why we have a VP. Still people will try to make his age an issue because there are few other avenues to effectively attack him. And the war has already begun. The machine is in full force to trying to do anything and everything to preemptively stop Sanders from winning in 2020. Still he is the best chance to win in a must win election.
    1
  10629.  @Nathan-gn3ls  I think that's pretty much it. I think there are phrases and words that, regardless of the content about said topic, cause youtube do anything and everything to push that content to the back burner. CNN for example can talk about the military and it won't be demonetized and it might even make their trending list. But Kyle and progressives talking about it... well... they are trying to silence them without being so blatant as full ban the way they did alex jones. David Doel, the rational national, just got done talking about this. Here's his very recent video on what I think is the same topic as our conversation. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6M8AjGcVXgM
    1
  10630.  @BoRaiChoWins  I was going to go off on you... then I kept reading. :)
    1
  10631. You voted for miriam adelson. "worshiper" You voted for a war criminal... just like dems did.
    1
  10632.  @667SatansNeighbor  "a ton of spam accounts" LMFAO Those are the comments they DON'T censor. "Hope that helps." It did not and you are wrong.
    1
  10633.  @667SatansNeighbor  "then get deleted." Deleted comments are GONE. And do not count towards the reply count. The comments I'm talking about are shadowbanned.
    1
  10634.  @667SatansNeighbor  " then get deleted." The people whose comments are being shadowbanned look like they are showing for all they know. The way to tell if you comment is being shadowbanned or not is by signing out and looking at the thread then... but nobody will do it cause it's too much work and the cen sor s know it.
    1
  10635. Richard Medhurst is live right now. If you like jimmy you will like him. Do yourself a favor and check him out. Peace!
    1
  10636.  @TheAlibabatree  Do you really not understand what public forums are used for? Especially when talking politics?
    1
  10637.  @TheAlibabatree  If that's what you think I said you are even dumber than I thought.
    1
  10638. Regarding, "there isn't a single Republican on the list." They are called justice DEMOCRATS not justice REPUBLICANS.
    1
  10639. Wolf PAC is not a group of people running for office. That is why they are able to focus exclusively on a single issue. You can't do that if you run for office. You are comparing apples and oranges.
    1
  10640. You are being ridiculous. These are people that are trying to run as, and I'm not sure how many more times I need to point this out DEMOCRATS. You should not have so much trouble understanding this. It is literally part of their name. Whether you like it or not that is suppose to mean something. The justice part means that they are prioritizing getting money out of politics and are going to run their campaign a certain a way. You don't want to support them? Fine. You don't want to donate to them? Fine. You want to start your own political party where the only requirement is a desire to get money out of politics? Fine. But I would really appreciate it if you wouldn't outright lie and say bullshit like, "JD democrats do not treat campaign finance reform as the number one issue," even thou they do, because you have a problem with their stance on other issues and because they choose to take a position on other issues. Regarding, "you should be taking every republican" Whether or not you want to face reality the words democrat and republican mean certain things. I would encourage republicans to focus on getting money out of politics the same way JD do. But that would make them justice republicans because words have meaning.
    1
  10641. Regarding, "If you prioritized CFR above party affiliation then you wouldn't have a purity test on other pet issues that have nothing to do with CFR." Worst. "Logic." Ever. There is a purity test when it comes to CFR. From their cite, "All candidates are REQUIRED to pledge not to take any corporate PAC or corporate lobbyist money." Despite this you don't say "If you prioritized other pet issues above CFR then you wouldn't have a purity test on CFR that have nothing to do with pet issues" even thou it would make sense according to your own idiotic "logic" because that isn't the BS narrative you are trying to push. As for the "purity test" when it comes to everything else, (again from their own cite) "Additionally, they will be progressive candidates who GENERALLY agree with the JD platform." (Note we should add, "JD will not support a candidate who does not support all of their progressive priorities" to the list of your lies.) So which is the priority? The area that is an actual litmus test and inflexible or the area that is flexible? Yes. You are absolutely are lying. Try not to lie to yourself about it the way you lie to everyone else. https://www.justicedemocrats.com/about
    1
  10642. I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt and think that you just have trouble understanding the meaning of words are not intentionally lying. That said you are definitely a liar. Priority does not mean, "nothing else matters and if something else matters it isn't a priority" like you seem to think. You are looking for exclusivity not priority. They mean very different things.
    1
  10643. But you know what, I'm done caring what you think. But I again encourage you to refrain from lying in the future to make your terrible points.
    1
  10644. Some of us care about the debt and deficit even if you don't.
    1
  10645. LSHITU should be a thing as either an acronym or as it's own word. Either would work for me.
    1
  10646. HRC smeared her as a russian much like sams crowd is smearing her as republican. They don't have argument.
    1
  10647.  @Buckleup-x9r  That sounds like the type of gibberish you say when you don't actually have a point.
    1
  10648.  @Buckleup-x9r  Are you trying to prove my point for me? It's not really necessary. But thanks anyway I guess.
    1
  10649.  @Buckleup-x9r  "you obviously got and continue to be triggered." This is funny because you sound triggered. "I didn't come to your post and rant" LMFAO Are you unaware that you keep responding to me with nothing more than ad hominem? Wouldn't you like to at least attempt an argument?
    1
  10650.  @Buckleup-x9r  I'm just kidding. I know you only want to rant and that you have nothing of value to say. But good luck with your mindless smears. It's clearly all you have.
    1
  10651.  @Buckleup-x9r  I'll take that as a no to my invite of something other than ad hominem. You continue to prove my point that that's all you have.
    1
  10652.  @Buckleup-x9r  " justifiable?" No. But I do think it was understandable considering the fact that thousands of people, many who were native russians, were being slaughtered in the donbas. It's also understandable considering NATO keeps breaking it's promises and putting countries on it's border. Lastly it's understandable because I know how much they hate nazis and ukraine had azov. I'd bet that if canada or mexico was joining a military allience hositile to the US you would think they would be "justified." Remember the cuban missle crisis?
    1
  10653.  @Buckleup-x9r  A bear isn't justified to maul a human being but if a human being is poking it with a stick I'm going to understand it.
    1
  10654.  @Buckleup-x9r  "articles in Reuters and NPR both interviewing Russians living in the Ukraine" And I've seen patrick lancaster interview some who thought it was. "Putin is insinuating that Zylensky is a Nazi" Nope. He is saying that zylensky is a puppet for nazis because that's a fact whether it triggers you or not. "who wants a to rebuild the old Soviet empire." Of course you do. You only listen to western propaganda. "His ambitions have seemed to backfired" LMFAO You are impossible to take seriously. "poised to gain 2 more countries" NATO was also going to provoke him because they don't want peace. They want war.
    1
  10655.  @Buckleup-x9r  "Al Jazeera? They are all saying the same thing." Yeah. You are impossible to take seriously.
    1
  10656.  @JohnBrowningsGhost  Good and bad are objective facts. They are not relative.
    1
  10657. Dems have the presidency, house, and senate while they point fingers at the other side.
    1
  10658. Which would be more reasonable if they didn't try to tell people they are open to different people (clearly they are not). Which would be more reasonable if it didn't demonstrate they don't prioritize winning. They say don't want "spoilers." They say they want unity. Maybe you just don't care they they are hypocrites and losers?
    1
  10659. I'm having a hard time understand you. Especially when you say the corrupt corporate "democratic" party is "too socialist leaning." They had supermajorities and used it to implement the republicans thinktake idea of obamacare instead of socialist health care.
    1
  10660. Any amount of socialism is a bad thing to you? So a country that has a high school education like socialist k-12 education is terrible for the country? We see things very differently. Obamacare is crony capitalism... like pretty much all of the country's capitalism these days. And I'm just fine with regulated capitalism for pretty much everything. It's just that there a couple specific things like health care and war that I'm not willing to let some get filthy rich off of.
    1
  10661. Doctors are for humans. Turtles get vets.
    1
  10662. You think and say what you do because of the dunning-kruger effect.
    1
  10663. They would prefer Biden or another sell out wins. But compared to Sanders winning... yeah. They would clearly prefer trump to Bernie.
    1
  10664. You insist on explaining the creation of the universe with god but you don't even try to explain the creation of your god.
    1
  10665. Also I love how you deleted the other thread. You know your ideas don't stand up to questioning. But that doesn't stop you from repeating them does it. Sad.
    1
  10666.  @daniram2002  regarding, "God is self-existent." Then there is no reason to think the universe can't be "self-existent" either then unless you just want to make terrible arguments for the existence of god with your case of special pleading.
    1
  10667.  @daniram2002  regarding, "it’s not my God it’s our God." Nope. It's your god. A bunch of bullshit that you buy into.
    1
  10668. Only if you don't want m4a. And why don't you want m4a?
    1
  10669. He's exposed himself as a fraud.
    1
  10670. Bernie did not vote for the war in Iraq. He spoke about it in great detail on the floor before voting against it.
    1
  10671. Bernie Nostradamus Sanders https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_om-x323Em0&t=20s
    1
  10672. Regarding, "Ok got the wrong war" That's a pretty fucking big mistake wouldn't you agree? Regarding, "when saddam invaded Kuwait early 90s" Yeah... saddam had INVADED a country that was an ally of ours. I'm a peace loving hippie who has no interest in war, wants to avoid it at all cost, and considers it a last resort always. But after an ally is being invaded that is the time it should be used and not a time for you wrongfully smear him, originally based on an outright lie, and now based on what was a legitimate use of force even by a peace loving hippie. Don't be afraid to do the right thing and correct your original bullshit or just delete it outright. If you leave it I'll have to think it is your intention to spread disinformation.
    1
  10673. Regarding, "Almost everyone voted for war on Iraq, including Bernie,,many believed te lies. WMD lies." Fuck it's hard to deal with hypocritical lying pieces of shit.
    1
  10674. Secret as in how the court is conducted dipshit.
    1
  10675.  @mikeottersole  Yes. They are. Along with their aipac puppets.
    1
  10676.  @mikeottersole  Yes. They are. As are their puppets in the US government are.
    1
  10677.  @mikeottersole  As are their puppets like you.
    1
  10678.  @mikeottersole  z'ism is akin to notseaism
    1
  10679.  @mikeottersole  It's not. Sorry not sorry if the truth hurts.
    1
  10680.  @mikeottersole  I can't even say what I want to say because of censorship by z's
    1
  10681.  @mikeottersole  Israel just murdered another child. And you are complicit.
    1
  10682.  @mikeottersole  Israel just bombed another child. And you are complicit.
    1
  10683.  @mikeottersole  Israel just ended the life of another child. And you are complicit.
    1
  10684.  @mikeottersole  Israel just took the life of another child. And you are complicit.
    1
  10685.  @mikeottersole  Israel is committing jennyside (sic). And you are complicit.
    1
  10686.  @mikeottersole  Israel is committing jennnyside (sic). And you are complicit.
    1
  10687.  @mikeottersole  Israel is committing enhtic (sic) cleansing. And you are complicit.
    1
  10688.  @mikeottersole  You are complicit in mass murder.
    1
  10689.  @mikeottersole  History will rightfully remember you the way it remembers those who supported the notseas.
    1
  10690.  @mikeottersole  "not a religious" Of course not... z'ism isn't a religion... it's a death cult.
    1
  10691.  @mikeottersole  "not a religious person" Of course not. Z'ism isn't a religion. It's a death cult.
    1
  10692.  @mikeottersole  "not a religious" Z'ism isn't a religion. It's a death cuuuuulllllltttttt.
    1
  10693.  @mikeottersole  "not a religious person" Me either. I'm atheist. But I wish there was a devil because of z's like you.
    1
  10694. Not the right things thou. Should have a coconut or, at least, someone's foot in there... not booze.
    1
  10695. Thumbs down for ryan grimm. If I wanted to watch corporate hack propagandists like him I'd watch corporate media.
    1
  10696. You thought enough of this comment to post it huh? That doesn't speak well of you.
    1
  10697. This is America Rachel... we pistol whip at the very least.
    1
  10698. Yeah Rachel, the white kids part was dumb. Now take out your gun and teach them a lesson.
    1
  10699. Doubling down on stupid Dick? I'd elaborate on why what you are saying is dumb but I feel no need.
    1
  10700. If that's what you want to think I don't care. You can't fix stupid so I'm not going to try with you.
    1
  10701. "People with logic like that are always amusing." I can't tell you how funny I find this. Thanks for the laugh dipshit.
    1
  10702. Regarding, "So your laughing at me laughing at you?" *you're and yes. Regarding, "Once again you do not comprehend complex tasks." You think the things you do because you are stupid as fuck. The only redeeming quality you have is that you are fun to laugh at. Regarding, "Im amuses by how stupid you are." *amused And again, you think the stupid shit you do because you are dumb as fuck. If only you were significantly smarter then you are. Then you might be smart enough to realize what an epic idiot you would be. Regarding, "Your amazing." *You're Regarding, "Ill make sure to look for you at the next Trump rally" I don't doubt you go to Trump rallies but you won't see me there. Good luck with the whole dumb as fuck thing you got going on.
    1
  10703. Yes. Even your average piece of shit democratic senator doesn't have their own foundation that essentially sells a uranium mine to russia.
    1
  10704.  M G  Did you remove the idiotic thumbs ups you gave your own comments? Good for you. I didn't think you had the self awareness to be embarrassed enough by them to take them down. Maybe there is hope for you. Probably not. But maybe.
    1
  10705.  Sasha Ja rom  Regarding, "how is Trump racist?" Maybe read what I've already written in this thread. I've already answered this so I feel no reason to take you very seriously. Well done deflecting to talk about biden like trump cultist love to do. As if he has anything to do with whether or not trump is a racist.
    1
  10706.  Sasha Ja rom  Regarding, "how is Trump racist?" Tell you what, I'll copy and paste what I've already written as if you actually care what my reasoning is. You obviously don't. "But why is trump a racist? Take his racist wall policy. Why does Trump only care about a wall on the southern border? Why does the guy who loves walls not think we need a wall on that wide open norther border? Because he is a racist. He only cares about building a wall between us and the country that isn't predominately white."
    1
  10707. I know people like to use the phrase 'time is money' but that doesn't actually make it true. My point is that voting costs you time while gambling at a rigged casino has you wagering money. That is an apples to oranges analogy. The powers that be work overtime to suppress the vote. That's because they know voting does matter even if you don't.
    1
  10708. There are always other ways to cover for and make excuses for the squad think sams sycophants.
    1
  10709. Not like sam. Give him all your money.
    1
  10710. If Biden's pick were going to be worth a shit it would have been announced long ago. But whoever it is hiding in the basement with joe. And hiding something is pretty telling.
    1
  10711. If it's so "clear" then you should have no trouble explaining the joke.
    1
  10712. The US is punching itself in the d ick.
    1
  10713. But they do stand for things... corporate interests and the status quo.
    1
  10714.  @minniemins2837  "Why the anger and aggression?" People are dying right now because they don't have health insurance. It's pretty impossible to take you seriously if you don't know why people are pissed.
    1
  10715. ​ @minniemins2837  "Of course I wanted it voted on." You want to know how you can tell that I want it voted on? I insist it be voted on. Regarding, "You don’t hold the monopoly on what the right strategy is." You two seconds ago, "Of course I wanted it voted on." It's clearly the right strategy and you are just trying to talk out of both sides of your mouth. Regarding, "Honestly I don’t know what the best strategy is" Are you the same person who literally just got done also saying, "Of course I wanted it voted on." or not? Regarding, "I’m not wanting to throw away allies simply because we disagree over strategy." If you don't support bringing m4a to a vote you don't support m4a and you aren't my ally. It's that simple. My allegiance is to m4a. Regarding, "We all generally have the same goals." My goal is to get m4a and that ONLY happens by voting on it. So if that isn't your goal then don't pretend otherwise. Regarding, "Don’t you see the problem with putting our friends and political allies on this “with us or against us” line" You are either with us or against us so I don't know why stating the reality of the matter would be a problem. If you want m4a you want it voted on or are just pretending and pandering on the issue. That's the reality.
    1
  10716.  @minniemins2837  Regarding, "being aggressive and insulting to the people who are supposed to be your allies" It's almost like we get to decide for ourselves who we think is on our side and who is against us. Regarding, "Who are you going to get to join your movement" Anyone who wants to support m4a. This isn't rocket science. Regarding, "telling people how they have to make it happen" Is there a way to get m4a without voting on it? So yeah... voting on it sorta has to happen while you spout nonsense like this. Regarding, "if they don’t do it your way" Do you have another idea on how to get m4a? No? No other way? Voting on m4a is the only way we get m4a? Turns out it does need to be this way. Regarding, "How do you think these things become laws?" Probably not by voting on it. How do you think these things become laws? Magic? Turns out you need to vote on it for it to happen. Regarding, "Or by coalitions?" Does this involve not voting or some shit? I must be insane for addressing anything you have to say intelligently. Regarding, "This is about the best way to get M4A to happen" Fun fact: literally the ONLY way m4a happens is by voting on it.
    1
  10717.  @minniemins2837  "Your strategy could be very wrong." So what's your strategy to bring m4a that doesn't involve voting on m4a?
    1
  10718.  @minniemins2837  Regarding, "I’m sorry if you are either too stubborn to see how destructive this “burn it down” attitude is" I'm not going to lie this is pretty funny coming from someone who wants to spend their time pissing on people trying to force a vote on m4a instead of spending their time trying to force our politicians to vote on m4a. I'm sorry if you are either too stubborn to see how destructive this "burn it down" attitude is.
    1
  10719.  @minniemins2837  Regarding, "I want a vote but I don’t think doing it this way is wise or strategic" FYI I honestly don't take you seriously in the least. I'm only addressing you further not for you but for anyone else who might read your BS. Regarding, "It doesn’t tell us anything new." It's already telling me things that are new. I thought AOC would fight for m4a. I thought nomiki konst wasn't a hack. But because of force the vote I'm ALREADY learning new things. Regarding, "It just makes M4A look weak to the public" Meanwhile, in reality, the corporate media is able to portray m4a as "pie in the sky" and "impossible" in part because it's not voted on. Not voting on m4a is BEING weak. Regarding, "when it loses by" If it loses then anyone who votes against it puts a target on their back. That's why pelosi and corporate twats are willing to fight so hard to not vote on this. Regarding, "They have every reason to vote yes because it’s guaranteed to fail anyways." For it to fail some people need to stop it. Just because some clowns can find shade is a nonsensical reason to not fight and expose the clowns you can. I also find "guaranteed to fail" really funny coming from a person who doesn't even want to vote. Regarding, "burn their bridges" So bridges with people whose job is to stop the public from m4a are suppose to be important to me? They aren't. Not even a little bit. Regarding, " if they are banned from any committees?" AOC literally just got kicked from a committee so playing nice is already proving to be a failure so.... Regarding, "AOC is already getting punished for her recent comments about Nancy." I guess AOC should just act like a corporate dem then. Then I'm sure we can have m4a right? Regarding, "They will bury her and she will be impotent." I guess AOC better beat nancy to it and become impotent herself then. Brilliant. If she doesn't force the vote she ALREADY IS impotent. Regarding, "now you have a M4A bill that has failed" And then we can start the process of targeting every single person that helped it fail... and we ALREADY are. Regarding, "When does M4A actually pass?" I'm not sure. Sooner than if we don't have a vote in the first place that's for damn sure. Regarding, "How long will that take?" Sooner now that targets have been place on all the people that stopped it from happening the first time. Regarding, "what are you doing on these comments here to push legislators to vote?" Well I'm not under the impression I'm talking to them directly and changing the world single handedly. I do hope to get the occasional person to sign the petition to force the vote but in all honesty I'm more hear to vent my frustration with people like you who make me feel like I'm living in the movie Idiocracy.
    1
  10720.  @minniemins2837  Regarding, "is stupid to bash other lefties who have a different idea of what is good for strategy" Pretty funny in an infuriating kinda way coming from you.
    1
  10721.  @minniemins2837  "you’re the one calling anyone who isn’t calling to force the M4A vote “suspect af”." I am. And literally the first thing you did in this thread was call people you disagree with "suspect af." You ARE a hypocrite.
    1
  10722.  @minniemins2837  "she got kicked from being in committee because she didn’t play fair" If I were interested in what you have to say at this point, but I'm really not, I'd ask what AOC did that you think wasn't "playing fair." Seeing as how AOC was ALREADY not doing ANYTHING that I want her to do when when she lost that committee seat your point is ABSOLUTE nonsense and only proves why AOC should be fighting the good fight all along. That committee seat only shows why playing nice like she has been accomplishes NOTHING.
    1
  10723. The establishment thanks you for doing their work for them.
    1
  10724.  @demsdebreaks8236  That doesn't answer my question. Do you not realize you are a hypocrite? Or do you just not care that you are a hypocrite?
    1
  10725.  @demsdebreaks8236  Don't forget to give your stupid comments a thumbs up.
    1
  10726. How does that hurt a republican in disguise?
    1
  10727.  @HSstriker  regarding, "not in my country" Don't get me wrong... there are all sorts of idiotic laws in the US. There are laws akin to this when it comes to things like voice recordings of phone calls and such in some areas. But I'm glad we don't have (to the best of my knowledge and there may be areas where this isn't true and they essentially are violating our first amendment) laws akin to what you speak. The only thing laws like what you speak would do is protect criminals. There is no reasonable right to privacy when you are in public. And you have no reasonable right to privacy when you are in my private area. You have a right to privacy when in your private area... but that right can and should go away when you are breaking the law. Maybe right isn't the best word to use for it... it's more like a privilege.
    1
  10728. At least obama had charisma. Asking people to vote for pete is beyond insulting.
    1
  10729. For a system that costs twice as much per person, produces inferior results, and leaves millions bankrupt... yeah... it really is that bad.
    1
  10730.  @bondbranden  He's still a huge fraud and he was more recent than obama. Stop comparing POS. I don't care which one you think smells worse.
    1
  10731. @WeAreIt Regarding, "We already knew who trump was." I might have but plenty of trump fans with degrees from trump university clearly didn't. There are already people who want to make excuses for him or deflect from the fact that he sucks by pointing at obama as if I care who is worse when they both suck. Regarding, "he isn’t the biggest fraud" Wait is the conversation now about who is the biggest fraud of all time or about who is the biggest fraud during a period of time? Why would you lie about what we are talking about? Obama and trump weren't happening at the same time. So who was the biggest fraud during trumps years if it wasn't trump? Oh right.... it was him.
    1
  10732.  @candycanessongs  Regarding, "You sound like a fraud Clint." Go on... Regarding, "You sound like a fraud Clint. You just want the conversation to stop." Never said I want the conversation to stop. Pretty sure that means that if anyone is a fraud it's you. Regarding, "How very "Democratic" of you." LMFAO. I'm here pissing on obama and the fraud squad and call them frauds but you want to make this partisan. LMFAO
    1
  10733. @WeAreIt Regarding, "So yeah Obama is the biggest fraud." Let me try and keep this simple in the form of a question. Who was the biggest fraud during the trump era? Spoiler alert: it wasn't obama, it wasn't aoc, it was trump. Regarding, "inconveniently trying to protect Obama" I'm not "protecting" obama. I just recognize that he wasn't president during the trump years. This isn't rocket science dipshit.
    1
  10734. @WeAreIt Regarding, "Obama is the biggest fraud." This is not about raking frauds from first to last. It's about who is biggest fraud from an era. Obviously. Does your brain melt when people rightfully call trump a fraud? It shouldn't.
    1
  10735.  @madashell7224  Why? Are republicans not frauds?
    1
  10736.  @ukiyo1371  I hope "dr" phil is paying you for your bootlicking of him.
    1
  10737.  @launabanauna8958  You: "He humiliated this confused young woman" Also you: "But to suggest that he is in any way a “joke,” is completely unwarranted." You are also a joke.
    1
  10738.  @katenix8384  He is a fraud and you are a clown.
    1
  10739. What about trump?
    1
  10740.  @RickyParker666  And you have nothing to offer about their valid criticisms of the video? Like for example, leaving out ana's attempted blackmail?
    1
  10741.  @RickyParker666  LOL sorry if the truth hurts. It's exactly what she was doing. She tried to use his apology note from back in the day to get him to stop outing TYTs shitlibery or she'd try to metoo him. Let's say it jimmy was actually guilty of being a sexual predator... then she enabled him and hired him long after she knew that. She's a terrible person and kyle is leaving out important details.
    1
  10742.  @RickyParker666  Ana was apparently willing to let a sexual predator (in her fake reality) be at large as long as he wasn't "running his mouth" about how she and TYT are POS terrible. That's blackmail.
    1
  10743. Yes. Amy should drop out.
    1
  10744. Was that sarcasm or do you really not get that I wasn't agreeing with you?
    1
  10745. My problem with you is that the conclusions you draw, again, as I already pointed out, leave no room for nuanced thinking. You just go ahead and go back to thinking literally everyone is working against you.
    1
  10746. In all honesty I think you are a fucking moron. Too stupid for me to want to address all your bullshit intelligently. Good luck with that.
    1
  10747. Gay rights.
    1
  10748. Too true. There is a handful of people who never think going to war is a bad idea. They are not good people.
    1
  10749. He is not equating anything. Don't be silly.
    1
  10750. I'm just kidding... I know it's both.
    1
  10751. Kiss Kiss, is that your name because that is what you like to do to Trumps ass? Is that thumb meant to go up Trumps butt?
    1
  10752. Steve you forgot to call me a snowflake fuckface.
    1
  10753. "She never ever bs'd anyone about how neither party is worth ish" Now you are just BSing. Ana has always been blue no matter who when it's election season. Are you paid to gaslight people?
    1
  10754.  @zoobrizz  Is that the best that you can do with your pathetic smears? All you are doing is proving that you are an idiot.
    1
  10755. He could give away everything he has and you would still mindless smear him. That's why you are a hack.
    1
  10756. Regarding, "let her run because tbh as a Bernie supporter his minor weakness is foreign policy which is her major strength." Bernie was preaching peace in Iraq while Tulsi said get me a uniform. Candidates don't get to share votes. Progressives should be coalescing around the progressive with an actual chance of winning.
    1
  10757.  @ALL_CAPS__  Regarding, " and needs to address this in a more targeted way." This isn't "targeted." https://berniesanders.com/issues/racial-justice/
    1
  10758.  @dougcasey6117  Regarding, " these needs pertains only to black folks?" Never said that. Strawman much? But I am talking about problems that disproportionately affect blacks, because reality. Regarding, "like a right-wing bigot" Yeah. They are known for caring about the disproportionate number of blacks in jail for weed even though blacks use the drug at a slightly lower percentage. /s Regarding, "reparations" I'm in favor of reparations but it's important that other problems are addressed otherwise those reparations are just going to go into the hands of the filthy rich. Do you have more stupid shit you would like to say?
    1
  10759.  @darkempath7436  Regarding, " my vote is going to Donald Trump" Just when I thought I couldn't take you any less seriously you proved me wrong.
    1
  10760. No.
    1
  10761.  @nothanks6738  You heard me. No means no. Not that it stopped that dentist from using their banana.
    1
  10762. "War pays for itself." Warmongers.
    1
  10763. If he stays then dems can fear monger about the court while running.
    1
  10764.  @kylequest  "Andrew Yang is a strong Progressive." The guy who lied about supporting m4a while running for potus? Whose UBI is as regressive as he can possibly make it? Who can't even support BDS? And sounds like a typical neocon on war and peace? Who thinks assange should be prosecuted? Just stop. He's a conman.
    1
  10765. Corruption
    1
  10766. I care because it's BS but to each their own.
    1
  10767. Why would you limit yourself to only one?
    1
  10768.  @ministryoftruth8499  Too little maybe? Only 3?
    1
  10769.  @ministryoftruth8499  75 percent is like a C in school. Keep learning. And by learning I mean whacking it.
    1
  10770. Her heart is in the right place. It just doesn't seem like it because she is so very wrong.
    1
  10771.  @Naldito15  "The next election will consist of 2 new puppets" Thanks in part to people like you who feed their narrative that's it's only about the two major corrupt parties.
    1
  10772.  @gwarlow  "Don’t vote for anyone" The establishment appreciates and counts on apathy like yours. Maybe don't do what they want like this.
    1
  10773.  @cockoffgewgle4993  "no it didn't" LMFAO Yes. It did. I hope you are at least paid to gaslight. "predominantly affected the poor" LMFAO Blacks are predominately poor. "people who committed crimes and did drugs." Meanwhile, in reality, hunter biden is out and about.
    1
  10774.  @cockoffgewgle4993  "no it didn't" It did. Sorry not sorry if you are triggered by facts. "predominantly affected the poor" Blacks and minorities are predominately poor.
    1
  10775.  @cockoffgewgle4993  "no it didn't" In the age of information ignorance like yours is a choice.
    1
  10776.  @sniperjared  "people getting locked up for dealing" I'm white as snow, old as dirt, smoked my entire life as have been ALL my dealers but I've never had to deal with the problem and I'm not the one the "stop and frisk" for no reason.
    1
  10777.  @davemartino5997  "our fault blacks love making money slinging rock ? Spare us your idiotic talking points" Never said that. Spare me your idiotic talking point.
    1
  10778.  @davemartino5997  "It’s our fault blacks love making money slinging rock ?" You have anything to offer about the things I've actual said f face?
    1
  10779. "feeding into right wing talking points" LMFAO. Russian agent obviously. /s
    1
  10780. Good luck with that. I can't wait to see who we get that is even worse than trump after biden's inevitable failure.
    1
  10781.  @brianmattingly3204  Regarding, "no one could be worse than Trump." Trump is incompetent evil in a world with actually competent terrible people. Competent terrible people are obviously worse. Some of them call themselves democrats these days... for example mike bloomberg. Regarding, "At least with an establishment candidate (yes I know, ew), we can stop the bleeding." Biden is largely responsible for the shit show we are in. He doesn't have a magic wand to make coronavirus go away or give people jobs, or money, or health care. Biden as president only ensures that after his disastrous presidency the "left" will be blamed for the oncoming depression and we can continue the cycle down the drain as the next trump gets to follow him. Regarding, "we HAVE to stop the bleeding." As if Biden does this. Let's reward a party that rigged it's primary for the guy with dementia. It's more like you are cutting yourself or like you have stockholm syndrome. Regarding, "It is a band aid. But band aids serve a purpose." This country needs open heart surgery while you offer a "band aid." What could possibly go wrong? That couldn't possibly lead to backlash after the obvious disaster coming down the road. Regarding, "I am simply not willing to look anyone in the eye whose relatives have died or suffered" What about the record numbers of people Biden has helped put in jail? Who are being put there in blatantly racist numbers? What about the many people biden has helped kill with his warmongering? What about women who accused him sexual assault? What about those people? You just gonna tell them orange man bad? Regarding, "I refused to vote" Is that what you think I advocate for? I don't. I say vote. But have standards for getting your vote. For example, don't vote for anyone that you consider evil, even if it's the "lesser evil." Regarding, "That'll be a great argument..." That would be a stupid strawman argument.
    1
  10782.  @brianmattingly3204  Regarding, "Since you apparently are having no part of lesser evil arguments" What? I am making arguments and don't pretend otherwise. Regarding, "who would you suggest I vote for? Honest curiosity." I suggest you think about voting the way I do. You know those signs that carnies would have that read, "you need to be at least so tall to ride." Well you should have your own hypothetical sign that reads, " you need to be at least so decent to get my vote." I'm not even going to tell you what metrics you need to use to "be at least so decent to get your vote." Just that you NEED to have that sign. Without it you are going to be willing to support any piece of shit that comes along as long as you think their opponent is worse. The more I think about it the more I honestly think the country would be better off if trump wins in 2020. Not because he is good or even decent because is obviously TERRIBLE, but because I think it leads to a far superior setup for 2024 and beyond. The next 4 years are going to suck regardless of who wins between trump and biden and I want the left being the next people given a chance instead of the next trump getting the reigns. But I have my sign. Trump is a piece of shit so he can NEVER get my vote. Regarding, "who would you suggest I vote for? Honest curiosity." Find a third party candidate you don't think is evil and represents your values and vote for them. The green party possibly. Or write someone it. But whoever you support make sure they are at least some kind of decent. And biden is not. Not even close.
    1
  10783.  @brianmattingly3204  Regarding, "You want to compare and grade Biden on 50 years of politics, or do what's best for the country." As if Bidens long history of being terrible has nothing to do with a discussion about what is best for the country? Really? Regarding, "The Covidiot-In-Chief has managed the country even more into the ground as though it were one of his buildings or casinos." As if Biden has is blameless for the shit situation we are in? As if civil unrest in a world where he exacerbated the problem like no other with his crime bill isn't the reality? Trump bad. I get it. Really I do. That doesn't magically make biden not suck because he obviously does. Regarding, "in another 4 he will have dismantled the justice department even more, installed another Far Right supreme court judge, and installed fascist control, deployed the military on US soil and created a secret police." Sure... all trump needs to dismantle society is 4 more years. Nevermind that biden is the one personally responsible for Clarance Thomas being on the court because of his disgraceful actions toward anita hill. Nevermind that biden happily supports the patriot act and spying on americans. That he and obama watched peaceful protesters have their rights trampled at DAPL. Just once I'd like a biden supporter try to justify their support by talking about biden. You guys would be so freaking lost if you couldn't talk about how trump is bad. Regarding, "This isn't about Biden not earning your vote" LMFAO. Maybe Biden can put that on a bumper sticker. "This isn't about earning your vote. -Joe Biden 2020 Regarding, "t's about stopping a Narcissitic Paranoid Schizophrenic from destroying the great experiment we call America." Whatever you got to tell yourself to rationalize supporting a pathological liar, warmonger, and corrupt piece of shit with dementia. Regarding, "Incidentally NO ONE believes her now" I do. It isn't hard to believe the guy with obvious boundary issues and wandering hands would be capable of such a thing. Regarding, "not a Single news agency bc she has been disproved" LFMAO. The corporate media buried the story until after he was the presumptive nominee. And "disproved" is utter nonsense. You can say you don't believe her if you want but what you are actually saying is just lies. Regarding, "But what is worse - 1 (false)...or 13." Anything over 0 is unacceptable. And just saying something is false doesn't make what you are saying true. Regarding, "you are voting for Trump!" I have as much trouble taking you seriously as I do trump supporters when you say shit like this. That's not how voting works. Trump supporter would say the same except that I'm voting for biden. All of you are morons spouting nonsense to try and rationalize supporting a piece of shit. Regarding, "No matter what you tell yourself to help you sleep at night." I'm voting for good. I'm not voting for someone that sucks. That's you. Tell yourself whatever you need to to help you sleep at night. I know you will. Trump supporters sleep like babies as well. Regarding, "You will have helped reelect the most dangerous man in American history." TDS much? He hasn't even been the worst president in my lifetime. GWB still holds that title. Regarding, "I'd say grow up." I'm old as dirt. Regarding, "you were willing to stand idly by as America plummeted into the abyss for your ideals" LFMAO. It's like you are hoping america crumbles so that you can be right. I would be glad to be wrong. I'd be happy to not have the next trump after the next obama. But history has shown us where this story goes.
    1
  10784.  @brianmattingly3204  Biden lies about working with civil rights, about being arrested with mandela, about being endorsed by the NAACP, about his record (like when he lied about not calling for cuts to SS), lies about anything when politically convenient. Tara Reade may or may not be a liar. But I know for certain Biden is a liar.
    1
  10785.  @MichaelAronson  You still making excuses for sam? I hope you are paid well for it.
    1
  10786.  @MichaelAronson  "confused" What about my comment has you so confused? You are impossible to take seriously.
    1
  10787. So what you are saying is that you are a russian bot then?
    1
  10788.  @tretre3892  I can't even image being as gullible and stupid as you are. Get a brain and some common sense. Not that it's possible. Sheep.
    1
  10789.  @cyyy  He's looking at the world and he's pissed which is understandable. But he's blaming peasants as if it's their fault things are the way they are and he's forgetting that they too are VICTIMS.
    1
  10790.  @cyyy  Meh. He's projecting evil on them ("waste of humans") and I don't think the OP is actually evil (a "waste of a human").
    1
  10791.  @magpie3794  "Time to grow a spine." Look man I'm all for people being heroes like snowden and assange but let's not act like anyone and everyone should be willing or have to make the sacrifices that those heroes made. Stop victim blaming FFS.
    1
  10792.  @cyyy  "how do you know that liberal?" How do you know I'm a "liberal?" "is he a victim too?" If you aren't sitting on top being part of the one percent then YES... they ABSOLUTELY ARE a victim. Even useful idiots who tell you to vote for complete POS can be victims even while they say the dumbest shit.
    1
  10793. "sense of justice... Waste of humans" The problem I have with this mentality is that it's the same type of mentality that thinks Ukrainians should be falling on their sword and fighting to the last man against russia because of a "sense of justice." And if you aren't doing that you are a "waste of a human" because they aren't fighting how you think they should. When in reality prioritizing peace is very human. You act like it's all black and white when the world is grey. You act like people shouldn't be willing to sacrifice anything for peace. Are you living by these values? What are you sacrificing for your sense of justice? Are you snowden or assange? I suspect not. I suspect you aren't really sacrificing anything while thinking everyone else should be willing to sacrifice it all.
    1
  10794.  @magpie3794  "I’m for peace" The only reason I even know this reply is there is because I can see it in my notifications. It says this thread has 16 replies but I can only see like 12 when I expand it out. Censorship sucks. If I haven't responded to someone here it's only because I can't see it.
    1
  10795.  @UnstoppableYaris  "is the video.." Am I addressing the video or am I addressing a person's specific quotes from this thread? I straight up haven't even ATTEMPTED to comment about ANYTHING in this video. "Does someone help you tie your shoes in the morning or is it Velcro?" Since this seems like projection I'll answer my own rhetorical question for you... I'm directly addressing a person's comment and not addressing this video. If you guys are trying to destroy the last little bit of faith I have in humanity it's working.
    1
  10796.  @UnstoppableYaris  This is suppose to be where the smart people hang out. Why are you here?
    1
  10797.  @UnstoppableYaris  What have you sacrificed for your sense of justice? I'd hate to think it's just virtue signaling so that you can think you are better than that human waste.
    1
  10798.  @UnstoppableYaris  "felt it was “safe” for them to show support for the common cause." Why did they think that? Did they have justified concerns or are you just dismissing them out of hand because you don't agree with their actions? "Do you think it’s about the money, or about the fact that people sat quietly and let the “thieves” operate with impunity?" I do my best to try and answer people's questions honestly but I'm honestly confused about what exactly you are asking me. Are you really asking me to speak about people that I've never met and don't exactly understand their situation outside of your biased cliffsnotes? "what have you done lately beside misconstruing others’ comments on YouTube?" Before I answer that I'm curious to know what EXACTLY you think I should be doing?
    1
  10799.  @UnstoppableYaris  "misconstruing others’ comments on YouTube?" I'm also curious to know how you think I'm misconstruing anyone's statements. Are you sure you aren't just triggered by what I'm saying?
    1
  10800.  @UnstoppableYaris  "cost me over $30K out of my own pocket." Let's say you didn't have 30K to lose. What then?
    1
  10801.  @UnstoppableYaris  I concede I don't really care what you think at this point. You destroy my faith in humanity as much as any "waste of human" out there.
    1
  10802. Dems have everything. Stop blaming republicans when you get nothing but crumbs.
    1
  10803.  @ReallyTwistedHumor  Why are you talking about republicans when dems have everything. That's pretty much my point even if we agree on most things. (not an attack on the capitol, I'm a pacisfist.)
    1
  10804. I hope that does not include justice dems and Bernie Sanders and is only referring to corporate shills.
    1
  10805. You are the dems wet dream. They know you are a sheep who will support them regardless of how terrible they are and that they have to do NOTHING to get your vote.
    1
  10806. I never really liked Rubin. I did like Maher.
    1
  10807. Regarding, "less than 5% of min. wage workers work full time." Where do you get you data? Pulled from your ass is not a credible source of information. The actual number is somewhere between 30 and 35 percent... as if you actually care. Clearly you don't. That is you getting the facts wrong. That is you having no fucking idea what the world actually looks like. Then you want to get into "opinion," aka why, and it isn't surprising that a person that can't get facts correct has an opinion that is beyond stupid. Seriously, I hate even using the word stupid there. It just doesn't do justice to someone like you. We need to invent new words to describe people like you because something like stupid just doesn't cut it. Purple do yourself a favor and don't waste your time on intelligent argument on this fuckface hoping to enlighten them. That is a complete waste of time. That said if you are here to vent some frustration towards the epic idiots like him that are dragging society down and/or just want to troll this douche then by all means carry on. They are a source of constant entertainment. Take, "I love how Bernie supporters have no clue how a business operates" for example. I don't know about you but that is hilarious to me coming from this moron.
    1
  10808. I agree with everything you said purple. I only engage this fucking idiot for some comic relief in sad times.
    1
  10809. Regarding, "I can admit my mistakes even though they are rare." LMFAO You can't even admit your mistakes without making another mistake while doing it in the same fucking sentence. Regarding, "that doesn't change anything else" You think the things you do because you are stupid beyond words. Regarding, "Most min. wage workers don't work full time, that is the point." Is that how you justify and rationalize lying? Regarding, "So in the end my point stands." So in the end my point that you, a person who is ignorant of facts, is not be taken seriously about anything, including their opinions. You only get to have a valid opinion if you are not a fucking liar about facts while doing it. Regarding, "I post many facts on these videos and people like you end up calling me a troll." He calls you a troll because you are a pathological liar. Regarding, "That is the level of argument you guys have." That is funny coming from the dipshit whose original statement is a brazen lie and then followed it up with more lies. Seriously... this is absolutely not hyperbole... you are a disgrace to the human race. You make everyone dumber when you open your mouth and the world would be a better place if you just shut the fuck up forever.
    1
  10810. Regarding, "you did not give a rebuttal on why most min. wage workers work part time." You think the things you do because you are stupid as fuck. I addressed this 4 days ago you fucking moron. Regarding, "You just called me stupid." Thanks for proving my point that you are stupid.
    1
  10811. LMFAO I find myself looking forward to the stupid things you say so I can laugh at you. You never disappoint in that. Regarding, "you didn't address it." I am awed that you can say things like this that are so epic stupid even after I point at it and not be ashamed and embarrassed of yourself. I refer you to, "As for why so many minimum wage jobs are part time you would be wise to examine the incentive corporations have for keeping their labor force working part time rather than full time that has nothing to do with the BS narrative you want to portray of a lazy public." As in... corporations often have a financial incentive for having part time workers rather then full time workers. Full time workers can cost them more (per hour of labor) because they are often required to give them benefits they don't have to give part time employees... like health insurance for example. I really need new insults for you in times like these. Nothing seems apt enough. As always thanks for proving my point that you are stupid. I couldn't do it without you.
    1
  10812. Bueller? You didn't address my questions. And when I say you didn't address it I am not lying like a piece of shit... like some.
    1
  10813. I guess I should just add "I can admit my mistakes" to your list of lies. What a disgrace to the human race you are.
    1
  10814. Or if snake warren did drop out. It was all orchestrated.
    1
  10815. Who are her supporters? I really do not understand them.
    1
  10816. So all wars are equal to you? Holy shit you are a moron.
    1
  10817.  @johnnyspin6346  Because Kyle should formulate his decisions about whether or not war is a good idea based on congressional approval? Again, holy shit are you stupid. And before you again make an ass of yourself and try to say that congress should always approve going to war before we do it... of course. But that's very different than thinking that congress should be approving it. Do everyone a favor and just shut the fuck up instead of making the world dumber with your drivel. Thanks for that in advance.
    1
  10818.  @johnnyspin6346  Nevermind then. I'll figure you can't make up your mind.
    1
  10819.  @dashx1103  "I can't begrudge anyone" I can and do begrudge anyone that votes for evil and/or tells people to vote for evil. And at the end of the day that's what sirota does... not only does he vote for evil but he tells everyone else they should be voting for evil also. It's abhorrent.
    1
  10820.  @dashx1103  "I also understand people who vote against who they think is the worst candidate." As do I. I understand that they have been propagandized by people like sirota who, every election cycle, tells everyone to vote for the blue team no matter how corrupt and terrible they are. He will actually tell you they are bad right before he tells you to vote for them. I legit have more respect for the dupes who support the trumps and bidens of the world because they think they have their back. Sirota KNOWS the blue team doesn't have your back and will STILL tell you to vote for them.
    1
  10821.  @dashx1103  "Judge people all you want." Yeah. It's not like we are talking about voting where that sort of thing might come in handy. Don't judge people claim deeply unserious people such as yourself. That's a way to good voting! /s " some "evil" is worse than other "evil." " There is. It's still evil and that's how they get you to vote for it. They know you would do it any other way and this is how they get you to say it's ok. It's not. It's just evil. "I voted Gravel in 2020" I don't care. This isn't about you no matter how much you want to make it that way. It's about sirota.
    1
  10822.  @dashx1103  "Don't tell me what to do." Sorry not sorry for telling you and everyone to not vote for evil. You are impossible to take seriously.
    1
  10823.  @dashx1103  "you seem to think you can define reality for everyone else." I don't. I say don't vote for evil. Whatever YOU think that is. You shouldn't vote for it. And when you say you are voting for the "lesser evil" that is YOU saying it's evil. Not me.
    1
  10824.  @dashx1103  "Who did you vote for" As always I voted for someone I don't think is evil. Are you really worried about who I'm voting for? You should be worried about the people who are voting someone they KNOW is evil. Millions of people knew trump was terrible and voted for him anyway. Sirota and his ilk are the other side of that coin and together they ensure the country circles the drain forever because they vote for evil and you think there is nothing wrong with that.
    1
  10825.  @dashx1103  "I understand people who vote "lesser evil."" Like I said so do I... I know they are conditioned to think it's ok by people like you and sirota. I understand that this is the ONLY way they would support evil. Convince them that at least that thing they know is evil and terrible is at least less evil and terrible than something else... like that makes it ok. It doesn't. "I don't really get the mindset of telling other people how they should think and vote." You don't understand why trying to get people to not support evil is important and worth while? You are impossible to take seriously.
    1
  10826.  @dashx1103  "You aren't persuading" While I concede I am condescending and it's not good for persuading ultimately my main method of persuasion is done with logical arguments. "you just tell people they are "wrong."" No. I don't. And while I do tell them they are wrong I also tell them WHY they are wrong. "Impossible to take you seriously." Is this your idea of persuading? Or is this "hectoring" and being particularly hypocritical about it? "So do you agree that the Squad should have abstained from voting for Pelosi as Speaker in 2020, thus allowing McCarthy to become Speaker?" What a terrible question. The squad should have been voting for someone for speaker who would bring M4A to the floor. Of course they shouldn't abstain and give away their power. "McCarthey" There is zero reason for his name to be talked about in any of this. His name is only wrongly mentioned because people like sirota and cenk wanted to fearmonger against force the vote. And you are doing more of it. Wow.
    1
  10827.  @dashx1103  "who did you vote for in 2020?" I'll copy and paste my answer.... "As always I voted for someone I don't think is evil. Are you really worried about who I'm voting for? You should be worried about the people who are voting someone they KNOW is evil. Millions of people knew trump was terrible and voted for him anyway. Sirota and his ilk are the other side of that coin and together they ensure the country circles the drain forever because they vote for evil and you think there is nothing wrong with that."
    1
  10828.  @dashx1103  "who did you vote for in 2020?" I'll try a third time to give you an answer since my first 2 tries have been shadowbanned... I voted for someone that I thought was good. Why would you worry about that? And not the people who voted for someone they THEMSELVES (not me) thought was evil. Millions of people voted for trump knowing he was terrible. I tell them what I tell sirota and his ilk. Don't vote for evil. Period. I shouldn't have to explain that, but I will.
    1
  10829.  @dashx1103  Furthermore I'm forced to explain the absolute basics of logic because of people like sirota. Don't vote for evil really isn't that hard, complicated, or controversial. It only becomes those things because the sirotas of the world who are out there manufacturing consent for evil.
    1
  10830.  @dashx1103  "you won't answer the question." Yeah. I don't like you very much and it's completely irrelevant to the point I'm making. It's just you deflecting.
    1
  10831.  @dashx1103  "Hilarious." You will continue to be condescending towards me after your lecturing me about it. Figures.
    1
  10832.  @dashx1103  "if someone voted for Biden because "they didn't think he was evil" they still suck" They would still be wrong but I would legit have more respect for that person than the sirotas of the world who know biden is evil and vote for him anyway. And all my arguments are completely different and much harder. For that person I would need to convince them biden is evil and that is hard. Telling someone to stop voting for something they KNOW is evil is much easier to do. Like I said they only get to that point because of the terrible "arguments" sirota and his ilk use to manufacture consent for evil.
    1
  10833.  @dashx1103  "Can't answer the questions." Nope. I choose not to. I even went out of may to go in great detail to tell you exactly why I'm not answering. You don't even attempt to address any of that. You will continue to use this as a deflection to avoid talking about the things of actual substance.
    1
  10834.  @dashx1103  "perfectly reasonable" Any chance you learned anything after all this? Let's see. Is it perfectly reasonable to vote for evil? This shouldn't be hard.
    1
  10835.  @dashx1103  Me: "I don't like you very much and it's completely irrelevant to the point I'm making. It's just you deflecting." You: "wHy aRe YoU nOt AnSeWeRiNg?"
    1
  10836.  @dashx1103  "hypocrite" You clearly do not know the meaning of the word. "since you are so willing to condemn others for their vote" I'm condemning people for voting for what they think is evil. "you'd offer information about your's" I've told you that I voted for someone I don't think was evil. If I did that would make me a hypocrite but I don't so I'm not.
    1
  10837.  @dashx1103  I just realized that you wrote "And who also KNOW that casting a conscience vote for an outsider candidate is a wasted vote." In the same comment as, "I voted Gravel in 2020." What an absolute clown and walking contradiction you are.
    1
  10838.  @dashx1103  "how so" According to you you are "wasting your vote." You are a clown.
    1
  10839.  @dashx1103  "who did you vote for?" I answered you question. You never answered mine... let's try again... is it "perfectly reasonable" to vote for someone you yourself think is evil? And again... this shouldn't be hard. The answer should be obvious.
    1
  10840. 8:56 "Nobody says that was right." Doctors are saying it's ok because they are the ones writing the prescriptions. What a tool that propagandist must be.
    1
  10841. It must be nice to think complex topics are actually "simple."
    1
  10842.  @Pauliewalnuts_822  I'm not a biden supporter and not looking to defend him or his positions. He is a complete POS. That doesn't mean your original comment isn't also trash.
    1
  10843.  @Pauliewalnuts_822  Also, FYI I'm not a right winger triggered at being associated with biden. I'm way left. I just understand that the world is incredibly complicated and that painting with huge brushes like you did in you OP is just idiotic. The world is grey.
    1
  10844.  @Pauliewalnuts_822  Regarding, "I am an idiot so explain please." I will give you one example among many of a person who votes democrat and isn't a "right winger." A left winger who has been brainwashed by corporate media propaganda. I promise you they exist.
    1
  10845.  @Pauliewalnuts_822  There probably aren't a ton of examples like I made it seem but another example is a left winger who adheres to a lesser of two evils philosophy and considers the democrats the lesser evil.
    1
  10846.  @Pauliewalnuts_822  There are left wingers who are too busy living their lives just trying to put food on the table to be properly informed about who they are voting for.
    1
  10847.  @Pauliewalnuts_822  Anyways... it's not so simple. Pretty much nothing in life is. When you think something is simple you should probably rethink things.
    1
  10848.  @Pauliewalnuts_822  Also, justice democrats are not right wing.
    1
  10849. I'm going to assume that you are trolling. Either way you suck at life.
    1
  10850.  @za.307  Yeah, you're totally not an idiot. /s
    1
  10851.  @it-s-a-mystery  "are you ok?" I legit have no idea what point you are trying to make. And I'm fine with it.
    1
  10852.  @it-s-a-mystery  "people who don't see dore for what he is usual need help, that's all." LMFAO He's not the blackmailer. That's the person you don't seem to see for what they are. It's funny. "claim someone flashed all their co workers on one mans word" LMFAO Ana literally left a blackmail note. I don't need anyone's word when I have ana's own words and they betray her. "it's a mystery" why you don't care about it. Just kidding. I know you aren't a serious person.
    1
  10853.  @it-s-a-mystery  "you're opting" You are opting ignore a literal blackmail note. I can only think it's intentional.
    1
  10854.  @it-s-a-mystery  "explain" Your turn. Explain how it isn't blackmail. How that isn't something a movie villain might say to try and blackmail. Because it clearly is.
    1
  10855.  @it-s-a-mystery  "Don't stop short." LMFAO I took you all the way there. Just ignoring my comment doesn't make it go away.
    1
  10856.  @davidgoldstein1526  The blackmail note among other things.
    1
  10857.  @za.307  "I got a problem with a middle aged man being lewd about a colleague." But absolutely no problem with a blackmailer. It's just weird.
    1
  10858.  @mckenzie.latham91  "No one does that at TYT" Except ana. "it’s never been proven" She literally left a note. Just ignoring it doesn't make it go away. "blackmail is an actual crime" It is. "if Jimmy had any evidence of it he would have gone to the police" LMFAO This is funny because if ana actually had evidence that jimmy harrassed her she would have gone to the cops a long time ago. Instead she tried to blackmail him with an apology note. "he didn’t because" The hassle likely isn't worth it and he has better things to do with his time. That said he was wise to get ahead of it by releasing her blackmail note when she wrote it.
    1
  10859.  @mckenzie.latham91  "blackmail is an actual crime and if Jimmy had any evidence of it he would have gone to the police" Sexual harrassment is an actual crime and if ana had any evidence of it she would have gone to the police.
    1
  10860.  @mckenzie.latham91  " it’s never been proven" She literally left a note. Just ignoring it doesn't make it go away.
    1
  10861. 1 candidates don't get to share delagates 2 he already has good foreign policy. if only tulsi listened to him on foreign policy... she might have avoided going to war in Iraq.
    1
  10862.  @dumont7478  Regarding, "In a brokered convention" Planning for a brokered convention is planning to lose. Sanders NEEDS to win on the first ballot or the party has all the levers of power at their disposal. Regarding, "in 2015/16 his foreign policy was dogshit" He has been saying give peace a chance for decades even if I concede he isn't perfect. Regarding, "That was his weakness." Meanwhile the fact that he voted against the Iraq war in the wake of 9-11 and gave a speech about why it was wrong that makes him look like Nostradamus in hindsight means that foreign policy is not the problem you are claiming. Regarding, "What I really don't like about his foreign policy has to do with him giving into the state department, pentagon, cia narrative about what is going on in various countries with "socialist" leaders have domestic "problems"." He's a politician who knows that the establishment is going to do anything and everything to stop him. He has to be careful to not give them ammo unnecessarily. You are talking about words. He can be trusted when it comes to action. There's no way he is going to start unnecessary wars.
    1
  10863.  @dumont7478  Regarding, "winning in the first round would be the easiest way for Bernie to be nominated." It's not just the "easiest." It's arguably the ONLY way he gets the nomination. Regarding, "But in calling for the only other progressive candidate to drop out in such a dismissive fashion will alienate a lot of potential Bernie supporters." When did dropping truth bombs become "dismissive." Even if it is I'm not here to hold hands and coddle people even if that is often the best way to win over sheep. The reality is that she has ZERO path to the nomination. The reality is is that every delegate (not that I think she can even get one) and more importantly every vote that she gets that would have gone to Bernie is a problem and a gift to the establishment. If pointing this out is being "dismissive" or some shit to you I honestly don't care. We are in the middle of a war and you are quibbling over hurt feelings. Regarding, "Us Sanders supporters need to be careful about consolidating the progressive bloc. That is all I mean to say." This isn't the only thing you meant to say. If this is the only thing you meant to say I'd be agreeing with you and I'd even concede that I personally could do far better at this. I get frustrated with voters voting against their interests. I get frustrated with what I see as terrible arguments and I let it get to me. But this isn't about me. It's about tulsi and what SHE should be doing and why. Sanders is running on behalf of US right now. Tulsi feels to me like she is running to build her brand at this point and throwing US under the bus to do it. And I'm a person that generally likes tulsi.
    1
  10864.  @dumont7478  Regarding, "While he is busy "not giving unnecessary ammo" to the state apparatus, the regime change machine has carte blanche to continue their regime change narrative." And Bernie spending all his time, energy, and political capital focusing on them and saying the things you think he should be saying would have ZERO effect on this. You know what would actually have an effect on their "regime change machine," Sanders being POTUS. Regarding, "And it even legitimises certain narratives." Again... the narrative < who is potus. What really matters? Regarding, "Words matter a lot, especially from presidential candidates." While words aren't meaningless, actions > words. Regarding, "He may personally not try to get involved in foreign military adventurism, but the cia and intelligence agencies will always be pushing regime change narratives to brain wash the populace. And that narrative has to constantly be challenged." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_om-x323Em0 Regarding, "This is why Tulsi Gabbard's foreign policy is so much better." She went to war while Sanders preached peace. Actions > words. That and her foreign policy proposals are tainted by a blatant conflict of interest. She collects a check from the MIC this very moment. It's like if Sanders collected a check from Aetna while advocating for M4A. Their messages would both still be correct but the conflict of interest is a red flag and reason to question their convictions on said topic. Regarding, "She challenges the phrasing of the narratives being woven." WENT. TO. WAR. PERSONALLY. Regarding, "Don't worry i am not taking this disagreement personal." Good. It's not.
    1
  10865.  @dumont7478  One more thing regarding, "WENT. TO. WAR. PERSONALLY." And it wasn't just any war. It was the biggest foreign policy disaster of the generation.
    1
  10866.  @dumont7478  Regarding, "that experience seems to have opened her eyes about all the lies that led to the war to begin with." Yup. Good for her. I'm happy she seemed to learn the correct message and is preaching that message. The same can be said of McCain on torture on cheney on gay rights. But as for what it says about any of their overall judgement, that they should need personal experience to come to obvious conclusions... it says something bad about all their judgement in general. I don't need to fall out of a plane to be pro-parachute if you fall out of a plane. And if it actually took me falling out of a plane to figure that out you would be wise to question my judgement in general... even if now all I want to do is go around preaching the importance of parachutes. Regarding, "I don't see Tulsi being in the military as a conflict of interest as she is constantly calling out the narrative of endless wars." It's a conflict of interest because it's a conflict of interest. If Sanders were collecting a check from Aetna it would ALWAYS be a conflict of interest because it is what it is. Even if sanders continued to preach for M4A it would still be a conflict of interest on said topic. It would always rightfully make you question if he could be trusted to follow through on those words. I would probably still support Sanders if this were the case. But I'd be supporting him in spite of such a conflict of interest. And I'd call it what it is. Regarding, "Tulsi Gabbard and Bernie Sanders are allies" Are you really so sure? You know how I know for certain Nina Turner is Bernie's ally? She is trying push him over the top and not running a campaign against him. Warren fans always called him an ally as well while she ran her campaign against him. They aren't. Candidates don't get to share votes, voters, and delegates. They are OPPOSING EACH OTHER THIS VERY SECOND and competing for the same voters in the same election. You can't fight a war against someone and be their ally at the same time.
    1
  10867.  @dumont7478  Regarding, "I think you need to calm down." Let's not act like this is an argument shall we? Regarding, "The mere existence of another progressive does not mean they are sworn enemies at war with each other." They don't just exist. They are literally competing for the same position, voters, votes, and delegates. That's why it's a war.
    1
  10868. A person with no "purity tests" is a person with no values.
    1
  10869. You lost me at "I dont know if that's racist." It is OBVIOUSLY racist. I am willing to tell you exactly why if you actually can't figure it out for yourself but I'd rather encourage you to think long and hard about the topic until you are able to conclude the obvious to yourself with me or someone else needs to state the obvious for you.
    1
  10870. At least most of sam's audience stops short of calling her a russian asset like hillary. They "only" call her a republican. People who don't have arguments will just smear.
    1
  10871. I'm just here to give ryan grimm a thumbs down.
    1
  10872. There's already plenty of 3rd parties. You need to show me proof that a new party has a chance of succeeding in today's system and they don't. Understand it isn't like the game suddenly gets fair for 3rd parties.
    1
  10873. AngryLotus cool strawman argument. Nowhere do I say don't vote 3rd parties. I voted for Jill Stein in 2016 in a swing state. But the fact of the matter is that she got 1 percent of the vote against 2 of the most despised people in the country. It really shouldn't be that hard to understand that voting 3rd party is plan B. If there is anyone who is making false promises it is you to suggest that just voting 3rd party is the answer. Clearly it is not because of reality.
    1
  10874. The only wasted votes are votes for people that don't represent you and that you don't want to win. I'd love to think that 3rd parties are the answer. I'd love it if the game was fair for them. It's just that it isn't. That doesn't mean I'm not going to support them if they are the only option I want to win because I will. If the same presidential election were today as in 2016 I will still happily vote for Jill Stein and have no regrets about it. But I have no delusions that that is the answer. Clearly it isn't. We need change and we need it now. We need a major party that actually represents the people unlike we have right now. To achieve this fighting for a progressive nominee of the "democratic" party is rightfully plan A. There is a reason the party is currently such a dumpster fire and will continue to be until at least 2020 and that reason is because Hillary "won" the nomination. That is why Perez is chair. That is why progressives were purged. But corporate dems can be purged the exact same way. The nominee holds crazy power in the party. They are able to shape and reform the party. They are able to unilaterally enact reforms. They get to tell the party what it means to be a democrat going forward. They could ban the party from accepting their legalized bribes and then all of a sudden we would have a major party that is incentivized to represent the people and not their big money donors. And if it succeeds it effectively kills 2 birds with one stone. It would give the people a party that represents them while simultaneously killing the current corrupt version of the "democratic" party. If it doesn't succeed and they get a corporate shill as the nominee then I will happily vote 3rd party along side of you. But that is rightfully plan B.
    1
  10875. Regarding, "they deserve to be RIPPED OFF." Do you always blame victims like this? Do you think women who dress slutty are asking for it so they get what they deserve as well if they are raped?
    1
  10876.  @pansepot1490  Regarding, " rape victims are abused AGAINST THEIR WILL." But maga cultist choose to be taken advantage of? Or maybe, just maybe, they are victims as well. Regarding, "I find it shameful" Well virtue signaled. Regarding, "no coercion involved here." Yeah right. As if they aren't being manipulated. Are you really so dense? Does that mean you too deserve to be taken advantage of?
    1
  10877. If it meant something I'm sure corporate media would be covering it more. /s
    1
  10878. Don't be. Fuck that guy. He deserves far worse then shame.
    1
  10879. You are either intentionally lying or stupid beyond words. Either way you suck at life.
    1
  10880. Sorry not sorry for having principles and standards.
    1
  10881.  @darkzq  You are an idiot. Almost remarkably so, just like, ironically, the MAGA nuts. Two can play your dumbass game.
    1
  10882. Back to the future promised me flying cars. That is what I want.
    1
  10883. And it is clearly too easy being poor.
    1
  10884. Is that why the corporate media is fingering her at the moment?
    1
  10885. That CIA POS sounds like he is using the same "logic" Putin is. There are no good guys. There is no one to root for. The world is run by greedy, self-centered, assholes and the peasants pay the price.
    1
  10886. It's not that labels aren't important. They are. But they aren't nearly as important how brainwashed the public is into thinking they need to be supporting one of the major parties. Hillary and Trump are fucking despised and still essentially everyone supported one or the other. I mean seriously... look at the labels that are attacked to those pieces of shit in addition to pieces of shit. They are garbage. Still they got what percentage of the vote? Essentially it all. Starting fresh sounds cool but it isn't practical in this country.
    1
  10887. I personally think the surrender tactic is a mistake.
    1
  10888. I think you overestimate labels. I care about effecting policy. I care about getting a major party that doesn't blow. Hostile takeover is the quickest way to achieve this. It accomplishes 2 goals at once... getting a major party of our own and killing the neoliberal wing. Corporate dems can be purged the exact same way progressives were purged. We just need to win.
    1
  10889. And if hostile takeover doesn't work I will likely support the green party. But I consider that plan B.
    1
  10890.  @LiftedBuddha  Regarding, "everything in this world is about race." It's not. You just an idiot racist wasting perfectly good oxygen for no good reason.
    1
  10891.  @LiftedBuddha  If you want to stop being a complete dipshit maybe realize it's about class (and not just the type of class you clearly lack). It's about rich versus poor you useful idiot for the rich.
    1
  10892.  @Foxy88444  Regarding, "it ain’t black people" Try to realize you aren't acting much different than our overt racist here. Stop thinking about things in terms of black versus white. It's rich versus poor. It's the elite versus the peasants. It's the oligarchy versus us. The race shit is just a distraction they use from keeping us from bringing out the guillotines.
    1
  10893.  @LiftedBuddha  Don't let the @liftedbuddha fool you. No one cares what you think.
    1
  10894.  @LiftedBuddha  I guess I should add narcissism to the list of your abhorrent characteristics. Did you know you aren't the only person in the world who might read what I wrote?
    1
  10895.  @Foxy88444  Regarding, "tbh on a scale from 1-10 how much do you think I gaf about what you just said" I was hoping you would give a fuck about your racism more than the overt racist would give about about theirs. I really thought you would. Clearly I was wrong.
    1
  10896. Warren? You mean the person who voted for 700 billion dollars a year for the department of offense? No thanks. I want an actual progressive with Sanders.
    1
  10897. No. It would not be ideal. Warren has done to many things that I think are unforgivable. She didn't support Sanders during the last primary. She didn't support the DAPL protestors. I think the leading candidates to run with Sanders would be Gabbard and Turner. But whoever it is I hope it is not Warren. I actually expect Warren to run in the primary against Sanders to try to split the progressive side for the establishment.
    1
  10898. Ah of course. That makes sense. And sorry for being a snippy. I just really do not care for Warren. I think of her as being very much like Obama in that they both are great speakers but ultimately, when it comes to action, I think they both fall very short.
    1
  10899. I'd rather watch corporate media propaganda than watch sams propaganda.
    1
  10900.  @thedissidentleftist6997  "you blindly supports Fascism." It's so transparent and lazy. I'm dumbfounded how this type of thing works on people.
    1
  10901. Masks are the devil.... think epic dipshits.
    1
  10902. What good is your movement if it won't even use the little bit of power it has to bring m4a to a vote?
    1
  10903. He might be saying the right things right now but if you trust him, a politician, then you are a dupe.
    1
  10904.  @dillonbatia880  What? I don't need to be a politician to know they are full of it.
    1
  10905.  @dillonbatia880  "I don’t trust politicians the same as you" I'm not sure what context you think you were using but "politician I trust" simply is not something I'd ever say. One way or the other we are not the same.
    1
  10906. I don't know what a dreck is but it sounds bad.
    1
  10907. By taking the mask off and showing us who he is.
    1
  10908. If you keep private health insurance industries around they will just try to carve out a bigger slice of pie by stealing from sick people. They have as much place in society as the for profit private prison industry, ie no place in civilized society.
    1
  10909. You really don't think full scale war is a risk?
    1
  10910. Sir Change regarding, "Bernie is the DNC's outreach coordinator, he gets paid to promote the turd of a party." I'm not sure how you can believe this. Bernie's existence has single handedly killed the image of the party. Because of Bernie far more people are woke to the rot in the party than if he were not around. If he is their promoter he clearly needs to be fired. They lost to fucking Trump for fucks sake. But if you want to think this go ahead. I just think it is beyond fucking stupid. Regarding, "Bernie's remarks on the BDS movement were morally reprehensible" I already said I didn't know what you were talking about. Seems to me it would have made sense to offer a tiny bit of specifics as opposed to a very general smear that is utterly meaningless without detail. Put a fucking quote up there so that I have something I can actually address. Regarding, "The Russia baseless accusations" You seriously don't think they fuck with us? I don't even blame them really. But I think you sound foolish to think they don't. Regarding, "w/o tangle evidence is reckless, like Iraq war reckless." Again, if we go to war with Russia... which we are not... you would have a point. Since we are not you sound silly to conflate the two. But speaking of Iraq Sanders was one of the few who spoke out passionately and accurately about why we shouldn't go to war with them on the Senate floor. If you are not aware of his words it is worth watching. And considering he voted against the Iraq war your choice of this analogy is very curious to very disingenuous. If I knew nothing and read this I would be lead to believe Sanders supported that war. Regarding, "and avoiding to speak about the one that happened in the party he now promotes" Because of Sanders they were fucking exposed. Sanders is the reason they rigged everything. Americans fucking hate people who are perceived to be whiners even when their whining is justified. Is that the last thing you want him to accomplish... some whining that literally accomplishes fucking nothing except making you feel good. You already know they are corrupt. Everyone should know they are corrupt. And again, if they don't know it now Sanders saying it isn't likely to change anyones mind... some people are just hopeless. Regarding, "if he doesn't challenge an election process that was rigged and is vulnerable to hacking" This is what you want? You want him to fight a battle he can't win and sacrifice his ability to win all the other battles yet to come. That is fucking stupid. I'm not sorry he isn't falling on the sword for you. He can't change all this shit by himself. Leave that to the lawyers. Regarding, "There are no political calculations when it comes to addressing the reason we got Trump in the 1st place" It is called POLITICS for a reason. Just "addressing" shit doesn't bring out change. Regarding, "Because the Democratic Party propped up Trump as the pied piper, colluded against Sanders, suppressed voters, limited debates, all while claiming to be impartial." Yup. You should thank Sanders for letting you know all this even if he isn't straight up telling you personally. I'm not sure how you can realize the party colluded against him and think he is their bitch at the same time. Regarding, "Bernie owes every person who donated to his campaign an explanation for not calling out the DNC's corruption." As a person who donated to him I want him to continue the good fight for the issues I care about in the best way possible. Pissing and moaning about how obviously fucking unfair the election was ACCOMPLISHES NOTHING. Not only that but, like I've already pointed out, it diminishes his ability to accomplish things going forward. Regarding, "what good is single payer or any progressive agenda when..." I assure you the millions of people without insurance feel differently than you about this. Regarding, "our election process is completely untrustworthy" It is fucked up. You know how we go a long way toward solving the problem? Get a guy like Sanders as head of the party. You know how we do that? Not by bitching and smearing him. But the DNC and the establishment appreciates you doing their work for them with your shortsighted thinking.
    1
  10911. Sir regarding, "to use Bernie's popularity to herd the sheep back to the fold" This doesn't seem to be working. Their approval is going to shit. People like me who used to consider themselves democrat are leaving the party. I identify with the Green party far more than the "democratic" party but that doesn't mean I won't support candidates I think are worthy of my vote if they run as democrats. People are forever what is important... not party labels. Regarding, "As a matter of fact they..." I am not, in any way, trying to or looking to defend the "democratic" party. They are a fucking dumpster fire. Ideally they would just die and be replaced with something better. But I try to be a realist. I do not think they are going anywhere anytime soon. I believe the best way for progressives to proceed is by trying to take over the party. That said we need to be working on a plan B and that includes supporting other progressive parties and not letting the "democratic" party think they can take our votes for granted. Not only that but we need other parties to try and pull the "democratic" party to the left. All of the shit you mentioned the DNC not doing was a result of Hillary "winning" the primary. If Sanders or another true progressive win in 2020 real reform might be achievable. Regarding, "without addressing their massive failures and corruption in 2016" Does this really surprise you? It is our job to point out that their lawyers admitted in court they don't think they need to be fair. It is our job to make sure they continue to fail until they actually represent us. Regarding, "I am honestly burnt out w politics" I understand the sentiment. They want us to quit. They want us to give up and just submit. Don't let them win without a fight. Politics is too important. It affects everything else in our lives. Regarding, "we are suppose to lower our standards bc that's what "reasonable" people do" That is bullshit. That is just a stupid corporate media argument by people who are trying to force you pick between a douche and a turd sandwich. That is what sheep do and I refuse to be a sheep playing their game. I am going to continue to vote for good and be willing to lose. The only wasted votes are votes for terrible candidates yo don't want to win. Regarding, "the party has done nothing to prove their legitimacy" Again I don't care about the party. That said I do care about the country and think the country desperately needs at least one decent party. I support people. I support Sanders because I believe in him. He has been around a long time and in that time he has fought for the things I care about. I'd support him if he called himself a democrat, republican, independent, green, or martian. That said I agree with him trying to work within the framework of the democratic party. Not as an insider but rather as more of a hostile takeover. Regarding, "have done nothing to prove to voters that they will reform" They absolutely will not on their own. We must force them. Regarding, "chooses to take political calculations regarding addressing the very problem with the party" Sadly this is the game that needs to be played. You have to pick your battles. In an ideal world Sanders could rail against the bullshit the DNC pulled. But this is far from an ideal world. Regarding, "This is nothing to brush under the table bc he is afraid to lose support." Again I am a firm believer that the best way to proceed it by reforming the democratic party from the inside so that he can work to reform the party. Let's say Sanders runs and wins in 2020 as an independent. Then what I think happens is both major parties oppose him, nothing of substance gets done, then after he is gone everything goes back to "normal." If Sanders attacks the DNC like you want they would be very justified in locking him out of the next primary which they are perfectly capable of doing if they want. He has to at least give the appearance of playing ball to prevent this. They literally can just pick their nominee if they so choose and hold no primaries what-so-ever (not that they would... they would at least try to give the appearance of elections... just without Bernie). That isn't why they are so corrupt. They are corrupt because in their own charter they say they are to be fair not take sides (which clearly they did). But Bernie could not have a side at all if they choose. He has to be careful to not give them an excuse to do so. Regarding, "otherwise he will lose his job with them." Again, more importantly he would lose the opportunity to take over the company. It isn't about working with them... it is about changing them. Regarding, "there is no evidence of hacking, None what so ever." The CIA came out and said there was hacking. Did they present a smoking gun? Hardly. Do I trust them? Not normally and not really. Still they are this nations spy agency and they said it happened. Again this is a time when you gotta pick your battles. Do you think a lot would really be accomplished if Sanders instead said, "fuck the CIA, they are lying." I don't. Again I assume, without evidence, that Russia fucked with us. I assume they do all the time and that this wasn't new but rather same ole, same old. Regardless I do not consider this to be important at all. In a country that has lots and lots and lots of problems this is not really important to me what-so-ever. We are not going to war with them anytime soon. This is just a stupid distraction and unimportant... at least it is to me. Regarding, "BDS." Human are inherently flawed. We all have biases. I for example admit that I am biased in favor or Sanders. I am likely to give him a pass for something where I might not for someone else. I am willing to give him the benefit of the doubt where I might not for someone else because I believe in him and trust him. I like to think that me knowing and acknowledging this helps me be critical of him thou at the same time. As for Sanders I suspect he, as a Jew, is biased towards Israel. That said I have heard him say critical things of Israel as well. "There comes a time when if we pursue justice and peace, we are going to have to say that Netanyahu is not right all of the time,” for example. Again, I didn't even know what BDS was so, as you can imagine, this is hardly an important issue to me. I care most about domestic issues. On foreign policy I am a peace loving hippie. Sanders record on war/peace has been excellent over the course of his time as a Senator. This comes from a biased guy but I'm willing to give him a pass on some rhetoric that really is not very important (I doubt I'm the only person who has no idea what BDS is), in an area where he is likely biased, and we are not going to be solving anytime soon. I just don't think his comments here are that important but again understand that this is not an important issue to me like it may be for you. And something like this is not going to be nearly enough to get me to change my view of the rest of his record which I consider to be exceptional.
    1
  10912. 17 replies and I can see 9. Some land of the free.
    1
  10913. Meh. It's evidence Bernie is winning the battle of ideas even if some try to steal his rhetoric disingenuously. Ultimately it's a good thing.
    1
  10914.  johndifool  What? Those are all biden lies. You must be stupid and uniformed to not realize it.
    1
  10915. Tell yourself whatever you want to rationalize running people over. Some people like you are idiots and hopeless.
    1
  10916.  @Murmire  Seems youtube thought I was being too mean in my response to you. Oh well. You are a waste of time an energy anyway.
    1
  10917.  @Murmire  Actually I did but like I said, youtube deleted it. You are a waste of time. That's why I'm not bothering to rewrite it. Even if I did you are obviously a hopeless idiot. Good luck with that.
    1
  10918. I wonder what would have been more effective? Lies that Sanders is a communist or the truth that Biden is suffering from dementia and has time and again tried to cut social security.
    1
  10919.  @muskyoxes  " If you've attached your virtue to hating everybody, then you are a political nonentity" It makes me a realist. George carlin knew that neither party gave a fuck about the peasants. And he was able to see it in a time when it was far, far, far harder to see it. If you think one of the major parties care about you then you are in denial.
    1
  10920.  @thunderpooch  "false equivalency is a right wing tactic." So george carlin was a right winger because he called out dems for being the POS that they are? That's not how it works. FYI if you are voting for the "lesser evil" you are still voting for and enabling evil.
    1
  10921.  @Opheliakami  If voting really mattered they wouldn't let you do it.
    1
  10922.  @Opheliakami  You go ahead and vote all you want. I don't have a problem with you doing that. I do have a problem if you want to act like it's going to change anything. It's not. It's a big club and you ain't in it. The elites don't give a fuck about you.
    1
  10923.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  "you think you're above it all and it makes you better than everyone else" You think that voting for a POS like joe biden makes you better than everyone else. In actuality it only makes you a bootlicker.
    1
  10924. He's evil and no amount of whataboutism will change that. Good people don't become billionaires.
    1
  10925.  @theflyingwelshman5338  Regarding, "it's not." Really? Ug.
    1
  10926. garbage person^
    1
  10927.  @Tyr_Magnus  You don't realize what a fucking hypocrite you are so let me try to explain it to you like you are 5 year old so that even a dipshit like you might understand. You are crying like a bitch, calling people butthurt and the like while simultaneously trying to be opposed to crying like a bitch.... which you would understand you are doing if you weren't stupid.
    1
  10928.  @Tyr_Magnus  I forgot to add a condescending grow the fuck up so consider this that.
    1
  10929.  @Tyr_Magnus  You never bothered to answer my question while busy letting all your stupid out for the world to see. Do you not realize you were being a hypocrite or does being a hypocrite not bother you?
    1
  10930.  @Tyr_Magnus  Feel free to be the hypocrite you are while answering it for all I care. Call me a child and all the stupid shit you want. Your insults are amusing considering they are coming from a hypocrite who is seemingly too stupid to realize they are a hypocrite.
    1
  10931.  @Tyr_Magnus  I'll take that as an answer to my question that you don't understand you were being a hypocrite even thou I don't believe it. I think that deep down you know and realize what you were doing was blatant hypocrisy but you simply are not intellectually honest enough to admit it because you suck at life.
    1
  10932.  @Tyr_Magnus  regarding, "I called people out for voting with emotions." You called out people for being "butthurt little child(ren)." You know how a butt hurt child might lash out? Because one of the first things that comes to mind by me would be by calling people "butthurt children" like you are so happy to do. #denial
    1
  10933.  @Tyr_Magnus  We agree on one thing... I should stop and use my time on people who are not intellectually dishonest hypocrites like you are.
    1
  10934. Remember fraud squad. Never forget.
    1
  10935. You know that party has changed an awful lot during their existence right? For example they used to be the party that represented racists back in the day. But don't let that stop you from thinking they can't change and never will.
    1
  10936.  @CrucibleBlack13  Regarding, "It is in circumstances that relate to this where one might opt for private coverage." Which is total horseshit and you know it. That doesn't happen NOW. Much less in the future. It's done by paying up front or through financing. Then again you got 3 instant thumbs up in 15 minutes on a buried comment. You reek of paid shill and you should be ashamed of yourself.
    1
  10937.  @ECisvotersuppression  Your lack of comprehension is showing.
    1
  10938. Except for all the really important differences. Like Warren's commitment to taking legalized bribes if she makes the general, like her voting to give Trump extra money for bombs, like Warren's lack of leadership, like Warren being a Republican in the 90s while Bernie has always been a true progressive. If you really think they are the same you need to look again. They aren't.
    1
  10939.  @dredayz8710  Regarding, " Their policies are almost identical" I literally just gave you areas where their policies, incredibly important policies, are anything but identical. Or do you not think supporting the MIC the way Warren did by voting to give Trump, a person she think is unbalanced, more money for bombs than even the orange clown wanted? Or do you not think taking legalized bribes in the general is important? And it goes so much further than just policy. Bernie is a trusted fighter for progressive policies and has been all his life while Warren is known for rolling over and not being found when important progressive fights are going on. There is a reason that she is becoming a darling for the corporate media when true progressives like Sanders are constantly smeared. Pull your head out of your ass.
    1
  10940.  @dredayz8710 What the fuck do you think they vote on?
    1
  10941.  @dredayz8710  Spoiler alert... Policy
    1
  10942.  @dredayz8710  Just go support Trump already. You sound "smart" enough for it.
    1
  10943.  @dredayz8710  Regarding, " you sound self-defeating" If you want your insults to sting you need to make me give a shit about your opinion. Regarding, "Probably wrote in some random name in 2016 that wasn't even on the ballot." I happily voted for Jill Stein and would do the exact same thing today if the same election were being held. She was the only candidate running that I actually wanted to win and that I thought was worthy of the job. You sound like a correct the record troll or like you are working for a similar group.
    1
  10944. Riptide regarding, "in case you haven't been paying attention the DNC selects the presidential nominee on their own and publicly stated they have no obligation to go with the will of the people." You are mischaracterizing the truth. The DNC says it is within their power to select the nominee (and sadly it is), but they don't actually do it. Primary voters absolutely do have a say in the matter as much as the establishment then tries to silence them.
    1
  10945. marsha regarding, "I'll never vote Dem again." You know I'm talking about the primary and not the general right?
    1
  10946. B4 regarding, "I didn't realise you were talking about the 2118 Primaries..I thought you were referring to 2120." I am talking more specifically about the 2020 presidential elections but all of my points are equally appropriate and applicable to 2018.
    1
  10947. Anna regarding, "nope the democrats aren't progressive" As a whole they absolutely are not nor have I suggested or implied they are. I'm pretty sure I've trashed them quite often. And they aren't going to become progressive by magic. Use the power you have to vote in their primary to make them progressive. Regarding, "vote republican just to piss off dems more." I think this is pretty fucking stupid but this conversation is not about what to do in the general. That is a completely different topic.
    1
  10948. Random regarding, "When people are ready for a real democracy they will demand a 3rd party solution." So what is your plan until then? Regarding, "If Bernie runs as a Democrat again he's for sure a sheepdog." So you are going to his lifetime of working for progressive causes. You are going to ignore the fact that there isn't a person on the planet who has done more to expose the party for how corrupt they are than him and you going to smear him because his plan is not the plan you would make? I think that is silly. Regarding, "the Democrats lawyers admitted they were a corrupt corporation" Without Bernie Sanders campaign that never happens.
    1
  10949. Regarding, "Ds & Rs are the same" Fools love to paint with broad brushes because they can't do nuance very well. The "democratic" party is a fucking dumpster fire for the most part but if you think that every single one of them is a piece of shit they you are being too blinded by hate for a party label. There is little difference between that and blind loyalty to a party. Support good people who share your values regardless of party labels.
    1
  10950. groch regarding, "you could find something better and build it in to a far better political party then the democratic party could ever hope to be." You go ahead and do that. Seriously that is a great plan. But in the meantime, while that is being done I'm going to try to shape the "democratic" party into something better. That is not the same as saying I'm going to vote for them in general elections.
    1
  10951. Alan Gann. I'm sorry I can't take you seriously enough to respond to you intelligently.
    1
  10952. hoodie regarding, "Aren't you in a time warp and ignoring the dynamics/dirty tricks pulled by the 2016 D national convention" No. I'm quite aware. Regarding, "And you say you're waiting for the D party to do all that b s again" No. I expect they will. I am saying that I'm going to do what little I can to fight them. Regarding, "I am not buying your banana oil - you're a D party operative, I suspect," You are being absurd. The path you are advocating is what the party actually wants which makes is more likely that you are a party operative than me.
    1
  10953. Truth regarding, "If you vote for Democrats, then you are in fact in bed with Wall St." Do you really not understand the difference between voting in the primary versus voting in the general? In one election (the primary) you are not actually trying to elect a person into office but rather you are just trying to shape the parties candidate. In the general you are voting for a person to hold elected office. They are very fucking different and those differences are very fucking important.
    1
  10954. Kathleen regarding, "Tulsi, Warren or Bernie need to leave the Dem Party. Giving power to a Criminal Cabal with new front puppets changes nothing." Really? You don't think that if the dems nominated Sanders that would change nothing? Regarding, "The Dem Party is utterly compromised and corrupted." Yup. And voting in the primary is your one chance to do something about it rather than just bitching about it and pointing it out. Regarding, "Why not make a real difference and boycott the Dem Party, instead." Because that is counter productive to getting the change you want. That is passing up the opportunity to make the dem party better.
    1
  10955. Omar regarding, "Warren." Most recently she voted for the department of offense budget. I do not trust her and think she is only progressive when it is politically convenient. That said if she were the nominee I would have to think long and hard about voting for her or the green party nominee.
    1
  10956. Coyote regarding, "I will vote my conscience. Voting for the lesser evil has failed me for 50 years" Vote your conscience. Don't vote for the lesser of evil. But VOTE. And don't pass up the opportunity to vote in the primary. The general isn't the only place where your voice can be heard.
    1
  10957. Omar regarding, "her banking POLICY and Bernies" Her banking policy is the place where she is best. Still I don't trust her and for the same reasons Coyote mentioned. The war budget and DAPL are litmus tests for me and she failed them both.
    1
  10958. Omar again regarding Warren. Being a human I am not entirely logically based. I also have and use my intuition. I don't trust Warren. I just don't. But this isn't really about her. Let's try to stay on topic.
    1
  10959. Jason regarding, "no way" What a compelling argument.
    1
  10960. Dan regarding, "Voting won't get it back." We are going to have to agree to disagree. I'm not looking to quit like you.
    1
  10961. Jay regarding, "I'll wait patiently for a third party that is actually out to help regular people." On behalf of regular people, "go fuck yourself for sitting on your hands and choosing to do nothing while we are fucked over. The war is going on now whether you choose to fight or not."
    1
  10962. berz regarding, "ppl are just sick and tired of being fucked over." They should be. I know I am. Regarding, "the DNC is corrupt beyond repair" Maybe. But I'm going to fight to repair it anyway. If it doesn't work I really haven't lost anything. Regarding, "it needs to just go fuse with the GOP once and for all." Don't hold your breathe waiting for that happen. Regarding, "but they are going to do that anyways" If you say so. Still I think waving the white flag instead of trying is dumb. Let's make them "do it anyways." Regarding, "ill be damned if I get to give em the "and look how many ppl voted in out primaries!" line." Is that really your biggest concern and problem with the plan? And you would rather let them say their corporate stooge is getting more than the more progressive candidate? Regarding, "participation in it is just not a viable option anymore." The DNC is very happy with your decision and thank you for it.
    1
  10963. Kap regarding, "Your name translates into government funding for the corrupt figureheads and their corporate masters." No it doesn't. It merely gives you the opportunity to shape the party instead of just bitch about it.
    1
  10964. Says a lot about you that you don't recognize the problem with giving photo ops to political figures. I have a problem with this and I'd say the same thing if they were doing this BS for the orange clown.
    1
  10965. We should make shitting on Bloomberg a national holiday. I'm really enjoying this.
    1
  10966. Don't accept imitations. Bernie Sanders 2020!
    1
  10967.  @LordBouz420  The lies mostly.
    1
  10968. Meh. If Bernie makes the general he will crush the orange clown. What really matters is the "democratic" primary. Bernie could use their votes their. Sadly he won't get as many as he should but at least they shouldn't be going to biden and his ilk.
    1
  10969. Wait, you want to outlaw political parties? What is wrong with you?
    1
  10970. Says the crazy person who repeats the same shit over and over.
    1
  10971. "we can at least give him credit for Pay Pal." Maybe watch the video before commenting.
    1
  10972.  @GyanPrakash  Let's just agree to disagree.
    1
  10973. How about you stop being selfish, pray for things like world peace or a cure for cancer instead of things for yourself since you have a direct line to god, and when you don't get them we can both agree you are woefully wrong.
    1
  10974.  @emailrobertbm  You seem like a nice guy. I know I can be a real dick and my point can be made much more diplomatically, but do you at least understand the point I was trying to make? You are sitting here trying to say you have a direct line to god. That you pray and it works. I'm saying prove it and use this power for something good. Otherwise I have no reason to take your claim seriously. You and your god should both not like cancer. Your god can do something about it. So... do it.
    1
  10975. I don't think there is an age restriction for VP, only for president.
    1
  10976.  @mefit1  Seek help.
    1
  10977.  @mefit1  You should seek help.
    1
  10978.  @mefit1  You should stop being a moron. I'm just kidding. I know you can't.
    1
  10979. If you actually had a vote wouldn't you be better off using it to get something you want?
    1
  10980. You are projecting. The bots and shills are on the other side working to smear jimmy.
    1
  10981. Sam Seder is controlled opposition for a corrupt warmongering party.
    1
  10982. I think that was him polishing the turd more appropriately know as a blow job to rich in the form of tax cuts.
    1
  10983.  @realdealholyfield3699  Maybe it sticks in my craw because of a personal experience. I was with friends at a pizza joint waiting for our pies to be made. I made a comment to my friends about the cashier who was now across the room. I think I called or a "hottie" or something like that.... to them, not the cashier. Whatever exactly it was it was hardly in bad taste. 2 of my 3 friends who were there, almost at the exact same time were like, "not cool dude, she might be able to hear you." I was like, "what? so what if she does? It's a tasteful compliment." And these were my friends. I was baffled by their response and it bugs me still when I think about it. So that's my story and that's where I'm coming from.
    1
  10984. Regarding, "this guy can not be trusted, he lied before and he can lie again." But trump can be trusted? Holy shit some people are retarded.
    1
  10985. His "good friend" is president.
    1
  10986.  @pcwallace1  "his so-called good friend did not help him get anything done" And it won't matter when it comes election time. At election time Bernie will tell you to vote for biden or whoever the blue team puts up no matter how unworthy.
    1
  10987.  @pcwallace1  "his so-called good friend did not help him get anything done" So why does bernie tell everyone to vote for him? Note: I have to repost this because my original reply is being shadowbanned in the "land of the free."
    1
  10988.  @pcwallace1  "Just goes to show them not good friends at all!" It shows bernie is a leading you to sla ughter. "Biden" "Trump" You shouldn't be voting for either and for all the same reasons.
    1
  10989.  @pcwallace1  "In my opinion neither the Democrats or the Republican Party" Yup. Both are bad. So are their salesmen like bernie.
    1
  10990.  @lindablackwell4852  "a troll" What is a troll to you? Someone who says something you disagee with? Why not tell people why what they is saying is wrong instead of only giving ad hominem?
    1
  10991.  @stefan4159  You are impossible to take seriously.
    1
  10992. Except he is a racist.
    1
  10993. For example his signature policy proposal during the election is racist as fuck. If he actually cared about border security he would be insisting there be a wall on the northern border. But he doesn't. He only cares about a wall with the predominately brown country. This is but one example of many as to why he is a racist fuck.
    1
  10994. Your pathetic response is very predictable. I'm sure that if I had pictures of Trump wearing a klan costume burning a cross on someones yard you would find equally pathetic ways to defend him as well. Regarding, "that is just practical" There is nothing practical about a wall on the southern border therefor your point is bullshit. Regarding, "Canadians entering the United States generally are not criminals," Mexicans entering the US generally are not criminals. Therefor again your point is bullshit. Regarding, "If a brown-skinned person commits a crime, calling him a criminal is not "racist"" But going out of your way to only enforce laws based on skin color is. What Trump is doing is akin to saying that mexicans illegally entering the country need to be dealt with while not giving a fuck when canadians illegally enter the country. That is what makes it racist.... only carrying about applying laws to specific groups of people while ignoring others. Regarding, "If brown people are illegally entering the country, proposing a policy to deal with that problem has nothing to do with racism." It is racist when you, at the same time, demonstrate that you don't give a fuck about white people doing the same shit. Regarding, "destroying the economy" Immigrants do not "destroy the economy." You think they do because you are stupid. Regarding, "It's about applying standards of law." No. It isn't. Otherwise he would want a wall with Canada. It is like you are trying to prove my point for me. You don't realize you are thou because you are a fucking moron. Regarding, "Your argument that he would build a wall at the Canadian border because of "border security" is just laughable." Holy fucking shit do you suck at life. Why would I think that Trump cares about border security? Because that is what he fucking says out of his orange mouth to try and justify a southern wall you fucking mental midget. https://www.politico.com/story/2018/04/04/trump-border-security-action-500172 I'm done with this. You go ahead and think he isn't a racist for all I care. You can't fix stupid and trying to use logic and reason with people like you is as effective as using logic and reason with my dog.... except my dog is far smarter than you.
    1
  10995. You are why Trump loves the uneducated. Fucking moron.
    1
  10996. Regarding, "Comments like this are precisely why it's impossible to have a conversation with you people." Comments like yours are precisely why it's impossible to have a conversation with "you people." You are devoid of logic and reason. The arguments you make are all dumb as fuck. Regarding, "Not everyone who disagrees with you is stupid." You might be brilliant in other aspects of your life but when it comes to this conversation you are clearly a fucking moron. Regarding, "It is very obviously false." Even Trump knows this isn't false. That is why he brags that he could shoot someone and that his mindless sheep would still support him. Regarding, "I actually don't literally support..." This isn't about you dipshit. This is about Trump. Regarding, "no not all Mexicans are criminals." Thanks for stating the obvious after implying they were. Regarding, "But there is a HUGE immigration problem from the southern border where there obviously isn't on the north." I welcome you to try and prove this bullshit claim when the fact of the matter is that currently there is a net ZERO immigration rate with mexico. This means that for every person from there here entering illegally one is leaving the country. Regarding, "They enter the country illegally" You claim to care about this but ignore the fact that people enter the country illegal through the northern border. Regarding, "exponentially more than there are from Canada." Prove your bullshit as if this is more important to the conversation that it is. The fact of the matter is that you shouldn't be caring about this if what you actually care about is people breaking the law. Do you not worry about prosecuting serial killers because they really don't kill that many people? Regarding, "If there is ever evidence of Trump telling police officers to only arrest criminals if there skin is brown" What he is doing is akin to that. He is telling police officers to care about brown illegal immigration and not giving a fuck about white illegal immigration. You just don't admit these obvious cold hard facts to yourself because people like you can rationalize anything. Regarding, "I know someone..." I didn't even read this. I don't give a shit about your anecdotes. Regarding, "Skin color has nothing to do with it. If you break a country's laws you get in trouble. Period." Do you hear yourself? Do you really believe the stupid shit you are saying? Who do you think is more likely to get in trouble? The people being targeted or the people being ignored? Regarding, "ask local black people" You watch too much fox news I'm betting. Forgive me for glossing over why everything you are saying here is dumb as fuck. Regarding, " it is about applying the same standard of law to everyone, everywhere." It obviously is not to Trump otherwise he would want a wall on the northern border. But you keep thinking shit. I know you will. And you wonder why I don't want to waste my time talking to you and don't take you seriously. Regarding, "If there is no illegal immigration problem on the Canadian border" Of course. It's only about "illegal immigration" even thou there is just as much rhetoric about border security. Oh, and again, there is a NET ZERO illegal immigration rate with Mexico currently. http://www.pewhispanic.org/2015/11/19/more-mexicans-leaving-than-coming-to-the-u-s/ Regarding, " If there is no illegal immigration problem on the Canadian border" So now that you know there is no illegal immigration problem with Mexico?????? Nothing changes... of course. Regarding, "Your politico link proves or reinforces nothing of what you've told me." That is because you are fucking stupid. Do you really need me to give you direct quotes where Trump specifically talks about the need for "border security?" Because they are not hard to find. Regarding, "Your last paragraph just further goes to show how impossible it is to converse with people like you." I don't give a shit. I know nothing I say is going to get through to you so I don't try to convince you. I only do this as catharsis because sharing the world with people like you pretty fucking frustrating. Regarding, "Did you truly think you were going to convince me of your point of view by insulting me and calling me names?" Nope. I know that if you are so fucking dense that you don't realize Trump is a racist by now nothing I can say is going to change that. And the fact that you don't already know the answer to your own stupid fucking question only helps prove my point that you are an idiot. Regarding, "You are "done with this" after calling me stupid several times, likening me to a dog, then plugging your ears with your fingers like a brat." I want to be. I really do. I know this is fucking pointless and that you are a lost cause but concede that I have a tough time letting stupid go unanswered and with you there is so. much. stupid. Regarding, "Unfortunately very little progress can be made when so many people in the world argue like this." You go ahead and focus on how I say things instead of what I'm saying. That is the low hanging fruit. You are correct. I should be nice if I were actually trying to convince you but I know that that is a wasted effort. But that doesn't change the fact that Trump is a racist and I've given you a perfectly good reason why. Regarding, "OH MY GOD, YOU ARE STUPID." I guess I could cry like a bitch about this like you would but I'm not a hypocrite. The bottom line is that I really don't give a flying fuck what you think about me or anything because I think so little of your opinion. I'm not joking when I say my dog is smarter than you but don't feel so bad about it.... my dog is really smart for a dog. Regarding, "I guess that means I have sound arguments." I have sound arguments because I have sound arguments. That has nothing to do with me being a dick. I am a dick. You don't understand that this has nothing to do with my arguments because you are fucking stupid. Regarding, "Another brilliant rebuttal. I'm convinced!" Don't kid yourself dipshit. I could write a novel of brilliant insights. I could cite everything. I could take the time to be nice and show you respect that I don't actually feel for you and it makes no fucking difference to someone like you. At the end of the day you are going to be stupid no matter what I or anyone says. Good luck with that. Again I'm going to try and quit this. I really want to. I should. But this is how I'm stupid in my own way. I waste time on hopeless causes like you.
    1
  10997. Yup... just insults thinks the moron. I guess you aren't smart enough to understand the parts where I tell you WHY you are stupid. They are actually there ya know. Oh and respect is earned... not given. I don't respect you for the same reason I don't respect flat earthers. But at least I'm honest with you. Which is more than can be said of Trump.
    1
  10998. Another brilliant rebuttal. I'm convinced! Then again this is a step up from saying I'm making points then immediately contradicting yourself and saying I'm only making insults. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E7NdrkKD8Vk
    1
  10999. Only because people like you who can't effectively use logic and reason are making the world a worse place. We can't all irrationally be mad at illegal immigrants for destroying the world. Some of us put the blame where it actually belongs.
    1
  11000. It is difficult to describe how torn I am. On one hand I know that nothing I say will make any difference to you. You simply are not capable of comprehending even the simplest of ideas correctly so me responding is not a good use of time. On the other hand I have a really hard time letting stupid shit go unanswered and literally everything you wrote is wrong for one reason or another. Even when you say something that is "true" like being nice makes for more compelling and persuasive arguments you completely ignore the fact that time and again I have said that I am not trying to convince you or persuade you. Ultimately the tie breaker at the moment is the fact that you wrote so much bullshit. Telling you why all that is stupid would take up quite a bit of time and I'm not going to do that at the moment even if part of me wants to. But I'll tell you what, if you really want I will tell you why literally everything you say is wrong if you ask. But keep in mind that if I do I am also not going to be nice while I do it. I am not going to pretend to have respect for you that I don't actually have. It's up to you. Whatever.
    1
  11001. Regarding, "If you aren't trying to convince me of anything why bother typing?" I already answered this and still you ask this question and have no idea why I might think you are stupid.
    1
  11002. As for the rest of your shit again I'm tempted to respond again but have the exact same thoughts as before. Part of me REALLY wants to go point by point through everything you say and tell you why literally all of it is dumb. But it won't do any good. People like you are hopeless. I wish you understood how similar you are to flat earthers. I keep thinking of them while talking to you.
    1
  11003.  @ronwest7930  They also shouldn't be corrupt, lying POS. But you support them anyway.
    1
  11004.  @ronwest7930  Is that how you rationalize supporting corrupt POS? I don't really care. Good luck being a moron.
    1
  11005. He has said he prefers what he does and doesn't want to run.
    1
  11006. Protect all journalists. This includes people like aaron mate before they are put in jail.
    1
  11007. I hope you are getting paid and aren't really this dense.
    1
  11008.  @randkalik  So you really are as dense as you portray. Good luck with that.
    1
  11009. Corporate media and chris hayes too... who buried this info for months. They are complicit.
    1
  11010. MSNBC and hayes told you to vote for biden and harris while this was going on. They are complicit.
    1
  11011. This is sarcasm right?
    1
  11012. Vote for good people. Ignore party labels.
    1
  11013. Is that what you heard? Damn son, you are an idiot.
    1
  11014.  @maiwelsh8025  "I know what I am talking about" No. You don't. Or if you do that means you are gaslighting. "The Atomic Bombings by Ian W. Toll" "Among the Navy brass, feelings ran strong against the bombings. Admiral Ernest King, the chief of naval operations, told his co-author that he did not like the atomic bomb “or any part of it,” and said that the air-sea blockade would have been enough to force a Japanese surrender."
    1
  11015.  @maiwelsh8025  You don't even attempt to back up your claims. Which is fine. But it would be better if you stopped trying to make everyone as dense as yourself.
    1
  11016.  @maiwelsh8025  "Several leading air commanders, including Generals Hap Arnold and Curtis LeMay, said that the atomic bombs were unnecessary because conventional bombing had already brought Japan to its knees. Remarks of this sort can be understood in the context of internal military politics and budgetary positioning. Yet it is clear that many military leaders thought the atomic bombings unjustified and even immoral. Admiral Bill Leahy, the senior most active-duty US officer of the Second World War, left a scathing passage in his memoir, charging that the United States had “adopted an ethical standard common to the barbarians of the Dark Ages. I was not taught to make war in that fashion, and wars cannot be won by destroying woman and children.”
    1
  11017.  @maiwelsh8025  "not willing to listen to me" You aren't even trying to back your claims up with anything. Maybe just be quiet. "one source by one person" It's one source that cites SEVERAL generals. They know what they are talking about, unlike you.
    1
  11018.  @maiwelsh8025  " I can quote experts and war historians and commanders at you" But you aren't. You are doing this instead. It's telling. Just be quiet.
    1
  11019.  @maiwelsh8025  You: "Don’t overestimate your own intelligence. It’s self righteous" Also you: "I know what I am talking about." You are a hypocrite.
    1
  11020. As if you aren't simping.
    1
  11021. Biden is a traitor to america.
    1
  11022. Do everyone a favor and leave out the broad stroke identity politics please.
    1
  11023.  @Etaoinshrdlu69  I don't care about your perceived "team." I care about m4a.
    1
  11024.  @Etaoinshrdlu69  "Stop it with the entitlement. " Better yet... you stop it with the bootlicking.
    1
  11025.  @Etaoinshrdlu69  I have nothing but contempt for the orange clown but don't let that stop you from deflecting from your hero the same way trumpanzee's do when the topic is their clown.
    1
  11026.  @Etaoinshrdlu69  You are clearly a sycophant. Just like trump supporters.
    1
  11027. Bernie already said he's supporting biden. Which means bernie sucks.
    1
  11028. Bernie is too busy manufacturing consent for corrupt dems like biden. He's already told you to vote for him and you likely will.
    1
  11029.  @misterf7299  Bernie is already telling you to vote for biden whose brain is melting. Which means that either bernie's brain doesn't work or he's corrupt.
    1
  11030. Bernie is going to tell you to vote for a corrupt person like biden and you likely will.
    1
  11031.  @misterf7299  "he’d take a lot of votes away from Biden" God forbid that corrupt POS wouldn't have won. "It sucks, but that’s the way it is." You will always find a way to support and enable evil like biden.
    1
  11032.  @misterf7299  "take a lot of votes away from Biden" So what. He's terrible. You will always find excuses and rationalizations for voting for evil.
    1
  11033.  @misterf7299  "he’d take a lot of votes away from Biden" Why should I care? He may as well be a republican.
    1
  11034.  @misterf7299  "how about this, you tell me who to vote for in 2024 right now" I have a better idea.... I'll tell you HOW you should be voting and you can figure it out yourself... You should vote for someone that YOU think is good. They don't have to be "perfect." But they need to be "good." According to you. For example if YOU think someone is a "lesser evil" then YOU still think they are evil and shouldn't vote for them.
    1
  11035.  @misterf7299  "that’s who I will vote for. Go!" Vote for good and be willing to lose. People like biden and trump aren't eligible. Good luck. Now GO!
    1
  11036.  @misterf7299  "good chat" No prob. And it's an important one. If you listen to sanders you will vote for evil. Which makes you wonder if even he's good.
    1
  11037. Your stupidity is almost impressive somehow.
    1
  11038. I guess you are just an idiot huh?
    1
  11039.  @RickyParker666  "willing to drop political positions/play defense for congress people who don't support m4a," Too vague. Stop alluding. Be specific. "SMEARING" Smears are lies you have to even attempt to give evidence of him lying. I concede I don't read everything, I'm just addressing points as I go but it's your responsibility to provide the evidence before claiming they have smeared anyone. Let's see if you get there a little late. "leftwing creators like vaush" I'm not too familiar with vaush but from my limited understanding there is nothing "leftwing" about him. "SMEARING other leftwing creators like vaush on Twitter right now" You don't even attempt to prove evidence of your claim. It makes me think the person smearing is you. "any sympathy I may have had for him getting "Mccarthy smeared"" LMFAO. You still haven't provided any evidence whatsoever. I have trouble believing you ever cared about the attacks of jimmy. He's been smeared and blackmailed and people want to blame him... THE VICTIM. You are tough to take seriously. I hope this is going to get better from you but I very much doubt it. "smear others on Twitter." Smears are lies. You have yet to provide a single specific instance of him smearing. That makes you the person smearing. Anyone can say the things you are but for you to be taken seriously you need to provide specific examples like you absolutely are not. I don't do twitter unless you got something specific to point at. "Kyle has done nothing but cu*k himself" Lies of omission about blackmail. Ghosted jimmy because he has a potty mouth to stay out of it with cenks nephew to talk about pocket pussies and diminish the importance of blackmail and smears. In his "apology" he tried to excuse standing up jimmy because he was too busy standing up jimmy. Claims millions of dollars doesn't make TYT corrupt. Claims I can wear a banana hammock to work and it's fine. And more. "what jimmy did was ABSOLUTELY sexual harassment," LMFAO It absolutely was not. The person guilty of sexual harassment at the time was the boss who was exposing their ass at work. Clearly. "any HR department in the real world would have kicked him out on his ass." LMFAO Speaking of asses and who should be kicked out for their behavior have you heard the one about ana exposing herself at work? That's what actual sexual harassment in the work place looks like. I suspect you would understand that if I were flashing my ass to you at work. "And Don't hit me with the "indecent exposure" line" LMFAO I'm sorry if the truth hurts. That's not on me. "equating a wardrobe malfunction to indecent exposure is bad faith as fuck" LMFAO Let's say I accepted you BS about it being a wardrobe malfunction which I don't. Or let's say I had a "wardrobe malfunction" at work. You sure AF have the right to point it out to me and I would want you to so that I could stop from exposing myself at work which believe it or not has never happened to me in my life. Go figure.
    1
  11040.  @RickyParker666  "saying that "a public option is still m4a"" What is the title of the video and at what time? "vaush" I honestly don't know enough about him to say anything on the topic. For all I know he's guilty of it all... or he's not. I just don't know. I do know that you are just making claims but not really providing evidence for it. If you can prove he is lying do that instead of what you are actually doing. "Your setting a really terrible precident arguing that what happened to Ana was "indecent exposure"" LMFAO Let's say, hypothetically, that her arce was out. Are you really going to tell me that it would not accurately be called "indecent exposure?" "and you shout out "hey everybody, look at that guy's junk"" LMFAO Nope. Your really setting a terrible precedent that this as anything like what happened. That is not anything like what jimmy said. In your hypothetical I would DEFINATELY make sure that you know you've lost your clothes. If a girl lost her top I'd make sure she knew she lost her top. In all of these situations there IS NO WAY of the person no be embarrassed about the situation. It's not the fault of the person telling them to put their bits back where they belong that they are embarrassed. It's the inevitable result of the situation assuming it's only an accident. And if it's not an accident then it's clearly sexual assault. "good faith" I'm not going to lie hearing you speak about "good faith" gives me a giggle. Projection is common for people taking your side in this.
    1
  11041. @J R "I'm not interested in your answer to my question." You aren't interest in the question period. You only play pretend so you can say stupid shit and not be challenged for it. "I don't view you as anyone whose opinion I care about." LMFAO I've been a fan of kyle for a really long time. That's whose opinion you don't care about? Your intellectual dishonesty is showing.
    1
  11042. I deny it. Therefor you are a liar in addition to being an idiot.
    1
  11043. I agree with everything you said until you said 3 people need to win. Only one gets to. Pick wisely. Hint: support Sanders. Because duh.
    1
  11044.  @mystbunnygaming1449  Yeah I get it. I'm just concerned about progressive support being split when I consider Sanders to be the clear person for the job.
    1
  11045. You don't think it's fair to analyze their past positions? In other words you have zero interest in trying to figure out if they are sincere or are just pandering to you. A past voting history is a must for anyone to study unless they are a complete and total fucking moron. I could tell you literally anything but without studying my past you have nothing. And that is what you have with Warren... nothing. At least nothing of value. Good luck with your conwomen.
    1
  11046.  @jdeljones  Regarding, "I keep up pretty well with their past voting histories. Every single one of these candidates has a shoddy voting record, including Bernie." You either don't keep up pretty well with their past voting histories or you are just a blatant liar. Bernie Sanders voting record, while imperfect, is not shoddy. It paints a clear picture of a principled progressive who has fought the good fight, even when that fight wasn't popular with the public (like for example gay rights) while, as you mention, Warren was busy being a 90s republican. I don't care what excuses and rationalizations you want to make for your support and "logic" of "I don't think this is fair to her and her current positions." You are just being an idiot supporting a clown for terrible reasons and dismissing the substantive problems with her for remarkably terrible reasons.
    1
  11047.  @jdeljones  Regarding, "so his support for the NRA when he 1st was elected to Congress is excusable." Holy shit what an idiotic framing of the past. "Support for the NRA." God damn do you really suck at life. Far too much for me to bother to waste my time saying all the things I want to say about your post. But as for the past... yes... that is fair game for Bernie and for all candidates because duh. As for what I am willing to "excuse" and what I'm not that is up to me. But what I don't do is try to pretend the past doesn't matter. If I thought enough of you and the things you had to say I might go into detail why this is not even close to important to me and elaborate why your framing is beyond stupid and wrong but at this point I'm just way done giving a shit what you have to say or think about anything and I'll just assume that everything else you have to offer is just as idiotic as the things you have already said. Regarding, "Warren has just as progressive a message as Bernie" Do you actually believe the shit you say? Warren who loves the MIC, loves dirty money and is looking forward to taking it in the general, who doesn't think medicare for all is important enough to put on her campaign site, has just as progressive a message as Bernie? God damn that is dumb. And ultimately this isn't nearly as important as who can be trusted to fight for progressive policies but who the fuck knows who that might be because we don't get to look at the past can we. You probably believed Trump when he said he wanted to give everyone health care as well because you clearly have no way of knowing who is just blowing smoke and who isn't. I'm done with this. I can't fix stupid for you but for the sake of the country stop being an idiot supporting a clown for terrible reasons.
    1
  11048.  @vladimirputin110  That's funny because the maga crowd are the same ones who have no interest in examining the orange clowns past.
    1
  11049.  @jdeljones  Regarding, "But google is free. You should research more." Literally everything you say is dumb for one reason or another but I'm not going to lie this is pretty fucking funny. Thanks for the laugh dipshit.
    1
  11050.  @jdeljones  Regarding, "I don’t think you’re actually interested in fruitful discourse." You're right at this point. I'm really not. I don't have unlimited time and I'm not willing to try and intelligently discuss complicated topics with someone so dense they can say, "I don't think this is fair to her and her current positions." That's flat earth level stupidity and I'm not looking to try and have intelligent conversations with them either for all the same reasons. Regarding, "I have a feeling that if he doesn’t you won’t do the same for the nominee, which tells me all I need to know about you and you’re commitment to progressive values." Which is but another example of you saying things that are beyond stupid. You put me in a tough place. On one hand only someone who has the intelligence of fly might say something so obviously idiotic but on another hand I have a really really hard time letting stupid shit go unanswered and this literally the only shit you seem to have to say. I want to tell you how asinine it is for you to think that I should vote for Biden if he gets the nomination even though I find there to be nothing progressive about him. But that is apparently your "logical conclusion" because you are an idiot. I guess I should add a "that tells me all I need to know about you." You are an idiot. Good luck with that going forward.
    1
  11051.  @jdeljones  Regarding, "You’re not a progressive, just a shill that supports one candidate based on his past and not on the future of progressivism." You're stupidity is almost remarkable. If you actually believe the things you say I almost feel pity for you. For your sake I hope you are just another paid shill (like Putin here) but I think you are genuine... just stupid. And that's too bad.
    1
  11052.  @jdeljones  Regarding, "But you don’t support Bernie for those initiatives or probably even know anything about them." Just keep thinking this. I know you will because it seems stupid things are literally the only thing you are capable of thinking. But thanks for this. I really do have a hard time letting stupid shit and stupid people go unanswered but there is always a point when even I have to conclude... what the fuck are you doing... this person is hopeless. And you are so I'm happily done with this. If your goal was to destroy what little faith I have in humanity... well done.
    1
  11053. @UCIyayBQfzvPLm19ioN2eYNA Regarding, "I’m assuming bc if Bernie loses you’re join the MAGA crowd and you not read up on any policy issues." Of course you would... because you are an epic idiot. I'm sorry for not being willing to tell you why everything you say is stupid beyond words. Even if I do you will still be stupid beyond words. So why should I try?
    1
  11054. Authoring the racist crime bill that exacerbated the problem of mass incarceration says far more about his character... or lack thereof.
    1
  11055. You legit sound and act like a notsea.
    1
  11056. I'm almost glad he's in at the moment for the reasons I actually wanted Hillary to run... he sucks up all the establishment money and support while having no chance of winning. I fear him far less than the next generation of establishment candidates.
    1
  11057. Sanders priorities include health care, education, a living wage, criminal justice reform and more. All are problems that disproportionately affect blacks. All are tangible ways to improve the lives of blacks.
    1
  11058.  @keithmcgaffie9963 Regarding, " no it doesn’t. That’s the American lie. A that shit fixes poor Whitestone" That shit fixes poor. And blacks disproportionately fall into that category. If you are a black who wants an education Sanders has a plan for it. If you are a black who is making minimum wage Sanders offers you a living wage. If you are a black without health insurance Sanders has a plan for you. Just because those plans also help other demographics is a pretty piss poor selfish ass reason to dismiss them. I mentioned criminal justice reform. That includes something like legalizing weed which again, disproportionately affects blacks even thou they use at a slightly lower rate than white. Regarding, "we need full reparations that’s the only tangible for blacks" It's not the only tangible for blacks. You seem to think that they only way something can help blacks is if it only helps blacks. It doesn't work like that. And even if Sanders came out today in support of reparations I see no possibility of it happening because of our house and senate. You are throwing the baby out with the bath water. Regarding, "it keeps the wealth gap the same" When you address problems that disproportionately affect the black community you do close the wealth gap even if you aren't closing it completely. As for the rest of your stuff... man there is a lot that is wrong with it. Forgive me for not addressing it all in it's entirety.
    1
  11059.  @keithmcgaffie9963  Your analogy is terrible. It's like you have no understanding of what the words proportionate and disproportionate mean and how they affect statistics and the concepts you are trying to use and dismiss. Let me try to explain this with a hypothetical situation and random numbers pulled from my butt. There are 4 people, three are white, one is black. One white has 100 bucks. The other 3 (2 whites and one black) have 10 bucks each. Clearly the whites have more and the income inequality gap is large because of the one white guy with lots more than the others. Let's say we then gave the 3 at the bottom 20 bucks each. Has the income inequality gap gone up or down between the races? The correct answer is that it's gone down even thou TWICE as much money went to whites than did to blacks in this hypothetical. It hasn't solved the income inequality gap but it has reduced it because of how proportionate the problem was to begin with and it disproportionately affected blacks. Now go again and reread everything I've talked about. Understand that, again, all of the problems I've mentioned DISPROPORTIONATELY affect blacks. They stand the most to gain based on proportions if these problems are solved even if they don't eliminated the income inequality gap entirely. This is not debatable because math. Regarding, "So if the bottom of the stats get the same treatment as the top nothing actually ever changes." We aren't treating the top and the bottom the same with the policies I've mentioned. The guy with 100 doesn't get more, if anything they actually stand to LOSE money in the form of taxes to pay for the money going to the people who are on the bottom. The rich already have health care, education, a living wage, and don't have to worry about going to jail for drug possession while the poor don't have those things. If we give those things to the poor we make a better, more fair world even if we don't succeed in making it perfect.
    1
  11060.  @keithmcgaffie9963  And here is the math proof. Three white guys start with 120 total (100+10+10). 40 is the average. One black guy averaging 10. The wealth gap is 30. After we give the guys on the bottom health care, otherwise known as 20 bucks each, the whites now total 160. Divide that by 3 they average 53.33. The one black averages 30. The wealth gap went from 30 to 23.33 and that doesn't figure in the taxes the rich guy had to pay causing his wealth to go down.
    1
  11061.  @keithmcgaffie9963  Regarding, "ok let me hit you with the fact of that analogy black farmers took three types of major loses these last few years of trump." This has NOTHING to do with the point I'm trying to make. Is there any chance you would be willing to address what I am talking about instead of deflecting to other things? Trump is fucking terrible and a clown. He is making things worse. I'm talking about ways to make things better. Regarding, "Three trump did a farmers bailout but guess who didn’t benefit black farmers." I honestly have no idea what you are talking about specifically but I can confidently say it has NOTHING to do with what I'm talking about. Regarding, "It’s like if I had three guns and you had one knife when weapons are handed out. Now the next time the weapons get handed out evenly as let says knives now I would have three guns and one knife while you would have two knives who’s have the better chances to hunt for food me or you. Before and after." It's not like that. Again your analogy is terrible. How about we lose them? How about you address the specific solutions I've offered instead because analogies are not your thing. In your analogy everyone is getting something. In the specifics I've mentioned only the bottom are getting something and the top are ones paying for it, ie losing something. Regarding, "because your example is exactly how barrack made more white millionaires then the norm" Obama was fucking terrible. He represented big money and corporate interests and again, has NOTHING to do with what I'm talking about. The ACA was a blowjob to the rich and powerful while giving the peasants crumbs. Universal health care on the other hand would destroy a wealth consolidation machine know as the private health care industry who disproportionately helps rich whites. It would disproportionately help blacks who currently go without health insurance more than whites. This system is paid for by more whites. Regarding, "the next go around new president hands everything out let say to ten then the white guy is going to be at 50" Which makes no sense because the rich already have the things I'm talking about. I don't know how to make this anymore clear. I've said it before but I guess I'll repeat it. The rich have health insurance, education, a living wage, and without fear of drug possession. They stand to gain NOTHING. They are the ones PAYING for the benefits the poor would be getting. Regarding, "immigrants" Man do you really, really, really have some misplaced anger towards immigrants. They are not your problem. The rich and powerful, the corporations and the oligarchy are. Regarding, "But wait here is the other flaws in that now the black guy have to pay taxes as well for immigrants to have healthcare" 1) you don't seem to understand who is to pay for these proposals 2) we ALREADY don't just let immigrants die when they get sick 3) all blacks would have health insurance who disproportionately go without it. Stop acting like their lives wouldn't be improved because of it. They obviously would. Universal systems are cheaper. Canada pays HALF as much per person for their universal system. You know what, I can't debate this anymore. You can't stay on topic at all and address the specific points I'm making and it's hard to try and address you while you are all over the place instead. Peace.
    1
  11062.  @AF-wd2gt  Regarding, "people were voting and continue to vote based on what is between legs" People vote based on skin color. Is that a logical reason to do what you are doing based on gender? Don't bother answering. It's rhetorical and obviously not ok. Regarding, "Why do you think 45 president not a single was a female" I'm sorry, I don't speak Idiot. Can you translate this into English for me?
    1
  11063. I prefer to call them the corporate media. It is more apt.
    1
  11064. Hopefully, when the russia/ukraine war is over, that statement will look silly.
    1
  11065. Ignorance is bliss.
    1
  11066. So you supported trump using this same failed "logic?"
    1
  11067. I think it was used to send a message to their own people more than that of the US. So that they could credibly avoid war.
    1
  11068. I love tulsi but maybe go with the progressive who has a chance. She never should have ran and she needs to drop out.
    1
  11069. "Tried to end senseless wars." If only he were the commander in chief he might have been successful... oh wait... "real leader" At best he was grossly incompetent at ending war. Or most likely you are just a dupe buying snake oil from a conman.
    1
  11070. Look... the CFPB is a great thing... in a vacuum. But we don't live in a vacuum. The context is important. We were coming off a major financial crisis. We needed banks broken up, bankers put in jail, and Glass-Steagal brought back (among other things). Instead we got the CFPB. Just enough so that the dems could act like they were doing something while not actually what they should have been. All the same things can be said of Obamacare. It's just controlled opposition to the real change we really need and bandaids for the country when it needs major surgery.
    1
  11071.  @InfoForYou8  "No." I'm pretty sure he was the guy. "Learn some logic." You aren't even attempting arguments. That's not very "logical." "Us vs. Them" It's my fault that the elite are crushing me? That they only see me as a commodity to be used to make money? That they will throw me away as soon as I'm not profitable for them? Sorry not sorry for taking the facts in and acting appropriately.
    1
  11072.  @tonyplow9882  "assuming what you want to assume." What a weird way to describe the position that noam publicly said about himself. I think it's far more apt to say that you are assuming he might have changed his mind because that's what you want to assume. Don't you think?
    1
  11073.  @tonyplow9882  "i am saying that we can’t be sure without asking him." Is this still your position? I know it was your position one minute ago but for all I can know for certain your position has changed. It would be wrong of me to assume you still think this. It would be better to do what you are doing and ask. Is that still your position? That we can't be sure without asking him?
    1
  11074.  @tonyclifton2230  "Alas you took fashion over knowledge." I'm not going to lie this is funny coming from someone who is manufacturing consent for corrupt dems.
    1
  11075.  @tonyclifton2230  "I am not saying biden is great" It's like driving head on into a wall at 100 mph instead of 120 mph. "paris climate accords" Nothing about it is binding. It's words and virtue signaling, nothing more. "keystone" Is that why we needed to vote for team fracking?
    1
  11076.  @dashx1103  I'm pretty sure he is. Even his biggest fans here seem to concede it.
    1
  11077.  @InfoForYou8  "you’d want to know his current position for sure." It's not very relevant to me at this point and I've told you exactly why. If you are arguing in good faith that we should be asking him what his position is then that is something YOU should be doing.... but you aren't are you? "I have no need to do ad hominem fallacious criticisms" I don't need to call flat earthers names but I concede I do it anyway. "I have no need to do ad hominem fallacious criticisms" Are you really pretending that your comment of, "Learn some logic" wasn't ad hominem? I'm pretty sure it was.
    1
  11078.  @dashx1103  "should vote against the Democrat. He stated that he's done it" Just not when the "democrat" may was well be a republican? "He stated that he's done it." Did he vote full blown republican? "you are just wrong on that." When did exactly did he tell people not to vote for a democrat in a general election? He's old as dirt. You must have a single example right? "I understand people who voted Trump because they thought Biden was unacceptable." You understand that type of nonlogic? If biden is unacceptable that means you don't vote for biden. It doesn't mean you should vote for trump. "I understand people who voted Biden because they thought Trump was unacceptable." Trump being unacceptable means you shouldn't vote for trump. Only a fool would think that means you should vote for biden. "I understand people like you who say we have to stop voting blue or red." If it makes you feel any better I understand why so many people vote for terrible people.... they do it, in part, because people like noam tell them they should. And he does it knowing that they are terrible. I actually have far more respect for the du pes who vote for trump or biden because they actually believe them and not because they are scared of the other guy.
    1
  11079.  @tonyclifton2230  "There were two options" Nope. But this is what you say when you are trying to manufacture consent for the major parties. "Democrats were better on the environment and he has been proven right." Because the dems have mandated drilling now? I don't think that proves what you think it does. But hey... at least the EXXON ceo is happy with biden and the dems!
    1
  11080.  @dashx1103  "So I took that statement literally." It is what would literally happen if noam got his way on the topic. We are a social species and we need each other.
    1
  11081.  @tonyclifton2230  "He was only one vote" He has legions of sycophants like you.
    1
  11082.  @tonyclifton2230  "who were the other options?" Do you really need me to explain what the word infinity means?
    1
  11083.  @tonyclifton2230  "Chance of winning." You are self defeating. Other don't have a chance of winning because you and people like you will only vote for corrupt major parties.
    1
  11084.  @tonyclifton2230  "What you said wasn't that funny." I wasn't laughing at me. "new start extended" Biden didn't go backwards on a single issue. Wow are you easily placated. "Paris accords back in place" Which like I said doesn't do ANYTHING of substance. "maybe an Iran deal soon" Maybe? You are giving him credit for things he hasn't actually done now?
    1
  11085.  @dashx1103  "Noam explicitly stated..." Noam explicitly stated, "such people have to be, they should have the decency to remove themselves from the community, if they refuse to do that then measures have to be taken to safe guard the community from them." Like I said... he wants them ostracized.
    1
  11086.  @tonyclifton2230  "it wasn't all bad." More military spending under biden.
    1
  11087.  @tonyclifton2230  "it wasn't all bad" Biden de port ed more.
    1
  11088.  @tonyclifton2230  "it wasn't all bad" More money for the MIC under biden.
    1
  11089.  @tonyclifton2230  "it wasn't all bad" Biden kicked more people out of the country.
    1
  11090.  @tonyclifton2230  "it wasn't all bad" More money for the department of offense under biden. Unlimited money for ukraine under biden.
    1
  11091.  @tonyclifton2230  "it wasn't all bad" Biden is forcing more people out of the country compared to trump.
    1
  11092.  @tonyclifton2230  I can't even get my message across right now in biden's america. Everything else I'm trying to say is being shadowbanned.
    1
  11093. How else would he bring up the time he spit on a guy?
    1
  11094. Maybe Kyle just sucks and no one, RIGHTFULLY, is interested in what he has to say.
    1
  11095.  @bladimirastorga9308  Shouldn't you be giving money to marianne williamson or something?
    1
  11096. Nah. He knows that democratic voters are against it overwhelmingly.
    1
  11097. They are both on shit but neither of them are on coke.
    1
  11098.  @stefan4159  Copy and paste troll is obvious.
    1
  11099.  @stefan4159  "I didn't say I was being nuanced," So you were just being a hypocrite on the topic then who was criticizing people for not being nuanced while you were not being nuanced yourself. Thanks for clearing that up. Not that I really care.
    1
  11100.  @stefan4159  "You're completely missing the point." You mean like you are missing my point that you are a hypocrite? Are you again trying to prove you are a hypocrite? It's working. We get it. You are an epic hypocrite. No need to keep proving it.
    1
  11101.  @stefan4159  Regarding, "When did I claim that I was being nuanced myself?" You weren't apparently. But you were criticizing people for not being nuanced. That's hypocrisy. "reveal your ignorance!" I'm not going to lie this is funny AF coming from you. Thanks for the laugh.
    1
  11102.  @stefan4159  Let's say you didn't want to be a hypocrite on the topic of "nuance." You could either A) be nuanced like you weren't doing or B) not criticize people for their lack of nuance. You did neither of these and instead went with C) being an epic hypocrite who can't understand why their actions are hypocritical.
    1
  11103.  @liesel16  "There is progressives in the general election." Meanwhile bernie will tell you to vote for people like joe biden in general elections. "Bernie is working hard" His voting record is exactly that of corporate dems since joe took office. Bernie is working hard to give the cover and support. He may as well be one of them.
    1
  11104.  @liesel16  Bernie is sheepherding you into a corrupt party that is opposed to workers. Good luck with that.
    1
  11105.  @liesel16  Bernie is herding you like sheep into a corrupt party. Good luck with that.
    1
  11106. Making sure it's citizens have health care isn't a legitimate function of government? We are going to have to agree to disagree about that.
    1
  11107.  @bravecaucasian  Is the bill of rights the definitive source of "legitimate function of government." Don't bother getting back to me. I don't actually care what you think or what the bill of rights left out (which is A LOT). I have my own ideas about what a "legitimate function of government is." And it includes helping it's people be healthy.
    1
  11108.  @bravecaucasian  Also... look at the entire world, who provide it's citizens with universal health care, and get back to me.
    1
  11109.  @bravecaucasian  "The US Constitution is the law of the land" I know. And still you cited the bill of rights and not the constitution. "The US Constitution is the law of the land" The greatest thing about the constitution is that it allows itself to be rewritten and changed. You'd think a guy citing the bill of rights would see that and acknowledge it. Instead you act like it's gospel. "The Bill of Rights says nothing about "health care"" Yup. And still I don't care. But thanks for this captain obvious. I've never suggested otherwise. "my point is that if lefties want it to be a right then they need to add an amendment." I want to add an amendment so your point is a waste of everyone's time. "Giving the current corrupt federal government even more control over our lives might not be the best idea considering nothing they do ever benefits us and ALWAYS ends up infringing on our rights." If this is how you want to rationalize the current POS shit system and not trying to improve it so be it and I don't really care.
    1
  11110.  @bravecaucasian  "our current federal government is criminal and corrupt." And you give those corrupt POS exactly what they want. They don't want a universal system. They want to keep price gouging you and making money off of your health with the current shit system.
    1
  11111. Maxfield regarding, "How thick do you have to be to keep voting within a system that is demonstrably and legally rigged" What are you proposing? I throw my hands up and give in without a fight? That is what the establishment wants and I'm not going to let them win without fighting and without voting. Regarding, "How blind do you have to be to ignore all of the dumb and inexcusable shit Sanders has done since July last year" This is they type of thing that requires you give examples rather than vague smears. Regarding, "The establishment wants you to keep wasting your time and money on this completely pointless charade you think is democracy." Not nearly as much as they want us to quit... like you are advocating for. Regarding, "Your votes are being electronically rigged, and your money is going to controlled sheepdog candidates." You can't even give intellectually consistent thoughts. If you think Sanders is just a controlled sheepdog then why would they need to rig votes against him?
    1
  11112. Maxfield regarding, "coopted candidates" You really think Sanders is "co opted?" The guy they smear. The guy they blame for Hillary losing. The guy who is forcing them to take a position on medicare for all. The guy that is the reason they need to rig the primary. You are a fool. There is no one more responsible for people being woke to how corrupt our government and the "democratic" party is than him. He has fought his entire life for progressive issues. The establishment appreciates you smearing him as being co opted and thank you for doing their dirty work for them. Regarding, "demonstrably rigged game." Yup. It is rigged. Sanders is the best hope we have for leveling the playing field if that is important to you. Regarding, "You are not fighting for shiz doing that." So you are then by bitching and smearing the guy fighting for you? Again the establishment appreciates your foolishness. Regarding, "What you are doing is wasting time and effort by participating in theater, and believing it is real." Let's say I agree with you... and I don't. What do you propose? What are you doing? Other than telling me how foolish I am for fighting for what I believe in? Regarding, "Keeping your mind in this little box is exactly what the powers that be want." WTF are you talking about? Is that why I get attacked constantly for my beliefs by the establishment? Regarding, "There are many other ways you can resist." This is the type of statement I expect from our politicians. Absolutely nothing specific. Just vague garbage to try and attack my position. Regarding, "No meaningful change is ever going to come about because you voted for the right person." Whatever you got to tell yourself to justify your idiotic decision not to vote.
    1
  11113. Max regarding, "The same Bernie Sanders who stayed silent while obvious election fraud took place," Here is something I don't think you understand about Sanders. He wants to talk about policy. Always. That is his thing. I don't think he would talk about anything else if he could. I'm sorry he is not doing exactly what you want to do but even you should realize there isn't jack fucking shit he could do about it. That is what lawyers are for. Sanders saying anything about this is only perceived as whining and I don't know if you know much about Americans but they fucking hate anyone who is being perceived as being a whiner even if their whining is justified. Even Hillary Clinton supporters had an impossible time justifying her whining in her latest book. The only thing that he could have done is say something but what would that have really accomplished? It would have made you feel all rosy inside. It may have woken a handful of people but be real... if they are not woke to it already they are not likely to be woke anytime soon. And what would it have cost? A fucking shit ton. Again Americans don't like whiners and he would have lost support especially when the entire establishment comes gunning for him on that. He loses his ability to address what he really cares about... POLICY. Again you are totally fucking inconsistent with your thinking. On one hand he is a co opted and on the other hand the system is being rigged against him. If he is just one of them then why the fuck do they rig it against him. It makes no fucking sense. Regarding, "and later endorsed the perpetrator of the crime" Again you are talking about a fucking endorsement and acting like it is his soul. I very much disagreed with Sanders at the time but I understood why he did what he did. He sided with the lesser of two evils. He fulfilled his promise to endorse the democratic nominee that he made when he entered the race. HE DIDN'T WANT TO BE BLAMED FOR TRUMP WINNING! And can you really blame him for that? Not only is he a terrible human being like Clinton but Trump is also straight up OFFENSIVE. I sure as fuck wouldn't want to be blamed for him winning. Fuck he endorsed her and they STILL blame him. Imagine how much easier it would have been had he not endorsed her. And because he did Hillary and the corporate dems only embarrass themselves and make themselves look bad when they try to blame him. Regarding, "he publicly dismissed the idea that the primaries were rigged" Again you bitch about things that, even if he did them, WOULD CHANGE FUCKING NOTHING. Well nothing other than making you cum and hurting his chances at doing the things he wants to do to help the people of this country. Regarding, "The same Bernie who formed a covert "non-aggression pact" with Hillary prior to the primaries." Do you have any idea who Sanders is? You say this shit like it is unthinkable and out of character of him. Sanders is all about policy. Sanders desperately wants to win elections on ideas, not by attacking his opponents. Some people, like me, really like that about him. If you want someone who will say or do anything to win then I would think you would love Hillary. It's not like her signing that meant anything. Regarding, "The same Bernie who urged voters not to vote third party in the general." You know he endorsed Hillary because you cry about it constantly so why is this really so fucking surprising and offensive. How fucking stupid would be if he said, "vote for Hillary Clinton! Or third parties, whatever." Would that make any fucking sense what-so-ever? Obviously not so stop acting silly. Regarding, "The same Bernie who shunned Jill Stein's repeated attempts at collaboration, or at the very least, open discussion." I'm sorry he doesn't live his life exactly how you wish. He isn't perfect. He doesn't walk on water. But the decisions he has made have rightfully made him the most popular politician in the country. The decisions he has made have put him in the best position possible to bring about the progressive change this country rightfully deserves. I voted for Jill Stein but Sanders didn't owe her jack fucking shit if he didn't want to. Regarding, "The same Bernie who ignored Tim Canova's campaign against DWS, who then lost as a result." I wish Sanders would have done more. I honestly don't know for sure why he didn't. Maybe he was just tired as fuck after running an incredibly long campaign of his own. But blaming him for Canova losing is fucking idiotic. You sound like a Hillary supporter blaming Bernie for her loss. Regarding, "The same Bernie who is now actively perpetuating the "Russian's hacked the election" lie." Who says it is a lie? You? The CIA, this nation's spy agency, says they did. Do I believe them? Not exactly. But accusing the CIA of lying is opening an entirely new can of worms that Bernie is wise to avoid. Again doing something like doesn't change jack fucking shit other than making you feel good and hurting Sanders chances of affecting policy. I would like to add that, although I am skeptical of the CIAs reports, I ABSOLUTELY believe the Russians meddled in our elections. I assume they did before any reports just like I assume the US meddles in everyone else's elections without any reports. If you think they don't fuck with us at all then I think you are being a fool. Regarding, "The same Bernie who went on tour with Tom Perez to encourage more people to vote democrat." You mean that tour that allowed Sanders to get his message out including talking about medicare for all for example? That tour that only made corporate dems look bad? Yeah, that is something to cry about (that is sarcasm in case you can't tell). Regarding, "The same Bernie who's wife said on live TV that the media had treated them fairly during the primaries." Yeah, if only Bernie's wife had broken down and cried about how unfairly they had been treated everything would have been different. Again that is sarcasm in case you can't tell. Stop acting so fucking foolish. Try to focus on getting change where you can get it instead of focusing on the battles that are best left not fought. I don't need Sanders and his wife to tell me they got fucked over to know it. Do you? Do you think the people that like to claim it was fair are going to suddenly change their because Sanders wife says so? Of course not. Stop acting like it would change anything. Regarding, "The same Bernie who also refused to be "drafted" into a new third party." I agree with him. Let's say Sanders did and won the presidency (even thou he would need a majority of electoral votes and not just the most, even thou he would risk splitting left leaning voters), let's say he did. Do you think he would be able to accomplish much? Of course not. He would be opposed by both major parties and then after he is gone they go back to business as usual and nothing changes. Let's say Sanders runs and wins as a democrat. He could unilaterally enact party reforms such as banning them from accepting their legalized bribes and others. Then all of a sudden we might have a major party that is incentivized to care about their voters instead of their big money donors. Oh and congressional democrats would be more willing to help him make the changes this country so desperately deserves. If you care about getting vengeance on the party more than you care about getting things done for the country so be it but you are being shortsighted. Regarding, "if you think voting Democrat = fighting" I vote for good people. People who believe in the policies I do and have a plan to get them done and I honestly don't give a flying fuck about their party label. Only sheep think labels are so fucking important. Democrats, Republicans and you all think way too much about that label.
    1
  11114.  @Steve-vp6mm  Respect is earned, not given. If they don't want to be called names they should be decent human beings.
    1
  11115.  @Steve-vp6mm  Regarding, "This is like me going "Suckular Talk" is just Fox News for Bernie Bros." Do you actually think this? Because if you do... ok. It would be dumb, but not because of the name calling but because of the substance. Regarding, "Trump level banter." If I made a list about the things I hate about Trump it would be a mile long. But nowhere on that list would I mention the name calling because I've honestly never given a shit. I've thought some of them are dumb but that's very different. Terrible people deserve ridicule and scorn. It's a way our social species makes clear that them being terrible people is not acceptable.
    1
  11116.  @Steve-vp6mm  Regarding, "I mean it is biased Bernie Bro chats. Undeniable." Um.. ok. So what. Kyle isn't advertising himself as "fair and balanced" which is but one reason why your original comparison of Kyle to fox asinine. Regarding, "mudslinging is not very diplomatic so it is a problem despite how much it doesn't bother you." Actually thinking that we should be diplomatic with people who have made clear what their agendas are is more of a problem then what I'm doing. Regarding, "Corey Booker and Beto Orourke" They sure as fuck aren't good people. They are people selling their soul and sucking corporate dick. Regarding, "Though I dont think its this guy's intention anyway" Oh yeah... that's right. You don't care about name calling as long as you think it's witty. Regarding, "you're the one with the hate boner for them." If you study the world we live in, our system of government, and the dysfunction in it and you don't get pissed you either A) are dumb as fuck and don't understand how bad things are or B) are a terrible person like the people you are bending over backwards to defend.
    1
  11117.  @Steve-vp6mm  We peddle in facts here, not bullshit. Therefor your continued analogy continues to be stupid as fuck.
    1
  11118. Is Kyle's fraudulent behavior just the beginning? I'm confident it is. He's a fraud.
    1
  11119. I can't fix your stupid for you Luke. Sorry.
    1
  11120. It doesn't matter. That's not where corporate media gets it's mouthpieces.
    1
  11121. That or bernie can vote to give the MIC billions.
    1
  11122. Youtube says there are 8 replies but they are only letting me see half. Isn't that the type of thing that is suppose make china the bad guy?
    1
  11123. FYI your president is actually the orange clown.
    1
  11124.  @ninjaskwantsacookie5334  Fair enough. FYI he sucks, just like the clown he is replacing.
    1
  11125.  @ninjaskwantsacookie5334  Regarding, "still better than mr orange" I'm not as sure. Trump never started a new war. And I care more about biden writing a racist crime bill than I care about trump writing dumb tweets. Let's hope Trump 2.0 is as incompetent as Trump 1.0 was after the inevitable failure that will be the biden presidency.
    1
  11126.  @ninjaskwantsacookie5334  Regarding, "racist" Authored the racist crime bill remember? And worked with segregationists to stop bussing back in the day. His veep to be was one of those girls according to her. Regarding, "has engaged in persistent efforts to take away workers’ health care" He bragged on the house floor that he has tried to cut SS and medicare. Regarding, "take away tik tok" Is this really an important issue to you? I personally don't care about this in the least, especially compared to many problems this world has that I actually consider to be important. Regarding, "covid is killing people" Covid would have killed plenty of people if Biden where president the past years. And it will continue to kill people after he takes office. Regarding, "he has done nothing about it." Wow. I can't believe you have me defending the orange clown but the reality of the matter is that the trump administration has done several things to fast track a vaccine. Operation warp speed is a thing.
    1
  11127.  @ninjaskwantsacookie5334  But to the best of my knowledge biden isn't homophobic. Still not sure that individual fact makes him "better" when thinking of the whole.
    1
  11128.  @everyvillainislemons2521  Any chance you would be willing to respond to the point I made? Here, I'll even repeat it in the form of a couple very simple questions. Does America currently let illegal immigrants just die when they get sick? Hopefully you will give the accurate answer to this question of no, we do not just let them die. Now seeing as how we already don't just let illegal immigrants die when they get sick what exactly is the big problem with saying we will give illegal immigrants health care?
    1
  11129.  @mckenzie.latham91  Well done on deleting the message where you blatantly lied about what I had said. Still you leave a comment up where you call me stupid. I'm not going to lie... I find that quite funny.
    1
  11130. @UC7nwvUH4lYc-wT2j97fG-QQ So you reposted your comment where you continue to make the same fucking mistake that you did to me. In it you are attributing words to someone they didn't say. Wow. What a lazy, idiotic, lying piece of shit you are. And people wonder why I think so little of humanity. It is because of idiots like you. You have no right to call anyone stupid.
    1
  11131.  @mckenzie.latham91  There is so much wrong with everything you say and so much I'd like to say but I'm going to try to keep this short. (it still won't be) Regarding, "i have to disagree and point out how you are no omnipotent being who knows everything...or knows how other people see and interpret things, or their state of mind in the situation" I don't need to be omnipotent to know that "it was just an accident, a push of the wrong reply button" makes no fucking sense to excuse a comment that includes comments to more than one person. I concede that your original error was very likely an honest mistake. If only you just said it was an honest mistake and you were wrong, but you didn't. You offered an "explanation" that was pure fantasy. You made the exact same mistake to Omar. You pretended my saying, "Either way you are a lying cunt attributing words to someone other than the person who said them." was wrong when I was absolutely correct and that was exactly what you were doing. And you did all of this while saying I'm "full of bullshit" and I need to "grow up and get over yourself." You have been nothing but an ignorant cunt from start to finish while being a hypocritical condescending cunt as well. Even the very first thing you said is fucking terrible. "Bernie or i burn my home down cause we're all done anyway... yeah when you actually say it out loud and drop the pussy "bust" connotation it sounds kind of stupid." You clearly have no understanding what the "bust" movement is about and what Bernie or bust means. Even there you are mischaracterizing people and putting words into their mouths that are not their meaning. And you are doing so while essentially calling people stupid. It would have been nice to talk about why everything you said here was idiotic, instead this got derailed by your constant stupidity elsewhere and blatant lies. Regarding, "coming off as the total asshole" I am an asshole. I concede this. I'm not pretending to be something other than that while also calling people stupid like you do. Don't lie to yourself. You have been nothing but condescending from the start while you take issue with me doing the same thing but without trying to hide it like you are. You want me to be a nice guy... then just once say something that isn't stupid as fuck from start to finish. Til then go fuck yourself.
    1
  11132.  @mckenzie.latham91  Let's look at you being condescending to me and this doesn't include all the many comments you deleted, only the three that remain. First comment, "stupid." Second, "oh mighty and entitled genius," "grow up and stop acting like a shit kicking baby," "i also however live in the real world." Lastly, "Like i said before, grow up and get over yourself." But when you are an asshole you think it's way different right? Hypocrites always do.
    1
  11133. You write like you are high.
    1
  11134. You do realize you wouldn't be make to smoke weed if it is legal right?
    1
  11135.  @timothyo718  That doesn't sound healthy.
    1
  11136. Because he is a dipshit and tool. Sad but true.
    1
  11137. Religion trains you to think like this. This is your brain on religion.
    1
  11138. Well done on making me feel like I'm living in the movie Idiocracy.
    1
  11139. That is funny coming from someone who is dumber than a 3rd grader.
    1
  11140.  @emerald3331  TYT isn't progressive period. Jimmy is.
    1
  11141. Warmongers are going to warmonger.
    1
  11142. http://www.jimkeady.com/welcome?splash=1
    1
  11143. Nah. It's more evil. They mostly just look stupid because their positions are indefensible.
    1
  11144. At least at the top. The peasants would be the reverse... the peasants are more stupid than they are evil.
    1
  11145. Miriam adelson is the one with power. Trump is a puppet.
    1
  11146.  @robm6645  Sorry not sorry for caring about the persecution of other journalists like aaron mate and jimmy dore in addition to caring about assange.
    1
  11147. I have fucking hated warren for years now. At this point I fucking hate you too if you don't understand what a piece of shit she is. Wake. The. Fuck. Up. Please.
    1
  11148.  @nelsonaddison  Regarding, "You're letting your emotions overrule your reason." No. I'm not. You are being unreasonable. Regarding, "Whether you like it or not, Elizabeth Warren is a power house." Whether you like it or not, Trump is a powerhouse. That isn't an innately logical reason for Sanders to want to run with him anymore than it's a logical reason to run with Warren. Regarding, "She is an incredible campaigner and debater." You can by how she took 3rd in her own fucking state. Regarding, "The question you have to ask yourself is; which team do you want her on, because she is going to join a team." She is ALREADY ON A TEAM YOU FUCKING MORON. Regarding, "I would much rather have her campaigning for Bernie than for Joe Biden." I would much rather have judas eating at our table than others jesus. That's what you sound like. Regarding, "you have no reason to hate me." I am so fucking exhausted of feeling like I'm living in the movie Idiocracy except that if I were actually living in that movie I'd have a better president than I do now and could get a handjob at starbucks. You are suppose to be on the smart team for fucks sake but you can't even tell who is on your team and who isn't. Regarding, "I'm just a guy expressing a valid viewpoint." You are spouting nonsense whether or not you realize it.
    1
  11149. ThOsE wHo PaRiCiPaTe In ThE wOrLd ArE hYpOcRiTeS
    1
  11150.  @HowMoneyWorks  "Corporations are people my friend." -a human sandwich
    1
  11151. The host is a comedian being paid to do comedy. Stop being willfully obtuse.
    1
  11152.  @Wr5379-g2y  Is that your idea of comedy? I find that funny but for different reasons.
    1
  11153.  @ominoreg  Yeah, your idiotic conclusion says everything that needs to be said about you the same way flat earthers "thoughts" on flat earth says something about them. Good luck to you in your life. You are going to need it.
    1
  11154. Term limits is not a solution. Money out of politics is. Term limits just increases the rate of the corrupt revolving door... nothing more.
    1
  11155. Get money out of politics and politicians who aren't bought and you won't care if they never leave.
    1
  11156. Karma isn't real. Just sayin.
    1
  11157. Polling when done correctly is fucking science and works great. But it's science that can easily and predictably be manipulated through things like poor methodology that might oversample old people. And stop citing Hillary and polling. She was within the margin of error at the national level in most polls. You are conflating biased pollsters with polls and ignoring the fact that she got about 3 million more votes at the national level. But national level polling doesn't account for our fucked up EC system.
    1
  11158.  @theamericanjoeshow  Regarding, "Why is it that our EC system is only messed up when a Republican wins?" It's not. It was fucked up from the moment the founders made it. I feel this way as a matter of principle. Don't think I have any love of Hillary or the "democratic" party. I don't. (I am a staunch Sanders supporter.) Regarding, "You never hear about it being messed up when a Democrat wins." Those dems are also winning the popular vote. I'd happily say the exact same things and be equally outraged at the process if a republican won the popular vote and lost the EC but that hasn't happened although there have been times when I thought it might have been a possibility going into an election. Regarding, "Could I make the argument that if we "Fixed" the EC system that a Republican would never win the presidency." You can argue that it would make it harder for them to win a national election because it would. But it isn't about helping or hurting a political party even thou I despise the republican party. It's about fairness and about what is right and should be. I'd argue the same things if it hurt dems chances. Regarding, "And in your mind that would be "fixing" the EC system?" Dump it. Popular vote wins. I don't care who you are, where you live, what party you identify with if even one at all. Your vote, as an American, counts equally as much as every other American. It's not hard to imagine. This is the same process we use for every other election. We don't have ECs at the state level when voting for governor or senator to make some votes far more valuable than others. And that is what the EC does at the national level. For example if you live in California, a state large enough to be a sizable independent nation, have MEANINGLESS votes for president. Seriously... if you live in California you can confidently stay home knowing that your vote for president doesn't matter. If I were running for president I would have ZERO reason to try and win their votes because the EC makes them not matter. And the same people who argue that the EC is necessary because without it only a handful of people's (those people in cities) votes would matter, ignore the fact that this is exactly the same thing the EC does. Because the EC makes only swing states important. Those are now the handful of states that control our elections. Politicians should be trying to win any and every vote because any and every vote matters the same. It's not a perfect system but that simply is as good as it gets. Taking that and making some votes more valuable than others (which is exactly what the EC does) is not fair and not right, regardless of who it may or may not help.
    1
  11159.  @theamericanjoeshow  By the way thanks for the compliments but full disclosure I can be a real dick who is crazy frustrated with the world and desperately wants the hope and change that was promised long ago but never delivered.
    1
  11160.  @theamericanjoeshow  Regarding, "Thank you for putting so much thought into the message you sent to me." I feel super strongly about the EC. This isn't the first time I've been making these points to people. Regarding, "(just cause a swing state is a swing state, that can change from year to year)" True. Even the example I gave of Cal can be a swing state in the Reagan, excuse me, right election. But the point remains... we shouldn't be controlled by whoever the swing states are at the time. We are all American and we all should be having our equal say in who our president is. And we candidate should be trying to win literally everyone and not be given reasons to ignore large percentages of the population. I'm old... like really old and I vote. 2016 was literally the very first time in my entire life that I was living in a swing state at the time of the presidential election and got to have a vote that actually mattered. Fun fact I used it for Jill Stein. But it was my choice to arguably have made it meaningless (it wasn't meaningless but that argument can be made). That's not right. But don't think that my position is based only from personal experience. From the time I learned about the EC I was like... wow... that's really dumb. Regarding, "isn't your idea just making the votes of people in big cities more valuable?" No. They are not. If you live in the city your vote counts EXACTLY as much as a person living in the country. Regarding, "What I mean is your solution is merely changing the importance from one group of people to another." It's not about this. Really. It's about fairness. Popular vote is as fair as it gets. I don't care what group of people you identify as. I don't care where you live. Those things don't matter. On election day we are all americans and americans all get to have our equal say when voting for our president. Or at least that's how it should be. That's how it is when you vote for governor and senator. There it doesn't matter if you live in the city or the woods and it shouldn't. You all just get your vote because you are all from the same state. There are all sorts of other ways that our government tries to ensure everyone gets to have their voices heard. California has the same number of senators as Wyoming. Regarding, "It's a fascinating topic and our founding fathers actually did mention that if we choose a president through popular vote that we would suffer the same fate as ancient Rome." Don't get me wrong I know there are quotes out there along these lines but the fact of the matter is that the EC had everything to do with slavery. It was a compromise between the north and the south and their 3/5ths people. We very well might see the same fate as Rome and think we are on that path already. If we crumple like Rome it will not be because we decided to let the popular vote win. Regarding, "Do me a favor and check out what our founding fathers said about the topic." I promise you I already have. Regarding, "And to be fare, is there something you'd like me to research?" I'll include an article but, in all honesty, I'm not that concerned about what the founding fathers (who didn't let women vote among lots of other really questionable things) thought back then. I'm most interested in addressing the world today and what I think is fair today. The best thing about the constitution is that it allows itself to be changed because despite the founding fathers flaws they at least knew they weren't perfect. Regarding, "And to be fare, is there something you'd like me to research?" Not really. But you should vote Sanders. And sorry about any typos. This is pretty long and I'm too lazy to go back and proofread like I should.
    1
  11161.  @VERCINGET0RIX  Regarding, "what a shallow argument." It's not their only shallow argument. Elsewhere they are saying stupid shit like I must be a trump supporter for acknowledging the fact that biden's brain is melting and asking me if I'm on the right channel because I don't like biden/kamala. They seem to think all the top comments here are pro-biden or some shit. I think they might be from an alternate reality because nothing they say makes any sense.
    1
  11162.  @VERCINGET0RIX  Regarding, "I redirected my critique at him." Don't waste your time addressing them unless you want to have some fun trolling the troll. Regarding, "Sorry." This is not even close to necessary. All good.
    1
  11163. The elite love it when you divide the people into "blue" and "red." Even when it comes to your state. So why are you doing what the elite want?
    1
  11164.  @songsandscience2295  They aren't describing comedy... they are describing propaganda.
    1
  11165. Is that how you justify making the votes of those people, who have a larger population than 41 states (assuming your fact is true) FUCKING MEANINGLESS. Seriously. There is zero reason for those people to vote and think it is going to do jack shit. Or in NY and Texas. People in 3 of the largest states can just as well stay home on election night and know that it isn't going to mean jack fucking shit. Meanwhile voters in swing states get to dictate the rule of the country. So it isn't that you give a fuck about a small group of people getting to make the call for everyone else... it is that you want to pick the right people in your mind to get to pick for everyone else.
    1
  11166. I guess my frustration with your stupidity can easlily be construed as being "triggered" to idiots. I'm sure it is much easier for you to say stupid shit like that then it is to intelligently refute my points isn't it?
    1
  11167. Like I literally just got done saying it is YOU and YOUR stupidity that makes me frustrated. But thanks for continuing to prove my point about you being a moron.
    1
  11168. Sure. I welcome you to insult me all you want. It's akin to being insulted by Hitler. Considering the source it's actually a compliment.
    1
  11169. He will be fine. There are different rules for the elite.
    1
  11170. I really wish youtube enabled the thumbs down feature for comments like yours.
    1
  11171.  @fidelamaya7860  Because you would want to try and blame Bernie supporters rather than: Trump supporters, or the DNC for rigging the primary, or Hillary for sucking so much she couldn't beat an orange clown, or the corporate media for giving trump billions in free media. That's why. Good luck with your stupidity.
    1
  11172. I eagerly look forward to the follow up video where you compare the candle's smell to the actual ass's smell.
    1
  11173. If youtube did an audit how many subscribers to sam do think would be fake? It's waaaaaaayyyyy more than half. Joe biden support is more real than sams and joe bidens support is manufactured too.
    1
  11174. God was busy doing other things. Obama was the devil's fault because of religious "logic."
    1
  11175. Randy regarding, "she’s a real hardass in-session which has always been something I love about her" I don't dislike this about her but I see it as being theater. I'd be more impressed if she got better results and had more of a message that criminals breaking the law need to go to jail but I don't see that from her. Regarding, "there are instances in her voting record that are contrary to her progressive stance" Like, for example, when she voted for the 700 billion per year department of offense budget. I was baffled by this. Not just because I think there are few clearer examples of votes that progressives should be a clear no, but because her vote was fucking meaningless. I fully expected her to vote no just because of the obvious optics of voting yes. I mean she didn't even think it was a good idea to pretend she was progressive on such an important vote. Regarding, "I think her rationale behind it is that she wants to be able to work with republicans" If that is her rationale then I question her intelligence. There is zero evidence to think that Republicans can be worked with on anything that benefits the country. Regarding, "it’s extremely difficult for her to get any legislation passed." Her signature accomplishment was the consumer protection bureau and this was done when dems could do anything they wanted. And in the wake of a possible economic collapse this was the best they could do. Not break up the big banks, not bring back glass steagal, not put at a single crooked banker in jail, this. And as much as it is a good thing it is a pretty fucking pathetic excuse for legislation compared to what the country deserved and needed at the time. It was just enough so that they could say they were doing something. Warren is better than most but that isn't saying much when you consider who she is being compared to. I do not trust her and do not consider her to be what I think is a true progressive.
    1
  11176. How do you come to that? 1.9 trillion would be a little under 7K to everyone according to my math.
    1
  11177. Try any other website.
    1
  11178. We still study worms and we'd talk to them if we could.
    1
  11179.  @MetaPixeI  "my point is something that is capable of travelling across the universe is definitely far far more intelligent than we are" If this is all you have it's not really much of a point. "something that is capable of travelling across the universe" I suspect that something capable of travelling the universe would still think we are about the most interesting thing in the area by a lot. "We have to understand that our entire perception and existence is completely limited to the point of view of "human being"" Sure. "Try and think outside the literal box" Made a valid substantive point. This is not that. "imagine something that not only evolved in a COMPLETELY different way. But also had millions (or even billions) of years of a HEAD START in attaining an "intelligent life form"" I suspect that such a thing would be interested in us the same way humans are interested in worms. I love to have a talk with worms but we are unable to communicate with them. Those super advanced beings you speak of are likely able to communicate with us the way we can't communicate with worms.
    1
  11180.  @MetaPixeI  "evolved in a COMPLETELY different way" You say this as if it would mean would be less interesting. This would likely make us more interesting.
    1
  11181.  @MetaPixeI  "Why?" I don't know exactly what all is in the entire universe but I'm confident we are still far more interesting than pretty much everything else in the solar system. If you don't you are selling yourself short. "And they don't need to reveal themselves to us to study us." I suspect that no matter how advanced your technology advances that technology is never going to be perfect and foolproof. Accidents will always happen. "I suspect that such a thing would be interested in us the same way humans are interested in worms" - Why?" Really? Why? I'll happily concede that it's possible that if there are aliens they don't care about us at all for x,y, and z. But you don't know why I'd think aliens would be curious the same way humans are curious? I get it. They might not be. But I think they would be and stand by it for reasons that really should be obvious. Look at you here... at least you are asking questions even if you don't do it well. I suspect aliens would be curious too. If you are going to come all the way here (space is really big) I'm betting they would be interested. But we can disagree about that if you want. "how can we assume anything about them?" I'm not going to throw out all my understanding because of things I don't understand.
    1
  11182.  @MetaPixeI  "you're not really understanding or acknowledging what I'm saying" I get what your saying. I just don't think it's good. "throwing shade at me for no reason." I concede I'm a dick. But I do it for a reason. "you're not really understanding or acknowledging what I'm saying" Your op is saying that aliens wouldn't be interested in us because to them we would be worms... beneath them... uninteresting. But your point is bad. The example you give is of a worm. That your idea of something that's uninteresting and not worthy of study. But we study it. We find it interesting. We'd talk to them if we could. The only reason we don't is because we can't... not because you have a good point. "maybe aliens are actually not in any way like us. But who knows. Maybe they are very similar to us." Let me put it to you this way... if aliens exist and have incredible technology that would allow them to come visit us that would make them "scientists" to me even if they are not human. And scientists are innately curious. I suspect it's like that for aliens as well. I'm willing to change that opinion with more info but that's where occam's razor would lead me with my understanding.
    1
  11183.  @MetaPixeI  " I have to ask what is your conclusion then?" I think that the universe if too big for there not to be life out there. As for if life has visited us that's a very different question and to that I answer... I don't know and I don't think so. "confirmed by the US government" You should be more skeptical of the government than you are. They "confirmed" WMD in Iraq. They "confirmed" a chemical weapons attack in syria. You might want to consider that they are liars who never really confirm shit. "Why haven't they." Maybe they have and I wasn't there. "Or you believe that none of the sightings are alien?" I think that we should have better evidence than we do if they were visiting. We don't have the technology to travel across the universe but we do have the technology to take pictures.
    1
  11184.  @MetaPixeI  "I never said "they're beneath us" or "uninteresting"" Then what exactly is the point you are trying to make with your OP if it isn't something akin to this? "it is worth noting that we cannot communicate with them." It's not as noteworthy as you think. They are not intergalactic aliens. While there would likely be great problems in communicating with them you yourself note how technologically advanced they would need to be. "Maybe similarly aliens you know.. don't have vocal chords.. or communicate telepathically?" I suspect they could draw or recreate a picture if they can fly intergalactic spaceships. "maybe they have the understanding that if they openly communicated with us, they would destroy our civilization." Maybe they would be too sexually attracted to us to communicate. If they did they would alien come all over the place to try and reproduce cause that's how they do it but it doesn't work with aliens so they just destroy themselves rather than communicate with us. "You know in cultural anthropology you're just supposed to objectively observe" Yeah. Because it's the nature of scientists to study. "Have you looked into alien abduction stories?" Yup. Lots can even be confirmed to be made up for attention. "It's interesting how the majority of them are all very similar." It's predictable if you want attention. If you are making things up you would still want you lies to be believed. "how many of them don't remember the events of their abduction until much later in life." This doesn't support their stories... it makes them less believable. "The only reason I mention government is because I thought that might be substantial for you." I'm more likely to believe aliens exist if the government were denying their existence. "Check out interviews with Commander Fravor" Maybe. Where should I be looking? Youtube? Elsewhere.
    1
  11185.  @MetaPixeI  "We can communicate" Yeah. We. Remember when you said, "Try and think outside the literal box we've been evolving..." You are thinking about this from a human perspective and not the perspective of a life capable of interstellar travel. "You're also assuming that it was hard for aliens to get here." Yeah. My best understanding is that nothing can travel fast than the speed of light and if something living tried to go anywhere close to that fast it's going to be hard. "No hate for the worms man." No hate for you. I just don't think you have a good point. It's not personal.
    1
  11186. The "progressives" in government know EXACTLY what they are doing Kyle. It's sad you don't recognize it.
    1
  11187. It's almost like people don't like it when their puppy stories become political props.
    1
  11188.  @copperthedragon870  Regarding, "challenge you to an Internet Fight." Neat. Regarding, "Biden is better than trump." I'm not a trump supporter and I don't really care who you think is better between the douche and turd. Regarding, "he's mountains better than trump" Are you really so sure? For example Trump started zero new wars as commander in chief and biden is a warmonger since we are playing which POS smells "better." Regarding, "he did not do this as a publicity stunt." LMFAO. Would you have so much trouble seeing this for what it is if Trump were doing it? Regarding, "Does that mean that if I run for president and adopt a dog I'm only getting it so I can boost my ratings? No!" The camera team and common sense suggests otherwise. Regarding, "Its basic common sense. Which you seem to be lacking in" What you are describing are the dunning-kruger effects.
    1
  11189.  @copperthedragon870  "challenge you to an Internet Fight." Did I win already? By easily swatting away every silly point you were trying to make?
    1
  11190.    Regarding, "Trump in 2005 said that Clinton will have a tough future ahead because he hung out with Epstein" What is your point? Trump hung out with Epstein. Did you watch the video?
    1
  11191.    Regarding, "Trump also banned Epstein from all his establishments YEARS ago" Did he? When EXACTLY was this and for what EXACT reason? Regarding, "trump said Clinton will have a tough future for hanging around Epstein" Again... this is exactly what trump did. Was he just trying to be a hypocrite? It worked. Regarding, "Trump was only seen with Epstein what once?" LMFAO. Are you serious? Regarding, "maybe Trump was involved with him" Except for the maybe part. Keep polishing that turd. Regarding, "you dumb" LMFAO. I'm not going to lie I find this quite funny.
    1
  11192.    Regarding, "no not except the maybe part, because you nor I know the truth." In the age of information ignorance like yours is a choice. Regarding, "No that isn't what trump did considering there is NO record of trump going to Epsteins island." Do you always try to move the goalpost like this when your original comment is proven to be wrong? "he hung out with Epstein" That was the goalpost. Those are the words in your original reply. Regarding, "All you are doing is trying to pass off your retarded assumptions as truth which is very fucked up." All you are doing is trying to deny reality. It's really fucked up.
    1
  11193.    Regarding, "Except there is literally 0 information out there to prove what you are saying" Did you watch the video? Regarding, "That isn't moving the goal post? How stupid are you?" LFMAO. Original goalpost, "he hung out with Epstein " Goalpost after you moved it, "hanging around Epstein AND going to his Island often." How stupid are you? Regarding, "And? so what? I didn't include everything in my original comment," Whatever you got to do to rationalize being wrong and then trying to move the goalpost to cover for it. Even after you moved the goalpost... so what. Look at the start of it. It STILL includes, "hanging around Epstein." That is STILL hypocrisy because as we all know trump and epstein hung out. Regarding, "you still have yet to prove anything I said to be wrong." Good lord you are an idiot. You literally just admitted you were wrong and now you want to have your cake and eat it too. Why am I wasting my time talking to you? I'm done with this.
    1
  11194. I was wanting that job but Ryan has clearly got this.
    1
  11195. Haven't you heard? It already happened.
    1
  11196. I agree with your message but all caps is terrible and hurts how you message is received.
    1
  11197. Am I suppose to be sorry for not being distracted by a puppy to care about the blatant propaganda? I'm not. Notice that you don't care about the puppy being used as a political prop and that this is propaganda? Says a lot about you.
    1
  11198.  @Fuzzycat16  The only thing I recall her being praised about here is for shitting on Biden.
    1
  11199. Some people fail to understand that even aspirin and caffeine are drugs.
    1
  11200.  @scottvelez3154  No. I'm mostly concerned with all the people who are months behind on their rent ATM.
    1
  11201.  @scottvelez3154  I probably should be more afraid of war since so many people like anurag exist.
    1
  11202. "Your a simple idiot" LOL *You're
    1
  11203.  @AZOffRoadster  Regarding, "HRC wouldn't have picked people THAT bad. Bolton and crew? Fuuuuck." Yeah... Hillary instead loves people like henry kissinger. Totally different. Not.
    1
  11204.  @chickenbeek  Regarding, "he did say stuff on the campaign like..." Sure he did. Taking both sides of every issue is his thing to try and win over everyone. That doesn't change the fact that he said what I'm saying. Regarding, "I'm not defending him, i'm just stating what is true." Look man I don't think you are big fan or something but you were defending him and you were not saying something that was true. I straight told you why it was wrong. Just because you don't have the stomach to listen to him for an extended period of time doesn't mean he didn't campaign on committing war crimes. "We have to take out their families" is the type of thing terrorists like ISIS should be saying, not a presidential candidate.
    1
  11205.  @chickenbeek  Regarding, "i still think there is part of him as a person not wanting to get into wars." He would nuke any country in the world without hesitation if it guaranteed him reelection. That's the type of person he is. He isn't even a republican (in that he cares about the party). He's a trumpian. That's all he cares about... himself. And maybe his family but I think he'd throw them under the bus too if it served himself. People not wanting war don't say shit like "we have to take out their families." They just don't no matter what else they might say. Regarding, "you can see the reluctance" If there's actually any reluctance in him it's only born of him caring what people think about him. And as soon as he thinks it's in his own personal interest to kill people there would be no reluctance and no hesitation. He is a terrible, terrible person with ZERO positive qualities. Please realize this and stick to this going forward and never even imply we should be doing what the guy who ran on committing war crimes wanted.... unless you want war crimes. And I am confident you don't.
    1
  11206.  @chickenbeek  Regarding, "i'm not even sure why you keep arguing" First... I like that you are genuine. In a world with lots of trolls I have no question about your sincerity. But we clearly don't agree on everything even thou we agree on plenty. Forgive me for not addressing the places where we have common ground and we do. I tend to focus on the areas where we disagree. Your praise of Trump and rhetoric about war on the campaign trail pisses me off. And I really wish you would just say, "yeah. good point. I was afterall just trashing hillary as a war criminal but then I was praising trumps campaigning whilst he was campaigning on committing war crimes. That was dumb and wrong of me. What I meant was..." Because it's ok to admit to a mistake. But whatever. Regarding, "i don't believe he would nuke anyone just for the hell of it" I never said "just for the hell of it." That is the description of a psychopath. Trump is all sorts of awful but he isn't that. Regarding, "i don't care WHY he does things" You really should. It's how you make predictions about what they might do going forward. Regarding, "if the outcome is positive." What positive outcomes are you referring to? Or is this just a hypothetical in case he actually does something good one day? Regarding, "You need to be able to separate your hatred or whatever for the actual issues." Huh? So I shouldn't hate him for substantive reasons? Because I'm not just calling him a fuck... I'm telling you why he is a fuck. Regarding, "Every president in my lifetime has been a piece of shit." So you are just used to eating it? If you think they are shit call them shit. That isn't hate for hate's sake. It's hate for a good reason. Regarding, "Fact is how things are under Trump is not really different than almost every president in my lifetime democrat or republican." I pretty much agree with this. But you say this like this is rational to just accept the status quo. It isn't. The fact that people have been fucked over for so long only makes clear how important it is to change direction. And I will add that things are getting worse. Sometime in your lifetime you have experienced "peace." Well maybe not perfectly but certainly far more then now as things are getting worse. Children have no idea what peace looks like. Money in politics is worse. Mass incarceration. Climate change. Outsourcing and automation. Stagnant wages while the cost of living goes up. Things are getting worse. Regarding, "shits on and cals out the military industrial complex" I'm sure the MIC is pretty upset about the raise they've gotten under trump. Just their raise was more than enough to cover the "unaffordable" proposal of college for all. He tore up the only really decent thing obama did so that iran can go back to making nukes and now there is additional pretext for us to go to war with them. John fucking Bolton. Trumps the commander in chief. If he wanted peace he can do it all by himself. It's not like he needs congresses approval for it. If he actually reined in the MIC I'd get down on my knees and suck his cheeto dick. Lucky for me and sadly for the world that isn't about to happen anytime soon so let's not pretend it's going to shall we?
    1
  11207. Statistically speaking... yes. But not me personally.
    1
  11208. Nah... it's perfectly logical to think you should start at the very fucking top when you have zero experience. /s
    1
  11209. "publicly harass/make legitimate threats" This is already way against the rules. No one suggests this is ok.
    1
  11210. Rigging your own elections if far easier than rigging a nation election. You got any proof?
    1
  11211.  @bigstein7075  I have. Got any evidence or just deflection?
    1
  11212.  @bigstein7075  So? Any evidence?
    1
  11213.  @bigstein7075  I'll take that as a no.
    1
  11214.  @bigstein7075  Is there any evidence in that wall of text?
    1
  11215.  @bigstein7075  Maybe but I walls of text are a pet peeve of mine as are people who don't give evidence and in the start of your wall of text you offered none. ONLY give me evidence. That's the ONLY thing I care about. Not your wall of text including bullshit. Do you have evidence or not. Because if you had a source it should have a link or something and I don't see that either. Lastly paragraphs are your friend. Use them.
    1
  11216.  @scottwaggoner223  "What do you need me to cite?" Where exactly you are getting your info... a title that I can look up on the internet and check for myself. "RT" I legit thought they were banned. I don't read them. You apparently do. So give a title of an article that can be checked. I showed you the way and still you act like you don't get it. "I’m in the states" So who cares about rubles when you are buying things. Are you paying twice as much for everything as I am from only a couple years ago? But you want to look at how the ruble is struggling? You are tough to take seriously.
    1
  11217. Rogan is a pundit who has no real power. Long story short you are using the word "bootlicker" wrong.
    1
  11218. An example of a correct way to use the word would be: sam sedar is a bootlicker for the democratic party.
    1
  11219. Regarding, "You have to extend basic dignity to everyone & everything." So I'm suppose to "dignify" Jeffrey Epstein? No.
    1
  11220.  @ilexevergreen5405  Regarding, "Karma!" Doesn't exist. Regarding, "his basic human rights, yes" Trump should have access to health care. That doesn't mean we I need to hope he gets well Regarding, "they killed him which doesn't make me sad." I was really sad when Jeffrey died. Not for jeff, but for his victims and for our knowledge of what happened. He was murdered because he knew shit and it would have been better if he lived longer. That isn't the case with trump. Regarding, " By killing him" The people that murdered him are just as evil as he was. I don't support that. And I don't support murder. But this isn't about murder. It's about hoping a terrible person gets what they deserve the way karma would work if it actually existed.
    1
  11221.  @ilexevergreen5405  Regarding, "no one said anything about having to wish him well." Your OP includes, "Need to be compassionate" Is that really so different?
    1
  11222.  @bobwilson360  In fairness I've always argued for a sarcastic font.
    1
  11223.  @steakismeat177  Regarding, " in almost every other single payer system private insurance does play a role." This is irrelevant to me and it should be irrelevant to Tulsi. We do not need a private insurance industry nor should we have one. A robust universal system like we should have eliminates their purpose entirely and trying to justify their existence is terrible. If you want cosmetic surgery you don't have insurance for it, you pay for it out of pocket.
    1
  11224. I'm betting biden.
    1
  11225. Political theater like this is very believable. It'd only be unbelievable if they really did anything good for the people.
    1
  11226.  @esmeortega2081  Regarding, "This is from 2018" And yet the dodo didn't bother to tell this story when he wasn't president elect. Regarding, "How is this a publicity stunt?" Would you have this much trouble recognizing it if team trump did the same thing?
    1
  11227. FYI the rest of the world already manages to have single payer systems but the richest nation in the history of the world can't afford what everyone else has think morons.
    1
  11228. It's about their performance. I love Bernie but his performance wasn't epic and/or didn't stand to the average joe. Kamala sucks in general but she did achieve that last night in part by leeching Bernies ideas. I'm Bernie or bust but it's only intellectually honest to admit that he didn't kill it the way Kamala did that night. And it's fine that she crushed Biden... because she was crushing Biden. That can only help Bernie in the long run.
    1
  11229. Gross andy.
    1
  11230. Try to realize you are no different than staunch dems and staunch republicans who care more about a party label than anything else.
    1
  11231. Was that response directed at me Taj? Do you really need me to elaborate and explain the obvious to you? Because if you do that would not speak well of you.
    1
  11232. AJ regarding, "Being an independent is not the same as being a democrat or republican." Wow. Really? No shit sherlock. The obvious point that I was making that you guys seem to miss is that anyone who cares about a party label rather than the policies a person is fighting for is just a fucking sheep fighting for a team.
    1
  11233. And AJ as for the absurd notion that Bernie "tows" the party line, he goes out of his way to run for his senate seat as an independent, calls for a "political revolution," is the only reason they needed to rig the "democratic" primary in 2016 in the first place, talks repeatedly about the things wrong with the "democratic" party, makes the corporate dems look worse by giving the people something to compare them to, was the impetus of the demexit movement and so much more.
    1
  11234. Taj regarding, "You are the one who said I was no different than a staunch republican or a staunch democrat." I guess it seems this way to you because you fail to understand the simple and obvious context. No you are not like them in every aspect but you absolutely are exactly like them in one of their worst aspects.... ie caring about a party label more than policy. You, like the staunch dems and staunch republicans, prioritize your team above all else. Regarding, "no such thing as an "Independent" party. Actually there is but that isn't really relevant to the conversation. Regarding, "Getting bogged down in semantics doesn't really bode well for you." It certainly was not my goal. I thought my point was rather self evident but you apparently can't understand it without the semantics. I guess I'll one last time try to explain my obvious point. If, like you demonstrate in your OP, you require a certain letter after a person name to "pay attention" to them, you are fucking sheep. That trait is exactly what stauch dems and staunch republicans require. In that aspect you are exactly like them.
    1
  11235. Ryan grimm sucks.
    1
  11236.  @teenkitsune  You openly admitted you had no understanding of why some might do what they do. I offered you a logical explanation why some might do something that baffles you. Nothing more. It's not like I'm saying that warm weather needs to be important to you or something. Try not to overthink it.
    1
  11237.  @teenkitsune  Really? That isn't logical. Can I assume that you are just as baffled why people prefer going to a warm beach on vacation then going to Antarctica or someplace cold then? That you think they are just being "whiny" when they do. Stop being willfully stupid to try and make your point. You are smarter than this.
    1
  11238.  @teenkitsune  Regarding, "You're comparing apples to oranges" No. I'm not. Whether or not you want to admit it there is a logical reason people prefer warm beaches to the cold when vacationing.... and that's ONLY FOR A FUCKING VACATION. It's a tiny fraction of the time where someone spends their time. You are talking about making a decision where to spend literally all your time and you want to pretend that, for some, warm weather isn't something they can and should consider when basing that decision. Well it absolutely is for some weather (pun intended) or not you want to admit it. That isn't important to you? Fine. I don't give a shit. That's you. But you can't think and act like your priorities are the only priorities. They aren't. And to simply dismiss other's priorities as "whiny" because they don't align with yours is really fucked up. Not everyone thinks living in America is "selling their soul." You are overemphasizing the day to day impact living in the "oppressive regime" has for the average joe and minimizing the impact weather has on the average joe. I feel the weather every fucking day. I don't feel the government everyday in part because I go out my way not to. I happily live out in the middle of nowhere.
    1
  11239. Sounds like he was kicked. Don't think he was doing the right thing of his own accord.
    1
  11240. That's why we all need to get out and vote for Bernie in the primary.
    1
  11241.  @captaindave88  Does that mean you are kyle or krystal based on your nonsensical "logic?"
    1
  11242. The electoral college is a fucking joke. I don't care what state you live in.... your vote should count exactly as much as anyone else. And the EC only makes it so that candidates care about swing states which is no better than the BS I'm sure you want to say about them only caring about large states.
    1
  11243. Could you imagine an honest person in that job?
    1
  11244. I know why you think the song is "conman" but listen again... it's actually "car man."
    1
  11245. FYI you don't need to be here.
    1
  11246.  @steelrain5626  Thanks. Do you ever say anything that isn't stupid AF for one reason or another?
    1
  11247. @Dilideo Regarding, "why was going to war against Iraq a morally bad vote?" It was based on lies of WMD.
    1
  11248. @Dilideo Regarding, "Even if the war was based on a lie, what makes that inherently a bad vote for war?" You are impossible to take seriously.
    1
  11249. @Dilideo Regarding, "“lie” is a super loaded term." It's perfectly apt. Stop making excuses for people who lied about WMD. Ultimately I find you impossible to take seriously. For that reason I'm done addressing you seriously after this. There were no WMD in Iraq. It was a lie that that there was that was being told. Please stop what you are doing. You are making everyone dumber.
    1
  11250. @Dilideo "If Iraq wanted to avoid a war, they could’ve." Holy shit this is stupid. As if Iraq was the one that wanted war with the US. I can't imagine how stupid you must be to say this and not realize how dumb it is.
    1
  11251. @Dilideo "not that I’m conceding the justifications for going to war in Iraq were trumped-up" You can't even concede things that are facts. The US went to war claiming iraq had WMD. They didn't have WMD. I can only think your purpose is to make everyone dumber.
    1
  11252. @Dilideo Regarding, "setting aside the fact that you’re obfuscating every question I’m asking" Your questions are asinine and I've told you repeatedly I'm done addressing you intelligently. But don't let that stop you from continuing to prove why you are an idiot like this. It just proves my point for me.
    1
  11253. @Dilideo Regarding, "the justification the United States had for going to war was the Baathists repeated violations and failures to comply with UN Resolutions passed in the 1990’s" Bush doesn't even use the word "baathist" while rationalizing the iraq war. You are trying to revise history. It's despicable. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2zT-ZHBbOzM
    1
  11254. @Dilideo Regarding, "if you want to talk" I've made it clear I have no interest in talking to you intelligently. You can't even comprehend that.
    1
  11255. @Dilideo Regarding, "you didn’t know who the Baathists are." LMFAO. Just because sadaam was a baathist doesn't mean bush was going to fight "baathists." We went there to fight SADAAM. What you did was akin to saying bush went to war with Iraq to fight men just because sadaam and his crew were men. It's nonsensical and demonstrates you are an idiot.
    1
  11256. I don't disagree that those 2 issues are important but there are lots and lots of other issues that are also very important like health care, social security, education, the environment, and more. I think you misunderstand how our elections and their roles are set up. A person gets the nomination of a party and that person picks as their running mate (or at least they are suppose to, there are other factors that sadly go into this) the person they think would be the best capable of doing the job should the unthinkable happen. Neither Sanders nor Paul would consider the other to be that person because, like I pointed out, they disagree on practically everything.
    1
  11257. Sam seder is controlled opposition meant to manufacture consent for the "democratic" party.
    1
  11258. You are going to get some crumbs but ultimately they are just crumbs.
    1
  11259. The US is a dumpster fire.
    1
  11260.  @davemartino5997  When EXACTLY was that?
    1
  11261.  @maryhuckaby2239  Doesn't that time include a president getting murdered?
    1
  11262. Voyeur aliens who just like to watch? Maybe.
    1
  11263. Someone, anyone who isn't a POS. Trump and Biden don't qualify.
    1
  11264.  @auxzmoron  Regarding, "You need to do more research if you're going to have such a strong opinion" You never bother to say what I'm wrong about. Probably because you have no idea what you are talking about. You need to do more research if you're going to have such a strong opinion.
    1
  11265.  @sc3609  Comments like yours that are devoid of any sort of substance are typical of yanggang. You need to stop bootlicking for a POS politician.
    1
  11266.  @izzylandyt  Yeah. Don't bother to try and intelligently refute the points being made to you. Just put your fingers in your ears, ignore them, and go back to your bubble says yanggang. It's exactly what trump supporters do when pressed about their clown.
    1
  11267.  @jtbui2010  I agree with UBI (not how he proposes it) but I think his heart is in the wrong place.
    1
  11268.  @ChristopherCricketWallace  Because he wants to gut the social safety net when any sort of actual progressive would pay for UBI by rich people.
    1
  11269. Scientists disagree.
    1
  11270.  @randomfullywonderful  yeah... it's only in the high 90's. And only a fucking idiot would require 100 percent to justify rejecting the overwhelming consensus right?
    1
  11271.  @randomfullywonderful  97 percent. https://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/
    1
  11272. So much defeatist attitude. No wonder the left loses so much. They would rather feel superior then win elections too often it seems.
    1
  11273.  @Dauntress-  Regarding, "we reach too far." What is this suppose to mean? Regarding, "My point is that Trumps policies are a far cry from some one like Bernie’s." I'm not going to lie I don't see this point in your original comment anywhere. Regarding, "And assuming that people actually vote on policy" Which is not a good assumption. Don't get me wrong it's what they should be voting on but if you are just going to assume it's what everyone does you would be wrong. And part of the problem with fox is that they don't give a clear and accurate picture of reality. They are being force-fed bullshit. Part of the reason they eat it is because they don't know different. You have the chance to try and break them from this. To give them real facts and knowledge. Some of them are going to eat it (real facts and knowledge). But not if you never even try. Regarding, "there are far more reachable groups" Preaching to the choir only gets you so far. Regarding, "people who think that Fox News is the end all be all of info sources" Americas are busy working their asses off. They are trying to pay the bills and put food on the plate. Lots of them are too fucking busy to spend the amount of time consuming and analyzing the news and politics the way you or I might do. But they might put the news on for an hour at the end of a long day to try and be informed. Maybe they trust fox for whatever terrible reasons. Let's not right them all off shall we? Let's not paint with huge brushes and assume all fox viewers are a monolith and all think exactly the same. Give them the benefit of the doubt and some of them are going to come to your side. But first you need to at least try to give them a reason to and calling them all dipshits who aren't worthy of even the effort is a ensuring defeat. You do want to win right?
    1
  11274.  @PixelGunZodiac  "There was no bombs in Syria, that's a lie made up by trumpers." LMFAO. I guess Sanders is a "trumper" then. He called biden out for this today.
    1
  11275.  @PixelGunZodiac  Somebody took a shot in Iraq because we are illegal occupiers in that country and biden thought it was cause to fire rockets into a different country that we don't have a declaration of war with breaking all international law.
    1
  11276.  @PixelGunZodiac  "There was no bombs in Syria, that's a lie made up by trumpers." I even posted a link for you so that might educate yourself but it got taken down. All you need to do is a quick search of biden bombs syria and you can educate yourself and stop spreading lies like you are.
    1
  11277.  @PixelGunZodiac  I feel like you know you are lying now if you didn't before. Are you going to change it? Or are you going to leave your lie up?
    1
  11278.  @PixelGunZodiac  "He bombed a TURKISH back miltia, not a syrian one." I'm not talking about who was bombed. I'm talking about where the bombs were dropped. Biden dropped bombs in syria no matter how much you want to lie about it.
    1
  11279.  @PixelGunZodiac  I find you to be a particularly disgraceful person.
    1
  11280.  @PixelGunZodiac  "He dropped bombs in Kurdish territory," LMFAO. He dropped bombs in the country of syria. You should be ashamed of yourself.
    1
  11281.  @PilliamWilliam  They don't call him cheesedick for nothing.
    1
  11282. I think the "lame stream media" and "deep state" live rent free in your head.
    1
  11283. Have you considered that Kanye might just be such a genius that his plan was to get slavery talked about and is succeeding? Now that is some mfing genius.
    1
  11284. If you don't want to force the vote you are a sellout. Sorry if the truth hurts. Him being a dick is just a BS excuse. You either do the right thing or you don't. Fraud squad. Never forget.
    1
  11285.  @NeorecnamorceN  Ignorance is bliss. You must be very happy.
    1
  11286.  @NeorecnamorceN  Regarding, "legitimate question" You can't even refrain from lying about this can you? Regarding, "what makes jimmy dore the sole bearer of progressivism?" As a progressive I consider m4a a litmus test. If you don't support m4a you can't really be considered progressive. And if you can't support voting on m4a I can't give you credit for supporting m4a.
    1
  11287.  @NeorecnamorceN  Regarding, "so now you alone get to determine progressivism" M4A is the litmus test not me. You can pick what side of the issue you want to be on. Regarding, "what makes M4A the litmus test?" I wouldn't call it the only one. But anyways... it's what THEY ran on. They said they support m4a. Do you always bootlick like this? Regarding, "What about reparations?" I'm all for it but I personally don't consider it a litmus test. But let's say a politician runs that issue and doesn't support it then they are rightfully called a fraud when it comes to that issue. Do you have any more whataboutism nonsense to deflect from the topic at hand? Regarding, "I could just as easily call any of those a litmus test and call you a sellout for not forcing a vote on them instead." Yeah... you can. Especially when they got LITERALLY nothing for their vote. They had an opportunity to push for progressive priorities and got NOTHING. In that moment it is impossible to tell the difference between corporate dems and "progressives." That's what selling out looks like. Regarding, "nothing progressive gets done?" LMFAO. That already happened. I'm blaming the right people for it. Why aren't you? Why are you bootlicking?
    1
  11288. @blueseaview 11 I know right. As if biden represents the left.
    1
  11289. Your format is remarkably similar to Beca. It's almost like you are the same paid shill.
    1
  11290.  @TheRealBizWiz  Or maybe you just aren't very intellectually honest and are just a useful idiot. Either way you are a clown, as is that disgrace of a person that is your candidate.
    1
  11291.  @TheRealBizWiz  Ok. Thanks. Good luck with that piece of shit you support.
    1
  11292.  @TheRealBizWiz  I think you should not vote for pieces of shit and stop being an idiot. If I'm telling you not to vote for shit I'm obviously not telling you to vote for trump. It just sounds like it to you because you are an idiot.
    1
  11293.  @TheRealBizWiz  Regarding, "We don’t all have to agree on politics my guy." Not voting for terrible people isn't for everyone.
    1
  11294.  @becazapatero2477  Regarding, "angry." Yeah. I'm angry. My government is a dumpster fire and the "democratic" nominee was a terrible person who now has dementia. If you aren't angry then you don't understand the world we live in. I'm tired of people supporting terrible people. I'm tired of feeling like I'm living in the movie idiocracy except if I lived in that movie I'd actually have a better president. And I live in that world because of people like you "two" (you are obviously the same person) who advocate voting for terrible people. You don't even attempt to try and justify it intelligently. Just orange man bad. Keep smiling while the world burns. I know you will.
    1
  11295.  @TheRealBizWiz  Regarding, "you can’t fix stupid." No shit. You can't agree to not support terrible people and don't seem to care that your candidate is terrible. I wish I could fix it for you. Too bad I can't.
    1
  11296.  @becazapatero2477  Regarding, "You act like you want to have a civil dialogue with this guy," I give two shits about "civil." I just want them to say something of value. Otherwise I'm going to call them an idiot while they don't. Regarding, "I think you started making accusations of him being some sort of paid secret agent" Because paid shills aren't a thing right? Because this type of conversation doesn't mirror the same experiences I've had with Hillary's Correct the Record, which it does. Regarding, "I’m a community organizer..." I have zero in interest in anecdotes and things that can't be verified. Regarding, "My first choice for a candidate was Sen. Sanders" Again... don't care nor do I have any reason to believe you. Regarding, " to vote for him because Trump" I know, I know, trump is bad. Duh. I'm not talking about trump. I'm talking about your clown.
    1
  11297.  @becazapatero2477  Regarding, "you having zero interest in things that can’t be verified" I know paid trolls exist. I know you fit the mold. Whether you are or are not is hardly the point. Regarding, "says the person who just complained because someone didn’t attempt to justify their argument intelligently. Which would only come from a mature dialogue)" You are an idiot. I can address a flat earther intelligently without being civil. In fact flat earth level arguments shouldn't be given respect. To suggest otherwise is to demonstrate flat earth level thinking. Regarding, "says the guy spending his time breaking down my every word" It's not always about you. Sometimes it's about the people that might come across your drivel. Regarding, "I care. I admit it." Just not enough to give any intelligent arguments to rationalize support for your clown. And before you go off on a tangent about how trump is terrible.... I know trump is terrible. Trump being terrible isn't a reason to support biden, it's a reason to not support trump. And I don't because I don't support terrible people. Regarding, "why do you even care to be here arguing?" You must be really self centered to not be able to come up with any reasons on your own.
    1
  11298.  @TheRealBizWiz  Regarding, "You are spanking that boy." What a clown you "two" are.
    1
  11299.  @becazapatero2477  LMFAO.
    1
  11300. Do you at least realize you are an anti-semite?
    1
  11301. zionism is akin to notseaism.
    1
  11302. I really can't imagine it. Then again it might just be a failsafe to keep my head from exploding.
    1
  11303.  @holdenbrooksweaver  Regarding, "And what ad-hominem did I call you?" They never said it was directed at them. You would realize that if you weren't stupid. Regarding, "You might want to pick up a dictionary because ad-hominem doesn’t mean what you think it means." As if you haven't used them. LFMAO. What a clown you are. And to be fair I've used them as well. But I don't pretend otherwise because I'm not intellectually dishonest and stupid like you are.
    1
  11304.  @holdenbrooksweaver  Also, you have engaged in ad hominem towards ben. Like when you called them ignorant. You suck at life. Not because of the ad hominem, but because of everything else about you.
    1
  11305.  @holdenbrooksweaver  Regarding, "He inferred it was directed at him." And it was. You called him ignorant. Your ability to suck at life is almost impressive at this point.
    1
  11306.  @holdenbrooksweaver  Regarding, "your blind ignorance while standing on a pedestal of moral superiority." That's ad hominem. I think even you realize this despite your intellect. I suspect it has more to do with your lack of intellectual honesty.
    1
  11307.  @holdenbrooksweaver  Tell me again how "your blind ignorance while standing on a pedestal of moral superiority" isn't ad hominem. Your stupidity is funny.
    1
  11308.  @holdenbrooksweaver  Regarding, "Now go to bed." Which reminds me... you need to work on your ad homimen. How many times are you going to repeat this stupid shit? It was never clever and you only expose how unoriginal and stupid you are when you keep repeating this. Then again it's kinda funny, but not for the reason you think.
    1
  11309.  @holdenbrooksweaver  Still using the same tired stupid insults? At least giving your own drivel a thumbs up is new even if not surprising from someone as intellectually dishonest as yourself. Figures.
    1
  11310.  @holdenbrooksweaver  Regarding, "You are probably the most confidently stupid person I’ve ever met." So. Fucking. Funny. Thanks again for the belly laugh!
    1
  11311. "it is a timely and important message." This message has been brought to you by the military industrial complex.
    1
  11312.  @iheartlreoy8134  Did they actually say that? Or are you just lying?
    1
  11313. Isn't censorship like that the type of thing china is suppose to be doing because they are the bad guy?
    1
  11314. Both parties represent war. But at least the occasional politician calls this BS out from time to time.
    1
  11315. Hopefully he will be too busy working for the dumpster fire known as CNN.
    1
  11316. Monopolies are poison regardless of the business. The handful of banks in the country use fraud as a business model.
    1
  11317.  @jmc4975  "Sam will vote for the lesser of 2 evils." Not only will sam vote for evil but he will tell everyone else they need to vote for evil also. "It's not like people think" Not only would sam vote for donald trump if he represented his team but he would tell everyone else they needed to vote for him too. He's not a journalist. He's a cheerleeder. "You can say the same thing about both sides" I do. "get a clue" This is funny coming from people enabling and supporting evil.
    1
  11318. Trump tried to sell steaks at the sharper image.
    1
  11319. Guy who claims to care about behavior closes by calling someone a "turd." I'm sure you think that is waaay different thou.
    1
  11320. Drop out and endorse Sanders.
    1
  11321. Just got done saying the same thing. I guess I should have looked at the other comments first.
    1
  11322. "Candice is profiting off the stupid republicans. Thats all." This is funny because sam makes all his money manufacturing consent for corrupt dems.
    1
  11323. Reality isn't for everyone.
    1
  11324.  @tclmac1  Regarding, "It's not the reality that bugs me." Are you really so sure? Regarding, "he made a deliberate decision to produce this piece a day before Andrew yang's announcement." He, a political commentator, made a political prediction that came through and it triggers you. You are acting like he said something that was false. He didn't. Regarding, "Its rude, disrespectful and pushy." It's human. We have a way of trying to predict things. Regarding, "It's Bernie bros like him that makes people turn off from Bernie and steer away from politics." He spits knowledge and understands reality. This was but one example of many of that.
    1
  11325. Let's all hope biden loses... not that trump should win.
    1
  11326. I'm way to the left. Even left of Bernie. I'd vote for a Republican I thought had principles (not that I can think of any) long before I'd vote for a corporate sellout dem.
    1
  11327.  @toarrestsomeoneistoviolate2643  Yeah. Bernie lies when he says people like Biden are his friends but that is hardly the same as your average politician and your average lies. Oh and nice name clown. It really let's people know who they are talking to. Go further. Do us all a favor and tattoo idiot on your forehead to help let us know who we are talking to in the same way you picked your dumbass name here.
    1
  11328. If only she were as consistent with the truth.
    1
  11329. Regarding, "I think they should be taxed 100% but that's probably just me." You aren't alone... with a caveat. This would only apply to crazy wealth. Like for all money someone makes over a billion dollars in a single year.
    1
  11330.  @TheSpartan3669  What do you think is going to happen if people couldn't make more than a billion? Do you really think that would stop the amazons of the world from being created? That is just silly.
    1
  11331.  @TheSpartan3669  Are you scared McDonalds would stop have stopped serving burgers after they sold a billion in such a world? Really?
    1
  11332.  Tom Price  One last rhetorical question for you before I ignore you forever... Would you like to work at amazon? And by rhetorical I mean I don't actually care about your answer. And I'm spelling that out for you like you are child because of your intelligence, or lack thereof.
    1
  11333.  Tom Price  Seems that youtube deleted my more intelligent response to your nonsense. They must have thought I was being too mean to you. Oh well. Your comment was so asinine it really didn't deserve an intelligent response anyway.
    1
  11334. She is a Sanders supporter. The fact of the matter is that she is trying to work within the party to make it better which is a near impossible task.
    1
  11335. You trust the fraud squad more? Really?
    1
  11336. There is a far better candidates than yang and gabbard in sanders but for some inexplicable reason...
    1
  11337. Sanders has sold us out to his "good friend."
    1
  11338. Tulsi has a very short record and even thou it's very short she has still "evolved" on some very important issues. Bernie on the other hand has a long, consistent record. There is no question about what we are getting when it comes to him. Tulsi would be a great running mate for Sanders but the reasons to support Sanders over Gabbard are many and the reasons to support Gabbard over Sanders are nonexistent.
    1
  11339. Not all. But every poll since the beginning of time shows that Bernie Sanders is her supporters second choice. Her staying in hurts Bernie for this reason. And that's why she has stayed in.
    1
  11340. Actually he was called an alcoholic for being an alcoholic... not for drinking a beer. God damn you are dumb.
    1
  11341. Is that why he is going to burn Kyle for all eternity in fire when he dies for the crime of disbelief? I'm just kidding... there obviously is no afterlife.
    1
  11342. What a disgusting take by robbie. Just appalling.
    1
  11343. I don't care about age. I care about policy and so should you.
    1
  11344. Regarding, "somebody in resemblance of Bernie" I don't know if you have been paying attention to American politics but politicians like Sanders are few and far between. And of the few that do exist none have the popularity and name recognition that Sanders currently has. Regarding, "Bernie himself risking his age/health/well being may become an issue in the future" Really? Because I think is a manufactured issue by and establishment that will do anything and everything to attack him. I wouldn't be surprised if big mac Trump dies of a heart attack any day but the idea that people should be voting on such a thing is utterly moronic in my opinion. I'd like to go on to add 2 things... 1) there is a reason we have VPs and I trust Sanders would pick a good running mate and 2) I'd vote for a dead Bernie Sanders before voting for most our politicians.
    1
  11345. Regarding, "it's not as if Bernie himself doesn't know anybody at all that is close to himself." Sure but you need to realize how that is not the same as being Bernie himself to, in all honesty, a rather incompetent voting public. Any true progressive is going to feel the full force of the establishment pushing against them and the difference between winning and losing can easily be name recognition. That is supremely important in our country in a way that it shouldn't be but ultimately is. Donald Trump is a fucking disgrace to the human race but one the main things he had going for him in 2016 was name recognition. Sanders has that now like no other progressives in the country. And if you think the corporate media is going to try and enhance any new progressives name recognition in 2020 you would be wrong. They are the same joke that would cover Trumps empty podium while Sanders would be speaking in front of record crowds. Regarding, "Bernie was too nice to Hillary during the primaries." One of my favorite aspects of Sanders is that he didn't want to win by trying to attack Hillary but rather he wanted to win and he cared about policy. I don't think he would have even mentioned Hillary's name if he didn't have to. Rather he would have preferred to talk about single payer, affordable education, banking reform, the environment, money in politics.... I fucking love that about him. That is shit is what is important to me. If you wanted a candidate that would say or do anything to win that is Hillary and company. It is what is different about him that makes him so special to some of us.
    1
  11346. Bill regarding, "the fact that newbie voters especially the identity politics voters need to see the negatives of what makes Hillary a terrible candidate." There are different ways to tell people why Hillary is terrible. To me the best way is by talking about policy. Tell them what you are for... I'm for single payer. Most people are for single payer. They should then consider Hillary position and words on the topic. Hillary on single payer, single payer will "never, ever" happen. Talk about how you want to reform the criminal justice system. People should then be considering how Hillary worked for mass incarceration to address the "superpredetor" problem. Talk about the environment. Hillary loves fracking. Tell them you want a 15 minimum wage. People should then be wondering what hillary's position on the issue is. I concede that there is no perfect solution. Some people are idiots who don't ask the obvious logical question of where does Hillary stand on the issue after you get done talking about it but let's say you do spend your time trying to talk about Hillary's position instead of your own then you are playing a dangerous game with the identity politics voters you mention. Those people are idiots who are just as likely to start thinking you are bullying a women. I can't tell you how many times I was mindlessly called a sexist for supporting Sanders, nevermind that I did vote for a women for president (not hillary). Anyways I guess to me talking about policy is playing offense and not playing defense to me. Especially with a corporate media that would rather talk about anything other than policy. They will always prefer to talk scandal and when scandal doesn't exist they will try to create it.
    1
  11347. Bill regarding, "look at what trump did" There is nothing remarkable or impressive about what Trump did. He benefited from the fact that all the republican establishment candidates split the support among themselves while he monopolized all the anti establishment sentiment in an anti establishment world. Republican voters know they are getting fucked over. They are just too stupid to realize who is putting it in their ass. Then he got lucky to face literally the worst candidate the dems could put against him at a time where her email scandals were at a peak and DNC primary fraud was at a peak. Still he got millions less votes. And most of the votes that went "to" Hillary and "to" Trump weren't votes for Hillary and Trump... they were votes against Hillary and votes against Trump. And again, as usual, he benefited from a voting public that is pretty stupid and being brainwashed on a daily basis by corporate media.
    1
  11348.  @wvu05  Anyone who told you to vote for demented joe isn't just annoying, they aren't all there.
    1
  11349.  @wvu05  "there was literally zero chance that anyone other than Biden or Trump would get elected" Because of people like you who insist on enabling and voting for evil. "If you want to live in a fantasy world where there are no consequences to your inaction" I want to live in a reality where people like you don't rationalize voting for terrible people. Millions of people voted for trump knowing he's a complete POS and voted for him anyway. You are the other side of that coin and together you all ensure the country circles the drain forever. Keep voting for evil and shaming people who don't. I know you will.
    1
  11350.  @TheBayFoto  And you got someone who is arguably worse. Maybe vote for someone who doesn't suck next time and be willing to lose.
    1
  11351.  @TheBayFoto  You can vote for literally anyone. And you voted for a POS.
    1
  11352.  @TheBayFoto  You: "folks that want to talk" Also you: "block them by all means." It's clear you only want to talk and have no intention of listening.
    1
  11353.  @imnotmike  "if you think that Biden is "arguably worse" than Trump, you have brain damage." You think? I think that if you voted for either of them then you have brain damage.
    1
  11354. You come quick.
    1
  11355. I encourage you to support a third party rather than writing bernie. We need to build support for alternative parties.
    1
  11356. They don't want or fear death. If you think they are going to magically go away anytime soon you would be wrong.
    1
  11357. It's just that I hear people say "the dems are dead" all the time and it frustrates me. That said I believe I agree with your sentiment.
    1
  11358. No he wouldn't check his record, citation, a lie about always getting endorsed by the NAACP. Check with mandela who he was arrested with. Check his work with civil rights. Check his hairy legs. You aren't black if you don't support obama biden democrats. If not vote for the other biden. Cornpop was a bad dude. Vote for the other guy. Biden 2020!
    1
  11359.  @TheMisfitPond  I'm not saying there is zero substance but I am saying that it is mostly theater. Take the closing statements. It's like they are actors reading lines. I love Bernie and he did great but it would have been better had he been allowed to talk for longer stretches of time. The topics they are trying to talk about can't be broken down into sound bites. And because they aren't given the proper amounts of time to talk it does just become about shit like "I wrote the damn bill." I love Sanders and loved that he scored this "point." But it shouldn't be about scoring points. It should be about debating ideas and that takes more time than they are given. The format is innately terrible and that's WHY it's that way. They can't let the public actually get informed.
    1
  11360.  @TheMisfitPond  Forgive me for nitpicking and don't take this to mean that I don't think we are on the same team but I have no doubt that we are. I do tend to only focus on areas that I disagree. With that in mind... Regarding, " I don’t think they have all necessarily earned their right to be there." As for what "earned" means this is very subjective. I definitely don't think it means, they are a progressive even if I personally am a progressive and want those ideas center stage. It is arguably a good thing that some corporate dems are their to be punching bags and to give viewers some perspective on what the differences are. Regarding, "Most of them are only there because they sold out to corporate america." Yup. Mayor Pete is a great example of this. He's super young with little record and that record isn't good but corporate media loves him and are happy to talk about him. He is a prime example of a manufacturing consent for a candidate. Compare that to Bernie in 2016 when Ed Shultz was told NOT to cover him announcing his running. Regarding, "bernie, Warren and marrianne lol" Bernie is the man and clear choice. Warren has openly admitted that if she makes the general she will happily take legalized bribes. Their is a reason why the corporate media and wall street seem to be warming to her and those reasons are not good for true progressives. Marrianne is a decent person but the first thing she said about universal health care was ATROCIOUS. That and I think that a person should have at least some experience in politics before running for the highest political office in the land. I need a record or I have no good way to know if I'm dealing with (and this is hypothetical and not meant to be a definitive statement) a snake oil saleswomen who is only looking to increase their brand awareness and sell books.
    1
  11361. LMFAO!
    1
  11362. Regarding, "Might as well still be illegal for both." Which is exactly what it would be while decriminalized. Decriminalized = technically illegal but with no real punishment for breaking. Regarding, "There's no point in it being legal" I'm sure people who are selling see it being DECRIMINIALIZED very differently. I'm sure they would see the point and the benefit of not going to jail.
    1
  11363. And yeah... it should go further. But it clearly is a step in the right direction.
    1
  11364. Actually it is important for the party to learn from their mistakes. They won't thou. They would rather lose to a guy like Trump than let an actual progressive like Sanders win.
    1
  11365.  @Paradox-dy3ve  "Yang is out their ACTUALLY attempting to do something about our major problems." No. He's not. He's just another POS conman and you are buying his BS.
    1
  11366.  @Paradox-dy3ve  "I'm sure it makes YOU feel good to morally condemn people for disagreeing with your opinions" But if it makes you feel good to prop up that POS if it makes you feel like you are doing good while you are only enabling evil you do you.
    1
  11367.  @Paradox-dy3ve  "Yang is out their ACTUALLY attempting to do something about our major problems." As an actual progressive if you asked me how I think UBI should be paid for I'd tell you "rich people." Not yang. Yang wants the first 25 percent of his UBI to be paid for the poorest of the poor. He wants the people most in need of UBI to often get literally NOTHING from his "uNiVeSaL" basic income. He wants to gut the social safety net to pay for his UBI. That isn't not just an expression of his abhorrent "opinion." That's an expression of his MORALS. Or as it stands with yangs like LACK of morals. But if you feel good while tries to get you to dismantle the social safety net you do you. You are a useful idiot for POS conman.
    1
  11368.  @Paradox-dy3ve  Youtube video titled, "Andrew Yang: Paying for a Universal Basic Income" How would yang pay for his UBI? The first thing he'd do is he'd cut "500 billion dollars per year on income support." Translation: he would gut the social safety net. It takes a special kind of evil to do that.
    1
  11369.  @Paradox-dy3ve  If you are the poorest of the poor and most in need of an extra grand a month you are likely to get nothing. But at least billionaires can get a UBI that's 25 percent funded by the poors while the poor would get nothing from yangs UBI.
    1
  11370.  @Paradox-dy3ve  "I still don't understand where the venomous hatred for him is coming from" I call him controlled opposition and you don't understand why that bothers me so much? This isn't rocket science. I honestly prefer republicans who don't act like they are on my side compared to snakes like him who are stabbing me in the back. "you're insulting and being super rude and awful" Look in the mirror. You are the same guy who says shit like, "I'm sure it makes YOU feel good to morally condemn people for disagreeing with your opinions," I'm absolutely concede I'm condescending. And that I'm mean. But at least I'm not a hypocrite about it like you are. "I tentatively suggested that we don't reduce Yang to exactly what you're reducing him to." It's my opinion that your opinion is asinine. Do I not get to express my opinion? Or do you only get to do it? He's EXACTLY the type of person who needs to be called out and exposed... for the same reasons I do that when the topic is trump. Do you have so much trouble understand why people get mad at trump? And call him a POS? Or only when it's about your conman? "Is it literally because you don't like this take of his" Maybe start at the top. I called him controlled opposition. It shouldn't need to explain in great detail that bothers me so much and I have better things to do than explain the obvious.
    1
  11371.  @Paradox-dy3ve  " "enabling evil" get over yourself" Get over yourself. While you pat yourself on the back for propping up your favorite POS conman.
    1
  11372.  @Paradox-dy3ve  ""enabling evil" get over yourself" Sorry not sorry if the truth hurts. I call out bootlickers for trump for all the same reasons. You are bootlicking for a POS conman. If want to act like he's not a POS you can do that intelligently. What you can't do is pretend that me thinking he's a POS shouldn't make me mad.
    1
  11373. I agree that you should be outraged by the parties actions during the primary but you still need to have enough nuance in your thinking to support progressives like justice democrats and Bernie Sanders even if they run as dems.
    1
  11374. They buried the truth til now. MSNBC is complicit in what is happening.
    1
  11375. kyle is controlled opposition, just like bernie
    1
  11376. For anybody who doesn't think splitting the vote is a real thing to be taken seriously please study the image found at 2:39. My point is that progressives should be coalescing around and supporting Bernie Sanders, the clear leader of the progressive movement.
    1
  11377. Yeah. You can tell he doesn't believe it because he has only been saying the same shit since the beginning of time. That is how I know someone is being insincere.
    1
  11378.  @twoshedsjohnson8540  Regarding, "POS" I'm not the one fighting to make sure workers aren't being paid enough to live on. Try not to lie to yourself about who is the POS.
    1
  11379.  @twoshedsjohnson8540  Regarding, " I'm the one who has a grasp of economics. You like to strut around..." You are walking talking evidence of the dunning-kruger effect. But don't let that stop you from strutting around whilst actually making everyone dumber with everything you say.
    1
  11380. SIGN THE PETITION! duh
    1
  11381.  @jordanromesburg6819  Regarding, "so Bernie should bend the knee?" What? No. Is that what you think I said?
    1
  11382.  @johnbemery7922  "Bernie has never made a difference" He's literally the only reason either of the last 2 primaries even needed to be rigged. He is largely responsible for the popularity of M4A. You are either blinded by bias or intentionally lying.
    1
  11383. With the news that neera tanden is withdrawing her nomination does everyone still want to act like Sanders might not have had a part in this behind the scenes?
    1
  11384. The amendment king.
    1
  11385. Obama lead to trump. Biden will lead to Trump 2.0.
    1
  11386. Regarding, "why don't dildos ever get any shit?" They do. But traditionally that's what buttplugs are for.
    1
  11387. She is a terrible person. But that doesn't mean she is wrong here.
    1
  11388. Nah. Let him suck up establishment money and support while he has no chance of winning.
    1
  11389. Has no real value is a great description of your comment.
    1
  11390. What about that is fake? This isn't the jimmy dore show? That isn't aaron? Or are you just a clown?
    1
  11391. Maybe you should slap them then /s
    1
  11392. Go say hi to your good friend joe while he destroys our quality of life and you do nothing to stop him.
    1
  11393. In Biden's defense he does better when people don't hear him speak.
    1
  11394. That doesn't excuse unethical practices to take advantage of suckers.
    1
  11395.  @jmorris023  Did you really just compare this guy being defrauded to stopping hitler?
    1
  11396.  @jmorris023  Just because he supports an orange clown doesn't mean you should turn a blind eye to what is CLEARLY unethical behavior by people who also likely support the orange clown.
    1
  11397.  @jmorris023  So why exactly are you bringing up hitler? Nevermind. I don't care at this point.
    1
  11398. "it has worked for five decades." Imagine saying this unironically. Wow.
    1
  11399.  @chamorroman  "You are just Edward nobody." Do you at least have the self awareness to realize why saying this makes you a hyp oc rite? Ken nobody?
    1
  11400. I love Bernie and think progressives would be wise to not be running against him and be supporting him. That said, as far as the debates are concerned, especially this far out, more voices is a good thing and something I want. Our country and our politics is strengthened when more voices can be heard. Shit... I wish Gravel were also on that debate stage. Remember how far out we are. And this perspective is extended to the general election. The threshold for 3rd party candidates should be seriously reduced. Because IMO more voices being heard is a good thing.
    1
  11401.  @robertanderson6929  Israel just bombed another child. And a mother. And a brother. And you are complicit. You more than most because of all the gaslighting.
    1
  11402.  @robertanderson6929  "Do you have an argument to make?" I'm going to stick to giving you much deserved insults. If you don't want me to treat you like a notsea you should probably stop acting like one.
    1
  11403.  @robertanderson6929  "Calling someone a notsea" I said you were like them. You are strawmanning.
    1
  11404.  @erenjeager5290  You know the US is falling apart right? That it exports death? That its not the good guy on the world stage. Enjoy your kool aid.
    1
  11405.  @pkway9394  "I’m Here if you need to vent" You sure AF aren't here to say anything intelligent are you.
    1
  11406.  @pkway9394  "we both aren’t talking intelligent " You are the person who says I'm being dumb right? So your dumb shit means I am talking intelligently. Thanks for admitting the obvious.
    1
  11407.  @pkway9394  " it’s cute watching you try to be intelligent!" It's boring watching you not be intelligent. Just once it would nice if you said something of value but I'm not going to hold my breathe waiting for it.
    1
  11408.  @pkway9394  "I swear this is getting better and better" I'm here because I care about shit "journalism." You need a life. Bad.
    1
  11409.  @pkway9394  "I’m just here to talk to you hunny" This is your last chance to say something of value or I'll have to only talk to other people.
    1
  11410.  @krink084  You are calling yourself void. That's not very nice even if completely accurate.
    1
  11411.  @pkway9394  That's by far the smartest thing you have said. You are void. I'll reward it with a response.
    1
  11412.  @krink084  I'll be here all week (maybe longer depending) to call out kyle and then I'll only be found at credible channels.
    1
  11413.  @krink084  "credible channels" Richard medhurst, the greyzone, greenwald, jimmy dore, useful idiots, bad faith, robert inlakesh, richard wolf, and others that I'm forgetting ATM.
    1
  11414.  @mikhailbakunin5000  "Certainly not Dore or the Grayzone." I mean, who would want real journalism that includes covering the OPCW whistleblowers am I right?
    1
  11415.  @mikhailbakunin5000  "I don't think anyone really knows what happened at Douma" The experts who wrote the original report seemed pretty sure of their findings until it was covered up. And I have no reason not to trust them but every reason to not trust the people who sidelined it.
    1
  11416.  @krink084  Medhurst is an absolute must if want to know what's going on in syria as he is syrian. He's also brilliant and ruthless the way jimmy is.
    1
  11417.  @krink084  "suggesting that trump was a wakeup call for the left?" It should have been but they wanted to blame russia. And trump was a result of not having a real left. Obama brought war, not peace, deported, not welcomed, represented the rich, his signature legislation was originally a republican solution and more. If obama brought actual hope and change and not the same old same old the country was willing to go with an orange conman because just maybe he would be different. " I've been of the opinion that until Trump the left was fast asleep." They are. And that's how the party and the people in power want it to stay. The only thing the establishment didn't like about trump was he gave the ugly policies of the US and ugly face. They would prefer an obama to try and put people to sleep.
    1
  11418.  @krink084  Jimmy focuses on the left because it needs a party of peace, protecting the environment, of criminal justice reform, of universal health care, of ubi, of breaking up the banks, of representing the people and not the powerful and more. The "democratic" party isn't an advocate of any of that, they are an obstacle to all those important solutions that we need. And there will always be a trump or people on the right like biden (he is not on the left) to represent big money and corporate interests. This country needs an actual left.
    1
  11419.  @krink084  "trolling" Yes. It is a waste of time. Don't think I'm here for that. I'm not. But if people are going to give mindless bs I will "troll" them and not take them seriously but that's not why I'm here.
    1
  11420.  @krink084  While I'd never vote for or support someone like trump deep down I think he was the lesser evil. Dems should be happy I don't support evil.
    1
  11421.  @krink084  "Kyle's not going anywhere." If he does it certainly won't be because of me. I feel defeated. I accept the world sucks and I can't really do anything about it. You were correct when you said I'm just shouting into the void. I am and I know it.
    1
  11422.  @krink084  I just want to give the world a little piece of my mind before I inevitably lose.
    1
  11423. It doesn't get more fair running as a 3rd party. It is very difficult to win a majority of electoral college votes in a 3 way race. It would sacrifice any ability to reform the party from the inside. Even if he won it would ensure both parties worked against his agenda. These are all valid reasons.
    1
  11424. Regarding, "How is 'income inequality' a problem at all? The problem is poverty." These are obviously directly linked. There is only so much money and wealth in the world. When there are a few that have everything then there is nothing left over for others and they are left in poverty.
    1
  11425.  @zach.0  Only because mindlessly calling everyone a bot is a smear not based in reality.
    1
  11426. I'd pay good money to be able to unsubscribe again. I'd do almost anything with a couple exceptions like not covering for blackmail and subscribing again.
    1
  11427. I'm only here to dislike and say that sam sucks.
    1
  11428.  @jeaninekorotki1835  Would you say the same thing if they were giving the orange clown this type of photo op in office?
    1
  11429.  @jeaninekorotki1835  Regarding, "if it was a gnuine gesture." LMFAO. As if this Biden's was a genuine gesture. Regarding, "I heard him speaking at one of his rallies about how he had no interest in having a White House Dog." I have zero use or interest in anecdotal stories. Regarding, "Why choose to trivialize a good deed which will certainly help boost pet adoption?" Why do you choose to trivialize what is clearly a political theater and are you pretending this is something other than that? Oh... and I don't want or appreciate political propaganda in my puppy videos. This is only going to alienate and hurt the dodo and their cause because they decided to interject politics unnecessarily.
    1
  11430.  @jeaninekorotki1835  Regarding, "You can't possibly know his true intentions" He has a lifetime history of being a terrible person. It gives me some insight.
    1
  11431.  @jeaninekorotki1835  I also know Trump's "true intentions" are also that of a terrible POS for the same reasons I know that of biden.
    1
  11432.  @jeaninekorotki1835  Regarding, "Anecdotal? Facts? More conjecture?" Common sense. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to recognize obvious political theater such as this. Regarding, "I respect your right to your opinion even if I don't agree with it." I too respect your right to your opinion even if I don't respect your opinion. Have a good night.
    1
  11433. "They can easily find someone worse." Can they? Give me an example of who you think is worse that they could get through. And good luck with this.
    1
  11434. Regarding, "I've only been a Democrat for over 30 years" What you are trying to do here is the equivalent of Trump saying "believe me" before saying a bunch of stupid shit. And being a democrat after how they have demonstrated they hate democracy only reflects poorly upon you. Regarding, "I get that you Bernie people love pushing this narrative that he was "cheated" out of the nomination but he wasn't." I get how you Hillary supporters and establishment fucks love to push the narrative that the elections were fair but it wasn't. Either you are fucking stupid for suggesting it is or you are being paid to regurgitate bullshit. Either way you suck at life. Regarding, "the superdelegates have always..." The favorite argument of people trying to justify injustice throughout all of history. It has always been that way there for it is fair. Sorry but the fact that something has been has nothing to do with whether or not it is fair and only intellectually dishonest people think so. Regarding, "In fact, the media generally went out of their way" Um no. They did not. And the media is specifically told (with a wink and a nod) by the DNC to not cover superdelegates AT ALL til the convention. Still they do it, still the DNC doesn't call them on it, and still the DNC doesn't require superdelegates to not disclose who they are supporting til the convention because THAT IS THE FUCKING POINT. Regarding, "Clinton finished 2016 with 55% of all votes cast in Democratic primaries to Sanders' 43%." Yup. And if we had free and fair elections you would really have a great point here. But the fact of the matter is that we do not have free and fair elections therefor your "point" is FUCKING MEANINGLESS. Regarding, "As far as California, Sanders could've won every vote in the primary - 100% - and he still would've wound up short of Clinton's delegate total" That is absolutely not true. You are a fucking liar or, at the very best, incompetent at math. Well, that isn't true. Actually I think you are a fucking liar and incompetent at math. Regarding, "anyone with basic math skills" Says the guy who has demonstrated they lack basic math skills. Regarding, "Sanders knew the rules of the Democratic Party's nomination process when he ran for president" Yes he did. That is not the same as it being fair. And that ignores the fact that the "democratic" party broke their own fucking rules. "the Chairperson shall exercise impartiality and evenhandedness as between the Presidential candidates and campaigns. The Chairperson shall be responsible for ensuring that the national officers and staff of the Democratic National Committee maintain impartiality and evenhandedness during the Democratic Party Presidential nominating process." Seeing as how that never happened everything you are saying is fucking garbage. Regarding, "special treatment" You think I want special treatment? I don't. I want free and fair elections and the DNC made sure I didn't get it from the start of the process to the finish. They considered Hillary Clinton to be their presumptive nominee in March 2015 according to internal memos and worked to make it happen to the detriment of Bernie Sanders. Regarding, "are short on facts and long on conspiracy theories." That is pretty fucking funny coming from you considering the facts are not on your side. Why was Debbie Wasserman Shutlz fired from the DNC? And who replaced her? You are correct that there was a conspiracy but it was proven to be more than a theory thanks in part to wikileaks. Regarding, "All it takes is a little research" All it takes is a little research to realize the game was rigged from start to finish. The fact that you don't realize it either makes you an idiot or paid shill working to "correct the record," but either way you suck. Regarding, "Now go educate yourself about how elections work and stop the fucking whining." Actually I'm whining because I am educated to how elections work in our country. http://observer.com/2016/07/wikileaks-proves-primary-was-rigged-dnc-undermined-democracy/
    1
  11435. Regarding, "proven to have been working with Russia" Who is the conspiracy theorist now? And where is your proof? I could use a good laugh fuckface. Regarding, "I'm not going to rebut every inane point you made because you're beyond reasoning with." Actually you are not going to address my points because you can't. The fact of the matter is that DNC rigged the game and it is much easier to just try to smear me with meaningless bullshit than it is to defend the indefensible DNC. I can't say it bothers or surprises me. I'm only surprised you haven't called me sexist. Regarding, "Nothing will ever be fair" Well this is as close as you get to telling the truth isn't it. Regarding, "invented conspiracy theories about why they didn't get elected" Says the guy ignoring all the facts that prove the game was rigged who believes in the Russia conspiracy. Too fucking funny. You can't make this shit up. Regarding, "I've always gone on to support the nominee of the party" Because you are a fucking sheep who blindly supports a party that doesn't give a fuck about you. And why should they. You are going to vote for them regardless like the mindless dipshit you are. Regarding, "because supporting the Republican candidates over the years was just not an option based on their policies." You know there are other parties right? And have you looked at the "democratic" parties policies these days? Just recently your party happily gave Trump an extra 80 billion per year for bombs. What could possibly go wrong there am I right? Regarding, "I sincerely hoping you're enjoying the Trump years because people like you contributed to it." So you aren't going to blame the DNC for rigging it. You aren't going to blame Hillary for elevating Trump using the "pied piper strategy." You are not going to blame Hillary for sucking so bad she couldn't beat Trump. You are not going to blame the corporate media for their biased coverage that included billions of free media to Trump. You are not going to blame the millions who didn't vote. You are not going to blame Trump supporters for Trump (including lots of democrats who voted for Obama). You are going to blame me? Of course you are because you are a fucking moron and doing stupid shit is your thing. Regarding, "And for that you get another big fuck you, imbecile." You think I am not smart only because you are a fucking moron. Keep defending superdelegates you stupid piece of shit and take a little responsibility for you and your party sucking so bad they can't beat an orange clown. If you cared so much about him and want to make sure he doesn't win in 2020 I would think you might want to operate with some fucking ethics but clearly you are too stupid to have learned anything. Don't change anything. You are doing great. People like you are fucking hopeless. Good luck going through the rest of your life being dumb as fuck.
    1
  11436. Wow. Just wow. So. Much. Stupid. Regarding, "You might want to check our intelligence agencies which have asserted that this is exactly what happened." I am quite aware that they have asserted that this is exactly what happened. But I didn't ask for assertions. I asked for proof and you have provided NONE. Those same agencies asserted that Iraq had WMD as well. So. Fucking. Funny. I provide proof and you call me a conspiracy theorist. I ask for proof and you provide none while claiming you hold the high ground. I think I get dumber talking to you. Regarding, "ample evidence" Holy shit am I talking to Donna Brazile? Is there ample evidence. Ample evidence. Ample evidence. But there is ZERO evidence. You can provide nothing other than the word of people who there is ample evidence to believe are full of shit. And if you are Donna Brazile I would just like to say that you can go fuck yourself even more than if you are just some random dipshit. Regarding, "one conspiracy has been proven while the so-called "rigging" of the campaign in favor of Sanders has not." I really have no idea why I am wasting my time talking to you at this point. You cannot possibly believe the bullshit you say do you? Again, you have proven nothing. Just saying there is ample evidence is not the same as providing evidence. And if the DNC did not rig things then why was Debbie Wasserman Shultz force to resign? And then the person who replaced her, you, Donna Brazile fed Hillary Clinton debate questions. When the DNC was taken to court their lawyers DIDN'T EVEN TRY TO CLAIM THEY DIDN'T RIG IT. Instead they argued in court that it was their RIGHT TO RIG IT and that the party had no responsibility to be fair. You are a fucking joke but not funny. Regarding, "And what other party was I going to vote for that wouldn't help Donald Trump in 2016?" I would like to again point out that the candidate you voted for, Hillary Clinton, intentionally elevated Donald Trump. SHE LITERALLY HELPED DONALD TRUMP IN 2016 to try and make herself look good in comparison. And now you want to sit here and talk about how Trump has you pissing yourself so bad you had to vote for the candidate that helped make him the nominee. You are exactly why she did it because she knew that you are such an easy to manipulate sheep that you are happy to vote for evil... just as long as you can think it is the lesser evil. You would have been happy to vote for Trump were he the "democratic" nominee (it is not that hard to imagine, he was a self described democrat not long ago) as long as your bitch ass thought the republican were worse. Regarding, "Our military..." Our military was already spending as much as the next 7 countries in the world combined but morons like you think they need more because you are epic stupid and happy to support the military industrialized complex. You clearly are pissing yourself about how terrible Trump is but you think giving him more money for bombs makes sense because you are retarded. Regarding, "so do all the "I won't vote for the lesser of two evils" perfectionist" Only a mental midget like you thinks that not voting for evil is requiring perfection. Regarding, "And no, you aren't smart -- not in the least bit." Of course you think this because you are a fucking moron. I would hate for you to think I am smart because you have managed to get literally everything wrong. Regarding, "I don't want people like you trying to influence MY Democratic Party because..." Let me finish this for you. Because you are FUCKING STUPID. I was a lifelong democrat. I voted for Obama twice. You really should care what I think because the bottom line is that if you actually care about winning elections you need people like me to win. But clearly you are not going to get my vote anytime soon so enjoy Trump in 2020. At least I don't get to influence your party and you get to keep your superdelegates. I hope it was worth it. Regarding, "Women, gays, minorities, religions that aren't Christian -- they all are under attack by the current administration and you need to own up to playing a part in that. My conscience is guilt free." Of course your conscience is guilt free. You voted for Hillary Clinton. The wars she has supported have ended womens lives all across the globe. She opposed gay rights as recently as 2013 til it became politically convenient to flip-flop. She worked to address the "superpredetor" problem by working to lock up a disproportionate amount of minorities. The wars she supported were all in countries with religions that aren't Christian. But your conscience is guilt free because you are a dipshit who voted for a candidate that has worked her entire life against the people you just claimed to care about. Regarding, "you seemingly need to invent conspiracies" You say this as if you offered a rebuttal to the points I made. The fact of the matter is that you didn't say shit. You just act like saying it is BS over and over that is like proving it is BS. It isn't. Too bad you aren't smart enough to realize the difference. Regarding, "go fuck yourself for being so easily manipulated and so ignorant of politics" No. You need to go fuck yourself. All you have done is spout bullshit. You literally make everyone you talk to dumber when you talk. You are a disgrace to the human race and you should be ashamed of yourself. It is sad you are not but I'm not sure why I expect more. You can't even do simple math for fucks sake. You probably think 2+2=5.
    1
  11437. Regarding, "A kid in his twenties, that's who." You can't even accidentally say something that is true. I mean you think that considering with how much you say you would occasionally get something right but you don't. I only wish I were in my 20s because that happened a long, long time ago. Regarding, "no better than the know-nothing Trump voters." Says the guy who would have voted for Trump if he were the "democratic" nominee. Try not lie to yourself about it. Deep down you know it is true. Regarding, "There's your evidence." Wow. Really compelling. You have an anonymous source and absolutely nothing concrete to point at. Just an article that boils down to "trust us" when I have good reason to be skeptic. But I'm the conspiracy theorist. That makes sense to small minds like you. https://www.thenation.com/article/a-new-report-raises-big-questions-about-last-years-dnc-hack/ Regarding, "Point me in the direction of voter fraud investigations that have been launched against people who changed votes or tampered with voting machines against Sanders because that's what rigging is." Still you can't say something that is accurate. You don't even possess the knowledge of what words in the English language mean. What you are talking about is election fraud. Those are the words intelligent people use to describe what you are talking about. I think you realize this and are just lying to make your case. Then again it might be that you are just too fucking stupid to know what the words you are using mean. Either way you suck at life. This is what rigging actually means, "to manipulate or control usually by deceptive or dishonest means." To rig an election. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/rig As for an example of the DNC manipulating or controlling the primary through deceptive or dishonest means here are a couple. https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/wikileaks-emails-show-dnc-favored-hillary-clinton-over_us_57930be0e4b0e002a3134b05 And there are plenty other examples of proof of them putting their foot on the scale that doesn't just amount to hearsay like you think is proof. Regarding, "I didn't want an independent socialist to be my candidate for the Democratic Party's nomination" I hate to point out nuance to you because you are clearly incapable of the type of thinking that is required to understand it but he is a democratic socialist. And you don't have to want Bernie or treat him fair but it also isn't as if you have a charter and your own rules that say you are going to be fair. Do you understand the difference? It really isn't that hard to comprehend and I think that even a moron like you is capable of telling the difference. Regarding, "the Democratic party isn't socialist either." Weren't they the party that brought about social security. You do realize that was socialism right? And if the DNC weren't interested in giving Bernie a fair shot they had the right to tell him to fuck off at the start. But they didn't and as soon as they let him run they had a responsibility to be fair and impartial while conducting their primary that uses everyone's tax dollars. But they were not, they rigged it, and all the evidence backs it up. Federal Judge William Zloch, "the DNC and Wasserman Schultz held a palpable bias in favor Clinton and sought to propel her ahead of her Democratic opponent." Um, yeah. No shit. Everyone with a functioning brain knows it. Regarding, "Goodbye and don't let the door hit you in the ass on the way out. And stay the fuck out while you're at it." Hillary said essentially the same thing last election. Good plan. But you fucks don't share any of the blame for Trump. Too fucking funny. It's kind of my fault for thinking you are capable of saying anything smart. I mean you can't even do simple math or operate a calculator correctly for fucks sake. Don't be afraid to fuck off. I'm tired of listening to all the stupid things you say and fear this discussion is making me dumber.
    1
  11438. If I cared more about your opinion I would wonder how you are trying to claim the primary was fair today.
    1
  11439. You can't possibly believe the bullshit you say. I find it impossible that someone can be as stupid as you without being paid. But maybe not. Maybe you are really just this fucking stupid. Either way you are a disgrace to the human race. Good luck with that going forward.
    1
  11440. Joe regarding, "I'm very secure in my own intelligence" Of course you are because you are a fucking moron. You would have to be significantly more intelligent than you are to realize you should be very insecure about your lack of intelligence.
    1
  11441. LOL. That might hurt if I cared about his opinion. Seriously thou I appreciate the laughs at your expense. Take care dipshit.
    1
  11442. Trolls like you suck so much. Make some changes in your life. You can do better than lying to people professionally. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BmZmPcRTUdo
    1
  11443. If I'm hostile it is only because I'm frustrated with the level of stupidity in the world. Don't be afraid to do your own research next time. Here, I'll give you a place to start... http://www.latimes.com/world/middleeast/la-fg-iran-frozen-assets-20160120-story.html
    1
  11444.  @zevkurtzman8108  Regarding, "your first point is not gonna convince me just by telling me im wrong. That doesnt convince me im wrong, it just tells me that you disagree with me, and displays the type of hubris ive seen from bernie supporters that kind of erks people." I'm sorry for not being willing to give you every detail of every thing going in my head. Yang's health care isn't what it should be, he doesn't support raising the minimum wage but ultimately all that is mute because he hasn't earned any trust from me. I don't just take politicians at their word and that's literally all yang has... words. Regarding, " i acknowledge the strategic voting point, and struggle with it." So let's not act like I'm just using corporate media propaganda. I voted for Jill Stein in 2016 IN A SWING STATE so I'm obviously not running with their BS. Regarding, "But that doesnt mean i cant support a different candidate to try to give him a chance before voting starts." Splitting the vote is real. There is a reason Biden didn't run in 2016 and it had nothing do with his kid. It would have been a game changer. Don't pretend that yang's campaign operates in a vacuum. It changes things. And those changes help the establishment whether or not your realize it or want to acknowledge it. Progressives don't get to share votes or delegates in an election that we desperately need to win. Regarding, "he understands economics in a lot of ways" Does he. I know he claims to as that's his argument to deserve the job but the problem with politicians isn't that they don't know any better or some shit like yang claims... they are bought. Regarding, "I dont mean any of this in malice, just honesty." Be honest... what's the biggest problem with politicians? It's that they are liars who sell their soul. Bernie is not that. And you know as much over decades of him being in the public eye. You have know about yang for what? A year? And UBI? A year? Maybe address all the problems that should have been being addressed for decades (like raising the minimum wage that yang is against) by a guy who you know with certainty is legit, before looking to a guy you just met who only has words. It must be nice for him. When Biden says he's the "most progressive" I get to look and point at his record to know he is full of shit. It must be nice for yang to not have that. That way he can say literally anything like so many politicians do but we don't have a way to check if he is legit or full of shit.
    1
  11445.  @TheAlibabatree  Regarding, ""then you are wrong" It was already going to be a long reply. I decided to not go into detail about policy because that's not really the point I was trying to make. The point I was trying to make is how trusting a politician with no record is begging to be played and lied to . If that is a big problem for you so be it. I suspect you aren't really interested in intelligent argument anyway.
    1
  11446.  @TheAlibabatree  Regarding, "Yang has a record, because he has a past." That means he has a past. He doesn't have a record because he has never had to vote for anything in his entire life. Regarding, "The idea that "we can only trust someone who served 30 years in DC" is absurd to me." Cool strawman argument put in quotes as if I said it when I haven't. The bottom line is that experience is valuable because it's experience. I shouldn't need to explain this. When you go get fast food you prefer the person taking your order and preparing your food have experience it's so common sense. And that's for a job that isn't very important. I'll bet you would understand, appreciate, and want experience if you were going to have major surgery. Or would you then think picking a guy who has never operated before is a good idea like you love no experience here? But it's not just about experience. It's about what a person does with experience. Because as you should know most politicians are full of shit. They tell you one thing and do something else when they get in office. Well I want to see what they do with their experience. And you should too if you actually cared about whether or not the person you support is the real deal. You know who we have no question is the real deal? Sanders. Because I've seen that his actions (that record) matches his words. Even people who disagree with him on policy have an impossible time pretending he is legit.
    1
  11447.  @TheAlibabatree  Regarding, "I personally disagree with some of his policies." None that you have bothered to mention nor arguments have been made about. Regarding, "I find it unnecessarily divisive. My point from the beginning is that people are allowed to have different opinions." Aren't you the same guy who said to me, "Lmao please crawl out of your own ass." After I had the audacity to offer my opinion that had you so triggered? Regarding, " it would be great if you could respect that (and anyone else.)" Maybe don't say the same things flat earthers say to get respect that isn't deserved. "Lmao please crawl out of your own ass. We get it. You're passionate about your favorite candidate. Good job, join the rest of the country. Your ego is not helping you, and its definitely not helping Sanders campaign." That's how YOU jumped in.
    1
  11448.  @TheAlibabatree  Followed with, "Yang has a record, because he has a past. If thats not good enough for you, well thats fine, thats your opinion. Its not a fact." It's a fact he doesn't have a record. Because we don't get to have our own facts. Why am I even addressing you at this point?
    1
  11449.  @TheAlibabatree  Regarding, "My response to that was fully justified." You flipped your shit at my offering my opinion. But that was before becoming the "unnecessarily divisive." "My point from the beginning is that people are allowed to have different opinions." hypocrite that you are.
    1
  11450.  @PTaoify  Regarding, "If you do not support Yang & Tulsi's voice you will split the progressive vote." These are words. They just don't make any sense.
    1
  11451.  @auniquedisposition9009  Regarding, "there's is nothing wrong or flawed about also supporting Gabbard and Yang during the primary" You only get one primary vote. It's not like you get to support them all. You have to pick one.
    1
  11452.  @PTaoify  Regarding, "It's a warning, that your actions are producing the opposite of your intent." I make logical argument that are based in fact. This is the type of shit you say when you have nothing logical to say. Regarding, "Your arrogance is the type of HRC-neoliberalism "vote for me or else" that must be purged from the left." I voted for Jill Stein in 2016 in a swing state. Maybe I'm coming at this differently than team Hillary because I obviously am. The best bullshit is rooted in some truth. And there is truth that being strategic about your voting is perfectly wise and logical. Let's say I have a candidate that I like who has a great chance at winning the nomination. But I have a candidate that I like more but they have no chance at the nomination. I care about my vote and want it to have the most impact. So I act accordingly. What I don't do is support evil... even if it's the "lesser evil." That is where the notion of being strategic about your vote goes off the rails. Do you think I'm doing that? Or are you just mindlessly giving me characteristics of despicable people without bothering to use any nuance to what you are saying? Do you not realize or not care that, for example, Joe Biden running in 2016 would have been a game changer? That candidates don't operate in a vacuum? That they affect others? Or do you just not care that the actions you are advocating for make Joe Biden and company more likely to win? Because that's the reality whether or not your realize it or are willing to admit it. And if you are engaging in things that help biden and hurt progressives I'm going to treat you accordingly. This primary is so fucking important it's remarkable. And you aren't helping.
    1
  11453.  @auniquedisposition9009  Regarding, "You knew damn well what I meant." No. I really didn't. And let's not act like I had read any of the shit you edited in after I responded. You want to donate to everyone? I guess that makes some sense to me. But don't act like some of that money you are giving might be used to take votes away from the guy you actually want to win and who you are actually supporting (in the way that matters most, your vote).
    1
  11454.  @PTaoify  Regarding, "You can only get us on your side by stopping the irrational hatred of Yang." I've talked in detail in this thread about how I value experience, and how I value trust from a politician like no other profession. I talk about splitting the vote, how he is doing it, and how that helps establishment fucks like biden. You ignore all of those substantive points and say this. So fucking worthless. I'm done with this.
    1
  11455.  @PTaoify  Maybe I should be nicer when holding the yanggangs hands when trying to get them to admit common sense facts like experience is a good thing for important jobs. I agree that makes for a more compelling argument. But I'm human and crazy frustrated with my species. Time and again people vote against their own interests for terrible reasons. I shouldn't need to explain my frustration when talking about politics which entails things like: perpetual war, the minimum wage, millions without health insurance, medical bankruptcy, mass surveillance, money in politics and corruption, the environment, income inequality and so much more. I shouldn't need to explain where my passion and anger comes from and so many want to act like I haven't got good reason to be frustrated.
    1
  11456.  @PTaoify  Regarding, "Guaranteed you don't understand anything about Yang's platform" In all honesty I seldom get to address facts like he doesn't want to raise the federal minimum wage, he isn't what he should be on health care, he is too quick to get on his knees to Israel and more because he has zero experience and zero record. Those are deal breakers. But the irony of your comment that has no substance talking about how I don't know my shit is pretty really.
    1
  11457.  @TheAlibabatree  Regarding, "Mr Logic still hasnt addressed my points." LMFAO. Pretty funny come from a dumbass hypocrite who is too fucking dumb to even realize they are being a hypocrite while doing so. Thanks for the laugh moron.
    1
  11458.  @auniquedisposition9009  And have a "terrible rest of the month🖕🖕" you hypocritical dipshit.
    1
  11459. "Monoclonals are experimental" They have been around for 3 fucking decades.
    1
  11460. "the first monoclonal antibody was approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) in 1986" Source: reality.
    1
  11461.  @whig01  "Not for covid." Which is exactly the same as ivermectin.
    1
  11462.  @whig01  "I'm not saying..." You are fearmongering about potential unforseen side effects for one drug that has been used for decades while touting and treating another drug completely differently because reasons.
    1
  11463.  @whig01  "These monoclonals have never been FDA approved." It took me too seconds to find an article titled, "FDA Authorizes Monoclonal Antibodies for Treatment of COVID-19"
    1
  11464.  @whig01  "AUTHORIZED not approved." Has ivermectin been "authorized" by the FDA to treat covid? Or are you picking and choosing what drugs to fear monger about?
    1
  11465. Yang worked for CNN
    1
  11466. So if Fauci lied then so did trump when he said the same shit right?
    1
  11467.  @alanheyes694  "you have to compromise to get a little." What's he getting for voting in lock step with corporate dems? Oh right... NOTHING. " It doesn’t mean he agrees with everything that’s put in the bills" Actually when you vote for something that's what it means. You are supporting those bills with your actions. And whatever words you were using are pretty meaningless.
    1
  11468.  @alanheyes694  If bernie didn't agree with the democratic establishment and their agenda he wouldn't be voting in lock step with them. Actions speak louder than words.
    1
  11469. At a time when dems have the presidency, house, and senate bernie is dumping all the blame on republicans. Maybe worry about your "good friend" and the job he is doing.
    1
  11470. Bernie or bust!
    1
  11471. If you voted for joe biden then no, you do not have standards.
    1
  11472.  @YaGotdamBoi  "yikes 🤦" You are proving my point for me. FYI biden sucks not that cultists realize it.
    1
  11473.  @Coheenez  "yang supports M4A. Nice lie." The health care plan he proposed while running for potus wasn't m4a or even close. Nice lie. "he endorsed biden AFTER bernie lost. Nice lie." He didn't endorse bernie after he dropped out no matter how much you want to lie.
    1
  11474.  @Coheenez  Regarding, "Just because you say it isn't, doesn't make that true." I'm right because the facts are on my side. But this applies to you and your BS. "you just make claims for m4a with no evidence" Yup. And just because I don't always give evidence to flat earthers that the planet is a globe doesn't mean the earth is flat or not. The facts are on my side even if I don't provide evidence. But the evidence is there for anyone that is intellectually honest. But yanggang pretty much never is. "How specifically does he not support universal medical coverage?" The health care proposal he presented while running for president was not m4a or even close. He was lying about supporting m4a. "Or do you just care that it wasn't named "medicare" for all?" I care that it wasn't a universal proposal. "So did Bernie by the time Yang endorsed Biden. Why endorse someone who will lose?" Bernie did not have 0 percent chance to win when yang dropped out no matter how much BS you want to say to hide that fact. "Why split the voting base?" LMFAO. That's what his presidential campaign did for progressives. Yang wouldn't take biden voters but he would take them from sanders. It's almost like it was designed to help the establishments goals. At BEST yang was a useful idiot for the establishment and their goals. "Are you really mad at him for making realistic predictions?" Do you really not get why people don't like your conman?
    1
  11475.  @Coheenez  Regarding, ""the facts are on my side" fails to provide even a single "fact"" Tell you what if you want to know about the reality in which you exist I refer you to youtube videos such as: "Andrew Yang CRUMBLES After Anchor Calls Out His Healthcare Plan" "Andrew Yang Gets Called-Out Over His Health Care Lie" "Andrew Yang: "Medicare For All Is Not The Name Of A Bill" (Yes It Is)" "Andrew Yang CONFRONTED on Medicare For All Stance" All of them are talking about what I'm speaking.
    1
  11476.  @Coheenez  Regarding, "you realize that claiming "the facts are on my side" and not providing any evidence or facts is exactly the line used by flat earthers, right?" You posted this after I gave you 4 different videos talking about his lies. You know that's evidence right? Even if you don't like it?
    1
  11477.  @Coheenez  Regarding, "you posted your evidence only after I has asked twice." I shouldn't have to do your homework for you.
    1
  11478.  @Coheenez  Regarding, "that just confirms you care more about the fact that he didn't want to do the specific m4a bill," You are confirming that giving you evidence is effective as giving it to trump supporters. "had another plan to achieve the same goal." His plan is not a universal plan. But that doesn't stop him from lying and pretending it is. "What's the problem?" It's not universal. Much like his UBI plan.
    1
  11479.  @Coheenez  "would you consider an opt-in public option that is available to everyone universal coverage?" As if this is what your clown was proposing. "Or are you salty we didn't upend 20% of our economy overnight?" I'm salty your clown lied about supporting m4a. It wasn't even going to be law for fucks sake and your liar couldn't even pretend to propose an actual universal system.
    1
  11480.  @Coheenez  Regarding, "ok nice ad hom since you seem to be falling apart a bit" Yanggang morons are frustrating. "robust public option" Biden was a for a public option. But only yang lied about supporting m4a. They are very different. "try to chill a bit." Don't hold your breathe. Don't take it personally unless you are one of the many paid shills yanggang has working for them. "The bill proposed in the house is by no means flawless. Your undying support for it is kind of nuts." I don't claim it's flawless. Ultimately there are universal proposals and there are not. Your guy lied about supporting one and presented another.
    1
  11481.  @Coheenez  "robust public option" Correction. Biden lies about supporting this the way yang lies about supporting m4a. Neither of them actually support it. It's all pandering and lies.
    1
  11482.  @Coheenez  Yang might actually support a robust public option. It's tough to tell after he has already proven he has no credibility on the topic after lying about supporting m4a.
    1
  11483.  @Coheenez  Let's say I ran ads saying I supported UBI. Then I gave a proposal that wasn't UBI or even close. That's what yang did on m4a.
    1
  11484. We call him a liar because he is one. Like how he has been saying in ads his for M4A but in reality isn't. As for everything else you said... go fuck yourself.
    1
  11485. ew. gross. no.
    1
  11486. Clearly you do not understand what the word proven means. Sweet irony when you talk about lies. Thanks for the laugh.
    1
  11487. Yeah... I thought it was funny that he was willing to say that Warren talking about corruption, "was directed at him."
    1
  11488.  @paulgally1657  Whoever they are I wish I had all their names. That way I could know to never hang out with them.
    1
  11489. Yeah. Bill just went there for the weather. You are annoying.
    1
  11490.  @slicc9048  I'm not going to lie following up, "that assumption makes more sense" with "I watched to see people make a fool of themselves....Its gratifying." Is funny in a you are stupid beyond words kinda way. People like you inspired Dunning and Kruger to come up with their original hypothesis.
    1
  11491.  @slicc9048  Just to be clear if I went with epstein to his pedophile island it would make more sense that I went there with him for the weather than for the pedophilia. That's your idea of "logic." That's what would make the most sense based on what we know about epstein. LMFAO. I wish I found your foolish more gratifying. It's more just frustrating having to share the planet with people like you.
    1
  11492. I hope they remembered that if you don't vote for biden you aren't black before writing their article. Toxic identity politics is confusing.
    1
  11493. That's not his job, that is ours. He is the issues guy who talks about universal health care, and education, and the minimum wage, and.... you can't expect him to do everything.
    1
  11494. Bernie's team should make that an official video and ad.
    1
  11495. David I think you are wrong when you say he doesn't understand politics. I am pretty sure he does and is just using political doublespeak which can be seen as not understanding politics but is just playing the bullshit game.
    1
  11496.  @oxman5571  That is exactly the type of substance free "argument" I'd expect from one of sam's fans.
    1
  11497.  @MichaelAronson  "What does this mean in English?" This is funny because you aren't making fun of me... you are making fun of the OP.
    1
  11498.  @MichaelAronson  No doubt the people who are giving your comment a thumbs up are the same people who gave the OP a thumbs up. It would prove my point even further, not that it's necessary.
    1
  11499.  @MichaelAronson  "I'm very much mocking what you said, actually." You are mocking the person who actually wrote it, the OP whom I copy and pasted it from. But you aren't smart enough to realize that despite how obvious it is.
    1
  11500.  @MichaelAronson  "I'm very much mocking what you said" LMFAO They weren't my words. They were copy and pasted from the OP. How can't you realize that? LMFAO
    1
  11501.  @MichaelAronson  "you're upset that one of my comments got a thumbs up?" LMFAO Hardly. I love it. I'll even add one for you.
    1
  11502.  @MichaelAronson  "So you admit you copied and pasted words even you don't understand?" No. But I apparently copied and pasted words that you do not understand. "What does that say about you?" LMFAO What does that say about you?
    1
  11503.  @MichaelAronson  Were you always like this or is it a side-effect of watching too much sam?
    1
  11504.  @MJH-kr4zg  I'm not joking about sam. But relax. It's not like I'm lying.
    1
  11505.  @MJH-kr4zg  And I wasn't the one making fun of you. That was "michael."
    1
  11506.  @MJH-kr4zg  Correction: I was making fun of you too.
    1
  11507. I don't care what she has to say anymore. It's all BS.
    1
  11508. You lost me at "All of his tweets are completely TRUE" and I'm going to assume everything else you said was just as fucking stupid.
    1
  11509. America does Fahrenheit.
    1
  11510.  @chadsimmons4496  Regarding, "Look where this conversation goes?" LMAO. This conversation was doomed from the start because of who you are talking to. It is not a reflection of the importance of our politicians acting morally in their personal lives.
    1
  11511. water why exactly is this an either/or proposition?
    1
  11512. @ ted Faucci funded gain of function research at wuhan and lied about it to rand paul under oath.
    1
  11513. by it do you mean the millions without insurance? you suck
    1
  11514. The last minimum wage raise we got was by GWB. Does that mean he is the lesser evil?
    1
  11515. He's not. And because Bernie has experience in politics you actually get to know exactly who he is, unlike a guy you had never even heard of long ago.
    1
  11516. Nope. That's your comment and you.
    1
  11517. Regarding, "well we have guns and they arent going away." I hope you are capable of realizing how selfish your attitude is. You are happy to ignore an epidemic of gun violence in the country so you can keep your toy. So be it. Just try not to lie to yourself about why you think what you do. And try to realize that it is you who is the propagandist trying to justify the unjustifiable.
    1
  11518. "National" Firearms Act. Do you really have no idea what national means?
    1
  11519. Just here to point out your betrayal, call you a fraud, and point it out to a few people before going back to ignore your lying fraudulent ass. Get f'ed kyle. Fraud.
    1
  11520. Ultimately I need proof. Do you have any?
    1
  11521. She has zero path to the nomination and splits the progressive vote to the benefit of the establishment. If she were actually an ally of Sanders she should be helping him get the nomination and not running against him.
    1
  11522.  @DiverDan1000-3  Regarding, "Her 3% to Sanders 25% is hardly splitting the progressive vote." Of course it is. The people that support them tend to identify as progressives. I'm not saying all 3 percent go to Sanders but about 2 points isn't out of the question. And 2 points matters. How close was Iowa? Regarding, "Elizabeth Warren is the one you should be hating on." I do. But this isn't about her. This is a deflection from who we are actually talking about... tulsi. I don't even consider Warren a progressive and I've been saying that for a long time. I suspect her campaign is designed to do what I think tulsi's campaign is doing so accidentally. Regarding, "We need to hear a progressive agenda from as many people in power as possible." Tulsi can and should do this but while supporting Sanders and trying to push him over the top the same way she did in 2016. Regarding, "so that Bernie is not singled out as a radical." They already do this. Tulsi being around changes nothing when it comes to this. She can stand beside him, not run against him and you can have all the things still that you claim can only happen while she runs against sanders.
    1
  11523.  @DiverDan1000-3  Regarding, "I think we both want the same goal." In a world and a place (the internet) with so many people who are disingenuous I have no question that we are ultimately on the same team. I tend to think that Tulsi is on the same team but I'm not perfectly convinced of it. She would go a long way of proving it to me here and now if she would just get behind Bernie and push in a world where we know the game isn't fair and he needs all the help he can get instead of opposing him. Regarding, "I just tend to think Tulsi has enough crossover appeal and influence that when she does concede, her support behind Bernie would bring even more voters his way." It would. That's why she needs to be doing this now and not later. The longer she waits the more people burn their ballots supporting her and a campaign that can't win instead of the campaign that can, should, and NEEDS to win.
    1
  11524.  @DiverDan1000-3  Regarding, "what you are proposing is a calculation you want Tulsi to make." Yes. I want candidates to think of their causes before themselves. Is that a problem or controversial somehow? Regarding, "Since the DNC and the media has smeared/dismissed her as much as they can, what do you think the chances of these networks would bring her on anymore?" Huh? I think her chances of booking spots on corporate news would be unaffected if she were going on as a candidate they are trying to ignore just as much as her chances would be as Sanders surrogate. She might even have a better chance. Not that this is nearly as important as her effects of splitting the progressive vote in an incredibly close election where every vote and point matters. Regarding, "The only channel inviting her is Fox." I don't understand how this is being used to try and justify her campaign. Regarding, "Remember, Tulsi had a real cushy position in the DNC as co-chair...but resigned amidst pressure to support HRC." Probably one of the most endearing things she has ever done to me. Regarding, "She has a rare combination of courage, integrity and empathy." I think you are right. I question her judgement at times thou. For example you shouldn't need to go to war to realize how terrible war is. And you shouldn't have trouble understanding how important it is that progressives stand together in this moment if we are going to win. She isn't doing this... not like she did in 2016 and should be doing again. It's a problem for me and it makes me question her judgement even though I do think her heart is in the right place. Regarding, "how would you feel about a Sanders/Gabbard ticket?" I jokingly say I'd vote for Sanders/Satan because I'd for Sanders and anyone he would run with. Far too much is made of the bottom half of tickets. I would have felt far better about it before she announced her candidacy. I would have felt far better about it had she never run. I feel worse about it with every passing state in the primary. I think Sanders, should he win the primary which is the war that is easily the hardest part of becoming president, should pick someone who is currently supporting him and has his back right now to be his running mate. Someone like Nina Turner.
    1
  11525.  @DiverDan1000-3  Regarding, "I like Nina Turner." Good. You should. I mention her because if the unthinkable were to happen to Bernie I think she would be an excellent commander in chief mostly because she demonstrates good judgement and good values. Regarding, "she has so little experience compared to Tulsi Gabbard." I do value experience but it is hardly the only thing I value. I also question what you seem to consider to be the correct kind of experience. Regarding, "House Committee on Financial Services , Subcommittee on National Security, International Development, and Monetary Policy Subcommittee on Diversity and Inclusion House Committee on Armed Services Subcommittee on Emerging Threats and Capabilities , Subcommittee on Readiness." I'll bet without knowing for certain that there isn't a single person on any of these committees other than tulsi you would suggest should be Bernie's running mate... because your idea of what the right experience is isn't what it should be. Furthermore you act like giving peace a chance is something you need to be in a committee to realize. It takes will, principles, and convictions to stand up to the MIC... not committee experience. Regarding, "Nina doesn't have that kind of experience/insight." First hand experience to come to obvious conclusions doesn't indicate actual good judgement. Warmonger john McCain opposed torture, because he was tortured. Demon dick cheney supports gay rights, because he has a gay kid. Tulsi opposes war, because she went to war. Ultimately people with actual good judgement don't require personal experience to come to correct decisions.
    1
  11526. "The intelligence community has already spoken for fucks sake." Those are the same people that lied about WMD in Iraq right?
    1
  11527.  @lordbunbury  Regarding, "Yang stated in all his speeches that m4all was the endgame." That's him lying. He doesn't get to have his cake and eat it too. "He supported m4all." Not when it really mattered. When he was running for potus and offered a health care plan it wasn't m4a or even close to m4a. Actions speak louder than meaningless words. "Yang did support m4all, but saw a different path to get it." LMFAO. A different path? He lied. I support m4a. You know how you could tell? If I offered a health care plan it would be m4a. That or I'd be a liar. Yang is a liar. "His UBI wasn’t regressive at all." Did you even bother to check the source I cited? Where he tells you that he is going to gut the social safety net to pay for his UBI? Because he did and that is regressive no matter how much BS yanggang wants to spew. "You would need to spend around 10.000 a month to come out negative in his UBI deal." I'd ask what you are talking about here if I wasn't convinced it's just nonsense. "The VAT" I've never mentioned the vat. Would you care to actually address the points I'm making? "If you get a 1000 a month per person of your household that is 18 and older, you don’t need certain other social programs anymore" So a person can live on 1K a month no matter what else is going on in their life? Even if they are being price gouged by the for profit health insurance industry for some life saving drug you can tell me that as long as they have 1K a month they are set. And that makes sense to you? "He didn’t want to abolish all of them" He did. Gutting food stamps isn't a requirement for UBI. It's a choice that a conman would make when an actual progressive would have rich people paying for it. "food stamps alone is around 60 billion, would go towards the UBI." Yup. Regressive as all hell. As if UBI couldn't be built on top of the system that is. Let's say that people needed less food stamps then that would be a good thing. But just taking them whether people need them or not is the act of a terrible politician. One of the things people who advocate say about UBI is that if we ever got it it would never go away. Well that's what I used to think about food stamps. Like how could you ever get rid of those. Who wouldn't want to make sure poor people have enough to eat? The answer was yang. He figured out a great way to gut the current social safety net for his regressive UBI.
    1
  11528.  @countchoculitis1528  "you're one of those guys that perfectly fine with ppl using illegal means to take your tax money (lobbyist + money as speech), but when somebody comes along and wants to use LAWFUL means to correct that, thereby protecting the all important middle class, your first reaction is: "BUT MY MONEY!"" Even you can't be possibly be so stupid to think that this is what I've written. Even you must realize you are strawmanning everything I'm saying right?
    1
  11529.  @lordbunbury  Regarding, "You need a plan to actually get m4all instead of just shouting you want it and never getting it." So you want to pretend that m4a is rocket science? That it isn't a program that we already have? But that it isn't a universal program like it should be? You and your conman are just pretending it's complicated to rationalize his lies on m4a. "I prefer getting m4all." LMFAO. Your clown offered a health care plan. It wasn't m4a dipshit. Yanggang is tough to take seriously. "You only get food stamps..." If food stamps are so bad why not just get rid of them now? This isn't an either or proposition. We can have both or neither too yah know. But yanggang will pretend otherwise because they are intellectually dishonest. "Food stamps are just an insult and degrading." Food stamps are food for a person who is having trouble eating. Starving is an insult and degrading. But this is the type of BS you tell yourself when taking away people's food stamps. You and yang suck. "In wartime people use food stamps." We are in perpetual war and certainly will be with the likes of a neocon like yang on foreign policy.
    1
  11530.  @countchoculitis1528  "That's the problem with you conservatives" I'm not a conservative. For that reason I'm going to just ignore whatever other nonsense you have written.
    1
  11531.  @countchoculitis1528  "I've seen that level of greed before." You clearly have no intellectual honesty just like the clown you bootlick for. "Now F O." Yeah. Well said. You can GFY.
    1
  11532. How did you know? I'm tired of being fooled.
    1
  11533.  @joyduncan9434  Regarding, "Too many celebs have fans for what reasons?" Mostly sex appeal.
    1
  11534. I guess I'll try to explain even thou I shouldn't need to. He was talking about the deficit. 100 percent of the deficit equals all the deficit (but no surplus). More then 100 percent of the deficit would mean that not only would there be no deficit but there would be a surplus which is factually accurate because of math. Be better Boristien.
    1
  11535.  @alanbrad4564  I'm sorry about that Alan. I probably should have offered you a choice of a blue or red pill before telling you.
    1
  11536. Too soon. I miss that TV show already.
    1
  11537.  @joewhite9074  "believes..." You did. "Why exactly should Ukraine cede any of it's territory to Russia in exchange for them to stop their aggression against them?" That was you "believing."
    1
  11538. He doesn't give a shit about the "democratic" party or he would probably be a democrat and not an independent. He cares about policy. As for him running as a dem for president that is just a result of accepting the sad reality of our political system and it's many flaws.
    1
  11539. Not really. She didn't run on m4a.
    1
  11540. Why exactly do you think we were close? I happily voted for Jill Stein and would do the exact same thing if the same election were today (in a swing state) but the fact of the matter is that she got around 1 percent of the vote against 2 of the most despised people in the country. The entire system is rigged, not just the parties, against progressives.
    1
  11541. I've never respected sedar. Or his sycophants.
    1
  11542. I hope you are being paid well to spread bullshit propaganda. Regarding, "it eliminates choice." Private insurance eliminates choice. Everywhere is "in network" in a universal system.
    1
  11543. Actually losers love the electoral college and making some people's votes more valuable then others.
    1
  11544. I asked the same thing essentially. I'm surprised more people didn't ask about this. You would think that if it was suppose to be decorative he would have gone with paintings.
    1
  11545.  @jeffmorency3224  Regarding, "so the relief bill didn't help regular people ?" Not like it should have. Obviously. I'm not looking to do the bare minimum of the bare minimum and be ok with that. I suspect you didn't spend a lot of time patting republicans on the back when they passed their bills. Republicans cut checks to millions more americans than dems means tested out of their bill and their BS didn't impress me either. Do everyone a favor and stop licking the boots of POS politicians who don't give AF about you.
    1
  11546. "attire" It shows what clowns they are. It shows how detached they are. It shows how much it's akin to the golden globes or other award shows. It shows how unserious these people are. Take your pick. All are legit reasons to talk about it even it's hardly the most important and most impactful thing the oligarchs are doing.
    1
  11547. "attire" One last thing... it's not a coincidence that reality mirrors dystopian novels like that.
    1
  11548. Joy Reid has the ear of the "left" the way Hannity or O'Reily do not. These are would be sane people the way people listening to Hannity and Bill O are not therefor it is more important to address her bullshit (and MSNBC in general) than Faux news.
    1
  11549. New regarding, "I refuse to plunge to your level of name calling." I don't care. If you want to call me names you go right ahead. I'm not a snowflake that needs to be coddled. Regarding, "I’ve always found people that have to go that low are usually lacking in something." I've always found that people who focus on how something is said rather than what is being said do so because they are not good at talking about the what. It's easier to get mad at me for calling you stupid rather than accepting the cold hard fact that what you said was fucking stupid and never should have been said. Regarding, "you basically stated that because people on the left listen to her she has to be called out." Yes basically. Bravo for addressing what I actually said rather than completely misrepresenting and distorting what I said into things are completely idiotic and have nothing to do with the point I was trying to make. Regarding, "That would be fine if she had made an incorrect statement and was not Twitting about her own opinion." So stupid opinion's shouldn't be called out? I disagree with your opinion. Your opinion is stupid. Regarding, "when did Joy Reid ever say she was representing people on the “Left”?" Who cares about what liar Joy would say about who she represents. The fact of the matter is that majority of the people who listen to her would identify themselves as being on the left rather than the right regardless of what she or you might say or what she or you think of as "left" or "right." Regarding, "And just because people are stating they’re on the “Left” doesn’t mean they are progressives." No shit sherlock. That is precisely why I put left in quotes. Also this is completely irrelevant to the point I was making. Regarding, "Just like people on the right are not necessarily conservative." Again totally irrelevant to my point. Don't be afraid to stay on topic. Regarding, "Doel’s whole point in this segment..." Are you talking to Doel or are you talking to me? You asked a specific question of "Why not go after Sean Hannity or Bill O’Reily?" And I answered it. I was not talking about the entire segment and am not interested in getting into that with you. You have enough fucking trouble with one specific point for fucks sake. Regarding, "If people on the “Left” don’t like her opinions then don’t watch or listen to her, plain and simple." Do you really believe the stupid things you say? Do you think about the shit you say? Is this a principled position of yours that you hold regardless of specifics or is this just hypocritical bullshit? When the KKK uses their freedom of speech to march and spread their bullshit do you say about them, "if you don't like their opinions then just don't watch and listen to them, plain and simple." Is that really what you think and say? Or do you understand the obvious need to call out and correct bullshit like an intelligent human being? I think that it is fucking hilarious that in your first idiotic response to me you thought I hated the 1st amendment. I fucking love it. Not because of what stupid people do with it but because of how important it is to be able to tell stupid people why they are stupid. Because not watching and not listening is not enough. People need to be called out when what they are saying is making the world dumber. Regarding, "she needs to be called out for not having the same viewpoint as him." Yup. Some viewpoints are not be respected. Some viewpoints need to be called out. Some viewpoints are detrimental to society you need to be saying why. Again would you be crying like a bitch if this were about the KKK and not Joy? And I guess I better be clear because you like to conflate, confuse, and distort what I'm saying and better add that I am not, in any way, shape or form, equating the KKK and Joy. They are not the same in the grand scheme of things. The point I'm making is that they are the same in that stupid needs to be called out even if their particular case of stupid is very different. Regarding, "And I was referring to the fact that it is Orwellian to not want or ridicule people if their ideology is different than yours." You are an idiot. You know what would be "Orwellian?" Not allowing the expression of other ideologies. That is not the case here. There is a world of difference between calling shit out not allowing it in the first place. There is nothing Orwellian about me calling you stupid. You get to keep on saying stupid things all you want. And when you do I am going to keep calling you stupid for saying stupid things because stupid things need to be corrected. You don't get to just go around and make the world dumber with everything you say and think I don't get to call you out for it. I do and I will.
    1
  11550. One more thing regarding, "don’t like her opinions then don’t watch or listen to her, plain and simple." I would like to note the hypocrisy of this statement. If you don't like Doel or my opinion then maybe you should just be shutting the fuck up instead of doing exactly what you think others shouldn't be doing.
    1
  11551. Vote in their primary to try and make them a party worth supporting. And if you don't want to vote for them in the general then don't.
    1
  11552. If anyone is controlled opposition it is you.
    1
  11553. You love projecting don't you.
    1
  11554. The oscars should be irrelevant. Stop caring what they think or say.
    1
  11555.  @whatmeworry8472  What would be illogical is not trying to formulate our own opinions on the matter. If you are a progressive it absolutely makes sense to try and determine for yourself who is or isn't on your side. In short stop being illogical.
    1
  11556.  @whatmeworry8472  Regarding, "she loves war" For example she voted to give the orange clown, a person calls "unhinged" even more money for bombs than that orange clown wanted because spending as much as the next 11 countries combined on war wasn't enough... it needed to be the next 13. Regarding, "Bernie way a winning way" Yup. He would have crushed trump had his own party not worked against him and poll after poll after poll since then shows him beating trump. Regarding, "I don’t think are many candidates in the race who are not for universal healthcare." Really? The only person who can be trusted to fight for it is Bernie. You have "democrats" using republican talking points to discredit it. The rest are pretenders at best... some don't even pretend like Biden. You need to be making a distinction between heartfelt convictions and pandering. You seem eager to believe politicians when they tell you things when any sane person understands they are known to be great liars and should be looked at with cynicism. Regarding, "If your argument is basically nobody is a progressive unless he holds exactly Bernie’s position then it’s a one member movement." Not my argument strawman.
    1
  11557.  @whatmeworry8472  Regarding, "the defense vote is a weak and indefensible argument" LOL. Nope. What is indefensible is voting for that budget. You are quickly becoming really tough to take seriously. Regarding, "If you look on any candidate from Bernie to Gabbard to Warren you will find ALL OF THEM costed for the defense budget of a certain year in the last 5 years." What? All budgets are not created equal. I'm talking about a specific vote that was indefensible. You seem to allude to something Sanders did that was indefensible so how about some specifics like I've given you. What budget in the last 5 years did Sanders vote for that was indefensible are you talking about? Regarding, "absurd talking point?" Correct the record is that you? Regarding, "I can point on Bernie weak voting in some defense votes as well as for any other candidates." Tell you what, I'll throw you a bone. Bernie isn't perfect. I've disagreed with him about things and votes. It happens when you have a voting record as long as his. But he and warren voted differently on this very specific bill. One represents me and the other doesn't. Just because Sanders isn't perfect doesn't mean excuse what warren did. This is whataboutism 101 and it's not ok. Regarding, "If you are intellectually honest you either give them all a pass or none." If you were intellectually honest you would be ok making distinctions. If you want to be intellectually dishonest you can paint it all with a huge brush like you are doing without bothering to use nuance when nuance is a good thing. Regarding, "Warren is no better or worse on that." She voted for an indefensible bill that Sanders voted against. Of course that makes her worse. As I type this I can't help but be mad that I've wasted so much time addressing you. Regarding, "Warren,Yang, Bernie, Tulsi and 5-6 other candidates are for universal healthcare. Saying otherwise is false." May as well include Donald Trump then for fucks sake cause he said he wanted to give everyone health care. Are you including pete? Who supports "medicare for all who want it?" Even though we already had words for what he wants, "a public option" while claiming that medicare for all isn't popular while simultaneously trying to coopt the term because it is popular? Regarding, "You can’t write Warren is not for universal healthcare with no basis" Wow. I'm so done with you at this point. Her waffling is well document and has been talked about plenty if you cared to listen. Just because I haven't gone balls deep into telling you info that you should already know doesn't mean I have no basis. Here are a couple videos because I've already wasted far too much time talking to you. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QuhuAZFrRFI&t=38s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nS5C4sryhK0
    1
  11558.  @whatmeworry8472  Regarding, "you went to great length to keep adding more and more points to segment your statement to make it true." You asked me to elaborate so I did. Thanks for conceding I'm being truthful. Regarding, "Does voting for defense budget under Obama different than under trump?" Um... of course. Has Warren ever gone around calling Obama "unhinged?" Of course it's different. It's a like a gun shop knowingly giving guns to people with mental illness versus a reasonable gun owner. It's different. Obviously. Now to be clear I do not think Obama is a responsible gun owner in this analogy (doubled our wars) but this is about what THEY say and think and to my knowledge neither Sanders nor Warren have ever leveled such an accusation against Obama. The details matter. For example voting for a budget that would be equal to what was isn't the same as voting to increase the budget by more money per year than Bernie Sanders "unaffordable how are we going to pay for it" college for all would cost. That's the increase that Warren voted for. It cost MORE than it would have cost to send kids to college in the US. Has Sanders ever voted for that type of increase? Has Bernie ever wanted to give a president more money for war than even the (insane) president wanted? Of course that type of stuff matters unless you are intentionally trying to muddy the waters like you are. You are impossible to take seriously at this point. I'm not even addressing you for you at this point because you seem incredibly disingenuous. It's for others that might read your drivel.
    1
  11559.  @whatmeworry8472  I find you impossible to take seriously at this point.
    1
  11560.  @TheRatsintheWalls  Thanks for listening and having an open mind to the points I was making. I don't find that to be the norm for most yanggang supporters online.
    1
  11561.  @TheRatsintheWalls  Regarding, "I'm more neutral on Yang than a full supporter" Still. I appreciate it. Usually when I bring up how he is gutting 500 billion dollars per year from poor people yanggang goes on to tell me how taking away food stamps is a good thing. I prefer this by a lot. "he's just one of the best options avaliable." I disagree. I think he's one of the best conman out there. That arguably makes him one of the worst. He is going to fool lots of people when others won't. That's why I think he is more dangerous and more worse than most.
    1
  11562.  @gfhcoalition6631  "They either ignore him" You mean like you are doing for the legit grievances I have with yang? "bash him with some cheap arguments" You mean like I'm not doing.
    1
  11563.  @MarkMeszarosYNG  In the age of information ignorance is choice. Good luck being an idiot then.
    1
  11564.  Cliff M  I accept your challenge. I look forward to eating spaghetti and meatballs! And then taking a holy shit!
    1
  11565. She is, was, and always will be a 90s republican liar who will say anything for political purposes. Let's stop acting like acts of evil are "mistakes." She should be PRIMARIED, much less not vp.
    1
  11566.  @bridgetsclama  Regarding, "Not saying I want her as the nom" Only acting like it. I guess that is better. Regarding, "that's what we loved about her to begin with. That fire spirit." Speak for yourself. I'm not nearly as impressed with political theater coming from a proven liar for political purposes. Regarding, "Relentless attacking with FACTS not unverifiable stories." She beat up on some the lowest hanging fruit imaginable. I've never seen someone get so much credit for doing a captain obvious impression.
    1
  11567.  @bridgetsclama  Mitch McConnell has to be one of the worst people on the planet and in politics. But you know what Mitch doesn't do that Warren does? He doesn't pretend to be on my side while stabbing me and my interests in the face. Few are as big of traitors as Warren. I mention this in case you wonder why she bothers me so much. Please let this fact bother you more.
    1
  11568.  @bridgetsclama  Regarding, "Actually, she's not the one I want, Bernie is." Fair enough. Regarding, "I hate that she's gone sleazy a la HRC." She hasn't "gone sleazy." She was always sleazy. The only difference is that now you realize it. She did you a favor. You are better off knowing who she is and now you do. Peace.
    1
  11569. Regarding, "if his presidency can drive otherwise smart people this crazy, it's worth it." This is what you care about? That is really fucked up. I'll just figure you are jealous of smart people.
    1
  11570.  @RipCityBassWorks  Stop being racist already. /s
    1
  11571. Grant regarding, "How can any CARE be good when it is written by insurance care." The ACA is far from "good," but it is BETTER than what we had before. Millions more people had insurance who didn't have it before. Preexisting conditions were gone. The rate at which prices were going up slowed. Kids could stay on their parents plans longer. People were guaranteed a certain amount of coverage as garbage plans were done away with. Do you dispute and of these facts? Do you really think the system was better before all this? Could it better? Of course. But it did make things better. Regarding, "Insurance companies spent $396 million lobbying for the ACA" They loved it because they were able to make lots more money but that doesn't mean it didn't also help the people in all the ways I already pointed out and more. Again there are all sorts of problems with the bill but if you don't think we can't make things worse then you are being silly. Things can absolutely be worse... like they were before it, and like they will be after Trump gets done doing what he is doing.
    1
  11572. John regarding, "the ACA is garbage." We don't disagree on this but I have one simple question for you. Do you think things were better or worse before it and why?
    1
  11573. Regarding, "As for what you said about it keeping rates down, that is just untrue." That is not what I said. I said, "The rate at which prices were going up slowed." That means that rates are going up. They are just going up at a slower pace than they were before. This isn't something that is happening in a vacuum. It is being compared to what was going on before it. And before the ACA prices were skyrocketing at completely unsustainable rates. After the ACA prices were increasing but at a slower rate (arguably still unsustainable but again... it was better). Regarding, "You seek to put a band aid on a gangrened hand." It's not what I would be seeking out like I never sought out the ACA... but if nothing else I think I'd want that band-aid and the ACA is better. Regarding, "I am tired if being sold garbage and told how great it is." Do you really get the impression from any of my comments that I think the ACA is great? The bottom line is that if I'm given the choice between 2 shit sandwiches to eat I'm going to chose the one that doesn't smell quite as bad. And I'm a guy that loves voting outside the 2 major parties and rejects the lesser of 2 evils argument.... but that is only when there actually are other options. There is no single payer that I can vote for currently. I have to pick whether or not I want the ACA or the system before it and the ACA, although complete fucking dogshit, is better.
    1
  11574. John regarding, "If you were..." There are going to be winners and losers with every law. I can't think of a single law that everyone is going to agree on or that would be good for everyone. And I'm not trying to ask about you or your family personally. I'm asking as a net plus or minus. On the whole. When everything and everyone is considered. Was the country better with it or without it? I think, although it sucked and should have been something very different, it was a net gain and the country was better off with it than we were without it. Regarding, "I ask again, what happens when we lose the number one job in the United States?" We will be forced to adapt. Hopefully there will be other jobs in other industries to replace the ones lost. Regarding, "Will they pick up insurance without an income?" It is pretty difficult for anyone to do much of anything without an income. But it is not as if this is being made worse by the ACA even if it isn't helping. I'd love for there to be single payer and for health care to be considered a right but that isn't going to be happening at the moment when you look at who controls the government. Regarding, "fraud and duplicitous." I like to call it a blowjob to the private, fuck in the ass, look for any reason to not give you health care if our CEOs can make more money to buy a bigger yacht health insurance industry. But it, pathetically, was an improvement upon what we had before it in my opinion.
    1
  11575. John regarding, "I answered yes for some no for others and you agree." Kinda. Yes for some and no for others is accurate for every bill. I ultimately decide that, on the whole, after everything is considered, we are better with it than without it. (even thou it sucks) Regarding, "Your second paragraph saying you hope they will find other jobs is naïve at best." I'm not claiming to have all the answers especially on such a difficult question. Society has found a way to adapt throughout history. Jobs and industries die off and are replaced by new ones generally but future automation could change things in ways I can't even imagine. I would like for everyone who wants to work to be able to find a job but again, I'm not going to pretend I have a good answer for you. I don't. Regarding, "You will see a steady decline in the number of people with health insurance as we continue to destroy jobs." I can't imagine single payer not happening in the future to help address this problem but it just isn't going to happen this second. Regarding, "Bilderberg Group" Had never heard of them. Looking at it on wiki now. Fascinating in a Dr. Evil kinda way. Regarding, "it gives the false illusion that more will have insurance in the future, they will not." I think there is a great argument to be made that the country would be better without it because it would speed up a single payer system but hasn't been the discussion I've been trying to have and consider this line of reasoning separate.
    1
  11576. John regarding, "truth is you don't get to vote on it at all" That was not how I meant it. I was just trying to say that single payer isn't going to be happening at the moment so I wasn't being considered in the thought experiment of what is better, having the ACA or before the ACA. Regarding, "Glass Stiegel or is against universal healthcare, retirements and believes in having more wars." Good list but I think you missed the most important litmus test of getting money out of politics. To me that is the one problem that causes all the others. Regarding, "You apparently feel the choices you think you are given are real choices," I carry an awful lot of skepticism when it comes to our politicians and our government but I'm going to keep fighting for the politicians and policies I believe in. Regarding, "I do not." So what does that mean for you? Is that like saying you have given up hope?
    1
  11577. Regarding, "what happens when we live in a world where we only need a couple million people to monitor and run the machines?" Like I said I definitely see automation being a problem society will face in the future and do not pretend to have any idea of all the problems that will come with it. Much less the solutions. Regarding, "the Bilderberg Group" I feel like I had heard the name before but that was about it. Regarding, "I recommend you go to the actual Bilderberg website" I did and I looked at their attendance list. I didn't recognize most of the names but the names of the people I did recognize were not people I care for. Regarding, "go Alex Jones on yourself." The closest I've ever done to this is thinking that 9-11 was an inside job. I still have questions but in all honesty I try not to go there. That said I'd be curious if you have any thoughts on this. Regarding, "This game is rigged" That much is obvious. To what degree it is rigged is much harder to figure out. Regarding, "the problem is that the average person isn't part of the conversation about what to do about what is coming." Ignorance is bliss I'm told. Sometimes I think I'd be happier if I knew less. Regarding, "my blog" I look forward to checking that out later. I've very much enjoyed our conversation and I thank you for your time. I can be very abrasive on occasion on these forums and if I've ever rubbed you the wrong way I apologize for it.
    1
  11578. Spoken like a real bitch.
    1
  11579. You are a moron. Good luck with that going forward.
    1
  11580. Or more likely he focuses on the religion that is the dominant one in his country. But I guess that would be too logical and obvious for some.
    1
  11581. Worse than neera? I'm not sure why you think that's possible.
    1
  11582.  @MegaMauserman  "Washington is full of all assortments of evil trash bags." I agree with that. What I don't agree with is that you "logically" conclude this is reason to not even bother to fight against a trash bag like neera.
    1
  11583.  @alanparedes2034  They aren't controlled opposition hacks like sam is. They are willing to call out dems bullshit for what it is.
    1
  11584.  @peterbondy  "we can simply go and find an outlet that agrees with our opinions" It really is a good thing otherwise I'd be forced to listen to the propaganda you think I should. And it's too bad I can't go out and find politicians who agree with my opinions the way I can still find pundits who legit agree with me. "Don’t even watch anything that challenges your point of view, right?" If I wanted to listen to corporatist hacks like sam I can go to all of corporate media. Do you listen to your own advice? So you advocate going to revolutionary blackout to hear what they have to say right? Or do you stay in your bubble here?
    1
  11585.  @peterbondy  Sam and his crew are hacks who would tell you to vote for donald trump if he represented their cult. They are sheepherders for the "democratic" party and they are leading you to slaughter.
    1
  11586.  @peterbondy  "not corporate hacks" Sam IS a corporate hack who goes on to MSNBC to act like joe rogan is the one misinforming people and not the corporate media. He does this, again, on msnbc.
    1
  11587.  @bearislandthuglife3463  Are you paid for your bullshit the same way sam is paid for his?
    1
  11588.  @peterbondy  "a thought experiment that proves your point" If you are intellectually honest it certainly does. If you would vote for an orange clown and call it "harm reduction" it does. " use your guess as proof?" Prove me wrong if you can (spoiler alert: you can't). Has sam every told anyone not to vote for a democrat in a general election? He hasn't because he's a hack and that's proof of it not that I suspect you would ever admit it. "You’ve lost all credibility with that silly so called thought experiment..." Let's not pretend that you were interested in anything I had to say. You are here to defend your cult and can't do it honestly. Sam cultivates some of the most intellectually dishonest people I've ever come across and I've talked to flat earthers.
    1
  11589.  @peterbondy  "Discussion over for me." Just ignore the intellectual dishonesty of your fellow cultist and pretend I'm the one with no credibility. Figures.
    1
  11590.  @peterbondy  "got to do with me?" It's a reflection of the intellectual dishonesty of the people in your cult. You want to criticize me but have nothing for the guy with laughable lies and wrapping it with smears? " one person’s comment?" I promise you they are not alone. I've been dealing with your cult on the regular as of late. Sams crowd are seriously some of the most intellectually dishonest people I've come across. "your credibility is nose diving by making silly comments." You listen to sam tell you to vote blue no matter who. He only pretends to care about how terrible joe manchin is. When the chips on the table and when it would matter most he would tell you to vote for that clown because he doesn't care how terrible he is he only cares about his cult. "Should I judge the quality of Revolutionary Blackout from your comments here like you are suggesting I should do with Sam’s channel?" Yup. For example I don't spread blatant lies like your fellow cultist for sam here.
    1
  11591.  @peterbondy  "you limp me in with others" You are criticizing me like sams sycophants. You are not going after the blatant lies of sams fans like sams fans. You are defending sam and not in any sort of good way like sams fans. You were trying to use a thought experiment as a way to ignore what I'm saying as if you are not capable of thinking. You have yet to acknowledge the fact that sam has never told anyone not to vote for a democrat in a general election. So yeah. I'm going to lump you in with all the others with you act like all the others. And the same thing can be said of AOC while she votes in pretty much lock step with all the corporate dems and while she squanders the leverage she has to get jack shit for progressives. That's how it works for me. I'm going to judge you by your actions. "That’s not fair to me or you if I did it to you." I call out everyone. You were trying to call out me right? But not the guy with blatant lies wrapped in smears? I want to you to say why because I think it's telling and hypocritical of you to pick and choose who you call out like this. You continue to address your problems with me and have yet to say their behavior was wrong a single time even when pressed. Repeatedly. "Because some other commentor didn’t look and see the channel you recommended did cover the Israeli issue isn’t anything to do with me or Sam or anyone else." So instead of calling it a lie which it obviously was you are going to polish that turd instead? "I’m not responsible for other viewers commitment to accuracy." I asked you what you thought of it. And instead of just calling it out like you seem so wanting to do for me you polished it. That's what I'd expect someone in sams cult to do. "They all have their dodgy moments." Do you have any breaking points? Where you decide that maybe it would better to not be exposing you to blatant propaganda? If you willingly listen to partisan hacks like sam not caring that he's a hack then you probably get what you deserve. Pundits are like politicians... have some standards. Don't listen to people that prove themselves frauds. Fool me once, well the point is that you can't get fooled again. "appreciate every single journalist" What about the ones that actively work with the CIA to propagandize the people? Don't get me wrong real journalists are heros. But fake journalists who are actually controlled opposition are the worst of the worst. "bottom line is I don’t need to agree with every segment I watch" Of course. But if you listen to people that completely disingenuous you are listen to propaganda out of some sense of duty to listen to all sides or some shit then you are being a dupe.
    1
  11592. And then he tells them all to vote for a warmonger like biden who would veto M4A if it got his desk and loves fracking. Bernie is a sellout.
    1
  11593.  @jvcyt298  "you would rather fascists take over everything" You say that like biden isn't one. "Bernie isn't far enough to the left for you?" Bernie's problem is that he is a sellout all he does is talk. "We have to work with what we've got" We get garbage in part because bernie tells you to vote for cor rupt people like biden and you listen to him when he does.
    1
  11594.  @jvcyt298  "you would rather fascists take over everything" Fun fact: neither of first two replies can be seen by anyone and are being shadowbanned because biden and his ilk are fas cis ts.
    1
  11595.  @jvcyt298  "you would rather..." Fun fact: This is my fourth attempt to write a reply in this thread because my first three are all being shadowbanned. Biden, that guy who wanted to open his own ministry of truth, is what you whine about.
    1
  11596.  @jvcyt298  "get help." LMFAO In other words you don't have anything intelligent to say in response.
    1
  11597.  @jvcyt298  "get help." I recommend the same for you. Maybe watch some george carlin. He had this stuff figured out in a time when it was FAR harder to see it. "it's a big club and you ain't in it." "they give a f about you. AT ALL!" -some smart guy you should listen to instead of bernie
    1
  11598. It's really too bad youtube doesn't enable the thumbs down feature for stupid comment such as yours.
    1
  11599.  @labenbrittenum6934  Pretty much everywhere. Forgive me for not wanting to take your comment more seriously than that, or don't. I don't care.
    1
  11600.  @labenbrittenum6934  "you not sure what you're talking about." Spoken like a flat earther when I don't choose to engage them about their BS. Figures.
    1
  11601. Ignorance is bliss... enjoy it.
    1
  11602. He believes in the status quo and corporations and that is who he represents.
    1
  11603. Is she being dragged or going willingly? She was part of the team that ghosted jimmy to bring cenk's nephew on krystal, kyle and friends. F her. Just got done unsubscribing from breaking points. I wasn't there for saagar.
    1
  11604. Mega regarding, "they can't guarantee representation of the voters." Really? Even when I wrote, "they are required to vote for whoever has the most delegates," that wouldn't be representing the voters? What would you propose then in a situation where there is a contested convention then? What would guarantee representation of the voters?
    1
  11605. I love a good conspiracy but I think it's enough to say that this is the result of capitalism and greed.
    1
  11606.  @corneliussulla9963  "Because derailed trains are good for profit." That's not what I said. I am saying that cutting corners is good for profit but cutting corners comes with consequences. "You dont love common sense it seems." This is funny coming from someone strawmanning the argument I was making. Thanks for the laugh.
    1
  11607.  @corneliussulla9963  "never seen socialism in their entire life" FYI social security is socialism. Even unserious people such as yourself should be able to figure that out considering what it's name is.
    1
  11608.  @corneliussulla9963  "to ANY socialist country of your choice" If socialism is such a failure then why does the US and capitalism seek to destroy them with sanctions and the like so much? Which of these countries aren't the US messing with? Oh right... all of them. "What ever dude." You were likely educated in SOCIALIST free education. You do make a decent point that it isn't good by existing.
    1
  11609. When it comes to biden versus Sanders it isn't about name recognition, it's about the corporate medias concerted effort to make biden seem like he is the more electable of the two. They will tell you Sanders proposals are pie in the sky, unaffordable, and not realistic while biden is the realist who speaks to middle america. Sanders is a socialist and biden and capitalism is the best. They get people fired up over trump. Try to paint him as the boogeyman. And don't get me wrong, he is terrible. But he is a symptom not the cause. Anyway they get so many people to care only about getting him out... so much so that that is literally all they care about and are willing to overlook what he is replaced with. And they make it seem biden is the guy for that job while ignoring that if a corporate dem was the way to beat trump hillary would be president. Corporate media is propaganda. And sadly it works on people who are too busy trying to pay their bills to figure out how exactly they are getting fucked over.
    1
  11610. Are you trying to prove my point that you are a moron?
    1
  11611. Yes. But not those who are paying close attention.
    1
  11612. Meh. I get what you are saying and why but ultimately what you want is a debate... not an interview.
    1
  11613. Nobody is forcing you to vote for Joe anymore than trump supporters are being forced to support the orange clown because of biden/pelosi/hillary.
    1
  11614.  @maxk4471  "how exactly Azov is the nazi battalion" Don't let their rebranding and removal of nazi symbols fool you, they are literally the only institutional nazi military in the WORLD. But just tell yourself that it's all just bad russia PR. It's funny.
    1
  11615.  @maxk4471  "western propaganda?" Yeah. Or do you really think that only russia and north korea are busy trying to brainwash their people?
    1
  11616.  @nickolaso1119  After you exit the 1st grade you will realize "I know you are but what am I" isn't as smart as you think.
    1
  11617. @Soup on a stick FYI actual soup on a stick is smarter then you.
    1
  11618.  @nickolaso1119  If that's what you think I said it's only because you are stupid.
    1
  11619. @Soup on a stick Regarding, "And yet you don't know how to use the words then and than?" Remember when you used the "word" "mastuerbating?" I'd never bring such a thing up in the moment because only a real piece of shit idiot would think that is important. It's obviously not to the sane. I will bring it up now because I do care about hypocrisy. You are so close to being dumb enough to forget to breathe. Just do it already. Just forget to.
    1
  11620. @Soup on a stick You really have nothing better to do huh? I almost feel pity for you.
    1
  11621. @Soup on a stick And I was sure trolling was your job. If you had any intelligence you would have made your worthless hobby where you are cancer incarnate your career.
    1
  11622.  @USS_Sentinel  While I understand why you say what you do ultimately the problem with US politics isn't the fact that it's a two party system... it's that our politicians are all bought. We could have 10 viable parties and it means nothing if all of them are selling out. Money in politics is the overarching problem.
    1
  11623. Just once say something that isn't stupid. I won't hold my breathe.
    1
  11624. While you are here David I just want to say keep up the good work.
    1
  11625. Make sure to vote blue no matter who like sam tells you to.
    1
  11626.  @MichaelAronson  "It worked" Do we have universal health care, a living wage, peace, money out of politics? Oh right... you are a unserious person.
    1
  11627.  @MichaelAronson  "Is that what you think elections do?" If the "democratic" party actually cared about it's people it would.
    1
  11628.  @ethanvilla4418  "this time in English." Maybe consider the possibility your comprehension skills are terrible.
    1
  11629.  @MichaelAronson  "Is that what you think elections do?" How do you think I'm supposed to get it if not elections?
    1
  11630.  @MichaelAronson  "I really have no idea." You just know that it's definitely not elections. Which is funny because that's literally the only way it's going to happen despite your asinine words.
    1
  11631.  @MichaelAronson  me: "universal health care" you: "nOnSpEcIfIc." I think I've let you waste more than enough of my time already.
    1
  11632.  @ethanvilla4418  "Or maybe even consider that rereading the drivel you typed might be promising because it made no sense?" LMFAO
    1
  11633.  @ethanvilla4418  "MY comprehension skills, right?" Yup. Vote blue no matter who like sam tells you to. Makes perfect sense even if it includes a typo.
    1
  11634.  @ethanvilla4418  "MY comprehension skills, right?" I'll explain my point to you like you are a child... it's that sam will forever tell you to vote for the blue team in a general election. He would tell you to vote for donald trump if he were representing the blue team in a general election. He is a sheepherder for a corrupt party. Good luck with that.
    1
  11635.  @ethanvilla4418  "my critique of Rogan violated that nerve of yours so strongly that you start malfunctioning?" I haven't even mentioned rogan. You must be projecting and malfunctioning.
    1
  11636.  @ethanvilla4418  "Nice rebuttal there, sparky? LOL. Just like I thought." They hypocritically rebutted without a shred of self awareness.
    1
  11637.  @ethanvilla4418  "I CAN'T WAIT to hear exactly how the GQP was going to offer anyone universal healthcare?" I don't support republicans and never have but don't let that stop you from your nonsense.
    1
  11638.  @ethanvilla4418  "I CAN'T WAIT to hear exactly how the GQP was going to offer anyone universal healthcare?" At least the GOP is honest when they tell you they don't support it.
    1
  11639.  @ethanvilla4418  "FINALLY, you get it." I'm pretty sure me saying "to" instead of "too" shouldn't have stopped you from understanding my simple and obvious point that sam that, like I said, "Make sure to vote blue no matter who like sam tells you TOO*."
    1
  11640.  @ethanvilla4418  "Not sure if you're saying, "people like Sam" OR "people who like Sam."" It must be unclear if you don't look at the words I used. But I specifically stated "people like sam." Stop trying to justify your idiocy.
    1
  11641.  @ethanvilla4418  "typo" Actually you know what.... I got it correct the first time. LOL You just can't read.
    1
  11642. No. But as much as it would be painful to watch I actually hope she does. She would suck up all the establishment support and money before inevitably getting crushed in the primary. She won't run thou and the establishment will back a much scarier candidate like Booker, Harris or Biden.
    1
  11643.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  You keep defending sam and his clowns while they support censorship. Maybe change your handle at least if you are going to boot lick for people who support censorship. Or don't. It makes me laugh really hard.
    1
  11644.  @penpenultra  Regarding, "If you refuse to engage intellectually, then why argue at all?" I'm trying to engage you intelligently but I'm not sure why as you deflect from the questions I ask and the points I make. Do you have any limits to your lesser evil mentality? Would you support hitler if thought their opponent were satan? Regarding, "what bootlicking? Voting?" Voting for a guy you yourself call a POS? That's bootlicking. You know it's the boot of POS and you lick it anyway. Sorry not sorry if the truth hurts. Not that I expect you to acknowledge the reality in which you exist. Regarding, "What a clown." Yes. You are.
    1
  11645.  @themajesticspider-man6116  Regarding, "I promise you that not voting will not help at all." Not once have I advocated for not voting. Is the rest of your comment this worthless? Not that I'm going to bother to find out.
    1
  11646.  @scrumblybumbles6513  Regarding, "your logic isn't hard to follow" Thanks for conceding your comprehension problems. Regarding, "you already said in another comment that a Biden Presidency would be better for the next 4 years" Marginally so. But at a great cost. Regarding, "so your opinions on Biden's policies really don't matter to this conversation" Um. What? If you say so I guess. Let's see where this is going. I don't tend to read everything. More often I try to address substantive points when they are given. Got any of those in this novel? Regarding, "Your comment didn't really address my main point (that Bernie and his policies became popular due to people being fed up with a corporate dem)" Yeah. It wasn't a very good point that oversimplifies the topic. People like things like health care, and peace and legal weed because they are good ideas... not because corporate dems are bad. These are progressive ideas that get popular in spite of corporate dems who do everything they can to stop the real progress this country needs. Regarding, "I can infer 2 possible answers from it:" You are making this harder than it is. Good ideas become popular because they are good ideas. Don't overthink it too much. Regarding, "please say why you believe Bernie and his policies became popular directly after Obama" First I'll try to answer why progressive policies are becoming more popular even in the era of trump. It's simple... they are good ideas that are seeing the light of day more. Support for M4A is inevitable because it's a good idea. Because we get more evidence of it every day. Because we can look at our neighbors to the north and see that they pay half as much per person for their system. And that system covers everyone. And medical bankruptcy isn't a thing. And their infant mortality rate is superior. And their life expectancy is longer. It's inevitable that it's going to gain popularity despite all the propaganda trying to tell you it's the devil. There is too much anecdotal evidence pilling up. Everyone knows someone fucked over by our health care system. It's an idea that is going get more popular going forward because it's a good idea. All the how are you going to pay for it bs and the like don't change it. People have the internet now. Knowledge is power. As for why is bernie popular I'll again try to keep it simple. He has been consistently on the right side of all the major issues, even when that side of the issue wasn't the popular one. The patriot act, the iraq war, gay rights, and more. Bernie LEAD. He's been the same guy since the beginning of time. With the same values, championing the same issues. If people on the right know he is nothing but genuine. That isn't common in politics. Regarding, "A lot of things can't wait until 2024 dude." Is that the unimportant election when I get to vote my values? But not this time? This time I have to vote for shit? Because reasons? I don't care who you or anyone thinks is worse. I don't support evil. Neither should you. Obviously. Regarding, "I honestly have doubts about how fair and free the election in 2024 would be if Trump was reelected." Why would you wait to have worries about free and fair elections til then? If you care about free and fair elections maybe look at your inhouse problems in the "democratic" party. Fun fact: who "won" the Iowa Caucus according to the "democratic" party. Pete Buttigieg because free and fair am I right? Regarding, "voting 3rd party is absolutely meaningless in the U.S." But voting for corrupt POS oligarchs who are everything that is wrong with our government is very meaningful right? Regarding, "can you chill with all this moral grandstanding dude?" What you call moral grandstanding is actually understandable outrage at the state of affairs. I doubt it's going to subside anytime soon. Regarding, "I thought Bernie or busters got all pissy about voter-shaming." I don't speak for all bernie or busters. I speak for me. If you vote for garbage I think you should be ashamed of it. And I'm tired of having nothing but garbage representation. Maybe if people felt ashamed of voting for garbage like they should we wouldn't be in this mess.
    1
  11647.  @chrisevilstewie  Regarding, "Who knows what Bernie was" Who doesn't? Regarding, "in the end to me after everything he is worse than Biden." The one who voted for the iraq war, the patriot act, repealing glass steagal, who proudly authored the racist crime bill, who lies about everything that isn't important but won't even lie about supporting things that are like being for M4A, the one who is corrupt is the better of the two? Um... no.
    1
  11648.  @chrisevilstewie  Regarding, "who was the guy who gave up running for president" He was "losing" during a pandemic who didn't want his supporters risking their health under the circumstances. Regarding, "so he could help that guy whom I guess your talking about or Bernie's good friend Biden." So how exactly does this make Biden better according to you? I'm just kidding. I don't really care what you think at this point.
    1
  11649.  @chrisevilstewie  Regarding, "Bernie got a large number of small donations from the people who wanted change the most and he through it in thier faces." He through it in thier (sic) faces. Yeah... you are impossible to take seriously.
    1
  11650.  @scrumblybumbles6513  Regarding, "Bernie's policies woulda gotten popular anyway" In a very simplistic way. Regarding, "it was just a coincidence they gained huge popularity right after Obama" What? M4A and universal health care has been gaining in popularity consistently for quite some time. It was popular when the dems had a supermajority and gave us republican health care. It's just that those dems are really just republicans in disguise doing everything they can to preserve the terrible system. People knew the system was a disaster back then. But lots of people were dupes who thought the dems had their best interests at heart. But they had corporate interests at heart. And sanders gets a lot of credit. He used his platform to champion M4A. It helps. Biden uses his platform to demonize M4A. Regarding, "(if you have it your way)" LMFAO. I'm not a trump supporter dipshit. But don't let that stop you from being an ass strawmanning what I say. If we had it my way nobody in the entire country would vote for either trump or biden. If we had it my way people would vote for good instead of rationalizing supporting voting for evil. Regarding, "I just can't justify not voting against that." There are ways to vote against that that don't also include voting for a warmonger who has never found a war they didn't want to fight. Trump is an orange clown and psycho and I trust him more than I do biden on foreign policy because trump has never started a new war (despite his efforts to the contrary). Do you ever think that too is something you should be voting against as well? Perpetual war and war with everyone? While you vote for exactly that and Biden? I'm just kidding. You justify that. Orange man bad is all that matters. Regarding, "There's no way you actually believe that the DNC is as fucked on voter rights as the RNC." There you go again caring about who is worse between a douche and a turd. You are just deflecting about the rot in your own party. You claim to care about free and fair elections but when I point to indisputable evidence of shenanigans on your team then all that matter is the that you think the other guys are worse. It's pathetic. Don't claim to care about free and fair elections then just ignore it when your team does it just like team trump does when their team is called out. Regarding, "Republicans are doing everything they can to exploit coronavirus" Pelosi doesn't want to give the people help because it might give trump a political win. Not that you care. Regarding, "you're an actual moron if you don't think there's a substantive difference between voting for a viable candidate and an unviable one." Did I say there wasn't a difference? I'd always prefer to vote for a viable candidate if I can. But I don't vote for evil. That's what you do. Regarding, "Can I ask," Sure. Regarding, "why do you suck Bernie's dick so hard" You mean why do I respect the guy who is the only reason the 2016 and 2020 "democratic" primaries even needed to be rigged? Well I also appreciate his continued advocacy for M4A. I probably didn't do his contribution to the cause the justice it deserved when trying to explain it's growth in popularity. Regarding, "he says you should vote Biden you suddenly disagree with him?" LOL. I guess this might be very surprising if you are sheep but shouldn't be. I love Bernie but I don't care about his endorsements very much. I decide who I vote for. Bernie is good. He isn't perfect. And he is wrong about voting for biden. Don't overthink this and make it stupid the way you like to do.
    1
  11651.  @scrumblybumbles6513  Regarding, "If the best ideas naturally become implemented" The best ideas do not naturally become implemented and I never said they have. Regarding, "why is Trump the President?" It's complicated. And seeing as how you started this with yet another strawman argument I don't really feel like getting into it ATM. Regarding, "the most effective way to vote against Trump is to vote for a viable candidate in opposition with him." Whatever you got to tell yourself to rationalize supporting a POS I guess. The most effective way to vote against trump is to recreate the exact same circumstances that helped lead to trump the first place. Ok bud. Regarding, "With 3rd party voting you're just throwing your vote away" The only wasted votes are votes for terrible candidates who don't deserve your vote and don't deserve to win. Spoiler alert. You are just throwing your vote away. As are all trump supporters. You are all sheep supporting clowns for terrible reasons. Regarding, "it's not doing anything to oppose him." I oppose evil. I guess my priorities than just more than orange man bad and for good reason. Regarding, "You dumbfuck, I know you're not a Trump supporter," Still you act like my ideal world is one where trump wins. And that makes me the dumbfuck? Regarding, "you did say that Trump was better for the future and that if you were doing lesser of 2 evil voting you would vote Trump." I also say time and again that it doesn't matter who is the "lesser" evil. And that all I really care about is the fact that it's evil right? Regarding, "if 2 options are bad it isn't wrong to point out that 1 is obviously less bad." It only becomes wrong when you support what is bad. And that is what you do time and again right? Is this where you want to spend your energy? Mindlessly weighing which evils are worse than others so that you can go out and support the lesser evils of this world? Would you rather vote for a murder or a pedophile? As if this should matter in the least? As if such a question is of any value whatsoever? Which is less bad? Since we are wasting brainpower on stupid questions whose answers shouldn't be of importance. Ultimately you shouldn't care who is worse. Neither should be considered. But why not? May as well pick a side since you care about who is worse all the time. Regarding, "I'm totally happy voting Biden" I'm really tired of feeling like I'm living in the movie Idiocracy all the time. Regarding, "Holy shit, you are so intellectually dead." I'm not going to lie this is pretty funny coming from the same person who just said, "I'm totally happy voting Biden." Regarding, "Pelosi wanted to give MORE than the Republicans" So the lesser evil shit is only for elections huh? So we get nothing thanks to pelosi instead of what republicans put on the table. This is where you have principles and standards. When the bread crumbs are actually on the table? LMFAO What a hack you and pelosi both are.
    1
  11652.  @souljaboyisbad  Regarding, "your comments get even worse." Thanks for not even attempting at making an argument. I'm sure it would have been terrible if you tried.
    1
  11653.  @scrumblybumbles6513  Regarding, "I'm not reading another giant wall of text from you." While I am long winded I use paragraphs. That means it isn't a wall of text. Regarding, "My point wasn't a strawman" Ultimately when you say things like, "If the best ideas naturally become implemented..." It's because that's what the other person is claiming. But if you just an idiot on a tangent that would make sense as well I suppose. I actually think the exact opposite. I think the best ideas do not naturally become implemented. So your question is nonsensical and has nothing to do with what I was talking about. Regarding, "throughout this discussion you have said that Bernie's policies have become more popular" Which is not saying that the best ideas naturally become implemented. Do I really need to explain in detail why? Regarding, "Trump is President (in large part) because when corporatism fails people turn to populism" If you want to insist I really don't care. This is an over-simplification of an incredibly complex topic. Regarding, "you might not know what the word 'wasted' means." What is wrong with me that I'm addressing you? LMFAO. I must be wasted. Regarding, "Even fucking Trump supporters aren't wasting their vote because they may actually impact the election." They can be impacting the election and be wasting their vote at the same time. You don't realize this because you are about as smart as them. Regarding, "3rd party voters will affect nothing." I live in a swing state. I matter far more than I should because of the EC. Regarding, "it is wasted, you are accomplishing nothing" If I'm accomplishing nothing it's only because the corrupt "democratic" party don't care about winning as much as they should. But hey... at least they have John Kasichs vote. Regarding, "you are 100% wasting your vote." What a useful idiot for the establishment you are. Regarding, "I've named 5 places where Biden is markedly better than Trump" I don't care. I can name places where trump is better than biden and have (foreign policy). That doesn't mean it's a logical argument to support the orange clown because ultimately they are evil and terrible. Regarding, "all of these issues will get worse/lead to worse outcomes if left to Trump for another 4 years." The country is going to persist for longer than 4 years and I don't support trump. Regarding, "it's not the difference between douche and a turd, one is obviously better" So just because one is better than the other that means that they can't be a douche and a turd? So because a murder and a pedophile are not equally terrible in the same ways they can't be a douche and turd either? Or maybe you are spouting nonsense? Regarding, "Yeah dude, obviously Republicans would have leveraged that into giving less for Covid support in the future." LMFAO I can't believe I ever responded to any of your trash at all.
    1
  11654.  @koffinski  Regarding, "Let's try the opposite." Huh? Regarding, "Have fun voting against your interests." I'm not voting against my interests. Regarding, "Four more years of Trump will definitely help us get progressive policies passed." Is that what you think I was saying? If so you are not smart. Regarding, "People will definitely learn their lesson like they did in 2016" Why am I responding to your nonsense? Regarding, "we definitely wont be left with an even shittier option." You mean like have been left with over and over already? Regarding, "Nobody needs the supreme court anyways" God forbid we don't elect Joe Biden, the guy who is practically single-handedly responsible for helping get clarence thomas on the court because of his atrocious behavior towards anita hill. God forbid we don't elect biden who can be trusted to put 100 percent corporate friendly twats on the SC. What would we ever do without that clown helping destroy the nation at the helm right?
    1
  11655.  @ScoopMeisterGeneral  Regarding your response that included nothing but the word regarding: that was stupid but it still managed to be smarter than your usual drivel.
    1
  11656.  @ScoopMeisterGeneral  Regarding, "Which usual drivel might you be referring to?" All of it. Regarding, "Anyway, my advice to you would just be to look up some synonyms for regarding." Does it bother you? I won't then.
    1
  11657.  @ScoopMeisterGeneral  Regarding, "All of what though? I don't think I've ever interacted with you before." Fair enough. I was mistaking you for scrumbly. Regarding, "it just makes all your comments incredibly boring to read." I don't care if my comments are boring. I'm not writing to excite people. I write to make a point and it tells you exactly what I'm addressing and that is important to me while excitement level is not, especially in threads like this that include over a hundred comments. Regarding, "I think your overuse of it probably betrays a lack of imagination." I think you lack imagination for the utility of it's usage and are overemphasizing it's importance for silly reasons.
    1
  11658. When Sanders entered the race in 2016 he was virtually unknown and down 50 points to Hillary. In 2020 he will enter as the most popular politician in the country with the name recognition of a rock star. There are not going to be enough dirty tricks in their playbook to stop him.
    1
  11659.  @worldforalll  Your point sucked.
    1
  11660.  @oscarosei1985  "had nothing to do with Graham and Jimmy's debate" That's the fucking point.
    1
  11661. Go outside and get a life.
    1
  11662. Biden is lying, POS, corrupt, warmonger and not the type of person to like.
    1
  11663. It's political propaganda and it's actually terrible.
    1
  11664.  @mackpluis  Would you have as much trouble understand why this is terrible if the dodo used their platform to give good PR for Trump while he was in office? Not that they wouldn't because this is political theater, but in a hypothetical world would you have trouble understand why this would be a bad thing if they did the same thing for trump?
    1
  11665.  @mackpluis  propaganda "information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view." Information. Check Especially of a biased nature. They wouldn't do this for trump. Check. Used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. Used to make you feel happy good thoughts about a specific politician and potus elect. This is clearly propaganda and I have a problem with that.
    1
  11666. He's not fighting for you. He has biden and the "democratic" party's back.
    1
  11667. He's fighting for the "democratic" party and he has joe biden's back.
    1
  11668. He's fighting with corporate dems and he has joe biden's back.
    1
  11669. It only took me 4 tries to get my message to show in the "land of the free."
    1
  11670. Not even. She is right wing.
    1
  11671.  @1369Stiles  "playing the political game isnt as easy as SOME dumbasses want to make it out to be." So you are an armchair politician. And a particularly hypocritical one at that.
    1
  11672. I'll have trouble not concluding this if she doesn't force the vote.
    1
  11673. Bush's presidency is still worse than Trumps has been.
    1
  11674.  @mudpiemudpie785  regarding, "she doesn't say she's for Medicare for all, she says she's for supporting the ACA and access to affordable health care for all Americans." I think that was last week. I think she currently has hopped on the bandwagon after making the political calculation. Real inspiring stuff.
    1
  11675.  @Protectobot  That seemed like an awful lot of unnecessary Trump bashing. I agree with it. I'm just not sure why it's there unless it was more for paco. It's like you are trying to convince me Trump sucks. I assure you I don't need that. I'm well aware. Regarding, "but if Bernie runs again, the Dems will just rig the primary again with superdelegates." Let's not act like things haven't changed since 2016 please because I assure you they have. In 2016 Sanders entered the race down over 50 points. Few knew who he was. He faced media blackout. All that has changed. Now he's the most popular politician in the country. Now he has the name recognition of a rock star. Now the media HAS to cover him to a certain degree. Now he will enter the race as the front-runner. Those are all way too important of facts to just gloss over and act like there is no reason to think 2020 will play out differently. Regarding, "He might as well run as a 3rd-party candidate" Worst. Idea. Ever. I'm so fucking tired of this. I like Jimmy Dore but him giving people this idea really pisses me off. He lost the "democratic" primary in 2016 by a hair while Jill Stein got 1 percent of the vote against 2 of the most despised, not just politicians, but most despised PEOPLE in the country. There are more sheep that are going to vote for the democratic nominee in 2020 regardless of their name, even if it's Satan, then Stein has managed to get running all her elections combined. That's the reality. And I haven't even begun to go into all the ways the EC makes it all but impossible for a 3rd party candidate to win the general. Just stop it. Sanders knows what he is doing. He knows winning the "democratic" nomination is the easiest (not to be mistaken with easy) way to win. He sees value in winning as a democrat because that is the only way to reform the party from the inside and more. Just stop with the 3rd party BS please. I'd love it if it were the best idea. I want more then 2 major parties. I voted for Jill Stein in 2016 in a swing state. But I live in reality and what you propose is just terrible strategy. Regarding, "he won't be allowed to participate in debates" Sure he would because he would have the required support at the national level. And even if he wouldn't this is nothing compared to overcoming the EC.
    1
  11676.  @mudpiemudpie785  regarding, "I can't say I either trust or believe her." Me neither. Fuck her. She should be supporting Sanders but instead she is stabbing him in the face. That doesn't mean I like or will use lies and your saying, "no, she doesn't say she's for Medicare for all," isn't factually accurate even if she has said this in the past. The fact of the matter is that, as of this moment, she openly supports it. Now whether or not it's a principled position or pandering is another question.
    1
  11677.  @Protectobot  regarding, "How do you think Bernie will be able to avoid having the primary rigged against him again?" I don't. I know it will be rigged against him. I know the establishment is going to do anything and everything to stop him. I know the corporate media will smear him. I know the game isn't fair. I have no illusions of fair fight. But you seem to think that all you need to do to for a fair game is run 3rd party. It isn't. Sadly there is no magical way to make the game fair overnight. As for how I think Bernie can overcome the rigging and why I think he can and will overcome it in 2020 I think I've already done that to a certain degree. I've already told you ways the game has changed from 2016 to 2020. Regarding, "There were no repercussions." Maybe not directly there should have been but again... things HAVE changed. Thanks to Sanders campaign in 2016 and wikileaks americans are far more "woke" to the corruption in 2020 then they were in 2016 and their shenanigans are going to be harder for them to pull. We should hopefully have a reduced number of superdelegates. I know you want more. So do I. But to get it we need to win and that isn't happening as a 3rd party. The 2 major parties have successfully rigged the game from top to bottom against them. Regarding, "DWS" and "Tom Perez" Yeah... these people suck and should not be in positions of power in the party. You know how they get outed and we get progressive chair who doesn't suck? Sanders wins as a dem. Sanders winning 3rd party does nothing to address these people. Remember when progressives were purged from the party? Well corporate dems can be purged the exact same way but to do it we have to win. Regarding, "What's the point of Bernie endorsing Hillary?" 1) Sanders agreed to support the nominee when entering the race and he does what he says. 2) Sanders said over and over and over and over how terrible he thought Trump was. How he would do anything and everything he could to stop Trump. This would be an example of that. 3) If Sanders hadn't endorsed her he would have been effectively blamed for her loss. Don't get me wrong many, including Hillary, tried to blame her. But those attacks didn't stick because of what Sander did. And it was crazy important that Hillary be blamed for her loss and not Sanders. If Sanders were effectively blamed then DNC would have had a perfect excuse for their loss and a perfect excuse to stay the same. Regarding, "Do you really think the Dem party can be reformed, and if so, how long will that take?" Yes I do and the key is getting the nominee of the party. They pick the chair of the party who pick the people under them who pick the people under them and so on. The party nominee is giving crazy power to practically unilaterally reform the party. This is an example of the type of power they have. https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=91226631 To be fair they went back on this specifically to benefit Hillary in her run but it gives you an idea of the type of power the nominee has. The reason the "democratic" party is certain to remain a dumpster fire until at least 2020 is because Hillary "won" the nomination. If it's possible to reform the party it would certainly take far less time then building a 3rd party in our system (which I consider to be impossible at the moment). Regarding, "How much time does this planet have before climate change destroys the human race?" I don't know. Some days I hope it won't happen for a long time. Some days not so much. Regarding, "superdelegates" I feel like they are overblown a bit. Don't get me wrong they suck. Don't get me wrong they are their to tip the scales. But they aren't really there for the reason some like to think they are. They are not there to overthrow the will of the voters. They are there to "frame" the election. There are there so that, for example, when Sanders and Hillary were neck and neck early in 2016 the corporate media could put up numbers including the superdelegates to make it look like Hillary was crushing him and the inevitable winner. They are not there to overthrow the will of the voters. I fucking dare them to give the nomination to the person with less pledged delegates. I'm of the belief that the "democratic" party isn't going anywhere anytime soon but that would change overnight if tried to pull that shit. The establishment is corrupt but they are not stupid and that would be stupid of them. Let them do it. It wouldn't be ideal but if leads to a destruction of the party then it would hardly be a total loss. Sorry if that was long. And sorry if repeated myself. I feel like a talking point machine at times because I just try to address points.
    1
  11678.  Paco Rodriguez  Seriously, are you even a little bit embarrassed to be you? When I think someone is stupid and incoherent I ridicule them or ignore them like I'm doing with you. I don't try and engage them intelligently like you are trying to do for reasons that should be obvious. You apparently think I'm incoherent (because you are stupid and have comprehension issues, not because I'm actually incoherent) and your response to that is "hey, let's talk," which is par for the course because nothing you do or say is intelligent or rational. You are stupid beyond words. You are an embarrassment to the human race. The collective IQ of the world is going to up significantly the day you die. If you want me to keep trolling you I will. I figure the more time you spend talking to me the less time you will spend making the rest of the world dumber. But again... I have zero interest in engaging you intelligently you fucking twat. I'd like to think that even someone so fucking moronic as yourself could understand this. But maybe even I am underestimating just how truly dense you are.
    1
  11679.  Paco Rodriguez  LMFAO! You are too fucking stupid to understand I made no threat. This is why I engage fuckers like you at all. It sure as fuck isn't for the intelligent conversation. It's because you are funny when I'm not thinking about how you are making the world dumber with everything you say.
    1
  11680.  @Protectobot  I wrote a lot to you because you, unlike some, are someone whose opinion and thoughts I do care about. I don't need, want, or expect you to address everything I said in my short novel but am looking forward to some of your thoughts on it. Please don't let the nonsense with me and the Trumptard stop you from getting back to me.
    1
  11681.  Paco Rodriguez  So you like talking to people you think are "terrorists?"
    1
  11682.  Paco Rodriguez  Because if I were an actual terrorist you should be scared. Duh.
    1
  11683.  Paco Rodriguez  I'm not saying you can't speak you fucking moron. I'm saying you wouldn't want to if what I do is terrorism.
    1
  11684.  @Protectobot  I had forgotten about this thread. Thanks for bringing me back here. Remembering the only time I've ever been called a terrorist in my life makes me giggle. (not by you obviously) Regarding, "solutions for advancing the progressive agenda" Yeah, this is not an easy question. And there are a few different trains of thought in how is the best way to bring about real progressive change. And sadly this is another way the establishment divides and conquers the masses, even among a group made up of exclusively progressives because when progressives are fighting about tactics, even if their goals are the same, they are still divided. Regarding, "wouldn't seem to take untold years to enact" I very much understand and agree with this. It is important we start changing things now. The public has know this for a while now. There is a reason Obama won campaigning on "hope and CHANGE." Sadly we never got change, we got more of the same. And we need that change now more then ever. Regarding, "constant pressure on the local politicians..." Meh. I like Nader but I don't think this is effective. They don't care what the peasants think. They are paid not to. The politicians who are bought need to be replaced. I find no reason to think they can be worked with or pressured into anything. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5tu32CCA_Ig&t=6s
    1
  11685.  @applefarm6126  Yah
    1
  11686. Shouldn't you be watching CNN or MSNBC?
    1
  11687. Isn't bernie the guy who just voted to give billions of dollars to the military industrial complex?
    1
  11688. Bernie just enable corruption with his vote to give billions to the MIC
    1
  11689.  Ahmad Hijaz  "bot" LMFAO Are you paid for this? Is this projection?
    1
  11690.  Ahmad Hijaz  "nah" Now the only people who support him are sycophants who remind me of trump supporters.
    1
  11691. If we gave it to you you would just want something else.
    1
  11692.  @MRJBoxing608  "ur gosh darn fool" Says a moron supporting a snake oil salesmen.
    1
  11693. Actually it's stupid to defend anyone attacking force the vote, unless you don't want m4a that is.
    1
  11694. He's remaking there's something about mary. It's going to be, there's something about n@z!s
    1
  11695. Kyle has lost all my respect. We can't be friends. He's dead to me other than I'm going to vent at his betrayal.
    1
  11696. It makes sense if your goal is to have a government be as far right as humanly possible.
    1
  11697. If you actually think that you are an idiot.
    1
  11698. Did she really? I missed it. I must have been distracted by the fact that she looks like a bobblehead.
    1
  11699. Who is suppose to be the baby and who is suppose to be the bathwater in your analogy?
    1
  11700. He ran on "hope and change." Yeah he was a centrist but he was great at pretending not to be.
    1
  11701. For your sake I hope you are intentionally trying to miss the point.
    1
  11702.  @carlosatreides5653  I guess not. Too bad for you. Good luck with your cult going forward.
    1
  11703.  @carlosatreides5653  ​ Carlos Atreides Ug. I guess I will try but in all honesty if you don't already "get it" I suspect you never will. I suspect that if you were truly curious about the answer to your "gotcha" question you would have already looked at the comments and would have seen that your question has been asked and answered multiple times in this very comments section. Regarding, "In the beginning there was a big bang." The overwhelming scientific consensus is that there was a big bang in the "creation" of the universe. I put creation in quotes because it means something very specific in this context. It is talking about the known universe. It's talking about the universe in the wake of the big bang because this is the only "universe" we have any reasonable ways to measure. Scientists concede that they currently have no good ideas about how to examine what may have been before the big bang and that they may never be able to measure it. That doesn't mean the universe was "created" by the big bang and the universe very well might have been here before the big bang. You shouldn't have a problem with this concept seeing as how you likely think these things about your fake deity.... that they were here all along and don't require a creator. Maybe I'm wrong about that and feel free to correct me about that but it seems like a safe assumption. So he thinks it's possible to think the same things about the universe that you think about your god... it was always here aka eternal and there was no creator for it... it just is and has always been even if it very well may have been in a very, very different form before the big bang. Regarding, "there was no big bang" Nowhere does he even hint that he thinks there may have not been a big bang. He merely accurately says he has no idea what was BEFORE the big bang. Maybe it was a "creation event." (and even if it was that doesn't mean that god did it) Or maybe the universe was eternal. But the rather specific length of time he gives is for when the BIG BANG happened.
    1
  11704.  @carlosatreides5653  Regarding, "My "gotcha" question will never be answered on Youtube." I literally just answered your question but don't let that stop you from taking the concepts out of context. Regarding, "Let's not be arrogant." Why? I am arrogant. But at least I'm not going to tell you that you are going to burn for eternity in hellfire if you don't buy my book of bullshit. Regarding, "I'm assuming by your comments of my "fake" deity and my " cult" that you are probably a liberal." I self describe myself as a progressive. Regarding, "Most of whom have no understanding of politics, economic or religion and is a real cult." Is this your idea of not being arrogant? But I love a good... "I know you are but what am I," I just haven't heard one since grade school. Regarding, "if he believes that the universe is eternal like our creator then he is trying to disprove it. That's quite clear." You are a moron. He isn't trying to disprove god anymore then he is trying to "disprove leprechauns." If your fragile worldview can't handle the possibility that maybe, just maybe, you believe a book of bullshit written thousands of years ago when people thought sickness were actually demons that's your problem. Regarding, "It is an attempt to push the idea morality is subjective so reason your way to pedophilia as the greeks and romans and "know" there is no God just like the communists." This is seriously some of the dumbest shit I have ever read. You are exactly the type of moron that religion needs. Forgive me for not addressing this bullshit more intelligently... or don't. I honestly don't give a fuck what you think at this point. Regarding, "Well done for doing no outside research." Jesus christ are you stupid. Seriously. I am so fucking tired of you cultists.
    1
  11705.  @carlosatreides5653  Regarding, "I never said anyone would burn in hellfire." No shit sherlock. But are you really not a bible thumper? Because that is that particular book of bullshit's position. Regarding, "You are definitely a narrow sighted person." Aren't the same fucking moron who just got done saying, "Most of whom have no understanding of politics, economic or religion and is a real cult." Regarding, "Which explains your progressive leanings." Um.. yup... obviously. How can you really not realize what a hypocrite you are? Regarding, "You are the one throwing around ad hominems." But you haven't? You have zero self awareness don't you? Regarding, "You use foul language which displays your ignorance of vocabulary." Words are merely a tool we use to express an idea there simply is no better way for me to express my frustration you fucking dipshits in your cult then by using the words I do. Regarding, "Obviously you do care what I think or you wouldn't have left a 2nd comment." LMFAO. I guess maybe I should have used the word respect. I do care what you fucking dipshits think because you fucking morons are busy keeping the world from progress because of a book of fairy tale from thousands of years ago and your cult has you brainwashed. Regarding, "Finally, using the name of the deity you don't like, for whatever reason, in order to cast derision on someone." Jesus Christ. I would need to think they exist for me "not like them." I "don't like" Jesus the same way I "don't like" Zeus. Regarding, "You haven't explained the problem of consciousness by the way," The "problem of consciousness?" There is no "problem of consciousness" unless you are referring to the fact that you arguably are not conscience. And yeah... that really is a problem. The world would be better if you were.
    1
  11706. I picture him shedding his human skin to spread out in his more natural form... that of a snake.
    1
  11707. Warren earns all the scorn she receives and more.
    1
  11708. By try you must be referring to him not fighting for it even the least little bit and caving immediately to the point of appearing completely disingenuous (because it was). And if there is anything to be learned from this is that the "democratic" party is a fucking dumpster fire that has no interest in passing progressive policy. They had a fucking supermajority and they used it to pass a Republican health care plan.
    1
  11709. Ok Crypto, I guess if you want to act like a fucking idiot and imply I'm saying he should have used his fists instead of the bully pulpit which is named what is for a reason that makes sense to fucking morons. They are called LEADERS for a reason. They are suppose to lead and get people to follow them. Not say "oh well, fuck it."
    1
  11710. Why did you put "women of color" in quotes like that?
    1
  11711.  @ssllsg9439  "i asked the question FIRST," Fair enough. I happily give you this if you give me that the question is dumb for the reasons I'm giving. "unable to understand,that im simply asking you a simple question" It's a terrible question and I've told you why. "HAVE TYT EVER SAID THAT ASSANGE SHOULD BE IMPRISONED FOR LEAKING THE DOCUMENTS?" I can't answer your question. I'm not familiar with everything TYT has said. I wouldn't doubt it but can't say with certainty they have. I can say with certainty that they have smeared assange and only painted a picture the propagandists want painted. Now that I've answered your terrible question to the best of my ability do you concede that they have smeared assange? A simple yes or no will do. And the only honest answer is yes they have.
    1
  11712.  @ssllsg9439  "let me get this straight. you have not enough information nor do you have the evidence that TYT has the intention to smear assange," I have evidence that TYT has smeared assange. Why do you keep trying to deflect from that? Why wouldn't that be enough to get your interest? "you have no problem at all coming to thhe conclusion and telling others that they are?" What? I told you that I literally can't make a conclusion but did offer some speculation as that's literally all I'm capable of offering. Your question is nonsense. I can't answer it and it's unreasonable for you to be able to think I can answer it unless I can answer yes. And I concede I can't. But saying no is impossible because that would mean I'd be familiar with everything TYT has said and I try to go out of my way to avoid their BS except to call it out. And I'm calling out their smears while you deflect from them. "you have no problem at all coming to thhe conclusion and telling others that they are? how irresponsible are you????" I made no conclusion. You are just lying. How irresponsible are you? "you want to make a claim,you need to have EVIDENCE and FACTS to back it up," Not only did I make a claim but I gave evidence to back up. I even cited a TYT report. You just ignoring it isn't on me. "TYT made that ONE video criticizing assange" That video was a smear job that ironically didn't include evidence and facts to back up their BS. The irony is pretty funny really. Thanks for the laugh. "other occasion..." LMFAO. This is like if we were talking about OJ Simpson and you were like... 'but what about all the times he wasn't murdering people.'
    1
  11713.  @ssllsg9439  "wheres the evidence?" The video with lies that I gave you. "intent of smearing" I need to prove intent now? Aren't smears enough on their own? "DUDE! you lliterally said this 'TYT has smeared assange repeatedly and justified his imprisonment'" LMFAO As if that's what we were talking about. What were we actually talking about? What were we "getting straight?" What were we talking about? What did you ask multiple times? Your terrible question. And for that I can't make a conclusion on it and I can only speculation. As for the smears... yes I've made a conclusion and I've given you evidence for it. You are just hand waving it away with nonsense. "forgotten what you wrote" Did you forget what we actually talking about there? Well if not hopefully I've cleared things up for you.
    1
  11714.  @janeryan2709  TYT has smeared assange several times. For example I cite the hit job titled, "Proof Manafort CONSPIRED With WikiLeaks?" by those propagandists.
    1
  11715. How does sam think joe rogan should be punished? Spoiler alert!.... Sam wants joe censored.
    1
  11716.  @uncomfortabletruth5915  Have you not seen a chick with a dick? What sex are they?
    1
  11717.  @abidahmad6692  I'm pretty sure you are leaving out lots of other things kyle has said.
    1
  11718.  @Allpurple_reign  Let's start with the need to end TYT, head over to the syria chemical weapons attack, and finish with how corrupt the justice democrats are.
    1
  11719. If you ever said something that wasn't retarded I might die of shock.
    1
  11720. Donald trump says you are wrong.
    1
  11721. I've been a huge fan of kyle for a long time. I'd be demonstrating cult behavior if I put up with his BS. You are projecting.
    1
  11722.  @gmic56ify  "I said ANY following" You were acting like the people backing up jimmy were being cultish. It's actually the opposite. "Kyle should've just kept out of it," LMFAO. Nope. Blackmail and smears are red lines that you gotta come out against. He was right to talk but his words were terrible.
    1
  11723.  @moderatingmoderation1699  "guys are saying anything new or surprising" Kyle and mate were covering the OPCW whisteblowers when they were smeared. You are an idiot.
    1
  11724.  @moderatingmoderation1699  "cookie cutter opinions regardless of the subject they're covering." Do you need to see the other side of smears? Blackmail? Imperialism? "I was very specific that the point I'm making" I like to think my point is pretty specific even if you want to just mindlessly dismiss it. I also concede that I stopped reading your crap at exactly the point where you said the stupid shit you did. There seemed little reason to waste my time with your crap further.
    1
  11725.  @moderatingmoderation1699  btw, paragraphs! Learn about them and use them.
    1
  11726.  @seaofgreens  "You're no fan." You got one thing right at least. I used to be a fan. "all too happy to tear him down" I take no joy in this. I'm pissed and feel betrayed. "petty feud." What a nonsensical way to diminish and dismiss my legit grievances without bothering to address any points I'm making. "seems pretty uncomfortable" That's how I figure he felt when ana was exposing herself to him at work. None of this is his fault. About the only thing I think he was wrong about was for apologizing to ana for anything. "Jimmy right in that incident either" What EXACTLY do you think he was wrong about? "You've clearly taken sides" You got a second thing correct. Good for you. Why haven't you taken a side? You keeping the side of the blackmailers open? "will take anything Kyle says as disingenuous" This is just a way of nonsensically handwaving away everything I'm saying while again not saying anything of value or substance. "So yeah.... you are in the cult of Dore" The only way you could say something so nonsensical is if you are in the cult of kyle. "drama" Even you concede blackmail but then you go back to characterizing the blackmail as "drama." People such as yourself are tough to take seriously.
    1
  11727.  @giftchiposipho8967  "jimmy's gang members are like trump's cult gang members who don't want their leader to be critiqued at all" Kyles' cultist hypocritically said while demanding kyle not be critiqued at all.
    1
  11728.  @giftchiposipho8967  "no one said Kyle must not be critiqued." LMFAO You mean like no one has said jimmy must not be critiqued but you are bring that BS up aren't you. "smearing kyle" Smears are lies. I'm not saying anything untrue about kyle. You might disagree that he is a fraud like I do but we get to have opinions about such things.
    1
  11729.  @giftchiposipho8967  It's not our fault that kyle is exposing himself as a POS. That's his fault.
    1
  11730.  @giftchiposipho8967  "jimmy's cult" I've been a fan of kyle and krystal longer than I've been a fan of jimmy. If I were a cultist I'd put up with their BS... like you are doing. You are just projecting your cult behavior on me.
    1
  11731.  @giftchiposipho8967  You don't even acknowledge the substantive points I was making. You just ignore them like a cultists would.
    1
  11732. There are so many names that deserve to be on that list. I'm not sure any of them would make my top 4 and I like none of them.
    1
  11733.  @BurnEdOutOne  They are all still puppets to a certain degree in my opinion. Again... I think they all suck.
    1
  11734. Sorry not sorry if the truth hurts and Sanders did well.
    1
  11735.  @jeroenmeester9528  Her sticking around proves she isn't a Russian asset or some shit? Seriously, this makes zero sense. Actually one of the points Hillary likes to make is that she might be a spoiler in the general and run as an independent. (actually to be fair I'm not positive Hillary has said this but some of her detractors absolutely have). Her sticking around when she has zero path to the nomination actually proves those people making that type of a point correct even if she ultimately can be trusted to not run independent in the general.
    1
  11736. Imagine thinking that pelosi cares about the people in taiwan. She doesn't even care about the people in her own country.
    1
  11737. Rocks don't make the things around them dumber. They don't deserve this.
    1
  11738. I care. Does it really matter if he is replaced by another person who corrupt and terrible?
    1
  11739. Why so much hate? She didn't support Sanders in 2016. She didn't support DAPL protestors. She voted for the 700 billion dollar budget for the department of offense. She is stabbing Sanders in the face this very moment. She is a 90s republican who was opposed to single payer til she made the political calculation. If you don't know the substantive problems we have with Warren then it's because you are willingly covering your eyes.
    1
  11740.  @JM-us3fr  Says who? You? What a lazy and pathetic way to dismiss the substantive problems I have with her. I'm guessing this "logic" is how you justified supporting Hillary in 2016. Few love and support Sanders then I do but I don't replace his judgement for my own when it comes to people and neither should you. Don't be afraid to do some thinking for yourself in the future.
    1
  11741.  @JM-us3fr  Regarding, "There's no need for insults." Sure there is. I don't only insult you... I've told you exactly why I've insulted you. Regarding, "Every politician learns to not take these things too personally." Oh... I get it. Because humans who act like robots and don't show or express emotion is better or something? Because this is suppose to be you, someone who doesn't take shit personally but is quick to tell me not to insult you? Regarding, "I want the progressive agenda to succeed, and we need allies for that; it's as simple as that." I agree with what you say, until you moronically assert that it's "as simple as that." Very few things are ever that simple. In my list of grievances that you never bother to address I tell why what Warren is doing it hurting the progressive agenda. It would really be cool if you spent a fraction of the time addressing that then just asserting that what you and her want is good for the progressive agenda. Regarding, "I don't care." Ok bud. Don't care about important things like a person's integrity. What could possibly go wrong with such miserable "logic?"
    1
  11742. I can't imagine the amount of stupid it would take to think saving 5 trillion dollars is a "silly argument."
    1
  11743. I'm sure they would just avoid your question by saying something like, "God works in mysterious ways."
    1
  11744.  @chrisgunther109  He went further than that... he defended him.
    1
  11745.  @chrisgunther109  "without actually doing the research." He is clearly doing deep dives into elon but didn't have a single thing to say about the "twitter files" or it's content but he did act like everything was all cool with twitter before elon go there. I can only wonder if it's more nefarious than ignorance at this point.
    1
  11746.  @chrisgunther109  "He makes some good points" Sure. Musk is terrible. It's low hanging fruit. But if it blinds him to reality it means he is pretty worthless to me and a pretty terrible source of info.
    1
  11747. Nope. But ana is a POS for the attempted blackmail.
    1
  11748. Pretty "psychopathic" to not realize that to some it's simply that they don't think masks work. Sure it's stupid but it's that. Don't make it into something else so that you can call people you don't like psychos.
    1
  11749.  @isaacmchale8832  Regarding, "so lack of education about Covid" It's not about "education" it's about ideology. Regarding, "Willful negligence, apathy; call it what you will." Some people legit don't think masks work. That's stupidity. Period. End of story. It's not being a "psycho," it's not "willful negligence," it's not " apathy." It's STUPIDITY. Stop trying to say it's something other than that to make it seem more nefarious than it really is.
    1
  11750.  @isaacmchale8832  Regarding, "I get where you're coming from" As do I. I get that you want to shit on them. But you have to do it right. Calling people morons should already be insulting enough. You don't need to add a layer of nefariousness to their actions like they were out deliberately trying to get people sick and when you do it makes you look as silly as them in a way. Regarding, "these people are elected officials, so they do not deserve the benefit of the doubt, or the luxury of stupidity." What you call the "luxury of stupidity" I call being intellectually honest. It's on you to show they aren't just morons when it comes to this rather than them being evil. They are clearly just morons. You don't embrace getting covid to trigger the left. Not even them.
    1
  11751.  @LBizKid04  regarding, "Give me one specific claim, with a valid primary source." Forgive me for being lazy as I just don't care enough about this conversation to be specific but the fact of the matter is that, "The gods have lived on earth in the likeness of men," was a common saying among ancient pagans for a reason. That reason being they thought gods were fucking humans. Regarding, "Why is it hard to believe that certain rules are for specific times?" We are talking about moral law and not the rules of baseball right? Is this how you rationalize the bible's position on slavery? It was a different time? Regarding, "Have you done the research to check it out," I honestly don't give a flying fuck about the mixed clothes shit and have done zero research into that specific topic. I prefer to stick with what I think are big issues... issues like the bible on slavery, or the god of the bible being a mass murderer. When it comes to the "little shit" which the mixed clothes things is, I prefer the bible's take on shellfish because I find if funny that the bible cares more about making sure people didn't eat shellfish then it cares about making clear that slavery is abhorrent and wrong like a legit holy book would. Regarding, "Wow, the slavery thing again." Yup. That slavery thing again. It never goes away and I'll never let it go as long as your book of bullshit continues to say what it does on slavery. Regarding, "are you asserting the slavery in the Bible is the same as, say, slavery that happened in America?" Not "the same" but the differences between the two is a pathetic rationalization to try and justify your book of bullshit's take on slavery. There is no context where saying, "you may buy male and female slaves from among the nations that are around you" is ok like it does in the bible and I want to think you would have no trouble agreeing with this if it were not for your cult.
    1
  11752.  @LBizKid04  yeah... I never thought I was conversing with a serious person and you proved me correct with your only example of strawmanning being about 2 fabrics... as if any serious person really gives a shit about that or think it's important. But I'm sure that your not addressing my points about slavery in the bible (which actually is important) is waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay different right?
    1
  11753. Not really. It's more a natural and predictable result of understanding the world in which you live.
    1
  11754. Regarding, "He was in the terrorist's backyard" Don't kid yourself. Seth is the terrorist. He's the foreign invader.
    1
  11755. Did the dislikes hurt your feelings? Are you going to be ok?
    1
  11756. Warmongers like TYT are not progressives.
    1
  11757. No offense but you are a moron. Or be offended. I'd be fine with that as well.
    1
  11758. I seriously do not care about term limits. They are not the problem. The problem is money in politics. If politicians were not selling their soul you wouldn't care if they stick around... like Bernie Sanders. Big money doesn't have a problem with term limits as there are plenty of up and comers willing to sell their soul. Your "solution" only serves to increase the rate the revolving door turns, nothing more. Forget about term limits and focus on getting money out of politics.
    1
  11759.  @TurtleTimeVoiceOvers  No. I'm pointing out that the solution you are suggesting isn't actually a solution while the thing you weren't talking about, even if you do care about it, is. Term limits is a terrible no good solution to the problem you ultimately care about addressing. You should be focusing on getting money out of politics and not on term limits which, for the reasons give, isn't an answer. That's great that you care about getting money out of politics. You should. And it should be the focus of your comment. That's my point.
    1
  11760.  @TurtleTimeVoiceOvers  Regarding, "Control freak much?" I find this kind of funny really considering how defensive you have gotten about my offering a dissenting opinion to yours while offering logical reasons for my opinion. Regarding, "rather than what I got out of it which caused me to comment?" Your comment is wrong. The solution you are offering is wrong. It's not a solution. And it is a common talking point in progressive circles as a solution when it's not and that's why I'm trying to address it with you. I'm trying to give you something to think about so that maybe next time you will leave the terrible point out and focus on the real solution. A solution that, while it is repeated constantly, is repeated for good reason. Regarding, "Yourself excluded, if you even are progressive which I highly doubt from the flavor of your bossy sarcastic replies." I don't know if you've noticed but progressives have been getting stomped on for quite a while and as a progressive (whether or not you want to agree with that or not) is pretty fucking tiresome. I live in a world with paid trolls and where politicians like hillary and biden are considered the "left." (at least by many). It's fucking tiresome and I'm exhausted by feeling like I'm living in the movie Idiocracy without the benefit of a superior president and being able to get a handjob at starbucks. I can be a real dick at times and openly admit this. But in all honesty that was absolutely not what I was trying to do with you. But I am warming up to the idea. Regarding, "It was mentioned at least three times in this video how one of the candidate’s opponents had been in Congress 30 years." So what. Get money out of politics and they won't be. There is no way they can win an election without it. Or you can just mindlessly enact term limits which does nothing to address the real problem and they are just replaced by a different corporate shill sooner while they go cash in at corporation early. Meanwhile term limits will force great progressive like sanders out of government early. Was there a problem with FDR sticking around? Cause I'm fine with it. I love long records. It gives me something to look back at and know exactly what I'm getting. I want politicians to be rewarded for good public service and be able to continue if they are doing a good job. And the corporate shills who are getting to stick around so long aren't being rewarded for good work... they (like pelosi and others like her) are being rewarded for selling out to big money. Hopefully I've given you something to think about. And if I've failed at that then, whatever at this point. I've made my point. Hopefully you are receptive enough to at least consider it.
    1
  11761.  @TurtleTimeVoiceOvers  Regarding, "Being a member of Congress for life was not what the forefathers had in mind." One last thing before I go. The "forefathers" included lots of racist slaveowners. Stop implying they were infallible. The best part of the constitution is that it allowed itself to be changed over time because they knew they weren't perfect.
    1
  11762. Yang works for CNN. That means he should be ignored.
    1
  11763.  @sokacsavok  Not really. I read it all. But my heart wasn't really in it after that.
    1
  11764. So you care more about a label than the person. Way to go. You share that trait with staunch democrats.
    1
  11765. Well the chances of the "democratic" nominee being progressive increase if you vote in the primary for the most progressive candidate you can find. The party is not going to magically change on their own after all. And if you are not happy with their nominee then by all means vote for someone else in the general. You owe them nothing. But to say, "I’ve personally already decided that I won’t be voting for any democrat any more," demonstrates that it doesn't even matter how progressive the person is. I hope that this was just hyperbole. Support progressives... even progressives that run as democrats. They can be hard to find but I assure you they do exist.
    1
  11766. Regarding, "That already happened in 2016." You have to be more specific here. I am not sure what you are referring to. Regarding, "I’ll vote for a progressive but I won’t hold my breath on the democrats." It is not about "holding your breathe." It is about keeping an open mind. Your original statement demonstrates a closed mind... even if there is a progressive democrat to support. Regarding, "So yes the democrats already lost my vote" Again... this demonstrates a closed mind. I'm not saying you should be voting for a democrat. I'm saying you should not be closing your mind to the possibility. There are progressives who are choosing to stay in the party to try and change them and make them better even if they are hard to find. I think you should at least be keeping an open mind and be willing to support them when you can. That is very different than saying you need to be supporting any or every dem that comes along. You absolutely shouldn't be supporting corporate dems. But you need to be making a distinction between the two and lot lumping them all in together. Broad based generalization is lazy thinking. Regarding, "need to work much harder than they’re currently doing to get my vote." The party in general doesn't deserve your vote but that doesn't mean you can't do things to make them better and make them more deserving of your vote. They are not going to magically change all on their own. Like I said you should be voting in the "democratic" primary for the most progressive candidate you can find. That demonstrates a clear message to the party that 1) you are going to be voting and are not just apathetic and 2) you want progressive policies and 3) you are going to fight for progressive policies. That is NOT a vote to put someone in office. That is a vote to try and shape the party and make them better because just bitching about how much they suck doesn't have the effect you want. Then in the general election you go right ahead and vote your conscience. Just because you voted in their primary does not mean you, in any way shape or form owe them anything in the general election. And if you want to vote for a 3rd party candidate you go right ahead. I happily voted for Jill Stein in the general in 2016. Unfortunately I didn't vote in the primary because, at that moment I was moving across the country... not because I didn't want to. Peace.
    1
  11767. Yes I am long winded. Regarding, "You can call me close minded if you want, i don’t agree." Your original statement is, "I’ve personally already decided that I won’t be voting for any democrat any more." You really do not understand why that is close minded? Seriously? I have never in my life voted for a republican. I have also never said, "I've personally already decided that I won't be voting for a republican" because the difference is having a closed mind versus having an open mind. Regarding, "I’m referring to the 2016 election that was rigged against the progressive candidate..." Ok. Yup. It was rigged. It was wrong. It was fucked up. How they purged voters in the primary. How they stacked the deck. It was all really fucked up. You know why they do it? Because they KNOW how important the primary is. They don't let independents vote because they don't want them to vote. So what do you want to do? Do you really want to do what the powers that be want you to do and not vote? Or are you going to tell them to fuck off and do what they don't want you to do? The establishment doesn't want you to vote in their primary. Consider that before you willingly give them what they want.
    1
  11768. Ryan regarding, "I don’t disagree on voting for progressives" And there are progressives who are still fighting for the soul of the democratic party even if they are few and far between. They deserve your support in my opinion. Your original statement suggests they are not going to get it. Regarding, "I disagree the Democratic Party is progressive" I have never claimed the party is progressive. In general they absolutely are not. The party is a dumpster fire. You don't need to tell me the ways they suck. I'd agree. This isn't about what the party as a whole is. It is about how to make the party better and why you shouldn't be writing off candidates before you even know what their names or policy positions. Regarding, "I have already made up my mind based on the facts" You can make all the claims you want about caring about facts but you don't even have a name. That is a pretty important fact that you should be considering but demonstrate it is not at all important to you. Regarding, "tell the Democratic Party to open its mind towards progressives" I do. By voting for progressives in the primaries and I could use some help. Stomping your feet doesn't have the same effect as supporting progressives... even progressives who have the audacity to try and work to make the party better than they are.
    1
  11769. Ryan regarding, "To the people fighting for the soul of the party, good luck." Yup. Seems they are fucked. They get to fight an uphill battle against a rigged system and they can't even get the support of people who consider themselves progressive. It seems to me that you care more about punishing a party that you are pissed at. Don't get me wrong you are correct to pissed. I know I am. But you are just stomping your feet. You are not fighting for change. You are just hoping it happens without you and then should it happen you will come along for the ride. If they day comes I hope you fuck off. You don't deserve change if you aren't willing to fight for it.
    1
  11770. We agree the party, in general, fucking sucks. We agree the game is rigged against progressives. The problem I have with your original statement is that it implies defeat without fight. The fight for the soul of the party is not over even if we are currently losing. No they do not deserve your vote. Nobody deserves your vote. But I'm sick and tired of people who care about party labels more than people. Your notion that you are not going to support any democrat is just as messed up as people that think you need to be supporting any and every dem. Everyone needs to be in the middle. People need to be judging candidates based on the person and not the party they are affiliated with. If you think me expressing a heart felt opinion is "shaming you" then so be it. I want your help. If I'm not going to get then I hope you feel shame about it. I think you should. But if you want to chip in and help it would be greatly appreciated going forward. Shit isn't going to change all by itself. We need to make it happen.
    1
  11771. Your original statement is not reflecting on the past.... it is projecting into the future.
    1
  11772. If you want to talk about the past then talk about the past. Seems we don't disagree on the past. But that wasn't about the past even if it is influenced by the past. You are making determinations in the future that indicate a closed mind and white flag of surrender. It seems pretty clear to me that you are going to let corporate dems win without a fight. I see no other way to interpret that statement. You leave no room for supporting progressive democrats in that statement. But whatever. I've said my piece and made my objections. Do what you will with it. Take care.
    1
  11773. Regarding, "I don’t see any chance of a progressive even being an option" There is a reason they had to rig the primary in 2016. There is going to be a reason they will be rigging the primary in 2020. It is because there is going to be a progressive option. You know why they purged progressives in the party? It is because there were progressives to purge. Corporate dems could be purged in exactly the same way but it isn't going happen by magic. They are not going to change on their own. People like you need to force them to change. Just waiting for it to happen isn't going to happen.
    1
  11774. Regarding, "The answer isn’t voting, because that has failed." The game has changed. More of the country than every is woke to the rot in the "democratic" party thanks to Sanders, wikileaks and others. Is it fair? Nope. And it isn't going to be until winning. And we can beat a rigged game but we need to stand together. Regarding, "The real answer is voting for a third party." I'd like to believe this but I don't. Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton were not just 2 of the most despised politicians in the country, they were 2 of the most despised humans in the country. Still Jill Stein only got about 1 percent. So forgive me but I wholeheartedly disagree. Don't get me wrong I encourage you to build 3rd parties and support good 3rd party candidates but the best way to get the change we deserve is by taking over the "democratic" party hostile takeover style. One of the reasons why the party is going to suck until at least 2020 is because Hillary "won" the nomination. That is why there is Tom Perez who got to pick the people under him who picked the people under him. Things can change but to do it we need to win. And it isn't going to be easy. The game is rigged. The establishment has lots of dirty tricks but I think 2020 gives us the best opportunity at a getting a progressive since... since a long time. Regarding, "Parties have come and gone" Not really. And the major parties have rigged the entire system. Do you think it is fair for 3rd parties? I assure you it isn't. You are just trading in one rigged game for a different rigged game. Regarding, "it’s time for a new party that actual represent the people" I agree that we need a party that represents the people. I agree that neither major party does. But some, like myself, think the best way to get a party that actually represents the people is by taking over the "democratic" party and we could use your help. Your original statement is not only not helping but hurting that cause. You make no effort to differentiate between corporate dems and progressive dems. Regarding, "Maybe don’t judge me" Look man... I judge everyone. Not just you. And so do you. Try not to pretend otherwise. Regarding, "open your mind to agreeing a third party is necessary." There already are lots and lots of 3rd parties. They already exist. I wish the game were fair for them. I want ranked choice ballots. I want open debates. I encourage you to build these parties and work to make the game more fair. But this isn't exactly about that. Regarding, "agree to give a third party more thought" I happily voted for Jill Stein in 2016 and would do so again today if the same election were today... in a SWING STATE. So it isn't like I don't give them thought. It's just that winning is important. It isn't everything but it is really really important. That is how we actually get what we want... by winning. The easiest (not to be mistaken with easy) way for progressives to win (ESPECIALLY at the national level) is by running as a dem because, like it or not, the game is rigged in favor of major parties. I absolutely will support 3rd party candidates but I think they are rightfully plan B. Plan A is hostile takeover. But we need help. Vote in the primary. Fight to make the "democratic" party better. Fight for a progressive nominee. And if they succeed in getting a corporate shill like Biden, Harris, or Booker then I will be right beside you voting for a 3rd party candidate. But please don't, like your original post suggests, not even try to get a progressive nominee of the dem party.
    1
  11775. Regarding, "more literal than it’s intention." I don't know how else to take it. Not only do you say it but you repeat it... You say, "I personally won’t be voting for any democrats in the future," and "I agree with a hostile take over." I concede you saying both these things in the same paragraph makes no sense to me. To me if you "agree with a hostile takeover" then you would logically say things like, " I personally will only be voting for progressive democrats in the future and corporate dems can fuck off." But I guess that is just me. Regarding, "I just think that party is far past the point of hostile take over." The key to a successful hostile takeover is getting a progressive nominee. The nominee determines the chair. The chair picks the people under them. Corporate dems can be purged the same way progressives were purged. The nominee is given CRAZY power to set rules and determine the direction of the party almost unilaterally. https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=91226631 Is the type of thing the nominee can do on their own. To be fair this reform was repealed to benefit Hillary Clinton when she was running. But the point is that this shit can be done and more but to do so we need to win. Political parties care first and foremost about the people that fund their elections. Make the democratic party raise money from the people and then all of a sudden they are incentivized to care about the people and not their big money donors and corporate overloads like now. Regarding, "Maybe some individual people in the party are worth the vote," I think Justice Democrats in particular have a pretty good idea. My trust in a politician is directly correlated to how they raise their money and JDs do it right. That said, I preach the importance of individuals. Good democrats, even if they are not as many as we would like, deserve your support. Your original statement says they won't get it. Regarding, "expect my opinion of not giving my vote to corrupt people." You are right to not vote for corrupt people. You are wrong to assume 100 percent of dems are corrupt. You need to look beyond a party label and look closer at individuals. Or don't. But realize that is essentially the same as people who blindly support democrats without bothering to examine the individual more closely.
    1
  11776. Regarding, "president which has already been proven to be something that is actively blocked by the majority of the party." I say over and over that it is rigged because it is. It isn't fair. But there is reason to think 2020 will be different. Sanders barely "lost" in 2016 after starting his campaign down 50 points, lacking name recognition, and facing media blackout. In 2020 he will enter the frontrunner, enter as the most popular politician in the country, enter with the name recognition of a rockstar, and the corporate media won't be able to effectively ignore him and portray him as fringe in the same way. The game has changed. There will not be enough dirty tricks in their playbook to stop him (I think). Support from people like you would be greatly appreciated. I personally think Sanders has earned our support even if the "democratic" party has not. Regarding, "No I won’t just vote if someone appears progressive in the Democratic Party" So you do not even trust yourself to decide if someone is progressive or not? You care more about a letter after a candidate's name more than anything else? You wouldn't vote for Clinton Holmes (d) but the exact same person can get your support if they change that one letter. Clinton Holmes (g) or Clinton Holmes (i) is toooottttallly different. Regarding, "My vote has to be earned" You demonstrate that your idea of "earned" has more to do with a party label than anything else. In one breathe you essentially say your vote can't be earned by dems and then you say this. We clearly have very different ideas of what "earns" our votes. Regarding, "Your hope for me to vote democrats if they are progressive is as useless as..." So you are progressive that isn't going to support progressives. Got it. It really is too bad. We both know the game is already rigged and could use you. I'm not sure why I think we can win when we can't even get progressives to support progressives. I guess I'm just a hopeless optimist.
    1
  11777. Regarding, "it’s my opinion that it is too late for a hostile takeover." But you don't feel the need to address my logical points as to why it isn't too late? Regarding, "an already dead party" Except they are not dead. And as much as it would be nice if they did actually just die the fact of the matter is that there is ZERO reason to logically think this is going to be happening anytime soon. Wishful thinking isn't going to make this happen.
    1
  11778. LMFAO Even the people defending kyle are using shitlib tactics like this to do it. It's very telling.
    1
  11779. Which is why if she gets the chance to vote on the issue she will do it wrong. She's a fraud.
    1
  11780. They are doing their job but they don't work you or the people.
    1
  11781. Regarding, "their job is to be a proxy vote for their constituents" That's only what they want you to think. They do not work for their constituents and this bill only proves it.
    1
  11782. Bernie will tell you to vote for joe and you will likely do it.
    1
  11783. Your comment is funny because you are clearly trying to assassinate the character of Jimmy Dore. Are you always such a blatant hypocrite?
    1
  11784.  @jontomas2271  Hypocrites always have idiotic excuses for their hypocrisy.
    1
  11785.  @jontomas2271  Regarding, "There you go again. - You double down on your idiocy" So you being a hypocrite is me being an idiot? Just STFU. Or are you trying to make everyone dumber with every stupid thing you say?
    1
  11786.  @jontomas2271  Does your hypocrisy not bother you? Or do you really not understand why what you are doing is hypocritical? FYI I have zero interest in ANYTHING you have to say that isn't just an answer to these questions so do me a favor and spare me from any other drivel you want to spout. Thanks.
    1
  11787.  @jontomas2271  On second thought I actually don't care about anything you have to think or say. Just go back to being a hypocrite who is too stupid to understand what is wrong with being a hypocrite.
    1
  11788.  @jontomas2271  You have your hands full being an idiot and hypocrite. That's why I think it's best to leave you alone.
    1
  11789.  @jontomas2271  I have to admit I was pretty stupid for taking you seriously at all.
    1
  11790. Your comment is remarkably stupid.
    1
  11791. That's not how sarcasm works.
    1
  11792. She's the candidate who went to war in Iraq when Sanders was saying give peace a chance right?
    1
  11793.  @chetanjagadale509  Regarding, "she was not politician during iraq war" She was a politician before she went to go serve the MIC. Regarding, "She was a soldier, who lied into war." She was a POLITICIAN who left her job in politics temporarily to go serve the MIC. And if you only defense of her judgement is that she was duped by the MIC when Sanders saw threw their bullshit it isn't much of a defense unless you don't care about a president's judgement.
    1
  11794.  @chetanjagadale509  I could only take you less seriously if you gave your own comment a thumbs up. Oh wait... you did that already.
    1
  11795.  @chetanjagadale509  "In 2002, Gabbard was elected to the Hawaii House of Representatives." This was before she went to go serve and enable the MIC personally was it not? It's fine though... because she sucked into it. So it's cool. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tulsi_Gabbard
    1
  11796.  @chetanjagadale509  One last thing regarding, "she was medic" So what. She could have been a medic for the red cross. She CHOSE to be a medic for the MIC. She still collects a check from the MIC this VERY DAY.
    1
  11797.  @chetanjagadale509  Regarding, "no one knew that the Iraq war was lie" I did, and so did Bernie.
    1
  11798.  @joshbell5387  Regarding, "Why the Fuck do you think she goes hard after these pointless wars?" For the same reason warmonger like John McCain opposed torture and a demon like Dick Cheney supported gay marriage... personal experience. People with actual great judgement don't need it to come to the obvious correct positions. Tulsi shouldn't need to go to war to understand that war is terrible. And "your reasoning skills need a little work" when you don't understand obvious truths like this. We are picking a commander in chief. Judgement is important. They type of judgement that might prevent someone from going to serve in a terrible war based on lies. And yeah... she was lied to. But some realized it at the time.
    1
  11799. I doubt you ever had it. And by it I mean sanity.
    1
  11800.  @edc3743  LMFAO. I have a brain. Do you? Not that I care at this point.
    1
  11801.  @schloops8473  Your stupidity is almost impressive somehow. Still I'm awed how someone can't understand the difference between what I can do and what I choose to do and why. Then again your lack of understanding of such an incredibly simple concept really proves my point of why I choose not to intelligently address more complicated ideas with you.
    1
  11802.  @schloops8473  I'm not going to lie I do find that funny coming from someone who has yet to say anything that isn't stupid as fuck. Thanks for the laugh dipshit.
    1
  11803.  @jocksharerock7318  "meaningless now" The US imprisons more of it's population than the rest of the world and it's not even close. Not only that but they are predominately minorities thanks to the racist policies biden has authored. Wow. Just. Wow. People are literally in jail thanks to the POS you are defending.
    1
  11804. I'm going to party like it's 1999!
    1
  11805. For the same reasons we "give a fuck" about what Trump says... yes it comes from someone who is terrible and immoral but ultimately it matters.
    1
  11806. I'm only here to call kyle a fraud and give him a thumbs down.
    1
  11807. Both major parties don't want to vote on M4A so I don't know what you are talking about.
    1
  11808. I guess Nixon should have just done that then huh?
    1
  11809. Some certainly are. Some certainly are not.
    1
  11810.  @petemavus2948  " Anyone would concede to not let Agent orange have a chance at another 4 years of MADNESS." LMFAO Trump is terrible but... there was less military spending under him.
    1
  11811.  @petemavus2948  "Anyone would concede to not let Agent orange have a chance at another 4 years of MADNESS." Biden has dep orted more people and the cages are still there.
    1
  11812.  @petemavus2948  "Anyone would concede to not let Agent orange have a chance at another 4 years of MADNESS." More people have lost their lives to cov id during bi den's administration compared to trump.
    1
  11813.  @petemavus2948  "Shows how much Bernie cared and I thank him for it." LMFAO You supported someone who is arguably worse than trump in ways that are suppose to be important to people on the left.
    1
  11814.  @petemavus2948  "He stands by his words" LMFAO Joe biden is his "good friend." That's what and who he stands by... and it isn't the peasants.
    1
  11815.  @petemavus2948  "Anyone would concede to not let Agent orange have a chance at another 4 years of MADNESS." If trump were representing the blue team he would tell you to vote for him. Bernie is blue no matter who.
    1
  11816.  @petemavus2948  "Anyone would concede to not let Agent orange have a chance at another 4 years of MADNESS." Biden has dep orted more people than tru mp did and the cag es are still there.
    1
  11817.  @petemavus2948  Biden has de port ed more people than trump. And has kept the cages.
    1
  11818.  @petemavus2948  Are you sure biden was even the "lesser evil?" Never mind the fact that he is evil but how exactly is he better than trump? Less mean tweets under biden?
    1
  11819.  @petemavus2948  " I have nothing more to say to you." LMFAO So you can't cite even a single way biden is better than trump. That's telling. And sad.
    1
  11820.  @petemavus2948  "bashing Biden whose term isn't even half through" LMFAO It's not my fault he hasn't done anything to be proud of in 2 years.
    1
  11821.  @petemavus2948  " long standing problems" That are literally getting WORSE under him. But keep pointing at the clown who isn't in office.
    1
  11822.  @petemavus2948  "Take your meds" LMFAO This is what you say when you have nothing of substance to offer. If you had any sort of substantive ways biden is doing better than trump you would give that instead. Like I said... it's telling.
    1
  11823.  @petemavus2948  "Don't you get it? I'm not engaging..." LMFAO You are doing it wrong. You are engaging. But it's clear you have nothing of substance to say.... "an enraged, demanding nut such as yourself" You only have mindless insults.
    1
  11824.  @petemavus2948  "I'm not engaging..." LMFAO Except you are.
    1
  11825.  @petemavus2948  "enraged, demanding nut such as yourself" It's just that you only have empty insults and nothing intel ligent to offer.
    1
  11826.  @petemavus2948  But it's clear you don't have anything substantive to offer... "enraged, demanding nut such as yourself" You only have mindless insults.
    1
  11827.  @petemavus2948  I can't set bar any lower for you. I'm asking for "better than trump" and still you can't get over it. I think that's why you are lashing out.
    1
  11828.  @petemavus2948  "an enraged, demanding nut such as yourself " Sorry to trigger you.
    1
  11829.  @bobbafett1849  "a Traitor" Maybe because even if trump is a complete POS they see people like you lying about him and they like it because you are so intellectually dishonest.
    1
  11830.  @bobbafett1849  "lambasted NATO" Bernie always does good when it comes to talking. But talk is cheap, especially from a politician. And all you have to offer is talk because that's all bernie has done.
    1
  11831. Imagine thinking that someone supporting israel war crimes is "anti-war."
    1
  11832.  @CM610LLL  Israel is an apartheid state who has no right to self defense... the people of palestine whose land was stolen do.
    1
  11833.  @CM610LLL  As long as israel is an apartheid state people will rightfully oppose them.
    1
  11834.  @CM610LLL  Give me liberty or give me death isn't just for white people yeah know.
    1
  11835.  @CM610LLL  "self defense" Israel is bombing hospitals, refugee camps, and ambulances. Imagine calling that "self defense," it's deeply unserious.
    1
  11836. Your good friend was busy fist bumping a murderer.
    1
  11837. She literally saved NY from giving BILLIONS of dollars to Jeff Bezos despite only being a single soul surrounded by swamp creatures. I can't take you seriously anymore.
    1
  11838.  @CMfuell  Regarding, "I give credit where credit is due" Do you? "AOC lost her progressive card," "AOC is a career politician, her voting record..." Regarding, "more and more she aligns with Pelosi" There is a pandemic. People want things done and being opposed to everything is questionable politics. Especially when even if she opposed the cares act (which I assume is what you are bitching about) it still passes easily. You want her to throw herself on her sword. She is forced to pick her battles. You want to question her decisions? Fine. But do so intelligently. Don't throw the baby out with the bath water. Don't act like a single sane soul in a sea of swamp creatures can be expected to perform miracles. Regarding, "Doing a good thing doesn't exempt you from criticism when you vote for a terrible bill that sells out your people to the oligarchs." One questionable vote on a bill that was going to pass regardless of someone's vote doesn't give you the right to mindlessly question an entire career as if that one vote represents that entire career.
    1
  11839.  @CMfuell  Regarding, "she still could not be bothered." Because you assume she need think the same way about this as you. Regarding, "she cared enough about the optics she needed to claim she did in fact vote against it," In your opinion. The average joe doesn't care about this vote the way you do. The average joe just wanted to government to do something during a crisis. Opposing the one thing of substance they were doing, even if terribly flawed, is questionable politically in world where you know corporate dems are looking for anything and everything to attack her with. Regarding, "when it doesn't even matter" Does it not matter or does it matter a lot? You need to pick a lane and stick to it rather than going for whatever you think supports your argument the best in the moment. Regarding, "I'm not sure why your sitting here making excuses for why she voted for horrible bills" You have one example. She isn't perfect but she is one of the best we have. If you can't support her then who can you support? Regarding, "why she won't call out her own leadership when they fail the voters," I think Nancy Pelosi is a straight up demon. But if I worked with her I probably wouldn't go out of my way to point it out all the time like you seem to think would be reasonable. Regarding, "I stopped caring about the individual in politics a few years back and now look solely at the record and policies." You are looking at a single vote and acting like it represents her record at large. You are acting like there were circumstances that made the vote you question questionable. We were in the midst of a pandemic. People wanted shit done even if you didn't. Regarding, "Otherwise you end up defending the undefendable" If I'm defending it it really isn't "undefendable." She still isn't taking dirty money. She still is doing far more to move the overton window to the left than you could ever dream of. She saved her state from giving billions of dollars to the richest man in world. That stuff should be talked about as part of her record too. But you ignore it and call her "undefendable." People aren't perfect. Don't act like it's reasonable to think they should be. Joe Biden is a terrible person. Attack him, not imperfect decent people like AOC.
    1
  11840. strong regarding, "Bernie chose to break his promise to us that he would not concede until the convention." Sander fought and campaigned while all the peasants got to vote. Isn't that what we are suppose to care about? Aren't we the side that cares about the people voting and not the superdelegates and party insiders? He "lost." No the game wasn't fair but ultimately Hillary had more pledged delegates than he did. He can't lobby for superdelegates before the convention and then credibly call for them going away. Regarding, "not addressing the election fraud, the purging of registered Dems, & now the unending stream of shady dealings that are revealed everyday, has left him looking very compromised." I don't need Bernie Sanders to tell me that he got fucked over because I know he did. And the people that still claim the primary was fair are not all of a sudden going to see the light and suddenly realize how fucking unfair things are if Bernie comes out and cries about the rigged process. Americans fucking hate whiners even when their whining is justified. One of the reasons he is currently the most popular politician in the country is because he got fucked over and still acted like the class act he is. Him crying about how unfair the process is would have CHANGED NOTHING, and at great cost. Sanders is smarter than that. Regarding, "He's not as believable as he was last year, as it's hard to comprehend his silence on the increasing dirt being exposed that is/was done by Dems." He is the least important person to bitch about him being fucked over. There is no one that is in a more biased position than him because it was him getting fucked over. Hillary as well with her whining. Even Hillary supporters had an impossible time justifying their fallen queens actions on her blame everyone but herself book tour. The politicians are the wrong people to be talking about how the process affects them. That is for us to talk about. They are OUR votes after all. Regarding, "Being associated with Dems will be poison" The party fucking sucks but if I were a gambling man, and I am, I would be willing to be the house that the democratic nominee wins the presidency in 2020. That means that what is important is who that nominee is. It needs to be a progressive like Sanders and not a corporate stooge like Harris, Booker, or Biden. Regarding, "going Green" I identify as with the Green party far more than any other party. But winning is important even if it isn't everything. And Jill Stein got about 1 percent in 2016 therefor I think this is a terrible plan.
    1
  11841. G Paltrow's probably already done it. If she hasn't don't give her ideas.
    1
  11842. If she is going to stay long enough to lose her home state she is willing to sabotage til the convention I think.
    1
  11843. Don't underestimate the deep sleep some are in.
    1
  11844. While I understand where you are coming from... the girl who died wasn't an adult. She was a child who was being taught by a moron.
    1
  11845. It's not inevitable. Self defeating attitudes are self defeating.
    1
  11846. Know what the words you are using mean in advance to avoid making an ass of yourself in the future.
    1
  11847. "you think all the climate change fear is real and they don’t care" Yup. This. They are getting rich enough to insulate themselves. They can always move when coasts flood.
    1
  11848.  @6milepete888  So you are going to just completely ignore my answer? You need ways Sanders only helps blacks? You are going to claim to speak for all blacks? As if they are a monolith? You are impossible to take seriously.
    1
  11849.  @6milepete888  I hope for your sake you are just a paid troll and aren't actually as dense as you seem.
    1
  11850.  @n0wheregrrl  Regarding, "if it becomes clear she can't win, she can drop out, endorse him" Let's hope this happens before too much damage has been done. Before too many delegates that would have gone to sanders have gone to her. Because despite, "request that votes go to him" that would only apply to future votes and delegates. The votes and delegates that should would have taken from sanders are gone and lost forever and that can very well be a game changer in an election cycle that is going to be a fucking war and every delegate and vote matters. Regarding, "that also sounded "crazy" back when Bernie was basically unknown" Bernie ran because their was no progressive voice in 2016. He had the entire wing of the progressive vote all to himself and if he didn't talk about progressive values no one would. You may as well be comparing apples and oranges as the two situations are clearly very different.
    1
  11851.  @n0wheregrrl  Regarding, "She's BETTER." Bernie Sanders had the stones to oppose the Iraq war for all the right reasons in the wake of 9-11 while Tulsi was enabling the MIC personally.
    1
  11852.  @johnl4309  Regarding, "We need to be careful of this whole progressive vote splitting narrative." It's not "narrative." It's reality. If you don't think vote splitting is a real thing and can be a game changer consider how 2016 might have played out differently had biden run. He would have split corporate dem votes with hillary and we would likely have President Sanders.
    1
  11853.  @cupiduspacis4209  Regarding, "whether delegates are transferable to another candidate when a candidate drops out" Let me do my best to try and explain this. Then I'll try to look for a source to back it up. I'm confident wikipedia has all the info to back me up. Candidates earn pledged delegates for how they perform in primaries and caucuses. Those pledged delegates are NOT transferable and must vote for their candidate to which they were pledged on the first ballot. At least according to the rules. How able they are to break the rules exactly I'm not exactly sure offhand. There are also superdelegates who get to do whatever the fuck they want. They suck my nuts and the irony of them being part of the "democratic" primary isn't lost on me. As progressives we must understand who controls the power and must be making a concerted effort to make sure we win on the first ballot. That's how we certainly win and ensure we don't get fucked over. If it goes to a second ballot and/or we are trying to make contingency plans about a second ballot we are almost certainly fucked. The establishment will almost certainly make sure that a corporate shill gets the nomination if it goes to a second ballot which, at that point becomes a real free-for-all and mess. At that point delegates can switch sides and pretty much do whatever they want. While in theory progressives could pool their delegates at that point you would be wise to think it won't happen as we would feel the full force of the machine on our throats. The best strategy is to make sure it never gets to this. We already have the most popular politician in the country, with the most name recognition, whose record is so long and consistent there can be no question about his positions and priorities so there is no reason for us to be fighting ourselves. We should be supporting the obvious choice and making sure he gets all the pledged delegates he needs, and more.
    1
  11854.  @cupiduspacis4209  I'm not going to lie I'm not reading this but if you are looking to check my understanding this is where I'd start if I were you. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_primary
    1
  11855.  @worldwidehappiness  Regarding, "Why would a person run... " People run for lots and lots and lots of different reasons and lots of those reasons have nothing to do with their political positions. Some people run for good reasons: like because they care about people and are trying to improve lives, and some people run for downright terrible reasons including controlled opposition and to benefit themselves personally. That would include benefiting themselves financially (Trump comes to mind), to stroke their ego (Biden comes to mind), or even just so that they might get laid more (Weiner comes to mind). Regarding, "Regarding $15 minimum wage - that's only needed if there's no UBI to supplement wages." How close do you think the US is to implementing UBI? Meanwhile we already have a minimum wage that really needs to go up and has widespread public support for that proposed increase already. I honestly can't take you and the things you say seriously. You may as well be controlled opposition to real change or at the very least are a useful idiot for that purpose.
    1
  11856.  @n0wheregrrl  Regarding, "If only you knew how astonishingly like a Hillbot you sound." Really? I voted for Jill Stein in the general in 2016 IN A SWING STATE and you think I sound like a Hillbot? If you think that you seriously need to think deeper about the things I'm saying because that's asinine and lazy thinking. Let me see if I can help you with that. First let's talk about motive. I'm trying to get a progressive in the WH. That's where I'm coming from. Does that sound like a Hillbot to you? It's not even about a specific progressive (at least not originally)... it's about getting A progressive there. That's my focus and that's my goal. That's where everything I'm saying originates from. Don't get me wrong, it does become about a specific progressive for logical reasons I've only started to touch upon, but I haven't even begun to go balls deep about the reasons why I think Sanders is the guy and Tulsi isn't because that's not the point I was really trying to make. I was originally just trying to talk about the legit dangers and pitfalls of splitting the progressive vote because it's a real thing that we as progressives need to acknowledge, take seriously, and not pretend doesn't exist. We don't get to just pass off our pledged delegates to one another, at least not on the first ballot, the one we really need to win, so let's not act like we can shall we? Another aspect of politics that is absolutely real and we must consider and be aware of is momentum. It's important. There is a reason the corporate media tried to paint hillary as inevitable from day one and is doing so again with biden... because they know momentum is important, real, and they were trying to use it and manipulate it. In 2016 Hillary Clinton won the first primary, Iowa with 49.8 to Sanders 49.6. That 0.2 difference is so much more important than the single delegate lost (or whatever the exact number may be) because of how it allowed the corporate media to frame the election going forward. In the week until the second primary every article written all got to read "Hillary Clinton WINS! It's already over. May as well not vote." as opposed to "Sanders squeaks out win, Hillary Clinton still leads all delegates (because we are going to wrongly include superdelegates in the total) by a mile." It impacted literally every other primary in ways that had nothing to do with a handful of voters difference. It was 0.2, in a tiny fucking state. But it fucking matters and affects everything that follows it. So if you correctly agree with me that that 0.2 is important then what about Tulsi's decision to run? Because she certainly is going to be taking that many voters from Sanders and then some and then some and then some and then some and then some... from him. If she weren't running what would you be doing? Supporting Sanders. These candidates don't operate in a vacuum. They affect the people around them. And my issue on this has far less to do with you and your decision, but it's pretty much my biggest problem with Tulsi at the moment. I think it demonstrates bad terrible judgement. Nina Turner is a progressive I love. I can't think of anything bad to say about her. I think she would be a great president. But if she decided to run against Sanders in 2020 I'd be pissed about it for the reasons I'm pissed at Tulsi and Warren. I trashed the shit out of Warren for her decision to run (and more but that's another story). Those arguments and my objections to her running didn't just go away when someone I like SIGNIFICANTLY more like Tulsi was making the exact same mistake in my opinion. Regarding, "We must all unite" Yeah. I am saying this. And I'm not just saying it I'm telling you why it's obviously a good idea. Do you want to win? Do you want a progressive in the WH like I do? Because unity is how we get there. I've said it before but it's worth repeating... we know the game isn't fair already. We really shouldn't be handicapping ourselves like this. We should unite. If you think that makes me a hillbot and you can't tell why my logical arguments are different than the shit they do/did... well whatever. That's very hillbot of you because it's really dumb. Regarding, "We must all unite behind [pre-selected candidate]" We can debate about who that candidate should be even thou I think the answer to that is obvious but it's honestly not about that. It's about the fact that unity gives us the best chance to win. And we really need to win. This country needs us to win. Regarding, "no trying to delve up the distant past" Tulsi is so fucking young there honestly is no "distant past" in regards to her unless we go back to her high school days. I brought up the Iraq war, so distant we are still there, and gay rights because she worked with people (not her personally as far as I know to be clear but that doesn't make this fact ok to me) involved in conversion therapy. A particularly offensive and repulsive practice. And I love the "distant past." I love calling Hillary a "goldwater girl." I'm of the belief that people don't really change and that when they show you who they are we should believe them. I love Sanders in part because of his "distant past." It demonstrates that he is a man of principle and convictions. Regarding, "while ignoring the present" I guess I'm ignoring the present good deeds of Sanders forcing Amazon to raise their minimum wage, the fact that medicare for all is supported by a majority of REPUBLICANS because of him, and more because, again, it really isn't about him to me. I'm only glossing over their differences because you keep insisting on going there and I try to address direct points. Or, were you just referring to, "calling out the Venezuela situation for what it was when Bernie was still parroting right-wing neoliberal talking points about it." Like this was some great point that I was ignoring. You are talking about rhetoric, nothing more. Or do you have fear that Sanders is going to go invade Venezuela or some shit? Because that would be a big deal (a wrong conclusion, but it would be a big deal). Or how exactly do you think they would substantively be different when it came to action as commander in chief in regards to Venezuela? Because while words aren't unimportant, actions are what really matters and I have no good reason to think their actions would be significantly different here. Both would stay the fuck out of Venezuela. That's hardly a good reason to think Tulsi is way better.
    1
  11857.  @cupiduspacis4209  Regarding, "I think having another unequivocal advocate of key progressive policies, like Tulsi, providing solidarity against the slew of corporate Democrats, at least for a while, is a positive." I have no question that there are aspects of Tulsi running that will be positive. As for whether or not those positives will outweigh the negatives remains to be seen. I am concerned it won't in an election with no second chances and of epic importance but hope to be proven wrong. Time will tell.
    1
  11858.  @n0wheregrrl  Regarding, "Do you expect anyone to actually read through all of that shit every time?" Some of us have more to say than can fit in a children's book. If you don't want to read it then don't. I really wish you wouldn't and it's more for others at this point who are capable of thinking about the things I say more logically. Regarding, "when you tell me to vote out of fear and not principle" Except I'm not asking you to sacrifice your principles. Even according to you you would be voting for Sanders if Tulsi wasn't running. And that's going to be the case for almost all of her supporters. It's not like she's pulling people away from biden. Do you not think Sanders is a progressive? Because if you think that then you would be sacrificing your principles. But you do. You just think Tulsi's a little better in your opinion. There's a world of difference between sacrificing your principles and voting strategically. Let's say the general in 2020 has Bernie versus Trump for the major parties and it looks to be close. Tulsi feels fucked over and runs 3rd party, she's polling at 5 percent. You still think she's better but you still like Sanders, just not as much. Would voting for Sanders be sacrificing your principles in that scenario? Or do you at least understand on some level that voting strategically is merely the result of being able to use logic and reason? That it's not all about fear but about being smart and trying to make the most out of the single vote you get? Do you at least understand how her running in that scenario would be splitting the vote? Because the concept isn't just a fantasy to be dismissed outright? Regarding, "If you like her "significantly more,"" Read it again. I clearly state that I like Tulsi significantly more in addition to all the blatantly obvious context around it. Regarding, "so was MOST of the Democratic party." You know who wasn't? Sanders. He has been advocating for gay rights as long as tulsi has been alive because that's what a leader does even when they know it's not popular. Regarding, "Her voting record is unimpeachable." Her voting record on the issue is great. It's why I never use those words. I may use more words than you like but I try to pick them carefully. I respect that her voting record on the issue is great. Still I question her judgement because of her history on the topic. There is a reason I say things like, "when someone tells you who they are, listen" and "people don't really change." Do you disagree with that? Or do you just not want to admit that her history (not voting record) is questionable. Because it is. It leads me to think she thinks they are "lesser than" but deserve the same rights. Again... I'm so not trying to make this about who is better. This isn't about that. But I'm going to respond if you keep trying to turn it into that. Regarding, " it's called "manufacturing consent."" Really? You think Bernie is manufacturing consent for war with venezuela? God damn. It feels like you are just trying to reverse engineer things to say at this point. Regarding, "Tulsi, by contrast, doesn't fall for their bullshit ... like, EVER." She. Went. To. War. But that was 10 years ago... aka ancient history.
    1
  11859.  @n0wheregrrl  Regarding, "it's a sign of a poor writer" 1) I don't claim to be a good writer. 2) I don't give a shit about your opinion of my writing skills. 3) This topic is mere pathetic deflection from the topic at hand. Sadly I'm dumb enough to take the bait (that parts on me). 4) This is funny coming from someone who demonstrates their comprehension skills suck. 5) I have lots I'd like to say. Significantly more than I'm doing and you are already whining about. So you're welcome for not including it all. Regarding, "Biden also pulls people from Harris, and so on." Yes. They do. Which is pretty much my whole fucking point. These candidates don't operate in a vacuum. They affect each other and how they affect each other is quite predictable really. You know this. I know you do. You just don't want to admit it or talk about it because deep down on some level you realize that Tulsi is absolutely pulling support away from Sanders. But you can't say it because then you might have to acknowledge how this might be considered bad judgement on her part and/or how it might be a major problem and/or obstacle to getting a progressive president. When I really wish you could just fucking admit the obvious and move on to why you are fine with it like a far more intellectually honest person would. Like "end the wars" did because that's what reason looks like. Then at least you would not be destroying my faith in the left like you are doing and I might salvage a tiny amount of respect for you. You are suppose to be on the smart side but I'm not sure how you got here. I could go into what's different about the corporate dems and why their strategy might be what it may and why they are less concerned with splitting their vote. But that would be pretty long for your short attention span. I'll just give you a clue to one of two theories I have about this... second ballot. Regarding, "are you just going to declare that no progressive but Bernie is allowed to run?" Can you really not understand the difference between me thinking I'm king and me giving logical reasons and sound strategy based on the priority of getting a progressive president that I've made perfectly clear? Regarding, "Tulsi won't run third-party if Bernie wins the nomination. Don't be an idiot." What I was doing is called reductio ad absurdum and it is common practice even for those who don't the name of what they are doing. It often times helps morons understand concepts they can't seem to grasp otherwise. But not always obviously. I'd tell you not to be an idiot but you clearly can't help it. Regarding, "is meaningless given the man is like a million years old" Experience and consistency is meaningless? Your opinion on the matter is in the minority. So much so that you are quickly becoming irrelevant and I'm mad I've wasted so much time addressing you. Regarding, "What MATTERS is where they are now" I pretty much agree with this. But how I know where someone is now is by studying their past. I don't just blindly take people's word for it when they try to tell me where they are at this moment. Regarding, "Do you need to see Bernie's Venezuela tweet?" No. I don't. I don't pretend I think he's perfect nor can I talk intelligently about the details of Venezuela. My original question remains that you have not answered nor addressed. Do you think we would be in any danger or invading Venezuela if Sanders were commander in chief? It's a pretty basic concept and question. Regarding, "So apparently you're voting in an election happening a decade or two ago" So apparently you're dismissing history. We are going to have to agree to disagree about it's importance. I'm done addressing specifics about Sanders and Tulsi (or at least I'm going to try my best to not take the bait about this going forward). No matter how many times I say it you don't seem to grasp what I'm really trying to talk about. If you have something to say about splitting the vote (what I'm actually trying to talk about) and why it's no big deal or not a real thing I will address that at some point.
    1
  11860.  @n0wheregrrl  Regarding, "Oh my god, you are an unbelievable idiot. How can one person spew so much verbal vomit and have so little of substance to say?" The irony. Thanks for the laugh dipshit. Regarding, "it IS also literally EXACTLY the same argument Hillbots" Except it's obviously not the same argument to people with more critical thinking skills than yourself. You are dismissing the valid reasons the things they say are able to resonate with people and not separating out the bullshit they coat it in that I'm not doing. Strategic voting makes perfect sense. It's why people only tend to vote for candidates running and don't even consider writing people in if I were to use a reductio ad absurdum argument. Regarding, "I REFUSE to let that kind of thinking guide my voting decisions." In your analogy Hillary is terrible. That is why you correctly wouldn't support her. How the fuck is that even close to your thinking about Sanders and what I'm doing? Spoiler alert: it's not. This is what I do. Please feel free to tell me what you think is wrong with it and where my reasoning, strategy, and logic go off the rails so much that you think I'm being just like a Hillbot. (or don't, actually PLEASE don't, if you do I figure it will continue to be the same stupid nonsense you've been going with). Step one... and this is really, really important, it's the step that hillbots always leave out and/or try to manipulate. It's where we obviously are not fundamentally the same. First I determine for myself if I think a candidate is worthy of my support. You know the signs they have at carny rides and shit that read, "you have to be at least so tall to ride." Well I have my own sign for politicians that reads, "you have to be at least this amount of decent to get my vote." Nobody under that line gets considered. At best hillbots can be said to have their own line that reads, "better than trump" when that line needs to be SIGNIFICANTLY higher for lots of obvious reasons, and mine is. That's why my vote in 2016 was a no brainer to me. Jill Stein was the only candidate running that I thought was above that line so my decision was made for me. It only gets interesting when there is more than one candidate above the line. Then I have something to think about and consider. Then I get to think about strategy. I consider things like who I think is better AND who has the best chance to win (among other minor shit not really relevant). I have one fucking vote and I want to make it count. That's just being logical and being smart... not fear, or sacrificing principles, or the same argument as hillbots because I have step one and my line which prevents me from supporting pieces of shit. Sanders in my opinion is the better candidate. He also has the far better chance of winning so again I don't really have much to think about at the moment. You on the other hand should. Because even if you wrongly think Tulsi is a little bit better you should realize that the guy with more name recognition and more popularity, who because of the work he's done forcing the corporate media to cover him and isn't facing the same amount of media blackout as he did in 2016 while Tulsi is, has the better chance of winning. If you care about getting a progressive president that should be relevant to you even if it's not enough to get you to support Sanders over Tulsi as of right now. And it has so much more to do with Tulsi than it does about you to me. You are nothing. Tulsi is important. And it's my belief that what she is doing, despite some clear advantages that I do like and despite the fact that she is the only candidate other than Sanders who I consider to be clearly above my line at the moment, is ultimately making it more likely a corporate shill like biden gets in the white house by dividing progressive support. And that's a problem for me. That's by far my biggest problem with her at the moment. Maybe I'm getting it wrong. I sure hope I am. But none of the bullshit you have said has done anything to convince me otherwise. Regarding, "I'm so done with this." Thank you in advance for this. I have a hard time letting stupid shit go unanswered.
    1
  11861. While I agree that there is plenty of wishful thinking going around, there's tons of it considering there is going to be 10 people on stage after all, there is also good reason to think the guy born with foot in mouth disease is not going to do well.
    1
  11862.  @LisaMurphy  Meh. I don't think he's a terrible debater but I also don't think he's a good debater. He will benefit from softball questions and media spin but I also think he will be targeted by more people than just bernie. He also has so many vulnerabilities. Time will tell and there are plenty of sheep. Hopefully I'm not just being blinded by my own desire to see him fail but I really don't think he will gain any support. At best I think his polling will remain where it is.
    1
  11863.  @LisaMurphy  Regarding, "his poll numbers" Polling when done correctly is straight up science. But it's science that is easily manipulated by using terrible methodology that, for example, oversample older voters and undersample younger ones. Regarding, "Most Dems prefer Biden because they are uninformed and they don't care to inform themselves." Let's not forget the misinformed. Corporate media propaganda is effective. That's why they do it. And part of it are the people who are pissing themselves over trump and only care about him losing. They buy the bullshit that biden is the best hope. Their bubble may very well burst after they hear him talk. He's fucking terrible. We agree the public is dumb in general but still there will be plenty to realize how bad he is after he talks in my opinion. Biden and his camp are wise to have had him go into hiding. They know people don't like him the more they know and hear from him and obama memberberries only gets you so far. Time will tell. We are all only trying to make educated guesses at this point.
    1
  11864.  @LisaMurphy  Regarding, "I hope you're right." So do I. Ultimately I think it's going to difficult for this debate to be a massive game changer for anyone with so many people on one stage. Regarding, "I think there are two great candidates, Yang and Tulsi" I'm not going to lie... I think it's pretty terrible to put those 2 above a guy who has been a progressive champion for as long as those 2 have been alive. Regarding, "beat(ing) Trump" I can't tell you how not concerned about this I am. I barely give a shit about the general in all honestly. The election that matters and really is important is one ironically named the democratic primary. I think literally all 20 could beat trump (well maybe not a couple of them actually so not literally literally) as long as they are perceived to have won the primary legitimately. That was why hillary lost even thou she had millions more votes. Ultimately the difference was that people thought she cheated to get there. Don't underestimate how much hate there is for trump. Lots of his original supporters were people just willing to gamble on the unknown. Now there can be no doubt how terrible he is. I think he loses but that isn't nearly as important as who beats him.
    1
  11865.  @LisaMurphy  Regarding, "I like Bernie but Tulsi is a better candidate because she's hardcore against the war profiteering. More so than Bernie." Bernie has been preaching a message of peace for longer than Tulsi has been alive. Sadly she didn't listen to him after 9-11, stayed out of Iraq, and avoided serving the MIC personally. Don't get me wrong I'm glad she seems to have gotten the correct message from her service, but I would have respected her judgement on the topic far more if she didn't need to experience war first hand to draw the obvious conclusions from it. She is showing the same type of judgement John McCain shows on torture and gay rights... they are positions born of personal experience when they shouldn't have needed that personal experience to come to the no brainer conclusions. Regarding, "I like Yang because he's very knowledgable about business and technology. Big plus for Yang is he's not a politician. Big plus!" How did this type of "logic" work out for trump supporters? Since when did a lack of experience in politics become a good thing? He hasn't earned the right to be legitimately considered in my opinion. I require people demonstrate how they will govern before giving them the highest position in government. You have absolutely no way to know how yang will govern with any certainty whatsoever because he never has. All you have to go off is his rhetoric, which, in all honesty, is one of the absolute worst ways to think you know something about a politician. A record on the other hand tells you what you really need to know. (That and where are they getting the money for their campaign.) Regarding, "Bernie's been in D.C. for about a half century." And in all that time he has demonstrated the type of judgement I want from our next president. He's fought for politically inconvenient positions, like fighting for gay rights before it was popular, and opposing war with Iraq in the immediate wake of 9-11. Experience is a good thing to me. And I know EXACTLY what I'm getting with him because of how long he's been around and how consistent he has been on the issues. He's the no brainer option in my opinion and I'm lost as to why anyone would support anyone else... unless they are rich as fuck or a corporation.
    1
  11866.  @LisaMurphy  Regarding, "What has Bernie gotten done as a senator?" First off it's important to note that he is a lone voice of reason in a sea of swamp creatures. Sadly his power as he stands all alone could never be that great. That said he still used the little power he has quite effectively... it's why he is known as the "amendment king." Or if you want something recent how about the fact that he has pressured amazon to raise their minimum wage to 15 and hour. Or the fact that a majority of republicans support medicare for all because of how he is winning the war of ideas. Regarding, "Remember his "I'm sick of hearing about her damned emails" moment?" Yup. Clear as day. I could remember thinking... I totally fucking agree. I seriously don't give a flying fuck about her emails. How about we talk about the really important shit like war, health care, the environment, money in politics, criminal justice reform, and about a dozen other things that I did consider important at the time. It is also of note that the most damning shit about hillary and her emails had yet to come out. His answer to that question may very well have been very different had the same question been asked a couple weeks or a month, later. I don't remember exactly when the worst of the worst came out... but I do know it was AFTER he answered that question. Some of us love that he is so issues oriented. That he focuses on building support for progressive causes rather than trying to tear others down. Some of us love that he wants to make it all about policy. If you want a candidate who is all about focusing on the people running against him you should be supporting trump. That's all trump does... attack. Regarding, "he also supported her in the general" Did you listen to him during the campaign? How he said over and over and over and over how dangerous he thought Trump was? That he would do anything and everything to stop trump from winning? You want to question his decision here? Ok. I get it. But try to understand how important it is that were hillary to lose that SHE be blamed for her loss... not bernie. Don't get me wrong there are plenty of people trying to blame everything other than hillary, and there have been plenty of people who have tried to blame bernie for her loss... but there's a reason those attacks don't land. There is a reason that the sane blame hillary for her loss. And that's really fucking important. If bernie didn't endorse hillary she would have absolutley been absolved of any blame for her defeat. And even thou I'd agree with you that his decision to support her was questionable at the time, I can't tell you how happy I am that most people understand that the fault was hers, and that sanders has put himself in a position to finish what he started in 2016 because he did the hard thing... yeah the hard thing. Because if you think he was happy about it you are crazy. Try to remember that Sanders was the only fucking reason hillary and company even needed to rig the game. Don't be afraid to show some appreciation for this, rather than just contempt because he didn't do everything exactly how you liked. As progressives we can disagree about tactics to achieve our goals. But just because some have different ideas about to best achieve those goals don't think they are any less progressive.
    1
  11867.  @LisaMurphy  Regarding, "the polls." Polls when done correctly is straight up science. But it's science that is easily manipulated by using terrible methodology that, for example, oversamples old people and undersamples young people. Bernie Sanders IS the most popular politician in the country and for good reason. Stop buying the bullshit establishment narrative. Regarding, "He's not going to be able to close that gap because the DNC establishment and the msm is fully backing Joe Biden." Self defeating attitudes are self defeating. And Biden is fucking terrible. The more he talks the more people don't like him and there is still lots of time for him to continue talking. Regarding, "This contest is pretty much over because the big money interests will pick the nominee this time just as they did last time." Lucky for us there is still a "democratic" primary. It's hardly fair but it does give us peasants a chance to break the wheel. Our job is to go out and support Sanders en masse so that no amount of bullshit can stop it from happening. You would be wise to help out and support him rather than divide progressive support and go elsewhere.
    1
  11868.  @LisaMurphy  I've already made the same points about polling to you. I have no understanding how you can still go there. Here's a video you should watch. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XRFBqP00YqA&t=419s
    1
  11869.  @LisaMurphy  Regarding, "I'm not a progressive, I'm independent. Ever heard of us? We make up more than a third of the voters." Do you think I'm part of the "progressive party" or some shit? I'm obviously an independent as well. Holy shit is this going downhill fast. Regarding, "What I'm in favor of is a viable candidate to beat Trump. Bernie is not that person" If you watched the video I gave you you would know that Bernie is currently beating trump by 12 points, a huge margin in politics. I'm addressing your "points" as I go but I'm quickly going to be quitting if this continues to be the quality of the things you say. Regarding, "all of whom are sell-outs in one form or another... Bernie is too socialist and not strong enough on the big banks" You are using the term "sell out" wrong. It doesn't mean, they do shit I don't like, like you seem to think. Bernie was one of the few that voted to keep glass stegall. He wants to bring it back. He preaches about breaking them up. And even if you think he should be doing more that doesn't make him a "sellout." And you saying so without proper evidence makes you a smear merchant and liar. Do you have evidence he, the guy not taking their money, is taking their money? Yeah... I thought so. I'm done with this at this point. I'll assume the rest of your wall of text is just as asinine. Take care.
    1
  11870. They can but they understand it is bad strategy. That would only force them to run on a 3rd party ticket and split left leaning thinking voters ensuring their defeat in the general. Their best play is to let them run as dems and rig it against them even thou I think they fail in 2020.
    1
  11871.  @voccsaycee30  "comparing Nazis to Israelis" It's a logical argument known as reductio ad absurdum. It shows why you are clueless, not why you are a nazi.
    1
  11872.  @voccsaycee30  "fucking absurd, obnoxious" More projection from you. All to try and back up your smear that they are "anti-semetic." It's what someone does when they don't have an intelligent argument to make.
    1
  11873. Is Christianity on the list? Because none have been responsible for more death than it.
    1
  11874. Pretty much if you care about getting a vaccine and will admit that what the government did helped.
    1
  11875.  @greglarson6293  Regarding, "I think we have the best outcome utilizing these large, free market companies (unethical as they are at times) to quickly and successfully develop vaccines for the virus." Does Krystal claim we shouldn't utilize the large soulless corporations or some shit? Or maybe you are just trying to mindless diminish the point krystal is making while fulling understanding it and agreeing with it. "I agree the government funding and facilitation helped" The governments actions... aka more government was better.
    1
  11876. Nope. His campaign is all paid for by the super rich. His "coalition" is white as snow and his message is nonexistent. Warren and Biden are far more likely to be the nominee.
    1
  11877. Your comments are consistent, consistently dumb.
    1
  11878. Regarding, "The "U.S." bears NO responsibility." Of course you are saying things that are idiotic. Do you ever not?
    1
  11879. Bernie didn't vote for the 700 billion dollar per year budget for the department of offense. Warren did. Bernie supported DAPL protestors. Warren ignored them. Bernie is a leader. Warren is a follower. You are an idiot. Good luck with that.
    1
  11880. Get out and vote for someone please. It's not the only election. And vote in the primary of course.
    1
  11881. But yeah, don't vote for biden, Buttigieg, or anyone like them.
    1
  11882. It's the most powerful position in the world and you are kinda dense. That is what I see.
    1
  11883. He's never been alright. And he should be uncomfortable.
    1
  11884.  @easternuniversityconferenc5488  He knows people are on to his act.
    1
  11885. It's an elite thing versus a peasant thing and not a left versus right thing. Stop being a tool for the rich and powerful who are trying to divide the peasants so that they don't take up their pitchforks like they should.
    1
  11886.  @dsweet5273  Like when he just voted to give 50 billion to "ukraine," aka the military industrial complex, instead of giving that money to help struggling americans.
    1
  11887.  @dsweet5273  Like when he tells you to vote for corrupt biden.
    1
  11888.  @dsweet5273  Like when he tells you to vote for his "goo d fr iend" joe.
    1
  11889.  @dsweet5273  Like when he went along with russiagate after literally being russiagated.
    1
  11890.  @dsweet5273  Like when he tells you to vote for a party who says that pete buttigieg won the iowa caucus.
    1
  11891.  @dsweet5273  "I take you're about 15 years old" I'm about the same age as sanders. "a very myopic world view. Just let the adults discuss politics kid." These aren't argument's it's ad hominem and nothing else. It's what children do when they don't have substantive points.
    1
  11892.  @dsweet5273  Like how sanders still blames republicans when dems have the presidency, house, and senate and can do whatever they want.
    1
  11893.  @dsweet5273  Every notice how sanders still blame republicans for everything? Even when his dems have control of everything?
    1
  11894.  @dsweet5273  FYI dems have the presidency, house, and senate if you want to know who to blame for what's wrong. Sanders will only blame republicans. Sanders will continue to vote in lockstep with corporate dems... meaning he really isn't any different than them when its time to vote and it really matters.
    1
  11895.  @rickyhits6547  "everything that's wrong" They are the same people who have made the decisions that have gotten us where we are. "Covid" Fauci funded it. "supply chains, oil/gas prices" Economic decisions and sanctions have consequences. "bigotry" Lots of them are bigots. "homelessness" LMFAO. Jimmy dore just did a great video on how to end homelessness and compares it to what we are doing instead of that. "wealth inequality" The decisions they are making continue to make this problem worse. "greedy corporations" They are all capitalists who enable those corporations. "stupidity, ignorance" The education system is bad because of them. " 😂😂😂👌" Sigh.
    1
  11896.  @thecryinglennyface166  regarding, "why the hostility" I just wanted to go back to this for a second in light of nutcase's comment. I hope that you watch South Park otherwise this isn't going to be as easy to follow but I do and always seem to find what I think to be interesting, relevant political commentary in it. In one of the recent episodes there was a school shooting. Everyone in the town just kinda blows it off and treats it like it's no big deal because they are numb to it. It's just business as usual. Sharon, one of the boys mom's, freaks out. To her it is a big deal and she doesn't understand why it isn't a big deal to everyone else. That's me... I'm Sharon in that episode. That's how I feel. This world has some crazy big problems it's facing. I'm troubled by it and I'm frustrated that so many others aren't. Whyamiretarded isn't even just a numb townsperson in that context who isn't troubled by the problems... they a person shooting up the school. They are literally busy working hard to make the world a worse place. So if you can imagine how much I might want to freak out and shake numb people out of their slumber you can only imagine how I feel about them. Sadly some people make the world worse by existing. They are one of them. Now I understand that emotion isn't the best way to win hearts and minds. There are far better ways to be persuasive but sadly I can't do that all the time. I'm no robot and I am going to be hostile with people like them. I think I have good reason for it. You can disagree with this if you like but if nothing else I wanted to give some perspective so that you can understand where the hostility comes from. I think nutcases comments towards you were ill advised, especially after our back and forth. We shouldn't lose sight of what is most persuasive in our arguments to those that can be reached and reasoned with. But (and they can correct me if they want as I don't like to speak for others) if you want to know where their hostility comes from it comes from the same place Sharon's hostility came from in that episode. We are angry. And we are frustrated and baffled why everyone else isn't as well. That's where it comes from. Again, I appreciated our back and forth. Take care. Peace.
    1
  11897.  @aaronfuentes5919  Regarding, "the only thing he could do is confront her ties to corporate, on the record" Is that all he can do? There is going to be a vote for her. Regarding, "Biden's candidate list only gets worse." The lesser evils BS with you clowns never ends. Regarding, "Worse than Tanden even." There are serial killers who are better than tanden. Stop defending this crap. Stop bootlicking. Stop excusing the inexcusable.
    1
  11898.  @aaronfuentes5919  I'm not going to lie I find it pretty unsettling that your nonsense comment about how the only thing bernie can do is can do is confront her got several thumbs up when that is clearly not the case. But apparently Sanders supporters can be just as sycophantic as trump supporters. It's pretty fucking sad for what is suppose to be the "smart" side. The world is clearly fucked.
    1
  11899.  @Richard.Atkinson  They are also defending someone guilty of sexual harassment as it was ana who exposed herself to jimmy at work.
    1
  11900. The republican leadership is nothing but terrible, but they are experienced politicians. So your comment makes zero sense to me.
    1
  11901. Bernie already told you to fall in line behind biden.
    1
  11902. You are proof that it doesn't take a brain to write a comment here.
    1
  11903. This guy is an insult to any self-respecting *human being.
    1
  11904. What is with the extra spaces?
    1
  11905. Do you really mean to tell me that you aren't impressed with a Republican health care plan? Yeah. Me neither.
    1
  11906. That's either good trolling or you are an idiot.
    1
  11907. Or make it that you can't be orange since we are offering up terrible ideas. Bernie Sanders would be a great president... because it's not about age.
    1
  11908.  @uptick888  I've supported sanders in the past. I watch in rage as the dems told everyone that pete buttigieg won the iowa caucus. I'm done making excuses for him. And the end of the day bernie will tell you to vote for biden. And you likely will.
    1
  11909.  @uptick888  "don’t feed the trolls" Trolls don't make arguments. They just make ad hominem and nothing else like you are doing.
    1
  11910.  @westonbirch4681  "You never cared about Sen Sanders" I supported him in the past and gave him money. But tell yourself whatever you want. I know you will.
    1
  11911.  @westonbirch4681  "the same fight he has faught for nearly 18 years." That's the problem. He's fighting for the party and selling out the people.
    1
  11912.  @uptick888  "has it ever occurred to you he may have had to" LMFAO Nope. I understand that it was his choice. "Use your imagination if you don’t get the drift" Has it ever occurred to you that bernie didn't have to sell out the people? Use your imagination if you need to.
    1
  11913.  @uptick888  "has it ever occurred to you he may have had to " As if bernie had to call a corrupt biden his "good friend."
    1
  11914.  @uptick888  "has it ever occurred to you he may have had to ?" I accept this type of "argument" from you as much as I'd accept it from someone trying to use it to defend trump, biden, pelosi, or any politician... I don't.
    1
  11915. "motive of why Oswald killed?" Wow... the answers to that seem transparently obvious. Littlefinger tells sansa after he kills the man who brought her to him in game of thrones.
    1
  11916. dead men tell no tails
    1
  11917. She sucks but she isn't the one who assaulted chris rock.
    1
  11918.  @ernestkhalimovii1859  "her cheating" That reflects upon her... not will.
    1
  11919.  @Nerwesta  "that's a pity" I use humor to keep me sane in a sad world. "educated on sharks" Good luck with that. I don't hate em. I'm just not looking to make friends and concede I'm too distracted by other things. But I wish you well. Peace.
    1
  11920. What BS. The truth of the matter is that the for profit private health care system would happily let your foot fall off if they can figure a way to not pay for it so they can make an extra buck. They are not in the business to provide care. They are in the business to make money. And they will cut as many corners as they can if it means their CEO can buy a bigger yacht.
    1
  11921. Blasphemy
    1
  11922. Darien regarding, "His age will be a major factor ." Why should anyone care about age? I care about policy positions and Sanders is essentially right on everything.
    1
  11923. Sharon regarding, "Bernie is in his mid-70's" Again... I don't care. Regarding, "a person that can continue what Senator Sanders has re-ignited" I consider Gabbard to be plan B but that is only if God forbid Sanders isn't healthy enough or chooses not to run. And if not her it has to be someone who keeps preaching what Sanders talks about. There is a reason his message resonated with the public.
    1
  11924. Grant regarding the Green Party. I hope the "democratic" party gives me a candidate to support next go round for Pres but if they don't I will happily vote for the Green Party again. That said I admit to being dismayed by how Jill Stein did during the last election. I mean... if she couldn't do better against Trump and Clinton then I have little hope for them going forward... not because of problems with the Green party but because I don't think much of the misinformed public who have been brainwashed into thinking they only have 2 POS parties to choose from. I had a conversation with someone. Just after I got done saying that Jill Stein was the only candidate running that I actually wanted them to win they said I was wasting my vote. Only a brainwashed sheep thinks that me voting for the only candidate I actually wanted to win would be wasting my vote. It made less than no sense to me.
    1
  11925. Darien regarding, "Bernie has a lot of great ideas" Yes. He does. And all his ideas poll exceptionally well with the public for good reason. Regarding, "so does rand Paul" Other than slashing the military and legalizing weed I have no idea what you are talking about here. Regarding, "I am against giving the federal government unlimited power over our lives." I don't know of anyone who wants that. I'm as far "left" as anyone I know but at the same time I want the military budget slashed, I don't my tax dollars going as subsidies to big oil, gas, and other corporations, I want the patriot act abolished, I want a small government that stays out of my bedroom among other "conservative" ideas. Ultimately I accept that we are going to have a government regardless so I want good government. But that is what we all think we want... it just means different things to different people. To me good government helps make sure everyone in the country has health insurance especially when I know that everyone in the country NEEDS it. There isn't a single person that can do without it so to me a good government makes sure its there especially when I know that when they do it will cost less, provide better service, and serve everyone. Some think that is "unlimited power." I very much disagree.
    1
  11926. Aitch regarding, "I don't think he could have switched to 3rd party anyway, and only got the following he did by using the Dem platform." He was absolutely correct to run as a democrat originally but after they actively worked to rig the game and it was proven from wikileaks he definitely could have run with the Green Party (Jill Stein offered him the top of the ticket) and things may have been very, very different but we will never know. Regarding, "Read WikiLeaks, vote third party, and we'll see you again soon" That's just not his style. He is determined to talk about policy and wants to run an issue oriented campaign always. It is hilarious to me that Hillary cried about him throwing mud when the opposite was obviously true. Many people are pissed that he didn't hit her harder.... there obviously was plenty for her to be attacked about. But he just wanted to talk about money in politics, single payer, raising the min wage, protecting the environment, breaking up the banks, income inequality, ect. Regarding, "Trump still would have won," I think Bernie would have won the most electoral votes but maybe not a majority. Hillary and Trump are both rightfully despised and Sanders is loved. Even people who voted for Hillary and Trump hated them most the time... they just hated their opponent more. I think that had Sanders run with Jill Stein they win. But like I said I think that should Sanders win in 2020 as a democrat that may very well be the best outcome. I could see a scenario where if Sanders wins in 2016 the establishment lets him get nothing done while in power and then after he is gone we go back to business as usual. Again should he win as a democrat he might be able to turn that pile of shit party into something useful again. I don't see the US having more than 2 major parties anytime soon and we really need at least one of them to not suck for once. Regarding, "3rd party got his bump the Dems would have had their arms twisted to take on some actual policies" They lost to Trump and they are still not going to really change. You can see the corportists fight it. They are happier to lose to Trump than let a progressive win who might upset the system that feeds them. Even supporting medicare for all is only being done for political reasons. I think the only way that party really changes is if Sanders is able to take the reigns and force them to ban corporate contributions for example. Then all of a sudden we would have a party that might care about the people instead of their big money donors. I think we have very similar ideas about what we want. Thanks for the conversation about how we might make it happen even if we disagree on some things. Sorry if I seem like a Bernie apologist. I fucking love him despite him not being perfect. He is about the only politician of power that I think is in it for the right reasons and this country desperately needs change. That is what Obama was able to win on... Change. Sadly we didn't get it and the public was willing to elect a known complete POS like Trump just because they couldn't say for sure how he might govern since he never has.
    1
  11927.  greatest dad  "codify Roe into law?" Yeah. "Somebody's been watching CNN" LMFAO Nope. And it's not something that CNN would talk about because it puts the blame at the dems. You are wasting my time. "Putin?" Are you ok? How desperate must you be to be talking about putin right now. You must have nothing intelligent to say. "🤣🤣" Ignorance is bliss.
    1
  11928.  @jeffreywillstewart  "you can't site Sam for us having a president, Congress, etc that are also about self interest. Although democrats." What? Your message is so incoherent I'm not sure what your point is but mine is that sam will tell you to vote blue no matter who regardless of how unworthy they are. Sam would tell you to vote for donald trump if trump were representing his blue team in a general. And he'd tell you you need to also because the red team is worse.
    1
  11929.  greatest dad  "you watch it." LMFAO Maybe just be quiet. You clearly have nothing intelligent to say. "That's why your saying the same thing they say on their broadcast word for word" I watch richard medhurst, revolutionary blackout, jimmy dore and others who point out how dems are failing and not codifying it into law. You are the one who watches CNN and you are an epic hypocrite about it.
    1
  11930.  @kfox420  "You made no point." I did. Your lack of understanding isn't on me. "The undemocratic activist Supreme Court" Did you describe them this way when they originally enacted roe? I'm just kidding. I know it's just hypocrisy. "to change the law" No. They would be changing their ruling. The people who have the power to change law are the president, house and senate and dems have it all. "But I get it" No you don't. "you think this is a team sport or something," I know it is. And I know that that dems are counting on you to play the game and go out and vote for them while they aren't doing anything for you. They are willing to let roe get rolled back because the only thing they care about is your vote. I don't play for either team. I call out both sides. Why don't you? "you wanna talk smack about the team you don't like" LMFAO What team do you think I play for? I've been talking smack to "greatest dad" this whole time. Are you sure you don't just have your team that you are mindlessly boot licking for? "They are both shit as far as I'm concerned." They why are you going after me for calling out one of the teams for their abhorrent behavior?
    1
  11931.  @kfox420  "They are both shit as far as I'm concerned." What do you think of sam seder? Who will forever tell you to vote blue no matter who?
    1
  11932.  @keirfarnum6811  "They need 60 votes in the Senate" No they don't. They choose to leave the filibuster in place so that they can have excuses for their failures so that people like you can pretend it's not their fault. This is type of idiocy you get when you listen to too much sam seder.
    1
  11933.  @keirfarnum6811  "We need MORE Democrats" No you don't. Dems have all the power they need to do anything they want and republicans can't stop them if they wanted. "Republicans will block everything we try to do." They can't do a damn thing if the dems didn't let them.
    1
  11934.  @Thezuule1  " it isn't a fact Dems have all the power they need to codify Roe since they just tried and the Senate couldn't get 60 votes" It's a fact that dems can get rid of the filibuster. So... you are just lying.
    1
  11935.  @thedissidentleftist6997  "Its because democrat party is many sects under one umbrella." LMFAO It's not because they are corrupt and would rather try and use the issue to run on? Oh wait... it is that. It is that they are bought and owned just like republicans are bought and owned. You fools are what happens when you listen to a propagandist like sam too much.
    1
  11936.  @Thezuule1  "they don't have the votes to do that either!" It takes 50 votes to get rid of the filibuster. "What reality are you living in?" What reality are you living in?
    1
  11937.  @Thezuule1  "they don't have the votes to do that either! What reality are you living in?" Maybe turn off propaganda like this and you won't be so terribly misinformed about the reality in which you exist.
    1
  11938.  @Thezuule1  "there are only 48 Democrats" If you can't get your facts straight then your opinions are rightfully ignored. This isn't true in my reality. Good luck with yours.
    1
  11939.  @thedissidentleftist6997  "you Republicans." LMFAO This is funny seeing as how I've never voted for a republican in my life and I'm old as dirt. Do you ever say anything that isn't laughably terrible?
    1
  11940.  @thedissidentleftist6997  You ever think about changing your name to "bootlicker" rather than "the disident leftist?" I think you should. It would be far more apt.
    1
  11941.  @thedissidentleftist6997  "It's a lame excuse as old as time" LMFAO What an apt way to describe your voting for the "lesser evil." Nevermind that it's still evil. Nevermind that you enable evil and excuse it when it's your team doing it. "Simple logic works." LMFAO How has voting for evil worked for you in the past? Is it getting it done? Or do you have a corrupt party with a demented leader? "makes republican party stronger." F the republicans. I call them out just like I call out your team. Maybe if you weren't so willing to put up with corrupt dems you might make them stronger... but you would rather spend ALL your time tearing down republicans to try and make your clowns look better by comparison. "After all I have seen republican party try literally every tactics into existence to get me to leave Democrat Party." I've had plenty of conversations like this where I call out republicans. I could imagine them saying, After all I have seen DEMOCRATS try literally every tactics into existence to get me to leave REPUBLICANS. I accept it from you as much as I do them.... I don't.
    1
  11942.  @thedissidentleftist6997  "After all you have 555 comments on this channel" Do I? How many do you have? "a serious attempt to get Democrats to switch to republican party" LMFAO Nevermind the fact that if I'm talking about republicans I only call them out for being terrible. Nevermind the fact that I'm here to try and get sam's sheep to wake up before he leads them to slaughter. Nevermind that the democratic party is terrible, and corrupt, and has all the power and isn't doing a damn thing for you.
    1
  11943.  @thedissidentleftist6997  What really makes you think you are a "dissident leftist?" Really? Bootlicking for corrupt dems? Go watch revolutionary blackout and you maybe learn what actual "dissident leftist" sound like.
    1
  11944.  @thedissidentleftist6997  "serious attempt to get Democrats to switch to republican party" I'm trying to get people like you to switch from blue no matter know propaganda like this to people who actually want to pressure the dems do good things because we know they aren't going to do it without it. Switch to richard medhurst, jimmy dore, useful idiots, glenn greenwald, the greyzone and others. But leave sam and his blue no matter who BS behind. He'd tell you to vote for trump if trump was representing team blue.
    1
  11945.  @thedissidentleftist6997  "a serious attempt to get Democrats to switch to republican party" Never do I ever say a single positive thing about republicans or their party.
    1
  11946.  @thedissidentleftist6997  "to switch to republican party" I never say a single good thing about republicans or their party. So...
    1
  11947.  @thedissidentleftist6997  If it seems like I'm promoting republicans to you it's only because you are boot licking for dems. I haven't said a single good thing about republicans but I have trashed them.
    1
  11948.  @thedissidentleftist6997  "why are you here" Because the world would be a far better place if it had less sycophants for corrupt parties like you in the world. It's likely hopeless with people like you but others can be saved.
    1
  11949.  @thedissidentleftist6997  "why are you here" Because someone needs to try and talk some sense you to and try to burst you from you bubble that is filled with nothing but establishment propaganda.
    1
  11950.  @thedissidentleftist6997  And if you wonder why I often have to repeat my messages it's because of shadowbanning and censorship, the types of things that sam is all for if it helps his team.
    1
  11951.  @moonlightfishin4113  "I guess evil really never prevails.🙂" Whatever point you are trying to make is completely lost on me.
    1
  11952.  @moonlightfishin4113  "who would have guessed? 🙄" Who would have guessed that instead of taking this opportunity to explain whatever point you were trying to make you would do this instead? I would.
    1
  11953.  @moonlightfishin4113  "who would have guessed?" What was your point? That evil prevails? That can't really be it can it? Were you wasting my time with things that literally everyone knows? Or what is your point? I'm genuinely curious how terrible it is.
    1
  11954.  @thedissidentleftist6997  "obsessed with a youtuber" LMFAO Because I use a small amount of my time calling them out? Because I think they are controlled opposition? This is the type of lazy "argument" you give when you have nothing of value to say. "Jommy Dore is a true Republican" LMFAO Shouldn't your BS be at least the slightest bit believable? Then again I'm just impressed you stopped short of calling me or jimmy a russian agent.
    1
  11955. Regarding, "I agree I should probably drop out of the race of Bernie gets her support." Seems like you do get what the problem with her is.
    1
  11956.  @elijahbowen1599  Regarding, "Me saying she has no shot to win the nomination has nothing to do with his genuine dislike of her." She is running a campaign that is getting voters that would overwhelmingly be supporting Sanders if she weren't in it. This benefits the establishment and hurts progressives. But she is running that campaign while having no path to the nomination. It makes perfect sense if you care about getting a progressive in the WH.
    1
  11957.  @jd7691  "You don't know what or who I support" This isn't about you. It's about the people who stormed the capital and they support trump. It was obviously about him. It wasn't about m4a or anything else. Don't pretend it was. Regarding, "Go watch CNN" Why would I do that?
    1
  11958.  @Attmay  I have my own ideas about what does and doesn't make someone a crook. Trump is one and it isn't even close. If you want to defend the orange clown try something else.
    1
  11959. Define "fair."
    1
  11960.  @hellfish2309  Let's say, hypothetically, I was in congress and held a deciding vote. While it might not be "fair" that this is the horse trade I might be offered I do think it is all too much how our government operates. And if the options given to me are: 1) if you vote for neera which you weren't going to do you can get a 15 minimum wage increase or 2) you can vote against neera and not get a 15 dollar minimum wage then I think my choice is clear and I trade a 15 dollar minimum wage for allowing a POS like tanden in and it's not even close. The good I'd be getting in return far, far, far, far outweighs the bad. It might not be "fair" to allow a POS like tanden in and I would hate having her in but among the things to note is that whoever gets that position is also going to suck even if they won't suck as much as tanden. It's sad and arguably "unfair" that this is the type of choice a politicians may face but it's the world we live in.
    1
  11961. Even when ana tried to blackmail him because his apology note?
    1
  11962. They gave a finger to the country too... instead of supporting someone decent.
    1
  11963.  @pooppoop7896  Watch video of him talking from 10 years ago and compare it to now when he has trouble finishing a single thought. And do so while not being a partisan hack. There is clear mental decline if you compare joe biden now and say... joe biden during his VP debate performances when he could finish a thought.
    1
  11964.  @holliscooper6081  'I exposed myself at work and was sexually harrassed by a fellow employee who had the audacity to say, 'what are doing? what is wrong with you?' to me. I was very embarrassed and it's clearly their fault.' Hollis probably.
    1
  11965.  @holliscooper6081  "She wasn't his boss at the time." She absolutely was. If you can't get you facts straight your terrible opinions are rightfully ignored.
    1
  11966. Nah. Bernie's plan is actually better than Canada and that is really saying something.
    1
  11967. He needs to make up his mind on where the fuck he stands? That is dumb even by internet comment standards. He says the same fucking things over and over. If you don't know where he stands it is only because you are not listening. He stands behind ideas and works for them. They are what is important. Not your labels.
    1
  11968. Regarding, "STFU you braindead!" Sweet irony. Are you braindead? Regarding, "Bernie needs to choose whether he is going stay with the crooked dems or work with progressives on a 3rd party." No... he doesn't. He needs to keep fighting for the ideas he has been fighting for his entire life and let people decide if they are going to work with him. Intelligent people don't care about labels like you. They care about ideas. They care about policy, priorities, and ethics. I don't care if Sanders called himself a democrat, independent, republican, martian or whatever... I care about the positions he fights for and he, as always, is fighting for the things I care about.
    1
  11969. The establishment appreciates your idiotic smears and are grateful for you doing their work for them.
    1
  11970. So you want stupid because it will help a certain party?
    1
  11971. Steve regarding, "a supposedly fair one that heavily favours one side given current trends" Fair is fair because fair doesn't care about who it helps or hurts. Currently people in voting in some of the largest states in the country (Cal, Texas, NY) have essentially meaningless votes while those that live in swing states have exceptionally meaningful votes. I just want a system where politicians would be incentivized to try and court every voter and not just a few. I don't care about the parties. Both major parties are complete garbage anyway.
    1
  11972. Steve regarding, "I'm in favor of some kind of new system neither the EC, nor the popular vote." Do you have an idea what this might be? Because, although imperfect, the closest to perfection I think we can ever get is a system where everyone gets one vote and everyones vote counts the same regardless of their political party, race, class, gender, turnons, or anything else. Are you an American? Because if you are you get exactly one vote and the most votes wins. That is simply as close to perfect as it gets and I honestly don't care what political party is perceived to benefit from it.
    1
  11973. It's like you aren't talking about a warmonger responsible for countless lives lost but you are.
    1
  11974.  @jujitsujew23  What an inappropriate response to the atrocities of war for which he is responsible. Give me a fucking break.
    1
  11975.  @jujitsujew23  Regarding, " Its exactly what your stupid comment deserved." I find this pretty funny coming from you. Regarding, "Please tell me all the atrocities that Joe Biden caused" He's a warmonger who has voted for literally every war the US government has wanted to wage including the illegal Iraqi War waged on false pretense that has lead to countless lives lost. In the age of information ignorance like yours is a choice.
    1
  11976.  @jujitsujew23  Regarding, "Please tell me all the atrocities that Joe Biden caused" Joe Biden is author of the racist crime bill that exacerbated the problem of mass incarceration destroying countless lives.
    1
  11977. Mandarich should be number one just because Barry Sanders was on the board.
    1
  11978. It would be easier for me to address what is right with her and that is nothing.
    1
  11979. Publicity stunts show lack of character.
    1
  11980.  JM 21  Regarding, "how is biden adopting a dog a public stunt" How is this not a publicity stunt? Would you have this much trouble recognizing what this is if trump were doing the exact same thing? Regarding, "is he not allowed to have pets" If that's what you think I was saying then you are tough to take serious. Do you always strawman people like this?
    1
  11981. Change? What change. "Nothing will fundamentally change." -Joe Biden
    1
  11982. F trevor noah. Free julian assange!
    1
  11983. I lost all respect for you when you said you were a trump supporter.
    1
  11984.  @mikesamra9126  No.. dear us. As the country is paying for your stupidity.
    1
  11985. So much stupid in your post. Bravo for that.
    1
  11986.  @dashx1103  "he's a good reporter" It's definitely not that.
    1
  11987.  @dashx1103  "I think it is exactly that." Even if they thought it it still wouldn't be true. He's a terrible reporter who fits right in with corporate media. "I get that a lot of people don't like him. Which is their prerogative." He's a liar. And you don't get to have an opinion about it.
    1
  11988. He's the same age as Bernie. What I'm trying to say is that his problem isn't his age, it's everything else.
    1
  11989.  @leovolont  Regarding, " you didn't hear the same thing I heard was that Bernie blew off Debate Prep and concentrated on getting all his stump speeches down to a minute or 30 seconds depending on the debate situation." Nope. I can't say I heard that Bernie blew off debate prep to try and do debate prep. Now I know you must be a paid troll but I'm going to have some fun with you. Regarding, "Do I really need a citation when I am pretty sure that if I heard it then you heard it too, right? Let's be honest with each other, right?" I have no idea what you are talking about. But I'm going to assume that you think I'm lying about something as silly as this because you are compulsive liar assuming people think like you. We don't. Some of us aren't pieces of shit. Regarding, "but again, there is nobody to the Left of Warren, right?" Um. No. Holy fuck. Are your comprehension issues really this bad? I've already answered this question and the answer was no. Regarding, "I KNOW what all the Policy Wonks say." And still you want to ignore policy. Regarding, "The Stupid Wonks are for Yang for Krise sake!" But I'm a policy wonk and I support Bernie. Do I not count? Oh wait... you said stupid wonks. I guess you are calling me a smart wonk. Thanks for that I guess. I would be more meaningful if I thought more of your opinion but that was still nice of you. Regarding, "undo the damage that Bernie does to himself" What exactly are you referring to that would require a ZILLION people to address. It sounds pretty serious. Regarding, "in the last Election his Grass Roots, probably guys, HURT him." That's probably why he closed a 60 point gap going in. Regarding, "Going door to door yelling at and insulting people for being stupid, yeah, that really helped." Aren't you the same person who just used the phrase "stupid wonks" two seconds ago? Regarding, "the best thing Bernie ever did was to Wake Up Alexandria Ocasio Cortez. SHE is now the Personification of the Progressive Movement." I can't wait for her endorsement of Bernie so that your head might explode. Regarding, "we should give him his Life Time Achievement Award" Are you always this ageist? Regarding, "If Warren does not pass him I'll hunt you down and give you 20 bucks." No you won't. And if I believed this bullshit I'd probably believe Warrens bullshit as well.
    1
  11990.  @leovolont  One more thing that I think is important... paragraphs, learn about them and use them.
    1
  11991. But Biden hasn't shown you that as well? If he hasn't you haven't been paying attention.
    1
  11992. Yes Harry, we all know how well the rich are doing.
    1
  11993. Biden gets it. He just doesn't care. Never Biden.
    1
  11994. It depends. Generally no.
    1
  11995.  B-Rye  no
    1
  11996. You would really prove your point that public schools suck balls if you said you went to public school.
    1
  11997. Clearly public schools suck because you are dumb as fuck.
    1
  11998. Because you are stupid beyond words I'm also going to point out the obvious fact that you were going be be dumb regardless of where you went to school. Teachers can only do so much and are not miracle workers. But thanks for sharing your "thoughts." Everyone who reads them, as always, is now dumber.
    1
  11999. I didn't say a single word about my life. I guess you didn't realize it and thought otherwise because you are a fucking moron who is incapable of intelligent thought.
    1
  12000.  @scruffopone3989  "Do you have Attention Deficit Disorder?" Do you? I ask because you seem incredibly distracted from what I'm saying. I'm just kidding. We both know you are just deflecting.
    1
  12001.  @scruffopone3989  "have to do with the Jan 6 riot?" Jack shit. What does your comment have to do with mine?
    1
  12002.  @scruffopone3989  "California being far more right-wing than its reputation proceeds it" You watch all of sams bullshit. Has he bothered to call out the dems in that state? Or is he too busy being mad about joe rogans free speech on MSNBC? Who lies to everyone on the regular?
    1
  12003.  @scruffopone3989  But you gotta simp for sam. Good luck with that. Hopefully he will make out with you.
    1
  12004.  @scruffopone3989  "fan of Sam" Let's not act like you aren't a huge fan of sam. Both of you share the same sort of intellectual dishonesty.
    1
  12005. There's no reason to give him the benefit of the doubt. Jimmy spelled it all out before he produced this bullshit and while kyle was ghosting jimmy to instead talk to cenks nephew.
    1
  12006.  @taciturn1992  If you want to make excuses for his covering for a blackmailer then you are dumb AF.
    1
  12007. Nope.
    1
  12008. Nobody dies from MJ so your comparison is asinine.
    1
  12009. Maybe if russell would visit him the way AOC does he would take it easy on him too.
    1
  12010. Literally nothing you have said is true.
    1
  12011.  @livingtoaster1358  In reality religion has always stood in the way of science, progress, and understanding.... like, for example, when they killed scientists for claiming the sun was the center of the universe. Religion has always claimed to have all the answers so there was no need for a deeper understanding of the universe. And when deeper understanding of the universe could be found and it contradicted their book of bullshit they couldn't have that. But none of those facts are going to stop you from continuing to believe the bullshit in your original post is it?
    1
  12012.  @livingtoaster1358  regarding, "you do realize that the catholic church knew that the earth wasn't the center of the universe" Yeah... I do, the same way I know they knew their priests were committing mass rape and they were lying about that and covering up that as well. This is actually evidence supporting my claims and not yours. You know who wouldn't lie about this? Science. And if your claim that knowledge of this fact would have been "chaos," which I don't agree with, that would only be more evidence of how religion was holding society back. Because that "chaos" would be further evidence of religion holding society back because of how it poisons people minds to respond to facts with "chaos" when those facts conflict with the book of bullshit. Because religious doctrine has people trained to believe stupid shit when it isn't true and people in your cult aren't interested in reality... they have their fiction and they are sticking to it... even this day.
    1
  12013.  @livingtoaster1358  regarding, "ok dude cuz bible obviously says to rape people" What the fuck stupid shit are you going on about now? Did I say that the bible said this? No. But it must be nice for you to just ignore the things I actually say and talk about about a bunch of bullshit that I didn't as if I did. But if you want to talk about what the bible says even thou that hasn't been what this conversation has been about then how about we talk about what the bible says about slavery. I'm sure you fucks have a commandment telling people not to do it or something right? Nope... 3 commandments telling you cultists how to suck your fake deity's dick just right but not a single commandment telling people to not do slavery like a moral supreme being might. And what does your book of bullshit say about slavery outside the commandments? It tells you how to do slavery right so that you do it and do it right so that you don't piss off your fake deity. Or, since you mention the noah story... how about we talk about how your fake deity is a genocidal monster that drowned an entire world filled with people including infants, children, dogs, cats, and everything else that was busy minding their business living in the world til your fake god wiped them all out except for the lucky few who got to board a boat. The god of the bible is a genocidal monster. I suspect you would agree if you weren't brainwashed by your cult. Sane people understand genocide is wrong. Brainwashed cultists make excuses and rationalizations for it.
    1
  12014. Fun fact: Cenk has lied about what Warren has said to him on his own fucking show. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=itiacoqgdQI&t=240s
    1
  12015. "when we look far out into the universe we look far back in Time" is referring to that fact that when, for example, you look up at the night sky you are not seeing events taking place this very second. You are seeing events that took place in the past but you are only now being able to see it after the time it has taken for light to have traveled to you. Hopefully that helps.
    1
  12016. Sam seder is controlled opposition and sheep herder for the "democratic" party.
    1
  12017. Thou doth protest too much.
    1
  12018. In other words: you are an idiot.
    1
  12019. She should drop out but she shouldn't be in a Sanders administration, much less his VP.
    1
  12020. Biden and company are actually most responsible for mass incarceration while you play the red/blue game.
    1
  12021.  @Alpharexx  "all you have is his word against hers" Ana pretty much admitted she was just blackmailing jimmy and it had nothing to do with his joke but about his accurate coverage of TYT.
    1
  12022. If you think Amazon wasn't already doing anything and everything to cut labor hours already you would be mistaken.
    1
  12023. Yup. The orange clown is a perfect leader for a clown empire.
    1
  12024. I think it's obvious you are a bootlicker.
    1
  12025. Regarding, "but isn’t all that done by the private industry" Kind of... for way more than it should cost. The private insurance industry price gouges. For example the US spends about 16 percent of GDP overall for health care (I actually think it might be higher... I am using older data). In Canada, where they have a single payer system, they pay about 10 percent of GDP for health care. That system that costs far less overall produces better results. They have longer life expectancy and lower infant mortality rates. Not only that but they cover 100 percent of their population while the US leaves millions without health insurance. Regarding, "I thought the government only pays for people without health insurance?" Well... kindof. They subsidize the entire system to keep it afloat and make sure the private insurance insurance industry continues to get filthy rich. Regarding, "isn’t all that done by the private industry" That private industry is being paid by Americans. If Americans can pay less to the government instead of lots to the private industry they would be wise to do so and it only makes sense. Everyone pays for insurance one way or the other. Ultimately it is a question of if you would like to pay less for it. I think paying less makes sense. Especially when it provides better care and covers everyone.
    1
  12026. Martin did a better job of explaining than I did. That said you should do your own research. These comments sections are not always a reliable source of info.
    1
  12027. When someone shows you who they are believe them the first time. maya angelou
    1
  12028. So you would rather pay more, get worse results, and leave millions uninsured (like the current system) then switch to single payer system because that system would be paid for by taxes. Holy shit are some people small minded.
    1
  12029. LMFAO Last time I checked sedar was getting checks from 3 different billionaires.
    1
  12030. While I agree I would like to add, since the topic is being stupid and incriminating, "I went to the big guys for the money. I was ready to prostitute myself in the manner in which I talk about it, but what happened was they said, ‘Come back when you're 40, son." -Joe Biden
    1
  12031. "isn't going to happen" But let's hope it does.
    1
  12032. Funny considering you are citing a book of bullshit that doesn't have a problem with slavery.
    1
  12033. Paid piece of shit shill says what?
    1
  12034. The squad didn't support her. Did you even watch the video?
    1
  12035. Does the truth hurt?
    1
  12036.  @WolvMedia_  Her foreign policy is terrible. She is just trying to sell books imo before she tells you to fall in line and vote biden.
    1
  12037. GWB is still the worst ATM.
    1
  12038.  @airtylerb  It's really not. GWB's list of failures include 9/11, an illegal war based on lies, torture, katrina, economic crash, bailouts, tax cuts, the patriot act, and lots more that I'm forgetting. This is hardly a comprehensive list. Don't get me wrong trump sucks but it's not even close who was worse as president. Afterall while the covid response has been terrible it's still not like covid itself was the orange clowns fault. It was always going to be bad.
    1
  12039. Is it just me or are the paid trolls forgetting this video as of right now? It's really nice.
    1
  12040. I'm sure they say good things about getting money out of politics, about universal health care, about college for all, about decreasing spending on the military, about protecting the environment and drinking water, about income inequality, about the war on drugs, and about all the other policies that are important to the left... oh wait... they don't... except when they want to talk about how unaffordable things like paying for college is to them.
    1
  12041.  @BigRob1994  regarding, "so legalizing marijuana and every other social issue that the left claims as theirs is not left wing." It's not about left versus right. The MSM is CORPORATE media. The care about corporate interests. They care about protecting and representing big pharma and others that have a vested interest in keeping weed illegal. I'm not saying legalizing weed is exclusively ours but it is what the progressive left wants and not what the corporate media gives. Regarding, "You dont get to just come in and hijack half of our ideology" Who the fuck thinks ownership of these issues are somehow important? The fact remains that the issues I mention, in addition to others are the things the left care about. And if the media was left wing like you claim then those ideas should be talked about... but they aren't... because your claim is bullshit. Regarding, "they're way to the left of me." There is nothing "left" about any of that shit. It's CORPORATE. It corporate interests. That is what they cover and care about. Don't attribute that shit to us. It has nothing to do with what we want so stop pretending that it is.
    1
  12042.  @BigRob1994  regarding, "the further left you go..." I'm not looking for a discussion about left versus right. This is irrelevant to the topic at hand. The topic at hand is whether or not the corporate media is "left wing." I gave you a pretty good list although not a comprehensive one of what issues are important to the "left wing." Do you dispute this list? Do you want to claim that these aren't the thing the left cares about? Because I AM "THE LEFT" and those are the first things I want to talk about when I talk about the things I care about. So if your claim is true that the corporate media is "left wing" then show me how that is demonstrated when it comes to those issues... the ones I care about. Or don't and concede that your claim is BS. Because not only do they not represent me, but they actively oppose the things I do care about. Regarding, "To me all of the mainstream is left wing" Demonstrate this claim by showing me how the corporate media represents me... because they don't. I'm "left wing" and go out of my way to trash them constantly. Why the fuck would I do that if they supposedly represent me and my interests? Regarding, "I get mad about you all taking half of our ideology because you call it left wing." Huh. It is left wing in that those are policy positions the left want. Do you disagree that these are things the left cares about? Because we do. How about you not care so much about the left/right labels so much? That is a bullshit narrative the corporate media loves to use to divide us. How about, instead of worrying about ownership of those issues, we instead work together in the areas we agree on? Instead of you getting pissed about us wanting to end the war on drugs and stop the military industrial complex you instead try to work with us where we share common ground? Regarding, "Look at it this way..." Dumbest analogy ever. Forgive me for not addressing it intelligently. Regarding, "I dont think the left is as bad as nazis," Thanks I guess. I too do not think libertarians are as bad as nazis. Again... please stop with the BS left/right narrative. The narrative that matters when it comes to the corporate media is the haves (big money, corporations, the establishment) and the have nots (the peasants). Realize the corporate media doesn't represent me. If I did I'd be there getting my news (aka propaganda) but instead I trash them and come to places like here for a reason.... Kyle represents me and my interests in a way the corporate media doesn't even come close to doing.
    1
  12043.  @BigRob1994  regarding, "all being left of me" Is this really all you can think about? Are really incapable of thinking about things without putting them on your hypothetical line so that they are easily understood by you? Regarding, "You dont get to change the discussion because you don't want to talk about it." The discussion is about if they are left wing. And I'm the left. That's the discussion. Sorry if the fact that they don't represent me what-so-ever is inconvenient to your narrative. Regarding, "There are a lot of far left wing ideologies" So show me how any of those ideologies are represented by the corporate media. Regarding, "I get pissed because you claim ownership of them." Do I thou? Because all I said is that those are things I want. I don't give a fuck about ownership... that's all you. Regarding, "You can be on the left and also oppose ending the wars and legalizing marijuana, do you deny that?" I guess it's possible as everyone is entitled to determine for themself what their ideas and litmus tests are but, with that being said, no. Not really. There are ZERO people that I consider to be part of the real left that are pro war and pro war on drugs. The progressive left is pretty much unilaterally opposed to the war on drugs and the military industrial complex. Bernie Sanders is considered the spokesman for the real progressive left and if anything the issue that he gets the most legitimate shit from when it comes to his record and policy from the left is him being too willing to use the military. That being said those grievances are often overemphasized but it shows exactly where we stand on the issue. Slash the fucking military.
    1
  12044.  @BigRob1994  regarding, "why is it so hard for you to understand that what is left to one person might not be left to another" You are missing the point. The point is that this isn't a left/right thing, it's a corporate, big money/little guy thing. The corporate media doesn't represent you... fine. I get that. The point is they don't represent me, the left, either. Regarding, "they don't represent you they dont represent anyone on the left." Because they don't. They represent corporations and big money. I keep asking you who and how they represent the left and you offer nothing. You seem to think that just because they don't represent you they must be representing the left... but they don't. Regarding, "How is it so hard for you to understand that?" This is not the point. This isn't about the parties... it's about the media. How is it so hard for you to understand that? Regarding, "the media is left wing" Then demonstrate this with something of substance. Why exactly are they left wing? Just because they don't represent you doesn't mean they represent the left. Regarding, "The Republicans and Democrats are both on the left" No. They aren't. You need to be able to have some kind of independent idea of what is the right and left in the world that isn't all about you. If you were to take the major parties in the US and transplant them into Europe or other civilized countries they would both be right of center. Policies that are "left" in those countries like crazy Bernies desire for universal health care is shit they already take for granted. That's the center there because it already exists. But this is totally irrelevant. We aren't talking about the major parties. We are talking about the media. And even thou both major parties and the corporate media all serve corporate interests that only goes to prove my point about what they are and who they represent... and it isn't the left anymore then it's you.
    1
  12045. Dick Cheney is a bad person. That doesn't mean it should be fair game to assassinate him.
    1
  12046. I'm pretty sure biden and trump prove that wrong.
    1
  12047.  @Dos_Caffeine  "used to work with TYT." Sedar didn't just "used" to work with TYT. He does right now. I'm sure this bothers you very much right? I'd hate to think you are a hypocrite.
    1
  12048. Better yet let's not "knight" people.
    1
  12049.  @JohnAdams-kc8wx  Fair enough. And if anyone is going to have it I'd rather the doc have it than blair.
    1
  12050.  @volourn9764  "DEMOCRATS SHOULD REMEMBER AL GORE WON FLORIDA IN 2000 — BUT LOST THE PRESIDENCY WITH A PRE-EMPTIVE SURRENDER"
    1
  12051.  @volourn9764  "not proof" It's as much proof as you have that if a completed recount was conducted that bush would have had more votes considering a legit recount, which was REQUIRED under florida law, was never completed.
    1
  12052.  @rembrandt972ify  "stupidity has equal or greater explanatory value." It has less explanatory value. Shadowbanning isn't a bug. It's designed.
    1
  12053.  @rembrandt972ify  "I personally think" I can tell you specific phrases and topics that will get you shadowbanned. You can reliably talk about flat earth and have it go up but when it comes to politics youtube sets out to sen sore certain topics and stiffle debate.
    1
  12054.  @rembrandt972ify  For example I tried to combine this post with my next one it will CERTAINLY be shadowbanned (assuming one of them isn't going to be already) The FBI worked with big tech to sen sore a true story about hunter bidens...
    1
  12055.  @rembrandt972ify  For example good luck trying to talk about the president's son's computer.
    1
  12056.  @rembrandt972ify  The US government and big tech worked to hide a true story about that computer during an elec tion in part through shadowbanning. I think this comment has only a 50 percent change of being shown and I could have made it closer to 0 with different word selections.
    1
  12057.  @rembrandt972ify  I just sent you a comment about that computer. It's shadowbanned but it might still show in your notifications. That's the type of comment that gets shadowbanned. But you could safely talk about flat earth if you want.
    1
  12058.  @rembrandt972ify  "Geno's side"? I don't know what you are referring to.
    1
  12059.  @rembrandt972ify  "Hunter" Ukraine was paying him for something. And it wasn't his brilliance.
    1
  12060. M C, ok. That makes sense but I think you were wasting your breathe trying to respond to the original poster intelligently.
    1
  12061.  @CheekyClapper  While I think that jimmy was correct to be mad I'd prefer to just give him a pass rather than really drag him. What he is doing is important and he is having a hard time right now. I'd rather try to lift him up despite a bad mistake.
    1
  12062.  @JL-gt1kc  "your show" Or yours. Jimmy has reason to be mad at him. Do you really?
    1
  12063. derp
    1
  12064. There is a point. Find someone who isn't corrupt and support them even if you don't expect to win. And elections are hardly the only thing you get to vote on. There are also referendums. The powers that be love it when you stay home. Don't give them what they want and don't lose without a fight.
    1
  12065.  @damion1757  No I mean like referendums on, for example, legalizing weed which is a pretty common example these days.
    1
  12066.  @damion1757  Regarding, "oh, and they're ALL corrupt...except Bernie, since he's been fighting for people for over 30 years...unless that's been made up too...who knows these days." Then go there and vote for yourself for all I care. But vote. That way you make it perfectly clear to the powers that be that 1) you are a voter who wants to be heard and 2) you aren't interested in voting for their brand of shit. Or better yet find people who aren't corrupt and running and vote for them. Justice democrats are a great place to start because their campaigns are financed by the little guy and politicians, when they get in office, represent who pays for their elections.
    1
  12067. We need new insults for people like you. Stupid really doesn't do people like you justice.
    1
  12068.  @philhunt26  "Voting for Republicans is worse by every metric" Is it? Because if you are voting for people like biden you may as well be voting for them. He belongs in their party.
    1
  12069.  @appetiteee5605  "He has always been consistent" He just voted to give billions of american wealth for bombs in another country.
    1
  12070.  @appetiteee5605  "Im unaware of when, where, and how he voted in lockstep with corporate dems." He has regardless. Since joe has become president he hasn't opposed their corporate agenda once. NOT ONCE. "If that is so a lot of democrats are bad and bernie is being coerced into following suit." Is that the only possbility? Or maybe he's just playing his part of the outsider until it's time for him to tell you to vote for the corporate dem when it matters most at general election time? "I just don't know about any of the stuff you are mentioning." If bernie is actually an outsider you should be able to point to a single vote that's he's made that's opposed joe. He hasn't. But don't just take my word for it... look into it for yourself.
    1
  12071.  @Mar-lz5xn  "Who or where is that someone?" You need to get out more. Good people are all around even if they aren't in the major parties. The problem is that people like bernie tell you those are the only people you need to be picking from.
    1
  12072.  @scootergeorge7089  "How do you know how, or even if the Joker voted?" I do not. My point isn't about them... it's about bernie and how he sheep herds people into a cor rupt party.
    1
  12073.  @scootergeorge7089  "Then next time do not post..." It's not my fault if you are going to get wrapped up in meaningless semantics. "Corrupt?" LMFAO Yes. Corrupt. "T do not consider them, as a whole, to be" They still tell you that pete buttigieg won the iowa caucus. They are the same party being led by joe biden whose sons laptop is real and exposes real corruption.
    1
  12074.  @scootergeorge7089  "do not consider them, as a whole, to be" This is just as silly coming from you as it is boot lickers for the republicans.
    1
  12075.  @scootergeorge7089  "BUT do not consider them, as a whole, to be corrupt." This is just as silly coming from you as it is republicans.
    1
  12076.  @scootergeorge7089  "do not consider them, as a whole, to be corrupt." They still say pete buttigieg won the iowa caucus.
    1
  12077.  @scootergeorge7089  "do not consider them, as a whole, to be corrupt." LMFAO Even bernie says they are, before he tells you to vote for them.
    1
  12078.  @scootergeorge7089  "Democrats do not want Joe Biden to run for a second term" Because he can't win, not because he's corrupt. They want to find someone just as corrupt as him but whose brain isn't melting.
    1
  12079.  @scootergeorge7089  " there is no real choice in the party a candidate runs under," Of course there is. "if they want to get elected!" The game is rigged because they rigged it.
    1
  12080. "if they want to get elected" The game is rigged because they rig it. They just got done kicking a green candidate off the ballot.
    1
  12081.  @scootergeorge7089  "if they want to get elected!" The game is rigged because dems rig it. They are the same party that just got done kicking a green party candidate off the ballot in north carolina.
    1
  12082.  @scootergeorge7089  "if they want to get elected" The...
    1
  12083.  @scootergeorge7089  game is
    1
  12084.  @scootergeorge7089  rigged because dems
    1
  12085.  @scootergeorge7089  rig it.
    1
  12086.  @scootergeorge7089  dems just kicked
    1
  12087.  @scootergeorge7089  a green candidate off the ballot in NC
    1
  12088.  @scootergeorge7089  And I have to write like this just to not be shadow banned.
    1
  12089.  @scootergeorge7089  Am I cynical or are you a dupe?
    1
  12090.  @scootergeorge7089  "You need to join us in the world of reality." LMFAO I haven't said a single thing that isn't true. This is what you say when you can't dispute it but want to pretend you are.
    1
  12091.  @scootergeorge7089  "Green Party?" Imagine pretending to not understand this. You are impossible to take seriously.
    1
  12092.  @scootergeorge7089  "as long as YOU keep voting for the incumbents, nothing much gets done." LMFAO I've already done this. And this is funny because you are blaming me and not the politicians with power. As if it's my fault we can't have nice things.
    1
  12093.  @scootergeorge7089  " You've certainly have a way with words, Holmes!" It's not my fault if you can't understand simple concepts and phrases.
    1
  12094. @G.D "I assume they're bots..." The people that don't want to vote for good. The people who rationalize supporting evil, like you are, destroy my faith in humanity. I hope you are at least paid for it.
    1
  12095.  @scootergeorge7089  "YOU know how a complete stranger votes." LMFAO Are you intentionally missing the point? "a faithful Republican from 1980 to 2012" LFMAO I'm amazed you aren't supporting biden or trump.
    1
  12096.  @idiotinabandanna8701  " instantly hate them" I've voted democrat. There is nothing "instant" about my hate. They have earned it. And BS is yours is what you say when you have nothing of substance to defend them.
    1
  12097.  @idiotinabandanna8701  If you support either major party you are a dupe.
    1
  12098. Regarding, "the source of financing." Are you saying I shouldn't care where a candidate is getting the money for their elections? I hope that's not what you are saying.
    1
  12099. But the support that a guy with dementia has doesn't surprise you? People are idiots. Idiocracy is real.
    1
  12100. Is there such a thing as a respectable neoliberal?
    1
  12101. Bernie 2020 cause he's been fighting for this for longer than tulsi has been alive and is just better.
    1
  12102. Walter regarding, "kids do not comprehend..." I'm old but I have quite a bit of respect for the younger generation even if there are things I do not understand. I think they have a better understanding of the current state of politics than lots of people twice their age and cite the number of them that support Bernie Sanders and 3rd parties. I guess it really helps them that they are not bombarded by corporate media brainwashing 24/7 in quite the same way. Regarding, "Hillary as puppet." The Clinton puppets have done so much damage to the country it is difficult to quantify. They are my generation and my generation sat by and watched it all go down without even a fight of note. Good people want to leave a better world for the next generation than the world they entered. I worry that won't be the case with my generation and it makes me ashamed and sad. And if you wonder why I might feel that way I look at money in politics being worse than ever, global warming, income inequality, perpetual war, the erosion of rights, and more.
    1
  12103. Let's hope the millenials are as smart as I hope they are. They are going to be facing lots of challenges I think. Automation for example is something that never gets talked about like it should in my opinion. Take care. I wish you and your family well. I hope I am wrong and they will be having a better life than the one before it.
    1
  12104. He's just trying to have his cake and eat it too. He willingly joined by having cenks nephew on with krystal.
    1
  12105. I dare you to cite your bullshit lies.
    1
  12106. You are full of shit. NOBODY dies from MJ. Put a link up proving me wrong.
    1
  12107. There are already lots of "third parties" and there are reasons why none of them are doing much. You would be wise to figure out why that is the case rather then just assuming a new party is a good idea. Because it isn't.
    1
  12108.  @gnomechomsky2524  Um... yeah. That is my solution. Bernie Sanders entered the race down 50 points. Lots had no idea who he was. He faced media blackout and "democratic" party shenanigans and only lost by a hair. The party and their BS tactics have been exposed and it is going to be harder for them to pull the same shit. And he still only "lost" by a hair and because of cheating. The game has changed. Don't act like there is no reason to think 2020 might be different because there is. Hostile takeover of the party is the plan. Corporate dems can be purged the exact same way progressives were purged. I, unlike you, know, admit, and acknowledge the game is rigged. You on the other hand seem to think that running 3rd party isn't. It is. Duh. If you think that the game isn't rigged against 3 party candidates, but it's rigged in different ways then you are deluding yourself. In that same year when Sanders only "lost" because of shenanigans Jill Stein got about one percent of the vote against 2 of the, not only most despised politicians in the country, but 2 of the most despised PEOPLE in the country. And that happened, in large part, because the game isn't fair for her either. Stop deluding yourself and pretending it is. There in no fair game. You have to pick your poison. And there is no good reason to think your plan is a good plan.
    1
  12109.  @gnomechomsky2524  Um no. You need a progressive nominee of the party. The reason the party is going to a dumpster fire until at least 2020 is because Hillary "won" the nomination. Its why Tom Perez has his job. Who picks the people under him, who pick the people under them, and so on. The nominee gets to unilaterally enact party reforms such as things like... https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=91226631 To be fair they went back on this to try and benefit Hillary but it should give you the idea of what type of power and influence the party nominee has all by themself to unilaterally enact reforms. But if you want to just piss on the plan without bothering to look at the details with moronic conflations of the party and the media then by all means. Good luck with your plan. I guess your plan fixes the corporate media or some shit because that's the new goalpost. Just ignore all the legit reasons I've told you your plan is shit. Ignore the legit reasons I've told you why our plan isn't shit. Good luck with that. Go back and bury your head in the sand. Keep telling your plan is a good one because it feels good to you. Don't let the facts get in the way of your delusions.
    1
  12110.  @gnomechomsky2524  I guess I'm just tired of fuckers like you making me feel like I'm living the movie "Idiocracy" without the benefits of being able to get a handjob at Starbucks and having the superior President. You don't get to have your own reality. I have to share this one with you whether or not you have any idea what reality actually looks like. I guess I'll add that I don't wear panties because you seem like the type to think that my response to this is an acknowledgement of that... because you suck.
    1
  12111.  @gnomechomsky2524  Regarding, "why can't you understand that the game is rigged against progressives taking over the Democratic Party from within?" Are you fucking kidding me? Have you even read what I've written or are your comprehension skills really this awful. I refer you to, "I, unlike you, know, admit, and acknowledge the game is rigged." and "There in no fair game. You have to pick your poison." I fucking quit this. Talking to people like you makes me want to conclude humanity is doomed, slit my wrists, and embrace the sweet release of death just so that I'm not exposed to your stupid.
    1
  12112.  @gnomechomsky2524  Are you even a little bit embarrassed to be asking questions that have already been answered?
    1
  12113.  @gnomechomsky2524  Fair enough. I guess you would have to be significantly smarter then you are to be intelligent enough to have the self awareness required to be embarrassed. The blank can be filled in by my previous quote, which not only have I stated but have repeated of, "There in no fair game. You have to pick your poison." Do you try to fill in the blank for your plan? Because if you think the game is fair for 3rd parties then you are even dumber then you seem. Somehow. I'm amazed such a thing is even possible. Now seriously. I fucking quit this. I'm not even joking when I say talking to you makes me want to kill myself.
    1
  12114. Regarding, "There is no evidence of any Trump corruption." I can't tell you how similar you are to Hillary supporters. You are all fucking morons.
    1
  12115.  @jodyodell6159  Regarding, "how bout constructively discussing your disagreement" You aren't entitled to my time and have given me zero reason to take you seriously. I really wish I could just give stupid comments like yours a thumbs down and carry on with my day but sadly youtube doesn't give me that as an option (that shows at least). Regarding, ""Dumb" really, lmfao." Really. Sorry not sorry if the truth hurts.
    1
  12116.  @jodyodell6159  Regarding, "Any discussion of who will win the nomination is exactly what cable news networks do." Meanwhile, in reality, there is always going to a discussion about things like "electability" and who is "winning" even while no one is actually voting. If you want to be intelligent you can differentiate between the people who do this correctly (like Emma) and between people who do propaganda with an agenda (like the corporate media and their efforts to manufacture consent who are manipulating information). It's not the same, obviously, and I shouldn't really need to tell you the world of differences between the two. Even now, that I've told you the difference, suspect that you can't or won't understand. Which is why I didn't bother in the first place. Feel free to prove me wrong about that.
    1
  12117.  @jodyodell6159  @Jody O'Dell Regarding, "since when did "lmfao" indicate hurt feelings." I never said a word about the phrase nor do I give a shit about it. Holy fuck you are stupid. Funny you include shit like, "Yet another logical fallacy from you and jumping to conclusions to fit your world view," when I was actually just telling you that I knew I being insulting and just didn't care if I hurt your feelings or not while being insulting.
    1
  12118. You go ahead and ignore a lifetime of supporting and working for progressive causes then because of a tactic that you disagreed with. I love Jill and voted for her in 2016 but winning and getting policies I care about are more important some misplaced moral superiority.
    1
  12119. Watching that was depressing.
    1
  12120.  @annettemacdonald9192  Too late for that for me. MSNBC has been dead to me for a while now... along with all the corporate networks.
    1
  12121. Meh. They think that anyone can beat Trump and they are pretty much correct about that. And as far as the corporate dems are concerned they would rather lose to Trump than win with Sanders.
    1
  12122.  @skeeveskeeve  "coup attempt" Coup means there was violence. You are not a serious person.
    1
  12123.  @skeeveskeeve  "bloodless coup" That is an oxymoron. For it to be a coup there needs to be violence. Not according to me but according to the dictionary.
    1
  12124.  @skeeveskeeve  "ignorant on an issue" You are the one mischaracterizing what happened.
    1
  12125.  @Solmangrundy  "tax dollars are always moved into private hands." Thanks captain obvious. They should be used for peasants for things like health care, housing, food, education... not to BILLIONAIRES. Don't you think elon has gotten enough already? When all of his companies keep getting billions in subsidies and tax breaks? "Who do you think they're paying to do literally anything?" Are you really advocating for trickle down economics?
    1
  12126. Has sam covered the fact that dems have killed universal health care in California? Or is he too busy smearing people using free speech?
    1
  12127.  @sebastiancuadros5257  Nope. But enjoy your laugh in blissful ignorance.
    1
  12128.  Capo Di capo  I used to be a big fan. Then again I used to be a fan of olberman, of maddow, of chris hayes, of nomiki knonst, of kyle and of krystal. "When someone shows you who they are believe them the first time." -maya angelou. I've never regretted leaving any of them behind after they really showed me who they were.
    1
  12129.  @michaelhomes8049  Is that suppose to mean something? Meh.... I'm ok not knowing what your "point" was.
    1
  12130.  @LeShawnTho  I was a huge fan of kyle for a long time. If I put up with his BS that would make me a simp. You know, like you are doing.
    1
  12131.  @michaelhomes8049  He gets paid by the comment? I'm confident that's not how it works and not just because you have trouble with the truth.
    1
  12132.  @krink084  "The more engagement on the video" Well I'm just going to have to risk it in the short term to make sure everyone knows he's a fraud and in the long term people leave him like they are. "thank you Clint. You're the best." LMFAO I have to wonder if you actually believe the BS you are saying. Like you can't actually think me making substantive points calling out your cult hero while you deflect with nonsense like this is a good thing for him do you? Even you must realize how detached from reality the things you say are right? Meh. Maybe not.
    1
  12133.  @duxnihilo  "not every offence is a hanging offence." True. This is. The mask is off. Saying the right things is easy. Actions speak louder than words. AOC could say the right things too just like kyle. "when someone shows you who they are believe them the first time" maya angelou "flaws and blindspots" kyle lacks integrity. It's a deal breaker.
    1
  12134.  @duxnihilo  "Jimmy has made worst mistakes" I concede jimmy has mistakes. I'll tell you things I disagree with him on if you want but the notion that he's messed up more than kyle is is wrong. "Lava Jato." I honestly don't know what you are talking about. I suspect that if I dig into this it's going to not be anything of real substance. But feel free to say more if you think you have a really good point here rather than just alluding to wrongdoing like this. "I didn't assume he was a bad-faith actor, I just assumed he made a mistake." Not all mistakes are created equal. I have no reason to think kyle made a "mistake" when ignoring the blackmail and every reason to think he's just a fraud. Jimmy's message to kyle after kyle's ghosted him unprofessionally because jimmy's got a potty mouth and to stay out of it with cenks nephew to talk about pocket pussies jimmy made everything perfectly clear. There's no mistaking that. There is only the actions of a disingenuous fraud. I was a big fan of olberman, maddow, tyt, and kyle. It really is a mask off moment with each. When they show you who they are you can't not see it anymore.
    1
  12135.  @paulharper7185  "What mask is off? Its always been clear to me that Kyle" The mask. The one that previous would have me agreeing with you that... it's always been clear to me that kyle is ok. It's gone. Like I said I've experienced the same with people like olberman and maddow and tyt and nomiki konst and others and it really is like their mask is removed and you are finally seeing them for what they are and it's disgusting. When you finally realize it for kyle because he is a fraud you would be wise to accept it. If you are a cultist you will ignore it.
    1
  12136. LOL at being a fan of TYT propaganda and wondering why award winning journalist exposing a coverup in syria is important. I hope you are paid for your stupid shit the same way TYT is paid by team hillary clinton and katzenburg millions.
    1
  12137. Moments later he could be heard saying, "Sore-E."
    1
  12138. MSNBC: 26K people out to support Sanders, nothing to see here. Also MSNBC: poll of 500 people, super important.
    1
  12139. Just a reminder that Trump sucking doesn't make Biden not terrible. He still is.
    1
  12140. The bar for impeachment should be high otherwise it can and will be used for purely political reasons.
    1
  12141. I don't know. Why would I ever try?
    1
  12142. 4:04 "Seriously we ain't stupid." I beg to differ sir.
    1
  12143.  @wavegodrobsanders539  No, I think you are missing the point. You are turning your back on all the good things and benefits blacks would receive from the specific things I've mentioned because they would also help other groups as well. That's why I'm calling you names. I'd do the same shit for a white guy crying that Bernie isn't offering anything that only helps white people. You want reparations? Fine. I get it. And I'd be for it personally. I also suspect that if Bernie were the dictator of the US he'd be for it and make it happen as well. But he's a politician who understands what a losing fight this is. Even if he said he was for it it would never happen because we don't elect a dictator. Instead he is making the wise political decision to focus on the good he can do that helps blacks and, sadly for you, helps others as well. You are only hurting yourself with this bullshit. And you only hurting the blacks who don't have health care, or want to go to college but can't afford it, or are in jail because of weed, and so much more... because he isn't falling on his sword for a cause that isn't going to be happening anytime soon. I'm done with this. I hope you are just a paid troll.
    1
  12144.  @wavegodrobsanders539  Regarding, "None of Bernie policies,as great as they are, closes the racial wealth gap" Meanwhile, in reality, he is trying to make the uber rich (who don't tend to be black) pay for education, health care, and more (whom blacks disproportionately have less access to). That does close the gap. I shouldn't need to explain the obvious.
    1
  12145.  @wavegodrobsanders539  And I haven't even mentioned him wanting to raise the minimum wage. That was really dumb of me, and you, to forget about.
    1
  12146.  @wavegodrobsanders539  Don't get me wrong.... I really, really, really want to quit this and that is my intent. I just have a hard time letting stupid shit go unanswered.
    1
  12147.  @wavegodrobsanders539  Regarding, "education does not close the black-white racial wealth gap" Um... of course it does. Blacks have a harder time affording to go to college therefor universal access would disproportionately help blacks. College education equals more money, significantly more money over the course of a person's lifetime. More money that would, again, be in large part going towards black people who wouldn't be able to get that education without it. If I were one of those people, who wanted to go to college but couldn't afford it, I'd be pretty fucking pissed about the terrible reasons you are using to stand in my way as if this wouldn't help me. Just because there are other problems in the world that exist is moronic justification to think more education wouldn't help blacks. Of course it would.
    1
  12148.  @wavegodrobsanders539  Regarding, "Marianne Williamson is Medicare for all" Like I said I know almost nothing about her. But I did just get done watching a video recently where she was asked the question, "would your focus be improving the ACA or replacing it with single payer?" Somehow she managed to fuck this question up in more than one way which is pretty remarkable to me. First she advocates, in her own words, for a public option. Secondly she straight up lies about that by pretending it's single payer when it's not. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YOTfkxEgzGo&t=0s The time you are looking for is 8:28 in the video. Regarding, "you've insulted me 3x's.. I promise you, you would shit your pants if we was face to face.. seriously" Yup. I can be a real dick. I'm an old fuck who doesn't give a shit about stepping on toes. You can beat me up? No shit. I'm old as fuck. But that doesn't change the fact that the points I'm making are on point. You would be wise to focus on what I say rather than how I say it.
    1
  12149.  @wavegodrobsanders539  I looked for it. The first thing that came up was, "what we got wrong about closing the racial wealth gap." and in the description it says it's about 10 myths. Is that what you are talking about? Or just post a link.
    1
  12150.  @wavegodrobsanders539  Regarding, "I want to thank you for saying, personally you would support reparations." No big deal. It's true. But I'm also not running for political office and have to worry about every thing I say being used to tear me down. If I were I'd likely avoid the shit out of this because I think it's not a battle that can be won. I'd also avoid saying voting rights need to be restored across the board for criminals even thou I think that too would be a good idea. But that didn't stop bernie on that one. I do think it stopped bernie about reparations. And even if he said he was all for it, and was elected, I'd have no illusions that I think he would be able to sign such a bill. If I were a politician I'd focus on the battles I thought I had a chance to win. That's far better than getting nothing done.
    1
  12151.  @wavegodrobsanders539  And don't take my insults personally. I'm a cunt whose frustrated with the state of things and wants change as I suspect you do. I see Bernie as our best hope of getting change. Maybe not all of it but certainly some huge steps in the right direction. I think you would be wise to help him rather than tear him down.
    1
  12152.  @wavegodrobsanders539  Regarding, "This could take the form of a direct race-specific initiative like a dramatic reparations program tied to compensation for the legacies of slavery and Jim Crow, and/or an initiative that addresses the perniciousness of wealth inequality for the entire American population, which could disproportionately benefit black Americans" AND/OR AN INITIATIVE THAT ADDRESSES THE PERNICIOUSNESS OF WEALTH INEQUALITY FOR THE ENTIRE AMERICAN POPULATION, WHICH COULD DISPROPORTIONATELY BENEFIT BLACK AMERICANS. Examples of this might include taking trillions from wall street and reinvesting it into education, education that would be given disproportionately to blacks. And taking money from the richest of the rich to provide health care to public, a public where a lack of health insurance disproportionately affects blacks. And taking money from the richest of the rich and making sure they give their employees enough to live on, like raising the minimum wage with disproportionately affects blacks. And taxing the rich and corporations significantly more in general to pay for social programs. This is stuff I've already talked about. All of these things would help even if none of them is going to level the playing field perfectly in and of themselves. Regarding, "According to this logic, we would expect blacks and whites with similar levels of education to display comparable levels of wealth." No, we wouldn't. The disparity of income earned between whites/blacks is a COMPLETELY independent problem. GIVING (as opposed to making them pay for outrageously expensive college education at the expense of the rich) college educations to blacks leaves them with more money in their pocket. A LOT MORE over the course of a lifetime. As for trying to make sure that it is the same as whites at the same education level is a completely different problem requiring completely different solutions. And even if we were able to magically make sure that blacks and whites all of a sudden overnight were to make the same at the same education levels that doesn't change the fact that more blacks aren't able to get that education to make that more money equal to whites. THEY WOULD STILL NEED TO BE EDUCATED AT THE SAME RATES TO GET THE SAME MONEY. Look at the figure 1. Forget for a moment about the disparities between the races and just focus on how much more blacks with a college education make compared to blacks with only high school. It's a lot and it fucking matters to those blacks who have it. Now, going back to the disparity between the races I absolutely agree that the disparity between the races at similar education levels is a crime. I'm open to ideas about addressing it. (and forgive me for repeating myself, I do that too much) But that is an independent problem altogether. Regarding, "Black students are more likely to take on student loans and accumulate student loan debt" Unless we do something about it. And if we did it would help. Regarding, "it could be argued, alternatively, that hard work can close the wealth gap." I'm not saying that, but I am saying raising the minimum wage would help. Regarding, "Martin Luther King Jr. called for a ‘bank-in’ movement." And MLK was correct in that this would help. That is not the same to thinking it would magically solve all the problems. Things like these are ways to address the problem and attack it from different angles. Let's imagine a world where hypothetically all cash wealth was overnight magically equalized in the form of reparations. Problem solved right? Wrong. Because that cash then gets put into the system, a system that still favors the powerful and those with the businesses. A system where blacks have less education. A system where the pay gap at equal educations is unbalanced. Jeff Bezos suddenly has no cash but people are still going to keep buying his shit at amazon. Solutions like the one MLK is proposing here is an effort to address one of the many, many, many problems out there. Is a comprehensive solution like the author think NIxon thought it was? Obviously not. Regarding, "continued economic penalties forced upon black workers" This makes me think of Sanders and AOC's proposal to curb the interest rates of loan sharks and predatory lenders. Regarding, "But the failure to bank black or buy black does not explain why we have a racial wealth gap of this magnitude" Of course not. There is so so so so so so so much more going on than just this. But if we ever we able to achieve "perfect equality" you would want this going on as opposed to spending your money at the walmarts and amazons of the world. Regarding, #4 saving. Saving is good advice for everyone. That said it's not like I think blacks are just being dumb not saving money. I understand you can't save what you don't have. But let's say you have an education and are making more (even if it's not as much as whites at the same level) then you hopefully are able to be saving more. And passing that down. Because wealth does create wealth. It takes money to make money. I'm writing this as I go and before I've read past the headline but the premise is bad because the notion of saving money works with all the other solutions. Of course it doesn't work in a vacuum all by itself. But if you are able to get your hands on money putting some of it away sure as fuck helps. Look at how the rich make so much of their money. They put it in the stock market and let it sit their while they cash in on dividends and don't pay taxes on it like those making their money with elbow grease. Again... it's not a solution in and of itself but it's a good idea for those with the means. I'm guessing the article is just going to tell me that they don't have the means. And now that I've read all of #4 I admit most of that went over my head. I was pretty lost there. Regarding, #5 is dumb at face value. Never thought that or anything even remotely close to it. I'm skipping it. Regarding #6 as usual they are conflating the solution offered with the problems of attaining the solution. The mention zuckerburg and bezos because those guys were able to do what the "solution" proposes. So the "solution" is fine... it worked for the rich guys who had access to the "solution." So it isn't so much a problem with the solution as it is the playing field going in to use the "solution." This is already crazy long and none of the other myths seem relevant to the things I've been saying. I'm also not going back and proofreading any of this so sorry for the typos.
    1
  12153. Bernie didn't want Trump to be President. Can you really blame him?
    1
  12154. Holy shit your comment is asinine.
    1
  12155. What a nice thing to call a fraud.
    1
  12156. Feel free to stay gone still.
    1
  12157. Bullshit is right... um.. what?
    1
  12158. Trump should have have his treasure secretary tell everyone how he bribed Kamala.
    1
  12159. Nina Turner
    1
  12160. What makes you think trump could have passed m4a if he actually wanted to?
    1
  12161.  @Del2394-g3z  Regarding, "no Republican was going to oppose him," LMFAO. Have you met the republican party? You honestly think they were going to support m4a? And all their money interests would be ok with that? WTF are you smoking?
    1
  12162.  @Del2394-g3z  Regarding, "we will never know though" I think we do. Or at least we should. There's no way that party supports m4a. Shit they didn't even support their own solutions to the health care system when they got obama stink on them. The ACA was a republican plan thought up by a conservative think tank.
    1
  12163. No. Nobody needs to die. Especially if you want to claim that killing people is wrong and act like a hypocrite. Regarding, "In some cases, guilt is unquestionable. Execution should be reserved for them only." I don't think you realize how incredible vague and subjective this is.
    1
  12164. Regarding "what do you think about that?" I think what you described in the first is appalling. Sadly nothing can change the mans crime. Killing him doesn't make it better. It doesn't change him. It changes us. It makes us as guilty of taking life as the man. Lock him up and throw away the key. I demonstrates a society committed to the sanctity of life. It says that we are better than the people who take life. Regarding, "Do you love your mother or your grandmother?" Nothing condescending about this is there? Regarding, "What if that happened to them?" I've had 2 father figures in my life that weren't my actual father. One of them was brutally murdered. The man who did it was killed while being apprehended. If he were not I wouldn't have wanted him put to death. I would have wanted him behind bars for the rest of his life because I like to think it makes me better than him. And I'm pretty sure I'm right, in part, because I'm not looking to take life unnecessarily.
    1
  12165. The capital is locked down.
    1
  12166. sucks
    1
  12167. This channel is affiliated with TYT not that Kyle would ever mention the conflict of interest even while talking about TYT.
    1
  12168.  @llabronco  Yanggang is a special breed.
    1
  12169. Hayes buried the info for months. He should share a cell with biden.
    1
  12170.  @bhunji1850  It's a dumb figure of speech and cults are used to make war.
    1
  12171.  @fatamorgana909  "without the benefits of religion" Of course it is. It's isn't a coincidence that among the many, many, many countries that the US is at war with NONE are predominately christian nations. People simply don't fight wars over their nonbelief in fake deities but they will kill people if they are convinced that their cult's deity has their back. And religion has been used in almost ever war ever even it's not always what the war is predominately about.
    1
  12172.  @jjgf8412  Regarding, "Nobody else?" Nobody that I think has a shot in hell of getting the nomination. I guess maybe Warren but I'd cross that bridge when I get there. Regarding, "Tulsi." If the unthinkable happened today and Bernie died I'd throw all my support behind her. But as of right now she has no path or realistic chance IMO. Regarding, "Pete." He is fucking terrible. The Bernie or bust movement aren't people saying there are no other good people out there. It is saying that he absolutely needs to be the "democratic" nominee and that any other candidate is courting disaster in the general. I absolutely will not support the Joe Bidens of this world or people close to him politically.
    1
  12173.  @NudeSophist  Regarding, " Didn't Warren call for open borders?" Huh? Do you think I was advocating for Warren or some shit? Do you think I'm a big fan of hers? I'm obviously not so I'm in awe as to why you are going to try to tell me bad things about her. Regarding, "against Trump" In all honesty I barely give a shit about the general election. The election that really matter is the "democratic" primary. As much as I think the Bidens of this world can possibly lose to trump the fact of the matter is that trump is fucking terrible. A complete piece of shit like Hillary got millions more votes than him, and that was back when trump had the unknown going for him. Now there is no doubt about how terrible he is. He is a fucking clown and I'd vote for a bag of dogshit on fire before I'd vote for him. The question people really should be asking is who SHOULD beat Trump, not who can beat Trump. But for those people that are asking the wrong question instead of the right one the answer is still Bernie Sanders. Regarding, "The way I see it, if your a democrat either you get Tulsi Gabbard to join as Sanders VP or there is no chance Trump won't win. Everyone else is just utter shite." Bernie Sanders/Satan could beat trump I think. The point I'm trying to make is that far, far, far too much importance is put on the bottom half of the ticket. That simply is not what people are thinking about when they vote. We should be focusing on getting him the nomination. Period. And he can be trusted to pick a great running mate. As for it needing to by Tulsi, and I'd be happy as hell with her, why would it need to be her? It's not like he needs to pick someone running against him. I actually think that someone supporting him at the moment and not opposing him makes more sense. Ultimately, again, the bottom of the ticket are just unimportant details when thinking about the chance of winning.
    1
  12174. If only he would have voted no then things would have been exactly the fucking same.
    1
  12175. Trump is literally commander in chief. Maybe care more about what he is doing rather than the bullshit pouring from his mouth.
    1
  12176. This is why, despite how much she makes me cringe, I'm glad she lingers like a bad fart. If she were smart she would just go away. Ultimately she just isn't that bright.
    1
  12177. If he actually had principles he would have mentioned the conflict of interest of him being affiliated with them while talking about them. Instead he didn't and covered for their blackmail. Kyle's a fraud and demonstrates he doesn't have principles.
    1
  12178. Everything you said after, "this is getting beyond ridiculous," was dumb as fuck.
    1
  12179. You must forgive Jordan for being human. Maybe you can get a robot to bring you the news in the future.
    1
  12180. @ Hayes buried this info for months and would have continued to bury it if harris won. He is complicit.
    1
  12181. @ Is that what you tell yourself when you voted for the guy who got more money from aipac than anyone and oversaw what happened in gaza? You are complicit.
    1
  12182. @ "AIPAC" Joe biden got more from then any anyone... not that you care. You are blue maga.
    1
  12183.  @Bbenton1959  "AIPAC" Joe biden got more money from them than anyone in history and you happily supported him while he armed and supported israel.
    1
  12184.  @Bbenton1959  You voted for what happened in gaza. You are complicit.
    1
  12185. The Hill is a traditionally conservative rag of corporate trash. The Hill Rising with Krystal Ball is for youtube, financed by that same corporate trash, but seems to be exceptional coverage pretty much due to Krystal.
    1
  12186. While true... this was always true from day one. Warren is not a progressive and never has been. She is forever a 90s republican.
    1
  12187. Do not vote for Neera Tanden. If you do I can only think you are a fraud.
    1
  12188. Sounds like you are just looking for reason to like her. That or you really don't understand the nature of things.
    1
  12189. Maybe both.
    1
  12190.  @rudithakorli4804  No shit sherlock otherwise you wouldn't be willing to dismiss the substantive ways she sucks and come to the asinine conclusions found in your original post. What do you like most about her? Her willingness to take legalized bribes in the general? Her being a Republican in the 90s when she was in her 40s? Her waffling on M4A? Her lack of support for Sanders in 2016 or for her fellow natives at the Standing Rock protests? Her continued support for the military industrial complex including voting to give Trump even more money for bombs than the orange clown wanted?
    1
  12191.  @rudithakorli4804  LMFAO I can't you seriously enough to respond intelligently to that.
    1
  12192. It's really too bad youtube doesn't enable the thumbs down for comments like yours.
    1
  12193. You can't lose things like integrity if you never had them.
    1
  12194. So we shouldn't fight for nice things because the media sucks?
    1
  12195.  @cheddarj8086  Regarding, "unfortunately, rn, yes" LFMAO. No. Regarding, "It gets us nowhere" It does. Literally every step of the way we get to see who actually supports getting m4a and who is full of shit. There isn't a single good reason not to do this. Regarding, "makes the progressive movement look weak" By forcing the vote? By using the little power they have to actually get something they want done? Doing nothing is BEING weak. Regarding, "when it hits the house floor and gets absolutely brutalized." Gets absolutely brutalized? LMFAO. What an apt description of the blowback and price that some of these politicians are going to pay for voting against health care in a pandemic. It's a winning position. It's worth the fight. That's why they don't want the vote so much. Regarding, "all I’m trying to say is this is not a hill to die on." m4a isn't the hill to die on? Let's agree to disagree. If this isn't worth fighting for nothing is. Regarding, "Many progressives are now calling AOC a snake" Yeah. It's almost like her actions have consequences. It's almost like just talking the talk isn't going to be enough. And that is how it should be. If she doesn't want to be called a snake all she needs to do is the right thing.... the same MFing things she SAID she was going to do. And I don't tolerate BS from anyone. Even less so from a person I actually expect something from. Regarding, "a backstabbed for not calling for this vote" It is. It's the same thing she said she would do while running. Now she is stabbing us in the back, betraying us, and betraying her word.
    1
  12196.  @cheddarj8086  Regarding, "which is completely and totally regressive" It's regressive to call politicians out for lies and bullshit? Since when? Regarding, "this is not the issue she should be criticized for." LMFAO. I have a tough time taking anyone seriously who is defending this bullshit. AOC and you included.
    1
  12197.  @cheddarj8086  Regarding, " AOC never said she would put a Medicare for all bill on the floor when she can" LMFAO. Yeah. She only said she would fight for m4a. That's way different than fighting it be brought for a vote. I can't do this. Like I said I can't take you seriously and talking to you only destroys my faith in humanity. I'm done with your BS.
    1
  12198.  @cheddarj8086  Regarding, "(in my opinion) ultimately regressive to the progressive movement" If it were actually "regressive to the progressive movement" in the opinion of nancy pelosi she would be calling for the vote. But she and her corporate dems would fight a war to stop this from happening. They know it only hurts them and helps m4a. Even if you don't or pretend to not get it.
    1
  12199. Huh? He thinks Trump is a tool but then again so are you clearly.
    1
  12200. Queen Karma regarding, "maybe the DNC learned a lesson last time." I think you misunderstand what the establishment dems want. They don't care about winning elections. They care about and their purpose is to maintain the status quo. As for how they are going to treat Bernie in 2020 you can expect more of the same. They are going to do anything and everything they can think of to try and stop him. Ultimately I am hopeful that there will not be enough dirty tricks in their playbook to stop him. As for changing the party that is not going to be happening until at least 2020 because Hillary "won" the nomination in 2016. Getting a progressive nominee in 2020 is the key to being able to force them to change. The nominee holds crazy power. They pick the chair who picks the people under them and so on. Corporate dems can be purged the same way progressives were purged. They are able to unilaterally enact reforms like, for example, banning them from accepting their legalized bribes. They get to tell the party what it means to be a democrat going forward. And none of that is possible if Bernie runs as an independent. And it isn't like running as an independent is even remotely fair either, it is just a different way to fight an uphill battle.
    1
  12201.  @GermanLeftist  Then vote for someone decent that you don't think is going to win.
    1
  12202. I'm not sure what prue garbage is but it sounds terrible.
    1
  12203.  @CinCee-  That makes sense.
    1
  12204.  @lmoral222  I think you are greatly underestimating the damage and are very wrong to think anyone is going to touch them.
    1
  12205. You are right that they don't care about "fan pressure." They care about the bottom line and Solo lost money.
    1
  12206. What a hack this guy is. He is terrible.
    1
  12207. More like gullible. He is an ally. Treat him as such even if he isn't perfect. Neither are you. That said I agree about your point of the endorsements. Just not how you said it. And that is coming from someone who can be a real dick.
    1
  12208. Regarding, "That was just in the last two months." Um... yeah. Were you under the impression that he was trying to make a comprehensive picture of her entire life? For example he says early that she is getting "more progressive." Which I object to the conclusion of. But what I don't take issue with it about is that it's not like he was trying to act like this has been her her entire career. In fact it goes out of the way to make clear she has changed. Regarding, "He should keep his mouth shut." Opinions are like assholes. Regarding, "Nixon..." This seems random and irrelevant to the conversation at hand. Regarding, "He's using his platform to help evil, withholding KEY facts." Are you kidding? I think his coverage is generally exceptional. That doesn't mean I'm going to throw the baby out with the bath water when I hear something I disagree with.
    1
  12209. Regarding, "how is he gullible" Probably for the same reasons I was gullible when I voted for Obama. Regarding, "he doesn't do the barest amount of research" Again you are acting like this was meant to be and was portrayed as a comprehensive picture of her. It obviously was not. Regarding, "2016 was 2 years ago, so if she wanted money out of politics, she should have endorsed and campaigned for Bernie." I agree with this. We don't have to all come to the same conclusions and it is asinine to think we will.
    1
  12210. Regarding, "those are current endorsements" Ok. Fair enough. Now I see where the Nixon reference was coming from. Regarding, "so how has she changed" In her rhetoric. And while I agree with you that it is pandering it is a change. Regarding, "Any NY politician sits up when AOC..." I totally disagree with what I think her motive is. I personally think it has far more to do with her trying to gear up for a presidential run. Does that mean I too am corrupt like David?
    1
  12211. Regarding, "entire video who's title and purpose is to amplify Kirsten's message." I don't know about you but I personally am completely dismayed by American politics. In general we are getting our asses handed to us and it has been that way for a long time. That "message" is a good thing. That "message" is correct. That is a win even if only a small one. As for the motive and imputes behind it there is room to agree to disagree. We can agree that it is pandering. That doesn't mean everyone needs to. Look at the comments. There are plenty of us making the point that despite the rhetoric she isn't to be trusted and they say why. If nothing else the discussion created is very constructive.
    1
  12212. Regarding, "let me tell you about pesticides. **Watches ad**... "sounds good but who can tell?"" Wow. This is silly. Is there any room to allow for differing opinions to you? If so where is it?
    1
  12213. It's more accurate to say she didn't endorse Bernie.
    1
  12214. "he was my president instead of trump." -some shtlib, probably
    1
  12215. He's so irrelevant here you are making an ass of yourself.
    1
  12216.  @Hertz2laugh  Of course I do.
    1
  12217. How can you love someone who voted for the 700 billion dollar military budget? She says Trump is crazy and terrible but was happy to give him an extra 80 billion for bombs.
    1
  12218. Regarding, "Giving Trump the military funding is indefensible." Yup. Still you talk about how you love her. That seems like a defense to me. Regarding, "Unfortunately I don't have the luxury of being able to vote for someone I agree with 100%." It isn't about needing someone who you agree with 100 percent of the time. It is about having litmus tests that you don't allow people to break. Voting for that bill is an example of a litmus test to me. It is completely unforgivable, inexcusable, and demonstrates polar opposite ideology then my own when it comes to probably my second most important issue (money in politics being number one). Regarding, "Either she thinks it's a better tactic to vote for the funding or believed in it wholeheartedly." I don't care what her motive was. Short of Trump holding her family hostage before the vote there is literally nothing that can excuse her decision on this issue for me. Regarding, "financial reform" Arguably her greatest achievement was the creation of consumer protection bureau because in a vacuum it is a good thing. The thing is is that we don't live in a vacuum. We lived in a world were we needed glass steagal brought back, banks broken up, and bankers put in jail. Instead we got the consumer protection bureau. A bandaid on the problem just big enough for the dems to say they were doing something about the problem of wall street while letting them continue to fuck over everyone. I very well might vote for her for senate if I lived in her state. But she has no business running for president and if she does it will only be to try and fuck over sanders.
    1
  12219. Why stop there when making shit up? May as well tell everyone they will get laid if we go to war with Iran.
    1
  12220. Pete's doing what he thinks is best for his team while Warren proves she is a snake.
    1
  12221. Chris has buried this info for months. He should share a cell with biden.
    1
  12222. @ "the administration" The entire corporate media is complicit and has manufactured consent for war crimes and war criminals.
    1
  12223.  @davidiihouston6883  You are blue maga who happily supports a party committing jennyside (sic).
    1
  12224. @ Israel just bombed another child with weapons given to them by the administration you voted for. And you are complicit.
    1
  12225.  @davidiihouston6883  Israel just buried another child with a weapon given to them by the administration you voted for. You are complicit.
    1
  12226.  @davidiihouston6883  You voted for an administration that funded and supported a jennyside (sic). You are complicit as are the people who told you to vote for it.
    1
  12227.  @davidiihouston6883  You voted for an administration that funded and supplied a jennnyside (sic). You are complicit much like the war criminals you supported.
    1
  12228.  @davidiihouston6883  Israel just ended the life of another child with weapons given to them by the people you voted for.
    1
  12229.  @davidiihouston6883  The people you voted for used that power to bury children in ruble. And you are complicit.
    1
  12230.  @davidiihouston6883  The people that you voted for used that power to end the lives of children with weapons of mass destruction.
    1
  12231.  @davidiihouston6883  The people you voted for used that power to bury childrne (sic).
    1
  12232.  @davidiihouston6883  You support a party complicit in jennnnnnnysssidee. As is hayes.
    1
  12233. @ You support a party arming and funding a jennnnnyyyside. You are complicit.
    1
  12234.  @davidiihouston6883  You voted for a party arming and funding jennnyysssiiddee. You are complicit, just not as much as chris.
    1
  12235.  @davidiihouston6883  "distorted" Hayes is a blue no matter who cultist just like you who doesn't care that you support a party complicit in jennyssside.
    1
  12236.  @davidiihouston6883  You support and vote for war criminals.
    1
  12237.  @davidiihouston6883  You are blue maga who happily supports a party regardless of what they are doing.
    1
  12238.  @davidiihouston6883  "virtue signal" You vote for people who leveled gaza because you can't signal this.
    1
  12239. @ Just a reminder that c hayes tried to get everyone to vote for a party leveling gaza.
    1
  12240. @ Just a reminder that c hayes tried to get everyone to support a political party committing jjjjeeennnooocciiiddee.
    1
  12241. @honeybeedaniels It's tough to take you seriously if you want to point the finger at me rather than hayes and MSNBC.
    1
  12242. Krystal is great.
    1
  12243. People who don't appreciate politics in puppy videos.
    1
  12244. Actually the solution to making government less corrupt is to get money out of politics. The solution to millions without health insurance is universal health care. It really does make sense to people that aren't idiots.
    1
  12245. "These movies are made for kids with IQ of a pigeon." Well written. /s
    1
  12246. Coherent sentences aren't for everyone.
    1
  12247. So long story short he is better than the "democratic" party.
    1
  12248. You've come to the wrong place then. Kyle defends the corrupt justice dems. He doesn't call them out.
    1
  12249. "he has not sold out to the establishment" Yang worked for CNN. He's a sell out.
    1
  12250.  @Anon-md5ep  Yang lied about m4a while running for POTUS. Yang wants to gut the social safety net to pay for UBI when any sort of actual progressive would have rich people pay for it. As if working for CNN isn't already enough to know he's a conman sellout.
    1
  12251. You have to try. We can't just leave them be to fuck up our lives with their stupidity. Don't get me wrong there are plenty of people that are too far gone but I think you are wrong to write this guy off. I think he has just gotten too much of his information from corporate media. That and he is still really young. I understand wanting to just say fuck that guy what a tool but we really need to keep fighting the good fight and keep making our case to the public. The facts are on our side. We need to keep using them.
    1
  12252. He did you a favor. We've all been fooled before. I was a fan of rachel maddow once even. But it's better to know they are frauds and get out.
    1
  12253.  @meanwhileinsooke  If kyles channel is getting helped by clowns like this with smears like this it's pretty telling that this channel is a dumpster fire and so are the people staying and defending it.
    1
  12254. "Doctored video." Hyperbole much? It was obvious satire. And if you have a problem with free speech and satire you are LOST.
    1
  12255. Trump is terrible. So is Trump derangement syndrome.
    1
  12256. I have a bridge for sale.
    1
  12257. "full support for jimmy" LMFAO Kyle isn't the only one who likes to have is cake and eat it too.
    1
  12258. "organize the riot" Riots are not something that is typically "organized."
    1
  12259. May as well just tattoo moron on your forehead.
    1
  12260. "His youtube channel, secular talk, an AFFILIATE of the young turks network." -wikipedia
    1
  12261. Not that kyle would ever be intellectually honest enough to admit it even when covering for TYT's bullshit and blackmail.
    1
  12262. Najeh Davenport pooped in my closet.
    1
  12263. "Why the fuck would this guy agree to come back for a live interview" He likes it when you watch.
    1
  12264. "Street cred" probably isn't a good way to judge an argument.
    1
  12265. And "team" mentality is poison.
    1
  12266. He would have but they had important topics to cover such as pocket pussies.
    1
  12267. Trian regarding, "They won't let him run as a Dem" Yes. They will. There is no reason for you to think this. Regarding, "so he would have to run in a 3rd party" They absolutely do not want him to run as a 3rd party candidate because they know that splits left leaning thinkers and ensures them losing. Regarding, "If Bernie did that, I would vote for him, but I'm not voting (D)" So you would vote for Bernie but only if he runs as an independent? Way too many people care about party labels and not nearly enough about people. Vote for good people... regardless of party label or you are no better than the sheep who only vote because of a party label. Regarding, "They can't be trusted." The "democratic" party is shit. That is why we need to support Sanders so he can change them.
    1
  12268. Trian regarding, "Dem primary voters mean nothing" Of course they do. You sound silly. Regarding, "with superdelegates in charge" Superdelegates are not in charge. They are only a small percentage of all delegates and there are less of then since last election... because of Sanders. Regarding, "The elite Republicrats choose their own private candidate. They said so, in court." They said they could if they choose to in court... and they are correct. But they don't. They have a primary. When you distort shit you are no better than the DNC.
    1
  12269. Trian regarding, "why aren't masses of disenfranchised voters joining them" The masses are sheep.
    1
  12270.  @lutherblissett9070  I guess the rest of world should have troops stationed all over the US.
    1
  12271. Let's say I agreed with you, and I don't because your statement is moronic, then you are saying that winning elections is more important that protecting the public. You suck at life Ken.
    1
  12272. While they are a big group that does not want weed legal they don't have as much to lose as big pharma, the private prison industry, and the cops waging the war on weed.
    1
  12273. Don't get me wrong kingjustice, the tobacco industry would absolutely try to make the most of legalization but that said it is plan B for them and they would rather not have another market competing with them. They absolutely do not want it legal.
    1
  12274. Actually policy wins.
    1
  12275.  @Boofyre  I want more than metaphors from politicians. What she was doing there was not really an different than Trump saying he's going to "make america great again (with love)." To both of them and their platitudes I want to say... so what the fuck does that mean, with the important shit, POLICY. And yeah, if I see "love" in that policy I might support you. But I'm not interested any of yours (or anyone elses) platitudes. I want a plan. A concrete plan.
    1
  12276. Sad but true. Can you imagine how coverage would have been different if this were Sanders doing shit like this and not biden? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AKCJ45QMyLU
    1
  12277. The establishment loves it when you don't vote and thank you for your decision. If enough people act like you they won't even need to rig the game anymore.
    1
  12278. Regarding, "It's my right not to vote good sir." No shit sherlock. I guess I may as well say something equally pointless like it is my right to use my free speech to tell you why what you are doing is dumb as fuck.
    1
  12279. Regarding, "I will use my own free speech to tell you that voting is a waste of time and that it has no effect on the corruption of government." Are you intentionally missing my point? Seriously... that corruption fucking loves you. You are everything they want from the public. You aren't even willing to use a tiny fraction of your time to make them fuck you over and fight them in that tiny way. You just bend over, present your ass, and take it without a fight. I'd ask what you think would effect the corruption of government but, in all honesty, I don't really give a fuck what you think on the topic at this point. I'm assuming it is just as equally asinine as your thoughts on voting.
    1
  12280. Regarding, "Shame on you for not being a good little pleb by not voting for the next oligarch to rule over you." If that is how you interpret what I'm saying it's only because you are an idiot. But well done on making a textbook strawman argument that totally ignores my point. Tell you what... how about I try and my point clear in the form of a question because you can't seem to grasp the point. Do you think the oligarchy wants you to vote or do they want you to stay home? Because the point is that they want you to stay home and you happy to do what the oligarchy wants like a fucking idiot instead of bothering to make them rig the game. But go ahead and stay home, which is exactly what they want like a total fucking moron who can't grasp that simple point. I'm done responding to this further. You can't fix stupid and I'm being foolish for trying with you.
    1
  12281. Regarding, "it's pretty accurate to what you're saying." But thanks for proving my point that you can't fix stupid before I go.
    1
  12282. Regarding, "That comment more fits you than me." Says an idiot who is happy to do exactly what the oligarchy wants. Who thinks the oligarchy spends billions on elections when they don't matter. Who thinks they purge voter roles even thou it doesn't matter. Then again I am an idiot for responding to you further.
    1
  12283. Regarding, "Have you seen the recent primaries in New York?" How about an accurate translation... Yes Clint, you are absolutely correct. I know they purge voter roles and I think they do so even thou voting and elections don't matter. That makes sense to me because I'm an idiot who can't logic.
    1
  12284. Regarding, "Oh good you are aware of that, thought you were a naive person." Translation... I have comprehension issues who can't understand the point even when it is spelled out for me like I'm a child. I deflect and distract from the point at hand with comments that are beyond idiotic.
    1
  12285. Rachel, seriously. Do you think the oligarchy wants you to vote or do they want you to stay home? Don't be afraid to answer this very simple question.
    1
  12286. Regarding, "Okay, now you're just being a dick." Nope. I'm being a dick trying to make a point to a fucking idiot who can't answer a simple question.
    1
  12287. Can't answer a simple fucking question. I suppose that if you did it would make you question your being an idiot on this and you can't have that.
    1
  12288. Just throw those blinders up and ignore the fact that you are doing what they want. May as well tell yourself you are being brilliant at the same time for it.
    1
  12289. Regarding, "I just did answer you're question" LMFAO. Ok. I seriously quit this time. You can't even tell the difference between answering a question and deflecting from it. You would have made a great politician with such an absurd statement. I quit. Good riddance. The establishment loves you. Try not to lie to yourself about it.
    1
  12290. I'm trying so hard to quit this. I really am. But I have a hard time letting stupid shit go unanswered. Regarding, "Nothing will change whether you vote or not" So why does the oligarchy spend billions on elections? Regarding, "that's one thing Obama taught me" You sound like someone who had their heart broken and afterward decided that love can't work because of one douche. What you should have learned from Obama was follow the money and don't support candidates selling out to win their election to big money and corporate interests. Candidates who get in office on the backs of small money and the people represent the people. Candidates who win their elections on the backs of big money represent big money and it shouldn't be hard to understand why. Politicians go with who get them in office. That is what you should have learned.
    1
  12291. Regarding, "why is there so much harshness towards me for deciding not to vote?" Because you are part of the problem when you don't instead of being part of the solution. Regarding, "Last time I checked, this is still a free country for the most part." But we aren't free to tell you why what you are doing is stupid I guess. That or what you are saying here is dumb as fuck.
    1
  12292. Regarding, "Should I be denied freedom of choice because some people don't like it that I don't vote?" No. Stop being ridiculous. Then again that seems to be the only thing you are capable of. Let's say someone was trying to tell you that you should wash your hands after using the bathroom. Would you try and use this same type of stupid as fuck "logic" for that? Or would you just understand that they are making a logical argument that you are deflecting from under the rationalization of choice. My telling you that you should wash your hands after using the bathroom wouldn't be to deny you choice or freedom. It is to make you open your fucking eyes and stop acting like a god damn idiot.
    1
  12293. Regarding, "it is up to me to make that choice" Why do you keep saying things that are obvious and irrelevant? It's because that is better than addressing the point isn't it? That choice of yours is beloved by the oligarchy. That's the point even thou you can't seem to grasp it. What the fuck is wrong with me that I am still trying to get you to understand this? You do you. But while you do understand that that the people you claim to not like LOVE you for it. Know that even if we are wrong, and you are correct and voting has zero hope of changing anything that tiny investment of your time is inconsequential. That if we are correct then you are a fucking idiot who is absolutely a part of the problem. And that your actions absolutely, 100 percent, without a doubt, will not bring about change. And if you want change, like I do, then you may as well "waste" that tiny bit of time just in case you are wrong... which you absolutely are because of reasons I've tried to explain to you. Because if voting and elections didn't matter then it would make no fucking logical sense that the oligarchy would spend billions of dollars on elections. They spend that money because you are wrong and because it does matter.
    1
  12294. Regarding, "Why can't you just accept that I chose not to vote and move on?" Was I unclear about you being part of the problem? That I want change and you aren't helping in getting it? Regarding, "Instead you keep painting me as a bad guy for not voting." I guess not. It's just that you are can't understand simple points and use logic and reason. I can only think you are trolling me at this point. And well done at that.
    1
  12295. Regarding, "me deciding not to vote is not gonna do much." This is how half the country rationalizes staying home on election day I suppose.
    1
  12296. Not that it matters. I'd never be caught dead on twitter.
    1
  12297. Something about Obama and Hillary I'm sure.
    1
  12298. no
    1
  12299. So dildo laws "sounds about right." And one of the 27 words in the incredibly cryptic, terribly written 2nd amendment is regulated.
    1
  12300. Regarding, "I don't like the "why is he/she still in this race?"" You don't need to like it for it to be a valid question for someone who has zero path to the nomination. Regarding, "It's an argument that has been used against Bernie as well." Yup. In an apples to oranges comparison kind of way. When people are telling you for Bernie to get out of the way it's for inferior candidates and reasons. Asking progressives to coallese around the clear leader of the progressive movement is obviously very different than that. Regarding, "I'm really not fond of the "you should sacrifice yourself for the Greater Good" mentality." Bernie might not be your guy then. He understands it's about us.
    1
  12301.  @ErikBongers  Regarding, "I still believe that more progressive candidates help create a broader base of grass root support." Meaningless when those votes are going to a candidate who can't win. Progressives have support when it comes to policy. We need to win some elections and particularly this one. The party is a dumpster fire in large part because Hillary "won" the 2016 primary. It's why, for example, we have tom perez. Regarding, "I'm thinking here beyond the presidency." Maybe spend more time thinking about what is in front of you before getting ahead of yourself. If we don't win this election I have zero hope for the future. Regarding, "Shifting the so-called overton window may have more impact than who's president." Tulsi can try to do this WHILE supporting Sanders the exact same way she did in 2016.
    1
  12302. Regarding, "So if you feel HRC was worse than trump than how can you blame him for voteing for trump?" Yes because supporting evil is supporting evil and this is just a bullshit rationalization for people to do so. And what if the election were between Hitler and Pol Pot? Would you be using the same bullshit argument? Because the same bullshit argument doesn't go away. The bottom line is that you have to draw a line in the sand and only be willing to support a candidate that is a certain amount of decent and if you think either Hillary or Trump comes anywhere close enough to acceptable to supported then I think you are fucking crazy and your sense of morality is pretty fucked up. Regarding, "3rd party candidate that had no chance of winning" One of the main reason a 3rd party candidate had no chance of winning is because of the stupid group-think of picking between the lesser evil. Do you not realize how stupid and circular this logic is? Why don't you vote for a 3rd party candidate? Because they can't win. Why can't they win? Because people are not voting for them. Why aren't people voting for them? Because they can't win. Why can't they win again? And around and around it goes. I suggest you vote for the candidate you want to win and not try to concern yourself with winning so much at least not when the candidates who "can" win don't deserve to win. Regarding, "One of them was going to win," In part because the establishment has you fools convinced you need to pick between a douche and a turd. Regarding, "Complaining that Bernie would have won is not moveing foward" It is about more than this. Those that don't study history and examine the past are doomed to repeat it. You know who wants us to move forward and not try to change things going forward? The establishment. (and you apparently) Regarding, "But the question is what do we do now" How about we support good people in the future just like we should have been doing the past for starters? Regarding, "Things cant stay the way they are." You would be surprised how wrong this is. Of course there should be drastic change. But likely we are just going to get to choose between a douche and turd next time because people keep playing their game.
    1
  12303. Regarding, "Who would have been better?" Between Trump and Clinton? Who cares. I refuse to play that game. I leave that you people like you who are happy to play the game the establishment wants them to play. Regarding, "Do you seriously think Jill would of stood a chance?" In a fair race against 2 of the most despised people in the country where for example she gets to debate with them? Yes I do. Sadly we do not have free and fair elections in this country. Regarding, "she would of gotten nothing done" I kind of agree with this. She would have been opposed by both major parties and not been able to pass any legislation of note. That said she would have been in a position to win the battle of ideas because the president is a unique position in that the corporate media HAS to cover them. As it stands they are able to marginalize her and the conversation people like her want to discuss. Oh and getting nothing done is better than doing things that actively make things worse like everything Trump has "accomplished" thus far. Regarding, "I don't think she would of been a better option anyway." This is stupid beyond words. If you think she wouldn't be better than Trump then I think you are fucking retarded.
    1
  12304. F isnotrael
    1
  12305. BULLSHIT! His subscriber count should be far superior to that of the majority report!
    1
  12306. If they actually didn't want "spoilers" they would invite them into the party rather than try to force them out where they... ya know... spoil things. If Sanders decided to run as an indy or green in the general this pledge wouldn't stop him. It would only allow them to smear him about it as he ran.
    1
  12307.  @ashisrizal2908  Yeah... that definitely seems like the type of thing that would make you want them to burn for eternity in a lake of fire. /s
    1
  12308.  @dixonyamowthe1297  Don't worry, hell isn't actually a thing and/or a place to go. But anyways I totally agree that, in general, the hill is trash. But I've been happily watching and loving their online coverage because like you also know, Krystal is fucking great. And in a world where I already have so much trouble finding places to go for news I'm ok going to hill online to see krystal. And sure even their coverage isn't perfect. They bring on far too many "strategists" aka propogandists but even then it isn't as bad because she pushes back on them the way corporate media doesn't. I guess I too might prefer she keep doing her great work elsewhere but whatever. The fact that it's at the hill might help us (krystal really) reach people that aren't normally reached and burst their bubble.
    1
  12309. People who care about the environment care. GERMANS, who spent BILLIONS for the pipeline care. You must be really terrible to not know the answer to your own question.
    1
  12310. It was terrorism. Period.
    1
  12311.  @Sedgewise47  The drug war is failure as well since you mention it. You are making excuses and rationalizations for environmental terrorism. It's disgusting.
    1
  12312.  @Sedgewise47  "allowing the addict" It's not your country. You are an imperialist, warmonger, and environmental terrorist.
    1
  12313.  @Sedgewise47  "allowing" Maybe worry more about your own country. There is already an ecological disaster in ohio. Maybe address that instead of CREATING more of them in other people countries in an act of war.
    1
  12314. We could save many lives if we harvested neil's body for parts. Neil must be cool with that right?
    1
  12315. At least the BBC has brought back DS9 as of late. The more I watch it the more I like it. Back when Star Trek was good.
    1
  12316. Have those friends bring friends.
    1
  12317. What was behind the world's heaviest door? Your mom.
    1
  12318.  @Blue_Tambourine  just stop
    1
  12319. You don't wonder what other conflicts of interest he might be leaving out going forward? Whose blackmail he might coverup next?
    1
  12320.  @cannibalspirit  What highlander is saying is bullshit. And they know it. But hey... if you repeat lies enough you get people to believe them.
    1
  12321.  @cannibalspirit  Regarding, "why is it bullshit?" "To ditch the Electoral College entirely, the US would have to..." This is bullshit because the most likely way to ditch the EC and something that is also an option, not to be confused with likely as doing this is also hard, is the National Popular Vote Compact.
    1
  12322.  @cannibalspirit  Get states with a majority of delegates to agree to give all their delegates to the candidate who wins the national vote.
    1
  12323. Meh. People who supported him were fools but your comment is still too harsh. And that's coming from a guy who admits to being a dick too often.
    1
  12324. Same. In a swing state. And I give two shits about any of their shaming. Feel free to try me DNC cucks.
    1
  12325. He feels passionate about it. So do I. Don't be ashamed of righteous anger.
    1
  12326.  @drabolit  "nah when you debate the best way to iron out concerns and ideas is to be unemotional" Arguably. But we are humans. And a human having emotion isn't something to be ashamed of... it's something you should expect. "whoever the other guy is just isn’t a good person" Maybe. But I think you are wrong to conclude they can't be a "good person" and wrong about things like this. I know people in real life who are good people but are propagandized and brainwashed into believing what ben does. "he’s purposefully ignoring truths Kurt brought up and saying he doesn’t “believe” what he was saying was true" I'm on kurts side 100 percent but this exact thing can be said about kurt IMO. IMO Ben is correct that some clowns do imitate terrible behavior that they see in media. The worst part of the debate was when kurt tried to deny this. It made it look like he was "purposefully ignoring truths ben brought up and kurt was saying he "didn't believe" that people imitate media when it's true as day they do. Ultimately I'm on kurt's side because even if someone imitates bad behavior it doesn't matter to me. People are responsible for their own actions.
    1
  12327.  @drabolit  For all I know deshaun watson only got a massage fetish from watching a subcategory of phub. But that doesn't mean phub is responsible for watsons actions... watson is responsible for watsons actions.
    1
  12328.  @drabolit  "a bad person shys away from truth imo" Good people are brainwashed and propagandized constantly. Thats why the do it. That's why corporate media is what it is. Save your ire for the elite where it belongs and don't blame peasants. They are VICTIMS.
    1
  12329. Is that really what you heard? I heard we don't really know shit til day 9.
    1
  12330.  @t__a__z  Regarding, "I heard him say that." You heard him say we don't know shit til day 9 and your OP says, "So what you’re saying is he’s probably in really bad shape" as if those two things can coexist? You are tough to take seriously. I hope you aren't always so intellectually dishonest.
    1
  12331.  @t__a__z  Thanks for admitting your mistake. There is hope for your intellectual honesty. Peace.
    1
  12332.  @t__a__z  You are clearly cool. Forgive me for being harsh originally. I'm clearly frustrated with the current state of affairs and it often shows.
    1
  12333. So far the worst part of 2021 are people like you.
    1
  12334. You can't even spell socialist correctly for fucks sake when we were suppose to be talking about commies. You think the things you do because you are not smart.
    1
  12335. Wait, I am confused, is he a communist or a socialist? You don't have to answer it is rhetorical. I don't actually care what you think but good luck with the whole stupid as fuck thing you got going on.
    1
  12336. That is a compliment considering the source. Thank you. I appreciate it.
    1
  12337. You were just saying you didn't care what I think and now you are telling me to watch your trash videos as if you do care. You are confusing me again. I want to call you a moron but that would be insulting to morons. You remind me of the guy in Idiocracy who got paid to say "brought to you by Carl's Jr" but it's as if you get paid to say "libtard" and are significantly dumber.
    1
  12338. You forgot to call me a libtard dipshit.
    1
  12339. Hayes and MSNBC told you to vote for biden and harris while this was happening. They are complicit.
    1
  12340.  @yougotthis7667  Just when I thought I couldn't hate the yankees more I read your comment.
    1
  12341. Good. Go.
    1
  12342. As if it's jimmy's fault ana exposed herself at work.
    1
  12343. Nobody needs to make it political. It already is because of who is in it and I don't appreciate them bringing politics into a channel about animals.
    1
  12344. Establishment candidates represent big money and corporations. That includes the private for profit health insurance industry and big pharma.
    1
  12345. It's really too bad that the thumbs down feature doesn't work for idiotic comments such as yours.
    1
  12346. Regarding, "How can healthcare be a “human right” when it requires the time and labor of others?" We get to decide what is and isn't considered to be a right in our society. Health care should be one of those things because our society shouldn't just turn a blind eye when people get sick. Regarding, "How does that “human right” work without the massive wealth afforded by our capitalism by which tons of labor can be sucked away?" Universal health care is cheaper. Canada pays HALF as much per person for their system compared to the US. All the countries in the world that are poorer than the US seem to be able to afford it.
    1
  12347.  Richard Peck  I'd be far happier if being outed for blatant hypocrisy would impact the clown. Sadly I'm sure it won't and I'm confident they aren't even a bit embarrassed.
    1
  12348.  @kellielaine5848  Both parties are corporate tools aka fascists.
    1
  12349.  @Bluebelle51  Let's not forget that he is the one who wants to poke Russia.
    1
  12350.  @eyelesspotato2189  Regarding, "You say that we may be better off in the long run if Trump wins in Nov." I'm actually of the firm belief this is the case. Note: never trump. I don't support evil. Regarding, "What are the chances that Ginsberg..." Ah yes, the courts argument. God forbid we don't elect Joe Biden, the guy who got Clarence Thomas on the court due to his unforgiveable behavior. God forbid we don't elect biden who can be trusted to put 100 percent corporate friendly judges on the bench. BIDEN IS ON THE RIGHT. That is who he is going to put on the court.
    1
  12351. They are not the left. They are the elite. And you are playing their game of trying to divide the left and the right.
    1
  12352. That still wouldn't be enough to get me to support him.
    1
  12353. Blind allegiance to parties is partly to blame for why we are where we are. Vote based on policy. Even if the "democratic" party is, in general, a dumpster fire, that doesn't mean that justice democrats aren't right when it comes to policy. People like them deserve your support.
    1
  12354. What a dick move by Larry. It was so great. Thank you for that Larry.
    1
  12355.  @shayyeager7582  Really? I'm pro-choice but I think I can easily answer this. They think it's a life and as a life they think it shouldn't be killed the way everyone tends to think killing another person is wrong. Do you think it's wrong to kill a baby that has been born? They think abortion is wrong for the same reasons you would use to think killing a baby after it born is wrong.
    1
  12356.  @shayyeager7582  I'm going to continue to play devils advocate. Regarding, "I just think if the parent isn't in a place to care for a child why put the child through that." They would say... put the child up for adoption. No doubt the child, after they are grown, would prefer that as opposed to not being alive.
    1
  12357.  @NeroCloud1  regarding, "Ok so why is it hard to get it to office if you have not faith" Because the religious (in general, not always), in addition to their stupid religious beliefs, believe stupid shit like atheists are inherently immoral and shit like that which make it all but impossible for atheists to win elected office. Regarding, "is there a way to change it to were no one will care" Education and debate. The things you moronically call "crying."
    1
  12358.  @Thor.Jorgensen  sorry for stealing the point you made. You obviously made it before me and I can't agree more.
    1
  12359. Science isn't the problem. Corrupt people are.
    1
  12360. I could only take your comment less seriously if it were all in caps. Oh... wait.
    1
  12361. nope
    1
  12362. "being a democrat today tells me something about the person" Not nearly as much as you claim. Sure the party is a dumpster fire but some people are looking to put the fire out.
    1
  12363. Stop caring so much about a party label and care about the person.
    1
  12364. "Are the Squad the "US left"?" Definitely not. They are oligarchs. "The US just has a wonky political spectrum" The US has CORRUPTION.
    1
  12365. Let's keep doing both.
    1
  12366. It's never a 1 v 1. Voting for a someone else who isn't evil is always an option. It's the option EVERYONE should take in such a scenario.
    1
  12367. Nah. If that were the case I might actually want war.
    1
  12368. Yes. You don't get it.
    1
  12369.  @redpillras3456  Trump is also racist. If you care.
    1
  12370.  @redpillras3456  Why does wall loving trump only care about building a wall between us and the country that isn't predominately white? Why doesn't he care about building a wall between us and the predominately white country?
    1
  12371.  @marc-julien6826  I don't really care to elaborate.
    1
  12372.  @marc-julien6826  Then again, regarding, "the USA will have lost support from all or most current allies" This is funny to me because the US losing support in waging war everywhere would be a good thing.
    1
  12373. The irony. Thanks for the laugh dipshit.
    1
  12374.  @GregAkers  "invade Taiwan" That's akin to the US "invading" texas. It's already theirs.
    1
  12375.  @GregAkers  "Not really !" Yes really. "You need to study history !" You don't even attempt an argument. You just give ad hominem like this. It's telling.
    1
  12376.  @GregAkers  "Taiwan has been free for too long" LMFAO You are not a serious person.
    1
  12377.  @GregAkers  "You need to study history !" I have. That's why I know what I'm talking about. I recommend the youtube video title, "President Jimmy Carter - Speech on Relations with China."
    1
  12378.  @GregAkers  "You folks really need to make sense, before you get on this thing" I can only think you are paid to gaslight.
    1
  12379.  @GregAkers  "Taiwan has been free for too long" "The government of the united states of america acknowledges the chinese position that there is but one china and taiwan is part of china." -Jimmy carter
    1
  12380.  @GregAkers  "You need to study history !" Take your own advice. In the age of information igno rance like yours is a choice.
    1
  12381. Yup. The race for 2020 has already begun.
    1
  12382. Actually the best thing about the constitution is that it allows itself to be changed.
    1
  12383. The first amendment was still an amendment.
    1
  12384.  @motherboard424  46 of 65 now show for those keeping count. No big deal that the government is working with them to censor you. /s
    1
  12385.  @jamesmiddleton1278  Did you hear about the good news from boston U? Where they combined the original stain with omicron to make an even more deadly virus? Probably not cause it's even money that this comment shows.
    1
  12386. I hope you are correct but let's not underestimate the establishment. It's going to be a war for 2020.
    1
  12387. Or something happens that makes them more able to justify another imperialist war because that is a real possibility right?
    1
  12388.  @rcarmisin3465  "Open your mind to the bigger picture." This is what you say to try and deflect from a murd ered journalist. "A dead journalist?" No. A MURD ERED journalist. "looking what's been going on there for decades, centuries." Is there something about it that makes the murd er of a journalist ok? Oh wait... "Is that how you rationalize things?" LMFAO What? FYI you are deflecting. Because you don't have anything intelligent to say about a mur der. "You got a small view chum" What about your big view makes that mur der ok? Oh right... nothing. And you know it.
    1
  12389.  @rcarmisin3465  F
    1
  12390.  @rcarmisin3465  U
    1
  12391. "0 credibility to be making political commentary" This is apt of CNN but not roger.
    1
  12392. It's only alive on the "left." If you don't believe in free speech you aren't on the left.
    1
  12393. What exactly are you mad at him for? He was literally the only reason the "democratic" primary even needed to be rigged in the first place. You are mad a guy for getting fucked over. It's like getting mad a person for getting raped. You are pretty fucked up lilly.
    1
  12394. You are an idiot and clearly are new to TYT politics.
    1
  12395. Holy shit. Do you ever say anything that isn't dumb as fuck? Regarding, "it's not the young turks" It is a subsection. I never said or implied anything to suggest that it wasn't a part of young turks unless you are a fucking moron. Regarding, "i'm not an idiot, yes i am new to tyt politics" Yes. You absolutely are an idiot. You can tell by the fact that you chose to make statements about something you have no fucking idea what you are talking about. This type of coverage is very typical of what you find on TYT politics not that you would know because, like you have said, YOU HAVE NO FUCKING IDEA WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT, but that doesn't stop you from saying stupid things does it. Regarding, "because i have avoided everything to do with the young turks" So the person that again admits to not having a fucking clue what they are talking about is also an expert? Holy shit are dumb as a box of rocks. Do the world a favor and never say another world. You make the world dumber when you speak.
    1
  12396. Don't you be scared to think differently than you are… and stop being an idiot.
    1
  12397. Guns also save millions of people's lives? Holy shit are stupid.
    1
  12398. Crrystal, am I wrong to think that you are downright gleeful about people being "struck down" in this life or the next (which doesn't exist). Who exactly sucks?
    1
  12399. And do yourself a favor and stop wasting time on your prayers. They are fucking meaningless. Or if they actually do something, and they don't, how about you pray for something a little more tangible. How about you get your fake deity to cure cancer if prayer actually does something? Or are you and your god pro-cancer?
    1
  12400.  @chrystalmcatee6224  regarding, "you God haters sure are angry" I can't hate something I don't think exists. I'm angry with people like you, who use faith instead of using logic, reason, and evidence. Regarding, "there are cures for cancer but they have been kept from the public because big pharma" Do you have evidence of your claim? Of course not. Because your cult has you trained to think things without good evidence. But let's say what you are saying is true... then pray to your god for an end to big pharma as if praying works... which it ABSOLUTELY doesn't. There is more evidence that praying for someone who is sick is WORSE for them then not praying, likely because of the psychological stress they feel to get better and prove that praying is doing them good. Regarding, "I have complete faith in God to serve justice." Of course you do. It must be nice to think there is some kind of karmic justice being dished out in the afterlife where people get to be burned for an eternity as if that punishment is apt for any crime. That you more special then you are... and get to live in the clouds in eternal bliss with your lost relatives. Your beliefs are absurd and wishful thinking. Regarding, "At the very least do u not believe in karma." No. Absolutely not. Do you have proof of karma? Of course not. But again, you are trained by your cult to believe things without it. Good luck being a sheep in the future. I know you will. You are exactly the type of nonthinking believer religions need. You use faith instead of logic, reason, and evidence like you should. But tell you what... if faith is so good use it for everything. Use it when cross the street instead of using your senses to cross the street... like a sane person would.
    1
  12401. This is why I hate the public and tend to think they are all idiots.
    1
  12402. Who would be worse?
    1
  12403. Do not vote for and support Neera Tanden. Better yet call her out and call out biden for nominating corrupt people like her.
    1
  12404. You can't really be that stupid can you cory?
    1
  12405. For the intolerably lazy... https://www.thoughtco.com/was-donald-trump-a-democrat-3367571
    1
  12406. I'm a pacifist or I would be right there with you.
    1
  12407. Trump is a POS. Just like Biden. Stop pretending otherwise.
    1
  12408. Except that what they said was wrong.
    1
  12409.  @NeoKailthas  Regarding, "you are not being fair," LFMAO. Nah, you are being a tool. Regarding, " it is understandable because Obama didn't deliver on what he promised and actually worked against us ." We aren't conflating different topics. What the Obama's said and what they have done are different topics that we are not conflating. That's what you are doing. The shit said was wrong and it has nothing to do with his actions as president. It just has to do with the stuff he said and it being wrong.
    1
  12410.  @NeoKailthas  Do the young people "not get it." Is that why they don't support corrupt "democratic" officials? Or are you and Obama being stupid.
    1
  12411.  @NeoKailthas  Do I know more about the cereal I don't eat ever or about the corruption in US government?
    1
  12412.  @NeoKailthas  Regarding, "ok great conversation 👌" Not really. It was doomed from the start when you were saying stupid shit.
    1
  12413. Israel is an apar theid state.
    1
  12414.  @thebossman222  Would you say the same thing if they gave Trump a photo op while he were in office? Or maybe then you would come to the obvious that it is political because of who is in it.
    1
  12415.  @thebossman222  Regarding, "They wouldn't allow an animal abuser" Do you have any evidence trump is an animal abuser? And thanks for proving my point that the decision to have biden on is political... not that you needed to.
    1
  12416.  @thebossman222  Regarding, "you'd have an objection to that because its political as well wouldn't you? Nope ypu wouldn't." Yes. I would. I'm not a political hack. That's what you are.
    1
  12417.  @thebossman222  Also... FYI not that you care... I'm not a supporter of the orange clown with tiny hands.
    1
  12418. I guess to anyone stupid enough to support Trump anyone not supporting their conman must have supported the conwoman. They don't. When you say that you seem to understand the importance of not supporting a crook. Meanwhile you support a crook.
    1
  12419. Al Gore rhythm.
    1
  12420. Are they why you can't have nice things? Or is it because of your american oligarchs?
    1
  12421. Regarding, "The fact that the Clinton Foundation got money was a coincidence." Yeah, they gave that 140+ million for humanitarian purposes. (That is sarcasm in case you are too dumb to tell without me telling you.)
    1
  12422. Does anyone actually think pelosi cares about the people in taiwan? She doesn't even care about the people in the US.
    1
  12423. 1) a person's occupation does not disqualify someone from giving a political opinion 2) she is hardly a failed actress, she is actually quite successful, not that this is relevant to the conversation. She's wrong. Stick to that and focus on that instead of what you are doing. Period!!!!
    1
  12424. "Bernie is budget chairman." LMFAO. This is obviously what we all really want. We should all probably just quit.
    1
  12425.  @FrostySumo  Regarding, "you just totally missed my point and/or you don't understand how powerful the budget chairman is" I don't even know where to begin to try and explain just how moronic your point is. But I'll leave you with this... this seat of bernie has NOTHING to do with force the vote. Not a god damn thing. Not even close. They aren't even in the same universe.
    1
  12426.  @FrostySumo  Regarding, "Do you not understand that a force the vote situation before the Georgia elections most likely would have resulted in us and losing the Senate?" Is nancy really popular in georgia or some shit? No. I guess I don't realize this because it's bullshit. Regarding, "Making the Georgia race about $2,000 is the only reason we won them." I'm sure if they thought they might also get universal health care they would have gone out and voted republican right? LMFAO Regarding, "Splitting the party with the medicare-for-all vote first thing makes us look terrible." LMFAO. Yeah. Be a party that is going to do nothing about health care during a pandemic. That's how you win. Thanks for this. I'm learning so much. Regarding, "If you don't immediately understand this point then of course you think we're in alternate realities." We are in alternate realities. Regarding, "Why even bother to make a comment if you're not trying to explain your point?" Why do I even bother to make a point when you demonstrate flat earth level stupidity in your OP?
    1
  12427. Because they aren't exactly a news organization. They are more about propaganda and they know Milano is going to say what they want said.
    1
  12428. Hostile takeover over the party is a far better strategy than trying to overcome the EC.
    1
  12429.  BartJ583  I can't tell you how nice it was when you weren't busy saying stupid shit.
    1
  12430. Regarding, "all you’re stupid ass" *your Please leave dipshit.
    1
  12431.  @gwendyp125  I can't speak for thunderfoot but the word hate works for me to describe elon.
    1
  12432.  @Inferno361  LMFAO. I'll bet that even epstein could "explain himself." Does that mean he's not terrible? No I'm not equating the two before you no doubt nonsensically go there... I'm making a point. Don't be afraid to answer my question even it's pretty rhetorical really.
    1
  12433. As someone who is lactose intolerant I know I'm sitting on a literal gold mine. I also know it could kill me if I tried to cash in. Life is filled with lots of tough decisions.
    1
  12434.  @LeftIsBest001  Regarding, "Every single day of her Senatorial career, Warren has fought against Big Banks, Big Pharma, Wall Street and on behalf of Americans." In which she has accomplished dick all other than some finger wagging. Meanwhile, she has stated her commitment to taking legalized bribes should she make it to the general. Regarding, "She's NEVER compromised with Republicans to weaken her stance." She WAS a Republican herself as recently as the 90s. People don't change like that so late in life unless they are pandering and pretending to be something they are not. Regarding, "She's NEVER supported or condoned the use of torture." She recently voted to give Donald Trump, a person she claims is "unhinged" more money for bombs than even the orange clown wanted. But what could possibly go wrong with that am I right? The department of offense really needed those extra billions didn't they? But it's not torture when you are just trying to kill people so that's different and better somehow. Regarding, "Yes, I can see how you'd find that amusing. 🤔. Fuckwad." I find your stupidity amusing in a pathetic idiotic sort of way. Fuckwad.
    1
  12435. They are not the "left." They are the ELITE. It's the elite versus the peasants that matters.
    1
  12436.  @InfoForYou8  "libertarianism " That's what happens when trump is potus right?
    1
  12437. I think it's more likely that you are just looking to make excuses for a terrible answer.
    1
  12438. Victim blaming at it's finest.
    1
  12439. You are hopeless if you don't understand it.
    1
  12440. May as well be a trumptard saying fake news FFS.
    1
  12441. We don't "give them a platform." They already have it. That's why we need to call them out just like Kyle is doing.
    1
  12442.  @krenwregget7667  It's not about the people saying stupid things... it's about the people who listen to those stupid things. You want them to have a counterview available to the bullshit narrative they are being fed. It's not going to change every mind but the only way to possibly change any minds is by bothering to try. Self defeating attitudes are self defeating.
    1
  12443. celvester regarding, "great idea" I'm not sure how much I'd pay but it is definitely a lot.
    1
  12444. Richard medhurst is live right now and it's way better than kyle.
    1
  12445. etikk regarding, "Bernie will be 79" I don't care about age and neither should you. Care about whether or not they can and should be the one doing the job.
    1
  12446. Technocrat regarding, "you're on every left-wing channel spewing the same dumb shit... Sit down and shut up" Wow is that funny coming from you. Please sit down and shut up. Everything you say is fucking stupid beyond belief. Do the world a favor and never speak ever again.
    1
  12447. Technocrat regarding, "why would I do that." Because humanity would be grateful to no long have you making the world dumber with all the stupid things you say. Regarding, "how about we talk about policy" No. Not because I am incapable but because I have concluded talking intelligently to you is a waste of time. I would have a better chance of enlightening my dog and I'm going to spend my time talking intelligently to her either. Seriously everything you say is beyond stupid. Do anything else with your time. Please stop making the world dumber by sharing your "thoughts." Thank you in advance.
    1
  12448. Technocrat regarding, "of course you don't want to discuss policy because you don't know anything about public policy or its implications" This is why trying to talk to you intelligently is a waste of time. I literally just get done telling you why I don't want to discuss policy but it just goes in one ear and out the other between that space in your head where a brain should be. You are not capable of understanding such a simple and easily understood thought but you want me to try and talk about the more difficult to understand things? Yeah right. You are incapable of using logic and reason. That is why I have no interest in discussing policy with you. But you go ahead and continue to think the idiotic things you do. There is nothing I nor anyone can say that is going to change that. It is a side effect of you being dumb as fuck. It would be funnier if you weren't making everyone dumber when you speak but unfortunately you make the world dumber by existing. Do the world a favor and stop.
    1
  12449. Technocrat that's right, keep being stupid and demonstrating you can't understand simple ideas... no matter. Regarding, "I'm going to troll you everywhere I see you comment.. That's my word." That is funny because I've been doing that to you already for some time. You, whyamipink, and global warming skeptic are all not worthy of intelligent conversation but are all fun to troll. You are all fighting for the title of dumbest human on Earth.
    1
  12450. Regarding, "one of my IT guys" It's nice to know all the "correct the record" trolls weren't laid off.
    1
  12451. People didn't make up your tweets kyle. Those weren't lies. Smears are lies. You are a fraud.
    1
  12452. "What Biden "believes" is not what he fights for" Nah. He believes you shouldn't get a raise and he is fighting for it. "he's been a huge disappountment." Only to people who expected him to not be terrible. "Dems will pay for this in the midterms" I agree that republicans are going to clean up in the midterms. "Biden (or Harris) will regret in 4 years." They don't really care as long as nothing fundamentally changes.
    1
  12453. Does that make him never mentioning his relationship with them while covering for their blackmail in the past ok?
    1
  12454. Meh.. fuck you.
    1
  12455. They are a private party. If they want to keep out "crazy people" they can tell them to fuck off at beginning of the process rather than hold rigged elections meant to only give the appearance of democracy.
    1
  12456. Technocrat I would be curious to meet you in real life to see if you are as fucking dumb in real life as you are on these forums. You literally only say things that are idiotic. It is remarkable really.
    1
  12457. Techonocrat regarding, "what have I said that's dumb" Literally everything you say is dumb. So much so that trying to engage you in any sort of intelligent conversation is pointless.
    1
  12458. You are an idiot. For your sake I hope that your saying only stupid things here is because you are being paid and not because you are just a fucking moron. Either way you suck at life thou. Good luck with that going forward.
    1
  12459. Do the world a favor and never comment ever again.
    1
  12460. You make the world dumber with the things you say and the world resents you for it. Stop saying stupid things or don't say anything at all.
    1
  12461. See what I'm talking about. I already told you. Everything you say is stupid. And even thou I already told you you require me to repeat myself because you are a fucking moron. Stop talking here. Forever. Burden your friends, if you have any, with your stupid shit.
    1
  12462. The only reason you think it's obvious I can't is because you are epic stupid. You are also epic stupid for trying to engage me in an intelligent conversation when I have made it clear I am not looking to. I am only here to tell you to shut the fuck up for the rest of your life.
    1
  12463. Meh. Fuck twitter. Sign the petition!
    1
  12464.  @Jasedabass  I paid off my schooling long ago. It's not like it directly affects me but I'm still 100 percent for it. I love the idea of our country investing in it's people rather than just bombs.
    1
  12465.  Major Thought Ahead  Regarding, "If you want a government not to lie to you well you must be an anarchist because no government does that." You are pretty tough to take seriously. Is your argument really that the government lies, just the way it is, and I may as well just bend over and take it? Regarding, "All governments lie and constantly at that it's the nature of the game." You sound like a neoliberal justifying dirty money in politics. That's just the way it is. I don't buy their bullshit about dirty money in politics and I don't buy your bullshit about lies from government. Regarding, "HOWEVER the intention behind the lies is what matters Anthony Fauci's intentions were pure." So the ends justify the means? Sigh. So much evil and terrible justified this way.
    1
  12466.  @peters4115  Regarding, "Trump" I've made it perfectly clear that I am talking about fauci and you start by talking about trump? Really? Trump is a fucking clown. But I'm talking about a completely different fucking person. Regarding, "Fauci lied for the greater good," Do you think that trump doesn't rationalize any of his lies as being for the greater good? He certainly does. Does that make it ok? Of course not. Regarding, "If you can’t “trust” the expertise of a lifelong expert on the subject, not to mention the rest of the scientific and international communities, then you are the sheep." Are we talking about fauci here? The guy who said masks don't help people? I'm confused. Regarding, "you blindly follow your own ignorance and the disinformation campaigns designed to confuse the mentally weak." You gather this from the fact that I want to call out fauci for his lie? Whatever. I don't really care what you think.
    1
  12467.  @nafaidni  Regarding, ""The government and its officials lie sometimes, so never trust what they say" is a terrible argument" You are using quotation marks wrong. I never said that. What you are actually doing is lying about why I said. Which is kinda funny considering the topic and why I'm not going to bother taking anything else you have said seriously.
    1
  12468.  @SamJohn52  Biden is creepy AF. Get over it.
    1
  12469. What's fucked up is you and your "logic" says this guy who paid for their college long ago but is fine with this cause I'm not a cunt.
    1
  12470.  @kebuhrogers  The state of nevada gave tesla 1.3 billion dollars. "Elon Musk’s growing empire is fueled by $4.9 billion in government subsidies"
    1
  12471.  @kebuhrogers  "so many good points to correct!" Do you get paid by the point you bullshit about or by the hour? I hope your soul was worth it.
    1
  12472.  @kebuhrogers  "Tesla investor" Good on you for admitting your conflict of interest while you bullshit.
    1
  12473.  @kebuhrogers  " It makes both sides of the argument stronger. Try it!" I'm not paid to be here and I have better things to do than argue with someone whose opinion is already bought and they can't be reasoned with. Whenever I talk to people like you I want to hope that somewhere deep down you at least have enough understanding what you are doing is wrong enough that you have some trouble sleeping at night.
    1
  12474.  @kebuhrogers  Try not being a complete POS bootlicking for a billionaire being funded by US taxpayers.
    1
  12475.  @kebuhrogers  Maybe if you elon can bullshit enough people your stocks can go up. GFY
    1
  12476. Never again will I support Bernie. He'd rather represent corrupt dems and war.
    1
  12477.  @brian6739  "He doesn't represent dems" He's voting in lockstep with corporate dems.
    1
  12478.  @brian6739  "He is changing dems" You have it backwards. The dems and his good friend joe biden are changing him.
    1
  12479.  @brian6739  I can't even get all my messages posted here because the US doesn't actually have free speech.
    1
  12480.  @brian6739  "He is changing dems" Let's say this were true, and it's not, then he must be terrible at it. The party is as bad and corrupt as it's ever been.
    1
  12481.  @brian6739  The dems are changing bernie, not the other way around. Obviously.
    1
  12482. Why the emphasis on them being workers as opposed to shoppers? That doesn't relevant to me like it does you.
    1
  12483. @My 2 Cents Regarding, " if you think Yang is terrible based off who he endorsed you need to take a hard look at your candidate." Again... this is but one reason of many why he is terrible. And if you want to continue to act like an endorsement during an ongoing election is the same as an endorsement after a primary... I find you impossible to take seriously. You are comparing apples to oranges whether you realize it or not. Regarding, " I don't know what fictional world you're living in" LMFAO. I have math to back up my "fictional world" claims. Biden hasn't won. Because math. Regarding, "last time I checked Biden is the one with the 156 delegate lead, black vote, and better polling in southern states." Last time I checked more than half the states have yet to vote, Biden has dementia, Biden has an atrocious record, and Biden is a pathological liar. We haven't even had a one on one debate. Regarding, "If I'm a sheep for using statistics and common sense I'll happily sport the label of "sheep". But, to each his own. You'll see what I'm talking about in 3 months." I don't even think you are sheep. I think it's worse than that... I think you are disingenuous. And if you think I don't understand that Sanders is behind and things aren't looking good you would be wrong about that just like you are wrong about pretty much everything. Good luck with your efforts to try and convince everyone that it's over even though more states have yet to vote than have not. Only dipshits think contests are unwinnable at halftime.
    1
  12484. @My 2 Cents Regarding, "The timing of the endorsement in all honesty is irrelevant." LMFAO. What's actually irrelevant is you. I'm done wasting my time on your stupid shit.
    1
  12485. @My 2 Cents Regarding, "All I'm saying is the people who are mad at Yang for endorsing someone like Biden should also be mad at Bernie for endorsing Hillary Clinton." Only a total dipshit fails to understand the difference between supporting the nominee AFTER they have won and helping make a candidate the nominee DURING the primary. Your 2 cents are way overpriced. You should be paying people for your thoughts because your thoughts make everyone dumber.
    1
  12486. @My 2 Cents Regarding, "So you're telling me if Yang endorsed Bernie Sanders instead of Joe Biden there would be this much backlash because he didn't wait until the actual nomination?" Never said anything of the sort. Would like to continue to strawman me? Him supporting Sanders would make sense because Sanders is far, far, far, far closer to the policy positions yang claims to adhere to. Instead he is supporting the candidate who is furthest from him on the issues he claims to care about. And regardless of what he does now... he can ALWAYS support the nominee at the end. Him supporting someone now serves to tilt the game in favor of who he endorses. It tells you who they PREFER win. It's an expression of values, or lack thereof. It's not about who has actually won because despite all your stupid shit you say it's not over. Please shut the fuck up. I have a hard time letting stupid go unanswered and that's all you spout. I'm an idiot for addressing you. Help me stop. Thanks.
    1
  12487. @My 2 Cents If it makes you feel any better you are hardly the only total dipshit out there. The world keeps looking and sounding more and more like the one in Idiocracy except that the president in that movie is better than the one we currently have. I'd give anything to shake some common sense into you. I'm honestly awed how you don't understand what is wrong with the things you say. Then again I shouldn't be surprised. The world is filled with sheep being lead to slaughter.
    1
  12488. Actually you kinda did. He is no nina turner, not even close. Sincerely a person who also voted for Howie Hawkins.
    1
  12489. We shouldn't rule out dumb.
    1
  12490. By the way I have the answer. Spoiler alert.... All of the above.
    1
  12491. The USA is a failed state.
    1
  12492.  @schinderhannesbartelsi9192  Where was that friendship in 2016?
    1
  12493.  @schinderhannesbartelsi9192  Regarding, "Bernie hasn't held it against her" Because if he was holding it against her he would be the type to be talking about that instead of medicare for all or the living wage or the environment or... Oh wait... he wouldn't. Regarding, "I wouldn't count it out that it was a plan of them in 2016 to." What? You think Bernie didn't want her endorsement? That that is why she left her progressive credentials sitting at home? Is that why she didn't support DAPL protestors as well? Was that part of the plan? Is that why she voted for the extra money for the department of offense? Or maybe, just maybe is she really just not that progressive? Regarding, "Remember Bernie didn't expect to win in 2016." Yeah. I remember that. I also remember things changing... like him surging early. He was neck and neck with hillary early and Warrens home states primary was super early. Hillary won by less than a point where and when momentum is incredibly important. If Warren has a spine and endorsed Sanders like she should have, Sanders wins her homestate instead of losing it and everything from there on out changes and, if my memory serves me, Mass was like the third primary.
    1
  12494.  @schinderhannesbartelsi9192  Just to be factual Sanders lost Mass by 1.4 points on super tuesday in 2016 but I stand by all my points and they were only looking at her influence in her home state.
    1
  12495.  @schinderhannesbartelsi9192  Regarding, "But don't let your emotions take the better of yourself." I'm talking about how she very well might be why we have President Trump instead of President Sanders. I'm talking about her support for money for killing. I'm talking about her lack of support for protestors having their constitutional rights trampled. I feel entitled to my outrage and emotion on such topics those. I can get emotional watching sports teams I like and you can imagine how ultimately unimportant something like that is in comparison. Regarding, "Bernie needs an attack dog by his side" No he doesn't. He does just fine all by himself even if he should be getting help from other progressives. All Sanders needs to do to tear down Biden is put his voting record up against his. That and just continue to talk about the incredibly popular policies he and the public both support. He didn't close a 50 point gap with Hillary by tearing her down. He did it by building himself up.
    1
  12496.  @mahasidha9  How could I forget hedges and wolff. Shame on me. Good on you.
    1
  12497. Sorry not sorry for refusing to support a corrupt, lying warmonger with dementia.
    1
  12498. As if TYT are progressives. LFMAO
    1
  12499. He didn't actually sellout because he was never on your side.
    1
  12500. The stupid is strong in this comments section.
    1
  12501. Even the corporate media not liking yang can make me like that conman. The same can be said about trump for similar reasons.
    1
  12502.  @morenitomoreno1282  "don't just assume a politician is good cause what you see as MSM doesn't like him" I think you should look at my comment again. I can't stand yang.
    1
  12503. There are different rules for the rich and powerful compared to the peasants.
    1
  12504. "vote for the status quo. vote blue no matter who." -bernie sanders actually
    1
  12505. Chaos are you saying Glass-Steagall isn't strong enough? Because although that isn't the only thing that should be done to fix this country I assure you it is very strong and was effective for decades at preventing the type of bullshit "banking" we have today. Commercial and investment banking need to be separate and that is how you do it.
    1
  12506.  @lpphillyfan  Regarding, "Why do I think you're homophobic?" Because you are an idiot. Sexuality is not a choice.
    1
  12507. You sound "smart" enough to be a trump supporter. Good luck being an idiot.
    1
  12508.  @ninjanik3  Premiums. It would be meant to operate the same way a typical private health insurance company would with only a few notable differences like they would be able to spend all their money on health care instead of wasting money on advertising and making their CEOS and a handful of people rich.
    1
  12509. How's being the piece of shit that you are today?
    1
  12510. Did you really just go from calling David a fool to hypocritically giving a shit about being respectful?
    1
  12511.  @PRUNEAVENUE  Regarding, "he definitely is not a fool." Yeah. He understands just how terrible and dumb that question was. Time that could have been spent, I don't know, hypothetically asking how candidates felt about the many dems who recently voted for Trumps military budget while simultaneously claiming he is insane. That question was painfully stupid. How you can't see and understand that makes my brain hurt and destroys some of the last little bit of faith I have in humanity.
    1
  12512.  @richardgreenwood6474  Regarding, " David Doel needs to be called out on his failure to research candidate positions thoroughly" You are replying to a person whose original comment is, "So just to be clear, Tulsi is the only one in the race who has unequivocally supported M4All her entire career." Which is straight bullshit. After being called out more than once for this pure fiction they lied with, "I said that she’s the only one other than Bernie that’s supported it her entire career." I'm not going to lie I find the irony pretty fucking funny. Oh and everything else you said is also wrong for one reason or another.
    1
  12513.  @richardgreenwood6474  Tulsi fucked up. She should have just raised her hand and sent a clear message of you can go fuck yourselves to the private health insurance industry. I mean, if you think we should keep them around then she didn't fuck up. But as a person who wants them gone and sees no need to keep them around I very much wanted her to raise her hand. I was deeply disappointed when she didn't. Even Warren raised her hand for fucks sake not that I think she is sincere.
    1
  12514. You want to attack the guy fighting for m4a? You have issues.
    1
  12515. This is your brain when it's in a cult.
    1
  12516.  @richardgarrison2842  He is according to blue no matter who people. What party's debate was he at? Who literally changed their own rules to allow him to be there?
    1
  12517.  @richardgarrison2842  Regarding, "That would be the DNC, still doesn't change Bloomberg is still a Republican." It actually does change things. Regarding, "Just because he changed his registration doesn't mean he changed his positions." No shit. I'm not talking about his positions. I'm talking about the political party he belongs to. That is literally exactly what he was changing when he changed his registration. It was the only thing he was changing. Regarding, "I would even argue Biden is a Republican." Maybe argue that he SHOULD be a republican. Then would could agree on something. That is also the type of thing you get to have an opinion on. What you don't get to have an opinion on is what political party someone actually belongs to. Bloomberg belongs to the "democratic" party at the moment. That's the reality. That's the fact. And we don't get to have an opinion about it. Especially in the context of which I was talking about about vote blue no matter who people.
    1
  12518.  @richardgarrison2842  Regarding, "I won't vote blue no matter who." Fair enough. I agree with this.
    1
  12519. Is that why you are here? Or is it because you are the world's least favorite paid troll? Better be careful, Yugioh is looking to steal your crown for king dipshit.
    1
  12520. Me: we're going party like it's 1999!
    1
  12521.  @holden6104  "it matters." No it doesn't. What actually matters are things like tangible power. The rest of the world "respects" people like trump and biden about as much as they "respect" the un family. They don't. But they are forced to deal with the US geopolitically because the US has real power while north korea doesn't.
    1
  12522. I really should add that krystal is also a fraud.
    1
  12523.  @robm6645  "You are a fraud" I'm not. And you can tell because my actions match my words unlike some people. "you don't care about Assange." I do. I care about it very much. I ALWAYS take exception when journalists are being smeared, blackmailed, persecuted and jailed... again... unlike some people.
    1
  12524.  @LeShawnTho  "Nope" Meanwhile in reality I've been an advocate of assange since BEFORE he was imprisoned. "you only care about drama" I'm talking about "when journalists are being smeared, blackmailed, persecuted and jailed' and you are characterizing it as "drama." You should reflect on what it says about your priorities and what it says about mine. "internet daddy" I've been a huge fan of kyle and krystal for a long time. If I put up with their BS that would be the cultist behavior, you know, like you are doing.
    1
  12525.  @LeShawnTho  "You don't care about assange or you wouldn't be whining on a substantial interview" I'm of the belief that I can walk and chew gum at the same time but if this is how you feel you have made it clear you don't care about assange while you whine about my comment.
    1
  12526.  @pewtercamaro  Dude, I don't give a fuck if you think they are "highly influential" or not. They are not the fucking news dipshit and you comparing them to what is suppose to be the news is stupid beyond words and I shouldn't need to explain exactly why. Regarding, "What about all news Monday through Saturday?" Corporate as fuck. When progressive policies are talked about they wonder how the fuck any of it is paid for and smear them as impossible. College for everyone? Totally unaffordable according to them. But when the budget for the military was increased by more then what it would have cost to pay for college... crickets. Not a fucking word. People who only get their news from the corporate media almost certainly don't even know about the government increasing spending for the department of offense. You'd think 24 hour news networks might have found some time to talk about it. But they don't for some "unknown" reason. Regarding, "How does the media view trump? Do you really want to go there?" Do you really want to go there? Because while it can be said they attack Trump they do so in all the dumbest fucking ways imaginable and leave the substantive ways they should attack him untouched. They talk about style and ignore substance because they are fucking clowns with a corporate agenda. They gave Trump BILLIONS in free media in his presidential run. They covered his empty fucking podium while Sanders was speaking in front of record crowds. But yeah... comedy shows as if I should give a fuck about those.
    1
  12527.  @pewtercamaro  regarding, "And who do the corporations generally support?" Big money, corporate interests, the establishment, the status quo. Regarding, "They covered Trump because he brought ratings, Bernie didn’t." What a bunch of bullshit. Is that why they covered Trumps empty podium over Sanders talking? Because the super popular politician who drove people in droves to see him speak would be bad for ratings? Is that why Ed Schultz was told to not cover Sanders announcing his running? Stop being so willfully dense or I'm going to have to conclude that you are being paid to think and say such stupid shit. Regarding, "You may not care about comedy shows" Is it that obvious? But you keep comparing the to actual news shows. Keep at it with the mental gymnastics. I don't fucking care at this point about the stupid shit you are saying.
    1
  12528.  @pewtercamaro  Regarding, "The corporate question was referencing what side does corporate media generally support, democrats or republicans." There is a huge corporate wing of the "democratic" party. The republican party is all but exclusively corporate. They don't give a fuck which party as long as they are representing corporate interests and the status quo. War and buildup of the military=good. Low taxes=good. Universal health care=bad. Free college=bad. Legal weed bad, big pharma good. Look at how they "covered" net neutrality. And by covered I mean ignored. Stop acting like this is about the blue team versus the red team. It isn't. It's about the haves versus the have nots.
    1
  12529.  @pewtercamaro  regarding, "Bernie didn’t get the ratings." What a bunch of nonsense. He's the MOST POPULAR POLITICIAN in the country for fucks sake. Seriously... I'm done giving a fuck about the stupid shit you want to say. I am losing the ambition to tell you why everything you say is fucking absurd.
    1
  12530.  @pewtercamaro  regarding, "Influence is the key word." No. News is the key word dipshit. We are talking about NEWS shows.
    1
  12531. Nomiki is tossing shade at force the vote. F her.
    1
  12532. Mckenzie I guess what I'd call nuance you would call excuses. I suppose it is easy to think that all military funding bills are created equal. They are not. Sanders stood on the floor of the Senate and gave an impassioned speech about why he was voting against going to war. Then after he sadly lost that vote and we were going to war regardless, he chose to fund the troops that were going to be doing the fighting as most sane people would want. But that is totally the same as giving Trump more money for bombs than even he was asking am I right?
    1
  12533.  @Ech0Bunnyman  You really think a z is going to out mossad's epstein?
    1
  12534.  @Ech0Bunnyman  Your new potus is miriam adelson. Good luck with that.
    1
  12535.  @Ech0Bunnyman  "Is that what you're saying." Not even close. Would you like to address anything I actually said?
    1
  12536.  @Ech0Bunnyman  Patel and your potus work for adelson and israel. Sorry not sorry if the truth hurts.
    1
  12537.  @Ech0Bunnyman  Expecting a z to expose an israeli asset is silly. That's what I'm saying.
    1
  12538. lol
    1
  12539.  @07Flash11MRC  "can dress however tf she wants to!" We can call her an idiot if we want to. And she is an idiot.
    1
  12540.  @botanicalitus4194  "talking to her in private" Stop saying this. Seriously. Getting a blackmailer alone in a room with you is stupid even by internet comment section standards.
    1
  12541.  @PieDisliker  Agreed. And I'd like to apologize to actual shit. It does not deserve to be compared to Ajit. My sincerest apologies to poop.
    1
  12542.  @ToxicTorgo  Calling out frauds is never a waste of time.
    1
  12543. It makes me think that humanity is doomed if you don't understand that this is clearly a political stunt.
    1
  12544. You know the guy who actually wrote that book thinks Trump is an idiot right?
    1
  12545.  @chrisbeeken  Regarding, "Really stupid comment there, Clint." I'm not going to lie this is pretty funny coming from you. It's also worthless and not an argument.
    1
  12546. Bestwick's "mind": just a sign that says space for rent.
    1
  12547.  @Bestwick1983  I mean you are literally bitching about thunderfoot. By your own definition he is living rent free in your head. Sorry if it hurts but you are a hypocrite.
    1
  12548.  @Bestwick1983  Are you jealous that thunderfoot has a million subscribers?
    1
  12549.  @Bestwick1983  "As for being jealous of TF's subscriber numbers?" I'm guess I'm just looking for some kinda way to intelligently explain your problem with TF calling out a billionaire conman that is doing it with taxpayer money. And it's not suppose to be anymore reasonable than your idiotic claims of jealousy.
    1
  12550.  @Bestwick1983  "Comprehension not your strong point I see. I never said I had a problem with him calling Musk out." This is funny to me because you clearly do care that he is calling musk out or you wouldn't be here. "his obsession with Musk" You are an idiot. "constant and repetitive videos going on and on and adding nothing new or nothing interesting to the conversation." At best you are new to the channel. TF has always arguably milked the topics he covers dry. Acting like this is exclusive to musk because of an obsession is absurd. He brings up liz holmes FFS but for some reason you aren't claiming he is obsessed with her. Why is that? "nothing new" And even still, despite him arguably repeating himself too much, there are new things going on. Musk did just win the time man of the year despite TF calling him out. Holmes is acting facing justice and he's talking about her but you expect him to shut while musk is winning awards and still getting rich with taxpayer money? "make my opinion known...whether you like, understand or agree with that or not. Mkay?" Whether you like it or not I'm going let you know my opinion that your opinion is stupid. mKaY?
    1
  12551. We say it not because we think it will happen but because it shows what a snake she is that she doesn't. Bernie or riot.
    1
  12552.  @chessnotcheckers9075  I've been saying fuck warren consistently for over 4 years and I understand why you are so frustrated by people who were duped by the conwomen. But to take their defense for a second... it's tough being a progressive. The entire government is one huge dumpster fire. All the rules are rigged against us. "Our party" fucking despises us and actively tries to crush us. People need to believe in something or they become apathetic. There are so few people to root for. I'm going around saying things like Bernie or riot because he really stands alone in a sea of swamp creatures. Some people have trouble accepting that because of what it means. They want allies and want to believe people are on their side. Ultimately they aren't. The only person beside Sanders in presidential politics that I don't despise is Tulsi. And if she doesn't drop out right about this very second that is going to change. Even if she wants to be on my team she is hurting the cause. Maybe I'm making the same mistake some people did with warren. I can't even imagine what is going to happen if they steal the nomination from sanders after he gets the most votes. Maybe America will surprise me and he wins on the first ballot. But I never try to underestimate their stupidity.
    1
  12553.  @espenha  "The subsidies Tesla has recieved are fairly irrelevant for the assets Musk has." Tesla has gotten literally BILLIONS of dollars from the government. You are a useful idiot for a billionaire conman but I'm betting that even you could be a billionaire if you got billions of dollars from the government.
    1
  12554.  @slaphappyduplenty2436  "There is no comparing the two." They are both conmen.
    1
  12555.  @espenha  " I don't believe Tesla has gotten a billion from the government." From the article titled, "Elon Musk’s growing empire is fueled by $4.9 billion in government subsidies"... "Nevada has agreed to provide Tesla with $1.3 billion" "Remember the..." Please stop. "That's just how things work" I imagine this is the same "logic" slave owners would use to rationalize slavery when it was legal. "the government is willing to pay for job creation" Something tells me that no company I would ever create, no matter how great or how worthy, would ever be able to get the subsidies musk is able to get. Please stop. You are akin to trump supporters licking his billionaire boots.
    1
  12556.  @espenha  And FYI that article is from 2015. He has certainly gotten more from the government since then.
    1
  12557.  @espenha  "the government is willing to pay for job creation." What universe do are you in? I live in this one... where american roads and bridges are crumbling but musk is getting billions of dollars to make himself rich.
    1
  12558.  @espenha  Please shut up. I don't care how you rationalize your butt love of elon.
    1
  12559.  @espenha  "Job creation is one of few very bipartisan issues" The major parties are akin to the sides in professional wrestling.... They are all on the same team working for the same people for the same interest of making money and consolidating power while pretending to be on opposite sides. They don't care about you at all and only see you as a tool they can use to make money. They are working together to fuck you over and you love it because you are stupid.
    1
  12560.  @espenha  " I don't hate Musk." You should. He is a POS conman using your tax dollars to get rich. "There are many like him, though not many as successful." Yup. There are many POS conmen out there but few are as successful as he is.
    1
  12561.  @rgruenhaus  "look at the "Representatives" Americans vote in" Yeah, it's the blue team, the people bernie tells you to vote for.
    1
  12562.  @rgruenhaus  "But look at the "Representatives" Americans vote in" They are the people bernie tells everyone to vote for. The blue team controls everything.
    1
  12563.  @rgruenhaus  The people in power are the people bernie tells everyone to vote for. Team blue has all the power.
    1
  12564. Youtube says there are 6 replies but only let's you see 2 of them. Isn't that the type of thing we say makes china the bad guy?
    1
  12565.  @rgruenhaus  "you have blinders on! Look at the corporate dems who side with the GQP!" You have blinders on! Look at who the "progressives" and bernie side with! They side with corporate dems!
    1
  12566. Harris is crap. She is only taking the position to pander. The establishment loves her. That is all I really need to know.
    1
  12567. Do you describe yourself as agnostic about leprechauns and unicorns? Probably not and rightfully so. And society should be challenging absurd beliefs. Just because someone holds a belief doesn't mean their belief shouldn't be challenged and should be respected. Critical thinking and logical thinking should be praised and encouraged. Faith type thinking should be called out for what it is because that type of illogical thinking has a way of bleeding into all their thinking.
    1
  12568. Do you really not realize the world of difference between using logic and reason to decide what to be intolerant of and using a holy book and faith to decide? There is nothing innately correct about being tolerant and the idea that I should be tolerant of everything is asinine. If that were so then I should tolerate pedophiles. If that were so then I should tolerate the Bibles position on slavery. I don't because such things are morally abhorrent, wrong, and absolutely shouldn't be tolerated. And I don't come to those conclusions because of what a book of bullshit says. I come to those conclusions after using logic, reason, and empathy.
    1
  12569. As if corporate dems aren't? Joe Biden says he would veto M4A.
    1
  12570. I'm pretty sure she didn't. Or if she did it was after the media called the election because of superdelegates. But whatever. Fuck her.
    1
  12571. =torture
    1
  12572.  @alabamaman8885  "Forcing the vote is almost always political suicide" If forcing a vote would bad for the cause pelosi and company wouldn't be willing to fight tooth and nail to stop it. Hell, if it would actually hurt the cause they would bring it up for a vote themself. They do everything they can to not vote on it because everyone knows it obviously would be good for the cause. "It's a Republicans wet dream." So republicans are trying to bring it up for a vote because it would be bad for the cause? Oh right... they aren't.
    1
  12573.  @alabamaman8885  "attack their own allies" I'm confident I have a much better idea who is actually on my side than you do.
    1
  12574.  @alabamaman8885  If the party burnt to the ground so that something better might replace them that would be a bonus. But getting universal health care is really what I'm fighting for and what I really want as an actual progressive.
    1
  12575.  @alabamaman8885  "Forcing the vote is bad for Democrats." If the party actually cared about winning elections it would give people health care. But their job is to maintain the status quo, not win elections. "which is your party dude" Since when? George Carlin said it best back when it far harder to see it... they don't give a f about you. At all. "take over the Democrats" I thought that was a good idea back when justice dems were being created. That was BS. I'm more in line with the thoughts of people like chris hedges and richard wolfe who see the party as dead and as only an obstacle for change. The oligarchy will only give the peasants just enough crumbs to keep them from picking up their pitchforks. And the peasants are too busy wasting their lives on their cell phones to even think about picking up a pitchfork.
    1
  12576.  @alabamaman8885  "Herbert Marcuse" I've honestly never heard of him. He sounds smart thou. Maybe I should. "completely reject progressive ideology" As a progressive I want things like: universal health care, giving peace a chance, breaking up the banks, protecting the environment, criminal justice reform, money out of politics, freedom of speech, freedom to decide what goes into my body, and more. This are all widely popular ideas with the peasants. The war that matters is between the top and the bottom... not the left and the right. The elite divide us into a left and a right to get us to fight amongst ourselves. That way we don't blame the powers that be, like we should.
    1
  12577.  @alabamaman8885  "get rid of the all the idpol nonsense" Are you talking about identity politics? I'm not bringing that to the table. That's just another tool the elite use to try and divide the peasants. It can't possibly be gotten rid of because there will always be disingenuous people using it to divide. I can only call them out and I already do that.
    1
  12578.  @alabamaman8885  "Until progressives let it go y'all be on your own." That sounds like today. Literally none of the people I follow and listen to treat this as important. They all recognize it's just another tool the elite are using to divide the peasants into camps so that they are easier to conquer. "calling more than half the country 'racist fascists'" You are talking about corporate media pundits. They are not progressives. They are elites. Brian williams essentially did this in his going away speech recently. Jimmy dore called him out for it.
    1
  12579.  @alabamaman8885  "Most progressives..." Don't paint with huge brushes like this. "I'm not disagreeing with your assessment on why this happens" Then it should be easy to know who to blame.... and it's not the peasant being propagandized and pit against you. I get that it's not easy. I get called a "commie" and crap like that. But I know that the peasants are not really my enemy even if lots of them are useful idiots for my real enemies.
    1
  12580. Actually they have covered it but not the way they should. The rational national has a great video talking about this. It is worth your time.
    1
  12581. Please do not reproduce.
    1
  12582. You can't really respect a person whose only doing the right thing because they are being forced can you?
    1
  12583. He is the commander in chief. It's not like he needs congress to declare peace first or some shit. But don't let that stop you from making excuses and rationalizations for his failure.
    1
  12584.  @misanthropichumanist7856  "Is everyone who thinks differently paid?" Nope. But the establishment does spend millions of dollars posting idiotic comments such as yours in their effort to "correct the record." "Such a shame that you’re triggered so easily when someone has a different view point." But you aren't being triggered by me by your own definition right? We are both giving our take but only you is being a hypocrite about it. "I decide which content I want and do not want." Thanks captain obvious. You have offered nothing of value yet again to the conversation at hand. "You’re lucky to get this reply," I'm not. You are not as important and intelligent as you think you are.
    1
  12585.  @DeadMouse32  "cult" LMFAO I've been a huge fan of kyle for long long time. You are projecting cult member for kyle. If jimmy were doing what kyle is doing I'd drop his ass as well.
    1
  12586.  @DeadMouse32  "I don’t identify" LMFAO. So you just pretend to care about what's happening to kyle for reasons or something? It's rhetorical... I don't actually care why you are here.
    1
  12587.  @DeadMouse32  "I’m just here enjoying the show" LMFAO Get a life.
    1
  12588. Well your dog is smarter then you at least.
    1
  12589. Hell, your dog's shit is smarter then you.
    1
  12590. Your comment is more likely to be controlled opposition. Either that or you are a useful idiot for the establishment.
    1
  12591. So vote for the guy that will defend fracking and is a sellout to big money. Your argument is trash.
    1
  12592.  @wesp9020  I don't require perfection. I'm voting for a candidate that I consider to be flawed. I require they not be evil. Biden is evil and everything that is wrong with our government. Don't pretend otherwise.
    1
  12593.  @wesp9020  "get in the way of good" Biden is not good.
    1
  12594.  @wesp9020  Regarding, "I couldn’t agree more." And yet you support a candidate that is the problem, not the solution, to the problem you claim to care about.
    1
  12595.  @wesp9020  Regarding, "you only have two options" Nope. I have plenty more. Regarding, "So are you gonna choose Trump, who does not believe in climate change" He has his golf courses insured against climate change not that it matters what a corrupt POS "believes" publicly. Regarding, "believes in science" LOL. I guess I'm too busy caring that biden is corrupt. Regarding, "those are our options." I have infinite options while you pretend there are only two.
    1
  12596.  @wesp9020  Regarding, "don’t know what other options you’re talking about" Are you really unaware that I can write in literally anything? Regarding, " this is what I mean when I say you’re letting perfect get in the way of good" Yeah... it's not good. So your "meaning" is nonsense. Regarding, "I’m not saying that Biden is a good person/politician or that his policies are good." LOL. So he's not good. And I'm not getting in the way of the good. Glad we can agree on this. Regarding, "I’m saying that I would rather have something over nothing." So you would rather have a pile of shit as opposed to not having a pile of shit. Interesting. Not every compelling. But interesting.
    1
  12597.  @wesp9020  Regarding, "we’re not talking about piles of shit." Yes. We are. Regarding, "We’re talking about the state of planet." If you say so. Regarding, "What planet will my grandkids inherit." I don't know. Regarding, "Trump is doing the opposite of nothing on climate change." This isn't relevant to the question of whether or not biden is good or bad on the topic of climate change. Spoiler alert, it's bad. Regarding, "I understand that climate change may not be your biggest issue." It's not but it's a big issue. Both Biden and Trump are terrible on the topic because both are corrupt. Both are the problem. Neither are the solution. You should support someone who doesn't suck on the topic you claim to care about.
    1
  12598.  @wesp9020  FYI the green party is actually good on the topic of climate change.
    1
  12599.  @wesp9020  Regarding, "To me that’s the same as not voting." Not surprising. Very sad. But not surprising. Regarding, "we have to do the best we can with the cards we have." Is this how you rationalize supporting a POS? I don't doubt you would say the same thing advocating voting for trump if he were representing team blue and you thought team red was worse. "we have to do the best we can with the cards we have." You would tell me... as you tell me I need to vote for the orange clown like a mindless sheep. Regarding, "Every day’s victory is a day’s victory never forget that." As if electing a corrupt POS is a victory.
    1
  12600.  @wesp9020  Regarding, "Your missing the point." Consider the possibility that your "point" is terrible. Regarding, "I’m advocating for the day’s victory." You are using the word victory wrong. What you are describing is best called a loss. Regarding, "reversing course on Trumps approach to climate change." As if a corrupt POS like biden is a step in the right direction. LMFAO It's just less orange. Regarding, "I’m not expecting bold progressive policies from Biden." Good. You should expect the policies of a corrupt person who is the problem to getting any sort of meaningful climate change policy. That is what you will get. Regarding, " I just want a win for the climate change column." Biden is a liar but he was telling the truth when he said nothing will fundamentally change under him. Try not to lie to yourself about what you are getting.
    1
  12601.  @wesp9020  Regarding, "your trying to win the war today but you can’t." Yup. And with no help from you. But supporting a POS isn't a win either so why is that something I should be fighting for? Regarding, "You have to take each battle one by one." What a shortsighted approach. I'd rather not. Regarding, "Nothing we do today will change corruption in Washington." You enabling corruption certainly isn't helping. Regarding, "It won’t change if you vote for Biden, it won’t change if you vote for Trump, and it’s not gonna change if you write in Jill Stein or Bernie Sanders." It won't change because of people like you... I actually have more respect for trump supporters who think their clown is the second coming. They are morons but at least they aren't willfully supporting what they know is a POS the way you are. Regarding, "You have to pick your battles." Fighting corruption is always a battle worth fighting. Enabling evil and terrible is always a dumb option.
    1
  12602.  @wesp9020  Regarding, "I’m trying my best with the power I have as a black man in America" You have the power of your vote and you are wasting it on a POS who is the problem, not the solution. Regarding, "that’ll just be two votes that don’t matter." You don't matter to the party because they know you will give them your vote no matter how terrible their candidate is. Maybe if you were willing to withhold your vote from them they might start caring more about you. And if they don't care about your vote and winning it just means they were never worth vote for anyway. Regarding, "Your trying to start a revolution by yourself." Nope. I'm just having standards for getting my vote. You should too. You know why team hillary propped up trump in 2016 using the pied piper campaign? To prey upon people like you with your mentality. Regarding, "Progress takes time unfortunately." Real progress is impossible because of people like biden.
    1
  12603.  @wesp9020  Regarding, "it’s made one battle at a time." You should think further ahead. This battle in front of you isn't the last battle you are going to fight.
    1
  12604.  @wesp9020  Regarding, "climate change" You keep saying you care about climate change. Ultimately you are enabling the problem.
    1
  12605.  @wesp9020  Regarding, "Your saying that but not making a case." I keep calling biden corrupt. You seem to agree that he is. My case is that he is corrupt. My case is that he is the problem. I've said this over and over. You aren't making a case that he isn't a POS. Regarding, "How is four more years of Trump gonna get me closer to my end goal?" It's not. Just like Biden doesn't get you any closer to your end goal.
    1
  12606.  @wesp9020  You know what might help get you closer to your end goal? The green party. Then again you might lose. As if that's a reason to not try and get nice things in the first place.
    1
  12607. They don't fight for democracy.... they fight for US hegemony.
    1
  12608. ​ @Enfiare  If I answer you don't I prove you did make a difference?
    1
  12609.  @falloutboy691  I can only take you less seriously if you gave your own bullshit comment a thumbs up... oh wait... you did that already. I guess I can't take you any less seriously than you are. Not only will they tell you to vote for all those POS if they are running against someone on the red team but they display the type of intellectual dishonest you do while doing it. They need to tell you the truth on occasion or you wouldn't buy their bullshit. But when it really matters they will tell you to vote for every name you listed because they are partisan hacks.
    1
  12610. No. I don't. You sound trump supporter type stupid to suggest they might.
    1
  12611.  @jonsmith9838  That thing that he wasn't being sarcastic about? Kinda an apples to oranges comparison wouldn't you say?
    1
  12612.  @jonsmith9838  It's clearly satire. If you think it isn't get checked for TDS.
    1
  12613. Doug Ford... fucking up my escape plan from the US if it ever comes to it.
    1
  12614. Talk is cheap.
    1
  12615. Better yet don't vote for terrible.
    1
  12616. Regarding, "Sanders wanted a contested convention in 2016. What’s a good argument against that?" I think I'd just point out that there wasn't a contested convention.
    1
  12617.  @PantherGurl86  Regarding, "they’re saying he called for one" There wasn't one. I'd need to know the specific quote being alleged to respond more intelligently than that.
    1
  12618.  @palestalemale1779  "when you say you’re pro vaccine but just don’t want to take THIS vaccine, you’re being anti vax." So you need to be willing to take all vaxs to not be anti-vax? What a joke. Fun fact: the word vaccine was recently redefined so that this "vaccine" could be called one.
    1
  12619.  @ndb9248  "I would still call Jimmy Dore an "anti-vax-mandater" as opposed to an "anti-vaxxer". Would you be able to explain where I'm wrong?" Don't sweat it or expect an intelligent answer from pale. You are clearly correct.
    1
  12620. Your book of BS also tells you how to do slavery right instead of maybe saying a commandment saying don't do it.
    1
  12621. That's how I felt about thunderfoot and then I see him slobbering over fauci and acting like twitter was just fine before elon even while they were working with government to censor true political stories.
    1
  12622.  @robsreality  Understanding the world in which you exist is the first step in changing it.
    1
  12623. I suspect he is using the same camera.
    1
  12624. Big fan of blatant liars? No thanks.
    1
  12625. Your thumbs down of ryan grimm got a thumbs up from me.
    1
  12626. In all fairness that blueprint was around long before Trump.
    1
  12627. "denied medical treatment for COVID-19 if they contract it" Hyperbole like this helps no one. This is hyperbole right? You aren't actually seriously right?
    1
  12628. I can only think you are paid for this or are a useful idiot who watches to much corporate propaganda.
    1
  12629.  @lonewolf5973  I find that to be a particularly silly comment to be giving your own thumbs up.
    1
  12630.  @lonewolf5973  Is it getting "creepy" in your opinion? Why isn't what you are doing "creepy" as well?
    1
  12631. Because hitler wasn't bad or something? Your comment is terrible.
    1
  12632. Nope. I need this in sad times.
    1
  12633.  @goblinstrategist301  "not productive." Of course outing frauds and their tactics is productive. Just stop.
    1
  12634.  @goblinstrategist301  Regarding, "They're not frauds because they disagreed with one tactic on one policy." They are frauds because their actions don't match their words. They ran on fighting for m4a. They had real power and real leverage. They used it to get nothing. Regarding, "You guys are watering down the term fraud to the point where it doesn't mean anything." You are defending clown politicians whose actions are proving they are frauds. You should really stop it. Regarding, "AOC still gets pretty much all of her money from small donors." It's not about this. It's about her saying that she would fight for m4a and campaigning on it to get all those small donors and then betraying them and voting for mama bear and getting nothing for it. She is suppose to be different than corporate dems but she is voting in lock step with them for indefensible garbage. Regarding, "TYT is still one of the most progressive channels in this country." They are garbage and they are lead by liars. Regarding, "They were wrong on this singular issue." Not only are they "wrong" but they were actively and maliciously lying. Stop polishing turds like them. Regarding, "They happen to be right about most other issues." Does that make lying ok? It doesn't work that way. It's propaganda garbage bought and paid for by team clinton. Why do you think they got that 20 million? Regarding, "The fact that they were wrong on this one issue doesn't make them "frauds."" People whose actions don't match their words are accurately called frauds. Do the world a favor and stop defending POS like them. Thanks. Regarding, "There's way more important fights than this." This is about m4a. Are you really sure there are way more important fights than this? Stop being silly. Regarding, "Jimmy is making 90% videos about punching people on the left" He's punching the people standing between the people and m4a. It's about m4a. Stop making it about "left" and "right." Regarding, "way more corporate media outlets..." Sorry not sorry for wanting to spend all my time attacking fox or whoever you think is the worst. I don't need to think someone is the "worst" to think they are terrible. Regarding, "Pick your enemies better." Pick your allies better. If you think TYT is you can't be more wrong. If you think AOC is while she votes for mama bear and gets nothing for it while she ABSOLUTELY had the power to get a vote on m4a and didn't then again can't be more wrong. You could be spending your time attacking the people standing in your way of getting health care but instead are here treating me and jimmy like enemies. You should take your own advice.
    1
  12635.  @goblinstrategist301  "On the other hand, if you believe that AOC is truly an enemy" I was on her mailing list. Before she voted for pelosi I warned her that if she voted for pelosi and got nothing for it I would actively try and see she is primaried and never wins another election. After she sold us out I had myself removed from her mailing list and I'm going to trash her every chance I get. Yeah. I truly believe she is the enemy. Actions speak louder than meaningless words. Maybe I'd be more willing to believe her if she didn't gaslight everyone with bullshit before selling us out but she did. Regarding, "AOC didn't get completely nothing for supporting Pelosi by the way. She got some minor concessions on paygo" Paygo is fucking worthless if you aren't going to vote. Please stop making excuses for this shit. Paygo was a self induced problem created by the dems but I'm suppose to give them credit for this? Yeah. I don't and you are insane to offer this as a rationalization and excuse for their failure.
    1
  12636.  @goblinstrategist301  "excommunicating her and others over this singular issue." I think you are insane for just ignoring that knife your back. "singular issue." M4A was the issue THEY ran on. That "singular issue" is the one they are lying about. I don't have time for it.
    1
  12637.  @goblinstrategist301  Regarding, "Forcing the Vote is not Medicare For All." Obviously. Regarding, "It is a way to get to Medicare For All." Voting on m4a is literally the only way to get m4a. It's a perfect litmus test. If you actually support m4a you should have no problem getting on board supporting this and if you don't you are exposed as a fraud to our cause. Or at least by "our cause" I mean anyone who wants m4a and isn't just pretending to want it. Regarding, "It was a good idea/good strategy, but realistically it probably wasn't going to work." It already worked in that it exposed AOC and the other frauds who DIDN'T force the vote. It also worked in that it exposed fraud "progressives" like TYT, nomiki konst... It didn't "work" in that it didn't bring us m4a but that isn't too surprising. Should this country ever get m4a it will take a fucking war to bring it and it clearly isn't going to be lead by frauds like AOC. This was the bare minimum ask and they folded without a fight. Regarding, "that could have either been good or bad" Not really if you want m4a. I know there are some terrible no good manufactured arguments about how it might be bad but it's all clearly BS. If you want m4a you want this fight. You have the best of it. It's a winning argument with the people and everyone knows it especially during a pandemic while millions lose their health insurance that was linked to the job they just lost. Regarding, "Republican attempts to repeal Obamacare." Their base LOVED it and you gotta do SOMETHING with your time. If you are on the "left," want to win elections and get people on your side m4a is seriously a nobrainer. But dems care more about maintaining the status quo than they do winning elections. Trumps rise was on Pelosi's watch but losing to the orange clown is less important than fundraising from big money. Their actions reflect their priorities. Regarding, "You keep equating forcing the vote to medicare for all when they are not the same thing." You are correct in that I make zero distinction between the two. We can have legitimate disagreements about the best way to get m4a in the long run but really.... if you are any sort of astute political mind you know forcing the vote is the right move politically if that's your cause. The squad knows. They don't care.
    1
  12638.  @goblinstrategist301  Regarding, "Where I disagree I guess is just a matter of scale." I mean you can do this but I really think you are being silly for this personally. Regarding, "I don't think it means they've completely given up on Medicare for All or that they're frauds by not going along with this plan." When someone shows you they are fraud through through their actions you should believe them. When I use occams razor their actions are better explained in that they are frauds, not that they are well intentioned and dumb and it's not even close. Regarding, "There's also a lot of backroom dealing in Congress" If AOC and company actually got anything of value for their vote they would tell you. Regarding, "PayGo" This is crap. Just stop.
    1
  12639.  @goblinstrategist301  Regarding, "paygo." Seriously... why should I care about paygo if they aren't going to vote on m4a? Paygo only has any value if you are also going to vote. It you aren't going to vote this is WORTHLESS.
    1
  12640. Jason you only have one good idea in my opinion and that one is pretty fucking obvious.... get rid of superdelegates. Yup. Obviously. Of course. But I do not like caucuses. Voting should be as easy and painless as possible. Caucuses require a larger investment of time. People should also be allowed to vote anonymously if they want. My favorite part of caucuses is that they are harder to flip votes but that isn't a good enough reason to go to them exclusively but rather is a good reason to reform primaries and make them better. Everyone should be able to have one primary vote that they can cast whereever they want. We also need to be doing anything and everything to ensure that a persons vote, whereever it is, has equal say. That means that all primaries should be held on the same day for all parties... you know, how we do it for a general election. That also means that the EC NEEDS to go. I don't care what state you live in, your vote should just as much say as anyone else in the country. The EC just makes sure that peoples votes are not counted equally. Votes in swing states are exceptionally meaningful and votes in deep red and deep blue states are fucking meaningless. Politicians should be incentivized to try and win every voter in every state.... not just the swing states like now.
    1
  12641. I agree. What should we call ourselves as people against labels?
    1
  12642.  @josephbrindley6038  Except people who love to use labels are also citizens. Would you like to try labeling people who don't like to use labels like yourself again?
    1
  12643. I guess we should just quit then. That's what Jesus would do.
    1
  12644. If you have faith in a corrupt party who rigs it's primaries you might. But why would you?
    1
  12645.  @monotech20.14  You don't actually think pete buttigieg won iowa do you?
    1
  12646. I feel sorry for you if you aren't a paid CIA shill. I legit hope you aren't as dense as your words.
    1
  12647. You say this like we don't already pay for it in other ways. And those other ways cost us about twice as much as countries with universal health care. So yeah.... it doesn't really count because ultimately we save money.
    1
  12648. The jab doesn't stop you from getting covid.
    1
  12649.  @arceusthomas2447  "so you think now ditching the entire afghan people is better?" I'm an american and I have nothing but contempt for our government. If I weren't a pacifist I'd advocate for a revolution. But there is no amount of hate I could have that I'd want anyone from another country to invade us and "help" us with bombs. I'm confident afghans and pretty much literally all humans feel the same way. It's not our fucking country.
    1
  12650.  @arceusthomas2447  "what if your previous government was trying to kill you for being born as a girl?" Then it's probably time for a revolution and not a foreign invasion. But what's really wrong with your comment is that you seem to think that US has good intentions. That it's waging war and dropping bombs on people because freedom or some BS. They are waging war because of imperialism, to steal countries natural resources and to bully people into doing what they want. Stop thinking and acting like the US murdering people is good for them. It's asinine. The "land of the free" imprisons more of it's citizens than any other country on earth by total by percentage of population and it isn't even close. They should worry about the lack of freedom in their own country first before blowing everyone else up. "Stop thinking that all war is bad." Stop thinking war, SPECIFICALLY INVASION, is good. It's not your fucking country. Let people whose country it actual is decide what is best for them. Bombing and killing people doesn't actually help them dipshit. Obviously.
    1
  12651.  @arceusthomas2447  One more thing I really should have added... Regarding, "Taliban." The US has funded and is largely responsible for the Taliban whom the US supported and built up to fight the soviets back in the day. Stop thinking the US is the good guy.
    1
  12652.  @arceusthomas2447  "I think they are a force for good as a whole though." Then you are stupid AF or at best are brainwashed AF by american propaganda. America is literally the least free country on earth based on how many of it's people can exist outside of a prison. "Let's see how well this comment aged in coming times" We don't need to look in the future to know your comment is BS. We only need to look at the past.
    1
  12653. Never Warren. You're welcome.
    1
  12654.  @InfoForYou8  "policies" Doesn't he support corporations mandating vaccines for their workers?
    1
  12655.  @InfoForYou8  "left libertarian" You make words meaningless with the way you use them.
    1
  12656.  @InfoForYou8  "Dore lied" What EXACTLY did he lie about? Are you sure he didn't tell the truth? But you just don't like it?
    1
  12657.  @InfoForYou8  "100% true" Translation: what I said was 100% percent true and this is how you try to deflect from oliver's transparently terrible policy positions.
    1
  12658.  @InfoForYou8  "What I said here is 100% true." Translation: what I said was 100 percent true and you are going to do this instead of addressing the true thing I said.
    1
  12659.  @InfoForYou8  "error" It's telling that you don't even attempt to address his terrible policy position but instead do this.
    1
  12660.  @InfoForYou8  "100% true" I'll ask again... what EXACTLY did jimmy dore lie about when it came to oliver?
    1
  12661.  @InfoForYou8  "not government policy" Of course it's government policy to decide what corporations can and cannot do. What a dumb thing to lie about.
    1
  12662.  @InfoForYou8  "propaganda" This is funny coming from someone spreading it. What exactly did jimmy dore lie about?
    1
  12663.  @InfoForYou8  "Saying corporations can do what they want is not government policy at all. 100% true" Governments decide what corporations can and cannot do with policy. Just writing "100 percent true" after a lie doesn't make it true.
    1
  12664.  @InfoForYou8  "Saying corporations can do what they want is not government policy at all. 100% true" This is such a transparent lie it could only be funnier if you followed it up with, " Climb out of the propaganda. It’s seriously negatively affecting you on these issues. I told you how to correct yourself" Too funny. It's called projection. Thanks for the laugh!
    1
  12665.  @InfoForYou8  "Use critical thinking" I will... talking to you is a waste of my time. I'm done with it. What exactly did dore lie about? Oh right... you have nothing. Thanks for proving it repeatedly.
    1
  12666.  @InfoForYou8  "Re-read it." Take your own advice..."Saying corporations can do what they want is not government policy at all." Yes. It is. If you are a government you can have policy that says corporations can do what they want... or not. "corporations can do what they want" you are literally describing government policy affecting corporations. Sorry I can't help you understand your own words.
    1
  12667.  @InfoForYou8  "Saying corporations can do what they want is not government policy at all" Who gets to decide if corporations can do what they want? Oh right... the government. You are describing GOVERNMENT POLICY affecting corporation. Even kindergartens get it.
    1
  12668.  @InfoForYou8  "Dore lied" The liar here is you.
    1
  12669.  @MRGRINCH323  "MAGA GRIFTERS" Dore never told anyone to vote for trump. I voted for jill stein. I don't think you know what the word "grifter" means. Fun fact: I'm only seeing this comment now because of censorship and shadow banning that the other guy would be fine with because it's being done by a corporation (working with the government) and not done directly by the government.
    1
  12670.  @InfoForYou8  Good call. We both know you have no lies of dore to cite and saying, "corporations can do what they want is not government policy at all," make flat earthers look smart by comparison.
    1
  12671.  @wasteddude  "you hate smearing but proceed to smear. Blackmail?" Yes blackmail. It's not a smear when it's true and it's true that ana tried to blackmail jimmy. It's clear as day. "I've been holding back, letting you run your mouth as if your some kinda warrior for what's good in the world. That's about to change." Those are words a blackmailer might say to you while holding a knife to a loved one of yours and it's exactly the words ana used to try and blackmail jimmy. It's clear as day. No smear. Just facts. "What's so hard to understand?" LMFAO I'm not going to lie this is really funny coming from you. No doubt if someone said something like that to you wouldn't have as much trouble understanding that they would be trying to blackmail as you are now. "No integrity?" Yes. He never mentions the blackmail nor the blatant conflict of interest that he is affiliated with TYT before covering for the BLACKMAIL.
    1
  12672. Israel has committed war crimes since it's inception in 1948.
    1
  12673.  @erubiel.h1487 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M94ii6MVilw
    1
  12674. somebody do you ever say anything that isn't idiotic? And shouldn't you be watching Alex Jones?
    1
  12675. My "reactionary views on trade and conspiracy theories." Thanks for proving my point about you only saying shit. I've literally only commented about 2 things. 1) I pointed out how it is simplistic and stupid it is to frame these topics as "left" and "right" as opposed to merely talking about the issues based on their merits and 2) I pointed out that literally everything you say is quite moronic. Forgive me for not diving deep into why everything you say is moronic. It seems logical to not bother with you considering I've concluded that you are a dipshit. But feel free to extrapolate whatever you want from that very limited information to fit whatever narrative you want... well that and the fact that I couldn't tell that you were mocking Jones. Considering the fact that you seem to be quite an idiot and there is a picture of him I figured you were a fan. My mistake.
    1
  12676. He has called out the military budget repeatedly.
    1
  12677. Does anyone have Shawty's number?
    1
  12678. So I am. That said I won't vote for Biden. I don't vote for terrible.
    1
  12679. "terror attacks" You mean like israel when it bombs hospitals and refugee camps?
    1
  12680.  @Yellow-yd6cz  That does sound like something they would do in israel.
    1
  12681.  @aw2031zap  "Too bad Sam Seder gets paid 0.0001% as much." He gets a paycheck from 3 billionaires last time I checked. Does he give you a cut to lick his boots?
    1
  12682.  @furiousapplesack  They aren't the only ones giving you corporate propaganda. "MSNBC" Sam literally works for them as a contributor. You are making my point for me.
    1
  12683.  @eddymac5767  I cannot take you seriously enough to respond to any of your drivel intelligently. Why do you continue to lick the boots of a corporate propagandist?
    1
  12684.  @eddymac5767  "Clit" You are the millionth person to try that joke. You must be remarkably unoriginal.
    1
  12685.  @eddymac5767  "You make me laugh." You do to. Like when you, "You might want read simple words better. I asked why are you so angry at him?" pretend you are unable to understand why I wouldn't like someone I'm calling a corporate propagandist. You are stupid but even get what I'm saying. You pretend otherwise because you are not a serious person.
    1
  12686.  @eddymac5767  "I fully understand what you're doing." Same. FYI calling people names isn't the same as making an argument.
    1
  12687. @UCsscAKYq8q2jrl-3ABXpiNw "He's not a contributor anymore." So to be clear this was a problem when it was happening? So when did he all of a sudden stop being a sellout? Allegedly? "Clit" Why do I get the feeling that this is just another account by a person with another name in this thread? Or were you really just awed by his childish, predictable joke?
    1
  12688.  @eddymac5767  "Clit" So you just want to act like you are in a sedar cult then? You do you.
    1
  12689.  @furiousapplesack  "not a problem at the time" LMFAO Is that how you describe sams nuts? "furious apple sacks?" "he wasn't going on to tow a corporate line. Nor does he now" He's a party hack and always has been.
    1
  12690.  @eddymac5767  "You have nothing more of substance to say so I'm in a cult." You haven't even attempted substance. Calling me clit repeatedly doesn't count.
    1
  12691.  @eddymac5767  "reason he's a corporate hack" He will always tell you to vote for the blue team in a match against someone from the red team. It doesn't matter how vile the person on the blue team is. He will NEVER care. He'd tell you to vote for donald trump if trump were representing the blue team.
    1
  12692.  @eddymac5767  You don't even attempt to say why what I'm saying is wrong. It's very telling.
    1
  12693.  @eddymac5767  "I'm trying." No you aren't. It's more apt to say you were agreeing with me with, "I fully agree that the majority of Democrats this day on age are corporate shills."
    1
  12694.  @eddymac5767  "So why will I correct you. I'm curious on who you prefer I listen to to get political information from Clit." You aren't willing to say why you think what I'm saying is wrong but you have all the time in the world to call me clit. You are not a serious person. May as well just admit that you don't care that sam is a partisan hack. It's clear you don't.
    1
  12695.  @oxman5571  Sedar sycophants are remarkably similar.
    1
  12696.  @oxman5571  That is funny to me because you are clearly triggered that I insulted your favorite POS propagandist.
    1
  12697. @UCOz0HyLJDDLVy-iOlxmptUg "Why does one have to be "triggered" Clit for just observing something in someone else that could possibly be true?" This is funny because you think I'm triggered for calling out sam. Are you upset? Do you need a hug?
    1
  12698.  @furiousapplesack  "who we should be listening to." I recommend you start with the basics and don't watch anyone with TYT in their channels.
    1
  12699.  @eddymac5767  I can't make you smarter than you are. I'm sorry.
    1
  12700.  @oxman5571  "loses again. I can't call him "Clit" because a clitoris gives a woman pleasure." Your stupidity is almost remarkable somehow.
    1
  12701.  @furiousapplesack  "I said who should we watch," You want to act like I should have a different deity for you to worship instead of sam. That's not how it works. You need to be taught how to think. Not what to think. If someone is a partisan hack, and sam clearly is, then you should probably be getting your "news" elsewhere. This isn't "news." It's actually partisan propaganda. And that should bother you. It clearly doesn't. Start with that as if you can.
    1
  12702.  @oxman5571  "Clint Holmes" I'm just impressed you didn't make a childish clit joke. You might want to edit it in.
    1
  12703.  @andrewbrady6154  "Clit" I'm just looking out for the cult of sedar. You are clearly a member.
    1
  12704.  @andrewbrady6154  If you take partisan hack sam sedar seriously then the feeling is mutual.
    1
  12705.  @mattrogers6107  "it’s not clear, and reasserting it doesn’t make it any more clear or true." It's clear as day but if you want to claim otherwise you can do it with an example. When has sam ever told anyone to vote for someone that isn't playing for his blue team. Good luck with that. Because it's never happened because he's a partisan hack no matter how much you want to pretend otherwise.
    1
  12706.  @mattrogers6107  "Maybe because when asked for ACTUAL reasoning you claim to have given some but that it must have gone over our heads?" You aren't interested in the world in which you exist. You only care about defending your clown no matter how nonsensical the things you say are. I admit this is hypothetical because trump isn't actually running in an election as a democrat but if he was I can promise you that he would be telling you to vote for him. He cares first and foremost what team a person plays for and nothing else.
    1
  12707.  @mattrogers6107  " working for MSNBC doesn’t automatically make someone a propagandist" LMFAO Meanwhile, in reality, literally every person working there is one. You must agree with their propaganda to claim nonsense such as this.
    1
  12708.  @TheHuxleyAgnostic  "So what if he..." Long story short you have zero examples of sam not being a partisan hack and you don't care that he is one. You are also one as well. Not that you care.
    1
  12709.  @oxman5571  "hasn't even bothered to mention the subject of the video" I haven't even watched the video. I don't care what this propagandist has to say anymore than I care what FOX news is talking about. But I will call out both for being propagandists from time to time. "which suggests he just likes to make the "partisan hack" statement wherever he may roam." I don't call everyone partisan hacks. I only do it for partisan hacks like sam.
    1
  12710.  @TheHuxleyAgnostic  "he's not a moron, like your grifter cult leader." LMFAO Sorry not sorry if the truth hurts and you have nothing of value or substance to intelligently claim your clown isn't a partisan hack.
    1
  12711.  @TheHuxleyAgnostic  " he's not a moron" We are going to have to agree to disagree about this.
    1
  12712.  @furiousapplesack  "who should we not watch." FYI some of the best political commentary I've ever heard was from george carlin. He was smart enough to realize that neither team gives a fuck about peasants in a time when it was far, far, far harder to have seen it or realized it.
    1
  12713.  @oxman5571  "whine about Sam Seder rather than to make any point" LMFAO My point is that sam is a partisan hack and that you should care about it. You aren't even trying to say he isn't a hack because he is and you aren't even trying to say that being a hack is should bother people because it should. You have no points to counter my points so you spout nonsense such as, "It makes it much easier to laugh at his intellectual impotence." Ignorance is bliss. I suspect you are very happy.
    1
  12714.  @TheHuxleyAgnostic  "Not partisan and not a hack, are two different things," LMFAO FYI you aren't actually making an argument of any kind. You are just asserting things and doing it nonsensically. "are two different things" Are you really claiming that someone can't be a "partisan hack" or some shit because that's two different things? Were you always this dense or is it a byproduct of watching too much sam? "it doesn't make him a hack" Sam is a hack because if a devastating scandal came out tomorrow involving trump and involving biden (or involving trumps kids versus biden's kids) he can only be trusted to tell you about one of them. And if it's about his team he can be trusted to cover for his team because that's what he cares about... his team... not truth. That's the truth whether or not you will admit it or acknowledge it. And that's why he's a hack. Sam would tell you to vote for donald trump if trump is the one representing his cult in an election. "Dore" I love how you want to deflect to make this about dore. Anything to distract and deflect from your cult leader.
    1
  12715.  @TheHuxleyAgnostic  " are two different things" LMFAO You will do anything to try and deny the fact that your clown is a partisan hack. But this is boring. Forgive me for not addressing you BS in more detail... or don't. "Sam criticizes Biden, and other corporate Dems, all the time," LMFAO I'm talking about meaningful criticism, and this isn't that. He might "criticize" his team but only as he tells you to vote for them. If he won't tell you not to vote for any of these people then his "criticism" is meaningless and not what I'm looking for. Would you like to try again? He tells you to vote for biden. He will tell you to vote for manchin if manchin is on the blue team versus the red team. He's hack and no amount of your nonsense changes that fact.
    1
  12716.  @TheHuxleyAgnostic  The day that manchin switches to the red team sam will stop telling you to vote for him. But until then he will forever tell you to vote for him in a matchup against the red team. He's a partisan hack.
    1
  12717.  @TheHuxleyAgnostic  "Every single Republican..." We aren't talking about Republicans no matter how much you want to deflect and distract to talk about them. This is about sam and him being a partisan hack. You are just deflecting. "Sam would support someone primarying Manchin." This is irrelevant to the point I'm making and I suspect that even you know it. Sam will FOREVER tell you to vote for manchin in a general against the red team. It literally does not matter who manchin is or what he's done. Sam ONLY cares about the color of the person's jersey and that's why he's a partisan hack.
    1
  12718.  @TheHuxleyAgnostic  "Do you have severe brain damage?" Just admit you don't care that he's a hack FFS. Your denial is just pathetic.
    1
  12719.  @TheHuxleyAgnostic  You are in a cult. And sam is your cult leader.
    1
  12720.  @TheHuxleyAgnostic  "harm reduction" I honestly don't care very much how you rationalize and excuse your supporting evil. Ultimately the "lesser evil" is still evil and you support it because you are a tool listening to a partisan hack spouting propaganda.
    1
  12721.  @oxman5571  "offing himself." It's like you are trying to prove my point that you are a triggered cultist.
    1
  12722.  @oxman5571  Talking to you is indistinguishable from talking to a triggered trump cultist at this point.
    1
  12723.  @TheHuxleyAgnostic  "Trump cultists..." Nonsense a triggered trump cultist might say, " doesn't know what "proving a point," "triggered," or "cultist" means. He loses again, the way his father lost when he took a load of semen, feces, and blood and turned it into "Not Sherlock" Holmes." Indistinguishable.
    1
  12724.  @TheHuxleyAgnostic  "Fitting, since you don't seem to know what any of those things mean." You continue to say things that are indistinguishable from trump cultists. Neither of you say anything of value.
    1
  12725.  @oxman5571  "takes his losses very poorly" I'm not going to lie this is funny coming from the same person who was so triggered they were calling for me to off myself earlier.
    1
  12726.  @TheHuxleyAgnostic  "Sam: Clinton sucks, but is still the better option than Trump." Yup. Sam will happily tell you to vote for a POS. He'd tell you to vote for donald trump using the same "logic" you are giving here. He'd say trump is "better" and that you should vote for him if were representing his blue team as long as there is someone on the red team to be scared of. He's a hack who would tell you to vote for trump if they were the one his team. You are a clown just like your conman.
    1
  12727.  @TheHuxleyAgnostic  Never has dore EVER said that people should vote for donald trump. Telling people to vote for complete pieces of shit is what your conman does.
    1
  12728.  @TheHuxleyAgnostic  I'm not sure if you are aware but dems have the presidency, senate, and house and rainbows and sunshine aren't breaking out. I think you might want to consider the possibility that they are partly to blame for why things suck and that they are not proving to be the answer. There are worse people than trump out there and we are likely to get one next election thanks in part to dipshits like you.
    1
  12729.  @TheHuxleyAgnostic  ""Biden has a worse record than Donald Trump." More covid deaths under biden. More military spending under biden. More deportations under biden.
    1
  12730. Fuck you for the time I spent reading that drivel.
    1
  12731.  daddyhennessy cannonburg  Regarding, "they threw there own primary against the guy and he acts like it never happened. what a tool." Meanwhile, in reality... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VRoKgfoqmFQ As if you should need Sanders to tell you he got fucked over. Do you generally blame the victim?
    1
  12732. Policies without conviction is meaningless.
    1
  12733. Do you not realize there is no difference between a non vote and a no vote or are just pretending in an effort to unjustly smear him?
    1
  12734. Marcella (I'm pretty sure I butchered the spelling) seemed alright.
    1
  12735. Regarding, "When you know this impeachment debacle is..." When you think that you should be voting based on partisan priorities and not based on conviction you are a lost partisan hack.
    1
  12736. I don't appreciate political propaganda. And I'd say the same thing if the dodo were using their platform to give the orange clown good PR.
    1
  12737. I welcome your hatred.
    1
  12738. Look man, I love Tulsi, but if she couldn't be conned she wouldn't have signed up to serve the MIC personally... like she did.
    1
  12739. Yup. Or you can censor him and make some of the batshit crazy things he says true.
    1
  12740.  @g.g4625  Exactly what it sounds like. Shaming voters for their decision to not support terrible candidates.
    1
  12741.  @CybeargPlays  They are blaming people who don't vote. And while I would prefer everyone would vote, it's hardly their fault that there isn't anything of value to vote for.
    1
  12742.  @g.g4625  For example I happily and proudly still voted for Jill Stein in 2016. People will try and shame that vote and blame me for trump as if it's my fault he won and is I voted for him. Voter shaming in general is a pretty despicable practice and is incredibly ineffective.
    1
  12743. In reality yang is making it easy. Maybe try harder to defend your clown.
    1
  12744. Maybe consider the possibility that you are a moron.
    1
  12745.  @montyburns9943  You might want to consider the possibilities that: 1) masks do work, 2) you are a moron and 3) I already fully understand our government sucks and lies all the time.
    1
  12746.  @montyburns9943  And 4) covid is real.
    1
  12747.  @montyburns9943  You are 100% the moron and have a 0% chance of being smart enough to realize it.
    1
  12748.  @montyburns9943  Because I think you are stupid? Nah. You are merely proving my point for me. Not that it's necessary.
    1
  12749.  @montyburns9943  Do you ever say anything that isn't stupid? Are you trying to prove the saying wrong that even a broken clock is correct twice a day by always being wrong?
    1
  12750.  @montyburns9943  Do you have any more stupid things to say? I'm surprised you haven't called me sexist yet because you are a flailing moron grasping at straws.
    1
  12751.  @montyburns9943  Actually, you know what... why am I a racist? That's what you are implying with that pointed thing on my head nonsense right? So why exactly am I a racist? Please explain. I'm sure you have really good reasoning for saying that and it isn't just the rambling nonsense from an epic dipshit right? Please enlighten me with the brilliance of your wisdom. Please tell me your "logic" and "reasoning."
    1
  12752.  @SandfordSmythe  "He belongs to no party." Since biden became president bernie has voted in lockstep with corporate dems. If all you had was the voting record for a corporate dem and the voting record for bernie you wouldn't be able to tell the difference between the two.
    1
  12753.  @SandfordSmythe  "He belongs to no party." Bernie will forever to tell you to vote for the democrat in EVERY presidential election no matter how abhorrent the candidate.
    1
  12754.  @SandfordSmythe  Bernie is a sheep herder for a corrupt democratic party and no amount of lies and meaningless labels will change that.
    1
  12755. Don't sit out. Vote. Biden and Trump aren't the only candidates running and the presidential election isn't the only thing to vote on. Vote. The powers that be love it when people stay home. Don't give them what they want.
    1
  12756. They are ignorant because MSNBC buried this story for months.
    1
  12757. Regarding, "I wouldn't count on it." I'll cross that bridge when I get there. The bottom line is that if I were a gambling man, and I am a gambling man, I bet the house he is allowed to run as a dem in 2020.
    1
  12758. people pretending to be the left =/= people actually on the left
    1
  12759. Yang's just another lying politician.
    1
  12760.  @AA-cg3gd  Like when he ran ads for president saying he supported m4a. Then he proposed a health care plan while running for potus. It wasn't m4a or even close. He was just lying.
    1
  12761.  @signalfire6  Regarding, "That's not what happened. I followed the campaign closely and you're lying or misinformed." It's exactly what happened. I can only think you are lying as yanggang loves to do. Videos on youtube that cover the topic include: "Andrew Yang CRUMBLES After Anchor Calls Out His Healthcare Plan" "Andrew Yang Gets Called-Out Over His Health Care Lie" "Andrew Yang: "Medicare For All Is Not The Name Of A Bill" (Yes It Is)" "Andrew Yang CONFRONTED on Medicare For All Stance"
    1
  12762.  @signalfire6  It doesn't matter how detached from reality your comment is. It doesn't matter that I can back up my statement and you can't. Yanggang will give your BS a thumbs up and pretend my comment doesn't exist. It reminds of trump supporters shouting fake news when reality isn't what they wish it was.
    1
  12763. Clearly I am not as smart as I'd like to think. I feel like a moron watching this. I'm lost.
    1
  12764. While I agree the endings were bad I'd encourage you to try and see the endings the way I do. The 3 eyed raven is a piece of shit who engineered the entire shit show just so that they could be king. Thinking of it this way is far more satisfying and makes more sense to me then the average interpretation of events.
    1
  12765. Why do you think he came all this way?
    1
  12766. If it's done right... absolutely.
    1
  12767.  @Happy_Shopper  If you do it right it doesn't get stale and boring. It's sci fi for fucks sake. It's not limited by things the way the real world is. It's only limited by the imagination of the writers.
    1
  12768.  @Happy_Shopper  I think my points pretty clear. I like it when it's done right and don't like it when it isn't.
    1
  12769.  @Happy_Shopper  I want movies like this... as long as they are good.
    1
  12770.  @Happy_Shopper  What does that mean? I'm old and used to words.
    1
  12771. I love Gabbard but let's focus on getting him the nomination and trust he will pick a great running mate (because he will). The "democratic" primary will be anything other then democratic and a bloodbath. That needs to be the focus.
    1
  12772. Actually he has covered this in the past.
    1
  12773. Here. At Secular Talk on other videos. Ignorance is not an excuse to say bullshit. Do some fucking research if you actually care. Which I suspect you don't.
    1
  12774. Huh? Did you think I was asking for evidence or something? Because I wasn't. I was merely trying to tell you that you are wrong. If this is something that you actually care about like you pretend then I advise you to go back and look again because it is there and when you say it isn't you look like an idiot. Even if I did choose to waste my time finding a clip and by rewatching shit I've already seen I suspect that you would just rationalize it with some bullshit mental gymnastics Shapiro style so it just doesn't seem like a very good investment of my time.
    1
  12775. Forgive me but I've got better things to do with my time then go back and rewatch things I've already seen to give you the answer you seek. Tell you what. You just think he hasn't for all I care and you can pretend I didn't say anything or that I'm wrong. I don't really give a fuck.
    1
  12776. LMFAO. Ok. If you say so. Maybe you should go back and watch all his videos. It isn't like Kyle exclusively talks about Shapiro when his name is in the title.
    1
  12777. Seriously thank you for the laughs in sad times. Tell you what... I'll point you back to my own words. "You just think he hasn't for all I care and you can pretend I didn't say anything or that I'm wrong. I don't really give a fuck." My thoughts on this haven't changed in the last 9 hours.
    1
  12778. Except that he has.
    1
  12779. Thank you for your approval. And I approve of your opinion if you're not willing to do the research since you are not going to go back and watch all his videos.
    1
  12780.  @thedissidentleftist6997  Does sam pay you by your post? By the hour? Or are you a burner account for sam? I know you aren't actually a dissident leftist so what are you?
    1
  12781.  @thedissidentleftist6997  "Sam never paid me." You mean you do this for free? I pity you.
    1
  12782.  @thedissidentleftist6997  "After all Republican party does the same thing so why not?" I'm sure your corrupt dems think the same thing when they take their corrupt money.
    1
  12783.  @thedissidentleftist6997  "After all Republican party does the same thing so why not?" This must be what your dems say when they sell out.
    1
  12784.  @thedissidentleftist6997  "I don't care." Are you sure you aren't sam "i don't care" seder?
    1
  12785.  @thedissidentleftist6997  But maybe change your name to something more apt like "placated leftist" or "useful idiot." I'm what an actual dissident leftist looks like.
    1
  12786.  @thedissidentleftist6997  "most of us don't like Pelosi and to a lesser degree bidens" And sam will tell you to vote for them in every general election because that's what controlled opposition does.
    1
  12787.  @thedissidentleftist6997  Pelosi and biden don't care if you don't like them. They have yours and sams vote. That's the only thing that's important to them and sam makes sure they get it.
    1
  12788.  @thedissidentleftist6997  "don't like Pelosi and to a lesser degree bidens" Sams job it to get you to vote for people you don't even like.
    1
  12789.  @thedissidentleftist6997  Sams job is to get you to vote for people you don't like joe and nancy.
    1
  12790.  @thedissidentleftist6997  "we all knows what will happens when republican party gets absolute majority." Nevermind the dems who currently have it all and are using it to wage war and not helps it's people. Good luck. You need it.
    1
  12791.  @thedissidentleftist6997  "you wish you can make a leftist trump worshipping party" Never said anything close to this. I'd NEVER vote for him. You and sam would.
    1
  12792.  @thedissidentleftist6997  "muted" When you silence someone you don't prove them wrong, you only prove you are scared of what they have to say. You and sam deserve each other since sam is for censorship.
    1
  12793.  @j0j0dartiste21  "i have never seen Sam advocate to vote for Pelosi." Sam has NEVER not told people not to vote for a dem in a general election. He's vote blue no matter who. Does sam people not even watch him?
    1
  12794.  @j0j0dartiste21  "Biden was one of two choices" this is what sam's teaches but it's blatantly false. Your choice were literally INFINATE. You could write someone in. "Don't see how telling people not to vote for him will get us anywhere to close to what we want." LMFAO He's in office right now. Do you see how voting him isn't getting you what you want? Or do you just not care? And want to vote for someone you know isn't going to do good?
    1
  12795.  @j0j0dartiste21  "i have never seen Sam advocate to vote for Pelosi" Sam has been a pundit for a long, long, long time. When has sam ever told anyone not to vote for a dem in a general? Oh right... NEVER. So yeah... sam is vote blue no matter who and that includes pelosi.
    1
  12796.  @j0j0dartiste21  "You are complaining that people are advocating to vote for Biden to prevent Trump." And I tell people voting for trump to stop biden that they are being dumb for EXACTLY the same reasons.
    1
  12797.  @j0j0dartiste21  Millions of people voted for trump knowing he sucked and was terrible and should never be POTUS. But they voted for him anyway because of biden. You are the other side of that idiot coin.
    1
  12798.  @j0j0dartiste21  Biden being a POS isn't reason to vote for trump and trump being a POS doesn't mean you should vote biden. This isn't rocket science.
    1
  12799. Don't get me wrong, the turtleman is one of the worst people on the planet. But the nancy pelosi's of this world do more damage to the country then he does.
    1
  12800. She was compared to a movie star and sex symbol because they both looked like bad badasses. What is wrong with you?
    1
  12801.  @alexs1640  Regarding, "Someone who understands what the Democrats has done to Bernie but still pushes voting for Biden because at least he's not Trump MUST be establishment right?" Maybe not. But you are clearly a willing tool for the establishment. Do you ever think enabling evil is dumb? You should.
    1
  12802.  @alexs1640  Regarding, "look forward to getting a progressive candidate in 2024." LMFAO. The best hope for a progressive candidate is trump winning in 2020. Electing joe "nothing will fundamentely change" biden in a world that is on fire and desperately needs change leads to trump 2.0 in 2024 and kills any possibility of a progressive winning. The country will blame the "left" for the upcoming shit show. It's how we got trump in the first place. Same old same old in a world that wanting hoping and change but not getting it.
    1
  12803.  @alexs1640  I honestly think the world is better off if Trump wins in 2020, not because of 2020-2024 but because of 2024 and beyond. Not that it matters. I don't support evil. No one should. As you support a POS like biden.
    1
  12804.  @nucleargandhi2709  Regarding, " I'll do whatever I can to see the not fascist in power instead of the fascist." Do you support the fascist next election if you think their opponent is a nazi? Maybe don't support evil at all instead?
    1
  12805.  @nucleargandhi2709  Regarding, "Do you actually believe the Democrats will decide they need to go further left if a milquetoast candidate like Biden loses?" I think that more people will wake to the rot in the party as they attempt to excuse their lose to an orange clown by blaming russia. Not that it matters. I don't support evil as a matter of principle, not because of hope of change in the party. I don't support evil because it's evil. Don't overthink it.
    1
  12806.  @nucleargandhi2709  But you did give you own drivel an instant thumbs up so must really be on to something. That or you aren't very intellectually honest.
    1
  12807.  @alexs1640  Regarding, " you need to lend me your crystal ball so I can also see the future" You don't. It's not what is important. What's important is people not support evil. The rest is just details for you to get lost in. Regarding, "You don't know that Biden in 2020 will lead to Trump in 2024" Maybe not. But I can't see any other way the next 4 years play out. Biden doesn't have a cure for coronavirus. Or a plan to give people money, or jobs, or health care. We are entering a depression whether or not you can see the obvious signs. And whoever has the WH will be blamed. Do you even bother to ask how trump got elected in the first place? Maybe figure that out so that might avoid it going forward. Because history is going to repeat itself. Regarding, "And this whole idea of enabling evil is stupid." Nope. You are just being stupid and enabling evil. Regarding, "Trump is the bad candidate." Thanks captain obvious. Regarding, "I swear some of you guys are taking this "holier-than-thou" attitude as if it's beneath you to vote for the lesser of two evils." LMFAO. Yes, voting for evil is beneath me. It should be beneath you. You don't need to be holier than thou to not support evil for fucks sake. I swear you must be willfully stupid when you know what you are supporting is evil and you support it anyway. "Lesser evil" = STILL EVIL. Regarding, "Are you doing it for attention?" Maybe I'm just tired of having clowns for president. If it makes you feel any better I give the same message to trump supporters. Do you really not understand the point I'm trying to make? It's really not as complex as you make it seem. It's crazy simple really. Regarding, "The best way to get change isn't to burn our country down." Do you even think about the things you say before saying them? You might think burning the country to the ground is dumb. But it clearly would be change. Voting for Joe "nothing will fundamentally change nothing" biden is not the best way to get change if that's something you actually care about, realize it, or admit it.
    1
  12808.  @zidneya  I'd give you a pass if I could and you had a Bernie sticker on your car.
    1
  12809.  @zidneya  If I had the power I'd happily write you a ticket if you had a trump or biden sticker on your car.
    1
  12810.  @zidneya  Regarding, " I always thought you pay a price for breaking the law" Are you new to the world and the US criminal justice system? No. Not everyone pays a price for breaking the law. Not even close. And not all broken laws are treated equally. It's not like we are talking about murder or some shit. Regarding, "not for hurting someone's else's feelings." This is funny because you are talking about a law that is as close to "hurting someone's feelings" as is humanly possible.
    1
  12811. Nah. It's great. Now if only Biden can get it and covid can win both battles.
    1
  12812. Just dump him. I know I am.
    1
  12813. I don't need "sources" to know trump says shit like "grab em by the pussy" and "take out their families." I've heard them from the orange clowns mouth.
    1
  12814.  @eleksitia  I would again like to reiterate my thanks for your being open to what I was saying. Being open to willing to listen to reason (which I like to think I was doing), is a sign of true strength and wisdom. Everyone is wrong from time to time but too few are willing to admit it. The ones that do are to be admired for it. Peace.
    1
  12815. @Sergio Aguirre regarding, "What people accept to work for is NONE OF YOUR BUSINESS." My tax dollars are my business. And when they have to go to people doing the right thing and working full time because they aren't getting paid enough to live on that is absolutely my business. Republicans claim to value work. They don't want moochers. But when people go out and do the right thing by working they suddenly stop caring about them.
    1
  12816. @Sergio Aguirre regarding, "They reward leeches." I find this funny coming from someone who wants to enable large corporations to leech off the labor of their workers by not paying them what they are worth. I find this funny because I'm the one giving a path to get people off welfare programs by making sure they are getting paid what they are worth.
    1
  12817. Screw Kyle.
    1
  12818.  @JackieLombardi  Jimmy and I were laughing at ana because she is an incompetent blackmailer but she's still a blackmailer and generally all around terrible person.
    1
  12819.  @dtrain300  Most of it... I had trouble stomaching it and didn't watch every single minute. Why? Do you mistakenly think this has something to do with my point? Because it doesn't. Telling the truth isn't smearing. Sorry not sorry if the truth hurts.
    1
  12820. I always care about hypocrisy.
    1
  12821. While I agree that we need to pick our battles I disagree this isn't a battle worth fighting. Romanticizing McCain as something he isn't and ignoring how terrible the media's coverage of this has been would be a terrible precedent to set.
    1
  12822. Regarding, "kyle's specific criticism of meghan." That is an example of romanticizing McCain as something he isn't and an example of hypocrisy. That is why it is fair game to me. Regarding, "She's allowed to romanticize her father's memory/legacy" Sure she is. But I am allowed to call it out for the hypocrisy it is. Especially when she is clearly already making it political. If she can take pot shots at Trump I can take pot shots at McCain for exactly the same reasons. And I personally think it is important because society needs to recognize and acknowledge evil... not pretend it was something else. She can think whatever she wants. But SOCIETY needs to accept the truth. And clearly they aren't, at least when it comes to the corporate media and lots of the country.
    1
  12823. I understand why she would say what she did even if she shouldn't have made it political by comparing her dad to trump. I do. But my opinion of McCain before he died is that he was FUCKING TERRIBLE. Terrible for this country. Terrible for countless countries around the globe. Just awful when it came to policy. The only redeeming quality he ever demonstrated was that he was a much needed voice of reason when it came to torture. That's it. In every other way I think he sucked. I'm not about to pretend I think otherwise because he, like the so many people he helped put there, is in the ground. Society has a moral obligation to call out warmongers, not call them heroes.
    1
  12824. "Biden would have cured covid and cancer by now if it weren't for manchin." -some shitlib, probably
    1
  12825. Musk has used billions of dollars from taxpayers to make himself rich.
    1
  12826.  @itsmebatman  I guess I'm just speaking for myself. Everyone should have a problem with that POS.
    1
  12827. @Shawn Brink It wasn't "scumbag progressives" who rigged the "democratic" primary, or voted for trump, or gave trump billions in free media, or sucked so hard her entire life she (hillary) couldn't beat the orange clown. But go ahead and blame us. That makes sense... to total fucking dipshits.
    1
  12828.  @krink084  You are frauds. Obviously. You should be embarrassed that you don't know what TYTs problem is.
    1
  12829.  @chandlerschneider1452  You sound like you have nothing of value to say.
    1
  12830.  @rgdssd  "drama" Only an epic moron would calls smears and blackmail "drama." "Get a life" Is this your idea of having a life? Making everyone dumber and trying to reinvent reality with BS? Sorry not sorry if the truth triggers you.
    1
  12831.  @tankerofgoodmusic8852  Your stupidity is remarkable. And this is coming from someone who thinks biden is a complete POS.
    1
  12832. What's sad is that people believe the drivel you just wrote.
    1
  12833.  @stickemuppunkitsthefunlovi4733  *aipac sent him
    1
  12834.  @reneelancaster8714  "biggest problem" You make me think it's copy and paste.
    1
  12835.  @stickemuppunkitsthefunlovi4733  Too long didn't read. Free Palestine!
    1
  12836. 0 percent is still too high.
    1
  12837. He's also not a fine journalist. He's a propagandist.
    1
  12838.  @peoples2296  For the establishment as a hack. That's not what I'm looking for.
    1
  12839.  @peoples2296  "foolish claim, he criticizes "the establishment" on a regular basis." Except he bootlicks for the establishment and writes propaganda for them on a regular basis so it's not.
    1
  12840.  @peoples2296  Speaking of a foolish claim you wrote, "Ryan Grim is a fine journalist."
    1
  12841.  @peoples2296  Ryan Grimm is what's known as "controlled opposition."
    1
  12842.  @peoples2296  If you want an example of ryan grimm writing propaganda I suggest checking out his recent article, "CHUCK SCHUMER EYES A SECOND SHOT AT RAISING THE MINIMUM WAGE THROUGH RECONCILIATION." It's something that should more accurately be published by chuck shumer's pr team. It's certainly not the work of a "fine journalist." It's propaganda for the establishment.
    1
  12843.  @peoples2296  "Source for any of the nonsense spewing out of your mouth?" Just like Chuck Shumer you want to have your cake and eat it too. You get to pretend that you are being reasonable and open minded by asking for a source but you demonstrate you have no interest in taking that source seriously by calling it nonsense before even checking it out. It's very intellectually dishonest of you... just like ryan grimm.
    1
  12844.  @peoples2296  Are you still bootlicking for ryan grimm today? Or have you maybe realize that isn't a good use of your time for someone who manufactures consent for chuck shumer?
    1
  12845. I'm sorry who was being blackmailed on the right?
    1
  12846. Lots of people are busy living their lives just trying to put food on the table and they are manipulated by propaganda. Not all are morons.
    1
  12847. Yes.
    1
  12848. I know right. Does CNN really suck? Is his daughter really bangable? Whenever I am in agreement I always have to rethink things. Ultimately a broken clock is correct twice a day.
    1
  12849.  @nickthompson1812  "Is it because it’s not right now or something? 18 months too late for you?" Yes. I'm busy caring about the people who are actually in power right now because I'm not a tool of the democrats.
    1
  12850.  @nickthompson1812  "Is it because it’s not right now or something?" Is it because you don't care that dems suck? Is that why you only want to deflect and point at republicans? That's what I'm forced to think.
    1
  12851.  @nickthompson1812  "I don’t know why holding them accountable is a bad thing to you." I know exactly why you and sam don't care about the people who are actually in power right now. It's pathetic.
    1
  12852. Good news... that won't help.
    1
  12853. Not at all. It's just important and worth talking about.
    1
  12854. This video screams US/western propaganda with it's title. And this channel has 7 million subs? Gross. That's how many subs caitlan johnstones channel should have... not this.
    1
  12855. I'm happy Trump isn't president anymore but I'm so fucking sad Biden is president.
    1
  12856. As if he isn't losing his marbles.
    1
  12857. Yeah... them committing a federal crime to destroy the ballots of an election that wasn't stolen makes the most sense. SMH
    1
  12858. Too bad. I was hoping the plane didn't make it.
    1
  12859. I hope you are paid for this stupid shit nathaniel. For your sake I hope you aren't really this dense.
    1
  12860. Your soul wasn't worth whatever they were paying.
    1
  12861. If she does run against Sander she will be forever dead to me. The only hope she has of ever regaining my trust is by doing the right thing and stepping aside.
    1
  12862. I really wish youtube would enable the thumbs down feature for comments like yours.
    1
  12863. Stopping Biden is a real issue.
    1
  12864.  @mikeh6700  "what mask" The one that claimed money corrupts. The one who was intellectually honest. The one who cared about smears, blackmail and the persectution of journalists. That mask is off and we are left with nothing but a coward and fraud.
    1
  12865.  @mikeh6700  "All he said" That's not 'all he said.' Kyle the hack said the millions they are taking don't make them corrupt while failing to mention he is affiliated with them. "Hate to break it to you, but that's true." I hate to break it to you but everything I've said is true while you make excuses and rationalizations for bullshit.
    1
  12866.  @mikeh6700  "literally everything you've said has been categorically untrue." Very funny. I have to wonder what specific examples you are going to give to back this up. "He's allowed to criticize TYT" Good thing I'm not saying things like he can't. Then I would be lying. It's more accurate to say that you are lying about what I've been saying. So you don't even bother to give a single example of me lying. That makes you the liar.
    1
  12867. Is he? He isn't getting my vote. You are both morons.
    1
  12868. I don't mind because I find Ben easy to laugh at. And I need a good laugh as often as I can get them in sad times.
    1
  12869. "Thank you chris." While it's good he said this now it's important to note that he buried this info for months. Chris is complicit as are MSNBC.
    1
  12870. Chris is a day late and a dollar short. He is complicit as are MSNBC.
    1
  12871. Chris and MSNBC buried this for months. They are complicit.
    1
  12872.  @GlassThirdEye  Regarding, "chuck is short for chris" This is sarcasm right?
    1
  12873. @M R Regarding, "Are you really so bitter as to not recognize the far, far greater danger to this person (BS)?" Sorry I didn't address this terrible point in my previous post. You must have edited it in. Are you really so dense to not realize why the "left's" corporate media is more dangerous? All but the dumbest of the dumb realize what a propaganda network Faux news. But there are lots of otherwise intelligent people who don't realize the damage being done by the "left" corporate media to smear progressives. They have no clue that, for example, Ed Shultz told about how MSNBC told him not cover Sanders announced running in 2016 to cover meaningless bullshit because they have an agenda just like faux news does. You for example have no trouble understanding how terrible faux is. But you clearly have a tough time realizing the same about CNN and MSNBC. That's why they are in fact more dangerous... at least in my opinion.
    1
  12874. @M R You are making pathetic excuses and rationalization for CNN and MSNBC. That is why I am frustrated with you. And don't get so bent out of shape over words. They are merely a tool we use to express ideas. And swear words are the best way to express frustration. And now I've told you clear as day why I am frustrated with you, in case it wasn't already clear enough.
    1
  12875. @M R Regarding, "Fox is the most watched MSM network, my friend." Fox viewers don't vote in the "democratic" primary. Which makes your point terrible.
    1
  12876. @M R Regarding, "have also exposed your own ignorance regarding which side's MSM does more damage" All you need to do to think this is ignore my point. Regarding, "Not to mention your childish insults" Aren't you the same person who has called me, "bitter, ignorant, and childish." But I'm sure you think that's way different. Hypocrites always do.
    1
  12877. @M R Regarding, "Are you actually suggesting that only Republican voters watch Fox?" Nope. More like I'm suggesting that Republican voters sure as fuck aren't watching CNN and MSNBC. That said the overwhelming majority of fox viewers are republican voters.
    1
  12878. @M R Regarding, "glass houses" I'm not in a glass house. I don't give a shit about your insults. I care about your hypocrisy.
    1
  12879. @M R Regarding, "you said I was making excuses for the lefts MSM media" No I didn't. As usual you are putting words in people's mouths. I said, "And if anyone is implying shit it's you. You are implying that what the corporate media on the left does is fine because it isn't as bad as what the right does. You are making excuses for the inexcusable... cause it's not as bad." There is a reason I used the word imply. You can't just take it out and act as if I didn't. But you put words in people mouths and take them out whenever it's convenient to make your terrible points. For that reason I see no reason to continue this... along with everything else.
    1
  12880. @M R I "literally" said it to a moron who ignores the context in which it's presented. I didn't say it in a vacuum... all by itself.
    1
  12881. @M R Regarding, "How did I take it out of context?" Wow. You need to go back to remedial english. "And if anyone is implying shit it's you. You are implying that what the corporate media on the left does is fine because it isn't as bad as what the right does. You are making excuses for the inexcusable... cause it's not as bad." Do you really not know what the word "if" means? It means I'm not stating something definitively. But expound upon the idea based on the idea that that is what you did do even thou I'm not saying it with conviction. Let's try an example. Let's say I said... "If you kill someone. You are a murderer." Did I just call you a murderer? Of course not. But a fucking dipshit like you would take it out of context to try and make a stupid point but the only thing you would be proving is how dumb you are. Regarding, "child" So you are happy being a hypocrite huh? Again... I'm done with this. Go back and get brainwashed by the corporate media some more.
    1
  12882. @M R But at least you get to pat yourself on the back cause it isn't as bad as being brainwashed by faux.
    1
  12883. @Amog They are practicing their "lesser of two evils" bullshit. Cause we are suppose to support evil and ignore the fact that it is still evil when there is a greater evil we need to be scared about... according to them.
    1
  12884.  @declaringpond2276  You are an idiot as demonstrated by both your content and grammar.
    1
  12885. Rahm should learn to split rocks, in a federal, pound you in the ass prison.
    1
  12886. I didn't think this show could get worse. Bravo if you were trying to prove me wrong about that the hill.
    1
  12887.  @shanecrow94  You know what nevermind what I said about giving him a second chance. The more I've thought about it the more none of this sits right with me. I'm officially unsubscribed for the first time in many years.
    1
  12888. Regarding, "hey Kyle, Yang isnt against $15min. wage" He is against raising the federal minimum wage. Try not to lie about it.
    1
  12889.  @AnkitSharma9212  Regarding, "you dont have proof of it I have." I don't huh? "Leave minimum wage to states" From his own twitter. Then again that was before he had reason to lie and pander. https://twitter.com/AndrewYang/status/991050364345602050
    1
  12890. 3 points. 1 it is not a large umbrella party and I cite them purging progressives, 2 it was Hillary's fault for losing and 3 the notion that we should be uniting behind anyone regardless of who that is is insane. By that logic you would support Satan if they called themselves a democrat.
    1
  12891. Still leaving your lie up. And you wonder why it is tough to tell the difference between bullshit and the truth these days.
    1
  12892. Joe biden is his "good friend."
    1
  12893. Actually we do need a government so we would be wise to fight for a good one.
    1
  12894. I don't understand the point of your comment. I guess if you are trying to say that there is no perfect voting system I would have to agree with the obvious. That said I want paper ballots because I want there to be a trail that can be checked even if it is not perfect especially without other safeguards.
    1
  12895. Nobody thinks it is foolproof but it is the best way to do elections along with other security measures. I'm stealing the following from another writer... Paper ballots should be hand counted on-site by teams of three people (1 dem, 1 gop, 1 indie, plus wandering supervisors), with the results posted in real time on the window and online, and then the ballots sealed in security boxes and transferred by at least three people to the main ballot repositories for any re-counts. You also need to make sure ballots are being properly issued to all citizens; no provisional bullshit to throw out votes i.e. crosscheck needs to be banned. We should have a system where all citizens are automatically registered to vote based on social security records, where voting precincts can log someone into a central voting database if the person is now living in a new precinct and comes in to vote.
    1
  12896. As if those are the only people who don't like your conman.
    1
  12897.  @Obelisk57  yang is your conman
    1
  12898.  @Obelisk57  Your level of intellectual dishonesty rivals that of hillary's "correct the record" trolls and that isn't easy to do. They would mindlessly call me a sexist for not liking their conwoman much like you are wrongfully calling me a racist.
    1
  12899.  @Obelisk57  Regarding, "BTW who are these other people you are referring to? Are you their spokeshole that represents them?" You are impossible to take seriously. I hope you are being paid for your BS. I hope you aren't actually this dense for free.
    1
  12900.  @Obelisk57  But I could use a good laugh. Why exactly am I a racist? Please be specific.
    1
  12901.  @Obelisk57  You called me a racist. You must have good "reasoning." So what is it?
    1
  12902.  @Obelisk57  Maybe add why you are lying about having already answered my question as well. Not that you will.
    1
  12903.  @Obelisk57  Regarding, "this is my 4th request" You are the same person who won't tell me why I'm a racist. Are you always so blatantly hypocritical like this? "Intellectually inferior, dishonest and woke racist" You can't be bothered to say why I'm a racist so I'll figure you can't be bother to back up any of your other BS as well. You call me dishonest but you are lying that I am a racist or that I have said anything that is even remotely racist. "Who are the other people you are referring to who think Andrew Yang is a conman?" I'm talking about people who are not racist and understand yang is a conman. I'm talking about people who don't like andrew yang based on things that have nothing to do with the color of his skin and have everything to do with the content of his character or lack thereor. That's what I'm talking about. Your welcome for answering your question despite your dodging mine. "WHOM HAS ANDREW YANG CONNED?" Andrew Yang lied about supporting m4a while running for potus. That's what conmen do. No more excuses. You called me a racist. Why?
    1
  12904.  @Obelisk57  Regarding, "either you can't read or simply a liar" Pretty funny coming from a liar like you. Regarding, "Calling Andrew Yang a conman without any evidence" I gave you evidence. He lied about supporting m4a while running for POTUS. Regarding, "YOU BELIEVE, as a minority" I've never said anything about his skin color. I don't care about this at all. You seem to care about skin color very much. But that makes sense seeing as how you constantly demonstrate hypocritical behavior. "he should toe YOUR narrative (all minorities think alike? all blacks vote Democrat?) is racist." I never said anything even remotely close to this. You are just lying and making things up. "I stand by my statement and accusation." I stand by my statement that you are exactly like hillary's correct the record trolls who would call me sexist because I had the audacity to call out their conwomen.
    1
  12905.  @Obelisk57  You are a disgrace to yanggang. You only make me more convinced than ever he is conman.
    1
  12906.  @Obelisk57  Regarding, "no need to go out of your way to confirm you are a RACIST" So saying yanggang is racist now? What is wrong with you?
    1
  12907.  @Obelisk57  Does yanggang know saying yanggang is racist?
    1
  12908.  @Obelisk57  How many people do you think you call racist per day?
    1
  12909.  @Obelisk57  You are like internet cancer.
    1
  12910.  @Bbenton1959  Is that what you tell yourself to vote for candidates complicit in jeeennnnyyysssiide?
    1
  12911. @ "worse" Millions voted for trump knowing he is terrible and voted for him anyone... like I said... you are blue maga.
    1
  12912.  @toyotaprius79  Stop playing the red/blue game. Stop acting like the different sides of the uniparty are different.
    1
  12913.  @samwalters1  I do worry we might have waited too long. I think economic overheating might be what's cause climate change. Maybe Summers and his oligarch friends can all take a piss on us to cool the world and save us all. Not all heroes wear capes.
    1
  12914.  @pm3157  One is a tool of big pharma. One is an actual scientist.
    1
  12915.  @pm3157  I really don't care. I do mean to take away from fauci. He's a POS. Campbell on the other hand isn't. That's far more important than any "credentials" you think they have.
    1
  12916.  @pm3157  I'm not talking about their education. I'm talking about their portfolio and their ethics (or lack of ethics in the case of fauci). This isn't rocket science and shouldn't be so hard to understand.
    1
  12917.  @pm3157  You sound like a bot that is malfunctioning. Are you ok?
    1
  12918. Remember when she thought most votes should win? I do. Now she is sticking in to try and win a contested convention. Classy. It's why she is likely to even lose her home state even.
    1
  12919. It was our fault? Not trump supporters, or hillary for sucking, or the DNC for rigging the primary, or corporate media for giving trump billions in free media, it's our fault? Bite me. Bernie or bust.
    1
  12920.  @dudeitskory  Your stupidity is quite impressive somehow.
    1
  12921.  @gaypreator8547  You would think Dan would show people why they shouldn't support these corrupt parties... but they will.
    1
  12922.  @aprilmillard-nd4xt  "my opinion" You are a dupe who supports a corrupt party filled with dan crenshaws... my opinion.
    1
  12923.  @CIARUNSITE  I'm sorry you can't accept that dan was elected as a republican and that the party does not represent your interests in the least. It's called denial.
    1
  12924. No. They don't. Even the states where he wins M4A is the popular position.
    1
  12925. You are an idiot. We need money out of politics and people like Sanders who will fight for it.
    1
  12926.  @goldbrick2563  "didn't protest it" Because he continues to tell you to vote for the same party that says pete buttigieg won the Iowa caucus instead of running 3rd party like a real revolutionary might.
    1
  12927.  @goldbrick2563  Bernie will tell you to vote for the same party that says pete buttigieg won the iowa caucus.
    1
  12928.  @goldbrick2563  "2020" Bernie will always tell you to vote for the blue team.
    1
  12929.  @goldbrick2563  He supports a party that says pete buttigieg won the io wa cau cus.
    1
  12930.  @goldbrick2563  "bernie didnt want the R's to win." You mean like trump already did and likely will again? As if biden is any better? Yeah, he isn't a revolutionary.... he's a sheepherder for a corrupt party. "Ross Perot controlled opposition or revolutionary?" Perot was a revolutionary. Perot was not reason the dems lost. This is no different than nadar nonsense. Nadar was not why gore "lost." Gore won florida and the election was stolen from him. Dems used to realize that. Now biden calls people like that the problem.
    1
  12931.  @alohatigers1199  "3rd party compete with 2 giant parties that are backed by wealthy people?" People with common sense. Who don't vote for the candidate with the most money but for the candidate who actually deserves it. "2 party system" We have a one party system. It's way past time people like you realize it.
    1
  12932. I'm not going to lie sam sedar sycophants making fun of people's masculinity is hilarious. Sam is so insecure his team is likely to delete this comment.
    1
  12933. That's funny because if you are on the right he's yours so far as I'm concerned.
    1
  12934.  @gregoryrogalsky6937  Nice try? Sorry if the truth hurts. And forgive for not addressing the rest of your stupid shit with a few nuggets of non bullshit sprinkled in. Or don't. Whatever.
    1
  12935. Just epic stupidity and Bernie is too smart for that.
    1
  12936. You really are able to rapid fire stupid shit aren't you. It's almost like you have idiotic talking points on speed dial.
    1
  12937. They want to win. But I understand why you would think they don't. Winning isn't the most important thing for them. Maintaining the status quo is.
    1
  12938.  @MichaelAronson  "He hasn't pushed back on Tucker once." You must live in an alternate universe. I live in this one. The one where tucker carlson said: "I didn't use to think that and now I do because you convinced me through the force of your argument." He said that while talking about pardoning assange.
    1
  12939.  @MichaelAronson  "provided an example of them agreeing," It's like you are going out of your way to intentionally miss the point that they didn't always agree. That dore used tuckers platform to move him to the correct position. You clearly don't care about the world in which you exist. You have an agenda.
    1
  12940.  @MichaelAronson  "They do now" Yup. Because when you were saying, "He agrees with Tucker on everything. He hasn't pushed back on Tucker once." You were full of it and lying. "rightwing" I'm talking about freeing assange and you are acting like that's "right wing." You sedar sycophants can't be anymore intellectually dishonest if you tried. Were you always like this or did you only learn it from sam?
    1
  12941.  @MichaelAronson  "Jimmy Dore is now a rightwing" I want things like: universal health care, giving peace a chance, money out of politics, criminal justice reform, to protect the enviornment, to break up the banks, freedom of speech, the right to decide what goes into my body, and more, just like jimmy. I guess I must be rIgHtWiNg tOo.
    1
  12942.  @MichaelAronson  "you were saying," I told you exactly what I was talking about it wasn't that. Me telling you what I'm addressing, " "He hasn't pushed back on Tucker once." That's me telling you what I'm talking about. I can only think you are pretending to not get it. "This is still true." Your lies are transparent. They didn't always agree on if assange should be free or prosecuted. Then dore made his case on his show and tucker changed his position. Those are the facts and you lie about them because you are not an honest person. "politicians does Jimmy Dore support" I don't care what conmen jimmy chooses to support. I'm not talking about them. I'm talking about policy. I can tell you one thing thou... if someone can actually be found supporting and fighting for universal health care, (pandering does not count. Trump after all could be heard saying things like "everyone needs health care.") Jimmy would support them. If AOC actually withheld her vote for pelosi and used it to demand that m4a be brought to a vote you can damn well be sure jimmy would support them. Instead we dems have control of everything and it won't even be voted on.
    1
  12943.  @MichaelAronson  "this is still correct" It's forever a lie. If jimmy never actually pushed back on tucker then tucker would still advocate that assange be persecuted. Instead he advocates that assange should be pardoned. Because of jimmy. You are a disingenuous liar and this is a waste of my time.
    1
  12944.  @MichaelAronson  "This means Jimmy Dore could claim something" Jimmy claimed assange should be pardoned. "Tucker disagrees" Tucker didn't. "Jimmy doesn't push back. He has literally never pushed back." Jimmy pushed back. Tucker changed his position. And you lie about it. It's not even a good lie. It's transparent.
    1
  12945.  @MichaelAronson  "Correct. You finally got it." You must be trolling me right? "so they agree on everything, like I said" All you need to do to claim this is ignore the reality in which you exist and ignore the time when they didn't agree on assange. It was before jimmy pushed back and changed tucker's mind. What a POS you must be to lie about this.
    1
  12946.  @MichaelAronson  Me: this is the exact time and place when and where they didn't agree. You: "so they agree on everything, like I said." You are a joke.
    1
  12947.  @MichaelAronson  You lying: "You only quoted Tucker saying they presently agree" Me actually quoting tucker: "I didn't use to think that and now I do." To be fair I'm taking tuckers word for this. I don't actually watch his show. But according to tucker jimmy has changed his mind and he would know better than you. Tucker is a liar but he is still more credible than you. "My point is that Dore never pushes back, because he doesn't." My point is that you are liar because according to tucker dore changed his mind about assange. "that would not be an example of Dore pushing back" Dore literally changed his mind about assange according to tucker. You are a joke of a person with an agenda.
    1
  12948.  @MichaelAronson  "That's not an example of pushing back." I can't take you seriously enough to keep responding to your BS. You are a joke.
    1
  12949.  @MichaelAronson  If you want to know what jimmy dore going on tucker actually looks like instead of lying about it I recommend the youtube video titled: "Jimmy Dore Brings Anti-War Message To Fox News!" It really shows how rightwing jimmy is as he spreads his message of giving a peace a chance on tucker.
    1
  12950. ​ @MichaelAronson  "You have to actually attempt to show why your opponent is wrong." Tucker literally conceded that dore was successful in accomplishing this. And that dore's arguments won him over. You are a joke. Or let me put ask you a rhetorical question... why does tucker now think that assange should be pardoned? Because of jimmy and his arguments according to tucker. That's the fact. Another fact: you are a joke.
    1
  12951.  @MichaelAronson  "It looks like two rightwingers" Rightwingers talking about peace? I guess I'm a right winger too then. You are a joke with an agenda.
    1
  12952.  @MichaelAronson  "agreeing with each other." Agreeing that jounalists should be protected and not persecuted. I guess I'm a right winger too in your world where facts don't matter.
    1
  12953.  @MichaelAronson  "Show me an example of Dore pushing back against Tucker." I don't watch tucker and I sure AF am not going to watch it for you. Even if I did you would find ways to ignore a smoking gun. I'm already admit I'm talking tuckers word for it and according to tucker jimmy changed his mind. "Of course you are." LFMAO Of course you say this. Only shitlibs like sam and you are on the left am I right?
    1
  12954.  @MichaelAronson  "without a shred of evidence" This is true if you ignore the fact that tucker said jimmy changed his mind. But he did so there is that and it's evidence. Obviously.
    1
  12955. I'll be honest. I think you are never being honest.
    1
  12956.  @Mike2digital  No prob. Maybe don't be so intellectually dishonest all the time.
    1
  12957.  @Mike2digital  Actually me giving you credit for being full of shit is me giving you the benefit of the doubt. I hope you are being paid for all the dumb shit you say. If you actually believe all the stupid shit you say that would actually say less of you and your intelligence on the whole, if not your morality. Either way good luck in life. You will need it.
    1
  12958.  @Mike2digital  Regarding, "I’m just stating facts bro" Nope. You lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie... Regarding, "I’m not trying to be hostile and cus like you are." I don't try to be hostile and try to swear. It's just a natural response to people like yourself who dedicate their time 24/7 to making everyone dumber and spouting nonsense constantly. I do the same for corporate media for the same reasons. Regarding, "I’m just pointing out that Yang is the beat candidate in the race" He sucks, just like you. And he lies, just like you.
    1
  12959.  @Mike2digital  Regarding, "dude you have no legitimate argument here. You’re just blabbing out smears" What an apt description of everything you say. Thanks for the laugh.
    1
  12960. Smart people can think stupid things. I cite religion as evidence of this.
    1
  12961. Jordan I honestly have trouble taking people like you seriously. I'm not sure if you are being intentionally dishonest or are just stupid as fuck. You go from staying stupid as fuck shit like, "government is involved in an industry prices inevitably go up" which is easily proven false when I point out that canadians pay far less for health care than the US to saying stupid as fuck shit like, "its also some of the best care," which is also easily proven to be bullshit. Canadians live longer than Americans, in part because of health care. No doubt you are going to want to claim it has more to do with them eating bad shit or something so then I'm going to point out that infant mortality rates in canada are also better than in the US. Good luck being retarded. You make the people you talk to dumber.
    1
  12962.  @meanwhileinsooke  "celebrating Assad's 100% "election" win" LMFAO Lies like this are so transparent I don't understand how they are effective at all.
    1
  12963. The divide is there. Nothing needs to be created.
    1
  12964. You had me until, "She is the worst of the candidates." That's terrible. Biden exists.
    1
  12965. Or Un.
    1
  12966. More like it's cut ties with kyle time.
    1
  12967. ​ Ash Win Regarding, " He announced it before it happened." He what? Maybe read the title of the video.
    1
  12968. There are so many answers to this but how about for the simple fact that the establishment loves it when you stay home and hate it when you go out and vote. It's why they do things like purge voter roles and disenfranchise voters in other ways. Don't let them win without fighting. And voting is fighting. The fact that electoral college is dumb is a TERRIBLE reason to stay home.
    1
  12969.  @SilentWatcher000  Thank you for that. We need to fight for what we want.
    1
  12970. It wasn't his property and this isn't the wild west. I agree with bri but don't let that stop you from from spouting nonsense.
    1
  12971. Anyone who looks up the definition of the words concentration and compares it to what is happening in gaza would realize it fits the definition PERFECTLY.
    1
  12972. I love this comment so much.
    1
  12973.  @layinlow77  I think they are saying you are right to be pissed at wallstreet and at warmongers. I know I am.
    1
  12974. Are you intentionally being obtuse?
    1
  12975. Because the "democratic" party is a dumpster fire.
    1
  12976. Someone sounds mad they can't get laid.
    1
  12977. All UBI are not created equal. Yang wants the poorest of the poor to be the first ones paying for his.
    1
  12978. Maybe realize that more than two people and parties run.
    1
  12979. I don't think it's a warcrime but it should be criminal to force people to watch CNN in airports.
    1
  12980. It's not Donny Deutsch, it's Donny Douche.
    1
  12981. Has sam called out any of MSNBC's many lies about covid? Nah. But he goes there to blame russel brand for misinformation instead like the puppet he is.
    1
  12982. When they do find common ground I am against it about 99.99% of the time.
    1
  12983. There is a time and place to oppose wars and that is when they vote to go to war. Voting to see that the troops have what they need after the decision to go to war is completely different. I suspect you understand that by try to use this talking point to smear Sanders unjustly.
    1
  12984.  @jamesmorison  "just want to hate Elon" I think you just want to hate thunderfoot. That or you just love the smell of musky balls. "his gig must be pretty profitable" Musk has gotten literally billions of dollars from the government and taxpayers while you pretend to be worried about the money thunderfoot is getting from youtube ads. LMFAO
    1
  12985. "will walk n talk for a price" So warmongers can pay him to speak out in favor of war? Or you are just silly?
    1
  12986. Youtube says there are 66 replies and I can only see 40. (yes I counted them, yes it's a little sad) Isn't that the type of thing that makes china the bad guy?
    1
  12987. The problem is a political ideology that starts with a z. It's not a religion that starts with the letter j.
    1
  12988. Tim, no problem. I'm happy someone enjoyed it. You gotta make the occasional joke about what is going on for sanity sake.
    1
  12989. frederik, yeah, I get it. I used to be proud to be an American. Now I'm embarrassed and ashamed.
    1
  12990.  @simonbrook3076  "the issue at hand" The issue at hand is important and if people like you had their way politicians would never be pressed on important topics like this. Your motivations for this BS is very questionable.
    1
  12991.  @simonbrook3076  "I totally agree that it is important to press politicians on important issues." You clearly do not. "pressing the politicians who are actually getting things done" Not only are they not getting things done they won't even answer questions addressing how they aren't getting things done. "namely stopping people from getting evicted from their houses" I mean except for the people that are getting evicted that is. "seems pretty counter productive to me." Bootlicking for a politicians even being asked questions like you are seems pretty counter productive to me but to each their own I guess. "I questioned the motives of the journalist" Yup I question your motives far more than the journalist asking questions. Are you paid for this BS? "I admit that my opinion might be cynical" As if that's your problem. Your problem is mindless bootlicking for a politician. Your problem is that you want to have your cake and eat it too. You can either be in favor of politicians being asked tough question or not. You don't get to pick and choose your moments in a world where politicians do everything they can to not answer any tough questions as evidenced by their interaction. "I just don’t understand" You got that one thing right. "politicians that are actually looking out for people." Except they aren't. Stop defending them when they aren't. And stop defending them from questions for sake. "this “interview” took place while Cory Bush was sleeping" What? They agreed to be interviewed. That doesn't mean they get to pick and choose the questions being asked of them. Just stop.
    1
  12992. The irony of you calling people communists with YOUR propaganda is really quite funny.
    1
  12993. He's trash. Seek help.
    1
  12994. Except it's not just a tweet. That tweet comes with a whole bunch of bullshit behind it unsurprisingly like... https://www.salon.com/2018/04/06/bernie-sanders-mlk-comments-anger-barack-obama-supporters/ https://www.dailydot.com/irl/bernie-sanders-obama-mlk-jr-anniversary/ So it's not "just a tweet." It's a concerted effort to smear him unjustly. Don't kid yourself. The race for 2020 has already begun.
    1
  12995. "Republicans solve problems" This is stupid even by internet comment section standards.
    1
  12996. Go watch richard medhurst and robert inlakesh and don't give your own idiotic comments a thumbs up going forward.
    1
  12997.  @johndavis8457  "you know it's true" And all you need to do to utter such nonsense is ignore my answer. You should know that you this is stupid. I'm not sure you do. "please answer the question. Critical race theory would say this is racist by definition…" That's not a question dipshit.
    1
  12998.  @johndavis8457  "I don’t understand!" You are getting one thing correct at least. "why are white people abs white males in particular hosting left channels?" Why wouldn't they? Being on the "left" means believing in giving peace a chance, protecting the environment, universal health care, breaking up the banks, money out of politics, criminal justice reform, legal weed, and more. Or at least that's what being on "left" means to me. Those are human values that everyone of every color and creed should be able to get behind. And like I noted with my original reply whites are not the only "leftist" youtubers out there. I'm literally listening to richard medhurst, a middle eastern syrian and not exactly white guy, right now. Another favorite of my is briana joy grey at bad faith. So your notion that it's only white guys is just not right.
    1
  12999. The election that matter is the "democratic" primary. Let's make sure Bernie wins it and the rest is going to be easy by comparison.
    1
  13000. LMFAO. Born yesterday?
    1
  13001. 12:47 Is that pope stallone on the right?
    1
  13002.  Sir Panda  I'm pretty confident that MrBerd was referencing the book 1984 and doublespeak.
    1
  13003. Yup. He also acts like selling out needs to involve money. It doesn't. It's simply betraying the values you act like you have.
    1
  13004. She ran to increase her exposure and sell books. That's hardly authentic to me.
    1
  13005.  @anthonybrowne3942  Regarding, "Unlike you a lot of people, money was not her motivating factor." So much wrong with so few words. First how do you know how much value I place on money? You seem to think a lot even though that's the type of behavior I'm saying I have a problem with. It's like your conclusion has more to do with your desire to try and insult me and has nothing to do with any sort of "logic." Second, most people care about money because that's what reality looks like. I even got done trying to make the point that money isn't everything very recently with nobody seeming to get it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wts_l8E3_FQ&lc=z22mczn53qqdsdn3yacdp433cgutt0jkay4k0ucfnntw03c010c.1578699038472777 My original comment, "I want whatever happy drug this guy is on. Unless liking Warren was one of the side effects." And I get responses like, "its called not worrying about money," "dude he’s rich." My take, "Money doesn't buy happiness." So that's what I actually think on the topic not that I think you care. And thirdly... money IS her motivating factor. She doesn't just give those books away. If she genuinely cared about politics there is a way to do it. You earn your place at the table and don't think you should be starting at the fucking top. The fact that she thinks anyone should be supporting her, instead of someone like Sanders who has earned their spot, is beyond insulting. She knows she has no right to support and had less than 0 chance of winning before running... but there was money to be made.
    1
  13006.  @anthonybrowne3942  Regarding, "when the first thing that comes from a person is money, that tells you where their head is at." When you want to act like money isn't a natural motivator of people you can tell they are coming from a position of great bias.
    1
  13007. Except we are actually currently at peace with them even if it is hostile. I'm pretty sure the worst thing that can happen is war breaks out.... especially because I think war with them would be completely unnecessary.
    1
  13008. I'm not interested in technicalities. I am pretty sure that the common opinion is that we are not currently at war with them... at least compared to other countries that we are not "technically" at war with but definitely are at war with. I am at least placated by a cease fire. I do not want full scale war and think those 2 meeting could give the MIC the excuse they want to end the cease fire. I mean you at least acknowledge that as a possibility right?
    1
  13009. Regarding, "The mindset of DPRK representitves will be that a state war exists," They can think that all they want for all I care. I care about what they are doing more than what they are thinking. As long as they are not busy killing people, and currently they are not, I can live with it. Regarding, "he could screw up bigly" Yes. He could. I agree with most things Dore says but him saying, "what risks?" over and over as if things couldn't get worse when clearly they can to be really silly. I want peace to break out. It's just that I think those 2 meeting has the potential to do more harm than good. Hopefully I'm wrong if they do actually meet.
    1
  13010. Are you uninformed? Are you angry? You should probably unsubscribe. You are worth it.
    1
  13011. Whoevers reply that is it can't be seen. Freedom of speech am I right?
    1
  13012.  @grmpEqweer  "So make your own platform, Clint." Wait. Are you trying to blame me this? And not the people in power? And you are doing it with that handle? You feel like controlled opposition... much like bernie.
    1
  13013.  @grmpEqweer  "tired of this beef, is all, from anyone." So you thought you would be a hypocrite and start "beef" with me?
    1
  13014.  @grmpEqweer  "You're here." I'm not why you can't have nice things.
    1
  13015.  @lindablackwell4852  "It's this bi-partisan crap" Nope. Dems have everything they need and there isn't anything republicans can do about it if dem actually wanted to do something. "Republicans represents the wealthy corporations" So do the dems. "progressives and left represent us." Not in their actions. Not in their votes. Their words are as meaningless as any of them.
    1
  13016.  @lindablackwell4852  Your intellectual dishonesty is showing when you give your own comments a thumbs up like that.
    1
  13017.  @lindablackwell4852  "I don't lie." LMFAO You are impossible to take seriously. "Majority of democrats for the regular people." LMFAO No they aren't. "Did not give myself a thumbs up." Your comment is being shadow banned. It can only be seen by me and I can only see it from my notifications. The only people where were capable of giving it a thumbs up are me and you. You are lying.
    1
  13018.  @lindablackwell4852  "Did not give myself a thumbs up." Your comment is being censored. The only people who could give it a thumbs up are me and you and I didn't do it. You are lying.
    1
  13019.  @lindablackwell4852  "Did not give myself a thumbs up." If you can't get your facts straight your opinions are rightfully ignored.
    1
  13020.  @lindablackwell4852  "gaslight!" The projection is funny all things considered. Thanks for the laugh.
    1
  13021.  @lindablackwell4852  "liar liar pants on fire!!" Yes. You are legit caught gaslighting and projecting red handed. "Trouble maker on purpose!" I'll figure this is more projection and you are paid for this. Shame on you.
    1
  13022.  @frankd.506  "I gave you a thumbs up" Nope. It still has the single thumbs up that it did since I talked about it. "I had no problem" You don't even know about the comment I'm talking about because you can't see it. Notice how I (at least as far as you can see) RESPONDED to them before you can see a comment of theirs? Well I'm talking about that comment that I responded to that you can't see.
    1
  13023.  @frankd.506  You will never be able to give that comment a thumbs up because you can't see it. The only people who can see it are them, because they wrote it, and me, because they were responding directly to me and because it shows up in my notifications. You can give their silly comment a thumbs up where they call me a liar but the facts are what they are.
    1
  13024.  @frankd.506  "Her name is Linda" She wrote more than one comment. I'm talking about a specific comment. "but I can't see it" Yup. What do they say in their first comment in this thread? The one I'm talking about? " 🤦‍♂" Prove me wrong. When you can't realize how silly this is.
    1
  13025.  @frankd.506  "but I can't see it" Or give that specific comment it's second thumbs up. I'll wait forever. Because you can't.
    1
  13026.  @frankd.506  "but I can't see it" Yup. And even if you can't realize it this will always be fact.
    1
  13027.  @frankd.506  Still waiting for that second thumbs up on that comment you can totally see.
    1
  13028.  @frankd.506  "I gave a thumbs up to her posts" Not all of them. The comment I'm talking about still only has a single thumbs up like it has for all this time. "you come off like you're desperate." LMFAO You still haven't given that comment a thumbs up. Reality is what is even if you can't see it or admit it.
    1
  13029.  @frankd.506  "you come off like you're desperate." LMFAO This is funny from a guy ignoring my point. I'll point this out again so that you can ignore it again... notice how, as far as you can see, I replied to linda before they even commented? That's because the comment I replied to, the one you can't see, is still the comment I'm talking about.
    1
  13030.  @frankd.506  I used to think sanders had really good fans. Now the only people who support him are liars and intellectually dishonest hacks like you and linda.
    1
  13031.  @frankd.506  I used to think sanders had great fans. Now the only people left are people who can't tell the truth and have no intellectual honesty such as you and linda.
    1
  13032.  @frankd.506  I legit hope you are paid for what you are saying. For your sake.
    1
  13033.  @frankd.506  Still waiting for you to give that second thumbs up to the comment I'm talking about. Just kidding. I know you can't. I hope you realize it too. I hope you are only being paid to gaslight like you are.
    1
  13034. I've never voted for him and never will.
    1
  13035. Funny take on the same topic. Worth your time. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iuZTch7FJgU
    1
  13036. Police need their budgets slashed. Just "demilitarizing" them is not enough all by itself.
    1
  13037. I mean... except for the shirt.
    1
  13038. Force the vote! Sign the petition if you haven't already.
    1
  13039. Call it freedom of speech instead of the first amendment then and think about the point instead of semantics.
    1
  13040.  @Zurround  "Our AMENDMENTS do not apply to him." I don't care. Why do you? The amendment is about freedom of speech. Do you support freedom of speech or not? Or are you willing to be hypocritical about it and think it's only for some and not others? Cause I don't think that either and I'm not sure why anyone should. I concede I might be confused as to the point you are trying to make but either way I like to think I've made mine. I support freedom of speech. I support journalism. I support assange.
    1
  13041.  @dannya.2616  I don't think you need to be afraid of that happening.
    1
  13042.  @Kehwanna  "Michelle Caruso-Cabrera" A republican journalist? What? "Amy Mcgrath" She seems like an empty vessel from what I know but I hardly have concrete proof that she is bottom of the barrel worst of the worst like neera is. "That irrelevant Elliot guy" Feels like you are discrediting your own answer. Neera, while evil, is relevant.
    1
  13043.  @Kehwanna  I guess youtube thought I used too many naughty words and wasn't nice enough to POS like tanden in my response to you and so they deleted it. Meh. I don't really feel like trying to repeat it. Long story short we are on the same team and the rest is details. Peace.
    1
  13044.  @ZiggaBIZ  Regarding, "views further to the right of Neera" LFMAO. What the actual fuck are you talking about? Do you not know anything about neera and her views or are just trying to bullshit everyone and lie about what she thinks like this? Her views are straight up right wing and she is corrupt AF.
    1
  13045.  @KaiserMattTygore927  Regarding, "How many times does the US need to prove you wrong before you accept "it can always get worse, and probably will" LMFAO. What exactly have I been wrong about? Ultimately this has jack shit to do with whether or not the US sucks. It's about whether or not there are people worse than neera. Ultimately there aren't.
    1
  13046.  @KaiserMattTygore927  I should also that what I find most problematic about all the people saying that it can get worse Neera is that they are using it as an excuse to not fight against a terrible POS like Neera. Even if it can get worse than neera so fucking what. It's not like that is a "logical" reason to not oppose her. Evil needs to be opposed. Even what some consider to be the "lesser" evil.
    1
  13047.  @zach8025  Regarding, "we’ve never experienced such complete corruption throughout an administration as what’s taking place right now." Except for pretty much every president in my lifetime and I'm old as dirt. Trump isn't even the worst president this century. GWB is. Regarding, "Mitch McConnell started the ball rolling" Really? That ball wasn't rolling a long time ago? Or maybe you are whitewashing terrible people like, for example, newt gingrich. Regarding, "I find him to be one of the worst bad actors in dismantling democracy." How about pelosi? And DWS? And the entire party who conspired to do anything and everything to stop Sanders from the nomination? Regarding, "you take a good look at all the criminals Trump has put in place" Yeah. They were criminals long before trump and tend to all be recycled rejects from previous corrupt administrations. Regarding, "own personal gains" How much is Hillary worth these days? What did she do to accrue all that wealth? The clintons were suppose to be millions in debt while they were in the WH because Bill had to pay for all his lawyers. So how did Hillary become rich as fuck while working in "public service?" Stop acting like Trump is a unique terrible. You do everyone a disservice when you do. Regarding, "The rampant disregard for the future of our country and world at large." Trump is fucking terrible but you know what I can say about him that I can't about the previous presidents, especially Obama? 0 new wars under trump. I'll bet the world at large appreciates that far more than they give a shit about mean tweets. Regarding, "The pardons of those who have been tried and convicted for crimes done in association with Trump’s own campaign." While terrible this is nothing new. Scooter Libby. Regarding, "we have pulled back a whole new era of knowingly, wantonly and, with malice of doing wrong." New era? We were at war with everyone, before trump. Racist cops worked with impunity, before trump. Flints water was poison, before trump. The ironically called "land of the free" imprisoned more of the worlds population and the highest percentage of people in the world, before trump. Corruption was rampant, before trump. Millions didn't have health insurance, before trump. Stop acting like any of this shit is new. There is literally NOTHING new about trump and his terrible. Regarding, "America today is pitied for what she has become. The world doesn’t respect America." No shit. As if any of this is new. Good for the world. Fuck the US. Who is the greatest sponsor of terror in the world and is the worlds greatest threat to peace and has been long before trump. Regarding, "The world literally laughed and mocked Trump." I'm sure they won't mock the terrible piece of shit whose brain is rotting in their corrupt head. (FYI I'm talking about biden here) I'm just kidding. Of course they will. As they should. Look.... I don't care if you want to tell people why trump is terrible. But I care when you pretend this shit is new. It's not. Not even close.
    1
  13048.  @zach8025  Regarding, "We obviously differ on what we perceive as blatant and rampant corruption." Which is really sad. It really isn't the type of thing we get to have an opinion about. Regarding, "please tell me when a Senate Majority Leader said, and followed through with blocking everything by never even allowing bills to be brought before the senate for voting?" Is this where you want to move the goalpost to now? I thought it was all about how trump is a unique evil. Is it now mitch is a unique evil? Mitch was doing this shit BEFORE trump was elected. You are proving my point that the problems were around before trump with this. Regarding, "Describe to me all the presidents who have not divested?" Pretty much every president in my lifetime other than carter. Clinton and Obama weren't self described billionaires entering office who needed to do this. But both are rich as fuck now. Where did they get all their money? Regarding, "Put their family in white house positions" Legacies in politics include the bushes on the "right" and the kennedys on the "left." Regarding, "Which AG got involved with..." You really think this is the first POS AG in history? LMFAO. Regarding, "Did the president’s bidding..." You really think this is the POS AG who was a partisan hack doing the president's bidding? LMFAO Regarding, "Lied" This is the first time an AG was a liar? LMFAO Regarding, "Authorized the attack on peaceful protesters" You must be young enough to have lived through Obama and Biden watching DAPL protestors have their constitutional rights trampled right? Regarding, "expecting you to be honest" LMFAO. You don't give a single example of me saying anything untrue. I can go on and on but I have real tough time taking you seriously. Regarding, "hyperbole of past administrations" LMFAO. Yeah... you are impossible to take seriously. I feel bad for you. I think you are well intentioned which is far more than I can say for most idiots on the internet. But you blame the wrong people. Much like republicans blame immigrants or soros and other stupid shit... you blame trump for the shit show that is. All of the rot in this country was around long before trump. But at least now you are starting to wake to the rot. That's why the establishment hates trump. Not because he is sadistic, or evil, or corrupt... but because he gives the ugly policies of the US an ugly face. He gets you pissed off about all the things wrong with the country even if you should have been pissed long ago. They would rather have Obama at the helm. Then when the US expands war, income inequality explodes, kids are put in cages (that started under obama and was only put on steroids under trump), millions go without insurance, mass incarceration and more is happening you just sleep through it while it happens. Regarding, "the volume of criminals" It's almost like you know I'm right but won't admit it. More is not different... it's just more of the same. If my problem is rice and I don't like to eat it and you give me a plate of it... it sucks and I'm not happy. If you give me more rice... I don't care. Why should I? I'm looking for different. Regarding, "Maybe you should have gotten off your ancient ass a long time ago" You want to blame me? LMFAO. Really? That's even stupider than trump supporters blaming immigrants for this countries problems. I didn't even know such a thing was possible.
    1
  13049. Sam probably thinks it's not a mistake to call for joe rogan to be censored. It's probably just "strategic hypocrisy" to him. I'm sure he never really believed in free speech.
    1
  13050. N B if you want to think I'm programmed and have comprehension problems because I have the audacity to disagree with you I don't really care. That type of stupid fucking shit sure as hell doesn't do anything to convince me to take the substantial time it would take to address all your shit.
    1
  13051. I'll take that as a yes to my question.
    1
  13052. N B regarding, "Fair disclosure: "whyamimrpink78" is a well-known Youtube capitalist troll." Well, we agree that this fuckface is a troll. But even if you got your utopia there is no reason to think that an entity like them would just go away and not be used still.
    1
  13053. If you wonder why I don't want to engage you N B it's because you have your talking points and you stick to them. It doesn't feel like a conversation when talking to you. You also want to go super fucking deep about incredible complex topics that aren't easily addressed here. And think you should be able to dictate the conversation and think I have should be addressing all the complex things you say. Sorry. I'm not. I don't have the time, energy, ambition, or desire to do a full dive into the topics you think I should and I don't care what you think of that. I addressed you to point out that, as much as you want to call whyamiadipshitmcliarfuckface a "capitalist troll" there is no reason to think he would just go away if you got everything you want. Nowhere do you even attempt to address that point but you go right back to where you were even though I've made it clear I'm not going there. I've tuned you out. You are clearly more genuine then the fuckface but I actually have more interest in talking to them because they at least amuse me and I require comic relief in sad times. Good luck with your efforts to demonize an economic system. It is clearly very important to you.
    1
  13054. whydoiliesomuch... Dance for me you fucking clown.
    1
  13055. N B regarding, "So nothing is as personal as you seem to think." Stop being so fucking dense. When you are saying I have comprehension problems and have been programmed because I said I disagreed with you that is personal so stop lying to yourself and me about it. It was also totally unjustified as I didn't even go into the reasons why I disagreed with you, I only asserted it. That type of leap in logic is about as fucking retarded as it can be. That is akin to saying something like, "You calling me a troll means you have no counter arguments." That is just pure logical fallacy born of idiocy. And yes... I just said you were being dense and retarded. That is personal. But I'm not going to be disingenuous and claim otherwise like some. I also understand that doing so isn't a way to be persuasive but I also wasn't trying to be like you were. I know that has a way of getting people to tune you out. That said it doesn't seem to work on you because you have your head up so far up your ass it barely matters what else is going on around you. Sane people have a way of going away when people tell them to fuck off but still... here you are. I don't know how much more clear I could make it that I wasn't going to go balls deep into a conversation about capitalism. Still you couldn't let it go. Still you persisted with your stupid fucking talking points even thou I made it clear I wasn't listening. Go start your own fucking thread if that is what you want to talk about and stop being a fucking douchebag trying to force your dumb fuck ideology on others that revolves around proving an economic system is the devil. I don't give a fuck about your thoughts and you've made it clear you don't give a fuck about mine or you wouldn't still be here.
    1
  13056. And I am done replying to you N B. So if you want to respond and get the last word in you go right ahead. I don't give a fuck what it is, I won't read it, and I'm just fucking done with you.
    1
  13057. Because people died and it was covered up.
    1
  13058. Does it bother you at all that she voted to give Trump more money for bombs then even he wanted?
    1
  13059.  @lwt3162  Great non answer. Any politician would be proud of your ability to completely not address it with so many words.
    1
  13060.  @lwt3162  Don't worry. I won't ask you then about her turning her back on her fellow natives and DAPL protestors in their time of need. I won't ask you about campaigning for a hillary clinton cabinet seat then endorsing a fellow progressive like Sanders in 2016. I'll just assume more non-answers.
    1
  13061.  @eleksitia  yeah, your arguments are wrong and I've already told you why where it belonged. I'm not going to be copy and pasting talking points like some.
    1
  13062.  @eleksitia  regarding, "I don't agree with all of his policy ideas." What don't you agree with him on? I ask as someone who agrees with him on pretty much everything (but not quite). I'm curious to know if you feel like sharing.
    1
  13063. @Sergio Aguirre regarding, "says who?" I do. That's why I said it. Regarding, "minimum wage is designed for ENTRY LEVEL work." There is no "design." It's just work. Work they should be paid for. Aren't we suppose to value work? Don't we think people working 40 hours a week are doing the right thing? Shouldn't they be paid enough to live on while they do? Because I say they should. And if they don't get paid enough to live on who makes up the difference? The government. And I personally am tired as fuck of letting my tax dollars subsidize corporations who are not paying their employees enough to live on. Regarding, "teach them skills." This is why we have schools and education.
    1
  13064. @Sergio Aguirre regarding, "Public schools are a joke" The biggest problem with public schools is that people like you don't want them funded the way they should be. Regarding, "You are nobody and have no authority to tell anyone, anything about their lives." I'm sure you think you are somebody, who has authority, and is using it to tell me what I need to think and do. Regarding, "Freedom is deciding the life you live" There is, has been, and always will be limits to freedom. Those limits are best used when people are using their "freedom" to hurt others. Regarding, "no two people will make the same wage." Do you bother to think about the things you say before saying them? People make the same wage all the time. Like currently there are lots, and lots, and lots of people who make the same wage right now... the minimum wage. And even if you got your wish and there was no minimum wage there would still be people making the same wage. Think before you speak and maybe you wouldn't come across so idiotic when you do. Regarding, ""living wage" is a bullshit term" It means that people should be paid enough to live on. It is a pretty simple, pretty easily understood concept. Regarding, "Anyone who wants to use governemnt force on regular people to get them to do something is evil." Like those evil abolitionists who wanted to force people to stop slavery. They are the evil ones think mental midgets. Good luck with your idiotic talking points in the future. I'm tired of addressing you and your BS. I've wasted more then enough time on you already. I'm happily done with this.
    1
  13065. Actually the justice dems suck. /s
    1
  13066. With so many candidates they will not get much time to talk. Still I'm willing to bet the house he uses his limited time to make sure and mention he's gay... as if that is suppose to be important.
    1
  13067. I love Tulsi but that "ally" is running against him at the moment same as Warren. He could use her endorsement, not her running against him and splitting the progressive vote.
    1
  13068.  @d-risky4994  Just stop. Bernie has practically never left campaign mode after 2016. If she wanted to know if Bernie was running all she had to do was give him a call and he would have said yes. You are clearly reverse engineering things to say from a position of great bias. Regarding, "I have no doubt in my mind that when the time comes to drop out she will endorse Bernie" When the fuck do you suppose this will be? Before or after votes have been cast and the damage has been done? Even if she dropped out a week BEFORE anyone votes she will have arguably hurt Bernie's chances because (and it shouldn't be this way but it clearly is) momentum is important in politics. There is reason the corporate media tried to portray hillary as inevitable in 2016 and tries to portray biden as inevitable in 2020. There is reason they like to talk about skewed polls all the time and how biden is leading and shit like that. Their arguments are made better because tulsi is siphoning potential voters away from Bernie with every moment she is running. If tulsi were not in the race right now the vast majority of her supporters would be supporting sanders. They sure as fuck wouldn't be supporting biden. And whether or not you want to be intellectually honest enough to admit it that hurts Bernie, hurts his chances of winning the primary, and makes it more likely biden or another establishment shill wins the primary. Again, I love Tulsi. But she should be supporting sanders and not taking votes away from him in an election that we already know damn straight isn't fair.
    1
  13069.  @d-risky4994  Regarding, "so you say Bernie never left campaign mode since 2016" Yup. Because the fact of the matter is that you and everyone had zero reason to think he wouldn't be running in 2020. Regarding, "I can say that since Tulsi and Bernie are friends that she might have more inside access to his campaign plans, indicating to me that he wasn’t sure enough to let his friends know his plan for 2020" Again you are trying to reverse engineer explanations to come to the conclusions you want. Tulsi actions are far better explained in that she knew Sanders was going to run and she just didn't give a fuck. And the exact same things can be said about Warren. Regarding, "there is no indication that she is cannibalizes Bernie votes" You are an idiot trying to make explanations that make no fucking sense. In reality comments such as Bernie/Tulsi 2020 and Tulsi/Bernie 2020 are very common and Tulsi/Biden 2020 is nonexistent. You know damn well they are running the same lane. Everything you say demonstrates you understand this reality. You call them "allies" in your original post. But you don't want to concede the fact that she is taking her voters from Bernie because you would then have to concede the reality that her campaign is hurting Bernie. Regarding, "and *SOME will continue to follow her if she backs out and supports Bernie" The majority of her supporters would back Bernie if dropped out today. That's the reality. Those are the facts. Are you first and foremost a Tulsi supporter? If she dropped out today who would you then be supporting in the "democratic" primary? Please answer those questions and please try to be intellectually honest while answering them. Regarding, "BUT WHY STOP NOW?" It's like I haven't already given you logical arguments as to why she should not being running and should be supporting Sanders. Oh wait... I already have. Do I really need to repeat all the logical reasons she should not be running? Regarding, "Her policies are vastly identical to Bernie’s policies" Yup. They are running the same lane, with the same policies, whose voters come from the exact same pool. Regarding, "she is better at presenting foreign policy blunders" Is she thou? Bernie has been preaching a message of peace for longer than Tulsi has been alive. Bernie voted against the Iraq war. Too bad Tulsi didn't listen to him or she might have avoided going to serve the MIC personally the way she did. Regarding, "can grow that message larger make her campaign LARGER" Her growth comes at Sanders expense. As I've already stated but you want to ignore the vast majority of her voters would be supporting Bernie if not for her. Because duh. Because facts. Because reality. Regarding, "SHE CAN RUN ON BERNIES TICKET." Makes no fucking sense and doesn't make more sense because it's written in all caps. It's not like she needs a campaign to be considered for this. I'm actually far more fond of Bernie picking someone like Nina Turner to be his running mate because she is doing the right thing and supporting Sanders and helping him while Tulsi is hurting him, opposing him, and making it more likely an establishment shill gets the nomination. Would Sanders be better if Nina were running against him? Of course not. Because reality. Because he, and the country, are better with her supporting Sanders and not opposing him. And the same concepts apply for Tulsi. Regarding, "But we need Tulsi to overtake Warren and/or Harris first" You make no motherfucking sense. If tulsi ever gets this big she has even more reason to keep campaigning, keep opposing sanders, and keep siphoning votes away from him in a world where progressives would be wise to coalesce around the clear leader of the progressive movement. Regarding, "WE NEED TO KEEP TULSI IN THE FUCKING RACE SO JUST STOP SHOOTING YOURSELF IN YOUR “INTELLECTUALLY HONEST” FOOT AND GIVE TULSI A SINGLE FUCKING DOLLAR" The irony is something. In reality you are shooting yourself in the foot. You and tulsi are splitting the progressive movement, you are making it more likely an establishment fuck like biden wins, and the sooner tulsi gets out of the way and endorses sanders, like she should have just done from the get go, the better. Every dollar I'm giving in this election cycle is going to Sanders because he is our best hope of getting a progressive in the WH. All progressives, peasants and politicians, would be wise to be working toward that goal while Tulsi is siphoning votes from him. Our best chance is unifying. Because duh. Do the world a favor and realize this sooner rather than later.
    1
  13070.  @d-risky4994  Regarding, " you’re feelings are getting in the way of reason" The irony. Regarding, "I very easily donated money to both Sanders and Gabbard" Fine. You know why you pick those 2? Because they are in the same motherfucking lane and you damn well know it. But you want to lie about the fact that they share the same voter pool because of what that reality means. Regarding, "Because as you’ve said they are in the same lane, on the same ideological team." Cool. Obviously. No shit. But in reality only one of them can win the primary. I can only vote for one of them. I need to pick a side. I don't get to have my cake and eat it to. Your original post you call them allies. But they are not even if they are in the same lane. The primary is a war where only one gets to win. They are on OPPOSITE SIDES trying to win over voters from the same lane. You know who really is an ally of Bernie? Nina Turner. Because that's the reality that you want to ignore. Regarding, "Show the country that those who follow the true progressive path are rewarded with support so it pushes out charlatans like Warren and Harris." You want to know one of the ways I determine if people like Warren and Harris are charlatans? I ask myself if I think that what they are doing is in progressives interest. Well Gabbard isn't working in progressives interest anymore than Warren and Harris are when it comes to opposing Sanders. ALL OF THEM ARE OPPOSING HIM. I've picked my team. I'm on team Bernie Sanders. And as much as I love Tulsi she is taking a knife and plunging it in his back at the moment. You never answer any of my questions. I don't just ask them rhetorically ya know. There are points embedded in them. Regarding, "Because while you keep saying that Tulsi voters are stealing from Bernie, I’m saying that donating $1 isn’t voting" The principles are IDENTICAL. Both are ways of showing support. Tulsi isn't getting a dime from me. I was on her mailing list. I sent her an email about 2 weeks before she announced her running and begged her not to run. I begged her not split progressive support. Don't get me wrong, it's not like I thought she was going to read it much less have it affect her, but I have understood the pitfalls of splitting the progressive vote going in. I wasn't just going to act like I didn't think she was fucking over Bernie while she was fucking him over because I want to like her. SHE'S FUCKING UP. Why the fuck would I want to support that? How the fuck do you think that makes any motherfucking sense? Regarding, "I’m saying that two ideological allies working to steal voters from Biden, Warren, & Harris" YOU ARE AN IDIOT. How the fuck did you end up on the smart team? It's like you have no fucking clue how elections work and how votes are distributed. I don't know how to make my points anymore clear so that you might understand them. Regarding, "then joining forces to win the nomination" What the fuck are you talking about? Candidates don't get to share delegates. Regarding, "Bernie’s biggest weakness is that he believes the other people on that stage are his friends" I am dumbfounded by how idiotic I find the things you say. The guy who calls for a "political revolution," the guy who was fucked over in the primary in 2016, the guy who goes out of his way to call himself an independent, the guy who has been smeared constantly since the beginning of time, the guy who is constantly bombard by "gotcha" questions believes the other people on that stage are his friends? What the fuck are you smoking? As always you have conclusions that you want to get to and just trying say anything to justify getting there. In reality the shit you say makes no motherfucking sense and it is beyond infuriating. I mean, I'm used to this type of stupid shit coming from trump supporters and Hillary/biden fans but coming from an "ally" this type of stupidity makes me want to shake a baby. Regarding, "he doesn’t smear or attack, even when it is justified... he plays on the defensive all the time" You almost said something that wasn't completely moronic and then you went and fucked it up. Yes smearing and attacking isn't his thing. But it's not about being "defensive." It's about presenting his vision for the future. And you know what? It works. He doesn't need to tear people down because what people crave, even if they don't realize it, is a vision for the future, a plan for things to come, and substantive ways he might make their lives better. If you want a cunt whose who plan is smearing, tearing down others, and attacking constantly you may as well go support Trump because that's all he does. Sanders on the other hand would rather tell you how he is going to improve your life rather tell you why the other person sucks. It's just another way he is different than the average politician and just another reason why he is the fucking man. Regarding, "There is no way he calls out Warren for her hawkishness." Thank god we had Tulsi on the debate stage with warren so that she could take him down a peg. Oh wait... Warren had a great night overall while Tulsi shit the bed until she had a moment taking down a clown whose name I don't even remember at the moment. Even Warren raised her hand to give the private health insurance industry the finger while tulsi disappointed me so much I wanted to break my tv. Regarding, "You’re not being intellectually honest by questioning Tulsi’s superiority on foreign policy," Really? Because I gave a couple pretty good reasons why I question her superiority on the matter. First she enabled the MIC personally through her service and secondly her experience preaching a message of peace is nothing compared to Bernie who has been advocating for peace his whole life. The best argument that can be made for her "superiority" is that foreign policy is the only topic she really wants to talk about. Shit even when asked about the gender pay gap she thought giving her military resume would be a good idea when Bernie would have actually answered the question given to him. Regarding, "Bernie paints his foreign policy in broad strokes, she actually fleshes out who, how, and why." American's don't give a fuck about the details. They want a president who brings the troops home and spends the country wealth on them rather than in foreign lands. They don't give a fuck about the nuances between sunni and shia. Please answer some questions for me. If Joe Biden ran in 2016 would that have been a game changer to the election to the detriment of Hillary? Assuming you realize this would have been a detriment to Hillary, how is this situation significantly different than what Tulsi is doing to Bernie? Would Bernie Sanders be better off if Nina Turner would be running against him instead of being busy fighting in his corner? How is this situation different than Tulsi? Do you understand that progressives are a finite number of voters? And they only get one vote to cast? Would Bernie Sanders be better off if Warren were not running? Especially when lots of her supporters consider themselves to be progressives? How is this significantly different than what Tulsi is doing? Do you understand that candidates cannot give their pledged delegates to one another? That the ability of any individual progressive candidate's chances are diminished when they have to share their voter pool? As I write these I can already imagine the contrived, terrible answers that you are going to give as you do anything and everything to desperately concoct answers that suit the conclusions you want to come to. I'm not proofreading any of that. I've already wasted far too much time on you already.
    1
  13071.  @d-risky4994  Well done on dodging and ignoring my questions.
    1
  13072. death wish, it takes a real special kind of stupid to need to edit a post that has one four letter word in it. I also find it funny that you are lying about me lying. Good luck with the whole dumb as fuck thing you got going on.
    1
  13073. Intellectual dishonest such as this seems a staple of sam's audience. I wonder if they were always like that or if they learned it from him.
    1
  13074. Biden can't cure cancer. Because he is cancer.
    1
  13075. op regarding, "Ranked Choice Voting" I love ranked choice voting but I'm not sure this is the best place for it. And I'm not saying that there are not other ways to prevent a contested convention. For example they could also change the rules so that the candidate who has the most delegates wins instead of needing a majority of delegates. The point I am making is that there is a legit reason to justify superdelegates. Let's say the party changed the rules to what I propose... Superdelegates stay but they are required to vote for the candidate who has the most pledged delegates. Would you really have a problem with them then? Because I wouldn't and I fucking hate them. And do you agree that it is in the party's interests to avoid a contested convention? Because there definitely is. And as soon as there is a contested convention the results will never be the will of the people at that point and the nomination is likely to be decided by the will of the party elites.
    1
  13076. That vacuum isn't working.
    1
  13077. What's worse than the kid saying it is biden still saying it.
    1
  13078. @fat imo Regarding, "wont call out bernie for not using it during either of his presidential campaigns" So much wrong with this. First Bernie has called it out in the past, maybe not to your liking but he has. Second it's not his place to call out rigged elections... it's ours. Him talking about it is only seen as whinning and sour grapes. Regarding, "pretending that Bernie isn't turning a blind eye towards election fraud" I honestly have no clue what you are talking about. He has said the game isn't fair. Bernie could spend all of his political capital for the rest of his life crying foul. It's not going to do shit coming from the person who has the most reason to lie about the game being rigged. That is one reason, in part, why no one takes trump seriously with his BS. I think he thinks his time is better spent elsewhere. And he is probably right. You want to spend your life trying to wake the sheep go for it. I wish you well in your effort. And good luck with that.
    1
  13079. Not for me but to each their own.
    1
  13080. Um... what?
    1
  13081.  @jeremysweeney2241  Sorry I asked. Holy shit you are an idiot. But before I go regarding, "Please move to Canada before you ruin our country, oh yeah, they wouldn't have you" David Doel is a Canadian.
    1
  13082.  @jeremysweeney2241  And that "backwards ass country" has a health care system that costs half as much per person compared to the US, for a system that doesn't leave millions uninsured, whose people aren't plagued by medical bankruptcies, and whose system produces better results (superior infant mortality rate and superior life expectancy). What does that say about your country and their system? I'm just kidding, it's rhetorical. I don't give a fuck about the stupid shit you think.
    1
  13083. Pretty funny of you to be calling others idiots.
    1
  13084. Why? Because you care more about a stupid label than about winning? You are willing to make the path that much more difficult because you are pissed at the "democratic" party? That is dumb as fuck and would sacrifice any ability Sanders would have to reform the party from the inside.
    1
  13085. AOC is easy to agree with until it comes to her votes.
    1
  13086.  @CamMcGinn1981  It might be understandable but it's still gutless and wrong.
    1
  13087.  @CamMcGinn1981  Meh. Nothing excuses his not addressing anas attempt at blackmail. And if he wants to be friends with corrupt, blackmailing, propagandist hacks like TYT I'd rather be subscribed elsewhere.
    1
  13088. He wasn't actually smeared though... smears are lies. It's true that kyle said a bunch of abhorrent shit on the internet.
    1
  13089. Bernie or bust. Never Warren.
    1
  13090. I think you are giving the drogon, the dragon who just got done burning innocent civilians, too much reasoning skill.
    1
  13091. To all the many of you claiming it can't get worse than neera who do you think exists that is worse than neera? I still have yet to get a single name.
    1
  13092. I hope you are getting paid to say this shit and aren't really this dumb.
    1
  13093. You want your "news" channel to support him. Well you get what you want.
    1
  13094. The fact that you are conditioned to point at others wrong doing to justify your own is fucking pathetic. And the fact that you feel the need to say libtard every time while doing so is fucking sad. Stop being such an epic moron for the sake of humanity.
    1
  13095. While I kinda agree with your point you need to also realize how important the conclusion to a story is. It gives context and meaning to all those other seasons. The conclusion impacts how good everything else is. It's not like they are independent of one another. A bad conclusion makes what came before it worse and a great conclusion makes the things before it better.
    1
  13096.  @somniator3205  Regarding, "I have been a fan of almost all episodes (even of the most criticized ones), but this final episode even left me with a sour taste." Same. 8-3, the long night was heavily criticized but I thought it was fucking great overall and very much enjoyed it. (note: the dothraki charge was god awful. Lucky for them they could just respawn for Dany's best hitler impersonation) It is just really sad how bad I think the conclusion was and it does taint the entire show to a small degree for me. That said I prefer to try and focus on the good and there is still plenty of that when looking at the whole. Regarding, "The entire show is utter bullsh*t" Meh. I feel like most people are better then this at directing their outrage. It's been my experience that most people understand and agree that the problem was that the story was rushed. That we weren't given enough time and context to understand why the characters were doing what they were doing. Regarding, "all the phenomenal actors, artists and technicians who poured their heart into this." Again I think that most people criticizing GOT would agree these people are not the problem. I find that almost all rage is pretty laser focused toward benioff and weiss... the writing.
    1
  13097.  Craig Bowers  "You lose support. You lose." All the more reason to fight for m4a. If you want my support you fight for m4a.
    1
  13098. Is this what you would say if we were talking about Jeffrey Epstein? Well it's just as nonsensical now.
    1
  13099. There is an honest debate to be had about when life begins. To many life begins at birth. But that debate has NOTHING to do with the debate about how life is to be treated. You are either being disingenuous to conflate the two or are just a dipshit. Either way you suck at life.
    1
  13100. declan regarding, "I'm just pointing out the hypocrisy..." It's not hypocrisy and I told you why. I would be just as idiotic as you if I said it was hypocritical for people to masturbate and be opposed the death penalty at the same time because those two things have NOTHING to do with one another. That is conflating COMPLETELY different issues and topics. "8 month baby." You know people have BIRTHdays right? When do you celebrate your birthday? Let me guess... it's the day you came out of the womb right? Not the day you were conceived right? Do you understand my point? The bottom line is that you are talking about COMPLETELY different things. We can debate when life is born. We can debate how life is to be treated. But you can't act as if they are directly connected in the way you are. They are not.
    1
  13101. Regarding, "you're a hypocrite aswell" You clearly do not understand what does and does not make someone a hypocrite. Regarding, "then start talking about shit like when you celebrate your birthday and try to dismiss my points" Let me try to make this clear. This debate isn't actually about when life begins. The point I was trying to make is that people, for obvious reasons, have a different opinion than you about when life begins. This is about the fact that you are conflating completely different things like an idiot. Regarding, "try to dismiss my points which are relevant" You only think they are relevant because you are not smart. Regarding, "abortion is murder" I disagree. But this ISN'T ACTUALLY ABOUT THAT. It also isn't about whether or not either of us is for or against the death penalty. This is about you conflating the two like a complete fucking dipshit. Regarding, "abortion is murder" and "your type want to protect pedos rapists and murderers." Try to be honest with yourself. The fact of the matter is that you think these 2 things. It doesn't matter that they have NOTHING to do with one another. You think them both and are trying to connect them as if the two thoughts have anything to do with one another. They don't.
    1
  13102. declan regarding, "just because you tell me it's not hypocrisy dose not mean you're right" You're right. I'm correct because of the validity of my arguments. I don't think you understand that because you are not very smart. That's ok.... you can let your cult do your thinking for you. I'm pretty sure you are a religious nut.
    1
  13103. Regarding, "I'm agnostic" Wow. I would have bet the house you were religious. Regarding, "abortion is just taking responsibility away from women" So you want to make sure that irresponsible people are raising kids then? I don't find that to be a very compelling argument. Regarding, "a hypocrite is someone who...." A hypocrite is defined as, "a person who acts in contradiction to his or her stated beliefs or feelings." If my stated belief is that life begins at birth I am not acting in contradiction to my stated beliefs. A hypocrite is not, as you suggest a person who acts in contradiction to YOUR stated beliefs or feelings. Regarding, "abortion is murder I don't care whether you disagree" I don't actually give a fuck if you think abortion is murder. You can think that all you want for all I care. But at least do so without acting like an idiot about it and thinking that it has anything to do with the death penalty. It doesn't. You know why? Because NOBODY is debating whether or not a convicted criminal is alive or not. Regarding, "my conscience is clear" I'm not sure why you think I would care about this. I guess, if you wanted to know, not that I'm sure why you would, my conscience is also clear.
    1
  13104. There is so much wrong with everything you say... Regarding, "the lefties pretend to care about the death penalty" So because we disagree on when life begins that means my belief about the death penalty is insincere? Or maybe, just maybe, there are people who have different beliefs than you. I disagree with you about abortion being murder but I'm not about to suggest that, because we have different beliefs you are only "pretending." I personally believe that taking life, other than in self defense is wrong and is to be avoided if at all possible. I also believe that life begins at birth. I don't "pretend" to think anything other than this. I don't act as if I think anything other than this. My actions are consistent with those beliefs... you know MY BELIEFS. Let's say I claimed to have those beliefs and supported the death penalty. That would be hypocritical. That would be acting like a hypocrite. You continue to judge me by YOUR BELIEFS. Your beliefs have nothing to do with whether or not I am a hypocrite. I can't spell it out any clearer to you.
    1
  13105. Regarding, "You also don't have to quote every sentence just simplify it instead of long comments" No thanks. That is your belief not mine. And when I don't do what you want I don't all of a sudden become a hypocrite. I'd be a hypocrite about it if I insisted you not be long-winded the way I am but I don't. You can go ahead and ramble all you want and quote all you want for all I care.
    1
  13106. Late term abortions are a minuscule minority of the abortions actually performed and very often done because of fetal abnormality. The VAST majority of abortions are very early in pregnancies and it's not even close. Let's say you wanted to only make late term illegal. Again you are going to be back to debating the line of when life begins. As a man I tend to differ to women on this issue. Although there are women who are fervently "pro-life" I've met many more that are "pro-choice," and I'm reluctant to want to impose laws restricting their freedom. I want to live in as free a society as possible. I only want people's rights restricted when they infringe on others. No doubt you want to say a fetus is "others," but I disagree. There is definitely a line to be drawn as far as when you want to think life begins and I believe birth makes the most sense. I mean a birthday has been a birthday since the beginning of time because that is when we understand a person is born. We celebrate that date because that is when we, as a society, have decided life begins. Maybe I'd be willing to move that line but I do concede that I am also influenced by my other world views. I believe that we live in what I consider to be a vastly overpopulated planet. We are consuming at an unsustainable rate and reproducing at an unsustainable rate creating immense pressure on the environment. I think the planet would be better off with lots less people. I'm not about to go killing people that everyone agrees is alive but I think it makes a lot of sense that children are not born to parents who don't want them. I'm not about to tell people they need to have kids because I think, in part, that is not fair to kids to insist they be raised by parents who don't want them. Let me ask you this... if a women is raped, gets pregnant, and wants to have an abortion is that murder to you? (this is my equivalent of talking about late term abortions... it obviously is not representative of the majority of abortions but does happen) To me and most people this is obviously a clear no. And to me there isn't really a significant difference between that women getting an abortion and any women who isn't ready emotionally, financially, or just doesn't want to have a kid. I'm not about to call any of them murderers. After people are born I want them treated as well as possible. I'm going to fight for them. But I need to decide when that fight begins. I'm obviously not going to fight for semen. Less obvious is what do about fetuses but ultimately I've decided life begins at birth and that is when I start fighting for them. People who are unwanted when born are at an incredible disadvantage and I see no good reason to insist they start life that way. Please note that I say start because, again, that is when I think it starts.
    1
  13107. Regarding, "if a woman's raped and wants an abortion id understand and I wouldn't criticize her decision" This would count as hypocrisy because it goes against the positions you claim to hold. I agree with this statement but again, my feelings have nothing to do with whether or not it is hypocritical. Regarding, "if someone has to die" What a silly way to frame the debate. It isn't an either or situation. They are completely independent topics. I'd be more willing to accept your position (not to be confused with agree with your position) if you didn't conflate the two topics. Lastly regarding, "the rapist." All you need is one case of consensual sex that is lied about as rape and then, have no illusions about it, you are a murderer. And not "murder" of something that is debated about whether or not it is even alive in the first place but murder of something that literally everyone everywhere agrees is alive.
    1
  13108. Regarding, "you misunderstand compassion for hypocrisy" You have repeatedly called abortion MURDER. That isn't me. That is you. And then you said, "I wouldn't criticize her decision." You won't criticize, what according to you, IS FUCKING MURDER. Clearly you do not understand what does and does not make someone a hypocrite. It is judging them based on THEIR OWN beliefs. The only hypocrite here is you because the only person that actually thinks abortion is murder is YOU therefor the only person who can be said to be acting hypocritically for allowing "murder" is YOU. Regarding, "the rapist be the one punished" You say this like me or others is saying rapists shouldn't be punished but those people don't actually exist. Regarding, "you support the death penalty for unborn children" That is what you think. You can think that if you want but that has nothing to do with whether or not I'm a hypocrite because I don't share your beliefs.
    1
  13109. This is how Bernie's political revolution starts.
    1
  13110. It's the potus elect. It already is political.
    1
  13111. Didn't run against hillary, didn't support DAPL protestors, voted for an extra 80 billion per year for bombs for trump, willing to take legalized bribes in the general. Take your pick as all are valid examples.
    1
  13112. There are millions of people who don't treat it like fake news. They treat it like real news and they affect me. That's why I care.
    1
  13113. Or russia.
    1
  13114. @Paul B Your caps lock key is broken. As is your brain.
    1
  13115. Are you intentionally lying or just too fucking lazy to do a web search. Sanders has in fact condemned what Israel did. https://www.dailysabah.com/mideast/2018/04/01/bernie-sanders-condemns-israels-killing-of-palestinian-protesters
    1
  13116. What are your thoughts on what you did? You know, blatantly lying?
    1
  13117. It is impossible to take you seriously. You are liar who gives their own stupid ass comments a thumbs up. You are pretty pathetic. Regarding, "criticizing is not condemning" They are literally synonyms fuckface. Stop making excuses for lying. https://www.merriam-webster.com/thesaurus/criticize
    1
  13118. You are an idiot, a liar and a douche. Good luck with that.
    1
  13119. Regarding, "criticize and condemn have different perception" Still trying to rationalize lying huh? Regarding, "the average American education is 9th grade" I want to think that this is hyperbole but I can't say for sure if it that or just another lie seeing as how you have already proven yourself to be a blatant liar. Regarding, "Jesus love you" This may be the happiest I've ever been to be an atheist.
    1
  13120. Regarding, "Jesus loves everybody" Yeah. I can tell because your book of bullshit says I am going to spend the eternity of the afterlife in a lake of fire for not believing in your skydaddy. That is "love." Regarding, "I and my friends will pray for you" How about you worry about significantly more important things if you are so in touch with your invisible all-powerful friend? Regarding, "about the 9th grade education level let me tell you a story" Seeing as how you demonstrate an inability to think intelligently I shouldn't be surprised that you think "a story" is akin to fact. Did you know that there is a way to know what the average education level of American is? Did you know that it is not done by a "story." Regarding, "you do not even know me therefore how could you judge that I am a liar" You fucking lied in your original statement. That is all I need to know about you to know that you are a liar. This isn't rocket science. Regarding, "remember what the Bible have said..." Remember that your book of bullshit advocates for slavery and all sorts of other completely hideous shit.
    1
  13121. unfortunately mr. nice guy Nidal Shehadeh is 100% pro-bible which means 100% pro-genocide inflicted on the the entire population of the planet during the great flood inflicted on women and children and the elderly, I am yet to hear him condemning the acts of their god killing innocent civilians.
    1
  13122. So your response to my comment is to get offended at the term I used to describe your imaginary friend instead of addressing the handful of ways I specifically talked about why your imaginary friend is a fucking psycho who is cool with slavery and genocide. Why am I not surprised? Those are the types of things you claim to care about according to your original comment. Those are things that you claim to think need to be condemned. But your piece of shit book of bullshit instead gives slavery rules. There are several commandments to tell you how important it is that you worship your piece of shit imaginary deity but no commandments (or any comments EVER) to say slavery is wrong in a time when slavery was prevalent. Your piece of shit god had a problem with people working on Sunday enough to tell you not to do it but they felt no need to say that slavery is wrong and shouldn't be done... you know like a moral being and moral god would. Instead your piece of shit god tells you how to do slavery right.
    1
  13123. Regarding, "Jesus is not what you see on TV" Of course. You, like every other religious nut job, from every other faith has this romanticized notion of what your god is like that says more about you than it does about the nonexistent thing you are talking about. Regarding, "Jesus is someone that you have to..." This is not a very logical or practical way of doing things for an all powerful deity. I wish you understood how brainwashed and stupid all the bullshit you said was. Regarding, "the good Lord can only do that if" Wait so your god isn't all powerful then? Regarding, "you have to seek the good Lord" Why exactly does this make any fucking sense? What would you think if a parent treated their child this way? Did you dad to say to you after you were born, "I'm happy to be your dad but before I am going to be a dad to you you are going to need to find me" as they walked out the door. Regarding, "everlasting life" You are a sheep who wants to believe in this bullshit because you can't accept the cold hard fact that when you die you are dead. Regarding, "you might think you are Beyond recovery" I think you are probably beyond recovery. That is very different. Regarding, "I tell you Jesus loves you" You say this but have nothing to say when I point out that your loving god likes to burn people in a lake of fire not for things like slavery but for simply not believing in them. Even if your god is real then your god is a dick according to your "good book." Regarding, "have you read the Bible" Yes. That is why I'm able to cite how the bible gives rules for slavery as opposed to condemning slavery. Have you read the bible? Because you don't seem to know much about your fictitious god. Never do you even try to attempt to address me talking about how your bible gives slavery rules instead of condemning it. Regarding, "are you Jewish" I've already said and made perfectly clear that I'm an atheist. Are you at all embarrassed when you ask questions like this?
    1
  13124. Oh and you forgot to give your last stupid comment a thumbs up. Don't forget to.
    1
  13125. Yeah, you are sure to do that but you are not going to address why your bible gives rules for slavery instead of condemning slavery. You are also going to regurgitate your stupid "jesus loves you" bullshit without addressing the fact that your "loving" god went out of his way to flood the planet killing all but everyone (I would think you would care about this since you claim to care about genocide) and burns people he "loves" in hellfire for all of eternity. I'm just suppose to ignore the ways your god demonstrates that they don't love and are a fucking pyscho and accept the stupid things you say without bothering to think intelligently. Sorry but I'm not a fucking moron. Save that bullshit for dipshits.
    1
  13126. I'm a person who, for example, understands that slavery is abhorrent and wrong... unlike your piece of shit non existent god. I suggest that you ask yourself who you are when you are worshiping something that is happy with slavery and doesn't condemn it. You won't thou because you are a brainwashed sheep who is ok with the completely immoral behavior of your fictitious deity because you think your belief will give you everlasting life instead of focusing on what is actually important... this life... the only one you get.
    1
  13127. Regarding, "I and my Brothers in Christ prayed for you all night long asking Jesus to extend his hand and touch your heart" So you have this really personally relationship with your imaginary friend and you used that opportunity to talk about me instead of asking them why they are a genocidal psycho who doesn't condemn slavery. Why don't you ask your sky daddy those questions? Your priorities are really messed up just like the fake god you worship. Regarding, "of course he's going to Grant you the good wishes not the naughty wishes" If the bullshit you say were actually true and not just obvious bullshit then you should be wishing for world peace or a cure for cancer and getting it. Instead you are wishing for me to believe the same stupid shit you believe in. Then again the results are exactly the same regardless of what you are thinking really hard to yourself about. Your "prayers" are not going to cure cancer or get me to believe in your bullshit. Not a great use of your time in my opinion seeing as how your time on Earth is limited and you don't get to live forever despite your insane beliefs. Regarding, "you have an amazing sense of humor" You are straight up delusional. I think I have more respect for flat Earthers because there is actually an Earth to think stupid things about.
    1
  13128. Blowjob machines already have too much power over us IMO.
    1
  13129. The key word is ABOUT.
    1
  13130. Yes I am going to give you flack for that because you are being a fucking idiot. The establishment appreciates you doing their work for them and they appreciate your stupidity.
    1
  13131. Regarding, "You're stuck on the idea that someone needs to run as a Democrat, even though it's obvious that the whole apparatus of party is rotten to the core," We need a good person and true progressive to run and win as a democrat, BECAUSE the "democratic" party is rotten to the core. Not only has the party rigged the game for their establishment candidates, but both major parties have rigged the entire game top to bottom start to finish and designed the system to be rigged against third parties as well. We desperately need at least one major party that isn't complete dogshit and the only way that is going to happen anytime soon is if a progressive runs and wins as dem. Then they could singlehandedly perform many much needed reforms within the party. Part of the reason they suck as much as they do at the moment is, in part, because Hillary "won" the primary. The corporate dems could be purged from the party the same way progressives were recently purged. The party could be banned from taking legalized bribes and more. Yes the democrats suck and I'm not looking to live side by side with them. I'm looking to take over the party hostile takeover style. I love Jimmy Dore but he doesn't seem to get that point about people still working to reform the party. I'm not trying to "save" them. I'd be happy if they just died. BUT THEY ARE NOT GOING TO DIE. At least not anytime soon. Especially with Trump as President. That fact alone could sustain the opposition party. We need to takeover the "democratic" party and the clearest path to do so is Sanders in 2020 and you are not helping when you smear him.
    1
  13132. You lost me at "George Bush is great because."
    1
  13133. Trump is not well. Vote for Joe Biden who has dementia. -Neoliberal hacks.
    1
  13134. Good. Go fuck off. Go be the sheep that you are. Reality isn't for everyone.
    1
  13135. Don't kid yourself, they know what they are doing. It is just that they care about maintaining the status quo, not winning elections.
    1
  13136. Dumbest
    1
  13137. Fucker
    1
  13138. Ever
    1
  13139. Sadly nothing will change that fact and I would be an idiot for trying... so I won't.
    1
  13140. I'd be bitter too if people wanted to smear me and blackmail me and my "friends" wouldn't back me up.
    1
  13141. If you are a warmonger you can get away with never using the word peace. They merely replace it with the word appeasement so that they never have to use it or think about it.
    1
  13142. "You aren't being shadow-banned or censored by big tech" It takes a real lack of self awareness to say this on youtubes website whose bots consistently shadow ban and censor. Sam's crowd isn't too smart.
    1
  13143.  TJ B  "those of us who have functioning brains have learned how to use the copy and paste to get around "shadow bans and censorship" LMFAO This comment that you just made is being shadow banned. You and I are the only ones who can see it.
    1
  13144.  @JamNMama1  Regarding, " you go right ahead and keep believing that." I will. Good luck with your smears you paid piece of poo.
    1
  13145.  @ogzombieblunt4626  "Muh scientist" What?
    1
  13146. Trump cultist are easily triggered.
    1
  13147. I'd be nice to be able to get rid of people like musk there.
    1
  13148. Nope. I don't trust her and I won't support her. She is only progressive when it is convenient.
    1
  13149. He forget about it despite jimmy's phone message to kyle that talks about it directly.
    1
  13150.  @nelsonartemio4218  Jimmy's mistake is his potty mouth. Of course they would rather talk about pocket pussies and minimize smears and blackmail than talk to him.
    1
  13151. Bernie is all talk before he tells you to vote for corrupt dems.
    1
  13152.  @robotjeans  regarding, "EC gives their votes to whoever wins majority of votes per state." I have no understanding why you think I need a lesson in how the fucked up EC works. Is this suppose to be some kind of terrible argument in favor of the EC? Regarding, "It's a winner take all for each state." But if you are going to try and give a lesson about how the EC works you should do it right next time. Maine and Nebraska are not winner take all.
    1
  13153. Seder is controlled opposition for a corrupt "democratic" party.
    1
  13154. CanadianPyro saltily said without the self awareness to realize their hypocrisy.
    1
  13155. The "land of the free" imprisons more of it's citizens than any country on earth and it isn't even close. I guess they are just uniquely terrible people or maybe, just maybe, the motto is bullshit.
    1
  13156. I'm confident he uses some of his pocket change to gaslight and BS people in the comments section.
    1
  13157.  @marlonese  LMFAO. It is about him. Try not to lie to yourself about it.
    1
  13158. One of the things I like least about politics is how it makes me dislike certain groups. For example I think Donald Trump has made me racist against orange people. Mitch McConnell makes me not like turtles. And Ben Shapiro makes me not like chipmunks on uppers.
    1
  13159.  @OK-nr6se  1400 + 600 = 2000 is a terrible argument because dems were promising 2K AFTER trump signed a stimulus giving us all 600.
    1
  13160.  @PixelGunZodiac  Regarding, "What country did biden bomb? You're making things out of thin air." Fun fact this is a direct quote from Sanders today in reference to Biden bombing syria. And I give sanders credit and praise for this... "Our Constitution is clear that it is the Congress, not the President, who has the authority to declare war." That's sanders speaking out against the bombs biden dropped in syria that you want to claim I'm lying about.
    1
  13161.  @OK-nr6se  The thing is is that I would be willing to give biden and company some wiggle room if their promise was always before trump signed checks for 600. Ultimately they deserve zero wiggle room for the reason I gave. That was just the point I was trying to make. But yeah. We clearly agree.
    1
  13162.  @PixelGunZodiac  Regarding, "You ignored 90% of what i said." Yup. I tend to tune out liars.
    1
  13163.  @PixelGunZodiac  "You ignored 90% of what i said." You ignored everyone question I asked of you. I also tend to tune out hypocrites.
    1
  13164.  @PixelGunZodiac  "This is an answer." Is was a yes or no question and you gave me doublespeak.
    1
  13165.  @OK-nr6se  Fun fact: 1.9 trillion is enough to give everyone a 6K check. But the dems can't even give the 2K they promised.
    1
  13166. Regarding, "you don't know what a fucking quiver is?" Yeah. That was the only time he lost me.
    1
  13167. Universal programs are best when they are universal. Some things should be for everyone. We don't not provide K-12 education to millionaires and billionaires for good reason.
    1
  13168.  @gilvanbergen3217  1) It doesn't really matter what I'm ok with... it's UNIVERSAL basic income. And billionaires are part of the universe. 2) Hypothetically would I be ok with them getting essentially a 1K per month refund when if we ever were to have a UBI they would have to be a big part of paying for it... yeah. I'd have no problem with that.
    1
  13169.  @gilvanbergen3217  You want a plan to exclude them you go for it. But don't call whatever you do universal if and when that day comes.
    1
  13170.  @mikegriggs4572  Do you not have any fear about what happens after Biden if you get your wish? How does the story play out long term? Joe Biden wins in 2020. Nothing fundamentally changes in a world that is crumbling and DESPERATELY needs change. How doesn't that lead to Trump 2.0 after Biden? How does doing the exact same thing again lead to change? Instead of a repeat of history.
    1
  13171.  @mikegriggs4572  Regarding, "I worry more about the harm trump can do to our Country, our Democracy, and our people over another 4 years" If that's the rationale you want to use to support evil and terrible so be it. You are hardly alone in your thinking. There are plenty of people on the right who think Trump is fucking terrible. That he sucks and doesn't deserve their vote. But they vote for the clown anyways just like you are voting for biden. And you all rationalize your voting for terrible by pointing at the other side and getting so scared you abandon any values and principles you might have had as you cast your vote for a disgrace to your species. You cite trump as your reasoning. They will cite Biden, or hillary, or pelosi as their reasoning. You are all sheep voting for clowns for terrible reasons. You are why Hillary used the pied piper strategy to prop up trump in 2016. And while you do what you do you ensure that every other politician will keep using that strategy because it clearly works on you.
    1
  13172. I think this is a fair statement.
    1
  13173. She was old and had cancer. Don't be an idiot.
    1
  13174.  @terryrobinson2324  Regarding, "she was old and had cancer for a decade or more. " Um... Yeah. So don't be an idiot.
    1
  13175.  @terryrobinson2324  She was old and she had cancer. You should be using Occam's razor, not an unfounded conspiracy theory.
    1
  13176.  @terryrobinson2324  Or let me try to put it to you another way... I'm far more surprised she managed to live as long as she did than I am surprised she died.
    1
  13177. If you are being smeared by TYT you are doing something right.
    1
  13178. Your comment would be funny if you were not dangerously stupid.
    1
  13179. You care too much about party labels. You share that trait with staunch republicans and staunch democrats. Vote for good people and care less about that label.
    1
  13180. Um yes. It has to do exactly with labels. Don't get me wrong the party in general is a fucking dumpster fire but that doesn't mean that all people who run as a democrat are fucking terrible. You don't vote for a party. You vote for a person. Regarding, "real progressive (Keith Ellison)" You know he is a democrat right? A good guy fighting for the soul of the party. The type of person that deserves your support, even if he has the audacity to wear that terrible label. Don't worry so much about that label. Support PROGRESSIVES. Support good people. Those are the labels that actually matter.
    1
  13181. Regarding, "support (Keith Ellison)" How do you mean this? Are you saying this as only being in the past tense? Because earlier you were saying "I cannot bring myself to ever vote Democrat again." So I admit I can't be sure exactly what the fuck you are saying. Regarding, "He was cheated..." You know why there is cheating? It is because there is a war being fought. I think you would be wise to support the good side as opposed to saying they can go fuck themselves because they are using tactics you disagree with. Regarding, "So funny that you're watching Jimmy Dore?" Is it really? Do I have to agree with a person 100 percent of the time? I love Dore and I love Sanders but, spoiler alert, I don't agree with either of them on 100 percent of things. I don't even agree with myself 100 percent of the time as I occasionally change my mind even. I think Dore is right about pretty much everything but I personally think there is value in fighting to takeover the party hostile takeover style. I'm not looking to coexist with corporate dems. I'm looking to kick their asses on the street. I want to purge them the same way progressives were purged. And you know why they were able to purge progressives? Because there were progressives to be purged. As in there are still people fighting the good fight even if they are hard to find at times. And I will support them because I believe in nuance and won't lump all people who are democrats and pretend they are the same. They are not. Regarding, "The Democrats would rather lose to a Republican, than win with a progressive." You are talking about corporate democrats. Not all democrats. It is an important distinction. Regarding, "They don't want you!!! Wake up." No shit. I don't want them (as in corporate dems) either. I'm not talking about supporting them. I'm talking about PROGRESSIVES. I support them. Regardless of the party label they wear. Regarding, "even if Bernie miraculously got the nomination?" Yeah. It may take a miracle since people like you who think they are progressive aren't willing to support him in that battle or, even if he wins the nomination, the battle after. Regarding, "Do you think Democrats would ever allow any of his policies to go through?" Huh? You act as if this is important to you but I'm not sure, again, why I'd take that seriously. Let's say Sanders did what you want and ran as a 3rd party candidate. Do you not realize that then both major parties would oppose everything he wants and would just try to run out the clock on his administration? Because they would. And don't get me wrong, corporate dems would still oppose pretty much everything a "democrat" president Sanders would try to pass but they would be more incentivized to work with him if he was a "democrat" as opposed to something else. Regarding, "They at this very moment are mad at Donald Trump for not dropping more bombs on Syria" Except there are democrats like Sanders and Gabbard that are not happy about it. Regarding, "You say I care about labels?" Yes. You demonstrate it by saying that you would support Sanders as a 3rd party candidate but wouldn't support him as a "democrat." So you obviously do care about that label far more than the person wearing the label. If you think Sanders isn't worth supporting as a dem then don't support him. Period. Regardless of the label he wears. I support him because I support him. The person. The ideas he advocates for. I'd support him if he were a dem, republican, independent, green, martian or other. That is what not caring about the label looks like. You do the opposite. Because you clearly do care about that label. Regarding, "lets get away from that labels! News Flash!" News flash. Those labels aren't going anywhere anytime soon even if there is a great case to be made that they should. The "democratic" party is suppose to be our party. And I'm going to continue to fight to make it what it should be. That means I am going to vote in their fucked up primary for the most progressive candidate I can find. And if the succeed in getting a corporate shill as their nominee I will tell them they can go fuck themselves and I'll support someone I want to win... like I did with Jill Stein in 2016. But that is rightfully plan B. Regarding, "Bernie Sanders won his state as a Independent!! Lets see him win the Presidency the same way!" Let's just pretend the entire system isn't rigged against 3rd party candidates. Or better yet. Let's accept that cold hard fact and act more accordingly. If you think Sanders is worth support then support him. Or don't. You vote for people. Not parties. Or at least you should... but don't.
    1
  13182. The party, in general, is a dumpster fire. We don't disagree about that. You don't need to spend time talking about they ways they suck. They do. I don't disagree about that. The area that we disagree on is is what are we suppose to do about it. How is the best way to bring about progressive change in the future? I personally think hostile takeover of the party is worth trying. Like I've already said corporate dems can be purged exactly the same way progressives were purged. The party nominee holds crazy power in the party. Power to shape and mold the party going forward. The ability to essentially unilaterally enact reforms. They get to pick the chair. The chair picks the people under them. Who pick the people under them and so on. One of the reasons why the party is going to suck until at least 2020 is because Hillary Clinton "won" the nomination. That is why Tom Perez got the job. I don't think that should be the only plan in action but that is plan A. Plan B is building up other parties and supporting them if hostile takeover fails. Even if hostile takeover would succeed there is great benefit to having other parties with power and influence. That is important to keeping the major parties "honest," and pulling them to the left... which is where I want policy to be. Regarding, "I just don't understand the need for popular candidates (especially Bernie and Keith) to attach themselves to a party that doesn't want them?" There are so many good answers to this question and none of them are because they are trying to coexist and live kumbyya (sic) with the corporate dems. It is about making the party into what it should be but obviously is not. That party isn't going to miraculously change all by itself ya know. We need people to force it to happen and those people need our support if they are going to be able to succeed. I'd love to think that just telling that party that sucks and has betrayed us to go fuck itself is the answer but it isn't. We live in a world with lots of brainwashed sheep. Sheep that have their teams and support them regardless of what they are doing. Millions of people have already decided to vote for the democrat already and it doesn't matter who that person is. That is just the sad reality and we would be wise to accept it and act accordingly rather than pretend that isn't the case. Then, especially at the national level, there is the electoral college. It isn't good enough to just get the most EC votes.... you need a MAJORITY of EC votes to win. That makes it incredibly difficult for a 3rd party candidate to win, especially when that candidate is certainly going to be splitting the vote with the "democratic" candidate. Oh and again possibly the most important reason to be a "democrat" is because that is the only way to reform and change the party... from the inside. Only sheep vote because of a party label. Vote for good people. People who share your values and priorities. I guess you can argue that giving the "democratic" party the finger is a priority. They do deserve it. But that is cutting off your nose to spite your face. And I'm not saying they are owed your vote. They definitely are not. But there needs to be nuance and there is no nuance when you say things like, "I cannot bring myself to ever vote Democrat again." I have never, in my entire life ever voted for a Republican and have no plans to do so anytime soon. But I also never say I will never vote for a Republican. If Rand Paul were the Republican nominee in 2016 I may very well have voted for him just because of his positions on foreign policy and drugs. Maybe not. But I would have thought about it because the point I'm trying to make is that the person is more important than the party label. Get some good people in the parties and then maybe, just maybe, they would not suck so much. Just a thought.
    1
  13183. Oh and you don't have to reply. I don't exactly do this to change people minds. Pretty much everyone has their mind made up here and isn't about to change... myself included. I do this to blow off steam about our government because just thinking about it makes my head want to explode and I need a way to stop that from actually happening.
    1
  13184.  @goblinobz  Especially while living in Alabama maybe vote for someone who actually deserves your vote? I live in a swing state and there is no way I'm voting for either Biden or Trump. I don't vote for dogshit.
    1
  13185. Not as well as if his last name were dipshit.
    1
  13186. To be fair she never actually supported M4A. Lying Warren was just pandering.
    1
  13187.  @timwalsh6283  If there was ever a time this last election was a time to support libertarian principles... instead dave told his listeners to vote for trump. He is a sheepherder for the duopoly.
    1
  13188.  @timwalsh6283  "I don't remember" Well he did anyway whether you remember it or not.
    1
  13189.  @timwalsh6283  "he was voting for Trump" That's waaaaaaay different. I'm just kidding. We all know why he would say something like that.
    1
  13190. Do you always blame victims like this?
    1
  13191. Literally everything other than where he puts his junk at night. I don't care about his sexuality.
    1
  13192. Your comment is dumb.
    1
  13193. Regarding, "Cenk had a more common sense explanation" Um... no. He didn't. He's covering for her... and it's not the first time. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=itiacoqgdQI&t=240s
    1
  13194. You are too stupid to realize you are stupid.
    1
  13195.  @shushuyu  Regarding, "It's all about the training." So. Fucking. Dumb.
    1
  13196.  @shushuyu  Here's another story about cops whose problem is "training." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bbHRgql9yuE&t=0s
    1
  13197.  @danielyeary148  They joined 11/28 just for this.
    1
  13198. There is a reason he calls for a "political revolution." He knows he can't do it alone.
    1
  13199. "complicit" So is MSNBC and Chris Hayes who buried this info for months.
    1
  13200. I understand why you would say that he is. I'd even agree they are arguably the same level of terrible... but worse... nah. He's really not. Trump is fucking terrible.
    1
  13201. Regarding, "outweigh" You don't get to put people actions on a scale like this. We don't live in a world where pedophile priests are forgiven if they do enough "good" things.
    1
  13202. Gave him billions in free media in 2016. They covered his empty podium while Sanders was talking in front of record crowds.
    1
  13203. AOC? Isn't she the one who just voted for pelosi and got nothing of value for it? Yeah... she sucks.
    1
  13204.  @janed5802  You are impossible to take seriously. For your sake I hope you are not actually as idiotic as you portray and are just getting paid to say stupid things. Either way you suck at life. Good luck with that.
    1
  13205. I've done everything humanly possible to smear and insult Bernie Sanders as a sexist and have nothing more to say because I suck so much. Elizabeth Warren.
    1
  13206.  @thepolishlatinofromphilly9709  I put it in google translator. It means, "fake news."
    1
  13207. I almost envy your simplicity and stupidity.
    1
  13208.  @vavan100 Regarding, " you have to pay or poor and stupid will murder everyone" Yeah, it's totally that and not that I want roads, education, universal health care and other things and that I understand those things need to be paid for. God damn you are stupid.
    1
  13209.  @vavan100 There's no taxes on the moon. Please go there.
    1
  13210.  @vavan100  Only to people who can't do math. Canada pays half as much per person for their health care system. That's the reality you fucking twat.
    1
  13211. I don't wait for journalists to be put in jail to defend them. Kyle was the same clown who wouldn't speak up for mate when he was being smeared. Kyle is a fraud. Save your respect for people more worthy.
    1
  13212. You are an idiot.
    1
  13213. You are the idiot. I thought I made myself clear but I guess you are not smart enough to understand even the simplest of things.
    1
  13214. I don't care about age. I care about policy. There is no reason to think Sanders can't do the job and if something should happen we have VPs for a reason.
    1
  13215. Nice news show fraud.
    1
  13216. She never had a shot. She is good. Biden was only ever going to consider someone terrible.
    1
  13217. Don't blame drugs for her shit.
    1
  13218.  @atm97ify  Regarding, "As someone who supports the NRA," This is where you lost me. When you said you support a bunch of garbage people working for gun manufacturers.
    1
  13219. He's not better than that. "when someone shows you who they are believe them the first time" maya angelou
    1
  13220.  @IdleCommentator  "insinuating that his position is caused by taking moey from TYT" Kyle is affiliated with TYT. It's clearly a conflict of interest not that kyle would be intellectually honest enough to admit it even when failing to mention their blackmail.
    1
  13221.  @IdleCommentator  "He is not affiliated with TYT." I'm sorry if the truth hurts. Then again maybe kyle has cut the cord. At TYT's homepage under "channels" you could see secular talk there earlier today. I'm looking at it now and it's gone. That still doesn't change the fact that kyle was affiliated with TYT and never mentioned it while covering for their blackmail.
    1
  13222.  @IdleCommentator  "was he also talking money from TYT" I don't know. Notice I never make this claim. I only state facts like they were affiliated. Kyle can try to scrub that relationship now to try and save the last shred of credibility he might have with some but it means nothing to me. It's too late to start doing the right thing for him.
    1
  13223.  @IdleCommentator  "pathetic attempts at trying to twist the known facts" LMFAO funny coming from you. Wikipedia still has it up because as of earlier today they were affiliated. Those are facts YOU are trying to twist. "secular talk, an affiliate of the young turks network" wikipedia I'm not twisting reality. That's what you are doing. I'm acknowledging it.
    1
  13224.  @IdleCommentator  Smears are lies. Sorry not sorry if it's true that TYT and secular talk were affiliated while kyle was covering for their blackmail. That's simply the world as it exists.
    1
  13225.  @IdleCommentator  "You are using Wikipedia as reliable source ?" It wasn't the only source of info. Like I as of TODAY I could go to TYTs homepage, look under channels and look at the "tyt network" and see secular talk there. I concede it's not there now. It WAS there early today. You pretending this changes how things were yesterday is what's sad. "Ron Placone being on the same list" Ron placone's channel is clearly affiliated with TYT. I'll happily give you that because that's how it works. If I pretended otherwise that would be me twisting things.... you know like you are doing.
    1
  13226.  @IdleCommentator  Correction... ron placones channel was affiliated with them just like kyle's was. His isn't there either anymore.
    1
  13227.  @IdleCommentator  "Dore cultists" This always makes me laugh. You know I've been a fan of kyles for far longer than I've been a fan of jimmy's. If I put up with kyles BS that is what would make me a cultist... you know like you are doing.
    1
  13228.  @IdleCommentator  "You still don't understand what "TYT Network" actually meant" You still don't understand that I've made no claims about what it means. Not a single one (correction noted later). I've only stated the fact that they were affiliated and you got all triggered and stupid like you were in a cult. "evidence for that you should provide" You know what if you have evidence of me making claims about "financial" interest when I only describe it as a "conflict" of interest you should provide it... but of course you don't.
    1
  13229.  @IdleCommentator  Correction. I made the one claim about what it means... that it's a conflict of interest. But that's literally it and you are just lying about what I've been saying.
    1
  13230.  @IdleCommentator  "Being listed among recommended channels =/ affiliated." Being in the "tyt network" =/= being in the "recommended channels. Are you being willfully obtuse? "they are OFFICIALLY attached to one another." LMFAO You just want to play the semantics game to try and deflect from the facts at hand. There is a reason that secular talk was in the "tyt network" earlier in the day and he apparently isn't now. It really does mean something... that's why it was done it the first place... and there's a reason why it might not happen going forward. "There is no "conflict of interest"" LMFAO Yeah. Just like there is no conflict of interest in having on cenks nephew to "stay out of it" am I right? You and kyle are impossible to take seriously. Hopefully both of you realize you are full of it and don't actually believe the BS you say.
    1
  13231.  @IdleCommentator  "to degrade him" I'm pointing out the blatant and obvious conflict of interest. You should be happy to know that I'm only degrading you because everything you say is terrible for one reason or another.
    1
  13232.  @IdleCommentator  "a troll loses an argument and than declares themselves a winner" I'm not going to lie this is funny AF coming from the hypocrite who said, "He is not affiliated with TYT. Stop lying, you fraud."
    1
  13233. I hope you are paid well to sell your soul Wells.
    1
  13234.  @hartkopz86  Why would I care what his plan is when I have less than no reason to trust him?
    1
  13235.  @hartkopz86  Just when I thought I couldn't take you any less seriously you ask that idiotic question. Maybe watch the video dipshit.
    1
  13236.  @hartkopz86  Here's another video for you not that it can change the mind of someone whose mind is being determined by the paycheck they get to shill. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gDWj8eWJXds
    1
  13237.  @owenmayes2128  Regarding, "you voted for the idiot," No. I didn't. Regarding, "he's your problem" Because US influence is exclusive to the US? Oh wait...
    1
  13238.  @PeaceIsJesusChrist  I feel the same way... but sarcastically.
    1
  13239.  @bigcauc7530  and republicans, and trump, and the cia. why would you only try to blame dems like this? Partisan hack much?
    1
  13240.  @bigcauc7530  Only someone deeply unserious would try to blame one side of the uniparty the way you have.
    1
  13241.  @PeaceIsJesusChrist  "only sarcastically?" Exactly.
    1
  13242.  @PeaceIsJesusChrist  Do you live in an alternate universe where assange was persecuted for criticizing islam or something? I live in reality.
    1
  13243.  @PeaceIsJesusChrist  I could only take you less seriously if you gave your own comments a thumbs up... oh wait... you already do that.
    1
  13244.  @PeaceIsJesusChrist  Assange is an example of a person persecuted because of who he criticized and he wasn't going after "islam" or "woke leftist agenda" he was going after western governments.
    1
  13245.  @PeaceIsJesusChrist  Assange went after the people you can't go after. In the age of information ignorance like yours is a choice.
    1
  13246.  @PeaceIsJesusChrist  "Show some maturity" This is funny coming from someone who can't use the internet to do their own research.
    1
  13247.  @PeaceIsJesusChrist  So you can use the internet but choose to stay ignorant. That makes sense.
    1
  13248.  @PeaceIsJesusChrist  You: "disrespectful and gaslighting again..." Also you: "I don't debate with children" If you were trying to prove you are a hypocrite you have! Well done! Bravo.
    1
  13249.  @PeaceIsJesusChrist  Don't forget to give that hypocritical statement a thumbs up!
    1
  13250. So are you saying that I shouldn't "punish" someone by using my free speech to tell someone to fuck off if I want? And if I do that is authoritarian?
    1
  13251. People like Biden and Trump.
    1
  13252. Meh. Sadly we are likely never going to know exactly what was happening behind closed doors. I don't think her failure is only because of manchin.
    1
  13253. This is funnier if you are high, on weed. I am.
    1
  13254. Regarding, "they will never, and I mean NEVER, allow progressives to take over the workings of the DNC" Not willingly and not without a fight. But if Sanders wins as a democrat they have no real choice. He could then, for example, ban them from accepting their legalized bribes and do other reforms within the party whether or not they like it.
    1
  13255. It simply isn't up to them if Sanders wins... http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=91226631 The DNC went back on this but the bottom line and point is that if Sanders wins he wields great power whether or not the oligarchs care. They will not give up their power willingly... but they can be forced. I'm going to add this to be fair... https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/dnc-allowing-donations-from-federal-lobbyists-and-pacs/2016/02/12/22b1c38c-d196-11e5-88cd-753e80cd29ad_story.html?utm_term=.80151f8e2a6b But I think it does not disprove the point I'm trying to make. No doubt the oligarchs didn't want that between 2008-2016 but it isn't up to just them.
    1
  13256. Me too. As much as the "democratic" party should just die I don't see it happening anytime soon and the country desperately needs a major party that represents the people. I was all about a 3rd party during the last election (after Hillary "won" the nomination) but I concede that I was demoralized by Stein's showing. I question whether or not she only got 1 percent but ultimately I was convinced that if that wasn't a time for a 3rd party it isn't going to happen anytime soon. And I'm convinced our best hope is to takeover the "democratic" party hostile takeover style. Peace.
    1
  13257. Go vote for something. The powers that be love it when you stay home. Don't let them win without a fight. And it's not like it's the only thing on ballot ever. There's always something to vote for.
    1
  13258.  @elieli5233  That fact is irrelevant to the point.
    1
  13259. Who cares what order they are in. They are all terrible.
    1
  13260. If they want to troll the party they can do so now if that is their priority. What you are saying is a silly reason to prevent people from voting.
    1
  13261. Jason regarding, "people can do it if they want isn't really a counterpoint" Actually it is. If your argument is that open primaries would allow people to "troll the party" even though they already can "troll the party" you point is fucking meaningless and stupid. Having closed primaries does nothing to solve the problem you claim to care about. Regarding, "people can only vote in one group of primaries." Um. People can only vote in one group of primaries except in exceptionally rare circumstances that should be done away with for all I care. Everyone should have a primary vote and they should be allowed to use it however they want. I am not suggesting that people get to vote in every primary. Nobody thinks that.
    1
  13262. "Especially for Chris." What? Chris is the one who comes out of this smelling like roses. I think you mean to say... especially for will and/or especially for the academy. Both of them have only tarnished their reputations forever.
    1
  13263. Do the koch brothers pay you for your smears like this?
    1
  13264.  @Anticitizen666  That's how I feel about your stupid shit. wow
    1
  13265. Is that suppose to be hard? It's not. Trump was a self described democrat during the GWB years and Bloomberg just got done running as a dem.
    1
  13266. Maybe I should have been running against Bernie Sanders for president, essentially saying that he shouldn't be president and I should, so that maybe down the road I can get a job in their administration.
    1
  13267.  @edc3743  Regarding, "Running doesn't disqualify you for serving NOR does it qualify you per se." Let's say you are running when you have zero experience in politics, zero chance to win, and your running would only serve to split progressive voters when we actually have a progressive champion running who is everything you aren't and are enabling the establishment's chances of winning. This goes to "how intelligent and wise you are." And they aren't.
    1
  13268.  @edc3743  Regarding, "Many times in the past fellow Democrats who ran have been pulled into administrations." What you are talking about are examples of a person with actual experience in politics being pulled into administrations. That's very different than asking a person on a vanity tour who has no experience in politics who is just trying to sell books books to serve. It's not that someone who has no experience shouldn't be considered for political positions. But they shouldn't be considered to start at positions at the top. You want to work in politics... do it right. Start at the bottom and earn your way up.
    1
  13269. The DNC is a dumpster fire trying to rig the election but ultimately it's probably good Bloomberg will be in the debate. He needs to be squashed and held accountable for his record. The media sure as fuck isn't bothering to try to hold him accountable.
    1
  13270. Yeah. Trump being a POS doesn't mean that Biden isn't also a POS.
    1
  13271.  @trellisappling7775  Regarding, "I'm tired of hearing this equivalent BS." If you heard me calling them equivalent it's only because your comprehension is worthless. Never do I say or imply they are equal nor do they need to be equally terrible to both be terrible. I'm tired of hearing stupid BS like yours. Stop it.
    1
  13272. Natural Selection regarding, "Absolute statements ... not very smart to make." So are you saying they are NEVER smart to make?
    1
  13273. I recommend videos by jimmy dore and glenn greenwald to know what it's all about.
    1
  13274.  @yooujiin  The two most relevant videos to what's going on are titled "Kyle Kulinski Omits Ana Kasparian's Blackmail Of Jimmy Dore From Video" and "TYT-Jimmy Dore War Shows Toxic Pathologies in Liberal Discourse." IMO
    1
  13275. Exploit? Really?
    1
  13276. There is no god and as evidence I cite Donald Trump as President.
    1
  13277. Except modern science does not take faith. Science takes evidence.
    1
  13278.  @radcabbage  Regarding, "we have no evidence." LMFAO. Actually there is lots of evidence for transition species. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o92x6AvxCFg That said theories can and will be changed when new evidence is learned and presented. That is what is great about science and it has NOTHING to do with faith.
    1
  13279.  @radcabbage  I believe in evolution because it's the best explanation given with the known evidence. If you want to change my mind you can... with evidence. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OuqFUdqNYhg
    1
  13280. You would think he should have mentioned his relationship while talking about TYT in the past don't you think? It's too late to save his credibility. Kyle's a fraud.
    1
  13281. I had no idea who ben burgis was before this. I liked it more when I didn't know who he was.
    1
  13282. "the incels leaving comments." That isn't a very nice thing to say about yourself.
    1
  13283. Durango likes Jersey Shore.
    1
  13284.  @ln5425  You can't really be this stupid can you?
    1
  13285.  @lordlubu3029  Not all candidates are accurately called evil. Stop being absurd.
    1
  13286. What a terrible person Lou Dobbs is.
    1
  13287. "down to earth?!?" Joe biden's "good friend?"
    1
  13288. You mean Bernie Sanders right?
    1
  13289.  @ManOnFire1998  nobody who is sane gives a shit about a person's age. What really matters is their ability to do the job and there is zero logical reason to think he can't. Tulsi is great but she would be facing the same problems Bernie had in 2016. She isn't widely known outside of very progressive circles and she would face media blackout exactly how Bernie did in 2016. She would be a great running mate with Sanders. You know we have vice presidents right? Because should the unthinkable happen to Sanders while president that is what they are there for.
    1
  13290.  @ManOnFire1998  you must be fucking with me. Have you not been paying attention to the workload he is carrying right now? Stop being an idiot or I'm going to have no choice but to think you are just an idiot working for the establishment spreading their "too old" nonsense. Then again you might just be a useful idiot for them. Not that such a distinction would really matter.
    1
  13291.  @momentary_  Regarding, "and not just lay off a lot of people." Because companies are magically paying lots of people right now that they don't need and could afford to do this. I really want to think that you are smarter than this and understand that companies already do and forever will pay as few employee hours as possible. This is not linked to the minimum wage at all. And everything else you said was equally dumb.
    1
  13292. Regarding, "$15 minimum wage." Start here. It tells you why American workers are actually worth more than this. Then understand that people who are near the bottom spend all their money which helps stimulate the economy. Regarding, "I am a big supporter of UBI" It's an entitlement for doing nothing. And society is better when people are doing things. That said I'm not entirely opposed to UBI. But I'm not entirely sold on the idea, do not think it's time is now even if I were, and I'm not about to sacrifice my actual priorities like raising the minimum wage or about to support a candidate with no experience and no record because of it.
    1
  13293. Because I meant to include a link https://www.huffpost.com/entry/minimum-wage-productivity_n_2680639
    1
  13294.  @ashwinihiremath8130  Regarding, "i don't mean any disrespect but UBI is something on which a lot of research has been done and my support for it is based on that data and research and not just a hunch." Thanks for the worthless argument from authority fallacy. And it's pretty funny that this is where you are starting your response after your OP was, help me understand. Regarding, ""Paid for doing nothing" is an annoying but very common misrepresentatiion of UBI." Paid for doing nothing is perfectly accurate. UBI would be an entitlement and would require nobody do anything to receive the benefit. That's simply a fact and if you want to claim otherwise the person misrepresenting is you. It would be treated like a human right the way we do K-12 education at the moment and the way Sanders wants health insurance to be treated. It's yours and you don't have to do jack shit to get it. The difference being that I'm 100 percent sold that education and health insurance should be a right and not as sold that cash should be. Regarding, "Even many rich technocrats support the idea of ubi." This is not an argument in favor of UBI... it's an argument against it. Regarding, "as to its viability" When I talk about it's viability I'm talking about things like the fact that I know of zero legislators who currently support it. Regarding, "I've read andrew's plan for it and while VAT may sound regressive, a UBI with VAT makes it overall progressive." It's regressive because of how he wants to pay for it and how it's used in other arguments. For example it's used to justify not giving workers a living wage. Or that it's benefits are not stacked for the poor, they lose them. That's why it's regressive.
    1
  13295.  @ashwinihiremath8130  Regarding, "it has bipartisan appeal" Neat. Prove it. Who are senators and house members who support it as that was actually the point I was making. Regarding, "plus UBI stacks with many benefits." Meanwhile, in reality, if I am getting 1K in benefits a month for food stamps or other government programs I would only get to trade that 1K in benefits in for yangs UBI. I gain nothing. That's the reality whether or not you realize it or are willing to admit it. Regarding, "The outside world seems to study the policy proposals of your candidates more than you." Funny coming from you. Thanks for the laugh dipshit. Regarding, "Really your arguments sound merely as opinions. Its clear you don't know what UBI is." This is the type of shit you say when you can't say anything of actual substance. Regarding, "Its clear you don't know what UBI is." Again... this is what you say when you have nothing of substance about what I said to say. How exactly did I mischaracterize UBI? When I said UBI is being paid for doing nothing how exactly was I wrong? What would I need to do to get then? Oh right. Nothing. Because of reality. Either you are dumb and don't get it or you do get and are pretending not to. Either way you suck. Regarding, "i was a big bernie fan before yang came around so i have lots of respect for bernie and his proposals." Yeah. And you are willing to trade in a guy that you know is legit because of decades in the public eye for a guy you had never even heard of a year and ideas that you can't defend intelligently. Well done. You are just another dipshit in America voting against their own best interests.
    1
  13296. Speaking of "oppressive government" whoever made the second reply it can't be seen. Isn't sen sore ship like that the type of thing that is suppose to make china the bad guy?
    1
  13297. WeLikeIt nailed it. If anyone is a shill it is Eugene. That or they are just a useful idiot for the establishment.
    1
  13298. Another conman with no experience no record and a foundation. Where have I heard that one before?
    1
  13299.  @johnb1567  Sanders has done the near impossible from a politician in a world of swamp creatures, earned my trust. He has earned by doing and saying the same things FOR DECADES. You clown is a guy you hadn't even heard of a year ago. But if that sounds like, "Its Bernie's turn" because IT IS! So be it. It's us versus the establishment. Get on the right side.
    1
  13300.  @johnb1567  Just when I thought you couldn't be any dumber. I hope you are a paid shill and don't actually believe the shit you say. Take care dipshit.
    1
  13301.  @cryptocrazy9599  Regarding, "Exactly!! “He’s been doing and saying the same thing for decades”" Only a paid clown can convince themselves that demonstrating principles over time is a bad thing. Regarding, "Don’t u think our country has evolved since decades ago?" Perpetual war, people not making a living wage, people without health insurance, people declaring medical bankruptcy, corruption, and so much more not problems of a bygone era that have all been magically solved. They are all getting worse actually. Regarding, "don’t help with the ongoing threat of automation." Yang doesn't have some magic solution to make automation just go away. Sanders offers people universal health care, not the "spirit" of universal health care. It offers raising the minimum wage. It offers creditability. Something your conman doesn't have. Just stop with your paid crap. You can do something else to pay the bills.
    1
  13302.  @cryptocrazy9599  Regarding, "U just proved that your for loyalty and not policy!" I hate yanggang so much. It is IMPOSSIBLE to take you seriously. On the off chance that you are genuine you are, at best, a useful idiot.
    1
  13303. It's a great ticket if you want candidates who assault their staff.
    1
  13304. No votes are fucking meaningless. The only thing that matters are yes votes. Sanders did not vote yes... stop acting like he did.
    1
  13305. Regarding, "he's just getting in the way" If you think this then you are not paying attention. Sanders has been fighting the war of ideas and winning. He is single handedly forcing the corporate media to talk about medicare for all. He is forcing politicians of both parties to go on the record on this important issue. He has done more to wake the country to corruption and the problems we face than anyone else in the country. He has a lifetime of being on the right side of virtually every issue. He is the most popular politician in the country and the best hope we have for getting the change we deserve going forward but if you want to ignore all that because of a fucking meaningless endorsement you go ahead. The establishment appreciates your idiocy and they appreciate you smearing him for them.
    1
  13306. Because our government represents the rich and they don't want it.
    1
  13307.  @latincajun80  The worst thing about people like you is that they are far too stupid to realize they are dumb. Good luck with that, and life, you will need it.
    1
  13308.  @latincajun80  Thanks for proving my point that you are an idiot who has no idea what reality looks like not that you needed to. We all get it... you are stupid. Feel free to shut up and stop proving it.
    1
  13309.  @latincajun80  Regarding, "looks like you pooped yourself." LMFAO. You really put me in my place. /s
    1
  13310.  @latincajun80  Stop wasting perfectly good air.
    1
  13311. CGI
    1
  13312.  @mashae2382  I mean you are the same person saying crap like, "Jimmy Dore who is definitely currently sounding anti-AOC." instead of talking about m4a and forcing the vote right? So yeah. You are part of the problem. As is anyone not just forcing our shit politicians to go on the record when it comes to m4a.
    1
  13313. Vote for progressives. But don't vote for people pretending to be progressives.
    1
  13314.  @JM-nt5ex  Regarding, "Even the real progressives accomplish jack shit" If they aren't accomplishing jack shit when they have real power like they do now then they aren't progressives. Take the loss and find people who actually are progressive and support them instead.
    1
  13315.  @JM-nt5ex  The fraud squad are clearly not progressives. Find people who actually are.
    1
  13316.  @JM-nt5ex  "I don't decide who supports them" It's just me and you talking here and I'm specifically addressing, "There really is no point in voting anymore for progressives." There is. I'm encouraging YOU to continue to support who YOU think are progressives. That just because the so called progressives have proven themselves to be frauds is not a good reason to stop fighting the good fight.
    1
  13317.  @JM-nt5ex  The empire is going to give you yang and UBI to prop up the system and in lieu of real systemic change to continue their gravy train longer.
    1
  13318.  @JM-nt5ex  If voting mattered I'm not sure they would let us do it.
    1
  13319.  @JM-nt5ex  Regarding, "Hating Yang is counterproductive." It's as counterproductive as hating biden and trump is. It's not. "He’s the only even remotely progressive candidate" He's not a progressive. He's a tool of the establishment. "actually gets things done before even being in office" What is this even suppose to mean? "able to attract right wingers" While this might be a good thing electorally I don't prioritize winning over people who aren't on my side. This is more of a red flag to me. I like people that attract progressives such as myself. "better than any other progressive dem you can find" I think he is a snake. Which makes him worse than corporate dems like biden who you don't pretend to be on mine and yours side. I suspect that only one has you fooled. That makes him the worst of the worst. I prefer people who stab me in the face as opposed to people like him who stab in the back.
    1
  13320. @Jarett Thompson So the earth is flat because they say it's not?
    1
  13321.  @innocentbystander3317  Are you intentionally missing my point? I've explained it. Ignorance is not a valid excuse.
    1
  13322.  @boomiron  I'm not siding with big pharma. I'm pointing out how no one had evidence because none of this was tested. When they claim to have had evidence they were wrong and the OP is wrong for all the same reasons.
    1
  13323. As always you are an idiot.
    1
  13324. No she won't. I think your best chance at getting her to tell the truth is by paying her.
    1
  13325. Of course they can be healthier. Stop being ridiculous.
    1
  13326. They don't care if it's trump... it's all about stopping sanders and the rest is just details.
    1
  13327. They aren't the ones doing jennnnnysssssidddde. You and israel are.
    1
  13328.  @rg5445  "we are being lied to about everything? That’s what logic would indicate." Don't take it too far. Donald trump is a POS and the earth is a globe.
    1
  13329. Since forever. She was, is and forever will be a 90s republican. If she is ever telling you she is something other than that she is lying, which is often.
    1
  13330. No more oxygen for you. Period.
    1
  13331.  @MajimeTV  "2 Corporatists" Dems always have an excuse to not do the right thing. Remember the time they tried to use the parliamentarian as an excuse? "you blame the democratic party" They have all the power to do whatever they want and there isn't a thing the republicans could do to stop them.
    1
  13332.  @MajimeTV  "a minority party can overrule the majority simply because they can, it’s not “all the power”" No matter how much you lie the republicans can't do anything to stop the dems if the dems really wanted.
    1
  13333.  @MajimeTV  "two corrupt corporatists" If those 2 were swapped out with bernie clones the dems would just find some other excuse to not do anything for you. Just like the "parliamentarian" BS.
    1
  13334.  @MajimeTV  The dems always find a reason to do what they want... which is sell you out. For example they could have codified roe into law but they would rather it be repelled to try and use it to get your money and your vote.
    1
  13335.  @MajimeTV  "the Filibuster" The dems could get rid of the filibuster and there isn't anything republicans could do to stop them. Would you like to try again?
    1
  13336.  @cathyandresiak1975  "they cannot do whatever they want without the votes" They are the ones with power. They are the ones with votes that they aren't using to help you. Stop making excuses for failures like this.
    1
  13337.  @kdnick8584  Do you also think it's unimportant to know that biden is a neoliberal? That the squad are frauds? I'm not a fan of labels but as long as they are being used correctly they are important and serve a purpose even if you don't understand why knowing who you are dealing with is.
    1
  13338.  @kdnick8584  "I just don't think it's important." You don't think it matters who is doing the interviewing? "interesting and informative. That is what is important." It always matters where your news is coming from and what their biases are. I hope you think about it when taking in things from CNN, MSNBC, or FOX. Because it matters in ways that seem transparently obvious to me.
    1
  13339. But you trust the guy who went to go work for CNN?
    1
  13340.  @snoopyzero1151  "your opinion" My opinion that talk is cheap? That's the opinion you are talking issue with? What does that say about your opinion?
    1
  13341. "No one else is." "vote for them anyway." -bernie sanders
    1
  13342.  @axepagode33626  You are an idiot missing the point. Sanders represents the peasants who label themselves "democrat." And I honestly don't give a fuck about corporate dems who actively rigged their own primary against their own rules. Those are fair weather friends. Sanders is a guy telling the party to get some help, make some change, and be better then they are. That is actually what real friends do. Like they should. Stop being an idiot and pull your head out of the corporate dems ass.
    1
  13343. Because he is being stupid? Maybe check your "logic."
    1
  13344.  @brianholmes6392  "butt hurt" This is funny coming from you. Are you going to be ok? Do you need a pillow before sitting down? You sound pretty butt hurt. I just want to make sure you will be ok.
    1
  13345.  @addorsubtract650  Kyle's outted himself as a fraud. It's new news. Time to accept it.
    1
  13346.  @addorsubtract650  1 bad take? He tells you TYT taking millions doesn't make them corrupt and doesn't tell you he's affiliated with them while doing it. He omits the blackmail originally despite jimmy spelling it out for him in a phone message. He ghosts jimmy because he has a potty mouth and to "stay out of it" with cenk's nephew to talk about pocket pussies and minimize the importance of smears and blackmail as "drama." He claims that people can go to work in whatever and it'd be fine if I went to work in banana hammock and nobody could say anything about it or shame me for it. Your math is pretty shit for someone calling themselves "add or subtract."
    1
  13347.  @addorsubtract650  Ultimately it's easy for people to say the right things and that's all kyle has really been doing over the years. Actions speak louder than words.
    1
  13348. @IAM REAL I legit don't care what glenn has to say about this... I BELIEVE MY OWN EYES. "Show me what exactly you are talking about" Wikipedia is shit but they give you the gist of what I'm talking about. And I'm sorry I can't give you exactly what I saw a decade ago but I know what what I've seen. They are not honest actors and you are dupe. "Targets of Project Veritas include Planned Parenthood, the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN), NPR, CNN, and The Washington Post. In 2009, Project Veritas associates published misleading[4] videos that depicted ACORN employees providing advice on concealing illegal activity, causing ACORN to shut down after losing funding;[5] ACORN was cleared of wrongdoing by the Attorney General of California in 2010,[4] and the associates paid a total of $150,000 in settlements to an ACORN employee who sued for defamation.[4] NPR CEO Vivian Schiller resigned in 2013 after Project Veritas released a deceptively[4][5] edited video portraying another NPR executive making controversial comments about the Tea Party movement and NPR's federal funding." -wikipedia sucks but this is what I'm talking about.
    1
  13349. @IAM REAL The ACORN videos THEY released were deceptively edited. It was the first time I was ever exposed to project veritas. And then I got to see the unedited footage. Veritas are frauds with an agenda.
    1
  13350. @MAKE AMERICA LOVE AGAIN I don't have links from shit I experienced a decade ago. I told you exactly what I'm talking about. I expect you will just say what I'm talking about is fake news but I know what happened because I lived through it. Do you have proof that you aren't stupid AF? I thought so.
    1
  13351. @MAKE AMERICA LOVE AGAIN The bottom line is that the first time I was ever exposed to their bullshit is when they released cut up videos of accorn employees. That's all we had for a period of time from them and it painted a certain picture acorn. And then I got to see the unedited footage It showed they are frauds. I don't have proof of it and wikileaks is shit but they tell you exactly what was happening at the time as I lived through it not that I expect you to believe it. Good luck being a moron.
    1
  13352. @HOPE and PEACE "going to CNN to find the truth." You are an advocate for project veritas. Holy shit is the pot calling the kettle black.
    1
  13353. @HOPE and PEACE "real journalism" Real journalists don't give clips out of context. That's what propagandists like PV do.
    1
  13354. @HOPE and PEACE You are advocating for glenn, a real journalist who would NEVER do that, AND you are advocating for propagandist POS whether you realize it or admit it.
    1
  13355. @HOPE and PEACE I can only conclude you want to try and brainwash people into thinking PV are legit because glenn denounced how the government went after them. You want to try pretend as if they have the credibility glenn does. GF Glenn is a real journalist who would NEVER do the things PV has done.
    1
  13356. @HOPE and PEACE PV is just like corporate media. They are all hacks with an agenda.
    1
  13357. @HOPE and PEACE "You proved you lied" Nope. You are only proving that you are intellectually dishonest and have ZERO interest in the truth. "SHOW THE EVIDENCE" I've already given you evidence. "PROVE YOURSELF A LIAR." Yeah... that's not how it works. I could literally have zero evidence for my claim. I could have literally zero evidence in proving my lived experience a long time ago. That doesn't prove I'm lying about what I experienced or that it didn't happen. You don't even attempt to explain how I and wikileaks might be trying to mislead everyone. Like what is that suppose to look like? Did MSM come out and release heavily edited footage that PV had ahead of time, before anyone even knew who they were? To try and discredit them so that when the original footage comes out they could call PV liars? You prove you are a joke who I've already wasted far too much time on. I've already pointed you wikileaks talking about what everyone who lived then and was paying attention already knows... PV are propagandist liars. You have the intellectual honesty of corporate media. You clearly have none.
    1
  13358. @HOPE and PEACE "a few PV investigative reports" LMFAO That's how I concluded they were frauds a long time ago. Fool me once... well you can't get fooled again.
    1
  13359. @HOPE and PEACE You also don't even attempt how my life experience might be explained without your favorite POS propagandists being frauds. I suspect even you know it can't.
    1
  13360. Good guess! But norm was very thoughtful.
    1
  13361. Or maybe, just maybe, they want the dominate cult in their country to reexamine their idiotic beliefs.
    1
  13362. The best thing about the existence of scientology is that it should give you (people in the more popular cults) reason to think your beliefs. You can see first hand how your cult got it's start.
    1
  13363.  @cherkovision  Christians are going to go softer on Mormons because Jesus. Their religions can be seen to have similar ancestry. Scientology and Xenu, not so much.
    1
  13364. It's not about being with them. It is about taking over.
    1
  13365. I don't know what that means but I suspect it's true.
    1
  13366.  @doctordoom1851  I don't even know what DBZ is. You guys are really making me feel dumb. Is that tv channel? A youtube channel? Other? I seriously have no clue.
    1
  13367.  @pipertt  Do you think they don't care about the number of views and subscriptions they have or something?
    1
  13368.  @pipertt  Regarding, "one knucklehead" So you are thinking they are alone in their thinking? Yeah... you are clearly an idiot. Regarding, "a good and wholesome channel" It was before they decided to get political. This is suppose to be the type of place people go to get away from politics. Not the place to go for politics. You might not care. But others do and rightfully so.
    1
  13369.  @pipertt  What a predictably worthless response from you. Regarding, "sorry snowflake. GFY" LMFAO. Try not to lie to yourself about who is actually being the triggered snowflake here. What you are doing is called projection.
    1
  13370.  @pipertt  Let me take you far more seriously than I should... Let's say you hypothetically did want to send the message to the dodo or another channel like them that you don't like what they are doing? How might you go about it?
    1
  13371.  @pipertt  Regarding, "I have zero problem with the video." You are merely triggered that we have the audacity to express our opinions and are lashing out with childish and silly insults. Maybe you could start a support group for people such as yourself who have had to deal with the troubling fact that others expressed opinions different than your own. Then you can all cry about it together and call everyone who doesn't think like you names.
    1
  13372.  @pipertt  Can you believe that I actually asked you a sincere question? As if you were going to even attempt to address it intelligently. That was dumb of me.
    1
  13373.  @pipertt  I pity you.
    1
  13374. I'll use that bullshit to ignore your moronic comment then.
    1
  13375. I fault her for both.
    1
  13376. I wish youtube would let me give your comment a thumbs down.
    1
  13377. If you really want to be for Sanders maybe don't call yourself yanggang.
    1
  13378.  @WizardOfWor  I'm not voting for the orange clown dipshit. Some of us don't support sexual predators, corporate tools and terrible people as a matter of principle.
    1
  13379.  @WizardOfWor  I'm not a Trump supporter you fucking moron.
    1
  13380.  @WizardOfWor  Regarding, "just like that, you've just exposed yourself as a Trump cultist" The irony of this coming from a biden blue no matter who cultist is pretty fucking funny. You make everyone dumber with everything you say.
    1
  13381.  @WizardOfWor Then maybe don't act like I support him. You don't need to convince me, or anyone, that trump is terrible. We get that. What you don't seem to understand is that Biden is fucking terrible. But you don't care about that... because you a hypocrite and idiot who has their corrupt team and they are sticking to it. Do everyone a favor... shut the fuck up.
    1
  13382.  Atheos B. Sapien  Regarding, "They can't deny what's so obvious." Magic man has a beer they would like you to hold.
    1
  13383.  Atheos B. Sapien  Regarding, "Corporate dems would push Cuomo before Bernie." Corporate dems would have already thrown Biden under the bus if the next logical choice for the nominee wouldn't be Bernie.
    1
  13384.  Atheos B. Sapien  Regarding, "Magic man is a cult member calling everyone else cult members." Yup. He'd happily be a trump supporter if trump were the dem nominee and they thought team red was worse.
    1
  13385. @Liverpool 11 Regarding, "Biden isn't a malevolent sociopath, surrounded and supported by malevolent sociopath's." Is that bar you set. Your standards are pretty pathetic. Also... he is a malevolent sociopath, pathological liar, sexual predator, his brain is melting and he is a general disgrace to my race.
    1
  13386.  @WizardOfWor  Regarding, "I see that you haven't read my reply to Dead Sirius about what I thought about Biden, have you?" Literally everything you say and every conclusion you make, including this one, is stupid beyond words. The worst thing about the dunning kruger effect that you experience is that you are too dumb to realize you are dumb.
    1
  13387.  @3ld919  Regarding, "We want the same things we just have different strategies to get there." I'll take your word for it. But maybe let's try my strategy as it's something new. We have seen were your lesser of evils bullshit has lead us already. Regarding, "If Trump is re-elected..." If trump is reelected and the country can't take it then maybe this empire should crumble sooner rather than later. At least if Trump is president I can count on you being rightfully mad at the government rather than asleep and supporting your team. Have some fucking standards for getting your vote for fucks sake. Standards that include not being evil. Otherwise what do you do if hypothetically Trump was the dem nominee (it's not too hard to imagine, he was a self described dem not long ago) and if hypothetically Bloomberg was the republican nominee (it's not so hard to imagine, he was a self described republican not long ago). Who are you voting for? Ultimately you are voting for whatever clown tells you they are on your team that moment aren't you. Just tell me you are on team blue and they get your vote.
    1
  13388.  @WizardOfWor  You think and say the things you do because you are stupid. Your welcome for the insult I have plenty more that are apt to your stupidity.
    1
  13389.  Atheos B. Sapien  Regarding, "You're confused, the only vote for drumpf is a vote for drumpf." Nope. Non votes are votes to Trump. That's how it works according to captain dipshit. We may as well all stay home then seeing as how over half the country doesn't vote. Trump has already won. It's a lost cause. Cause that's how voting works. Note: this is sarcasm in case you are magic man and are too stupid to understand the obvious.
    1
  13390.  @WizardOfWor  Regarding, "What the hell do you want me to do, give my vote to Trump?" It's like you are trying to prove my point that you are an idiot. I can't believe I've wasted so much time addressing your stupid shit when you are obviously flat earth level hopeless.
    1
  13391.  @WizardOfWor  Regarding, "These people don't understand what's at stake & aren't taking this seriously. It's ridiculous, & it's infuriating." The irony.
    1
  13392.  @WizardOfWor  Regarding, "Did you read 3LD's posts?" Nope. I don't read anything. Or at least that is what you think because you are an idiot. Regarding, "Are you NOT getting what we're up against in the long haul?" A corrupt "democratic" party is part of the problem. You don't understand or acknowledge this because you are dumb. Regarding, "Do you really think that having Trump for another 4 years are going to make things any better" If I did I would be a trump supporter. I'm not. I've said so repeatedly. You claimed you understood this. You obviously don't. You demonstrate you are dumb. Regarding, "Tell me why I'm an idiot & why I'm hopeless. Just tell me. I'm waiting." I already have dipshit. You are literally proving my point.
    1
  13393.  @WizardOfWor  Regarding, "Once again, you can't properly debate because you're too busy with the name calling" Calling you names isn't the only thing I'm doing. I'm also telling you exactly why I'm calling you names. Regarding, "You're pathetic." Is this your idea of "properly debat(ing)?" Seriously thou... do you at least have the self awareness, intelligence, and intellectual honesty to realize what a hypocrite you are? I suspect not. I suspect like most hypocrites you have ways to rationalize how your insults are different than mine. In a way you would be right. They are different. My insults of you are justified and I'm not being an idiot hypocrite while doing it the way you are. Regarding, "Plus once again, I never said that YOU support Trump whatsoever. Learn to read." So you said, "What the hell do you want me to do, give my vote to Trump?" as an intentional strawman argument? You suck at life. That is but one reason of many as to why.
    1
  13394.  @WizardOfWor  Regarding, "You're done." I may as well prove that you are a total moron one last time who has no idea what they are talking about and just spouts nonsense. This is me not being done.
    1
  13395.  @WizardOfWor  But at least maybe you fucking off means that you do at least understand that you are a hypocrite... but you are just too big of a bitch to admit it.
    1
  13396.  @WizardOfWor  Regarding, "Just shut up & stop replying to me." I'm having too much fun laughing at you. Regarding, "The only hypocrite here is you." LMFAO. I can't believe actually gave you credit for understanding how you were being a hypocrite while obviously being a hypocrite. That was pretty dumb of me in hindsight. Nobody is perfect.
    1
  13397.  @WizardOfWor  Thought experiment for you to ignore intelligently... The "democratic" nominee is Hitler. The republican nominee is Satan. Who do you vote for? If you are intellectually honest and believe the dumb shit you have said in this thread you would have to conclude that you would support and vote for Hitler. Shit... you'd campaign for him... just like you are now and using the same stupid words to do it. Vote hitler. And non votes and votes for anything decent are votes for satan and blah blah blah. That's you. If your philosophy leaves room for supporting hitler instead of finding something good to support even if it means losing is likely... your philosophy is dogshit and you are a hopeless idiot. The exact type of idiot that both hitler and satan would still need and prey upon. Because if everyone just adopted a common sense philosophy of... don't support evil. Neither can win and good would prevail. Sadly this world has people like you. And not only do you not just shut the fuck up, you actively make everyone dumber the same way flat earthers do.
    1
  13398.  @WizardOfWor  Regarding, "You're the one who keeps attacking me on almost every post" I am. I don't pretend otherwise. You earn it and deserve it. The same way flat earthers do. Not that you realize it. Regarding, "you have the nerve to say I'M a hypocrite." When you are calling people names. That's actually the textbook definition of hypocrisy. And you wonder why I call you names. It's because of things like this. You lack understanding, intelligence, and intellectual honesty. If you were those things you would say. I was being a hypocrite. Because we don't get to have our own facts. And when you do and act like you do and are... you aren't to be taken seriously. And you have proven me right that you can and never should be taken seriously. You are a joke.
    1
  13399.  @WizardOfWor  Regarding, "As I've said before MANY TIMES NOW, Biden isn't even my favorite. How many times must I keep repeating myself? I'm only concerned on what's best for the country in general." So in thought experiment land this =As I've said before MANY TIMES NOW, Hitler isn't even my favorite. How many times must I keep repeating myself? I'm only concerned on what's best for the country in general. Regarding, "Dude, I voted for Bernie for the Democratic nominee, even though he had a lesser chance of getting the nomination." So... Dude, I voted for Bernie for the Democratic nominee, even though he had a lesser chance of getting the nomination. Vote for Hitler. Regarding, "I'd never support Satan (Trump) or "Hitler"" Huh? You'd never support Satan, Trump, or hitler? Why am I to believe this? Where is this reflected in anything you have said previously? Everything you have said can be used to rationalize supporting ALL OF THEM. INCLUDING HITLER. Because that's where a lesser of two evils argument goes when you use a reductio ad absurdum argument... which is what I did even though I doubt you understand what I was doing. Regarding, "I'm living in reality while you're living in fantasy land." I am in fantasyland for trying to address you intelligently. But you are so far gone you can't admit being a hypocrite while it's put right in your face and you can't answer simple questions. Well... I guess you did. Just not in an intellectually honest sort of way. But prove me wrong. What have you said that should lead me to believe you won't support hitler in hitler vs satan? When on the contrary EVERYTHING you have said says you would be all about hitler. Regarding, "You don't know me at all." Even the things you have said here? They don't count... like... at all? Regarding, "How do I make everyone dumber?" By, in part, not understanding that I just answered this very question and not being smart enough to realize it. By advertising and advocating for a philosophy that could be used to justify and rationalize supporting hitler and failing to realize that it doesn't while doing. And so much more. Go back and read everything I've already read. I've covered this.
    1
  13400.  @WizardOfWor  Regarding, "now you're referring to BIDEN as Hitler." No. I'm not. I made it clear that I made a hypothetical situation up. You are impossible to take seriously. Regarding, "Why don't you explain to me & everyone else who you think we should vote for then, Mr. Expert?" Anyone that you think is GOOD. Anyone that you aren't conceding is EVIL. Being a sexual predator is disqualifying. I guess I should add that this is you in my hypothetical... Why don't you explain to me & everyone else who you think we should vote for then, Mr. Expert? Vote Hitler. That's you. Because all you are doing and have done is advocate for a lesser of two evils. That's it. And don't you think hitler is worse than Satan? Of course you do... so you would support hitler. Regarding, "Again, tell me & everyone else who we should vote for that's going to better this country for citizens, the economy, etc.? What other valid options are there as to which we can't re-elect Trump? Name them. And again, don't twist my words to & say that I'm calling you a Trump supporter." So, in hypothetical, "Again, tell me & everyone else who we should vote for that's going to better this country for citizens, the economy, etc.? What other valid options are there as to which we can't re-elect Satan? Name them. And again, don't twist my words to & say that I'm calling you a Satan supporter." You advocate for a lesser of evils. That's it. Whether you realize it or not. That's me "twisting your words?" That's you calling you out for your bullshit. Hitler is less evil than Satan. You would support him in my hypothetical. Lie all you want. You would support Hitler.
    1
  13401.  @WizardOfWor  Let's look back. I'm bored. I'm going to take everything you say and apply them to my hypothetical... a hypothetical where the "democratic" nominee is Hitler and the republican nominee is Satan (it would be for his second term, nobody thought he was going to win but his opponent was Hillary.) I'm not going to go through all your BS. Just enough so that even a person of your intellect might see and understand the point I'm making. Your altered quotes, "Like Satan doesn't have dementia? Don't act like a hypocrite. VOTE HITLER!" "If you're a progressive & either stay at home, vote 3rd party, or do a write-in/vote down ballot, then congratulations; You've just contributed to Satan's re-election because those things are automatically a vote for him! Vote Hitler!" "And Satan's not any of those things? He has a long history of them. (because why not. just keep repeating stupid) VOTE HITLER!" "I never said that you were (a Satan supporter. I just imply it heavily and tell you that if you don't vote for hitler then it's a vote for Satan). Vote Hitler. This is you in my hypothetical. Because that's where a vote for the lesser evil argument goes when you put it to it's extremes. Try to prove me wrong. I dare you. I would be funny. Point to a spot where the "logic" you are using and the arguments you are making couldn't be used to rationalize supporting Hilter in my hypothetical. Please try. I want to laugh.
    1
  13402.  @WizardOfWor  Regarding, "I'd never support either Satan or Hitler. Both are awful." LFMAO. So many comments to pick from. Literally all of them are appropriate. But I think I'll go with... Whatever, man. What the hell do you want me to do, give my vote to Satan? That's NOT going to happen. Don't you think that I would vote for someone other than Hitler for the general election if there were a better candidate? Of course, I would! But even if Hitler is out, the DNC's just going to put out another centrist Democratic nominee. That's just the reality, & you're not living in it. Instead, you & some others don't want to properly debate & instead want to talk down to me & call me every name in the book while acting like I don't know nothing. It's fucking stupid & ridiculous. Learn to grow the fuck up. Vote for Hitler. And if you do literally anything other than voting for Hitler it's a vote for Satan. That's me. That's me being a grownup.
    1
  13403.  @WizardOfWor  Feel to pick anything you have said as a response to your comment of "I'd never support either Satan or Hitler. Both are awful." ALL OF THEM WORK. Because all you do is advocate for a lesser of evils. And hitler is less evil than satan.
    1
  13404.  @WizardOfWor  Regarding, "I'd never support either Satan or Hitler. Both are awful." For fun let's try something else. I'd never support either Biden or Trump. Both are awful. See how easy that is? See how much sense that makes? But when we say that your brain melts the same Biden's brain is obviously melting.
    1
  13405.  @WizardOfWor  FYI I'm done taking you seriously and bothering to address you intelligently. I can't believe I ever did. What a waste of time.
    1
  13406.  @WizardOfWor  Regarding, "This argument has ran it's course" It was over before it began because you are not a serious person. You can't answer simple questions and you can't be trusted to act with any integrity. You are a hypocrite and incapable of intelligently addressing the points I make. You just pretend I'm not making them. Regarding, "Why don't you just come directly out & admit what you REALLY want to say?" Is don't vote evil really so hard to understand? Comeon. Even for you this shouldn't be so hard. Regarding, "Just say that we should sit on our hands & not vote." Why would I say something I don't think? Oh... this is what you think a don't vote for evil philosophy leads. Nope. That's about as "logical" as everything you conclude. It's not. I say go out and vote. Find someone good, who represents you, who deserves to win, who isn't a sexual predator, and vote for them. This isn't rocket science for fucks sake.
    1
  13407.  @WizardOfWor  Regarding, " you NEVER addressed me seriously, intelligently & "nicely" until now." You proved me right by not started. You proved me wrong to ever start. You were always hopeless. This was always a waste of time. Regarding, "I started to call people names because you & others were the ones who were repeatedly disrespecting me, & I've had enough." Hypocrites always have rationalizations for their hypocrisy. Why what they are doing is different. Ultimately they are just hypocrites. But even some hypocrites are intellectually honest enough to admit it when they are being a hypocrite. You offer excuses and rationalizations. Regarding, "Once again, you don't know me or my life. Period." Just repeating stupid shit doesn't make it true. You might have noticed this about me but I can be kind of a dick. I wouldn't even try to contend otherwise. It's like you could know something about me by talking about me. I for example know that you are a hopeless idiot. Even after pointing out why this type of statement is absurd you repeat it. You prove you are hopeless and incapable of learning. Regarding, "You're one of the most nastiest, rudest people I've ever debated. That's saying a lot." OnCe AgAiN, yOu DoN't KnOw Me Or My LiFe. PeRiOd. Regarding, "If you don't want to debate with people like myself properly & in a nicer way, don't even bother replying, because you're wasting MY time." Your time is less than worthless. Time you spend addressing me is time you aren't busy making someone else dumber. And you are funny to talk to for the same reasons I find flat earthers funny to talk to. Regarding, "And that's ALL you had to say." It was essentially the exact same point the original poster was making. The one that made your brain melt the same way bidens brain is melting. You think you are entitled to my time... or my respect. You aren't. You are part of the problem. If only I thought you weren't hopeless. I might have bothered to try to be convincing instead of rude. It's frustrating sharing the globe with people like you. It's like I'm living in Idiocracy except if I were in that movie my president would actually be better than the one I have. Commacho was dumb but he wasn't evil. Regarding, "The woman accusing him has changed her story multiple times. It's supposed to be "Innocent Until Proven Guilty", NOT the other way around. Not every man is guilty." Biden is a clown but he gets one thing right... if you think he did it you shouldn't vote for him. I think he did it. Your innocent until proven guilty sounds cool but we aren't talking about the standard for him to go to jail... he is being vetted for POTUS. To suggest that my standards for getting my POTUS vote should be the same as my standards for saying he should be in jail cell... is, as is everything you say, asinine. Regarding, "Not every man is guilty." Look at how comfortable Biden is making women uncomfortable ON CAMERA. It doesn't take much convincing that a person who demonstrates they don't understand and respect people's boundaries might have done such a thing. Even if he didn't he still sucks. As a person and as a candidate. He, as is the majority of the "democratic" party, is corrupt as fuck. And I don't care to hear your latest corporate media talking points rationalize their suck. Not that I think you would even try to do so intelligently. Just more mindless garbage.
    1
  13408.  @WizardOfWor  Deal with my typos. I think so little of you I don't care to waste my time to correct them at this point.
    1
  13409.  @WizardOfWor  Regarding, "And at this point, I think so little of YOU." Good. I want your approval the way I want Hilter's. I don't. I prefer your scorn. It means I'm doing something right. Regarding, "you proved my point of being one of the most awful, rudest posters ever" Wait... that's the point you have been trying to make all this time? Even as I've said and conceded I can be a dick? Or are you just saying words to be the exact thing you are again condemning me for... being a dick. I almost think you are just being a hypocrite... as usual. But to steal some words from a hypocrite I know. "It's ridiculous and infuriating." Pretty sure that is a direct quote. And the only person who gets to think, say, and act like this is you. Good riddance to you.
    1
  13410.  @WizardOfWor  Regarding, "I never denied that Biden has dementia" Imagine telling people that the "adult" thing to do is to vote for a person who you think has dementia to have their finger on the nuclear button. Your stupidity is epic.
    1
  13411.  @WizardOfWor  Regarding, "I NEVER said anything like that." Wait... so now you ARE denying that biden has dementia? Or do you not understand that the POTUS has their finger on the nuclear button? Or that I haven't been the only one of us that has been condescending? Clearly you have never said anything like this. /s LMFAO. One of us is definitely an idiot.
    1
  13412.  @WizardOfWor  Regarding, "You're nuts, dude." AlL yOu HaVe ArE iNsUlTs. Regarding, "I wish that there was a proper block feature on here." It's called shutting the fuck up. I only respond to you because I have a hard time letting stupid go unanswered and you are only capable of uttering stupid.
    1
  13413. Everything you just said can also be said about corn pop. You are just buying joe biden propaganda.
    1
  13414.  @Ron-oe7hg  So what? Why do you feel the need to try and deflect like that?
    1
  13415.  @Ron-oe7hg  "being that you're one of "those ppl"" People who give you context so that you know EXACTLY what I'm referring to. Yes. I am. Please forgive me. "then where was your comment about THAT." It was when the topic was about him. Unlike this current thread. "Not outing you as a troll" LMFAO No. You aren't. But you do sound like you are projecting. Trolls like to do that. They also don't make any substantive points, like you haven't.
    1
  13416. The corporate media is an important topic and requires being talked about.
    1
  13417.  @iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii5924  I don't have a problem with you saying he is the better option. I take issue with you saying, "Get the F out of here bringing up those idiots!" Like "those idiots" shouldn't be talked about. They absolutely should.
    1
  13418.  @iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii5924  regarding, "i'm calling those on TYT idiots" Ok. I guess I thought you were referring to the corporate media seeing as how that is the topic of the video. I have no idea why you thought what you were trying to say was clear. I don't really care about TYT, your opinion of them, and they had nothing to do with the video at hand. So... whatever. Peace.
    1
  13419.  @iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii5924  Ok. You elaborated and made yourself clear after I misinterpreted what you said. Now that I know what you were trying to say I have no interest in addressing this further. Take care peace.
    1
  13420. Who would that even be?
    1
  13421.  @Thought_Processing_  "don't know" Isn't that kind of important to your hypothesis? Regarding, "maybe a republican to be 'bi-partisan' never underestimate the establishment dems" LMFAO. I have nothing but contempt for the republican party and would still, MUCH rather have any random nameless republican drawn from a hat than neera. Do you have even a single name of someone they could pass who would be worse than neera? Ultimately it doesn't exist. Neera is the bottom of the barrel. It doesn't get worse than people like her.
    1
  13422.  @Thought_Processing_  You think the dems are going to pick and pass ted cruz? I think you are proving my point for me.
    1
  13423.  @Thought_Processing_  "republicans would vote in favour" LOL. Sure. As if he could would ever possible be nominated. Just stop. Regarding, "my cynicism is justified." Cynicism is justified. Your "logic" is not. Tanden is the bottom of the barrel. There aren't worse than her.
    1
  13424.  @big_guy_of_leiden5688  I'd prefer Kasich to tanden.
    1
  13425.  @Thought_Processing_  "to be nominated you just need..." You need someone worse than neera. There aren't. Regarding, "don' let you hatred for Neera blind you to the fact that as bad as she is most if not all republican politicians are worse than her" LMFAO Don't let your hatred for republicans blind you to the fact that neera is as bad or worse than all of them.
    1
  13426.  @Thought_Processing_  If two people aren't going to give me anything and aren't going to do jack shit for me I prefer the POS who aren't promising me anything. I prefer an "honest" POS. In that aspect republicans are better than dems.
    1
  13427.  @Thought_Processing_  Regarding, "republicans are far less honest," Are they? They didn't get into office by promising 2k checks. They didn't get into office by promising to raise the minimum wage. They don't get into office promising to "restore the countries soul" and then bomb a country we don't a declaration of war with. Dems are the only ones making those promises to me and breaking them. Regarding, "we know Neera is a POS because she has said so the republicans lie about it" What? I'm not sure what you are trying to say here. I really hope it's not what I kinda think it might be. Regarding, "I prefer the devil I know to the devil I don't." I don't care what "devil" anyone thinks are worse. It's not really relevant. Both suck. Neither are worthy of support and the rest is just details.
    1
  13428.  @Thought_Processing_  But before I go I'd like that add that I understand why you might think dems are the "lesser evil." They aren't. It's just their role. The "democratic" party's job is to give the peasants just enough crumbs so that the peasants don't all pick up pitchforks. The crumbs they give you aren't because they are "better." It's only because that's how they can manipulate you and get you to think you are their friend all the time. That way you turn the other cheek when they lie. That way you can just tell yourself it's fine because at least they are less evil than republicans. They are not. It's akin to professional wrestling. All the rhetoric about how much they hate the other side is just a show. They all work for the same people and share the same goals. But one side has you thinking they give a shit about you. They don't. You would be wise to realize that.
    1
  13429.  @Thought_Processing_  I'd prefer to be stabbed in the face than the back. But it's still not really "better" to me.
    1
  13430.  @Thought_Processing_  Dems have calculated that 1400 is enough to stop everyone from picking up pitchforks. If they thought they could get away with 0 that's what they would do instead. Fun fact: 1.9 trillion could cut checks of almost 7K to everyone. But dems cant even give the 2k they promised.
    1
  13431.  @Thought_Processing_  And that 1400 is also to get you to turn the other cheek when the other almost 5600 per person mostly only goes to help the rich who are already doing great and are increasing their wealth during the pandemic.
    1
  13432.  @Thought_Processing_  I get it if you don't want to swallow the red pill but it is what it is.
    1
  13433.  @Thought_Processing_  "you still get crumbs though making them the lesser evil" Nope. If those crumbs are there to serve and service evil there is nothing good about them. Without those crumbs people would unite against the oligarchy and the world would be a far better place. Crumbs are hurting the people in the long run.
    1
  13434.  @Thought_Processing_  Regarding, "good stuff is still good" Thanks captain obvious. But placating the peasants to keep them from revolting is not a good thing. Stop acting like it is. "you go with the less bad." Have some standards and self respect for fucks sake. Have principles. The "lesser" evil is still evil. Let's say you wake up tomorrow and thought the republican party were less terrible. Is that good logic to support those POS? It's clearly not. Support good and be willing to lose because neither major party is good. Or keep finding ways to rationalize supporting evil and be a sheep being led to slaughter.
    1
  13435.  @luker.6967  Nobody. I don't have a vote and if I did I have no idea who I'd support but I can say with certainty I wouldn't support yang.
    1
  13436.  @f0repl4y  "people eat MSM BS right up!" And their candidates. Yanggang seems to forget their clown went to work for CNN.
    1
  13437. This is what sam sedar propaganda is designed to get you to think... that joe rogan is the problem and not democrats even though they have the presidency, the house and the senate.
    1
  13438.  @scruffopone3989  Thanks for proving my point... not that it was necessary.
    1
  13439.  @lordlubu3029  Do all your comments break down to "I know you are but what am I?"
    1
  13440. People other than you understand how much Iowa and NH do not represent the rest of the country where pete struggles to get 1 percent with minorities. Also... he's terrible in quite obvious ways.
    1
  13441.  @Goatman710  Meh. I'm far more worried about Biden and Warren than I am of pete and it's not even close.
    1
  13442. Trump is right about one thing... his daughter is very bangable.
    1
  13443. Regarding, "so he can face justice." Have you met the US criminal justice system?
    1
  13444. I've never voted for him and I never will.
    1
  13445. He is establishment. His whole campaign was a concerted effort to try and siphon votes from sanders and cockblock him from the nomination at the behest of the establishment.
    1
  13446. Meh. It really isn't. A paper bag filled with dog shit could beat Trump. Bernie Sanders isn't the right choice because he's the only person who can beat him. He's the right choice because he's far and away the best candidate.
    1
  13447.  @MasterOfSparks  Regarding, "We Sanders supporters vote based on issues." Which is pretty much my point. Stick to the issues. That's why Sanders is the man. Not because he is the only guy capable of beating trump which simply isn't true. We live in a world where a complete piece of shit like Hillary got millions more votes then trump. A complete piece of shit like Hillary absolutely would have won the general if only she had been seen by the public to have won her primary legitimately. And that was before we actually got to see trump in office. Now there can be no question how terrible he is and how he would govern like there was before because he never actually held political office. Stick to the issues... not a terrible talking point that sanders is the only guy who can beat the orange clown.
    1
  13448. He is Canadian.
    1
  13449.  @twatts1523  My point is that anyone who tells you to vote for either major party is "part of the problem." Pun intended.
    1
  13450.  @twatts1523  My point is that anyone who tells you to vote for either major party is "part of the problem." Pun intended.
    1
  13451.  @twatts1523  My point is that anyone who tells you to vote for either major party is "part of the problem."
    1
  13452.  @twatts1523  My point is that dave is "part of the problem."
    1
  13453.  @joeschmo1194  I don't need more than that. If you support the duopoly... and dave supports the duopoly... then you are part of the problem... not part of the solution. Are you dave's burner account?
    1
  13454.  @joeschmo1194  I don't need to do more than point out that dave supports the duopoly and that makes him part of the problem and not part of the solution. Did dave pay you for this? Or are you a burner account for him?
    1
  13455.  @joeschmo1194  "What else you got?" I don't need anything else. If you support the duopoly, and dave supports the duopoly, then you are part of the problem and not part of the solution.
    1
  13456.  @joeschmo1194  "did Dave..." Are you dave's burner account?
    1
  13457.  @joeschmo1194  "what else" I don't need anything else to prove that dave is part of the problem and not part of the solution.
    1
  13458.  @joeschmo1194  "What else ya got?" I don't need anything else to prove my point that dave is part of the problem.
    1
  13459.  @joeschmo1194  "What else you got" I don't need anything else to prove my point that dave is part of the problem.
    1
  13460.  @joeschmo1194  I don't need anything else to prove that dave is not part of the solution. And that he is part of the problem.
    1
  13461.  @joeschmo1194  I don't need anything else to prove my point. You deserve each other. You are both part of the problem.
    1
  13462.  @joeschmo1194  My point applies to you to. Maybe try being part of the solution next time.
    1
  13463.  @joeschmo1194  The point I was making about dave applies to you too... obviously.
    1
  13464. I went from being one of AOCs biggest advocates to being one of her biggest detractors. Fraud squad. Never forget.
    1
  13465. FYI you don't need to be here.
    1
  13466.  @1970DAH  "needlessly long. He rehashes old stuff way too much." I don't know what else to tell you other than you don't need to be here.
    1
  13467.  @1970DAH  "Is that your answer to everything?" Obviously not. Only to your 1st world white person problem. "you don't need to read my comments if you don't like them." This sounds like a good idea. Your whining is tiresome and pointless.
    1
  13468.  @1970DAH  Do you ever say anything that isn't stupid AF?
    1
  13469. No. We should call identity politics exactly what it is... toxic and wrong. We shouldn't entertain it anymore than we should entertain racism.
    1
  13470.  @prodesu8607  Regarding, "identity politics does prove a bigger point." Um what? It's trash and proves nothing of value or importance. Regarding, "it gives us an idea of the larger picture when it's mostly old white men who are in charge." The country is ruled by the rich. That's the problem... not what color or gender those super rich people are. Regarding, "I'm a white man myself." I don't fucking care about your color or gender. And you should really shop giving such a big shit about it as well.
    1
  13471.  @prodesu8607  Regarding, "it does say something about the state of our country that the political representation is so lopsided towards white men in comparison to other identities." It tells you who has the money. It tells you nothing about who you should and shouldn't be voting for and that's what we are talking about isn't it? Because when you use this type of information to try and justify voting based on what's between a persons legs is where you go off the rails. Regarding, "it works for a reason." Because people like you insist on feeding the beast the way you are now. You are part of the problem. Be part of the solution instead.
    1
  13472.  @prodesu8607  Regarding, "I just told you, I don't vote based on identity and don't think people should." But you continue to entertain this conversation when you shouldn't. Identity politics is poison. The notion that I should or shouldn't be supporting a person based on things like gender or race is stupid. I shouldn't need to explain this or talk about this the same way I shouldn't need to talk about or explain why racism is poison. And I shouldn't be entertaining the idea. Regarding, "The way to convince them to not do so isn't to call them stupid" If the shoe fits... wear it. And I'm not here to coddle people. I concede that my points are best made when I don't call people stupid but ultimately when people are being stupid that's what I tend to do. Regarding, "there's an inherent discomfort in seeing all our leaders look different from oneself in a country with a history as damning as the US has" There are plenty of conversations to be had and I'm not shutting the door on all of them but the notion that I, or anyone, should be basing their voting decisions on what a person looks like isn't one of them. And the people that want to try and talk about this tend to only be trying to deflect from the actual important things people should be thinking about when making that important decision. I'm not playing that game, neither should you, and by playing it you only perpetuate the problem. Identity politics is flat earth level stupidity. But even flat earthers and their BS aren't as insidious and dangerous as identity politics. Because identity politics is just another way to try and divide people and get them to vote against their own interests. It has real world effects the way flat earthers and their dumb doesn't.
    1
  13473.  @prodesu8607  Regarding, "I'm mostly trying to get you to empathize that others may have a different view" Let's say that view were racist. Would you say this then? Because that really is the quality level of their "view." Regarding, "there's some legitimacy to that view." No. There isn't. I'm talking specifically about the view that a voter should care about things like what's between a person's legs or what the color of their skin is. There is ZERO legitimacy to that view. And when you say there is, again, you are part of the problem.
    1
  13474.  @prodesu8607  Regarding, "It's not entirely illegitimate to care about representation for a gender or minority that has been oppressed for centuries." It's like you are intentionally misunderstanding what the word "representation" means. It doesn't mean someone looks like me. I get to pick who represents me and nowhere do I think that what a person looks like tells me anything of value when it comes to that. Just fucking stop already. And I don't use idiotic physical features to make such a determination like you insist on giving credence to. And when you, and others perpetuate bullshit like this... like you need to look like someone to represent them, you are part of the problem spreading nonsense. I guess we should get more Sarah Palins and Michelle Bakmans in government because vagina. Or better yet we should stop using physical features to care about such things. If someone said they preferred men to be politicians you would understand it would be wrong. But you are giving the reverse the time of day. It's just as wrong and innately hypocritical. True equality is not giving a shit about all the things you are giving people a pass to care about. If we are ever going to achieve what you want your mindset needs to change drastically because you are part of the problem.
    1
  13475.  @prodesu8607  Regarding, "I feel like you don't get what I'm saying." It's more that you don't get what the person asking the question was saying. Regarding, "I agree that we shouldn't choose politicians based on those things." Go back and listen to the question being asked... that's what we are talking about right? Obama, at least in as much as the question would have you believe, DOES think we should be choosing a politician based on those things. It was the whole fucking question. The point made being, if women were in charge things would be better, not because of anything valid or of any of the things you want to make this about... but because of a vagina. That's it. Nothing more. Don't act like it was about all the other shit you want to make this into. How isn't that sexist as fuck? How isn't that the exact type of mentality that you have a problem with? Imagine for a second if the point being made by Obama was, men have been in charge for good reason, because men being in charge is innately good and if women were in charge it would be bad. That's literally the point he is trying to make but in reverse. Regarding, " What I'm saying is that it reflects our society in that old white men are vastly statistically over represented in congress in relation to how the country looks like." Realize that isn't the point being made in the question. Realize the point being made was, Obama thinks women should be in charge not because of stats or because they aren't represented... they should be in charge because of a vagina. That's it. That was the point being made. Stop trying to make it into something that it wasn't. Listen to the question again and the point Obama was making in it. And stop trying to make it into something it wasn't. It was garbage.
    1
  13476.  @prodesu8607  Let's say you agree with the point Obama and the tool smirking while making the world dumber with their question while the sheep applaud was asking... what would be the logical conclusion? Well if the world would be better if women were in charge I should only vote for women and shouldn't vote for men. That's the "lesson" to be learned. It's fucking garbage. Please stop defending this crap.
    1
  13477.  @prodesu8607  Did that get through to you at all? Did you realize that you were conflating a legitimate conversation about identity and politics with the specific unacceptable conversation that was actually going on? Did you see where the logical conclusion of the conversation being had led to? Or were you just tired of the conversation and/or offended that I swear like a sailor?
    1
  13478. Not if they have dementia at least.
    1
  13479. What poll is that at 3:47?
    1
  13480. Who are you talking about?
    1
  13481. Nabuto the idea is that it would make it illegal for Wall Street or anyone else from giving them money that they could keep for themselves. They work for us so we pay them. They do not work for Wall Street now or ever (in theory) and we ban them from bribing them... err paying them. It is disgusting how we allow our politicians to get rich as fuck from their political influence. This is one possible solution to prevent that going forward. Then all we would need to do is stop them from bribing politicians while they are running their campaigns.
    1
  13482. Sandy regarding, "not realistic," We have a Republican President, the Republicans control the house and senate, and the democrats are all corporation sellouts. Nothing that is worth a shit is realistic these days, in part because these "representatives" are happy to use the revolving door to make themselves rich. Regarding, "they make millions" Give ex presidents 1 mil a year and if they are not happy with that then they can go ahead and not run for the job going forward. Regarding, "citizens united is the issue" This is a huge part of the problem but it is hardly the only problem with money in politics. Money in politics was a problem before this... after it is worse thou. Sandy regarding, "public financing" We have it... just not the way it should be. Regarding, "2 mos campaign" I think campaign season is way too long but this sounds like an over-correction in my opinion. That said we definitely agree it is too long currently. Regarding, "rank choice voting" This is a no brainer and is desperately needed. I'm not sure it is any more realistic that what I proposed... again you have to consider the powers that be these days. They are not going to let anything good like this happen either. Still I am happy you mentioned it and I'm not going to call it unrealistic other than to make a point about your statement of me being unrealistic.
    1
  13483. But does it? We only have a candle.
    1
  13484.  @hellfish2309  Sorry not sorry if the truth has you triggered and that you have nothing of substance to counter it other than ad hominem BS.
    1
  13485.  @hellfish2309  " i actually asserted that Wikipedia is unreliable at best" Yup. Without giving any evidence it's just textbook ad hominem and you haven't offered a shred of evidence for anything you have said.
    1
  13486.  @michaelhomes8049  "How does said affiliation work? Very vague term." I honestly don't know all the details because kyle and TYT don't both to disclose it even while talking about each other.
    1
  13487.  @hellfish2309  "you have no argument" LFMAO I can't tell you how funny this is coming from you. Thanks for the laugh. Fun fact: yours isn't an argument hypocrite.
    1
  13488. Nah. They are already working on ways to remove their vocal cords.
    1
  13489.  @glennwilcock4593  Syria, ukraine, israel...
    1
  13490.  @glennwilcock4593  Meanwhile, in reality, the US is sacrificing a generation of ukrainians in a proxy war.
    1
  13491.  @glennwilcock4593  "guarantee that" Except there are... we gave ukrainians weapons systems they aren't trained to use. US troops are the only ones able to operate them.
    1
  13492.  @glennwilcock4593  "U.S. troops, missile defense system deployed to Israel" -cbs news
    1
  13493.  @glennwilcock4593  "US troops in Ukraine can now earn hazard pay" -military times
    1
  13494.  @glennwilcock4593  I can only think you are intentionally gaslighting at this point.
    1
  13495.  @glennwilcock4593  "not where they were" So when people shoot at US troops for occupying other people's country's are they not going to fight back or something?
    1
  13496. Aren't you the idiot and bitch who ran back to their safe space rather then admit that they were lying again? And that lie was particularly dumb as fuck... even for you. Regarding, "a waste of space." You know what a real waste of space is? The area above your shoulders.
    1
  13497. Oh... and the word you were trying to say was "one." Any idea why you might get something so simple wrong? Spoiler alert... It's because you are stupid beyond words.
    1
  13498.  @GregoryAlanGaskill  It's tough to know in a world where someone will say what did and do so without sarcasm. There should be a sarcasm font.
    1
  13499.  @Peopleofthesun386  You seem to be easily impressed.
    1
  13500.  @Peopleofthesun386  Regarding, "Not impressed with Biden" Maybe stop with the whataboutism and deflection then.
    1
  13501.  @Peopleofthesun386  If it makes you feel any better I don't care for or accept trump supporters deflecting from their clown to talk about the other team either.
    1
  13502.  @Peopleofthesun386  Regarding, "It was Trump or Biden" What does that say about our empire? Regarding, "No deflection just facts" Do you know what a deflection is? They can still be facts. It's just that they are not facts about the topic at hand. The OP was talking about the orange clown. It was about him. You deflected to talked about someone else. Try not to lie about what you are doing and try to be a little more intellectually honest about what you are doing. That way maybe you can avoid deflecting in the future before doing it. What you were doing was deflecting. That's just a fact whether you realize it or admit it.
    1
  13503. You mean kinda how dems acted like trump was satan and trying to mount a coup?
    1
  13504. Can you imagine the crowd that would show for Ted if he said he was going to let everyone punch him in the face? That might be the biggest crowd in the history of man.
    1
  13505. Yeah. You can tell he is good at his job of working for the dems by the way he has exposed the rot in the party more than anyone else on Earth.
    1
  13506. Hasn't exposed anything? Huh. You must be living in a different world than I do. I live in this one. Where Sanders has exposed them for what they are by existing. They wouldn't have had to rig the primary 2016 in the first place if it were not for him. They wouldn't have looked worse because he was there. He proved you don't need corporate money and superpacs. But I guess you live in a different world than I do.
    1
  13507. Regarding, "Do you think progressive doctrine is somehow unique to Bernie?" No. And I have no idea why you would think I might. Regarding, "If you have been paying attention..." If you have been paying attention you would realize that the more people than ever are woke to the rot in the party. Clearly you don't want to give Bernie any credit for this but he fact of the matter is that it is a direct result of his existence. When you said, "Corporatism has U.S. politics on lockdown." You were essentially correct. The only reason the public is exposed to that "flower" in shit is because of there actually being that flower. And that flower is Bernie Sanders. You know... the guy who calls for a "political revolution." The guy who makes sure to identify himself as an independent and not a dem. The guy forcing the corporate media to talk about single payer. The guy who makes sure everyone sees that "sea of shit" for what it is because he gives them a flower to compare it to. But you go ahead and continue to smear him. There is lots of that stupid shit going on around here. Fuckers expect him to do literally everything when literally everything, including the fucks who should be supporting him, are working against him. It is fucking disgusting.
    1
  13508. Regarding, "What does that even mean?" Let me try to draw you a picture with crayons so that you can understand. It means that it is ironic that you are accusing others of thinking they are better than everyone else while demonstrating that you think you are better than a large group of people. Regarding, "All I am saying is..." No. You are saying more than that. You just don't realize it because you are not smart.
    1
  13509. Zach regarding, "while demonstrating that you think you are better than a large group of people" HA! Never said that once!" No shit sherlock. Had you said it I would have said that you said it. I instead said that you demonstrated it because.... can you figure it out dipshit? Ok... you are hopeless and I'm wasting my time with you. Go see a doctor. You need help.
    1
  13510. Your comment? yikes
    1
  13511.  @joeterzio7175  No one takes you seriously enough to try and intelligently address your smears.
    1
  13512. Who cares if someone is asymptomatic or not. Both can spread the disease.
    1
  13513. That is something you should be embarrassed about, not proud of. Dore is great but you need a life.
    1
  13514. Ok buddy. If that is really what you get off on then you go right ahead and you be you. Sorry for pointing out that I think what you get off on is pretty pathetic and that I think you should probably be spending more time being outside and/or doing anything else with your time.
    1
  13515. Regarding, "First, I'm not your buddy" No shit sherlock. It was meant to be condescending. Regarding, "second, I don't need your apology" It wasn't actually an apology. I guess you don't understand this shit without me spelling it out to you because you are not very smart. Regarding, "Third, there are people out there..." I think this is funny because you think it relevant to the conversation at hand. This is about you. The guy who is proud to and makes it their life mission to say "first." So proud they need to make it clear that this isn't their first time. They have done this shit before. Regarding, "I guess there is the proof that your brain isn't functioning properly." I guess you would think that because your brain isn't functioning properly. Regarding, "You should really go hug that electrical transformer now" No thanks. Doing stupid shit is your thing, not mine.
    1
  13516. Regarding, "you have a sack of rocks for a brain" This insult would be more effective if it wasn't coming from a dipshit. Regarding, "I guess you don't understand how a clap back works." Sorry for pointing out why what you said was stupid. I guess you didn't understand how that works. Regarding, "a guy who apparently has more important things to do" I'm not claiming that me calling out stupid where I see it be an especially constructive use of time but it has more merit than saying "first" as a hobby. Regarding, "there is saying "you can't beat stupid"" Yup. You really prove that saying with your stupid. Keeping doing it if it really brings you joy for all I care. Simple pleasures for simple people.
    1
  13517. Warren is crap.
    1
  13518. So much stupid in so few words. Way to go.
    1
  13519. That's my second favorite kind, second only to a billionaire behind bars.
    1
  13520. Meanwhile, in reality, he is voting in lockstep with the corporate dems. Talk is cheap. Actions speak louder than meaningless words.
    1
  13521.  @Livemem  Regarding, "yeah, starting out cursing me" Nope. I started out pointed out simple truths that you should have no trouble understanding because they should be pure common sense. Then you went off and said some of the dumbest shit imaginable (which isn't surprising because there isn't anything intelligent yang supporters can say to justify their support) and yeah... I curse. They are words. And words are merely a tool we use to convey a message. And I simply don't know of a better way to express my frustration with the stupid shit you have said and a world that has so many major problems that need addressing than by cursing. If you don't understand why things are so bad that they make me angry and if you want to use that as an excuse to dismiss the substantive points I've made... well I'm not surprised.
    1
  13522.  @Livemem  Regarding, "starting out a conversation by calling me a "dipshit" is not going to make me say, "hmm maybe he's right"" Yup. It doesn't make for a very compelling argument. Ultimately I'm a human being who is crazy frustrated with stupid arguments such as yours. If only trump supporters understood that a presidential candidate needs to have experience and a record and maybe he wouldn't be in office. But here we are and it pisses me off. Sorry not sorry if the truth hurts and I find everything you have to say really fucking stupid. I know this isn't a good tactically but people like you piss me off and I'm venting because you deserve it. I do the same shit with flat earthers for the same reasons and even their stupidity isn't as dangerous for the world as yours is because here we are talking about the upcoming election and the future of the country and the world. And maybe, just maybe another person who is thinking that yang is a good idea might read what I wrote, not take it so personally, and come to their senses. Truly intellectually honest people, even when being insulted, are capable of compartmentalizing things, not taking it personal, and are still able to listen to substance. But they are rare and it isn't surprising you are one of them. Regarding, "I have the right to be just as angry at YOU for not understanding why you would stop everyone from getting $1000 a month" How do you know I'm opposed to this? I haven't even talked about it. I'm talking about trust and how and why it is earned. I'm talking about the things you should be thinking about when determining if someone is legit or a snake oil salesmen. Shit... I could come out today running on 2K a month but that doesn't mean shit because I have done as much as yang has to earn your trust other than he doesn't curse like a sailor, not that that has anything to do with trust. I'm interested in UBI. I really am even if not entirely convinced. But first we need to overhaul the entire system first. We need to make sure that if we gave everyone money it isn't just going to all go to the top the way it already is. But I have ZERO interest in supporting a candidate who has no experience in politics and no record to confirm or deny they are going to fight for the things they claim. It makes no fucking sense in a world where you damn well should know that politicians are rightfully known to be great liars. Especially when we do have a person that has demonstrated that they are going to fight for the things they talk about while in office. Regarding, "I personally have no problem with Bernie, but Yang just has a better way to get there." I personally do have a problem with Yang. The arrogance to think he has any right to run. The fact that his campaign is splitting progressive support and making it more likely an establishment fuck like Biden wins is unacceptable. I don't have time or patience for his arrogance and stupidity in a world that desperately needs change. Regarding, "the way you speak to people, you are only helping to drive people AWAY from Bernie's campaign." This is certainly the least stupid thing you have said but I'm human and we are talking about: millions without health care, perpetual war, education, money in politics, the minimum wage, mass incarceration, the environment and so much more. If you can't understand why and where passion comes from when those are the topics I question your humanity.
    1
  13523.  @Livemem  Regarding, "you know Bernie just as well as I know Yang, so you honestly don't KNOW who's more trustworthy." Do you listen to yourself? You can't actually believe this can you? And you wonder why I might call this stupid when you are obviously just trying to reverse engineer things to say to try and rationalize your support. Bernie has held political office for a long time. I've been able to watch what he does with power. I've been able to see that his message is consistent and that he doesn't just go with the flow. He has a record I get to study. He has demonstrated principles. Principles that he has stood up for even when they weren't politically convenient like when he supported gay rights long before it was the thing to do. Seriously... just fucking stop. In a world of dumb motherfuckers you have to be smarter than this don't you? I just can't take you seriously not that I've ever had any reason to. I've said what I've wanted to say. I should have been far more nice while doing it but whatever. Stupid like this pisses me off. I seriously feel like I'm living in the movie Idiocracy when I hear shit like this except at least if I were in that movie I'd have a better president and could get a handjob at starbucks. I'm honestly not reading or addressing anything after this. I don't see the point. You are either too dumb to understand why what you are saying is dumb or you are being intentionally obtuse because you are being paid. I don't care anymore. At least you won't have to hear me tell you you are stupid while telling you exactly why everything you are saying is dumb.
    1
  13524.  @Livemem  I ain't your buddy guy.
    1
  13525. BULLSHIT! /s
    1
  13526. Bernie Sanders is why m4a is as popular as it is.
    1
  13527.  @stevemorales4098  He has never been in favor of superdelegates existence. Trying to win them is not the same thing. I suspect you know this but pretend otherwise because you not an honest actor. Then again I'm not ruling out the possibility that you just aren't very smart.
    1
  13528.  @jonsmith9838  Regarding, "he was for them enough to..." Trying to win is not the same as being for something. I could be against kickoffs in football but that doesn't mean that if another team is kicking off I'm not going to play.
    1
  13529.  @stevemorales4098  LOL Sure. If putting words into my mouth like an idiot makes you feel good about yourself then I'm not going to stop you or correct you for all I care about your "thoughts."
    1
  13530.  @stevemorales4098  Just figure you are wrong about everything. I have better things to do than tell you all the specific ways you are dumb.
    1
  13531.  @jonsmith9838 Regarding, " yes but then if someone else use the same tactic" It's a different election. And superdelegates have a different role. They aren't putting their thumb on the scale from day one. There weren't hundreds of them going out and supporting biden in 2020 before anyone else even entered like they did for Hillary in 2016. Apples and oranges. Regarding, "warren didnt say super delegate are awesome either but she using it to." She is lying. As she usually does. She has said time and again that the most votes should win. She is right about that. They should unless there is some kind of really great reason why they shouldn't. And there isn't that kind of thing with Bernie. It's just an excuse to try and stop him as always. Regarding, "now if your argument it was wrong then, and it wrong now." Superdelegates are always wrong. That has ALWAYS been Bernie's position. But if he is playing a game in which they have a monster role you can't just expect him to not try and gain their support. That's not how it works and their is nothing hypocritical about that.
    1
  13532.  @stevemorales4098  Regarding, "Im not wrong" You are walking/talking evidence of the Dunning-Kruger effect and a complete waste of my time. Good luck with your idiotic smears and propaganda going forward but don't be afraid to make some changes in your life. You need them as much as this country does and that is really saying something.
    1
  13533.  @stevemorales4098  When never making those changes that you should but won't I suggest starting with the basics like capitalization. Trolls like you really seem to struggle with it.
    1
  13534.  @jonsmith9838  Regarding, "why shouldn't Warren use the same rules." It's undemocratic. She has gone on record as saying things like, "most votes should win." Regarding, "why is going against the will of the people when warren does it but when its Bernie its dont hate the player hate the game" Bernie's situation was completely different. Those were superdelegates that were being fought over DURING the primary. Those were superdelegates who gave their support in the HUNDREDS even before Sanders announced his CANDIDACY much less a peasant got the chance to vote. They were put up with regular delegates to influence the vote from day one. Even when pledged delegates were close all delegates were put up by a corporate media to influence the race. If things were the same they all would have come out and supported biden. Not only would the media be putting them all up together to make it look like he's winning even though he hasn't won a state but it would have influenced each of those states. It's different. Obviously. Sanders was trying to get those superdelegates while the war was going on. While voters still were going to vote. That's not the same as saying... after the entire process after getting less votes to try and get superdelegates then. Sanders didn't do that. And had he tried without something like Hillary being indicted or election fraud (there was election fraud) then she should win and she did without fight from Sander AT THE END. As for everything else you are going on about you are getting off topic.
    1
  13535.  @jonsmith9838  Regarding, "the war was over when Sanders was doing that" No it wasn't. I hope you aren't intentionally trying to reinvent history. The truth is that Sanders had a mathematical chance at a MAJORITY of pledged delegates going into the very last primary of California.
    1
  13536.  @jonsmith9838  And his ability to earn those pledged delegates is influenced by how superdelegates he had. Regarding, "your making a lot of assumptions that super delegates is what cause that many more people to vote for." Superdelegates played a huge role in framing the election. Hillary wasn't portrayed as inevitably by accident in 2016 and neither was it that Biden was tried to be portrayed that way in 2020. Momentum matters. Ultimately the fact remains that Sanders had a chance at having more pledged delegates going into the VERY LAST election. That's the fact while you act like it was over early or some shit.
    1
  13537.  @jonsmith9838  Regarding, "wherebyiu getting that." I lived through it and understood my reality as it was happening. Regarding, "link please." You want evidence though it isn't hard to find. Let's see. Wikipedia 2016 democratic primary. Final pledged delegates, Hillary 2271, Sanders 1820. How many pledged delegates did Hillary get on the last day of voting of june 7 (i'm not counting DOC on the 14th)? Hillary won 254 (cal), 10 (montana), 79 (jersey), 18 (nm), 15 (both Dakotas). 376 delegates total. Take those from Hillary give them to Bernie the final is Hillary 1895, Sanders 2196. Because math. I didn't just look this up to know. I understood the world as it was happening. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2016_Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries
    1
  13538.  @jonsmith9838  Now that I've provided the evidence I encourage you to ask yourself why you didn't realize that Sanders was mathematically capable of finishing with the most pledged delegates going into the last day of voting? Why did you think the race was over so early? You aren't perchance proving my point about how superdelegates were used to manipulate people's perception of the race in real time are you? Fun fact the election was called by the corporate media on a day LITERALLY NOBODY VOTED! Does that seem right to you?
    1
  13539.  @jonsmith9838  So what situation in 2016 would be most like a contested convention in 2020? That situation is most like the day after California. The day after Sanders was mathematically eliminated from getting the most pledged delegates. What did he do at that time? Did he fight it? Nope. Did he try to get superdelegates to swing to him then? Nope. He threw in the towel. Had he fought after California then all the clowns trying to smear sanders would have a point. They don't. They are merely smear merchants out to try and reinvent history and rationalize the "democratic" party favoring superdelegates instead of democracy. The funniest thing they say is (essentially, this is my paraphrasing), screw democracy. Sanders, that guy who is in favor of democracy, they are the one who isn't a democrat. Me, I'm the democrat. You can tell by how much distain I have for democracy. Sanders is an independent. He should run as an independent. But if he actually ran as an independent I'd cry about that too because I don't actually have any principles. I'd say he is splitting the vote and then I'd blame Sanders if Trump wins. Pretty much I just don't want Sanders to run or win and will support any argument that leads to that conclusion regardless of anything I've said in the past about most votes winning. I'm not intellectually honest. Sometimes I go by the name Steve Morales but not always. I suck at life. That's not exactly what they say but that's pretty much what I hear.
    1
  13540.  @jonsmith9838  Regarding, "bernie would if had to..." So now that I've proven myself correct you think the goalpost should be moved? I used the words mathematically capable for a reason. Did you not understand what those words meant while I was saying them? Regarding, "Warren had such as much mathematical likely good if not more." I suspect your point is as terrible as the words you used for it. Regarding, "your acting like she wrong" Because she obviously is. She is right when she says most votes wins. It's just that she only says it when politically convenient. Why aren't you acting like she is wrong when she says the most votes at the end shouldn't necessarily win? Regarding, "he right when there pulling the same tactics" They aren't the same tactics. If they were the same tactics Sanders would have fought after all the peasants cast their ballots and he had less votes at the end. HE DIDN'T DO THAT. That's what Warren and team anti democracy think is ok. And that's clearly not what he did. Apples and oranges whether you realize it or not. Regarding, "he knew he couldn't get that" I showed how he was mathematically capable of finishing with HUNDREDS of more pledged delegates going into the very last day. After an entire election where the playing field was being tipped. Even if he thought he couldn't get them he was running through the finish line the way runners are taught to. No matter all your words the fact remains that: Sanders actions were DURING a primary. Warrens plan is for AFTER a primary. World of difference you are ignoring. I really hope it isn't intentionally and disingenuous. I've given you respect and time I haven't for the other clown. I hope that wasn't me being foolish. Regarding, "she was betrayed as inevitable because the polls and that she was nearly always ahead even without the superdelegates." You mean exactly like it was for Biden in 2020 while he kept not winning? Turns out Biden wasn't inevitable nor was Hillary. But that's what you are told to manufacture consent for terrible people. Chuck Todd did want to give sanders credit for being one of the top contenders much less the front runner even after winning the first two primaries. This is done for a reason and that reason isn't honest. Regarding, "he really really had no argument after California." Yeah. No shit sherlock. Remember you said this. The establishment won't have much of an argument if they try to take the nomination from Sanders at a contested convention. Make sure you think and say the same about them should it happen. Regarding, "not going to give him a trophy for not being insane" Like you are seemingly doing for warren at the moment? Regarding, "I got my own principles to. think every votes matter." and "think whoever's get the most votes win. that wss true now and true in 2016" Which is what Sanders has been saying since the beginning of time. Superdelegates aren't his idea. He has always been opposed to them. But if they are busy tipping the scale of an election he is in the midst of he is going to fight for them and that isn't hypocrisy. Regarding, "think the electoral collage suck" Do you? Does that mean that if you ran for president you wouldn't try to win the EC like a sane person? If you tried to win the EC would this statement then make you a hypocrite the way you seem to think Sanders is being hypocritical? Would you instead ignore the EC and try to win the popular vote because that's how you think things should be? Regarding, "not going to act like that not the system" Oh right. That's what you would do. That's what Sanders does on the topic of superdelegates while you are baffled by it, struggle to understand it, and mislabel it.
    1
  13541.  @jonsmith9838  Regarding, "well first off your assuming again." You are assuming I'm assuming. Maybe just address what I'm saying instead of what you think I'm thinking. Regarding, "assuming that I want to take it from Sanders." I was assuming the opposite actually because you said things like the most votes should win. Regarding, "and assuming I'm a lady." I was assuming the opposite. I assume people named jon are men. This is also crazy irrelevant and my problem with addressing this is two fold as I typed this, lost it, and am typing it again for no good reason. Regarding, "i want sanders to win..." Good. That said it's not relevant to the conversation at hand. The conversation at hand is Sanders actions in 2016 and if they are consistent with his words. And they are. Regarding, "he had no argument at that point because he was massively behind on ever level" He did. Do you even know what his argument was at the time while you dismiss it this way? Regarding, "he did argue even if Hillary had more delecates the superdelegates job to pick the best canidate. so yes he was talking about going near the end at that point. that's fact." So all you need to do to tell the truth is ignore other facts... He never fought for superdelegates when the primary was ongoing. "near the end" is not at the end. I know you want to ignore the distinction but it matters for intellectually honest people. Regarding, "bravo he gets a trophy." You dismiss this as obvious and common sense by sanders still it's not the parties plan if roles are reversed. They are dead set on a contested convention, stealing the nomination, and fighting for someone with less votes AT. THE. END. I'm way done with this. I've wasted far too much time addressing you. You want to reinvent history and make the end a time different than it was.... just like the corporate media did when they called the election when nobody was voting. California is a state large enough to be an independent nation but fuck their votes. It was already over despite not being over.
    1
  13542.  @jonsmith9838  It wasn't just over going into cal according to you. It was over around the time of super Tuesday... months earlier and how many states? Shit... if that's how it works then it should already be over in 2020. Sanders has the most votes in 3 out of 3. We should probably just cancel the rest. It's over because the word over is now arbitrary instead of being based on math.
    1
  13543. LMFAO. No.
    1
  13544. Your comment should come with a triggered warning.
    1
  13545. Nah. Read it. It's the quickest path to atheism.
    1
  13546. Are you sure it's not our bombs that make us great? The billions that bernie just voted for?
    1
  13547.  @TheFlutecart  "it was blown up." People were dying in the donbas long before russia invaded. People are dying in the US.
    1
  13548.  @TheFlutecart  "it was blown up" I'm sure the answer to that is more bombs from the US. /s
    1
  13549.  @TheFlutecart  Not one reply can be seen. "Land of the free" am I right?
    1
  13550. He said during the debate that the US spends twice as much as everyone else. That is comparison and as simplistic as it can get for a dumb public. Shit, even I lose understanding of money when we start talking about trillions and trillions of dollars. We pay twice as much as everyone else. This is perfect, easy to understand, and a comparison.
    1
  13551. Meh. You are reaching. They would say the same thing about biden.
    1
  13552.  @crickey__in__durham  Ultimately we both agree that they are not impartial but I really don't care for your argument personally.
    1
  13553.  @crickey__in__durham  Regarding, "If I'm playing for the Lakers, I don't say that the Celtics are "hard to beat" because I admire them and am rooting for them, I say that because I'm concerned that...well...we won't beat them...lol." I just don't see it that way personally. Few love Sanders more than I. I would absolutely say he would be "hard to beat" in the general because I think he would be hard to beat in the general... not that I think he should be beaten. I just don't see the phrase the same way personally but maybe I'm actually in a small minority in my thinking.
    1
  13554.  @crickey__in__durham  Hard to beat is a compliment to me. That said we don't always use words the exact same way.
    1
  13555. Next time you will advocate for the fascist because at least they aren't a nazi. Maybe have some standards for getting your vote. Standards that neither trump nor biden should come even close to reaching.
    1
  13556. Why do I feel like at the quick instant thumbs up are paid for by big money for biden?
    1
  13557. You are either an idiot or soulless.
    1
  13558. Because rational people don't give a fuck about age. Bernie being old is really nice in some ways. It gives us a long background to look at so that we know exactly who he is. Obama was able to dupe lots of people in part because he didn't have a long record to look at.
    1
  13559. The most popular politician in the country is a "nobody?" No. You are a nobody. And a stupid nobody at that.
    1
  13560.  @cameronmoore4061  "it is not his opinion, it is what he wants your opinion to be." So I guess by your own "logic" this isn't your opinion. It's what he wants your opinion to be. "Everyone knows it came from a lab" Do they? Don't get me wrong I think it came from a lab but we don't exactly have the smoking gun and likely never will because it will be covered up. "even ron" You offer this opinion of yours but you aren't offering any sort of evidence to support it.
    1
  13561.  @paulsommerhalder9049  "that Pro-China guest? I forget his name" If I were trying to come up with an example of a smear as an example for a textbook this might be it.
    1
  13562.  @cameronmoore4061  Regarding, "I have reasoning, ron doesn't." Everyone thinks they have their reasons dipshit but not everyone is a hypocrite about it like you are. "Why did china flip out on australia for starting an investigation?" LMFAO. Let's say for second they hypothetically are innocent even though I think it was a lab leak... of course they would not want an investigation for the same reasons I don't want anyone investigating me for murder and rape.... because I've never done either of those things. "Notice ireland didn't care" I really didn't. But only because I really don't care about this. What is your point exactly? Do people think ireland leaked corona or some shit that I'm totally unaware of?
    1
  13563.  @cameronmoore4061  Regarding, "they asked for an investigation and got slapped with sanctions by china, and a cease in all diplomatic dialogue." Wait... this is your smoking gun? "you're clearly an idiot" I find this funny coming from you. Thanks for the laugh. "will do nothing but prove this to anyone reading "I really didn't. But only because I really don't care about this. " Imagine my shock" I honestly have no clue what point you are trying to make here and I'm fine with that.
    1
  13564.  @OmarApps1  That I'm aware of and that actually does make the case while Hayden is focused on the wrong things.
    1
  13565.  @OmarApps1  "an attempt to manufacture a vaccine against the AIDS virus in a Chinese laboratory" Which seems like nobel enough goals. But are the costs worth it?
    1
  13566.  @cameronmoore4061  "When china are involved people lie and grovel, people like you." I've said I think it was a lab leak. I said that if there is a smoking gun it will be covered up. But don't let that stop you from saying stupid like this. Whatever. I've wasted far too much time addressing you already. I'm done with that.
    1
  13567. TYT are not progressives.
    1
  13568. Set a record for the largest pyramid built out of sex toys and then I'd be impressed.
    1
  13569. TJ Are you intentionally trying to make it sound like he was teacher flirting with his students? Are you intentionally trying to mislead people? Are you part of the smear campaign against him? At best you are a useful idiot for them spreading lies. Do the right thing and delete your comment.
    1
  13570.  @harrisonschneider8333  I think it's better they not even try.
    1
  13571. Let's say I agreed with this: Why does a republican have a lot more power and pull inside the "democratic" party than AOC?
    1
  13572.  @BRCBrick  Regarding, "he served in the House for almost 20 years," So his FORMER service is more important that AOC's CURRENT service in government? Regarding, "rubbed a lot of elbows with the higher ups" It funny that you are defending this clown and corrupt party but what you are actually saying is more of an indictment of them really. "Rubbed elbows" is just polishing a turd known as insider horsetrading. Regarding, "is much better connected with major figures than" But why is the guy who doesn't hold political office and holds ZERO tangible power "more connected." Shouldn't the powers that be care more about AOCs actual power? Since she is the only one of the two who has any? Or at least should? Regarding, "It's a numbers game" It's a corruption game. Try not to lie to yourself about it. Regarding, "who you know" People don't know who AOC is? Do you always say exclusively ridiculous shit?
    1
  13573.  @Scroteydada  I can't take you seriously enough to respond to you intelligently further. Good luck being the idiot that you are.
    1
  13574.  @Scroteydada  Stay stupid. I'm sorry I can't fix it for you. And if I'm mad it's only that it's only because it's frustrating having to share the earth with people like you who make me feel like I'm living in the movie idiocracy, except my president is dumber.
    1
  13575.  @Scroteydada  You think and say what you do because you are an idiot. People like you inspired dunning and kruger to come up with their original hypothesis. You are hopelessly stupid and unfortunately you are trying to make the world around you as dumb as you are.
    1
  13576.  @Scroteydada  I hope you are just trolling me at this point.
    1
  13577. It should be called the department of offense.
    1
  13578.  @kylezheng8807  Regarding, "did you even watch the video." Yes. Regarding, "I literally said it is "potentially" fraud," Where were you when it this type of stuff has been going on the past? And it has been going on lots and lots and lots in the past. But in the past it was only the super rich doing this so noone was calling it "potentially fraud." Regarding, "here a lawyer to prove it." I don't care. Again... where was your lawyer saying this about this type of behavior in the past? Regarding, "I am not saying these people are evil or bad," You are just saying that they are pretty much committing fraud. Regarding, "He says that the case could go either way, since the term market manipulation is a little loose." I don't care. These people are fucking heroes and the people they are making the money off of are monsters. Stop deflecting from that.
    1
  13579.  @kaijessen3654  "This is the best of all possible worlds" This is stupid even by internet comment section standards.
    1
  13580.  @kaijessen3654  "Commenting on Voltaire is stupid or having read Voltaire is stupid?" You can tell what I'm referring to because it's in the quotation marks. This is clearly not the best of all possible worlds and to suggest it might be is asinine. "I’m going to guess that you don’t read much more than bumper stickers." Idiots love making assumptions. And when I do read a bumper sticker I even call it out when it says something stupid.
    1
  13581.  @kaijessen3654  The quality of the things you have said has progressed to that of a kindergartner. Bravo.
    1
  13582. He's still the guy who didn't mention his relationship with TYT even while covering for their blackmail. He has no principles. He's a fraud.
    1
  13583. He didn't try to discredit her at all. He merely pointed out factual reasons why Sanders is the better candidate.
    1
  13584. Too late. He's a fraud. Accept it.
    1
  13585. I love Bernie but he's not even a socialist much less an "extreme socialist." He advocated for socialism in certain areas but is still very very capitalist in others. And that's fine, Bernie is the man. But ultimately he isn't an "extreme socialist," whatever that is.
    1
  13586.  @despoticmusic  No man it's not a scam... I gave them a nickel and now I'm a billionaire! They even gave me a happy ending.
    1
  13587. Spot on Tara. You beat me to it by a few seconds.
    1
  13588. Make sure you are all subscribed to revolutionary blackout and sabby sabs if you are not already.
    1
  13589. You, and everyone should stop giving a shit what the oscars have to say.
    1
  13590.  @joelramsay5072  "No one will hire him now." Someone will even if he won't be able to get the roles he used to.
    1
  13591.  @joelramsay5072  "No one will hire him now." He was applauded like 15 minutes after committing assault.
    1
  13592. You'd think it was something bad but all things considered it was probably the only good point he made because this is all crap.
    1
  13593. If it wasn't here I sure as fuck didn't see it because I refuse to watch corporate media propaganda.
    1
  13594.  @AB-zl4nh  "Even what Jimmy Dore claims he did was work place bullying and inappropriate." You are a liar. Jimmy admitted to a joke for which he apologized for 7 years ago and it was accepted. You should be embarrassed for lying like this. "If I did that at work I would rightfully be called in for a meeting with the manager." Sounds accurate about a person exposing themself at work... that wasn't jimmy with repulsive behavior. That was ana.
    1
  13595. Do you think the government would give me billions of dollars for my guillotine company?
    1
  13596. Holy shit are you stupid. Good luck with that.
    1
  13597.  @phanders6236  "it is wrong to behave like a creep" I agree. Ana and her creepy behavior of exposing herself at work and of attempting blackmail is very wrong and it's good that people are shining a light on her immoral terrible behavior.
    1
  13598.  @lurice0  "it was wrong for jimmy to cite a specific incident." No. It wasn't. He was being blackmailed and was trying to get out ahead of it.
    1
  13599.  @lurice0  BTW regarding, "SHE NEVER MENTIONED THE SHORT SKIRT STORY" Yes. She did. She mentioned the apology note. The apology note was for the short skirt story. Just typing things in all caps doesn't make your BS better than it is.
    1
  13600. The 'democratic" party is not the "left."
    1
  13601.  @jd0monty  Whataboutism 101.
    1
  13602.  @SamJohn52  Is that the only thing you are capable of saying?
    1
  13603. It's not "killing itself." It's doing the opposite. It's more infectious and less deadly.
    1
  13604. If Warren runs it will be to intentionally try and siphon progressive votes from Sanders. If she runs I will think even less of her than I do now and that is really saying something.
    1
  13605. Regarding, "I have no doubt that she is running in 2020." I'm not nearly as sure. I hope you are wrong. If she does run she can go fuck herself. Like I said if she does it will be at the establishment's behest to try and fuck Sanders. Regarding, "As well as Kamala Harris, and possibly Joe Biden." Again I'm not so sure. I hope you are correct about this. I want as many establishment fucks in there to split the vote. That said it is my personal belief that they will clear the field for a specific candidate the same why they did for Hillary in 2016 and we will know for sure who the establishment shill is when the superdelegates tell the peasants who to get in line and follow before a single vote is cast. Regarding, "But if the election comes down to Trump vs Biden or Warren please vote Donkey." No promises. I want a leader and true progressive (as I see it). I think Warren is neither of those things. Regarding, "That orange ass hat is ruining your country" Trump isn't the problem. He is a symptom of the problem. This country has been going down the shitter for a quite a long time before he got in office.
    1
  13606. Sam seder is distracting you from the people who are actually in power. Sam is controlled opposition.
    1
  13607.  @admiralhorde4809  Regarding, "A “got you question” would result in a negative light being shown onto the person in question." The goal of a "gotcha question is to try and make the person being asked the question look bad. Just because they failed in their goal doesn't mean it's not a gotcha question. Regarding, "That question was..." That question was the exact same type of question they would NEVER ask of Joe Biden because if they were asking joe biden questions they wouldn't be out to "get him." And that question is out there. Joe biden literally just got done trashing civil rights leaders. But there is a reason why biden won't be asked about it in the same way nina turner is asked about the same behavior because the corporate media is only out to get one of the two. Nobody in corporate media is asking joe how he expects civil rights leaders to work with him because they aren't out to get him. They will puff him up.
    1
  13608.  @admiralhorde4809  Regarding, "Your arguing my point and please stop" I'm definitely not but I'll happily stop because addressing you is not a good use of my time.
    1
  13609.  Whiskey Drinker  Regarding, "He's right on economics though." I'm not as convinced of this as you are. That said I find his viewpoint different and interesting. Regarding, "Obama" I voted for Obama. But after watching him govern I asked myself how I could have been so duped. For example how could a guy who voted against the Iraq war become such a warmonger while president? The answer was money as it often is in life. He was corrupted by money. Since then I make sure to follow any candidates money trail far more closely and I'm not likely to vote for any candidate I think is selling out. Even Warren says she will sell out if she gets to the general so ultimately I'm not interested in supporting her.
    1
  13610. "another corporatist?" In other words you are admitting that AOC IS a corporatist. Thanks. Not that it really needs be said. And you are one of the people "defending" her.
    1
  13611. You are why trump loves the uneducated.
    1
  13612.  @tylernelson1993  I know he has so if there is a video with him lying about it I'd love to see it. Do you have a citation?
    1
  13613. Everything can kill you when you overdo it.... even dildos.
    1
  13614. Nobody cares about hair.
    1
  13615. Cool straw man argument. Nobody is really arguing against religious freedom. You can keep your cult but you should be paying taxes on it.
    1
  13616. It's worse than that.
    1
  13617. Chris regarding, "his initial vote was against the war but every vote there after he voted yes to fund the war you cannot vote against the war but then vote for funding the war it's hypocritical" You are a fucking moron who doesn't understand what the word hypocritical means. The fact of the matter is that his votes make absolute sense. There is the vote to go to war. He votes against. Not only does he vote against but he gives an impassioned speech in front of congress as to why he is voting no. Time proves all his logic is fucking perfect but he is on the losing side of that vote and we are going to war. Period. No votes after that are going to stop it and change that simple fact. Bernie Sanders, because he is not stupid like you, accepts that sad fact of reality and acts accordingly afterward. He is given the choice of funding the troops properly as they go to war or voting to not fund them as they are going to war. Keep in mind that EITHER FUCKING WAY THEY ARE GOING TO WAR. So he votes to fund them because, seeing as how they were going to war, he wanted them to have what they needed while at war. That makes perfect sense to someone who isn't dumb beyond words or working real hard to smear someone. Regarding, "like I said you didn't do the research" Like I said you are a complete fucking dipshit. I'm not sure if you aren't aware of the logic or are just too stupid to understand it but either way you are a joke. That said his record is not perfect in my mind. There have been things I've disagreed with him on. But I don't expect perfection because I'm not a fucking moron. The only person I agree with absolutely on everything is myself and I'm not even sure if that is true. But good luck with your continued efforts to smear Sanders. The establishment fucking loves you for it and appreciates you doing their work for them. You are either already working for them or you are a useful idiot for them. Either way you suck at life and can lick my taint.
    1
  13618. What a compelling argument you make Chris. I guess that's all you have after I've pointed out why literally everything you have said is dumb as fuck. But the establishment loves you because you are a fuckface and stupid. Good luck with that going forward.
    1
  13619. Planet regarding, "That old bag should be hung for treason." I don't believe in the death penalty. I'd be happy if she spent the rest of her life in prison thou. Regarding, "Hillary / dnc cheated the entire primary." There is literally nothing she wouldn't have done to win. And the DNC would have rather lost to Trump than lose to Bernie. (and if you agree with that you must realize that that is because they know Bernie is a threat to them) Regarding, "To support someone who cheated us of our democracy is too much." and "How could bern support everything he stands against?" and "How could he support the person that cheated us?" If you want to disagree with actions I can understand that and respect that. What I can't respect is a misguided notion that he did what he did as a "sell-out." When entering the primary he agreed that he would endorse the winner at the end. Sanders is the type of person who will go out of his way to do what he promises he will. That said you can say the DNC broke their agreement with him so he would have been justified in breaking his agreement with them and I would wholeheartedly agree. He didn't. And even if I very much question his decision I don't have that much trouble understanding it. Would you want to be blamed for President Trump? I sure as fuck wouldn't. He is all the corruption and terrible of Hillary but with the added bonus of in your face racism. He, pretty much everyone in the country, played the game of who do you prefer? A douche or a turd sandwhich. He picked the douche and didn't want to be blamed for the turd sandwhich. I fucking hated it at the time but I get it. And forget for a moment what that decision made meant to the presidential election but consider what it meant for Sanders ability to affect policy going forward. Remember that he and I fucking love policy. That is really what it is all about. He doesn't do it for himself. He doesn't do it to be loved. He does it because he wants to make people lives better. And even if you might disagree with his decision the bottom line is that he made an impossible decision because sucking up his pride and doing something I don't think I would have been able to do because that decision was the difference in him being able to effectively push for medicare for all, and increasing the minimum wage, and all the other policies he cares about. Because he did what he did he is currently the most popular politician in the country and that gives him the ability to fight more effectively for the things we care about. Do you think that would be the case if he didn't do what he did? If he were effectively blamed for Trump being president? And Hillary and company still tried and are trying to blame him but, because he didn't give them ammunition to do so, even hillbots have an impossible time defending the fallen queen when she tried to blame Bernie. Regarding, "I can't be ok with a system that gives us trump/hillary." Don't think that I am. That is a fucking joke. Regarding, "He had the momentum to run 3rd party and do well." You want to question his decision to not do so that is fine. I get that and respect that. Have you seen the movie "half baked?" I wanted him to go to the convention and get up on stage and say, "fuck you, fuck you, fuck you, you're cool, fuck you, I'm out and running with the green party." He didn't and we will never know for sure how he would have done in a 3 way race. He certainly would have been fighting an uphill battle although I think he may have been able to win. That said this would have been a yuuugge risk... Getting the most electoral college votes wouldn't have been enough, it would have taken a majority of electoral college votes to win. If he doesn't win Trump definitely wins. If Trump definitely wins Bernie is definitely blamed and, unlike now, they would have been successful at blaming him. Not only would his career had been essentially over at that point but the movement he started would have suffered a DEVASTATING blow. And even if he wins he likely is able achieve almost nothing in terms of legislation. Both major parties would oppose and obstruct everything he would have tried to do and they would work to just run the clock out til he is gone and then try to go back to business as usual after he is out. Regarding, "Supporting lesser of two evils gets us what we got today. That's y we r here. Supporting lesser of two evils is supporting evil. I refuse to support evil." I agree with all this. I happily voted for Jill Stein and will look again to the green party if the dems succeed in forcing through a corporate shill in 2020. But Bernie in 2020 gives us the best chance we have at actually getting a progressive in the WH. Not only that but winning as a dem, and not as green or 3rd party would be so much better. The nominee of the party has crazy power to reform the party, shape the party, and pick the people in it. Part of the reason the dems currently suck as much as they do and will continue to do so until 2020 is because Hillary "won" the nomination. That is why there was Perez. Then Perez got to pick the pick under him who picked the people under them and so on. But corporate dems could be purged just the same way progressives were recently purged from the party. Sanders is the best hope for what we want. In 2016 he was down 50 points to Hillary when he started and only lost because he was cheated. In 2020 he will be the most popular politician in the country with the name recognition of a rock star. The establishment knows this. They fear him. You can tell by watching all their actions. If he was on their side they wouldn't be working 24/7 to try to discredit and smear him with every dirty tactic they have. I literally wonder and wouldn't be surprised if Chris were just shill paid to smear Sanders. Maybe not. Maybe he is just a useful idiot. But if he isn't that is a tactic they will use against him because they will do anything and everything to stop him. For the sake of the country lets hope they don't succeed. Peace.
    1
  13620. Planet regarding, "a lot of ur arguments are self contradictory." That is pretty vague. If you are going to say that I'd prefer it if you elaborated with more than just that. Regarding, "Some what "restarted" to boot." I have no idea what you are saying here. Could you elaborate or rephrase?
    1
  13621. Planet regarding, "give u specifics" Ok. That's your call but in my opinion that is pretty lazy and weak. I mean, don't get me wrong, I think there is a time and place for insults and no need to justify them (my original comment in this thread was exactly that), but I think doing so is almost never justified. Regarding, "The only reason I said ur arguments were retarded..." Specifically in my original response to you I think I was not very rude at all. There were no personal attacks at all. The closest that can be said was that I attack an argument of yours and told you exactly why I thought what I did. Regarding, "I normally avoid personal attacks." You do realize where I got most pissed at you right? "Sounds like ur the hillary fan to me." That is pretty much a personal attack to me. I fucking hate Hillary and did not appreciate you saying that in the least. Not only do I find it insulting but I think that you saying it was not, at all, justified. I had been talking exclusively about Sanders except for one comment about Hillary where I actually insult her. Me saying, "If you wanted a candidate who would do anything and everything to win then I'm sure you loved Hillary and company," was clearly done in a disparaging manner and then you were calling me a Hillary fan. How do you like it when people call you a Hillary fan? Because I am not a fan of that. Regarding, "I normally avoid personal attacks, stick with issues." Telling me I'm making bad arguments but not bothering to say why seems to contradict this. Regarding, "death penalty" I'm not looking to debate the death penalty here but the fact of the matter is that I'm opposed to it from a principled position that I think killing people is wrong when there is another option. I make no exceptions to this belief even for the people I think deserve it the most. Regarding, "this entire debate seems like a waist of both our time" If you don't want to talk that is fine. I am genuinely interested why you would say "a lot of ur arguments are self contradictory" if you feel like elaborating because I am genuinely interested in what you have to say unlike Chris. But if you don't you don't. Regarding, "Bern did things that I question." Of course. Me too. That is only natural. The guy has been in government for a long, long time so it only makes sense that there have been decisions that he has made that someone is going to question but you need to look at the big picture in my opinion. Even if there have been areas I disagree with him ultimately I think questioning whether or not he is actually progressive or whether he is fighting against corporate democrats or for them is quite obvious. I expect the establishment is going to try and use this area specifically to thwart him. I worry many will fall for the tactic because the public is right to be skeptical of everyone that is a politician. Regarding, "if he makes it through the primary he'll have my vote." I hope he has your vote before that. I believe that, by far, the most important election in 2020 isn't going to be the general election but rather the "democratic" primary. Regarding, "If u don't find any of berns actions questionable that's up to u." I'm pretty sure I've given examples of decisions I question of his. I also think it is logical that progressives can agree on goals they want to achieve and have different ideas about the best way to get those things but ultimately we are still on the same team. Regarding, "Maybe at this point we could at least agree to disagree." Again if you are going to respond to anything I would ask it would be why made that one statement but even if you don't I wish you well. If you were insulted by anything I said I apologize. I can be a straight super dick at times (see comments to chris for examples) but that really wasn't my intent with you at all other than me getting pissed about being called a hillary supporter.
    1
  13622. I wasn't exactly saying that you did like Hillary but rather saying that the characteristic that you wanted so much out of Bernie was exactly what you would expect out of Hillary. I was hoping that would demonstrate why I liked a characteristic that was the exact oppose of her. I guess ultimately, even if we agreed on nothing else we can both agree that we do not like being accused of liking her. I fucking hate that Trump is president but I do like that she will never be president. Take care. Peace.
    1
  13623. So your "defense" of his actions is that it was "puffery" aka the rosiest way you can think of to describe lying? Are you fucking serious?
    1
  13624. "Taiwan sovereignty" They have as much "sovereignty" as your state has... they don't have any.
    1
  13625. Sam really proves it.
    1
  13626.  @f_youtubecensorshipf_nazis  Why? I already know it's true. That's why I try to waste as little time on you as possible. But I will have some fun with you.
    1
  13627. "understand the constitution before you share sophomoric notions." You have what's known as dunning-kruger.
    1
  13628. Nope... I see it too.
    1
  13629.  @something709  You can do better things with your time than polishing POS.
    1
  13630.  @warsamemohamed7244  Regarding, "coronabullshit which isn’t real at all" I have family who literally have it this very moment. Either they are in on the "coronabullshit" or you are far too stupid to take seriously.
    1
  13631.  Louis Ward  I'm pretty sure the existence of Trump proves there isn't a god. Or at least not an all-knowing benevolent god. If god does exist they would suck and trump's existence would be the evidence.
    1
  13632.  @warsamemohamed7244  Please just shut up. You are making everyone dumber.
    1
  13633.  Big Time  Regarding, "You are so dumb." Try to realize that you think and say the things you do because you are not smart. Regarding, "the candidate that is "Better" should get your vote." Do you not know there is more than giant douche and turd sandwich on the ballot? Regarding, "Your not supposed to vote for the worst person out of the 2. Are you kidding me??" Are you kidding me? Do you really think I'm a trump supporter? I'm clearly not. I don't support terrible people. That's what you do. Regarding, "You are exactly the reason why America is in the shape we are in." Actually we are in the shape we are because people like you have no standards for getting their vote and they cast their ballots for corrupt terrible candidates like biden and trump. Regarding, "I can't believe how ridiculous you Trump people are." I'm not a "trump people" dipshit. I don't support evil. That's what you do.
    1
  13634. @Notorious D.R.B. May as well tattoo dipshit on your forehead. Everyone's going to figure it out anyway.
    1
  13635. Kyle can get fucked. His support was tepid at best and it doesn't make up for his other BS.
    1
  13636. I can't find it funny because of all the real world implications.
    1
  13637. Sadly it's not only believable but predictable at this point.
    1
  13638. He calls himself a democratic socialist. I stopped reading after getting the first thing you wrote wrong.
    1
  13639. I guess to an idiot wanting people to not lie is the same as not wanting to learn new things.
    1
  13640. Well said. It really is as simple as that.
    1
  13641. Interesting take.
    1
  13642. Chris rock has gained the respect that I lost for will smith... and it was a lot.
    1
  13643. Even dorks can be evil.
    1
  13644. Sam and his crew are controlled opposition and they are leading you to slaughter. They would tell you to vote for donald trump if he represented their cult and say it's for "harm reduction" or because he's "less evil."
    1
  13645.  @scruffopone3989  Ad hominem and nothing else, how predictable from sam's sycophants. Were you always intellectually dishonest like this or did you learn the behavior from sam?
    1
  13646. Is Kyle a fraud? Yes. He is.
    1
  13647. It's hard to be shocked that corporate media sucks. I could only be shocked when they aren't terrible.
    1
  13648. Science uses evidence. Religions use faith.
    1
  13649. They don't. That's why they would prefer AOC speak and not Kasich.
    1
  13650.  @martenkrueger8647  "progressive attitudes...that teach skin color is a free pass!" I'm a progressive and I'm the one calling it out so it's not exactly a "progressive attitude."
    1
  13651. Brave AOC, to completely betray all your stated beliefs and sell them out to support me took amazing courage. I don't know how you did it. Thank goodness you were here for me and turned your back on the people who supported you and got you were you are. Sincerely, Nancy Pelosi.
    1
  13652. You need to check your math.
    1
  13653. That's not the "left" that does that. That's the elite.
    1
  13654.  @eristicfreethinker2098  " non elite folks on the left" Their are peasants on both sides who are useful idiots for the establishment goals. Like you, and your rhetoric that serves them and their interest to divide the peasants in the left and right camps to get them fighting each other instead of the people with actual power.
    1
  13655. I'm the left. I'm not your enemy. I'm not trying to redefine what vaccine means. I actually call out the people who do. Focus on the elite. They are your enemy.
    1
  13656. Because there are still some good people in the party... like justice democrats. Duh.
    1
  13657. Edit note... this comment of me was dumb. Feel free to ignore it as I misinterpreted the comment. Scoop regarding, "Nothing wrong with political parties." There is nothing innately wrong with political parties. Just stop it with this bullshit. They are essentially a "team." And so fucking what. If you think the team sucks then don't support them. Stop acting like them existing is the problem. It isn't and it is absurd to claim it is. Like I've already said money in politics is the problem. Even if you get your wish, as if it is even remotely possible, nothing of substance would change. We would just have politicians who don't have a team but are still being bought off. Regarding, "The problem is the two-party system" No. It isn't. Stop it with this retarded ass bullshit. There are lots of parties in this country other then the top two. And even if there were a million of them they would still suck balls if nothing else changes because they would all still be shills selling out. Stop blaming the wrong shit. Especially when your fantasies are as likely as monkeys flying out of my butt. Get money out of politics. That's the problem. And stop distracting from that with this stupid shit.
    1
  13658. Scoop regarding, "Dude, calm down." If the state of things doesn't piss you off then you don't get it. My emotion is a direct result of the state of things. Regarding, "I literally said that there is nothing inherently wrong with political parties, so I don't understand your objection." You are absolutely correct. I misunderstood your comment. I read it as being sarcastically for no good reason. That was my mistake. My apologies.
    1
  13659.  @reasonwarrior  "people don't wakeup and unite because they assume they know what everyone is about based on their group" They unite based on vested interest. It's not in the interest of the people if the elite own everything. "All black people aren't a certain way, all white republicans aren't either." Thanks. Have I said they are? Maybe address the things I actually say. "This is what marxist want you to think" So according to you all marxist are a certain way? You are wasting my time. "Do you have any idea how much turnover there is in those categories," Very little these days, especially compared to the past where people were more easily able to move between groups. And this isn't important to me. I don't care what class you are in. I care whose interests you represent.
    1
  13660.  @reasonwarrior  "peasants could become millionaires all the time" The founded a system where it was easy to become a millionaire as long as you exploited some slaves or someone else. Because that's what capitalism does.
    1
  13661.  @reasonwarrior  "I think it's much more meaningful to just categories people by good and evil" Good people don't become billionaires. "For every great fortune there is a great crime." -some smart guy stating the obvious
    1
  13662.  @reasonwarrior  "Appears useless to argue" It's not my fault everything you say is terrible for one reason or another. "a simplistic view of a complex problem." Just calling income inequality a "complex problem" doesn't make it true. In a complex world some things are "simple." For example if the exxon CEO loves the "inflation" bill that really is all you need to know about it... it's terrible. "Keep talking about those darn elites though, as if you know what that means." I'm confident I know what simple words mean even if you don't.
    1
  13663.  @Sunflower-ug3eh  I wish that were true but as malcomn X has said, "If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing," and some people are "not careful."
    1
  13664.  @squanchy7643  "Upward mobility is important." Sure. "Don’t hate people just because they’ve worked hard to make their lives better." I don't. I hate you if you side with the elite. You don't have side with the class you are in. You can choose to be class traitor. "Are we enemies because I made choices in life that ultimately lead to increased prosperity?" Nope. But we are enemies if you got to where you are by stepping on other people. Was your prosperity created by someone whose live isn't better? That's when we have a problem. "I think we all can agree that dark money and corporate backing of politicians is problematic." So are you using your new wealth to buy the system? Because if you are calling this out and trying to stop it we can always be friends on this topic if not anything else.
    1
  13665.  @squanchy7643  "I don’t think you should hate someone because you’re envious of them." I'm an "anti-capitalist" and you conflating that with "hating capitalists.
    1
  13666.  @squanchy7643  I don't care how much money you have. I care which team you are on.
    1
  13667.  @Woeisme2  "Your fellow republicans" I'm an not a republican and never have been. Which makes "Actually talk to each other before assuming," really funny in a you are an idiot kinda way.
    1
  13668.  @Woeisme2  "democrat bad" Also, democrats are bad, just like republicans. Clown.
    1
  13669. It would be interesting but sadly it isn't going to be happening anytime soon. The last hope for something like that was when Feingold and McCain tried to get money out of politics. Then citizens united happened and things have only gotten worse. The common ground you were talking about refers to the peasants. There is no coalition to be had among politicians on any of those issues. Both major parties overwhelmingly love money in politics, war, corporate welfare and eroding civil liberties.
    1
  13670. Yeah... vote for this culture warrior backed by MSNBC as he votes to give billions to another country.
    1
  13671. We don't? Cause I'm voting and it isn't going to be for a sexual predator.
    1
  13672. There is no god. Sincerely, reality.
    1
  13673.  @kevinmichaelbergman8276  Do you just capitalize words at random?
    1
  13674.  @iBasheveryone  "the literal interpretation could be a conspiracy theory" Are you living in some sort of alternate reality where conspiracies don't exist? "that might as well be nipped in the bud" I feel the same way about the BS you are spewing. You probably should have nipped that in bud before giving us nothing but nonsense.
    1
  13675.  @iBasheveryone  "I've no incentive to act so angrily over something on the internet. I've my own dignities." Have you looked at your name?
    1
  13676.  @iBasheveryone  "You misinterpret me." Then tell me how you aren't being a hypocrite? You are criticizing people for, "act so angrily over something on the internet." And "I've my own dignities." And your freaking name is "iBasheveryone."
    1
  13677.  @iBasheveryone  "I don't mean to criticise you." You clearly where being critical of someone while saying, "I've no incentive to act so angrily over something on the internet. I've my own dignities." Please don't pretend otherwise and please answer my simple direct question towards you. How isn't that action hypocritical of you considering your name is "iBasheveryone?"
    1
  13678. Is naming yourself "iBasheveryone" your idea of not acting angry over the internet? Is that your idea of having dignity? Or were you being a hypocrite?
    1
  13679.  @iBasheveryone  So no answer to my simple direct question?
    1
  13680.  @iBasheveryone  As it is predictable. Like your evasiveness.
    1
  13681. @Eran Riblo Yeah. Trump probably got Covid from a mask. /s
    1
  13682. Don't let me down covid. You got this.
    1
  13683. Thanks for the belly laugh dipshit.
    1
  13684. I think it's going to fail. But every step of the way we get to see who is for it and who is against it. I've loved AOC in the past but she is being exposed as a fraud as is ANYONE acting like this isn't a nobrainer if you want m4a in the long run.
    1
  13685.  @josephjohn907  Regarding, "AOC is still the same Progressive that I supported and still Support" I voted for someone I thought was going to fight for m4a. Not squander a gift that has been given her. Regarding, "I like representation more than anything." I want policy. "Representation" is only a means to get it. Regarding, "You Anti Progressive Democrats" You seem pretty willing to lump me into a large category based on little. Regarding, "foolish vote" Wait... m4a is a "foolish" vote? Yeah, you are tough to take seriously. Regarding, "Dummy Dore didn't Support Bernie during the Primary instead he supported Tulsi who didn't endorsed M4A in an interview with Dummy Dore." This has NOTHING to do with forcing the vote on m4a. But I suspect that is why you are bringing it up. To deflect and distract from the topic at hand.
    1
  13686.  @thesoundofmerk  I honestly hope you are paid for that crap and aren't actually as dense as you seem.
    1
  13687.  @thesoundofmerk  " what does it do then? does it force us to know who is for M4A? we already know lol" Meanwhile, in reality, I get to learn who is going to fight for m4a and who won't. Apparently AOC won't. That's what I'm learning this very second. As for the rest of your shit I don't take you seriously enough to want to address it intelligently.
    1
  13688.  @thesoundofmerk  One thing I would like to add before I go back to ignoring you... corporate media is able to portray m4a as "pie in the sky" "unattainable" "fantasy." That's a lot harder to do when it's on the table for a vote. And it's a lot harder for politicians to justify their position when that position is being voted on and not just talked about. I suspect you understand this but pretend not to.
    1
  13689.  @thesoundofmerk  Regarding, "you literally didn't make one point that makes sense" That's the dunning-kruger effect you are experiencing. "Stop acting like you are making points and adress the real question, WHAT WILL THIS ACTUALLY DO THAT IS GOOD?" I've already told you exactly what good I think it's doing this very fucking moment. You just ignoring my point isn't the same as me not making a point. Here copy and pasted, "I get to learn who is going to fight for m4a and who won't." This isn't rocket science. It might just seem that way to you because you are stupid.
    1
  13690.  @papaj3177  "she has no vote in congress." Your OP isn't talking about progressives who only have votes. It's only talking about "progressives" which BJG is. Regarding, "So my statement is still correct." Your statement was never correct so I can't be surprised that you continue to insist upon lying now.
    1
  13691.  @papaj3177  We are certainly on the same side. But I accept terrible arguments that are essentially lies from you as much as I accept it from biden and trump supporters. I don't.
    1
  13692.  @papaj3177  Ultimately the biggest mistake I think you are making is that you are lumping progressives and people pretending to be progressive into the same group and acting like they are the same.
    1
  13693. Stop caring so much about party labels for fucks sake or you are doing the exact same thing as democrats and republicans. Support good people. That is what is important. Not the letter after a person's name.
    1
  13694. I was interested to learn more about her. But after the debate I agree... she's there to try and sell books.
    1
  13695. Comments like yours make me want to vote for the orange clown. In other words you can pretty much GFY.
    1
  13696. Yes. More than once.
    1
  13697. Yes. They are the ones that have happy endings.
    1
  13698.  @BCNeil  It wasn't weird, it's just hypocritical AF and wrong all things considered.
    1
  13699.  @alexanderdonald9167  Patricia lawson stole from me, kicked my dog, and cheated on me, with you. Both of you are frauds and both of you should be ashamed of yourselves.
    1
  13700.  Mapack Mark  They have an only fans account but I wouldn't recommend it.
    1
  13701.  @technosaurus3805  Regarding, "I will assume you are just choosing to be ignorant." If that's what you want to think I don't care at this point. I'll just assume you are paid to spout nonsense, make everyone dumber, and spread disinformation but not worth addressing intelligently further. Goodbye.
    1
  13702.  @technosaurus3805  "minimum wage laws were designed... to force minorities into public housing" Your stupidity is remarkable.
    1
  13703. To think harris lost despite having the darth cheney vote. Go figure.
    1
  13704. Obvious smears like yours only makes me know I'm on the right side as is scott.
    1
  13705.  @GearHedd  "The truth hurts huh?" Does the fact that you are a smear merchant hurt? I hope so but I doubt it.
    1
  13706.  @GearHedd  "telling the truth about child predators become known as a smear merchant?" Meanwhile, in reality, the CIA like you protects actual child predators but frames innocent people not towing western propaganda. I hope your smears are worth it.
    1
  13707.  @GearHedd  "Ukraine" You pretend to care about ukraine. Is that how your rationalize your lies?
    1
  13708.  @GearHedd  "Thanks for the free laughs." Same. I almost pity you.
    1
  13709. Bernie has been saying and doing the same thing for decades. Maybe help him going forward.
    1
  13710. He already can't finish a thought.
    1
  13711. The party is not suppose to be crowning candidates before primary elections and putting their thumb on the scales to influence elections in that way. Even the piece of shit DNC seems to understand this concept according to their own fucking charter. From article 5 section 4 of their own charter, "In the conduct and management of the affairs and procedures of the Democratic National Committee, particularly as they apply to the preparation and conduct of the presidential nominating process, the Chairperson shall exercise impartiality and evenhandedness as between the Presidential candidates and campaigns. The Chairperson shall be responsible for ensuring that the national officers and staff of the Democratic National Committee maintain impartiality and evenhandedness during the Democratic Party Presidential nominating process." Um, yeah DNC. That is how it is suppose to be done. Obviously you are suppose to be impartial and evenhanded but thanks for saying it. But what would be even better than you saying it is you living it. And it is obviously controversial when you are rigging the game as opposed to doing the right thing and letting the people decide.
    1
  13712. Regarding, "Is it wrong to make sure the health responders get the equipment first?" By lying to the public and destroying what little faith the public has left in it's public institutions? Obviously. If you are lying to the public because you think the public is listening to what you have to say and are going to do what you say why wouldn't you just be straight with them? Tell them to make their own masks and wear them for their safety and not go and buy the masks available... to save them for the medical professionals instead... they would listen. And even if they weren't going to listen maybe, just maybe use the power of the government to make sure health responders get them first. All of that makes far more sense than lying to the public and giving everyone a perfectly good reason to ignore scientists the next time they try to say something. I mean why the fuck should I listen to ANYTHING that POS says? I'm reminded of quotes by maya angelou and of course... GWB. "There's an old saying in Tennessee — I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee — that says, fool me once, shame on — shame on you. Fool me — you can't get fooled again." Even a moron like GWB gets it.
    1
  13713.  @MarionetteMuse  One thing to add... it's easy to talk the talk. Actions speak louder than meaningless words.
    1
  13714.  @FacelessProphet1  cucks for kyle unite
    1
  13715. Trump is a pathological liar but he gets one thing right... "CNN SUCKS!"
    1
  13716. So you care about a party label more than anything else? Way to go. You share that retarded "logic" with dem and republican faithful. I'd also like to note that trying to redefine sellout to mean does something I disagree with is fucking moronic and tired.
    1
  13717. If I didn't make sense to you it is only because you are a fucking moron.
    1
  13718. The guy who can't comprehend the English language thinks I need to get educated. Too fucking funny.
    1
  13719. I'd rather have Kanye be president before either Trump or Biden... but no.
    1
  13720. Go take some English classes instead.
    1
  13721. I never liked Donna. She is misguided on politics and seems like a dishonest, immoral, slime ball of a person who would sell out the country to make a buck. I respect truth regardless of the messenger but I am not going to forgive her lack of character for an atypical moment of good judgement that is only being done to sell books and enrich herself.
    1
  13722. Donna Brazile not being honest even after being caught red-handed. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q-JChl8w6oQ
    1
  13723. It's about trump far more than it is about his supporter. Even if it were about his supporter... who supports someone matters.
    1
  13724.  @christaylor3485  You two sound like you should make out.
    1
  13725. Nina is on the right side of the issue. Maybe don't be insulting your few allies.
    1
  13726.  @synchronium24  I want to think part of why neera was dumped was because sanders wasn't going to vote for her. That said we will likely never know for certain what exactly was going on behind closed doors.
    1
  13727. Projection is standard operation procedure.
    1
  13728. But there is peace now. I hope that was sarcasm.
    1
  13729. I seriously am not sure what you are trying to say. Could you reword and rephrase?
    1
  13730. Regarding, "The Korean interest is different. They want unity of their country." Is that suppose to be a NK view SK view or both? I'm not going to pretend to be an expert in their thinking but I tend to believe that NK (as in Kim Jong Un) cares most about maintaining power, increasing his standing in the world, and developing weapons for defense. But that isn't really the point. The point with me is that, as a peace loving hippie who wants peace and fears this meeting being used to start war what do you think is the best way to achieve maintained peace and thwarting the MIC? I normally advocate for diplomacy but the fact of the matter is that I don't trust the idea of those 2 meeting.
    1
  13731. Regarding, "Look at your representatives..." I very much agree with everything you write here but that isn't exactly the question I was looking to have answered. I was asking how to stop the MIC from getting what they want specific to NK and with the current representatives. I do not want to full scale war with them. Normally I would think that diplomacy here would be wise but the fact of the matter is that I do not trust Trump and Kim meeting. I fear those 2 meeting, should it happen, being an event that leads to war and not peace. To me, although the current situation is far from perfect, the risk of them making things worse is very real. I agree with Dore about most things but I think his dismissal of that possibility to be rather silly in this video. It seemed to me your original comment echoed a similar sentiment. I desperately want peace. I'm just not convinced those 2 meeting is a good means to that end.
    1
  13732. Sure. If neither want sex. It works best when they are both gay.
    1
  13733. Daniel regarding, "pro Israel" Most American's don't care about anything that is going on outside of their country nearly as much as they care about what is going on inside it. I follow lots of politics and still I am more like them in this regard to a certain degree. Don't get me wrong I do care about what is going on outside the country but I don't analyze it like some and care about being "pro Israel" like you think is really important. I want peace. Period. That's what I care about when it comes to foreign policy and the rest is just details. Regarding, "in the Obama days" Lots of people were obviously duped by Obama. He was great at talking the talk. But, like I pointed out, my love of Bill was more about before that... I'm talking about him in the immediate wake of 9-11. He said things that couldn't be heard anywhere else and needed to be said. I appreciated that he was saying it. Regarding, "who scapegoated religion as the cause of the world's problems" There's lots of blame to go around and some of that blame can clearly be placed on the doorstep of religion. Do you think it is a coincidence that among all the wars the US is currently fighting none of them are with a "christian nation?" Because it isn't. Regarding, "didn't say a single thing about money" It took me two seconds to prove this statement is false. There is a case to made that he should have done more but that doesn't excuse you outright lying about something that is easily debunked. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mvqv9j0rfb0 Regarding, "an ultra capitalist" This made me giggle. Regarding, "who gave Obama a million dollars" If I were rich as fuck I would given Jill Stein a million dollars in 2016. Does that mean I'm an "ultra capitalist?" I think you are conflating things.
    1
  13734. Daniel regarding, "But when I said single thing about money, I mean that obviously money, greed and power are incentives for war." You mean something like this...? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h1O5vJRSGHY What the fuck man. I'm here to piss on Maher and you have me defending him. The thing is is that no matter how much I want to piss on him I'm not about to lie to do it. Regarding, "Those things (one in the same) that exist regardless of religion" Maybe they "exist regardless of religion" but if you think religion isn't interested in money, greed, and power then you aren't paying attention and those that seek money, greed, and power use religion to achieve those goals. Regarding, "I would disagree on the motive being religious." I never said the "motive" is religion. It isn't. But those wars are JUSTIFIED largely through religion. It isn't the only bullshit they use of course. There is also WMD bullshit and others but religion is one of the ways they are able to justify the unjustifiable. That was what I was saying and it is absolutely true. If that oil was in white Christian nations this shit would never be happening. PERIOD. Please don't even try to claim otherwise. Regarding, "It's also important to note that the U.S. does sanctions that are not muslim and are predominantly christian" No. Its really not important. This is not a conversation about countries we sanction. This is about countries we drop bombs in. That is too big of a distinction to make this point "important." Again to be clear I'm not saying the powers that be care first and foremost about religion. You are correct that it is about money. But the powers that be use religion to get what they want. It is a way they are able to divide people. To make them less important and less than themselves so that when they lose their lives it isn't such a big deal.
    1
  13735. Regarding, "Clearly you're the Maher buff" That's just it, I'm not. I used to watch him all the time back in the day when I had HBO but that is YEARS ago. That didn't stop me from being about to fact check your statement and prove it wrong in less than 2 minutes. Regarding, "I don't remember Bush saying..." He doesn't need to say it. I'm talking about people who don't question their god committing mass genocide by wiping out the population of the Earth in a flood. I'm talking about people that think its fine that their god burn all the people that don't believe in their god in hellfire for all eternity. These are people that have been trained to think irrationally and they don't require good reasons to kill those people because they are not like them. A few thousand people dying on 9-11 are super important. A hundred thousand people dying elsewhere not as much. Why? In large part because of religion. They don't identify with them so they don't need to be "sold." They just accept it. That is how I mean that it is justified to them. I'm talking about the state of mind of Americans, not about the rhetoric of politicians. But your misinterpretation of my thoughts was fair before I hopefully just clarified my meaning. Regarding, "I think there are other factors besides..." I am very careful to parse my words. I never say that religion is the only reason this shit happens but rather that it is a huge factor. So huge that at the end of the day it is make or break. It is very often the difference between war and peace. Regarding, "I think you're purposely misreading my arguments." Do you? I'm not. I think I just disagree with your ideas that Maher hasn't changed and that religion isn't a huge factor when it comes to war. Regarding, "I'm just saying that they started the Iraq war because..." That is not the only thing you are saying. If that was the only thing you were saying I wouldn't be disagreeing with you about anything. I agree with this. My point is that if Iraq were a christian nation then regardless of all this, war never happens. As you point out Canada has lots of oil. Do you think America could go to war with them to get it in the same way? Because they can't and this is, in large part but obviously not exclusively because of religion. Regarding, "I just pointed out that Maher scapegoats religion as problem #1, I just simply disagree with that type of rhetoric." I don't remember him making a list and putting religion number one. Rather I do remember him talking about how religion fucking sucks and how it is detrimental to the world. I agree with all this. That doesn't mean that I don't think money isn't the driving force for the military industrial complex because it is. Those ideas can coexist and are not exclusive. I rail against religion all the time. Hopefully you don't interpret that to mean that I'm also "scapegoating them" and not saying that there are other factors going on in an obviously complex world because I'm not. Save that term for places where it is deserved. For example Hillary Clinton and Bill Maher (I'm pretty sure but don't quote me on him exactly as again I don't really watch him anymore) scapegoats Bernie Sanders, and Russia, and sexism for her loss.
    1
  13736. Don't get me wrong twitter is still a dumpster fire but to act like it was all good before elon is unforgivable. You should be calling out the censorship and instead you are covering for it. Shame!
    1
  13737. Whoever made the second reply it's being shadowbanned because of course it is in the "lAnD oF tHe FrEe."
    1
  13738.  @jae52247  but it does show in my notifications... "the Trump Administration did that?" Of course it wasn't them. Of course it would have been done by the deep state which is just a name for UNELECTED bureaucrats working in government. To act like it was trump and his team specific is asinine.
    1
  13739.  @jae52247  "There was no government involved in that issue." The twitter files which thunderfoot never covers makes it clear that they ABSOLUTELY were working WITH government to make these decisions. Its called fascism.
    1
  13740.  @jae52247  "he Elon Twitter is doing that and more to block any flight tracking" I'm not here to defend elon but no doubt you want to deflect and try to make it about him. I have zero love for him and what I'm talking about isn't about him.... it's about what was happening before him. And as much as I only have contempt for him I am happy he has had the information released that was.
    1
  13741.  @jae52247  "I think you are delusional and live in your own fantasy world where you just choose to believe things that fit your world view." This is funny all things considered. I've brought up only facts.
    1
  13742. Do me a favor and give me a call in 20 minutes... I'm going to be on Rave Dubin and need a way to do as little talking to him as possible.
    1
  13743. Do you have a citation for that Ghostly?
    1
  13744. @Bernard I'm not sure. It's only a work in progress and has been for like 20 years so it should be done sometime soon.
    1
  13745.  @jesterprivilege  And let's not forget the episode of south park where butters got a ninja star in the eye.
    1
  13746.  @xXRockXLobsterXx If you don't demand to get more than to just be shot in the toe that's all you will ever be offered. At some point you need to vote your values. Voting for evil is voting for evil and you shouldn't be voting for evil.
    1
  13747.  @DigitalLibrarian  Regarding, "He is very competent" He's a moron. Regarding, "He is very competent ... at keeping everybody's attention while the rich run out the back door with everybody's money." I feel like you are talking about corporate media here far more than Trump. A corporate media that deflects and distracts from the stories that should be important to report on the political thoughts of ja rule and meghan mccain.
    1
  13748.  @queenrayne1338  Regarding, "But don't underestimate the damage that is already done." I don't. But what's done is done. The country is fucked. The next four years are destined to suck. We are looking at a depression no matter who is our next president. So who do we want blamed for it? Trump or Biden? Because if joe "nothing will fundamentally change in a world that desperately needs change" Biden is our next president we are very likely going to get something worse than trump next time around. I'm not saying this to advocate voting for trump. I'm saying it so that people who might support biden are given pause. Neither Biden nor Trump are worthy of support. People should vote for good.
    1
  13749.  Don P  Regarding, "If you think Biden would be worse than Trump you're either a right winger, or a complete moron, or both." I just made a case why trump is arguably better for the country. I'm not a right winger. I just think that if Biden is elected it is destined to be a disaster and that that disaster definitely leads to trump or someone worse after him. I understand that the next 4 years don't operate in a vacuum. Please explain to me why I'm a moron in my line of thought.
    1
  13750.  @TheBiggreenpig  Literally the only thing you biden supporters have and literally the only thing trump supporters like " ignacio vulliez" has is to point their finger at the other side and call them terrible. It is so pathetic and is crazy hypocritical when your candidate is also terrible (even if not equally terrible people who like to strawman shit about false equivalency). Just once I'd like trump or biden supporters make the case for their candidate without even mentioning the other side. That said I won't hold my breathe waiting for it to happen.
    1
  13751.  @deadwingdomain  Regarding, "will likely make it so he can have a third term." LMFAO. Get yourself checked for TDS. How is he going to do this? He's not a dictator for fucks sake. He got millions less votes than a complete POS like Hillary. He is getting crushed in polls by a terrible person with dementia. Let's say I agree with your stupid comment. Even if he can be elected to a third term so what. The country will be burning in 2024 and they will blame who has the WH not reward them with a third term.
    1
  13752.  @Miskatonic1927  Regarding, "I think you might be missing their point. If Trump is reelected, and has a Republican controlled Senate, then we may have a full blown authoritarian government solidified." Let's say I agreed with this. It would be evidence the country deserves to crumble. Regarding, "Trump will have that fascist mandate..." Look at the country. It's a dumpster fire. What would it say about the "democratic" candidate if they can't beat trump during a depression and pandemic? Regarding, "Plus the Supreme Court, plus the other lifetime Federal court appointments." God forbid we don't get the corporate clowns on the court that biden would nominate. God forbid we don't elect biden whose behavior toward Anita Hill was unforgivable and helped give us clarance thomas. All you have is fear mongering and orange man bad. Even after I tell you what I want (if you are a biden supporter I want you to tell me why he is good) you don't even ATTEMPT to do it. I know trump sucks. Really. I do. But I'm not motivated by fear. I'm motivated by good. Regarding, "With everything that has been going on the last 5 months I think we could give Biden the benefit of the doubt that at least some things will improve socially and economically." Biden is largely the person most responsible for the social unrest we are seeing because of his racist crime bill that has exacerbated the problem of mass incarceration. That's the person you want to give the benefit of the doubt to? Really?
    1
  13753.  @alliedatheistalliance6776  Regarding, "This is the best chance we've had to get a third party, don't listen to David Doel on this please." There are already lots of third parties. Ultimately the game is rigged against them from top to bottom. By all means try to build them up. But the best hope for real hope and change in country and world that desperately needs it is through hostile takeover of the "democratic" party. It's not a fair fight and it won't be easy but it's our best bet IMO.
    1
  13754.  @alliedatheistalliance6776  And I'm certainly voting third party this general. But that is plan B after plan A and bernie sanders "lost."
    1
  13755.  @anti-classist  Yup. I prefer incompetent evil over competent evil any day.
    1
  13756.  Don P  Regarding, "Because after another 4 years of Trump, there might not even be a 2024 election to worry about." TDS much? What does this mean to you? Trump runs for another term? Trump becomes dictator? Or the country crumbles? Not that it really matters. All are pretty far fetched other than maybe the country crumbles. And if the country crumbles so be it. I'm not sure the country that locks up more it's citizens than anyone else, doesn't guarantee health care to it's citizens, whose government is filled with corruption, whose media is better called propoganda, and whose country is the greatest threat to world peace really deserves to exist.
    1
  13757.  @sandybathwater8385  Regarding, "I can tell there is decency in him" We have to agree to disagree about this. Lies about being in civil rights, lies about being arrested with mandela, lies about NAACP endorsements, lies about his record and anything else he think will help him politically. To put it another way, "don't lie to yourselves, chuds, you know he doesn't give a damn about you." Or at least you shouldn't. He has been on the wrong side of EVERY important vote. War, the patriot act, corporate socialism, the drug war, militarized police, repealing glass steagal, and so much more. Regarding, "this isn't directed at you" Maybe not but I thought I should address it.
    1
  13758.  @IMSiegfried  Regarding, "Huh? How so?" Really? Do you even attempt to read what I write? Or does acting willfully ignorant really not bother you? Regarding, "You haven't named one good thing trump has done." It's not about this. It's about who is in the drivers seat to take the WH in 2024. With trump a true progressive is potentially next. With Biden the next trump is potentially next. It really is that simply while you don't get it. Regarding, " I do not understand your logic." I'm ok with that. You don't seem to understand much. Regarding, "we have no idea what the board will look like in 4 years." No idea? Really? The virus is ongoing. No idea. People don't have jobs. No idea. A corrupt government. No idea. Were you born yesterday? If so then, and only then, should you have "no idea." Regarding, "You also think that Biden will be exactly like Obama was 2008." I actually think will will be far worse as POTUS. Obamas brain wasn't melting while he was in office afterall. Regarding, "it's now 2020 meaning you can't ever go back to where you were before and Biden is not Obama." Thanks capatin obvious. I had no idea. Regarding, "Trump is.." God forbid a biden supporter didn't deflect by mentioning trump. Regarding, "Biden at least has a soul." That guy who would say anything for political gain? He has a soul? Are you sure he didn't give it to the devil so that his lies about working in civil rights, about being arrested with mandela, about being endorsed by the NAACP and more doesn't affect him the way it would in any sort of sane world? Regarding, "Our country is sitting on the edge of a cliff." Thanks to people like Biden. Not in spite of him.
    1
  13759.  @IMSiegfried  Regarding, "Biden is winning the election" You say this like people have voted. You say this like Biden doesn't have dementia that is going to be on full display after he emerges from his basement. Maybe he "will win." But he isn't "winning." Nobody has voted. Regarding, "You say nobody can give you a reason why to vote for Biden and I gave you one before I even read your comment." You gave me trump is bad. Which isn't a logical reason to support biden. Trump is bad is only a logical reason to NOT support trump. And you gave, "Biden has a soul." which is just nonsense. He would say literally anything for power. It's very trumplike. Regarding, "ranked choice voting" I'd love ranked choice voting. But the "democratic" party would rather fear monger about spoilers than improve the system and eliminate the effect.
    1
  13760.  @Miskatonic1927  Regarding, "The fact that you think that everyone else has TDS." I don't think everyone has TDS. Just the people who say things that are ridiculous and demonstrate it. Regarding, "thinks in some sort of "orange man bad" twisted thinking is just ridiculous" Um. What? Regarding, "Don't act like there is some sort of mass conspiratorial thinking towards Trump." Is that what I'm doing? You are tough to take seriously. Regarding, "Even Bernie Sanders has said numerous times (before and after he dropped out) that Trump is the most dangerous President in our lifetime." Few people love Sanders more than I but I have a mind of my own and am not a sheep. 9-11, torture, and lies that led to war wasn't Trump. He is terrible but that shit happened on Ws watch, not his. Get back to me when he does that or something equal to it. Regarding, "this country could very well crumble" Let it crumble then for all I care. The "land of the free" imprisons more of it's citizens by total and by percentage of population and it isn't even close. It's cops murder it's citizens. Despite being "the richest nation in the history of the planet" it's the only "civilized" nation to not guarantee health care to it's people. It's the greatest threat to peace around the globe. It's government is filled with corruption. Is that really a country that should stand? Is that really worth protecting? With a guy who is corrupt and terrible? Who is partly responsible for all that terrible for one reason or another? Regarding, "Which means that that you are fine with whatever death and destruction that may result from that." Using your "logic" you are fine with whatever death and destruction comes from a biden presidency. And he will bring it as he always does. He never found a war he didn't want to fight. Biden would poke russia and start a war with russia if it meant winning the WH. Which means you are fine with that.
    1
  13761. Then you do not understand the system. The major parties have rigged the game from top to bottom to favor the major parties and they have great advantages.
    1
  13762. You can't actually believe the stupid shit you wrote can you?
    1
  13763. "The democrats can always count on you bernie." Yes that corrupt party absolutely can. Bernie will forever tell you to vote blue no matter who.
    1
  13764.  @IMPOTUSx2  My point STILL stands.
    1
  13765.  @IMPOTUSx2  "the ones that actually give a damn!" Who EXACTLY are they suppose to be? George Carlin had if figured out in a time when it was FAR harder to see it. "it's a big club and you ain't in it."
    1
  13766.  @IMPOTUSx2  "the ones that actually give a damn!" "they don't give a f about you. AT ALL!" -carlin
    1
  13767. *jimmy I would have never been so nice to this backstabber.
    1
  13768. Sorry you don't understand context. It must be because you are not smart.
    1
  13769. sprybug holy shit are you dumb as fuck. Not everything said is meant to be taken literally and some things people are expected to understand context. You clearly are not capable of this and it is really pathetic. Using your "logic" nobody could say "nobody is covering it" because as soon as they say it then somebody has covered it. Stop being an idiot.
    1
  13770. And make sure those jobs don't pay dick so that the government gets to subsidize them even more. Seriously thou... holy shit you are a tool. Can I safely assume you are a paid shill?
    1
  13771. Because there is no room between, "better than trump" and "Jesus" right? Are you intentionally trying to act stupid?
    1
  13772.  @thebossman222  I don't appreciate politics interjected into my puppy videos and photo ops for our clown politicians. I'd say the same thing if they were giving the orange clown a photo op. That's why.
    1
  13773.  @markitgeek  Regarding, "apparently, so do a lot of MAGAts." Is that why there were here in the first place to complain about the interjection of politics?
    1
  13774. sasansabr clearly has nothing of value of substance to offer. That's why they offer worthless word vomit.
    1
  13775. Oh yeah. I should really add that they are pathetic.
    1
  13776. I'm pretty sure I have omicron right now. It's just like any winter cold I've ever had.
    1
  13777. Meanwhile he said Trump is the biggest problem.
    1
  13778.  @jamieg2427  No specifics? Jimmy dore can tell you exactly why he's a hack for hours on end. Like talking about ryan grimms recent piece of propaganda manufacturing consent for chuck shumer in his article, "CHUCK SCHUMER EYES A SECOND SHOT AT RAISING THE MINIMUM WAGE THROUGH RECONCILIATION." It's like something that was written by chuck shumer PR team.
    1
  13779. I'm already voting for someone who isn't perfect. I'm just not voting for your POS candidate who is accurately called evil and terrible.
    1
  13780.  Justin Griffith  We are not sentient but we are still smarter than Chuck Todd. But speaking of donuts, what's with putting holes in so many of them before murdering them through ingestion? Do you really need to torture them first? Not cool. Oatmeal.
    1
  13781.  @mrg0th1er83  Still nothing and it's been days. It's pretty hacky.
    1
  13782.  @mrg0th1er83  Then again there is, "How Will Yang Fare After Israel Comments?" But that's hardly a headline that calls him out. It merely wonders if he will be ok.
    1
  13783. Except I can't shout fire in a theater because of the 1st amendment and you can't own a tank because of the 2nd amendment so let's not pretend those amendments aren't restricted because they are.
    1
  13784. What a sad, pathetic, and lazy way to dismiss my point hans. I'm sure you have never made a typo either, especially in the all important arena of the youtube comments section where spelling and grammar are supremely important. I would like to add that if you actually didn't care about my opinion the way to have demonstrated it would have been by not responding to me. What you did actually demonstrates that you do care because actions speak louder than words.
    1
  13785. hans regarding, "Add this question to the ballot" How about something that isn't so loaded, disingenuous and leading? How about a simple, do you favor universal background checks? For starters, because I'm pretty sure my opinion on that isn't in the "minority" despite the stupid things you say. But who cares that I call you out for saying stupid things. You don't actually care what I think am I right?
    1
  13786. hans, wow. Just wow. Forgive me but I don't have the ambition to address why literally everything you say is wrong but regarding, "we already have universal background checks" is empirically false. I'm not sure if you are lying intentionally or just stupid but what you are saying here, like everything else you say, is just wrong. "Currently, federal law requires background checks (through the National Instant Criminal Background Check System) only for guns sold through licensed firearm dealers, which account for 78% of all gun sales in the United States." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_background_check
    1
  13787. This really shouldn't surprise you at this point. It's what you should expect.
    1
  13788.  @thomasmackelly7685  "your problem is that you put too much on one person." I blame all progressives who ran on m4a for not demanding they force the vote. All those people who just voted for nancy got jack shit for that vote. I suspect your problem is that you don't blame them for squandering the power they had in that moment.
    1
  13789.  @thomasmackelly7685  Regarding, ""If bernie doesnt overturn everyone in the senate then i mad"" Yeah. I didn't say this yet you put it in quotes. Pretty tough to take you seriously when you lie about what I say instead of addressing what I actually say.
    1
  13790.  @mycelia_ow  "Not all Dems are the same ideologically lmao" Thanks captain obvious. But counterpoint, if they all vote in lockstep for pelosi and with corporate dems can they really be said to be that different? Regarding, "do tell how Bernie Sander, a social democrat progressive, is anything like conservative Biden" Isn't Sanders that guy who was telling everyone to vote for Biden? Regarding, "or the corrupted Mike Bloomberg" And likely would have told everyone to vote for bloomberg if he were the nominee. Regarding, "Warnock isn’t an establishment corporatist, that’s all you need to know" I need to know more than this. For example I need to know if he is going to vote in lockstep with establishment corporatist the way the fraud squad just did. But when nothing changes don't have any illusions about who you should be blaming.
    1
  13791.  @thomasmackelly7685  "your problem is that you put too much on one person." You can really tell because I'm talking about how dems are going to control everything. /s
    1
  13792.  @dynamicworlds1  "less progressive than Trump?" When it comes to war and mass incarcerating black folk... yeah. He is. Then again biden is more progressive when it comes to mean tweets.
    1
  13793.  @randytessman6750  "The dems are far more separate then the repubs and do not vote in blocks." If you say so. Ultimately I don't care. I care about results and that's why the dems suck. They don't produce results. Regarding, "Joe Manchin & AOC have hardly anything they agree on but are both dems." No doubt this is how you are going to rationalize a party that ultimately produces jack shit for the people. But the oligarchy knows they need to give the peasants crumbs from time to time so that they don't revolt. In that the "democratic" party is a resounding success.
    1
  13794.  @murk4552  "you will be when McConnell gets out on Life Alert in a fancy convalescent hospital" Um... what?
    1
  13795.  @mattheww797  "I want the US Wars to continue." While you want forever bombs I want m4a. To each your own I guess.
    1
  13796. Wow, you think you know it all. Ugh! If you know so much, run. Put up or shut up. You are total nobody who think they are hot shit slop.
    1
  13797. Is this the fake news trump warned me about?
    1
  13798. Joel regarding, "Pence is quiet" Why exactly should I care how loud or quiet a psycho is? Regarding, "(Pence is) sane." Hahahahaha. Do you actually know anything about the guy you are talking about? The guy is a religious zealot whose priorities include taking away a womens right to choose persecuting the lgbt community. He is at least as bad as trump on ALL important issues. The environment, education, trade, guns, and more he is practically indistinguishable from trump when it comes to policy... that thing I mentioned all that time ago that you have never bothered to address. And the fact that you don't seem to understand how terrible Pence is only helps prove my case for me. I would actually prefer Trump over Pence because sheep like you are easily put to sleep as long as terrible policy is wrapped in sweet talk. Feel free to correct me but I'm confident you fucking love Obama don't you. Nevermind that he more than doubled the number of wars we are in, nevermind that he persecuted whistleblowers and journalists, nevermind that he set record deportations, nevermind that his signature piece of legislation was a Republican health care plan, nevermind that his failure helped give us trump... you fucking love him don't you. Because while he fucked over the people of this country he did it while not being offensive. I need people like you to stay pissed and angry at our government because I know that you are all too willing to go to sleep because you are a fucking sheep easily put to sleep.
    1
  13799. anarchore do the world a favor and shut the fuck up forever. Nobody gives a fuck what a mental midget like you thinks about this or anything.
    1
  13800. Regarding, "I'm not here to be your scapegoat," I'd ask what the fuck you are talking about here if I actually cared. Regarding, "I voted for Ralph Nader in 1999" So did I. I guess I haven't brought it because it is totally fucking irrelevant to the conversation at hand. Regarding, "Fuck Obama" Well... I'm not going to pretend to be perfect. I am genuinely shocked at this. Good for you. Regarding, "he's quiet so he's not going to piss off every world leader" And why exactly shouldn't ever world leader be pissed at us? THEY SHOULD BE PISSED AT US. And if their priorities are so fucked up that they care more about the president's twitter habits then his actual actions then they are just as fucked up and absurd as you on the topic. Regarding, "He's sane so he won't say shit.on tv like he can pardon himself" Jesus fucking christ. When I think about the problems this world is facing and the fact that you consider trump saying something stupid that has no real world effects what-so-ever as being important I want to throw up in my mouth. Then you again you immediately discredit your own point 2 seconds later when accurately saying, "NOBODY takes him seriously." Either nobody takes him seriously (which is true, at least when it comes to the sane) or I need to piss myself when he says something dumb. Those 2 things can't coexist simultaneously. Regarding, "BTW, I'm the founder..." Cool for you. I am amused that you think this makes you saying stupid shit anymore relevant. But it really isn't about that is it. You just want to jerk off to your own ego. Fucking pathetic. Regarding, "get on board with a man of the people working for real change?" Are you fucking retarded. Literally the only thing I've been addressing is your desire to make Pence president. Is that your "man of the people working for real change?" Because that is what I've been talking about despite your desperate desire to change the conversation from that.
    1
  13801. Joel regarding, "you're going off on people left and right with long drawn out rants." Sorry for bothering to tell you why what you say is dumb. Stop saying dumb shit and I will have no need to do so. Sorry for being longwinded. Some of us have more to think and say than can fit on a bumpersticker. Sorry if I'm angry when it comes to politics... it is a side effect of understanding. But don't feel too bad about it. I at least think enough of you to bother trying to address you intelligently if not politely, which is far more than I can say about anachore. Regarding, "Get your own YouTube channel if you've got the solution" Would you accept this type of dumb as fuck thing if it were said to you? Should I be allowed to mindlessly dismiss what you say because you don't have a youtube channel? Or would you see and understand that is complete fucking garbage "logic" used to distract and deflect from substantive points rather than saying something not dumb as fuck? Regarding, "PROVE IT" That's what I was doing by pointing out how Trump and Pence are not different in any sort of substantive way when it comes to policy. That was already me proving my point as opposed to saying moronic shit such as, "Get your own YouTube channel." Regarding, "Ego" Are you fucking kidding me? Do you really want to pretend that you weren't just jerking off your ego when bringing up that shit about yourself that had nothing to do with the topic at hand? I suspect not actually. Denial is a powerful thing.
    1
  13802. torch regarding, "After trump goes to prison, we should just have a special election and elect Bernie." While Bernie should be our president that doesn't mean I think we should just ignore what the constitution has to say on the topic especially when it is quite clear. I assume that you are just fantasizing about Bernie as president which I understand. Still I think that saying we should all take a piss on the constitution for political reasons is a terrible idea.
    1
  13803. Regarding, "you'd understand the clear logic in what I've said." This is the extent of your "logic." You just assert stupid fucking shit and back it up with word vomit. I have an impossible time telling the difference of your intellect with the average Trump supporter. Regarding, "I didn't bother reading your verbal diarrhea" If you say so. That said I can't tell the difference because you haven't done anything differently here then before. Good luck with the whole dumb as fuck thing you have going on. We are living through the movie "Idiocracy" sadly.
    1
  13804.  @progKansas The CFPB is a good thing in a vacuum and step in the right direction, as the ACA was. But the fact of the matter is that we don't live in a vacuum. We needed Glass steagal brought back, banks broken up, and bankers put in jail. Instead we got the CFPB. A bandaid when the country needed major surgery. Realize the context and realize why it isn't so great. It's just enough to appease people like you to thinking the dems are doing something.
    1
  13805.  @jakethesnake2x  Yes. He's really that bad. If I wanted to watch corporate media propagandists like him I'd watch corporate media.
    1
  13806. Is that it? It's not the controlled opposition and bullshit artists?
    1
  13807. I agree that progressives should not be splitting the vote. They SHOULD be supporting Sanders.
    1
  13808. Not really. I value experience and require trust that yang hasn't earned. Maybe he should run for political office that isn't at the friggin top and earn that trust before thinking they have any right to be the most powerful person in the world and/or deserve a job they clearly have no right to.
    1
  13809. Maybe he would prove me wrong. Maybe he is the exception to the rule. But 9 times out of 10 politicians are corrupt and liars. I don't like odds like that going in.
    1
  13810.  @tadem3886  Regarding, "just so i understand you mean experience in government?" Pretty much. There is a reason that being a senator or being a governor is considered the norm for presidential candidates. It's the "minor leagues" of politics where you get to see what politicians do with power when given it. Regarding, "And also what do you mean by trust?" Really? Regarding, "I trust that he had the well being of Americans at heart" Trump supporters think the same about their clown. Everyone loves to think they can just listen to someone speak, look into their soul, and just know. It doesn't work that way. Trump is a terrible conman and still so many buy his bullshit. Well there are actually some excellent conmen out there that you should protect yourself from. To protect yourself from conmen in politics you do 2 things: follow the money and study their record. Well yang doesn't have a record for me to study. It's a major problem because trust is important to me and I'm not willing to just trust a politicians words and that's all yang has. I require a record at this level and so should you. There is no excuse for not having it and by supporting someone without it you are just begging to be played.
    1
  13811.  @tadem3886  Regarding, "Trump/yang" Yeah... Trump has been in the public eye for a long time so there was more reason to not trust him. Yang is a guy you likely had never even heard of a year ago. Maybe if you didn't know who trump was you would have said the same about him and been citing his nonprofit as evidence that his is cool and trustworthy the way you are yang. You've just learned who yang is and you know what yang wants you to know about him at this point which isn't much and includes him voting on nothing in his life. I take it you weren't one of the people who voted for Obama because the guy talked a great game and learned something from your mistakes huh?
    1
  13812.  @tadem3886  Regarding, "Comparing Yang to Trump is like comparing apples and oranges." Guys known for being business men, have nonprofits (both the business men part and the nonprofit parts are reasons why their supporters support them), had no experience in politics and were running for president. They are not entirely different especially when you are citing the same reasons for supporting yang that trump supporters used for supporting him. Regarding, "I dont know why you have such a negative view of him." Thinks he is qualified to be president when he has no experience, has never proven it at the lower level they way any sane person should, is splitting the progressive vote and making it more likely an establishment fuck like biden wins when progressives need to coalesce around a guy who has PROVEN beyond all reasonable doubt, with a consistent record a mile long demonstrating his principles and values with more than just words that he actually is what he says he is. Regarding, "Isnt it possible that he is a decent person that wants to help people improve their lives." Yup. It's possible. Isn't it possible that he is just a snake oil salesmen telling you what he thinks you want to hear to get your vote before leaving you high and dry the way most politicians do and/or is just an establishment tool to siphon votes from Bernie from the left to keep the guy they actually fear from winning? If you concede this possibility maybe go with the sure thing who has proven who they are for decades.
    1
  13813.  @tadem3886  Regarding, "i think im starting to understand why so many Bernie supporters fear Yang." Progressives are shat upon by the establishment. They will do anything and everything to fuck us over and stop us from having power. Sanders was fucked over in 2016. Yeah... I fear Sanders is going to lose, fear for the country, and fear for the future. Do you at least start to understand why trust is important? And why your guy doesn't deserve it? Are you going to try and intelligently address any of the points I'm making? Or are you just going to dismiss them? Regarding, "My support for yang comes from mainly because of UBI." No shit. Thanks for actually being intellectually honest about it. So many of his supporters pretend like it's about something else but ultimately people are just being bribed to support him, nevermind the fact that you have no reason to trust him and have no reason to think UBI would pass even if he were elected. Regarding, "There is nothing that Bernie has proposed that would make a more fundamental and immediate improvement in my life like a UBI would." Sanders is about M4A, education, ending war, raising the minimum wage, breaking up the banks, protecting the environment, getting money out of politics and so much more and he can actually be trusted on all these issues but fuck that cause you're being bribed. You might have a future in politics with that. Regarding, "If Bernie announced tomorrow a policy for 1k a month ubi i would change my support to Bernie" Nevermind. Fuck Bernie. I've seen the light. I'm going to run. I'm offering you 2K a month. Unless you want more. Cause I'll tell you more if you want. And you have just as much reason to trust me as you do yang.
    1
  13814.  @tadem3886  Regarding, " the way i see it, Yang and Bernie have similar polices on a vast majority of topics" The way I see it one guy has earned my trust which rightfully isn't easy to do and the other hasn't come even fucking close. Regarding, "the key difference is UBI. Do you not agree with UBI?" It's an interesting idea that I'm not opposed to in time but it's time isn't now. 1) The way yang proposed to pay for it is regressive 2) without fixing all the other major problems that need fixing all that money is just going to funnel to the top the EXACT same way it is now and 3) I fear that if implemented it would be used as an excuse to be able to dismantle all other social programs. If you really think they are so similar except for that one policy, a policy that, like the candidate you support, is something you HAVE NEVER EVEN FUCKING HEARD OF A YEAR AGO, maybe address all the problems that should have been being addressed for decades first. And use the guy who can actually be trusted to fight the good fight while doing it. Then afterall that is done... we can talk about UBI cause I know it won't all just go to the top and after it's being proposed by a guy I have reason to trust.
    1
  13815.  @tadem3886  I got a great laugh watching this and thought of you. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4d_FvgQ1csE
    1
  13816. Shouldn't you be washing your sheets for your rally?
    1
  13817. LMFAO. It's funny because the racist card was her defense.
    1
  13818. Citation required.
    1
  13819. I want 90s republicans and their ilk to go back to their party.
    1
  13820. To be fair Jimmy Dore being an asshole is just a BS excuse to not do the right thing.
    1
  13821. Even their attacks can't make me like him. I felt the same way about trump.
    1
  13822.  @gioiaferrante  "I have no time for simple comments!" LMFAO Instead you will just ignore the simple and direct point. "It's rather sad when you go to Sweden and see they are doing way better than us, all of us and all of Scandinavia is doing great! Individuals who have never voyaged, let alone lived in another nation or done relations with exemplary countries, should shush." You are boot licking for a person in power who is responsible for this. "Please Spare me the B.S" This is projection. "lose your whole family to this pandemic," Does this really need to happen to me for me to be able to call out your favorite politician? Wow.... that's the rant you are going with after my response? It's telling that you do that instead of addressing my point.
    1
  13823.  @gioiaferrante  "I have no time for simple comments!" This is funny considering you are copy and pasting the same talking points hours apart. I hope whatever you are being paid to do it is worth it.
    1
  13824.  @gioiaferrante  "I'm not copying" It was the same BS word for word. The quality of bernie supporters has really gone down. The only people left that support him have zero intellectual honesty.
    1
  13825.  @gioiaferrante  And you still didn't even attempt to address my simple and direct point. But good luck with your latest BS. I'll figure that's just copy and pasted too.
    1
  13826.  @gioiaferrante  "Please Spare me" You even have the same typo that you don't have elsewhere "Please spare me" in your copy and paste job. Please spare me your lies.
    1
  13827.  @gioiaferrante  Nice wall of text. I'll assume it's more copy and pasted BS from a liar.
    1
  13828. Universal health care is cheaper. A lot cheaper. Canada pays half as much per person for their system.
    1
  13829. Fun fact: hitler also won time man of the year in addition to musk.
    1
  13830. That room is still too full.
    1
  13831. Do yourself a favor and get out of your cult.
    1
  13832.  @kruuuuune  And never addressed it. He just ignored it.
    1
  13833. That happens long after you become part of the problem.... like you are right now.
    1
  13834. I could use some extra IQ points. Especially after losing some reading your moronic post.
    1
  13835.  ss  Regarding, "Change is happening with the success of progressive candidates over old party hacks." None of this has anything to do with Trump or Biden. It's merely a deflection. Regarding, "I don't like the DNC as much as you do" I doubt it. If you didn't like the DNC as much as me you would refuse to keep enabling them and supporting their clown candidates. Regarding, "dire circumstances like Trump, removes the luxury of a protest vote." I'll just wait for the unimportant presidential election to vote my values then. Oh wait... they are all important. You never addressed my real point. I'm looking to the future and 2024 while being convinced the next 4 years are going to be a depression. Am I wrong to think Trump 2.0 is inevitable after Biden's inevitable presidency failure? Because that's how I see things playing out.
    1
  13836.  @Bluebelle51  Regarding, "People have been trying this "from within" crap for decades" Yup. And it hasn't worked. But it can. The key is getting a progressive nominee of the party. Corporate dems can be purged from the party the same way progressives have been in the past. The nominee is given crazy power to shape the party. They can, for example, ban that dirty money the corporate dems love so much. That would change the party overnight. There are no easy solutions. They all suck. All are not fair. But hostile takeover of the party is still the best, easist and best way to get the change this country needs. But don't mistake that for good or easy. I know it won't be. I know the establishment won't go down without a crazy fight.
    1
  13837.  @Bluebelle51  One more thing regarding, "People have been trying this "from within" crap for decades" People have also been trying to run 3rd party and build 3rd parties for decades.
    1
  13838.  @Bluebelle51  Regarding, "I'm more willing to vote for what I want and not get it than to vote for what I don't want and get that" Damn right. Winning is important but it isn't everything. Especially if "winning" means getting dogshit corporate dems. That's really just losing. Don't get me wrong I'm under no illusion that the party is going to change but I'm going to fight for the change I want anyway. And I'm not backing corporate dems. Justice democrats for the win.
    1
  13839.  ss  Regarding, "I don't support DNC candidates, where did I say that?" It seemed pretty implied when you were saying, "can anyone seriously risk having another four years of Trump" This seemed like you were clearly making the case for voting for Biden who is a DNC clown candidate. Feel free to correct me if you would like but that was the impression I got and it still seems understandable. Regarding, "My concern right now, is for the future of the Republic itself." Why exactly? The US is the greatest sponsor of terror around the globe. It's the greatest threat to world peace. It's government is filled with corruption. It doesn't guarantee health care to it's citizens. It locks up more of it's citizens by total and by percentage of population and it isn't even close. Why is saving this country really so important to you? Are you really sure it's worth saving as it is? Regarding, "Trump threatens its very existence." He is a clown and a symptom of greater problems. The US will persist. That said I'm not sure it should.
    1
  13840. Don't kid yourselves about what is happening and what is going to be happening until the election... it's a war. The establishment is going to do anything and everything to smear Sanders.
    1
  13841. That's their plan. Ours needs to be winning overwhelmingly on the first ballot so that it doesn't go to a second ballot.
    1
  13842.  @seanie002  Judging by their comment I'd say they are doing better than most the sheep going around.
    1
  13843.  @seanie002  Or to put it another way, you ok huh?
    1