Comments by "antonyjh1234" (@antonyjh1234) on "Willy OAM" channel.

  1. 62
  2. 22
  3. 13
  4. 11
  5. 8
  6. 5
  7. 3
  8. 3
  9.  @peter12266  I'm listening to this at the moment and he's talking about the russian economy suffering and their exports disappeared, when the reality inflation has dropped and the Ruble has increased in value and exports have opened up to countries around the world that they didn't have before.. I'm just confused how this person is supposed to be classed as an expert, when everything he has said is false, he seems so ill informed. Russian losses are 1/8th of Ukraines, Ukraine hasn't had military service from about 2012 until recently while Russia has always had it, a year of military service for what 25 million men who are of fighting age, while Ukraines total population of Ukrainians is this. At the moment every male in Ukraine is forced at gunpoint to be fighting, they can't leave the country and now they are rounding up Hungarians to be forced to fight. I understand he's part of the group that believes one side of this propaganda but Willy should branch out a bit more imo. Russia is building 20-30 T90M tanks a month and western tanks are supposed to be the saviour but won't arrive for months so they will build enough to more than counter what is coming through. Ukraine is now "WE" and that "we" can win this just ignores what Russia feels or thinks about the issue, the rest of the world's armies could join to this and there would be no winning, China see's what is happening and they wouldn't join USA as they know what is happening to Russia will happen to them, same as possibly India. It's such a shame people think more men dying and the risk of nuclear war happening is called winning. Added : The title of Willy's video is : what the media won't tell you, Willy hasn't told us what the media won't tell us in any meaningful way, because sooo much was left out of this and it just promotes more war which we should all be ashamed about especially our "free" media, something that wasn't or is needed, in any way. We must also remember Russia is fighting a war of attrition because they have too, they are going slow to minimise their losses because they know USA/US funded NATO might get involved with their armies. If only "we" hadn't lied about the 2014 minsk agreement and stuck to "our" deal, less land would have been lost and millions of lives wouldn't have been forever changed. All for resources..
    2
  10. 2
  11. 2
  12. 1
  13. 1
  14. 1
  15. 1
  16. 1
  17. 1
  18.  @Kevlar_soul  Why mobilise? Because they know who they could eventually fight, USA, to say Ukraine can train men faster is racist or just plain stupid, these are basically the same men. You're not listening though, a year of military service for a lot of them means what, that they should put those conscripts into battle before they have finished the year? Of course not, the 200,000 that are there would be about right, you need people to maintain those fighters, same like USA having 1.4 million in their military, not all of them are fighters. Objectively slow and being costly in materials, why doesn't the same cost apply to Ukraine. It's not Russians who I get the information from, it's a retired US weapons inspector, a retired US Colonel who have a better idea than I do of what's happening on the ground, they also say Ukraine doesn't give out this information which is why you can't find it but Russia always has been good on these things. You seem to be clinging to the six month story of Bakhmut, why not talk about the steel plant and the rounding up of the Asov Nazi's, supposedly Ukraines best force, why not discuss the area that Russia have wanted and got that had russian civilians in, why not discuss that it is easier to defend than to attack and yet russia is still moving forward, why not discuss that it is a 1000 kilometre front line that russia has to maintain, yet you talk about one small spot where Ukraine is throwing everuthing they have into it right now, because this area is quite important for Ukraine, of the four roads they only have one road left and soon that will fall, why not discuss that everybody knows the wests goal is to try and use up everything russia has with the bodies of Ukrainians, and then you say the best thing for russia is to use all this up quickly? I don't understand it, none of what you say is logical, so if you could explain, why the longer this goes on with their heavy weapons and the losses that means for Ukraine, while Russia has another 30-40 million men to go, that it is bad for russia, because remember they have the natural resources to maintain themselves, while Ukraine must get it all imported and I can't remember his name but one of the heads of the US military has just come out and said if this goes on another six months then supply side issues for more military goods is going to become an issue, russia has another six months or six years, do you honestly see the same for Ukraine, no matter how special you think they are?
    1
  19. 1
  20. 1
  21. 1
  22. 1
  23. 1
  24. 1
  25. 1
  26. 1
  27. 1
  28. 1
  29. 1
  30. 1