Comments by "antonyjh1234" (@antonyjh1234) on "GBNews" channel.

And this is all western central banks saying this. Australian one said the same thing.
10
I hope everyone who believes this discrimination took place withdraws their money from these banks.
4
What a liar. Opposite Tuesday is it?
3
Artificial intelligence will soon be able to value every single thing for its carbon value and it could be carbon credits, that would be equitable and fair throughout the world and kept global warming in check, none of you would have jobs other than the society service of two to three years everyone has to do, basic food would be supplied, same as accomodation and of course free medical care. Robots do everything else and we all go back to painting landscapes. Added : I @zark0g, would effing well love it.
3
In a world of equity why should you own anything? Because you think profit is going to come to you but profit instead of value might be, should be, a thing of the past.
2
I don't know why people don't check their opinions first, you're nowhere close ronnie A total of 689,629 deaths were registered in 2020, while 683,191 live births were recorded. This means that natural change in the UK – the difference between births and deaths – was a negative figure of 6,438. In Scotland, there were more deaths than births each year since 2015, and for Wales this was the case each year since 2016 All countries are having an aging population situation, soon those over 65 will be around 25% of the population, some are already there, this has never happened before, that the age pyramid is no longer a pyramid, that even percentage's of people of all age groups are going to be alive. Added : 23 countries are going to lose 50% of their population by 2100, Japan for example will lose 50 million people overall by the end of the century. So the thing is if every country is at full employment and deaths are more than births then countries soon are going to need to find different ways to measure the systems health because growth isn't going to be the metric used anymore.
2
I suppose we shouldn't talk about the 4-5 million people killed for control of fossil fules in the last two decades by USA then or the tens of millions displaced. It is a shame Just Stop Oil hasn't included "new" in their signs as they want the UK govt to stop new oil exploration, which isn't a bad proposition. We were supposed to reach 1.5c around 2034, we might reach that at the end of this year now.
1
@TheIrvy So you think attacking my dyslexia means I am wrong?
1
@TheIrvy No you acted like a muppet and use one word spelt wrong likeit has anything to do with the argument made, it doesn't, you think you can attack something so it denigrates everything else, it doesn't it just makes you a .... In answer to your question, I can;t see what is wrong sometimes when the red line is under the word, but spellcheck, is that a thing in you tube comments otherwise? "Sweetie" ha, yep proves my first comment.
1
First off the business of govt is business, they do not care about the environment. Climate change exacerbates all impacts, insurers are leaving the industry and people without insurance. None of this matters to every one c means 7% more moisture? Climate deniers should be illegal in the public sphere like this. GB news should be ashamed for what they try to do. I wish this man were younger so he could see the damage coming.
1
We are a debt based monetary system that control's the education system, running on a fossil fuel system that has to rely on the same amount of energy being used for the life of the loans. Electricity is 20% of our energy and we aren't paying the external costs of the other 80% or even the 100%. The central banks, private organisations effectively, issue money on govt debt with a cost of around 3-6 cents per hundred which we pay back with our lives, that's around a 3300% markup. Commercial banks take our money and lend it out to other people and then that gets loaned out again and so on when it reaches somebody else's account. We get taxed at least 50% of our working lives through income taxes, various sales taxes, fuel taxes, fee's and fines for the govt, along with local council then banks take another cut, at current interest rates on 500k the interest is 360k, by using other peoples money then they charge us fee's and then people will say the woes of the world is how much we consume with the very little we have left. We are told our value is our much we can add to this system. We could do a lot less, stop working, provide every single person in the world shelter and food and medical care for free and raise general wellbeing immensely. We live in a belief system, we have to be able to believe in something other than this slavery. We think we are free because we can choose the colour of our car, that we fill up with oil foreign families have been "displaced" over, to go on a holiday with. Our weekends only exist because of our jobs, our holidays, what we believe is correct and incorrect, what is worthy for our time debt to spent on, profit instead of value. All money is debt, it's not been gold since 71, if all the debt was paid back there would be no money in existence and considering we are going to spend our lives on something, then we should start to revalue what this debt is for...the issue is people can go through schools that are supposed to educate and not know where money, something they spend their whole lives around, where it comes from or how it comes into being. I think a realisation that all money is debt, that someone is paying interest on, the ones and zeroes in your account don't have anything to do with the amount of money in them, that's just an accounting trick, that if we saw all money as debt, we might value it better, hopefully. *People are going to say we can just leave our problems behind and go to space instead of thinking of a different system than capitalism, without realising the huge amounts of energy we use without a second thought, a litre of diesel is 10.6kw's of energy, have a look at your power bill and see how many kwh's you use, a US gallon is 40.12kw's, the huge amounts of energy we use would not exist by taking it with us so we'd have to worry about food and shelter and medical care, if we just got rid of capitalism, we could do that here and everybody happy, if we just believed. We had a carbon pulse that shouldn't continue, we have 23 countries going to lose 50% of their populations by 2100, China 1.4 Billion down to around 5-700 million, Japan 50 million down, a lot of European countries, the future in a system based off growth could be difficult anyway.
1
Thats a big trick though, the system is designed for couples and being a small but still an important part of the system doesn't necessarily mean you will be happy either. All debt is money, if you don't want new money coming into the system then wage increases stops, which is why the system needs debt instruments like people unemployed and pensions. How does one escape the system, is the trick, to call this simple is wrong imo. It's up to individual people what they think value means, what they want to spend their time and money debt on but all your don'ts, can have reasons for doing so as it means money enters the economy which is going to happen anyway with rebound choices that you'll make. @GK1976A
1
Thats a big trick though, the system is designed for couples and being a small but still an important part of the system doesn't necessarily mean you will be happy either. All debt is money, if you don't want new money coming into the system then wage increases stops, which is why the system needs debt instruments like people unemployed. How does one escape the system is the trick, to call this simple is wrong. It's up to individual people what they think value means, what they want to spend their time and money debt on but all your don'ts, can have reasons for doing so as it means money enters the economy which is going to happen anyway with rebound choices @GK1976A
1
We do live in a system that relies on growth, the population growth rate in the UK is 0.6% per year, builders of new homes do need customers. The fertility rate is only 1.5 births per woman, below the population replacement rate of 2.1 births per woman so if you want less immigrants then have more babies.. The issue is whether you want population decrease and then job losses will occur then, how far do you decrease it too.?
1
@madmountainman5197 Money is a product, it costs almost nothing to produce and you pay it back with hours of your labour into your own bank which they then lend out to the tune of 90% of it, why do you think they are idiots to get as much of it out there as they can if they can get such a great return and over so many years? Buying a house these days means the bank gets the same value of the house in interest, 100% of the value is loan shark territory.
1
@ronnieince4568 Middle of a pandemic when they got pregnant nine months beforehand doesn't mean what you think it does imo. Nevertheless you are talking about something a decade old, and only taking the data from 2010 when deaths decreased and births increased, the cross over line has happened almost a few times in the late 70's 80's and late 90's, there definitely hasn't been an average of 200k in the last 30 years looking at the graphs now. The historic fact is that the world doubled in less than three generations UK is no different but to expect 200k ever again while fertility rates are below replacement but you are completely wrong to think 200k is the figure you should bandy around now as it is not anything to do with the reality now or going into the future. The future is more deaths than births and that will be the norm for quite a few decades.
1
@ronnieince4568 Also children being born now doesn't have much of an impact on housing nor would children of immigrants who come, while they are added to the total number it doesn't mean you should look at total numbers as an impact on housing, let's imagine half of the numbers are children so half of total dwellings could be needed, now we are down to 0.17% growth, which is stuff all if you are a builder of new properties. When the ageing population passing gathers speed and passes away this should mean more properties come onto the market and around the modern world this is happening, oldies in three or four bedroom homes are staying until they die., when they go property could crash. As I mentioned initially 0.6% grwoth was the plan, we are down to 0.34% and it is expected to decline till at least the end of the century and the world is expected to reach peak popualtion by the middle of this century so the question remains, when its a multi decade lowering of the popualtion in uk from 2055 till the end of the century would you want immigrants then and if so then why not import their children now because they will be the longest consumers therefore add more to the govt coffers.
1
@ronnieince4568 What do you mean Actually we are aging very slowly? Who said there was a speed that is normal? The point was we are aging as a planet, which still stands. The work ethic is a tricky one because it isn't needed as much, soon with artificial intelligence being able to take quite a few jobs and even now a lot of jobs are pointless, what do we do with all this spare time, something that couldn't be imagined 100 years ago but if they could they would think the world was better because of the amount of spare time we now have. We were supposed to make the world better otherwise what was the point then older people like yourself say " You don't have it as hard as I did" and fair enough too but isn't that called progress?
1
@ronnieince4568 I hear you, it's been a huge rush in all the modern countries and now it's Africa's turn, they are going to be almost half of the world by 2100 and now in modern countries it's a probable multi decadal recession coming. Even though there's billions that would come they are all broke. I'd say the UK has sucked as much money that it can in and with all countries at full employment it's getting harder and harder to get quality immigrants.
1
When do you stop the accountability though? Like how far back are you willing to go?
1