Comments by "antonyjh1234" (@antonyjh1234) on "What would a good fiscal rule look like?" video.

I would say being fiscally responsible can only happen if the environment is at the epicentre and essentials should be given free, as that's the only way to keep control on consumption.
5
Now I disagreed with your first part about taking out of people's minds the concepts of paid back because if it stops then govt spending has to stop otherwise money builds up but I get your point regarding all debt is money, I think that's the thing that trips all people I have told, every single one, that every single dollar that exists, an amount of debt does too, that what we call money is just one side of a ledger and people to think how much of their life they have spent to make bankers rich, I think it is quite confronting, they all believe money built up in society like gold. For you to say he should do a video about national taxes don't pay for govt spending makes me think this is your first video?
4
I can never work out why people use the word arrogant to somebody who is telling you a truth about the system and they are giving you something for free.. The fiscal rule un this case is that current ones are von tricks and new rules could direct this energy to health care, environmental care, he said "child policy and education" these financial rules that are set in place now suit one class of person and what is being talked about are new rules, how is that arrogant? How is asking for care arrogant or an implication?
3
All reality is somebody else's idea
2
@physiocrat7143 As long as everyone has food shelter and medical care, in the world, why not.
2
@blackbulldog4897 Yes I understand this but it is debt, we are one side of a ledger and money operates on a basis of zero and yes it is drained out, to keep the value of the dollar. We can't have money coming in at the top of the bucket if the hole at the bottom is plugged up and the name of the game is to not let the bucket overflow but to always have water flow through it ie society. I understand if we pay back all debt then there would be no money, tax is a drain but in this system an integral part.
1
@blackbulldog4897 The hole is taxes Edit : The water coming in the top is all debt let's say, central and commercial banks, we are the water in the bucket and our purchasing power, the hole in the bottom is tax so money doesn't build up.
1
@blackbulldog4897 And my belief all along .where did you think I didn't understand this already in regards to my original comment? edit taxes are the hole, not savings..yes?
1
@blackbulldog4897 ps : Is draining society of debt draining "it of its net financial assets" I had a problem with the wording because then we would have to agree debt is an asset. All the embedded energy that is in society would still exist, the buildings, roads water filtration plants, all these would still exist without money so then once all money is removed, which I am all for, which industries would people still want and the people are the asset then. So yeah, I don't agree with the wording of its financial assets because a lot remains as assets and if money does leave society which as you say us just debt to banks, when it should be debt to society, then how does debt to society become the real value. We got into a lot of debt, for a long time to people who don't really care, getting rid of this debt to "them" could be the best thing to wash down the drain once and for all.
1
@blackbulldog4897 I was saying tax can't stop, because it is that drain, that is always open, block if off and where will the water go so unless new water stops at the top. it will build up, or what we call runaway inflation.
1
@frankcooper6118 There can't be arrogance about a fact, i think you are projecting your own arrogance and that your words apply to you more than him.
1
@physiocrat7143 Life is an open ended commitment, I don't understand your point. The need for the basics doesn't go away, currently we have an obesity epidemic, while last year the world produced enough food for every single person to gain weight, whose responsibility is it to stop that, let people starve to death and no-one takes responsibility? If carbon or emissions are the things to control and food and shelter, medical care/services are the least we know we can emit and everybody be fine, what standard will depend on the emission value.
1
@richardharvey1732 Epicentre or epidemic? We don't need to control money, we need to control the system humans live in. Money could be done away with, should be done away with and we all have a carbon value we can spend per day. Most people of course have to stop working and we go to a rolling public service jobs for each person in their life but controlling the human system is easy, if given the chance. We have spent our lives paying off debt thinking it had value, electricity in the UK is 15.68% of total energy used and renewables are around 2% of total energy, point being unless we stop working and thinking money can be exchanged for unlimited energy, the whole thing is done. Of course, it would mean a policy of less jobs, that shouldn't be a hard sell, tell 90% of the world they will get food, shelter and medical care for free but you have to stop working and live a low impact life and it would be a step up, would people vote for a policy of less jobs and a complete reset though? PS : Even an energy value would work, people get all these for free, do not work except five or however many tears each person has to be in the three trades. they get an energy value that could mean the same products are still sold, fly to the moon, 200,000 credits better save up if you only get given 2000 a month.
1
@physiocrat7143 I have had a fridge running, my entire life, I have had hot and cold running water at the turn of a tap and a toilet that takes away my number two's and have had electricity, my entire life, this is what I call, white privilege. it is a systemic failure and breakdown if other people don't have these things, have never had any of these things, if a fridge means a medicine stays viable and you have no electricity and die then it goes beyond a tax system and I am in disagreement about why poor people are poor, they are an integral part of the debt based system in the UK but I am talking global, this is not just one part, about just what is important to Europe, or the church. Unless you have taxes on jobs how does the money leave the system again?
1
@richardharvey1732 We don't need to control money, we need to control the system humans live in. Money could be done away with, should be done away with and we all have a carbon value we can spend per day. Most people of course have to stop working and we go to a rolling public service jobs for each person in their life but controlling the human system is easy, if given the chance. We have spent our lives paying off debt thinking it had value, electricity in the UK is 15.68% of total energy used and renewables are around 2% of total energy, point being unless we stop working and thinking money can be exchanged for unlimited energy, the whole thing is done. Of course, it would mean a policy of less jobs, that shouldn't be a hard sell, tell 90% of the world they will get food, shelter and medical care for free but you have to stop working and live a low impact life and it would be a step up, would people vote for a policy of less jobs and a complete reset though? PS : Even an energy value would work, people get all these for free, do not work except five or however many tears each person has to be in the three trades. they get an energy value that could mean the same products are still sold, fly to the moon, 200,000 credits better save up if you only get given 2000 a month.
1
@richardharvey1732 Do we need to control money, we need to control the system humans live in, money could be done away with, should be done away with and we all have a carbon value we can spend per day. Most people of course have to stop working and we go to a rolling public service jobs for each person in their life but controlling the human system is easy, if given the chance. We have spent our lives paying off debt thinking it had value, electricity in the UK is 15.68% of total energy used and renewables are around 2% of total energy, point being unless we stop working and thinking money can be exchanged for unlimited energy, the whole thing is done. Of course, it would mean a policy of less jobs, that shouldn't be a hard sell, tell 90% of the world they will get food, shelter and medical care for free but you have to stop working and live a low impact life and it would be a step up, would people vote for a policy of less jobs and a complete reset though? Even an energy value would work, people get all these for free, do not work except five or however many tears each person has to be in the three trades. they get an energy value that could mean the same products are still sold, fly to the moon, 200,000 credits better save up if you only get given 2000 a month.
1
@richardharvey1732 Hard to get a reply to you as you tube removes it, will keep trying different ways
1
@richardharvey1732 We don't need to control money, we need to control the system humans live in. Money could be done away with, should be done away with and we all have a carbon value we can spend per day. Most people of course have to stop working and we go to a rolling public service jobs for each person in their life but controlling the human system is easy, if given the chance. Of course, it would mean a policy of less jobs, that shouldn't be a hard sell, tell 90% of the world they will get food, shelter and medical care for free but you have to stop working and live a low impact life and it would be a step up, would people vote for a policy of less jobs and a complete reset though? Even an energy value would work, people get all these for free, do not work except five or however many tears each person has to be in the three trades. they get an energy value that could mean the same products are still sold, fly to the moon, 200,000 credits better save up if you only get given 2000 a month. We have spent our lives paying off debt thinking it had value, electricity in the UK is 15.68% of total energy used and renewables are around 2% of total energy, point being unless we stop working and thinking money can be exchanged for unlimited energy, the whole thing is finished.
1
@richardharvey1732 Money could be done away with, should be done away with and we all have a carbon value we can spend per day. Most people of course have to stop working and we go to a rolling public service jobs for each person in their life but controlling the human system is easy, if given the chance. We have spent our lives paying off debt thinking it had value, electricity in the UK is 15.68% of total energy used and renewables are around 2% of total energy, point being unless we stop working and thinking money can be exchanged for unlimited energy, the whole thing is finished Of course, it would mean a policy of less jobs, that shouldn't be a hard sell, tell 90% of the world they will get food, shelter and medical care for free but you have to stop working and live a low impact life and it would be a step up, would people vote for a policy of less jobs and a complete reset though?
1
@physiocrat7143 As long as we both are under the understanding taxes are there to remove money from the economy and if they don't keep the same value in land taxes, that will be passed down, that money inflation will happen?
1
@richardharvey1732 Money could be done away with, should be done away with and we all have a carbon value we can spend per day. Most people of course have to stop working and we go to a rolling public service jobs for each person in their life but controlling the human system is easy, if given the chance.
1
@richardharvey1732 We have spent our lives paying off debt thinking it had value, electricity in the UK is 15.68% of total energy used and renewables are around 2% of total energy, point being unless we stop working and thinking money can be exchanged for unlimited energy, the whole thing is finished Of course, it would mean a policy of less jobs, that shouldn't be a hard sell, tell 90% of the world they will get food, shelter and medical care for free but you have to stop working and live a low impact life and it would be a step up, would people vote for a policy of less jobs and a complete reset though?
1
@richardharvey1732 Money could be done away with and we all have a carbon value we can spend per day. Most people of course have to stop working and we go to a rolling public service jobs for each person in their life but controlling the human system is easy, if given the chance.
1
@richardharvey1732 Money could be done away with, should be done away with and we all have a carbon value we can spend per day.
1
@richardharvey1732 Money could be done away with and we all have a carbon value we can spend
1
@richardharvey1732 Controlling the human system is easy and epicentre : "the central point of something"
1
@richardharvey1732 I noticed on a channel someone's messages were coming to me but not showing up on the public page which is new. Tried so many times just to get what came up publicly, that was the second half but no keywords or anything that I could see, just very strange how sometimes I just switch the 1st half with the second and then it does post. Preferably I'd like to switch to carbon value/emission value for all goods sold, the number of goods don't need to change, just that they will by their emission value and how many credits people get given. 20% of the modern world's energy is electricity, we could stay on that remove all personal vehicles and change society for the better within an election term.
1
@richardharvey1732 2nd attempt for it to come up on the page so maybe you could tell me if you got this message? : I noticed on a channel someone's messages were coming to me but not showing up on the public page which is new. Tried so many times just to get what came up publicly, that was the second half but no keywords or anything that I could see, just very strange how sometimes I just switch the 1st half with the second and then it does post. Preferably I'd like to switch to carbon value/emission value for all goods sold, the number of goods don't need to change, just that they will by their emission value and how many credits people get given. 20% of the modern world's energy is electricity, we could stay on that remove all personal vehicles and change society for the better within an election term.
1