Comments by "antonyjh1234" (@antonyjh1234) on "Why doesn’t the Bank of England tell the truth?" video.
-
"Bank" not banks, the RBA, the banks fund us. It's unsettling to realise that debt is created at around 4 cents per hundred dollars to create and we pay it back with our lives, full value.
Edit I suppose we fund them with money borrowed from commercial banks, to pay their borrowings, half our life's work efforts go towards the govt through income, fuel, gst "taxes" just to take money out of the system, instead of making our lives easier by doing less, absolutely crazy system.but we have to understand "they" have been trading thousands of years with money and promissory notes and we were born into a debt based system thinking money is valuable without understanding it is just banker debt. Can you imagine any Australian politician coming out and truly explaining money, it makes me think business interests need the dumbest people at the "top"
6
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
What is the debate you are proposing because I don't see one in your comment, I see someone say the mmt model has no argument against it and if they did it would be like talking to a flat earther so at the risk of that I would like put to forward one or two.
It costs around 4 cents per hundred dollars to create this debt, we pay it back full value, with our lives and efforts.
The issue with creating debt out of thin air and calling it money and other people think it is valuable is if the world says I don't want to hold American money anymore or UK and like Brics, will take value for value of goods and in a world where goods may be the only things valuable, that holding something that is just a means of exchange, backed by nothing but our belief, that can have issues.
The other issue is this debt is being created, it enters the economy as money spent by govts, where we have no choice where that spending goes, we are supposed to wait for the trickle down and be happy, that money or energy could have been directed in any way, it doesn't really matter if we all stood on our heads, as long as the money enters it must leave again but to say all this effort from us the public to be forced to earn bank debt, to exchange it to live has issues that need to be discussed more than it's the economy, nothing to see here, let's move on.
I think it would surprise a lot of people that money doesn't build up in the system, that taxes make money disappear, the public education system teaches people to get a job, just to earn debt. For all the value of the property in the Uk, there isn't the money to buy it. Most people think they have to just get some money because there's so much of it, they don't realise for new money to come, new debt must be made, give people that belief that all money is bank debt, I doubt as many people would steal it.
There's certainly debates to be held around this term what we call money and the lack of understanding amongst the public and why we should let that continue without directing that energy towards sustainability or the health service but surely we could do better than war and real estate.
1