Comments by "antonyjh1234" (@antonyjh1234) on "Donbass Zugzwang | Fierce Fighting On The Bakhmut Flanks. Military Summary For 2023.05.14" video.

Have you seen the bunker busting bombs that fire down and explode underground, but there could be an issue of it coming in from overseas for the Ukes and it immediately moving out, underground could mean more hours of storing it, not enough storage, etc, I mean this is hundreds of tons we are talking about.
4
@_seventh_son Do you think they can't see them as they cross the border, sure you could put smaller amounts in different area's but I would say just like they knew where they were this time, there wouldn't be the lack of information just because the destination is underground.
2
@Shadowless Kick Naive? You mean they believed the words that were told to them at the time. In 1994, Russia officially signed up to the NATO Partnership for Peace, a program aimed at building trust between NATO and other European and former Soviet countries. President Bill Clinton described it in January 1994 as a “track that will lead to NATO membership.” “Bill-Boris” letters in the summer and fall of 1994, and the previously secret memcon of the presidents’ one-on-one at the Washington summit in September 1994. Clinton kept assuring Yeltsin any NATO enlargement would be slow, with no surprises, building a Europe that was inclusive not exclusive, and in “partnership” with Russia. In a phone call on July 5, 1994, Clinton told Yeltsin “I would like us to focus on the Partnership for Peace program” not NATO. Clinton wrote in his memoir, “Budapest was embarrassing, a rare moment when people on both sides dropped the ball….”[3] Actually, the drops were almost all in Washington. When the U.S., Canada and 10 western European nations came together in 1949 to form the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, they had a clear goal. “Keep the Soviet Union out, the Americans in, and the Germans down,” SO I ask you has this changed at all in this current situation and if some people are telling lies, is it naivety to be fooled by them and if so who should be blamed more the liar or the believer?
2
@thekurdishtapes8317 They were never going to become a slave state to Russia. Are you serious that you believe this crap that US doesn't annex countries etc, I mean this has to be sarcasm right? They occupy a third of Syria, killed and affected millions because of fossil fuels under the lies of WMD's, ask anybody in Iraq or Afghanistan if they feel as though the US has helped them to live in freedom. USA bombed a country for ten years before 9/11 and then claimed they were the ones attacked. Two weeks before 9/11 "we" bombed a weapons making factory, it turned out to be a school which is why so many people were always going in and out of it and 32 children were killed, maybe that's the freedom that you are talking about.
1
@_seventh_son I would go the other way and think there is a network of people who would only be studying what ships came in from where, what trucks have come from which ports/country's by using satellites to see what went where and even local spies who would be giving the information on both sides of where they are before they even move to the front line. Ideally you'd switch around where they were stored. even if well known that it was underground and considering we are talking tons and tons used weekly an underground place would be easy and more dangerous because they might get buried and Russia advances before they can clear the path, as you don't need to actually hit the ammo, just bury the entrance. Stalking supply vehicles could also work with satellite as all you have to do is backtrack that vehicles path as everything would be recorded.
1