Comments by "antonyjh1234" (@antonyjh1234) on "Ukraine. Military Summary And Analysis 01.02.2023" video.

"Causing" wars and fully understands why they do it.
33
@anglet64 If that was the case USA wouldn't have just left a failed 20 year stint in the same place. If you aren't learning from what you say was a Russian mistake then does that make USA dumber? Nevertheless, this current war is about defence for Ru, it is USA attacking once again, into another failure.
26
@anglet64 Who says US troops are in Ukraine, sure you've had US "advisors" for the last 8 years and currently but now it's Putin and a personal attack? That shows nothing but ignorance what is happening to Ukrainians, those 300,000 injured or the more than 150,000 dead, it's just silly language that means nothing.
16
@anglet64 If you fund a proxy war you are attacking the country being attacked aren't you, what do you think the last 8 years has been about? Ru has gained more land than what the 2014 Minsk agreement mentioned and are achieving all of their goals, how is this losing? I think US will fund as long as they can, the more weapons means more money taken from the American taxpayer and lines the pockets of the MIC plus maintains US hegemony or at least the impression of it. What USA or at least the inhabitants of it don't realise is that they are losing this hegemony, the majority of the world is against them in this.
9
@anglet64 No I did not forget but that goal is on track. I don't know why people mention trade as anything to do with this. Russia has by law a year of military service for men so let's say 20-30 million men that will be of fighting age, with a year's military service already do you think USA will mobilise their males, or NATO theirs, this is not NATO's armies against Russia, this is the people of Russia, who haven't gone to a war footing yet, Russia thinks this is their existence at stake and all Ukraine had to do was not enter NATO, a US funded organisation. What you should ask yourself is why is China supporting Ru, same as India, Africa, 130+ countries haven't recognised sanctions and only increased trade, you should look at BRICS and how many countries wanting to join, already they are are around 45% of the worlds population, if they move away from the petrodollar which looks likely USA will suffer more. China doesn't need to help militarily as Ru have as I say achieved all their goals but they are certainly on Ru's side because they know they will be next if Russia loses and that looking at it at the moment is a very big IF, an imaginary IF, that only exists in western media's news. Russia economy has only improved since this started and trade they didn't have before with oil has increased, India for example while Europe is getting demolished with higher energy prices along with food prices and refugees.
6
@anglet64 You are talking about a situation that happened in Cuba 60 years ago, one that recently 192 countries voted to stop sanctions against, the only two who voted against were USA and Israel so votes are meaningless. The IMF has just changed Russia's outlook of negative growth to one that is positive for 23, I'm not sure where you get 2/3rds from, India was almost non existent in crude now they are second to china which has increased massively it's trade, the truth is Ru has found other trading partners and moving forward will surpass what Europe took, while europe has 100's of percentage points increases buying russian crude from third parties or having to buy US energy. I'm not sure where you are getting your information but you might to do a bit of third party checking on your info. Cheers.
5
@vepraksoldat2963 What surprises me, or rather shouldn't I suppose, is the majority of these people arguing against the reality on the ground don't have playlists, channel subscriptions, playlists etc, all their channels are just empty accounts, along with their empty words.
3
@anglet64 HA, you offer nothing to all the points I offered now just more obfuscation and clinging to myth's. Ask yourself what did Russia gain by having a river as the front line, remember 8 years of defences put in by USA and under their "advisors", concrete and steel are now behind the russians, they have rolled over these and taking the rest at their speed and have suffered 1/8th the casualties and now somehow, because I don't honestly know how you are but you seem to be saying Ru is losing, it's mindless drivel, the video that we are commenting on proves this so it is right in front of your eyes but you still seem blind, I honestly have no clue how you still cling to these but you should remember Russia was keen on Ukraine integrity, something that has been sorely lacking.
1
@marcelinoperez2926 If I could add to that, I can't remember the name of the group and I don't speak russian, it's easy enough to find but they are running 24/7 and even according to the kyiv post are producing 20-30 of the T90m tanks, per month, so by April will have produced as many that are coming since the announcement. 31 Abrams and 14 Leopards, with a hastily trained crew...I would hate to be those crew memebrs.
1
@MaximusCommodus Sure, even the Mozart Group, a US mercenary group, who on their wiki say they have no contact or guidance from US authorities, which to me is madness, if we were to see an armed group in other country the leader would be called a war lord but the point about US troops was official US army troops, officially the only ones in have been "advisors", people training troops, training people within the country, intelligence etc etc. There is no official US involvement of troops on the ground fighting. Added : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uJO41U_Jsic Garland Nixon who does a show with Scott Ritter once a week talks the neo cons goals as well.
1
@MaximusCommodus It was my impression after listening to him that Mozart Group left because they came face to face with reality and it wasn't him riding in to success like a john Wayne movie. Billions has been given by USA as we all know, Obama's press releases talk of the equipment given, the personnel given to ensure the security of Ukraines energy resources, saying USA isn't involved in this war is just as an oxymoron of calling Jake Sullivan a nations security advisor when all he's done is lessen it.
1
@MaximusCommodus https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7YRWgH1_Knk
1
@MaximusCommodus If only they had spent the money on a decent health system, their world would be very different. With great power comes great responsibility and they squandered it within 80 years. All great powers suffer this and we are possibly seeing the final death throes of USA and I feel for USA because like Russia they are being pushed into a corner, the only difference is they are being pushed into a corner by their own actions. Either country pushed into a corner when they have so many nukes, is something we should all be out for blood if it happens on whoever push's the button and personally I don't think it will be Russia, considering USA has done it twice, we all know it's been discussed on their end.
1
@MaximusCommodus Considering a Billion is 0.1% of the military spending and USA gains so much from Mexican etc workers, there isn't going to much sympathy for not having a decent health care system for all involved. Call them illegal intruders if you want but the American system would cost so much more if they didn't do the work they do. All empires enslave people, my point is, in this modern time USA could have done much better than it has, although I also believe that they realise making things better, would in fact make them worse. Imagine if we gave food out for free, housing for free, that would make things better for millions of people, those at the top realise making things better would actually make things worse. Those in power don't want things "better", as long as they have enough money, they are fine in this lifetime.
1
You realise the person that USA supported was seen as the most corrupt by those in vietnam? You realise the people fighting the french before usa took over, were fighting for democracy?
1