Comments by "antonyjh1234" (@antonyjh1234) on "Optimization of Wagner's army. General mobilization. Military Summary And Analysis 2023.04.13" video.

  1. USA pays for Ukraine now, they are paying all bills, pensions, etc and equipping them for almost a decade, If no men can leave then 5 million doesn't seem out of place, considering this might include all females that can fight as well.
    5
  2. If no fighting age person can leave it doesn't sound unbelievable.
    5
  3.  Blitz  I disagree that it will be too much to take care of, USA will treat it like a training exercise for their soldiers without getting hurt themselves. If these people are already being paid for then it's not a big shift to get them to be doing something towards the war effort, even if it's packing magazines.
    1
  4.  Blitz  I would put it to you that USA is already paying totally for Ukraine, through the IMF and World Bank, both he3adquatered in USA and that the military is an arm of both these organisations. I don't know what you mean that recruitment "will" be forced, it is now. I do not disagree in the casualty numbers but if USA has been doing this for 9 years now and they haven't cared in all that time why do you think USA will care in the future? What should be raising rage is that we let the miltary machine have this much power. What if nothing has changed since WW2 when millions died then and people were just as outraged but equally as powerless to stop it? What do we do then? In both world wars females were used for industry and war activities, five million from their population isn't a stretch on WW2 and while out of our realties, it has been par for the course when these events have taken place before. Ukraine doesn't need money for weapons, not right now anyway. If you are already paying for people to stay home, it won't cost much more to put them on the front line.
    1
  5.  Blitz  The US does have unlimited money though, they have been printing more than enough and people still believe in it as a reserve currency, the GFC and current examples of how much money they print mean to me that they can most definitely afford to feed 1.67% of USA's population. USA has been arming Ukraine for 8 years before this started and USA has only now got rid of all their excess, same as other countries, which USA will get a return on when they supply those countries new arms. War is a business for USA, it contributes directly to the GDP, take war out of USA's activities and the dollar would collapse so while you say USA can't afford to arm Ukraine I'm saying to you USA can't afford to not arm Ukraine. It has a military machine, that must be fed and this is no different to any of the other wars/mass killings that USA has been involved in. Yes these new weapons might arrive slowly, because they are after all private businesses that are making these new weapons but like shells from France and the gunpowder from Australia, they are providing enough bullets etc in enough numbers to hold Russia to a slow march and Ukranian men are dying and getting injured in the hundreds of thousands and the MIC does not care. USA cares for its hegemony to be continued and don't think USA isn't making money from this in other ways like gas supplies to Europe after they blew up nord 2, this war directly helps USA's economy, sanctions are designed so that USA profits. Taking this information in, that the larger the war the more it helps the MIC and the people in govt that support them who get paid in the millions so that billions are put on the books, after the govt just prints the money, wouldn't a larger Ukraine force be in the best interests for the MIC to profit? I would say yes, especially since USA isn't being weakened militarily through this, as I say, 5 million foreigners fighting would be a wet dream and a training exercise for some in the US military and it would be no different to what USA has done since Vietnam, arm some people, let them fight and then take the profits, same as they tried when arming Hussein and Bin Laden, same as the lie abouts wmd's. USA isn't fighting Russia right now for anything other than financial gain, those gains are going to be more than what arming Ukraine is going to cost imo. IF USA won in Ukraine, they would get the benefits from Iraq and Afghanistan and the reason they still occupy a third of Syria, for fossil fuels, that they would love to pass through Ukraine to supply Europe. The probelm is this is going to be existential for both countries, if USA doesn't change they will end up like Israel but war directly helps USA, millions of people have died so that Americans can have cheap petrol and this current example of how USA operates to maintain world power is no different, so the question you have to ask is can USA afford to not arm Ukraine?
    1