Comments by "antonyjh1234" (@antonyjh1234) on "The USA Plans To Send Your Uncles, Cousins And Sons To Fight Russia. Military Summary For 2023.12.08" video.

  1. Sme, I've said before I'd be carrying one if I could but probably not many shotguns in the military arsenal
    4
  2. Tucker Carlson on the map..
    4
  3. Where did 6k come from? "The German arms manufacturer Rheinmetall has recently announced the conclusion of a contract with an unnamed European customer for 155-mm L15 shells. In total, 10,000 155 mm artillery rounds were ordered and the value of the announced deal was about 33 million euros. This puts the cost of one 155 mm shell at around 3.3 thousand euros." That's 3555, for a hunk of metal that's shaped to precision, has explosives etc "The U.S. military already is ramping up production of 155mm artillery shells, but now the Pentagon’s weapons acquisition chief is setting a higher goal for 2025. The military will make 100,000 155mm shells per month, or more than one million in total that year." If they cost either of those prices that's a lot of money that people have to pay interest on as it's added to the national debt and won't be paid off in your lifetime, it's not just the initial cost. Ukraine has been firing around 4-7000 a day and a mullion shells divided by 365 is 2739.72 shells 6000 shells per day is 2.19 million shells are needed.. yeah nah
    2
  4. Do you have proof or are you just one of those people that need to say something? "Neither the Geneva nor Hauge convention bans shotguns in war1. In 1918, Germany tried to convince the US that shotguns were against war laws for causing undue pain and suffering on the battlefield. However, the US used them to quickly clear German trenches and suspected that Germany was declaring them illegal because they were effective, not because they were cruel. So the US continued to use them and won the war2"  @bily2939 
    2
  5. If they send the army, Russia mobilises, a country full of men who have had at least one year military service, if USA mobilises, who is going to fight? The obese ones can't, for a driving country not a lot of fitness and no military service. If they send the army, I am not sure if USA will survive, other countries will swamp USA and its partners imo.
    1
  6. I think a lot of people see that there is no honour killing people based purely off profit. We wonder why people in the military have the highest rate of suicide , they got sold a myth and they know it. @xtriggermortisx7881 
    1
  7. Good point, never thought artillery needed along with it. the business of govt is business and they looking busy @ljubomirculibrk4097 
    1
  8. Sure, a debt based system like we have has an ongoing debt that won't be paid and for new amounts of debt to be entered into has to have a valid reason in the US parliament. The current debt in USA is 34 trillion and between George Washington to Ronald Reagen it grew to 1 trillion, then took off. The interest is 3/4s of one trillion and US taxes are 2.6 trillion. Capitalism is the means of production are supposed to be in private hands, paid for by the people, if the people/govt aren't going to build new factories and there is talk of a default, private companies might not want to expand and they can't be ordered to, unless it's war.
    1
  9. PS Russia has a military service system that all males are supposed to do, they have a system where factories are going to continue to operate, since ww2, this would surpass any private company that booms and busts based off war
    1
  10. The American press have been silent on this since it started in 2013, same as all western media...it's almost like they are all owned by the same people.
    1
  11. any proof to this lie @bily2939 
    1