Comments by "antonyjh1234" (@antonyjh1234) on "The Most Shocking and Destructive Natural Disasters" video.

  1. But you know how a teaspoon of good soil is supposed to hold a billion organisms right, and you do realise that adding 2.5 parts per million sized parcel of air which is really small means something right? There's 25 trillion trillion molecules in a sq metre and there's 45,000 parcels of those between you and the troposphere, but because radiant heat is different to sunlight, then it gets trapped, right? Like, you know that per litre of diesel there is 10.6kw's of energy, 40,12 per gallon, according to my last electricity bill a full tank of diesel emits the same energy as 5.2 months worth. You know of all the energy we use 20% is electricity and the rest is fuels and as I say this heat adds to the problem of CO2 trapping it? You know this before you talk of fancies? Whatever you think it really doesn't matter but you have to have an answer for changes never seen before, the speed. We know pre 2010 the globe was warming at 0.18 per decade, then it jumped 55% to 0.28, not it looks as though we are going to be another 55%, so a 110% jump is something quite large. If you think this isn't from the huge amounts of energy that we are converting from being stored to be in the atmosphere, then what do you think it could be, because none of this has been seen before, the speed. Now if we were to take the fastest rise in sea levels at 5 c it is supposed to be 330 years for 10% to melt, 7 metres or 23 feet. What about 1.5 metre's in 150 years, 1 metre in a hundred, and then what does that mean for society.
    1
  2. I don't blame them, a lot of their lives they have heard lies, seen the corruption and controlling of their lives by govts and nothing has changed in decades, and this is just another one of those stories like the k2 bug, I mean I filled up my bath in case.. A planned ignorance is still ignorance and it has been bliss comparatively to what's coming, but if govts, or the media aren't explaining it and I've only started doing it this way in the last few months then how far are we away from everybody with the same knowledge? We have to be able to stop the very system that all of these people's lives depended, could not exist without, and to tell people it was all for nothing, that what they did under the thoughts of the day, weren't deemed a sin, but now are, it must be hard to realise. ( Using the Hebrew definition of sin before it got ruined by the updated version, Khata or Chata, to fail at one's task ) Why do the powers that be concentrate on keeping the existing power schemes in place instead of complete change, because change is hard and they would lose all power over us and power over us is how the system is designed instead of raising general wellbeing. When people realise the enormous amounts of energy we take for granted, that should have been explained by govts and schools, that those two systems have just been in place to support a monetary system, backed by oil that they knew would cause all this damage....I can see where we have come from but once people realise how much of their lives have been spent on supporting a system most people don't even have the time to think about deeply, and how much of our lives we pay to corrupt govts, I think they are going to be annoyed so there would have to be govt influence to keep people in the dark, I mean they must be sanctioning disinformation. Some...A lot, of people think their chosen govt is doing right by them or has their interests at heart, a lot of people think religions are true, that there is a right and wrong opinion, when it should be a right or wrong goal, raising general wellbeing while cutting out fossil fules, or not. It's the cutting out of all oil products from our lives that is impossible to happen, de-growth is the only way now and for that to happen, the bourgeois need to adopt change first, all other system changes apparently it comes from them 1st, like slavery was stopped because of the enlightenment period in France and England, the worlds bourgeois though is us, across the board a 80% drop needs to happen, for every single person in USA, the modern world, no matter their standard of living. If the govt came out now and said we will enforce it, how many people that are on board with the belief of global warming are going to sit back as their whole economic life they believed in is gone forever and clap their hands and say good? People who march in the street think a solution other than de growth can happen and it can't, so are you going to be the one who goes on live tv and say everything you've ever known, is now changed, but we know a way to make it better and that's don't work, stay home, we will get food to you, there are no more bills, but there will be no more choices, above need? You would have to have the army stationed at all the supermarkets and stores that were needed to be kept and the rest might burn...there would be death on the streets for days, especially in US where people might band together with arsenals... Very scary propositions and a lot of people might realise this, especially older people who have seen the changes more. On a brighter note, I suppose, 23 countries are going to lose 50% of their populations by 2100, china 600 million, japan another 50 million, the world has slowed and will slow dramatically percentage wise from now, 100% increase between 1959 and 99, it's only 50% the next 40 years and after 2039 it'll reach 12%, the world will see a lot of modern countries lose their emitters, of course by then we could be well over 4c but these countries over the next 80 years is going to continue to decrease, my worry is govts will use this and say, "see, what we are doing is working, so you keep working" when per capita emissions won't have changed one bit. @jus10lewissr 
    1